if you keep saying that they will notice it and kill it to, as an afterthought mind you but they will do it. Usenet would be fairly easy to kill due to it not being as distributed as p2p, i mean i cant fire up google in a tor browser type a hash of my download find 50 usenet groups with the and add them to my peer finding pool like i can with torrents.
what we need is free usenet server system living in a.onion or a torent over tor system
It may be huge and cost tons but they also a have a even more gigantic user pool paying them at insane amount per month. They can afford it they would just have to spend money. And who wants to do that when they can at a fraction of the price buy all the congressmen they could want, to let them out of servicing their customers.
Yes but iphone was first to market. And while true android has more activations per month, iphone is more visible due there being only one model of iphone (not counting harddrive size) per yea,r so is much more noticeable when compared to the billions of android models with ten users each.
well as consoles become more complex so do computers and there operating sytems which off sets the it. this will probably continue on like this for a very long time.
Look, the network that the US and Israel attacked WAS an offline network (last article I read). Tell me, if they go completely offline... how will they distribute their beloved MS Updates?
The year of the Linux desktop will come in Iran much sooner.
Exsept the overthrone governments have been going to the same type of extremist leadership Iran already has. The extremist muslum groups love the Internet they love socalnetworking sites like twitter and facebook. But once they have the power they will disconnect their new country from them to keep stop people from using them the same as they already did.
Except that there is a movement in the debian community to try and become a fsf approved distro. I find it slightly hypocritical that they will refuse to approve of distros that merely have a none-free section even if it is turned off by default. Is that not in and of itself in interference and inhibiting the freedom of the user to install what ever software they like?
no you don't have them sign your kernel that would lead to just the problem you described you have them sign your boot loader which loads what ever kernel you chose
You sound like you have not read much if any of the new testament. You know the whole "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" or "love thy neighboor as thy self" or "ask ye oh man what is good and what does the lord require of the but to do justly love mercy and walk humbly with thy god." Sound fairly peacefull. I don't see any excuse for being terrible toward others. The being terrible to others comes from human nature.
um, grub is a bootloader not an operating system, and windows 8 is a operating system (the operating part is disputable) not a bootloader. the windows bootloader can't boot any operating systems other than other versions of windows. your comment does not make any since.
I wonder will that allow booting of fedora or ubuntu which are having their distros signed by Microsoft to boot on arm hardware? anyone else know i would really like to have a ubuntu tablet and that seems like a cheap way.
Yes because one gaming company decides it doesn't like windows and makes a Linux port. It must mean that it is an industry change.
well EA has some games in the ubuntu software center, blizzard has said window 8 sucks and is considering porting, and valve is porting, those are the big movers in gaming it is not just one company it is the whole industry.
i think it would be easiest to have a mens a womens an a other section. if you have xx and no penis your a woman, you have a xy and a penis your a man, else you compete in other.
if cell contains "y" then cell = male else cell = female
hormone concentration and hormonal tolerances don't really mater it is decided by you genes primarily and food/lifestyle (or hypodermic needle). what gentiles you have does not really mater either they can either be cut off or sewn on.
That is just it, cloud services are inherently insecure. the trade off comes with convenience, no hardware to fiddle with no set up just write a check every month.
If your files are encrypted client side it doesn't matter what they do with your data as long as you can pull it back down. strong encryption means you don't have to trust anyone*. (*as long as you are the only one who knows the password)
Slashdot Mirror
if you keep saying that they will notice it and kill it to, as an afterthought mind you but they will do it. Usenet would be fairly easy to kill due to it not being as distributed as p2p, i mean i cant fire up google in a tor browser type a hash of my download find 50 usenet groups with the and add them to my peer finding pool like i can with torrents.
what we need is free usenet server system living in a .onion or a torent over tor system
It may be huge and cost tons but they also a have a even more gigantic user pool paying them at insane amount per month. They can afford it they would just have to spend money. And who wants to do that when they can at a fraction of the price buy all the congressmen they could want, to let them out of servicing their customers.
Yes but iphone was first to market. And while true android has more activations per month, iphone is more visible due there being only one model of iphone (not counting harddrive size) per yea,r so is much more noticeable when compared to the billions of android models with ten users each.
well as consoles become more complex so do computers and there operating sytems which off sets the it. this will probably continue on like this for a very long time.
So you fill all usb ports not used for your keyboard with epoxy
Look, the network that the US and Israel attacked WAS an offline network (last article I read). Tell me, if they go completely offline... how will they distribute their beloved MS Updates?
The year of the Linux desktop will come in Iran much sooner.
Exsept the overthrone governments have been going to the same type of extremist leadership Iran already has. The extremist muslum groups love the Internet they love socalnetworking sites like twitter and facebook. But once they have the power they will disconnect their new country from them to keep stop people from using them the same as they already did.
i play my nes but i also have an emulator that i play when not home
i always found cleaning them with rubbing alcohol and quetips helped
Spock time travels only rarely. It was obviously the doctor.
if they sabotaged oracle they would lose a lot of devs and code donations. despite How evil oracle is they do donate good amount of code to linux.
Except that there is a movement in the debian community to try and become a fsf approved distro. I find it slightly hypocritical that they will refuse to approve of distros that merely have a none-free section even if it is turned off by default. Is that not in and of itself in interference and inhibiting the freedom of the user to install what ever software they like?
no you don't have them sign your kernel that would lead to just the problem you described you have them sign your boot loader which loads what ever kernel you chose
patents lots and lots of patents. Google might be interested in buying them for their patents alone.
they had over the air updates long before iphone
You sound like you have not read much if any of the new testament. You know the whole "do unto others as you would have them do unto you" or "love thy neighboor as thy self" or "ask ye oh man what is good and what does the lord require of the but to do justly love mercy and walk humbly with thy god." Sound fairly peacefull. I don't see any excuse for being terrible toward others. The being terrible to others comes from human nature.
um, grub is a bootloader not an operating system, and windows 8 is a operating system (the operating part is disputable) not a bootloader. the windows bootloader can't boot any operating systems other than other versions of windows. your comment does not make any since.
I wonder will that allow booting of fedora or ubuntu which are having their distros signed by Microsoft to boot on arm hardware? anyone else know i would really like to have a ubuntu tablet and that seems like a cheap way.
Yes because one gaming company decides it doesn't like windows and makes a Linux port. It must mean that it is an industry change.
well EA has some games in the ubuntu software center, blizzard has said window 8 sucks and is considering porting, and valve is porting, those are the big movers in gaming it is not just one company it is the whole industry.
i think it would be easiest to have a mens a womens an a other section. if you have xx and no penis your a woman, you have a xy and a penis your a man, else you compete in other.
if cell contains "y"
then cell = male
else
cell = female
hormone concentration and hormonal tolerances don't really mater it is decided by you genes primarily and food/lifestyle (or hypodermic needle).
what gentiles you have does not really mater either they can either be cut off or sewn on.
shortly after the world war three and the eugenics wars.
That is just it, cloud services are inherently insecure. the trade off comes with convenience, no hardware to fiddle with no set up just write a check every month.
If your files are encrypted client side it doesn't matter what they do with your data as long as you can pull it back down.
strong encryption means you don't have to trust anyone*.
(*as long as you are the only one who knows the password)
plus on insightful