Slashdot Mirror


Demonoid Shut By Ukrainian Authorities

hypnosec writes "After a prolonged outage that lasted for nearly a week Demonoid has reportedly been audited and closed down by the Ukrainian law enforcement agency. According to reports the Ukrainian anti-cybercrime police division carried out an investigation of ColoCall – the hosting service provider for Demonoid. Servers were sealed after all the data on the servers was copied. According to ColoCall the servers haven't been seized but, they are not operational any more. The hosting service provider is going to end the agreement with Demonoid. 'Investigators have copied all the information from the Demonoid servers and sealed them.' a manager from ColoCall, wishing to stay anonymous, said."

178 comments

  1. You're a GOOD dog!! Yes you are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    About time that the Ukraine accepted what most governments of the world have already accepted--that the U.S. is your master and you had goddamn well better do whatever the fuck we tell you to!

    Now sit, rollover, and say "We're your bitch!" ....No, SAY IT LOUDER!!

    1. Re:You're a GOOD dog!! Yes you are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I want to know was did they have permission from the server owners to copy all that data....

    2. Re:You're a GOOD dog!! Yes you are! by lightknight · · Score: 3, Funny

      Lord and master. We own their land, too.

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    3. Re:You're a GOOD dog!! Yes you are! by Jahava · · Score: 2, Insightful

      About time that the Ukraine accepted what most governments of the world have already accepted--that the U.S. is your master and you had goddamn well better do whatever the fuck we tell you to!

      Now sit, rollover, and say "We're your bitch!" ....No, SAY IT LOUDER!!

      This does raise a worthwhile issue: I couldn't find anything in the article that says that the US requested that Demonoid be shut down for this meeting.

      Now, the US Authorities are likely quite happy that it was shut down, but that's a different point. Doing something to please a trade partner isn't necessarily being its "bitch". People, corporations, and countries, the US included, suck up to each other all the time as a sign of respect, deference, and/or good faith and to gain a more favorable status. That sounds like what this is: the Ukraine knew that the US would view the move positively, so they did it as a gift to strengthen their status.

      If the Ukraine knew that Obama loved candied walnuts and consequently brought him a few bags for the meeting, nobody would say that they were his "bitch". Just because this gift is despicable doesn't change that fundamental intention.

    4. Re:You're a GOOD dog!! Yes you are! by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      About time that the Ukraine accepted what most governments of the world have already accepted--that the U.S. is your master and you had goddamn well better do whatever the fuck we tell you to!

      Now sit, rollover, and say "We're your bitch!" ....No, SAY IT LOUDER!!

      Because there are so few countries with copyright laws you mean ? At least where I live, the local copyright people + a whole lot of small companies are pushing the government like mad to do stuff like this, saying tens of thousands of jobs depend on it.

      Also I've recently visited a very large software company (in America), and the developers were nearly universally in favor of copyright laws and destroying things like demonoid and thepiratebay. I'm not sure if that's typical, and yes, the youngest guy there (~25) did not share this opinion, but I'm pretty sure he was much outnumbered.

      I think slashdot is providing us with a somewhat limited selection of people declaring their opinions on this matter.

    5. Re:You're a GOOD dog!! Yes you are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because there are so few countries with copyright laws you mean ?

      No, because websites shouldn't be taken down just because there is some infringing material on them. The US is already seizing domain names randomly. That's bad enough. Other countries don't need to go and do similar things.

      Also I've recently visited a very large software company (in America), and the developers were nearly universally in favor of copyright laws and destroying things like demonoid and thepiratebay.

      Not exactly the most unbiased group to ask, eh? Ask me if I deserve a million dollars.

    6. Re:You're a GOOD dog!! Yes you are! by synthespian · · Score: 1

      Until you seize Ukrainian carbon units of XX genotype, you ARE NOT THERE YET.

      --
      Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
    7. Re:You're a GOOD dog!! Yes you are! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you deserve a million dollars?

    8. Re:You're a GOOD dog!! Yes you are! by shentino · · Score: 1

      They probably had a search warrant.

    9. Re:You're a GOOD dog!! Yes you are! by shentino · · Score: 1

      The answer would depend on whose pockets it came from to fill yours.

    10. Re:You're a GOOD dog!! Yes you are! by shentino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      At least candied walnuts, unlike serving a public enemy's head on a platter, don't require other people to get squashed.

      Catering to someone's likes is ok, but catering to their hatred in a way that hurts others is not.

    11. Re:You're a GOOD dog!! Yes you are! by sFurbo · · Score: 0

      In my view, it would depend on what level of discomfort accepted in order to please the other party. If the candied walnuts were so expensive that the Ukrainian diplomats family would not eat that day, I would say he was Obamas "bitch". Likewise, if a country dismantles its civil rights in order to please the US, I would say the word "bitch" was in order. I don't know enough about this case or the status of civil rights in Ukraine to determine if it is applicable here.

    12. Re:You're a GOOD dog!! Yes you are! by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 2

      Think of the walnut trees! They're having their children ripped away from them by this madman's lust for sugar-coated plant fetuses! What a monster!

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    13. Re:You're a GOOD dog!! Yes you are! by xenobyte · · Score: 2

      They probably had a search warrant.

      For what? - I'm willing to bet that there isn't a single bit of illegal material on any demonoid server. It's portal and a tracker, not a bitlocker!

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    14. Re:You're a GOOD dog!! Yes you are! by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      maybe, the usual trick seems to be send in the swat team, rampage and get out before the local authorities have a clue about what's going on. This american lobby thing is seriously getting out of hand. Even if it doesn't seem to solve anything and it sure as hell doesnt feed anyone but lawyers. Well, i had some good points for uncle s this week because of curiosity but this puts them back below zero

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
  2. Color me surprised by dyingtolive · · Score: 5, Funny

    If your shit's not safe in the Ukraine, it's not safe anywhere.

    --
    Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    1. Re:Color me surprised by f3rret · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well if the story is anything to go by, then the site was not closed down over copyright claims, it was shutdown over serving malware adds.

      I can see why the Ukranians would shut it down over that.

      Russian doesn't give a damn about US copyright claims.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    2. Re:Color me surprised by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I'll have to check the links when I'm off work.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    3. Re:Color me surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I corporatist America copyrights claim you!

    4. Re:Color me surprised by JDG1980 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Russian doesn't give a damn about US copyright claims.

      Ukraine != Russia.

      The former Soviet republics that are now independent states (including Ukraine) tend to be friendlier to the US and EU than Russia itself is, because they rely upon NATO support to maintain effective independence from Russian control.

    5. Re:Color me surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia > U$A
      Always!

    6. Re:Color me surprised by interkin3tic · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does the Ukranian government regularly take action against malware? If not, then no, they got shut down for copyright infringement, and "We're shutting down this malware site for your protection, citizen" is a lie on the same level as "We had to shut down the protest because they didn't have a proper permit, not because we don't like their message."

    7. Re:Color me surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In corporatist America copyrights claim YOU!

      There, fixed it for you.

    8. Re:Color me surprised by C0C0C0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Ukraine != Russia.

      The former Soviet republics that are now independent states (including Ukraine) tend to be friendlier to the US and EU than Russia itself is, because they rely upon NATO support to maintain effective independence from Russian control.

      Ukraine != Poland, either. The entire northern half speaks Russian natively and, despite the best efforts of the Ukrainian Ukrainians, they appear to have the upper hand in parliment right now. I'd say that the jury is still out, and while Ukraine certainly isn't Belarus, they lean a lot more towards Moscow than you suggest.

      --
      You are totally blocking my view of the wall. - Dogbert
    9. Re:Color me surprised by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Interesting

      there's another twist of the story that ". According to one source in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the investigation was timed to coincide with Ukrainian First Deputy Prime Minister Valeriy Khoroshkovsky's visit to the United States, after he released a statement with the US Trade Representative agreeing to "redouble" intellectual property enforcement. While the ColoCall source says Demonoid has backup servers elsewhere, nothing has been restored at this point."

      http://www.theverge.com/2012/8/6/3223253/demonoid-bittorrent-tracker-shut-down-by-ukrainian-police

      so they're doubledowning and redoubling efforts. Maybe they won't bother with finding out who to prosecute and for what, but that's not the point of eastern european lipservice police work really.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:Color me surprised by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      The former Soviet republics that are now independent states (including Ukraine) tend to be friendlier to the US and EU than Russia itself is, because they rely upon NATO support to maintain effective independence from Russian control.

      Not all of them. Baltic states, certainly, and also Georgia. Belarus goes back and forth, but it's not particularly welcome in Europe with its current regime in any case, so it mostly uses the "we'll go to EU" card to force Russia to give some consessions. Most Central Asian states are dictatorships, ranging from mild (Azerbaijan, Kazakhstan) to extreme (Turkmenistan, Tajikistan), and as such aren't really very friendly to either US or EU. Additionally, those of them which border Afghanistan and Pakistan have a very direct threat of Islamic insurgency, and rely on Russian army to maintain their existence if the worst comes to pass.

      Ukraine is actually somewhat schizophrenic in that regard. Its problem is that it's a bitterly divided state: most of eastern regions are historically more russified, and populated predominantly by Russian speakers who either self-identify as Russian or at least aligned with it, while western regions are historically more polonized, and populated predominantly by Ukrainian speakers who self-identify clearly as Ukrainians, and make it a point to stand apart from Russia. The middle of the country, including the capital, is a mish-mash of both. The divide goes beyond the language and self-identification, it also straddles religion (Eastern Orthodox Moscow Patriarchate, vs Kyiv Patriarchate and Greek Catholic). Needless to say, these groups don't much like each other, and have pretty much opposite political goals with no cooperation. So depending on which party is in power at any given moment, foreign policy of Ukraine can pretty much turn around, every five years. And right now, the party in power is pro-Russian one.

    11. Re:Color me surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why so many people want to move to Russia.

    12. Re:Color me surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The former Soviet republics that are now independent states

      ...but are almost all run by former KGB agents.

      FTFY

    13. Re:Color me surprised by horza · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Ukraine is incredibly corrupt. It's the main factor dragging the country down. A young girl can hitch-hike home in the early hours of the morning after clubbing and be safe. There is nearly no aggression I have seen. Hanging out around the Black Sea on a Friday night is safer than being in London. The people are really friendly, and sometimes even charge the real price! However the police patrol the streets and if they see a drunk tourist they will drag him down a side street and kick the crap out of him before taking his watch and wallet. Even simple paperwork at the police station means bribes for everybody you come into contact with. Scams from "law enforcement" officers are rife. If one top guy decides Demonoid is out, don't expect them back. Certainly there will be no appeal. Wonderful country with fantastic people, but don't expect real justice.

      Phillip.

    14. Re:Color me surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess. Linux > M$ too.

    15. Re:Color me surprised by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I wonder why they didn't just split the country, with the western half being "Ukraine" and the eastern half staying part of Russia. Then both groups would be happy, except the people right in the middle and in the capitol.

    16. Re:Color me surprised by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The way to do it is to live in the USA (or other western nation better yet), but keep your servers in Russia. Then you get the best of both worlds.

    17. Re:Color me surprised by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      after he released a statement with the US Trade Representative agreeing to "redouble" intellectual property enforcement.

      That reminds me of the scene in Star Wars (or was it RotJ?) where Darth Vader visits the Death Star and talks to the commanding officer about how unhappy the Emperor is with the progress on construction, and the officer nervously promises to "redouble" their efforts.

    18. Re:Color me surprised by shentino · · Score: 1

      So maybe someone friendly to the MAFIAA poked a black hat into planting malware on it, and then blew the whistle on malware.

      It's almost like calling the feds after hacking CP onto someone's computer. Which has been done btw.

    19. Re:Color me surprised by shentino · · Score: 1

      And I bet you whoever planted those ads was paid off by copyright lobbies.

    20. Re:Color me surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Russia == USA

      All totalitaristic regimes are based on some sort of hatred, "anti-something" national idea.
      In Russia, it is "anti-west", "anti-USA", "anti-EU".
      In USA, it is "antiterrorism", "anticommunism", "anti-Russia".

      In contrast, look at small european countries. No national hatred to anything, no "patriotism", no dictators.

    21. Re:Color me surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      actually, this is not the first time that Ukraine got bent over. In 2003 for example, a "studio" got whacked.

    22. Re:Color me surprised by shentino · · Score: 1

      Kinda fishy since they apparently got hacked into.

      You'd think that cybercops would be going after the hackers.

    23. Re:Color me surprised by shentino · · Score: 1

      Doubly so since they got hacked into.

      I'd bet that the malware was planted.

    24. Re:Color me surprised by f3rret · · Score: 2

      Kinda fishy since they apparently got hacked into.

      You'd think that cybercops would be going after the hackers.

      You'd think a lot of things. (This is probably going to sound racist, deal with it) Eastern European politics aren't exactly known for their transparency and willingness to divulge information about the basis for its decision-making.

      Oh and it's often corrupt as hell, so make of that what you will.
      The malware thing was probably just an excuse to go after them for whatever reason they had behind the scenes-

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    25. Re:Color me surprised by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      (This is probably going to sound racist, deal with it) Eastern European politics aren't exactly known for their transparency and willingness to divulge information about the basis for its decision-making.

      "Eastern European" is not a race, so the phrase you're looking for is "xenophobic stereotyping based on ignorance and prejudice".

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    26. Re:Color me surprised by Noughmad · · Score: 1

      If your shit's not safe in the Ukraine, it's not safe anywhere.

      Kramer 1, Newman 0

      --
      PlusFive Slashdot reader for Android. Can post comments.
    27. Re:Color me surprised by f3rret · · Score: 1

      "Eastern European" is not a race, so the phrase you're looking for is "xenophobic stereotyping based on ignorance and prejudice".

      I could have used "Slavic", would that have made a difference? Politics in the FSU has a long and storied history of corruption, I guess western politics have too, so there you go.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    28. Re:Color me surprised by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      The eastern part, and especially Crimea (which is most heavily russified) has been raising that point occasionally, not really very seriously so far but more as a stick to get something else - "if you don't do what we ask for, we're gonna hold a referendum to separate" sort of thing.

      The problem with this approach is that it's not like the split is clear-cut geographically. Much like red/blue in US, either side has a strong minority residing in it from the other; and in both cases, the split would hurt them - in the east because it would then likely seek unification with Russia and ditch Ukrainian as the national language (or, at best, leave it as a regional one), and in the west, because it would make Ukrainian the de facto majority language rather than just de jure national.

      Furthermore, there is more than one boundary there, and they are not perfectly aligned - on one hand you have ethnic self-identification (Russian/Ukrainian), where most but not all (80%) identify as Ukrainians. Then you have the language split, where 50% consider Ukrainian their native language, 30% Russian, and 20% say "both". But when you ask people about "language they speak most daily" rather than "native language", 50% say Russian, and more people are fluent in it than Ukrainian. And then there is political affiliation, which is a thing of its own. So it's all quite messy and complicated - if a guy says he's Ukrainian, says both languages are his "native", but primarily speaks Russian, what should be his alignment? He's screwed no matter what - he wants an independent country where he can usefully speak whatever language he wants, and neither side would provide for that.

      Then of course there's irredentism. This is stronger on the western side, because they focus more on Ukraine as an independent state, and emphatically reject any outside reliance - many, in fact, go further, and reject historical connections with Russia as well, on the extreme nationalist side of things going into racial comparisons like "Ukrainians are Slavs, while Russians are some kind of asian Turko-Ugro-Mongoloid mix". Needless to say, they also see the present border of Ukraine as its natural one, and reject any possibility of separating any regions from it, especially those that are highly likely to rejoin Russia if separated. These guys also claim that those identifying as Russians or speaking Russian are mostly "brainwashed" Ukrainians, and should be restored to their real national identity, forcibly if needed.

      On the other hand, the eastern side being more aligned with Russia, quite a few there see Ukraine not just as a natural partner, but as just a historical and cultural region of the greater Russian state with minor local variations - and so the need for a separate state is suspect by many in the first place. On the extreme side of things, this again goes into ethnic nationalism by claiming that western Ukrainians are "the Polish fifth column" and "not really East Slavs", and that Ukrainian language is "Russian mangled to look more like Polish". From there the obvious next step is to claim that Ukraine, as an Eastern Slavic region, should re-enter a union with Russia and Belarus in the entirety of its historic Kievan Rus territory (which includes most of the West Ukraine, as well), while the "alien elements" in the west should be russified or expelled.

      In other words, it's the same usual bullshit that you see in regions inhabited by two ethnicities who, in reality, form a single contiguous spectrum across the territory because they historically originate from a single root, and have diverged slowly over time due to shifting political rather than constant geographical separation. Ditto with the languages - while normative Russian and Ukrainian differ, the actual dialects in use more gradually transform from southern Russian to eastern Ukrainian, with a mix of both in the middle. The sharp split is mostly in the heads of people - i.e. politics and religion. Coincidentally, a very s

    29. Re:Color me surprised by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      and the language issue can be solved (right now Ukrainian is the sole official language, which is a major grievance with russophones in the east; on the other hand, many Western nationalists despise the de facto popularity of Russian as threatening their identity). Much the same way as it is in Canada today. Though, then again, Canada is also not exactly a shining example of success in that area...

      Maybe I'm misinformed about Canada, but I thought in Canada, almost everyone spoke English, except for the people in Quebec who speak French. I've been to Canada several times (but not Quebec, mostly the western side) and rarely heard any French, and just assumed anyone speaking it was a tourist from Quebec. It seems to me that QC could secede without too much trouble.

    30. Re:Color me surprised by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      By "same way as in Canada" I meant making both languages official on the federal level, as well as in the public education system (with reasonable limitations), but otherwise letting the provinces do their thing - Quebec only has French as an official languages, obviously, but most other provinces use English de facto without specifying a de jure official language, and some are officially bilingual. You can always find a place that works best for you, while retaining your citizenship.

      I don't know about too much trouble. Should Quebec secede, it would raise the question of the status of English minorities in its areas bordering Ontario, as well as French minorities in Ontario itself, and Acadians in Maritimes.

      But, yeah, it wasn't meant to be an exact match, rather as an existing arrangement that is similar in some respect that could be borrowed from. About the only other country that I can think of that is actually in more or less the same boat is Belgium, and that is not a good model right now. Even then it's not quite the same, since in Belgium (and in Canada), the two sides involved have historically distinct ethnic, cultural and linguistic background, with relatively recent cohabitation in a single state. In Ukraine it's the other way around - historically a single ethnic, cultural and linguistic background, which has diverged relatively recently due to politics.

      It's actually that common background that makes things harder in some extent, since either half has a seemingly legitimate claim to the entire nation (or at least the label thereof). Belgium could split into Flanders and Wallonia - they'd have to settle the border, but otherwise there's little doubt about what cultural identity of either side is. And Quebec could split away from English Canada in a similar manner. But Ukraine would have to split into West and East Ukraine, and both sides would lay claim to the same culture and history, and deciding on the border would be very difficult (like, who gets Kyiv?). I think that would just create an irredentist time bomb more than anything else.

    31. Re:Color me surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So Poland starting with its Constitution of 1791 was and remains a place with a long history of corruption. Good one.

    32. Re:Color me surprised by f3rret · · Score: 1

      So Poland starting with its Constitution of 1791 was and remains a place with a long history of corruption. Good one.

      Basically, yes.

      That said Poland was never in the Soviet Union.

      --
      Admit nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter-accusations.
    33. Re:Color me surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that should be the entire eastern half speaks Russian natively.

  3. Huge victory for content industry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Congratulations! It will now take people an additional 3 clicks to find the movie, game or song they want to steal!

    Keep up the good work, guys, people will stop making unlicensed digital copies any day now!

    1. Re:Huge victory for content industry! by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Informative

      When Doctor Who started up again Demonoid torrents were the only way us USAians could see it *at all*. It probably helped Who and many other BBC shows get their American deals.

      There is definitely advantages for content owners here whether they want to admit it or not.

    2. Re:Huge victory for content industry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you think demonoid was the only place to get Doctor Who, you're hilariously incorrect.

    3. Re:Huge victory for content industry! by neminem · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You mean except for all of the other torrents that existed in other more actually private private trackers? And probably also public trackers.

      I'm not arguing with your main point (New Doctor Who is exactly how I got introduced to the wonderful world of illegally stealing tv shows too), but Demonoid wasn't the only place you could go (I've only ever used it for a few things.)

    4. Re:Huge victory for content industry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course there are advantages, and the BBC was fully aware of all the advantages Demonoid posed. The BBC made full use of those advantages by turning a blind eye to the 'illegal' proliferation of its product all the while weakly protesting their existence for plausible deniability. Now that WHO back to it's glory-days form and the BBC is making lots of licensing money from overseas sales all of a sudden action is taken.

      Oh dear, oh dear, oh dear. What have we here? Shame shame on you Demonoid. You've been a very naughty file sharer.

      And the rich and powerful get rich and powerful, and the tune just goes on and on.

    5. Re:Huge victory for content industry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no it wont

      open chrome, preferably on a tor node

      with peerblock running type in the address bar "movie/game/song i want to access torrent"

      nothing changes for me other than something new will be on top besides demonoid on my search

    6. Re:Huge victory for content industry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Peerblock is a joke.

    7. Re:Huge victory for content industry! by darkfeline · · Score: 1

      When Doctor Who started up again Demonoid torrents were the only way us USAians could see it *at all*. It probably helped Who and many other BBC shows get their American deals.

      There is definitely advantages for content owners here whether they want to admit it or not.

      Ha! You almost got me there. If I didn't know better, I'd think you were suggesting content owning corporation CEOs were intelligent.

    8. Re:Huge victory for content industry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess seeing as theyre the Content Owner as youve stated, perhaps they should be free to decide that for themselves!

    9. Re:Huge victory for content industry! by xenobyte · · Score: 1

      When Doctor Who started up again Demonoid torrents were the only way us USAians could see it *at all*.

      I got all my Doctor Who needs adequately satisfied by www.thebox.bz who specializes in British TV. That they were proud of Doctor Who was evident in the fact that for a long time their main logo was the TARDIS and the name itself is also a reference to the TARDIS Police Box. These days, it's a slang reference to a tv set and both the main logo and favicon is a pictogram of a classic tv with a rabbit ear antenna. It's fast and the rips are always flawless (and often exclusive), and they treat their users decently and don't delete them or reset their ratio if they are away for a while. Yes, it's a private tracker, just like Demonoid was.

      PS: Of course I bought the blu-rays (and deleted the downloads) when they came out, and BBC is fairly fast when it comes to releasing shows on consumer media, so we're talking a month or two where I borrowed the shows before being able to pay for it.

      --
      "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken (1880-1956) --
    10. Re:Huge victory for content industry! by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The thing is, if I were a content owning corporation CEO my business plan wouldn't be based on giving away my content for free indefinitely.

      As a user, you may love having free content, but at some point it all has to be paid for, unless you want to get rid of professional quality work and just have random people shouting on YouTube.

      And now the slashdot "well it is up to you to make money by other means such as selling action figures" idiots will reply, and I will get down-modded, and lah di da.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  4. If everything was copied. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There couldn't have been anything illegal on the servers. Also I doubt the authorities paid a license to copy the IP of Demonoid.

    1. Re:If everything was copied. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Off-topic since this isn't what happened in this case but it makes me wonder. Since governments issue the permit they have ultimate authority over the IP. At least that's probably what would be argued in cases where authorities break international copyright law.

      We live in a world where executive power is shared across countries while judicial review remains in pockets of jurisdiction. We have all of downside of a one world government but none of the benefits.

  5. OTOH, US Law Enforcement could take a lesson... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OTOH, US Law Enforcement could take a lesson on how to conduct a raid on a datacenter. Go in with a forensic team, isolate, copy, preserve, and leave the shit in place. You don't go in with bolt cutters to cables, wipe out businesses of a dozen other bystanders in the facility, seize stuff for months, or prevent businesses from starting back up.

    1. Re:OTOH, US Law Enforcement could take a lesson... by jamstar7 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But that's not as much fun, nor does it appeal to the 'cowboy' mentality it seems a lot of Feds have been cultivating lately. And the collateral damage? Shouldn'tve put your data on a server those eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeevil terrorrorrorrist pyrates could use! Now go file the appropriate papwerwork, along with the appropriate fees, and maybe, if you're good kids and eat all your vegetables, they MIGHT let you see your (totally legal) data sometime before the Second Coming of Elvis.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    2. Re:OTOH, US Law Enforcement could take a lesson... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      wipe out businesses of a dozen other bystanders in the facility, seize stuff for months, or prevent businesses from starting back up

      You're assuming that this isn't the entire point of a raid: Send a clear message to all businesses on the planet, "don't come in contact with anything near copyright violation, if nessessary, we'll nuke the site from orbit, if that's the only way to be sure."

    3. Re:OTOH, US Law Enforcement could take a lesson... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Multiple backups.

    4. Re:OTOH, US Law Enforcement could take a lesson... by Shagg · · Score: 1

      Depends on what your goal is.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    5. Re:OTOH, US Law Enforcement could take a lesson... by darkfeline · · Score: 1

      wipe out businesses of a dozen other bystanders in the facility, seize stuff for months, or prevent businesses from starting back up

      You're assuming that this isn't the entire point of a raid: Send a clear message to all businesses on the planet, "don't come in contact with anything near copyright violation, or we'll nuke the site from orbit for the lulz."

      FTFY

    6. Re:OTOH, US Law Enforcement could take a lesson... by jplindy · · Score: 1

      But that's not as much fun, nor does it appeal to the 'cowboy' mentality it seems a lot of Feds have been cultivating lately.

      Lately!?... how about have always had ;)

    7. Re:OTOH, US Law Enforcement could take a lesson... by bbecker23 · · Score: 1

      That's it! I'll be writing in a "Corporate^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Government Seizure Prevention" line-item on next year's budget request.

      Seriously, though, is this really something we're willing to accept. I can perfectly rationalize a backup budget to hedge losses to hardware failures and the like, but the threat of becoming collateral damage in an IP shakedown? Why is that even a thing?

      --
      cat /dev/random > sig.txt
  6. Investigators have copied all the information by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Torrent plz!

  7. Re:Bout time by preaction · · Score: 5, Informative

    Demonoid was a torrent site, not a storage service.

  8. Re:Bout time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not theft, it's copyright infringement!

  9. Re:Bout time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're an idiot. You don't even know what Demonoid was.

  10. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As much as I agree that Obama is part of the problem (he's a huge corporatist, allowing banks to get off the hook like he did) he's running against Romney who will do NOTHING except what corporations one. There is no candidate standing that will curb corporate abuse. It's not a party issue.

  11. Shocking! by frovingslosh · · Score: 5, Funny

    There is a Ukrainian law enforcement agency? Who knew?

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Shocking! by HapSlappy_2222 · · Score: 4, Funny

      There sure is!

      Not only is there a law enforcement agency, but he's a pretty good guy, too.

    2. Re:Shocking! by darkfeline · · Score: 1

      You know what they say, the best law enforcement agency is the one no one knows exists.

    3. Re:Shocking! by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Don't be silly, of course they have a law enforcement agency. It's a very effective one too. For a sufficient "donation", they'll enforce any law you want enforced, whether that law is on the books or not.

    4. Re:Shocking! by Hunter+Shoptaw · · Score: 1

      Oh where's a +1 when you need it!

  12. Re:Bout time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't actually know what Demonoid is, do you?

  13. well.. crap by lemur3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know its been said before.. but I think itd worth saying again..

    A lot of stuff on demonoid wasnt in print anymore, and there was a big focus on books/other things that arent readily available anymore.

    I think that it brings up a big point that we miss when the whole debate of copyright infringement and pirating the newest movies is brought up in relation to these torrent sites.

    These places are in some ways the last place to easily access important parts of the culture of the world.... Is it so important to protect the newest blockbuster films at the cost of so many people losing access to bits of global creative culture that they cant access legally ?

    1. Re:well.. crap by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      One area that is constantly ignored are the grey-area copyrights (where no one knows who owns the copyright because a copyright holder has gone bankrupt) and the stuff in torrents that is not even in print. Trading that stuff doesn't hurt anyone and, as a matter of fact, often gets them noticed again and brought back into print. Has anyone ever heard a greedhead from the *AAs even acknowledge this?

    2. Re:well.. crap by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You'd be lucky to get them to acknowledge that grey-area copyright and out-of-copyright materials even exist in the first place!

    3. Re:well.. crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newest blockbuster movie from 70 years ago...

    4. Re:well.. crap by DanielRavenNest · · Score: 2

      A lot of stuff on demonoid wasnt in print anymore, and there was a big focus on books/other things that arent readily available anymore

      The files themselves were not hosted on Demonoid, just the index, comments, and tracker. The "stuff" still exists on everyone's hard drives. I'm sure a lot of it will pop back up on other locations. One lesson to learn from this is a big central site is not so good from a security standpoint, it makes too attractive a target. 100 specialized sites catering to different interests would be more resilient, since it makes the work to take them down 100 times harder.

    5. Re:well.. crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Being able to access old, out-of-circulation content is a GREAT use for sharing, unfortunately if you are enjoying FREE stuff (even if it's SO OLD IT'S LEGITIMATELY IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN) you are NOT spending money to get the latest %BLOCKBUSTER%, and are therefore costing the big media companies. They will only be happy when it is completely impossible to derive ANY joy without paying someone somewhere something (and preferably a portion of that will go to them, or the money will collect somewhere that they can sue to grab it, negotiate to partner, buy it out, or buy some laws to ban it).

    6. Re:well.. crap by nabsltd · · Score: 2

      The files themselves were not hosted on Demonoid, just the index, comments, and tracker. The "stuff" still exists on everyone's hard drives. I'm sure a lot of it will pop back up on other locations.

      AFAIK, torrents tracked by the Demonoid tracker were not required to be exclusive to that tracker. At this point, it's pretty much all tracked by other trackers or DHT. The only real issue would be the torrents that are not indexed anywhere else...they will still live on, but you won't be able to search for them.

    7. Re:well.. crap by Shagg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course they won't acknowledge this. The **AAs are not advocates of the artists, they're advocates of the distribution companies. By definition, they couldn't care less about grey-area copyrights because those don't have anything to do with their business.

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    8. Re:well.. crap by PsychoSlashDot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      One area that is constantly ignored are the grey-area copyrights (where no one knows who owns the copyright because a copyright holder has gone bankrupt) and the stuff in torrents that is not even in print. Trading that stuff doesn't hurt anyone and, as a matter of fact, often gets them noticed again and brought back into print. Has anyone ever heard a greedhead from the *AAs even acknowledge this?

      You don't understand. If you're consuming entertainment material that isn't available legally anymore, you're STEALING from the makers of content that is legally available. How can this be? Simple. You have X hours of entertainment time in your week. If there is no free entertainment available, you will purchase entertainment that is not free. By going back to out-of-print material or by dipping into TV/movies that are no longer available, you are wasting your valuable entertainment dollar-hours that should have been invested in Big Entertainment. For shame.

      --
      "Oh no... he found the .sig setting."
    9. Re:well.. crap by Flipstylee · · Score: 1

      I wish i could mod you up. This is no different from back when i primarily used FTP, And IRC was nice,
      you could get "infringing" things there aswell, but damn i miss the manuals and texts they used to have, in big piles everywhere,
      people trading everything in to get their server ratio up.

    10. Re:well.. crap by darkfeline · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that I like entertainment that is not free and that it is not complete crap. It's the same argument as "People who are pirating this movie equals lost sales and money for us" that big media throws around so often nowadays. Sure, some of them would pay if they couldn't get it free, but most people will pay even if they could get it free, and most people who get it free wouldn't pay even if they couldn't get it free. You follow me?

    11. Re:well.. crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like how library.nu was.. before it went down.

      Is it so important to protect the newest blockbuster films at the cost of so many people losing access to bits of global creative culture that they cant access legally

      To the people that hold all the cards ( and cash ) it is.

    12. Re:well.. crap by shentino · · Score: 1

      Actually they do care.

      It's unwanted competition for our eyeballs.

    13. Re:well.. crap by shentino · · Score: 1

      Funny...

      If they are my entertainment hours, how does anyone but me get to decide how they are spent?

      Contrary to what the mafiaa goons want everyone to believe, it's MY calendar, MY clock, and MY wallet.

      I will use them as I fucking see fit, and I will start by punishing anyone who tries to convince me otherwise by not patronizing them.

      News flash to the mafiaa: Trying to control my purchasing decisions with DRM and region locking and other crap is the fastest way to piss me off and make me not watch your stuff. And heaven help you if you try to undermine my sovereignty over my own time and money with a backdoor rootkit.

    14. Re:well.. crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try myanonamouse.net

  14. Sad by Dunge · · Score: 0

    Sad to see this go too. In a few years the Internet will only be a weak shadow of it's former past.

  15. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is no Democrat or Republican candidate standing that will curb corporate abuse.

    FTFY.

    Third parties don't get enough notice in this nation to be included in such a generalization (which, if all third parties were included, would become false anyway).

    A quote I've been trying to spread around: "The only wasted vote, is the one that goes to a Democrat or a Republican."

    Here's hoping it catches on...

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  16. wtf are you talking about by poetmatt · · Score: 4, Informative

    they never had malware ads, but they did turn on the ads after being DDOS'd due to the bandwidth bill. Considering that such a thing happened literally in the last two days I can't see why the Ukranians would shut it down that fast or even have the capability to, for that matter.

    1. Re:wtf are you talking about by shentino · · Score: 1

      I think they got hacked by a copyright cartel friendly blackhat just to give the ukracops an excuse to shut them down.

      Kinda like planting CP on your boss's computer then calling the cops on them.

  17. Oh it's just the Ukraine by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

    If it were the U.S. I'd be worried they'd come after the stored user data & put people into indefinite detainment (under NDAA 2012).

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    1. Re:Oh it's just the Ukraine by TheSpoom · · Score: 4, Interesting
      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    2. Re:Oh it's just the Ukraine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So.... what was stored on the servers? Email addresses/user account names, and separately a database of torrents.

      If someone registered for the site and used it to access some torrents... would the tracker have stored a list of torrents per account accessed?

      What I'm getting at is that I'm not sure how useful the account information would be to law enforcement.

    3. Re:Oh it's just the Ukraine by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Why I'm not worried: Do you think, as a matter of policy, that a site like Demonoid would have long retention of IP logs?

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    4. Re:Oh it's just the Ukraine by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      If it were the U.S. I'd be worried they'd come after the stored user data & put people into indefinite detainment (under NDAA 2012).

      For the moment, that provision is blocked: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Defense_Authorization_Act_for_Fiscal_Year_2012#Indefinite_detention_blocked

      I am as disgusted by Obama as much as I was embarrassed and ashamed by Bush. The only reason I am keeping my American citizenship (I no longer live in the US) is so that I can vote for anyone that might possibly be better, though I am starting to have real doubts that it will ever happen.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    5. Re:Oh it's just the Ukraine by Hunter+Shoptaw · · Score: 1

      Thats not even close to what the article said.

  18. No what? by Westwood0720 · · Score: 1

    Where is one to get torrents? =[

    1. Re:No what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Webistes that were better than Demonoid to begin with, just have to know someone who has a spare invite lying around.

    2. Re:No what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kickasstorrents (kat.ph) Still better than the rest.

    3. Re:No what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's not. As previous posters have said, Demonoid had a LOT of old and out of print stuff. Kat may be ok for current stuff, but it doesn't have nearly the depth of content Demonoid gave you access to.

    4. Re:No what? by jamstar7 · · Score: 2

      BTJunkie folded earlier this year, damn it.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  19. WTH is Demonoid? by ruiner13 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I know the admins are busy people, but perhaps explaining what Demonoid is and why they'd want to shut it down would be useful. Not everyone knows every website on the internet and their purpose.

    --

    today is spelling optional day.

    1. Re:WTH is Demonoid? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently not everyone here knows how to use Google of Wikipedia, either.

    2. Re:WTH is Demonoid? by ch0knuti · · Score: 3, Informative
  20. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    They don't get enough notice because they don't have any actual power and thus business and the rich throwing money at them buys nothing. That'd change if third party candidates got elected. Money and Power corrupt and as a country we've basically decided we are fine with it thanks to the supreme court and citizens united, pacs and super pacs, etc...

    Good luck getting any of that reversed when elected politicians eyes are like looney toon cartoon characters with dollar signs rolling and a cash register caching. They won't ever vote to strip themselves of unlimited secret campaign funds and a third party candidate would just take a seat at the trough with the 600+ other pigs.

  21. DDOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So, are we comfortable with officially labeling the DDOS from which Demonoid has been suffering these past few days an act of officially-sanctioned vandalism on the part of law enforcement, local or otherwise? Because this is damned coincidental, if not... and should be terrifying to businesses the world over if true.

    1. Re:DDOS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My guess is the DDOS was to prevent users from updating their details while **RIA via some (government) agency went about shutting the site down.

      Email addresses could identify users. Demonoid does keep a history of upload & download stats, but I'm not sure if they maintain a list of torrents downloaded.

      yikes, I hope not. I can't remember which (if any) email address I used to register.

    2. Re:DDOS by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      My guess is the DDOS was to prevent users from updating their details while **RIA via some (government) agency went about shutting the site down.

      Email addresses could identify users. Demonoid does keep a history of upload & download stats, but I'm not sure if they maintain a list of torrents downloaded.

      yikes, I hope not. I can't remember which (if any) email address I used to register.

      Good thing I never registered for an account there, eh? But I did search for a torrent within the last 2 years...

      Cue jackboots in 3... 2... 1...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  22. Disadvantages of 3rd world countries by davidwr · · Score: 2

    The country that tolerates you one day can turn against you the next, and you have little or no recourse.

    At least in the United States, if you have enough cash you have access to the courts.*

    *Pissing of the feds in ways that invoke National Security(TM) are, sadly, excluded. But as far as copyright violations go, any American has as much access to the courts as he has money to pay lawyers. This is not true in some other countries.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:Disadvantages of 3rd world countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Maybe with "enough money", you can indeed buy justice (assuming your funds are not frozen), but don't kid yourself that we peasants have a chance. I worked with a guy whose entire server farm was confiscated, along with every piece of electronic media in his possession, over a false CP accusation. No charges have been brought in the ten years since, but the guy has yet to see any of his equipment or media returned, despite several lawsuits to that end. It is, of course, hardly worth pursuing at this point, considering the depreciation attached to decade-old server equipment, but that's kinda the point... beyond a relatively short period of time, any length that the courts "hold" your electronic and/or digital property is essentially government-sanctioned theft, and there's nothing you can do about it.

    2. Re:Disadvantages of 3rd world countries by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's why it's a good strategy to keep everything separate. Don't live in the same country you're hosting questionable material in (even if it's just links and there's no copyrighted material there at all); live someplace nice, and keep the questionable stuff in someplace that doesn't care. And keep regular backups, so if they suddenly do care, you can start up an identical site in a different 3rd-world country that doesn't care. And make sure to keep your association with these sites secret.

    3. Re:Disadvantages of 3rd world countries by lpq · · Score: 1

      At least in the United States, if you have enough cash you have access to the courts.*

      Tell that to the owner of the megadownloads...

      The US freezes assets of accused people exactly so you DON'T have access to good defense. That's been true since Bush-I signed the zero tolerance and forfeiture laws in back almost 20 years ago.

      The owner of the site who the US tried to have deported from New Zealand -- who didn't entirely cooperate...offered to come back to the US for trial if they unfroze his assets so he could mount a defense.

      The Feds -- eh? Why should we bother? We got you shut down like our 'friends' (Hollywood) wanted, AND **WE** get to keep all of your assets -- the cops get to keep everything they confiscate! And the beauty is -- you, the used-to-be-owner, don't even have to be tried or found guilty... it was your property that was accused, and it doesn't have rights. So it isn't entitled to presumption of innocence, and the owner must pay for a trial and prove his property's innocence!!!

      VERY Screwd up... has led to alot of cop corruption over the past
      two decades -- including widely publicized evidence planting, and police-paid informants to send in tips so places could be raided -- and their owners shot dead (Ventura, CA 5$mill(1990's) ranch raided and owner shot in bedroom in dawn police raid to confiscate his ranch for profit by trying to find any drugs (a dime bag would do). There was nothing on the ranch and no indication of any illegal activity). The guy was clean -- DEAD clean.

  23. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by DanTheStone · · Score: 2

    Good luck getting any of that reversed when elected politicians eyes are like looney toon cartoon characters with dollar signs rolling and a cash register caching. They won't ever vote to strip themselves of unlimited secret campaign funds and a third party candidate would just take a seat at the trough with the 600+ other pigs.

    Who do you think passed McCain-Feingold before the Supreme Court struck down the provision? It wasn't a referendum.

  24. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what corporations one? Was that supposed to be 'want'??

  25. Now what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get torrent sites off the "www". They could still use the internet, just not the www. Torrent sites should only be reachable with a protocol that no browser would ever support.

    I think that visibility (thanks to the sites using the www and non-techies using Google) is big part of the problem. It made torrent sites too simple for non-techies to get to and rocketed awareness to the top.

    1. Re:Now what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Get torrent sites off the "www". They could still use the internet, just not the www. Torrent sites should only be reachable with a protocol that no browser would ever support.

      I think that visibility (thanks to the sites using the www and non-techies using Google) is big part of the problem. It made torrent sites too simple for non-techies to get to and rocketed awareness to the top.

      Freenet is just sitting there, waiting for people to realize this is what it's for. Trackers and comments and other low-bandwidth stuff would fit well there.

    2. Re:Now what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Freenet is just sitting there, waiting for people to realize this is what it's for. Trackers and comments and other low-bandwidth stuff would fit well there.

      Freenet is based on java and has performance problems.
      Osiris (uses C++) + magnet links and you're good to go. No performance penalty of any kind.
      Another advantage (at least to me) of Osiris is that the user can decide which web portals to connect to. So you don't have the problem of freenet where a part of the cache is on your computer and you don't know what is in it(among other things child porn). On Osiris if a porn web portal doesn't suit you no problem, you don't connect to it and nothing is downloaded on your computer. This makes it easier to develop communities around specific themes.
      And creating an incredible community was one of demonoid's best points.

  26. Please educate me by dave562 · · Score: 2

    /me admits to knowing.

    Why couldn't someone setup a site like Demonoid on Tor, but direct people out to the public internet to actually transfer the torrents? The tracker would exist on the Tor network, but the file sharing would be done on the public network and therefore not saturate the limited bandwidth available via Tor.

    Is there something inherent in bittorrent that requires the tracker and the transfer to take place on the same network? Is it so inherent in the application that it could not be separated into two separate components?

    1. Re:Please educate me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm also not aware of any reason this wouldn't be possible, but my thoughts on the matter immediately go to the matter of getting your average bittorrent user to run Tor just to access bittorrent. Not that it's HARD, persay, but there are other systems of filesharing (Anomos comes to mind) that in large part, didn't catch on despite being perhaps easier than accessing a .onion tracker (Anomos used it's own implementation of onion routing and encryption to provide a more private bittorrent-like experience). I'd love to see it tried regardless, but I'm skeptical that the masses will migrate to something like that until all of the major torrent trackers are offline, horribly laden with malware, or when accessing one becomes an instant lawsuit/criminal penalty. If one does spring up though, I'd be quite happy to hear about it through slashdot...if that doesn't spur users on, nothing will!

    2. Re:Please educate me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok I'll do the honors :

      The solution is to do away with centralised websites.
      Use Osiris, a software that creates distributed web portals. You can create a website, have it hosted on hundreds, thousands, hundreds of thousands of nodes with no possibility to censor anything. The information is synchronized once you get up and running and that's it. It works more or less like Opera Unite, but whereas Unite was dependent on Opera (at least for the account creation) no such thing is needed in Osiris. Each computer user that connects to a distributed web portals has a synchronized image hosted on this computer. A link is posted by user X ? Some time later user's Y computer is updated and he has the link. And away you go with the torrent.
      Seriously, this problem has already been fixed. Emule doesn't let you create anything like a community because you have to use a standard forum. Osiris+torrent is unbeatable. We just need to raise awareness about this solution.

    3. Re:Please educate me by Znork · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Technically you don't even need a tracker anymore as magnet links are enough for distributed hash tables, and magnet links can easily be distributed anywhere, while DHT is a builtin component of the transfer network. TPB already operates that way and would work fine on Tor (as far as I know there could already be several such tor sites, can't say I've checked).

      After that it'll probably go to i2p or turn over to the various f2f networks available. Sharing technology is already several generations ahead. The only question is really how far the pressure will go to push people towards an utterly unmonitorable network.

      Of course, ending up with an evolved completely opaque network has advantages once We The People will be forced to start lining people up against the wall.

    4. Re:Please educate me by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      "Of course, ending up with an evolved completely opaque network has advantages once We The People start being forced to line up against the wall."

      FTFY

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
  27. In fact, there were plans to join NATO by tlambert · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine%E2%80%93NATO_relations

    It's currently on hold because of their current president and parliament, as part of trying to keep Russia from coming unglued at them. However, if their stated intention to join the EU goes through, it's likely they will become a NATO member state (21 of the 27 EU member states are currently members of NATO). Currently, they engage in joint military exercises with NATO.

    1. Re:In fact, there were plans to join NATO by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraine%E2%80%93NATO_relations

      It's currently on hold because of their current president and parliament, as part of trying to keep Russia from coming unglued at them. However, if their stated intention to join the EU goes through, it's likely they will become a NATO member state (21 of the 27 EU member states are currently members of NATO). Currently, they engage in joint military exercises with NATO.

      As someone who can speak Russian pretty well and has spent a decent amount of time there and still has friends there, I can provide some insight. Basically when Krushchev took over in the 50s he moved some territory from the Russian SSR to the Ukrainian SSR. He was from Ukraine and if you look at a map, the move did make sense as it made the areas in question much closer to their SSR capital (Kiev) than they had been (Moscow). The problem was that when the USSR split up that these areas were primarily Russian speaking and ethnically Russian and they still look wistfully towards "Mother Russia". So basically it created a schizophrenic country where half the people think they are really Russians and the other half think they are Ukrainian.

      The situation is incredibly complicated but basically the Ukrainian half and the military strongly want to join NATO. The EU? Eh, maybe, maybe not. The Russian half has some people who are adamantly opposed to NATO because they believe all the bs that comes out of the Russian media that NATO is a force of evil and some people who believe that joining NATO will lead to a Russian invasion. Actually joining NATO is about the only thing that would protect them against a Russian invasion. Russia has shown that it does not respect borders (ask Georgia and Moldova about that, although the Moldovan situation is more indirect) and the military and the Ukrainian speakers know that. The problem is that the Russian speaking people are in charge of the government now and they have been trying appeasement as a way to deal with Russia. The Ukrainian speaking people are hopelessly split into 2 warring factions whose leaders were too self-serving to form a united front against the Russian speaking half of the country who have united behind the old pro-Russian party. Ukraine is far too corrupt to join the EU for probably decades to come. Ukrainian people have very unrealistic goals and dreams about where their country should be economically and instead of trying to reach for an achievable goal like "In 10 years let's get to where Poland is today" they instead want to be today at the same economic level of Germany. The recent governments have failed to exploit Ukraine's low cost environment as a possible source of cheap labor for Europe and the educational system in general does not encourage the learning of useful international languages like English which might help to induce businesses to create jobs there. So my belief is that for the next 10-20 years Ukraine will likely not be part of the EU (many Russian speaking people distrust the EU, by the way) or NATO. The only way this will change is if the Ukrainian speaking people unite behind a new candidate yet to emerge who will force change down from the top and clean up the corrupt Soviet style government that is still in place.

  28. NNTP by spanky_poppagasket · · Score: 2

    Viva la Usenet!

    1. Re:NNTP by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      No, shut up. Ixnay. Sssh.

    2. Re:NNTP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With all the news servers closing down (Comcast's and AT&T's loooong ago)...good luck with that...

  29. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by Shagg · · Score: 1

    You actually believe that if a third party achieved a significant voice in government, that they wouldn't sell out to corporations just as the two main parties have?

    --
    Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
  30. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You actually believe that if a third party achieved a significant voice in government, that they wouldn't sell out to corporations just as the two main parties have?

    Not necessarily, and FYI, I never said anything to that effect. Learn to read what's written, instead of inferring what you want to think is there.

    What about you? Do you actually believe it's better to be a good little wage slave who doesn't challenge the status quo, rather than at least attempt to cast off your shackles?

    If not, why bust my balls over pointing out that which has the potential to change the political landscape for the better?

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  31. Usenet no longer matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Demonoid was great for obscure hard to find stuff. TPB is ok if you're looking for mainstream stuff, but Demonoid had hard to find things that were *SEEDED*, unlike TPB where you might find a torrent hard to get anywhere else, but its not seeded.

    I know some bring up usenet, but usenet is a cesspool for file sharing. Its been flooded with spam and malware and noobies over the last couple of years thanks to the likes of easynews and giganews etc. The nice thing about TPB or Demonoid is you can read the comments of a file and see what others have experienced before downloading anything. Sure there are text messages you can read/download but its stupidly messy and inconvenient, and all usenet clients for binaries suck. Unison sucks the least but I think torrents are far far easier to use. The only real benefit of usenet is speed and perhaps retention. If you use the premium services you'll easily max out your connection. And if you use the NNTP service instead of a webclient like Easynews has you get 1000+ retention. But I've seen torrents still healthy and alive that far exceed what you get from the premium usenet providers.

    1. Re:Usenet no longer matters by hendrikboom · · Score: 1

      So we need a p2p system that maintains and distributes the comments that users make on torrents. Any proposals?

    2. Re:Usenet no longer matters by shentino · · Score: 1

      Emphasis on "had"

      Honestly, after the trouble they had in mexico last year I'm surprised they didn't beef up their redundancy.

  32. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by Charliemopps · · Score: 2

    If you think Obama, or any member of the democratic party for that matter, is not completely bought and sold to corporate interests, you're a fool. The difference between Republicans and Democrats? There isn't one. Those with a lot of money simply shift where their campaign donations go from election season to election season. Republicans invade countries to fight terrorism, Democrats invade to liberate the oppressed. Does it really matter what the excuse is when the result is the same? If you're voting Democrat or Republican during the next election, YOU are the problem... Not Obama or Romney.

  33. Safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For the users that went to Demonoid, will there be any threat of litigation?

    1. Re:Safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's over. We're going away. But at least we'll be together!

      You wanna be Daddy, or shall I?

    2. Re:Safe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But seriously, will they be able to track all the downloads, even if someone hasn't downloaded from there in the past couple of months?

  34. Maybe they were bought by the media corporations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, Ukraine could care less what the US tells them what they need to do, but what if these Government officials got some money from the media companies? I hear Ukrainians earn very little and are easily corruptible. Perhaps it's the money that motivated this sort of action.

  35. Steve Jackson got his stuff back by davidwr · · Score: 1

    If he hadn't been so persistent, or if he'd had an accusation that caused his friends to desert him, he'd be in the same boat though.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Jackson_Games,_Inc._v._United_States_Secret_Service (raid was in 1990, he won the court case and got his stuff back in 1993 or so).

    Unfortunately, it's going to take multiple victims of false allegations who are wealthy enough to fight back and win before courts and society will stand up and shame police into doing the right thing when they are in the wrong. In the meantime, some innocent people will be raided or worse, charged and intimidated into pleading guilty (and lying under oath as they do so!) or will be convicted falsely by a jury.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  36. Obvious answer by jonwil · · Score: 1

    Find a country to host these things in that wont bend over to the interests of the USA and its corporations.

    1. Re:Obvious answer by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, you just can't trust any one country or entity. Instead, find multiple countries to host these things, and keep the sites mirrored. If one country pulls a Ukraine, you have a handful of other countries still running the site.

  37. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2

    The only way a third party will ever get in office is when the electorate starts to give a flying fuck, and if that ever happens (we can dream, right?), some degree of accountability might actually take place.

    Then again, considering the majority of the stuff that gets blamed/credited on/to the President is actually the legislative branch, I hold very little hope for the U.S. to do anything but continue its downward spiral towards irrelevancy.

    You can do it folks, but you're gonna have to do it 1 congressperson at a time.

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  38. first rule about fight club by lister+king+of+smeg · · Score: 1

    if you keep saying that they will notice it and kill it to, as an afterthought mind you but they will do it. Usenet would be fairly easy to kill due to it not being as distributed as p2p, i mean i cant fire up google in a tor browser type a hash of my download find 50 usenet groups with the and add them to my peer finding pool like i can with torrents.

    what we need is free usenet server system living in a .onion or a torent over tor system

    --
    ---Saying gnome 3 is better than windows 8 not so much a compliment as it is damning with light praise.
  39. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

    You actually believe that if a third party achieved a significant voice in government, that they wouldn't sell out to corporations just as the two main parties have?

    No need to buy them out when you can just do the Beria routine on them and frame them for kiddie porn & child molesting. Scratch Yet Another 3rd Party Politician. Rinse and repeat as necessary, provided the election boards just don't bother to disallow the candidates on the ballot and toss any writeins for them on the grounds that they're not a 'legal candidate'. Remember, most of the election board members are either Republicans or Democrats, very few 3rd Partyers onboard.

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  40. Re:Roger Waters understood in the 1990s... by Pax681 · · Score: 1

    Can't you see It all makes perfect sense
    Expressed in dollars and cents,
    Pounds, shillings and pence
    Can't you see
    It all makes perfect sense

    aaaah Roger Waters... great song... great album also well fitting to place here ;)

  41. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sad you think voting is anything but smoke and mirrors to keep the proles busy.

  42. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

    Hell, if voting could change anything anymore, they'd make it illegal. You do realise how many layers are between you and the Powers That Wanna Be?

    --
    Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
  43. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by djhertz · · Score: 1

    As a Libertarian, thank you. I live in NH and get a lot of calls from presidential survey companies, "In the upcoming election will you vote for the Republican X or Democrat Y." And I respond with "Neither, I'll be voting for the Libertarian candidate Z" They don't seem to ever like that since the little boxes they use don't have that option. I'll be told, "Sir, that isn't an option" and then I get on my soapbox....

    Part of why I became a Libertarian was to have an impact. The phrase "The only wasted vote, is the one that goes to a Democrat or a Republican." really hits home and I'm going to start using that a lot. I have a friend with her PHD in Political Science. I thought voting for anything but X or Y was a waste but she pointed out that anybody who usually votes one way or the other is already a notched vote, it isn't going to change. The 2 big parties need me, so what can they do to get my vote? So by voting and being vocal about how I feel I can get the attention of X and Y and maybe they will change a bit towards my direction. So by acting how I do, I impact both sides. If I am a solid X or a solid Y I'm just in the pile to be counted, not to be courted.

    --
    Modest doubt is called the beacon of the wise - William Shakespeare
  44. God I hope not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The EU is already heavily weighted with these states, each of them has their Russian sub-population with loyalties back to Russia. For the sake of the EU I hope they don't ever join the EU or NATO. Russia is trying oldstyle KGB expansion into Europe.

    If you look at Kosovo/Serbia as an example, Russia sends Serbians aid, however it drives the trucks over backroad mountain passes so that the EU (who guard the borders to Kosovo) will intercept them. Then it screams 'EU is stopping us giving Serbians aid' in attempts to manipulate media in Serbia.
    http://www.rt.com/news/russia-aid-serbia-kosovo-733/

    Serbia recently elected a pro-Russian leader who had an awful lot of campaign money behind him and an agenda like 'EU blocks aid, Russia sends aid to Serbians'

    Really Putin is a KGB man, he plays long political games. Any state that joins the EU, can't have split loyalties, because Russia will fight when its oil reserves run short. Most likely invade middle Asian states, but also back into Eastern European ones. See South Ossetia as an example. Russian paid the South Ossentian police (thats a foreign countries police force), it armed the rebels, and when South Georgia went in to disarm them, it invaded 'to protect' the locals.

    Classic KGB move. We can't have NATO crippled when Putin is running fake elections and invading foreign countries.

  45. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

    The difference between Republicans and Democrats? There isn't one.

    Wrong.

    The Republicans are obviously big fans of corporatism, and all their followers have bought into their rhetoric about "job creators", and how the ultra-wealthy need tax breaks.

    The Democrats make a lot of noise about how they'd like to fix stuff; their speeches sound good to people who aren't in the right wing. But then they never actually bother to DO any of the things they talk about, and when questioned, they blame it all on the Republicans. "The Republicans forced me to sign this bill that helped the corporations/banksters/etc."

    You're correct that there's zero difference in actual governance between the two, but there's a world of difference in what they say to their brainwashed voters. It's how they keep up their "divide and conquer" strategy to maintain power.

  46. And I finally got my invite after 10-years of wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Drats!

  47. I smell a setup by shentino · · Score: 1

    According to torrent freak:

    http://torrentfreak.com/demonoid-busted-as-a-gift-to-the-united-states-government-120806/

    >>> Shortly after [the DDoS] a hacker break-in occurred, and a few days later came the investigators,” the source added.

    Smells like a plant to me.

    What if the hacker was someone paid off by a MAFIAA friendly contact, and the hacker was paid to plant malware ads on the servers, just to give Ukrainian authorities an excuse to shut them down?

    It's just as devious as hacking someone, planting CP on their computer, and then calling the feds on them.

    Which by the way has already happened:

    http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2010/08/disgruntled-brit-plants-child-porn-on-bosss-computer-calls-cops/

    So it wouldn't surprise me at ALL if this the malware ad spewing was a black hat contract paid for by someone friendly to US copyright interests.

  48. Re:Bout time by shentino · · Score: 1

    Sadly, it's theft because the powers that be say it is.

  49. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by shentino · · Score: 1

    They are not layers, they are flat out barriers.

    For what it's worth though, I *did* vote.

    Assuming that

    A) it doesn't get lost in the shuffle
    B) drowned out by sheeple that are drunk on political koolaid
    C) doesn't get hacked out during counting by a mitm attack

    I plan to have it do something. At least now I have earned the right to bitch if things don't go my way.

  50. *sadface* by Peartree · · Score: 1

    *sadface*

  51. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    sad you think voting is anything but smoke and mirrors to keep the proles busy.

    Well, personally I feel that the soap, ballot, and jury boxes have all failed us, and thus we are left with but one more box to open in defense of (what's left of) our Liberties.

    However, I also tend to get lambasted by Uncle Toms when I posit that particular ideology, so I figured I'd at least make an attempt to appease the status quo.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  52. Re:Roger Waters understood in the 1990s... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roger Waters = Gak!

  53. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by Hunter+Shoptaw · · Score: 1

    And as great as you quote may seem, you should understand that the only wasted vote is the one that goes to something other than a dem or repub. Because of the Electoral College system we have in place, you dreams of a third party president are simply utopian.

  54. Re:Just like the war on drugs, nobody ever learns. by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    Yup, that's exactly what those interested in maintaining the status quo want you to think.

    In reality, were a majority of a state's population to vote for a third party, and the electoral candidates for said districts voted otherwise, they would not maintain their positions long.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese