Autism rates have been on the decline, and this decline started when vaccination rates began their decline.
Explain that, poison advocates.
Correlation does not imply causation.
The supposed "link" from vaccinations to autism is easily studied so it's actually been thoroughly studied multiple times by looking at medical records. No obvious link exists in the available data. I'd call this whole idea that there is a link a lie..
There is just about as much "proof" of the link between vaccines and autism as there is to unleaded gasoline to autism, if you follow the logic used in the first argument.
I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that mankind isn't going to meet it's end because of this.... Maybe a nuclear winter will do it, but not this..
Nice try leftie... You cannot spin out of this one... Which side has a history of rioting over election results? Who was rioting in DC on the 20th of January? It wasn't the conservatives on the right.... LOL Maybe I'm wrong though... Do you have any examples of right wing riots? (Perhaps at some pervious January 20th where our candidate didn't take office?)
I'm not the one posting expletives in all caps... (See two posts up which came from you..) Who's triggered? My job is done here, anything more would be trolling you (which might be fun, but I don't have the time to play)....
Have a nice day, what ever is left of it where you live..
Queue the trolling post which I will likely just ignore.
LOL... Nice jab.... "Hope and Change" and "I'm with her" back at you...
I'm surprised you didn't bring up Cain's "999" slogan in his last failed campaign bid. THAT was more pizza than pizzazz if you ask me.
Campaign slogans are pretty much ALWAYS going to be pithy and trite. You do realize that "make America great again" slogan was used by Ronald Regain (1980), and Bill Clinton used the phrase a couple of times in his 1992 run. (Hillary used it in 2008 in her failed attempt) Which makes it a oldie but a goodie given that three campaigns won using it and only Hillary lost using it.(But she's a two time presidential loser anyway).
Ah yes, the source of most traveler's frustrations with Airlines... You want to check a bag? $$ You want to sit in a more comfortable seat? $$ You want food during the flight? $$$ A carryon? $$
All this because folks want to fly CHEAP over comfort or customer service...
Meanwhile more and more people are realizing that "hey, being poor shouldn't mean I should have to go massively in debt just because I'm unlucky enough to get sick".
No, Obamacare means the poor must decide if they 1. Want to pay the tax/fine for not having insurance or 2. Buy insurance they couldn't hope to actually get any benefit from before they go bankrupt paying the deductible AND the premiums.
What good is insurance if you cannot afford to pay the premiums and food at the same time? What good is having coverage if you cannot pay the required deductible? THIS is the problem of Obamacare, because it hammers the poor with HUGE costs up front when they pay just their premiums, even if they don't get sick, then hammers the sick again with huge deductibles on top of that when they have to use their coverage.
Obamacare is failing and is fast becoming unavailable and hugely expensive.. But that was the whole plan. It was SUPPOSED to fail, AFTER Obama left office, to create a crisis to be used to sell a new and bigger program to the now entitled to healthcare masses... It's how democrats do things..
LOL.. Aircraft which are out of kilter weight and balance wise are very much the passengers problem, even if they are unaware of the issues. Unfortunately, overweight or aircraft with out of tolerance centers of gravity are exceedingly dangerous things to fly around in. Problem is that pilots don't necessarily know about the problem until it's too late. The aircraft still flies, until you happen to hit a part of the performance envelope where weight and balance start to play a role (like on short final when slowing down or on departure when going slow), then the aircraft becomes unflyable and crashes. Everybody has a bad day in these cases, and it's happened more times than you'd care to know.
Look, you have to get a bit less thin skinned to play this political game well. All the tantrums and rioting is not helping your cause and I suggest you tone down the rhetoric a bit.. I suppose that the political reality will kick in mid-winter when the mid terms get started and your side will have to dial it back a bit to stay in contention or lose big again, but that's up to you. At least that's how it seems from over here on the right.
The democrats are searching for a reason, any reason, no matter how crazy or ill-advised that will hopefully get people to the polls to vote for them. This is but a trial balloon to test the political winds aloft.
They already know that the Anti-Trust laws exist, they don't care. They NEED a cause (other than bashing Trump or keeping Obamacare which is for their base) to recapture the middle. This is a good as any I suppose..
My dad worked for them for 35 years starting just before the transition to jets, and I can assure you there is nothing I've seen so far, they cannot mess up with stupid mismanagement and/or lack of caring. They've even managed to mess up aircraft maintenance a time or two and crash a couple of planes as a result... But that's how big organizations always are. Inept, inefficient and dangerous if not well managed.
I will say this though, for an airline, they are one of the better managed carriers for it's size, at least they where before the bankruptcy. After that, who knows? Seems of late the management is sorely lacking in any vision for customer service in their quest for keeping their narrow profit margins. But that's a problem for the whole industry, now that price is more important to the consumer than service or safety. All I can say is this little experiment will NOT end well and people will die to pay for this cost cutting eventually. Aviation history, as short as it is, makes that clear.
Yea, brown shirts and jack boots for ALL at the FCC...
Seriously. We don't have the budget for that kind of enforcement activity. Besides, it takes the FCC YEARS even DECADES to actually get around to enforcing interference. In one case (see K1MAN) it took nearly 20 years to yank a ham radio license, even then it didn't end his on air activities until the guy actually died.... They where a bit quicker with the guy who kept interfering with emergency services, but it still took decades to get him finally off the air.
It may be a "cheap shot" by the FCC, but I see their logic here. I also see manufacturers using the situation to their advantage (some of them at least) but what other choice does the FCC have?
Seriously? Before you start soldering new flash chips in, you might want to consider a couple of other things first. There will usually be a J-TAG header someplace that I'd try first in your attempts to alter the boot loader.
Raspberry Pis have a single 10/100 port on them. In what universe is that good for a router?
No universe I know... That port is USB based (USB 2.0) which is going to be pretty slow. Now don't be fooled by a single port... Coupled with a VLAN enabled switch (which are cheap) you can have multiple ports on your system, no problem.
I'll give you a hint... They LOST a lot of money in the past. They are allowed by the tax law to carry over these losses into future tax years to offset their current profits. You can do this too, if you have more deductions and capital losses than income in one year, you can deduct the remainder of your losses in future years...
LOL.... Cannot bring yourself to admit that Trump is at least better than average eh? Not many real estate developers survive in New York City you know, much less make money like Trump did. Obviously he's not a stupid business man, but has made quite a bit of money in his various ventures... But hey, don't admit anything that might paint your political opponents in a good light...
Next you are going to tell me he cheated is way to wealth.... That's how this narrative goes... 1. They inherited it, 2. Didn't earn it by working for it.. and when that fails 3. They cheated others to get it... It is this progression I call "Class Envy" which is really a vapid philosophy, only used for political gain in the USA...
How does Slashdot feel about the Federal Communications Commission being technologically inept?
They are run by a group of political appointees who may or may not (mostly not) have relevant technical experience. Who's surprised that they don't know what they are doing? Or that they are beholden to their political interests over what actually makes technical sense? I'm not.
I saw this clearly when they took up the BPL (Broad Band over Power Lines) issue, where they where going to shove internet data over the power lines on wide bandwidth RF carriers and the FCC commissioners ignored the fact that this would pretty much interfere with pretty much every licensed radio service using any frequency starting at DC up though light. Who thought THAT was a good idea? You guessed it, the FCC... Or when they entertained Light Squared's proposal to pretty much make every GPS user buy new hardware, just so they could obtain otherwise unusable spectrum space for their high speed data service....
Yea, for the most part, the FCC is a bunch of political hacks who are put into place to satisfy the big corporate donors supporting political campaigns and not for their technical skills or understanding..
And YET.... We have Trump as our president, pretty much pulled himself up by his own bootstraps to get where he is... Surely if Trump can do this kind of thing, YOU and your friends can get the unfair tax laws changed...
Slashdot Mirror
What's MS supposed to do when you stumble across an NSA sponsored "feature"? Or is this to make sure intentional vulnerabilities aren't too obvious?
They will deny it is a vulnerability and refuse to pay... After all, it's a "feature" and they already knew about it.
Darn, you beat me to it... I used priority mail so maybe I get there first??
Autism rates have been on the decline, and this decline started when vaccination rates began their decline.
Explain that, poison advocates.
Correlation does not imply causation.
The supposed "link" from vaccinations to autism is easily studied so it's actually been thoroughly studied multiple times by looking at medical records. No obvious link exists in the available data. I'd call this whole idea that there is a link a lie..
There is just about as much "proof" of the link between vaccines and autism as there is to unleaded gasoline to autism, if you follow the logic used in the first argument.
Ozone hole...
Global Cooling..
Global warming..
Climate Change...
Now this????
I'm going to go out on a limb and guess that mankind isn't going to meet it's end because of this.... Maybe a nuclear winter will do it, but not this..
I don't know if that's redundant or not... These are interesting days....
Nice try leftie... You cannot spin out of this one... Which side has a history of rioting over election results? Who was rioting in DC on the 20th of January? It wasn't the conservatives on the right.... LOL Maybe I'm wrong though... Do you have any examples of right wing riots? (Perhaps at some pervious January 20th where our candidate didn't take office?)
I'm not the one posting expletives in all caps... (See two posts up which came from you..) Who's triggered? My job is done here, anything more would be trolling you (which might be fun, but I don't have the time to play)....
Have a nice day, what ever is left of it where you live..
Queue the trolling post which I will likely just ignore.
LOL... Nice jab.... "Hope and Change" and "I'm with her" back at you...
I'm surprised you didn't bring up Cain's "999" slogan in his last failed campaign bid. THAT was more pizza than pizzazz if you ask me.
Campaign slogans are pretty much ALWAYS going to be pithy and trite. You do realize that "make America great again" slogan was used by Ronald Regain (1980), and Bill Clinton used the phrase a couple of times in his 1992 run. (Hillary used it in 2008 in her failed attempt) Which makes it a oldie but a goodie given that three campaigns won using it and only Hillary lost using it.(But she's a two time presidential loser anyway).
I'd rather have a cheaper flight.
Ah yes, the source of most traveler's frustrations with Airlines... You want to check a bag? $$ You want to sit in a more comfortable seat? $$ You want food during the flight? $$$ A carryon? $$
All this because folks want to fly CHEAP over comfort or customer service...
Meanwhile more and more people are realizing that "hey, being poor shouldn't mean I should have to go massively in debt just because I'm unlucky enough to get sick".
No, Obamacare means the poor must decide if they 1. Want to pay the tax/fine for not having insurance or 2. Buy insurance they couldn't hope to actually get any benefit from before they go bankrupt paying the deductible AND the premiums.
What good is insurance if you cannot afford to pay the premiums and food at the same time? What good is having coverage if you cannot pay the required deductible? THIS is the problem of Obamacare, because it hammers the poor with HUGE costs up front when they pay just their premiums, even if they don't get sick, then hammers the sick again with huge deductibles on top of that when they have to use their coverage.
Obamacare is failing and is fast becoming unavailable and hugely expensive.. But that was the whole plan. It was SUPPOSED to fail, AFTER Obama left office, to create a crisis to be used to sell a new and bigger program to the now entitled to healthcare masses... It's how democrats do things..
LOL.. Aircraft which are out of kilter weight and balance wise are very much the passengers problem, even if they are unaware of the issues. Unfortunately, overweight or aircraft with out of tolerance centers of gravity are exceedingly dangerous things to fly around in. Problem is that pilots don't necessarily know about the problem until it's too late. The aircraft still flies, until you happen to hit a part of the performance envelope where weight and balance start to play a role (like on short final when slowing down or on departure when going slow), then the aircraft becomes unflyable and crashes. Everybody has a bad day in these cases, and it's happened more times than you'd care to know.
Guess you got triggered there.... Sorry... Not!
Look, you have to get a bit less thin skinned to play this political game well. All the tantrums and rioting is not helping your cause and I suggest you tone down the rhetoric a bit.. I suppose that the political reality will kick in mid-winter when the mid terms get started and your side will have to dial it back a bit to stay in contention or lose big again, but that's up to you. At least that's how it seems from over here on the right.
I feel like that definition solely depends on much those big companies donate to Democrats.
EXACTLY THIS!
The democrats are searching for a reason, any reason, no matter how crazy or ill-advised that will hopefully get people to the polls to vote for them. This is but a trial balloon to test the political winds aloft.
They already know that the Anti-Trust laws exist, they don't care. They NEED a cause (other than bashing Trump or keeping Obamacare which is for their base) to recapture the middle. This is a good as any I suppose..
I figure this trial won't gain much traction..
Both are Both....
My dad worked for them for 35 years starting just before the transition to jets, and I can assure you there is nothing I've seen so far, they cannot mess up with stupid mismanagement and/or lack of caring. They've even managed to mess up aircraft maintenance a time or two and crash a couple of planes as a result... But that's how big organizations always are. Inept, inefficient and dangerous if not well managed.
I will say this though, for an airline, they are one of the better managed carriers for it's size, at least they where before the bankruptcy. After that, who knows? Seems of late the management is sorely lacking in any vision for customer service in their quest for keeping their narrow profit margins. But that's a problem for the whole industry, now that price is more important to the consumer than service or safety. All I can say is this little experiment will NOT end well and people will die to pay for this cost cutting eventually. Aviation history, as short as it is, makes that clear.
Books are heavy.
Isn't there a weight limit on checked bags? If so it doesn't matter.
Yea, brown shirts and jack boots for ALL at the FCC...
Seriously. We don't have the budget for that kind of enforcement activity. Besides, it takes the FCC YEARS even DECADES to actually get around to enforcing interference. In one case (see K1MAN) it took nearly 20 years to yank a ham radio license, even then it didn't end his on air activities until the guy actually died.... They where a bit quicker with the guy who kept interfering with emergency services, but it still took decades to get him finally off the air.
It may be a "cheap shot" by the FCC, but I see their logic here. I also see manufacturers using the situation to their advantage (some of them at least) but what other choice does the FCC have?
Seriously? Before you start soldering new flash chips in, you might want to consider a couple of other things first. There will usually be a J-TAG header someplace that I'd try first in your attempts to alter the boot loader.
Raspberry Pis have a single 10/100 port on them. In what universe is that good for a router?
No universe I know... That port is USB based (USB 2.0) which is going to be pretty slow. Now don't be fooled by a single port... Coupled with a VLAN enabled switch (which are cheap) you can have multiple ports on your system, no problem.
SO you don't know how GE is doing this?
I'll give you a hint... They LOST a lot of money in the past. They are allowed by the tax law to carry over these losses into future tax years to offset their current profits. You can do this too, if you have more deductions and capital losses than income in one year, you can deduct the remainder of your losses in future years...
They are following the law....
LOL.... Cannot bring yourself to admit that Trump is at least better than average eh? Not many real estate developers survive in New York City you know, much less make money like Trump did. Obviously he's not a stupid business man, but has made quite a bit of money in his various ventures... But hey, don't admit anything that might paint your political opponents in a good light...
Next you are going to tell me he cheated is way to wealth.... That's how this narrative goes... 1. They inherited it, 2. Didn't earn it by working for it.. and when that fails 3. They cheated others to get it... It is this progression I call "Class Envy" which is really a vapid philosophy, only used for political gain in the USA...
You mean somebody tripped over the power cord in the server room again?
How does Slashdot feel about the Federal Communications Commission being technologically inept?
They are run by a group of political appointees who may or may not (mostly not) have relevant technical experience. Who's surprised that they don't know what they are doing? Or that they are beholden to their political interests over what actually makes technical sense? I'm not.
I saw this clearly when they took up the BPL (Broad Band over Power Lines) issue, where they where going to shove internet data over the power lines on wide bandwidth RF carriers and the FCC commissioners ignored the fact that this would pretty much interfere with pretty much every licensed radio service using any frequency starting at DC up though light. Who thought THAT was a good idea? You guessed it, the FCC... Or when they entertained Light Squared's proposal to pretty much make every GPS user buy new hardware, just so they could obtain otherwise unusable spectrum space for their high speed data service....
Yea, for the most part, the FCC is a bunch of political hacks who are put into place to satisfy the big corporate donors supporting political campaigns and not for their technical skills or understanding..
Then.. Wouldn't the "report" of the "IT staff report" which was apparently verbal not in itself constitute documentation?....
Oh the irony...
And YET.... We have Trump as our president, pretty much pulled himself up by his own bootstraps to get where he is... Surely if Trump can do this kind of thing, YOU and your friends can get the unfair tax laws changed...