Slashdot Mirror


User: Trollificus

Trollificus's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
544
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 544

  1. Re:Fucky on Nintendo GameCube Clone Out In Japan · · Score: -1

    Did you get syphilis from that camel's ass too?
    *scratches burning nutsack*

  2. Re:Reverse Engineering? on The Guts Of An iPod · · Score: -1

    This is true.. Very true indeed.
    It might be best to go armed. Unless you feel like making some extra cash off the misses.

  3. Re:WOW! on Making Money In Open Source · · Score: -1

    You may only gaze upon it's magnificence, and pray your eyes do not melt from their sockets.

  4. Re:read carefully: opensource based _COMPANIES_ on Making Money In Open Source · · Score: -1
    "*me moving to Japan in a couple months... Gotta brush up!"

    Then you'll want to recheck that statement. It should be "eat lice for the les of your rife"

    Just try saying aluminum. ;p~
    Arumirum!

  5. Fucking hilarious! on Making Money In Open Source · · Score: -1
    "Making Money In Open Source"

    Fuck! I did a total spit take when I saw that headline. My keyboard and monitor are fucking soaked now!
    Since when did Slashdot start posting comedy?

  6. Re:Why no USB then? on The Guts Of An iPod · · Score: -1
    Believe me, you're not in the minority. These things are standard now. Most pre-built PC's shipped this year come with IEEE 1394 ports. And for those who choose to build their own, an expansion card isn't hard to find.
    Lord knows it's a hell of a lot faster than USB.

    Why does USB even exist? Oh yeah, Intel was too fucking stubborn and wanted to corner the market on substandard technology. I guess that explains a lot of Intel's business strategies.

  7. Re:Translated Version on The Guts Of An iPod · · Score: -1

    What did you expect, an insightful or original post?
    Sheesh, this is Slashdot after all. Your standards are way too high.

  8. Re:Anthrax at NASA? on The Guts Of An iPod · · Score: -1

    Nah, it's just that space crack they've been smoking.
    Been there, done that, got the t-shirt.

  9. Re:Posting at this hour of the day... on The Guts Of An iPod · · Score: -1

    We can't let a bunch of thieving cowards from a penal colony to get first post.
    That would be an outrage!

  10. Re:Reverse Engineering? on The Guts Of An iPod · · Score: -1

    If this doesn't tell you that Koreans should be lined up and shot, I don't know what does.

  11. Re:Look out, Taco. on DeCSS Injunction Reversed In CA Case · · Score: -1

    Quick! Remove the search feature!
    *Evil snicker*

  12. Re:PDF? on DeCSS Injunction Reversed In CA Case · · Score: -1

    Different account. But no less obvious than this one.

  13. Re:PDF? on DeCSS Injunction Reversed In CA Case · · Score: -1
    It's funny, when I mentioned that in an earlier story, I was modded down.

    Oh how I would love a chance to shoot some moderators right now.

  14. Re:Random fact: on Perl6 for Mortals · · Score: -1

    I'm totally there! The rich creamy filling is the best part!

  15. Re:Another Inovation... on Da Vinci Bridge Built · · Score: -1
    I've been reading for a while. I'll check it out more after I've slept a bit. =)
    Damn all nighters.

    Hrmm.. Looks like they wiped out the user database.
    I am now user 75.. As opposed to the 130-something I was before.
    I feel leet now.

  16. Re:Another Inovation... on Da Vinci Bridge Built · · Score: -1
    Not only that, but he was the original designer of the pocket pussy we all take for granted.

    After seeing what the average Italian housewife of that era looked like, you'll see why this thing was such a hit.

  17. Re:Nordmenn elsker bruer on Da Vinci Bridge Built · · Score: -1
    Yeah, yeah. Nice bridges. Whatever.
    They're harbouring terrorists. Let's bomb the shit out of them!

    What, are you some kind of unpatriotic fuck hole?
    You're either with Ashcroft, or you're a filthy good for nothing terrorst.

  18. Re:ANN: new scientific journal on Da Vinci Bridge Built · · Score: -1

    I guess hot grits and Natalie Portman truly have gone the way of the dodo.

  19. Re:Random fact: on Perl6 for Mortals · · Score: -1

    Can you get it from fucking him in the ass too?

  20. Re:Temptation? on Interactive Fiction Competition 2001 · · Score: -1

    That's exactly what I'm saying. =)

  21. Re:handheld on Interactive Fiction Competition 2001 · · Score: -1
    Snuggle?
    What are you, gay or something?

    Then again, judging by those shots of you and Ken together, I'd say my question was already answered.

  22. Re:The ban is lifted! on Interactive Fiction Competition 2001 · · Score: -1

    whassup il mio neeeeegah!

  23. Re:my name is omg on Interactive Fiction Competition 2001 · · Score: -1
    Babelfish ist mein Freund! Alle hageln das slashdot gestapo!

    Tun Sie nicht Drogen. Bleiben Sie in der Schule.

  24. Re:Temptation? on Interactive Fiction Competition 2001 · · Score: -1

    No, Open Source == COMMUNISM.
    But the use of Crack Cocaine is in there somewhere. You never know with those open source hippies...Always smokin' them branches n'stuff!

  25. Re:Check out Erasmatazz on Interactive Fiction Competition 2001 · · Score: 0, Interesting
    So, you're only trading one 'end level wall' for another.
    Sure, you can go off on a tangent, but in the end, you still have to deal with the same problems and plot changes in the same order as before, only now they'll pop up in different locations.

    How about a game where you don't need to save the fairy princess, but can rather run off with the prince! No, no. All kidding aside, does this man's games follow a truly random path? The kind of path where you don't need to befriend the annoying goblin you saved from the moat monster in order to progress through the castle?
    Ack, it's almost 4 am and I'm making no sense. But I think you know what I'm getting at.

    Another thing that always pisses me off about Stonekeep-esque games is that you always need the fricken' key. Why use a key when I have a perfectly good sword to chop the door down with? Now *that* would add some realism. And of course, to account for getting by easily, your weapon will be dealt damage and be less accurate. A fair trade imo.