If we wanted to get those beasts off the road, make the drivers get a chauffeur's license, commercial insurance and back a trailer on the road test. This wouldn't be a problem for those who really needed them, but it sure would thin out the posers.
My impression is the elevator sells the leftover's from last-year in with their "commodity" seed, I'm sure this would be in violation of their licence with Monsanto. One would think that Monsanto had a buy back program for unsold seed, If I were buying from them, I'd be suspicious of them shorting their customers so they could sell the same seed twice.
Yes, the guy across the road had a couple hundred acres of succotash growing this year, since everybody is growing hybrids, 2nd gen corn is pretty puny and unproductive, so it just looks funny and very little corn gets into the beans both of which is mostly livestock feed.
That was a single strain of Maize, not soybeans, of course I'm not sure why you want Round-up Ready corn, it well above the weed level. Beans on the other hand are about the same height as most weeds, so there it makes some sense.
That probably depend on the mutual assistance treaties between the US and Australia, I suspect given the close cooeration between our countries during WWII, Vietnam and Afghanistan it probably is illegal.
Say an action is not illegal because a prosecutor decided not to file charges is nonsensical; it just means the benefits of prosecution doesn't exceed the costs. Anyways Gillard only has to find one thing illegal in the matter to blow Asange's suit out of the water, even the most trivial will do. One thing that will be interesting is this is a civil suit, Asange is probably going to be compelled to return home as a witness to testify and I'm not sure that's what he will want to do.
Just to amplify, you have to remember that Hillary is the woman that made the President of the United States sleep on the couch, and the hated Obamacare was basically her baby.
Well looking at Wicked Laser's web site, their most powerful handheld laser ( 1,250mW), Spyder Arctic has a beam shape of 2 X 5 mm, and a divergence of 1.5mRad, so at 1Km, the beam would be about 3X7.5m, add in a little more or particular splatter would be enough dispertion to still make PV detection highly possible. The PV cell can easily be embeded into the frame of the glasses surrounding the lens, or even embed then into the shutter itself with difficulty. For that matter, the first polarizing filter and the lcd shutter could be mounted on the planes windows and the second polarizing filter can be on the lenses of the flight crews glasses.
At least the Canadians have better beer than most of our would be conquerors, but alas I fear the Canadians are too smart to fall into that trap; and would just seal off their boarders.
I'm meant goes black figuratively, the amount of darknening is adjustable, but the amount of visual obscuring wouldn't be any worst then being laser dazzled.
I have a welding helmet with a LCD shutter, as soon as the the photo-voltaic cell detects a bright light, the lcd goes black; cost less that $50.00 at Harbor Freight; lots of people like pilots spend more than that on sunglasses. Sure you couldn't go completely off the shelf with it, the helmet is about shade 3 even when off, which is pretty dark at night, and I'm not sure what would happen trying to look at an LCD display in a cockpit while wearing LCD's on your eyes, but it's very plausible.
They can't ban tobacco, it's one of the four sacred herbs to the Native American's religion and is essential to certain ceremonies. Banning tobacco use is likely to be unconstitutional for governments and discriminatory for businesses.
Dude when you type bruce into google, Bruce Parens comes up on the second page (it used to be the third on the first page) so obviously the game should have been Rogue; number 6 of the The Ten Greatest PC Games Ever, now get off of my lawn!
So, l will reiterate. Nobody knows what trolling is anymore! They don't. Being abusive is trolling. Saying something controversial isn't trolling.
Actually my definition of trolling is "Saying something controversial for the simple purpose of stirring up controversy" , some trolling is actually good generates pageviews and drives up revenues from ads and puts a little passion into the discusion; too much get peoples pissed and they leave the site.
Well yeah, it like after "The March of Dimes" beat their disease, Polio; then they realized,"Shit now we'll have to get a real job", but instead they re-branded themselve into being against Birth Defects, a fight without end and life-time employment for the staffers.
(R) or (D) is not a factor here. It's just that what is, is.
I'm not sure why it's not, the Democrats were screaming bloody murder over what the CIA was doing under Nixon and defanged the CIA to stop all of the assinations and sponsered coup d'états all over the world; later it was the rightwing death-squads roaming central america to stop the comunist in Nicaragua under Regan; but now it's all OK because it's under Obama's watch.
He's such a sissy look dude, I'm sure it wouldn't be the first time he got a swirlie; I'm still not understanding why waterboarding is supposed to be that bad.
After we send out the counter-notification, the claimant must then notify us within 10 business days that he or she has filed an action seeking a court order to restrain you from engaging in infringing activity relating to the material on YouTube. If we receive such notification we will be unable to restore the material. If we do not receive such notification, we may reinstate the material. Copyright counter-notifications
The way I'm reading this is if he files suit in the US for copyright infringement; gets a restraining order youtube takes the video down for good. He got their addresses from the counter-claim, send a summons via certified mail, go to court and get a default judgement easy-peasy.
The DMCA has worked the way it was intended; he filed the claim with Youtube, Youtube took down the video and notified the poster of the take-down complain, then the poster counter-claimed. After the counter-claim it's up to the courts
Slashdot Mirror
What's wrong with using the EPA estimates? Sure they suck, but they suck uniformly!
If we wanted to get those beasts off the road, make the drivers get a chauffeur's license, commercial insurance and back a trailer on the road test. This wouldn't be a problem for those who really needed them, but it sure would thin out the posers.
Just find some kid that busted up his 'stang trying to drift, and drop that 5.0 into the Miata, then she'll run.
My impression is the elevator sells the leftover's from last-year in with their "commodity" seed, I'm sure this would be in violation of their licence with Monsanto. One would think that Monsanto had a buy back program for unsold seed, If I were buying from them, I'd be suspicious of them shorting their customers so they could sell the same seed twice.
Yes, the guy across the road had a couple hundred acres of succotash growing this year, since everybody is growing hybrids, 2nd gen corn is pretty puny and unproductive, so it just looks funny and very little corn gets into the beans both of which is mostly livestock feed.
Obama's promoting class warfare against the people with the most working capital hasn't exactly worked to lift the country out of recession.
That was a single strain of Maize, not soybeans, of course I'm not sure why you want Round-up Ready corn, it well above the weed level. Beans on the other hand are about the same height as most weeds, so there it makes some sense.
That probably depend on the mutual assistance treaties between the US and Australia, I suspect given the close cooeration between our countries during WWII, Vietnam and Afghanistan it probably is illegal.
Say an action is not illegal because a prosecutor decided not to file charges is nonsensical; it just means the benefits of prosecution doesn't exceed the costs. Anyways Gillard only has to find one thing illegal in the matter to blow Asange's suit out of the water, even the most trivial will do. One thing that will be interesting is this is a civil suit, Asange is probably going to be compelled to return home as a witness to testify and I'm not sure that's what he will want to do.
I'm sure the Australian government is salivating at the thought of the discovery process.
Just to amplify, you have to remember that Hillary is the woman that made the President of the United States sleep on the couch, and the hated Obamacare was basically her baby.
Well looking at Wicked Laser's web site, their most powerful handheld laser ( 1,250mW), Spyder Arctic has a beam shape of 2 X 5 mm, and a divergence of 1.5mRad, so at 1Km, the beam would be about 3X7.5m, add in a little more or particular splatter would be enough dispertion to still make PV detection highly possible. The PV cell can easily be embeded into the frame of the glasses surrounding the lens, or even embed then into the shutter itself with difficulty. For that matter, the first polarizing filter and the lcd shutter could be mounted on the planes windows and the second polarizing filter can be on the lenses of the flight crews glasses.
At least the Canadians have better beer than most of our would be conquerors, but alas I fear the Canadians are too smart to fall into that trap; and would just seal off their boarders.
I'm meant goes black figuratively, the amount of darknening is adjustable, but the amount of visual obscuring wouldn't be any worst then being laser dazzled.
I have a welding helmet with a LCD shutter, as soon as the the photo-voltaic cell detects a bright light, the lcd goes black; cost less that $50.00 at Harbor Freight; lots of people like pilots spend more than that on sunglasses. Sure you couldn't go completely off the shelf with it, the helmet is about shade 3 even when off, which is pretty dark at night, and I'm not sure what would happen trying to look at an LCD display in a cockpit while wearing LCD's on your eyes, but it's very plausible.
They can't ban tobacco, it's one of the four sacred herbs to the Native American's religion and is essential to certain ceremonies. Banning tobacco use is likely to be unconstitutional for governments and discriminatory for businesses.
Quitting is easy, I've done it 7 times; staying quit, now that's the hard part. I've been nicotine free for 3 years now.
Dude when you type bruce into google, Bruce Parens comes up on the second page (it used to be the third on the first page) so obviously the game should have been Rogue; number 6 of the The Ten Greatest PC Games Ever, now get off of my lawn!
So, l will reiterate. Nobody knows what trolling is anymore! They don't. Being abusive is trolling. Saying something controversial isn't trolling.
Actually my definition of trolling is "Saying something controversial for the simple purpose of stirring up controversy" , some trolling is actually good generates pageviews and drives up revenues from ads and puts a little passion into the discusion; too much get peoples pissed and they leave the site.
What we'd call trolling isn't even attempted by these pathetic posers, they don't have the intellectual horsepower to do it.
Well yeah, it like after "The March of Dimes" beat their disease, Polio; then they realized ,"Shit now we'll have to get a real job", but instead they re-branded themselve into being against Birth Defects, a fight without end and life-time employment for the staffers.
(R) or (D) is not a factor here. It's just that what is, is.
I'm not sure why it's not, the Democrats were screaming bloody murder over what the CIA was doing under Nixon and defanged the CIA to stop all of the assinations and sponsered coup d'états all over the world; later it was the rightwing death-squads roaming central america to stop the comunist in Nicaragua under Regan; but now it's all OK because it's under Obama's watch.
He's such a sissy look dude, I'm sure it wouldn't be the first time he got a swirlie; I'm still not understanding why waterboarding is supposed to be that bad.
The way I'm reading this is if he files suit in the US for copyright infringement; gets a restraining order youtube takes the video down for good. He got their addresses from the counter-claim, send a summons via certified mail, go to court and get a default judgement easy-peasy.
The DMCA has worked the way it was intended; he filed the claim with Youtube, Youtube took down the video and notified the poster of the take-down complain, then the poster counter-claimed. After the counter-claim it's up to the courts