Slashdot Mirror


Bruce Perens: The Day I Blundered Into the Nuclear Facility

Bruce Perens writes "I found myself alone in a room, in front of a deep square or rectangular pool of impressively clear, still water. There was a pile of material at the bottom of the pool, and a blue glow of Cherenkov radiation in the water around it. To this day, I can't explain how an unsupervised kid could ever have gotten in there."

181 comments

  1. So... I read the article. by Nationless · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is that it?

    1. Re:So... I read the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      " ... and now I have super powers."

    2. Re:So... I read the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      TL;DR

    3. Re:So... I read the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is that it?

      "The real question is..."What kind of spin doctor excuse covers this lapse of security?"
      Answer: The same kind of bullshit that comes out of the nuclear industry when caught with their pants down. Nuclear is Unclear.

      Why would it need to be more secured than it was? Holy crap, loosen the straps on your tinfoil hat a little.

      It's like a kid finding a box of used needles... zomg how did that possibly happen, what about teh consequences?!!1

      A car barreling down the road at you with nothing but bare pavement separating your path from his is more dangerous.

    4. Re:So... I read the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Is that it?

      Yeah, really, inquiring minds want to know! Did he get bitten by a radioactive penguin?

    5. Re:So... I read the article. by mcneely.mike · · Score: 1

      Real short; Don't bother

      --
      soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
    6. Re:So... I read the article. by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      I guess cancer is kind of like a super power.

    7. Re:So... I read the article. by cvtan · · Score: 3, Funny

      I thought it was part of the dialog from Zork.
      "You have entered a dark passage. If it weren't for the glow from Cherenkov radiation, you might be eaten by a grue."

      --
      Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
    8. Re:So... I read the article. by F34nor · · Score: 3, Funny

      Have you played text Pac-Man? "You are in a hallway, there are floating balls at waist height to the east and west, in the distance your hear what you think are ghosts."

    9. Re:So... I read the article. by quenda · · Score: 5, Funny

      I guess cancer is kind of like a super power.

      or so Lance Armstrong would like us to believe.

    10. Re:So... I read the article. by rioki · · Score: 5, Informative

      This was a scientific test reactor... The security is at the gate and they passed that. The actual room is totally safe. The "old" neutron test reactor of the TH-Munich could be visited. If you fell into the water you would need treatment; for desalination. That is they would rub you down with lotion, because the distilled water would remove the salts in your outer skin. Now the "new" one on the other hand can't be seen, but not because of radiation, but because it is a high pressure reactor. OMG I saw a nuclear reactor...

    11. Re:So... I read the article. by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Funny

      Is that it?

      No, in some countries the second part is censored. You might not have discovered how he later discovered how he had amazing powers over women and his incredible steamy sex sessions. I will never forget those pictures.

    12. Re:So... I read the article. by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2

      Is that it?

      Indeed. Such rooms are part of the standard guided tours at nuclear facilities. And you do see Cerenkov radiation with your own eyes. Of course the water is enough to shield you.

      Now if he had jumped into the "pool" and took a swim, that would have been a story!

    13. Re:So... I read the article. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Does Pac-Man have a waist?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    14. Re:So... I read the article. by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Funny

      That is they would rub you down with lotion

      Doesn't sound like the sort of place they should let children into.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    15. Re:So... I read the article. by rmstar · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does Pac-Man have a waist?

      In the same way most americans have one (sorry, couldn't resist).

    16. Re:So... I read the article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now that has been established that nobody on Slashdot reads the article anyway, we can gradually work towards the next step in lazyness, by submitting ever shorter articles, until finally the submissions will only contain deadlinks.

      Unfortunately, by clicking on the link and disclosing this you have further delayed this natural evolution....

    17. Re:So... I read the article. by damien_kane · · Score: 4, Funny

      That is they would rub you down with lotion

      Doesn't sound like the sort of place they should let children into.

      It's better than giving them the hose, again

    18. Re:So... I read the article. by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

      Yeah. Sounds like it was probably a TRIGA or similar reactor. These are designed such that drowning is actually a bigger hazard than radiation.

      Seriously - these reactors usually had life preservers to prevent drowning in the event that someone fell into the pool. If you did fall in, unless you were an idiot and intentionally swam down to the reactor, you were more likely to die due to suffocation/drowning than to have any health effects from radiation.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    19. Re:So... I read the article. by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Now I want to play the Pac-Man text adventure. I bet it could be made fun.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    20. Re:So... I read the article. by rullywowr · · Score: 0

      or so Lance Armstrong would like us to believe.

      No that's just the steroids, and performance enhancing drugs.

    21. Re:So... I read the article. by RoboRay · · Score: 1

      TS;RI;WITR

    22. Re:So... I read the article. by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Dude when you type bruce into google, Bruce Parens comes up on the second page (it used to be the third on the first page) so obviously the game should have been Rogue; number 6 of the The Ten Greatest PC Games Ever, now get off of my lawn!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    23. Re:So... I read the article. by metalgamer84 · · Score: 1
    24. Re:So... I read the article. by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Wow.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  2. When you woke up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet you were all sweating and the blanket was on the floor. But hey, on the upside you can try teaching yourself lucid dreaming, just like those women in the Wheel of Time and the like.

    1. Re:When you woke up... by F34nor · · Score: 1

      Lucid dreaming according to Tibetan Buddhists is the fastest path to enlightenment. Practice accrued during dreams is has real world measurable effects on behavior. If you want to learn kickstarter just had a lucid dreaming mask similar to the NovaDreamer but for much less money.

    2. Re:When you woke up... by Randle_Revar · · Score: 1

      That isn't lucid dreaming, it is connecting to another reality. Hell, you can physically enter it, travel somewhere, and come out in the real world location you moved to. That doesn't really work with lucid dreaming.

  3. BMRR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    BNL had three research reactors.

    Not sure whether BMRR or HFBR were water-moderated, but I'd bet it was the Brookhaven Medical Research Reactor. A bunch of beautiful glowing stuff at the bottom of a deep pool of water is a common configuration for a research reactor used for the production of medical isotopes.

    1. Re:BMRR? by iggymanz · · Score: 2

      storage of spent fuel is also done in pools with borated water of course. The answer to Bruce's question is that his parent wasn't doing his job. The danger to Bruce even had he swam & dived ten foot deep in the pool was zero (divers even go into flooded cavity with reactor head open during refueling). He should be thankful he got to see the pretty blue glow with complete safety.

      Still wimpy compared to Technocrat, Bruce, you don't allow comments there. You want a site with traffic again you'll have to open the floodgates of hell. --Ralph

    2. Re:BMRR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nah, sounds like the old nuclear waste management facility, bldg 830? Big pool of water, and manipulators for transferring stuff, decommissioned but still there, although a bit more secure now. Failed to google up any pics. Doesn't look like any of the three reactors had water pools.?

    3. Re:BMRR? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      Based on the description, it sounds like that reactor had pressurized coolant.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  4. The 60s and 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think Bruce might be looking at the past through the lens of today. In the 60s, nuclear plants and labs had a couple of security guards to protect from theft and whatnot. They didn't carry guns. Unless there were secret things going on, these places weren't heavily guarded. Nuclear power wasn't considered a security issue. Nor were airports, train stations, etc.

    1. Re:The 60s and 70s by ceoyoyo · · Score: 5, Informative

      Lots of universities had research reactors (a few still do). They had no more security than some bored grad students working in the outer lab. If it was an open house even they would have been too busy to look after every wandering kid.

    2. Re:The 60s and 70s by hawguy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Lots of universities had research reactors (a few still do). They had no more security than some bored grad students working in the outer lab. If it was an open house even they would have been too busy to look after every wandering kid.

      When I was in high school we did a tour of university's research reactor, and like you said, the only people there were a few grad students and an operator (or maybe he was a professor?) - no armed guards, no fancy security systems, we just had to sign in with the student at the front desk. We weren't allowed in the room that had the reactor pool,but we could see it (and the blue Cherenkov Radiation glow) through a large thick glassed window. They said that the water was sufficient to contain the radiation but they didn't want many people in the reactor room since any contaminants in the water could become radioactive.

      We were standing in the room that had the door to the reactor room, so I don't think it would have been hard for a kid to accidentally gain access to the reactor room if someone inadvertently left the door open or didn't pull it closed after they left the room.

      But at the time, the coolest thing in the building was the remote manipulator arms they used for working with radioactive materials. After playing with those arms, I decided I was going to have a career in nuclear science. Though somehow I ended up in IT instead.

    3. Re:The 60s and 70s by Intrepid+imaginaut · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Back in 2006 I walked directly through Heathrow without ever being checked. Jetlagged all to hell I took a side door, dressed in a business suit and looking authoritative, zombied my way through a maze of corridors and past a desk of men staring intently at a monitor, before finding my way outside the airport.

      On a subsequent trip, confused about the flight, I asked a man with a submachine gun the route to my gate, went there immediately, got there before the security team, and sat down watching every other passenger being frisked and scanned. The security guard was even there, someone pointed me out and obviously asked him a question, he shook his head no.

      The more things change, eh?

    4. Re:The 60s and 70s by bmo · · Score: 2

      In the late 70s I was doing yard work for an oceanographer and biologist down the road from me. We hopped in the truck one day because he had to go to the Graduate School of Oceanography in Saunderstown RI, which was literally a mile away, to get some stuff he was working on.

      The URI GSO has a research reactor. We just walked in, he did his stuff, and we left. No guards, nothing. Not even a receptionist especially on a Saturday. ID? On a 13 year old kid? You kidding?

      --
      BMO

    5. Re:The 60s and 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A lot of those research reactors have a lot less material in them than people picture when told it is a nuclear reactor. Some of them require considerable disassembly to remove material. Others would require major operations to actually get the material any distance away due to the radiation. In one case when asked "What if someone just swam down there and grabbed some of the material?" the response was "They would be dead before getting out the door with it." So if anything, the amount of security needed is based on their concern someone will damage equipment or do something stupid, not so much getting away with the radioactive material.

    6. Re:The 60s and 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've got you beat: They let us walk THROUGH the reactor in either the 6th or 7th grade as part of one of those summer-school programs. It was on the local military base (not long before the glorious (Clinton? Bush?) era base closures happened. A town with 5+ bases, two of them AFBs, all closed and sold off to commercial interests...).

      Still, one of the most awesome memories of my early life.

    7. Re:The 60s and 70s by Anachragnome · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I used to live in Mountain View, CA. when I was a teen. A friend and I used to ride our bicycles out on the levies that abounded along the southern San Francisco Bay--commonly know as the "Baylands"--often following the wooden catwalks that stretched for miles over the water surfaces that the levies partitioned off. The top of these levies were used as security roads around the eastern side of Moffet Field and Nasa's Ames Research Center.

      We soon realized that as long as we bypassed a security check-point near the north end of the base, using the catwalks, that once we were beyond the security roads on the levee, nobody gave us a second glance. I guess they assumed we were military kids or something, because we were able to ride our bicycles right past the tarmac by going through an open gate in the security fence--only once did anyone say anything to us and that was to tell us that we were supposed to walk our bikes when we were inside the hangars. We spent many hours wandering around those hangars that summer. Ames had the neatest stuff--helicopters with wings, jets with VTO rotors, a helicopter with no windshield (mind you, this was the early 80's--I'd never heard of a "drone" before), models of every sort lined up for wind-tunnel testing, etc. We once went out there in the middle of a hot, summer night and watched a large jet take off (judging by the lights and noise) and barely caught sight of a totally silent aircraft follow it off the ground less then 3 seconds behind the first, this second aircraft only being visible by virtue of creating a silhouette against the brightly lit Bay-Area sky--otherwise it was totally silent and had zero lighting. Not sure why they'd be doing so, but it looked like they were towing another aircraft under cover of darkness. Pretty exciting, especially for a kid.

      I somehow don't think that one could stroll into that place as easily these days. Lucky we didn't get shot.

    8. Re:The 60s and 70s by AK+Marc · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I went to the Cyclotron (the name for the Texas A&M nuclear reactor), there was no security, other than a badge-swipe door that runs off student ID. I was escorted, so no idea if mine would have worked. Once in, there was no security at all I could see. There were few other people, but we were escorted by an "elder" of the facility, so they likely knew him by sight.

    9. Re:The 60s and 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but they didn't want many people in the reactor room since any contaminants in the water could become radioactive.

      Please don't pee in our pool. Really. Remember how Godzilla got started? Right. We're serious.

    10. Re:The 60s and 70s by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      A cyclotron is a circular particle accelerator, not a nuclear reactor.

    11. Re:The 60s and 70s by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Yes, yes it is. However, nothing I said was untrue, inaccurate, or incorrect. That they called their nuclear reactor "particle accelerator" doesn't change what it was. Or are you arguing that if I call a nuclear reactor a fish, it is no longer a nuclear reactor?

    12. Re:The 60s and 70s by cbelt3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bingo. I can recall being in the research reactor at U Mo in Columbia in the early 1970's. People forget how accessible facilities were before 9/11 . Apparently we're so used to the Police State that we've created that it's pretty much taken for granted.

      Which is a great pity. The less accessible cool research is for our children, the less interested our children will be in becoming cool researchers. Big Bang Theory and Mohawk Guy nonwithstanding.

    13. Re:The 60s and 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      (Clinton? Bush?) era base closures

      Yeltzin-era. After the USSR fell, we were gonna close some bases; it didn't matter if it was Bush, Clinton, Bob Dole, or Ross Perot in the big chair.

    14. Re:The 60s and 70s by hackertourist · · Score: 1

      I suppose you could define a cyclotron as a nuclear reactor, but thatâ(TM)s rather unusual.

    15. Re:The 60s and 70s by jbeaupre · · Score: 0

      Dude, you can call it anything you want. But if you saw the "Cyclotron" it wasn't a nuclear reactor. Texas A&M's "Cyclotron" is a cyclotron (confusing, eh?). A completely different technology.

      They have two reactors. But they do this weird thing and call them "reactors."

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    16. Re:The 60s and 70s by gtvr · · Score: 1

      In high school (80s) I got a tour of the U MD reactor. We walked up to the top & looked down into the reactor. It was cool, but again no big deal was made by another other than the fact that you could maybe get good grades and get to go to a school with a NUCLEAR REACTOR!!!

    17. Re:The 60s and 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Texas A&M has a cyclotron on campus across from the engineering building and a 1 MW TRIGA research reactor at the nuclear science center a couple of miles from campus. They are not the same thing and the reactor was not called "Cyclotron".

    18. Re:The 60s and 70s by Bootsy+Collins · · Score: 2

      No, he's trying to tell you that cyclotrons and nuclear reactors are completely different things. What you said was inaccurate.

    19. Re:The 60s and 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recently visited a research reactor and the people there said the security is mostly dissuasive. As in, the guards will let you pass if you say you're visiting one of the labs inside.

    20. Re:The 60s and 70s by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      You got shafted... When I toured the Ward Lab at Cornell (during one of the last 2-3 years of its operation before it got shut down), we did get to stand at the top of the pool and look down.

      And you're right - even in 1999, there was, at most, a badge-swipe lock on the door.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    21. Re:The 60s and 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all had cooler objectives than IT...

    22. Re:The 60s and 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm jealous...

    23. Re:The 60s and 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having been to Texas A&M's cyclotron and UT Austin's research reactor (and their Tokamak), I know the difference and so should you (unless you truly are an Aggie and were misinformed on purpose). A nuclear reactor is a fission device that generates heat and radiation via bombardment of atomic nuclei with neutrons, which splits the atoms of the nuclear fuel into different elements. A cyclotron is a completely different machine that uses a magnetic field to accelerate charged particles to very high speeds and then these particles collide with a target splitting a single particle into sub-atomic particles. Both machines use "fission," but by completely different mechanisms for completely different purposes. No one would ever call a nuclear power reactor an "atom smasher," which is a more common term for a Cyclotron.

      A Tokamak is a nuclear fusion device that contains hydrogen atoms inside a plasma field and uses intense pressure to fuse the hydrogen atoms into helium atoms, generating tremendous energy. The problem is that the energy needed to invoke the fusion reaction is often greater than the amount of energy generated by the reaction.

    24. Re:The 60s and 70s by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that "The Cyclotron Institute" is the "owner" of the building that houses the cyclotron and the AGN-201M nuclear reactor, and The Cyclotron Institute falls under the nuclear engineering department (As does the TRIGA Mark I, which I have also visited, but as a more guarded public tour).

      So many people think I'm wrong, but nobody has corrected me. My information was that the AGN-201M nuclear reactor is in the cyclotron building. If that is not true, please name the building that houses the AGN-201M nuclear reactor. Having spent 6 years there in engineering, it's likely I was in the building with it at some point.

    25. Re:The 60s and 70s by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I never said they were the same thing. I'm saying the nuclear reactor is in the building called "The Cyclotron Building" and that building contains a nuclear reactor. I never said the cyclotron was a nuclear reactor.

    26. Re:The 60s and 70s by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Then what building is the Texas A&M AGN-201M nuclear rector in? Unless you can name the building and it is not the building most commonly called "The Cyclotron Building" by students (including students in nuclear engineering), then I'll assume you were in the building with the nuclear reactor when you were in the cyclotron building.

    27. Re:The 60s and 70s by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      I don't disagree. Texas A&M has two reactors. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Texas_A%26M_Nuclear_Science_Center Now, I can't find a building name for the AGN-201M nuclear reactor, but thats the one I think I was in the building with. The other is a stand-alone facility I also went to, but as a public tour, and has much more better security. Both the cyclotron and the older, smaller reactor are (from my understanding) in the same building, both under the nuclear engineering department, and both built in the 1950s, back before nuclear security and protection was critical.

      That both were nuclear engineering devices in the same building and the building was named for one and only one of them doesn't seem like a critical issue that should get so many slashdotters panties in a wad.

    28. Re:The 60s and 70s by jbeaupre · · Score: 0

      According to wikipedia, the reactor is several miles from campus. The Cyclotron Institute also doesn't list any reactor as part of their facilities.

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    29. Re:The 60s and 70s by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      According to Wikipedia, the newer, larger reactor is in a facility several miles from campus (an incorrect simplification, as you would not leave Texas A&M owned land to walk there, aside from crossing public streets, though the main body of the campus is a few miles away).

      Further, I specified the older, smaller and "on campus" AGN-201M nuclear reactor. Again, someone felt the need to correct me, without any actual correction. Where is the AGN-201M nuclear reactor that Wikipedia mentions is at Texas A&M?

      I agree the Triga reactor is off by the airport. I've been there. It's near the corner of Nuclear Science Road and George Bush Drive. But in Google maps, I note that the building I recall as housing a nuclear reactor is labeled "Land Air and Space robotics lab", probably because Google Maps isn't supposed to label nuclear reactors or something. Or, maybe in the 20 years since I was there, my memory of both events faded. But at least the building is as I remembered it, as I passed it a number of times. Though looking again, I see that I may have been to the Mitchel Physics building to see the nuclear reactor, though the comments on the security are the same.

      But, given the responses so far, someone will claim that it can't be the Mitchel Physics building because Mitchel didn't invent the nuclear reactor. Though possibly it was in the unnamed building adjacent to both.

    30. Re:The 60s and 70s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back in the 70s I did things, and didn't get into any trouble. Other times, I got into trouble for things I didn't do. It all depends on the asshole looking for trouble. There's more of them, now.

  5. This is it! by binarylarry · · Score: 3, Funny

    This explains Bruce's Open Source super powers.

    It's like peter parker but instead of a spider, its a pool of radioactive cherenkov radiation.

    I knew it!

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    1. Re:This is it! by bugs2squash · · Score: 1

      I don't think radiation is radioactive

      --
      Nullius in verba
    2. Re:This is it! by binarylarry · · Score: 1, Funny

      Im sorry I'm not up on all the latest hiphop slang you kids use these days.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    3. Re:This is it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Some radiation is in fact radioactive. In particular neutron radiation can undergo beta decay.
      Cerenkov radiation, however is stable.

    4. Re:This is it! by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Doh!

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    5. Re:This is it! by QuantumPion · · Score: 2

      While free neutrons are unstable, unless they are flying through empty space you would not notice. The mean lifetime of a neutron bouncing around matter before being absorbed is on the order of microseconds, while the half-life is 10 minutes.

    6. Re:This is it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think radiation is radioactive

      cherenkov is.

  6. Adventure? by Holistic+Missile · · Score: 2

    The way it starts out, it reminded me of the old Scott Adams adventure games from the Atari 800 days...

    --
    When you're dead, you don't know you're dead. It only affects the people around you. Same thing when you're stupid.
    1. Re:Adventure? by synaptik · · Score: 1

      Or even Douglas Adams, for that matter...

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
    2. Re:Adventure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, I'd kind of like to play a Scott Adams adventure game. "The Last Cubicle" or something like that.

    3. Re:Adventure? by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      oh wow, a low,low UID of 125, and he doesn't seem to know Scott Adams was writing adventure game s way before Douglas Adams wrote his game.


      goddamnit /., way to fail at HTML, just jamming random spaces into things.

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    4. Re:Adventure? by synaptik · · Score: 1

      You are correct, I didn't know that name in the context of text adventure games. I thought the GP was having a brain-fart, mentally conflating the name Scott Adams (of Dilbert fame) with Douglas Adams (who had at least 2 adventure games in the 80's that I can recall, namely: Bureaucracy, and HHGttG) In my defense, I didn't play many games. My parents bought me me a TRS-80 Color Computer, but weren't inclined to spend any money on games for it. My exposure to the Douglas Adams games was from a friend who had a Commodore 64.

      --
      HSJ$$*&#^!#+++ATH0
      NO CARRIER
  7. Umm... by SGDarkKnight · · Score: 2

    Thats the whole story? I was sort of expecting more. Well, to the final question of that rather short article. It was most likely the area where they kept their spent fuel bundles. I know in some nuclear power plants, the spent fuel bundles have to be kept in a pool of water for a number of years until their half life is met, and they can be transfered to a dry storage facility. Normally the "pool" is not guarded or locked due to personel constantly going in and out, but there is radiation checks that are done upon exiting the area, also you wear a device for monitoring your radiation dose.

    As for the blue glow, you can read all about it on wiki

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cherenkov_radiation

    --

    ...A no smoking section in a restaurant is like having a no peeing section in a swimming pool...
    1. Re:Umm... by Radworker · · Score: 2

      I can assume that you have not been in a commercial plant. The spent fuel pool is a locked room inside the vital area and is key card access controlled. The fuel is not being kept there because it is too radioactive. It is being stored there until decay heat becomes manageable. The area is typically monitored by area radiation monitors (ARM) and you will typically have a self reading dosimeter (MG,SAIC, or similar ) as well as a TLD (thermo-luminescent dosimeter) for record purposes. You may or may not use a frisker when you leave the immediate area depending on what work is being performed at the time. You will do a full body frisk when you leave the RCA (radiation controlled area). These terms and procedures are US ones but the rest of the world has basically the same setup that I describe assuming that we are talking about a PWR type reactor.

    2. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I actually work in one, and the irradiated fuel bay (IFB) is where we keep our spent fuel bundles, and it is not locked or have restricted access (aside from signs stating "authorized personel only"). We wear TLD's at all times inside the plant, and when we have to enter a radioactive work area, we also wear DCD's (Dose Control Devices). When you leave the IFB, there is a whole body monitor that you must use.

    3. Re:Umm... by Radworker · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected then. By the term IFB, can I assume Canadian? Really? You guys just let anyone in with the spent fuel? Do you take pizza delivery in containment then? ;-)

    4. Re:Umm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thats correct, and by no means does anyone just walk in there, unless they got work to do, but really, its not "locked up", sure there are a couple of doors and a lot of signs warning of the hazards and such, but that's about it. Also, I think in this day and age, there is far less chance of someone being able to come in on a tour and wander off, we have to keep a close eye on anyone that is part of a tour.

      As for the pizza delivery, only on night shift :-)

  8. A: Blundering into a nuclear facility by slew · · Score: 4, Funny
    1. Re:A: Blundering into a nuclear facility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This.

      Whoever submitted this is either Bruce himself, or some blog reading whore. Nothing more than a "me too" attention whoring. The editors should be ashamed of themselves.

    2. Re:A: Blundering into a nuclear facility by fustakrakich · · Score: 4, Funny

      Q: What do Bruce Perens and an 82-year old nun have in common?

      Both are creatures of habit?

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    3. Re:A: Blundering into a nuclear facility by binarylarry · · Score: 3, Funny

      Both are virgins, of course.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    4. Re:A: Blundering into a nuclear facility by plover · · Score: 4, Funny

      Q: What do Bruce Perens and an 82-year old nun have in common?

      Both are creatures of habit?

      You can kiss a nun once or twice, but don't get into the habit.

      --
      John
    5. Re:A: Blundering into a nuclear facility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAH!!!

    6. Re:A: Blundering into a nuclear facility by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Whoever submitted this

      Bruce Perens writes

      But hey, be pissed if you like, I thought it was an interesting story and I'm glad he posted it. I think you're taking Slashdot a bit too seriously.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  9. Glowing Cousin by newsman220 · · Score: 2

    I have family who lived in and around Oak Ridge in the 50's. Some of them got booted to make way for the plant. Legend has it one cousin was a technician at the plant, walking around with his clipboard up when he went through the wrong door. He stopped walking, looked down, and realized he was standing at the edge of the pool with the nuclear pile in it. He described the same blue glow. Dropped the clipboard, quit his job and moved to the Bahamas to track satellites for NASA.

    1. Re:Glowing Cousin by muon-catalyzed · · Score: 2

      It's called radiation theraphy. The reactor pool is best for treating your rheuma, take a 5 minute dip, swim around a bit, just keep your 6 feet safe distance from the Cherenkov glow and the fuel rods, it is pretty refreshing!

  10. research reactor by chipperdog · · Score: 1

    Likely a tirga research reactor or something similar

    1. Re:research reactor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, similar. Like maybe a TRIGA.

  11. Pretty cool if true. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm jelly.

  12. I actually read the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read the article because the summary didn't tell me ANYTHING. Too bad there was nothing in the article either...

    I hate it when people blow off every post as, "this isn't news!" But this really isn't news... Its.. a paragraph.

  13. Sounds made up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    it does.

    nice web site, it just screams computer expert.

  14. This sounds very improbable by GoodNewsJimDotCom · · Score: 4, Funny

    The only way this could happen is if the guy in sector 7g was grossly incompetent.

  15. Brookhaven National Lab by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Back when 10.0.0.0/8 was ARPANET and not private address space, BNL had some hosts that were wide open to tourists. Security wasn't high on their list of priorities. I guess that same attitude extended to their nuclear facilities.

    1. Re:Brookhaven National Lab by LordByronStyrofoam · · Score: 1

      10.x.x.x was DEC's class A address block in the days before the great renaming.

      --
      Slashdot's name? When my compiler sees /. it generates a warning about a badly formed comment.
  16. Area 51 by stanlyb · · Score: 1

    Duh, it is obvious, he is an alien.

  17. Don't make him angry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why does Hulk never burst the seams on his pants, anyway?

    1. Re:Don't make him angry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God forbid we see his winky! But did you see the partial skeleton backbone as he ripped that person apart! That was sooo cool!

    2. Re:Don't make him angry! by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      Tiny penis.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
    3. Re:Don't make him angry! by retchdog · · Score: 1

      they're made of a metamaterial designed by dr. manhattan.

      kind of ironic, really.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    4. Re:Don't make him angry! by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Mr. Fantastic, actually. Unstable Molecules.

  18. Spent Fuel Pool by msheekhah · · Score: 1

    Um, a kid shouldn't be able to walk in and see a spent fuel pool. Not cool.

    --
    Mark Anthony Collins
    1. Re:Spent Fuel Pool by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      why not? spent fuel pool has 30 feet of water over the tops of the fuel assemblies. you'd just get normal background radiation standing over one.

    2. Re:Spent Fuel Pool by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

      Exactly. A kid shouldn't be able to walk in and see a 30 foot deep pool of water without the presence of a trained lifeguard and the availability of a suitable sized flotation device.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    3. Re:Spent Fuel Pool by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      His dad was supposed to watch him. case closed.

    4. Re:Spent Fuel Pool by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      and another thing, the real world has oceans, lakes, rivers and creeks that can drown and kill Guess what, I played on and in all of those in my childhood. sometimes kids die from those...oh well

  19. Black Mesa by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    "I found myself alone in a room, in front of a deep square or rectangular pool of impressively clear, still water. There was a pile of material at the bottom of the pool, and a blue glow of Cherenkov radiation in the water around it."

    That was when I heard his voice:

    "Bruce Perens in the flesh... or rather in the Hazard Suit.

    I took the liberty of relieving you of your weapons... most of them were government property. As for the suit... I think you've earned it."

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  20. So what? by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I live about 4 miles from a reactor. You can walk in and look down at the reactor during business hours. They commonly take local school children on tours. Unless you're going to dive into the water and start trying to yank fuel rods out by hand I don't really see what you could do with it. I suppose you could drop a pipe bomb in there but I don't really think it would do much.

    1. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      which reactor ?

    2. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live about 4 miles from a reactor. You can walk in and look down at the reactor during business hours. They commonly take local school children on tours. Unless you're going to dive into the water and start trying to yank fuel rods out by hand I don't really see what you could do with it. I suppose you could drop a pipe bomb in there but I don't really think it would do much.

      I call Bullshit.

    3. Re:So what? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      A PWR fuel assembly weighs about 1400 lbs, a BWR one about 360 to 700 lbs. (several standard sizes). The fuel pellets are inside zircaloy rods. no kid is going to dive down that deep and yank anything.

    4. Re:So what? by bickerdyke · · Score: 1

      Both PWR and BWR usually have a closed, preasure proof lid (hence the name PWR) that prevents jumping in and swiming. Your parent poster was either describing a spent fuel pool or a completly different reactor configuration.

      --
      bickerdyke
    5. Re:So what? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 1

      He's probably talking about a TRIGA. Far less fuel/lighter fuel, but it's still gonna be a bitch to swim down and remove it. If you fall in, drowning is a bigger worry than radiation.

      --
      retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
    6. Re:So what? by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Here's a pic:
      http://www.engr.wisc.edu/cmsimages/ep-nuclear-systems-engineering.jpg

      Whomever is taking the picture is leaning over the railing. But basically you walk in, you're on a catwalk with a steel railing right out of some james bond film... and you're overlooking this 1960's looking thing. Last time I was there was before 9/11 so maybe they've added more security, but I doubt it.

    7. Re:So what? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      oh, he wasn't talking about a spent fuel pool, but a "pool reactor" like TIGA. Those have "5x5" fuel assemblies with 3m long rods, that's still going to be hundreds of pounds, but swimming down to the running reactor will ruin your day so never mind about lifting one

  21. Really? by Cute+and+Cuddly · · Score: 0

    Any evidence of this anywhere?

  22. And that's a minute or so of my life... by logicassasin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... that I'll never get back.

    This was not "News For Nerds", it was "the ramblings of a guy on the internet".

    --
    Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
    1. Re:And that's a minute or so of my life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think Bruce Perens has done enough for computing that he's considered more than "a guy on the internet."

    2. Re:And that's a minute or so of my life... by Empiric · · Score: 1

      It was news to me. ;)

      If you managed to find a browser to post that complaint, that doesn't contain code he was involved with in one way or another, consider me impressed.

      --
      ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    3. Re:And that's a minute or so of my life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IE6.

      No way he takes credit for that.

    4. Re:And that's a minute or so of my life... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that speaks more about you than him, now don't it?

    5. Re:And that's a minute or so of my life... by khallow · · Score: 1

      Fame for a specialty is like that. I happened to work at HP when he was hired for a short time around 2000 (hope I'm not coming on too strong with my namedropping). Most people there didn't know or care, but the programmers with any open source experience talked about it a lot.

    6. Re:And that's a minute or so of my life... by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      Not sure if your trolling or ignorant, but will give the benefit of the doubt. Bruce PerensBio.

    7. Re:And that's a minute or so of my life... by Empiric · · Score: 1

      I'm betting I could find some Spyglass code still in there somewhere. ;)

      --
      ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
  23. Sounds like a small research reactor. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It sounds like a convection cooled pool-type LEU reactor. Some colleges have them. You can't have much fun with them, unless you pull the control rods out really fast. The moderation from steam bubbles quickly reduces the power otherwise.

  24. Oak Ridge used to hand out "hot" dimes by dltaylor · · Score: 3, Informative

    Lived in Chattanooga for a while "back when"; school trips sometimes went out to Oak Ridge. Souvenirs included a dime in a little case, and it was "fun" to watch a Geiger counter react to it.

    Doesn't surprise me that Bruce could get near a non-weapons reactor.

    1. Re:Oak Ridge used to hand out "hot" dimes by dltaylor · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. Re:Oak Ridge used to hand out "hot" dimes by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      They tore down the old Atomic Energy Museum (wood framed, with white siding and a dark gray asphalt shingle roof), and built a more modern, concrete one, which they call the American Museum of Science and Energy. http://amse.org/
      They don't do the dimes anymore. As it originally worked, you actually dropped your own dime into a slot and watched it get irradiated and then put in a thin metal case about the size of a quarter, with a plastic front cover that the rest of the case was crimped around to hold it in place. At some points, the system used an operator/lecturer, but eventually, the whole thing ran hands free, the dime automatically passed under a Geiger detector probe on a little conveyor belt as it came out, and I think I remember them going to an all plastic case at some point or other. That was the sixties for you. I might have had a dozen of those things, total.
      I was about 11 or 12 when the newer facility was built. On a "triple dog dare", I jumped off the just finished poured main stairs into a five foot pile of sand one weekend and twisted my ankle a little screwing around on the unguarded construction site. Hey, I missed the rebar by a good six inches. Eventually, the cops ran us off the site, and looking back, I wonder what took them so long since the site is literally right next to the police station.
                Here's the really odd thing: I was back in Oak Ridge recently, and where the old atomic energy museum was is a vacant parking lot - except there are these concrete anti-vehicle barriers put up after 9-11 to guard the old museum that was already long vacant and about to be torn down, and those are still there.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  25. Ask Dr. Fred by Galaga88 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like he was in Maniac Mansion, not a licensed nuclear facility. Dr. Fred's security seemed to consist of two disembodied tentacles and an ornery nurse.

    Fred never did a good job of keeping people away from that pool.

    1. Re:Ask Dr. Fred by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Don't push that button. :)

  26. See thru heartbeats with X-Ray by sinan · · Score: 1

    My father was the fix-it-all man in 1957 when I was 10 years old. One day he was fixing an X-Ray machine, and after he fixed it he showed me how heart heart beats, which was fascinating. I watched it for about a minute. Innocent days.

    1. Re:See thru heartbeats with X-Ray by binarylarry · · Score: 1

      that's so cute and horrifying at the same time.

      --
      Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  27. And then I found $10! by djnanite · · Score: 2

    Which was nice...

  28. Description reminds me of... by hotdiggity · · Score: 3, Funny
    You find yourself alone in a room, in front of a deep square or rectangular pool of impressively clear, still water.

    There is a pile of material at the bottom of the pool, and a blue glow of Cherenkov radiation in the water around it.

    > TAKE PILE

    You cannot take that item.

    > INVENTORY

    You have:

    • a rope
    • a watch
    • non-radiation-resisting clothes

    > GO NORTH

    You cannot go that way.

    > JUMP IN POOL

    Sorry, I don't know what you mean.

    > ENTER POOL

    You have jumped into the pool.

    You have died from radiation poisoning.

    1. Re:Description reminds me of... by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      > ENTER POOL

      You have jumped into the pool.

      You have died from radiation poisoning.

      Your irradiated corpse will now be eaten by a grue

      There, FTFY

  29. Negligent escort. by dfenstrate · · Score: 2

    At some of these research reactors, you can pull the rods out of the reactor shortly after criticality and take your measurements with the fuel rod in your hand.
    Individual research reactor loads may or may not be particularly dangerous- you can have a radiation well above background level, but far below the rate required to cause health issues.
    However, a recently irradiated fuel assembly from a power reactor will kill you in short order*, if not shielded by a lot of water.

    As for the young Mr. Peren's misadventure, these places are built for adults with the security clearance and knowledge required to get into the facility in the first place. These knowledgable, responsible adults may then escort visitors on arranged tours.

    A visitor can be shown (more or less) whatever their escort has access too. The escort's duty is to keep the visitors out of trouble while showing them around. It seems as though Bruce's escort was a bit negligent (and knew it, from the student's displeasure.)

    *perversely, the high radiation level of a used fuel assembly is a bit of a security feature. You can't steal something that will kill you before you can get out the door.

    --
    Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
  30. The Tesla coil at Griffith Park Observatory by mbstone · · Score: 1

    When I was a 3rd grader on a field trip, circa 1965, we went to LA's Griffith Observatory where there was (and is) a 500,000 voltTesla coil, behind a glass door and maybe four feet high. Part of the tour was (and no longer is) being able to feel the zap from the coil.

    I remember being asked to climb the activated Tesla coil and refusing. To this day I don't know if the teacher was serious, or what if anything would have resulted if I had climbed the sucker.

    1. Re:The Tesla coil at Griffith Park Observatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess we're about the same age, my father worked there then. It wasn't a glass door, it was a sealed window on the display side. You could get zapped from protruding metal screws if it was running, skin effect keeps you from frying. Only guides could turn it on, it wasn't a regular red button pusher. There would be no way to climb it, as the door to the inside of the glass case was from the shops in the basement. False memory? Maybe your brain was ionized. They've remodeled the whole place now, but I prefer the dangerous old days. The Museum of Science and Industry used to have some dangerous stuff too. Now all is boring.

  31. My father didn't get me in by cvtan · · Score: 1

    But he did sneak in some zinnia seeds for me and had them irradiated so I could do an experiment for biology class about how the radiation influenced the germination rate. And I had a REAL chemistry set too! Great days!

    --
    Sorry, but gray text on gray background is making my eyes bleed.
  32. Scare Piece? by Bensam123 · · Score: 1

    I actually read the article too... Nothing to see there besides the headline. The author makes it seem like this happens today and his extremely hazy memory is representative of walking straight into a active nuclear reactor (think of the kids! they're so unsafe). There are a lot of other explanation that people are leaving on the page that are more likely. How did this even make it on slashdot?

  33. The 60s and 70s? Try modern times. by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can still see the characteristic and beautiful Cherenkov radiation at the research reactor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. I've seen it a number of times.

    Up until recently, it contained 1400 pounds of highly-enriched (weapons grade) U-235 in 58-pound bundles. It is in a building across from a 7-level parking ramp and an 80,000-person football stadium.

    There are a number of such "Research and Test Reactors" around the US.

    A 2005 ABC News report found:

    - "No guards. No metal detectors. Bags were brought into the reactor room. Doors to the building are open during the day, and no IDs are required for entry."

    - "The building was undergoing major renovation, and construction workers, large trucks and building materials surrounded the rear exterior."

    - "The university Web site includes a 'virtual tour' and detailed photos, descriptions and diagrams of the reactor, the fuel elements and the control room. The reactor manager informed the Fellows that tours had to be scheduled three weeks in advance and that a locked door with a window view of the reactor was the closest they could get. But a friendly professor told the Fellows about a basement entry to the reactor room, where a reactor operator opened the door and let the Fellows photograph the reactor from the doorway. Two other operators allowed the Fellows to come inside carrying their tote bags, and briefly take photographs about 15 feet from the reactor's base. No campus security ever approached the Fellows."

    An 2004 New York Times report found:

    - "[UWNR's] fuel is weapons-grade uranium. If it were stolen, experts say, it could give terrorists or criminals a major head start on an atomic bomb."

    - "[...] out of concern that the uranium might be turned into bomb fuel, the Department of Energy has spent millions of dollars to develop lower-grade fuel and convert scores of reactors to run on it. [...] But the six campus reactors in this country are not among them."

    - "Campus reactors have far less security than places where the government keeps bomb-grade uranium, and they may have foreign students of unknown political sympathies."

    - "[...] the fuel now in the campus reactors is dangerously radioactive, making it hard to handle. [...] however, that highly enriched uranium was an easier fuel from which to build a bomb than is plutonium."

    - "The reactor operators are paid $10.50 an hour. They recently got a raise to that level [...] because someone discovered that campus file clerks were paid more than the reactor operators.

    - "[...] the current fuel load will last about 108 years at current rates of use."

    "The truck is the real threat. You want to make sure the truck stays away 250 feet minimum." - Ronald Timm, Former Department of Energy security analyst

    Here, the primary entrance to a major parking ramp is about 50 feet away.

    Also, it's not like it's really a mystery what he saw at BNL. There have only been so many reactors there in the last 60 years. It's odd, beautiful, and I suppose comparatively rare for a person to see, but it's not a big deal.

    1. Re:The 60s and 70s? Try modern times. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No university research reactor has ever used weapons-grade uranium. The highest design was 20% U-235, which is higher than commercial reactors but nowhere near weapons grade. Furthermore, once the reactor has operated for a few hours, the fuel is no longer weapons-grade and cannot be made so without isotope separation.

      The reason why these university research reactors have less security than a commercial PWR or lab is because they are so robustly designed there is pretty much nothing you could do to harm one.

    2. Re:The 60s and 70s? Try modern times. by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

      This is incorrect.

      The University of Wisconsin-Madison Nuclear Reactor was one of six NRC-designated Research and Test Reactors to use highly-enriched uranium. Wisconsin's was enriched to 70%, and some research reactors use U-235 enriched to 90%.

      [...] since 1978, out of concern that the uranium might be turned into bomb fuel, the Department of Energy has spent millions of dollars to develop lower-grade fuel and convert scores of reactors to run on it. As of July 30, according to the Government Accountability Office (formerly the General Accounting Office), 39 of 105 research reactors worldwide had converted or were in the process. But the six campus reactors in this country are not among them.

      [...]

      Power reactors in this country use uranium fuel in which the proportion of U-235 has been raised to 3 to 5 percent, which is low-enriched fuel. Anything over 20 percent is considered highly enriched. Bombs are generally over 90 percent. Some research reactors run on fuel enriched to over 90 percent; Wisconsin's is 70 percent, and the quantity is probably a little less than is needed for a bomb.

      Ref: http://www.nytimes.com/2004/08/15/us/uranium-reactors-on-campus-raise-security-concerns.html?pagewanted=all

  34. Hypnagogic halucination, more likely by Mathinker · · Score: 1

    The "not remembering opening the door" makes it seem more like a hypnagogic halucination which, by now, has been converted into a false memory. OTOH, I don't doubt about the lack of security during that era which has been talked about by other posters, so it could equally be a true memory. There isn't enough evidence to decide the truth about this matter.

  35. this isn't Hollywood by v1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    "They would be dead before getting out the door with it."

    My initial reaction to this is "this isn't Hollywood, where two 9mm bullets makes a car explode." Radiation in fatal doses takes at leas hours and usually days or weeks to kill you. If it's extremely high it could give you a pounding headache, dizzy, very sick to your stomach, or possibly even pass out. But if you got to that point quickly you'd have been many times over the fatal dose. A high enough dose of xrays can knock you unconscious, but even that requires a more energetic source than decay.

    Basically what I'm saying is radiation poisoning isn't instant. All but the most intense exposure will simply write your death sentence. It will take at least many hours to play out and actually stop you from breathing. You could probably swim down and grab a rod and try to muscle it to the surface. (it's very dense) By the time you got to the surface you might even be starting to show signs of blistering on your hand that is holding the rod, but even that is more likely to be in the 10 minute range. The heat the rod is producing without the water cooling it would probably be more of a bother for you. If it was radioactive enough, you'd be a dead man walking, but walking for sure, for awhile. (and setting off every radiation alarm you got near on your way out the door with the rod) Oh, and it might be messing with your vision when you got close to the rods. Some of the people that were cleaning up at chernobyl got their skin tingling and got to see the "fairy lights" sparkling around them, which had nothing to do with actual sparkles around them, it was messing with their nervous system at that point. A lot of those people died, a good chunk of them 2-20 weeks later.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    1. Re:this isn't Hollywood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are multiple ways radiation can kill you on several different time scales. You can't just give a "typical" number, because it depends on the does. Weaker doses that mess up your ability to regenerate blood can take weeks to kill you, higher doses that stop you from being able to absorb nutrients from food can kill you in several days. Damage to the nervous system can be from days to hours or less depending on the dose.

      And remember, one of the potential reasons to have research reactor is to generate short half-life, high activity materials that would decay too fast to be produced and shipped from somewhere else. The dosing could fall anywhere on the scale depending on exactly what research they are doing. Not to mention the really high stuff I've read reports of from national labs (although they would have much higher security than a university), where in one case, efforts to dislodge a stuck sample was foiled at one point by the radiation melting plastic tools being used by a remote controlled robot.

    2. Re:this isn't Hollywood by QuantumPion · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dose from an unshielded spent fuel bundle (or research reactor) is far greater than other typical sources - on the order of 50,000 to 1,000,000 R/hr. These kinds of doses can be instantly fatal. An HP tech explained to me once that if you placed a spent fuel bundle on a football field, and ran towards it as fast as you could, you would drop dead before you could touch it. If you swam to the bottom of a research reactor to try to touch the fuel you would most certainly become incapacitated by the time you got close enough to touch it.

    3. Re:this isn't Hollywood by v1 · · Score: 1

      An HP tech explained to me once that if you placed a spent fuel bundle on a football field, and ran towards it as fast as you could, you would drop dead before you could touch it.

      And that is complete BS btw. See subject.

      MOST of the damage radiation does effectively fires a shotgun through your DNA, causing your cells to be unable to synthesize critical proteins and of course divide. Cells don't manufacture proteins the moment they need them, they keep a surplus. That's why even strong radiation isn't instant. It doesn't cause your organs to liquify or your blood to evaporate. Most often it just puts a lot of your cells within days, hours, or tens of minutes of cell death. Your body will still continue to function physically until too many cells have died. And even then it won't be "drop dead", your body will just start to wind down. It'll be more like "wow this is exhausting" followed by "I think I need to lie down for a minute" and then you don't have the strength to stand back up etc.

      Radiation death is only going to approach "instant" if it makes a VERY severe hit on your nervous system. Even then unless it's incredibly intense t's more likely to make you dizzy and nauseated within a few minutes. If you start hurling within a few minutes of exposure, you'd better have a pencil and paper handy for your note to mom, and get busy while you can still write legibly. That's as intense as it usually gets, short of being at hiroshima etc. But then those people were dead instantly not due to radioactive decay, but due to exposure to face-melting xrays and thermal blast.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    4. Re:this isn't Hollywood by v1 · · Score: 1

      Actually you know what, I take that back. There IS one reasonably accurate hollywood example. Star Trek - Wrath of Kahn. Spock's death by radiation exposure is probably the most clinically-accuarte portrayal of very intense radiation exposure to hit the big screen. He wore gloves so we didn't get to see him peel his skin off his hands trying to open the container. You got to see his voice getting horse, difficulty seeing, disorientation, skin blistering, and not 'dropping dead' the second he popped the cap. Tho he did go a bit faster than he should have, but at least they put in a little effort for authenticity. When I watched that I was thinking he ought to only last 20-30 minutes or so but of course I had no frame of reference on actual radiation type and dose ;)

      Your "HP Tech" may have been referring to having received a fatal dose by the time you got to the rod. But if he was actually implying you'd drop dead before getting to the rod, he bought too far into someone's fantasy.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    5. Re:this isn't Hollywood by QuantumPion · · Score: 1

      So my numbers and facts are complete BS, because of you don't think 1,000,000 R/hr is a "VERY severe hit on your nervous system" based on watching Star Trek II? Really? Really?

    6. Re:this isn't Hollywood by v1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, in areas where I'm not an authority, I DO tend to rely on wikipedia, documentaries, and science articles I've read much more than a 3rd party account of some random person that's a tech in a completely unrelated area. High end gardeners are more likely to know about radiation than random HP techs.

      And I was just pointing out one specific unusual exception to the "hollywood science" rule with Kahn there. Just sayin' you're going to pick up more accurate information on this topic from that movie than your "expert". And that's entertaining.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  36. They were different times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hitler had been defeated, muslims weren't invented yet, and the only people to be suspicious about were people with Russian accents. The only need for security was to make sure people didn't steal office stationery or take too many biscuits from the cookie jar.

  37. End the stereotype please by Gothmolly · · Score: 0

    Acting like Bruce Perens is relevant only reinforces the stereotype that he is.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:End the stereotype please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He's a hell of a lot more relevant than you are. Do you have any idea what his net contribution is to the tools you use every day? Certainly he wouldn't be at the top of such a list, but he's definitely been a significant player in a variety of roles. If nothing else, how many people's routers use busybox?

    2. Re:End the stereotype please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sure, Bruce. Except that BusyBox hasn't contained any of your code for many, many years.

  38. no, I'm not trolling... by logicassasin · · Score: 1

    I know exactly who Bruce is. Doesn't negate the fact that this was not "News", and it's STILL the ramblings of a guy (Bruce Perens, male = guy) on the internet (his blog = on the internet).

    --
    Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
    1. Re:no, I'm not trolling... by Iskender · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile this triggered a really interesting discussion with a lot of informative posts. Good enough for me.

  39. so... I should care why? by logicassasin · · Score: 1

    As I've stated below, I know who he is, but why should that even matter? This was about as newsworthy as RNS tweeting what he ate for breakfast or Miguel de Icaza blurting somewhere that he's on his way to Ecuador for some R&R.

    His contributions to FOSS don't make him above a bit of criticizm or someone poking fun at a post on his blog.

    --
    Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
  40. not Bruce's reactor, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    long ago, I did have an oddly casual encounter with the blue nuclear glow. I worked at a very large aerospace company on stuff that flew in hard vacuum. Some of our critical components needed to be inspected by neutron radiography. The drill was that the company had a van and driver who took the parts over to the (rurally-located) reactor and brought them back, with the films. The parts would then sit in storage for the modest time required for the neutron activation radioactivity to cool down. Then we tested them.

    So one day the driver was out for illness, and we absolutely *had* to get the parts N-rayed. My boss said go do it. I put loaded the parts into my 1959 VW bus (an oldie even at that time) and drove to the reactor installation. I was imagining a major facility...you know, nuclear stuff? Imagine my surprise when I parked by what was basically a glorified Quonset hut - a building sheathed with corrugated steel sheets and no apparent security. I opened the unlocked door, walked in and basically said, " Hi, I'm ** from ** and I've got some parts we need N-rayed. Where do you want me to put them?".

    There were two guys running the reactor. Two people only in the entire facility. They walked with me to my bus, helped me carry the parts in, and they set the parts up in a plastic cage with sheets of film with a neutron sensitizer. They invited me to join them as they lowered the cage into the radiography region. This was when I got to look at the reactor core, glowing quite a bright blue under its pool of water. They pulled the parts after a few minutes, spent an hour developing the film, and sent me on the way with the film and the mildly radioactive parts. In the very back of my bus, at their suggestion.

    I felt odd, driving back to my job site that afternoon, thinking about having seen the minor Cerenkov leakage of energies that could break cities - and how casually those energies were regarded by those responsible for them. It was an interesting day. And it was a different time, for sure.

  41. Research facilities by drolli · · Score: 3, Informative

    are the most unsafe place you can imagine. I worked in a lab where a small accelerator building was attached. All doors were unlocked an unsupervised (only the "tritium" room where most radioactive sample were stored) was locked. The rest was only locked/with alarms when the accelerator was running. Some (quite small, but highly active) source used for the lab courses were (in a pile of shielding material), essentially open around the clock; and that was in the mid-90s. Everybody who knew where these were could just go in the building, enter the room and take them (if you are stupid enough....). In the same building i opened a shelf (which had no warning signs) and suddenly found contaminated tools (which were marked).

    If we had an open day, and the hand of a four year old would have been small enough to insert into the hole into which the samples were let down by a rod to activate them, also something bad could have happened.

    At least fore radioactive stuff there was a mandatory handling lesson, and standard procedures. What really annoys me is when it comes to chemicals in science labs. You would be surprised how much radioation it takes to result in the same increase in cancer rate as for certain chemicals commonly used; which is exactly the reason why industry either banned these or is using them with very good precautions and good working equipment, while in sciene any untrained grad student just uses these without gloves.

    I agree that even on a 'open door' day a door with seriously radioactive material in an large accellerator facility should be locked, but its easy for me to imagine that its not. I believe that the biggest problem is "build a fence around the facility and we know everybody inside" method. That worked in the last century during normal operation (some other person would be spotted quite reliably), but on open door days it obviously does not work and i seriously doubt it works with the current fluctuation of inhabitants of a scientific building.

    After one or two years in science, the first thing which i did when entering a new working space in an unknown area was to clean the table very carefully and look in all drawers on my desk. (and radioactivity was the least of my concerns....).

  42. Not more than once, anyway by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    From a security point of view you're right, from a practical point of view a teenager with good diving skils might try it. Once.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  43. My father did probably worse by damaki · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My father use to work for the French national police force. It's a half police, half military police corp.
    One day, he visited a nuclear power plant for whatever security reason. With a group of people, he walked around one of these famous pool, then just clumsily fell in it. He was of course decontaminated as soon as I happened, and well, he still has no cancer decades after, even as a heavy smoker.
    Sadly, he did not get any superpower either, just a smart kid, years later ;)

    --
    Stupidity is the root of all evil.
    1. Re:My father did probably worse by TuringCheck · · Score: 2

      You'd have to dive to get any signifficant dose of radiation. For the typical research reactors I doubt anyone can hold his breath enough to take a lethal dose (munching at the material excepted :-)

    2. Re:My father did probably worse by BancBoy · · Score: 1

      Your family name isn't Clouseau by any chance?

      --
      [UID-HeinzIntel]
    3. Re:My father did probably worse by damaki · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      --
      Stupidity is the root of all evil.
  44. The Day I Blundered Into Pam Anderson's Bedroom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Day I Blundered Into Pamela Anderson's bedroom.
    from the did-you-remember-to-lock-the-door? dept.
    Dirk Diggler writes :
      "I found myself alone in an immense cavernous bedroom, in front of a deep square or rectangular bed of impressively height and breadth, "Be still, my heart!" I said aloud. There was a pile of gauzy, diaphonous material at the bottom of the bed, and a blue glow of Cherenkov radiation in a sort of halo all around it, I realized at once that these were Pamela's underthings. At the left, I saw a giant rack holding what appeared to be items utilized by a sexual deviant, for intentions I care not to mention. To this day, I can't explain how an unsupervised kid could ever have gotten in there."

  45. No... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enough radiation in a short enough time can kill you quickly.

    In the literature is a reference to someone dying withing 1/2 hour of exposure. (At ~2500 RADs, apparently, from an active fission criticality event.)

    The 'skin tingling' is from direct excitation of the nerves from beta radiation, which cause a current in high enough numbers.

    The 'sparkles in the eyes' are from high energy alpha particles entering the eyes.

    Having either one of these effects happen to you is a good sign your life is going to be miserable and short. :)

    Few of the (uninformed-of-the-dangers) Chernobyl firefighters lived more than 6 weeks...

    Here's actual information: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acute_radiation_syndrome

  46. What do Bruce Perens and Bruce Banner have in.. ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A fascination with large does of Gamma radiation, the Avengers? .. and on yeah on occasion, that Huge Rage Monster, big fan of that.

  47. Don't play in the pretty blue water by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bruce, for god's sake, please don't play in the pretty blue water!

    (Yes, it's toilet humor)

  48. University of Maryland TRIGA rector by TheSync · · Score: 1

    (Before 9/11) I went on a tour of the University of Maryland TRIGA training reactor (picture looking into core), and yes you could see the Cherenkov radiation at the bottom of the pool when the reactor was running.

  49. Homer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DOH

  50. Who got fired? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did they fire one security guard?

  51. Re:And by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

    this non-story deserves /. space because...

    ...while the story itself goes nowhere really, the comments it spawns are pretty entertaining.

  52. 15 Years of Stuff That Matters by gratuitous_arp · · Score: 1

    15 Years of Stuff That Matters -- Phew, glad that's over!

  53. could it be this spent fuel storage pool at BNL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2165557/Scientists-create-hottest-temperature-Big-Bang--250-000-times-warmer-centre-sun.html

    the picture a couple down might be what he saw