Slashdot Mirror


The Day Leo Traynor Confronted His Troll

McGruber writes "Dublin-based writer Leo Traynor has written a piece about confronting the troll who drove him off Twitter, hacked his Facebook, and abused and terrified his family. Quoting: 'I blocked the account and reported it as spam. The following week it happened again in an identical manner. A new follower, I followed back, received a string of abusive DMs, blocked and reported for spam. Two or three times a week. Sometimes two or three times a day. An almost daily cycle of blocking and reporting and intense verbal abuse. ... Then one day something happened that truly frightened me. I don't scare easily but this was vile. I received a parcel at my home address. Nothing unusual there – I get lots of post. I ripped it open and there was a Tupperware lunchbox inside full of ashes. There was a note included, saying, "Say hello to your relatives from Auschwitz." I was physically sick. ... In July I was approached by a friend who's basically an IT genius, and he offered some help. He said that he could trace the hackers and trolls for me using perfectly legal technology, which would lead to their IP addresses. I said yes. Then I baited them – I was deliberately more provocative toward them than ever I'd been before.'"

594 comments

  1. Trolling? by steppedleader · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Compared to the typical trolling found on the internet, this seems a bit more like harassment or stalking, no?

    1. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm disappointed that the author didn't press charges. This kid is probably a sociopath. When he stalks and hurts other people in the future the police won't have the evidence they need of past cases. Sociopaths don't learn how to stop hurting people, they just learn not to get caught the next time.

    2. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Norman, Is that you?

    3. Re:Trolling? by jamesh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm disappointed that the author didn't press charges. This kid is probably a sociopath. When he stalks and hurts other people in the future the police won't have the evidence they need of past cases. Sociopaths don't learn how to stop hurting people, they just learn not to get caught the next time.

      Or he's a messed up kid who didn't have a clue that his actions were hurting someone.

      If it was me being stalked I'd be demanding that the kid doesn't go near a computer for 6 months (or until he's legally an adult) and that he has a curfew at night so he can't just be off at a mates place doing the same thing. It should give him a chance to catch up on Jewish/German history and have some appreciation for what he's ranting and raving about.

      I think he should be given another chance, but only one. I'm not sure what it's like in the country where Leo Traynor resides but people have gone to jail over here for less.

    4. Re:Trolling? by bloodhawk · · Score: 5, Informative

      yep it isn't actually trolling at all. It seems nowadays any bad or obnoxious behaviour gets labeled with troll, I guess this is what happens when people try to use a catchy term without actually understanding what it means.

    5. Re:Trolling? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, that's insulting. Good trolling seems to be a dying art these days. A good troll post says something that sounds plausible, and encourages responses. During the thread, it becomes less and less reasonable, but the aim is to make the other person say something unreasonable first or to make them waste a large amount of effort replying. If you want to see a good troll, read some of the threads started by roman_mir.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed. A troll keeps things on the forum only. Once they extend beyond the forum I also think it is more than trolling.

    7. Re:Trolling? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Sociopaths don't learn how to stop hurting people, they just learn not to get caught the next time.

      That's not true. A sociopath merely lacks empathy - they may be aware that they are hurting someone, but they don't understand why that's a bad thing. Placed in an incentive system where hurting people is penalised and provides no advantages, they'll do what's best for them and stop.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    8. Re:Trolling? by GNious · · Score: 1

      So, eh, a good beating would be useful to teach a sociopath to stop hurting others?

    9. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sociopaths generally don't respond to punishment.

    10. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you want to see a good troll, read some of the threads started by roman_mir.

      Not only is good trolling rare, but no one even knows what trolling is anymore! Someone isn't trolling just because they say something you disagree with. I can say with certainty that although I disagree with roman_mir, there are people who genuinely have similar 'extremist' views.

    11. Re:Trolling? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree with the AC. The extent of what the evil little miseryshit did proves it was not just a game to him. I'd wager his show of tears was just that- a show. His brain is miswired. There's a whole section that simply isn't working. Coulseling won't acomplish a damn thing, but he'll be able to make it look like it did.

      Sociopaths are the most manipulative people in the world. It's why the alphas go into politics. They thrive there. They are one of the three types of people in this world that you never EVER trust along with junkies and Party loyalist ideologues.

    12. Re:Trolling? by Seumas · · Score: 2

      Yes, but the target's name is Leo Traynor; not Lisa Traynor. Therefore, he won't get as much traction or sympathy as he possibly could. If his name was Lisa, the internet would have a white-knight-shit-storm and there'd be an endless stream of navel-gazing articles visiting the tired old trope of "the internet is sexist, vile, misogynistic, blah blah durp durp" and Twitter and Facebook would be called to the floor for not protecting him. Er... "her".

    13. Re:Trolling? by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yes but sadly we see more and more of this, sick little maladjusted fucks that decide for whatever reason YOU are the cause of some problem in their lives or the world would be better off without you and will go VERY stalkerish on you.

      In fact as someone who recently had to deal with something not as sick, but creepy and weird where some asshole was hacking into a nice former customer of mine. this guy is soooo fucking bland I can't imagine how he could do anything but bore someone to death but this little prick would take over his computer and wipe his files, trash the OS, even pop up a box calling him filthy names. I have to thank the slashdot community for when i put up a list of what i had done trying to stop this guy with no luck you guys pointed out things I had not thought to check and thanks to you I was able to stop him, so thanks guys.

      But what we old greybeards think of when we think of the word troll and what we are seeing now? Two totally different things. Hell I had one last year that followed me around the net for a solid year, making piles of accounts everywhere I went. For what purpose? just so he could post a response to everything I said with the sentence "Die you fat fucker DIE!". That's it, just that sentence over and over and over, across dozens of websites. While it never phased me, when you think about how much work he had to do, searching the web for every place he could possibly find where I was, spending a good 15 minutes or more making fake accounts...just for that sentence.

      We are seeing more and more sick puppies out there, personally i think its just what happens when one of Gabe's fuckwads loses touch with anything other than the little bubble they create for themselves on the web. I'm sure if a shrink got a hold of this nutbag he would believe that he was actually the moral one here, that Traynor had somehow "insulted" him, dared to enter the space HE owned, or some other bullshit that to HIM would be perfectly rational, just as the cockbag that trashed a couple of years worth of data on a nice bland nobody's PC probably felt it was somehow "justified". Which just goes to show how truly warped and twisted those without a firm grasp of reality can get when they live in cyberspace.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:Trolling? by Fjandr · · Score: 1

      Unless he's already very practiced and had reason to believe he'd been caught after years of successfully pulling this behavior off, the fact that he spontaneously burst into tears without any indication that Leo actually knew it was him means it's unlikely. The scenario was a trap, and he confessed without being presented as the suspect.

      Not likely a sociopath, but definitely fucked up in some way or another.

    15. Re:Trolling? by Fjandr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem with the idea that the tears were for show was that it was deliberately kept from him that they knew he was the perpetrator. He confessed without being confronted with evidence linking him to it, or even the slightest hint that they suspected he was the perpetrator. At least that's the picture presented by the article.

    16. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to see a good troll, read some of the threads started by roman_mir.

      Roman_mir is only trolling himself, thinking he can change this site's demographics if only he tries hard enough. He always seems more upset than any of his responders are.

      The whining about post modding and open self-identification when using a sockpuppet account betrays his desperate desire to enlighten us all.

    17. Re:Trolling? by Registered+Coward+v2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, that's insulting. Good trolling seems to be a dying art these days. A good troll post says something that sounds plausible, and encourages responses. During the thread, it becomes less and less reasonable, but the aim is to make the other person say something unreasonable first or to make them waste a large amount of effort replying. If you want to see a good troll, read some of the threads started by roman_mir.

      True, a good troll had that ring of plausibility that it triggered teh "Huh? I must respond to this..." reflex before the responder sat down and thought it through. For example:

      While Star Trek (Star Wars / Firefly / Battlestar Galactica - pick one) tried to stay true to science as much as is possible in a science fiction world where faster than light travel is the norm; they missed one big thing -> everytime a shuttle craft passed the Enterprise it cast a shadow. In a vacuum; everyone knows you don't have shadows in a vacuum.

      Of course, posting that in a Star Trek (or Mensa) group is like shooting fish in a barrel..

      Trolling isn't flaming (any idiot can flame); but unfortunately trolling has lost its original meaning much as hacker has. Nor is simply disagreeing and laying out your position; though many people are willing to yell "Troll" when they can't defend their position. AFU, in the old usenet days, was a great example of the art of trolling; unfortunately since the decline of usenet and the onset of eternal September it's a different world.

      --
      I'm a consultant - I convert gibberish into cash-flow.
    18. Re:Trolling? by steppedleader · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nah, roman_mir is just a libertarian type... I like having a few of those around. Don't necessarily agree on a lot of the economic stuff, but it's nice to have someone complaining about the lack of respect for civil liberties among the mainstream parties.

      Committed establishment Republican types? Now, there's a mystery. I've completely lost the ability to tell them apart from trolls.

    19. Re:Trolling? by flyingfsck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes absolutely. A good beating will modify the behaviour of anyone dramatically. If it is a true sociopath, you just have to beat more agressively. Medieval crowd control methods as practised by the Catholic Church and Vlad the Impaler, still work just as efficiently today, as it did back then.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    20. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not true... A troll is someone who tries to scare other people. The article explains it very well :-)

    21. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TL;DR. Trolling is a art.

    22. Re:Trolling? by 1u3hr · · Score: 2

      In TFA Leo says how his wife was also targeted.

    23. Re:Trolling? by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hell name a SINGLE Internet word we old greybeards came up with that hasn't been butchered all to hell by folks that don't get it had a specific meaning, just one. Troll, shill, virus, its all lost its original meanings because too many who don't have a clue what they meant use them wrong constantly. That's why I don't even say words like trojan or virus anymore but just tell them "You got a bug" because as far as the public is concerned everything is a virus, and everyone that does something bad on the net is a troll. its just lost its meaning.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    24. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The problem with the idea that the tears were for show was that it was deliberately kept from him that they knew he was the perpetrator. He confessed without being confronted with evidence linking him to it, or even the slightest hint that they suspected he was the perpetrator. At least that's the picture presented by the article.

      Bullshit. If a cop had you in a room and started talking about the details to a crime you committed and you 'spontaneously' confessed, you can hardly say that you didn't realize you were a suspect. This man who barely knew the kid suddenly visited him and then started showing him the details of his crime. Yet you still think the kid didn't realize that he was a suspect? Come on! The kid confessed because he figured it out and knew that manipulation was required to keep his freedom. That is all. It wasn't remorse. Sociopaths are more manipulative than you can imagine.

    25. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Remember that the author already knew the kid for a long time. He's in a much better position to judge what the kid is like than we are. Teens are less mature in their capability to judge the consequences of their actions or to control their impulses than adults. What you see may be caused in part by immaturity instead of sociopathy. He appears to be pretty messed up, but it may be something he will outgrow. He may be a sociopath, but he may also be an overly sensitive kid who has already been scared shitless by this confrontation and doesn't need more to motivate him to get back on the right track. That is not something we can judge from just reading a short article like this. Leave the judgement to the people near him.

    26. Re:Trolling? by Psychotria · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you want to see a good troll, read some of the threads started by roman_mir.

      Not only is good trolling rare, but no one even knows what trolling is anymore! Someone isn't trolling just because they say something you disagree with. I can say with certainty that although I disagree with roman_mir, there are people who genuinely have similar 'extremist' views.

      I began to write a new comment saying pretty much the same thing as you. Since you've almost nailed it, I decided to reply to your comment instead. So, l will reiterate. Nobody knows what trolling is anymore! They don't. Being abusive is trolling. Saying something controversial isn't trolling. Trolling is leading the person to believe what you're saying or showing them, or leading them into a trap, and then, although not compulsory, making them look like a damn fool. This is quite distinct to saying something like "you're a gay horse". I dunno what a gay horse is, but let's pretend it's offensive. That example is an insult, not a troll at all. The media doesn't know what a "troll" is. They label people who bombard people with insults as trolls. The people who do that are not trolls. Trolls are much more subtle and often *funny*. Maybe it's going to end up like the hacker vs. cracker shit. It seems like the more mainstream things become the more our past is lost.

    27. Re:Trolling? by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      Correction to my post: being abusive isn't trolling.

    28. Re:Trolling? by Psychotria · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd like to add that possibly satire is more align with trolling. A lot of The Onion articles are "trolls". To the initiated they illicit a response based on a falsehood. That's a troll.

    29. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he's a messed up kid who didn't have a clue that his actions were hurting someone.

      If it was me being stalked I'd be demanding that the kid doesn't go near a computer for 6 months (or until he's legally an adult) and that he has a curfew at night so he can't just be off at a mates place doing the same thing.

      It's not really that simple. What needs to be done is to find a way to prevent the kid from doings things that hurts someone without depriving him of too much of what regular kids have. Internet is the main form of communication for kids today and depriving someone of internet access will isolate them socially completely.
      There have been plenty of stories where parents didn't realize that social interaction looks a lot different today than it did in the 90's and think that their kids spend too much time on the computer. This a led to numerous suicides and other unwanted actions. (Heck, one kid even shot his parents, admittedly the main problem might have been that there was a gun in the same house as children.)
      The desired outcome is to set the kid straight, not to guarantee that he ends up a sociopath.

    30. Re:Trolling? by jamesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I agree with the AC. The extent of what the evil little miseryshit did proves it was not just a game to him. I'd wager his show of tears was just that- a show. His brain is miswired. There's a whole section that simply isn't working. Coulseling won't acomplish a damn thing, but he'll be able to make it look like it did.

      Sociopaths are the most manipulative people in the world. It's why the alphas go into politics. They thrive there. They are one of the three types of people in this world that you never EVER trust along with junkies and Party loyalist ideologues.

      So what are you suggesting? If he as sociopathic as you suggest, then simply pressing charges won't change anything, so you'd have to lock him up to get him out of harms way. You couldn't lock him up forever of course (what court would do that?), so eventually he'd get out again. And if he wasn't really that messed up when he went in, he would be when he got out.

      And I bet the tears weren't for show. Even if he is a sociopath and didn't care one way or the other how much pain he'd caused, he would still have been truly upset that he got caught.

    31. Re:Trolling? by shiftless · · Score: 0

      You can't blame the kid bro or judge him too harshly. Guaranteed he's got a fucked up home environment. We shouldn't excuse bad behavior, but we should certainly try to understand it and to feel empathy towards those who genuinely need some help and guidance in this miserable life. I myself acted up as a kid and hurt people sometimes; I didn't mean to, that's not how I was meant to be, that's just how I was due to the situation at home. Even now I struggle to avoid being a complete asshole sometimes especially when dealing with idiots on the Internet. The things we experience in our lives influence us powerfully and without outside help sometimes it's near impossible to escape from the mental cage we've been raised in.

    32. Re:Trolling? by QQBoss · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      TL;DR. Trolling is a art.

      Grammar Nazi trolling is more of a science, actually. Normal everyday trolling is more of AN art.

    33. Re:Trolling? by Antonovich · · Score: 2

      Wow, I guess the 30 minutes or so a day I spend on /. isn't enough. To be far, I rarely read ALL the comments but this dude gets mega-hammered every time he writes anything. Basically everything he writes gets modded down to -1. I think he definitely deserves some serious credit for having a comment branch off and talk about him though, whether he be a genuine Troll (TM) or not!

    34. Re:Trolling? by smittyoneeach · · Score: 3, Funny

      A dying art?
      I do my part
      Clean-shaven tradition:
      A most healthy start.
      Burma Shave

      --
      Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
    35. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems like the more mainstream things become the more our past is lost.

      No, you're just romanticising the past. Trolls have always just been assholes looking to piss people off for fun. Just like this kid, as a game.

    36. Re:Trolling? by Psychotria · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is a real troll. And a good one (even if it's not true):

      http://www.bash.org/?244321

    37. Re:Trolling? by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      It seems like the more mainstream things become the more our past is lost.

      No, you're just romanticising the past. Trolls have always just been assholes looking to piss people off for fun. Just like this kid, as a game.

      Pissing someone off (in the end) without overtly doing it might be a troll. Being an obvious asshole isn't being a troll. Trolling doesn't include being a total fuckwit (like the boy in the article). What the boy in the article did was not trolling; it was abuse and harassment.

    38. Re:Trolling? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Since you've almost nailed it, I'll just add one thing. Here on Slashdot we have a -1 Troll option and a -1 Flamebait option. Almost nobody here knows what either of those terms mean anymore, including right here on Slashdot. As an example, when someone is clearly making moronic statements that they actually believe, and one calls them a moron, that is neither a troll, nor is it flamebait. Wikipedia gets it completely wrong as well. Flamebait is much like trolling, where the poster says something ridiculous in order to bait people into flaming them. Ergo, if I call someone a moron when they have made it clear that they are either a moron or intending to be one, my response might be a follow up to flame bait (if the poster intended to get me to call him a moron), but is not itself flamebait. Now, I'd really like to see people read this, understand it, and start modding correctly, but let's face it: there are a lot of morons in the world ;-0

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    39. Re:Trolling? by Tastecicles · · Score: 1, Funny

      that's up there with telling someone the green light on their CRT is really a camera...

      Or "Oh, you wanna hack me? OK, my IP, to make life easy for you, is 127.0.0.1, and you can try and plant this command: "format c: /f". I'll send you a thousand Dollars if you can kill my computer."

      Next system message: "SUCKER HAS LEFT CHAT (BROKEN PIPE)"

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    40. Re:Trolling? by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 2

      No, that's insulting. Good trolling seems to be a dying art these days. A good troll post says something that sounds plausible, and encourages responses. During the thread, it becomes less and less reasonable, but the aim is to make the other person say something unreasonable first or to make them waste a large amount of effort replying. If you want to see a good troll, read some of the threads started by roman_mir.

      Truth! Good trolling divides communities because not everyone realises the game they're playing. This kid was trolling in the sense that demanding an ATM PIN at gunpoint could be considered to be "hacking".

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    41. Re:Trolling? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      " This kid is probably a sociopath."

      Since he broke down and cried because his conscience was getting to him it is quite clear that he is not a sociopath.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    42. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's why I don't even say words like trojan or virus anymore but just tell them "You got a bug"

      So you are the one who is resposible for the abuse of the term "bug" as whatever instead of an error in program code.

    43. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Throwing around beatings works wonders until you hit the wrong kind of person, or someone whom the wrong kind of person cares enough about, who'll be waiting in a tree for you far away with his long range sniper rifle that he acquired and learned to use just for you. Though I guess you are right that this is a dramatic modification of behavior. This will become even more of an issue once good 3D printers become easily available.

    44. Re:Trolling? by manwargi · · Score: 1

      The irony is that these threads on the subject of trolling seem to be generating the intended effect.

    45. Re:Trolling? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      Holding libertarian views and loudly and consistently extolling them regardless of how stupid they might be in the context of the thread or even on their own merits isn't trolling.

    46. Re:Trolling? by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      The part of the sociopaths brain that connects their present action to future consequences simply does not work. No matter how severe the punishment, the sociopath won't even consider it when hurting someone. That's why these people are constantly in an out of jail.

    47. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "No, that's insulting. Good trolling seems to be a dying art these days."

      It's people, they got numb. I troll my local newspapers to get some discussions going and I have to use up to 2 Dozen accounts until it really gets going, years ago 1 account was enough to get some serious discussions going and lure the morons and the bigots out of their caves with their mouths frothing.
      It's more difficult these days.

    48. Re:Trolling? by narcc · · Score: 1

      Think about your breathing.

    49. Re:Trolling? by mcneely.mike · · Score: 0

      Ma?

      --
      soylentnews.org Go there to enjoy the people!
    50. Re:Trolling? by Millennium · · Score: 1

      It seems to me that the only real difference is one of degree.

    51. Re:Trolling? by Hentes · · Score: 1

      but the aim is to make the other person say something unreasonable first or to make them waste a large amount of effort replying

      Out of curiosity, how much time have you just spent explaining an AC how real trolls are so much sophisticated?

    52. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's insulting. Good trolling seems to be a dying art these days. A good troll post says something that sounds plausible, and encourages responses. During the thread, it becomes less and less reasonable, but the aim is to make the other person say something unreasonable first or to make them waste a large amount of effort replying. If you want to see a good troll, read some of the threads started by roman_mir.

      See some of the "astroturfing" first posts for a while now. Still pushing peoples buttons and creating the reaction they are looking for, even when they started going more and more over the top.

    53. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If his name was Muhammad it would have been a national incident. If the friend's son was a non-Muslim Muslims all over the world would be rioting, burning churches and demanding his extradition to Iran so that he could be killed.

      It seems that the truth is now flaimbait. Parent post is off-topic but true.

    54. Re:Trolling? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      We are seeing more and more sick puppies out there, personally i think its just what happens when one of Gabe's fuckwads loses touch with anything other than the little bubble they create for themselves on the web.

      OK, but how do they become a fuckwad in the first place? Usually a lack of parenting. The parents let electronic devices raise their children. The content for the devices is paid for by sociopaths, so it is written to appeal to sociopaths. Then they are surprised when the children become sociopaths.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    55. Re:Trolling? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This will become even more of an issue once good 3D printers become easily available.

      This is already theoretically an issue because you can acquire all the parts but the barrel to build some guns without even being 18, if you're sneaky. It's not actually an issue because making a barrel is non-trivial and you need specialized equipment, and 3d printers won't be able to make one any time soon.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    56. Re:Trolling? by flyneye · · Score: 0

      I agree, on behalf of myself and others branded "troll" for our inability to discolor inconvenient truth with politesse, I would point out that this sick little bastard is just a criminal. I, for one, threaten none, but, confront me with some silly bullshit after tracking me down and I assure you that you will be my personal toy victim and anxiety vent, no matter your station, for your trouble. Better bring your whole family and a packed lunch if you intend to battle me. I am a self imposed hermit for good reason. I see most around me as stupid and have a low tolerance for stupidity. Yes, it's inaccurate, yes, I struggle with it,yes, I realize it's not realistic,no, it's not pleasant, no, I'm not a threat to anyone (minding their own business out of arms reach), yes, I still manage to function in society, mostly without incident and even prosper.
            This kid is just a stalker. to troll or flame is a controlled art meant to make the point, by overkill ,to the stupidest common denominator.
      We bravely face invincible ignorance of the majority, often with our reputations and karma on the line, just so even the biggest morons can know when the sky is, or isn't falling.
      The kid showed no sign of bravery or righteousness in anything he did. The author handled things brilliantly .

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    57. Re:Trolling? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Being abusive is trolling

      How ironic. You're ranting about what trolling means when you don't even know what it means. Trolling is when you say shit that you don't even believe in order to get a specific response. It can be used for good, if you're having a conversation and you say something ridiculous to point out how ridiculous it would be to say that thing. Mostly it's used for ill, e.g. to make people upset about references to gay niggers.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    58. Re:Trolling? by truedfx · · Score: 1

      What definition of troll do you use? I would consider being abusive as one particular, not necessarily very effective, form of trolling. Just like the messages we both agree on as trolls, being abusive also can be done in order to get you to ignore a rational discussion and just flame me as a response. If that's the goal of the message, why isn't it a troll?

    59. Re:Trolling? by jcr · · Score: 2

      Yeah, trolling is something very different from what went on here. Trolling means posting inflammatory messages just to elicit a reaction.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    60. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To my mind, the actions this kid perpetrated rank up there with that shitbag of a woman who drove a teenage girl to suicide.

    61. Re:Trolling? by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nobody knows what trolling is anymore!

      Just like nobody seems to know what hacking is, either.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    62. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you think bug only means an error in a program?

      If you have a bug, you've been bugged, you are being spied upon, spyware was installed either by a virus or through a trojan or worm or lack of user intelligence.

    63. Re:Trolling? by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      It's not "an issue" in America, because any idiot with $100 can already buy a gun, and have it in his hand a lot faster than crafting it on a 3D printer.

      Google "buy guns cheap" and have your credit card ready.

    64. Re:Trolling? by dredwerker · · Score: 0

      Since you've almost nailed it, I'll just add one thing. Here on Slashdot we have a -1 Troll option and a -1 Flamebait option. Almost nobody here knows what either of those terms mean anymore, including right here on Slashdot. As an example, when someone is clearly making moronic statements that they actually believe, and one calls them a moron, that is neither a troll, nor is it flamebait. Wikipedia gets it completely wrong as well. Flamebait is much like trolling, where the poster says something ridiculous in order to bait people into flaming them. Ergo, if I call someone a moron when they have made it clear that they are either a moron or intending to be one, my response might be a follow up to flame bait (if the poster intended to get me to call him a moron), but is not itself flamebait. Now, I'd really like to see people read this, understand it, and start modding correctly, but let's face it: there are a lot of morons in the world ;-0

      I completely agree with your post. And must be a moron as I accidentally moderated it redundant. So this post will unmoderate it.

      --
      On a long enough timeline. The survival rate for everyone drops to zero. Chuck Palahniuk, Fight Club, 1996
    65. Re:Trolling? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      It's not "an issue" in America, because any idiot with $100 can already buy a gun, and have it in his hand a lot faster than crafting it on a 3D printer.

      Depends on where you are. In California, not so much.

      Google "buy guns cheap" and have your credit card ready.

      I live in California, so I can buy a gun with a credit card, but then it gets sent to a gun store and I have to deal with the background check and pay $40.

      On the other hand, I know people who can get me any gun I want if I'll pay for it. But I won't get ANYTHING from them for $100. I don't have any interesting weapons, because I live in California and that's extra-sketchy here. Just normal ones.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    66. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Weak attempt at trolling, steppedleader.

    67. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then forget about the gun and substitute anything really nasty. Running a car over you in a lonely street, rattlesnake, poisoned blowdart ... heck, just stalking and knifing you if he's brave and capable enough. The point is things can escalate badly.

    68. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      With respect, I don't think roman_mir/udachny is a troll.

      I thought he was, but then he started replying to some of my anti-libertarian bait threads.

      Eventually he started rambling incoherently about how Stalin's goons killed his family, how evil I was, etc., descending into telling me that he would be in prison right now if I were closeby as he wouldn't be able to hold himself back. He also told me he now has a "personal interest" in me or something.

      At that point I decided that either I'd out-trolled him and he didn't know what to do next, or that he really was a guy whose family had been killed by Stalin and who - as a result - decided that anything which wasn't his perceived diametric opposite must be pure evil. IOW, roman_mir/udachny is another example of someone with a harrowing childhood experience with X who quickly associates everything with X.

      Of course, that itself could have been part of the troll. But mindless threatening abuse isn't trolling - it's mindless threatening abuse. Anyone with enough time can do it.

      A more subtle conclusion would be that which, I believe, applies to many trolls: they are reflecting a good dose of their opinion, but know it's too irrational to be able to justify soundly, so instead they pretend to themselves that they're playing a game. Eventually they get so caught up in the game that they forget that they've been coming out with bullshit. I believe this is particularly true with the libertarianism/social Darwinism crap that's also popular in the mainstream media these days. Consider Fox News: after a few months working at that place, I am convinced that you entirely forget just how unscientific your journalism is. You've come in as a conservative possibly genuinely wanting to Expose Liberal Lies, and you come out as a conservative prepared to say absolutely anything as long as it seems to advance the Party Line.

      tl;dr A Troll is someone with an unsound belief doggy-paddling in a slough of anti-intellectual culture.

    69. Re:Trolling? by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      It might be if he isn't really a libertarian.

      I have to say, before slashdot I didn't have such strong views about how libertarianism was such a stupid, selfish and immoral philosophy. You have to wonder whether some of the people extolling it's virtues here are actually people who are deliberately trying to give it a bad name.

    70. Re:Trolling? by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Summary was a waste of time. The submitter should have specified that "The Troll" turned out to be victim's friend's stupid teenager son.

      I understand that the fear of the victim and suffering, etc. was real, but for the rest of us, statistics is what important and the identity of the petty young sociopath as a (1) acquaintance (2) teenager, would help a lot for other victims of anonymous harassment to be more calm about such cases.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    71. Re:Trolling? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      forget about the gun and substitute anything really nasty. Running a car over you in a lonely street, rattlesnake, poisoned blowdart ...

      all of which takes more prep (meaning they're less likely to actually do it) and is more likely to get you caught than a long-range rifle shot.

      In actuality it's a load of shit. You are I hope aware that the federal government offers discounts on surplus main battle rifles (M1 garands) and their ammunition through the Civilian Marksmanship Program. Our government wants us to be riflemen. Terrorist snipers are not a common problem in the USA in spite of the broad proliferation of high-powered scoped rifles. The risk of this sort of thing is grossly overblown.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    72. Re:Trolling? by mapkinase · · Score: 2

      The difference between the troll and The Onion, is that The Onion is well known satire magazine and only Iranian government and people who live under rock don't know that. The troll who signs up "The Troll" is not a troll anymore, he is just expressing obviously offensive material with a noble desire to wake up the masses from their .. .well, you know what I mean.

      Unless he is Holocaust victims. God forbid trolling the Jews.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    73. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "The kid did wrong"

      The guy engaged in a persistent laborious and concentrated effort to stalk, harass, and threaten the guy. He did very badly wrong, many times over, with a deliberate intent and malice.

      "to ASSume he's a sociopath is just utter stupidity"

      Why? It seems like a pretty reasonable assumption.

    74. Re:Trolling? by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      But who's being trolled? It might be the guy pretending hunter2 is his password.

    75. Re:Trolling? by 1u3hr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ell name a SINGLE Internet word we old greybeards came up with that hasn't been butchered all to hell by folks that don't get it had a specific meaning

      Well, "net" lingo usually borrows and perverts vocabulary from other realms. "Troll" is a bit of wordplay on the net fishing method and the mythical monster. "Geek" used to be a guy who bit the head of chickens in a circus sideshow. You can't complain too much when the words receive wider usage and change their meanings again.

    76. Re:Trolling? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      name a SINGLE Internet word we old greybeards came up with that hasn't been butchered all to hell by folks that don't get it had a specific meaning, just one. Troll, shill, virus

      You think we invented the word shill, created in the 1920s?

      That's why I don't even say words like trojan or virus anymore but just tell them "You got a bug" because as far as the public is concerned everything is a virus, and everyone that does something bad on the net is a troll. its just lost its meaning.

      And you helped.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    77. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      " This kid is probably a sociopath."

      Since he broke down and cried because his conscience was getting to him it is quite clear that he is not a sociopath.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crocodile_tears

    78. Re:Trolling? by Charliemopps · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed. I'm an argumentative person, and generally like to debate. I basically can't post in regular forums any longer, as forums have devolved into dens of like-minded individuals that do not want to have their view points challenged. Disagree and they're shouting troll and locking your posts in seconds.

    79. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seemed like an effective technique to avoid any significant punishment for his action.

      You seem to be under the misunderstanding that sociopaths cannot cry, or cannot appear to show emotions.

    80. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Today representatives of the Catholic Church still impales little boys against the little boys' will. I wouldn't describe it as working "just as efficiently today", however.

    81. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      "Nah, roman_mir is just a libertarian type"

      No, he's not. He's just a dickhead.

    82. Re:Trolling? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Re-read it, and what I wrote. Pay special attention to because his conscience was getting to him. He didn't know he was caught yet, so they couldn't have possibly been crocodile tears.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    83. Re:Trolling? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Not at all. I do however posses enough awareness and intellect combined with an ability to comprehend what I read to realize that he didn't know he was caught so there was no punishment for his actions to be avoided as far as he was concerned.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    84. Re:Trolling? by Nursie · · Score: 2

      Err no. RTFA again. Trolled Dude talks to the parents and tells them what's going on, then arranges a meeting with Troll Mama, Troll Papa and Troll. After a polite chat he breaks out the file full of stuff and starts going through it.

      THEN Troll boy cries.

    85. Re:Trolling? by curiousJan · · Score: 2

      "Messed up kid"s who send ashes and make references to relatives from Auschwitz are far more than "messed up" ... I have to agree with the posit that this a potential-sociopath and worthy of watching _within_ the system, so that he can be further constrained should he devolve. All the better if he's not a sociopath and has really only made a very, very stupid mistake.

    86. Re:Trolling? by curiousJan · · Score: 2

      Yeah the kid did wrong, but to ASSume he's a sociopath is just utter stupidity.

      Making logical inferences from the, granted minimal, information available from this particular case and adding in the base knowledge available via psychology of sociopaths is not utter stupidity ... ignoring the signs and allowing the potential for further harm to additional individuals would be.

    87. Re:Trolling? by multimediavt · · Score: 2

      That's not true. A sociopath merely lacks empathy - they may be aware that they are hurting someone, but they don't understand why that's a bad thing. Placed in an incentive system where hurting people is penalised and provides no advantages, they'll do what's best for them and stop.

      Actually, a sociopath is just someone that has no regard for other people whatsoever. This takes many behavioral forms including the example talked about by the OP.

      The kid needs help and I am glad that the situation was resolved the way it was. If the kid had been arrested he may not have gotten the help he needs and gotten far more antisocial. I hope his parents also get some counseling because they are the ones that raised that monster! Obviously they let him spend far too much time on that laptop and not enough time interacting with real people. Far too easy to nurture your psychosis in the fantasy world that is the Internet.

    88. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not at all. I do however posses enough awareness and intellect combined with an ability to comprehend what I read to realize that he didn't know he was caught so there was no punishment for his actions to be avoided as far as he was concerned.

      You know nothing. You weren't there; you're relying on the author's description. You didn't experience the environment, the conversation, observe microexpressions, body language, etc. You don't know if one of the adults telegraphed in some way, no matter how seemingly minor or innocuous, that he's toast.

      The kind of pronouncements we're making on here are wild speculation, nothing more.

    89. Re:Trolling? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      "You know nothing."

      I know you are an idiot who cannot understand what he reads, so that is something.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    90. Re:Trolling? by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 2

      Look at any dictionary. Definitions are listed in the approximate order in which their usage first became known. Each mild variant of meaning came into being in the same way. Technology is no different.

      Words get thrown out there, people use them in various ways, and the meanings change over time. Then people settle on a usage, the "vulgar" definition. Which in itself is an interesting read. The Damascus Latin Bible was "vulgar" for a thousand years.

      http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/vulgar

      I try to keep people to the real meaning of things. But people were taught in school how to determine meaning from context. When they find a word or phrase they don't completely understand, they use it they way it makes sense to them. So you have "for all intensive purposes" and "begs the question" in common usage. You can correct it, but you can't win unless you personally intervene with everyone, individually, and repeatedly.

      Good for you for wanting to be specific and clear when communicating. When groups of people do that and agree on the meaning, it is "jargon". No one cares.

      This happens to be the kind of "trolling" where you have a specific victim in mind. It is not clear that Leo was the only victim - he could very well be the only one willing or able to find his troll. If you have any fringe awareness of the concept of "4chan", you should be aware that targeted trolling is no different from anonymous random trolling. Except for the heightened satisfaction it gives when you know you have "won" again.

      As I understand the story, this kid targeted the facade of a neighbor, the online presence who is not a person but a bunch of text and pictures inside the little box. And he kept dragging his line, and got a kick out of every time Leo bit. The only way to make it more fun was ramp it up a notch. The only difference here is the kid's inability to see a neighbor as a person. Counseling was appropriate. Although if your neighbor had some sort of fame or notoriety outside of being a neighbor, such as being popular on Twitter, it could be possible to associate the neighbor with the person you met, and the persona with the digital world.

    91. Re:Trolling? by fustakrakich · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No way... Dr.Bob,DC has him beat by a long shot. He's always very civil, and never insults anyone. In a Slashdot poll he would be number one. In fact, I wish they would do that poll.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    92. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      its just lost its meaning.

      You are witnessing two phenomenons of language: regression, and the newbie factor.

      Considering how briefly computers have existed, and the etymology of the words in question, it should be expected to happen. Troll has just regressed back to its original meaning: a monster that lives under a bridge - or the slight variation a monster that lives in a computer. Most people aren't told the intended meaning when confronted with these words, they just hear them in the context they're used and assume a slight variation on the old meaning (if any).

      If you don't want regression to happen, use a random word generator or bizzare prefix/suffix. If a word didn't exist, it can't regress. For example, instead of troll, use "ignoll". It sounds like ignore, plus gnoll. Instead of cracker, re-purpose jargon like nop (gnop, gnopper), or jmp (hjmp, hjmper - pronounced like humper).

      For the noob factor: restricting access and adding hurdles (actual challenges, quizzes, whatever). Just don't accommodate as much.

    93. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who does these kinds of things is sick - and no, I'm not suggesting that lets them off, I'm actually suggesting the opposite.
      This sick pathetic excuse for a human needs to be put down, permanently. It's the only way to be sure.

    94. Re:Trolling? by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1, Funny

      No this is terrible. When you are making a movie or TV show, you have to illuminate things so the folks at home can see them. Since you don't have much light in the vacuum of interstellar space, you have to provide your own. You can't light every surface because you don't have a portable sun, so you do the best you can. So you get the occasional shadow.

      The shadow is maintained in more modern movies, when it can be fixed digitally, because it provides atmosphere (the literary kind, not the physical kind). If you broke with tradition people would go nuts on you, call you Michael Bay, and make a song about how much your movie sucked. Like taking out the whip-smack sound effect from martial arts movies - if it doesn't sound like it hurt, it wasn't kung fu.

      And, just because you don't see the light source doesn't mean there isn't one. They could be right next to a dwarf star, or close enough to a solar system. It just isn't in frame.

      And finally, anyone familiar with "in space they can't hear you scream" is unlikely to have a brain fart long enough to replace sound with light in their model of how fake science works. So go lrn2intrnet moar.

    95. Re:Trolling? by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

      Could you simply not see the "Edit post" button on your own stuff so you don't have to double-post like that, karma whore? And btw nice try slipping in a reference to "OMG PONIES" to lend yourself some cred.

      Rule of thumb: once the news media pick up a thing, it is no longer that thing. They don't understand it, and the misinformation spreads like wildfire. People tweeting and re-tweeting so that something that should have been an ephemeral thought gains persistence and lives on long after you corrected it. Kinda like your first post (which you can't edit now that you have replied), and probably like this guy Leo. If he had just stayed away from tweeting, he would have been fine, but he had to type stuff into the internet like he was famous or something. Who wants to read what you're typing? That's the problem with writing - everyone can do it.

    96. Re:Trolling? by fustakrakich · · Score: 2

      ... everyone knows you don't have shadows in a vacuum.

      You mean we only see a lunar eclipse because we have an atmosphere? I did not know that

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    97. Re:Trolling? by hazah · · Score: 0

      You can't train someone to be a sociopath, they are born with it.

    98. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean: Out of arguments, have no record to stand on, all I have left is name calling Democrat types?

    99. Re:Trolling? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Nobody knows what trolling is anymore!

      I do!
      It's dressing up as a Scandinavian monster!

    100. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vlad the Impaler is more of an example of an Alpha Sociopath coming into power and exerting control over others that might be like himself. Although I agree with the idea of making the risks far out weigh the benefits discouraging someone like this, the extremes to which that particular despot went are unnecessary through out 99% of human history.

    101. Re:Trolling? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      There seems to be a popular form of argument on the net (and other media) where people will deliberately pretend to be incredibly stupid if that's what it takes to reject the viewpoint of another. It's sometimes obvious that they do not actually believe what they've written but don't really care about lying to people outside what they see as their little tribe, so long as they "win" some sort of childish argument game. I think some of those who look like they are deliberately trying to give something a bad name instead fit into that category and don't really care what "outsiders" think about it.

    102. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because if you make an offensive video about Jews, they wil form mobs and burn down your embassy.

    103. Re:Trolling? by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      So what are you suggesting? If he as sociopathic as you suggest, then simply pressing charges won't change anything, so you'd have to lock him up to get him out of harms way. You couldn't lock him up forever of course (what court would do that?), so eventually he'd get out again.

      Eventually, that's exactly what they do. The parole process assigns heavy weight to a test for sociopathy. If you score high, which means, you're still a sociopath (this never changes, but they re-apply the test every time) then you don't get paroled.

      Some day a-la a an old Voyager episode they may have a cure for it, but right now the prevailing wisdom is to keep them locked up forever, because a death sentence is actually more expensive.

    104. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He hacked into his Facebook acct and knew his "victim's" home address. Sometimes, its best to assume the worst in human nature, especially when you are being clearly targetted with apparent psychotic behaviour.

    105. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot. There is absolutely no reason why you cannot have a shadow in a vacuum. A shadow is caused by LIGHT being blocked by an object...looks like you've been reading those 'explosions have no sound in a vacuum/space' explanations too often, and now you've confused it with light/shadows. There's this thing called a 'lunar eclipse' you may have heard of...it's a 'shadow' in a 'vacuum' (space) caused by the earth blocking light from the sun....
      Sheesh, talk about a non-geek...hand in your slashdot membership immediately. :)

    106. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that all you've got? Let me ask, do you have a doctoral level degree in a social science.. even something as suspect as "counseling"? You do not fucking know what was going on in that kid's head. I'm suspecting your IQ is two standard deviations to the left.

    107. Re:Trolling? by PJ6 · · Score: 1

      The part of the sociopaths brain that connects their present action to future consequences simply does not work. No matter how severe the punishment, the sociopath won't even consider it when hurting someone. That's why these people are constantly in an out of jail.

      Lack of empathy and lack of self-control are independent traits. Of course, the most obvious sociopaths have both.

    108. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Read the GP's post history. He is an obsessive anti-Muslim bigot. Constantly trolling and looking for fights. Downmods are appropriate when it comes to the crap he posts.

    109. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hell name a SINGLE Internet word we old greybeards came up with that hasn't been butchered all to hell by folks that don't get it had a specific meaning, just one. Troll, shill, virus, its all lost its original meanings because too many who don't have a clue what they meant use them wrong constantly. That's why I don't even say words like trojan or virus anymore but just tell them "You got a bug" because as far as the public is concerned everything is a virus, and everyone that does something bad on the net is a troll. its just lost its meaning.

      Not all trolls are psychos. All trolls are rude and disrespectful, lash out with antisocial impunity. Regardless, killing anonymity (for the general public) is a really bad, really stupid, idea.

    110. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sociopaths don't learn how to stop hurting people, they just learn not to get caught the next time.

      That's not true. A sociopath merely lacks empathy - they may be aware that they are hurting someone, but they don't understand why that's a bad thing. Placed in an incentive system where hurting people is penalised and provides no advantages, they'll do what's best for them and stop.

      Exactly. Steve Jobs eventually learned that bankrupting companies is not a good thing.

    111. Re:Trolling? by microbox · · Score: 1

      but they don't understand why that's a bad thing

      Correction: the suffering of others does not naturally fit into their cost function.

      --

      Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
    112. Re:Trolling? by qvatch · · Score: 1

      Now, this, this is an example of trolling. Slightly absurd, somewhat believable statement which derails the thread.

    113. Re:Trolling? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1
      I highly doubt you know what a standard deviation is, actually, but try looking three in the other direction or so if you actually do.

      " Let me ask, do you have a doctoral level degree in a social science."

      So if I had a doctorate in Anthropology, for example, that would make a difference to you? You don't need a high IQ to figure out that a guy who posts as an AC and then hangs around to see the replies and post more idiotic ramblings is a troll.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    114. Re:Trolling? by sg_oneill · · Score: 1

      I'm sure if it wasn't his friends son, he would have. But friends dont put friends kids in jail. More to the point, because the kid WASNT a stranger he had other less destructive options available than ruining the kids life in revenge.

      --
      Excuse the Unicode crap in my posts. That's an apostrophe, and slashdot is busted.
    115. Re:Trolling? by hazah · · Score: 2

      WTF!? It's a genetic mutation to begin with which is fostered by the environment in which the child develops. That is why not everyone of them turns out to be a serial killer and why some actually have relatively normal lives. My father shows an overwhelming number of traits, it doesn't mean I look down at him for it. Think a little harder and maybe look this up before you mod, or is that too much of a challange?

    116. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In a vacuum; everyone knows you don't have shadows in a vacuum."

      Is this a troll?

      What does the lack of presence of an atmosphere/gas (vacuum) have to do with the prevention of light casting a shadow? I feel the need to spell it out for you. A shadow is an object disrupting directional / parellel light which was contributing in a proportion great enough to the present contributing ambient and diffuse lighting to be noticeable to a human.

      Shuttle craft are almost always deployed in solar systems. The distance of the local sun in such systems almost always ensures the primary light source is effectively unidirectional. If you're talking about situations where they encounter shuttles in inter-stellar space, and there genuinely isn't light being generated from ships/drives/surface lights to explain it.. then... well.. I think you must have a very hard time watching movies in general if you're paying attention at such levels? I'm sorry? The shows are meant to be fun, and it sounds like you aren't having it.

    117. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You did a fine job of proving their point.

    118. Re:Trolling? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      it's almost as if no one controls the language

      leading to a constant fertile ground of imagination and invention of new words and shifting meanings

      and this is a bad thing in your mind?

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    119. Re:Trolling? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Yes, but as an extension of himself, so the double-standard has still been applied to her by extension, unfortunately.

    120. Re:Trolling? by Toonol · · Score: 1

      That may be true; but there's a disconnect between that kind of sociopath, and the typical usage of the word as bandied about here. On slashdot, 'socialpath' is nearly synonymous with 'jerk'. You can't identify sociopaths with the loose definition, and then treat them according to the stringent definition. Logic error.

    121. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But you repeat yourself.

      Libertarianism is just the statement that society has no duty to protect the weak. "Enables suffering because he can" is the effective definition of "dickhead".

    122. Re:Trolling? by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shouldn't that be Myanmar Shave, now?

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    123. Re:Trolling? by stridebird · · Score: 1

      Sociopaths are the most manipulative people in the world. It's why the alphas go into politics. They thrive there. They are one of the three types of people in this world that you never EVER trust along with junkies and Party loyalist ideologues.

      Arguably, junkies and ideologues are sociopaths too. It's enough to say "never trust a sociopath". Except the problem is that sociopathy isn't simply absent or present in a person; sociopathy exists in all people to a greater or lesser extent. And sociopathy is probably the result of the interactions of a set of underlying psychological states and conditions: the forces that establish such properties as self-esteem, motivation, empathy and so on.

    124. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, you do know that the original post here WAS in fact a troll.

      "You're right. Trolling is when I call you a stupid useless faggot, which is exactly what you are."

      The troll wasn't the fact that the original anon said someone was a "useless faggot", it's that they defined trolling as obviously wrong in a discussion about trolling, and 20 people jumped in to argue about how wrong he is.

      I'd call that the definition of trolling.

      Now of course we need to discuss the implications of the intent vs. result and whether that matters.

    125. Re:Trolling? by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      I see this as more of a Cyber Bulling then really trolling. Trolling is usually a way to either get someone flustered up so to avoid an honest factual discussion. I see in the news a couple of great trolls out there.

      The birther movement and Obama is a Muslim troll: Why debate issues when you try to keep debate going on some lame conspiracy theory that really facts will do nothing to stop it.

      The Romney Quotes, most of those quotes that he said are often taken well out of context. However they are used out of context to get am emotional response.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    126. Re:Trolling? by unkiereamus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This kid is probably a sociopath....Sociopaths don't learn how to stop hurting people, they just learn not to get caught the next time.

      Fun fact, per the DSM-IV Sociopathy, or actually Antisocial Personality Disorder, as it's now known, can't be diagnosed before age 18.

      What that source material doesn't cite, and what 5 seconds of googlin failed to turn up, and thus would require too much effort for me to cite, is why.

      Put simply, almost all kids profile as sociopaths. Look at the diagnostic criteria, I'm sure you'll see why.

      Now, before anyone jumps up and says "But...but...he's 17, that's close enough to 18, right?", I'll point out that like any developmental milestone, that's just a guideline, there's always some play in development, plus or minus.

      Now, having said that, it's entirely possible that this kid actually is a sociopath, personally it doesn't read like that to me, but I'm willing to be wrong.

      --
      I needed a sig so people would know who I am, but I was too drunk to make something witty, so you get this instead.
    127. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "In a vacuum; everyone knows you don't have shadows in a vacuum." Are you trolling here?

    128. Re:Trolling? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Go on to 4chan and tell me whether all of those folks on /b/ are sociopaths, or whether it is remotely possible that growing up in this always anonymous age tends to break down that brain filter that would tell you what lines not to cross.

    129. Re:Trolling? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Did you know that if you touch that dangly bit in the back of your throat you can taste everything you've eaten in the last 12 hours?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    130. Re:Trolling? by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh I'm with you there 110% Drinkypoo. When my sister was diagnosed with a terminal illness right after the birth of her second son and her husband decided 'that was too much for him" and bailed i was handed two adorable little boys under the age of two as my mother had to devote herself full time to taking care of my sister. I was lucky that mom had given me a great example so I sat there reading "Great sci-fi writers of the 70s" to them and when it came to electronics while my boys got to have all the electronic stuff they could possibly want, what with me being a geek (My sister was royally pissed that the oldest boy's first word wasn't "mama" but "MINE!" as I had snuck the controller out of his hand while he snoozed and replaced Barney Hide and Seek with Eternal Champions and he caught me) I never EVER used it as a babysitter, i used it as a learning tool.

      I didn't just get educational games, I did things like took apart a hard drive and had a friend cut me a clear plastic top for it so they could see how the drive spun and wrote when they would hit save, showed them by putting their faces into DOOM levels how what you saw on the screen was controlled by loading files and scripts, I tore things apart and showed them how they work. This paid off later in life as the oldest now helps the others in his pre-med classes that don't have great computer skills and the youngest is becoming incredibly skilled with graphics.

      But when I would pick them up from their friends houses or ask them how things were there....damn, just damn. Homes without a single book in them, not a single one which shocked the hell out of my boys which were reading Narnia and Harry Potter from when they were little, and parents that frankly never actually interacted with their kids! It was ALL TVs and consoles in their bedrooms and as long as they weren't "bugging" the parents whatever they did was fine. I didn't choose to have two babies dropped into my lap but the thought of just dumping two little kids in front of an idiot box and never interacting with them just horrifies me, talk about stunting their development!

      But there comes a time when shitty parents or not its time to grow the hell up and accept responsibility and at 17 I think the kid is old enough to know better. Its not like there isn't tons of horrific footage of the death camps all over the net, 5 minutes in Google would have shown him that wasn't something to be using like some sort of prank. Its time for him to man the fuck up and learn what he can and can't do or frankly this little shithead is gonna open his mouth to the wrong person in college and get his ass stomped.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    131. Re:Trolling? by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      Erm... then why does Slashdot get an exemption?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    132. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ell name a SINGLE Internet word we old greybeards came up with that hasn't been butchered all to hell by folks that don't get it had a specific meaning

      Well, "net" lingo usually borrows and perverts vocabulary from other realms. "Troll" is a bit of wordplay on the net fishing method and the mythical monster. "Geek" used to be a guy who bit the head of chickens in a circus sideshow. You can't complain too much when the words receive wider usage and change their meanings again.

      What nets? Trolling is something people do every day from the back of their personal boats, you just drag a line in the water while moving.
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolling_(fishing)

      That's what trolling a forum is, tossing some lines out while you putt around hoping they follow. For amusement, to change the subject, or whatever.
      IMHO, the analogy still makes complete sense, and to call someone who trolls, a troll, is hardly wordplay.

      Using 'troll' (noun) to mean 'asshole on the Internet' is COMPLETELY WRONG. Trolling takes skill. You have to be both correct, and incendiary, or incorrect and sincere, or ... well, you have to try it to learn other patterns, but I think I made my point. You don't even need to be anonymous to troll, you just have to be believable. "I'm voting for Mitt Romney because I like his economic policies, and he is white." would work under almost any circumstances, for example.

      Mailing a box of ashes to someone is NOT TROLLING, that is inviting police action.

    133. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This happens to be the kind of "trolling" where you have a specific victim in mind.

      Sorry, but no. That is not the spirit of trolling in either sense. You toss lines out behind you and see what you get, that's trolling. It's not chasing the fish, that's called fishing, or harassment.

      Breaking into a facebook account, sending harassing items in the mail, not trolling. That's not even baiting someone for a response, so again, not even CLOSE to either meaning of the word. This is plain old harassment.

    134. Re:Trolling? by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      Kid seems like more than just a jerk. Maybe he is that kind of sociopath. Who knows.

    135. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction to my post: being abusive isn't trolling.

      Before your correction I was going to say, nice troll...

    136. Re:Trolling? by houstonbofh · · Score: 2

      Uh, no... RTFA again. "A couple of days after that conversation I met my friend, his wife and their son in a quiet and discreet location. The son, The Troll who almost driven me mad, was totally unaware that I'd be joining them." This was a man telling a friend how crazy his life was getting. The kid MAY have been smart enough to catch on, but they did what they could to trap him. A true socio-path might have been just enjoying the results of his work.

    137. Re:Trolling? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      "You got a bug"

      Us TRUE greybeards object to that incorrect usage. A bug is actually a moth or other such insect that got stuck in the electrical relays of a mainframe computer. But its been butchered beyond belief and has lost its meaning.

    138. Re:Trolling? by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Internet is the main form of communication for kids today and depriving someone of internet access will isolate them socially completely.

      We used to call that "grounding" and somehow I survived it more than once. I know this may come as a shock, but punishment is supposed to be unpleasant.

    139. Re:Trolling? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      You really think that Leo Traynor will not be watching his friends kid who tortured him for a year? He still has all the data and proof, so if he does devolve, the record is still there.

    140. Re:Trolling? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Take it from personal experience... Being run over by a car takes almost no prep. Getting away with it takes more, but that is the case with anything.

    141. Re:Trolling? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      You can't identify sociopaths with the loose definition, and then treat them according to the stringent definition. Logic error.

      There is more than one person on slashdot. And sometimes they disagree. So I will see your "Logic Error" and raise you a "False Premise."

    142. Re:Trolling? by SomeKDEUser · · Score: 1

      No, Although I sympathise with the notion that more people ought to be stalwartly and adamantly in favour of personal freedom, libertarians are not adding anything to the conversation. They operate on the fundamental principle that no-one should even try to stop dickheads from being dickheads because PERSONAL FREEDOM and MARKET WILL SELF-CORRECT.

      This is nothing to do with personal freedom: this is just the expression of a wannabe psychopath angry that he cannot follow his impulses. But not all libertarians are like that. Some have been lucky in life, and they deeply want to believe they are successful because of their efforts, and not their circumstances. Think middle-aged white guy in a gated community.

      Fundamentally, libertarian do not understand that their cherished market and contract law needs to be enforced. Enforced by an entity powerful enough for that: the government, and that the government to be legitimate and powerful enough, needs to stem from the will of the people, and be large enough, and that the people might think that the dog-eat-dog world of the libertarians is not what they desire. So deep down, libertarians wish that their perfectly free world be enforced by a fascist dictatorship.

    143. Re:Trolling? by greg_barton · · Score: 1

      HOW DO YOU KNOW MY PASSWORD??

    144. Re:Trolling? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Does it have to be either / or? It could never be that our rather screwed up sociality is raising people that have less value and empathy for others?

    145. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    146. Re:Trolling? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      That's why I don't even say words like trojan or virus anymore but just tell them "You got a bug"

      So you are the one who is resposible for the abuse of the term "bug" as whatever instead of an error in program code.

      A virus has been referred to as a bug since before there were computer viruses. And a listening device has been referred to as a bug since before there were common keyloggers. But even with your argument, how does most mallware get installed? Through a software bug... (If you answered "Adobe" you still get credit.)

    147. Re:Trolling? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Could you simply not see the "Edit post" button on your own stuff so you don't have to double-post like that, karma whore?

      What site do you think you're on?

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    148. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not sure I disagree, but pressing charges may not be needed - depends on the kid. When a neighbor's kid was harassing my family (knocking on the front door and hiding so it seemed nobody was there, or rather, someone was there, hiding and watching us from... from where?), my wife eventually found out who it was (from another neighbor), and called the state police (it was a state offense). There is little in this world that scares the bejesus out of a kid more than a visit from a black booted, gun toting, fully uniformed state trooper. No charges pressed, just a talking to. Put an end to the terrorism instantly. (A different neighbor's kid couldn't seem to keep out of our yard, despite several calls to the parents. A visit by a town police officer put an end to that as well. The parents were angry at us for calling the cops, not at their precious little Jimmy (not his real name) for acting like the miscreant he was. Parents these days - worthless.)

      So calling the cops but not pressing charges can put the perp and the police on notice, so if there is a next time, things can be handled a bit more seriously.

    149. Re:Trolling? by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      Read the GP's post history. He is an obsessive anti-Muslim bigot. Constantly trolling and looking for fights. Downmods are appropriate when it comes to the crap he posts.

      Also, true. But in this case he was both on-topic, and correct.

    150. Re:Trolling? by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be Myanmar Shave, now?

      Not really. The governments of the U.S., UK, and Canada do not recognize the current Myanmar government as being legitimate, so they still refer to the country as Burma.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    151. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re-read it, and what I wrote. Pay special attention to because his conscience was getting to him. He didn't know he was caught yet, so they couldn't have possibly been crocodile tears.

      You really wouldn't have figured out that you had been caught if you were put in that situation? Seriously?

    152. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm surprised not to see the same questions being asked on /. Thanks for posting the link.

    153. Re:Trolling? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      "I have to agree with the posit that this a potential-sociopath and worthy of watching _within_ the system, so that he can be further constrained should he devolve."

      I might agree with you except for one thing: I have seen what "the system" itself has devolved into. For some time, it has no longer been a "justice" system, but instead has been a money-generator for the state, corporations who run "corrections" facilities, and the multiple other businesses (lawyers, parole officers, counselors, etc.) that support them. All at taxpayer expense.

      Today, "the system" is designed to never let you out once you get in. Even for minor things, they put obstacles and conditions and fees on things that are intended to make you stumble, or miss payments, or violate parole, and keep you attached to them forever. I have seen that happen to more than one person.

      I am sure it is worse in some states than in others. But if I had any concern for the kid or his family at all, I would invoke "the system" only as a last, desperate resort.

    154. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or he's a messed up kid who didn't have a clue that his actions were hurting someone.

      If he can spell "Auschwitz", he's smart enough to know what he is doing is wrong.

    155. Re:Trolling? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Take it from personal experience... Being run over by a car takes almost no prep. Getting away with it takes more, but that is the case with anything.

      Well, that's what I'm talking about. If you're far from the scene of the death, it's probably a lot easier to get away with the crime. But then, people do get away with hit-and-run.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    156. Re:Trolling? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can't blame the kid bro or judge him too harshly.

      Yes I can. Everyone is responsible for their own actions. Not everyone in adverse situations turn into raging assholes. It's not an excuse.

    157. Re:Trolling? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Sociopathy isn't a black / white thing. Most people have sociopathic tendencies at times. Some people are really, really bad sociopaths. The latter often end up in prison or politics, or both. Most leaders in business have more sociopathic tendencies than say, most rank and file.

      So, for our pet sociopath in this discussion, it's a little premature to suggest he be placed on an ice flow with a hungry polar bear (although this imagery is comforting when thinking about most members of Congress). But he does need some close evaluation.

      As Raven64 noted somewhere above, you can create situations where the sociopathic tendencies can be controlled. Probation is one - most people don't want to go to jail. If they're smart enough and not too fucked up, you can rig it so the big hammer stays over their head for long periods of time. He might just change enough of his behavior to get by in society and become, say, a member of Parliament.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    158. Re:Trolling? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      You got a bug because you didn't use a Trojan.

      The problem with defending the purity of the English language is that English is about as pure as a cribhouse whore. We don't just borrow words; on occasion, English has pursued other languages down alleyways to beat them unconscious and rifle their pockets for new vocabulary.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    159. Re:Trolling? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. While a bad home environment is the cause of many of societies recursive ills, there is quite a bit of research on de novo human psychological pathology. Some kids are just bad.

      I recall watching a couple of videos on 5 year olds that talk about starting fires, knifing siblings and torturing animals. The families, as best as can be reconstructed (and notice that is a significant caveat, but there are lots of examples of this sort of thing) aren't in any way malignant. It's just something in their neurological development that went astray.

      These kids appear to have been born that way and they are friggin scary.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    160. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Punch the little fucker's teeth out, then pull of all his fingers and thumbs and say to him 'Good look trolling until they get voice recognition working properly'

      On second thought, pull the little fucker's tongue out too.

      And put a video on youtube of it being done, so that other trolls think twice

    161. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I bet the tears weren't for show. Even if he is a sociopath and didn't care one way or the other how much pain he'd caused, he would still have been truly upset that he got caught.

      If you read about what a sociopath is, then you'd understand that you're basically betting against Michael Jordan making a slam dunk from 5 feet out with no one guarding him.

      I'd like to take you up on that bet :)

    162. Re:Trolling? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      What we'd call trolling isn't even attempted by these pathetic posers, they don't have the intellectual horsepower to do it.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    163. Re:Trolling? by budgenator · · Score: 1

      So, l will reiterate. Nobody knows what trolling is anymore! They don't. Being abusive is trolling. Saying something controversial isn't trolling.

      Actually my definition of trolling is "Saying something controversial for the simple purpose of stirring up controversy" , some trolling is actually good generates pageviews and drives up revenues from ads and puts a little passion into the discusion; too much get peoples pissed and they leave the site.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    164. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, totally wrong. Those behaviors exhibited before age 18 are consistent with a diagnosis of Conduct Disorder. Take the 5 seconds next time, bigmouth.

    165. Re:Trolling? by Teancum · · Score: 1

      I did that once upon a time. As troll bait I simply gave out what looked like a plausible password that I never used before in my life and now will never use either.

      At least that is better than the password "password", "12345678", or "changeme"

      I've seen all of those used as passwords before is the sad thing.

    166. Re:Trolling? by Teancum · · Score: 1

      Because if you make an offensive video about Jews, they wil form mobs and burn down your embassy.

      In of course the dozens of countries that they form the majority of the population.

      Of course what happens if you make an offensive video about Buddha? I suppose some monk will set themselves on fire if they really want to protest.

    167. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy shit. Watch this and then review the page on psychopathy and anti-social personality disorder on Wikipedia.

    168. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would really be better to put the sociopath down or lock him up.

    169. Re:Trolling? by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      catch up on Jewish/German history and have some appreciation for what he's ranting and raving about

      Or maybe he's just up to date with more recent Israeli^WJewish/Palestinian history.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    170. Re:Trolling? by Onymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Unless he was smart enough to see that this special, unannounced meeting with Traynor was set up to confront him.

      But, yeah, it's hard to say.

    171. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While Star Trek (Star Wars / Firefly / Battlestar Galactica - pick one) tried to stay true to science as much as is possible in a science fiction world where faster than light travel is the norm; they missed one big thing -> everytime a shuttle craft passed the Enterprise it cast a shadow. In a vacuum; everyone knows you don't have shadows in a vacuum.

      LOL. I see what you did there. I'll just call you out right now before someone takes the bait for real, Troll.

    172. Re:Trolling? by camperdave · · Score: 1
      The age-of-18 thing is probably a legal thing, not a psychological or physiological thing. From Behavenet:

      The purpose of DSM-IV is to provide clear descriptions of diagnostic categories in order to enable clinicians and investigators to diagnose, communicate about, study, and treat people with various mental disorders. It is to be understood that inclusion here, for clinical and research purposes, of a diagnostic category such as Pathological Gambling or Pedophilia does not imply that the condition meets legal or other nonmedical criteria for what constitutes mental disease, mental disorder, or mental disability. The clinical and scientific considerations involved in categorization of these conditions as mental disorders may not be wholly relevant to legal judgments, for example, that take into account such issues as individual responsibility, disability determination, and competency.

      The definitions at Behavenet are not purely clinical. Below 18, the subject is legally a minor in most jurisdictions.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    173. Re:Trolling? by bernywork · · Score: 1

      Where's grub when you need him with a good Dr Bob post?

      My coworkers looked at me like I was nuts when reading through that post.....

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    174. Re:Trolling? by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      You give him a police record. Eventually he hangs himself with further crimes, and at least people who google have a chance at being forewarned.

    175. Re:Trolling? by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      I'm disappointed that the author didn't press charges. This kid is probably a sociopath. When he stalks and hurts other people in the future the police won't have the evidence they need of past cases. Sociopaths don't learn how to stop hurting people, they just learn not to get caught the next time.

      AFAIK, doesn't seem to be much difference with a kid who tortures dogs and cats and this. Both seem dangerously close to growing up to be outright sociopaths.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    176. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He knwe it was hurtful, or ihe wouldn't have bothered. This.... isn't enough to be certain of sociopathy, but I'd certainly check the kid's history for animal abuse or sibling abuse for other clues.

      This is serious stalking. This isn't :give the kid a chance" turf, this is "get the kid in therapy and look for other crimes to see if they need to be locked up or to justify long term therapy."

    177. Re:Trolling? by reub2000 · · Score: 1

      Maybe he's not even a sociopath. Normal people can do some pretty inconsiderate things. Maybe he has some socipathic tendencies and a little punishment will do wonders. If he's a full blown sociopath then no amount of punishment is going to change him. It's hard to draw any conclusions from the information given in the article.

    178. Re:Trolling? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      This is quite distinct to saying something like "you're a gay horse". I dunno what a gay horse is, but let's pretend it's offensive.

      I don't understand, could we get a car analogy to explain it?

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    179. Re:Trolling? by Nursie · · Score: 2

      Keep reading... Junior only starts bawling after a whole list of things are brought out and he realises the game is up.

      Sociopath or not this kid needs to a full on psych eval, not just 'counselling'

    180. Re:Trolling? by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      Unless you have gastroparesis, then it's more like 24-48.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    181. Re:Trolling? by brusk · · Score: 1

      The hunted2 becomes the hunter2?

      --
      .sig withheld by request
    182. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Studies how that boy's frontal lobe - to make meaningful decisions, does not mature until the age of 27 or so and for girls it is 22 or so. So, the boy had his bad decision making binge and was caught. Punishing him for that would have created a hidden monster later. Were all the Slash dot readers matured before the age of 27 or so? I am not condoning the boy's error of judgement but by not retaliating against him the author had gone up in my esteem. Sorry he went through nightmares and fear, but he proved himself to be a magnanimous human being. I salute you.

    183. Re:Trolling? by stridebird · · Score: 1

      ooo my own personal troll. how nice.

    184. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a fucking nincompoop, just quietly.

      "He didn't know he was caught"

      Really? That's what you're going to go with? Well then you'll have to show us where it says the kid has a severe mental handicap, because anybody who is not retarded would have realized they were caught.

    185. Re:Trolling? by StoneyMahoney · · Score: 1

      If the kid is a sociopath, he needs help and counseling, possibly medication as well. He's not choosing to be a prick, he's mentally ill. Punishing a kid for being ill is a disgusting idea - who the hell modded this post up? You should all be ashamed of yourselves!

    186. Re:Trolling? by DrXym · · Score: 1

      I think he's genuine in his beliefs regardless of how stupid I consider them personally. On the other hand that Dr Bob cretin who stinks so many article with chiropractic screed probably is a troll, or mentally unbalanced, or both.

    187. Re:Trolling? by martyros · · Score: 1

      Some day a-la a an old Voyager episode they may have a cure for it, but right now the prevailing wisdom is to keep them locked up forever, because a death sentence is actually more expensive.

      Is it really necessary to lock them up? If someone is born without empathy, they can't really do anything about that. But they can at least see that there are benefits to having people happy with them, and living roughly within the rules for society. They can even channel their sadistic tendencies to appropriate channels -- like playing certain kinds of cut-throat games (Diplomacy comes to mind). I'm pretty sure I've got people of my acquaintance who fit this description, but manage not to be evil anyway.

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    188. Re:Trolling? by shiftless · · Score: 0

      No moron, that's not a logical inference, that's just pure stupidity. You don't know anything about psychology, clearly.

    189. Re:Trolling? by shiftless · · Score: 0

      The guy engaged in a persistent laborious and concentrated effort to stalk, harass, and threaten the guy. He did very badly wrong, many times over, with a deliberate intent and malice.

      SO CLEARLY HE'S A SOCIOPATH!!1 LOL

      Fucking moron.

      Why? It seems like a pretty reasonable assumption.

      Hey dumb ass: I capitalized ASSumption for a reason. When you ASSume shit you only end up making yourself look like a fucking heartless, clueless dipshit.

    190. Re:Trolling? by parkinglot777 · · Score: 1

      You really think that Leo Traynor will not be watching his friends kid who tortured him for a year? He still has all the data and proof, so if he does devolve, the record is still there.

      How would he be watching the boy? The boy already knew how to disguise his identity on the Internet even though he made a mistake using his own house IP address. Next time, he would be more cautious on this mistake. Now what? The author is not an IT expert. The author is not with the boy 24/7. Also, what would be benefiting the author for watching the boy all the time?

      Also even though he has the history proof of the boy, how would an authority trace back to the boy and then him (the author)? It is not likely to be processed (get to) that quick when there is no official record of his misbehave. Technically, yes he has the proof but just that would really be helpful in practice? Maybe, maybe not...

    191. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't blame the kid bro or judge him too harshly. Guaranteed he's got a fucked up home environment. We shouldn't excuse bad behavior

      Why not? Not to be harsh or anything. Consequences are usually a learned behavior. "the paint is wet" "no its not *touch*" "uh yes it is" "oh yeah it is"...

      Also you are in one part of your argument saying we should not judge him, then say we should. Which is it?

      There gets to be a point in life where you need to stand up and be a man and accept you screwed up and take your punishment. Or at the very least be accountable for them (sounds like you are at least to this point). You do something wrong and if you are caught you are going to get blasted...

      I used to post here with a real name. Until I found a stalker myself. I cut that off before he got too into it and he found greener pastures. This guy was not some 'young punk' either. I dug into him a bit and found a 43 year old man who was on a one man crusade against the internet and anyone who even slightly disagreed with him. He did not even ever actually realize I agreed with many of his views. That was how warped he was. He spent pages and pages attacking me and others. These sorts of guys work on a different plane of existence than your average 'luz troll'. They are stalkers, they go from the luz into criminal activity and the trip is not a long one. They are not in it for the luz. They are in it because they think you personally dissed them in some way. The guy in the article handled it a LOT better than I would have. I would have been pressing charges or at least it would have been on my top 10 list of things to do...

      This episode of dragnet sums it up quite nicely. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0565654/ and this http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0565654/quotes The brilliant part of that? It was over 40 years ago... Same crap different time. It shows what we are dealing with is not any sort of new issues. Its the same thing. People singing the same old tune. I highly recommend buying all 4 seasons and watching them. It is quite eye opening if you have been paying any sort of attention to the internet.

    192. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good trolls are also humorous and offtopic. The MyCleanPC and APK Time Cube rant are recent gems posted here.

    193. Re:Trolling? by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      A co-worker discovered a 'bug' in this traditional sense just a few months ago. Some kind of beetle got pinned in the fan of a power supply, causing it to jam and the device to repeatedly overheat.

    194. Re:Trolling? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but he acknowledges the sock puppet account.
      I'd presume he was more troll-y if he pretended it wasn't him.

    195. Re:Trolling? by Dan1701 · · Score: 1

      To be honest it sounds to me a lot like the kid's major existence was on assorted social networking sites, and much of his social self-worth was about getting reactions from other people in these social networks. There're only a few ways of consistently getting such reactions; always posting wise and apposite comments (which I manage maybe 30% of the time, try though I might), posting jokes or humourous cat photos, and posting attacks which attract the schardenfreude tendency of others.

      However, I think that social media must have become pretty much ALL of this kid's socialisation and social life; like all teens he is mentally driven to socialise as much as possible, but he's not actually meeting people face to face much so isn't getting the all-important slaps in the face for being rude, aggressive or basically just a jerk.

      The cure is to limit his access to social media and try get him socialising face to face a good deal more. He simply hasn't learned the rules, and won't do either, not if socialising is confined to texting on a smartphone or somesuch.

    196. Re:Trolling? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      Why did the company choose Burma for the original name of the product? Was Burma particularly well known for perfectly shaved men? Or was China Shave already taken, and they were going for the far east thing?

    197. Re:Trolling? by mcmaddog · · Score: 1

      Did we read the same article??? He pulled out the box of "Mementos" and that's when the kid realized what they were there for.

    198. Re:Trolling? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      I miss Dr. Bob...i was always wondering how he would swing things around to chiropractic health.

    199. Re:Trolling? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Eh, he knew the jig was up, and they probably wouldn't even be confronting him with nothing.

    200. Re:Trolling? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      There's a clear and concise response, but with detritus like you it would be a waste of time.

      Or did I hit a little too close to home? Hmm.

    201. Re:Trolling? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Eh, not seeing that. I know plenty of people mired in political ideologies that are otherwise good people. Sometimers it's their ability to care that leads them to such things. By ideologues I meant people who are not running for office. They may work for a campaign, or just vote regularly, but have solidly bought into a single school of ideological thought without it being a source of power or control for them personally.

      Junkies I suppose could be considered a form of chemically induced sociopathy? ;-)

      As for everyone having it, well, none of the works I have read try to spread it that far. Everyone has a level of self interest- it's arguably necessary for survival, but there's nothing pathological about it in most people.

    202. Re:Trolling? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Wasn't suggesting anything. I have no idea what to do. It's big problem that has stymied people who are experts in the field.

    203. Re:Trolling? by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1

      My pet peeve is overuse of the term "download".. like years ago, when my FIL says he "downloaded" the file off the CD he put in his CD drive to his Desktop. I guess "copied" doesn't sound contemporary enough; I didn't have the heart to tell him a download/upload only applies to files moved across a network at the time, he was so happy he just figured out how to do it.

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    204. Re:Trolling? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I wish I could find a link on the net to the video, it was one of those "scared straight" kinda shows in the mid 90s and they took these kids to a big pen, Riker's I think.

      What I'll never forget is the warden looked at their case files and said "Most of these you can help, #3 and #14 are lost causes" and when asked he explained why. #3 was named Leroy or something like that and was a crack baby. he said "This kid has had the part of the brain that lets him visualize the future and past just wiped out, I've seen it a million times. you can't teach a person not to commit crimes if they have no concept that there is gonna be a tomorrow and they will be punished. For Leroy there is ONLY today, yesterday and tomorrow are concepts he'll simply never understand" and the second one? Pedo which he pointed out you just don't stop those with anything short of prison, once they have started preying on kids that's it.

      Sure enough at the end of the show they did a follow up, and the 14 year old Pedo was already in jail for raping a 7 year old but it was leroy that would have raised the hair on your neck. he was in jail for bashing a man's head in for a leather coat and they asked him about it: "Leroy did you LIKE what you saw at prison?" no. "Then WHY did you bash that man's head in?" because he had a nice coat and I wanted it. And then they talked to the warden who said "This is EXACTLY the behavior I was talking about, Leroy has brain damage. His brain simply cannot process the concept of yesterday or tomorrow, all he knows is this very minute. How do you teach someone right from wrong when they can't understand the concept of future and past? you can't, all you can do is lock them away so they can't hurt anyone else" and watching that kid? TRULY SCARY as he really didn't understand, he just couldn't grasp the concept that things you do this minute can affect you in the future, that part of his brain will simply never work. So for the rest of his life Leroy will be a predator, because if he sees something he wants? He'll just take it as he has no concept of consequences and never will.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    205. Re:Trolling? by tibit · · Score: 1

      If I ever meet you, I'll buy you as much beer as you can stomach and then some. More people like you is what the world needs. Thank you. There never seem to be enough thank you's, you know.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    206. Re:Trolling? by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Read the GP's post history. He is an obsessive anti-Muslim bigot. Constantly trolling and looking for fights. Downmods are appropriate when it comes to the crap he posts.

      Translation: "He has studied Islam and can refute our statements that it is peaceful. Because we are embarrassed by this truth we resort to ad-hominem attacks from anonymous accounts and modding him down to try to censor the truth".

    207. Re:Trolling? by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Online stores that sell guns still abide by the laws of the destination address. In most places that means it has to ship to someone with a Federal Firearms License who then holds it for you until you pass a background check, make sure you have a safety certificate, and hold it for at least 10 days. Each state differs but its not like buying on the Internet somehow overcomes the laws.

    208. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's you're troll you little faggat.

    209. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the beatings will continue until morale improves.

    210. Re:Trolling? by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      There comes a point in life where people you meet and interact with don't care that you had a fucked up life, or you were beaten, or your parents were evil, or you have any number of problems.
      They just care that you're an asshat.
      And write you off as one. Not everyone has time to sit around and ponder "hmm, i wonder if he had a bad childhood".
      An example of this is job interviews. Act like an ass, you're gone. poof.
      It's life, it's just how it is.

    211. Re:Trolling? by DekuDekuplex · · Score: 1

      "Good trolling" was dead before it was born. It was about as "good" as "good cracking." Your distinction is just about as valid as the one between "good harassment" and "bad harassment."

    212. Re:Trolling? by sartin · · Score: 1

      So you have "for all intensive purposes"

      I used to design physiological monitors. They monitored ECG, BP, PPO2, and one or two other things (this was a while back). They were used in CCU, ICU, NICU, SICU, and stepdown units. So, I designed heart monitors for all intensive purposes.

    213. Re:Trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I'm pro-immortality, so many things are forgotten about or destroyed by the newer generation of children. Unlike computers.

      If we were all immortal, words or the meanings of would never have to change, precious resources would never have to be spent on the massive level as they are at the moment purely for the sake of manufacturing never ending large numbers of unproductive carbon units.

      I'm als'''NOCARRIER

  2. So, let the opining begin... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, do we actually believe that a college-age man is sufficiently motivated to troll the same person, including offline, for weeks on end; but so obtuse that he doesn't realize such trolling's effects, or did TFA's author just get played by a sociopathic little fucker's crocodile tears?

    I'm voting for #2, personally. Wholly anonymous mob pile-ons can easily enough sweep up ethically-unimpressive-but-basically-standard-issue people; and some damaged-but-mostly-harmless types actually seem willing to spend their time dumping copypasta on entire forums; but solitary, prolonged, systematic trolling of one target chosen for no reason? Kid is bad seed.

    1. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I tend to agree with that... how I read it is he was crying because he got caught, not because he realized his stalking was a bad idea. If he had kept it to online nonsense, you could write it off as a bored moron who needs a swift kick in the ass, but when he started the whole mailing of packages thing, well, now the fucker needs locked up, or at the very least institutionalized until they can figure out what the flying fuck is wrong with his brain.

      I'm ambivalent to the whole Internet Fuckwad Syndrome, because it's nothing to get pissed about... but when it moves outside to the real world, well, that is when it needs to be prosecuted harshly. This isn't a Troll... this is a psychopath. It's like the word 'hacker'... non-techies have co-opted a word and changed its meaning. (Unlike 'cyberbullying'... which is a term coined by technophobes about trolling...) ...that's for another thread, though...

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    2. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What does Europe and neo-Nazis have to do with anything? Reading and believing anything written in some damned blog is a common malady for people who spend way too much time online, and conspiracy sites are only slightly less reputable than some of the "news" sites often quoted online.

    3. Re:So, let the opining begin... by immaterial · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ...well, now the fucker needs locked up, or at the very least institutionalized until they can figure out what the flying fuck is wrong with his brain.

      Prison is going to do what for his mental health exactly? Then note that Leo Traynor's condition for not going to the police was that the parents put the kid in therapy.

    4. Re:So, let the opining begin... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 0

      What does Europe and neo-Nazis have to do with anything?

      I dunno, maybe the "Say hello to your relatives from Auschwitz" bit? Did you even read the story? The guy was clearly targeted for being a Jew. I find it very unlikely that it was all just a prank of some sort.

      Oh, and it's all happening in Ireland, which last I checked was in Europe.

    5. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If he wasn't a Jew he would have been attacked for something else. Any it could have happened anywhere. You're reading too much into the message of a sociopath, and thereby giving him more credit than warranted. The attack wasn't in the message. The attack was in the stalking. The message was just tailored to the victim.

    6. Re:So, let the opining begin... by tbird81 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Who cares. Prison isn't there to make people better or to rehabilitate them. Its purpose is to punish people.

    7. Re:So, let the opining begin... by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 2

      Prison isn't there to make people better or to rehabilitate them.

      Exactly. It's good for the economy that people end up right back in prison.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    8. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It is assuming he is mentally ill. He could just be a fucking cocksucker who needs to be placed out of society before he kills someone. I am not qualified to know if he's in need of help or cornholed by a huge black guy named Thunderdick. But something needs to be done, or we'll all be reading about this asshat's killing spree with our Post Toasties.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    9. Re:So, let the opining begin... by chrismcb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So, do we actually believe that a college-age man is sufficiently motivated to troll the same person, including offline, for weeks on end; but so obtuse that he doesn't realize such trolling's effects,

      Yes

    10. Re:So, let the opining begin... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      if he's in need of help or cornholed by a huge black guy named Thunderdick. But something needs to be done, or we'll all be reading about this asshat's killing spree with our Post Toasties.

      Since he's in Ireland and not California, none of your scenarios are likely.

      We keep getting stories here about how foolish it is to demonise video games, because there's a difference between virtual violence and real violence. This guy was a jerk and needs to be taught a lesson, but not punished as if he'd actually physically assaulted someone.

    11. Re:So, let the opining begin... by shiftless · · Score: 1

      .....which is a travesty. I hope you're not advocating this.

    12. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Option #3: The kid has a severe psychiatric disorder and fixated on a family friend when it just as easily could have been Jodie Foster or Gabrielle Giffords.

    13. Re:So, let the opining begin... by immaterial · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, we should lock this kid up with only criminals to socialize with, where he can (out of desire or necessity) join a neo-nazi prison gang who will reinforce all his fucked-up worldviews. And then a few years later we can throw him back into society and everything will be peachy-fucking-keen.

      Not only is the philosophy you're touting far more damaging to society as a whole, your RAWR PUNISHMENT attitude isn't even supported by the victim in this case. Who is being served by throwing the kid in prison?

    14. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree with that... how I read it is he was crying because he got caught, not because he realized his stalking was a bad idea.

      I immediately thought "this is one of those White guys who has converted to Islam". If he is not stopped soon we will hear about him doing something much more serious

    15. Re:So, let the opining begin... by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You really don't see what's wrong with a prison system that all but guarantees that anyone who isn't a cold, hardened criminal going in will be one coming out?

      There are enough people who are naturally or are turned into habitual criminals without a "justice" system actively creating them.

    16. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Sique · · Score: 1

      And what is punishing people good for? If punishing wasn't done for some reason, why even bother?

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    17. Re:So, let the opining begin... by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      I'm not so sure you can call it mental illness, there are people with a genuine hatred of jews and blacks asians Muslims even plain old Americans.

      I have a friend who seems your typical republican nut job , loves jesus, dogs and a pathological loathing of Obama is it because he is a democrat or because he is black i suspect the latter to be honest.

      Is it mental illness that caused the recent American deaths in Libya ?

      Having extremest views tends to be misguided, but are they mentally ill? When the westbourough baptists picket the funerals of American servicemen are they mentally ill?

      Now if you are a believer in the zionist conspiracy does that make you mentally ill or misguided? You have to bare in mind the victim is jewish which is extremely rare in Ireland. I don't know any jews in ireland so chances are this kid only knew of this one family and possibly only leo is jewish. Almost certainly that will be why he was targeted.

      On the positive side it maybe that the kid will no longer see leo as that Jew but as a regular human being like the rest of us. That's the thing with labels people see the label and not the people that are being labelled.

      How much labelling goes on here for instance, is that by mentally ill people or misguided ones?

      How about the 1% maybe some of them should be executed, interestingly that is a hard target since you only really know the companies not the leadership. I really can't see how you can equate extremism with mental illness without coming to the conclusion we are already in the asylum and there are more of them than us.

    18. Re:So, let the opining begin... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Who cares. Prison isn't there to make people better or to rehabilitate them. Its purpose is to punish people.

      But who will punish you for supporting an activity which makes the world an uglier place? Oh wait, that would just make the world uglier. I guess I forgive you for being so short-sighted. Just try to develop a longer view, please.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    19. Re:So, let the opining begin... by drinkypoo · · Score: 0

      So, do we actually believe that a college-age man is sufficiently motivated to troll the same person, including offline, for weeks on end; but so obtuse that he doesn't realize such trolling's effects,

      Yes

      You're not very smart, are you? Trolls do what they do because of the harm they will be able to inflict, not in spite of it, or in spite of being ignorant about it.

      On the other hand, I agree with the solution. Prison won't help. On the gripping hand, it won't actually help without some serious help from the parents, who are already failures.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    20. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure this is a psychopath. It sounds like he got the shock of his life when he was discovered, and he was probably harassing the victim initially because of feelings of powerlessness.

      I've had a couple of death threats tossed at me over years since I got online, some of them quite lurid, but I think my stalkers gave up because I didn't give them the fear reaction they were hoping for. There was also a situation several years ago when somebody was harassing my girlfriend, and he basically dropped offline altogether from what I could tell once I sent him a message that explained that I knew who and where he was, and he'd better cut that shit out.

    21. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Azghoul · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So you're in favor of either committing him to a mental ward against his will (read Thomas Szasz), killing a 17 y/o kid for being a dick, or having him suffer life-long physical and emotional injury due to prison rape. When the victim here says he wants to give the kid a chance.

      And you're the sane, socially acceptable guy here?

    22. Re:So, let the opining begin... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      So you're in favor of either committing him to a mental ward against his will (read Thomas Szasz), killing a 17 y/o kid for being a dick, or having him suffer life-long physical and emotional injury due to prison rape

      Isn't this a UK story? Isn't prison rape mostly a US problem? Well, maybe Turkey, that used to be the canonical example before we picked up the torch.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:So, let the opining begin... by couchslug · · Score: 0

      "Prison is going to do what for his mental health exactly?"

      Nothing, but it will keep him from doing more damage as long as he's incarcerated. Crazy isn't curable and there are no mental health treatments which work. We should stop pretending and switch to damage control.

      We need to reture to the institutional model, which was discarded strictly for reasons of expense. Lock them up, drug them into docility, but treat crazies as gently and professionally as practical. Leaving them on the street helps no one.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    24. Re:So, let the opining begin... by BasilBrush · · Score: 2

      The three objectives of punishment in the criminal justice system are punishment, rehabilitation and deterrence. It's not correct to say it's only for one of them.

    25. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Artifakt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I really can't see how you can equate extremism with mental illness without coming to the conclusion we are already in the asylum and there are more of them than us.

      Yes, but there are times when it feels like that is exactly the case. I have an acquaintance (I'll call him Nutcase A) who has swung far into the Teaparty side of politics. Now I'm not claiming anybody else at the last rally he attended is particularly mentally ill, but this guy has, for just one example, gotten so down on some people for letting their kids watch PBS that he has explained to a group of us how all those European travel shows are fake because the Russians tore up those European countries so bad they don't really look like that. A couple of people present with me drew him out on this point, and he now apparently genuinely believes that World War 2 was the US against Russia, that Russia conquered Europe as far as Italy and France, making them all Socialists, held that territory until the 80s, and that those countries weren't freed until Reagan won the cold war. By him, the Germans were on our side during WW2 until the Commies overran them. The Berlin wall enclosed all of Commie Europe, up the Atlantic seacoast. It's like he listened to some Limbaugh and Coulter descriptions of Hitler being a leftist because the Nazis were National Socialists and took that argument to heart so sincerely that he had to re-write fifty years of history to be consistant with it.
                  Oh, and Clifford the Big Red Dog is particularly a commie plot to indoctinate the youth of America. I know this guy passed at least a normal high school history class once, but it's like he's now rewritten it all in his mind, and everything he seems to believe is being filtered through an incredibly and increasingly warped version of right libertarian philosophy.
            What your comment made me think of is that his example has made me ask other people on the Tea Party side about their nutcases, and there's a strong tendency for those people to claim there aren't any people like that guy attending their rallys and speaking at their town halls. I know some of these people have met Nutcase A, and in a couple of cases, have heard him say at least something totally whackjob. I was there when those cases happened. Even if Nutcase A is 1 in 1,000 and there's a lot more reasonable people making up the bulk of the group, I'm finding it harder and harder to believe those other people are not in some weird state of denial, deliberately or delusionally pretending they don't have any Nutcase A's at all around. And, I'm wondering about what else they are in denial over. When somebody claiming affiliation with the American right says, for example, that they haven't seen any signs the dislike of president Obama is racially motivated, I wonder if they have just ignored hearing a dozen rants and a hundred racial slurs at their last meeting - wondering if they start out thinking in each incident that those people aren't really the core of their group, and five minutes later have turned it into "that didn't happen at all - we aren't like that, so I didn't hear what I heard.". When people appear to be standing right next to some ranting and raving 'crazy people', and swearing they didn't hear anything crazy, yes, you start figuring the whole group is part of the illness.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    26. Re:So, let the opining begin... by multimediavt · · Score: 1

      But it wasn't a random person this kid targeted. If you read TFA then you would have seen the part where the kid is the 17-year old son of a friend. The kid was someone Leo knew as a boy as his description of the cookie offer at the meet clearly states. The kid is just messed up and thought he could mess with people with no consequence. Counseling is the best option for that, not dumping him into the UK legal system and making him more antisocial. But, this kid knew his target for a long time. This was NOT a random person attacking another.

    27. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      The company running the prison. Duh.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    28. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Cochonou · · Score: 1

      Ah, finally !
      Thanks for showing us what a real Troll is. :)

    29. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember, this college-age man was 17. What the UK calls college, the US calls high school. What the US calls college, the UK calls university. I did all kinds of crazy things when I was that age. Some of those things I regret, but all of them I learned from. Learning about the effect he was having on the targets of his "game" probably taught him a lot and I bet he wouldn't do something similar again.

      It's kind of like how some bigots are really mean to the people they "hate", but only because they've never actually met one. Once they get to know one, they come to realize what a jerk they've been and come around.

      dom

    30. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this guy called the cyber-police, back-traced it, and consequences were never the same.

      the package was hilarious.

      the idiots in this thread are posting without having read the article. Plot twist: the troll turned out to be the guy's friend's son. The guy's friend offered to turn his son in to the authorities because he was just that much of a pussy, too.

      See, the thing is, dweebs will send all the offensive things they can think of to you in order to insult you, but unlike ordinary stalkers, they are unlikely to escalate to actually causing harm. Because they're a bunch of limp-dicked beta male dweebs who wouldn't know adventure if it snapped their little pink bras.

      They settled it in-house. All the commenters are saying that next time the kid rapes a woman to death in order to steal the key to the bank safe with national security secrets to sell to Iran, the police aren't going to be able to hold harassing some guy against him.

    31. Re:So, let the opining begin... by mbunch5 · · Score: 2

      What your comment made me think of is that his example has made me ask other people on the Tea Party side about their nutcases, and there's a strong tendency for those people to claim there aren't any people like that guy attending their rallys and speaking at their town halls. I know some of these people have met Nutcase A, and in a couple of cases, have heard him say at least something totally whackjob. I was there when those cases happened. Even if Nutcase A is 1 in 1,000 and there's a lot more reasonable people making up the bulk of the group, I'm finding it harder and harder to believe those other people are not in some weird state of denial, deliberately or delusionally pretending they don't have any Nutcase A's at all around. And, I'm wondering about what else they are in denial over. When somebody claiming affiliation with the American right says, for example, that they haven't seen any signs the dislike of president Obama is racially motivated, I wonder if they have just ignored hearing a dozen rants and a hundred racial slurs at their last meeting - wondering if they start out thinking in each incident that those people aren't really the core of their group, and five minutes later have turned it into "that didn't happen at all - we aren't like that, so I didn't hear what I heard.". When people appear to be standing right next to some ranting and raving 'crazy people', and swearing they didn't hear anything crazy, yes, you start figuring the whole group is part of the illness.

      I may be misjudging you here, and for that I apologize, but I was nodding along with your post until it became a not so subtle attack on one side of the political spectrum. The thing is, I know "Nutcase A's" that are just as vehement in their support for Obama. Different alternate histories, but the same fervor and delusion. So my question to you is, did you not notice those guys the last rally that you were at?

    32. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who don't understand right and wrong still understand wrong and pain.

    33. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Jeremi · · Score: 1

      So, do we actually believe that a college-age man is sufficiently motivated to troll the same person, including offline, for weeks on end; but so obtuse that he doesn't realize such trolling's effects, or did TFA's author just get played by a sociopathic little fucker's crocodile tears?

      I'm not sure it really matters what we believe. We're just a bunch of random nerds who were fed a few kilobytes of ASCII text, and are using that, plus our own imaginations, own personal experiences and prejudices to try to reconstruct a model of "what must have happened".

      But the truth is that we don't really know. We've never met any of the people involved, and we never saw or heard anything of what transpired, except for one short textual account.

      Given that, it's pointless to try to draw any firm conclusions, since they are likely going to be wrong anyway. Pretending we have the ability to do accurate third-hand psychological diagnosis based on 5 minutes of reading a story is just flattering and fooling ourselves.

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    34. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sane liberals don't really go to rallies, so those are usually a distillation of liberal nutcases. What disturbs us is that supposedly normal, mainstream conservatives are not properly isolating their own nutcases in the same way...

    35. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prison is only bad if you've got something better to do. It's like a sex-tour for bi-curious men.

    36. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh? A friend of mine was raped by a nigger in Ireland. That scenario is entirely plausible. Keep in mind Irish niggers aren't like our American niggers. Irish niggers are North African Muslims. But they hate working and love raping and stealing just as much as Thunderdick :)

    37. Re:So, let the opining begin... by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      I tend to agree with that... how I read it is he was crying because he got caught, not because he realized his stalking was a bad idea.

      I've had the misfortune to have dated a couple of people who I'd describe as sociopaths, and this is exactly how they act. Not having empathy for other people's feelings doesn't mean you don't have any of your own. When bad things happen to you -- like getting accused of something serious -- you get upset. In fact, I would suggest that a lot of the behaviors you see in sociopaths are actually complex coping mechanisms designed to help them avoid painful feelings. They're keeping themselves happy and it's up to you to do the same for yourself; it's not their concern.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    38. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure the Wiemar Republic had people supporting it who had some nutty ideas...but, yeah, you see where in Godwin's name this is going. Now, I'm not saying the Tea Party are nazis, I'm just saying that it is very possible and not illogical to claim one group of people has considerably more background nuttiness than another, even if both have some nutcases. And I am saying...the Tea Party is more illogical, more racist, more happy to be ignorant than the "nutcases" supporting the centrist party known as the Democratic Party.

    39. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Random nerd? I'm a predetermined jock, actually.

    40. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now if you are a believer in the zionist conspiracy does that make you mentally ill or misguided?

      No, it means you're paying attention.

    41. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't a Troll... this is a psychopath. It's like the word 'hacker'... non-techies have co-opted a word and changed its meaning. (Unlike 'cyberbullying'... which is a term coined by technophobes about trolling...)

      It's also like the word 'psychopath' - non-psychologists have co-opted a word and changed its meaning...

      Not just at you - there's far too many posts ITT that misuse both 'psychopath' and 'sociopath'.

    42. Re:So, let the opining begin... by KritonK · · Score: 1

      Prison isn't there to make people better or to rehabilitate them. Its purpose is to punish people.

      Perhaps it is, in your part of the world, but there's a reason why, even there, prisons are called "correctional facilities"; punishment is only part of the reason people are sent to prison.

    43. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yyyyeah, he IS the sane, socially acceptable guy here. Y'know why?

      DOCTOR_JEST DIDN'T ATTEMPT TO RUIN AN ENTIRE FAMILY'S LIFE FOR WEEKS ON END!

      So the fact that YOU'RE calling the person who as far as you know is 100% innocent of any wrongdoing whatsoever in his entire life, yet has posted an opinion online insane, but are standing up for the college-age person who has spent hours of his time actively attempting to ruin someone's life as much as they possibly could just short of burning them alive in their house.

      Oh yeah, you sound like the type of person who's judgement I should be taking seriously.

    44. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds to me like you are being trolled.

    45. Re:So, let the opining begin... by niado · · Score: 1

      I think he was using the Tea Party as an example that he was personally familiar with, and one which many readers identify with since "those crazy tea-partiers" is a common meme on slashdot (and well, everywhere really).

      I personally have met no "Nutcase A's" among Obama supporters, though I am acquainted with (and have close friends among) several in the opposite camp. However, this is likely due to the fact that I live in the heart of tea-party land (which unfortunately correlates to the heart of "racism land") and meet very few Obama supporters in general.

    46. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Mike+Van+Pelt · · Score: 1

      I personally have met no "Nutcase A's" among Obama supporters,...

      Check out the "Zombietime" web site, and you'll get pictures and descriptions of a number of the Bay Area's finest examples of the type. (Note: parts of this site are bodaciously NSFW... The Full Monty of the Bay Area tradition of naked protestors is on display here. What Has Been Seen Can Not Be Un-seen.)

      Yes, I know, "Zombie" has (his/her) biases. and yes, does have an agenda. It was quite interesting to see wider views of the same scene shown on the front page of the San Francisco Chronicle, to see the "spontaneous" demonstration being orchestrated by a woman with a bullhorn wearing a North Korean flag T-shirt.

      Yes, I am also aware that that woman, and many of the protestors in the area, are far from Obama supporters, and actually consider him to be a far-right-winger.

    47. Re:So, let the opining begin... by j-beda · · Score: 1

      The three objectives of punishment in the criminal justice system are punishment, rehabilitation and deterrence. It's not correct to say it's only for one of them.

      Unless punishment serves the goals of deterrence and/or rehabilitation - it would seem a bit pointless. I suggest that "punishment" should not be an objective, even if it might be on of the tools to obtain the actual objectives.

      Maybe is is part of "revenge"? Should that be one of the three objectives?

    48. Re:So, let the opining begin... by tibit · · Score: 1

      What I don't particularly get is what extreme libertarianism has got to do with being a nutcase in the sense of believing in a made up version of recent world history. Yes, the specimen you mention might be both libertarian and a nutcase, but it's a coincidence IMHO.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    49. Re:So, let the opining begin... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you're right. I mistakenly repeated the word "punishment". It should have read:

      "The three objectives of punishment in the criminal justice system are retribution, rehabilitation and deterrence."

      Retribution is to fulfil whatever need there is in the victim or society to make the offender pay for what they did.

    50. Re:So, let the opining begin... by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

      THIS is what passes as +5 interesting? Wow, the trolls are apparently moderating now as well.

    51. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      Why again do we let prisoners socialize with other prisoners? Do they need to socialize? Yes they do. Do they need to socialize with other prisoners? I think not.

    52. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      If we're using sociopath as a synonym for psychopath (which is quite reasonable, neither has a universally accepted definition) then from what I've read they have very shallow affect and feel emotions much more mildly than non-psychopaths (in addition to being devoid of empathy I hasten to add). So yes they may cry but if they do it a LOT it's probably geared towards manipulation in some way.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    53. Re:So, let the opining begin... by Bryansix · · Score: 1

      I may be misjudging you here, and for that I apologize, but I was nodding along with your post until it became a not so subtle attack on one side of the political spectrum. The thing is, I know "Nutcase A's" that are just as vehement in their support for Obama. Different alternate histories, but the same fervor and delusion. So my question to you is, did you not notice those guys the last rally that you were at?

      Quote for Truth! I know this is Slashdot and all but I can only stand so much intellectual dishonesty in one post and the original example about the Tea Party is about as intellectually dishonest as it gets.

  3. Traced his IP? by Kindgott · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet they used a GUI interface using Visual Basic!

    --
    If there's anything more important than my ego around here, I want it caught and shot immediately.
    1. Re:Traced his IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I bet they used a GUI interface using Visual Basic!

      No! Everyone knows when you trace an IP it does a 3D mapping google fly over with a little dot following a line from each location and then zooms in close to the final location showing a live video feed! I watch movies I know how computers work!

    2. Re:Traced his IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone's gotta stand up and show this guy that we internet trolls will not be bullied!

    3. Re:Traced his IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He backtraced it!

    4. Re:Traced his IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it really matter how they did it? It worked. God forbid anyone use a GUI. How's the command line looking up there on your high horse?

    5. Re:Traced his IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet they used a GUI interface using Visual Basic!

      I haven't replied to a /. post in forever....

      I'll be sending you the address to which you may ship my new keyboard and monitor ;)

    6. Re:Traced his IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wooshing sound wasn't his horse farting.

    7. Re:Traced his IP? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You joke, but I have actually solved a bit of a mystery that way. Years ago, my roommate was dating a girl named Hayley who was going to school in another state (Colorado). One day she forwards him an email she said she got from an anonymous girl in our city stating that she was sleeping with my roommate behind his girlfriend's back.

      About a week before she received this email, Hayley had asked me if it was possible to trace emails from email providers like Yahoo which I admitted could be difficult if the person knew what they were doing. Anyway, she sent me all of the header information in the email from this unknown source. Luckily Yahoo records your IP address and puts it in the header of your outgoing email. I used NeoTrace or something similar which showed me that the IP address in question was from Colorado, specifically the same school Hayley went to.

      At this point I was a little suspicious, so in order to confirm my findings I created a Yahoo account and sent a test email to Hayley's Yahoo account. Sure enough, my IP address was being recorded in the header. As my suspicions grew, I decided to scan the logs from my website to see if this IP address ever popped up. Sure enough, it was associated with 4 or 5 comments from Hayley herself.

      After a shot or two of bourbon, I decided to present my findings to my roommate and let him come up with his own conclusions. We came to the consensus that Hayley was basically trying to fake an excuse that would allow her to break up with my roommate without having to assume any of the blame herself. Her plan failed, and when she dumped my roommate a month later she had to do so without spreading lies about him.

  4. Re:First post by jd2112 · · Score: 4, Funny

    God hates fags

    Yes. Smoking can kill you.

    --
    Any insufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from technology.
  5. Keywords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Keywords in the original text:
    "basically an IT genius,"
    "hacked my facebook account"
    "trace the hackers and trolls for me using perfectly legal technology, which would lead to their IP addresses."
    "the abuse had emanated from three separate IP addresses in different corners of Ireland."
    "The third location was a friend's house."

    so, you can know the house location of each poster on twitter ? - troll-

    1. Re:Keywords by wordsnyc · · Score: 5, Informative

      There are a lot of people arguing that this whole story is a fable; the IT guy the author presents to defend his account is a feckless bullshitter. Basically it's a case of two guys who don't know that they don't know the technical difficulties in what they claim to have done. The whole thing is embarrassing and annoying.

      --
      Sent from the iPad I found in your car.
    2. Re:Keywords by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      No you can't know the IP of a random twitter account, but he moved off twitter on to his own system probably hosting his own blog at his own domain.

      This gives server logs which hold an ip for each visitor and comment. While it is unlikely that you would be able to know much more than ISP. Googling the IP might indicate the use of an internet cafe, the identifying one probably came about because some messages from that IP were from the friend and others from the troll.

      A smarter troll would have used a proxy.

      Also if you have a google adwords account you can identify your site visitors to a geographic location usually to the nearest city. Your ad's can be tailored to specific areas. No point in paying for clicks when you are advertising a product or service which will require a customer to visit your business address. Geolocation isn't perfect, i use a mobile broadband provider and my traffic is on the isp's network to Dublin so you might think i was in Dublin. There is a browser add on for firefox called geolocator which can set a location to give to certain websites.

      From the sounds of it somebody got lucky, If the ip hadn't have been identifiable as a friends address then the only alternative would have been to get the guards to investigate who would contact the ISP and locate the address of the account using the IP at the time. This course of action would have almost certainly led to a criminal prosecution. As it was a friends son, it would have been socially awkward to have taken the same action.

      Guess knowing this stuff makes me an IT genius! or perhaps !genius on this site.

    3. Re:Keywords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dunno about the IT guy bit. But there are plenty of ways to gain someone's home address and phone number(s) with mediocre technical skill. It's incredibly easy to unintentionally broadcast that information across the internet, especially with how many device that default to allow embedding that data. Really only takes a couple hours with google and a couple easy to acquire free tools.

      It's easy to say it's a fable, that the tech barrier is large, but in reality very few people think twice about putting their name, address, and phone number into a registration form.

      However what stands out to me in this story is that the guy claims to have gotten a package from the offender, but doesn't so much as mention checking the return address.

    4. Re:Keywords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keywords in the original text:
      "basically an IT genius,"
      "hacked my facebook account"
      "trace the hackers and trolls for me using perfectly legal technology, which would lead to their IP addresses."
      "the abuse had emanated from three separate IP addresses in different corners of Ireland."
      "The third location was a friend's house."

      so, you can know the house location of each poster on twitter ? - troll-

      Some friend.

    5. Re:Keywords by Mashiki · · Score: 0

      Yeah but it reads out good for the ignorant masses, that's about it. For anyone with an IQ above room temperature this entire thing is just stupid and should never have made it to the front page of /. but look at the site shall we? It's going downhill even faster than it was a few years ago.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    6. Re:Keywords by Hentes · · Score: 2

      I can imagine that some wifi hotspot IPs can be found in public, and it's also not completely impossible that his friend had a static IP which he knew. Facebook passwords can be broken like any other (although I won't call that a hack, but this guy is not an "IT genius"). How they got the IP is a better question, but one method would be to set up his acount to automatically send him the login logs (not sure about Facebook but it can be done in Google+ which he said he used in the baiting), pick a weak password and hope the troll will try to crack the account.
      It can still be fake but I wouldn't say it's completely impossible.

    7. Re:Keywords by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      Yep, I agree. The article seems more like a troll than the alleged troll the article talks about (the "alleged troll" is not a troll at all but a case of abuse or harassment).

    8. Re:Keywords by Arker · · Score: 1

      It may be a fable but there is nothing here remotely impossible. If you cant figure out how to get a stalkers IP in the circumstances in question, you arent thinking very hard. Several other posts here have already outlined one of the more likely techniques involved.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    9. Re:Keywords by triclipse · · Score: 0

      Would it be ironic if the story was a troll to stir up Slashdot debate about what is and what is not "trolling"?

      --
      No Inflation Taxation without Representation
    10. Re:Keywords by frisket · · Score: 2

      However what stands out to me in this story is that the guy claims to have gotten a package from the offender, but doesn't so much as mention checking the return address.

      Parcels sent locally here (Ireland) don't need a return address: that's an American requirement.

    11. Re:Keywords by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      "so, you can know the house location of each poster on twitter ? - troll-"

      No, but if it is the IP of a friend you can compare this IP from emails he sent you and determine that the IP used to post to twitter is the same as the one used to send the emails. Since IP based geolocation is accurate to the city in general, once you know it is local it is a no brainer to start looking at those you know for us guys who are "basically IT Geniuses" ;-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    12. Re:Keywords by Reschekle · · Score: 1

      There is no such requirement in America either.

    13. Re:Keywords by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Plus, the article describes having three IP numbers, one of which was a private address. That suggests the other two were associated with public locations, i.e. coffieshops, schools, or libraries. I don't know that much about how it's set up in particular parts of Ireland, but in the US, those are usually fixed IPs, plus, if one of them was a school, wouldn't that be a pretty good clue about which member of the home was most likely? Suppose, for example, the two fixed IPS were within a few blocks of each other, one was a school, one was an internet enabled cafe, and the timing fit school hours and such?
                  I'd figure getting from there to connecting the private IP with an address (and doing it, as the article says, legally) is the challenge, and there are some likely techniques already mentioned, but depending on just what the public IPS are, you might start off with a pretty good guess of the age group of the 'troll', whether they walked or drove from location a to b at certain times, and other such things. The fixed IPs alone might be enough to do some detective work in the physical realm, plus they certainly would help confirm whatever you narrowed it down to. There are probably 500,000 people who could do it with the 'legally' stipulation, and millions without that part.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    14. Re:Keywords by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Hate to shoot down my own post, but on rereading, I noticed that the IPs are described as different corners of Ireland, something which would have made me suspect an older person or small group, and if this was set up by a teen, suggests they made some serious efforts at obfuscation. Given that point, I don't think the locations would support moving part of the investigation into the real world. Still, you can get a little useful info from the facts, for example, I'd expect anyone routing through proxies would probably also pick some that crossed international borders (a real pro would tailor proxies to give a misleading impression, but the semi-skilled always pick exotic (to them) proxy locations whether it's actually useful or not), so any person trying to follow a trail there could probably justify proceeding from the assumption that the 'troll' was still physically local.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    15. Re:Keywords by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Then why the bullshit about geolocating the IPs? Spin it any way you like, but the story as presented makes no sense.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  6. Context? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the background story going on here? Who is the guy in question? I feel like there's some context I'm missing. Is this guy a political commentator or something?

  7. Puhleese by kiriath · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like a lifetime movie to me.

  8. At what point... by ameoba · · Score: 2

    At what point would a sane person just call the cops?

    --
    my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    1. Re:At what point... by Truekaiser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Before or after he found him?
      A sane person would of given the cops the information and let this be a legal issue. I would of done the same. Basically this kid crossed the line from harmless internet troll, to potential killer when he moved the trolling to the real world. that has consequences and it they ruin his life well it's his fault.

    2. Re:At what point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      He did. And they were not helpful.

      I was petrified.
      They had my address.
      I reported it to the authorities and hoped for the best.
      Two days later I opened my front door and there was a bunch of dead flowers with my wife's old Twitter username on it. Then that night I recieved a DM. 'You'll get home some day & ur b**ches throat will be cut & ur son will be gone.'
      I got on to the authorities again but, polite and sympathetic as they were, there didn't seem much that could be done.

      Sort of surprising because I'm fairly certain the language of that threat rises to a criminal level with the threat of bodily harm and kidnapping, especially given that the person making the threat knows the address of the person they are threatening.

    3. Re:At what point... by Kohath · · Score: 2, Informative

      Paragraph 13 of the original story. It's a good read.

      The cops can't protect anyone. They just show up after you're dead and string up crime scene tape. In the UK you're not allowed to protect yourself either -- it undermines government authority.

    4. Re:At what point... by Cl1mh4224rd · · Score: 1

      At what point would a sane person just call the cops?

      He did. Twice.

      --
      People will pass up steak once a week, for crap every day.
    5. Re:At what point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      would of --> would have

      please

    6. Re:At what point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      He did. "I was petrified. They had my address. I reported it to the authorities and hoped for the best.

      Two days later I opened my front door and there was a bunch of dead flowers with my wife's old Twitter username on it. Then that night I received a DM. "You'll get home some day & ur bitches throat will be cut & ur son will be gone."

      I got on to the authorities again but, polite and sympathetic as they were, there didn't seem much that could be done."

    7. Re:At what point... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      well they'd have taken far more notice the moment it became a "hate crime" with the Tupperware box of ashes and the note about relatives in Auschwitz

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    8. Re:At what point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well they'd have taken far more notice the moment it became a "hate crime" with the Tupperware box of ashes and the note about relatives in Auschwitz

      yeah.. but maybe they didn't give a shit because leo traynor is an attention whore.

    9. Re:At what point... by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      'You'll get home some day & ur b**ches throat will be cut & ur son will be gone.'

      I agree with others; the story smells. Anyway, if it'd been me, my concern would've evaporated the minute I'd read the "ur" instead of "you're" - fucking imbeciles just don't have what it takes to make me feel truly threatened, I suppose; imagine being approached by a mugger... and suddenly the mugger suffers a loud, explosive bout of diarrhea: any and all "streed cred" they might've possessed... just ran down their pant leg.

    10. Re:At what point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      ... In the UK you're not allowed to protect yourself either -- it undermines government authority.

      While in essence what you say is true, in practice, you'll find that not all the police, judiciary and juries are 'on side' with that particular message.

      Another thing, whilst I'm at it, the UK has three separate legal systems, one covering England/Wales, one covering Scotland, and lastly Northern Ireland. There may be UK wide laws, which are usually 'rubber stamped' by the Scottish and NI legal systems, but the implementation and interpretation of said laws depends on which legal jurisdiction of the UK you're in.

      Having been told by a Chief Constable in Scotland that in the event of anyone breaking into my house, so long as it's within my property, I have the right to defend myself and my family, and if I fear for their or my life, then extreme actions are permissible, then I'd think it's safe to say that I do have a right to protect myself, the issue lies with how much force I use to do so and in what circumstances.

      I've no idea what the legal position is in England/Wales, but having lived there for 15 years and having on at least one occasion been caught on 'surveillance' cameras 'defending myself' against a couple of muggers (one ran, I left the other U/S on the ground) and despite the incident being on camera/tape, and despite my good self being a somewhat easy individual to spot in a crowd the police never did anything about it.

      So, yes, we have a bunch of control freaks in power who'd love to regiment every microsecond of our lives (irrespective of what political party they're pretending to be this month), yes, we're not allowed to own guns the same way you Americans are, yes, these restrictions haven't done a damn thing to stop the increase in 'gun crime' in the UK (Fact: gun crime is on the rise, and it is now easier to get large calibre handguns on the 'black market' since the UK government banned the ownership of the things), but, please, please don't get hung up on the fact that we do not own firearms somehow equates to we're without the means of defending ourselves, and, despite the best efforts of the State and despite the picture the media paints, we are allowed to do so.
      The laws are still policed and implemented by the more than occasional human being, a lot of incidents never get to the legal system in the first instance as the Police/CPS/Procurator Fiscals take one look at the evidence and won't present it, of those which do go, you only hear about the 'being prosecuted for self defence' cases that papers with a political agenda like the 'Daily Mail' want you to hear about, you'll never read about the people who are admonished/found 'not guilty' (unless it suits the paper 'politically').

    11. Re:At what point... by Arker · · Score: 2

      While in essence what you say is true, in practice, you'll find that not all the police, judiciary and juries are 'on side' with that particular message.

      Naturally. And here the mirror is true, while in essence our legal system still recognises a right to self defense, not all police, judiciary, or juries are on side with that either. It's a daily battle to try to preserve it.

      Another thing, whilst I'm at it, the UK has three separate legal systems, one covering England/Wales, one covering Scotland, and lastly Northern Ireland. There may be UK wide laws, which are usually 'rubber stamped' by the Scottish and NI legal systems, but the implementation and interpretation of said laws depends on which legal jurisdiction of the UK you're in.

      Similarly, the USA has 51 separate legal systems, one for each state, and a federal system which has original jurisdiction in federal territories. Your right to self defense is much more strongly enshrined in, say, Texas or Idaho, than in New York or California.

      Having been told by a Chief Constable in Scotland that in the event of anyone breaking into my house, so long as it's within my property, I have the right to defend myself and my family, and if I fear for their or my life, then extreme actions are permissible, then I'd think it's safe to say that I do have a right to protect myself, the issue lies with how much force I use to do so and in what circumstances.

      Some US CoPs would tell you the exact opposite here. In both cases it can depend practically on the people involved. If the prosecutor wants to prosecute and the judge wants to convict they can generally find a way, and vice versa.

      despite my good self being a somewhat easy individual to spot in a crowd the police never did anything about it.

      But in practice they can get away with selective enforcement. The fact that no one bothered to hassle you on previous occasions wont protect you if someone wants to do so in a similar situation in the future.

      --
      =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
      Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
    12. Re:At what point... by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      You know what? I just saw the last shit I will ever give, walk off into the sunset.

      If someone threatens my family or me in my own home, then I will not consider any sort of moral tightrope as I end the threat. Period.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    13. Re:At what point... by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Early on in the process, which is why that is exactly what he did before he enlisted the help of his friend.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    14. Re:At what point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Humans are mostly baboons with better negotiation skills.

      In your case, I'll make an exception.

    15. Re:At what point... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      we're not allowed to own guns the same way you Americans are, yes, these restrictions haven't done a damn thing to stop the increase in 'gun crime' in the UK (Fact: gun crime is on the rise, and it is now easier to get large calibre handguns on the 'black market' since the UK government banned the ownership of the things)

      That's not a fact at all. Gun crime in the UK peaked in 2003/2004. It's been declining since.

      http://blogs.channel4.com/factcheck/files/2012/09/19_fc_guncrime.jpg

    16. Re:At what point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to actually read the article. He did. Multiple times.

    17. Re:At what point... by multimediavt · · Score: 2

      Before or after he found him? A sane person would of given the cops the information and let this be a legal issue. I would of done the same. Basically this kid crossed the line from harmless internet troll, to potential killer when he moved the trolling to the real world. that has consequences and it they ruin his life well it's his fault.

      But, like many other knee-jerk reactions to headlines, you failed to read the article to find that the kid was a family friend's kid and that throwing him in the slammer would be the worst thing for a sociopath. So you're saying you'd lock up your friend's kid rather than confront the family and deal with the issue with empathy and regard for the well being of others? Nice sociopathic behavior on your part, btw. The kid needs help, not punishment! He's 17! Still a minor in most developed countries' legal systems. Throwing him in jail would have only made his behavior worse, and might have led to actual physical harm to those involved when he got out. Sociopaths LOVE revenge!

    18. Re:At what point... by multimediavt · · Score: 2

      Sort of surprising because I'm fairly certain the language of that threat rises to a criminal level with the threat of bodily harm and kidnapping, especially given that the person making the threat knows the address of the person they are threatening.

      Not at all. Firstly, this all happened in the UK, so unless you live there you have no idea how their legal system deals with cases like this. I know that in the U.S. it is dealt with differently state-by-state as there are different laws in different states dealing with cases like this but, one thing holds fairly true throughout. Unless they actually do something, threats mean nothing and the police file your complaint until something happens. Once something happens those threats get used as evidence, but most threats and such go uninvestigated because police just don't have the time. Sorry, there are no super cops that investigate every report that comes in. That's TV myth and misguided presumption in most cases. Unless the guy is caught on the premises or in the act of threatening you, the police aren't gonna care. Have a nice day...

    19. Re:At what point... by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      Need data from 2011 and 2012 as well to dispute GPs claim. Also, try to stay away from pop media and blogs (your source was both) as both have agendas and cherry pick numbers. One should be able to find crime statistics from the U.K. gov't.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    20. Re:At what point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > potential killer

      > has consequences and if they ruin his life well its his fault

      So, you're saying that since he sent a hitlarious package, he's a potential killer, and that if he didn't understand the gravity of what he was doing it's his fault.

      What you don't understand is that he's a dweeb, not a gangster.

      This is a new phenomenon. It used to be, if you got sent suspicious packages, it was from someone who would just as soon assault you. This time, the suspicious package was used to insult.

    21. Re:At what point... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      basically this kid crossed the line from harmless internet troll, to potential killer

      Everybody is a "potential" killer. The kid never showed any sign of committing real violence. He crossed a line, several lines, but was nowhere near the "murder" line.

      Yeah, he was obnoxious and threatening online. He sent the guy a box of ashes. That was still purely symbolic "violence".

    22. Re:At what point... by BasilBrush · · Score: 1

      Channel 4 is not pop media. It's a respected British terrestrial broadcaster, who's 7 O'Clock News programme, of which this is a branch, is second to none. The very existence of Factcheck is to take claims of politicians and check the facts to see if they are saying the truth or not.

      But I only quoted that because I already knew it from reading the British Crime Survey for many years. Yes, that's official government statistic service figures. If you check out the British Crime Survey, you'll find that the exact same figures are buried in it's PDF pages.

      That trend is accurate. And 2010-11 is the latest published. It's a biannual publication.

      Again, gun crime has been falling in the UK since 2003/4. That's the true fact.

    23. Re:At what point... by joseph90 · · Score: 1

      He is not in the UK. He is in Ireland (the republic of) a seperate country.

      J.

    24. Re:At what point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correcting in this way misses the point of why people make the error. What the GP has heard all their life is "would've" which sounds just like "would of". We should just teach them to spell the contraction correctly.

    25. Re:At what point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was in Ireland, not the UK.

    26. Re:At what point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grew up in rural America but I doubt it's different for anyone. If I feel someone is posing a threat to my life, or the life of my family, then I will find a way to end that threat. The safety and well-being of the perpetrator being a distant secondary concern. What the law states about it isn't even going to be a factor.

      IOW, if my options are die or kill someone in self-defense, then I will attempt the latter. Any legal punishment is preferable to being killed by a criminal. I do suspect there are cultural differences in proportions of people that would first attempt to flee from their home VS cower, comply, and beg VS attempt to wound VS attempt to kill in such a situation, so I'm just referring to the contrived scenario where it's purely kill or be killed.

    27. Re:At what point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you will find that it took place in Ireland, which has not been part of the United Kingdom for some time now (well apart from a small bit in the north east of the island, mores the pity).

    28. Re:At what point... by Truekaiser · · Score: 1

      The kid had the 'guilty mind' and the will to commit a violent act. The fact that he took the time to send packages that could not be easily traced by the layperson back to him proved he has the will to cause harm. He just did not have the opportunity to do so. Given the opportunity I believe based on the information provided, he would of caused harm to them. The only reason I think he shows remorse is that he got caught and confronted.

      He should of faced legal consequences of his actions, at his young age it would of not impacted him as badly as an adult but still would of shown his actions have consequences. As well to his parents to show them that they should be just a little bit more involved in his online activity.

    29. Re:At what point... by bigrockpeltr · · Score: 1

      I would've beat the shit out of him and then call the cops. that's what we do here to burglars.. catch them and beat them then call the cops and beat them till they arrive then ask the cops for 15 more minutes... by this time they are basically begging the cops to take them away.
      death threats to me and my family?? don't expect to walk properly afterwards.
      after reading the article i was a bit disappointed that nothing happened to the stupid kid. and also question the validity of the story. maybe i have been trolled lol

      --
      $ unzip, strip, touch, finger, grep, mount, fsck, more, yes,fsck,fsck,fsck,umount, sleep
    30. Re:At what point... by tibit · · Score: 1

      A sane person knows the cops won't do a thing.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    31. Re:At what point... by tibit · · Score: 1

      IOW, the relationship between you and X varies the outcome of X's stay in the slammer, everything else being equal? That's news to me, I must say.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    32. Re:At what point... by Maritz · · Score: 1

      There was a bit about pissing on Leo's wife prior to killing him. That's fairly direct.

      I'm inclined to agree with you general, but sadly there's a risk that all that's happened is a psycho/sociopath has just learned how to get away with this shit. Any reasonable line that's been drawn has been well and truly crossed. Since it's the friend's kid, fine, but if it was a stranger I know I'd throw the book at the twat.

      --
      I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
    33. Re:At what point... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      The kid had the 'guilty mind' and the will to commit a violent act.

      No. He never committed any violence. It was all symbolic.

      Also, Traynor knew his family, so if the kid ha a history of real violence he would have known.

      The kid was acted despicably, needing to be socialised and taught that what he did was wrong, but that's all.

    34. Re:At what point... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      There was a bit about pissing on Leo's wife prior to killing him. That's fairly direct.

      It was a threat. It's not violence. he never pissed on anyone. He never killed anyone. He was trying to scare them, and succeeded, It was just a game to him.

      If you've been online for more than a couple of weeks you get that and worse at the drop of a hat. I've had a few threats of violence here. The Fuckwad theory is pretty well founded. But fuckwads are just hot air. if you treat the words the same as the act, what do you do with people who actually do commit violence? Straight to the electric chair?

      People have seen so many slasher movies that they think the world is full of psychopaths -- it is, but not violent ones. Plenty like this kid though. He was roleplaying. He should be punished, but for what he actually did.

    35. Re:At what point... by barrtender · · Score: 1

      Yes, because all serial killers can all spell very well...

      Example: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zodiac_Killer

      Your story is backwards anyway. If a mugger comes up and tells you to give him your money in a very uneducated tongue it's much more likely (at least, it seems to me) that he would be liable to do something stupid, whereas someone who is clearly very learned will most likely think before stabbing someone for $20.

  9. great ending by calzones · · Score: 2

    Oddly heartwarming ending. It's awesome when people can take the high road and restrain themselves from lashing back at abusers, who do this stuff out of boredom, insecurity, and immaturity (or sometimes mental instability issues, alas). But recognizing that people do stupid regrettable crap, and that maybe their lives need not be ruined over it, and that maybe some good might come out of something bad... that's great strength and maturity. Kudos.

    --
    Asking people to think is like asking them to buy you a new car
    1. Re:great ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly heartwarming ending. It's awesome when people can take the high road and restrain themselves from lashing back at abusers, who do this stuff out of boredom, insecurity, and immaturity (or sometimes mental instability issues, alas). But recognizing that people do stupid regrettable crap, and that maybe their lives need not be ruined over it, and that maybe some good might come out of something bad... that's great strength and maturity. Kudos.

      I'm afraid that is what the author was aiming for.

      " He said that he could trace the hackers and trolls for me using perfectly legal technology, which would lead to their IP addresses. I said yes. Then I baited them" ... " I posted links to my Google+ account, blog and invited people to contact me on Facebook. I'm delighted that a lot of my lovely friends did. I'm also delighted that The Troll did too. It transpired that the abuse had emanated from three separate IP addresses in different corners of Ireland. "

      So one can find the IP-address of anyone who contacts them on Facebook? I'm inclined to believe that the story is utmost half-true. It's not improbable that the whole story is made-up, like one of those feelgoodstories that are regularly debunked on Snopes.

    2. Re:great ending by Sique · · Score: 2

      Why? He put IP-Adresses of his new places on the internet. He uses the usual channels, Google+ and Facebook and Twitter. The new places are on servers his IT genius friends has set up. He gets the logfiles and analyses the addresses. Three adresses he can't put a name on.

      Why you seemed to understand that he got the logfiles from Facebook is beyond me. It's described differently in the article.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    3. Re:great ending by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      Oddly heartwarming ending. It's awesome when people can take the high road and restrain themselves from lashing back at abusers, who do this stuff out of boredom, insecurity, and immaturity (or sometimes mental instability issues, alas). But recognizing that people do stupid regrettable crap, and that maybe their lives need not be ruined over it, and that maybe some good might come out of something bad... that's great strength and maturity. Kudos.

      Oh come on. Police involvement is only going to ruin a life if the offence committed is so serious that disruption of their life is clearly warranted. It's not as if the police the are in the habit of sending kids to the fabled "Federal Pound Me in the Ass Prison" for being a bit mean. They're looking for serious harassment and threats, and certainly something beyond a random YouTube comment threatening to come there and kick someone's ass. This kid not only crossed the line in to Fucked Life Country. He gaily skipped across - waving his cock as he went. He clearly has issues that should not be dismissed as boyish pranks. The box of ashes is pretty messed-up, as is the threat to kill his girlfriend. All of this to someone who was a friend of the family? Yeah, that's regrettable and certainly should be dealt with to see what else this kid's been up to.

      It's serendipity that the kid's parents are friends of the victim. If that were not the case, I'd see no reason at all to not get the Gardai take this pretty bloody seriously. Most likely, barring a track record for acting the cunt, he'd get a talking to and perhaps a caution. Had a kid in the UK harassing a friend of mine. Hacked some of his accounts (yeah, his passwords were terrible), and threatened to screw up the business he was running. I traced the guy quite easily because he'd left a pretty obvious footprint on the web, and we contacted his local police. Never heard again from the kid. Was he arrested? Probably not. Likely the police had a chat with his parents, who promptly pulled the plug on their little proto-neckbeard.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    4. Re:great ending by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Police involvement is only going to ruin a life if the offence committed is so serious that disruption of their life is clearly warranted.

      That's a load of shit. If the police are personally arsed by the offense they will put their own effort into it.

      It's not as if the police the are in the habit of sending kids to the fabled "Federal Pound Me in the Ass Prison" for being a bit mean.

      Police don't send people to prison. They send people to court (effectively) and the court sends them to prison, which it may well do for political reasons as well as logistic ones. It's only called a "justice" system.

      It's serendipity that the kid's parents are friends of the victim. If that were not the case, I'd see no reason at all to not get the Gardai take this pretty bloody seriously.

      Odds are the kid chose his victim based on the high likelihood of getting away with it even if caught.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:great ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Odds are the kid chose his victim based on the high likelihood of getting away with it even if caught.

      ...and he would be right, too.

    6. Re:great ending by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Odds are the kid chose his victim based on the high likelihood of getting away with it even if caught.

      ...and he would be right, too.

      Indeed, and that is precisely where I fall into a moral quandary on this issue. On one hand, putting the kid into the system is unlikely to actually produce a net positive result. On the other hand, playing into his hands is unlikely to produce a net positive result as well, and meanwhile, nothing is really being done. I think a course of therapy is about as likely to cure him of his sociopathic behavior as a homeopathic dose of dioxin is likely to cure you of dioxin poisoning. What he really needs is a life experience that will change him for the better. I don't think that's prison, but I don't think that's therapy, either. I propose to force him into the peace corps.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    7. Re:great ending by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      That's a load of shit. If the police are personally arsed by the offense they will put their own effort into it.

      Sure, and the kid could die from "accidentally" falling down the stairs while in custody. Is what you describe likely in this case, and if so, why?

      Police don't send people to prison. They send people to court (effectively) and the court sends them to prison, which it may well do for political reasons as well as logistic ones. It's only called a "justice" system.

      Yes, you're technically correct - the best kind of correct. I was of course speaking colloquially. Neither the police nor the courts send people to some place named "Federal Pound Me in the Ass Prison". Is this kid likely to go to prison for political reasons?

      Odds are the kid chose his victim based on the high likelihood of getting away with it even if caught.

      Sure, or he chose his victim because he thought he'd never be caught. Who knows? Asking that the kid receive counselling is a good idea, and it seems that his parents are taking things seriously. I don't know if the kid has a habit of antisocial behaviour. Hopefully the confrontation and some counselling will set him straight.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
  10. This is not a troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    More of a stalker than anything and that they didnt call the police will just make him learn how to not get caught

  11. The key word there... by avatar139 · · Score: 1

    ...being basically! As if a real I.T. genius would ever use basic!

    --
    I'm honest enough to admit I lie to myself.
  12. Safety first by Kohath · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is why content delivery systems need to be licensed by governments. This wouldn't have happened if Twitter were prohibited because it's unlicensed.

    It's a safety issue. Just like the license you need before you can drive your own car. Just like the license you need to be a barber. Or the permit that those kids should have gotten before the cops shut down their lemonade stand. Or the license that that guy in North Carolina needs to publish dietary advice on his blog. Or the law license that Elizabeth Warren doesn't need because she's one of the special people.

    Leo Traynor should be ashamed for having an unlicensed conversation with his Troll. Is he a certified criminal counselor? He should have gotten the authorities involved, because they should always be involved. In everything.

    1. Re:Safety first by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 1, Funny

      He should have gotten the authorities involved, because they should always be involved. In everything.

      Precisely. Sadly, some people are perfectly willing to trade away safety for this 'freedom' nonsense. I honestly wish it was possible to have a TSA agent constantly breathing down everyone's necks; if that happened, we'd be perfectly safe from all the evil trolls, rapists, and terrorists! Oh, and copyright infringers (the most dangerous criminals of them all).

      Safety first.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    2. Re:Safety first by circletimessquare · · Score: 2

      Can't tell if you're a parody or serious

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    3. Re:Safety first by demonlapin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ergo, GP post is a good example of an actual troll.

    4. Re:Safety first by TeamMCS · · Score: 1

      I completely disagree, if you introduce licenses for content providers you suddenly raise the barrier of entry. In one fell swoop you'll push yet more communities underground and inhibit those little sparks of creative which begin an explosion.

      Your sentiment I do agree with and we should think of ways to introduce accountability or self policing of some kind. It is simply almost impossible to remove negative/pseudo psychotic behaviour from any corner of the web, funnily enough it is a part of freedom we have to manage. Maybe the real answer here is to work with people to mitigate the effects trolls have.

    5. Re:Safety first by TeamMCS · · Score: 1

      ...That said, Twitter (et al) should be punished through existing legal means if they allow said trolls to run wild without giving the community a method to self manage

    6. Re:Safety first by The+Master+Control+P · · Score: 1

      If you don't see that that's a parody your sarcasm detector needs to be completely replaced.

    7. Re:Safety first by fa2k · · Score: 1

      You trolled at least a couple of people, well done :)

    8. Re:Safety first by Turminder+Xuss · · Score: 1

      The irony is strong in this one.

      --
      You seem to regard science as some kind of dodge... or hustle.
    9. Re:Safety first by circletimessquare · · Score: 1
      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    10. Re:Safety first by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 2

      Why? If their community doesn't like it, they can leave. No need to blame Twitter for someone else's actions.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    11. Re:Safety first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fascist! authorities involved in everything? right. 1930's Germany all over again. just crawl back under your rock pea-brain.

  13. Something doesn't sound right by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "I was deliberately more provocative toward them than ever I'd been before."

    This sentence makes me think that, however vile the "troll" could have turned out to be, this wasn't an entirely black-versus-white situation. I suspect this guy was being a jerk back at anyone who was a jerk to him, and it escalated further than he thought it would.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Something doesn't sound right by Hentes · · Score: 1

      My account was followed by a fairly innocuous looking one which I followed back and within 10 minutes I had received a direct message (DM) calling me a "Dirty fucking Jewish scumbag". I blocked the account and reported it as spam. The following week it happened again in an identical manner. A new follower, I followed back, received a string of abusive DMs, blocked and reported for spam. Two or three times a week. Sometimes two or three times a day. An almost daily cycle of blocking and reporting and intense verbal abuse. So I made my account private and the problem went away for a short while.

      He might not have been agressive, but he was definitely careless and a very slow learner.

    2. Re:Something doesn't sound right by MysteriousPreacher · · Score: 1

      This sentence makes me think that, however vile the "troll" could have turned out to be, this wasn't an entirely black-versus-white situation. I suspect this guy was being a jerk back at anyone who was a jerk to him, and it escalated further than he thought it would.

      It may not be as black and white as presented, but to extrapolate as you did is pure crystal ball gazing. On examining the entrails, I suspect that Traynor declined to involve the Gardai because Traynor had been conducting an affair with the kid's mother, which the kid threatened to reveal to the world. This would also explain why the kid was so aggressive.

      Or perhaps Traynor had sometimes responded angrily, as many would do under similar circumstances, but had deliberately begun goading the kid in order to trap him.

      --
      -- Using the preview button since 2005
    3. Re:Something doesn't sound right by jon3k · · Score: 1

      Hard to know what that means without context. Sounds to me like he just dangled some very jewish statements out and let the psychos work up a lather about it.

    4. Re:Something doesn't sound right by multimediavt · · Score: 2

      "I was deliberately more provocative toward them than ever I'd been before."

      This sentence makes me think that, however vile the "troll" could have turned out to be, this wasn't an entirely black-versus-white situation. I suspect this guy was being a jerk back at anyone who was a jerk to him, and it escalated further than he thought it would.

      Have you ever had a troll come after you? It all starts off as harmless verbal sparring and ALWAYS escalates. Trolls are like dogs with frisbees and just won't let go, especially when they are minors with no responsibilities, plenty of time on their hands and sociopathic tendencies. What you learn is to cut them off, like Leo tried to do, but some don't go away. Try having your own discussion board some time and be required to deal with trolls. I think your perspective on being a jerk would change dramatically. Plus, he was trying to bait the troll at that point to find him, duh! Just like the cops SHOULD have done way before he had to.

  14. this is not trolling by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is stalking

    Its like calling arson vandalism

    Identify the nature of the transgression correctly

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:this is not trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more like calling copyright infringement rape.

  15. I read this 4 days ago. Interesting nonetheless... by Gordo_1 · · Score: 2

    A kid basically ruined the guy's life, essentially just for lulz -- or for lack of anything constructive to do with his time. Fortunately, the kid did not understand how traceable IP addresses are and he was caught and confronted. Most interesting part of it was that the kid really didn't seem to truly comprehend what devastation he was causing to another human being, because he did it all remotely from the safety of his computer.

    Reality is that this is just an extreme example of what goes on daily on semi-anonymous message boards (like this one). If we all had to show our faces, I'm sure we'd be a little more civil toward one another. Personally, I don't think I run a very high risk of ending up in the situation that this guy was in, since I value my online anonymity too much. I realize that for many, the temptation to spread their personal misery is just too great, and so they troll, which is really just a cry for attention -- something they probably didn't get enough of growing up.

    Anyway, enough pontificating. Queue the trolls...

  16. Nothing new here, just new medium by dbIII · · Score: 2

    I tend to agree with that... how I read it is he was crying because he got caught, not because he realized his stalking was a bad idea.

    See also the radio troll Alan Jones in Australia - very upset this weekend because he was caught the second time he said he publicly addressed a group of people with a comment about the Australian Leader's recently deceased father dying of shame. Stirring up a race riot a couple of years back and getting away with it probably made him think he could get away with anything.

    1. Re:Nothing new here, just new medium by bloodhawk · · Score: 1

      It is bad enough the article doesn't understand what trolling is and mislabels the stalkers actions as trolling, please don't compound the issue by calling what Alan Jones does as trolling. He is obnoxious, insulting, abusive, rude but that doesn't make him a troll.

    2. Re:Nothing new here, just new medium by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Since his role is insulting people to stir up trouble (eg. Cronulla riot) I think that makes him a troll in every way apart from the "on the internet" definition. If you disagree, fair enough, but that's my opinion.
      Alan Jones is a relic of the time when pedophile teachers were quietly sacked instead of turned over to the police as soon as circumstantial evidence appeared. Whether he was guilty or not that infamy and sudden end of his teaching career turned him into someone that pre-emptively insults just about everyone to get a reaction, which must have been considered entertaining by the idiots that put him onto Sydney radio.

    3. Re:Nothing new here, just new medium by mikechant · · Score: 1

      Since his role is insulting people to stir up trouble...

      That's more like flamebait; trolling is *a bit* more subtle.

  17. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What god? Cthulu hates everyone.

  18. IT'S CALLED BULLYING !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And it's all perfectly okay, over here, courts have so ruled !!

    I like how mom and dad Troll wanted to run the little bugger in for his high crime !! Way to go !! Hip-hip-whoreaway !!

    1. Re:IT'S CALLED BULLYING !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      With a dash of terroristic threating thrown in. All perfectly NOT legal, even over here. This is something Usama taught us. Now get those shoes off, and let's see your pretty little thing in the booth.

  19. Fake by TechnoGrl · · Score: 1

    Yeah ... this is being pushed all over the web - likely by Traynor himself and it stinks of fakery.

    1. Are we really to believe that Traynor and his wife get physicaly threatened for THREE years and Traynor does literally nothing about it? No restraining order after he finds out? He just decides to let it all go away.

    2. Conveniently Traynor doesn't prosecute so there is no real record of this actually happening

    3. How does Traynor's "genius" I.T. friend get an IP address from ...Facebook (wtf??) ? And how does he use that without a court order issued to an ISP to track it to a physical address?

    4. After the very first drop off of a message and ashes at his doorstep Traynor NEVER puts up a cam so he never sees the OTHER TWO drop offs of messages on his doorstep? W.T.F.??! He lets at least two chances go by and NEVER goes to the police and files a report we can verify. Bogus /. has seen a LOT of Munchausen's by Internet over the years - from sad cancer tales that never were to stories of little children dying of diseases who never did and now this. It has fake written all over it and I SO wish someone would look closely at Traynor and get to the bottom of this.

    --
    ----- In Your Cubicle No One Can Hear You Scream...
    1. Re:Fake by drcagn · · Score: 1

      Re: 4. He said he got a parcel, I'm assuming from the post. So no one dropped it off, it was delivered.

      --
      Scorta futuere amo!
    2. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3. How does Traynor's "genius" I.T. friend get an IP address from ...Facebook (wtf??) ? And how does he use that without a court order issued to an ISP to track it to a physical address?

      Does facebook forward email?

      I once found in my web log someone trying to guess URLs. From what he was looking for I figured he was someone who knew me, so I grepped his IP address in my mailbox and found he was someone on a mailing list I was on. Creeped him out when I asked him what he was looking for.

    3. Re:Fake by GeLeTo · · Score: 2

      How does Traynor's "genius" I.T. friend get an IP address from ...Facebook (wtf??) ?

      Quite easy. You post a status with a link that's only visible to the stalker. When he visits the link, you have his IP address.

    4. Re:Fake by tftp · · Score: 1

      How does Traynor's "genius" I.T. friend get an IP address from ...Facebook (wtf??)

      You publish an interesting link that points at your own server. Your stalker will inevitably visit. But I have no idea how to tell him apart from another 100,000 visitors and search bots.

      And how does he use that without a court order issued to an ISP to track it to a physical address?

      That is a good question. My own IP address geolocates to the city where my ISP has their HQ - that is not even close to where I live. The ISP won't tell anyone, I hope, unless presented with a sufficiently valid, legal request.

      Conveniently Traynor doesn't prosecute so there is no real record of this actually happening

      This is possible if Traynor is a meek, soft guy who cannot stand for what is dear to him - his family. By all indications, the whole story points in this direction. Any normal, red-blooded guy would sue the bastard into oblivion. Anything else would be just a slap on the wrist, enabling the stalker to continue his "games" with other people. He will only be more careful. His downfall was that he was stalking someone he knew. If only he was threatening an old lady in another town, nobody would ever find out. Even in this case the stalker could have said "No, it wasn't me, I don't know - but I had a virus on my computer a while ago, mayhaps that was it." The evil bastard got excellent training on this one, and the victim shook his hand and walked away.

      After the very first drop off of a message and ashes at his doorstep Traynor NEVER puts up a cam so he never sees the OTHER TWO drop offs of messages on his doorstep? W.T.F.?

      That's another item to prove that Mr. Traynor is a weak, technophobic person who just got lost when faced with true evil. The police was useless; they didn't even give him an advice like you did. Stuff the house with cameras, announce to the world that you are leaving on vacation - and you will attract the stalker to the house, sure bet.

      It must be said, though, that Mr. Traynor is not alone in his dependence on "someone else" to solve his safety and security problems. In UK any other approach is worse than the threat. Maybe even setting up a camera will violate someone's rights. Most people in his shoes (about 100%) would be first scared. This is normal - we don't face crime every day. The question is only in what they do after they come to their senses - who they talk to (police, lawyers, private investigators, gun dealers, etc.) and what proactive measures they take. This guy did exactly nothing of value. In the SHTF situation he and his family would be among the first to go.

    5. Re:Fake by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      If it's "fakery" and people all over the web fell for it, then that is the real troll ;)

    6. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And how does he use that without a court order issued to an ISP to track it to a physical address?

      I have been able to identify visitors of my web site several times by searching my email archive for IP addresses found in my web server log.

    7. Re:Fake by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      It was delivered by *somebody*, whether courier or USPS.

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    8. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So no one dropped it off, it was delivered.

      Let me set this straight; he received an unsolicited parcel, and yet he opened it? Without any awareness of whether the contents were malicious? He was fortunate that it was inert.

      I know some people are greedy but that's just stupidity.

    9. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's fake, mostly because googling him only turns up results from the last 4 days.
      So he's either a really crappy writer who has never appeared online before, or he's faking it.
      His blog has posts going back a couple of months, but the dates can be easily faked.

    10. Re:Fake by TechnoGrl · · Score: 1

      Had you read the actual article you would have discovered that he did NOT get the alleged IP address from an embedded web link but solely from Facebook. Had you any actual technical background at all you would know that the IP address is only part of the problem - you then have to get the ISP to translate that IP address to a customer physical name and address and THAT takes a court order - especially in Europe where privacy protections are far greater than here in the states.

      But then again I would expect a troll who uses both ageism and misogynism in his post to support a likely troll like Traynor.

      --
      ----- In Your Cubicle No One Can Hear You Scream...
    11. Re:Fake by TechnoGrl · · Score: 1

      Yes but consider that non-commercial IPs are almost always dynamic (surely the I.T. "genius" in Traynor's story would have told him this) and if you are going to confront your best friend's son over charges of heinous racism, threats of physical violence to himself and his wife, as well as terrorist packages sent to his door - all things that carry potentially long criminal sentences (especially in Europe) - would you REALLY do so over a dynamic I.P. or would you spend the extra week or two to confirm the link between IP address and physical address by a court order to the ISP?

      Also are any of us seriously to believe that the father of the story-child's first reaction was to turn him over to the police? Just based on the word of his friend and NO other evidence (nothing from an ISP). Wouldn't you at least think maybe he would first get a lawyer for the kid maybe? It seems way too pat and easy - not to mention that the first thing the guy who has been terrorized for three years does to the kid is ... give him cookies? What/. The ? F.? !!!

      One more thing. Traynor doesn't want the kid to go to jail, he wants to give him a second chance right? So what does Traynor do? He spreads this story ALL over the internet for two weeks - which maybe would carry the risk of the kid getting outed all over the internet and his life ruined. Does any of this make sense?

      Come on we both have seen this thing before - attention seekers spreading stories of their fake exploits all over the internet. This one carries the double viral-inducing quality of rage at the terrorist story-kid combined with marvel at Traynor's saint-like goodness in giving the kid a second chance. It's all too pat and none of it makes sense. It's fake and I sure that will be proven in the days and weeks to come but by then Traynor will already have his 15 minutes of fame.

      --
      ----- In Your Cubicle No One Can Hear You Scream...
    12. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The IP address was that of a friend. It's very likely he could tell that from tracking the IP of comments on his blog.

      There's cameras all over the place in the UK. I doubt setting up another would be a problem. But that's irrelevant, as this happened in Ireland, not in the UK.

    13. Re:Fake by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      And then you find out the household that was using that IP address at that time by...?

      Remember, Fantasy Man here assures us this his "basically an IT genius" friend did it "legally".

      How?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    14. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Remember, Fantasy Man here assures us this his "basically an IT genius" friend did it "legally"."

      Have you completely discounted the idea that this "IT genius" actually worked for the kid's ISP? Obviously he wouldn't want that detail released in the story, as it would lead to an internal investigation at the IP and potentially getting fired.

    15. Re:Fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then you find out the household that was using that IP address at that time by...?

      It was the friend's son. The friend also visits the link tying the same IP address to two separate users. Traynor knows the friend's username and deduces the troll is a resident of his household.

      CAPTCHA: despots... seemed fitting

  20. Re:What started all this isn't mentioned anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bad time to have the sarcastic [/troll] tag removed!

  21. yeah it seems to me this story is made up by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a nice moralistic story but it doesn't pass the smell test

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  22. Re:fable by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "There are a lot of people arguing that this whole story is a fable; the IT guy the author presents to defend his account is a feckless bullshitter. Basically it's a case of two guys who don't know that they don't know the technical difficulties in what they claim to have done. The whole thing is embarrassing and annoying."

    Are we getting ... wait for it ... trolled? (Can I start a meme? Rick-Trolled?)

    What's really out of whack is the sequence of events. So the cops can't find this guy, they're wringing their hands in helplessness. Along comes "An IT Genius" that traces the house by IP ... and the cops couldn't call any of their guys on the entire force to do that? However if the kid torrented a Song they would have found him pronto.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  23. Re:First post by binarylarry · · Score: 2

    Cthulu want more brownies!

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  24. This is a simple case. by xor.pt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The author is just too naive, or cowardly to deliver his friend's son with legal action.
    In the end the author tries to spin this little story as a 'I'm the bigger man' tale instead.
    The author is at this point just enabling him, like his parents.
    This is a 17 year old who's in college. He's a danger to himself and others, and any additional damage caused by him will also be in the author's head.
    What did he learn from this? Cry when you get caugh, and your actions have no consequences.

  25. Trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trolling is the act of being disingenuous, it is not harassing the shit out of someone; Slashdot, you disappoint me.

  26. How is it even difficult? by Kohath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Post a link for a guy to click on. He clicks on it. It goes to a page you publish on your server. You look in the server logs. You know his IP address. Then you can find his city and possibly his neighborhood from that. And you know his ISP.

    After that it can become more difficult. But it's hardly impossible. If a friend at the guy's ISP will do you a favor (the troll in the story is local), or if you can simply guess the right answer and check it, it's easy again. If you can read someone's cookies with a cross-site scripting vulnerability or trick them into installing malware, it's not going to be too hard to find them.

    1. Re:How is it even difficult? by jimicus · · Score: 2

      You don't need to go that far.

      It was pretty obvious the stalker was known to his victim. If he sent an email from home, the IP address of their router would be in the headers.

      If there was an accurate entry in a geo IP database, that gives you the town.

      Now, if you don't live anywhere near that town but you have a friend who does - sounds like a hell of a coincidence.

    2. Re:How is it even difficult? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Post a link for a guy to click on. He clicks on it. It goes to a page you publish on your server. You look in the server logs. You know his IP address. Then you can find his city and possibly his neighborhood from that. And you know his ISP.

      After that it can become more difficult. But it's hardly impossible. If a friend at the guy's ISP will do you a favor (the troll in the story is local), or if you can simply guess the right answer and check it, it's easy again. If you can read someone's cookies with a cross-site scripting vulnerability or trick them into installing malware, it's not going to be too hard to find them.

      You don't even have to have him click a link. Send an email with a web bug (1 pixel img), hosted on a server you have log access to, and when he reads it you have his IP. I'm not a hacking wizard but have actually managed to backtrack someone sending stalkish emails to a friend to the stalkers place of employment (which made identifying who it was obvious in this case) just using a simple web bug and traceroute.

    3. Re:How is it even difficult? by jcr · · Score: 1

      Or you can just look for whoever's reading your blog far more than any other visitor. Your usual readers might hit your site daily or so. A stalker might be just about camped out on it.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    4. Re:How is it even difficult? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't seen any helpful IPs in gmail and ofher freemail headers in a long time.

    5. Re:How is it even difficult? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any email client worth it's salt will refuse to load any inlined images unless you approve for this reason.

      I know both Gmail and Microsoft Outlook do it this way.

    6. Re:How is it even difficult? by InsectOverlord · · Score: 1

      That's assuming he was not using a webmail (a pretty big assumption).

    7. Re:How is it even difficult? by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily a problem. Most web-based email systems put the public IP address of the client PC that sent the email in the headers somewhere.

    8. Re:How is it even difficult? by rohan972 · · Score: 1

      I've taken the IP address from infected emails and searched for it in my legitimate email. They were coming from my cousin's place. Having identifiable mail with the same IP makes it a lot easier and is probably what happened with this guy.

    9. Re:How is it even difficult? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      You don't even have to have him click a link. Send an email with a web bug (1 pixel img), hosted on a server you have log access to, and when he reads it you have his IP.

      This doesn't work with modern email clients. Spammers can set the URL of the image to a unique ID code that's linked to your email address, so as soon as you load the image they've just confirmed that your email address is valid. We don't want that, so external images are blocked by default.

      However, a decade ago this would have been more likely to work.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  27. Mildly spurious by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    All the symbolic deliveries of ashes and dead roses was very romantic, but I guess that could happen. However, what's up with the "IT genius friend" part, who can somehow get the message senders' IP addresses and then trace them up to an accuracy of a house? I think the story got a bit twisted or is missing some information there.

  28. Tech? by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

    This is pretty much the definition of Idle, is it not?

    Cool story bro seem appropriate.

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  29. Typo? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Queue the trolls...

    It may be that you intended to use the homophone of the word, which would be typical. However, either form could be potentially valid semantically, despite having distinct meanings.

    Either way, encountering this part of your comment effected my reaction.

  30. Doubt exists.... by BigBadBus · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Doubt exists.... by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Interesting... while it is far-fetched and most likely a fusing of many stories into one "meta" story about trolling (though as I've pointed out elsewhere in the thread that 'trolling' isn't what this blog entry describes), I am now more curious about the details than I was initially reading it (I was not convinced the "IT genius" was using legal means to track the perp... I just thought they got lucky, considering.)

      At the very least your link provides some doubt to the veracity of the claims made by Traynor. That should be enough healthy skepticism to invalidate the entire story, to be honest.

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    2. Re:Doubt exists.... by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      Echoing a post of mine elsewhere.

      Isn't trolling the theme of making up something designed to get people riled up?

      Your article does a much better job of detailing the raw concerns I touched on above - I too noticed big problems with the police aspect.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  31. Provoke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then I baited them – I was deliberately more provocative toward them than ever I'd been before.

    That's the first time in the article that he mentions having been previously "provocative"; up until then it sounded completely one sided. So what are the missing details?

  32. Re:I read this 4 days ago. Interesting nonetheless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    really didn't seem to truly comprehend what devastation he was causing to another human being, because he did it all remotely from the safety of his computer.

    He probably felt the same way a drone operator feels after dismembering civilians at a peaceful hillside wedding from the safety of his computer. ...initially elated at a job well done, only later to feel 'oh shit I fucked up'.

  33. Happened to me in high school. by Chrontius · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Happened to me in high school.

    I blocked at least a dozen AIM accounts a night for weeks (maybe months); I can be fortunate there was no "twitter" then, nor this "book of faces", and that smartphones were this exciting new thing Handspring was just introducing to the market that nobody could afford.

    Then I got two unsolicited copies of the TSR novel "Death of the Dragon" in the mail - this may have been an error by a small book distributor I did business with, so I can't be sure -- but "Dragon" was part of the IM name I used at the time, and I could never be sure. I still have both copies, and I haven't read either. I don't actually think I even touched either after I put them on the bookshelf those years ago.

    Then the fella proved himself grossly incompetent, and threatened to beat me to death. In a public library, where I "was", he was "behind" me. I was sitting at a desk, at home, with a baseball bat within arms' reach. I mocked him for the rest of the night, and then it ended. He failed. Epically. His confrontation... wasn't.

    But I'm not in high school any more. I spent the next couple years reading books like "Shooting To Live" and "Kill or Get Killed". I took years of aikido, tae kwon do, and studied a few forms of swordplay for a few more years. I carry a gun, and enough ammo to get through the statistically average civilian-defense gunfight, and then a little more. Sometimes, more than one. I'm seriously considering building some ghetto-but-effective body armor. (Steel rifle plates went out of style because they're heavy and unconcealable, but they offer an awful lot of protection). I don't carry a gun because I expect to get in a fight; I carry because I don't expect to get in a fight. If I expected one, I'd simply send a SWAT team in my stead, and sip Starbucks in the mobile command center. (No police department takes documentable, documented conspiracy to commit murder lightly in this age of lawsuits!) I don't sit with my back to the door at restaurants any more, I know what phrases like "condition yellow" mean, and I look for the bulge of a poorly-concealed weapon now when someone walks into the gas station while I'm fueling up.

    Fortunately, for the most part, I don't mind living like this. In practice, 98% of the time, it just means I can make unplanned trips to the gun range without going home for weapons. And - unlike most liberals - I know a secret: The shooting sports are fun. I hesitate to say it, but it's a blast to put 20 shots into a single hole not any bigger than a nickel; mastery for its own sake is one of the most rewarding things.

    But somewhere, deep down, I know and cannot forget: I found this thing I enjoy because someone threatened to kill me in a public place, in front of witnesses, and get away with it. And other geeks may not get through it as well as I did. I may enjoy the trappings, but I wouldn't want to put anyone through the scary parts on the way to where I am today.

    Let us not mistake this for an isolated incident; it is not. Let us not mistake it for something new; it is not. Let us not allow this to happen again; it should not.

    1. Re:Happened to me in high school. by shoemilk · · Score: 1

      I don't sit with my back to the door at restaurants any more,

      Wild Bill Hickok is that you?!

    2. Re:Happened to me in high school. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent is a nice example of troll.

      We're asked to believe that anonymous douchebaggery by some kid, even though it was revealed to be a complete farce, has driven Chrontius to join the 2% of Americans frightened enough to get a concealed carry permit. Drove him to learn several martial arts, and to consider "building" his own combat armor. Years of effort and expense because some anonymous kid figured there was a high probability that anyone on the internet was using a public terminal, culminating in Chrontius claiming to have "gotten through" this experience well, content in his self-defense fantasies, even though he is still afraid to sit with his back to a door.

      This post is an example of flamebait.

    3. Re:Happened to me in high school. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the funniest thing I've ever read on slashdot. I actually burst out laughing when you said aikido but I totally lost my shit when you said you were going to build body armor. All of this because one guy threatened you in high school. What a sad and scared little man you must be.

    4. Re:Happened to me in high school. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, that's funny.

    5. Re:Happened to me in high school. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget learning 'swordplay' dude. Concentrate on being able to run more than 50 feet - it's a much more effective form of defence when you have no experience outside of a highly controlled environment.

    6. Re:Happened to me in high school. by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      it seems like you beat the monster by becoming him

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    7. Re:Happened to me in high school. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      More than a bit irrational in your rabid anti self defense spiel, aren't you? You are one of those types who tell the rape victim to relax, don't resist, just lie down, and enjoy it.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    8. Re:Happened to me in high school. by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      i dunno. you're the stalker, it seems like you would have experience with your scenario

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    9. Re:Happened to me in high school. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      No, I only respond to you when you say particularly stupid shit. Which seems to be more often than not. Sometimes I like feeding trolls like you, no, excuse me, flamebaiters (flamer for short) like you for the money shot. If I were stalking, I would go after everything you post and seek you out. But since you do appear to be lucid and semi coherent sometimes, there's no need for that.

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    10. Re:Happened to me in high school. by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      whatever is source of your frustrations in real life, try to focus your awesome sense of judgment and keen punitive abilities on that, rather than random people on the internet

      thaaanks dude

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    11. Re:Happened to me in high school. by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a little worrisome that you've bought into this self-defense thing so much that you are considering wearing body armor everywhere you go. Statistically speaking you will never see an average civilian gunfight. But in any case kevlar is cheap, you can get a real vest instead of some ghetto body armor. It will be better.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    12. Re:Happened to me in high school. by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

      Word!

      --
      “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
    13. Re:Happened to me in high school. by radish · · Score: 1

      Wow. Paranoid much? I hope you don't drive, eat red meat or smoke. Because all of those things are waaaaay more likely to kill you than some nutjob with a gun (unless you count yourself - people shoot themselves accidentally with worrying frequency!). Best take a parachute next time you fly as well...

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    14. Re:Happened to me in high school. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What most people don't know is Kevlar is not much use without plates. With plates, you're right back to being bulky. Heck, normal Kevlar also doesn't stop a knife, unless you get the type specifically meant to stop sharp blades. For Chrontius, consider ceramic plates. I wear them (I'm also in a war zone) and they're a lot better than the others for protection and weight. Wear your armor more than 5 minutes and you'll quickly agree with me.

    15. Re:Happened to me in high school. by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I wasn't clear (I wrote that at something like 4AM local time; it's not exactly my best writing) - I did not mean for wearing everywhere I go. I meant for leaving under the bed in case those books were sent deliberately, and not accidentally; if that's the case, the guy has my address.* I'm not sure if the library thing was his way of some kind of cop-out; it could have been genuine incompetence and coincidence, or it could have been some way to end the confrontation while still coming off as though he would have gone through with it had he identified me correctly.

      Statistically speaking, I will never see a gunfight, and if I ever do, it will be too soon. I'd be perfectly happy to have "wasted" that investment. If nothing else, I'll enjoy shooting bowling pin matches after work, I guess.

      *(The books came from the same shop as, and shortly after, an order I placed. I could have simply gotten the book someone else ordered by mistake, and the one the bookseller sent when the other customer complained they never got their reading material. Or, they could have been purchased as a "gift" for me by my troll. I doubt I'll ever be able to know conclusively how they ended up on my doorstep.)

    16. Re:Happened to me in high school. by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      AC, first, I'd like to thank you for serving our nation. (Or your nation, if we don't share one; it's still quite a patriotic decision.)

      I'd consider ceramic plates if I actually expected to get shot at. (As mentioned above, I'll statistically never need either weapon or armor.) Actually, I'd probably go with polymer plates; despite the bulk, they're a couple pounds lighter than ceramic and I hear they don't tend to shatter when hit by rifle fire (though, they are terribly expensive). Steel rifle plates are something like 20 pounds each, but if you're only going to wear them for five adrenaline-fueled minutes after you hear someone kick down your front door, I think I could live with that weight. I appreciate the voice of experience, however; if you think they'd be more burden than is prudent, I'd like to know.

    17. Re:Happened to me in high school. by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      Most of the time I'm happy to live a boring life, knowing I'm doing my civic duty to deter strongarm criminals from working in my city. Some of them are smart enough to avoid targeting well-armed populations, as the odds don't tend to favor a long career as a professional crook. I think I'll just quote this: "In 1966, the city of Orlando responded to a wave of sexual assaults by offering firearms training classes to women. Rapes dropped by nearly 90% the following year." Source is either the DOJ or a study by the University of Chicago; this footnote is a little ambiguous. The Bureau of Justice Statistics reports the same thing occurred in Texas when concealed carry was legalized; a 93% drop compared to the rest of the nation the first year, and 500% the second. I conclude that well-armed populations get left alone, {sarcasm}and my civic duty is to help my friends and neighbors be left alone.{/sarcasm} Traffic safety, I can't do much about that beyond driving safely. Other than that, I vote in local elections for the candidate promising to fix roads, or with a track record of doing so - I do what I can.

      Red meat's attendant risks can be offset via not overindulging and staying in shape. It's not the only way to get enough iron in your diet, but it's certainly the tastiest.

      I'd debate your "worrying frequency", as well. Firearm accidents account for 0.8% of all accidental deaths, according to the CDC in 2001 (pardon the age of my data, it's what I have it hand). There were 800 accidental firearm deaths in 2001, and the number has been continuously falling since 1981 with the exception of one puzzling spike in 1993. Most of these are hunting accidents* along the lines of Dick Cheney's incident with his lawyer.

      *(Gary Kleck, “Targeting Guns: Firearms and Their Control”, 1997, pages 293-324)
      **(And no, I don't smoke.)

    18. Re:Happened to me in high school. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Uh, didn't that happen a long time ago? Are you still worried this guy is going to try to kill you?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    19. Re:Happened to me in high school. by Chrontius · · Score: 1

      It did. I'm no longer worried about him. That's mostly the product of a nagging worry, which is under most circumstances dormant; most months I never think about this once. However, in the last day or so as a result of reading about Leo's ordeal, it all seems quite fresh in my memory - which is unavoidably going to color my normal responses.

      In a week, I hope to once again believe that body armor is a silly way to spend a bunch of money, but that hit a little close to home.

    20. Re:Happened to me in high school. by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I guess I can understand. I got punched in the face once, and the emotional memory of that stayed with me. For a long time, whenever a car drove by me on a lonesome street, I was worried that the driver would shoot me (or throw an egg or something) as he went by. After time of ignoring that feeling (that is, doing what I wanted), it went away, and I no longer worry.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    21. Re:Happened to me in high school. by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      History is written by the winners. Typically that's the guy who brought a gun to a fistfight.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    22. Re:Happened to me in high school. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent links to PDF document hosted on neo-nazi domain. Fucking retard.

    23. Re:Happened to me in high school. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same thing happened to me in highschool too, except this was before internet and was mostly stalking outside my home and letters. Final confrontation never came, I never told anyone. Just lived in complete fear for a few weeks.

      Then I got over it that year and moved on, rather than living in such intense fear that I decided to wear body armor.

      Kids do dumb things and it was most likely tough talk. If your story is true (the your description of your current status sounds wickedly fake), I hope you live far, far away from me. People shouldn't live in as much fear and heightened state of anxiety as you do, it leads to gun accidents if you think everything is a potential threat and are armed to the teeth.

      Or, you spend so many years amped up for a confrontation that never happens, you create one.

      Make peace with your past and free yourself from fear and paranoia, or consider living in the woods far, far away from people for all our sakes.

    24. Re:Happened to me in high school. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes and no on serving. I'm 15 years Air Force, but I'm working with SOF in a civilian capacity right now.

      My assumption was that wearing the armor was for being shot at. If you do expect, wear plates in your armor. Otherwise, your armor is only going to stop shrapnel. So in my case, when a 107mm rocket landed about 50 feet away from me, it would stop shrapnel to my body, head (helmet) and face (ballistic eyewear). However, without plates if you get shot by anything above a 9mm from 100 yards or less, the class III armor (kevlar, no plate) isn't rated to sufficiently stop it. So back to my point, no expected gunplay in a civilian setting (no shrapnel), no point in body armor.

      Think about your implication, 20 each for plate weight sounds high, but lets roll with. If someone kicks your door, you have seconds to A) become coherent (it wasn't a dream, a transformer blowing, car backfiring, 'Nam flashback (kidding)) B) Remember, "Hey I have armor." C) Grab it D) Fling 50 pounds over your head, or around your arms (depending on which type of armor you buy). As some one who, to date, is 100% of the time the first one in PPE (personal protection equip) in my group when the "Incoming Rocket" alarm sounds off, I can safely say it's a stretch. If it's an aggressive home invasion, you're probably toast since they'll likely hit the bedroom as your donning the flak jacket. If it's the neighbor thinking your're out of town and wants to check your snacks in the fridge, you're probably fine.

      Honestly, it will very likely be too much of a burden. It's better to spend the $4,000+ you have for armor on shooting range time to increase your accuracy and reflexive shooting/posture/responses.

    25. Re:Happened to me in high school. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BlueDragon?

    26. Re:Happened to me in high school. by alexo · · Score: 1

      Fortunately, for the most part, I don't mind living like this

      How about your wife/girlfriend? Does she mind?

  34. An example of a "crack" in learning culture. by beachdog · · Score: 1

    I am exploring the hypothesis that motor skill development in children, and in particular, the failure of certain children to learn certain motor skills lays the groundwork for the later development of toxic and unhealthy behaviours such as harassment described in the original post and related behaviours such as bullying, a recently widely reported socially destructive behaviour.

    What do I mean by "explore a hypothesis"? I work with severely disabled kids. Kids that have huge time delay around a simple task like holding a pencil and making a mark on a sheet of paper. This has lead me to observe non-disabled elementary school kids and the extreme rapidity where every month every child develops new abilities to play games. Kids quickly move from "throw it to me" to performing screen passes and showing new control as they play basketball.

    The same learning process, in public school, trails off into disorder and incompleteness in matters of moving from motor skills to social skills like befriending and interacting socially in a group at lunch. Some kids stand in clusters, trying to figure out how to get and give attention. Other kids are silent. All of them floundering around gradually falling into a gelled relationship. Whatever that relationship is, it is not formally a part of "school" (but I see the same processes taking place as when I went to elementary school some 50 years ago). The capability of making a friend, being a friend and being able to keep becoming socially healthy is something of great importance and real delicacy.

    The hypothesis applies to this kid and this cruel trolling or harassment like this: many years beforehand this person failed to learn some motor skill, then failed to pick up the game, then failed to learn the ideas and rules embedded in the game. When his motor skill apparatus had matured to the point where he was able to engage in sophisticated motor skill planning he lacked an adequate experience and capability base to conduct himself in a constructive manner.

    The past few years it seems like lots and lots of kids are getting to their high school and college years and displaying highly developed motor skills and planning skills with a really grave absence of the high level part of culture. Are the number of socially deficient young people greater now than in past years? I don't know.

    I feel tracing the bad social behaviour back to motor skill acquisition in elementary school points to a way to address the behaviour problem at it's inception.

     

    1. Re:An example of a "crack" in learning culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Classic example of ever generation is worse than the last.

      NOW GET ORF MY LAWN!

    2. Re:An example of a "crack" in learning culture. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The problem with your idea is that there's kids who are physically damaged who can't play certain games who nonetheless grow up to be healthy and functioning members of society. There's ways to socialize that don't involve structured games. I was never really into them (though I did play four square with other kids, on purpose) but I did great socially until middle school. I was in sixth grade with the kids I'd been with since kindergarten on one side of town, and then we moved to the other side of town and I went straight into a middle school in the middle of the school year with a bunch of kids I didn't know, and I was different. Disaster ensued and from then on school was suffering for me and I was the very lowest man on every totem pole in four schools thereafter, counting that one which I got kicked out of, and then my first high school which I also got kicked out of.

      I think that it's social trauma that causes social withdrawal which leads to further social withdrawal.

      There was just a clipping posted to G+ where people were complaining about the suspension of a teacher who asked a fat kid if he ate his [missing] homework, right up until I pointed out that bullying begins with the teachers and the administration and works its way down. I was singled out for verbal abuse for my lack of participation in school from sixth grade on, but my lack of participation was due to the massive abuse I was receiving from the other students... which was encouraged by the attitude of the faculty. My self-esteem didn't really recover until I was in my late twenties. I moved to Texas and was thus able to re-invent myself. By the time I came back everyone who had been a problem was working at Wal-Mart or similar, or they themselves had grown up and realized what a festering little piece of shit they had been.

      I trace the bad social behavior back to bad social behavior on the part of others, encouraged by bad social behavior on the part of the faculty. Since they're the adults in the situation, they bear the lion's share of the responsibility. If you think there's no more important job that you can do than parenting, try teaching, where you have the chance to fuck up thirty kids at once.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  35. It's not trolling by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    He's was being a complete dick. I hope his parents neuter him.

  36. Article is most likely a fake. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    The article is most likely a fake.
    Tracking someones home simply by having an IP adress with no help from the ISP and various legal procedures? Yeah, sure.
    *Not* going to the police over physical world death-threats? Yeah, sure.

    I bet money that this is a fabricated news story by a loony pseudo journalist. Or that Leo Traynor simply doesn't exist. There are accounts on the interweb that indicate this.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Article is most likely a fake. by Sique · · Score: 1

      You didn't read the article thoroughly. He went to the police. Twice. And you don't know who the IT genius guy knows at the local ISPs.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    2. Re:Article is most likely a fake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you think the media may have been tricked by a true internet Troll with this fake story....... I don't know if that's disturbing or just brilliant trolling.

    3. Re:Article is most likely a fake. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A friend's home. He has a blog. It's very likely his friend left comments, and he could get the IP that way. No legal procedures required.

      He went to the police twice.

      I've heard of Leo Traynor before this.

      There are comments on the interweb that indicate you didn't read his post properly.

  37. Xbox 360 by cfalcon · · Score: 0

    They call it the Xbox 360 because when you see it, you turn 360 degrees and walk right back the way you came!

    1. Re:Xbox 360 by Interfacer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      360 degrees means you're looking directly at the xbox again ...

    2. Re:Xbox 360 by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      They call it the Xbox 360 because when you see it, you turn 360 degrees and walk right back the way you came!

      I assume you're meant to moonwalk on your outbound trip. I thought that was a Genesis game...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Xbox 360 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this one never ever fails :)

    4. Re:Xbox 360 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      trolled.

    5. Re:Xbox 360 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thus the point of this often stated piece of humor.

  38. Definition of trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This sounds much more less like a troll than a stalker. A troll is someone who gives you, or anyone else, shit on a site...a stalker is someone who focuses on you and follows you in some fashion. Sure...trolls are annoying, but I'm suspicious that this is simply part of a conspiracy to confuse the two by definition. And more importantly, legally.
    Hackers are fine and beneficial beings...trolls are too in their own way. I most cases they just want to provide a fresh perspective, if not. They're using the Internet as a therapeutic tool.
    Please, let's not confuse trolling for stalking and then perversely give trolls 10 year sentences, (annoying as they may be) by confusing reality, like copying is often confused with theft.

  39. Hmmmm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obvious (self-claimed) techno-illiterate is trolled. He just happens to know an IT Genius (TM) who just happens to work at his ISP and coincidentally is able to pass on personal identifying of a third party in a manner that just happens to be legal. Then the whole episode (which appears to involve criminal activity with deliberate intent by the so-called troll) is just washed away, leaving no independent documented trace. Call me suspicious. Which ISP employs people who are so 'helpful' in the absence of legal warrants? Don't the have something like a Data Protection Act over there?

  40. Who the hell is Leo Taynor, and why do I care? by JamesTKirk · · Score: 1

    I've never heard of this guy. He's supposed to be a "writer", but the only thing I can find about him is his blog, and this article which he's managed to get plastered everywhere. Why do I care that his neighbor's kid was harassing him?

  41. Humans are difficult.. by fa2k · · Score: 1

    It's people like this (troll) who make it hard to argue for universal free speech. So we're stuck with some lame subjective standard for harassment.

  42. You have all been Trolled. by Tastecicles · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Leo Traynor is a fiction. Apparently he has lived in no less than seventeen countries over the past eight years, including some of the most politically unstable regions on the planet; more that he has managed to stay still long enough to gain a DPhil in international politics (no school anywhere has any record of him), that he has worked for all three main parties in the UK as a press liaison officer (yet no mention of him in the Press, ever). That he has worked for both parties in the US as a Press liaison officer (ditto). His story is so full of holes you could drain chips with it.

    Leo Traynor, you are a bullshitter.

    --
    Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    1. Re:You have all been Trolled. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out the fancy places Leo Traynor likes to hang out (or says he does) http://topsy.com/s?q=%40leo_traynor+foursquare

    2. Re:You have all been Trolled. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
    3. Re:You have all been Trolled. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Leo mention in your comment seems to be a fiction. But I'm pretty sure that's not the Leo we're talking about.

    4. Re:You have all been Trolled. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Coffee shops, restaurants and train stations. How unbelievable.

    5. Re:You have all been Trolled. by valentinas · · Score: 1

      Quick Google search gives no results from earlier than 2012 related to him (and 99% of results is that troll story). Is this meta, or what? Quick, someone write an article "How a troll trolled about trolling a troll"!

    6. Re:You have all been Trolled. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He lives in Dublin and the paper that got conned by gaygirlindamascus insists he is real.

    7. Re:You have all been Trolled. by Tastecicles · · Score: 1

      yes which is precisely why that same paper is censoring comments on the online copy to exclude those which it deems counter to the delusion.

      Isn't it sad when so many people can see this shit coming from a mile off, yet the media insists it's genuine?

      --
      Operation Guillotine is in effect.
    8. Re:You have all been Trolled. by alexo · · Score: 1

      Please mod parent up

  43. This is Ireland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest you learn a little about Ireland before posting. It is a very different culture from the US.

    1. Re:This is Ireland by xor.pt · · Score: 0

      Culture doesn't justify letting someone off the hook for a crime potentially exposing others to the same fate, no matter where you live.
      Also, I suggest you learn a little bit about the person you're posting about, before making bigoted assumptions about their nationality.

  44. Conspiracy sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These conspiracy sites are spreading hate and paranoia.
    Doe this sound familiar to you?
    The Jew run illuminati controls the world with their annual bilderberg meetings and everything that has ever been wrong with the world is because of the Jews. (and black people...and muslims...and whoever they can point their hate stick at)

    I believe this kid might have chatted with one (or a few) of those deranged felon crack heads, and had been manipulated into targeting Leo.
    I don't believe this kid was a sociopath, but he is definitely on the right path.

    1. Re:Conspiracy sites by PPH · · Score: 1

      Or the kid did a bit of research and figured out what would push Traynor's buttons. He doesn't necessarily have to believe it. He just has to know what will get someone's goat.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
  45. Re:Article is most likely a fake*2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also this from the end of the article:

    The author has asked us to make clear he does not want to be paid a fee

    Somebody's unethical enough to lie but is concerned they may get into legal hot water if they're uncovered and they've taken money for it. They're still getting lots of free publicity though.

  46. Appropriate Response by Millennium · · Score: 1

    If you've ever seen very young puppies playing, you know that it's not as cute as it sounds. There's yelping and pain, and often even blood as the puppies bite one another mercilessly. But as the days and weeks pass, that stops; by being bitten, the puppies learn that biting hurts. It takes a little while, and is perhaps not the most pleasant of methods, but it's what their minds can process.

    Some people are the same way. It's a cruel thing to force a bully (or its net-cousin, the troll) to look in the mirror and see what they've really done; what they really are. It messes with a person's head in a way that those who haven't experienced it cannot understand. But many of them legitimately NEED that kind of cruelty; it's the language they speak, the stimulus they know how to sense.

    It's still cruel, mind you; it shouldn't be shied away from, but it shouldn't be glorified or looked forward to either. Sometimes it's not even possible, especially in the age of the Internet. But when it can be done, I'd call it preferable to bringing in the authorities. It's less wasteful, on account of not throwing up lifelong obstacles for the troll to overcome, and when properly applied it hurts worse than the law would allow our authorities to inflict anyway. Justice and vengeance, all wrapped up in a nice, neat package.

  47. On the subject of 'bullies' by SternisheFan · · Score: 1
    These.trolls are just modern bullies, plain and simple. After being bullied throughout my childhood, at age 19, I've learned the 'trick' about bullies, Many have tried to bully me in the 30plus years since and I've allowed only one to succeed, a former girlfriend's twin sister, a 'special case. Allow me to relate how I lrearned about bullies.

    One beautiful Sunday morning in Queens, N.Y., I am in my car, parked along a nice open-field park. It's,for the 19 year old me, a great morning! I'm enjoying my coffee and breakfast sandwich while listening to a great Dr. Demento show on the radio, and all is right in my world. Until I look in my rearview mirror and see something that doesn't 'fit' with my perfect morning. It's a straight road and far behind me a van is parked, and there are three young men around the driver's door, and they are yelling a great deal. I want to ignore this and go back to my Sunday comics, but I'm bothered by not knowing what to do. More upset that it's ruining my perfect morning,, I get out and walk a beeline course straight to them, not knowing what I'm going to do, but I do know what's happening is wrong.

    The last 40 feet, one of the guys notice me, and the leader of their group walks tough up to me, words are exchanged. And yes, I am scared. He's bigger than I am, and if it came to a fight I'd lose. But a few weeks earlier I'd heard somewhere that when it comes to bullies, never show fear. Never 'back' from a bully, not even in your eye. They will sense your fear, once you show fear, the fight's over, you've already lost, and you may as well lay down and 'take your beating'. So when the tough moves toward me, I don't move, words get exchanged. I mention coolly (in my best Clint Eastwood voice) that three on one isn't fair, and that I'm just here to "even up the odds." And an amazing thing happened. He backed down, unsure of what I might know. They walk off, I check the driver who has a pretty girlfiend in his passenger seat. Ask if he's ok, he says "Yeah, thanks.", I walk back to my car feeling shaky from the adrenaline effect, and go back to my fine Sunday morning, feeling kind of good about the way that episode turned out.

    I learned that day that bullies are mostly hot air, and also that I'm a pretty damn good 'bluffer'. It's a poker game, really. That bully didn't know me, and I acted confidant enough so that he felt I wasn't worth the risk, and 'folded' his hand. I've used this 'never show fear to a bully' technique throughout my life, and it works on some of the biggest guys! Now, there are situations where "walking away" is what a man must do, not all confrontations 'need' to be 'won', and some can't be won, best to leave. But know your local laws so you don't get arrested a lot. This post may get modded down, or off-topic. I'm typing it in so maybe some young man or woman reading this will be helped if they ever have dealings with a bully. They come in all shapes, sizes and types in life. 'Trolls should be treated the same way, never let 'em see you sweat.

    1. Re:On the subject of 'bullies' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good job!

      Bullying behavior is fairly standard, and so standard techniques work against them.

      I also find they are easily intimidated by shining group attention on them. Dark people don't like sunlight.

      I once had somebody hang a grisly package on my door knob because I'd stood up to them on a previous occasion. My first impulse was to immediately get rid of it, to hide that it had happened, but instead I didn't touch it or remove it, but let it hang there all day for all the other apartment occupants to walk by and see, and I told everybody I knew about it. By the end of the day, everybody was buzzing. I also told the apartment building managers. The offending person moved away soon after, not just from the building, but from the community.

      I'm sure they still hate me, but who cares? Nobody likes bullies and they squander their social currency in a healthy community. Normal people out-number sickos.

    2. Re:On the subject of 'bullies' by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      Good job!

      Bullying behavior is fairly standard, and so standard techniques work against them.

      I also find they are easily intimidated by shining group attention on them. Dark people don't like sunlight.

      I once had somebody hang a grisly package on my door knob because I'd stood up to them on a previous occasion. My first impulse was to immediately get rid of it, to hide that it had happened, but instead I didn't touch it or remove it, but let it hang there all day for all the other apartment occupants to walk by and see, and I told everybody I knew about it. By the end of the day, everybody was buzzing. I also told the apartment building managers. The offending person moved away soon after, not just from the building, but from the community.

      I'm sure they still hate me, but who cares? Nobody likes bullies and they squander their social currency in a healthy community. Normal people out-number sickos.

      Excellent, Nicely played! You handled that very well, because they don't like everyone to know. That's how they work, through fear and intimidation. Very hard to bully when there are witnesses, takes the wind out of their sails real quick.

      One thing I should've put in my post was, to use a Clint Eastwood line, "A man's got to know his limitations." You have to be careful with some folks, not everyone is 'dealing with a full deck'. And nowaday's you don't know if someone's on medication, or is really deranged. Usually, go with your gut. Your gut doesn't usually lie to you.

      And if you get a gang on you, don't even pay attention to any underlings, focus on the leader only. If he folds, the other's usually will too. But I like your public humiliation technique,

  48. Re:I read this 4 days ago. Interesting nonetheless by LourensV · · Score: 1

    If we all had to show our faces, I'm sure we'd be a little more civil toward one another. Personally, I don't think I run a very high risk of ending up in the situation that this guy was in, since I value my online anonymity too much.

    That's an interesting case of Prisoner's Dilemma there. If everyone is anonymous, nobody can stalk anybody, but there will be relatively many rude people. If only some people are anonymous (and potentially rude) and others aren't (and are civil), then the civil folks run the risk of being stalked by anonymous rude people. If nobody is anonymous, nobody can stalk anybody, at least not while escaping punishment, and we'll have fewer rude people.

    In the Prisoner's Dilemma, there are several solutions to this. One is having an external authority that keeps both prisoner's from talking. Another strategy that works well (in the sense of fostering cooperation) is tit-for-tat with random altruism, where in each round of Prisoner's Dilemma you cooperate if the other person cooperated with you in the previous one, and betray if they betrayed you, except that you occasionally give them a break and cooperate even if they betrayed you. This latter feature keeps the system from getting stuck in endless loops of betrayal. The analogues in the case of Internet anonymity would be a real-name policy, and letting users selectively share their personal information with others. Note that for the user to follow the tit-for-tat strategy, users have to know that it's the same person who betrayed them last time, so you can't have multiple accounts per person (another reason for a real-name policy). Of course, there are also good valid uses of anonymity and anonymous speech, and there should be a place for them as well.

    I realize that for many, the temptation to spread their personal misery is just too great, and so they troll, which is really just a cry for attention -- something they probably didn't get enough of growing up.

    Exactly, and that is why the solution that Traynor chose is the right solution, and it's quite admirable that he did so. But even if all he would consider would be self-interest, this would have been the correct solution. Prisons and other punishment don't solve the problem of crime in a society. They just repress the symptoms, and they deflect and channel feelings of revenge into something more civilised than a lynching. If you actually want to solve the crime problem, you have to prevent people from becoming criminals, because once they are there is very little you can do to turn them into good citizens again. That means keeping a very close eye on 12-18 year olds who are running with the wrong crowd, who live in unstable families, and so on, and intervening where necessary. Keep them on the straight during puberty and adolescence, make sure they finish school and find a job and start a family, that's basically all you have to do (see also the recent find-hackers-girlfriends item). And for the ones for which it's too late, and the ones with mental disorders, well, so far prisons and closed institutions is the best we can do it seems. But if Traynor had had this kid sent to prison, the kid would have been out in a couple years, and would probably have got right back into stalking people or worse. The path he chose to take gives Traynor a much better chance of never having to deal with this again.

  49. Merciful to a wicked is wicked to the merciful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mr Traynor has made a grave mistake. Merciful to a wicked is wicked to the merciful. Hopefully the next victim of the little shitface will also have an IT Genius friend. Reporting the little shit to GARDA would have been THE RIGHT THING.

    1. Re:Merciful to a wicked is wicked to the merciful by SternisheFan · · Score: 1

      Mr Traynor has made a grave mistake. Merciful to a wicked is wicked to the merciful. Hopefully the next victim of the little shitface will also have an IT Genius friend. Reporting the little shit to GARDA would have been THE RIGHT THING.

      I respectfully disagree. He showed 'mercy' to the confused young man, an admirable quality. Whether ot not this story actually happened, just because you 'can' seek retribution does not mean you always 'should'. That boy learned an important lesson, and the situation ended., that was what the man wanted. You don't always get 'justice' in life. And sometimes, people who seek out revenge oftentimes turn into a worse person for it. I've had times when I would have been entirely 'justified' in making someone's life worse by seeking 'righteous justice', instead I forgave them. It lifts a heavy negativeness off of me by forgiving. The people I forgive may still be the same, that really doesn't impact my life at all, I've found. But I can tell myself, "I'm SO glad I'm not like THAT person!" It helps me to get a sense of satisfaction, knowing I didn't allow myself to become another fool who shouts to anyone who'll listen, "But, I was right!" They let their sense of needing to be 'right' eat away at the good inside them, leaving them bitter and angry. That's not who I choose to be.

  50. Imagine by aheadinabox · · Score: 0

    if this was your kid,your little or big brother that was doing this. How this would likely have some serious consequences to the ole family structure. I know if this was my family member,i would be utterly devastated. Sure, incarceration,counseling or whatever is decided for consequences is important, but wow. Talk about a dark secret.

  51. In popular culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  52. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucky for you then that god doesn't exist.

  53. Re:fable by am+2k · · Score: 1

    So the cops can't find this guy, they're wringing their hands in helplessness. Along comes "An IT Genius" that traces the house by IP ... and the cops couldn't call any of their guys on the entire force to do that?

    As far as I've heard from friends and experienced myself, the cops don't give much of a shit unless child porn or something similar is involved, or you lead them at the person who did it yourself.

  54. I don't buy it by DL117 · · Score: 1

    This story makes absolutely no sense whatsoever, and I see basically two possibilities:

    1.The events described, as a whole, actually happened, but the technical issues described(finding the IP and hacking the facebook page) were misinterpreted by the author.
    2. The entire thing is false.

    I don't know which one it is, personally I think the latter as it sounds implausible and reads like a work of fiction.

    The claim of the "IT genius friend" finding the house from the IP obviously makes no sense for two reasons:

    1.Twitter and Facebook do not reveal their user's IPs, nor do most email services. Depending on the blog host, it's possible he could have found the IP there, but obviously there would be no way to be sure it was the same as the stalker(troll is the wrong word) on FB and Twitter.
    2.Converting the IP to a physical address obviously is not possible without cooperation from the ISP. The author claims that his friend was able to deduce not one, not two, but THREE physical addresses from the IP addresses, including his friend's house. I don't see an ISP doing that without police or court involvement first, as giving a customer's physical location out opens them up to significant liability.

    The overall story appears false as it is practically written to appeal to those who fear young people using computers. "His son was glued to the computer...couldn't watch TV without tweeting" "engrossed in conspiracy sites". This reads like a work of fiction pushing an agenda, an anti-youth, anti-internet hit piece.

    When I started writing this post, I honestly wasn't sure which of the two possibilities was true, whether the author misconstrued the events or whether the whole thing was a hoax. Having re-read the article a few times now, I'm sure this is false and a hoax, and I hope it is exposed.

    1. Re:I don't buy it by DL117 · · Score: 1

      I just read the link to the blog, where he claims a public available geolocation site was used, that is obviously false since anyone who has ever tried plugging their IP into one of these knows it can only give you a very broad location, city-level.

    2. Re:I don't buy it by j_2048 · · Score: 1

      Does seem somewhat calculated to trigger outrage.
      On his actual blog he attempts an explanation of the IP tracking by saying it is similar to a method described here:
      http://evertb.wordpress.com/2012/09/26/tracking-a-troll/
      but the method described is far from convincing.

    3. Re:I don't buy it by j_2048 · · Score: 1

      I get a location with accuracy to about 800km.

    4. Re:I don't buy it by wordsnyc · · Score: 1

      Apart from the implausible IP tracking to house-level, the whole story itself screams fake. As someone said, it's a Lifetime movie. Do you really believe that a 17-yr old would put together a box of ashes with a note about Auschwitz as a way to terrorize his parents' friend? Most kids that age, sadly, have never heard of Auschwitz. Why is there no online record of the author's "bait" to the kid (web page, blog, whatever)? He claims to have been driven off twitter, but his twitter acct is a week old. Where's his old acct? What was the handle? Everything is mysteriously unverifiable, even though none of it would reveal the kid's identity.

      IT"S ALL BULLSHIT, and half the friggin net has fallen for this stupid fairytale.

      But wait, it gets better. I first saw Traynor's story in a link pushed on twitter by a Guardian reporter in Ireland. I asked him if he could vouch for its veracity. No reply. A day later, Traynor's essay was reposted as a personal essay in ... the Guardian. It got several hundred comments, only a few of which were skeptical. From personal experience in the comments thread and the comments of a few other readers it was apparent that the Guardian was deleting at least some comments that cast doubt on Traynor's story.

      At this point I strongly suspect that that Guardian reporter is either the real author or is working with "Traynor" to boost his career.

      --
      Sent from the iPad I found in your car.
    5. Re:I don't buy it by tibit · · Score: 1

      At this point I can't but agree. Either the original article is very poorly written, or it's just fiction. The kid supposedly started harassing him when he was 15. Yeah, there are plenty of sickos even younger than that, but they don't act quite that way most of the time AFAIK. How the fuck does one get his Facebook account "hacked"?! I keep hearing this and all I can come up with that they used some trivial password that took 10 manual tries to figure out for someone who knows the target, or that the same password was reused on many sites, one of which has a breach. Hacked, to me, means that the perp either rooted (or otherwise had control over) the machine the target used to log in to FB, or that they got access to FB's very own password database and managed to brute-force the surely hashed and salted password hash to recover the plaintext password. Doesn't sound very plausible unless you the target is routinely using public workstations, and the perp can simply attach a keylogger a bit in advance.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
  55. Re:First post by Millennium · · Score: 1

    God also hates bullies: 2 Kings 2:23-24

  56. This is fake by hessian · · Score: 1

    Sorry to burst bubbles, but this overly dramatic and sappy story is obviously designed for readership consumption and to get famous. It's 100% fake, doubled-down vague on details.

    1. Re:This is fake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:This is fake by wordsnyc · · Score: 1

      One good question is why the Guardian chose to print this with absolutely no verification. The guy claims to have called the cops twice. There would be a record of that. And so on. Of course, the fact that the earliest known mention/promotion of this story on Twitter came from a Guardian reporter poses interesting possibilities. Paging Jason Blair....

      --
      Sent from the iPad I found in your car.
  57. Warning signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Young people setting fires, torturing animals, and yes sending threats via computer are obvious sing of psychopathic personalities. I predict the boy will eventually cause serious harm to someone.

    1. Re:Warning signs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since that he was confronted he has completely reformed, graduated from pharmacy school, and is preparing medications for the elderly. I think we have nothing to worry about.

  58. Trolling? Bullying! by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    That's basically what this guy was, a bully. He was picking out someone he deemed weaker, he looked for a trigger that he could push to make his victim cower in fear and he went for it. That's the same shit that has been going down schoolyards for ages now.

    The only reason this gets some attention is that it can happen to someone of voting age.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  59. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LMAO, so you troll back even more sophomoricly? Yeah, you're a pro. Back to math class, youngster!

  60. Understanding by loufoque · · Score: 1

    Did the guy ever try to understand what drove this "Internet troll" to hate/despise him so much, or did he just assume it was baseless racism and he was crazy?

  61. The Authoritarian Personality by microbox · · Score: 2, Informative

    A good beating will modify the behaviour of anyone dramatically.

    Evidence shows that punishment like this only modifies behaviour whilst the threat continues. Remove the threat, and you'll find nothing changed. This has been very precisely studied.

    Medieval crowd control methods as practised by the Catholic Church and Vlad the Impaler, still work just as efficiently today, as it did back then.

    Gee... you must be an authoritarian personality. People are different. They are not all like you. Most are not like you. You cannot project your experience of life onto others. Perhaps medieval crowd control would be good for you -- but for the rest of us, it will just create a spiral of violence. Like the violence in medieval times.

    --

    Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
    1. Re:The Authoritarian Personality by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Or else YOU'VE been trolled. Your sarcasm detector is out of tune.

    2. Re:The Authoritarian Personality by skovnymfe · · Score: 1

      So you keep showing up at his house and beat him up from time to time, just to make sure the message sticks, yah?

    3. Re:The Authoritarian Personality by microbox · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah, got it. Have spent so much time reading right-wing-nut blogs that I'm failing to see parody from sane people. (Authoritarians used to be split between dems and GOP, but that was the old days.)

      --

      Like all pain, suffering is a signal that something isn't right
  62. Re:I read this 4 days ago. Interesting nonetheless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyway, enough pontificating. Queue the trolls...

    http://goat.cx/
    Trolololoooo

  63. it doesn't always end that way by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Whether the story is true or an attention grab, what occurs to me is that the end is unusual and in some ways unrealistic. It depends on the troll having some decency in them that they had not managed to suppress by their hatred or disdain of their quarry.

    Yes, it is possible to track down an harasser. I've done it. (It was a team effort, and the guy eventually lost his job and will probably never work in that field again.) It needs to be someone who can manipulate the tools without knowing how they operate, and without the knowledge and experience to adequately cover their tracks. Lots of people are full of venom but not intelligence.

    The thing is, just telling them what kind of person you are and how badly they hurt you is, if anything, added motive to (in my opinion) the great majority of scum out there. They don't care who you are, and the fact that they've caused you pain is invigorating. Making the world crash down on them is in most cases the only solution.

    In this particular case (again, if true and not just a marketing effort), given that the troll was the son of a friend, confronting the kid with parents present is a necessary first step, but I'd be surprised as hell if it worked. Real life is seldom so accommodating.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  64. The Troll was his son? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yet another anti-semitic hatecrime is a hoax.

    1. Re:The Troll was his son? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jews gonna jew.

  65. bah. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That teen needed to be beaten with a sack of nickles in an alley.

  66. Seriously? Jayson Blair wannabe! by nicoleb_x · · Score: 1

    What a crock of shit.

  67. Leo Traynor by Dunge · · Score: 0

    Who the hell is Leo Traynor?

  68. Leo Traynor's BS Exposed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.resistradio.com/news/questioning-the-trollocaust-did-leotraynor-really-suffer-vile-hate-campaign

  69. Leo Traynor: great troll, or greatest troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He captures the smug, fastidious overwhelmed-boomer persona fantastically well. I remember how adults used to pull that crap all the time when I was a teenager: they conspire among themselves, ambush you, embarrass you by your poor ability to express yourself, bully you into "agreeing" to things, and then blab to everyone about how you are an incomprehensible crazyperson with nonsensical motivations, sometimes within your hearing or even to your face. I think "It was a game thing" was a lie, telling him what he wanted to hear. If there were a reason, it does not make sense to throw it in the adult's face after being cornered like that because the adult's entire aim is to get inside the kid's head and exploit his weaknesses.

    Overall, of course I side with Leo over the troll, but it is so obviously wrong to relentlessly terrorize others then hide behind your youth to avoid retaliation. There's nothing to learn there, so criticizing Leo is more interesting. In particular, his smug last word:

    "You're better than this. You have a name of your own. Be proud of it. Don't hide it again and I won't ruin it if you play ball with your parents."

    This is part of a larger debate about pseudonymity on the Internet. He seems to find it immoral not to volunteer to make yourself vulnerable to retaliation. You'd think, after being harassed like this, the man might have a different perspective, or might think to experiences a little bigger than his own where someone could make his life unliveable. Also I think this thought, "make yourselves maximally vulnerable or be treated with suspicion or excluded" is the hallmark of an abusive regime, like the heart plugs the Harkonnens installed in Dune.

  70. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cthulhu doesn't hate everyone. In fact, he thinks everyone is delicious.

  71. Leo Traynor Is A Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  72. Sociopath by FlynnMP3 · · Score: 1

    The thing that gets me about this story is the "IT genius" family. We are told basically nothing about them other than it consists of a husband, wife, and 17 year old son. We are told that the father did notice his son always being online and never watching TV. Didn't they start to suspect something was up with their son? If this boy truly does lack any empathy it would of shown up prior to this incident.

    The story just doesn't go deep enough to provide context to the boy's actions. Yeah, taken at face value, that was easily premeditated harassment and deserves some kind of punishment. If his brain is lacking in chemicals that keep him from realizing what wrong he is doing, then it needs to be treated. Everybody deserves a shot at happiness in their lives.

  73. So why is Leo Traynor an idiot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The following week it happened again in an identical manner. A new follower, I followed back, received a string of abusive DMs, blocked and reported for spam.

    So why does Traynor follow bother to follow twitter people who follow him? You can't DM people unless they follow each other. Problem solved.

    He was horrified at what his son had done. Horrified, but not surprised. He wanted to call the authorities there and then and turn him in. But I said no.

    What you should do is take the kid out to the woodshed, and give him the beating he richly deserves. Make sure there are no witnesses. Problem solved.

  74. Re:I read this 4 days ago. Interesting nonetheless by 32771 · · Score: 1

    Ruining somebodies life via the Internet, eh? I could say something like, "if that is possible you didn't have a life to begin with". Unfortunately, some of us are forced to use the internet via sites like Facebook and Twitter since the aggregate number of users there has become so large it has become sensible to attach your commercial interests to it.

    Beyond that I do value my semi-anonymity here at slashdot and think people here are more civil than you portait them to be. I did meet bigger assholes in real life.

    --
    Je me souviens.
  75. Cooked Up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This story sounds cooked up. The ending is a bit too Brady Bunch for reality.

  76. needed a night at the cop shop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kid's 17? He needed some time downtown. Give him an idea of what lockup is like. I stay off political threads these days as generic, to me at least, political theorizing has led to "If I see you I'll bash your head". Not physically worried - the lethal weapon is the mind - but don't need problems with the cops and I have kids etc ... And, from purchasing domain names in the 90s without thinking it through, I can't get my home address off the internet as web scrapers found it before I blocked it and now a company in Fla said for $50 they'd consider removing it from their database. As an experiment I got their PO box pretty quickly but the two companies in China listing my address didn't respond.

    So it's AC from here on out ...

  77. Internet TROLLS = whimps & wusses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's my "take" on it, & everyone here pretty much KNOWS I have my own personal "troll psycho-stalker fanclub" (which they do to nearly ALL of my posts here).

    I suspect it's only a SINGLE fool though... one I've completely DUSTED in computing technical debates here on /., actually!

    Why would I think that? Simple: Geeks are PRONE to "geek angst" when you "shoot them down" in errors... & they seek "revenge" via trolling (or as is often done here on /., downmodding posts & running - no justifications whatsoever that are vaild are offered either!)

    Now, some of these "trolls" that stalk me CALL ME A TROLL... well, all I can say to that, is this:

    You disprove the points I level vs. your posts? You can call me a troll then, but that's KIND OF TOUGH, when you use FACTS as I do in technical discussions on computing.

    APK

    P.S.=> 1 thing /. needs - A REVISION TO THE MODERATION SYSTEM, & by that, I mean allowing the ability to KNOW who downmodded you, so that if the poster IS doing "hit & run" unjustifiable downmods, you can id who did better, to simply confront them (& thus, humiliating them for it) on the reasons WHY they did so (usually "effete retaliation" like a woman would do, in hit & run downmods or off-topic ad hominem attacks etc.)...

    ... apk

    1. Re:Internet TROLLS = whimps & wusses by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      That's my "take" on it, & everyone here pretty much KNOWS I have my own personal "troll psycho-stalker fanclub"

      Cool story, bro. :>

      I suspect it's only a SINGLE fool though

      For the hive mind!

      Geeks are PRONE to "geek angst" when you "shoot them down" in errors... & they seek "revenge" via trolling (or as is often done here on /., downmodding posts & running - no justifications whatsoever that are vaild are offered either!)

      Exactly! Like when you post "TLDR" to a post, you get rewarded with another TLDR post and a guy posting that you should answer him to disprove the facts on his TLDR post on all your other Slashdot replies!

      Now, some of these "trolls" that stalk me CALL ME A TROLL... well, all I can say to that, is this:

      I call you "The hosts file guy".

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:Internet TROLLS = whimps & wusses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ash Fox you got played. You played yourself http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41558327

    3. Re:Internet TROLLS = whimps & wusses by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      The second search result I got on Google was this:

      http://www.thorschrock.com/2008/05/19/how-to-respond-when-people-threaten-to-sue-you-on-the-web/

      In my opinion, you got played.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    4. Re:Internet TROLLS = whimps & wusses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ash-Fox the troll gets played even more by playing himself http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41560787

  78. Re:First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You obviously need to be touched by His noodly appendage! Clearly this Cthulu is a myth, much like this 'Leo Traynor'. Don't spend your life wandering around the world lost and blind! Become a Pastafarian and get groped by His noodly appendage today! http://www.venganza.org/

  79. This goes beyond trolling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just straight up malicious harrassment. The person harassing him is clearly deranged.

    Trolling is baiting someone to get a response out of them for laughs. Example, what the GNAA would do here was trolling, with annoying first posts and goatse to essentially prank people.
    This is trying to ruin someone just for the sake of doing it. I mean, how much further would it have gone? If this guy didnt get his rocks off on trying to systematically ruin the guy, would he up the ante and try to get him killed? It kept seeming to escalate. The kid was looking for some quick empowerment over his victim, and that usually escalates to something bigger when he doesnt get his fix.

  80. Onymous Coward: "Your presence is requested" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Unless he was smart enough to see that this special, unannounced meeting with Traynor was set up to confront him." -

    Confronting you now, see you here -> http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3154101&cid=41508377

    * However, more importantly? Here -> http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3154101&cid=41508399

    (The latter's the findings of your /. peers, & a security expert from a division of Symantec, vs. your words...)

    APK

    P.S.=> There you are... see you there to discuss the matter!

    ... apk

  81. The kid is crazy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, this kid is totally nuts. And how do you become such a huge anti-Semite at that age? Surely he heard his parents talk that way? It took me decades to get my biases and that all came from real interactions with people, not just crap I read online.

    The guy should have pressed charges. The kid isn't misunderstood or confused or something, he's a fucking nutter who needs observation, counseling, and possibly medication.

    1. Re:The kid is crazy by wordsnyc · · Score: 1

      Lemme save you some time: NONE OF THIS ACTUALLY HAPPENED. SOME TWISTED ATTENTION WHORE MADE IT ALL UP. And he's not real good at makin' stuff up, hence the huge friggin' holes in the story. The author is not "stupid," he's just nowhere near as bright as he thinks he is.

      --
      Sent from the iPad I found in your car.
  82. I thought the same thing. by i286NiNJA · · Score: 1

    But it's feasible that the author's statements that he baited the troll on might indicate he used some sort of honeypot to get the troll to cough up his IP address. As far as getting him to reveal his ACTUAL location, it seems like it might take a lot to get him to do it even once. But three times? I have to admit this would be quite a stretch without maybe some sort of actual hacking or something. But maybe he did indeed bait the troll into somehow installing something on his machine, that'd be illegal and he couldn't ever write about that, he'd have to sanitize his story a bit. Also the geolocation site could be something, If I had a friend who lived in a relatively small city in ireland and an IP showed up there. I might ask my friend... "hey this isn't your IP is it?" especially if my antagonist seemed to know a lot about me. But why your father's friend??? It's not like there aren't an endless supply of superior trolling targets on the internet, though I have encountered these sorts of trolls in the past, really angry and abrasive but not actually funny.

    I think your points are hard to argue with though.

  83. Antisocial Personality Disorder & Conduct Diso by Guppy · · Score: 2

    Fun fact, per the DSM-IV Sociopathy, or actually Antisocial Personality Disorder, as it's now known, can't be diagnosed before age 18.

    Technically correct, because the childhood version has its own separate equivalent, known as Conduct Disorder, in which the criteria are appropriately tailored for the characteristics of younger individuals. Note that the criteria list for Antisocial Personality Disorder includes an item for past history of Conduct Disorder, too.

  84. Re:fable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read it more as "the cops couldn't be bothered to make an effort", which in many places isn't so unlikely

  85. Re:fable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > So the cops can't find this guy, they're wringing their hands in helplessness. Along comes "An IT Genius" that traces the house by IP ... and the cops couldn't call any of their guys on the entire force to do that? However if the kid torrented a Song they would have found him pronto.

    That's the realistic part.

  86. So really - how did they get the IP address again? by jools33 · · Score: 1

    According to the article:
    "My Twitter account was deactivated but before doing so I posted links to my Google+ account, blog and invited people to contact me on Facebook. I'm delighted that a lot of my lovely friends did. I'm also delighted that The Troll did too."

    So can anyone explain how you get to someones IP address by inviting people to contact you on Facebook?

  87. Did he build a GUI in Visual Basic? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot

    1997-2012

  88. but the speech wasn't by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    Yes going by the test there is a suggestion of Irish locality, but It seems it was composed by a Yank to me.

    I thought it was fake too. Reminded me of made up journo crap straight away, like half the shit found in any Murdoch rag & in many other rags too.

  89. Exactly by Concern · · Score: 2

    The author of this story typifies everything that is wrong with today's no-accountability culture.

    He's weak in the exact way that fosters the troll that tortured him. I honestly find myself disgusted with him. I imagine, though she may not admit it, his wife was not thrilled and consciously or subconsciously thinks less of his approach to "defending" the family.

    I don't care if it's a friend's kid or my kid. He needed to fail at manipulating his way out of trouble. He needed to go before the police and the courts.

    Now others will suffer because of the author's common, and absolutely awful, "the past is the past, I forgive you" approach to dealing with crime.

    --
    Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    1. Re:Exactly by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      No-one ever learns from second chances do they? Lock everyone up, just in case, that's what I say.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
  90. Not a troll by whitroth · · Score: 1

    No, the kid wasn't a troll. He was, rather, a stalker. In the US, if he'd been after me, I'd have tried a couple of things: one, as much as I despise them, I would have called the FBI. This is possibly wire fraud, and is certainly a death threat. The Men In Black showing up at the kid's door, and probably taking his computer, might have gotten his attention to the RW.

    Two: I could do my own tracking. The thought of either threatening to show up at his door with a real sword, which I know how to use, is vastly entertaining.

    Three: possibly the simplest one, and the one I'd start with: I'd contact my 'Net provider, a phone company, and talk to their Fraud and Abuse dept. I can say, from having worked for several US telecoms, they do *NOT* take this kind of thing kindly... and they can talk to other phone co.s....

                      mark, who needs to sharpen his sword....

    1. Re:Not a troll by whitroth · · Score: 1

      Oh, and a *real* troll crossposts to, say, five newsgroups guaranteed to start flamewars, like, a non-Xian religious group, talk.christian, and talk.abortion....

                    mark, who loved the one who added alt.religion.editors

  91. I don't believe the article... by ToddInSF · · Score: 1

    It's a fiction. There's no reason the troll shouldn't be in jail, and there's no way that the author, if he were telling the truth, wouldn't go tot he authorities and have the little asshole arrested and hailed.

    I get the gist of the article, it's supposed to imply that game play and tech addiction is responsible for the trend of people being cowardly little shits.

    The reality, though, is that it' not the tech, it's the culture and sociopathy. Don't confront trolls like this, that can get you killed. Gather the information and report them to the authorities, get a lawyer, sue them, and send them to jail.

    It's where they belong.

    No way is an adult man that's received a note about his wife's throat being slit someday going to just let something like this slide; nor should he. The article is fake, the guy is a liar, and his message is stupid.

  92. Re:fable by overmod · · Score: 1

    (Can I start a meme? Rick-Trolled?)

    No, but you could channel Ed Khil...

    "Trollolo-Leo! Troll Leo! Troll Leo! Low, low, low, low..."

  93. and then what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    give us the name of this legal software. so did you go after those turd tamping little a@@h@les? don't leave us hanging!

  94. lousy work of fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'm not buying this propaganda.

  95. Re:fable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is Ireland we're talking about. I think it's a fair comment to say that a lot of our police would regard this as a nuisance, at most. There was no blood spilled, no property damage, and an almost invisible perpetrator. In an environment where there is a resurgence in 'gangland' killings, in broad daylight, and where the same force is, like most things here at the moment, under-funded, they were never going to prioritise a case like this. They have a few 'IT genii' on the force but by and large, they have no specialist training. If the kid torrented a song they would, I could almost guarantee you, completely ignore it; they have more important things on their minds. If they did have sufficient resources to deal with this kind of thing then I'm pretty sure their approach would have been similar to the author's - confront the minor in the presence of the parents (and probably a social worker or solicitor - I'm not a legal expert) to let him know he'd been caught, that they were aware of him and his activities, and that they would be watching him in the future. Not march him into court in handcuffs and send him off to an institution where any criminal tendencies and distorted views of the world would be re-enforced.

    From a local perspective, there is nothing 'out of whack' about this story.

  96. Re:fable by Maritz · · Score: 1

    So the cops can't find this guy, they're wringing their hands in helplessness. Along comes "An IT Genius" that traces the house by IP ... and the cops couldn't call any of their guys on the entire force to do that? However if the kid torrented a Song they would have found him pronto.

    Once heard on the radio, that a body had been found in a suitcase washed up on the shore of the Liffey (Dublin). The radio advised that Gardai (police) were treating the death as suspicious.

    --
    I do not want your cheap brainburning drugs. They are useless for work. And I am a working man today.
  97. You are part of the problem. Yes, you. by Concern · · Score: 1

    No one ever learns if there are no consequences other than having to cry when you torture someone's entire family for months (in the most vile way imaginable).

    You get your second chance when the police and the courts are done with you. They give plenty of ill-advised second chances as it is, especially to kids.

    --
    Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    1. Re:You are part of the problem. Yes, you. by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      You don't have much of an imagination, do you? Only an idiot locks up children if there is any other option. Never underestimate the stupidity of young boys left to their own devices, I hope you do find yourself in a position to reflect on your opinions expressed previously with children of your own at some point.

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
    2. Re:You are part of the problem. Yes, you. by Concern · · Score: 1

      Everyone is someone's kid. There is no crime that wasn't committed by someone's little angel, and if you don't think the courts can handle crime, you have bigger problems.

      Only an idiot raises their children without real, proportionate consequences for their actions. This is not teasing another kid on the schoolyard. This is a teenager experimenting with very adult bad actions, and waiting to learn what the consequences will be. Will they be very adult bad consequences? What are the limits, really? And this determines what kind of adult they will grow into.

      I hope you never find the opportunity to reflect on how you may not be the only parent with selfish and naive notions about an accountability-free world. Your precious angel may get in harms way of someone else's precious angel someday, who was raised the same way. The results will be predictable.

      Loving your kids means raising them right. Not being their friend. Or treating it like they got caught missing curfew too many times when they mail your friend ashes labeled as their relatives who died in the holocaust.

      --
      Tired of Political Trolls? Opt Out!
    3. Re:You are part of the problem. Yes, you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consequentialism is the stick. The carrot -- teaching children to want to do the right thing -- works best.

      All parties here are really jumping the gun on whether or not this guy is sociopathic.

      If he's not, then the author did the best possible thing.
      If he is, then the only solutions are to either remove him from society, or to ensure that the risk of getting caught multiplied by the harm of getting caught multiplied by any risk-aversion or risk-tolerance multiplied by the error in analysis by the sociopath's intuition still proscribes the action.

      Some people might be in between but between the "normals" and the out-and-out sociopaths, the best solution for one is the worst solution for the other. Going half-way won't be good enough to dissuade a sociopath, and will be suboptimal for the "normal".

  98. You're a troll I've wiped out before with facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I call you "The hosts file guy"." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Sunday September 30, @08:15PM (#41509383) Homepage

    See subject-line above, & these times I've made you RUN like the troll you are:

    ---

    Ash-Fox outnumbered & outthought, in a 40++:1 ratio:

    http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3137925&cid=41448805

    ---

    Ash-Fox RUNS vs. data on Windows on Servers worldwide:

    http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3110069&cid=41346029

    ---

    * "Blowing Away" a troll like you, by using FACTS?

    Well... you just KNOW that I've just GOTTA say it (as-is-per-my-usual "inimitable style"):

    THIS? This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'"...

    APK

    P.S.=> Just as it was above in those 2 links you RAN from, troll, and of course? Here again, now, using those facts in the 2 links above... lmao!

    ... apk

    1. Re:You're a troll I've wiped out before with facts by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      See subject-line above, & these times I've made you RUN like the troll you are

      *A post talking about TLDR in which you reply with content that is still TLDR.*

      *Link where another is advised to not bother going down to your level and you continue operating on that level, baiting*

      Made me run? Not really, you just reinforced my points.

      THIS? This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'"...

      You're so tense, it's amazing.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  99. "3 strikes, yer out", Ash-Fox you troll... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You RAN from my facts on Windows Server:

    http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3110069&cid=41346029

    ---

    You RAN regarding my posting style being upmodded MANY times when you said my posts aren't read:

    http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3137925&cid=41448805

    ---

    You RAN regarding my post on malware "false positives" I asked you to disprove in its points:

    http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3132237&cid=41401485

    ---

    * Ash-Fox: Your life as a troll must be pretty depressing - you aren't even GOOD @ it, lol...

    APK

    P.S.=> Another "troll" getting 'dusted' (& in "The Wreck of the Ash-Fox Fitzgerald" here? LMAO, you just KNOW I've just GOTTA say it, as-is-per-my-usual "inimitable style"):

    THIS? This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" & it ALWAYS IS, vs. Ash-Fox especially...

    ... apk

    1. Re:"3 strikes, yer out", Ash-Fox you troll... apk by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      You RAN from my facts on Windows Server

      Ran? I gave advice not to go down to your level, that was all.

      You RAN regarding my posting style being upmodded MANY times

      Your posting style upmodded many times, let's reference the posts you linked...

      http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3110069&cid=41346029

      Score: -1

      http://yro.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3137925&cid=41448805

      Score: 0

      http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3132237&cid=41401485

      Score: -1

      Your mass posting style sure gets you upmodded...

      Cool story, bro.

      * Ash-Fox: Your life as a troll must be pretty depressing - you aren't even GOOD @ it, lol...

      why so tense, bro?

      THIS? This was just "too, Too, TOO EASY - just '2ez'" & it ALWAYS IS, vs. Ash-Fox especially...

      It's interesting to find out that following me all over Slashdot, posting replies to me that go on for many lines is considered "too easy" as opposed to me posting "TLDR" to one of your posts.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  100. You FAIL, Ash-Fox you troll... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You blew your modpoints from your MANY alternate registered 'luser' account sockpuppets on those posts of mine to downmod them, but YOU didn't disprove my technical points in them, and you know it, I KNOW IT, as does anyone else reading with 1/2 a brain does... period!

    * You FAIL...lol!

    (Ash-Fox: What's it like being a total loser of a troll such as yourself? "Inquiring minds want to know"...)

    APK

    P.S.=> You make me laugh - it must be an awful life to live as a troll like you, Ash-Fox... lol!

    ... apk

  101. Ash-Fox the troll, STALKING me, again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's interesting to find out that following me all over Slashdot" - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Wednesday October 03, @04:02PM (#41542163) Homepage

    You're following ME around /., Ash. We see that much here too.

    * You FAIL, Ash-Fox... and you're VERY STUPID & easy to outwit as well with your own b.s. you're spouting!

    APK

    P.S.=> Proof's RIGHT HERE in this post, as to the lies you're telling in the above quote... as well as in the other links I posted, lol, that you "downmodded" in "effete retaliation" since you're unable to disprove technical points I made in them (facts are like that - they DESTROY trolls such as yourself)...

    ... apk

    1. Re:Ash-Fox the troll, STALKING me, again? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      You're following ME around /., Ash. We see that much here too.

      Not really, I just stumble on your posts from time to time. Now you on the other hand, five minute difference between each reply to one of my posts? Cool story, bro :>

      You blew your modpoints from your MANY alternate registered 'luser' account sockpuppets on those posts of mine to downmod them, but YOU didn't disprove my technical points in them, and you know it, I KNOW IT, as does anyone else reading with 1/2 a brain does... period!

      I find your posts to be "TL;DR" and you insinuate that I some how have the will power to maintain sock puppet accounts? Cool story, bro.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  102. You only show us you stalk me here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny I posted 1st in the links I posted, & you show up trolling AFTERWARDS... "funny that", eh (NOT)!

    * Honestly - what IS your problem?

    APK

    P.S.=> You're only showing us you do more of the same stalking of myself here now...

    ... apk

    1. Re:You only show us you stalk me here by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Funny I posted 1st in the links I posted, & you show up trolling AFTERWARDS... "funny that", eh (NOT)!

      I already answered that in the previous post, reading comprehension issues again?

      * Honestly - what IS your problem?

      Well, it's certainly not being paranoid there is a guy out there who has many sock puppet accounts to harass just me because I wrote a hosts file management utility.

      P.S.=> You're only showing us you do more of the same stalking of myself here now...

      For the hive mind!

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:You only show us you stalk me here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  103. Paranoid? Not @ all, & a question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Well, it's certainly not being paranoid there is a guy out there who has many sock puppet accounts to harass just me because I wrote a hosts file management utility." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Wednesday October 03, @06:41PM (#41543831) Homepage

    What have you ever written for programs others use Ash? Nothing.

    LMAO - I have to laugh, since it IS truth! You haven't shown us otherwise after all...

    ---

    "For the hive mind!" - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Wednesday October 03, @06:41PM (#41543831) Homepage

    Don't you mean for the TROLLING COWARDLY WUSS "Ne'er-Do-Well" MIND instead, troll?

    I say that since:

    ---

    1.) You've already been shown stalking me around here on /., & for the past few weeks now in 3 separate posts.

    2.) You've never created ANYTHING OF WORTH yourself in the way of programs.

    3.) You're nothing but a troll...

    Period!

    ---

    * Living the life of a TROLL online, and a "ne'er-do-well" on YOUR END to top it off?

    Pitiful!

    APK

    P.S.=> Do yourself a favor Ash-Fox: Do something constructive & productive that's of service to others - since it's FAR BETTER than trolling & stalking others as YOU do!

    ... apk

    1. Re:Paranoid? Not @ all, & a question: by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      What have you ever written for programs others use Ash?

      My current project is Exodus Viewer.

      Don't you mean for the TROLLING COWARDLY WUSS "Ne'er-Do-Well" MIND instead

      Nope, I'm making humor based off your plural form of representing yourself.

      I say that since:

      Since you're mad, bro.

      You've already been shown stalking me around here on /., & for the past few weeks now in 3 separate posts.

      Stalking you? Hardly. Stumble across your posts? Yes.

      2.) You've never created ANYTHING OF WORTH yourself in the way of programs.

      You didn't search very hard, did you?

      3.) You're nothing but a troll...

      I am a born again virgin.

      Do yourself a favor Ash-Fox: Do something constructive & productive that's of service to others

      Are you trying to imply I don't pay my taxes? I resent such allegations sir!

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  104. Ok then, let's compare & contrast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "My current project is Exodus Viewer." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Thursday October 04, @12:54PM (#41550613) Homepage

    I've done 40++: 1 even becoming a COMMERCIALLY sold one by certified MS partners (that did EXTREMELY WELL @ Microsoft Tech-Ed 2000-2002 as a FINALIST in the hardest category there - SQLServer Performance enhancement).

    * That's SuperCache I/II by EEC Systems/SuperSpeed.com ... & the tuning engine for it (which made it 40% more effective in fact!)...

    (So, how about YOU?)

    ---

    "Nope, I'm making humor based off your plural form of representing yourself." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Thursday October 04, @12:54PM (#41550613) Homepage

    You showed that you've stalked me @ least 3-4 times this month alone on these forums, Ash -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41541723

    (And, there's no question I posted there FIRST, & you came in "trolling"... completely off-topic too, no less!)

    ---

    "Since you're mad, bro." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Thursday October 04, @12:54PM (#41550613) Homepage

    LMAO - far, Far, FAR from being angry here... more pitying you stalking me actually!

    ---

    "Stalking you? Hardly. Stumble across your posts? Yes." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Thursday October 04, @12:54PM (#41550613) Homepage

    Off-topic trolling doesn't QUALIFY as legitimate, Ash... grow up!

    ---

    "You didn't search very hard, did you?" - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Thursday October 04, @12:54PM (#41550613) Homepage

    For what? Ash-Fox?? Searching for someone by a "nickname" wouldn't usually YIELD a damned thing in most cases!

    (Considering you've only got 1 project, that's not even a commercially sold one? Well...)

    ---

    * Grow up Ash-Fox... seriously!

    APK

    P.S.=> Put your time into your application instead of trolling my posts, doing off-topic illogical ad hominem attacks directed my way that FAIL, & what-not...

    ... apk

    1. Re:Ok then, let's compare & contrast by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      I've done 40++

      I wouldn't be surprised if I've been involved in more, but I haven't been counting.

      1 even becoming a COMMERCIALLY sold one by certified MS partners (that did EXTREMELY WELL @ Microsoft Tech-Ed 2000-2002 as a FINALIST in the hardest category there - SQLServer Performance enhancement).

      * That's SuperCache I/II by EEC Systems/SuperSpeed.com ... & the tuning engine for it (which made it 40% more effective in fact!)...

      You sound fairly difficult to work with in general, I'm sceptical.

      (So, how about YOU?)

      NDAs prevent me from talking about commercial solutions I've co-developed.

      You showed that you've stalked me @ least 3-4 times this month alone on these forums,

      Stumbled across your posts, Mr. Hosts file guy. I don't go seeking them out.

      LMAO - far, Far, FAR from being angry here... more pitying you stalking me actually!

      Cool story.

      For what? Ash-Fox?? Searching for someone by a "nickname" wouldn't usually YIELD a damned thing in most cases!

      Which reinforces my point that you didn't search very hard.

      (Considering you've only got 1 project, that's not even a commercially sold one? Well...)

      More reading comprehension issues. I've done far more than just one project.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  105. YOU write it by yourself? Eat your words too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You sound fairly difficult to work with in general, I'm sceptical." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Thursday October 04, @05:31PM (#41553321) Homepage

    FIRST OF ALL: "Eat your words"

    http://lib.store.yahoo.net/lib/superspeed/ScReadMe41.txt

    Search my name (Alexander Peter Kowalski), there in the link above and EAT YOUR WORDS... lol!

    So, you "eating your words" again vs. myself? Hey - not a "1st" for you vs. myself!

    (Since I've already pointed out you having to do THAT VERY THING while you trolled me 3-4 times this month already... & you RAN from disproving my tech points in them too, lol!).

    That's just fact already established here!

    ---

    SECONDLY: Answer the question in my subject-line

    I ask it, since I heard a TEAM works on the SINGLE project you spoke of that you claim involvement with...

    ---

    "NDAs prevent me from talking about commercial solutions I've co-developed." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Thursday October 04, @05:31PM (#41553321) Homepage

    Sorry, THAT won't "cut it" & sounds like b.s.! Just to be BLATANTLY HONEST here on this...

    So yes: I'd ALSO LIKE TO SEE PROOF, just as I put up above, OF YOUR INVOLVEMENT IN THAT "EXODUS VIEWER" AS A PROGRAMMER OF IT...

    I haven't seen it... show me a link that proves it as I did for you above...

    ---

    "I wouldn't be surprised if I've been involved in more, but I haven't been counting" - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Thursday October 04, @05:31PM (#41553321) Homepage

    Heck - I could cite 80++ vs. around 40-50, IF I counted all the information systems I've written professionally of "enterprise-class"/"mission-critical" nature that span into MILLIONS of lines of code, with many moving parts (code, stored procs, middleware, setup & more).

    And?

    Hey - I only cited shareware/freeware I did... albeit, 1 that was GOOD ENOUGH to be "bought out" by a certified MS partner since it made their already great ware GREATER by 40% in performance!

    (Funniest part, I did THAT as far back as 1996... I'd wager YOU were STILL IN DIAPERS back then, lol!)

    QUESTION: HAVE YOU DONE THE SAME? No, evidently!

    ---

    "More reading comprehension issues. I've done far more than just one project." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Thursday October 04, @05:31PM (#41553321) Homepage

    Heck, like I said above now? I could cite HUNDREDS (almost) since 1994... of varying natures!

    APK

    P.S.=> I'll be waiting... apk

    1. Re:YOU write it by yourself? Eat your words too! by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      It's 23:51 here, tldr.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  106. Tell us - how do your words taste? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now that you had to eat them flavored w/ the "bitter taste of defeat" (self-defeat, mind you, since you shot your mouth off) and spiced with YOUR FOOT IN YOUR MOUTH -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41553465 ?

    * YOU FAIL!

    APK

    P.S.=> IF you would have come up with 1 piece of proof of YOU being a developer on that project (especially SOLE developer, not part of a TEAM of them)?

    I'd have given you 1 thing though IF you did that: That you'd have done SOMETHING alright, yourself... but, you can't prove any of it!

    (Which only 1 other "troll" of mine here on /. had ever come up with to show for themselves - I respected him for it though, unlike yourself @ this point!)

    ... apk

    1. Re:Tell us - how do your words taste? by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      P.S.=> IF you would have come up with 1 piece of proof of YOU being a developer on that project (especially SOLE developer, not part of a TEAM of them)?

      http://exodusviewer.com/apk.txt

      but, you can't prove any of it!

      Sure I can. I'm just not easily motivated to do anything for a random angry guy on the Internet.

      (Which only 1 other "troll" of mine here on /. had ever come up with to show for themselves - I respected him for it though, unlike yourself @ this point!)

      Was it this guy (first result when searching your name)?

      http://www.jaylittle.com/jaylittle/?cmd=article&sub=display&id=30

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  107. You didn't answer the question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do your words taste after you had to eat them, after stating you doubted I was part of SuperCache by SuperSpeed.com/EEC Systems?

    * Face it - you FAILED, troll...

    ---

    "http://exodusviewer.com/apk.txt" - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @09:06AM (#41557713) Homepage

    Sorry, I won't visit a site you control - I just wanted to see YOUR NAME in the credits for that program AS THE PROGRAMMER OF IT (sole programmer, not part of a team, showing YOU DID IT BY YOURSELF, without help or source from others or other sources) from somewhere online OTHER than a site you run (what IS your name anyhow?)

    After all - I produced mine, easily... why can't you??

    Plus, it's not a commercially sold program either... despite your b.s. that "NDA prohibit you talking" (that is TOTAL b.s. - if you wrote part of something like that, then HOW WOULD YOU CLAIM IT AS PART OF YOUR RESUME otherwise?)

    ---

    "Sure I can. I'm just not easily motivated to do anything for a random angry guy on the Internet." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @09:06AM (#41557713) Homepage

    Far from angry here - more laughing @ this point, especially about the "NDA" b.s. you tried to feed me... lol!

    APK

    P.S.=>

    "Was it this guy (first result when searching your name)?" - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @09:06AM (#41557713) Homepage

    LMAO - Jay Little was "shot down in flames" on Memory Optimizers unstalling Exchange Servers by "yours truly" (me) over @ Windows IT Pro magazine's forums here:

    http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internals-and-architecture/the-memory-optimization-hoax#feedbackAnchor

    Where he stated he was (literally) "An Expert on Exchange"!

    To that, I produced Microsoft's OWN DOCUMENTATION on it?

    Jay Little shut up & ran!

    (Well, after *trying* to "troll me" on RamDisks & IRQL_NOT_LESS_THAN_OR_EQUAL_TO abends/errs (which signals driver or hardware failure iirc) over @ NTCompatible.com when he followed me to there from Windows IT Pro - which got him banned @ NTCompatible too, lol)....

    Then, he began email harassing me, & making death threats... this all got Jay Little REMOVED from his hosting provider CrystalTech.com too (lmao).

    He's still "sore" from defeating himself (just as YOU have here, troll)...

    ... apk

    1. Re:You didn't answer the question by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      How do your words taste after you had to eat them, after stating you doubted I was part of SuperCache by SuperSpeed.com/EEC Systems?

      I didn't get that far, I read the first search result on you instead, as I said earlier, I'm just not easily motivated to do anything for a random angry guy on the Internet.

      Sorry, I won't visit a site you control

      Regardless, that fulfills your "IF you would have come up with 1 piece of proof of YOU being a developer on that project" requirement. I don't care for your changing of goal posts.

      what IS your name anyhow?

      According to the first search result on your name, you harass people's ISPs and other crap. Why would I knowingly give that information to you? I don't care enough to deal with your tantrums.

      Plus, it's not a commercially sold program either... despite your b.s. that "NDA prohibit you talking" (that is TOTAL b.s. - if you wrote part of something like that, then HOW WOULD YOU CLAIM IT AS PART OF YOUR RESUME otherwise?)

      Easy, it goes along the lines of "Developed an ecommerce system for a major retailer using Oracle's ATG framework" etc.

      Far from angry here

      Your bold and caps says otherwise, guy.

      To that, I produced Microsoft's OWN DOCUMENTATION on it?

      Two points.
      1) Microsoft doesn't have a good reputation here.
      2) Microsoft is a huge company and bound to make mistakes.

      He's still "sore" from defeating himself (just as YOU have here, troll)...

      In my opinion, defeat is when I type your name in a search box and click "I'm feeling lucky" and find out you're a well known "asshole", "troll" and gloat a lot.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  108. Face it - You FAIL, Ash-Fox (4th time)... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Your bold and caps says otherwise, guy." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @09:48AM (#41558057) Homepage

    Your STALKING me around this forums (& getting shot down + you running away each time) 4x this week already, proven here with verifying links of each:

    http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41541723

    Shows QUITE otherwise & who's "angry" here (& you stalking me shows anger from you directed MY way)... lol!

    (ALSO - So, how do your words taste, now that you had to eat them here too? LMAO -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41553465 )

    ---

    "I didn't get that far, I read the first search result on you instead, as I said earlier, I'm just not easily motivated to do anything for a random angry guy on the Internet." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @09:48AM (#41558057) Homepage

    Ahem: I put up the proof of my being part of a commercially sold program from Microsoft Certified Partners... you can't show the same!

    (Plus, I did that level of work, that did EXTREMELY WELL in the hardest category there is @ Microsoft Tech-Ed 2000-2002 as a finalist there, 2 yrs. in a ROW no less, in SQLServer Performance Enhancement AND it reviewed extremely well before that even & my making it perform 40% BETTER no less, in the esteemed Windows IT Pro magazine (Windows NT magazine 1996 then)).

    Fact!

    Additionally: You trying to say an "NDA" stops you from taking credit for writing part of an app, is b.s. (you wouldn't be able to put it on your resume otherwise, fool, lol!)

    (I don't blame you for being angry, albeit, @ YOURSELF, for blowing it SO MANY TIMES as shown directly above vs. myself during your "stalking" of myself, that it's not even FUNNY anymore...)

    ---

    "Regardless, that fulfills your "IF you would have come up with 1 piece of proof of YOU being a developer on that project" requirement. I don't care for your changing of goal posts." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @09:48AM (#41558057) Homepage

    Man - again: You didn't show me ANY PROOF from a site you aren't part of, & I most definitely will NOT go to a website you control (you'd have my IP address then, that's a "no-no").

    Heck - you could merely be the webmaster for that site, not a programmer of that program (let alone the SOLE single programmer, proving YOU DID THE WORK YOURSELF, & didn't "bite off' the work of others (as in Open SORES)).

    You haven't proved, or shown, me anything... well, other than you like to "eat your words", lol!

    ---

    "According to the first search result on your name, you harass people's ISPs and other crap. Why would I knowingly give that information to you? I don't care enough to deal with your tantrums." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @09:48AM (#41558057) Homepage

    No, I simply produced PROOF (undeniable) that I got those who harassed me, KICKED from their hosting providers, and I blew Jay Little CLEAN AWAY easily, using concrete, verifiable, & UNDENIABLE information from Microsoft's own documentations...

    (LMAO - & you *tried* to crap on me, with Jay Little? LOL, huge mistake on your end, but then again, since history's already shown us this much? You "blow it" badly vs. myself, tons of times... hence, your "stalking" of myself on these forums which I've already shown you doing, just as you did in THIS VERY POST!)

    ---

    "Easy, it goes along the lines of "Developed an ecommerce system for a major retailer using Oracle's ATG framework" etc." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @09:48AM (#41558057) Homepage

  109. You ran from this before, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Per my subject-line above -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3132237&cid=41401485 where I recently overturned a "FALSE POSITIVE" on the ware I wrote we were discussing here (which YOU tried to "put down" but were unable to disprove points I made on it that give users of it better speed/bandwidth online, better "layered-security"/"defense-in-depth", reliability, & even anonymity to an extent (vs. DNS Request logs + DNSBLs too!).

    "In my opinion, you got played." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @11:04AM (#41558829) Homepage

    Did I? CA (whom Thor SCHMUCK submitted the erroneous data to) passed that single app of mine (of 30++ in a single utilities package I created) AS ZERO THREAT LEVEL IN THE END... it isn't scriptable for attack even, & violated NONE of CA's 21 questions for removal in fact!

    I PASSED EVERY SINGLE ONE!

    LMAO - Thus?

    Well... You FAIL again, Ash-Fox: There's no way for you to discredit me!

    Nothing that I haven't "got covered" with facts that disprove your links (from trolls like Jay Little whom I already 'dusted' you on as I did he, and now, Thor Schmuck too... lol!)

    This is too easy... since you've been:

    ---

    1.) Shown as a troll 4x this past few weeks on /., stalking myself (as you are here) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41541723

    2.) That I did commercially available code from a certified MS partner that did EXTREMELY well while YOU were still in diapers (lol) @ both Microsoft Tech-Ed 2000-2002 as a FINALIST in its hardest category, 2 yrs. in a ROW no less -> (of which YOU couldn't show the SAME LEVEL OF PERSONAL ACHIEVEMENT ON YOUR OWN by yourself no less... lol, "NDA"? b.s.! You couldn't claim it on your resume then either...)

    3.) You run after trolling me, unable to disprove my points (see #1 above)

    4.) You ran from a question (lmao - "how do your words taste?" -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41553465 )

    ---

    & more...? Please... lol!

    (Give up Ash - or, I'll just continue systematically "dismantling you", & showing that your "geek angst" has gotten "the best of you", in your continued trollish "stalking" of myself here on /.'s forums!)

    Your last 2 "latest failed attempts" (lol, @ illogical off-topic failing ad hominem attacks no less) in Jay Little + Thor "Schmuck"?

    YOU FAIL, yet again... lol!

    You also said I "gloat"? Absolutely - after "trashing a troll" in yourself (or, others like you)?? I merit that right after blowing away trolls such as yourself (& there's NO DOUBT you've been trolling me, this is the 4th time I've shown that much in a few weeks from this website)... I love it, enjoy it, actually!

    Thanks for making MY GLOATING, possible, here!

    APK

    P.S.=> In detail, regarding "Thor Schmuck" (the SEO optimization goof whom I burned along with Computer Associates):

    From my +5 Upward Modded post on Computer Associates, above (CA's the source of that libel of myself):

    ---

    CA's disreputable - See their "ethics" in accounting practices which they got busted for:

    PERTINENT QUOTE/EXCERPT:

    "Customers know Computer Associates - and, these days, for all the wrong reasons. Just as the company was beginning to shed its reputation as a home for legacy software products that carried an inflated price tag, it was rocked by a series of accounting scandals. An on-going FBI fraud inquiry and investigations by the US Department of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission have left it reeling, with a power vacuum at the top as over a dozen senior exec

    1. Re:You ran from this before, lol... apk by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      tl;dr - But from the length I assume you disagree.

      Do you think you got played on the third Google search result?

      http://www.jeremyreimer.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?t=4128

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    2. Re:You ran from this before, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me, but while this interesting conversation, I came across a comment that has slightly offended me. Please, do tell me, what's wrong with wearing diapers?

    3. Re:You ran from this before, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ash-Fox is pissed and needs a diaper for it, haha. Ash's trolling fails yet again for the fourth time in weeks here against apk. We know it is you posting Ash-Fox

    4. Re:You ran from this before, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Diapers are made for incontinence, not anger. Also, you probably won't believe me, from what I've noticed; but I am not Ash-Fox.

    5. Re:You ran from this before, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if you're pissed like Ash-Fox who pissed on himself here. Haha.

    6. Re:You ran from this before, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh? I'm not sure what you mean by that, as, where I live; pissed refers to someone that is under the influence of alcohol.

    7. Re:You ran from this before, lol... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This says it all, cuz Ash-Fox failed badly 4 or 5 times http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41560787 Ash-Fox must be drunk then since he blew it so badly and played himself there again hahaha.

  110. HUGE mistake there too, lol... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jeremy Reimer got "blown away" along with Jay Little (same time) for STALKING ME to Windows IT Pro & libelling me, email harassing me, & more!

    ---

    1.) Jeremy Reimer had his website removed from his hosting provider too, & was also caught email harassing me by his ISP Shaw of Canada

    2.) Jeremy Reimer, after being thus "blown away" resorted to making "edited" libelous photos of myself (& a 'song' he sang) like a petulant child would after being "smoked" by myself

    3.) I dusted EVERY SINGLE "naysayer" of mine there too, including Dr. Mark Russinovich (a former 'co-worker' of mine for Sunbelt software in the mid to late 1990's)

    ---

    Hey, look everyone:

    Ash-Fox is just like Jeremy Reimer & Jay Little! Same with Doctoral Candidate (then), Jarrett DeAngelis as well (another of Reimer's 'henchmen', since Reimer's TOO undereducated & inexperienced to speak on computing technicals of that nature & level!)

    (Ash-Fox is the same - & his stalking me, running from my technical points you trolled COMPLETELY off-topic, & questions I asked you here, as well as on Jay Little Jeremy Reimer's FELLOW ARSTECHNICAN I dusted along with Reimer & more, show it...)

    Trolls - they're ALL THE SAME, everywhere it seems, same patterns, & same ease for defeating them, with facts. It's all I ever use, & it works to 'dust' trolls, every single time.

    Fact: It is ALL at the Windows IT Pro link I posted earlier in regards to Jay Little -> http://www.windowsitpro.com/article/internals-and-architecture/the-memory-optimization-hoax#feedbackAnchor who claimed to be an "exchange expert", lol, & I DUSTED HIM ON THE FACT THAT EXCHANGE SERVERS THAT HALT OR SLOW UP CAN BE SPED UP OR UNHALTED BY MEMORY OPTIMIZATION PROGRAMS!

    Jeremy Reimer *tried* to bring that stooge Jay Little in to "get the best of me" on technical information in computing, only to be EASILY, "blown away", lol... too easily!

    Microsoft's documentations did it for me!

    Face it: When my "naysayer" detractor MERE TROLLS have to resort to their "last resort" of ad hominem attacks and, lmao getting their websites REMOVED by their hosting providers for it too (Jay Little - CrystalTech.com, & Jeremy Reimer - Shaw of Canada )?

    Gosh (lol) - "I wonder WHO FAILED" (not)?

    APK

    P.S.=> Getting BOTH Jeremy Reimer (and his pal Jay Little) kicked from his hosting provider for his website (having portions of his website removed too, AND HE ADMITTING HE IMPERSONATED ME ON HIS WEBSITE & libeled me too, + Reimer being put on a tracking ticket by Shaw for email harassing me then having law enforcement involved too (Det. Felton BC Canada)?? Priceless...)

    Ash-Fox - you resorting to "eating your words" here -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41553465 (lol) and evading my questions on it, lol, & stalking me all over this forums, troll -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41541723 also?

    Please... you only show us ALL you're "stalking" me as well as FAILING in your off-topic illogical ad hominem attacks that are being blown away too... easily!

    ... apk

    1. Re:HUGE mistake there too, lol... by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Tell me more.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  111. Not until YOU tell us a few answers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like how did your words taste, since you had to eat them -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41553465

    Your answer?

    ---

    Tell WHO posted 1st in the links shown here in the next link, & who showed up "trolling" afterwards (YOU trolled & RAN 3x, & this is the 4th ) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41541723

    ---

    Did you attempt to resort to going "off-topic" here too (as you did in those 3 trollings you did my way shown above)?

    YES!

    Did you attempt illogical ad hominem attacks here directed MY way also, only to FAIL 3 TIMES MORE?

    Yes, here they are:

    ---

    Jay Little: (who stalked me, was banned from 2 websites, & had his site removed by CrystalTech.com for libel of myself, AND, death threats PLUS blowing it badly vs. myself on Exchange Servers, which he laughingly said "I am an expert on Exchange", lol, some expert...)

    http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41557869

    ---

    Jeremy Reimer: (who alongside Jay Little above had portions of his website that libeled & impersonated me removed, and had his site removed from HIS hosting provider too, after email harassing me & being caught in it by both Shaw his ISP in Canada, plus Law Enforcement in a Det. Felton of BC Canada):

    http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41559579

    ---

    Thor Schmuck: (Who submitted an app of mine as a "malware" which I disproved by passing ALL 21 of CA's removal test questions & was lowered to ZERO threat levels (they're only 1 of 5 or so AntiVirus companies I've 'burned' on it in the past, mind you - false positives abound, & guys like Nir Sofer + Dr. Mark Russinovich of MS can tell you the same, since it's happened to them too):

    http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41559065

    ---

    * ALL absolutely FAILS on YOUR PART, Ash-Fox!

    (Mainly since they're failed attempts @ "trolling" me via illogical ad hominem attacks, running from straight questions I asked of you & proof of them, running from disproving MY technical points 3-4x on /. in the recent past, & more...)

    Ash-Fox: Don't you know that the "last resort" of DEFEATED TROLLS, every time, tends to be off-topic illogical ad hominem attacks?

    They truly ARE, the sign of the "defeated troll"... lol, and you resorted to them.

    APK

    P.S.=> Funny lastly how I can produce PROOF of having successfully had my sourcecode bought out, after it IMPROVED an already EXCELLENT application set from SuperSpeed.com/EEC Systems, which was a finalist @ MS Tech-Ed 2000-2002 in the HARDEST CATEGORY THERE - SQLServer Performance Enhancement -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41553465

    You, by way of comparison? ZERO in the way of that much... then, you *try* hiding behind some B.S. about "NDA"'s? LMAO - how're you supposed to put THAT on a resume then??

    YOU said you doubted me? I doubt you... I showed that I built what I did, myself, & it improved an already GREAT set of apps too boot that are highly esteemed & sold by a certified MS partner...

    ... apk

    1. Re:Not until YOU tell us a few answers by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      Did you attempt illogical ad hominem attacks here directed MY way also, only to FAIL 3 TIMES MORE?

      Attacks? Nope, never did/attempt or otherwise any attacks against you. You're really paranoid.

      Mainly since they're failed attempts @ "trolling"

      I see these posts as being very good examples of exposing your nature and your inability to process the reality of the situation.

      They truly ARE, the sign of the "defeated troll"... lol, and you resorted to them.

      How much more effort to you expend into replying to "tell me more", than I spent writing that reply again?

      P.S.=> Funny lastly how I can produce PROOF

      Funny how you say you're willing to accept proof and then suddenly change the goal posts when I show it to you. I can equally produce proof if I want to, I just don't feel inclined to because of your behavior.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  112. You avoid a question ('gee, wonder why?" not) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " I see these posts as being very good examples of exposing your nature" - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @02:06PM (#41561085) Homepage

    WTF? LMAO - You're the one who came in trolling ME here, for the 4th time this past couple weeks now on this forums!Just like you did for the past few weeks shown here where you trolled off topic, couldn't disprove facts I put out or dispute the views of your fellow /.'ers -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41541723

    ---

    "Attacks? Nope, never did/attempt or otherwise any attacks against you." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @02:06PM (#41561085) Homepage

    What were those links you dug I had to blow away then from Jay Little, Jeremy Reimer, & Thor Schmuck then?

    They weren't ontopic, were they??

    No...

    So, why did you attempt to use them vs. myself then??? I can tell anyone why: The "last resort" of a defeated troll is weak failing off-topic illogical ad hominem attacks... & you resorted to that 'fabled "last resort"', lol!

    (Too bad I can point to EXACTLY where those came from, predating them each/all, & disproving them? Those are 3 trolls online that I blew away, lost their websites, & are still 'sore' since they are the only ones showing it apparently!)

    ---

    "You're really paranoid." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @02:06PM (#41561085) Homepage

    Not @ all, & whatever I am? It's certainly a LOT better off than you are after this (lol) -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41560787

    You fail, badly...

    ---

    "and your inability to process the reality of the situation." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @02:06PM (#41561085) Homepage

    WoW... lmao, see above & "eat your words", troll... the question you kept avoiding though is about that!

    ---

    "How much more effort to you expend into replying to "tell me more", than I spent writing that reply again?" - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @02:06PM (#41561085) Homepage

    WTF? Man, talk about "pot calling a kettle black"... lol!

    (You're the one who trolled ME here, and many other places recently too all shown above!)

    ---

    "Funny how you say you're willing to accept proof and then suddenly change the goal posts when I show it to you." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @02:06PM (#41561085) Homepage

    I wanted to see proof, that I provided (I can put out a LOT more if you like too of things I've done, while YOU WERE STILL IN DIAPERS I'd almost wager, IF you wish...).

    Proof you wrote the app you noted BY YOURSELF, and if it is a commercial product (you had no proof of this & vainly *tried*, lol, to say an "NDA" won't allow you to take credit for writing it... ha, TRY PUTTING THAT ON YOUR RESUME!)

    Not from a site you own or control (I am not going to site you're merely the webmaster at instead of a coder)... do it as I did - provide proof from a website you have nothing to do with (trade mags, company sites, etc.).

    You can't it seems... & I knew it!

    ---

    "I can equally produce proof if I want to, I just don't feel inclined to because of your behavior." - by Ash-Fox (726320) on Friday October 05, @02:06PM (#41561085) Homepage

    Then WHERE IS IT?

    (Clue/New NEWS/NewsFlash everyone -> "It AIN'T...", lmao... )

    Blowhards abound, right Ash-Fox? If you're going to talk the talk, walk the walk, produce proof.

    APK

    P.S.=> By the way, answer the question here ->

    1. Re:You avoid a question ('gee, wonder why?" not) by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      What were those links you dug I had to blow away then from Jay Little, Jeremy Reimer, & Thor Schmuck then?

      You are mistaken, you didn't blow them away. If you did, they wouldn't be the first results when Googling your name.

      They weren't ontopic, were they??

      Considering the topic of this article, nope.

      So, why did you attempt to use them vs. myself then?

      I used them as counters to your point and wondering if you left search results up because you respected them, as opposed to failing to get rid of them.

      You fail, badly...

      Cool story, Bro. I'm not the one getting all tense and writing in capitals and bold etc.

      ...& you resorted to that 'fabled "last resort"', lol!... ...It's certainly a LOT better off than you are after this (lol)... ...Man, talk about "pot calling a kettle black"... lol!... ...a commercial product (you had no proof of this & vainly *tried*, lol...

      LOL!

      I wanted to see proof

      And I gave it to you and then you started the whole goal post changing again.

      Then WHERE IS IT?

      So tense...

      P.S.=> By the way, answer the question here -> http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3153677&cid=41557357 since you had to "eat your words"?

      You tell me, since I don't recall that happening.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
  113. Ash, it's "day's end" & I have guests... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone can "SEO" a search, and funny that THEY come up "1st", eh? NOT! Lmao... 100's of others show a LOT differently though, don't they? Sure... I've done some pretty "ok" stuff in my time (& far from done yet).

    Ah, in any event... it's been a pleasure CONTINUALLY "blowing you away" Ash-Fox, ala -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hgI8bta-7aw&feature=related

    But... it's time to "not feed the troll" (for awhile), lol, & listen to a more "upbeat" tune here -> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCorJG9mubk

    (The singer "does it for me" & IF the hosts file was a girl? She'd sing the first line to us all... "I get no money talk @ all"... absolutely, & more speed/bandwidth, security, reliability, & anonymity - she's my "magic friend" (per the tune, again... lol!))

    APK

    P.S.=> You, in turn? NEED to listen to this lady (you're a girl, right? Only a woman would keep this up & taking this logic punishment, only they can be THAT illogical, lol):

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K_t9AA3Z4PE

    Since when you take me on, you always FAIL, badly... lol!/quote?... apk