Slashdot Mirror


User: budgenator

budgenator's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
10,671
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 10,671

  1. Re:So lemme see if I understand this... on Dozens of Suspicious Court Cases Aim At Getting Web Pages Taken Down Or Deindexed (washingtonpost.com) · · Score: 1

    That would work if you knew in advance enough to prepare the brief. My suspicion is the victim of this fraudualent action wouldn't even know his page got de-listed or his comment got deleted.

  2. Bill Clinton perjured himself under oath and was the second US President to be impeached, although he wasn't convicted; that was a big part of why he settled out of court for $850,000 with Paula Jones, in a Sexual harassment/indecent exposure law suit, to avoid having to testify under oath again.

  3. "criminal negligence"

    You throw the word criminal around like it is candy. Just because something isn't up to your standards doesn't mean it is criminal.

    Are you kidding, this is the United States, we have laws against everything, often several contradictory laws.

  4. Juanita Broaddrick, rape of an subordinate,1999,
    Kathleen Willey, groped an subordinate without consent
    Paula Jones, Sexual harrasment/indecent exposure settled out of court for $850,000.
    Dolly Kyle, Adulterous affair
    Gennifer Flowers, Adulterous affair
    Monica Lewinsky, Adulterous affair with an subordinate
    Sandra Allen James sexually assaulted 1991,
    Eileen Wellstone, sexually assaulted, 1969,
    Christy Zercher Groped 1991,
    Carolyn Moffet Attempted rape, 1979,
    Helen Dowdy groped 1986,
    Becky Brown sexually harassed her in the mid-1980
    Regina Blakely Hopper predominately consensual with a sexual assault
    Elizabeth Ward Gracen consensual affair,
    Dolly Kyle Browning consensual affair from the 1970s until 1992
    Sally Miller (Sally Perdue) consensual affair 1983
    Lencola Sullivan unconfirmed affair

    It's a freaking laundry list most were either a Miss Arkansas or in a subordinate work position

  5. What Trump says women let him do pales in comparison to what the Bill/Hillary tag-team did to women who didn't let them; Bill would abuse them sexually then Hillary would abuse them psychologically to keep it covered up. There has only been two presidents Impeached ever and Bill Clinton was one of them, and it was for perjury over the attempted cover up of is sexual escapades with Monica Lewinski.

  6. Re:I'm fine with it.. on Milo Yiannopoulos Wants To Buy 4Chan, Promises Free Speech Haven (hollywoodreporter.com) · · Score: 2

    Your freedom of speech is an individual right to speak without Governmental interference; when you put on an organisations uniform, you appear to be a representative of that organisation not an individual. If you say things that harm your organisation, you will likely be removed from that organisation. Colin Kaepernick is just a spoiled middle-class kid trying to pretend he's ghetto; he was playing an image game and it blew-up in his face. The NFL has ratings problems and the brass will gladly duct their responsibility in it and shove all of the blame on to Kaepernick. The NFL is probably secretly glad he volunteered to be the pariah because if Kaepernick didn't exist, the NFL would have to invent one. You have to have a scapegoat on standby after all.

  7. I stand corrected, I thought there were 3 or 4 variants of the libertarians on the ballot, 3 or 4 Socialist parties and a couple outright Communist Parties on the ballot.

  8. It doesn't matter who you do or don't vote for, to really screw them just say you will not vote for them when the pollsters call, tell them you'll vote for some 3rd party candidate. If we start getting 4 people on the Presidential debates than it will shift (slowly perhaps) from which of two are the worst to who is the best.

  9. My bet would be that he is using tax avoidance measures to such an extreme level - secret Swiss bank accounts, shell companies in Ireland, whatever it takes - that he fears even the people would find it distasteful.

    None of that is likely to show up in his Federal Individual Income Taxes, it's all buried in the Corporate Individual Income taxes. Same with the Clintons, Individual Income taxes tell you nothing, hell the Clintions used the same Capital lose deduction the she was ragging on Trump about!

  10. Re: Great on Clinton Responds To WikiLeaks During Debate, And Blames Russian Hackers (qz.com) · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Trump is a gross person. That's why I'm voting for him. Safe spaces and social justice agendas demand that the pendulum swing back a bit.

    That's one thing that cracks me up, the Progressive Liberal SJW piss and moan so much about Safe-Places and freedom from micro-aggressions, but they don't think twice about using a hot-mic conversation from the bathroom or the locker-room; as a Male WASP, the men's john is about the only safe-place left for us.

  11. Write ins are fine, also there is usually 20 or so Political Parties on the ballot in my state, Michigan, as well as most states. It's the nature of our Electoral College system and Federal Campaign Financing that pretty much insures only a Democrat or a Republican will be elected.

  12. Re: Lost emails on Guccifer 2.0 Dumps a Bunch of Clinton Foundation Donor Data (engadget.com) · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, but at the time of the hardware wipes I think they legitimately thought there was no classified information on the server.

    It's easy to understand why, classified intel was supposed to be clearly marked and on a completely separate system. No one was supposed to be emailing classified information to Clinton, even if it was a State Dept email address, and none of the few pieces of classified information on Clinton's server was clearly marked as classified.

    The documents are not classified because they are marked, they are marked because they are classified.. When HCR stated that her attorney, who has no security clearance nor need to know, read each email, she admitted guilt to a felony that has a 10 year prison sentence attached to it, if just one classified email slipped through the cracks and onto her server. Using personal hardware in a classified job is just insanity.

  13. Re:Lost emails on Guccifer 2.0 Dumps a Bunch of Clinton Foundation Donor Data (engadget.com) · · Score: 1

    Deleting all the emails isn't a crime, and if she's "guilty" of storing confidential emails, deleting them is her duty.
     

    (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States. 18 U.S. Code 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally

    The only part of this that isn't straight forward is that the Presidential Qualifications are Constitutional defined and not limited by this law.
    Additionally;

    (f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
    Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. 18 U.S. Code 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

  14. Re:Clinton is above the law on Comey Denies Clinton Email 'Reddit' Cover-Up (politico.com) · · Score: 1

    Sounds like your saying is if a bully keeps punching people in the face when there is no witnesses, we should wait until he kills someone before calling him out. Sooner or later, "the boy who cried wolf" should be called "where there's smoke there's fire".

  15. Re:It won't matter what Comey says on Comey Denies Clinton Email 'Reddit' Cover-Up (politico.com) · · Score: 1

    > Whoever, having the custody of any such record...

    Which means she is innocent, as the FBI found. She did not destroy records. She had someone else do them. Go after them for their crimes. Leave her alone.

    Well then that would make it a conspiracy wouldn't it.

  16. Re:Of course they said that on Comey Denies Clinton Email 'Reddit' Cover-Up (politico.com) · · Score: 1

    What a wanker, every punter know you ask shit like that on stackoverflow.com not reddit, no wonder our cyber-security is so FUBAR.

  17. Re:It won't matter what Comey says on Comey Denies Clinton Email 'Reddit' Cover-Up (politico.com) · · Score: 1

    My biggest hope is that Trump seems to have a knack for surrounding himself with people who are better at their jobs than he is and follows their advice.

  18. Re:It won't matter what Comey says on Comey Denies Clinton Email 'Reddit' Cover-Up (politico.com) · · Score: 1

    Citation needed
    What laws at that time were broken?

    Well for starters

    (b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.
    U.S. Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 101 2071

    followed by

    (f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
    Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
    18 U.S. Code 793 - Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information

    I think those are a pretty good start. Because she's running for president, which has constitutional qualification the disqualifications of Title 18, 2071, don't apply to the presidency but the 3 years still does.

  19. Re:Clinton is above the law on Comey Denies Clinton Email 'Reddit' Cover-Up (politico.com) · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The mastery isn't concocting a coverup that is effective in perpetuity, the mastery is having the coverup unravel so slowly that people are desensitized to each revelation. Hillary is cleared of deleted 30,000 emails that are Government records, by an FBI director that is entangled financially both personally and professionally up to his eyeballs. Just detailing the facts are enough to make you sound like a Conspiracy Kook. 13 people associated with the Clintons have been murdered, 14 or 15 have died by suicide, another 13 in accidents and another 12 in airplane crashes and 4 of her former Secret Service have been killed by friendly fire; Hillary could literally kill somebody on television and do her little eyeroll and dismissive chuckle and 25% of American would think the witnesses were conspiracy kooks now.

  20. Re: these new companies trying to get around old l on Tesla Sues Michigan Over Sales Ban (usatoday.com) · · Score: 1

    Foreign corporation?? Tesla is headquartered in California, and the main exchange they are listed on is NADAQ. Tesla motors =/= the former soviet company...

    Silly rabbit, a company incorporated in California is just as foreign to the state of Michigan as a company incorporated in the Soviet Union! They would even have to petition court to file suit against a Michigan Resident. I would bet a dollar to a donut hole that Tesla is incorporated in Delaware anyway.

  21. Re:I don't see the problem on Tesla Sues Michigan Over Sales Ban (usatoday.com) · · Score: 1

    Maybe a smidgen of income and property taxes, sales/use taxes will be collected at the SOS, Secretary of State's office, when you register it. Importing a foreign car (out of state or out of country) isn't that big of a deal, they even wave some taxes or fees once in a lifetime for out of country imports.

  22. Re:Thanks Elon on Tesla Sues Michigan Over Sales Ban (usatoday.com) · · Score: 1

    ... then whines about not having money to buildi a 2nd bridge from Detroit to Windsor, that the truckers won't use because thy hate Detroit traffic and Windsor isn't on the 402 to Buffalo like Port Huron is.

  23. Re:Laws on Tesla Sues Michigan Over Sales Ban (usatoday.com) · · Score: 1

    Dentsply is a good one.

  24. Re:The Real Reason Car Dealerships Are the Worst on Tesla Sues Michigan Over Sales Ban (usatoday.com) · · Score: 1

    A big part of that is because 1. the tax laws so highly favor car manufacturers, the state gets more revenue from dealer's than they do from the manufacturers, and 2 the UAW is a formidable voting block, you can't hurt big business without hurting big union.

  25. Re:these new companies trying to get around old la on Tesla Sues Michigan Over Sales Ban (usatoday.com) · · Score: 1

    No they just call it "Doc Fees" and "Dealer Prep" instead of maximum; and don't forget all of those options you didn't want but paid for anyway so you didn't have to wait 2 months for your order, and the option packages where you pay for 3 things you don't want to get the one you do.