Russians say 10 tons at 30 km/s which, if I am to believe WolframAlfa, is around 1 kiloton of TNT. Is it enough to blow windows if exploded at 20 km altitude?
Yes, there is a "presumption of innocence" for chemicals used in food and elsewhere, which is wrong, imho. Any new poison can be legally used, and when it is found it is really a poison, it takes 20 years to prove scientifically and then another 10 years legally, which is way too long for a given person - he's likely be dead by the time. It used to be different - there were legally "natural" foods and "artificial" and it had to be marked as such on the label. Corporations fought it and won (that's how we got ingredients list, instead of a simple one word - artificial). Sure, it's impossible to go back as there are too many people on earth to feed naturally - most will have to eat falsified foods. We know that nature always finds a way to kill overpopulated species (one either find a way to control it's own population or disappear) and I think food poisons, not nuclear weapons, is the way to be used on us.
This is exactly why I personally try to avoid any paid software and such like a plague and use free source. It's not because I mind paying - I actually want to pay people for their work - but because I feel that if I bought something, it is unconditionally mine to do whatever I want with it. Yes, the law is currently different; yes we shell try to change it. Meantime, I just don't buy that kind of products unless absolutely unavoidable. For example, I'd love to have iPad - it's great - but I will not buy it ever.
It seems to me that it is much more likely that all of them choose B and died on their home rocks before they got a chance to leave.
Besides, an argument that we are not a typical place in the universe is not generally accepted. Using it any modern problem, such as dark matter issue, could be explained easily.
Unfortunately, it is impossible to train airbus crew to fly the plane. Airbus autopilot has at least four different levels of automation called "laws" http://www.airbusdriver.net/airbus_fltlaws.htm. Each one is disengaged by autopilot itself, if necessary. Now, there is no way to manually switch between laws hence pilots can not learn them. On top of it, airbus flies differently so all their past experience is somewhat useless or even counterproductive. In a way, I know how to fly with my 150 hours better, than your typical airbus pilot. It is scary.
The real question is how much oil it would take. So called gold bugs do not necessarily like gold per se. They simply believe the classic definition: "money is a commodity used for exchange".
You need to put about 10% of your income into a long-term retirement fund. , and have (ideally) six months of living expenses in a money-market or savings account (Must have).
There is a catch though. If the US people really switch to 10% savings rate, we'll get Great Depression 2.0 and 6 month savings will be way too low. It's called Paradox of thrift http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_thrift
That's why the only sound strategy is to save yourself, but push others to spend. Unfortunately it does not work long term either because saved money is a form of credit to said others and sooner or later they will default.
Perhaps, I did not make myself clear. Sure, you can be here on B1 and look for a job based on your *foreign* experience/education. But if asked about current job, you'd have so say unemployed, which would be a lie. You can't say you are working in the US on B1 as it will potentially make adjustment of status much more difficult. It's a catch 22 situation.
There is much bigger reason why companies don't want to obtain H1-B. While on work visa, it's relatively easy to find some other employer willing to take you on H1-B or even on adjustment of status to Green Card. On the other hand, somebody working on B1 can't look for another job at all - he can't claim experience because it is illegal. Makes nice slaves. It used to be popular in 90s, but in little shops.
Slashdot Mirror
I quit gaming back in late 80's. If this thing really works, I am back. Anybody tried it?
next year. Nice! Where do I preorder both? http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/news/2004/03/62867
Besides, some of those last times were rather ugly and could get much uglier. A civil war or revolution using nukes comes to mind.
Don't forget solar eclipse.
Russians say 10 tons at 30 km/s which, if I am to believe WolframAlfa, is around 1 kiloton of TNT. Is it enough to blow windows if exploded at 20 km altitude?
The big issues involve licensing for eBooks and the fact that publishers seem to engage in punitive pricing with Libraries
Mod the parent up please. Yes, this is *the* issue.
On the other hand, on billions of habitable planets over billions of years no one survived to say hello.
Well, it already named, albeit indirectly, after a Russian city Samara - the place where first space rockets were made.
More importantly, South Korea will inherit North's nuclear weapons; a nice bonus.
They became too stupid to get here.
Yes, there is a "presumption of innocence" for chemicals used in food and elsewhere, which is wrong, imho. Any new poison can be legally used, and when it is found it is really a poison, it takes 20 years to prove scientifically and then another 10 years legally, which is way too long for a given person - he's likely be dead by the time. It used to be different - there were legally "natural" foods and "artificial" and it had to be marked as such on the label. Corporations fought it and won (that's how we got ingredients list, instead of a simple one word - artificial). Sure, it's impossible to go back as there are too many people on earth to feed naturally - most will have to eat falsified foods. We know that nature always finds a way to kill overpopulated species (one either find a way to control it's own population or disappear) and I think food poisons, not nuclear weapons, is the way to be used on us.
This is exactly why I personally try to avoid any paid software and such like a plague and use free source. It's not because I mind paying - I actually want to pay people for their work - but because I feel that if I bought something, it is unconditionally mine to do whatever I want with it. Yes, the law is currently different; yes we shell try to change it. Meantime, I just don't buy that kind of products unless absolutely unavoidable. For example, I'd love to have iPad - it's great - but I will not buy it ever.
May I ask why Chrome is better for Netflix? (no trolling - just don't know)
Do I really want to give my Google password to and external site... just thinking.
Second that. It's my homepage for years. Somebody's making a very bad decision.
If we are still talking about the US gasoline, the peak was in 1998. http://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=PET&s=A103600001&f=M It dived more than twice since then.
It seems to me that it is much more likely that all of them choose B and died on their home rocks before they got a chance to leave.
Besides, an argument that we are not a typical place in the universe is not generally accepted. Using it any modern problem, such as dark matter issue, could be explained easily.
That's why there are billions of habitable planets around and no aliens anywhere.
We need iLight (c)
Well... I do; for the US that is.
It was Henry Bliss. He was a real estate agent in NY (no surprise here), killed by a taxicab (still no surprise).
What is interesting, it was an electric car. We got to stay with gas just for the sake of children. http://www.wired.com/thisdayintech/2011/09/0913first-us-pedestrian-killed-by-car/
Unfortunately, it is impossible to train airbus crew to fly the plane. Airbus autopilot has at least four different levels of automation called "laws" http://www.airbusdriver.net/airbus_fltlaws.htm. Each one is disengaged by autopilot itself, if necessary. Now, there is no way to manually switch between laws hence pilots can not learn them. On top of it, airbus flies differently so all their past experience is somewhat useless or even counterproductive. In a way, I know how to fly with my 150 hours better, than your typical airbus pilot. It is scary.
The real question is how much oil it would take. So called gold bugs do not necessarily like gold per se. They simply believe the classic definition: "money is a commodity used for exchange".
You need to put about 10% of your income into a long-term retirement fund. , and have (ideally) six months of living expenses in a money-market or savings account (Must have).
There is a catch though. If the US people really switch to 10% savings rate, we'll get Great Depression 2.0 and 6 month savings will be way too low. It's called Paradox of thrift http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_thrift
That's why the only sound strategy is to save yourself, but push others to spend. Unfortunately it does not work long term either because saved money is a form of credit to said others and sooner or later they will default.
Perhaps, I did not make myself clear. Sure, you can be here on B1 and look for a job based on your *foreign* experience/education. But if asked about current job, you'd have so say unemployed, which would be a lie. You can't say you are working in the US on B1 as it will potentially make adjustment of status much more difficult. It's a catch 22 situation.
There is much bigger reason why companies don't want to obtain H1-B. While on work visa, it's relatively easy to find some other employer willing to take you on H1-B or even on adjustment of status to Green Card. On the other hand, somebody working on B1 can't look for another job at all - he can't claim experience because it is illegal. Makes nice slaves. It used to be popular in 90s, but in little shops.