Slashdot Mirror


Google Killing Off Mini, Video, and iGoogle

New submitter Trashcan Romeo writes "Three years ago, it accounted for 20% of all visits to Google's home page. Two years ago, Lifehacker readers voted it the best start-page service. Today it was announced that iGoogle will be retired — or in the company's parlance, 'spring cleaned' — on November 1, 2013." Google Video is also getting the axe this summer. It hasn't accepted new videos since 2009, and all of the old ones will be migrated to YouTube. The company is also getting rid of Google Mini, Talk Chatback, and their Symbian search app.

329 comments

  1. And nothing of value was lost... by snowgirl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Really. I pinged a friend who uses iGoogle, and he's just like "Meh".

    --
    WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    1. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by skipkent · · Score: 3, Funny

      Didn't work/look right with noscript anyway.

    2. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh yeah? I Googled a friend who uses ping, and he's just like "hem".

    3. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You're right, that's the real indicator.

      I pinged a friend who uses the internet, and he said "meh". Perhaps we should just shut it all down.

    4. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by baker_tony · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good sample size you've got going on there for your analysis.

    5. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A tool built almost entirely in javascript doesn't work with a JAVASCRIPT BLOCKER?!?!?!?!?11111111

      That's just crazy talk.

      But seriously, expecting to browse the modern web with noscript enabled just isn't sane.

    6. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by gishzida · · Score: 2

      Sane? Modern Web?

      Insensitive clod! this is /.

    7. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Brucelet · · Score: 3, Funny

      I wanted to ping a friend who uses bing to see if there was a microsoft alternative, but I couldn't remember how. I had to bing my friend who knows ping so I could ask him for help.

    8. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Really. I pinged a friend who uses iGoogle, and he's just like "Meh".

      That's strange, when I pinged him he said, "bytes=32 time 3ms TTL=53".

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    9. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      We have those kind of people here on slashdot. I don't get the no-scripters either. Maybe it's a good idea for grandma and here XP machine.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    10. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Funny

      3ms? He said friend, not coworker!

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    11. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always use noscript, and can't remember the last time it was a problem. I do have Javascript enabled for a few websites (like gmail and slashdot), but most work better without it (because webdesigners can't resist abusing anything they get their hands on). Or by modern web you mean Twatface? Not everyone uses it, you know.

    12. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by lakeland · · Score: 2

      One man's friend is another man's co-worker...

    13. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only things I need to turn noscript off for are social networking sites and comment sections. Almost everything else that I want to go to works fine without dumb scripting, and if they can't be bothered to make their dropdown menus usable then I didn't want to be there anyway.

    14. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I ain't a fuckin' grandma. Using Noscript and Adblock Plus. I guarantee my web experience is more pleasant than yours. Web pages don't start playing video or audio, shit doesn't start moving of its own accord. No ads, no script driven bullshit unless I allow it.

      Anyone who just lets web sites do whatever the fuck they want in their browser must have a few screws loose.

    15. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Besides, it's no chore to whitelist sites so their javascript runs fine, and block the million crufty bits of script that are being loaded from god knows where.

    16. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Antonovich · · Score: 1

      It moderately pisses me off, as I use it as my main RSS/News feeder for both my home and work profiles but whatever. I am also an unashamed Google fanboy/apologist so try to keep it Google as much as possible (yes, I'm that bad!)... I really can't see it taking up huge resources on their side though so this definitely goes on the "annoyed they didn't keep it" pile.

    17. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      While I don't use Noscript anymore (my browser is sandboxed and runs lower than a regular user thanks to low rights mode) I have to see one would have to be insane not to run ABP, and to run NS as well if they are on XP. Because I can tell you the second biggest attack vector after social engineering is infected ads, so why take the risk so some corp can show you bullshit you don't want, is gonna suck your bandwidth and irritate the hell out of you, and you aren't gonna buy from them anyway?

      As for TFA this is why I don't really like to use google for anything other than a Gmail spam dump, because with them you just never know. With Google it seems like a product has to be a megahit or they pull the plug, even if there are millions using the thing. While I don't use any of TFA services i'm sure those that did probably aren't gonna be happy, but the way Google is its not like they can have an EOL date like MSFT because frankly they don't have a clue how long something is gonna last. if it becomes a hit they stay, if it becomes anything less they fold, I'd be afraid to use any new Google service until it passed the megahit stage myself.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    18. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't work/look right with noscript anyway.

      iGoogle is the best bit of Google it is the best home page ever .

      As for the noscript kiddies well there's no hope for them anyhow

      Google think again you have been warned..

    19. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by DerPflanz · · Score: 2

      I only have AdBlock Plus, and I also do not have video and audio starting or stuff moving around. I guess it's the kind of site you go to...

      --
      -- The Internet is a too slow way of doing things, you'd never do without it.
    20. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by wmac1 · · Score: 2

      I come to Slashdot from iGoogle RSS reader almost 90% of the time. I have been using iGoogle as my RSS reader since almost 2007.

      It is a pity but I think I will be able to find numerous alternatives.

    21. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      Where I work 300ms is a co-worker.

    22. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by wmbetts · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have no problem with viewing the occasional ad. They help fund websites I enjoy including slashdot. I have the option to turn off ads here, but I don't. Saying your web experience is better than someone who doesn't subscribe to your philosophy of "all ads are bad and completely ruin the entire web" is silly. The phrase "a good web experience" is subjective. What I find good you might find bad and vice versa. If a website has annoying video and/or audio ads I just won't go to the site. If it weren't for marketing I would have missed out on some interesting things. I do absolutely need those things? No, but that doesn't change the fact I like them.

      --
      "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
    23. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by FrootLoops · · Score: 1

      I pinged him last night and he said "bytes=god yes, time=0ms, TTL=about a minute".

    24. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and one man's wife is another man's sex partner.

    25. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Where I work 300ms is a co-worker.'

      You young whippersnapper, when I was young we had 1200ms and we liked it!

    26. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 2

      You binged to ping? But what of the friend that smoked the bong and played pong?

    27. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by jones_supa · · Score: 1

      I also liked the extensive commentary from the participants.

    28. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Siridar · · Score: 3, Funny

      You binged to ping? But what of the friend that smoked the bong and played pong?

      You mean Dave?

      Dave's not here, man...

    29. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by vlm · · Score: 1

      A tool built almost entirely in javascript doesn't work with a JAVASCRIPT BLOCKER

      My guess is he's talking about whitelisting not working with some random 3rd party app. All I use on my igoogle is /. RSS feed and the calendar, and whitelisting those worked perfectly. He's probably got some bizarre 3rd party app thats malfunctioning, therefore its all the platform's fault. Just like the people who install the "steal my cc.ru" extension on firefox and its unstable and suddenly its all FF fault and all FF installs suck.

      expecting to browse the modern web with noscript enabled just isn't sane.

      LOL show me some "modern web" worth shutting off noscript and I'll think about it.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    30. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Fallingwater · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I use noscript, but reversed - it's set to enable everything by default, and I disable selectively stuff that annoys me. This way I avoid all the really bad stuff (like autoplaying anything) without being left with a half-broken internet.

    31. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by pandronic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can't imagine a web with no Javascript. It's like using half of the web. I'm a webdeveloper and website owner and I really, really, really don't care about people who don't have Javascript enabled. I'd rather give the rest a great experience and I don't want to spend time and resources to provide a fallback.

      Also advertising supports many of my favorite sites. I probably wouldn't be paying for a subscription, but I think it's common courtesy to give website owners the chance to make a buck for their hard work. I have Adblock installed and I only use it when ads are too annoying that they disturb my browsing experience.

    32. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 2

      A case in point of an ad that pisses me off: I've been on Ryanairs website the last couple days planning a trip. They have pop unders that load when you click the "book now" button. For some reason my browser freezes for several seconds when I click the button the first time. Since I'm using a crappy wireless connection I'm pirating from my girlfriend's neighbor I'm never sure if it is just the site being slow, the connection or the stupid pop under delay.

      That is another instant killer for me people with google analytics or banner ads that load slow and before the actual content of the site. I'm sorry but if I have to wait 5+ second with a 75Mbps connection for your site to fetch some ads to show me before content I'll go somewhere else. Like other people posted I don't use AdBlock heavily (only occasionally if I have something I really have to go to that has this problem) or no script I just avoid sites that don't play nice like the plague.

    33. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Nimey · · Score: 1

      Meh. I was using Noscript when Firefox was still my main browser. If a site didn't work right and I was reasonably sure it wasn't malicious, it got whitelisted. It was only ever a mild annoyance to have to do this.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    34. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by squiggleslash · · Score: 1
      P> It makes sense for a handful of websites but I'd rather blacklist the bad sites than whitelist the good scripts as most of the web just doesn't work otherwise.

      There's an add-on called "YesScript" that works exactly the way I want it. If a site's JS is seriously screwed up, you can click on one icon and JS no longer works for it, now or in the future. Otherwise JS is on.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    35. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by AngryDeuce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can't imagine a web with no Javascript. It's like using half of the web.

      Yeah, which is usually the half of the web you actually want. You know, as opposed to all the other bullshit tracking, 'traffic monetizing' scripts that are all over the corporate web now...

      To give an example, my former local news site of choice, Madison.com, had a complete redesign a few weeks ago that they talked up. "Oh, it's going to be so much better and more modern, the comments will be much better, etc"...what they neglected to tell everyone was that they were adding a shit-load more tracking services (which, thanks to NoScript, I was able to block) and on top of that, they threw up a fucking paywall, because you know all the tracking cookies and Facebook Connect bullshit they are earning money on, not to mention the ad impressions, and not to mention the shady shit they pulled on their iOS/Android app where they place their in-app ads right next to often used links, like the link to post a comment, thus capturing probably thousands of accidental ad-clicks they shouldn't have, all that wasn't enough, now they have to limit you to 5 articles a month (unless you subscribe to the local paper...yeah, right, who the hell pays money for a fucking newspaper these days?). Well, unless you have NoScript running, then it doesn't work and you can look at all the articles you want, just like everyone could before the all those "improvements".

      I will grant that Javascript adds a lot of functionality to the web, but it's abuse has made me treat all JS as suspect until I can ascertain if it's implementation is for functionality or turning me into a product to be sold. I see no moral dilemmas whatsoever with using NoScript to block all of that bullshit and selectively allow what I actually feel are worth the compute cycles to be run on my machine, because it's still my fucking machine. If they don't like it, that's fine, they can do like a lot of sites are doing these days and basically have their site return blank pages if JS is disabled...but in truth, when they get that ridiculous with the shit, I just stop using their site and find another one. It's not like there aren't alternatives out there, after all.

      If anyone should be blamed for the fact that Adblock is becoming ubiquitous these days (and NoScript is starting to, as well, something I encourage as much as possible), it's the people that abused internet ads (and later JS) in the first place. If I hadn't have finally gotten sick and goddamned tired of click-jacking "punch the monkey" horseshit I likely never would have added Adblock and NoScript to my browser in the first place.

    36. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anyone should be blamed for the fact that Adblock is becoming ubiquitous these days (and NoScript is starting to, as well, something I encourage as much as possible), it's the people that abused internet ads (and later JS) in the first place.

      Same for E-Mail. The greedy abused the system so much that a lot of people have moved to crappy alternatives like Facebook.
      The users may use it to communicate and the greedy can monitor their behavior. Greed wins every time.

    37. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by bobbutts · · Score: 1

      So you surf around with ad-block disabled and then blacklist any sites that have annoying ads? Seems like extra work and you still see the worst ads on your first visit. If you're not buying anything, a buck is quite optimistic for your impression.

    38. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by srh2o · · Score: 1

      And I use Adblock full on, full time. Different strokes for different folks.

    39. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by RandomFactor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      a webdeveloper and website owner and I really, really, really don't care about people who don't have Javascript enabled. I'd rather give the rest a great experience and I don't want to spend time and resources to provide a fallback.

      Off mark.

      Railing against folks because they value the security of their system is angsty and irrational.

      You don't need to provide a fallback for non script enabled visitors (though it is appreciated when I site does provide non JS fallback), you simply need to allow them their broken access, they are fully aware that most sites are broken in various ways without scripting and willl turn JS on granularly as needed.

      You don't spend resources, they don't get pwned. Everyone happy.

      --
      --- Mercutio was right.
    40. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

      And was your friend's name Jing? I knew a Jing and, wow, could she sing! She once sold me a ring. But Idon't know if she knows how to ping. But I know how to get hold of her, so I don't have to bing.

      --
      That is all.
    41. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Krojack · · Score: 1

      I use it but the other way around. Everything is blocked but I whitelist popular domains I know are going to be safe such as google.com or ebay.com and even slashdot.org. Other domains I visit on a regular bases that prove to be good end up getting whitelisted also.

      I haved used iGoogle from day one and will be rather sad to see it go. The other services (other then google video) I haven't even heard of. I'm shocked they didn't make the Google Video change earlier.

    42. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Krojack · · Score: 1

      Exact same here. The only annoying part is trying to watch that embedded video on some blog and trying to figure out which domain(s) to temporarily allow. It can be tricky with all these CDN domains now. If I can't get it after allowing 3-4 domains then I say fuck it and move on. No lost on my part.

    43. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Krojack · · Score: 1

      The only problem with this is, I've gone to a blog that was exploited and seen NoScript block JS from some random domain named 8845.cn. If everything is whitelisted and you have no popup notice of all the JS sites being executed (which would be annoying) then you could get screwed over. I would rather check everyone out before letting them into my house then assume they are safe and leave the door wide open. =)

    44. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Fallingwater · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is that most sites use javascript from sources different than the site itself, forcing you to figure out what can be blocked and what can't. I won't deny that your way results in more efficiency, but I just can't be arsed.

    45. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by slacker001 · · Score: 2

      https://reader.google.com/ sounds like it would work well for you.

    46. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by lonecrow · · Score: 1

      I beg to differ. I surf with noscript enabled, and yes on sites I decide to trust I will temporarily allow their scripts others I trust permanently. It is a pain sometimes on sites that load scripts from 20 different domains. Typically on those sites I choose to find another source instead.

      Do other IT professionals really surf the web with all scripts allowed by default? Isn't that...insane?

    47. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by lonecrow · · Score: 1

      There is no requirement to serve ads with javascript. I serve my ads as images and links so they display even with noscript and adblock.. I have an optional javascript that runs onclick to count clicks but if javascript is turned off at least they still see the ad.

      I figure ads on my site get 20% more views because I display them without javascript.

    48. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by jseale · · Score: 1

      A tool built almost entirely in javascript doesn't work with a JAVASCRIPT BLOCKER?!?!?!?!?11111111

      That's just crazy talk.

      But seriously, expecting to browse the modern web with noscript enabled just isn't sane.

      No duh! If you're so afraid of being rained on by the web's foreign particles, use a text-based web browser like Lynx.

    49. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by BurningFeetMan · · Score: 1

      That's exactly like me... Any idea how we're gonna get our RSS fix once iGoogle is gone? I've been looking for alternatives, but haven't had much luck.

    50. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by tolkienfan · · Score: 1

      I get .033ms for coworkers. Except for other locations - there is a speed of light issue...

    51. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by cavebison · · Score: 1

      But seriously, expecting to browse the modern web with noscript enabled just isn't sane.

      Really? Works fine for me. Most script is in the same domain as the page, which is enabled by default. It's only cross-domain scripts that are off by default, and they're usually only needed for delivering ads or Twitter/Facebook services which I don't care about or want anyway. Facebook API disabled in every site I visit? I can only be happy about that.

      Just enable the few cache sites for things like jquery, and you're golden. No unwanted crap and sites run faster. NoScript is awesome. Anyway, these days one has more than one browser installed. Usually one of them is Chrome. I use Firefox with NoScript for general web browsing. When I want to use Facebook, Google Calendar (ie. full-on apps) I use Chrome. Nothing easier. And, separating my browsing from my app use, I don't have to worry about things like FB tracking me all over the web or any other shenanigans.

    52. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by Spugglefink · · Score: 1

      It moderately pisses me off...

      Put me down in the severely pissed off column.

      I really can't come up with anything more worthwhile or meaningful to do, so I fart in their general direction.

    53. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by robsku · · Score: 1

      But seriously, expecting to browse the modern web with noscript enabled just isn't sane.

      Perfectly sane - it may not be realistic, but just like expecting people to not act like dickwads it's still sane. And most of the time not being able to use a page without enabling all or some sources of javascript is because of nothing but crappy lazy planning and programming - most functionality should & could be made to degrade gracefully when client lacks functionality.

      Logged in gmail with Opera Mini on my old cell phone last week - yes, it has very limited javascript support, but basically not - and received a very nice mobile optimized interface, so exceptionally well working compared to many pages today that should not even need any "ajaxy" stuff yet still utilize it without noscript fallback sometimes even to show static content (ie. article main text), which is too common and really awful work I wouldn't want to use in my resume.

      Most content would work perfectly fine without client side scripting and should be written that way - and any javascript, especially AJAX stuff should then be added to complement how the page works and only features not possible otherwise should be written as only way to do or see something being with client side scripting.

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
    54. Re:And nothing of value was lost... by robsku · · Score: 1

      What is there to "get" about some people enjoying the possibility to choose where scripts are used when some pages just work better with javascript partially or totally blocked? I have experienced huge sluggishness with some pages when scripts are all allowed while working same or better when some/all of it is blocked - hard to get? Not unless you are mentally challenged.

      --
      In capitalist USA corporations control the government.
  2. iGoogle will be missed... maybe by insnprsn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been using iGoogle since '05, I feel like this is a loss but I'm already moving over to Google Reader and getting used to the new interface... at first I'm "Meh" about Reader, but I dont hate it, yet.

    1. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by skipkent · · Score: 5, Funny

      So you're snowgirl's "Meh" friend!

    2. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by insnprsn · · Score: 1

      No, I'm "Meh" about Reader, for now

    3. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by JoeMerchant · · Score: 4, Insightful

      iGoogle and my.yahoo are the primary reasons I "use" both services.

      I suppose they have something new, but "spring cleaning" my iGoogle may just leave me sticking with my.yahoo

      Some of us are happy with the old interfaces - now: GET OFF OUR LAWN!

    4. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by macshit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Google Reader's a fine app for [what seems to be] its intended purpose—but it's nothing like iGoogle, and doesn't do a great job of replacing it in my opinion. I use both regularly, and will be sad when either goes away.

      This does seem a pretty weird decision. The reasoning they give (basically "lol, phones and device-/browser-specific apps are the future!") is kind of dubious, and seems strangely at odds with Google's general push for device-/browser-independent apps.

      I wonder if this is the result of some internal political/turf/funding war at Google...?

      [My guess: The Google+ team is politically very powerful, and they want to push everybody to use that instead. Never mind that Google+ (which I like) is extremely different, and not a particularly good replacement for iGoogle...]

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    5. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      i've always preferred google reader to igoogle and any other feed reader out there (online or offline). i'm really scared that google will kill it too i sometime. seems like they are going to reduce everything to g+.
      is there any other feed reader that is as good?

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    6. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, I actually stopped used iGoogle a month ago, when I finally migrated from Google Reader (has one annoying bug that hasn't been solved in years) back to a desktop program. I only had mail, calendar and reader gadgets in my iGoogle page, and with the latter irrelevant, I just set my homepage to gmail.

    7. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might appreciate a more efficient use of space on Reader, as well as other cleanup... In Firefox there's Google Reader Fixes: http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/116931

    8. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Endovior · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hrm. I've been using iGoogle as a homepage for years, now... nice convenient place to simultaneously check email and news before doing whatever else I'm doing with my browser at the moment. Heck, I mainly check /. based on the iGoogle widget; it's a convenient way to promote things to my attention. In contrast, I rather dislike the Reader interface; if iGoogle is indeed axed, I probably won't start using Reader afterwards (or at all, probably)... they do different things in different ways, and Google really doesn't have a good replacement on hand.

    9. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by no1nose · · Score: 2

      I'm in the same boat here. iGoogle.com and my.yahoo.com are my two main homepages when I launch Chrome. I use their bookmarks features quite often. Last year Yahoo! messed with the bookmarks on my.yahoo.com and tried to force everyone to use the Yahoo Toolbar to manage them. I nearly left Yahoo, but eventually they gave into their user requests and allowed them to be managed from my.yahoo.com again.

    10. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always f3lt confid3nt that igoogle would be there when i wanted it. You may find having, not as fulfilling as wanting
      -SPOCK
      EVER NOTICE KIRK HATED TABLETS TOO? Reading is fine, typing sucks.

    11. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by legont · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Second that. It's my homepage for years. Somebody's making a very bad decision.

    12. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      I just deleted my whole Google+ account, it was so useless to me. I was going to check out PageFlakes, but apparently so was everyone else, so that service has now crashed.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    13. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by ender- · · Score: 3, Informative

      Thirded. I switched away from my.yahoo.com when iGoogle first came out and I've been using it ever since. I've got it set up just perfectly as I like it. I'm going to be extremely disappointed if/when they retire iGoogle. :(

    14. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by jader3rd · · Score: 1

      iGoogle and my.yahoo are the primary reasons I "use" both services.

      So do you have an opinion on how they stack up against my.msn ?

    15. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by kramulous · · Score: 2

      Agreed. Gmail, Calendar, Documents, Chat, Quick Notes all on a single landing page. It was quite convenient.

      --
      .
    16. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by D'Sphitz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      i'm really scared that google will kill it too i sometime

      They are doing a pretty good job of training millions of people not to get too attached to anything they make, because it will likely disappear someday with no justification (along with your data).

    17. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by donweel · · Score: 1

      My computer won't be the same without iGoogle to launch my day. I will have some months to figure out how to come up with something that works the same I suppose but I am not too happy about it.

      --
      Many a long talk since then I have had with the man in the moon; he had my confidence on the voyage. Joshua Slocum
    18. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by SnowZero · · Score: 2

      Well, Google does give plenty of notification that a service is getting retired and lets you download all your data, so the data's only gone if you are too lazy to download it with 6+ months of notice.

    19. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by kwikrick · · Score: 1

      Phones and tablet computers already have a 'start page' in the form of the launcher screen with live widgets. I guess iGoogle makes less sense on those platforms. On the desktop, it is possible to customize your desktop with live widgets, but I most people I know don't bother (including myself, I like a clean desktop). I suppose that with Windows 8 people will get used to having launcher with live widgets again. Microsoft has been pushing the idea of a live desktop for a while. I suppose Gnome and KDE will follow suit too, sooner or later.

      --
      assignment != equality != identity
    20. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      but I most people I know don't bother (including myself, I like a clean desktop).

      Or they are at work with a locked-down desktop

    21. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Chrisq · · Score: 2

      Me fourthed. They have nice widgets all in one place - email, feeds, news, etc - and I can see the same thing at work, home, friends PCs etc.

    22. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Necroloth · · Score: 1
      iGoogle is my homepage - has my emails, chat, calendar, BBC News, Slashdot, currency converter ... all in one convenient place.

      This is a bad decision imo... and I shall miss it :(

    23. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by vlm · · Score: 1

      Heck, I mainly check /. based on the iGoogle widget

      Ditto, you'll be seeing less of me (some folks are probably saying "good")

      Thing is igoogle is not exactly "high tech"... maybe for 1996 it would have been pretty impressive. I can make my own homepage on my own server without too much effort. I need the API into goog-calendar and goog-reader and I'm all good.

      Heck, infinitely crude as it is, I could make four frames/framesets and embed calendar.goog in one frameset, gmail in another, reader in the third, and put something else in the fourth like plain ole goog ready to search. This would be about a 6 line HTML file problem and I haven't tried it, but how bad can it be?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    24. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly that. My only two tabs are gmail, and the news. It had *some* info, but not the horrible mess iGoogle is according to what I see, though, so I can understand most users with "eighty-core" CPUs and "twenty terabytes" of RAM "bought last week" being annoyed when their 230 frontpage gadgets load at the same time. Well, at least my dad. He's got, like, three liveTV flash windows, and numerous sports-news-related gadgets. Oh, and a flash poker app.

      And my SO, with her flash hamster, java turtles, HTML5 "eyes follow mouse" and enough rss feeds to fill a 576-page daily newspaper (and we do not live in the US, so HUGE newspapers with dozens of sections are unheard of. So my metaphor doesn't suck!).

      So I guess "the rest of the normals" were kinda like them and google doesn't care about serving those goddamn ugly ram-intensive pages anymore?

    25. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't even imagine what I will use as an alternative. iGoogle has been my Home Page more or less forever and everyone I have shown it to has adopted it as theirs. Granted that it doesn't seem to behave well on my smartphone, but on my office and home computers it has been and still is just about all I could ever want. I hope that, if Google doesn't reverse this ill-considered decision, someone will come up with a good alternative as Google lets this useful tool die a slow death.

    26. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by guises · · Score: 2

      Come on now, you can't start complaining that Google isn't retaining enough of your data. They might get the wrong idea.

    27. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by jafiwam · · Score: 2

      Aside from a locked-down desktop, the whole strength of iGoogle is it's an online web page you customize.

      Granted, I blocked all the ads and only use three, maybe four of the little plug ins (a lot of the third party ones just didn't work right, so the reliable ones were the default offerings).

      Not having to finger-fuck a browser on whatever computer I am in front of and get all I need by simply logging in was the major attraction. People get PISSED if you install a toolbar. They DONT get pissed if you just add another URL to their browse history when you use their computer.

      I have all my work and fun related bookmarks that I want at the tip of my fingers on it. I use it every day, many times a day. Plus, from there I can use Gmail, Documents (now "Drive" whatever that is supposed to mean), etc.

      Google tried to change the bookmarks by limiting it to five, and not allowing the categories and it was a huge problem.

      Like it or not, there's a market for a "build it myself" link list. If I have to, I'll build my own I guess, or maybe find another service.

      This whole "apps apps apps phones" thing is stupid, and going to blow over. Ignoring this fact is going to get Google in second place some day.

    28. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Will.Woodhull · · Score: 1

      I too use both both my.yahoo (I like its news service) and iGoogle (my primary search engine). In my opinion, each one is the product of a more reputable company than any of the .msn offerings. I'm a pragmatic ethicist: I prefer to do business with companies that are less likely to screw me over.

      Until Microsoft dumps its current CEO there is no reason to consider any of their products if there are any reasonable alternatives. It is not that I think all the evil is bound up in that one potty-mouthed monkey dancer; it is that his continued presence at the helm is a clear indication of a deep and pervasive "screw your partners and clients for fun and profit" attitude within the corporation. His continued presence is an excellent litmus test for evil within that corporation. At the moment, there are reasonable alternatives for every product that Microsoft offers.

      --
      Will
    29. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Drumpig · · Score: 1

      Agreed, iGoogle is my homepage and the first thing I check every morning.

    30. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by JoeMerchant · · Score: 2

      iGoogle and my.yahoo are the primary reasons I "use" both services.

      So do you have an opinion on how they stack up against my.msn ?

      No experience, no opinion, no interest.

    31. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Inda · · Score: 2

      Me...

      I've joined the conversation late, as usual, and most people are saying the same thing: I use it for email subjects, which Google only updated recently, RSS feeds, Reader, Latitude, Calendar (very important to me), English Premier League table, Twitter,...

      C'mon Google. Get a clue. 5, 6 years of use from power users should tell you something. It's a highly used tool.

      Alternatives? 10 tabs on Firefox startup doesn't sound like something I want to do.

      Hopefully they'll make a replacement.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    32. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by IANAAC · · Score: 1
      I don't use a "Start Page" in the sense iGoogle was originally intended to be, but I use it often, because I can easily put all the useful gadgets I use throughout the day (converters, dictionaries, timezone checkers, shipping rates, etc.), so I'll miss it too.

      I suppose I can find replacements for most of what I use on yahoo or some other service. I haven't checked, though.

    33. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am certain that the data will be kept and mined by google.

    34. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      Trust kill is a very dangerous move for any company's self-preservation. Trust attracts *new* users from other services into your own.
      In the past 3 years the crisis caused many free services to get DROPPED and BOUGHT by someone you hate. Among the technical minded, trust for even having to "activate" free that for some reason are off by default on our current account is dubious. I'm looking at you Youtube and you too, Google Plus. I will NOT provide EXTRA info and accept new EULAs. Especially annoying it is that my I was able to use log into youtube years back, till they felt like I now need to link it to a google account. I never uploaded a single video, so I lost almost nothing by refusing to sign in.

      Purchasing my very first Android took longer when I hated Verizon, AT&T, didn't trust sprint, AND AT&T threatened to buy T-Mobile. Things have grown to the point where I just won't join any new service at all. Still pray that I wake without being forced to get a facebook account to sign into old services, or have my Yahoo data bought by facebook or something. I really hated to see my Barnes and Noble data scooped by Borders. Things are getting ridiculous and I don't trust anything online. Too bad. My thousands of pictures that could have gone to Picasa, Yahoo's Flicker, Instagram (pre-facebook buyout) or even Facebook are just chilling in my hard drive as wallpaper slideshows visible only by my friends.

      Soon, EVEN slashdotters hating Metro will acquiesce to forced adoption of Windows 8 or 9 by machine attrition and new shiny hardware (like needing wireless N, USB 4, octo-core --whatever the next hot thing.) The price to pay is Trusted platform will end up driving out linux and cementing Windows into our hardware. Windows Market adoption on native MacOS and Windows will bring players like Facebook to our machines. What's more, we'll see the inevitable "porting" of Smartphone carrier cancers like non-removable Apps AND sponsored-Ads-everywhere.

      At that point even my current "private wallpaper" sharing will upload my metadata, picture names and everything else but keystrokes to the big guys (maybe keystrokes WILL be fair game, given the this year's Android mini-scandal).

      Bleak freedom ahead for privacy holdouts. Stock up on some hardware and save it for installing today's linux on it before it's too late ;)

    35. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My bookmarks still do not work on my.yahoo... was there something you needed to do to re-activate them? They are the reason I switched to iGoogle in the first place.

    36. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by rusl · · Score: 2

      Well said.

      Plenty of old people use iGoogle. I use it too. I am quite annoyed by this. I don't want to have a home page for each computer or customise apps or whatever. I guess I'll have to make my own but it won't interface as well with all the Google products. Which will mean I will use google less. This seems like a bad decision. They should reverse it.

      --
      Stupidity is its own reward.
    37. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Paco103 · · Score: 1

      I use iGoogle ON my phone! It's my default home page in my Android browser. I don't want to maintain a separate "app".

    38. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto - now I gotta work up some other way to have a portable personal portal (ppp). Maybe a variant on the old TiddlyWiki will work - brush up on JS and HTML 5 I guess...

      Thanks for tearing down my little web infrastructure after hooking me on it big G - NOT.

    39. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by BurningFeetMan · · Score: 1

      Me... +1

      iGoogle has been a staple to my internet for quite some time. The little panda & fox wall paper used to cheer me up on shit days, kinda like the day I had when I read on iGoogle that they were nuking iGoogle.

    40. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by cboslin · · Score: 1

      Great post

      Privacy has been and will continue to be the killer app online, cloud, fog or whatever. I too will control my data by keeping it local and being careful about what few services I will use that are NOT local.

      I have a Windows 7 box for testing, but am NOT looking forward to upgrading to Windows 8. I probably will run a copy for testing, but I am very thankful my dev tools are Linux and under my control.

      A service will come with privacy in mind, once it does...even if adoption is retarded by proprietary FUD and roadblocks, it will never have a problem staying in the black...staying profitable and for the reason you mention TRUST!

    41. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by cboslin · · Score: 1

      i'm really scared that google will kill it too i sometime

      They are doing a pretty good job of training millions of people not to get too attached to anything they make, because it will likely disappear someday with no justification (along with your data).

      Actually there is something else starting to happen that is going to negatively impact google over the long haul. Every time they change a service removing features users feel are critical to their usage (Youtube is an excellent example also) they chip off a bit of Trust that user has in Google over all.

      Because of Youtube decision with their new interface (and not listening to their users) I started setting up alternatives to anything in Google that I use, the first thing I did was set up an alternative email account. (I rarely use my Yahoo account any more being rather pissed off at them for wrongly limiting my ability to export my information...at least Google does not do this. MSN is not an option for this reason among many other proprietary reasons that result in unplanned outages at the most inconvenient times)

      I did not adopt Google+ for this reason in addition to them preventing me from checking it out when it first came out...I had time to try it when it first came out but could not get an invite, by the time I got an invite, it was not convenient for me to spend time there and I have never felt a desire to try it since.

      I do not depend on anything Google because I now expect them to take it away at a whim without enough advanced notice and without options, thus why get started with it in the first place.

      I know I am not the only one. In almost all examples they could provide options, but choose not to.

      After you have been hit a few times, it honestly no longer matters their (Google's) reason why they take it away and/or switch to something else...you start to think twice whether to adopt the new software in the first place...why spend allot of time configuring and working with it only to have it taken away without options, without recourse. Once TRUST is diminished, adoption of new technologies is less likely; once TRUST is lost, its pretty much game over as you will find alternatives for everything...and trust me, alternatives exist for pretty much everything.

      With tools like HTML5, PHP, Python, Ruby, JavaScript, scripting languages, Linux, you can create anything and it will run standalone (when not connected to the Internet) on your embedded device, netbook, laptop, desktop and home server. A web presence can be obtained for as little as $4 and as much as $10 per month that you also control 100%. Most people spend more than that for lunches in a week.

      Why risk having it taken away from you to begin with.... considering time is money, it would be cheaper to roll your own and control your tool set completely.

    42. Re: iGoogle will be missed... maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto. Really dumb decision.

  3. Haven't been to google in a while. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    With most major browsers having the url bar also usable to enter your search queries, I haven't had a need to go to a google homepage in a very long time. Be it igoogle or the normal homepage.

    1. Re:Haven't been to google in a while. by SJHillman · · Score: 0

      I only go to the Google homepage when they have a cool doodle. I mostly just use iGoogle for a couple of stock widgets... no big loss if I have to go somewhere else (probably Google Finance).

    2. Re:Haven't been to google in a while. by vlm · · Score: 1

      With most major browsers having the url bar also usable to enter your search queries, I haven't had a need to go to a google homepage in a very long time.

      Different workflows for different folks. I like the default of searching the web, but often I click maps then search, or click news then search, or the handy GMAIL then search my gigs of stored email. The mighty GOOG doesn't seem to have search context properly radio buttoned or whatever, or at least not UI'd like I like to see. Yes you can pitifully find all those search results in a plain search, but try searching for "restaurant middle of nowhere" what you get from maps is infinitely better than what you get from the generic web search.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  4. Archive Team again? by tepples · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All videos on Google Video will become private YouTube videos. Will this see the return of the Google Video archiving effort by Archive Team, covered in a previous Slashdot story?

    1. Re:Archive Team again? by antdude · · Score: 1

      I thought Google changed its mind to keep Google Videos. Just no more new uploads since its original annoincement.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  5. Farewell iGoogle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I will miss it. I've used it for quite a while. I suppose I can use something else, but it works well and does what I want.

    1. Re:Farewell iGoogle by qzjul · · Score: 1

      Agreed; it seems odd to me that they'd kill something that (at least to my eyes) doesn't look like it requires any maintenanace, and is really quite a good tool. Maybe they have something up their sleeves, but I'd have appreciated if they did that they'd release it before killing something like this...

    2. Re:Farewell iGoogle by datavirtue · · Score: 2

      That's it! Lets fork this shit!

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    3. Re:Farewell iGoogle by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 1

      Agreed; it seems odd to me that they'd kill something that (at least to my eyes) doesn't look like it requires any maintenanace, and is really quite a good tool. Maybe they have something up their sleeves, but I'd have appreciated if they did that they'd release it before killing something like this...

      They DO have something up their sleeves, and it's called Chrome. They want everybody using Chrome, that's the point.

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    4. Re:Farewell iGoogle by ender- · · Score: 2

      Agreed; it seems odd to me that they'd kill something that (at least to my eyes) doesn't look like it requires any maintenanace, and is really quite a good tool. Maybe they have something up their sleeves, but I'd have appreciated if they did that they'd release it before killing something like this...

      They DO have something up their sleeves, and it's called Chrome. They want everybody using Chrome, that's the point.

      And exactly what does Chrome have to do with replacing iGoogle? Chrome is a browser. iGoogle is a customized homepage. I use Chrome [love it]. I use iGoogle.I have my iGoogle home page set up exactly how I like it. I have my most frequently visited bookmarks set up, I have the site feeds I want, the weather I want, the various other widgets I want, and they're all in the same place they've been for the last half-decade so I know exactly where to click for what I want.

      I will not be happy if they retire iGoogle.

    5. Re:Farewell iGoogle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I happen to use igoogle in chrome. I will be very sad to see this go. I suppose soon gmail will close down too - taken over by g+ messages...

    6. Re:Farewell iGoogle by D'Sphitz · · Score: 1

      And exactly what does Chrome have to do with replacing iGoogle?

      "With modern apps that run on platforms like Chrome and Android, the need for something like iGoogle has eroded over time" src

      They don't clarify what "modern apps" we are supposed to switch to other than pointing at the Chrome store, or even what exactly a "modern app" is. Some would say a "modern app" could mean something like GMail or iGoogle... oh I guess that's not it. I guess it was only a matter of time until this ongoing slaughter of google products got to one I cared about, fuck em.

    7. Re:Farewell iGoogle by vlm · · Score: 2

      They don't clarify what "modern apps" we are supposed to switch to other than pointing at the Chrome store, or even what exactly a "modern app" is. Some would say a "modern app" could mean something like GMail or iGoogle

      Well a "modern app" on chrome is sure as hell not google reader.

      on igoog, the goog reader widget shows you all your new feeds and refreshes pretty much real time. You can look at comments and decide to open if its good enough (like this /. story) or close and it disappears (like, say, another dancing cats /. video story). Awesome functionality. Its hard to think of how to improve it.

      on chrome, there are two goog reader "apps". Its moronic to call an icon-bookmark a app, but they have the balls to do it, so if you're too dumb to set or use a bookmark for reader.google.com but able to fog a mirror occasionally enough to install a chrome app, you can get a icon on your page that when clicked goes to reader.goog, and sadly thats all it does, nothing more than a bookmark. LAME! The other "app" is a toolbar icon that shows a digital count of how many new stories/articles/feed items whatever are waiting and usually operates on a couple minute latency from the igoog display, which is kinda weird but you get used to it. Its only other functionality is to, you guessed it, act as a "bookmark-icon" for reader.goog again... Thats all it does. LAME!

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    8. Re:Farewell iGoogle by vlm · · Score: 1

      That's it! Lets fork this shit!

      I'm guessing the "fork" in my case will be about 4 lines of HTML with a frameset holding a couple frame src?

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    9. Re:Farewell iGoogle by qzjul · · Score: 1

      Yea, I also use iGoogle in Chrome; I don't see how chrome is at all a replacement for this; I happen to have slashdot, ars technica, wired, bbc, micheal geist's blog, linux today, phoronix, Gmail, the weather, torrentfreak, fsdaily, and a graph of the crude oil price all on one page in iGoogle. Oh and the time. And links to any other google service I want to use....

      I don't see how that functionality is duplicated by *anything* else; least of all Chrome; or RSS readers... as others have said, I don't want to have to click through each one to find stories I want to read, I want to see them ALL at once, expand the summary, and read the whole thing if it sounds interesting.

    10. Re:Farewell iGoogle by cboslin · · Score: 1

      Agreed; it seems odd to me that they'd kill something that (at least to my eyes) doesn't look like it requires any maintenanace, and is really quite a good tool. Maybe they have something up their sleeves, but I'd have appreciated if they did that they'd release it before killing something like this...

      They DO have something up their sleeves, and it's called Chrome. They want everybody using Chrome, that's the point.

      And exactly what does Chrome have to do with replacing iGoogle? Chrome is a browser. iGoogle is a customized homepage. I use Chrome [love it]. ...

      I stay with Firefox simply because it allows me to control not just the website main cookie (all chrome allows) but every single one of the ad and tracking cookies. I can also control Flash cookies completely by using Linux and redirecting the crap to /tmp which is deleted between reboots.

      Perhaps your inability to granularly control Chrome is the point. They can pretty much do what they want, track what they want, put stuff on your device without your being aware and without your consent.

      I strongly believe Google is less evil than most other companies, but they are not perfect. And no telling what will happen should the owners sell the company one day.

      If you do not control your device, you are one event away from an expensive paper weight. Of course your work flow will be interrupted at the worst possible time.

  6. Multiple task lists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Great. How am I going to get to see more than one task list at once without iGoogle? Stock google tasks is barely functional as it is.

  7. What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by vmxeo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Reading over the sunset annoucement, I don't think they realize how people really use it. It's not a mobile service, and it isn't simply a redundant link to stuff, it's a dashboard of what I'm interested in and a portal to all of Google's other services. It's also not just a homepage, it's the page I have open on my desktop all the time.

    1. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree. I have it open all the time. My stock portfolios, Gmail, five different news sites and even Lio.

    2. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Manfre · · Score: 5, Insightful

      iGoogle is the only browser homepages I've used in the past ~5 years. I guess it's time to switch back to about:blank or roll my own replacement for iGoogle.

    3. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 2

      Widgets?

      OS X, Windows 8, KDE, Android and others allow you to embed HTML snippets on the desktop.

      Rather than load a web browser, one can "mashup" HTML widgets on your home screen directly.

    4. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by SJHillman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've done the whole widgets on the desktop thing, it was cool for a while but ultimately I found that I liked it in a web page better. Seems to be less buggy too.

    5. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Same here. According to their "What's happening to iGoogle?" help page, they say "With modern apps that run on platforms like Chrome and Android, the need for something like iGoogle has eroded over time".

      That's certainly not true for me, and I'm both a Chrome and Android user. They're great, but Android is not the desktop, and Chrome is not the only browser on the the only computer I use. iGoogle is good for me because it's cross-platform, highly flexible, and feature full. That's why it's so key to my everyday workflow, and that's why this is a seriously misguided choice on Google's part.

    6. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by lehphyro · · Score: 5, Informative

      You may want to give Netvibes (http://www.netvibes.com/) a try.

    7. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by MikShapi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Same here.
      I always have it open as a working dash. It's easy to use, less buggy than native OS widgets and easier to find the content I need to plug in it.
      And with all due respect, Chrome is not my browser of choice for a list of reasons as long as my arm. Firefox is.

      iGoogle is, to me, one of the most useful google products out there.
      Google is now trying to make itself less useful to the IT professionals and powerusers.
      Misguided decision indeed.

      --
      -
    8. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by SQLGuru · · Score: 1

      Also, when it's widgets on the desktop you have to minimize your work to see it. With an open browser window, you can either switch to the browser (which you frequently do anyway) or [at least in Windows] hover over the browser icon in the taskbar to get a smaller preview window which is generally enough to see if there's a new mail message.

    9. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you wanna bet Google buys netvibes.com before the end of the year?

    10. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Same here. What are they thinking?

    11. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by cluening · · Score: 4, Insightful

      ... it's also not that hard to write your own. There are plenty of perl/python/whatever rss libraries out there to do all of the hard work, and then you just need to spend some time fiddling with CSS to make it look pretty. Here's what I created about 10 years ago, before all of these other things existed:

      http://www.wirelesscouch.net/cgi-bin/headlines/headlines.pl

      (Well, maybe those other things existed. I certainly didn't know about them though.)

      --
      Posted from the wireless couch.
    12. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could buy it first.

    13. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Hunter-Killer · · Score: 1

      I switched to Netvibes a few years ago, when Google added the unremoveable sidebar (which was added at the behest of gadget developers, apparently the only users of iGoogle that matter). It has served me pretty well, though I still miss having a Google search bar with full functionality.

    14. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. I've got mail, reader, calendar, to-do on there. Already looking for a replacement, and since this sucks majorly, i'm looking to replace the google services (reader in particular) the i was using iGoogle as a front for.

      That'll teach me to put all my eggs in on basket. Anyone got spare baskets ?

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    15. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by obarthelemy · · Score: 3

      And then you change PCs, and got to do it all over again. Or you switch to your Tablet, laptop, netbook.. ditto.

      A dashboard webpage is really the most portable way to do that. Looking for a replacement as we speak...

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    16. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea, I'm not really happy about Google axing iGoogle. I use it heavily--it is running pretty the entire time I am at the computer. Their page listing their reasoning and suggested "alternatives" is a big middle finger, providing vague to almost nonexistent answers. I am in front of a computer all day at work. I will not pull out my phone to check my mail or view my Reader articles, when there is a full ledge computing device directly in front of me. "I really like iGoogle -- are there any other alternatives?
      On your mobile device..." No, that's not a feasible alternative.

    17. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by qzjul · · Score: 1

      This; it's so useful it's all I've used since it came out; I haven't tried google reader, but I doubt it will it allow me to spread out various feeds all over + have the weather and some stock prices, all in one place, so i don't *HAVE* to switch between tabs or apps or programs or whatever....

    18. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 0

      A web page has simplicity, granted.

      But today's tech buzzphrase is all about syncing to the cloud. HTML widget profiles can theoretically be device and platform independent.

    19. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just replaced my iGoogle with Netvibes. Thanks for the tip, I like it better already.

    20. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      Went to the Netvibes site. They have a premium version. Pricing indicates it's only $499 per month!!! Wow, it must be good.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    21. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by sootman · · Score: 1

      Looks great on my phone. Nicely done!

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    22. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google has sucked ever since Eric Schmidt gave up the reins.

    23. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you know in Windows, you can hover over the bottom right corner, and you can see the desktop too.

    24. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by legont · · Score: 1

      Do I really want to give my Google password to and external site... just thinking.

    25. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      I have been in the process of migrating my yahoo mail contacts to my gmail account because gmail lives on my Igoogle home page. Since Igoogle is going away, I guess I will stop that. I like having my home page be a useful search page, while at the same time displaying what the few things I am casually curious about (sports scores, whether I have new email, the weather, date and time, there are other things on my Igoogle but I never look at those).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    26. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Curunir_wolf · · Score: 2

      This is a really bad trend. Windows 8 wants you to use a Microsoft account to log into your local desktop. Cisco has pushed down updates that require Linksys router owners to use a Cisco cloud account. All of it in the hands of some sysadmin I'll probably never meet that works for some suits that couldn't give a shit if I live or die.

      What's left to actually own?

      --
      "Somebody has to do something. It's just incredibly pathetic it has to be us."
      --- Jerry Garcia
    27. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But why not offload all the widget-processing too? my old laptop runs much faster without that stuff. and i can open a browser when i want to. it is also automagically synched between devices (OS independent).

    28. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok - netvibes actually seems like a good alternative. Is there any way to easily export all the RSS feeds from your igoogle homepage? Since you can't easily see the URL of the feed, it takes a while to port.

    29. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by DaleSwanson · · Score: 1

      Reading over the sunset annoucement, I don't think they realize how people really use it. It's not a mobile service, and it isn't simply a redundant link to stuff, it's a dashboard of what I'm interested in and a portal to all of Google's other services. It's also not just a homepage, it's the page I have open on my desktop all the time.

      I'm sure they know exactly how people use it, they just don't care. They know that some people will replace will replace iGoogle with Google+, Chrome + web apps, or Google reader. Other people will move to something not run by Google. They feel that the benefit they get from additional Chrome and Google+ users will out weight the lose of some users.

    30. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by David_Hart · · Score: 1

      I use iGoogle all the time on my tablet. It would take several mobile apps to replace it.

    31. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      I imagine that that's designed for commercial uses. All the references to it on their site are surrounded by references to analytics, not really something the average user cares about.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    32. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Some Linux window managers allow you to create a "widgets layer" that can be toggled with just about any hotkey, button, icon, etc and temporarily shows all the widgets overtop of everything else on the screen.

    33. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by elmartinos · · Score: 1

      I have been using netvibes for longer than iGoogle existed. I think it is superior to iGoogle.

    34. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reading over the sunset annoucement, I don't think they realize how people really use it. It's not a mobile service, and it isn't simply a redundant link to stuff, it's a dashboard of what I'm interested in and a portal to all of Google's other services. It's also not just a homepage, it's the page I have open on my desktop all the time.

      Sure.. that's right.. the company that runs most of the web's analytics doesn't realize how many people use their own services... If only one of the idiots there had thought to embed some tracking script in the page!

    35. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      In Windows, Win+D minimizes all windows, pressing it again restores them all exactly as they were. In Unity I think it's Ctrl-Alt-D. I'm sure all windows managers have something similar.

    36. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by adolf · · Score: 1

      Not while playing a full-screen on my right-most monitor.

    37. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by afidel · · Score: 1

      And you know what, the fact that I can setup igoogle once and use it the same way on every device is one of the reasons I really, really like it. I don't have to setup a new configuration each time I switch devices, I just go to www.google.com and click on the igoogle link.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    38. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by bakuun · · Score: 1

      Who said anything about Google password? Netvibes have their own account registration process. You can log in with your FB if you have one, but that's all OAuth, so you won't be giving them your credentials in that case either.

    39. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by MatthewCCNA · · Score: 1

      What's left to actually own?

      your debts

      --
      "He is so stupid. And now back to the wall!" Moe Szyslak
    40. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by MMC+Monster · · Score: 2

      Agree 100%.

      This is my homepage. Able to put my own links and have a google bar at the top just makes it even more handy.

      I'll probably use it until the last day and then look for a similar service.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    41. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by vlm · · Score: 1

      Has it improved since 1998? I did the dynamic desktop thing on windows and whenever IE crashed it really screwed up the whole machine. If they're sandboxing better now a days maybe it won't be so bad?

      There is never anything new in IT, this craze is just retro from that era.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    42. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      my.yahoo.com?

      Must admit this one surprises me. iGoogle is so simple in concept it's hard for me to believe that Google needs to devote that much in resources to it. Meanwhile, it's a home page, and until recently at least, web entities prized being someone's home page more than anything else, with good reason. If you start at Google, then you're already using Google.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    43. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they don't realise?

      I think you forget this is google, who track everything...

      they even know my toilet ambulation habits.

      trust me ... they KNOW who they are losing by making this change

    44. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by jameson71 · · Score: 2

      And shuts it down like they did to meebo. Really disappointed in them lately.

    45. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by fnj · · Score: 1

      Google is doing its level best to make itself less useful and less relevant to ALMOST EVERYONE. It's a mass mental disorder on the part of management.

    46. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by rusl · · Score: 1

      me too

      --
      Stupidity is its own reward.
    47. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by rusl · · Score: 1

      Plus the widgets are tied to only one machine. I guess you could sync thing with UbuntuOne but that would be hacking. Also I sometimes need to use a Windoze computer and I'm not going to install Ubuntu One on that (I know it is theoretically possible, but it's not my windows computer and I don't want to spend enough time on it to do that)

      --
      Stupidity is its own reward.
    48. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by rusl · · Score: 2

      This reminds me of the ridiculous article about CLI being obsolete. Progress goes backwards sometimes because people who get enticed by shiny things are in charge of making all the computers and don't know that they are de-evolving instead of progress.

      --
      Stupidity is its own reward.
    49. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm very disappointed with Google's plans to kill iGoogle. I've been using it as my primary home page on several computers for approx. 5 yrs. It took me significant effort to get iGoogle to where I like using it daily.
      Google - leave it alone, stop killing useful user apps that you encouraged us to setup in the first place.
      Bad decision!!!

    50. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree with your view as I have been using it since the days they used to call it Personalized Google. Please let me know if you happen to find a worthy replacement and I'll go back to using about:blank as the home page.

    51. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by BurningFeetMan · · Score: 1

      I keep smirking as I read through the comments of /.'ers who state that they'll consider writing their own replacement for iGoogle. Can you guys combine forces, or something, make something really worthy? Call it, iSlash, or something...

    52. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by cboslin · · Score: 1

      This is a really bad trend. Windows 8 wants you to use a Microsoft account to log into your local desktop. Cisco has pushed down updates that require Linksys router owners to use a Cisco cloud account. ...

      I had not heard that about Windows 8, I hope you are mistaken as if that is true, I will NOT even own a copy for testing anymore.

      Had not heard that about Cisco / Linksys either. Not good.

      Can not understand what anyone would not use DD-WRT, OpenWRT or Tomato firmware on a supported device (firewall/router) for a variety of reasons, a 24 X 7 bandwidth monitor and 100% control over the most critical device required for surfing the Internet, my firewall/router. Nice those firmwares turn a hardware device costing from $15 = $200 into a professional device with features only found in devices costing closer to $3,000.00.

      I no longer purchase hardware that I can not control locally 100%. Avoiding proprietary badness helps me stay sane.

    53. Re:What exactly am I suppose to replace it with? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for the tip. So far I'm finding netvibes superior to igoogle for my purposes (a home page that displays my google calendar, weather, and news). Sometimes forced change works out for the better...

  8. Google Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a damned good non-YouTube search engine. It's where I go when I need something other than what the YouTube community does best. And, it's not just for porn. I tend to find the unlisted songs from YouTube that way. The songs that YouTube has taken down. Also, it helps with documentaries and such. Try YouTube with some of those topics and you'll get nonsense. Google Video shows 'em to me.

    1. Re:Google Video by EdIII · · Score: 1

      And, it's not just for porn

      Clearly. If Google was that good at indexing porn videos the service would not be cancelled. It would become a profit center.

    2. Re:Google Video by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      I'm also really disappointed to hear they're getting rid of the Sybian search engine. I loved seeing girls ride those, but never knew that Google was indexing them all - there's nearly thirty years of history there.

  9. Guess we shouldn't be surprised by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've used my iGoogle page as my homepage for however long it's been around - five years? six? It'll suck having this go away, but it's been obvious for a while that Google's all about killing off anything they offer that they've been unable to monetize.

    What I find funny is their suggestion that, as an "alternative" to iGoogle, we should either move to using Google Play (um, what?) or start using Chrome as a browser. Yeah, how are those iGoogle replacements again?

    I'll find a non-Google replacement, just like I have whenever they've discontinued their other offerings I liked.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Guess we shouldn't be surprised by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 2

      Netvibes is a much better dash board than iGoogle ever was.

    2. Re:Guess we shouldn't be surprised by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      Chrome's extensions or plug-ins or whatever they call them can replicate most of the functionalities of the widgets. I only use Chrome for it's various widget/app-like extensions and Netflix, never use it to surf the web.

    3. Re:Guess we shouldn't be surprised by seandiggity · · Score: 2

      I used iGoogle years ago, primarily for the RSS feeds. If you have access to a web server, there are a number of ways to set something similar up yourself. I've done it at me.seandiggity.com using WordPress + Aggregator theme + some extra plugins. There are definitely simpler ways, but I like the flexibility of WordPress's widgets.

      --
      Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
    4. Re:Guess we shouldn't be surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps Google is entering the Windows ME stage of its corporate life cycle. They've pretty much come to own the market; now it's time for them to start fucking it up long enough for a competitor to get a foothold.

    5. Re:Guess we shouldn't be surprised by EvilSS · · Score: 1

      I'm leaning this way. If Google is killing iGoogle, one would assume its for declining use and that does not bode well for NetVibes. And my.yahoo is hideous. I'm not going there. Being in the cloud is great until Google decides to retire your favorite cloud.

      --
      I browse on +1 so AC's need not respond, I won't see it.
    6. Re:Guess we shouldn't be surprised by datavirtue · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, and it's only $499 a month!

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    7. Re:Guess we shouldn't be surprised by legont · · Score: 1

      May I ask why Chrome is better for Netflix? (no trolling - just don't know)

    8. Re:Guess we shouldn't be surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netvibes is free. You can pay for business features, but it's not required.

    9. Re:Guess we shouldn't be surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still annoyed they killed Google Desktop Search.

      Google's specialty is seach. Why don't they want to be the people who search my local files? Google Desktop Search, while it was horribly outdated, was the best local file search I ever used. There is no replacement. When it started getting unreliable with my new Windows 7 install I had to switch to Copernic. Copernic isn't as good, and isn't free (with all features). Focusing your company in one direction is good, but killing off products which cost so little to maintain seems shortsighted.

    10. Re:Guess we shouldn't be surprised by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      I use multiple monitors at once, so it's nice to have Netflix playing on one monitor while I'm working on the others. I don't like to fullscreen it (either through Netflix or through F11 with Chrome) because I like having the browser controls there just in case I need to move it to a different monitor, close it, etc quickly so Chrome's natural minimalist UI gives Netflix plenty of screen space. It's not my main browser (I'm an Opera guy... possibly the only one in the state), so I don't have it open all the time. Chrome's really quick load time and quick video load time make it great for opening to watch a quick video on Netflix, fire up Pandora, etc. In my personal experience, it also has the least issues with videos not playing properly, crashing, etc. It's really all personal preference based partially on how I use my PC's different monitors.

    11. Re:Guess we shouldn't be surprised by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's great and you did a nice job, but I just want a homepage, not a project.

    12. Re:Guess we shouldn't be surprised by qzjul · · Score: 1

      It feels a bit like... Why would you need a web browser, when you can get all the same things with wget, nano, and the gimp! All your text reading and image viewing desires in 3 completely separate, inconvenient things?

    13. Re:Guess we shouldn't be surprised by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I saw no comparison with iGoogle. Tried it, probably never going back.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    14. Re:Guess we shouldn't be surprised by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      So I only have to install chrome and it's extensions on every system I use. I'm sure there will be no problem getting root on those systems, and Apple will allow Chrome widgets on iOS real soon now.

      Or, I can load my iGoogle page from damn near any system on the planet.

      Yeah, Chrome is clearly a drop-in replacement.

  10. Not the Sybian! by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd keep that.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Not the Sybian! by RubberDogBone · · Score: 0

      A Sybian is possibly the best thing a person can own. Either they get to enjoy it themselves, or their friends will drop by to enjoy it. It's a win either way. No downside.

      --
      Sig for hire.
    2. Re:Not the Sybian! by EdIII · · Score: 0

      Wait.. what?

      Enjoy it yourself? Are you "massaging" your prostate or something? Once you start doing that with "heavy equipment" it sounds like you are a couple drinks away from outsourcing that work to "consultants" you meet in a "bar".

      As for the friends dropping by to use it, I assume those are chicks. In that case you are just lazy. The chick will have a good time but you will look a dufus watching her from the couch.

      Take a hands on approach. Even if it is with modified power tools, get in there and do the job yourself. It's more rewarding that way.

  11. Google Video Search isn't going away by tepples · · Score: 2

    It's a damned good non-YouTube search engine.

    I read the featured articles, and it appears Google is not retiring Google Video Search. It's retiring Google Video hosting so that it can focus effort on Google Video Search: "As we said nearly three years ago, the Google Video team is now focused on tackling the challenge of video search."

  12. Onto NetVibes by PcItalian · · Score: 0

    After a quick BING search I found NetVibes which with some modifications had my homepage up and running mirrored from iGoogle. Fuk'em, google can lose my business... Back to Firefox too.

  13. but, my webcomics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I use igoogle to read webcomics. I don't know another service that I can access from anywhere and just load rss feeds onto.

    1. Re:but, my webcomics! by SJHillman · · Score: 1

      Like... Google Reader?

    2. Re:but, my webcomics! by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Reader is totally lame. When I heard this news, I thought to myself, 'well, time to take another look at Reader, maybe they made it not lame in time to retire iGoogle....' Nope. Nothing but a mash of items with some useless numbers next to them about how many things you haven't read. Most of the screen real estate is completely wasted and there's no setting to improve it.

      The whole reason that iGoogle's RSS widgets were so awesome is that you could pile tons of them on top of each other four columns deep. I could see, in an organized way, like two hundred headlines at once and not have to click on anything except what I cared about. Reader is too manual. I don't want to click on a dozen different things just to get huge bloated summaries of things I might not even want to read. It's inefficient, and I'm just not doing it. Bye Google, you sure know how to break people of a habit.

      Guess I'll look into this netvibes thing everybody is talking about.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    3. Re:but, my webcomics! by macshit · · Score: 1

      I think Google Reader's goal is very different than iGoogle's, so it's not a good replacement for it.

      Judged on its own merits, though, Reader's actually pretty nice (and has lots of fans, judging from the outcry the last time they changed its UI...).

      --
      We live, as we dream -- alone....
    4. Re:but, my webcomics! by s7uar7 · · Score: 1

      If you organise your feeds into folders in Reader you can view all items in each folder in one list.

    5. Re:but, my webcomics! by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Reader and iGoogle are really different tools with different functions.

      iGoogle is more about seeing what is going on right now. Reader is more about wanting to make sure you don't miss anything good.

      Your favorite once-a-day/week blog is a perfect thing to have in Reader - you'll easily keep track of what you've seen, and you can skim if you want to. If you stick CNN in Reader you end up with a feed that always has 5000 unread items in it, unless you spam the mark-all-read button every 15 minutes.

      CNN is a great thing to stick in iGoogle - you'll always see the current news. If you stick your favorite blog in there, then you'll miss articles since it won't keep them there until you read them.

      Both are useful tools, when used for their intended purpose. I don't really get dropping iGoogle. I don't use it, but I've run into several who do. It can't cost them much to operate - why not give people a reason to not make Bing their homepage?

  14. Not every cloud has a silver lining by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Cloud computing is always heavily promoted and it does have many advantages. However, it also has one significant disadvantage -- your computing environment is at the whim of whomever is providing said service. If you come to depend on a service and the provider cancels it, you can try and find a substitute or simply accept that you are out of luck.

    These services that Google is dropping, are not critical, but they could have been. Not every cloud has a silver lining, or even a chrome one.

    1. Re:Not every cloud has a silver lining by Bigby · · Score: 0

      And they are giving you a 1.5 year warning that these non-critical apps are retiring. That should be expected. I don't expect my phone to last 5 years. You shouldn't expect an online service to last more than 5 years. They retire for good reasons. Something else is there.

    2. Re:Not every cloud has a silver lining by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      If it was a local app it would last as long as you wanted it to last I think is the point.

  15. Because i's a patented letter? by k(wi)r(kipedia) · · Score: 2

    iDon't know, maybe Google's simply replaced the i with a +?

    1. Re:Because i's a patented letter? by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      WHAT THE FUCK is iGoogle! I thought I was a serious Google hipster until I heard of this and realized I didn't know what it was! WTF?!

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    2. Re:Because i's a patented letter? by DaleSwanson · · Score: 5, Funny

      WHAT THE FUCK is iGoogle! I thought I was a serious Google hipster until I heard of this and realized I didn't know what it was! WTF?!

      Maybe you should Google it?

    3. Re:Because i's a patented letter? by ryanmika · · Score: 1

      iGoogle yes, google replace with a+ http://palukursusdisain.blogspot.com/2012/05/988bet-agen-bola-untuk-prediksi-piala.html

  16. Why they killed the mini by snsh · · Score: 2

    Google started killing off the mini years ago when they stopped releasing software updates for it, and stopped updating the hardware.

    It's kind of disingenuous for Google to say the mini has an 'adequate' replacement. Google Custom Search doesn't give the admin nearly enough control. There's no way to guarantee all your pages will get included in the index, even if you're on a paid subscription. No keymatch functionality, no regex exclusions, no freshness tuning. And the Google Search Appliance costs over 10x the cost of the mini (starts at $45k instead of $3k). It's hard to call that a suitable replacement.

    The problem with the mini is that Google couldn't make enough money on it. It basically started out as a min-GSA, with less beefy hardware and a lower license page limit. Customers would buy it, deploy it, and forget about it. It worked great. Google thought that customers would migrate from the mini to the GSA, but I think what happened is once they had the mini they stayed with the mini for their public website, and many never saw the need to spend $$$$$ to upgrade to the GSA for enterprise search.

    At one point a few years ago, Google released a "VM edition" of the mini/gsa for development use. They quickly realized that VM was the wrong way to go because without the pretty hardware and cables they couldn't justify the cost of the GSA to customers, so they quietly cancelled the VM and all mention of it. Wish I had kept the copy I had downloaded.

  17. Ruined my day by Teknikal69 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    First thing I saw when I turned on my PC and I actually came from the Slashdot iGoogle widget.

    I've been using iGoogle since it first launched and it's really the only reason I use many of Googles services and also the only reason I bother logging into Google at all.

    Very disappointed in honesty I think I'll probably end up giving Bing a try simply because I can't think of anything else to replace it with.

    1. Re:Ruined my day by cis4 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The Slashdot widget on iGoogle is the only reason I come here. Here's to hoping someone will make a replacement.

    2. Re:Ruined my day by ninjacheeseburger · · Score: 1

      Dropping iGoogle support is probably one of their worst decisions ever why else would I even make google my home page?

      It probably doesn't directly make them money but if that's their reason for dropping it I might have to abandon gMail before that gets killed off.

  18. igoogle gone? .... meh! by glebovitz · · Score: 2

    I use iGoogle. I will miss it. I hope they will have something to replace it. IMHO, Google services always have the feel of something half finished. They are kinda like the anti Apple.

    1. Re:igoogle gone? .... meh! by icebraining · · Score: 1

      You mean the Apple who launched a phone without so much as copy-paste, not to mention third-party apps and many other features that were considered standard in every smartphone at the time?

  19. irritating by aikizensurfer · · Score: 1

    I've had iGoogle for 3 years and have just recently begun getting into the habit of using as my "daily paper" instead of relying on the ever-accurate Facebook =P now they're going to close it? Can they just hire me to update it into the latest hot Web Property? ;-(

  20. MyYahoo by MrEricSir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How about MyYahoo? iGoogle was a knockoff of 90's "personalized web portals" anyway, so why not go with the original?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:MyYahoo by jafiwam · · Score: 0

      Short answer: Yahoo sucks.

      Long answer: Yahoo sucks, is for retards, clutter is good in their eyes, heavy downloaded graphics is good in their eyes, the mail interface sucks, the shit pushes pop up windows, toolbars, and other faggotry, makes NOISES, etc.

      Fuck yahoo. I'll make my own fucking web page and hide it on my company web site in some deep nested folder before I use that monkey crap again.

  21. rss feeds -- that's all I use - alternatives? by 2centplain · · Score: 1
    I mostly have various rss feeds on my iGoogle home page. Very, very useful to quickly see what's happening on pages I pay attention to. (Like, Slashdot, of course.)

    I don't use many of the other gadgets/toys. Well, Weather Underground, Woot watcher, Google Finance are useful, but I could live without them.

    Are there alternative sites that provide a similar function?

    1. Re:rss feeds -- that's all I use - alternatives? by octothorpe99 · · Score: 0

      I mostly have various rss feeds on my iGoogle home page. Very, very useful to quickly see what's happening on pages I pay attention to.
      (Like, Slashdot, of course.)

      I don't use many of the other gadgets/toys. Well, Weather Underground, Woot watcher, Google Finance are useful, but I could live without them.

      Are there alternative sites that provide a similar function?

      Netvibes looks pretty decent actually.. Just created a dashboard full of rss feeds iGoogle-style. Bye google.

    2. Re:rss feeds -- that's all I use - alternatives? by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      i find google reader nice for reading all my rss feeds. but they may close it down, too.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    3. Re:rss feeds -- that's all I use - alternatives? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's widely used by tech journalists and bloggers (even if not by most of the general public). There will be holy hell if they drop it.

  22. Dammit!!!! by Yosho-sama · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I use iGoogle as my landing page. I have my email, slashdot, new york times, BBC, the weather, a sunlight map, wikipedia, and a pet hamster all on the same page. Where else am I going to get all that the second I open firefox?

    --
    My kingdom for a donkey!
    1. Re:Dammit!!!! by ferret4 · · Score: 1

      http://www.my.yahoo.com/ - although I doubt it'll have a gmail interface, just a ymail one.

  23. iGoogle. I used it and love it. by C_Kode · · Score: 5, Interesting

    iGoogle. Having all of your RSS feeds, your email feed, calendar, TODO list among a few other things. It is very useful and effective in what it does.

    There are several websites that post interesting items, but not enough to visit them every day. The RSS feed makes it were you don't have too. Combining it all with stuff you do use every day (email, calendar, todo list) makes iGoogle extremely useful.

    What I find is most people have tools at their finger tips that they have no idea how useful that tool actually is and therefore don't end up using it.

    iGoogle is useful, but like Google+ most people have no idea how to actually use it. (at least half-intelligent people are actually figuring out how to use Google+, that just doesn't seem to be the case for iGoogle)

    That ignorance is a loss for us all.

  24. I just keep waiting for the spring cleaning notice for GWT.

  25. iGoogle Replacement by paleo2002 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've been using iGoogle as my home page forever. Considering the broad range of services Google provides now - email, chat, voice services, etc. - you'd think they'd want to provide a central hub. I've got mine set up for some basic news headlines with sports, hollywood, and Fox filtered out. I also use it for local weather, Google Chat, and to manage account settings. I think I'll miss the news aggregator function the most.

    Any suggestions for a good generalized news aggregator? Something that will draw from a variety of sources and can be customized for topic preferences.

    1. Re:iGoogle Replacement by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Netvibes

    2. Re:iGoogle Replacement by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      No good. Netvibes is an RSS site. I just want a list of sports scores (not stories about scores, just the scores), a weather widget, a time and date widget(not essential, just convenient sometimes), and an email widget that shows the most recent emails in one of my gmail account (or yahoo). Maybe its time to see if I can configure My.yahoo like that. Last time I tried, the closest I could come was my yahoo mail and the weather.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    3. Re:iGoogle Replacement by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      And the fact that Netvibes also supports RSS feeds makes you not want to use all those other gadgets it has that you said you want?

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    4. Re:iGoogle Replacement by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      If it has them, it needs to put them where I can find them.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    5. Re:iGoogle Replacement by paleo2002 · · Score: 1

      Just looked at Netvibes. Its a social media aggregator with news feeds from Yahoo and Bing (bleck). I put in "science" as my starter topic and it comes back with thousands of forum posts and blog entries. I'm not interested in what forum trolls and paid sock puppets think about the LHC press conference. I'd like to read about the contents of the press conference.

      I'm looking for something that draws on actual news sources like AP, Christian Science Monitor, the Guardian, CNN, etc. without me having to open a dozen web pages and sift through their individual interfaces. I guess I need to learn to use GoogleNews and then open up a few other pages for weather, chat, etc.

      Maybe I need to ask a broader question: If having a personalized home page is obsolete, what's the new way to see all the basic information you're interested in one place?

    6. Re:iGoogle Replacement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Netvibes does what you want. It can follow any RSS feed, although it has a zillion it already knows about. I use it to aggregate headlines from the BBC, Guardian, New York Times, Foreign Affairs, etc. I started with My Netscape, went to My Yahoo, thence to Google Reader, and now I'm on Netvibes. I'm very happy with it.

      I'm not sure what you're finding so hard about it; I just click the "add widgets" button and search, or more commonly, just paste an RSS link.

    7. Re:iGoogle Replacement by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Having a personal page is not obsolete. However, Netvibes is much more usefull when configured manually instead of using one of their preset pages. The preset pages give you information overload. My netvibes page has the local weather, USA today, Wallstreet Journal, Slashdot, Stocks, my Google calendar, Gmail and other pop3 accounts, plus FB and a few others. It really looks and acts pretty much like an iGoogle page.

    8. Re:iGoogle Replacement by paleo2002 · · Score: 1

      Alright, on further inspection Netvibes does appear to have the same functionality as iGoogle. Just took some poking around to figure out how it works. The edit buttons for the feed widgets were not visible for me in the default theme so I couldn't figure out how to edit or delete content initially.

      Good recommendation. Now I'm ready for when iGoogle goes dark . . . in November of 2013.

  26. Really? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    And they are giving you a 1.5 year warning that these non-critical apps are retiring. That should be expected. I don't expect my phone to last 5 years. You shouldn't expect an online service to last more than 5 years. They retire for good reasons. Something else is there.

    You miss the point. Yes, these are relatively trivial services, but that doesn't mean that cloud providers can'tor won't drop more important services. You maynot expect an online service to last more than 5 years, but most businesses do.

    1. Re:Really? by Manfre · · Score: 2

      This expectation is easily proven by the many businesses that still keep IE6 around because of a business critical web site that requires it.

    2. Re:Really? by theArtificial · · Score: 1

      You miss the point.

      Seems to me that if you're a business who is dependent upon 3rd parties for your core services you're at their mercy. Why even involve a 3rd party? Doing things in house takes expertise, time and money and many businesses seem to find it cheaper in the short run to lease expertise and equipment and outsource operations. This situation underlines some of drawbacks of not doing things yourself (as a company).

      Yes, these are relatively trivial services, but that doesn't mean that cloud providers can'tor won't drop more important services.

      And why are they dropping the service? /. seems to think Google is unable to monetize iGoogle. Google is providing useful yet free service, not a paid service. Paid services typically involve a contract which cover items like availability, which as a business you're able to make plans around.

      You maynot expect an online service to last more than 5 years, but most businesses do.

      I don't know many successful businesses which base their day to day operations off of free 3rd party services with no service agreements. They've got bigger issues if their entire business model revolves around iGoogle wouldn't you say?

      --
      Man blir trött av att gå och göra ingenting.
    3. Re:Really? by dkf · · Score: 2

      You miss the point. Yes, these are relatively trivial services, but that doesn't mean that cloud providers can'tor won't drop more important services. You maynot expect an online service to last more than 5 years, but most businesses do.

      But you miss the point. If it is important to you that a service be there, you should be willing to pay for it (or support it in other ways). If you're willing to pay, you're going to find someone willing to take your money and provide the service. It might not be the original provider of the service, but nobody ever promised you that. What's more, you've got plenty of notice of the discontinuation of the service by the current provider, time enough to find a replacement. (If you have irreplaceable data in the service — shame on you if you do! — then it is a very good day to start backing that data up to something you control directly. But that was true a day ago, a week ago, a month ago, and a year ago too.)

      Expecting a service to "just be there" while costing nothing to you is unreasonable. It's even unreasonable on the internet (shock! horror!) and the Cloud is just a label for virtualized services provided over the internet.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    4. Re:Really? by vlm · · Score: 1

      Doing things in house takes expertise, time and money and many businesses seem to find it cheaper in the short run to lease expertise and equipment and outsource operations.

      And if its critical business infrastructure they're outsourcing, then they're walking dead.

      I've worked on both sides as provider and seller of software as a service.

      If its part of your core competency and a critical path in your processes, like say, a translation service bureau who accepts emails in one language -> (magic happens) -> sends out translated documents in email, you'd have to be out of your mind insane to outsource email. Been there seen the carnage.

      On the other hand if its just something you kinda use, like say a heavy equipment repair service who outsources email, that is business genius because email doesn't really directly matter to the business.

      Give it a standard /. analogy. Lets talk about outsourcing tightening bolts. Well for a automobile manufacturer, outsourcing bolt tightening would be pretty moronic, thats kind of a core competency out on the assembly line. On the other hand, for a two truck sized florist delivery service, hiring out for mechanical service probably makes a lot of business sense.

      Lets say you're a premium burger restaurant, midwesterners know what "culvers" is, and I guess the flyover coastal areas have their premium chains too. Outsourcing burger frying to McDonalds would not be terribly wise, no matter how much money it saves short term. Now outsourcing electrical repair work, that makes business sense.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    5. Re:Really? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Google mini is a paid for service.

    6. Re:Really? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it doesn't matter if it is paid for or not. The risk still exists. Say for instance your company standardizes on Google Docs (and pays for it) instead of purchasing Microsoft Office. Three years from now Google drops Docs. What do you do? If you had gone with Office, your installed versions are still good (look at all of the businesses still running IE 6, because they depend on it for applications).

      Cloud computing, when relying on third parties, is full of risk because you are at the mercy of those third parties. Basically, with the cloud, a business is paying for a service instead of a tangible product. As such, the vendor doesn't need to provide that service indefinitely and when they quit offering it, the business is sol. Sure they could host their own cloud, but what of the millions of small businesses that don't have the resources to do that?

    7. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What of the businesses that outsource payroll to ADP? That outsource their call centers? That outsource their insurance? That outsource accounting? That outsource IT?

      If any of the companies they rely on to provide a service go out of business, they don't have a tangible product to fall back on.

      It's a risk of outsourcing in general, and is not unique to software.

  27. Forgive my ignorance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but why do google do this? Why don't they keep them around, and improve them, or roll them into something bigger?

    Seems to me that if something isn't an instant hit, they kill it off eventually.

  28. Replacement by n30na · · Score: 1

    I've used iGoogle for years as my base place for reading news and checking up on things when i get to my computer, and always keep it open as my first browser tab..

    Does anyone have any good suggestions for a replacement? I have a good while to find one so I suppose I might even be able to write one by then, but might as well see what exists already.

    1. Re:Replacement by SilentSheep · · Score: 1

      http://www.netvibes.com/ seems to be the alternative that most people are suggesting.

      --
      .
  29. Spring Scape by John.P.Jones · · Score: 1

    I'll miss spring scape, watching frog & ladybug go through their day was great.

  30. Ahh, Crap by Thinine · · Score: 1

    Now what will my Mom use for a homepage? It checks her gmail, stocks, weather, and offers a translator. What will she do now? TELL ME GOOGLE, WHAT WILL SHE DO NOW?!

  31. Foolish by Charliemopps · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've used iGoogle for years because I spend most of my day in a corporate environment. It put everything I needed on 1 page... Google... which I was almost expected to visit regularly. So I'd pop it up, I could see my email, the temperature, CNN news, and even slashdot. In fact, I read this story first through iGoogle. Can I use Chrome and its extensions to do this like they suggest? No... my web client is fixed, and I can't add extensions at work. The idea that we're moving away from web based apps to browser based, local plugins it insane to me. What is this? 1999?

    1. Re:Foolish by lexman098 · · Score: 1

      It's all about the apps! Chrome has a market now haven't you heard? Get with the times grandpa! Nevermind portability...

  32. Roll your own, it's easy by seandiggity · · Score: 2

    If you have access to a web server, there are a number of ways to set something similar up yourself. I've done it at seandiggity.com using WordPress + Aggregator theme + some extra plugins. There are definitely simpler ways, but I like the flexibility of WordPress's widgets.

    --
    Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
    1. Re:Roll your own, it's easy by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, there are much better things to do with my spare time than constantly patch my home page as various sites change their API/interface.

    2. Re:Roll your own, it's easy by seandiggity · · Score: 1

      Like comment on /. eh? ;)

      In all seriousness, I just log into WordPress and change a URL if a feed stops working, something you'd have to do with any RSS reader as well. It doesn't have all the "gadgets" that iGoogle had, but I only found myself using the news feeds anyway.

      Anything that can be a WordPress widget you could display as well, so you could do a lot more with it than I do, and still the only maintenance is keeping your plugins and WordPress core updated (trivial nowadays).

      It's certainly not more maintenance than iGoogle, where the gadgets had the same flaw you're pointing out: they relied upon other websites for content, if those websites or Google sloppily changed something, the gadget broke.

      Sure, you have to install WordPress and do the initial configuration, and that takes time...I do it for a living so it's not a big deal to me. As far as maintenance is concerned, however, I have just spent more time replying to you than I have on that WordPress installation in (at least) 6 months.

      --
      Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
  33. Re:iGoogle. I used it and love it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use iGoogle too. Looks like a lot of slashdotters do. Seems like odd timing. They just changed the layout recently.

    They're suggesting Chrome-only solutions that you have to install locally, so they have none of the advantages of a webpage which I can easily use at work, at my parents' house, at my house, etc., change in one of those places and be reflected everywhere, and so on. And a separate mobile-only solution (it never occurred to me to use iGoogle on my phone; I already use apps for that).

    Disappointing.

  34. Good. Google Does Only One Thing Well Anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and that's its search results. The thing that Google used to do superbly was have the cleanest and most efficient interface for searching of any search engine: A single line search field with a "Go" button. They fucked that up with autocomplete and cookies and javascript and yadda yadda yadda to the point where I can't even use it anymore. I switched to ddg.gg and have stayed with it even though its results suck compared to google's. I just couldn't take google's front end anymore.

    1. Re:Good. Google Does Only One Thing Well Anymore by Exrio · · Score: 1

      Try startpage.com - Google-based results, similar privacy to DDG, no-nonsense interface works fine in Dillo ('nuff said).

  35. WHERE?? by tcc3 · · Score: 1

    All of these reasoned arguments for the practical application of igoogle are fine, but I ask you: Where will my Hamster live? Where?!?!

  36. netvibes.com by Sturm · · Score: 1

    I spent about 15 minutes and was able to get netvibes.com to look almost *exactly* like my iGoogle page.
    I've been using iGoogle since, well, EVER since... I couldn't imagine doing without that kind of aggregator service as my homepage.
    Anybody looking for a replacement for iGoogle should definitely give netvibes.com a try. It's worth the few minutes it takes to duplicate everything.

  37. Bad move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google killed Desktop Search too that was the best search tool for Windows OS. Now they kill the best home page. I am sure a small company will step in with a replacement for iGoogle if Google plays nice or is it the new MS?

  38. Google Reader by slasho81 · · Score: 1

    Now I'm fearing for Google Reader, which I use all the time. Google hasn't updated it for years, so it's just a matter of time before it is "spring cleaned".

    1. Re:Google Reader by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Now I'm fearing for Google Reader, which I use all the time. Google hasn't updated it for years, so it's just a matter of time before it is "spring cleaned".

      Wasn't there a big to-do a few months back over them integrating its social features with Google+ instead of keeping them standalone?

    2. Re:Google Reader by slasho81 · · Score: 1

      They removed the old sharing functions from Reader and replaced them with Google+. It wasn't really an update. Some even consider it as stunting Reader because they had their social network in Reader and then they lost it. As far as I know, all the employees who worked on Reader were removed from working on it years ago, and there are no plans for doing any work on it in the future.

    3. Re:Google Reader by BurningFeetMan · · Score: 1

      Don't say that... I've just started using it as a temporary measure until I find something that fits the groove that iGoogle is leaving!

  39. google not às cool as they used to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fn bean counters ruin everything they touch. Don't let the door hit you on your way out.

  40. Google does this all the time by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

    I think Google must drop more than half the stuff it starts. It does make me especially confident to rely on Google service.

    I agree, why drop this? Has it not been successful?

  41. I don't think it's a matter of "ignorance" by Sturm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a matter of fact, the tech site forums are loaded with people bemoaning the demise of iGoogle.
    One of the things that Google is really good at is analytics. They KNOW how many people are using iGoogle.
    That leads me to believe they are shuttering it not because of lack of use but rather because TOO many people are using it. They obviously believe they are losing "clicks" or as some others have stated, they are trying to herd us into using some bastardized version of Google+ they have yet to release.
    Google has been pretty good about living up to the whole, "Do no evil" thing so I'm hoping we all wake up in a few days/week and read on our shiny new netvibes.com homepage that Google has changed their mind about dropping iGoogle.
    Dropping iGoogle might not be totally "evil" but it will definitely make me think twice before using any other new Google-branded services they release in the future.

    1. Re:I don't think it's a matter of "ignorance" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well they're going to lose a lot of clicks when users stop using it altogether.

      The thing I liked most, besides the obvious RSS feeds, mail, weather, etc. was the ability to create boxes based around search terms. I've had four separate widgets for each of the major Detroit sports teams, all showing three articles at a time. Depending on which season it is, I could move the boxes around so the more relevant teams are more accessible. Now instead of visiting google multiple times a day and using it as a launcpad for many of my regular activities, I'll be forced to find an alternative. Less visits, less clicks, less revenue. Thinking I'll just jump to Google+ as my alternative is laughable, and I really hope they have some foresight to what this will do.

    2. Re:I don't think it's a matter of "ignorance" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Sigh*

      Nerds and their conspiracy theories when something they don't like happens. You've backed a product that is considered a failure and that is a massive body blow to your ego. As such a smart person you can't possibly be wrong so it must be a conspiracy.

      Maybe Google KNOW how many people use iGoogle and despite the claims of a "load of nerds" (who are not usually a good measure of the habits of the general population) not enough people are using it to warrant spending time/money offering and supporting it. I guess moving with the times only applies when it gives nerds free shit rather than taking it away?

    3. Re:I don't think it's a matter of "ignorance" by fnj · · Score: 1

      Google has been LESS good about living up to "do no evil" lately. In fact it's easy to imagine google as a mad bastard, a kind of Magic Christian Guy Grand eccentric billionaire, cackling and rubbing its hands over how it is pissing people off lately.

    4. Re:I don't think it's a matter of "ignorance" by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Seriously? Google is evil because they don't want to support a free service that is probably burning cash?

      Sigh. And people call file sharers entitled.

  42. i'll miss Google video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i can easily search for content over 20 minutes long on Google video, last day, week or month ..
    i think these filters should be made to work properly on Youtube.. dammit. gonna be stuck to working with Youtubes
    shitty filters :(

  43. Re:Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is really fascinating people. Created by himself with a staff is developing with each passing day. You Can have a look on google.
    http://www.vayoog.com/notebook-yedek-parca.html

    Monk Google Vayoog sits in the Yedek desert. Each day, he draws a few symbols in the sand with his Parca staff... some days, the rain comes, and obliterates much of his work; but he will rewrite it, better than before. Someday, he knows a long dry spell will come, and he will finish developing. The code will be complete, and the world will finally know the search engine it has longed for. Well, that or a really snazzy breakout clone.

  44. We're growing apart, Google. by dhaines · · Score: 5, Funny

    You seem really withdrawn and distant. It's that gossipy jerk Facebook, isn't it?

    Our iGoogle times were great. Remember how we discovered new things with Reader, how we built our lives around Calendar? And wow, you were really good in search!

    But you've changed, Google. I don't mind that you're heavier, but this diet is like cutting off your legs to lose weight. And frankly, you're kind of clingy.

    So let's just be friends. I'll still see ya around Maps, and maybe we can catch an image search sometime. Your tracking will always be with me.

    Sorry I missed you at Plus, I came by but no one was there.

    1. Re:We're growing apart, Google. by kramulous · · Score: 1

      Nice.

      --
      .
    2. Re:We're growing apart, Google. by Lifyre · · Score: 1

      Very nice.

      --
      I'll meet you at the intersection of "Should be" and "Reality"
    3. Re:We're growing apart, Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Like!"
      ROTFLMAO!

  45. It's a web page, not a cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has nothing to do with "cloud computing". This is simply a website that decided to stop offering a service.

    It's a free service, there's no SLA, these things happen.

  46. iGoogle Replaced by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been an iGoogle user for over a year now, and My Yahoo for years before that. I love(d) both because I could have the same homepage on any computer, with quick access to my RSS feeds, top 5 websites, simple weather, etc.

    So when I got the news that iGoogle was going away, I was pretty dismayed. I left My Yahoo because of the abundance of advertising and wasted screen space.

    After a little searching, I found that MSN offers a service nearly identical to iGoogle without the plethora of widgets. It's called "My MSN" and is at http://my.msn.com.

    The interface is the same as the other portals, and I've currently got my Slashdot RSS feed along with about a dozen others, weather, favorite links, and local movie times. It supports "tabs" (multiple pages) but I don't use them.

    1. Re:iGoogle Replaced by jafiwam · · Score: 2

      As much as I hate to say this, My.MSN.com seems to have basically a clone of iGoogle. Anybody wondering about it, should go look at it and try the "Customize" and "Add Content" features. I found everything I use on iGoogle there.

      I don't use an MSN email box, but could add Gmail as a bookmark easily enough, that's how I use it in iGoogle now anyway.

      Plus, switching from Google to Microsoft over this will be an appropriate "FUCK YOU RIGHT BACK COCKSUCKER" to the folks over at Google for fucking with something that's actually useful.

  47. Coincidence? by DrEasy · · Score: 1

    Just yesterday I decided to give up on iGoogle, as I hated the fact that I couldn't use it while using a different YouTube account in the same browser. Much as I don't mind them logging and datamining everything I do (to some extent), I don't like them to correlate my calendar, my email information AND the silly videos I might want to watch. So the Google/YouTube consolidation did it for me, and I returned (unhappily) to My Yahoo. Too bad, as I really liked having Google Calendar and its to do list so readily available. Now with iGoogle being retired I really can't regret my decision. But Yahoo Calendar is ugly and its to-do list sucks. Netvibes looks promising, so I'll give it a shot.

    --
    "In our tactical decisions, we are operating contrary to our strategic interest."
  48. iGoogle is my homepage! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't have a smartphone anymore. I prefer just normal dialing on my phone. I know too much about technology and the government to trust a smartphone.

    But iGoogle is my homepage. I use it everyday and I go to it all the time. I have four iGoogle pages setup for my use. One for work, one for travel, one for everyday, and one for the gamer in me. I think that chrome is a great browser, but is still far away from ideal...meanwhile iGoogle is ideal.

    So much for "progress".

  49. Please Sign this petition to save iGoogle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please sign the petition to save iGoogle.
    http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/dont-kill-the-igoogle-webportal.html
    And let anyone you think might be interested in saving iGoogle about it.
    Thank You.

  50. Ironically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... I read about this *from* iGoogle :(

    I'm kinda sad. iGoogle has been my collection of news and rss feeds, available from any computer and everywhere, which has been a bliss as I have to use multiple computers at work, and 3 at home too.

  51. Re: iGoogle will be missed... definitely!!!! by David_Hart · · Score: 4, Insightful

    iGoogle has been my home page for years as well. I check my email, news, sports, slashdot, woot, weather, traffic, movie times, network tools, etc. all in one interface. I'm going to be very sad to see it go. Those that never used it missed out on a good app that could be used to consolidate a bunch of information in one place.

    Does anyone have any suggestions as to what might be a good replacement?

  52. Re:iGoogle. I used it and love it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who are you to say what is the right way for someone else to use them? while google+ could be argued to have some social rules on behavior - due to interaction between people, igoogle is purely giving the user what they set it up to give them... how can they do that "wrong"?

  53. Re: iGoogle will be missed... definitely!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Those that never used it missed out on a good app that could be used to consolidate a bunch of information in one place.

    The alternative view is that those who never used it missed out on yet another opportunity to inform Google of their personal preferences and usage patterns...

    To many people iGoogle was irrelevant because they don't see the point of signing-in to search the web and don't use other Google services.

  54. And this is exactly why I haven't gone to Google+ by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

    I understand that it's a business decision and I don't begrudge them that, I'm just not interested in taking a lot of my time to develop a presence on their social network only to have them decide that it's not making the kind of revenue they want and killing it.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  55. Re: iGoogle will be missed... definitely!!!! by SpzToid · · Score: 1

    Managing News is fairly easy to setup and configure yourself. It is LAMP, free, and open-source.

    http://managingnews.com/

    I prefer iGoogle, but I'll probably move to MN now; especially because I always wanted to tweak the fonts & display for use on my own mobile devices. Google is giving me the push I needed, even though my to-do list is big enough as it is. At least they're giving me time to get it done. Thanks Google!

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  56. Ditto.... by pivot_enabled · · Score: 1

    So I start using a Google facility and then they kill it? I was happy to switch away from my.yahoo (got tired of yahoo constantly trying to add crapware to my machine) once I got iGoogle all set up. I guess I will search for a non-google replacement.

    1. Re:Ditto.... by Endovior · · Score: 1

      Yeah, really. Been playing around with a few alternatives... netvibes.com seems pretty close to what I'm looking for in most respects, but their Gmail app is really terrible compared to Google's (perhaps unsurprisingly), since it just gives you a short listing of unread messages only, that doesn't actually let you read the whole message, like the iGoogle app does. Maybe they'll get better before Google sinks their own ship, maybe not... or maybe the minimalism of their app appeals to you, who knows? It'd be worth the effort for you fellow lamenters to check it out, at the very least.

  57. ok so the best replacement...... by jafffacake · · Score: 2

    So I can replace iGoogle with netvibes, we've established that. I'd now like to know how to let google know how displeased I am about their decision to cancel iGoogle. Does anyone have a link I can use to rant at google? I looked around google's help pages for a little while, with no success :-(

    1. Re:ok so the best replacement...... by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Informative

      So I can replace iGoogle with netvibes, we've established that. I'd now like to know how to let google know how displeased I am about their decision to cancel iGoogle. Does anyone have a link I can use to rant at google? I looked around google's help pages for a little while, with no success :-(

      http://www.change.org/petitions/google-don-t-kill-igoogle#

    2. Re:ok so the best replacement...... by Chrisq · · Score: 1
  58. Petition by piles · · Score: 1

    It seems time for a petition. Anyone caring for setting this up?

  59. Quickly! Steal all the CSS! by rebelwarlock · · Score: 1

    The only difference between iGoogle and a dashboard you could write yourself is how it looks. Just yoink all the CSS while it's still up, and make yourself a replacement.

  60. Apple or Google? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    My wife uses iGoogle on her macbook in Safari. Now I suppose she will just use the apple provided desktop widgets.

  61. Re: iGoogle will be missed... definitely!!!! by dewatf · · Score: 2

    I have found iGoogle very useful. Having one tab where I can quickly check email, calendar, weather, docs, to do list etc.and then launch from there only if needed has been very efficient. It means I don't have to use notifications so can ignore stuff when until I quickly want to check then see everything with one click. It is the same on my desktop, laptop and all the different Windows, MacOs and Linux computers in different browsers at work with no hassles or involvement from IT. And it is launched when ever you start the browser or click on the home page icon.

    The thing is that not enough people used it for Google to be bothered supporting it and the current trend is to stand alone apps because there is no point in doing anything else on phones and tablets. Sure I can stick a lot of different applications in shortcuts on desktops or run apps in multiple tabs but it will be much less inconvenient. Having everything automatically open in one tab with a sensible layout was the whole point.

    Interestingly I tried changing my homepage from iGoogle to Google Search to see what life will be like without iGoogle, but when you try to automatically open search as your homepage it still defaults to iGoogle, part of Google's attempts to promote the service.

  62. Hmmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be coming up to the Q2 earnings conference call.

    Q1 cost me Google Code. And cost them some stock price.

  63. Complain to Google directly by Squeeself · · Score: 1

    Those of you, like me, who use iGoogle and are mad that Google's dropping it with no good alternative, please voice your complaints on their product forums and raise the volume a bit: http://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/websearch/3SDRsOMBonA/discussion

  64. igoogle rarely censored by jago25_98 · · Score: 2

    one really good thing about igoogle was that I never saw it censored by sysadmins. what I've found is you have to use the services that they use but don't tell you about and this was one of them.

    personally I won't miss google video but talkback is a shame and isn't mini a major shock for websites that use it?

  65. Nervous about email by Geeky · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's things like this that make me - and possibly small businesses - nervous about email and the other google apps products

    While it's unlikely they'd ever kill gmail, it makes it harder to make a case to bet the farm on google. Shame there's no really viable alternative to email with a half decent web interface (animated ads flickering in the corner of my eye annoy the hell out of me and I don't want to jump through ad-blocking hoops on every PC I ever use).

    So iGoogle might not be a big product, but it's visible enough (unlike maybe some of the smaller products they've killed) to make potential users pause.

    --
    Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  66. Google Now by montyzooooma · · Score: 2

    Just wondering if getting rid of iGoogle, which I was never a fan of but which didn't seem heinous either, has anything to do with the "Google Now" app on Android.

  67. YOU CAN'T MONETIZE IGOOGLE?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How big of a moron do you have to BE Google?

    Seriously, you SUCK as an advertiser. Actually seriously suck. You are the reason your own services are killed off. YOU.
    How can you not possibly monetize iGoogle with such space? HOW?!
    Why haven't I got a job yet? Eh Google? Why? I'm obviously smarter than your entire advertising team. And sadly I don't think I am being sarcastic anymore.

  68. Re: iGoogle will be missed... definitely!!!! by vlm · · Score: 1

    MN looks polished. You sure its a iGOOG replacement? Looks more like a reader.google.com replacement.
    I skimmed the website and its basically "feedonfeeds" from 199x or reader.google.com from 200x with a optional map display, written in drupal.
    Is there more to it that I missed in my skimming?
    If not, as a test you could set reader.goog as your home page, and if you catch yourself saying "a map would make this better" then do the MN thing.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
  69. Too sad too bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been using iGoogle since what feels like forever... back when they only had the teahouse and a few other themes. You won't believe how crazy are about the teahouse theme... just go read the comments everytime Google screwed up the theme or layout:

    http://www.google.com/ig/directory?dpos=top&root=%2Fig&url=www.gstatic.com%2Fig%2Fthemes%2Fteahouse%2Fteahouse.xml&type=themes

    There are already comments bemoaning the end of iGoogle.

    If anyone at Google reads this - why kill iGoogle? It is the only reason I stay logged in with my Google account. No iGoogle? No more constant logging in. No more tracking for you etc.

  70. Because they're private by tepples · · Score: 1

    First, there was Google's decision to stop new uploads. Second, there was Google's decision to delete all videos in one fell swoop, which was reversed. Third, there is Google's decision to copy all videos to YouTube as private videos and then delete them. They will be private on YouTube even if they were public on Google Video. AT might take issue with the fact that they'll be taken private, and a lot of uploaders aren't going to be around to make them public again.

    1. Re:Because they're private by cboslin · · Score: 1

      First, there was Google's decision to stop new uploads. Second, there was Google's decision to delete all videos in one fell swoop, which was reversed. Third, there is Google's decision to copy all videos to YouTube as private videos and then delete them. They will be private on YouTube even if they were public on Google Video. AT might take issue with the fact that they'll be taken private, and a lot of uploaders aren't going to be around to make them public again.

      This sounds familiar with what they are doing to Youtubers. If you create content and point to a URL and they delete, move the content that URL points to, you are left with what?

      Add to that the public / private issue and whats the point.

      To add insult to injury, should someone wishing to censor information you have pointed to in links from your blog, content, website, etc... all they have to do is put in a DRM / DCMA take down request and those supporting links to your content are useless. Do you cache a copy? If not, what are you left with?

      Feels wrong in many ways... another chip of TRUST gone.

  71. Re: iGoogle will be missed... definitely!!!! by SpzToid · · Score: 1

    I've only dabbled with it to date, but I spend a lot of time working as a Drupal developer so my understanding of it is decent. It is Drupal server software; what is called a 'distribution' of Drupal, or a flavor. If Drupal were Lego, then those 'Boeing 747 Lego-thangs' would be like a specialized Lego 'distribution' akin to one derived from Drupal; and released as open-source.

    I hadn't really thought about it, but it is probably more like Google Reader than iGoogle when you really think about it. Also, like I read later in the thread NetVibes might make a better, more-close-to-iGoogle replacement. Still, for tinkerers Managing News is kinda neat.

    Feed sources come from whatever RSS feeds you input. I don't think it comes with any, or if it does, they are *minimal*. As I recall it is super easy to allow it to use Google/ Gmaps to do a little geolocation of the news articles, so you can look at a pinpoint display, to see I don't know, trending airplane crashes or something.

    If you wanted to re-publish some of the collected feed-nodes by editing and publishing it yourself, then MN becomes more valuable.

    There's a Drupal module (that is not difficult to add), which recreates the little iGoogle squares. Oh wow, I haven't seen this in ages, it looks perfect. It is called HomeBox. https://drupal.org/project/homebox. Now I think you're ready to provide your own cloud solution which competes against both iGoogle and NetVibes. Well, NetVibes *is* pretty slick, so you'll need to pour some elbow grease into, but you've got a good start I think.

    --
    You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
  72. Netvibes is blocked by Chrisq · · Score: 2

    Netvibes is blocked by my employer's firewall ;-(

    1. Re:Netvibes is blocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      try protopage.com . How is that?

  73. meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love my igoogle page. I've got slashdot, google reader, my calendar, my docs, my email, headlines, etc. It's nice and convenient. So stupid of them to get rid of it.

  74. I use iGoogle all the time by MGROOP · · Score: 1

    iGoogle is my homepage. It is a very convenient way to display everything I want to see as soon as I open my browser. It has the news, the weather, my email, my calendar, some of my favorite rss feeds and much more. It is the perfect jumping point into the web.

    I signed the change petition. I doubt it will change Google's mind, but this is the internet and I need to rant.
    http://www.change.org/petitions/google-don-t-kill-igoogle

  75. original iGoogle engineer == artist by Darf+Bobo · · Score: 1

    I attended a workshop with the person who developed iGoogle. She's a fantastically interesting person who creates works of art that often incorporate computers and programming, like code that sings itself.

  76. Re: iGoogle will be missed... definitely!!!! by insnprsn · · Score: 1

    iGoogle wasnt about signing in to search the web. In fact you don't even have to sign in to use iGoogle as an RSS reader or any of its many widgets.

  77. RIP Google Video Search by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    It's a pity Google's video search now only searches YouTube. The one thing I now use Bing for is it's cross-site video search. Yesterday I was searching for a clip of Bond flying Little Nellie. Turns out the best one was on TCM - Bing found it, Google didn't.

  78. Contact them via Phone and let them know by Destructo-Bot · · Score: 1

    Here is Google's contact number, give em a ring and let them know that they shouldn't be canning iGoogle. Anyone have an email address of someone higher up in the organization?

    United States
    Google Inc.
    1600 Amphitheatre Parkway
    Mountain View, CA 94043
    Phone: +1 650-253-0000
    Fax: +1 650-253-0001

  79. percentage cut? by baxrob · · Score: 1

    I'd love to see a percentage (killed projects vs total google projects), attached to these periodic google "spring cleaning" stories. The total would have to be somewhat hypothetical, but ... I just use gmail, reader, and 'drive', and the top nav bar is way crowded from my perspective. I'd bet most goog.users would just make vastly different housekeeping decisions. ... Never forget: features and choices are a /cost/. (Though, all those terms are relative)

  80. iGoogle by ThePhilips · · Score: 1

    LOL

    I would have used iGoogle - and probably many others - if Google hadn't decided to f*ck up its appearance and behavior few years back. There were lots of flames on Google forums.

    The iGoogle of 5-6 years ago was probably the best start page I ever had: fast loading, easy on eye design and most importantly useful.

    The later iGoogle (with the unmovable bar on the left) looked like meh and some things also started behaving the same.

    But it was all for the sake of the progress - as Google developers always tell us. And now they kill it.... LOL. They should restore from back-up the older version, make the "no more f*ck-ups" promise and I'm pretty sure many users would go back to using it.

    P.S. I hope they wouldn't drop the old HTML-only GMail view. (Link to it they have already removed.) Or I would have to start looking for a new e-mail service too...

    --
    All hope abandon ye who enter here.
  81. Video Search on Google by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    It's a pity Google's video search now only searches YouTube

    Would be if it was true, but its not even close. Google's video search searches the web, not just YouTube.

    Yesterday I was searching for a clip of Bond flying Little Nellie. Turns out the best one was on TCM - Bing found it, Google didn't.

    Doing a search with terms "James Bond" "Little Nellie" on Bing I get 33 results, 25 of which are from YouTube, and none of which are "from TCM" (by the site -- actual root source of the video, maybe). Same search on Google Videos gets "about 67,400 results", from a wider array (from just the first few pages) of sources than Bing's,

  82. protopage.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another alternative to iGoogle is www.protopage.com . Check it out!

  83. conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On a related link: "Iran Reverse Engineers Cobra Attack Helicopter"

  84. Reader? by rusl · · Score: 1

    I don't even know what Google Reader is let alone want to jump ship to it. I don't want to read more stuff, that is for sure. I like that iGoogle organises the stuff I need to look at so it is less daunting. This is a counter intuitive type of progress for the Google.

    --
    Stupidity is its own reward.
  85. Fork it! by rusl · · Score: 1

    Let's fork it back into Google Labs! I don't care it it's made a little more technically demanding to setup.

    Google should be nationalised and all the code put GPL so that we can fork things we need and they don't have to try and "monetize" away all usefulness.

    --
    Stupidity is its own reward.
  86. Way to go, Google! by photonyx · · Score: 1

    What's in line for the next "spring cleaning"? Gmail? Sure! And while you are at it, don't forget to spring clean that pesky search engine, which shows some idiotic unrelated results every single time I search for something that is not in a kindergartener's vocabulary!

  87. Netvibes by zerofoo · · Score: 1

    I've switched to Netvibes.com - their free service is pretty good - better than iGoogle in some ways.

    -ted

  88. Re: iGoogle will be missed... definitely!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Netvibes is very similar to iGoogle

  89. Re: iGoogle will be missed... definitely!!!! by dufachi · · Score: 1

    I am checking out Netvibes as a replacement.

    --
    -Kinsey
  90. You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everyone here is a cunt.

  91. Maybe life in the cloud is not that fluffy. by dinther · · Score: 1

    (Re-post because I posted in the wrong thread)

    I have taken to cloud storage in a big way and mostly quite like the convenience of it. But increasingly I am now forced to react whenever someone sneezes in Mountain View and decides to shut down something. I was affected by Google Pages to which I had links from all over the internet. I had some software downloads on that and the new Google sites is useless. It is not so much having to move my files, the problem is that other things link to it. Documentation refers to it. In the case of my free software, I could not be bothered to move the web-pages over to my server so I just deleted the whole lot. So, I you needed normal map correction software, Lightning fast image sharing through IM you are now missing out on my free software.

    I used Buzz a little, it got shutdown too. Not too much of an issue but I was considering to put effort in creating a decent following on it. Glad I didn't. Also glad I never jumped on the Google Wave bandwagon either.

    However, I have used iGoogle from the moment it became available and right until today that is my dashboard. The default home page on all my computers.
    In one view I can see my appointments, emails, slashdot, bookmarks, chat, Google menu bar and recent google documents. Where else can I have that?

    So, now they shut that down and I am forced to change the way I do things to their time schedule. And this is really the tip of the iceberg. On Google+ I have a personal and business page. Growing a following takes effort and time but what if they shut that down? In a smaller sense the cloud is also starting to show the downsides.

    They are forever "improving" the user interface experience. This means that from one month to the next I am never quite sure how to access my Adsense control panel or other account details. Stuff changes constantly, layouts and styles change and it affects my productivity.

    There are real benefits to local software. Although unused, my old Office XP will still run on my windows 7 machine without me having to re-learn how to use the software all the time and forever hunting through menus to find back a feature that I am sure is there somewhere.

    I used to blame Microsoft for never sticking to anything (Enter Silverlight) but in all honesty, their OS is remarkable. It will still run very old windows code and I think they do deserve to be recognized for that. In contrast, my new Galaxy S3 android phone will no longer run a $6 racing game I purchased for my Google Nexus One two years ago.

    In short: The big providers are their own worst cloud enemy because they keep changing the platform and rules of engagement. And don't give me the "But it is free what do you expect" argument. It is not free at all. I pay for it with information about me and exposure to adverts.

  92. Re: iGoogle will be missed... definitely!!!! by cboslin · · Score: 1

    current trend is to stand alone apps because there is no point in doing anything else on phones and tablets.

    Interesting comment. Definitely not what you are hearing from those pushing cloud solutions for everything.

    Since I never intended to move away from stand alone apps, only using online anything when it added something for me, your comment rings true with what I have expected and still expect regardless of the hype.

    Makes me think of suits and ties...if a gentleman sticks with medium sized lapels and medium width ties, others (larger or smaller) will come in and out of style, however the medium level ones will never be OUT of style. Thus a more effective investment for anyone without an unlimited source of funds.

    I envision purchasing a new Linux embedded device this year that will not be limited in any way for a device of its footprint. With the promise of HTML5 I should be able to find / develop apps that will run whether I am connected to the Internet or not. With WIFI I will have phone access in 80% or more of the places I am. The obvious exception being while traveling, but even in that example I can use the device stand alone and sync back up when the next connection opportunity presents itself.

    All without an additional monthly fee beyond my Internet access!

    I expect it will have as much power (all areas except perhaps hard disk drive) as my desktop eventually.

    It will be fully open and rootable or I will not purchase. It will have as as much power as all past netbooks and most laptops.

    The hardware, being open, will always be able to run multiple LInux distros, fully configurable and fully installable. Which means any new device that I switch to after it will run all the applications the last device ran.

    Sounds smart to me.

  93. protopage is another alternative. by stry_cat · · Score: 1

    I've seen people mention netvibes as a replacement. However I've discovered protopage.com. I think it is better than netvibes b/c you can click and drag to resize each widget (even across columns). It took me about two hours to move over all my feeds and figure out how to get things like google calendar and gmail to appear correctly. I also added a number of feeds since it was so easy. I'm extremely disapointed that iGoogle is going away. However I've found something better so it has worked out in the end.