Slashdot Mirror


User: Azghoul

Azghoul's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,208
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,208

  1. Re:Bush vs. Gore on A Minor Political Screed · · Score: 1

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!

    Here's a goof with his little pro-stoner link on his post, talking about Bush being stupid.

    HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

  2. Re:I'll expand on that idiot part... on Dark Hearts And The Net · · Score: 1

    Stupid == Steve Magruder.

  3. Re:What massive global climate change. on Hawking On Earth's Lifespan · · Score: 1

    You're an idiot.

    Listen to Rush Limbaugh for a while and see if the original poster's fearful rant against globalization is mentioned, ever.

    The original poster's comments are more akin to Buchanan's mentality, not Limbaugh's. Limbaugh is far more likely to discuss football scores.

  4. Re:Typical condescending European attitude on 2600 Staffer Arrested During Republican Convention · · Score: 1

    AMEN BROTHER!

    The left is incredibly whiney this year, aren't they? Or are they -always- like that and I just haven't paid them enough attention?

  5. Re:Xfree86 4.0/Direct 3D architecture on XFree86 4.0.1 Released · · Score: 1

    Dude, are you an MS bimbo? Win95 has no DOS code?!? Run 'format a: /s' and tell me that boot disk doesn't contain DOS.

    That's about the first time I heard anyone not from MS (hmmm... wait a minute) say that Win95 has no DOS code.

    This, of course, is pretty off-topic, but it was funny.

    longer necessary. There were certainly changes, but the DR lawsuit established, to my satisfaction at least, that the announcement of the "disappearance" of DOS in Windows 95 was more for marketing than technical reasons. Microsoft's arguments at the time had as much technical credibility as their infamous video demos in a more recent trial.
    >>>>
    That's FUD. Win95 contains no DOS code aside from the compatibility module. It contains a great deal of Win 3.x code, but as I said its up top. Think of it this way. The core foundation was totally overhauled. It got rid of DOS, supported Win32 protected mode, etc. Once they had this skelatal foundation, they stuffed a lot of Win 3.1 back on there to support graphics, printing, UI, etc. That's why Win95 has a lot of 16 bit code, even though the architecture is totally new.

  6. Re:Poorly equipped, huh? on Frankenstein Time · · Score: 1

    No kidding!!

    I have -never- said a bad word about Katz's articles, but this one tears it. He can't imagine a more arrogant society?!? What a load of shit. I'm about as far from a sociology major as they come, but even I recall a term called ETHNOCENTRICITY. Just about -every- culture has the same 'issues'...

    Someone should start a Decaf for Katz Fund...

  7. Outstanding! on Penthouse.com Goes After Usenet Posters · · Score: 1

    This is an absolutely brilliant Troll. Too bad it's off-topic, because it's well-written and includes some truly subtle humor. Whoever pushed it down to -1 sucks. :)

  8. /. Hypocrites? on Unisys Cracks The Whip · · Score: 2

    Question: Why would /. carry a story detailing the (obvious) evils of Unisys, mention burning GIFs in an implicitly positive way... and then use GIFs for their graphics?

    (PNG == "Good Thing")

    Jesse