Ask your ISP how that IPv6 roll out is coming along.
The answer, when it comes to most IPs, is "badly."
It means you have a firewall, but you don't know how to use it and some random software can magically bypass it.
It can "magically bypass it" because it makes an outgoing connection to a central server. People, in general, allowing themselves outgoing connections, and connections made on their behalf by software they install. That doesn't mean they don't know how to use their firewalls.
Someone digs in from miles away, steals the computer - you forgot to pour any concrete in before the computer, and even if you did they could take their time cutting through it - and you're completely oblivious to the crime. I'd put it in a glass box at the top of a greasy pole in the middle of the gun-toters.
That's entirely subjective, and you're not logmein's target audience. Where's the open source solution that's so simple that your hunt-and-peck-typing grandad can use?
a special service that allows you to upload a file on the appropriate creator online and get the program version already compiled.
Well that sounds like a terrible idea - submitting your username/password - even encryption keys (optional) - to a third party so you can get your one-click executable?
At the end ricompattiamo all in a file NomeDiNostroGradimento.zip, carichiamolo online and wait a few seconds.
The rest of the documentation is about as comprehensible as this snippet.
made all the more surprising by the fact that 'consensus revenue estimates for LogMeIn in 2014 are $190.3 million,' suggesting that their system of providing both free and paid accounts for what is ultimately a straightforward service that could be duplicated for well under $1 million was already doing quite well.
Why is it surprising that a company might want to do better than "quite well" when it sees the opportunity?
Also:
what is ultimately a straightforward service that could be duplicated for well under $1 million
Go on then. Or was that number just pulled out of someone's behind?
Granted, it's fairly easy to guess (though you never know what Krazy Kim's planning), but there are two of them. The one this story is talking about is called South Korea. That's its name. It's not called "Korea."
Just trying to instil a sense of professional journalism here...
I would not kill a creature I did not intend to eat though, unless it was to serve a purpose, such as killing a coyote.
But you answered it anyway, in that you don't take pleasure from the isolated act of ending an animal's life, which could possibly be inferred from your original post.
New object recognition algorithm learns on the fly
I know wearable computing is the next big thing but putting one there - especially if it has a camera attached - is going to look a little bit... weird.
Slashdot Mirror
Ask your ISP how that IPv6 roll out is coming along.
The answer, when it comes to most IPs, is "badly."
It means you have a firewall, but you don't know how to use it and some random software can magically bypass it.
It can "magically bypass it" because it makes an outgoing connection to a central server. People, in general, allowing themselves outgoing connections, and connections made on their behalf by software they install. That doesn't mean they don't know how to use their firewalls.
Not a bad start, but it's hardly going to be the "it just works" of Teamviewer or LogMeIn.
Some combination of UPnP and DDNS is all you need.
In a situation where HFS will "just work," so would a standalone VNC server, wouldn't it?
Landing on a high-speed small comet versus a giant planet, seems more difficult to me.
Both targets will be/were travelling at close to relatively zero at landing time.
The lack of gravity and atmosphere might make the comet easier.
there are some very simple ways to make this work for non-technical people.
Such as?
Someone digs in from miles away, steals the computer - you forgot to pour any concrete in before the computer, and even if you did they could take their time cutting through it - and you're completely oblivious to the crime. I'd put it in a glass box at the top of a greasy pole in the middle of the gun-toters.
...all of which would have padded the summary out to a decent length and been highly informative!
Easy
That's entirely subjective, and you're not logmein's target audience. Where's the open source solution that's so simple that your hunt-and-peck-typing grandad can use?
we can and should develop our own VPN solutions...
This isn't a VPN solution.
...free of corporate constraints.
Apart from, y'know, the necessity of the central server which is what makes it work so simply and easily for non-technical users.
No pissing around with NAT and firewalls, for a start.
a special service that allows you to upload a file on the appropriate creator online and get the program version already compiled.
Well that sounds like a terrible idea - submitting your username/password - even encryption keys (optional) - to a third party so you can get your one-click executable?
At the end ricompattiamo all in a file NomeDiNostroGradimento.zip, carichiamolo online and wait a few seconds.
The rest of the documentation is about as comprehensible as this snippet.
How can you copyright the word 'Candy' for trademark?
Microsoft can only trademark "Windows" in their specific context
Is "computer games" more specific than "operating systems"?
Windows NT - doesn't fit the pattern so people ignore it
Windows 2000 - doesn't fit the pattern so people ignore it
made all the more surprising by the fact that 'consensus revenue estimates for LogMeIn in 2014 are $190.3 million,' suggesting that their system of providing both free and paid accounts for what is ultimately a straightforward service that could be duplicated for well under $1 million was already doing quite well.
Why is it surprising that a company might want to do better than "quite well" when it sees the opportunity?
Also:
what is ultimately a straightforward service that could be duplicated for well under $1 million
Go on then. Or was that number just pulled out of someone's behind?
For what, exactly?
Well, whoops :*
Ball lightning caught on video
Wow! I sure would like to see that. Luckily this is the internet, where the magic of hypertext means information can be linked to quickly and easily.
Hmm? There's no link to the video in the summary, you say? Well that's not very good.
Hmm? There's not even a link to the video in the article? Slashtwats.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...
and [...] spectrograph
It's just another poorly worded summary.
Because samzenpus doesn't read what he's given.
Ask Slashdot: how do you convince an ISP to bury cable in your neighborhood?
Is that a euphemism for something...?
At least it wasn't "backyard."
Granted, it's fairly easy to guess (though you never know what Krazy Kim's planning), but there are two of them. The one this story is talking about is called South Korea. That's its name. It's not called "Korea."
Just trying to instil a sense of professional journalism here...
Yes. I will admit, I enjoying hunting.
That wasn't the question...
I would not kill a creature I did not intend to eat though, unless it was to serve a purpose, such as killing a coyote.
But you answered it anyway, in that you don't take pleasure from the isolated act of ending an animal's life, which could possibly be inferred from your original post.
Snakes serve no purpose
Baby snakes would disagree!
owning a snake is puerile.
Why? People keep fish.
US Geneticist Discusses North Korea Trip With Dennis Rodman
I expect they probably did have a chat about it at some point, yeah.
Honestly, I thought that J. Random Geneticist had scooped an interview.
New object recognition algorithm learns on the fly
I know wearable computing is the next big thing but putting one there - especially if it has a camera attached - is going to look a little bit... weird.
I like killing and eating geese and pheasants
You like killing and eating them, or you like eating them and are at ease with the necessity of killing them first to enable the eating?
...that's the one that's a bit like Linnux but not quite, right?