I'm really not (apart from the sophisticated part *straightens bow tie*). What is the difference between using a login page on a website versus uses a preformed secret URL to establish your permissions to access data?
You use the word "undiscoverable" as if there is such a thing. Everything is "discoverable".
My point is that a convoluted, randomly generated URL is of the same class of discoverability as username/password combo.
If I take down the number sign next to my door it does not make my apartment "undiscoverable".
No it doesn't, but then your analogy isn't a valid one. A house sign is not an address or a set of directions, and an apartment is visible by anyone nearby, rather than only those with the directions.
A URL's stated purpose is the exact opposite - to grant access, i.e. make a document, file, or application accessible.
But it can be used in exactly the same way as a password. If I programmed my webserver to respond only to a specific, randomly-generated URL which was not determinable by means other than brute force, how is that not equivalent to a password?
Given the undiscoverable nature of the data, the URL in this case could be considered to be a password. A normal login procedure is just a correct sequence of bytes, same as a URL to fetch a specific piece of data. Those who know it can get the data (and should be the only ones authorised to do so by the owner), those who don't, can't. Discovering a URL can be just as hard as discovering a username and password.
2. transfer it to 35 " film first before digitizing it.
angry reason: interneg loses detail.
Maybe, just maybe, these people know a little more about film restoration than you do.
More importantly though, where did you get this information from? It's not in the linked article, and it's not mentioned in the video. They only say they did it "digitally."
Know what makes me angry? People who don't capitalise the first word of a sentence, and fail to use apostrophes in words like "you're."
Wikipedia says hand colored films began in 1895 with Thomas Edison. This isn't hand painted though. Anyone with photography knowledge have an explanation?
Explanation for what? None of those things contradict the other.
It looks to me (having not listened to the audio track) like it was shot through rotating red/green/blue filters, which results in some slightly psychadelic colour trails on moving objects but some remarkably clear full colour on still objects.
They might have also fixed the transition and jerkiness.
They haven't. It's possibly slightly (though barely noticeably) smoother than the sort of pictures we're used to from that era, but I don't think it was worth commenting on if that happens to be the case.
Slashdot Mirror
'Autism' is simply
Wow, three words in and you've already got it wrong ;)
I know steam is scary and confusing but I believe in you!
:D Just trying to minimise my drive usage, is all.
I know it's a bit out, but I'd go for 149,896,229,000m - exactly 500 light-seconds.
But they won't be able to shut the door unless the bar is moving at relativistic speeds.
Or - and I know this will be controversial - how about not speeding in the first place?
and only requires players to install the Source SDK (included with all Source games, or a free download)
I followed the link for the free download only to find a link to steam://run/211. Can I install the SDK without also installing Steam?
I'm really not (apart from the sophisticated part *straightens bow tie*). What is the difference between using a login page on a website versus uses a preformed secret URL to establish your permissions to access data?
You use the word "undiscoverable" as if there is such a thing. Everything is "discoverable".
My point is that a convoluted, randomly generated URL is of the same class of discoverability as username/password combo.
If I take down the number sign next to my door it does not make my apartment "undiscoverable".
No it doesn't, but then your analogy isn't a valid one. A house sign is not an address or a set of directions, and an apartment is visible by anyone nearby, rather than only those with the directions.
A URL's stated purpose is the exact opposite - to grant access, i.e. make a document, file, or application accessible.
But it can be used in exactly the same way as a password. If I programmed my webserver to respond only to a specific, randomly-generated URL which was not determinable by means other than brute force, how is that not equivalent to a password?
Nice graph, but the pedant in me won't let me go without pointing out that those are absolute prices of different liquids, not relative prices.
Given the undiscoverable nature of the data, the URL in this case could be considered to be a password. A normal login procedure is just a correct sequence of bytes, same as a URL to fetch a specific piece of data. Those who know it can get the data (and should be the only ones authorised to do so by the owner), those who don't, can't. Discovering a URL can be just as hard as discovering a username and password.
I'm sick of tired of people mocking others for their physical appearance!
Besides, she's clearly the love child of Owen Wilson.
[citation needed]
When are American's going to grow up?
When you stop abusing the apostrophe.
2. transfer it to 35 " film first before digitizing it.
angry reason: interneg loses detail.
Maybe, just maybe, these people know a little more about film restoration than you do.
More importantly though, where did you get this information from? It's not in the linked article, and it's not mentioned in the video. They only say they did it "digitally."
Know what makes me angry? People who don't capitalise the first word of a sentence, and fail to use apostrophes in words like "you're."
Surprising xkcd link
Is that "surprising" in the sense of "not an"?
through rotating red/green/blue filters
Or cyan/magenta/yellow.
Wikipedia says hand colored films began in 1895 with Thomas Edison. This isn't hand painted though. Anyone with photography knowledge have an explanation?
Explanation for what? None of those things contradict the other.
It looks to me (having not listened to the audio track) like it was shot through rotating red/green/blue filters, which results in some slightly psychadelic colour trails on moving objects but some remarkably clear full colour on still objects.
They might have also fixed the transition and jerkiness.
They haven't. It's possibly slightly (though barely noticeably) smoother than the sort of pictures we're used to from that era, but I don't think it was worth commenting on if that happens to be the case.
Also, paedophiles use money. Now, I'm not saying that QR codes can turn people into paedophiles, but you can't buy candy without money, sheeple!
Well played!
May be the teenager is from one of states, and her parent gave the vampire their consent?
No, no - you have to give permission for a vampire to enter your house, not your daughter.
Three reasons possession of child porn must be re-legalized in the coming decade by Rickard Falkvinge.
If he'd written "should, in my reasoned opinion," instead of "must" I'd be slightly more inclined to listen.
However, try making three-dimensional porous structure out of it!
'k. brb.
I'm not sure I'm wrapping my head around this properly. How would this area compare, say, to a hypothetical single layer of graphite?