Use the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd letters of some phrases that you have written down and on the back of a business card in your wallet / purse? Put them in your phone?
But the companies' (Endgame) blog pages has some actual concrete info. Reading over the site, much of what he talks about is already implemented, or at least there is software out there that companies can get (much of it open source). To quote his page Hunting on hosts:" running processes, active network connections, listening ports, artifacts in the file system, user logs, autoruns", using Yari, etc. BUT, at least this page isn't just "buy my product" but does give some tutorials / examples of how to use various free utilities (like Sysinternals, Yari with Powershell, Elasticsearch) and he even includes CLI examples. I'm bookmarking this and will read over it later when it's not 04:32 and I should be asleep instead of posting on Slashdot LOL.
End-users, the "layer 8" of the OSI model. One way to stop a good chunk of intrusions: force everyone in your organization to go back to plain-text email. No more HTML emails, no more files attached to emails, no embedded links or graphics. Almost every time I read about some new ransomware hit, or most break-ins, it's always some phishing attack via email. Obviously these end-users aren't capable of being educated how to recognize them, so to me the only way to "fix" the problem is to BOFH the situation and remove the most commonly used paths of attack. Anyone who demands these "enhanced capabilities" should also be made to sign an addendum to their employment contract that they are financially responsible for any attacks that they allowed because they just "had to have the ability for people to send them files in their Outlook".
from TFA: "and US Senator Dianne Feinstein to discredit Snowden" Gee, what else has Feinstein tried to do? Weaken/destroy encryption? Her own staff hacked by the CIA? Repeatedly tried to push bills that empower law enforcement to violate the 4th Amendment? Makes me wonder if the NSA/CIA has some leverage on her, something they know about her, to get her to have such zeal in violating her oath to uphold the Constitution.
Also, the "open Court" is actually what Snowden himself has listed as a condition of returning to the US to stand trial. As of yet, this hasn't been any mention of a guarantee of this by any judicial activists. We all know this will never happen because the CIA/NSA doesn't want their dirty laundry aired to the public anymore.
There are still 19 states that didn't accept the expansion. 89% of the "gap" adults are in the Southern states; apparently they still really hates their poor people. In my state, I made more off unemployment than the "poverty" level but stll don't qualify for any help on the Federal level; so I'll have a big "tax penalty" this year. IMHO, the IRS shouldn't assess this penalty for people who are caught in the gap in those 19 states...why punish us for the choices our state legislature made, especially when I personally voted against these people? I really should just move; but it's pretty impossible to move when you have no cash reserves.
I think, at least in the US, UBI will have to be different depending on the area. Our country is larger than the entire EU, one rate for everyone isn't really practical. A flat-rate would most likely cause massive population shifts from high-cost areas to low-cost areas at an insane rate and depopulate major metro areas. Not that I'm saying this is necessarily a bad thing...but here in Tulsa I can rent a 3-4 bedroom house for 2k a month.
My CORBA insurance coverage is $595 a month, no vision no dental. That's not counting any co-pays if I actually use it. That cost is actually more than my half of the rent, almost 2x what I pay for groceries, 5x my electric, etc. And since I made about $42K last year (I was "work force reduced from HPE in December), and I live in Oklahoma, I don't qualify for any "reductions" on the health Exchange. Hell, if my state could get away with it, we would be forbidden to even purchase on the Exchange.
I think they actually make most of their money by charging photographers, agents, etc to post job listings. As far as I can tell, most models are posting for free. There is some "premium membership" for models, which I'm assuming they charge for...but it seems like maybe 1% or less of their members go that route.
Yeah, Model Mayhem still isn't doing any background checks or any such things. I just signed up on the site on the "agent" side, and the only requirement to post a shoot was to give them some money.
This happened, but it was considered "operator error" as someone put in a 0 and then the system crashed as it couldn't divide by zero. Personally, I see this as a "design error" that it allowed anyone to put in an invalid number in the first place, but that's just me.
If you go to any hospitals here in the USA, you probably already DO put your life in the hands of Microsoft...you just don't know it. Most medical equipment from GE runs Windows. A good friend of mine does ITSEC at Oregon Health and Science Hospital, and it's a constant battle with various manufactorer's to keep their equipment patched vs FDA certifications.
Since it's at a 0, I'm reposting the AC comment. "No one is talking on the phone, you are just driving or walking around and the telco is recording your location." So when your not actually talking on the phone, but it's automatically switching towers as designed, then who are the two parties? And supposedly that's what LEO is after; the metadata on the towers showing where the "perp" was located.
Trump COULD execute someone, he'd just have to hire some group like the Mafia to do so. If he gets elected, he could convince the CIA to "arrange an accident" lol
well, here in the US we have The History Channel...as for the world run by lizards "ancient alien theorists say yes." Because they NEVER say no apparently.
Too bad whomever took that pic can't, you know, take a better picture. So we could maybe actually read it, instead of just being able to make out a few words. I notice #2 says "Communications", and #4 says "Residential Legal Notices". My assumption is they want everyone to friend them so they can start serving notice via Facebook. This is still not generally accepted; as far as I can tell there is only a single court case in regards to this, and that was for divorce papers, in New York, and under VERY specific circumstances. Circumstances that are outlined in New York's Domestic Relations Law; and even this FB idea is only as a "last resort" if you can't locate them...basically only if you can show the other party is hiding out and avoiding being served.
Part of me wishes that this had actually gone through, and then City Park had tried to evict someone by ONLY notifying them via Facebook. As I doubt this is a recognized avenue of service, the resulting court case could have helped start the case law showing this isn't going to fly.
City Park Apartments The old address was at 764 N 900 W, this one is at 780 N 900 W. But it's been around for quite some time. However, the "missing one" was marked "unofficial" so perhaps this is the "official" page.
Here's a cache if anyone is interested. The official page is gone now, no telling if they pulled it or FB did. Gawker has more info, including part of the new clause that says “to not post on any public forum or page negative comments relating to the community.” While it may not be strictly illegal, it would be found discriminatory against those who don't have a Facebook account, internet access, etc. The quoted lawyer mentions this; it might violate other laws too; but it would be trivial to show in court that this is discriminatory against the elderly etc who don't use computers, have a Facebook account, etc. It's not technically a "free speech" issue, since it's not a Government agency forcing this..and at this time the only "free speech" restrictions are the Government, a private corp can do whatever it wants inside it's contractual agreements. Utah, and Salt Lake, might have additional "tenet laws" that might restrict them.
The telephone company really is the "first" or "second". This isn't "released data", it's a requirement for the service they sell to work at all. It's technically impossible to "opt out" of, or restrict, and still have the device function at all. In this court's fantasy world, who is the "first" and "second" party, if the teleco is the "third"?
Slashdot Mirror
Use the 1st, 2nd, or 3rd letters of some phrases that you have written down and on the back of a business card in your wallet / purse? Put them in your phone?
well, if your password is REALLY long, you might notice someone standing over your shoulder for the 10-15 minutes it takes to input it!
so, your aunt uses a strap-on? or is transgendered? lol
"my voice is my passport"
But the companies' (Endgame) blog pages has some actual concrete info. Reading over the site, much of what he talks about is already implemented, or at least there is software out there that companies can get (much of it open source). To quote his page Hunting on hosts:" running processes, active network connections, listening ports, artifacts in the file system, user logs, autoruns", using Yari, etc. BUT, at least this page isn't just "buy my product" but does give some tutorials / examples of how to use various free utilities (like Sysinternals, Yari with Powershell, Elasticsearch) and he even includes CLI examples. I'm bookmarking this and will read over it later when it's not 04:32 and I should be asleep instead of posting on Slashdot LOL.
Mental attacks? Does Finland have an issue with rouge telepaths?
A "financial file server" honeypot full of virus / malware? lol
End-users, the "layer 8" of the OSI model. One way to stop a good chunk of intrusions: force everyone in your organization to go back to plain-text email. No more HTML emails, no more files attached to emails, no embedded links or graphics. Almost every time I read about some new ransomware hit, or most break-ins, it's always some phishing attack via email. Obviously these end-users aren't capable of being educated how to recognize them, so to me the only way to "fix" the problem is to BOFH the situation and remove the most commonly used paths of attack. Anyone who demands these "enhanced capabilities" should also be made to sign an addendum to their employment contract that they are financially responsible for any attacks that they allowed because they just "had to have the ability for people to send them files in their Outlook".
from TFA: "and US Senator Dianne Feinstein to discredit Snowden" Gee, what else has Feinstein tried to do? Weaken/destroy encryption? Her own staff hacked by the CIA? Repeatedly tried to push bills that empower law enforcement to violate the 4th Amendment? Makes me wonder if the NSA/CIA has some leverage on her, something they know about her, to get her to have such zeal in violating her oath to uphold the Constitution.
Also, the "open Court" is actually what Snowden himself has listed as a condition of returning to the US to stand trial. As of yet, this hasn't been any mention of a guarantee of this by any judicial activists. We all know this will never happen because the CIA/NSA doesn't want their dirty laundry aired to the public anymore.
There are still 19 states that didn't accept the expansion. 89% of the "gap" adults are in the Southern states; apparently they still really hates their poor people. In my state, I made more off unemployment than the "poverty" level but stll don't qualify for any help on the Federal level; so I'll have a big "tax penalty" this year. IMHO, the IRS shouldn't assess this penalty for people who are caught in the gap in those 19 states...why punish us for the choices our state legislature made, especially when I personally voted against these people? I really should just move; but it's pretty impossible to move when you have no cash reserves.
I think, at least in the US, UBI will have to be different depending on the area. Our country is larger than the entire EU, one rate for everyone isn't really practical. A flat-rate would most likely cause massive population shifts from high-cost areas to low-cost areas at an insane rate and depopulate major metro areas. Not that I'm saying this is necessarily a bad thing...but here in Tulsa I can rent a 3-4 bedroom house for 2k a month.
My CORBA insurance coverage is $595 a month, no vision no dental. That's not counting any co-pays if I actually use it. That cost is actually more than my half of the rent, almost 2x what I pay for groceries, 5x my electric, etc. And since I made about $42K last year (I was "work force reduced from HPE in December), and I live in Oklahoma, I don't qualify for any "reductions" on the health Exchange. Hell, if my state could get away with it, we would be forbidden to even purchase on the Exchange.
I think they actually make most of their money by charging photographers, agents, etc to post job listings. As far as I can tell, most models are posting for free. There is some "premium membership" for models, which I'm assuming they charge for...but it seems like maybe 1% or less of their members go that route.
Yeah, Model Mayhem still isn't doing any background checks or any such things. I just signed up on the site on the "agent" side, and the only requirement to post a shoot was to give them some money.
This happened, but it was considered "operator error" as someone put in a 0 and then the system crashed as it couldn't divide by zero. Personally, I see this as a "design error" that it allowed anyone to put in an invalid number in the first place, but that's just me.
If you go to any hospitals here in the USA, you probably already DO put your life in the hands of Microsoft...you just don't know it. Most medical equipment from GE runs Windows. A good friend of mine does ITSEC at Oregon Health and Science Hospital, and it's a constant battle with various manufactorer's to keep their equipment patched vs FDA certifications.
Since it's at a 0, I'm reposting the AC comment. "No one is talking on the phone, you are just driving or walking around and the telco is recording your location." So when your not actually talking on the phone, but it's automatically switching towers as designed, then who are the two parties? And supposedly that's what LEO is after; the metadata on the towers showing where the "perp" was located.
Trump COULD execute someone, he'd just have to hire some group like the Mafia to do so. If he gets elected, he could convince the CIA to "arrange an accident" lol
well, here in the US we have The History Channel...as for the world run by lizards "ancient alien theorists say yes." Because they NEVER say no apparently.
Putting on my tin-foil hat, perhaps this is why Yahoo spent an extra $500,000 on security just for her and family.
Too bad whomever took that pic can't, you know, take a better picture. So we could maybe actually read it, instead of just being able to make out a few words. I notice #2 says "Communications", and #4 says "Residential Legal Notices". My assumption is they want everyone to friend them so they can start serving notice via Facebook. This is still not generally accepted; as far as I can tell there is only a single court case in regards to this, and that was for divorce papers, in New York, and under VERY specific circumstances. Circumstances that are outlined in New York's Domestic Relations Law; and even this FB idea is only as a "last resort" if you can't locate them...basically only if you can show the other party is hiding out and avoiding being served.
Part of me wishes that this had actually gone through, and then City Park had tried to evict someone by ONLY notifying them via Facebook. As I doubt this is a recognized avenue of service, the resulting court case could have helped start the case law showing this isn't going to fly.
City Park Apartments The old address was at 764 N 900 W, this one is at 780 N 900 W. But it's been around for quite some time. However, the "missing one" was marked "unofficial" so perhaps this is the "official" page.
Here's a cache if anyone is interested. The official page is gone now, no telling if they pulled it or FB did. Gawker has more info, including part of the new clause that says “to not post on any public forum or page negative comments relating to the community.” While it may not be strictly illegal, it would be found discriminatory against those who don't have a Facebook account, internet access, etc. The quoted lawyer mentions this; it might violate other laws too; but it would be trivial to show in court that this is discriminatory against the elderly etc who don't use computers, have a Facebook account, etc. It's not technically a "free speech" issue, since it's not a Government agency forcing this..and at this time the only "free speech" restrictions are the Government, a private corp can do whatever it wants inside it's contractual agreements. Utah, and Salt Lake, might have additional "tenet laws" that might restrict them.
However, IANAL
The telephone company really is the "first" or "second". This isn't "released data", it's a requirement for the service they sell to work at all. It's technically impossible to "opt out" of, or restrict, and still have the device function at all. In this court's fantasy world, who is the "first" and "second" party, if the teleco is the "third"?