If you're a plumber and you hear the house two doors down, whose pipes you installed 4 years ago during the construction of the house, has a leak. You aren't going to go and fix it for free, are you?
I don't know what kind of regulation could facilitate good business and secure products. The more secure you make something, usually the more it will cost the client (even with security-first orientated programming).
GPS has what, ~3/4 meters precision? That's on Earth.
This would eventually have 1 km precision in _all_ of space. Ya that's a big circle on my futuristic, hologram smartphone Goopple Maps (c), but in _all_ of space?! Damn...
Most of Netflix's content is licensed material, it would make sense that viewed content matches the same rough estimate of percentages.
I mean, they say it themselves, Netflix is *pushing* their original content and ramping it up. The numbers in those campaigns start low and then get high.
Who watches House of Cards or Stranger Things more than once, twice at most, in a given decades span of time, and this survey was 12 months long.
Intelligence-based TLA: "Sorry, about that. Our engineers thought they had finished installing our MIM, but they missed a step in their post-op checklist. Don't worry though, nothing to see here, business as usual."
To extend your analogy, I would certainly purchase a 2018 Hyundai Elantra over my current 2008 model. But I've heard there were some safety risks with the newer ones, so I'll go with the Tesla (AMD).
The point is that a large portion went to the rich. The percentage is just hyperbole (at this point, in the future its real). But the message is the same, the tax cut was not for the poor or middle class as mr trump tried to pitch, but a tax cut for the rich.
It was clearly for the rich. Even without the 83% story line.
Slashdot Mirror
Black Mirror ... "98% match making" ... Not too far off
You work for free?
I have some bridges you might be interested in.
If you're a plumber and you hear the house two doors down, whose pipes you installed 4 years ago during the construction of the house, has a leak. You aren't going to go and fix it for free, are you?
I don't know what kind of regulation could facilitate good business and secure products. The more secure you make something, usually the more it will cost the client (even with security-first orientated programming).
It's not that I don't have enough time, I do.
It's that the powers at be only want to spend time on something if a client pays for it.
Every couple days?! Pft, make those suckers create a new Ad profile for you on every page load. Block all cookies and caching.
Sounds like a simple solution then.
Extend that too easy to use ".remove()" jQuery method to remove event handlers too.
I think the difference between Google's products results shows that's not entirely true. Otherwise, they would've returned the same results.
AI/Machine Learning is playing the pivotal role here.
Siri's results prove that in my mind, she's dumb af. All she does is web queries.
fyi: saveie6.com yields 404
Great, I can download all my Facebook and Instragram data.
Now... what about deleting it from their servers?
Ha! There was just a story a few days about about the discovery of a pulsar "hiccup".
Now there is a story claiming their reliability, classic Slashdot move, classic move.
GPS has what, ~3/4 meters precision? That's on Earth.
This would eventually have 1 km precision in _all_ of space. Ya that's a big circle on my futuristic, hologram smartphone Goopple Maps (c), but in _all_ of space?! Damn...
No, wrong. Kinda. Hexagon is the right idea, but pulsars, pft.
They found the seventh chevron.
Most of Netflix's content is licensed material, it would make sense that viewed content matches the same rough estimate of percentages.
I mean, they say it themselves, Netflix is *pushing* their original content and ramping it up. The numbers in those campaigns start low and then get high.
Who watches House of Cards or Stranger Things more than once, twice at most, in a given decades span of time, and this survey was 12 months long.
Intelligence-based TLA: "Sorry, about that. Our engineers thought they had finished installing our MIM, but they missed a step in their post-op checklist. Don't worry though, nothing to see here, business as usual."
To extend your analogy, I would certainly purchase a 2018 Hyundai Elantra over my current 2008 model. But I've heard there were some safety risks with the newer ones, so I'll go with the Tesla (AMD).
Modding needs a confirmation box, selected redundant instead of insightful. Sorry man. Posting to undo..
Just ran a benchmark of the service, here are my results:
Final benchmark results, sorted by nameserver performance:
(average cached name retrieval speed, fastest to slowest)
1. 0. 0. 1 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
- Cached Name | 0.020 | 0.023 | 0.029 | 0.002 | 98.0 |
- Uncached Name | 0.022 | 0.090 | 0.287 | 0.075 | 100.0 |
- DotCom Lookup | 0.049 | 0.055 | 0.066 | 0.003 | 100.0 |
1dot1dot1dot1.cloudflare-dns.com
CLOUDFLARENET - Cloudflare, Inc., US
1. 1. 1. 1 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
- Cached Name | 0.021 | 0.023 | 0.030 | 0.002 | 95.9 |
- Uncached Name | 0.022 | 0.096 | 0.325 | 0.082 | 100.0 |
- DotCom Lookup | 0.048 | 0.073 | 0.166 | 0.043 | 100.0 |
1dot1dot1dot1.cloudflare-dns.com
MEGAPATH2-US - MegaPath Networks Inc., US
8. 8. 4. 4 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
+ Cached Name | 0.048 | 0.052 | 0.057 | 0.002 | 100.0 |
+ Uncached Name | 0.060 | 0.104 | 0.344 | 0.073 | 100.0 |
+ DotCom Lookup | 0.063 | 0.070 | 0.158 | 0.014 | 100.0 |
google-public-dns-b.google.com
GOOGLE - Google LLC, US
8. 8. 8. 8 | Min | Avg | Max |Std.Dev|Reliab%|
+ Cached Name | 0.049 | 0.053 | 0.060 | 0.002 | 98.0 |
+ Uncached Name | 0.057 | 0.106 | 0.367 | 0.077 | 100.0 |
+ DotCom Lookup | 0.063 | 0.073 | 0.156 | 0.020 | 100.0 |
google-public-dns-a.google.com
GOOGLE - Google LLC, US
It's also much easier to screw up digitally than physically... and much harder to undo.
You're missing the point.
The point is that a large portion went to the rich. The percentage is just hyperbole (at this point, in the future its real). But the message is the same, the tax cut was not for the poor or middle class as mr trump tried to pitch, but a tax cut for the rich.
It was clearly for the rich. Even without the 83% story line.
I miss my palmOS phone
Your troll is showing
Timezones can die in fire.
Poor people, people on medicaid, elect to pay monthly as it's cheaper in the short run and that is the biggest motivator.
It's a savings of $84, that piss stream had a few drops left, you just forgot to shake.
I'm not sure what they are talking about either.
My guess is some use of local storage.