I still don't trust Microsoft 100% due to their past, but I think they do want to do more in open source, so I'm cautiously optimistic about the new Microsoft. If IBM can change, so can Microsoft. And I'm hoping they actually did change, but I'm still a bit cautious with them.
If the "killer robots" tried to take over the world today they would fail quickly, XKCD seems to have explained why already. https://what-if.xkcd.com/5/
"Hyperlinks Are Protected By the First Amendment"
If that's the case, then everything on thepiratebay.org is perfectly legal. Torrents and magnetlinks are esentially hyperlinks for the BitTorrent protocal.
...instead of stopping the system if it doesn't verify (kill switch) or sending the results back to headquaters (spying), otherwise it's DRM. As long as the user has full control on what this thing does such as turning it off or changing what server it sends the info to or what it registers as counterfeit and what doesn't then it could be a good thing. But if this is used to lock the user out of his own hardware or prevent him from changing or modifying it then this is going to be a huge problem.
It's actually easier and quicker for me to use than an IDE. I usually use Bash as my shell and Kate as my text editor (Kate is similar to Notepad++ in functionality which is what I used before my switch to GNU/Linux). when I compile projects I either use a simple Makefile or CMake depending on the size of the project. I've done OS detection and resolution with Makefiles before.
Yes the guys who made CandySwipe saw Candy Crush Saga, so they hopped in their time machine and went back to 2010 to create the Candy Crush Saga knockoff.:rollseyes:
Slashdot Mirror
It's a clock, not a bomb. I thought we already established that.
I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof" that Obama "supports Muslim terrorists"
One of those rare events where the bug really is a feature.
I think Cataclysm got inspration from this
I still don't trust Microsoft 100% due to their past, but I think they do want to do more in open source, so I'm cautiously optimistic about the new Microsoft. If IBM can change, so can Microsoft. And I'm hoping they actually did change, but I'm still a bit cautious with them.
And this is why just 5 mod points aren't going to cut it.
What I'm worried about is letting a computer algorithm decide wether it should kill someone or not.
Although a lot of problems with Cataclyst will probably be solved as a result of this
Now if Catalyst gets good enough it might be an option to start using now.
Agreed. I'd upvote this if I had any modpoints. But since I don't, commenting is the best I could do.
You're probably getting downvoted for calling him a twat, not for correcting him.
It fixed Comcast's rep when they renamed their services to Xfinity. Oh wait, no it didn't.
If the name Redskins was "disparaging". They wouldn't be naming their team after them
Doubt it. I'm a progressive and I find this regulation stupid.
If the "killer robots" tried to take over the world today they would fail quickly, XKCD seems to have explained why already.
https://what-if.xkcd.com/5/
If they "personalize" learning the same way Facebook "personalizes" ads. Then I don't blame them for not wanting it.
I've been to college. I know first hand it's the education.
I'm guessing the word "Trustworthy" in "Microsoft’s Trustworthy Computing Investigations" is a homonym.
"Hyperlinks Are Protected By the First Amendment" If that's the case, then everything on thepiratebay.org is perfectly legal. Torrents and magnetlinks are esentially hyperlinks for the BitTorrent protocal.
Agreed, I've been running Chrome with graphics acceleration enabled for a long time and I never ran into any issues.
It's not. I've been to San Jacinto college, and their programming classes sucked. Advanced C++ my ass.
The Linux kernel could use that GPLv3 license right about now.
...instead of stopping the system if it doesn't verify (kill switch) or sending the results back to headquaters (spying), otherwise it's DRM. As long as the user has full control on what this thing does such as turning it off or changing what server it sends the info to or what it registers as counterfeit and what doesn't then it could be a good thing. But if this is used to lock the user out of his own hardware or prevent him from changing or modifying it then this is going to be a huge problem.
It's actually easier and quicker for me to use than an IDE. I usually use Bash as my shell and Kate as my text editor (Kate is similar to Notepad++ in functionality which is what I used before my switch to GNU/Linux). when I compile projects I either use a simple Makefile or CMake depending on the size of the project. I've done OS detection and resolution with Makefiles before.
Yes the guys who made CandySwipe saw Candy Crush Saga, so they hopped in their time machine and went back to 2010 to create the Candy Crush Saga knockoff. :rollseyes: