Slashdot Mirror


Obama Invites Texas Teen To White House After "Bomb" Clock Incident At School

The Grim Reefer writes: In a followup to this morning's story about the arrest of 14-year-old Ahmed Mohamed for bringing a homemade clock to school that was mistaken for a bomb, President Obama has invited the teen to the White House via Twitter. The President tweeted: "Cool clock, Ahmed. Want to bring it to the White House? We should inspire more kids like you to like science. It's what makes America great." The Irving Independent School District in Irving, Texas sent an email to parents about the incident asking students to: "immediately report any suspicious items and / or suspicious behavior."

657 comments

  1. will the tsa / SS let him take the device in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    will the tsa / SS let him take the device in?

    1. Re:will the tsa / SS let him take the device in? by ClickOnThis · · Score: 3, Informative

      will the tsa / SS let him take the device in?

      Absolutely, once they inspect it and confirm that it's not a bomb.

      Electronics are allowed on planes. Explosives aren't.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:will the tsa / SS let him take the device in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It really depends on the security person. Most are ok, and handle it well when they don't recognize something, but a few will cause problems if they don't know what something is. I used to have to fly with some calibration equipment for esoteric detectors used in science research, and about 90% of the time I had zero problems getting through security. A large percentage of the other times I could get through by showing them that the equipment had a label with company name and part number, hence it looked like a commercial piece of equipment. However, the couple times I had to carry a prototype, lacking the nice casing, I had a 50-50 chance of getting into through with no questions versus getting a lot of questions.

    3. Re:will the tsa / SS let him take the device in? by penguinoid · · Score: 0

      "immediately report any suspicious items and / or suspicious behavior."

      From their behavior, I can tell that the school officials and Texas police department are incredibly suspicious (and also stupid pussies). Perhaps we could have them all sign up with a psychologist to test them for paranoia?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    4. Re: will the tsa / SS let him take the device in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Does

    5. Re:will the tsa / SS let him take the device in? by Kuruk · · Score: 1

      He will the arrested again at the texas airport trying to take in on the plane.

    6. Re:will the tsa / SS let him take the device in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the condition of said electronics after inspection may be questionable.

  2. That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by slart42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now, if there is any good chance to smuggle a bomb into the white house, this is it.

    1. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0233469/

    2. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure if +1 Funny or -1 Moronic...

    3. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Would a kid of any other background gotten the invite though?

    4. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      http://southpark.wikia.com/wik...

      I'd love to link to the scene where Cartman asks if he has been checked for bombs, but alas, DMCA and all...

    5. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by ArcadeNut · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Would a kid of any other background been arrested?

      --
      Visit the Arcade Restoration Workshop @ http://www.arcaderestoration.com
    6. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only if he/she looks like a terrorist!

    7. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by bobbied · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Would a kid of any other background been arrested?

      YES....

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    8. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by sycodon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Especially if the kid nibbles a Pop Tart into the shape of a pistol.

      Then, it's," Katey, Bar the Door!"

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    9. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 1

      Damn, that was his plan all along!

    10. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, a black kid would have just been shot instead.

    11. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Tailhook · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes. Ordinary whitebread suburbanite kids with chemistry sets have been hassled by the authorities in this country, and Slashdot has indulged outrage about it too, as recently as last June. Put away your little group-think grievance detector.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    12. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Dunbal · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Only if he put his hands up and/or stated "I can't breathe".

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    13. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arrested? Yes

      Invited to the WH? No

    14. Re: That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      (fires 16 rounds in your direction with war cry)

      S....sorry. I'm American.

    15. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh Say does that Star-Spangled Banner yet wave o'er the Land of the Free and the Home of the Brave?

    16. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linking something isn't illegal.

    17. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by BradMajors · · Score: 1

      The President's offer is going to cause kids through out the country building clocks hoping to get an invite to the WH. All those clocks will create chaos.

    18. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Garfong · · Score: 1

      The Secret Service may be somewhat more on the ball than the Irving PD.

    19. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      No, and neither is having a clip of it on the internet (a one minute clip from a 24 minute show easily qualifies as fair use) but Viacom routinely scans youtube for anything mentioning south park and will send a DMCA takedown, and I don't have the time/energy to fight it.

    20. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      That kid has become the "hot coffee lawsuit" of students.

      The "hot coffee" eh? You mean the lawsuit everybody uses for an example of mockery towards the legal process, while themselves being substantially unaware of the actual physical injuries suffered by Stella Liebeck, that she offered to settle for far less than the jury awarded, and that evidence was brought for that McDonalds knew their coffee was served at an excessively hot temperature which they required their franchisees to use, and that hundreds of other people had also been burned by their coffee.

      Is that really the example you want to use?

    21. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by rockout · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should try reading the fucking news, if the summary wasn't enough for you. "The 14-year-old's day ended not with praise, but punishment, after the school called police and he was arrested. " http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/16/...

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    22. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by rockout · · Score: 0

      They have? When? For real, I don't recall reading about that. Got a link? I'd read it.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    23. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by tchuladdiass · · Score: 2

      I thought that it was primarily because McDonald's served a hot beverage in a cup that easily collapses when you grab it, and the lid pops off. Now their cups are very rigid even with no lid.

    24. Re: That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would send the wrong message. Obama has an image to keep after all.

    25. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [citation needed].

      also, as has been pointed out, you should read the artical, especially the bit about being
      arrested and hauled off.

    26. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by DaHat · · Score: 1

      Linking something isn't illegal.

      If it is illegal content, yes it is: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      "Nyeh! But Google points to the Pirate Bay and other piracy websites" Yes... and they often take down links to such places to avoid liability for contributing to said illegal infringement.

    27. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Why link to YouTube? South Park has been available to watch from the official site for some time now.

    28. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      yes You must be new to the nerd world.

    29. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by publiclurker · · Score: 1

      I'll take blatant bullshit answers for a thousand Alex.

    30. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by budgenator · · Score: 1

      Being perp walked through school in handcuffs is either being arrested or kidnapped, so maybe the kid is an asshole, oops I mean "disciplinary problem", that's a character flaw not an illegality. Besides what 9th grader isn't an asshole? They'd be better off keeping 8th, 9th and 10th graders in a post middle school anyways.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    31. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that GP and GGP were referring to some other incident with a child and a pop-tart, and not to the clock-bomb kid.

    32. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by dywolf · · Score: 1

      upon learning the kid's name one of the cops apparently said "of course".

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    33. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Besides what 9th grader isn't an asshole?

      In my senior year of high school, the administrators got the brilliant idea to merge the two high schools in our town. Unfortunately, all the students couldn't fit so they shuffled the 9th graders into a building of their own. A building full of 9th graders without any upper classmen to put them in their place. Even seniors didn't want to go near that place. (I'm not sure when, but they stopped this bad experiment but they since went back to two high schools.)

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    34. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Aighearach · · Score: 3, Informative

      I thought that it was primarily because McDonald's served a hot beverage in a cup that easily collapses when you grab it, and the lid pops off. Now their cups are very rigid even with no lid.

      No, guessing things that are easily looked up is not "thinking. You did not "think" that.

      McDonalds stood their ground and refused to lower their coffee temperature to a safe level, or an industry-standard level. They really did have scalding hot coffee that was hotter than what consumers would expect, because it was way hotter than every other chain, hotter than standard commercial coffee equipment heats it to when used according to manufacturer's specifications. They simply did not care about the injuries that numerous people had suffered. Coffee doesn't even taste better when brewed super-hot, it tastes worse. But, their customers don't know or care about coffee quality, and if it was hot or not is all they really report on.

      Cups were changed later, for whatever other reasons. Nobody was asking that they change their cups, or do something different than everybody else. They were asked to serve coffee that it is in the temperature range that food and drink are customarily served in the United States, and that is regarded as safe for humans.

    35. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      All those clocks will create chaos.

      but I wonder, will 2 of them ever be right at the same time? or, does that only apply to non-working clocks? I'm so confused.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    36. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by huckamania · · Score: 2

      It would be nice if we stopped painting entire organizations, professions, states and countries every time a story like this comes out. In the discussion of this story, the role call of villains includes the USA or 'murica, Texas, the city of Irving, Republicans, Teachers, Police and most of all White People. At most there was a handful of people involved and a free press with an activist citizenry turned the whole thing around.

      This kid has gone from oppressed to a likely poster child in about 6 hours. Good for him. I hope he makes the most of this opportunity.

      As far as politics is concerned, it is just as likely that a cop and a teacher are registered Democrat as Republican. They both belong to a union, not that there is anything wrong with that. As far as immigration is concerned, I don't see how this applies. Republicans want technical people to legally immigrate and immigrants in general to not burden our welfare system or behave criminally.

    37. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, here's one from Canada. Here's another one from New York. Here's another one from a month ago, though in their defense, there were some criminal acts involved (B&E).

    38. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Harassed. Not perp marched out of school in handcuffs by armed men.

      But, this is Texas. If you aren't white and you don't play football, then you're a terrorist.

      --
      ~X~
    39. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by U2xhc2hkb3QgU3Vja3M · · Score: 1

      Only if you live in the USA. They use geoblocking.

    40. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Source?

    41. Re: That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need hulu plus to watch many of the episodes on southparkstudios :(

    42. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 1

      I actually found the clip I'm looking for by searching on Google, but it wouldn't load for whatever reason, so meh.

    43. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Are you a member of the Irving PD or school teachers by any chance?

      Can you really not tell the difference between a pop tart and a clock?

    44. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by h33t+l4x0r · · Score: 1

      My bet is that his disciplinary problems come from everybody treating him like a terrorist. There's no way to be a Muslim kid in a Texas high school and not have disciplinary problems.

    45. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about the MIT student at Boston's Logan airport (KBOS) in 2007:

      * http://tech.mit.edu/V127/N40/simpson.html

    46. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      You do realize that an explosive device requires ACTUAL explosives don't you? This doesn't even look like a bomb from Hollywood or TV (like the crackers in Irving tried to claim). It just looks like a random collection of electronics and a large led display.

      We made gag clocks in Junior Achievement more convincing than this.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    47. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by microTodd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's exactly the one he's talking about. Last June.

      http://yro.slashdot.org/story/...

      It wasn't that hard to find, dude. Probably took less time that it did for you to write your reply (which somehow got modded up).

      --
      "You cannot find out which view is the right one by science in the ordinary sense." - C.S. Lewis on Intelligent Design
    48. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Garfong · · Score: 3, Informative

      It would be nice if we stopped painting entire organizations, professions, states and countries every time a story like this comes out.

      If the head of an organization (e.g. the Irving PD Chief) says something in their capacity as head, it's supposed to reflect on the organization. That's why they've called a press conference; are responding to interviews; etc. is to explain the position of the organization (although not necessarily the position of the members of the organization). If they give a dumb response it reflects poorly on the organization, the same way as if they give a good response it reflects well on the organization.

      The rest of your post is either a straw man or you're responding to the wrong post. I didn't talk about any of those things.

    49. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Try reading the article. The only reason they were forbidden from linking is because they entered into a consent decree.

      Also, Google does not remove links to TPB. Go search for it right now and you'll see it pop right up.

    50. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It's pronounced terrist.

    51. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      It looks fine to me. The problem is that the police photo failed to provide any easy way to gauge scale. It looks at first glance like a briefcase sized box with an oversized numeric display. But look closer and it's really a tiny box, not much room to in explosives.

      And don't trust jihadwatch.org, a bunch of paranoid freaks over there. And I apologize to other freaks for the unfair comparison.

    52. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      The City of Irving paints itself with a stereotypical brush already. Its major is a loon who thinks sharia law is being implemented in Irving, and has become a minor tea party celebrity over it.

    53. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      I sense much anger in you.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    54. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by I'm+New+Around+Here · · Score: 1

      You made something in JA? We just sold pre-packaged first aid kits for people to keep in their car.

      --
      If you think I voted for Trump because of this post, you're wrong. I voted for Dr. Jill Stein of the Green Party. Again.
    55. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of all the blacks killed by police lately, you pick the two with the least actual cause for complaint? Why don't you throw "stand your ground" in for the trifecta of pointless posts?

    56. Re: That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are if you advertise your product cutting chairs, yes. This is why when you see those products advertised, you will see them using safety equipment AND using the product responsibly.

      McDonald's has those drive throughs, they serve coffee out of them, and the coffee they served, at a temperature regulated by the head office, was known to be hot enough to cause severe burns.

      McDonald's knew what it was doing. And they knew of the injuries that resulted.

      So the jury decided they had some liability.

    57. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      And those white kids have been led out of school in handcuffs after the arresting police officer said, to quote, "yeah, that's who I thought it was." Given the kid didn't even know the officer, what does that even mean? Brown kid with Muslim name. Interpreting it any other way is just putting your hands over your ears to stay ignorant.

      Not to mention the mayor of the same town the school is in came under a lot of fire for anti-Islamic statements in the past (coincidence that the police act like their boss?)

    58. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by will_die · · Score: 3, Informative

      The temperature of the McDonald's coffee was already below industry recommended levels. The levels that the lawyers, and what you are mistakenly calling industry levels, came up with was from them going to near by stores that sold less amounts of coffee and measuring them. The plaintiffs lawyers then claimed that was the normal temperature.
      The temperature of the McDonald's coffee was from 82 to 88 C at the max according to plaintiffs lawyers, so by the time served less. The recommendations from manufacturers, coffee drinking clubs, and grinders they recommend in the 90 to 96 C range.,

    59. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now, if there is any good chance to smuggle a bomb into the white house, this is it.

      Perhaps, if his clock looked like this.

    60. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by marsu_k · · Score: 1

      Aeropress recommends 80-85 C, depending on the type of coffee. And I do agree, as I drink my coffee black. (>= 90 cannot be instantly consumed).

    61. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      Coffee doesn't even taste better when brewed super-hot,

      Yes it does. Optimum brewing temperature for filtered coffee is 90 degrees Celsius +/- 4K. Below that, you'll get nasty, sour-tasting sludge.

      However, after brewing the coffee should under no circumstances be kept at this temperature, because this will cause many of the compounds responsible for its flavor to evaporate - in addition to causing third degree burns.

    62. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Skapare · · Score: 1

      you can watch South Park on NRK from outside USA. The audio is dubbed into Norwegian (of course).

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    63. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Alioth · · Score: 1

      There's also no way to be a geek without having "disciplinary problems", for one or more of the following reasons:

      * Being bullied. If you're a geeky kid you will be bullied. When you finally get fed up of this, snap, and hurt a bully - the school will punish you.
      * Not taking interest in compulsory subjects that don't interest you. (Personally I lost count of the number of times I ended up in detention in French because I had spent the evening messing around with a circuit, or writing some computer program, instead of my French homework).
      * Answering back. Many geeks can be smart-arses and will argue with teachers and end up in detention. (Usually deserved).
      * Skiving mandatory sports classes to spend more time messing around with some circuit you're constructing or program you're writing.

    64. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AND it's a clock made from a KIT; the kid is no "genius"....just a kit-assembler.

    65. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Coffee is best brewed at 85-95C, depending on equipment and blend. However, it is best served at around 75-80C max. At that temperature you can only sip small amounts with extra air for cooling. Above about 65C will give your mouth and tongue a burn if exposed for more than about a second. Personally I prefer significantly below that, around 50C.

      The other issue with McDonalds is that they served it in a flimsy cup at a drive-through. When most people drink very hot coffee it is in a sturdy mug. At lower temperatures it becomes impossible to hold less well insulated containers because they burn your fingers. 60C for 3 seconds on skin results in a burn.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    66. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the 11th grader using dad's /. account.

    67. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Depends on a lot of things. The judge in that case found it illegal to distribute DeCSS under the DMCA, and ruled that it was illegal to have links that had no purpose other than to download DeCSS. The situations also differ in that it its inherently illegal under the DMCA to distribute DeCSS, while it's not necessarily illegal to distribute a small part of a copyrighted work.

      So, it may be illegal to post a link to a video clip, or it may not be.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    68. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by spmkk · · Score: 1

      Would a kid of any other background been arrested?

      First of all, yes.

      Second, back at you: would a kid of any other background have been invited to the White House? (Spoiler: the girl in the above link wasn't.)

      If this kid's name had been Seamus or Mordechai or simply Johnny, his arrest (a) would have hardly caught any media attention or public outcry, and (b) absolutely would have not been recognized by the President and resulted in an invitation for a personal audience.

      What (if anything) this boy's background had to do with his arrest is anyone's guess, but it has everything to do with his being a media darling, capturing Presidential attention/sympathy, and evoking the unprecedented level of populist white-knighting.

    69. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming kids from all other backgrounds could have built a clock.
      Sweet, but naive.
      Go look at published science papers from any .edu, normalise against population and get back to us.

    70. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Sure...if he were darker than a very mild peach.
      ex. Black kid in park with bb gun, clearly marked. Shot dead.
      Black man buying a b.b. gun. Shot dead.
      White man on Capitol parkland with REAL assault rifle, asked for I.D..
      I will say, this is an education.
      Now he knows that his life is not valued at all, that white people WILL place his life in danger for nothing but their own ignorance.
      Sounds like a fine way to create a Jihadi!

    71. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's the one. The one in which a stupid fuckwit did something stupid with a cup of coffee and decided it must be someone else's fault.

      It's a fucking hot liquid. She knew that. She was stupid. She didn't deserve to get burned, but she sure as shit didn't deserve to win a lawsuit about it.

    72. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That kid has become the "hot coffee lawsuit" of students.

      The "hot coffee" eh? You mean the lawsuit everybody uses for an example of mockery towards the legal process, while themselves being substantially unaware of the actual physical injuries suffered by Stella Liebeck, that she offered to settle for far less than the jury awarded, and that evidence was brought for that McDonalds knew their coffee was served at an excessively hot temperature which they required their franchisees to use, and that hundreds of other people had also been burned by their coffee.

      The decision deserves mockery, but not for the reasons you cite. She had hot liquid in close enough proximity to injure her, which meant it was also close enough to potentially injure the driver once the car started moving. Who knows what might have happened as a result of that? A car in motion is a very dangerous piece of equipment, and sudden trauma to the driver can result in bad things happening, and not just bad things limited to the occupants of the vehicle.

      Even an ordinary cup of hot coffee could cause problems in this situation, let alone a super-hot cup.

      Under those circumstances, her stupidity (and that of the driver) could easily have caused somebody else - perhaps a child walking though a crosswalk in the parking lot - to be killed.

      It's much like handling a firearm while drunk: a really bad idea.

      A responsible person would have refused to accept the drink in a container susceptible to spillage, or would have transferred it to another (better) container, or would have finished the drink before getting in the vehicle.

      That MacDonald's was also at fault does not change the fact that the decision was very poor. All the parties involved should have been penalized.

      In general, there is no reason why the entire fine assessed against a commercial party engaging in negligent action should go to the plantiff (and the plantiff's lawyers). The money of the fine could be split in some reasonable fashion between the plaintiff and some other use (consistent with ethics), such as a non-tax-deductible donation to a charity. This would allow a large fine to be assessed against a wealthy entity without turning tort law into a money-making machine for the unscrupulous and the unethical.

      Similarly, the executives of the corporation responsible for the decision should have been penalized: they had the leadership responsibility to see to it that this kind of thing didn't happen on their watch.

      The legal profession, as a class in society, is in a position of ethical conflict of interest with respect to the nature, scope, and form of the legal system. The jury in tort cases is also in a position of ethical conflict of interest with respect to giving awards to private citizens. With respect to both groups, this case was certainly not handled in a manner consistent with good principles of ethics (when even the appearance of conflict of interest must be avoided). As the right to ethical practice of law is certainly one of the most fundamental rights arising under the 9th Amendment, this makes the ruling not only unethical but illegal.

      Fear of invalid lawsuits leads to all kinds of problems for society, including the infringement of rights fundamental to a free country, such as the right to roam. It is absurd that backwards Britain recognizes this right, but the USA does not, and US property owners are often even required by insurance companies to fence off their land out of fear of lawsuits. What happened to the Land of the Free?

      US legal history can be profitably studied in terms of legal ethics issues. Within this framework, one examines at ethical conflicts of interest involving the legal profession (as a whole, or smaller groups within in), and the ways in which the profession or society in general addresses these issues (or, more commonly, fails to do so). These ethics problems result in a diseased legal system. Often the symptoms o

    73. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by doccus · · Score: 1

      "Cool fake bomb you terrorized your school with.. Wanna bring it to the white house?" Crikeys!! Man the Prez shouldn't go onto twitter after a particularly big pull off his glass pipe...
        If you look at it dispassionately, it's obvious the kid made it that way to solicit a reaction. wires sticking out of a circuit board hooked up to a clock face, that rings in class? Wodda prankster. ! Completely normal behavior for a 14 year old.. at least it used to be....

    74. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The temperature of the McDonald's coffee was already below industry recommended levels.

      The temperature of the McDonald's coffee was from 82 to 88 C at the max according to plaintiffs lawyers, so by the time served less.

      Horseshit.

      http://www.lectlaw.com/files/c...

      McDonalds' quality assurance manager testified that the company actively enforces a requirement that coffee be held in the pot at 185 degrees, plus or minus five degrees. He also testified that a burn hazard exists with any food substance served at 140 degrees or above, and that McDonalds coffee, at the temperature at which it was poured into styrofoam cups, was not fit for consumption because it would burn the mouth and throat. The quality assurance manager admitted that burns would occur, but testified that McDonalds had no intention of reducing the "holding temperature" of its coffee.

      Plaintiffs' expert, a scholar in thermodynamics applied to human skin burns, testified that liquids, at 180 degrees, will cause a full thickness burn to human skin in two to seven seconds. Other testimony showed that as the temperature decreases toward 155 degrees, the extent of the burn relative to that temperature decreases exponentially. Thus, if Liebeck's spill had involved coffee at 155 degrees, the liquid would have cooled and given her time to avoid a serious burn.

      McDonalds asserted that customers buy coffee on their way to work or home, intending to consume it there. However, the companys own research showed that customers intend to consume the coffee immediately while driving.

      Do you just make up the lies, or do you recycle them from AM radio? Nobody else served it that hot. Nobody else had to change the temperature they were serving coffee at. Have you ever owned a restaurant? Do you know anybody who works in a restaurant? The only way to think that temperature is normal is to be in complete ignorance of serving temperatures or burn safety, and also to refuse to read the facts about the case.

    75. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by will_die · · Score: 1

      For temperature there are two different common forms of measurement, one called Fahrenheit the other Celsius; will leave it to you to look up the details and how you convert from one to the other.
      So 185 degrees F, like you copied, is equal to 85 C.
      However thanks for the rest of your hatred.

    76. Re:That's not a bomb, it's a clock! by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      OK smahty pants, now what would happen if I knew that, and stand by my statements? Would be capable of reasoned disagreement, including, uh, reasons? Odd that you post something that is content-free, presumptuous, and accusatory, and yet is pure speculation with no consideration for other possibilities, and yet you accuse me of "hatred."

      I stand by my... quote of lectlaw.com lol and also my analysis of the case.

      If you're so smaht, when you converted the numbers and looked everything up... did you find the horseshit? Because you'll find 2 things; McDonalds was holding the coffee at an undrinkable temperature that was much hotter than everybody else in the industry, and also that anti-responsibility commenters here are lying or "misremembering" both about the common temperatures used in food service and also about the temperatures that McDonalds was using. It is hilarious that you would accuse me of not understanding number conversions, when you didn't do the conversion, didn't plug the numbers into the conversation to understand what they mean in the context.

      You're doubling-down on known horseshit.

  3. On the flight there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...the kid will still have to endure the humiliation of the nude body scanners or enhanced grope-down. Kinda takes some of the "nice" out of the gesture, IMO.

    Anyone who believes the government does not have a database of the useful biometric identification data (pics) harvested by these nude body scanners, in a post-Snowden world, is being deliberately naive.

    1. Re:On the flight there... by sycodon · · Score: 1

      And that's just to get on the plane.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    2. Re:On the flight there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "endure the humiliation of the nude body scanners or enhanced grope-down"

      I know people who've paid good money for that. Hell when I was in Vegas I had neighbors who were paid to do that.

  4. I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof" t by pouar · · Score: 1, Troll

    I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof" that Obama "supports Muslim terrorists"

    --
    while :;do if windows sucks;then mv windows /dev/null;pacman -Sy linux;fi;done
  5. Gofundme by bangular · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Where's the gofundme? After being punished so badly for doing everything right, I think the wealthier geeks in the world could have 4 years of college paid for in a few days.

    1. Re:Gofundme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His lawsuit against the police, the school, and the town should take care of his college expenses. Arresting an innocent kid and denying contact with his parents is a very serious offense.

      Unfortunately it's taxpayers that will pay, rather than the people directly responsible.

    2. Re:Gofundme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No need. The school and the police will be paying him a lot after they get reamed in court. He's also going to get internship offers from a bunch of tech companies.

    3. Re:Gofundme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      first he will a good lawyer to clear his name.
      As a record like this make him have a hard time getting past HR at some place and what about the HR / job application website where you have put down some thing like this.

    4. Re:Gofundme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I dislike the term "taxpayer" - it implies that there are people who don't pay tax. But everyone who buys anything, let alone earns money, ends up contributing toward government coffers. Even if you've always been completely reliant "on welfare" - a very unusual scenario, relative to the whole population - you're acting as a conduit for money into private hands. The latter will generate wealth by investing that money (hopefully), and that means more tax is paid.

      So, it's the people that will pay - all of them.

      Now, the government is elected by the people - really, it is! there might be a lot of lobbying going on, but ultimately it's democracy that determines whether corruptible people are elected or not.

      The government is responsible for the police force and the school system.

      Working backward, the police/school answers to the government answers to the people.

      So, who is ultimately responsible for this? The people.

      The party responsible is going to end up paying for the damage done.

      Cynic as I am, I won't deny when something is working right. And if you go all, "I know a better system of government than a democratic republic!" good luck enforcing it - because the two options are will-of-the-people and force. Even the Objectivist arch-capitalist and the purest of Marxist communists agree that each final system develops out of the consent of thinking people - they just have different ideas on what the choice of people acting in their interests ends up being.

    5. Re:Gofundme by budgenator · · Score: 2

      yeah this Reprobate will never get a tech job anywhere!

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    6. Re:Gofundme by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are people who don't pay taxes. For instance, I am not a Texas taxpayer. I pay no taxes to Texas. "Taxpayer" is a convenient way to denote the people who pay taxes in the context of where the term is used.

      It can refer to particular jurisdictions: Nation, state, county, city, etc. It can refer to particular taxes: income, sales, property, gas, consumption, estate, capital gains, etc.

      Furthermore, there are no doubt, some people who indeed pay no taxes, and the term "taxpayer" distinguishes those people from the people who do.

      The fact that some people need to be corrected in their conflation of "tax payer" with "federal income tax payer" is not a good reason to legitimize this inference.

    7. Re:Gofundme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The upcoming lawsuit will pay for his college just fine.

    8. Re:Gofundme by zieroh · · Score: 2

      I dislike the term "taxpayer" - it implies that there are people who don't pay tax. But everyone who buys anything, let alone earns money, ends up contributing toward government coffers.

      The word "taxpayer" is a useful word in contexts like this because it tends to reinforce that the settlement (if there is one) will come out of the taxes that the people pay. It also serves to suggest which people are going to pay -- namely, the people who pay taxes in the relevant municipality, or school district, or maybe the whole state.

      So yes, "people" works too, but "taxpayer" does a much better job of reinforcing the principle being discussed, and is therefore (IMHO) the correct word to use.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    9. Re:Gofundme by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Does it matter if you pay the $.02 tax on the small pack of gum you buy at the gas station if the government spends thousands of dollars on you? I think it's a good idea that everyone should pay some form of tax (even the most meager of incomes should still incur some non-zero tax) simply because it makes everyone have a little skin in the game and therefor more likely to participate in government, but there are people who pay far less into the system than they receive. But before you think this is some type of attack on the poor, some of the people in that category are rich and get more benefit from the government through various forms, programs, etc. than they pay in, even if they have to pay taxes that amount to more than some people earn.

      I think the end goal of any sane government should be getting to a point where everyone can contribute more to the system than the take from it. That's how you enrich society.

    10. Re:Gofundme by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Always the option of starting your own business to hire yourself, which is the course Bill Gates took. Of course with the right family connections, it is also possible to bypass HR

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    11. Re:Gofundme by blackanvil · · Score: 1, Interesting

      " For instance, I am not a Texas taxpayer. I pay no taxes to Texas. " Actually, Texas gets more in Federal spending money than they contribute via taxes, about $1.40 for each tax dollar paid. So even if you're not a Texas, you pay taxes that are spent there.

    12. Re:Gofundme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are people who don't pay taxes. For instance, I am not a Texas taxpayer. I pay no taxes to Texas.

      If you pay taxes in the US some of them will be paid to Texas. Not directly, but US government will do business in Texas and your taxes pays for that business.

    13. Re:Gofundme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. I am an expat and as such, I pay no taxes to the US government.

    14. Re:Gofundme by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      So even if you're not a Texas, you pay taxes that are spent there

      Which is still different than being a Texas taxpayer. Federal tax money is *spent* all over the globe. I don't consider myself to be a taxpayer in every country in the world where Federal money is spent.

    15. Re:Gofundme by andymadigan · · Score: 1

      I'd suggest he get out of Texas and come here to SF. Employers here are barred from asking if you've been arrested (unless you were convicted).

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    16. Re:Gofundme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dislike the term "taxpayer" - it implies that there are people who don't pay tax. But everyone who buys anything, let alone earns money, ends up contributing toward government coffers

      I am apathetic to the fact that you dislike the term "taxpayer". Yes, there are people that don't pay taxes. In some states, there is no sales tax. And in other states, there is no state income tax. And if you earn less than average, it is possible that you can not only NOT pay federal taxes but also you might be reimbursed more than you put into the system.

      Depending on where you live, you job, and your income, you might be able to get back more from the IRS than you paid in.

      .

    17. Re:Gofundme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cynic as I am, I won't deny when something is working right. And if you go all, "I know a better system of government than a democratic republic!" good luck enforcing it - because the two options are will-of-the-people and force. Even the Objectivist arch-capitalist and the purest of Marxist communists agree that each final system develops out of the consent of thinking people - they just have different ideas on what the choice of people acting in their interests ends up being.

      You 'forgot' a number of things:

      - You talk about a democratic republic, as if we were anything near a well-functioning democratic republic. You could argue about 'voting' (when it's properly implemented, and not corrupted itself...) for the ('representative') democracy part, but you can't associate "stupid corrupt self-centered behaviors" with the republic part... they are precisely opposed... "res publica", "the public thing", as in "independent from individual considerations", otherwise said, from their prejudices and errors: the society of reason. It's easy to argue most decisions today are pretty irrational, in one way or another.

      - People are not born omniscient. There are many ways to easily manipulate them into bad decisions, even in front of the most important questions, often leading to more problems and manipulations. It's very difficult to break this cycle.

      You can't simply put responsibility on 'the people'. Of course, the 'corrupt/manipulators' are not much more responsible either (and most of us, at different levels throughout our life, are actually 'corrupt/manipulators'), being manipulated among themselves. And then there is for everyone the weight of the past and everything else in our present, which makes everyone even less responsible for anything. To break the cycle, you have to look both into the details and the globality of our condition.

      - The "will of the people" expression generally bears a connotation of "present time". Thus, there is a third variable, with 'force': time.

      Time to research more, to discover more, time to publish and teach more, time to accept more, and to work more on applying.

    18. Re:Gofundme by sociocapitalist · · Score: 1

      So, who is ultimately responsible for this? The people.

      If representation were one vote per person you would be correct.

      The system in place, however, is not truly democratic and will not easily be fixed without revolution, which seems unlikely.

      --
      blindly antisocialist = antisocial
    19. Re:Gofundme by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Is there a way to make sure the kid has enough money to get to the White House? It isn't necessarily cheap, and as far as I know those invitations don't come with air fare.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    20. Re:Gofundme by Wycliffe · · Score: 1

      I dislike the term "taxpayer" - it implies that there are people who don't pay tax.

      That's not what it implies to me at all. When I hear "taxpayer" used, what is usually implied is that there is no free money and the money is actually coming from "the people" not from some mysterious bottomless government coffer.

    21. Re:Gofundme by Archtech · · Score: 1

      "Now, the government is elected by the people - really, it is!"

      You poor deluded person.

      "I don't care who does the electing as long as I get to do the nominating".
      - William M. Tweed (“Boss Tweed”) as quoted in Understanding American Government (2003) by Susan Welch, p. 224

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    22. Re:Gofundme by Archtech · · Score: 1

      "I think it's a good idea that everyone should pay some form of tax (even the most meager of incomes should still incur some non-zero tax) simply because it makes everyone have a little skin in the game and therefor more likely to participate in government, but there are people who pay far less into the system than they receive".

      This sounds as if you think government is a benefit. But just because you are forced to pay for something, it doesn't follow that you'll gain from it.

      "Be happy you don't get all the government you're paying for".
      - Will Rogers

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    23. Re:Gofundme by Archtech · · Score: 1

      It's quite impressive that, nearly 170 years ago, there were people who saw exactly where the nanny state would lead.

      "When under the pretext of fraternity, the legal code imposes mutual sacrifices on the citizens, human nature is not thereby abrogated. Everyone will then direct his efforts toward contributing little to, and taking much from, the common fund of sacrifices. Now, is it the most unfortunate who gains from this struggle? Certainly not, but rather the most influential and calculating".
      - Frédéric Bastiat (“Justice and fraternity”, in Journal des Économistes, 15 June 1848, page 324)

      --
      I am sure that there are many other solipsists out there.
    24. Re:Gofundme by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      You buy gas, right? Then you are paying taxes to Texas. You just don't know it.

    25. Re:Gofundme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes you do. You're required to file taxes with the IRS unless you've renounced your citizenship, although there is a substantial deduction for overseas earned income.

    26. Re:Gofundme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No I don't. I haven't paid US taxes in years.

      The IRS can say whatever it wants, it doesn't mean it's legal. I don't live in the US and I work for a non-US company, so I don't pay US taxes.

      The IRS is free to come TRY to get me. If they show up at my door, I'll have them arrested.

    27. Re:Gofundme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a difference between paying taxes to entity X and having that money spent on entity X. If some of my tax money goes to helping earthquake victims in Haiti, it doesn't make me a Haitian taxpayer.

    28. Re:Gofundme by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between paying taxes to entity X and having that money spent on entity X. If some of my tax money goes to helping earthquake victims in Haiti, it doesn't make me a Haitian taxpayer.

    29. Re:Gofundme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Furthermore, there are no doubt, some people who indeed pay no taxes, and the term "taxpayer" distinguishes those people from the people who do.

      The number of people who do pay not taxes are vanishingly small, and most likely dependent people (minors or the elderly/disabled in a 24/7 managed care situation).

      Just think of all the taxes that are hidden here and there. Sales tax, gas tax, payroll taxes, taxes on telecommunications, property taxes, etc.

      You'd have to move to one of the few states without state sales taxes, avoid municipalities with their own sales taxes, make so little to avoid filing federal income taxes (or lie about it), work under the table for cash, and rent or squat to avoid paying any of the above listed taxes. But be careful - there's more taxes out there. Want to drink? There may be a tax on alcohol. Even the drunk bums living under bridges will end up paying that tax.

  6. Love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is awsome

    1. Re:Love it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not good enough, they didn't shoot the bomb perp.

  7. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by ToxicBanjo · · Score: 0

    Trump will, he's happy to make shit up.

    --
    There are only 10 kinds of people in the world. Those that understand binary and those that don't.
  8. Damage was already done by mark-t · · Score: 3, Informative

    From the original story, the kid vowed... note, *VOWED*... to never bring another invention to school again.

    Admittedly the vow was probably made prematurely, but people who are of the sort to make vows in the first place are not the sort to break them simply because their circumstances might change.

    1. Re:Damage was already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's best to acknowledge or lampshade your pedantry, lest you seem the obnoxious, inconsequential douchebag.

    2. Re:Damage was already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Texas = Box of stupid. If the kid's parents can afford to move to a normal part of civilization he'll realize that he's not that out of the ordinary. Plenty of bright, ambitious kids get stuck in these godforsaken cesspool states (Kentucky is another one). Only going away to college saves them so they can reach their true potential.

    3. Re:Damage was already done by slazzy · · Score: 2

      Even if he never brings another invention to school, hopefully meeting the president will inspire him to keep inventing at home at least.

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    4. Re:Damage was already done by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you were unaware that the word "invention" has a far broader meaning than what you would appear to ascribe to it. If he built it himself, and not from a kit, and he was not simply copying something that somebody else had already done or described to him how to do, then it most certainly does qualify as an invention of his. The fact that he didn't invent what he built in the sense that it might otherwise be worthy of a patent is immaterial.

    5. Re:Damage was already done by mark-t · · Score: 1

      True.... but much of the fun that comes from doing that sort of thing comes from also being able to show your peers what you built.

    6. Re:Damage was already done by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      If the kid's parents can afford to move to a normal part of civilization he'll realize that he's not that out of the ordinary

      They've already said, before this incident, that they wanted to move but cannot afford to.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    7. Re:Damage was already done by HornWumpus · · Score: 0

      My understanding is that he basically recased on old LED clock.

      If that's an 'Invention' the word has be redefined to not mean anything. The worlds crafters are not all inventors.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    8. Re:Damage was already done by tlhIngan · · Score: 2

      My understanding is that he basically recased on old LED clock.

      Which is utterly boring to adults, but to an 11 year old kid, it's pretty fascinating.

      And while not patent worth in its own right, it shows a sense of curiosity and exploration, and maybe a desire to have something that no one else has - a cool looking clock.

      I mean, sure, it's not really invention, but then again, we like people who repackage stuff - like Ben Heck who repackages consoles into "laptops" and stuff.

      And think of it this way - she got arrested for repackaging a clock.

    9. Re:Damage was already done by mark-t · · Score: 1

      The word hasn't been redefined, it means what it always has. As for the allegation that it could be so overbroad as to mean nothing, building something from a kit, building something by following directions made by somebody else, or expressly copying something that somebody else has already made are examples of things that would not qualify as inventions, although they would still qualify as crafts.

    10. Re:Damage was already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (initiate "grass is always greener" mode!) A winning number of votes. Any dork can create stuff, but the president knows how to communicate with other people, persuasively. Whether it's Obama, Bush2, Clinton, Bush1, Reagan, Carter, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, etc: all those people did have a thing they could teach most of us.

      Very seriously, the president might have some magic words which mean "fuck off you pathetically stupid coward" (but sound either nicer or more threatening) that this kid might have been able to invoke when the principal and cops were attacking him.

    11. Re:Damage was already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So he'll be employed, which is still a step ahead of you.

    12. Re:Damage was already done by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      So what? He's breaking out of the mold here, trying to think for himself, that puts him light years ahead of the average student in America.

    13. Re:Damage was already done by Darinbob · · Score: 4, Funny

      Being bright is his real crime. The police probably suspected something was wrong with him when they learned he didn't play football or beat up kids smaller than he was.

    14. Re:Damage was already done by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      I think you're taking a figure of speech a bit too literally here.

      While it's possible that he made a solemn oath to a deity or figure of authority, I think it's more likely he's simply decided never to do so again, with the journalist deciding "vow" is a better word.

    15. Re:Damage was already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you meant that the people you listed know how to LIE to other people persuasively.

    16. Re:Damage was already done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if he never brings another invention to school, hopefully meeting the president will inspire him to keep inventing at home at least.

      This president is likely going to tell him to stop building clocks and start building bombs in order to blow up people in Pakistan. Because that's what this president stands for.

  9. Like a grownup by jaredmauch · · Score: 1

    This is "tell a grownup" territory vs the schools helping teach teenagers (which need guidance, just like some of us adults need from time to time) on what is appropriate or not. This will obviously be a trigger story for people in the tech community that feel sensitive to this issue or raw because of bullying they received and why some of us have trouble trusting school judgement as grown men and women.

    I just wish they handled this privately with the parents without dragging the liason officer into the mix, the local police, etc.. Judgement call made wrong way clearly.

    And really. If the threat was actually real, or realistically perceived that way, we should have heard of the evacuation on the news yesterday.

    1. Re:Like a grownup by rahvin112 · · Score: 5, Informative

      They would not let him call his father when the police questioned him. This is a direct violation of his and his parents rights. It's illegal to question a minor without their guardian present. I really hope everyone is telling their kids out there to refuse to answer questions in such a situation without their parents present.

      The police department and school district are going to be paying his family some serious money once the lawsuits are filed. I dare say he won the lottery with this highly illegal and stupid treatment.

    2. Re:Like a grownup by SecurityGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This will obviously be a trigger story for people in the tech community that feel sensitive to this issue

      Sure. I'm "sensitive to this issue" because I saw the same sort of stupid abuse of authority, albeit in a minor way. Abuse of authority should get pushback. People make mistakes, and that's fine, but the people who screwed this up should have been told to knock it off before the kid was disciplined.

      I just wish they handled this privately with the parents without dragging the liason officer into the mix, the local police, etc.

      It should have ended almost immediately. Teacher suspects a bomb, someone competent determines it's a clock, everyone goes about their business, parents get a courtesy call to let them know what happened.

    3. Re:Like a grownup by jaredmauch · · Score: 1

      Agreed.

    4. Re:Like a grownup by bmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I just wish they handled this privately with the parents

      You're talking as if he still did something wrong.

      He made a "my first EE project" - something he should have been praised for. But instead even the teacher he initially showed it to (a geek like the rest of us) basically said "hide it."

      The problem with this is that none of the adults involved in this stupidity outside of the parents and Obama, acted like adults.

      And he's right in declaring that he won't bring his own projects to school anymore. They don't deserve to see creativity out of this kid. Because they're douchebags, every last one of them at that school district.

      He should GTFO of that school and get home schooled. Better yet, the whole family should get out of Texas and move to Cambridge MA. And the school district should pay for it.

      --
      BMO

    5. Re:Like a grownup by LVSlushdat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Its just sad that that payout is gonna come from the taxpayer, NOT the idiots who perpetrated this. Theres a large number of people involved with this that should be behind bars, and have their pay garnished for the rest of their life to pay this kid for this...

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
    6. Re:Like a grownup by mrchaotica · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You seem to be insinuating that there was anything even slightly wrong with what Ahmed did (by claiming that he "needs guidance" or that it needed to be "handled," even privately). Let me assure you that there is not. Ahmed is totally and completely innocent of even the appearance of wrongdoing, and having the school officials apply any sort of "handling" or "guidance" (let alone the "threats" and "punishment" that actually happened!) would be wrong on their part.

      This is not a situation where a student should be admonished "hey, that's too much like a bomb; don't do it again." This is a situation where a student should be praised that "hey, that's a cool project; keep up the good work!" What we have here is a model student who did everything right, but whose reward for that excellence was to be punished for it by bigoted, paranoid imbeciles. He should not have been arrested. He should not even have been "handled" or "guided!" He should have been celebrated!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    7. Re:Like a grownup by bmo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its just sad that that payout is gonna come from the taxpayer, NOT the idiots who perpetrated this.

      Good. Because the part of the school that sets policy is the fucking school committee, elected by the public.

      Elect morons to the school committee which does important things like set the budget and hire administration and you get stupid policies like this.

      Stupid should hurt.

      --
      BMO

    8. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wish they handled this privately with the parents without dragging the liason officer into the mix, the local police, etc.. Judgement call made wrong way clearly.

      etc... like the part about putting him in handcuffs. That was necessary.

    9. Re:Like a grownup by dywolf · · Score: 1

      and now they're going to punish the kid for their mistake

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    10. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teacher suspects a bomb, someone competent determines it's a clock, everyone goes about their business, parents get a courtesy call to let them know what happened.

      I think the someone competent should rightfully have been a police officer. You don't mess around with potential bombs but once it was determined it wasn't a bomb they should have said, we'll keep this in the office until after school. Please come pick it up at that point and don't bring it back again. Thanks and sorry for the confusions. Calling the police was proper and the right thing to do, heck most schools have one on campus anyway. Arresting him etc. was absolutely the wrong thing to do.

    11. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would sue and after I won I would give the city an option. Pay or fire the idiots involved.

    12. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just wish they handled this privately with the parents

      You're talking as if he still did something wrong.

      He made a "my first EE project" - something he should have been praised for. But instead even the teacher he initially showed it to (a geek like the rest of us) basically said "hide it."

      The problem with this is that none of the adults involved in this stupidity outside of the parents and Obama, acted like adults.

      And he's right in declaring that he won't bring his own projects to school anymore. They don't deserve to see creativity out of this kid. Because they're douchebags, every last one of them at that school district.

      He should GTFO of that school and get home schooled. Better yet, the whole family should get out of Texas and move to Cambridge MA. And the school district should pay for it.

      --
      BMO

      I'm not sure Obama acted like an adult. To me it looks like a publicity move, while not harmful, I doubt he really cares about the kid or well any of us.

    13. Re:Like a grownup by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      Its just sad that that payout is gonna come from the taxpayer, NOT the idiots who perpetrated this.

      Where's the gofundme? After being punished so badly for doing everything right, I think the wealthier geeks in the world could have 4 years of college paid for in a few days.

      s/wealthier geeks/taxpayers/; The system works! Hooray for socialism!

    14. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The idea that the school suffers if this child does not display creativity troubles me. The school does not suffer either way, the only one who suffers is the child. The immediate lesson he has learned is that he must keep his head down and be just like every one else. Creativity will be punished.
      That is a hell of a thing to teach a child.
      Way to go

    15. Re:Like a grownup by bmo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Obama did the right thing, IMO. The people who did this need to be embarrassed, personally.

      Inviting the kid to the White House immediately shows how fucked up the school district is.

      Were I president, I would have done it even if I had to pay out of pocket.

      --
      BMO

    16. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Were school officials present? Could they have been acting in loco parentis?

    17. Re:Like a grownup by jaredmauch · · Score: 1

      I was perhaps trying to be more subtle. This should have been a non-event. The problem here is clearly that people without a clue about technology went and abused this kid who is still learning. Did you take a moment to read the letter the school district sent out? They basically said that nobody else should bring something like this in and if they do to "tell an adult" vs ask some questions and have it be a non-event. Instead they paraded the kid out like he was a criminal. That's surely not private where the teacher saying "hey this is cool, can you show me after class" might be much better.

      Thanks for misconstruing my comment though, I see it got you +5. I'll go back to cowboyneal jokes vs trying to engage in dialogue.

    18. Re:Like a grownup by RabidReindeer · · Score: 2

      The idea that the school suffers if this child does not display creativity troubles me. The school does not suffer either way, the only one who suffers is the child. The immediate lesson he has learned is that he must keep his head down and be just like every one else. Creativity will be punished.
      That is a hell of a thing to teach a child.
      Way to go

      It's not just the child. See it repeated over and over again. The frequency with which incidents like this happen mean that the upcoming generation is going to have all the initiative beaten out of it. From "Can Do!" to "Don't Dare!" in under a century.

    19. Re:Like a grownup by jaredmauch · · Score: 0

      Also, take a look at the letter text posted in this comment: http://news.slashdot.org/comme...

    20. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't wait for a win. Just offer a settlement.

      The city can select one of the following: Pay one shit-ton of money and fire these people and publicly humiliate them, pay five shit-tons of money and fire them quietly, or pay ten shit-tons of money and let the twatwaffles keep their jobs.

    21. Re:Like a grownup by SomePoorSchmuck · · Score: 1

      Obama did the right thing, IMO. The people who did this need to be embarrassed, personally.

      Inviting the kid to the White House immediately shows how fucked up the school district is.

      Were I president, I would have done it even if I had to pay out of pocket.

      Oh please! This deserves a meme image taken from the old anti-drug commercial where the kid says to his day, "I learned it by watching you!!"
      Where did local ISDs and municipalities learn zero tolerance policy, heavy-handed antiterrorism persecution, and rapidly expanding abuse of investigatory power? From the national political trends over the past 30 years. What the President did is nothing more than clever well-calculated recognition of a photo op. If he truly wanted to show leadership on the issue, how about rolling back the Patriot Act? How about directing his FBI/DOJ/TSA staff not to pursue warrantless wiretaps and obscure no-fly lists and nude body scans and mass data surveillance and on and on?

      --

      Hollywood, Television, has become the dream machine. We need to take that back; each of us is a Dream Machine
    22. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I built things in high school too. Unlike this kid, I did build some bombs. I blew the shit out of stuff in my backyard. I also lived in the country. My parents weren't pleased, but they thought maybe it could lead to something useful when I got past the teenage phase of watching things go boom. It did. Chem degree -> MBA -> to a productive taxpayer who no longer messes with things that go boom. It is important to understand physics, and the only way to learn is to do it. Kids in Europe are better off by the time they reach adulthood because they do not live in the US nanny state.

      He must not have communicated well enough, or the English teacher and cops are truly dimwitted, which appears to be the case.

    23. Re:Like a grownup by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      School Committee?
      This was more likely the teacher+administration+maybe the police.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    24. Re:Like a grownup by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      No, kids should learn if they did something wrong they should know when to detect an illegal interrogation, and then tell them right away where all the other evidence is so that when the fruits of that interrogation get thrown out, all the evidence will too.

      Oh, wait, maybe that was a different moral lesson.

      I grew up on both sides of the tracks.

    25. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This is not a situation where a student should be admonished "hey, that's too much like a bomb; don't do it again." This is a situation where a student should be praised that "hey, that's a cool project; keep up the good work!"

      Growing up I was shuffled between many bad public schools and good private schools, I learned a lot more in the private schools but I probably learned the most valuable things I use daily from the bad public schools.

      * How to take an unfair beating that leaves you bruised and bloody and make those people your friends.
      * How to get around adults and their petty rules.
      * How to not to look for praise or try and impress people all the time. Sometimes it backfires real bad like this situation.
      * How to duck when someone pulls a gun.

    26. Re:Like a grownup by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

      Its just sad that that payout is gonna come from the taxpayer, NOT the idiots who perpetrated this. Theres a large number of people involved with this that should be behind bars, and have their pay garnished for the rest of their life to pay this kid for this...

      The police and school officials all receive public money as their salaries. So the taxpayers kind of get the bill regardless of what happens.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    27. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A clock is a timer 555 chip, this thing was scary and suspicious as hell, check the photos and description (and his behaviour when questioned)
      http://www.jihadwatch.org/2015/09/robert-spencer-in-pj-media-barack-obamas-half-clocked-tale-of-islamophobia

    28. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually the school acts as the parent in that role. You only find out about "in loco parentis" after it happens. Schools are usurping parental rights for legal and medical matters

    29. Re:Like a grownup by rahvin112 · · Score: 1

      The School board (or committee if you prefer) hires all the School administration. They are the ultimate authority for the school district in setting policy and hiring the staff that run the district. In most US jurisdictions they are publicly elected. By punishing the school district you ultimately punish the voters that elected the school board who set the policies and hired the people that caused the lawsuit. This makes the voters the ultimate bearers of responsibility.

    30. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's illegal to question a minor without their guardian present.

      On another site I read another Texas parent say his child's school handbook says they don't have to make sure that happens. (Bold below is mine.)

      Here is a link to the page containing the MacArthur High School's 2015-2016 Student Handbook:

      http://iisd.schoolwires.net/Page/1835

      Here is the section on law enforcement agencies. (This does not comprise the entirety of the handbook and it is an excerpt, it is being cited for discussion, no claim to authorship nor ownership, so being posted for discussion for fair use.)

      LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES (All Grade Levels)

      Questioning of Students
      When law enforcement officers or other lawful authorities wish to question or interview a student at school, the principal will cooperate fully regarding the conditions of the interview, if the questioning or interview is part of a child abuse investigation. In other circumstances:
      - The principal will verify and record the identity of the officer or other authority and ask for an explanation of the need to question or interview the student at school.
      - The principal ordinarily will make reasonable efforts to notify the parents unless the interviewer raises what the principal considers to be a valid objection.
      - The principal ordinarily will be present unless the interviewer raises what the principal considers to be a valid objection.

      Students Taken Into Custody
      State law requires the district to permit a student to be taken into legal custody:
      - To comply with an order of the juvenile court.
      - To comply with the laws of arrest.
      - By a law enforcement officer if there is probable cause to believe the student has engaged in delinquent conduct or conduct in need of supervision.
      - By a probation officer if there is probable cause to believe the student has violated a condition of probation imposed by the juvenile court.
      - By an authorized representative of Child Protective Services, Texas Department of Family and Protective Services, a law enforcement officer, or a juvenile probation officer, without a court order, under the conditions set out in the Family Code relating to the student’s physical health or safety.
      - To comply with a properly issued directive to take a student into custody.
      Before a student is released to a law enforcement officer or other legally authorized person, the principal will verify the officer’s identity and, to the best of his or her ability, will verify the official’s authority to take custody of the student.

      The principal will immediately notify the superintendent and will ordinarily attempt to notify the parent unless the officer or other authorized person raises what the principal considers to be a valid objection to notifying the parents. Because the principal does not have the authority to prevent or delay a student’s release to a law enforcement officer, any notification will most likely be after the fact.

      Notification of Law Violations
      The district is required by state law to notify:
      - All instructional and support personnel who have responsibility for supervising a student who has been taken into custody, arrested, or referred to the juvenile court for any felony offense or for certain misdemeanors.
      - All instructional and support personnel who have regular contact with a student who is thought to have committed certain offenses or who has been convicted, received deferred prosecution, received deferred adjudication, or was adjudicated for delinquent conduct for any felony offense or certain misdemeanors.
      - All appropriate district personnel in regards to a student who is required to register as a sex offender.

      [For further information, see policies FL(LEGAL) and GRAA(LEGAL).]

    31. Re:Like a grownup by tbannist · · Score: 1

      To me it looks like a publicity move, while not harmful, I doubt he really cares about the kid or well any of us.

      Why, do you think he's going to run again for President in 2016?

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    32. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Presidents represent the power structure not you, anything benevolent they do is only temporary placation.

      The kid should tell Obama and the ENTIRE fucking executive, congressional, and judical branches AND the AMERICAN PUBLIC PSYCHE to FUCK OFF with their god damned kiss ass invitation, their 911 FEARMONGERING, their SPYING, POLICE ABUSE, and abuse of power in general that leads to shit like this happening.

      That's the correct thing for the kid to do.
      When are you people going to learn that your "government" IS NOT by OR for you.
      Just like every other government in history, it is AGAINST you.
      And if you expect your life and that of your descendants to last beyond the ABJECT FAILURE that has befallen EVERY OTHER state in history, you need to be the punkass little kid who stands to that power and abuse and says FUCK YOU.
      You would be surprised how fast they crawl away in fear of you.
      Right now it is YOU who are CRAWLING IN FEAR.
      That's both hilarious and sad.

    33. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Government [noun]: An entity that GOVERNS OVER its SUBJECTS with AUTHORITATIVE DIRECTION or CONTROL as a CONTINUOUS EXCERCISE.

      Yep, you sorry ass government loving sheeple are fucked. LOL.

    34. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking as if he still did something wrong.

      Clearly he did do something wrong. He's in Texas and his teacher, police, etc expected a bomb. It should have made a bomb. One big enough to blow up Texas.

      That'd have solved two problems. One, destroying Texas and all the dumb fucks there who agree that making a clock and bringing it to school is bad. Two, having to live in Texas.

      PS - Lather, rinse, and repeat for plenty of places all over the world. "It's always bigger in Texas." Nah, there's plenty of other fuck up places that do it bigger and better than Texas.

    35. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Its just sad that that payout is gonna come from the taxpayer, NOT the idiots who perpetrated this. Theres a large number of people involved with this that should be behind bars, and have their pay garnished for the rest of their life to pay this kid for this..."

      How is this even possible? You have so fucked up systems there. Is there no personal responsibility and accountability at all? "I'm a mindless police, I do what i'm told" ? Does the same apply to nazi concentration camp guards? Make the police pay _some_ amount of fines out of their own wage, so it makes them think if they should follow the law after all. And no, you don't need to make them pay the whole sum, just enough to work as a punishment, not enough to make them commit suicide.

    36. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's nice, but when it comes to politics, cynicism is the right approach: Obama getting involved is nothing but a publicity stunt. If it wasn't meant to be a publicity stunt, then why did he make such an effort to do it in public?

    37. Re:Like a grownup by chihowa · · Score: 1

      It's clever, but I wouldn't depend on that strategy unless it's your only choice. We're very close to the time when the courts rationalize away the doctrine of the fruit of the poisonous tree.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    38. Re:Like a grownup by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Better yet, the whole family should get out of Texas and move to Cambridge MA.

      If he moves that near to the hysterical overreaction capital of the US, he'd be lucky to live a year! That's where nearly half of the "bomb hoax" victims we've seen in Slashdot stories hailed from.

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    39. Re:Like a grownup by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Sure. The School Board or whatever is responsible for setting policies and making sure staff are able to do their jobs. The ultimate authority is with the voters, and so it's reasonable that taxpayers pay for these things. If School Board members don't care about doing things that cause them to have to pay out large awards in lawsuits, that's at least a clue to the voters that they might want to elect somebody else next election.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    40. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best post, this right here.

      It's OK to be cautious in a school environment, we probably expect that. However once the "alert level" is back to normal, everyone can talk about what happened, how to avoid it next time, and apologize for any bruised feelings.

      I'm saddened that this story made the national, even international news. Pretty sure I did some stuff as a child that raised eyebrows.

      Even the child and their family could have handled this better. Lots of people saying "they did nothing wrong." Really? Nothing at all? How about a heads-up to the teacher the day before? "Hey teacher, I'm going to bring in a science experiment tomorrow." Did it never occur to them that bringing in a breadboard with wires hanging off it might cause some concerns? Are they completely unaware of the various school shootings and violent episodes, not to mention repeated threats from multiple (mostly overseas) terror groups?

      I'm not saying the family are the prime culprits here. I'm only saying that they were a bit clueless about the public safety concerns in today's world.

    41. Re:Like a grownup by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      There's no fucking way the district's official policy is to disallow children from calling their parents. This is a rouge staff member with a vendetta, and some pinche racista cops.

    42. Re:Like a grownup by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      Talk about pass the buck! Ooh ooh! Myturn-myturn!!!

      We elect mayors who appoint police chiefs who hire cops who shoot unarmed people. So clearly the voters are responsible for that too! And the victims die because the holes made by the bullets manufactured by ammo companies who get their raw materials from metals mines in Africa that use German mining equipment designed on software sold by US companies supported by IT departments in India that use telephones that were invented by Alexander Graham Bell. So it's really all his fault!!

    43. Re:Like a grownup by Cederic · · Score: 1

      How about a heads-up to the teacher the day before? "Hey teacher, I'm going to bring in a science experiment tomorrow." Did it never occur to them that bringing in a breadboard with wires hanging off it might cause some concerns?

      Really? You expect a 14 year old to submit a health and safety certificate request in advance, educate the teachers on what a fucking clock looks like and beg permission to please do science, pretty please, awww go on?

      No, I think the student did nothing wrong, acted perfectly reasonably in taking a home-made clock in to school, should have had no expectation that people would over-react and try and hang him for it, and was shamefully treated.

    44. Re:Like a grownup by bmo · · Score: 1

      If he moves that near to the hysterical overreaction capital of the US.

      I live here in the Northeast (RI, Arlington MA, and now NH). Was planning, but got lazy and didn't go, to go to the finish line on 4/15/2013. I would have been on the opposite side of the bleachers because I didn't have tix to the VIP side.

      I had to tell people in various methods (facebook, phone, etc) that I was OK since I said I was going.

      Outside of the idiotic Mooninite (SPELLING!?) LED sign shenanigans, what the actual fuck are you talking about?

      Shut the fuck up.

      --
      BMO

    45. Re:Like a grownup by chihowa · · Score: 1

      Haha, so emotional! I was able to find four distinct stories on the first page of a simple Google search, so I'll assume that your hysteria is clouding your memory.

      Honestly, the constant hum of righteous outrage is one of the reasons why I left the Northeast. I'll shut the fuck up now and let you get back to that...

      --
      If you want a vision of the future, imagine a youtube comments section scrolling - forever.
    46. Re:Like a grownup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      school == child+child+...

      if one child is compromised, the school is diminished. along with the child, of course.

    47. Re:Like a grownup by lkcl · · Score: 1

      Teacher suspects a bomb, someone competent determines it's a clock

      the clue here is in the word "competent". i'll leave the word "assumption" dangling as being associated with the above sentence and let you work out the connection...

  10. See Something Say something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Text of the Letter:
      "If you see this so-called suspicious clock making Man, report him. Civic deeds do not go unrewarded. And contrariwise, complicity with his cause will not go unpunished. Be wise. Be safe. Be aware. "

    I'm scared! I saw someone carrying something I don't like. Stop them from liking what I don't like!

    I'm going to report so much as an unfriendly shadow.

    Someone knocked on my door! time to stand my ground!

    The flight attendant didn't give me some free drinks, he's brown, so he must be doing something!

    1. Re:See Something Say something by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best is to go to an airport and report random people talking on cell phones.

  11. America by bangular · · Score: 4, Funny

    So let me get this straight, this kid is being arrested and Trump is leading the polls?

    1. Re:America by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight, this kid is being arrested and Trump is leading the polls?

      Thus proving that, at some point, Biff Tannen got the sports almanac and we're living in the alternate 2015. Can someone please get the Delorean and set things right?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    2. Re:America by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      So let me get this straight, this kid is being arrested and Trump is leading the polls?

      Yes, because not everybody finds ratios as difficult as you do.

    3. Re:America by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      The problem is we can't get anymore plutonium from the Libyans.

  12. suspicious behavior SHOULD be reported by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would include the MacArthur style behaviour of the school teacher and principle.

    1. Re: suspicious behavior SHOULD be reported by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you mean McCarthy, as in Senator Joe, not MacArthur, as in General Douglas. MacArthur was notably in favor of bombs. Also, the school administrator is the principal, not principle. Perhaps your school should be reported for something.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  13. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They don't need to smear his name with silly stuff like that, IMO. The man is a liar, he has broken his promises to us, and his primary accomplishments have been an expansion of the power of the government.

    This nice gesture does not make up for his abuse of power against his people.

  14. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof" that Obama "supports Muslim terrorists"

    Proof? Maybe not. But GOP and certain Fox News show hosts will probably spin it in some bad way. And certain people will drink the kool-aid in big gulps.

  15. paging JonKatz by Thud457 · · Score: 2
    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  16. No push for teacher education? by Obscene_CNN · · Score: 1

    What no push for teacher education? If there is nothing that looks like explosives there is no reason to think its a bomb. Of course this might make teachers look stupid and Obama doesn't want to offend the teachers union.

    --
    I don't want to do a sig now
    1. Re:No push for teacher education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Smart people, especially people who know technology, know better than to go into education. $40k per year isn't worth it.

    2. Re:No push for teacher education? by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 0

      What no push for teacher education?

      It's in fucking Texas. I think we can all agree that no one wants to throw good money after bad trying to teach teachers there.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    3. Re:No push for teacher education? by david_thornley · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In which case you must be appalled at the teacher's actions, which were to confiscate the device, put it in a desk drawer, and continue teaching the class. If it could have been a bomb, the teacher was endangering the life of everyone in the classroom.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    4. Re:No push for teacher education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, I have a cell phone right here that is EXACTLY the same as a bomb trigger.

      BOO!

    5. Re:No push for teacher education? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This kid built, knowingly or not, an actual triggering device out of an alarm clock.

      No he didn't.

      He built a clock. A clock is not the same as a bomb trigger. If you keep on insisting it is, then literally every watch and phone the kids are wearing/carrying is a potential bomb trigger.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:No push for teacher education? by Obscene_CNN · · Score: 1

      Any electronic clock (or mechanical clock) is a potential bomb trigger be it a cell phone or wrist watch. The only thing that makes it a bomb is explosives. From the picture nothing even remotely looked like it could be explosive. It is just circuit boards and wires. The only person that acted appropriately was the teacher that took it away and shoved it in a desk (he was being disruptive with it).

      --
      I don't want to do a sig now
    7. Re:No push for teacher education? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      for Pete's sake this "thing" was in a metal box that started making noise when the kid plugged it in during class. Does that sound like it might be dangerous? It does to me. I'm sorry but that warrants a bit of attention by the school's teachers and administrators.

      Yes, and here is the attention it warrants:

      "Hey Ahmed, what's in the box?"

      "It's a clock."

      "Oh, cool."

      Instead, it got,

      "GET DOWN ON THE GROUND YOU FUCKING ISIS TERRORIST SCUM! STOP RESISTING! STOP RESISTING!"

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    8. Re:No push for teacher education? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Bomb TRIGGER...... That's what they suspected it was and what it looked like...... Which, if it had been one, would have landed young lad in legal trouble of a criminal kind.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    9. Re:No push for teacher education? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Seriously? NOBODY involved is claiming this kid was abused by the cops either verbally or physically, including the kid and his parents.

      He was arrested... They put cuffs on him and walked him out to the car and drove him to the local jail...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    10. Re:No push for teacher education? by Dr_Terminus · · Score: 1

      With that logic, I recommend we take away your car, computer, cell phone, gas grill, laptop batteries, lighter fluid and anything you own that COULD be used as an explosive device, a trigger for an explosive device, a delivery method for an explosive device or a tool to make an explosive device, until the authorities can firmly establish what your intent is with those items.

    11. Re:No push for teacher education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was arrested

      Oh, that's cool then. How about I call the cops and have you arrested for no reason. You cool with that? Or is it suddenly less cool when bullshit happens to you?

      BTW, I'll let the cops know that your cellphone might be used to trigger an IED, because it could be a bomb TRIGGER!

    12. Re:No push for teacher education? by tylikcat · · Score: 1

      ...because the only possible thing that could motivate "smart people" is money. :-P

    13. Re:No push for teacher education? by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

      Amazon sells bomb triggers. http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb...

    14. Re:No push for teacher education? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      In the teacher's defense, they were only following the role of the TSA officers who confiscate "potentially explosive" liquid and then toss it in a bin with everything else right at the security checkpoint. Way to properly dispose of "potential explosives" and protect people from harm!

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    15. Re:No push for teacher education? by Aighearach · · Score: 2

      Sorry to poke holes in your knee-jerk Obama hating, but President Obama said very early in this whole thing that it is a teachable moment and that Ahmed's teachers failed him.

      Don't let reality interfere with your hating-points, Jr.

    16. Re:No push for teacher education? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      This kid built, knowingly or not, an actual triggering device out of an alarm clock.

      No he didn't.

      He built a clock. A clock is not the same as a bomb trigger. If you keep on insisting it is, then literally every watch and phone the kids are wearing/carrying is a potential bomb trigger.

      *gasp!* The phone the cop is carrying is also a potential bomb trigger! So is his radio! So is his tazer! So is the drop-gun in his sock! He has more in his car, too. You know who else has potential bomb triggers in their pockets? Every teacher in the school. You know who else does? The kid with lunch money in his pocket. You know why? Radio Shack.

    17. Re:No push for teacher education? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Right.... Actually, don't show up with something that LOOKS like a homemade bomb trigger if you are a student at public school... If you do, somebody just might get the wrong impression... If you do, and they do, then don't complain about being inconvenienced when they hold you for questioning.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    18. Re:No push for teacher education? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The only thing that makes it a bomb is explosives. From the picture nothing even remotely looked like it could be explosive.

      And the corollary is, of course, that the only thing that makes it a bomb trigger is being connected to a bomb.

      So the special snowflakes claiming it is a "potential bomb trigger" are making the mistake of thinking that it is potentially connected to a bomb. But that was checked, and it is known if it was connected to a bomb or not. So there is no potential for it to have been connected thusly.

      I'm not sure yet, but my theory is they don't understand the word "is," or the temporal concept that it represents.

    19. Re:No push for teacher education? by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      What no push for teacher education?

      It's in fucking Texas. I think we can all agree that no one wants to throw good money after bad trying to teach teachers there.

      Like the President said, it is a teachable moment; and the lesson is that Ahmed's teachers failed him.

    20. Re:No push for teacher education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree every smartphone and watch is a potential bomb trigger. I'm not ready to staff the bomb squad with school teachers who seem to have limited training in that area.

    21. Re:No push for teacher education? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But admit that this device, while not an explosive, was EXACTLY the same as a bomb trigger.

      This device was not the same as a bomb trigger. One obvious difference is that a bomb trigger is attached to a bomb. If it's not attached to a bomb, then it's not a bomb trigger. Just like the fact that the cell phone in your pocket is not a bomb trigger until you decide to attach it to a bomb. Once you attach your cell phone to a bomb, then instead of being a cell phone it's a bomb trigger. A clock is not a bomb trigger, it's a clock.

      This kid built, knowingly or not, an actual triggering device out of an alarm clock.

      A "triggering device" is also not a bomb trigger. Note the distinct lack of a bomb to trigger.

      We cannot loose sight of what this device COULD have been used for

      Your car can be used to intentionally strike and kill a person. Should you be allowed to drive it? What about the knives in your kitchen? Do you perhaps own any guns? I hope you don't use acid to help maintain a pool, and god help you if you fertilize your lawn.

      This wasn't just an innocent shop class project the kid says he intended it to be

      Actually, yeah, it was. Would you be fine if he 3D-printed some fancy plastic case so that you couldn't see the wires, would that calm your heart rate and make your palms stop sweating? Because that's the only real difference between what he built and what sits on your nightstand.

      until the authorities could firmly establish what his intent was their actions where justified.

      They could have firmly established his intentions by talking to his electrical engineering teacher and hearing that the kid showed the clock to the teacher. It would have been pretty obvious what his intentions were: to build a clock and show his EE teacher. They weren't interested in that though, they had a narrative that they wanted to reinforce and only had the evidence that he possessed something that had wires in it, his skin is brown, and he's Muslim. So instead of looking for actual evidence and intent, they just decided to arrest him. It's the lazy way to go, which is something that cops are pretty good at.

      That some stupid teacher shoved the thing into a desk drawer, not withstanding.

      Seriously. Obviously a clock goes on the desk, not in it.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
    22. Re:No push for teacher education? by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

      Oh for Pete's sake this "thing" was in a metal box that started making noise when the kid plugged it in during class. Does that sound like it might be dangerous? It does to me.

      Are you the biggest moron on the planet or do you just play that role on Slashdot? Why would you think that it was dangerous because it was making noise? News flash, bombs in the real world don't have big flashy lights and large LED countdowns and they don't go 'beep' every time a clock ticks off a second. Just like the school administrators and police in the incident, you've "educated" yourself by watching poorly written movies and for some reason you think that real life works the same way. People who make dangerous things generally don't want to call attention to the dangerous thing before they use it, so they don't include flashing lights and buzzers in the design. The way this incident was handled was a massive overreaction and then when called on their stupidity the "authorities" doubled down on the stupid. For you to defend them is just idiotic.

      --

      Enigma

    23. Re:No push for teacher education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're and idiot

    24. Re:No push for teacher education? by Kavonte · · Score: 2

      Would you be fine if he 3D-printed some fancy plastic case so that you couldn't see the wires, would that calm your heart rate and make your palms stop sweating? Because that's the only real difference between what he built and what sits on your nightstand.

      That's more true than you may realize. The clock that he "built" is just the internals of an alarm clock mounted in what looks like a fancy school supplies box that resembles a small metal briefcase. (I disassembled everything when I was his age too.)

      The whole situation reminds me of when I was in 6th grade and, while doing dumb shit during free time, I created a small "don't kick me" sign, the opposite of a "kick me" sign, and in an effort to add more creativity, I decided that putting "lick me" on the other side was appropriate as it rhymed and seemed slightly affectionate in the sense of how cute little puppies like to lick people, and so it built upon the "opposite of 'kick me'" theme. I then decided to show the result of my efforts to a teacher, who didn't seem too amused but didn't say much about it. When I tried to retrieve the note and return to my desk, she said "no, I'll hang on to it" and kept it. So I thought "well, whatever" as I certainly wasn't all that attached to it, but I was certainly confused as she didn't seem impressed by it and so I had no idea why she wanted to keep it either. The next day I found myself in trouble for having created the note, and eventually ended up with some sort of punishment for having created it (though I don't recall what the punishment was, just that it was less serious than a detention), and yet throughout the whole process I had absolutely no idea why anyone took any offense to what I had done. It wasn't until a year or two later that I realized that she must have assumed "lick me" to be some sort of sexual reference, and that no one wanted to explain to me what I had done because they just assumed I knew what I had done and that I was simply trying to pretend as if I was ignorant of it to avoid punishment.

      So with that in mind, here's my hypothesis of what happened to this kid:

      He apparently likes to take apart electronics, as evidenced by the many photos of him in articles holding a mess of electronics internals. So after disassembling an alarm clock, he decides he wants to build a clock by mounting the components into a box of some sort. He has this cool little school supplies box that resembles a little metal briefcase, and so he mounts the components into it. He then decides to show it to people at school, and so he takes it to school, and during free time in English class when everyone is talking to their friends, he pulls it out and plugs it in to show his friends. The alarm clock noises catch the attention of a teacher who sees it and realizes it resembles a movie prop bomb, and concludes that he has created a hoax bomb. Indeed, if it made the typical alarm clock buzzing noise, it may have caused a minor amount of panic in the classroom when doing so, and this may have helped her to conclude that the purpose of the device was that it was supposed to be a hoax bomb, one which simply created noise rather than an explosion. (Honestly, that totally sounds like something I would have built when I was his age had the idea occurred to me.) So she confiscates it and reports him to the police. Then the police show up and, assuming the kid knows what he has done, they don't bother to explain the problem to him. Instead they just ask questions hoping to get him to confess to it being a hoax bomb, questions like "what is this" and "what is it for" and "why did you make it," to which he responds "it's a clock" and "it keeps time" and "I wanted to make a clock." So they assume he's just too smart to confess to what he has done and arrest him anyway. Then, when their stupidity makes national news, they try to explain themselves by saying "he wouldn't tell us anything about it, he just kept saying 'it's a clock.'," as if he was being elusive, when in rea

    25. Re:No push for teacher education? by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Or they could have rubbed two synapses together - which is more than you have - and asked "if this is the trigger, where is the bomb?"

    26. Re:No push for teacher education? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Yes... It IS...

      No it ain't.

      He didn't BUILD A CLOCK, he soldered wires to a clock that he disassembled...

      He made a clock by hacking up an existing clock. Still building a clock in my book. I don't require him to mine the sand by hand and refine it into silicon in a home build industrial process before etching chips in a home fab in order to give him due credit.

      It was designed to "trigger" something electrical by the looks of the pictures I've seen.

      Bullshit. Unless you've seen very different pictures from me (and I'll take your lack of links as a no unless you post some now) it looks like any old 14 yr olds electronics project. It's kinda messy and full of wires. Kid could do with some serious instruction in cable ties, but he'll learn soon enough himself (and that's the best lesson) the importance of keeping things neat and tidy.

      Seems like it would have worked as a bomb trigger to me, given the kid's description of what he was trying to build and looking at the pictures.

      You're obsessed with bomb triggers. Cellphones have been used for bomb triggers very successfully and very effectively, especially cheap ones. Why not arrest, per-walk and deny representation to every poor kid with an old phone in school?

      The pictures I've seen visually say "Bomb Trigger" albeit in a Hollywood "B" movie sort of way.

      Right, because Holywood B movies make the distinction between bomb triggers and bombs, a point you seem to find incredibly important.

      Once the authorities have something that appears to be a bomb part, it's "Detain kid who built it", "Ask Questions about suspicious device" and investigate the situation fully until you can figure out exactly what's going on.

      Jesus no. I hope you are never, ever in charge of anything important ever.

      If you really think it's actually a bomb: call the bloody bomb disposal experts. They didn't think it was a bomb, they just wanted to be a dick to the kid. It's all over the news stories: they figured they could be a dick because they pretended it was a "bomb hoax". Go actually read the facts.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    27. Re:No push for teacher education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well it wasn't a bomb, it was a clock. But everyone knows those are easy to turn into a bomb, you can do it in two easy steps.

      A. take that clock.
      B. attach a bomb to it.

    28. Re:No push for teacher education? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Inconvenienced? I'd say that being handcuffed and illegally questioned goes beyond inconvenience, as is a three-day suspension.

      And what the hell LOOKS like a homemade bomb trigger? How is someone supposed to know that in advance? Someone claims to have checked out school policy, and found nothing about clocks or homemade electronic devices.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    29. Re:No push for teacher education? by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Awh com on... IMHO He KNEW what this looked like, he's a 14 year old nerdy boy, I was one of those once and my son is nerdy and 15.

      We are only getting ONE SIDE of this story, from the boy and his parents. The school and the police are not saying much because they CAN'T by their policies. The school doesn't discuss discipline in public for a reason and the police don't discuss issues with minors for a similar reason.

      Somehow I just don't think the one side we are getting is everything, that the authorities really did have reason to suspect this kid was building more than just a science experiment. The fact that he plugged this device in and it went off DURING CLASS seems to be on purpose to me. He did it to get attention paid to himself and the device. In typical 14 year old, "don't plan a head and consider the consequences" fashion he succeeded in is goal, just a bit too well..

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    30. Re:No push for teacher education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because your a moran, dredged up from reddit or myspace, or god knows what cesspool

    31. Re:No push for teacher education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, as 10+ years have taught us, nearly anything can be a "trigger." 2 liter bottle of soda? Trigger. Foam and nails? Trigger. Cell phone? Trigger. Bicycle tire? Trigger. Push button switch? Trigger. Clock? Trigger. Remote control for garage door opener? Trigger. Guy holding wires? Trigger. Bent cutlery (butter knife, spoon, fork)? Trigger. Book? Trigger. I'm not exaggerating. I can quote reports (assuming they're declassified) for all of the previous items being found in Afghanistan as a trigger for an IED, and I haven't even scratched the surface.

      It's too laughable of a premise to defend. Then again, TSA was stopping people with nail clippers.... (sarcasm, as TSA is a laughable premise to security discussions in general). "A1C Stone has stopped more terrorism than the TSA" (Stone being the guy who was on the French train a couple weeks back).

    32. Re:No push for teacher education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh . . . didn't some Muslims who crashed the plains work in teams?
      Uh . . . don't some Muslims suicide bombers work in teams?

      Look. What is going on right now in our world. Some Muslims extremists, as a group, are planning more suicide bombs as I write this.

      How hard is to wonder if this kid was bringing in the clock and the next kid was bringing in some play-dough that isn't actually play-dough.

      They could have firmly established his intentions by talking to his electrical engineering teacher

      Could they really? Can you tell me even now that his intention wasn't to meet up with another member of a team and bomb the school? You can't. All you can do is guess.

      Racial profiling is neither right nor wrong, it just is. If you hear that a certain group of people (who all have a similar look) participate in suicide bombs, then everyone with that particular look is now tagged as possible suicide bomber. This isn't the fault of profiler, it is simply learning from the past.

      If a group of Muslims had never taking out the twin towers, if many Muslims had never participated in suicide bombs, this wouldn't have happened.

      But guess what, those bad things did happen. They are real. They are facts. Muslim extremists performed those acts. Sure, they were Muslim extremists, but one bad egg makes the whole carton smell bad.

      So quit blaming the school and the administration. Blame the Muslims who took out the twin towers. Blame the Muslims who condone, support, and participate in suicide bombs.

      The administration did exactly what they were supposed to do based on factual history.

    33. Re:No push for teacher education? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      In other words, he was physically and psychologically abused by the cops.

      How would you like to walk in front of your coworkers in handcuffs?

    34. Re:No push for teacher education? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and cell phone, of course.

  17. If I had a child now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I would home school him or her.

    Not because I don't want them to learn about evolution

    Not because I think Jeebuz thinks the road to hell is paved with Global warming or that that allow gay kids in school.

    It would be because School administrators are stupid reactionary fuckwads who can't tell the difference between a circuit board and an IED, because little children get arrested for sexual assault for kissing another child, because now that police are patrolling the schools, causing little kids getting arrested for resisting arrest and assault felonies and a million other stupid things.

    You cannot build intelligent adults from the hopelessly stupid school teachers and administrators who apparently orgasm when they destroy a child's future.

    --
    The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    1. Re:If I had a child now by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1

      This is our culture of fear and ignorance blossoming!

      We have a society which ostracizes the individual in favor of group think. Anyone not conforming to the pre-defined mold is immediately cast as suspect, ridiculed and shunned. Some of these individuals will take this negative energy and overcome adversity. Others will snap and go on killing sprees.

      Acceptance should be pushed in schools, Get to know people because I can guarantee you no person (group thinker or loner) is the person they are viewed as on the surface. I understand that this is a fight against our animal nature, but what virtue isn't?

      Fear is a major problem we have here in America. Though there is a large segment who would balk at that assertion. That fear is due in part to our geographical isolation. We simply don't have the daily exposure to different cultures and peoples and everyone fears things they do not understand.

    2. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your Left Wing, Democrat, Educational Establishment at work.

      They've been on high alert ever since the Pop Tart incident.

    3. Re:If I had a child now by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Speaking of reactionary, what hard data do you have that you and the home environment is better suited for teaching your child? Are you a teacher yourself and do you have the qualifications needed to give your child a well rounded education? What about social environment? How do you teach teamwork?

    4. Re:If I had a child now by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Australia is way more isolated than the US. It shares no land borders with any other country and its cities are the most remote in the world.

      Yet despite that there is nothing like the level of racial or terrorist fear in Australia as there is in the US. Oh sure there are still plenty of red necks who talk about Islam destroying the country and "If you don't like it leave" but the vast majority think those people a nuts and have no problem with other cultures or think they are going to get blown up.

      I do think your comment about different cultures though is probably correct though. One of the things I noticed when I travelled around the US is that outside of the major cities the country becomes a lot more culturally uniform and I think there are whole swathes of the US population that don't have interactions with anything other than their own race/culture.

    5. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It would be because School administrators are stupid reactionary fuckwads "

      Oh the irony...

    6. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...School administrators are stupid reactionary fuckwads who can't tell the difference between a circuit board and an IED...

      To play Devil's advocate... isn't one of the main points of an IED to make it difficult to tell the difference? The "this is an IED" sign is only put on by stupid IED designers.

    7. Re:If I had a child now by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Can you tell the difference between an IED and a metal box the kid just plugged into the wall? I don't think you can. Heck, I've seen pictures of the thing and I'm not sure I could, at a glance, be sure it wasn't going to explode and I'm an electrical engineer... At the very least it looked like a triggering device that used an alarm clock as a trigger.... How can an English teacher or a principle tell for sure? Hint: They can't so the call the police....

      Full disclosure.. I home schooled my kids.. But not because the staff at my local school are incompetent or don't care about the kids they are charged with educating.... But because my kids got a better education at home without all the "social" distractions that come with public schools which peddle the "one size fits all" education model which does an average job educating your average kid.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    8. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says someone who clearly has never watched Fox News.

    9. Re:If I had a child now by roman_mir · · Score: 0

      Home environment is better in a huge number of ways:
      1. Fewer sick people around, less chances of spreading disease.
      2. Fewer collectivists around, less chance of raising one.
      3. Fewer ignorant fucktards around, less chance of getting arrested for building a digital clock.

    10. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do think your comment about different cultures though is probably correct though. One of the things I noticed when I travelled around the US is that outside of the major cities the country becomes a lot more culturally uniform and I think there are whole swathes of the US population that don't have interactions with anything other than their own race/culture.

      You haven't been to the US in the last 20 years, then.

      Many small midwestern towns have disproportionately large immigrant populations because of agribusiness. The local (usually white) people all moved to the city because the good-paying jobs are there. The uneducated and poor are stuck in the podunks with the crappy jobs, so they've all turned to making meth in the garage. And when you've got it, you might as well use it, so there's an epidemic of meth-heads. And since meth-heads are terrible employees all the agribusiness factories (think meat-packing plants on-site at a chicken farm that looks like the ones you've seen on TV) turn to immigrant workers. They can't afford to live in cities because cities are not just high crime hell-holes, they're overpriced high crime hell-holes. So the immigrants move to the rural areas, get decent "low-brow" jobs, and slowly get absorbed into a culture that will eventually make them into entitled "rich" people. (And by "rich", I mean willing to work for a living while staying relatively meth-free.) They'll eventually move to the city, because the jobs in rural areas really are crap. And the cycle begins anew. (The meth-heads are constant, but drive the whole thing. Yes, meth abuse is an economic engine here. This country will grind anyone to dust for a buck.)

      The repeat rate on this cycle is approximately 7-10 years.

      A similar cycle occurs in run-down urban areas, but at a slower frequency (about 10-15 years). This cycle is directly attributable to the state department's placement of refugees.

    11. Re:If I had a child now by Princeofcups · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I would home school him or her.

      Not because I don't want them to learn about evolution

      Not because I think Jeebuz thinks the road to hell is paved with Global warming or that that allow gay kids in school.

      It would be because School administrators are stupid reactionary fuckwads who can't tell the difference between a circuit board and an IED, because little children get arrested for sexual assault for kissing another child, because now that police are patrolling the schools, causing little kids getting arrested for resisting arrest and assault felonies and a million other stupid things.

      The solution is homeschooling? I thought it was work with your community to improve your schools so that EVERYONE benefits. We've become a society of not only "me first," but "only I matter."

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    12. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then how will you teach your child to survive in a world ruled by 'stupid reactionary fuckwads' who have the power to ruin your life on a whim.

    13. Re:If I had a child now by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      what hard data do you have that you and the home environment is better suited for teaching your child?

      I'd be willing to bet that no one in his home has had the police called on them for eating a poptart so that it was gun-shaped, pointing their finger and saying "bang!", or making a digital clock.

      Are you a teacher yourself and do you have the qualifications needed to give your child a well rounded education?

      I'd just like to point out that the people involved in this story were teachers. There's nothing magic about having a teaching credential that somehow imbues one with the ability to impart knowledge to others. Give a kid access to the required resources and foster the right attitude about learning and they'll pretty much teach themselves.

      What about social environment?

      Sports, boy scouts/girl scouts (find a troop that actually does real backpacking/canoeing), friends, home school group outings.

      How do you teach teamwork?

      Sports, boy/girl scouts, homeschool groups (I'd be shocked if there isn't one nearby that does rocketry or robot building or other similar nerdy group projects). Team based online games? Tabletop RPGs with friends? Hell, they can even get involved in an open source project or something.

    14. Re:If I had a child now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Australia is way more isolated than the US. It shares no land borders with any other country and its cities are the most remote in the world.

      Yet despite that there is nothing like the level of racial or terrorist fear in Australia as there is in the US.

      Let's chat a little about the aborgines, shall we?

      I mean it's obvious that 'Mjurrica is the absolute worst country that was ever inflicted on the earth - so let's get that out of the way first.

      Fortunately Australians realized early on that they needed to force the aboigines to assimilate into Australian haute culture - that only makes sense. Right? hmmm. And I suppose that it was the evul 'Murricans who came over and stole their land, eh? Certainly the superior Australians would never do anything like that. And at least you all waited until 1976 to pass the Aboriginal Land Rights legislation.

      And thank heavens your Enlightened Government issued an apology to the aborigines for the "forgotten generation". ...... Oh wait, they didn't did they?

      And Terra nullius I think that means "Everyone is equal" right? Oh wait... Crap I'm sorry, but remember, I'm a dumb racist 'Murrican. Terra nullius, for those who do not know, was an official Australian doctrine that was only overturned in 1991 - Nineteen hundred and ninety one folks, 24 years ago - that declared the aborigine's land as no one's land.

      Pretty handy shit when you want to steal someone's land. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Yeah, we 'murricans are pretty bad. We've done some bad things in our time.

      Most of us even admit it. Terrible what we did to the Indians, and race problems are a disgrace that may take another century to get over.

      But don't get all high and mighty about how y'all are somehow enlightened - y'all have your own dirty laundry.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    15. Re:If I had a child now by DeathElk · · Score: 1

      You must live in Surry Hills (NSW). I used to live in Surry Hills and I sure miss it. Now I live in a coastal regional city, where racism is not only accepted, but encouraged. Those who object to the obscene banter (like myself) are vilified themselves. I've been here for nearly ten years, and the "vast majority" of Australians in this and other similar towns are racist, terrorist fearing moronic bogan cunts who believe cunts like Ray Cunt Hadley to be the path to enlightenment. I'm ready to move back to inner Sydney. Or leave this stupid island altogether. Fuck these cunts. Outside the capital cities, Australians are fearful, racist fuckwits.

      And our government sure does a great job of whipping up terror fear. Hopefully Turnbull will turn this around but I doubt it. He's going to have to suck up to the racist element of LNP if he wants to get anything done.

    16. Re:If I had a child now by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Heck, I've seen pictures of the thing and I'm not sure I could, at a glance, be sure it wasn't going to explode and I'm an electrical engineer

      You're also a very disingenuous engineer. There is no battery powered circuit you could tell unequivocally "wasn't going to explode" and that includes a laptop. Being an electrical engineer, I'm pretty sure I could rig up a laptop replacing half the battery with explosives so that from the outside and even an opening and reasonable inspection it looked for all the world like a laptop.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    17. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you a teacher yourself and do you have the qualifications needed to give your child a well rounded education?

      Are you a time traveler who is preemptively shaming them for not involving a qualified tutor, or are you being intentionally ironic with your reactionary straw man? It's so hard to tell time travelers and comedians apart these days!

      Wait, you're not either? Uhh...sorry, I've got nothin'.

    18. Re:If I had a child now by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Speaking of reactionary, what hard data do you have that you and the home environment is better suited for teaching your child? Are you a teacher yourself and do you have the qualifications needed to give your child a well rounded education?

      He couldn't do much worse than a school in Irving, Texas where it appears nobody in the faculty or administration knew what a clock was for.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    19. Re:If I had a child now by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      Can you tell the difference between an IED and a metal box the kid just plugged into the wall?

      Yes, when you look inside one, there are explosives. When the teacher looked inside Ahmed's box, there was just a circuit board.

      Full disclosure.. I home schooled my kids..

      Of course you did.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    20. Re:If I had a child now by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      At what point did I say that there wasn't racism in Australia, or that there wasn't awful things done to people based on race in the past?

      If you would like to add a few extras in Tasmania all the Aboriginals were killed except 1 that was kept, alive, in a museum so people could come and look.

      Perhaps this time your 'Mjurrica education can re-read what I wrote and see that the subject of the sentence you quoted is the word fear.

      So yes let's chat about the Aboriginals, could you please give me an example of where we slap them in handcuffs because we think they are terrorists and are going to blow us up when the come to school with an engineering project? If you want to go completely off topic however I am happy to discuss the sad situation that sees their life expectancy, child mortality rates, education, earning potential, and incarceration rates all being significantly worse than the average. If you have a solution, or even a suggestion on how to fix it I'm all ears.

    21. Re:If I had a child now by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      No not Surry Hills, I live on the outskirts of Brisbane.

      There are plenty of racist fucks in Australia. And I have seen, and been the recipient, of abuse for telling someone to shutup for being a racist idiot.

      What I was more getting at is that I don't think people are scared of bombs going off in Australia like they seem to be in the US. Racist morons or not I can't imagine a school kid getting cuffed for bringing an electronics project to school.

    22. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aboriginal population pre European ~ 300,000
      Aboriginal population 2011 census ~ 600,000

      American Native population pre European ~ 40-100 MILLION
      American Native population 2010 census ~ 5 MILLION

      So yes, you ARE a stupid "Murican".

      You built your nation on the wholesale genocide of one race, the wholesale slavery of another, and the economic servitude and ruthless exploitation of millions of poor immigrants ripe for the picking. It's in your DNA.

      The Australian colonists were products of their times, yet they (along with the New Zealanders) built the most inclusive and finest society the world has ever known.

      Americans never even gave 'Terra Nullius' lip service. They didn't need to. Apart from it being Latin (and thus incomprehensible to Americans) it didn't even blip on the radar as the Muricans just exterminated most of the natives and herded the rest into concentration camps.

      Truth hurts, huh ?

    23. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make sure the door doesn't hit you on the ass on the way out.

      Maybe Somalia or Yemen would be more to your liking ?

      You could also try Syria.

      I look forward to viewing your execution video on Liveleak soon. ISIS throwing the self loathing pathetic girly man off a building.

      Maybe you could lecture them on cultural relativism on the way down ? Make sure you wear your bike helmet.

    24. Re:If I had a child now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Speaking of reactionary, what hard data do you have that you and the home environment is better suited for teaching your child? Are you a teacher yourself and do you have the qualifications needed to give your child a well rounded education? What about social environment? How do you teach teamwork?

      I do know that he's less likely to get arrested for something silly

      http://www.wsj.com/articles/fo...

      You figure that getting arrested for wearing too much perfume is a good idea?

      Or a student in Wisconsin who was arrested for theft when a classmate shared a Chicken nugget with him? The sharing friend was on a food assistance program, so the kid he gave the nugget to was somehow stealing.

      All of this business of giving children criminal records for things that teens do every day, that aren't crimes at all, is draconian and horrifying repression - and sounds more like North Korea than the USA.

      And perhaps you might answer how well rounded an education a child can get from jail. Or even if it matters, because with the kooks who want all children tried as adults, they will have a very big problem getting good jobs.

      With all that, to answer your question - I have no doubt at all that if I educated my own child at home he or she wouldn't be arrested for some dumbass crime like wearing too much perfume, and if a science experiment went wrong, I wouldn't charge them with a felony.

      Here's an interesting statistic from the article:

      Over the past 20 years, prompted by changing police tactics and a zero-tolerance attitude toward small crimes, authorities have made more than a quarter of a billion arrests, the Federal Bureau of Investigation estimates. Nearly one out of every three American adults are on file in the FBI’s master criminal database.

      So in reality, you are asking a really fucking stupid question. In a "school" system designed to turn children in to criminals - I'm saying that the system can't provide any good education at all. I'm not capable of that poor a job.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    25. Re:If I had a child now by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Have YOU seen the pictures?

      It looks like it COULD be a bomb trigger, albeit in a Hollywood B movie sot of way... And YES, it could have been ready to explode and look benign ... Electrolytics can do that when you put AC across them, but hey...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    26. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about a few more reasons to look up?

        - Communal school supplies. Bought Johnny a nice pen because he was a good kid? Too bad, Mary took it.
        - Litterless lunches. Sounds like a great idea, but nowadays it means a lunch stasi takes away Johnny's lunch because he lost his $20 lunchbox and you gave him a brown bag today.
        - Mandatory healthy lunches. See above.
        - Peanut bans. Bad because it teaches the affected bad habits (that everything will be peanut free when they are an adult), forces low income parents to put together less healthy lunches (see above), and it ends up being a brown paste ban. Also, lunch stasi.
        - No more lunchtime. (I don't know why schools pick on lunchtime so much...) Instead idiotic nutrition breaks happen several times a day. Unless you smoke this is not real life.
        - Just one recess. Wonder why kids are fat?

      There's plenty more, that should get you started.

    27. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A multi generational decades long study was done in Canada by unbiased university professors. The results are easily available on Google. The research discovered slight improvements in intelligence levels and marked improvements in social involvement.

      Does that work for you?

      Also, teamwork in real life involves working with people more than 6 months off your birthday. That causes the improved socialization of homeschooled vs institutionalized kids.

      Qualifications are pointless when used incorrectly. I posit that the institutional environment is the wrong use of teaching qualifications and so significantly hampers the teachers' abilities they end up doing a worse job than unqualified parents. Can you imagine the quality of work your doctor would do if they had to talk to 30 patients about their issues at th same time?

      *shudder*

    28. Re:If I had a child now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 2

      I'd just like to point out that the people involved in this story were teachers. There's nothing magic about having a teaching credential that somehow imbues one with the ability to impart knowledge to others. Give a kid access to the required resources and foster the right attitude about learning and they'll pretty much teach themselves.

      Children are natural scientists. But a zero tolerance arrest kids for reasons so trivial that the offense actually isn't a crime anywhere outside of the Gulag called a school they are in will take care of that in short order.

      What about social environment?

      Sports, boy scouts/girl scouts (find a troop that actually does real backpacking/canoeing), friends, home school group outings.

      Versus arrests for too much perfume, failed science fair experiments or disagreeing with teh school commisars - now that's a positive social experience.

      How do you teach teamwork?

      Sports, boy/girl scouts, homeschool groups (I'd be shocked if there isn't one nearby that does rocketry or robot building or other similar nerdy group projects). Team based online games? Tabletop RPGs with friends? Hell, they can even get involved in an open source project or something.

      In our school district, home schooled students are encouraged to got involved with sporting teams. I had a couple of homeschoolers on my son's Ice hockey team. They were as well socialized as any of the kids coming from the Gulag school system, and better than most. I don't really consider an environment where you can be arrested for damn near anything as a good social environment. If someone thinks it is, they can send their children to state prison to get socialized.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    29. Re:If I had a child now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      "It would be because School administrators are stupid reactionary fuckwads "

      Oh the irony...

      THey were stupid reactionary fuckwads when I went to school years ago, and they were stupid reactionary fuckwads when my son went to school, and they are stupid reactionary fuckwads today.

      Nothing at all reactionary about an opinion formed over 40 years of the same thing.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    30. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Things that can possibly contain a bomb:
      book bags
      lunch boxes
      any locker
      a pencil box
      cars
      laptops
      computers
      just about anything

      If you're going to take the position that anything that can be a bomb should be treated like a bomb until proven not a bomb, then we should just screen the kids on their way in to school like we do for air travel so we all know that nobody has any bombs. Otherwise, we end up fearing anything that isn't commonplace and punishing people for being outside the norm.

    31. Re:If I had a child now by bobbied · · Score: 1

      You look in side? Now that was stupid, but what did you see?

      You would have seen a jumble of wires soldered to some repurposed circuit cards from an old electric clock.... It's not obviously a bomb but Darn that sure looks like a bomb trigger and small amounts of explosives can be hidden in lots of unlikely looking places...

      What are YOU going to do? Hand the kid his box back after school or make sure it really is safe first?

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    32. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fewer fucktards, maybe, but as a percentage of encounters that depends a lot on the parents.

    33. Re:If I had a child now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Can you tell the difference between an IED and a metal box the kid just plugged into the wall? I don't think you can.

      And I can't tell anything at all ever at 100 percent.

      Apparently in your world, these students need a daily stripsearch and cavity search, because, well you can't tell if little Tiffany is smuggling some nitroglycerine in some place where the sun don't shine. But then she might have swalloed a ballon of the stuff, so we better do some exploratory surgery.

      Because being 100 percent certain that no one has done anything remotely wrong is impossible.

      And just because you are inherently so fearful and one tiny step away from panic doesn't mean you can call the shots.

      After all, it has worked so well Here's a listing of the incredible success that a quarter billion arrests have had over the last ten years

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting different results.

      And arresting a young lady because she was wearing too much perfume is having exactly what diminishing effect upon violence in schools?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    34. Re:If I had a child now by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1

      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/...
      I'd bet a large wad of money that I know most subjects better than any elementary school teacher. I have a friend who homeschools his kid as well as sending him to school. The kid is #1 in his class and has jumped two grades. And then there was the valedictorian from my engineering college who was homeschooled up until the time he came to university.

    35. Re:If I had a child now by tylikcat · · Score: 1

      ...though considering laptop batteries, you might do just as well altering them rather than replacing them. Depending on the alternative explosives, of course. It always amuses me that laptop batteries are considered *just fine* for airplanes...

    36. Re:If I had a child now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The solution is homeschooling? I thought it was work with your community to improve your schools so that EVERYONE benefits. We've become a society of not only "me first," but "only I matter."

      The solution is understanding how humans work, and understanding how schools work, and allowing my children to become a functioning adult without becoming a number in the US criminal system for things that are not actually crimes.

      Its also knowing the difference between things you can fix, and things you cannot. The US public school system is unfixably broken. With a quarter of a billion arrests over the last 10-15 years, and school violence still happening, in the "get tough on crime" outlook that so many Americans have, the call is going to be for even more arrests. It doesn't work, but it's a soundbite "cure"

      I'm pretty certain that in the next ten years, children will be appearing in front of a judge for serious violations like skirt length and haircut violations. As noted before, there are limits that society can put up with on girl's wearing criminal amounts of perfume. So if we don't get tough on these young criminals, they'll just graduate to worse infractions, like the wrong color nail polish.

      And with some corrupt judges sending children to prison for kickbacks for small infractions - like the two in Scranton, PA. I'm going to ask you, do you think so little of your children that you'd be willing to send them to a place where they might easily destroy their future?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    37. Re:If I had a child now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      At what point did I say that there wasn't racism in Australia, or that there wasn't awful things done to people based on race in the past?

      Of course you didn't, my Chachalaca - You missed my point.

      People outside of 'Murica are so so quick to point out how awful we are. Conveintely omitting their own issues.

      Just

      Like

      You

      Did

      Yeah, we've fucked up some times. Even with some of the stuff you wrote. I admit it, and you just go on the offensive when I call you on it. That, dear chachalaca, makes you a hypocrite.

      Some times, I wish that the US would have remained neutral in the 40's. Don't you agree, tomodachi?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    38. Re:If I had a child now by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Terrible what we did to the Indians

      India was the Brits, man. Didn't you read Gunga Din?

    39. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would home school him or her.

      If you can't even determine your own child's gender, maybe you shouldn't be the one providing their education?

    40. Re:If I had a child now by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Dear child, I find your Faith in the ability of small Texas communities to change and become inclusive even to Muslims as a breath of fresh air in these cynical times. Yes, I believe you, they can change like night to day, yes, they can grow from the worst to the best, if only their victims hold their heads high and continue suffering the abuse in order to show their abusers how wrong it is.

      That has always worked in the South before. Just give it some time.

    41. Re:If I had a child now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Truth hurts, huh ?

      Yes, it does, as I've noted. It's a national disgrace that we're still living down.

      But your trying to somehow exonerate what the Australians did to the Aborigines by noting that we were nasty to more native Americans makes as much sense as exonerating us because of a nasty little incident in Europe during the late 1930's to mid 1940's. I'm saying they are all bad actions. You apparently have a murricahate based filter.

      Is the cognitive dissonance that strong in you?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    42. Re:If I had a child now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Terrible what we did to the Indians

      India was the Brits, man. Didn't you read Gunga Din?

      You mean - to be precise - the Bharat? My bad. Worse than that, when we bother to use metric, we measure in Meters. Go figure.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    43. Re:If I had a child now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I would home school him or her.

      If you can't even determine your own child's gender, maybe you shouldn't be the one providing their education?

      psst, dear coward - read the subject, and what I wrote after that. I'll do it for you, since sometimes it is hard to keep attention

      If I had a child now I would home school him or her

      You know, a hypothetical offspring?

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    44. Re:If I had a child now by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Hand it back of course - during school though. Whereas, I take it you would strip search every student just in case they have a bomb hidden in a body cavity somewhere - after all small amounts of explosives can be hidden in lots of unlikely looking places. Or do you only strip search the children who have a watch or a phone with them since only electronic devices can set off bombs...

      And http://ichef-1.bbci.co.uk/news... looks no more like a bomb trigger than my cell phone or thumb drive or laptop or calculator or lighter or a snap circuits jnr set

    45. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Home environment is better in a huge number of ways:

      Is it? Let's see if you can provide a list of a "huge number of ways"
       
       

      1. Fewer sick people around, less chances of spreading disease.

      Except that some childhood diseases actually help to prevent the same diseases from becoming truly awful in adulthood. Chickenpox is a great example of this; Chickenpox is bad but shingles - if you haven't had Chickenpox - can kill you.

      So you failed at number 1.
       
       

      2. Fewer collectivists around, less chance of raising one.

      Ever hear of private schools, parochial schools, or charter schools? You get a significant role in choosing who your child goes to school with in any of those. And frankly every public school I've ever seen has a copy of your favorite religious tome so you can't really say your religion is being oppressed.

      So you failed at number 2 as well.
       
       

      3. Fewer ignorant fucktards around, less chance of getting arrested for building a digital clock.

      Being as 2 and 3 were interchangeable from your perspective, you automatically failed at this one for the same reason.

      So how many items need to be on a list for it to be "huge"?

      Three? You don't have three.

      Two? You don't have two, either.

      One? You don't even have one.

      Zero? I've never heard of anyone using a number system where zero is a huge number.

    46. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I thought it was work with your community

      Where'd you hear that? Haven't heard of that meme. Another solution is to move to another school district.

      Be aware that you're working directly against other people who are also "working within their community" and are also established and are also able to make your child's life miserable. You could waste your time with that and achieve nothing for the community nor for your kid.

      Your kid SHOULD come first before other kids.

    47. Re:If I had a child now by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      It is not the public school system that is broken - it's only a symptom of a larger problem. The society is broken.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    48. Re:If I had a child now by jrumney · · Score: 1

      Yet despite that there is nothing like the level of racial or terrorist fear in Australia as there is in the US. Oh sure there are still plenty of red necks who talk about Islam destroying the country and "If you don't like it leave" but the vast majority think those people a nuts and have no problem with other cultures or think they are going to get blown up.

      Agreed about the vast majority, based on the Australians I know. But the big problem with Australia is the rednecks are in charge of the Government's immigration policy. From the offshore detention camps, to the fact that their visa regime is stricter than China's for Westerners.

    49. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was the school evacuated? Surely if the device looks dangerous enough to call in the police then at least the school should be evacuated.

    50. Re:If I had a child now by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      If the quality of education is determined by the number of police incidents then you are absolutely right. But if you actually believe this then please do your child a favour and don't try and home school them.

      As for sports, scouts, etc. While I agree it's possible I suggest to you the result pales in comparison to spending 7 hours a day surrounded by peers. Not that the child may not be successful, but they will develop very different social skills as a result. I've met a few home schooled people. Very bright, but complete social outcasts.

    51. Re:If I had a child now by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No, you're still talking reactionary. Education is not measured in the number of altercations with police. This is just one very tiny part of what this child (who is still just one person in the entire school) will get out of his many years of schooling.

      The question is: what makes you superior in being able to prepare your child for their future life? You may very well be a fantastic teacher, but remember that you need to be a teacher first and foremost and not just a person who doesn't call the cops.

      As a side note in terms of preparing people for life, having a major altercation with an authority figure in itself can be a good life learning. The world is an absolute shithouse place full of idiots and sometimes idiots in power. Isolating people from these realities is not necessarily the answer, and I say that as someone who got suspended for defending myself at school. That taught me a very valuable lesson about authority figures and who can be trusted to do what's "right".

    52. Re:If I had a child now by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      The detention centres are supported by both sides of politics. They were introduced under a conservative government, abolished by a Labor govt, brought back in by the same Labor govt but a million times worse, then maintained by the current conservative govt.

      It is worth noting that the detention centres are only for people arriving by boat, so if you arrive in Australia by plane and claim asylum you won't end up there.

      What did you mean about the visas though? It can be hard to get permanent residency in Australia but visiting is easy.

    53. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have been trying to improve the schools for decades. It hasn't worked. There's only so long you can keep on doing the same failed thing and expect something different to happen this time around. It's just well beyond the point where it's obvious the only solution is to tear it down and start over, so start homeschooling.

    54. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought about that. I could teach my children any school subject they'd like to learn.
      The problem is: how do you teach your child about dealing with idiots?

    55. Re:If I had a child now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I HAVE seen the PICTURES, hey you know your fingers could be a bomb trigger. Better chop them off just in case (save the rest of us from having to read anything else from you)

    56. Re:If I had a child now by dpidcoe · · Score: 1

      If the quality of education is determined by the number of police incidents then you are absolutely right. But if you actually believe this then please do your child a favour and don't try and home school them.

      Understand that (generally speaking) the educational system is tailored towards the greatest common denominator. If you're an average person and manage to not run into any horrible teachers, then you'll probably do ok and have a typical experience. If you're slightly outside of the norm, you'll be ground down by the school system until you fit. The further away from it you are, the worse it will be. There are some cases in which that might be a good thing (I knew some kids who were naturally assholes and required a bit of peer provided consequences until they learned). But then there are cases where it's a very bad thing (I've known some really smart people who ultimately never reached their full potential because they had "being smarter than average is bad" beat into them by the school system)

      While I agree it's possible I suggest to you the result pales in comparison to spending 7 hours a day surrounded by peers. Not that the child may not be successful, but they will develop very different social skills as a result. I've met a few home schooled people. Very bright, but complete social outcasts.

      At the risk of making an analogy, that's kind of like taking someone who grew up in a middle/upper class family, dropping them in the hood, then saying they're a social outcast because they don't hang with the gangsters very well. I guess technically they would be an outcast, but it's not really a bad thing in this case.

    57. Re:If I had a child now by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Given that the teacher's response was to stick it in her desk drawer and continue with the day's lessons, she obviously didn't think it was anything dangerous.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    58. Re:If I had a child now by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This is what's so fucking ludicrous about the whole thing.

      If there's genuine fear it's a bomb, then you enact the "oh shit, there's a bomb" process. They didn't, so they didn't think it was a bomb. At which point, what the fuck was the rest of the charade for?

      I've been evacuated from my home because of a suspect IED that looked like a battery with two wires sticking out of it, and that turned out to be a battery with two wires out of it. There was a level of uncertainty, so the "oh shit, there's possibly a bomb" process kicked straight in, we stood around gossiping, the bomb disposal squad turned up, had a chuckle and let us go back home.

      Another day a bomb went off, killed some people and broke the school windows. Later that day, we all went to lessons in the undamaged buildings.

      Those fuckwits in Irvine clearly have serious issues, and I don't mean young Ahmed.

    59. Re:If I had a child now by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      moron.

      Any circuit "could be" a bomb trigger.

      Electrolytics can do that when you put AC across them, but hey...

      Or even reverse biased DC. Well done, you've just described almost every circuit ever except some very recent cellphones which use the latest gen MLCCs.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    60. Re:If I had a child now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      It is not the public school system that is broken - it's only a symptom of a larger problem. The society is broken.

      There are issues for sure - But the schools are behind the curve in not realizing that getting tougher and tougher on lesser and lesser offenses will produce the same things that teh war onn drugs created. More criminals for really petty infractions.

      As William F Buckly noted: "marijuana prohibition has done far more harm to far more people than marijuana ever could"

      And the same for the young lady who wore too much perfume, and is now a convicted criminal.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    61. Re:If I had a child now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      The question is: what makes you superior in being able to prepare your child for their future life?

      That's your question, not mine. As a person who has goe through the public school system, as well as a person who's son has gone through the public school system, I've seen that it is so royally fucked up and has been for a long time, and is only getting worse.

      Which makes your "question" silly. Because I can ask the same question of the public schooll system, and it fails miserably. That bar is terribly terribly low.

      As a side note in terms of preparing people for life, having a major altercation with an authority figure in itself can be a good life learning.

      Kewl! It is the logic that kids should be allowed to get addicted to crystal meth because that teaches them that there are some bad drugs out there, and will do them some good. And furthermore, that getting sent to jail, maybe becoming bubba's favorite anal insertion target, is teaching them a valuable lifes lesson.

      The world is an absolute shithouse place full of idiots and sometimes idiots in power. Isolating people from these realities is not necessarily the answer, and I say that as someone who got suspended for defending myself at school.

      Who is isolating? This is avoidance of that shithouse world, at least until the little one will need to commit an actual crime to be arrested for it. What good is knowing that there are assholes out there when you have a felony on your police blotter, and can't even be a full citizen.

      That taught me a very valuable lesson about authority figures and who can be trusted to do what's "right".

      I had my share of stupid problems myself. Fortunately, it was during an age when a kid might get expelled for three days instead of a night in lockup. Its odd, I look at this system as abusing children, and you seem to take joy in turning children into criminals so they'll know something about life. Maybe we need to start charging babies with criminal offenses when they make a mess in their diapers. Teach them important life lessons, you know. Here's what you apparently approve of - as far as I can tell, because I would want my children to avoid this, and you want them to experience this:

      http://ccjs.umd.edu/sites/ccjs...

      Be my guest. I'll pass on that.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    62. Re:If I had a child now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      I thought about that. I could teach my children any school subject they'd like to learn. The problem is: how do you teach your child about dealing with idiots?

      Take them to a Republican Presidential debate.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    63. Re:If I had a child now by jrumney · · Score: 1

      What did you mean about the visas though? It can be hard to get permanent residency in Australia but visiting is easy.

      Here's the list of countries with visa-free access to Australia, for whom visiting Australia is easy:

      1. New Zealand
    64. Re:If I had a child now by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

      Ok. Though I don't really consider the free e-visitor visa (subclass 651) which you can get in about 5 minutes online free of charge to be a particular challenge...

      Eligible countries
      Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland ,France ,Germany ,Greece ,Hungary ,Iceland ,Ireland ,Italy ,Latvia ,Liechtenstein ,Lithuania ,Luxembourg ,Malta, Monaco, The Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Republic of San Marino, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom – British Citizen, Vatican City.

      NZ is a special case as a NZ citizen is free to live and work in Aus without restriction.

    65. Re:If I had a child now by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Which makes your "question" silly. Because I can ask the same question of the public schooll system, and it fails miserably. That bar is terribly terribly low.

      You misunderstand. It's not my question at all since I'm not home schooling anyone. It's a question for you to ask yourself and that is all. If you have some empirical evidence that you are better suited to teach then by all means go forth and educate people. Just know the world is full of reactionary idiots who will make a call on a completely unrelated matter i.e. thinking they are a more capable educator because a school has a single student arrested on dubious grounds.

      If you have some deep understanding of the principles required to educate your child, then you most definitely did not make that apparent in your original post. You just came across as someone with a typical knee-jerk reaction.

      My comment is: Make sure what you're doing will actually have the correct intention. Will your kid not get arrested on dubious grounds at home? Almost certainly. Are you able to better educate him/her? That is the question you would want to most strongly consider before you start. Don't just do so with the understanding that the current system is messed up, do so with the understanding that you have a system that is better.

      That is all.

    66. Re:If I had a child now by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1

      Which makes your "question" silly. Because I can ask the same question of the public schooll system, and it fails miserably. That bar is terribly terribly low.

      You misunderstand. It's not my question at all since I'm not home schooling anyone. It's a question for you to ask yourself and that is all.

      Neither am I - I've said that in order to allow a child of mine today to have a better chance of growing to an adult with any kind of future, I'd home school them. Won't have to worry about police in the hallways arresting them for things that aren't crimes - or are you denying that perfectly normal children are now being turned into criminals for matters that are not crimes?

      If you have some empirical evidence that you are better suited to teach then by all means go forth and educate people. Just know the world is full of reactionary idiots who will make a call on a completely unrelated matter i.e. thinking they are a more capable educator because a school has a single student arrested on dubious grounds.

      First thing is that you have a talent for understatement that verges on the humorous if it weren't for young people's lives being destroyed. Just Duckduckgo "police in schools" and "police in schools statistics", then read a few, then come back and accuse me of being reactionary because I'm all upset that as you put it "a single student arrested on dubious grounds".

      Back to the main thrust

      I have personal experience from when I was in school, personal experience from when my son was in school, and enough evidence based on both scholarly reports and news stories that I no more want a child in the public school system than I would want them living in a meth house.

      If you have some deep understanding of the principles required to educate your child, then you most definitely did not make that apparent in your original post. You just came across as someone with a typical knee-jerk reaction.

      And fortunately you didn't come to a knee jerk reaction, eh?

      For what it is worth - I do a significant amount of teaching, in the fields of electronics and computing. I also teach a course on emergency communications. And I'm rather good at it, if the demands for my time are indicative. I tutored my own son in math, and as was my own experience his grades improved a lot after that. I attributed it to a similar experience to mine in school. My first algebra teacher was so nasty bad, so boring, so uninterested, that my own grades reflected that, only to be "fixed" after my electronics teacher introduced our class to slide rules - then something clicked and it was D's to A's. Without using a slide rule. Something about that mathamechanical (tm) setup of the things, I believe. He was the one of two good teachers that I had in my entire public school experience.

      Too bad slide rules aren't still in some use. Mine was the last class in our school to ever use them. And the batteries last like forever!

      But no, I'm not accredited with a degree in each subject taught in school. And you might fire back with my experiences and my son's experiences as being mere anecdotes, not worthy of consideration.

      But then again, neither are the teachers 100 percent accredited who are in there now, and most accreditation seems to be mated to taking tests successfully. Coupled with the gulag atmosphere in many schools, it has gone well beyond being about me. Schools aren't turning out particularly good products, and are not safe places to groom children for their futures. I could hardly do worse.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
    67. Re:If I had a child now by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I don't hold a passport from any of those countries though.

    68. Re:If I had a child now by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Dude, he was arrested for a possible "bomb hoax". Given the device's appearance and the events leading up to what happened in the middle of English class, it doesn't seem outside of the realm of reason that authorities acted properly, or at least within their established procedures.

      I'm saying that there is another side to this story that we are NOT hearing because the authorities are following their procedures and are not allowed to discuss the actual events, all we have is what the kid and his activist parents are saying. The school is saying that there is more information, but without written permission from the boy's parents they cannot discuss it.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  18. Re:Sure, honoring his fellow Nazi Atheist Muslim! by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    He doesn't quite look a Native American.

  19. This story has the same virality as police malprac by Applehu+Akbar · · Score: 0

    For years, thuggish police activity like property seizure without due process, wrong-house raids, use of SWAT teams for routine civic disputes and killing nonviolent dogs during raids as a matter of policy had been carped at in obscure online discussion forums by "constitutionalists" and other people who the major media could easily ignore as nutjobs. With Ferguson and the Garner case, the stories went racial, and so it was at this point that liberals decided to become involved. Now police malpractice is a mainstream cause, and everybody is taking pictures of cops to uncover the latest case of bad behavior. Last week when New York was full of tennis stars for the US Open, the James Blake case brought it all to our attention again.

    Meanwhile, brain-dead political correctness and high-handedness by pubic schools in suspending students for such crimes as wearing a political T-shirt or chewing a Pop-Tart into the shape of a gun have been complained about in the same obscure and non-PC corners of the online world for years. Just last week, a young boy was arrested for stealing a kiss.

    Is the Mohamed case the Ferguson of public school systems, the case that finally blows the problem out into the open? Now that race is involved, the same liberals who kiss the feet of school boards after their every authoritarian ukase have suddenly Become Concerned. Perhaps now the battle will be joined.

  20. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The primary function of law enforcement is to protect the rich from the poor. Law enforcement wins hearts and minds by having an ostensible function of protecting everyone, including the poor, and maintaining order. The fact, however, is that the sorts of dangers that threaten the haves (break-ins, muggings, thefts, etc.) are perpetuated against them by the have-nots. So the net effect is the same: protect the rich from the poor.

    As the middle class continues to slide into the lower class, the perception of police will continue to shift from "protector" to "oppressor," and so the "war on law enforcement" will only escalate.

  21. You stay classy, Irving ISD by ClickOnThis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As the last linked article points out, rather than being contrite about the unwarranted treatment of Akmed Mohamed, the Irving Independent School District is doubling down. In addition to reporting "suspicious" activity (mentioned in TFS) the letter from Principal Daniel Cummings to parents included this gem:

    I recommend using this opportunity to talk with your child about the Student Code of Conduct and specifically not bringing items to school that are prohibited.

    Nice posturing. So, was the item he brought to school actually prohibited? Or is this just innuendo?

    --
    If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    1. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2

      What's prohibited is whatever the principal says is prohibited. For the children's safety, obviously.

    2. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They prohibit clocks in school?

    3. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Irving ISD Student code of conduct right here in Spanish and English:

      http://www.irvingisd.net/Domain/1454

      I looked through it and didn't see anything that prohibited what he brought. Only thing remotely close was under "Possession of Cell Phones, Telecommunications or Other Electronic Devices", but that really seemed oriented towards smart phones and perhaps tables-- this kid made a clock (so to call that a prohibited electronic device would mean no one could wear a watch unless it was old school wind-up)".

      Oh... found another gem. Page 6 under Prohibited Items "Any articles not generally considered to be weapons, including school supplies, when the principal or designee determines that a danger exists". However, if the danger was that it might be a bomb... well one would think school evacuation would have been in order.

      This is just sad. So glad my children are home schooled (reason 9236 :-)).

    4. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Jahoda · · Score: 1

      He's a football coach who went and got himself a masters of education from an A&M-system night school. Need I say more?

    5. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you. That is all

    6. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Rhywden · · Score: 1, Informative

      110 V is not lethal - hurts like a bitch, but lethal? Nope. The AC makes it even less dangerous. Plus, if 110 V were lethal then how do you think people survive being hit by a taser where the voltage is a multiple of 10,000 Volts?

      It's the resulting current, the amount of charge transferred and the length of the current which make electric appliances dangerous. But at 110 V you almost have to work hard to kill yourself.

    7. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Optic7 · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't even say that 110V hurts a lot either. It just feels really weird, and makes your muscles clench on their own. I've been shocked by 110V several times.

    8. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      it had exposed LETHAL voltages when he plugged it in during class.

      Citation please. None of the news stories or photos have any indication of exposed lethal voltages.

      He took apart a PLUG IN alarm clock and soldered wires to it

      How do you know? Again, citation please. And even if he did, good on him for tinkering and learning something.

      then carried the thing around in a METAL box.

      Which appears to be insulated inside, according to the police photograph.

      That exposes 110Vac which is downright lethal, and has killed many in the past.

      Your claim of exposed 110V AC is unsubstantiated, and in any case it's not why he was taken to juvenile detention in handcuffs, to be interrogated for hours without parents or counsel present.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    9. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, the claims here. this should be fun.
      1. "this device was dangerous"

      uh, fact not in evidence.

      2. "it had exposed lethal voltages when he plugged it in during class"?

      lethal? please substantiate. what was the amperage?
      can you provide a reference that it was plugged in during class? that is not
      in either article i read.

      3. "metal box .. exposes 110 vac"

      do you have evidence that the metal box was attached to either pole, or perhaps was it
      attached to ground?

      4. "clearly this kind of thing is prohibited"

      really? please provide a citation.

    10. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Technically, anything over 35 V is considered lethal though some would argue that 45V is a better limit... 110 volts can and does kill over 500 a year in the USA. In fact, it's the voltage that kills the most, mainly because it's literally everywhere....

      Personally I've been shocked by 230V multiple times and 110 a few times, where it is not immediately lethal, anything that can cause you to loose control of your own movements (which is about 40V) can be lethal. The victim who "cannot let go" is the one that dies from the lower voltages like this. This is why you only touch possible live sources with the back of your hand, so the involuntary jerk when your muscles contract pulls you away from the source.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    11. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each year, there is an estimated average of 60 electrocutions associated with consumer products in the US. The three most common product categories associated with electrocutions are small appliance, power tool, and lighting equipment.

      Still, I suppose it's like guns to you Muricans.....as long as it doesn't involve a *gasp* "TURRIST" then it doesn't really matter, right ?

    12. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not just voltage that matters. Have you heard the saying "it's the current that kills"? https://www.physics.ohio-state.edu/~p616/safety/fatal_current.html

      Plus the AC makes it more dangerous because it is at the unfortunate frequency of 60 Hz: http://www.bassengineering.com/e_effect.htm

    13. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Ah come on.. this was a DISASSEMBLED alarm clock that he plugged in. The box could be opened...There is zero chance this thing was UL certified...

      Now if he had it powered by a 9V transistor battery or two, then I'd be willing to accept it wasn't inherently dangerous, but he PLUGGED IT IN, which in my view has zero place in public school science experiments unless the thing being plugged in is a UL listed power supply that puts out less than about 24 volts...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    14. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

      60Hz AC matches the impedence of the human body pretty well and makes it more lethal. And 110v definitely can be fatal depending on the person, contacts and path. It's not guaranteed death, but is dangerous and should be treated that way. And you're right about the current and 25kv isn't definitively lethal either. Static electricity shocks can be > 70kv.

    15. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

      No...ex post facto Law shall be passed.
      Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 US Constitution

    16. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wrong. At 110V, the voltage is high enough to overcome the body resistance and pass enough current to kill you. Death has occurred with as low as 42V.

      110/120Vac @ 60Hz is especially dangerous as it exceeds the "let go threshold" (where the muscle contractions prevent a victim from letting go of the object), but does not deliver enough initial energy to propel the victim away from the source. This means the duration of shocks is likely to be a lot longer.

      With 60Hz AC,as little as 30mA current is enough to induce ventricular fibrillation. This can be a lot lower if the current has a direct pathway to the heart. However the frequency of alternating current is far more likely to induce ventricular fibrillation than direct current. In fact DC requires 10 times more current to induce ventricular fibrillation.

      With 100V at 50Hz, 50% of the population will have a body impedance of 1875 Ohms or less. This equates to 53.33mA and is more than enough to be lethal.

      Yes people survive being hit by a Taser, but Tasers aren't just a 50kV charge. There is open circuit voltage of 50kV, but this only occurs until the barbs make contact (closing the circuit) or an arc occurs. With a closed circuit this drops to 1200V 100 microsecond pulses (as about 19Hz) each pulse is current limited to around 1.9mA (100 microcoulombs of charge). However despite this being well below the typical danger threshold, people have also died from Tasers.

      I'm guessing by your comment that you have survived a 110V shock. You were lucky, thats all. Congratulations. So many other people haven't been....

    17. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Throw him back in jail! YEAH!

    18. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by marciot · · Score: 1

      I recommend using this opportunity to talk with your child about the Student Code of Conduct and specifically not bringing items to school that are prohibited.

      It would be awesome if all the students got together and made plans to get to classes late every single day. Why? Because bringing time keeping devices such as clocks or wristwatches to class is obviously prohibited...

    19. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, let's see. Having read most of your comments so far, the only possible conclusion at this time is that you have no idea what you're talking about, you're speculating wildly, and you appear to have some agenda which does not include the truth, for some reason.

      Hmm. No, you're not credible.

    20. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      60Hz AC matches the impedence of the human body pretty well and makes it more lethal.

      Can you say more about this? In what sense does 60Hz match the impedance of the human body? For all practical purposes, 60Hz is DC.

    21. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Rhywden · · Score: 1

      Okay, I can only speak for 230 V (and 1,000,000 V due to my Van De Graaff generator :) but 230 V is perfectly survivable as well.

    22. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      60Hz AC matches the impedence of the human body pretty well and makes it more lethal.

      Hz is a measure of frequency of the AC waveform, and not impedance. As well, 120V (110 as you assert) is safer than higher voltages which is why it is in use in North America (even though costs are incurred in doing so).

      Finally, it's not the voltage that will kill you, it's a combination of the amperage and the path that the electricity takes through your body. 1000A flowing from your fingertips to a ring on the same finger to ground will probably burn your finger right off, but likely not kill you (exaggeration for the purpose of illustration). 10A flowing from your left index finger to your right index finger to ground will likely stop your heart.

      Voltage ~= strength of the flow of electrons
      Amperage ~= measure of the number of electrons flowing
      Watts ~= work done by said electrons.

    23. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      Hz is a measure of frequency of the AC waveform, and not impedance

      Skin impedance changes quite significantly with frequency. I assume this is what the OP is referring to.

    24. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. You certainly are grasping at straws now. I've been zapped by 110 and 220, also watched a co-worker get zapped from a house mains. He said his fillings felt "weird" :)

    25. Re:You stay classy, Irving ISD by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      It's a good thing that a school principal is in no way, shape or form a member of any branch of the federal government.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  22. The TSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you think will happen when he tries to take this past the TSA at the airport?

    1. Re:The TSA by ClickOnThis · · Score: 1

      What do you think will happen when he tries to take this past the TSA at the airport?

      The TSA will inspect it, confirm that it has no explosives, and then send him on his way.

      --
      If it weren't for deadlines, nothing would be late.
    2. Re:The TSA by Alioth · · Score: 1

      They may wipe it down for an explosives test and then let him take it anyway.

      I've taken all sorts of electronics in planes, many bare circuit boards in static shield bags, and lithium polymer batteries that actually look like bombs on the X-ray with wires sticking out. The most they do is use their explosive detector, just like they do with people's laptop computers.

  23. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

    George W. Bush has been out of office for nearly seven years. Time to let go of the hate and move on.

  24. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by pouar · · Score: 1

    It's a clock, not a bomb. I thought we already established that.

    --
    while :;do if windows sucks;then mv windows /dev/null;pacman -Sy linux;fi;done
  25. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The inner city thugs ARE the police.

    "You didn't signal a right turn 100yd before the turn! You're under arrest! PUT THAT CIGARETTE OUT!!!!"

    The difference is inner city thugs are
    a) less likely to shoot you dead
    b) not defended for doing so (hence the reason for (a)).

  26. aciremA by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 0

    So let me get this straight, this kid is being arrested and Trump is leading the polls?

    The endless abuse, stupidity, waste, and misery is why Trump is leading the polls.

    We've got the Republican debates tonight. See if any of the politicians will take a clear stance on fixing anything.

    Oh, and check the voting records - it's the only way to make sure.

    USA Freedom Act (Senate) (source)

    YEAs: 67 (D = 43, R = 23, I = 1)
    NAYs: 32 (D = 1, R = 30, I = 1)
    Not voting: 1 (R)

    1. Re:aciremA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your link is to the House vote on the "USA Freedom Act" HR 3361, which was not taken up by the Senate.

    2. Re:aciremA by Okian+Warrior · · Score: 1

      Whoops - cut-and-paste typo.

      The actual link is here.

      The tabulated data is correct, it's just the link points to the house roll-call instead of the Senate.

      Good catch - thanks for the heads up.

    3. Re:aciremA by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      The endless abuse, stupidity, waste, and misery is why Trump is leading the polls.

      Ironically, those are all perfect descriptions of Trump's personality, attitude, and business acumen to date.

      Why on EARTH does anything think he'd be a good leader? The only thing he has ever been good at is fucking over everyone else (including his OWN employees, shareholders, and investors, with multiple bankruptcies) to get ahead personally. Well, declaring bankruptcy to fuck over the "shareholders" and employees of the US isn't going to work...

  27. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no war on law enforcement, there is a war on criminals masquerading is cops.

  28. Electronics used to be taught in high-schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I bet every kid who ever took an electronics class in high-school made a digital clock. Why is it that nobody including teachers immediately thought OMG Terrorists!! back then? Because we became a nation of pussies. Scared of everything except the thing we should fear the most..

    1. Re:Electronics used to be taught in high-schools by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      When I was growing up in the 1970's, kids were blowing up toads with firecrackers and garbage cans with pipe bombs. Kids today can't step on a sidewalk crack without their parents hovering over them and the police ready to detain them.

    2. Re:Electronics used to be taught in high-schools by r-diddly · · Score: 1

      Mod up if I had points. I know, weak, but it's the thought that counts.

    3. Re:Electronics used to be taught in high-schools by An+ominous+Cow+art · · Score: 1

      While I was growing up in the 70s, I knocked a tooth out of a kid who was blowing up frogs with firecrackers.

      But yeah, my friends and I carried pocket knives to school from about 2nd grade onward, and we wandered the post-apocalyptic wasteland of the old clay quarry without getting murdered, etc. and our parents and schools didn't worry too much.

    4. Re:Electronics used to be taught in high-schools by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The 1970's were awesome! The FBI asked my mother about the tall, tomato-less tomato plants that my bother grew in the backyard and she insisted were tomato plants (they weren't). The Hell's Angels and the sheriff department had a brawl down the street that brought out the fire trucks and news media. Firecrackers were sold on every street corner no matter how many roofs caught on fire.

    5. Re:Electronics used to be taught in high-schools by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      I bet every kid who ever took an electronics class in high-school made a digital clock.

      And we'd all grew up watching the same movies, so we'd compete to make them look as bomb like as possible because then it looked cool, just like in the movies. Oh I should mention my school was actually evacuated a couple of times from fake IRA bomb threats phoned in to the police. No one ever cared about our clocks/timing circuits/decade counters/etc, except the teacher was always pleased when we got them working.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:Electronics used to be taught in high-schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh... I went to Catholic school... We only had switch blade combs for our hair! ;-)

      I found mine the other day, showed it to my kids who thought it was awesome. I told them never take it to school, though... Heaven knows what would happen if someone at the school saw something like that!

    7. Re:Electronics used to be taught in high-schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In grade school I made a clock, that was basically a black box with a red LED display. But ugly but damn, looking back, it would've easily been mistaken for a bomb :D

    8. Re:Electronics used to be taught in high-schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In 1975, I came into my high school drafting class one day and noticed that the guy sitting at the desk to my right was missing part of two fingers on one hand. Turns out he blew them off while using a screwdriver to pack black power into the pipe bomb he was making. Darwin Award runner-up that year, I'd say. But as far as I know the police never even talked to the guy about it.

    9. Re:Electronics used to be taught in high-schools by jrumney · · Score: 1

      I bet every kid who ever took an electronics class in high-school made a digital clock.

      Nope. We started with a variable DC power supply, then a delay circuit using a 555 timer IC, and finally a dimmer circuit using a triac and pot (which I ended up using to turn a cheap single speed drill into a variable speed one). Apart from those three projects the rest of the year was theory as far as I recall.

    10. Re:Electronics used to be taught in high-schools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Scared of everything except the thing we should fear the most.." ..... the fear itself?!

  29. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I don't know if you noticed, but there's been a war on law enforcement recently.

    This is a lie. You are a liar.

    a certain movement that feels that police arresting inner city thugs is some sort of social justice travesty.

    This is a lie. You are a liar.

  30. Re:This story has the same virality as police malp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just last week, a young boy was arrested for stealing a kiss.

    To be fair, that's actually sexual assault.

  31. It's OK.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is the view of the Ministry that a theoretical knowledge will be sufficient to get you through your examinations, which after all, is what school is all about.

  32. Yes, especially in Boston. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes. Have we already forgotten the Boston lightbright scare?

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2007_Boston_bomb_scare

    1. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      Or the Dangerous Denver Diminutive Robot incident.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      I'm honestly surprised that there hasn't been a flood of copy-cat incidents. It's now entirely possible to bring the US to a complete standstill just by putting random toys in odd places.

    3. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      > Yes. Have we already forgotten the Boston lightbright scare?

      I'm pretty sure 'arab terrorists' and 'dirty hippies' are filed under the same bucket to these people.

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    4. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tell me about it... one time I put a MyLittlePony doll in.... well.. nevermind, but I had to stand still for a while.

    5. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by BradMajors · · Score: 4, Informative

      If a terrorist wants to cause wide spread terror he just needs to distribute tiny robots throughout a city. It would shut down the whole city down. Using bombs would be far less effective.

    6. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by rockout · · Score: 1

      Boston Lite-brite?? You mean where the two individuals were arrested for breaking a law that states that "it is illegal to display a 'hoax device' with the motive to cause citizens to feel threatened, unsafe, and concerned"?

      If you can make the argument that a similar law exists in Texas, and this kid had a motive of "causing citizens to feel threatened, unsafe, and concerned," then you might have a valid argument.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    7. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by rockout · · Score: 1

      No one was arrested in Denver for that.

      --
      I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
    8. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
    9. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At this point, you could probably cause widespread terror with post-it notes with the word "bomb" written on them. For under $10, a terrorist wannabe could cause major panic.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    10. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by TsuruchiBrian · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between personally possessing unknown electronics and distributing unknown electronics all across the city in populated public places.

      The same response may have happened if they were caught distributing backpacks all over town.

      Simply having electronics is nothing like what happened in Boston.

    11. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When my dad was a hippie in the sixties and lived briefly in Milwaukee they had the same "red line" for "long-hairs" as for blacks. He literally walked half a block into the wrong neighborhood, and was stopped by the police and told which side of town he was allowed in.

      The difference is, as a long-hair he was driven back to "his side of town." If he was black, he'd have probably spent a night in jail to "explain the situation." That was before they realized they could just shoot blacks, of course.

      Back then, I'm also not sure being "brown" would have even been different than "black."

    12. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by zieroh · · Score: 2

      Really, they don't even need toys. Boxes of roofing nails distributed on select thoroughfares at rush hour will plunge just about any city into complete chaos.

      Clearly, it's time to lock up the roofers.

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    13. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      If a terrorist wants to cause wide spread terror he just needs to distribute tiny robots throughout a city

      mc donalds and burger king would like to hear more about this.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    14. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just toss some caltrops off of a freeway overpass.

    15. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by Your.Master · · Score: 2

      You don't need to show that the kid has that motive, because the two individuals in Boston didn't have that motive. The Boston motive was to promote the Aqua Teen Hunger Force movie.

    16. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by Trogre · · Score: 1

      Yes but you're neglecting an important point: Those morons did something fully deserving of arrest. This kid didn't.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    17. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?... Open your eyes asshole.

    18. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by Talderas · · Score: 1

      I suspect you would achieve a greater success by writing "not a bomb" on the post-it notes.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    19. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by maestroX · · Score: 2

      Hippies.They're everywhere. They wanna save the earth, but all they do is smoke pot and smell bad.

    20. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Three post-it notes on a wall:

      Post-it Note #1: "This post-it note isn't a bomb."
      Post-it Note #2: "Neither is this post-it note."
      Third post-it note left blank.

      How much panic is induced and what would the charges look like for sticking three post-it notes on a wall?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    21. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That was before they realized they could just shoot blacks, of course"
      Your ignorance in amazing given that tons of black were shot and killed well before the 60s simply for the color of there skin but I'm sure your so enlightened now that you enjoy fables of "hand up, don't shoot".

    22. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      The Boston motive was to promote the Aqua Teen Hunger Force movie.

      What, you're pretending that doesn't immediately cause "citizens to feel threatened, unsafe, and concerned" ?

    23. Re:Yes, especially in Boston. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "not a bomb" would cause a panic too

  33. Good Move by r-diddly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, literally, good move Obama. Doesn't make up for all the other embarrassments & injustices, and there are many. But at least there's a line... at least being arrested for dumb shit, just this once, gets you a presidential apology. "I made a clock." "We think it's a bomb. Is it a bomb?" "No." "We think you wanted us to think it was a bomb." "But it's patently not a bomb." "Don't bother telling us it's not a bomb... that's exactly what you want us to think!" "I do want you to think that!" "Well then why did you build this bomb-looking bomb then?"

    1. Re:Good Move by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's a good move, but I know an even better one. How about "inviting" (summoning) the teacher, the principle, the police officers and their chief of police to the White House, to ask them what the fuck they were thinking. The president giving these idiots an earful semi-publicly (not in public but it'll make the news) might give other panic-mongers and closet dictators some pause. It'll be worth it even in the extremely unlikely event that the backlash from a presidential chewing-out allows a terrorist to slip through. Fear, suspicion, surveillance and oppression aren't going to stop them anyway.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Good Move by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      "I made a clock." "We think it's a bomb. Is it a bomb?" "No."

      "So ... it's a timer for a bomb?"

    3. Re:Good Move by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a good move, but I know an even better one. How about "inviting" (summoning) the teacher, the principle, the police officers and their chief of police to the White House, to ask them what the fuck they were thinking. The president giving these idiots an earful semi-publicly (not in public but it'll make the news) might give other panic-mongers and closet dictators some pause. It'll be worth it even in the extremely unlikely event that the backlash from a presidential chewing-out allows a terrorist to slip through. Fear, suspicion, surveillance and oppression aren't going to stop them anyway.

      That would be an overreach - which is everything the president has been accused of doing by the GOP with very little actual evidence of such. Intervening directly in a non-federal matter like this is exactly the wrong thing to do. What he has done is neatly publicly shame the school district and the cops without intervening directly in their discipline.

    4. Re:Good Move by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're right; I'm not too familiar with what the U.S. president can and cannot do. But if I were in any way in the direct chain of command (like minister of justice in my own country), I'd have these clowns in front of my desk tomorrow.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    5. Re:Good Move by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      The legal term is "bomb paraphernalia."

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    6. Re:Good Move by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      In the US, the federal government is responsible for some things, and not allowed to intervene in others. Education is reserved for the states to set up.

      In fairness, it's not how we would probably set up the country if we were doing so today, but government education wasn't on the horizon when we wrote the constitution, and "state's rights" were made very explicit because states had to be convinced to join.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    7. Re:Good Move by MiniMike · · Score: 1

      He's in Texas. He should have said it was an improved game clock for the next high school football game, they would have carried him out on their shoulders while cheering.

    8. Re:Good Move by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Nope, they'd be entirely in a State-level chain-of-command. It is kinda like the EU; even where the local authorities are required to followed guidelines from "above," they're often not actually in any sort of broader chain-of-command outside their country.

      All these sorts of local police, school district officials, mayors, etc., are under the State chain-of-command with their Governor at the top. Even where there are federal guidelines, they attach the guidelines to receiving federal money, and if they need to enforce it they have to go through the courts because there is no chain-of-command that bridges State and Federal officials.

      The most criticism they would get from Texas officials would be something like, "gosh guys, this is making us all look bad here."

      The most the President could do would be to "invite" them to the White House. They'd just say "no" and make him look powerless and meddling. He's much better off just criticizing them via twitter, as he is. It is a "teachable moment" and the lesson is that "his teachers failed him."

    9. Re:Good Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only people in the direct chain of command are the idiots in the local school district who hired this principal and set up these policies, and the fuckwads at the state level that oversee and fund the public schools here.

      I attended a Richland High School, not that far from Irving (we played MacArthur in football in the early 90s at least). Richland is one of the remaining Rebel mascot schools, which while it gave up the rebel flag in the mid 1990s and "Dixie" in the late 1990s, still uses rebel imagery and mascots. I can't help but keep thinking "gee, at least my high school doesn't seem like the most racist one in Texas for a little while".

    10. Re:Good Move by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but government education wasn't on the horizon when we wrote the constitution

      Actually, when they wrote the US Constitution, several states mandated public schools as a civic duty.

      They may not have been quite as universal or mandatory as today, but they did have the schools.

      You can speculate what role they might have thought the federal, or even their state governments would have, but you can't say they were necessarily unaware of the concept of public schools, not to the point of saying "it wasn't on the horizon" in the fashion you mean. In the sense that it had gone past the horizon, and come home to roost, you would be correct.

      Even the Northwest Ordinance made provision for schools. "Art. 3. Religion, morality, and knowledge, being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged. "

    11. Re:Good Move by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      Sometimes its better to model the proper behavior for impressionable developing minds like Texas school functionaries. Getting in their face about them being wrong just makes them defensive, and they'll never listen then.

  34. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by msauve · · Score: 1

    It's a "not a" bomb!

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  35. "Immediately report suspicious behavior" by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Irving Independent School District in Irving, Texas sent an email to parents about the incident asking students to: "immediately report any suspicious items and / or suspicious behavior."

    "Hello, Office? I'd like to report that the principle is acting more moronic than normal....I think he's a replicant."

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:"Immediately report suspicious behavior" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Irving Independent School District in Irving, Texas sent an email to parents about the incident asking students to: "immediately report any suspicious items and / or suspicious behavior."

      Hello, Sheriff? I've got a student here who's questioning the creationist lesson plan. No, this isn't the first time he's questioned my authority. No... No... No, he's not brown, really, more just tanned... No, I don't think they're all brown... No, I'm pretty sure the heathen atheists can be any color... Alright... Alright, but give me a couple of minutes to clear the good, god-fearing children out of the classroom first...

    2. Re:"Immediately report suspicious behavior" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For what it's worth, I have heard of someone doing that in the Army. The CO was a nightmare, and everyone hated him. Someone put acid in the guy's coffee, then called it in and said he was acting strangely.

    3. Re:"Immediately report suspicious behavior" by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      They tried to do that to two of my teachers in middle school. Failed both times. The first teacher just kept acting totally normal, and presumably enjoyed the trip, and "nothing happened." The second teacher calmly walked to the nurse's office, said what he believed was happening, and got a week of extra paid leave.

      It sounds like a good prank, and the joke-version that people retell sounds believable, but the copycats have a pretty low success rate.

  36. Sounds like ISIS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds like an elaborate plot by ISIS to get to POTUS.

    1. Re:Sounds like ISIS! by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      Now why in tarnation wood a bunch a towelheads wanna kill that damn secret muslim? That just don't make no since.

  37. Not sure I would want to study STEM in the US by Harlequin80 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, would you want to learn electronics, chemistry, physics, or comp sci in a country which might just decide to lock you up for doing your homework?!?!?!

    1. Re:Not sure I would want to study STEM in the US by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      Why do you think the U.S. in falling behind in training scientists and engineers. Ignorance is the rule, not the exception.

    2. Re:Not sure I would want to study STEM in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't want to study STEM anywhere else! Have you seen what STEM pays outside of the US? I'm an overqualified PhD working in Europe on very difficult problems.

      In the US, you're trying to get McDonald's cashiers higher wages than I've got. And I don't even have one of those permanent positions yet.

    3. Re:Not sure I would want to study STEM in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you see what they pay science graduates in hard currency, you will personally lead the church choir.

  38. Re:Moslems look out for each other by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    In other news President Obama and the First Lady will pledge their eldest daughter in marriage to Akmed.

  39. TX + FL = WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is it with populous gulf-coast states? If there's a shake-your-head in "I'm embarrassed to be an American" silence story in the news, more often than not it's from one of those two states. I think Fark.com even had a "Florida" tag for one of its story categories... Maybe there should be a tag here for them both? Those two states have something in the water/mosquitoes/seafood they consume from the gulf? Someone should get some grant money from the feds to research it since we research all kinds of other crazy hypotheses with huge grants...

  40. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by CanadianMacFan · · Score: 2

    Only because chemistry class was that afternoon.

  41. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    There has been, eh?

    Then why has this last year had FEWER police deaths by shooting than any others for years?

    Why, in fact, has Obama's presidency had fewer police deaths than his predecessors since the 1970s?

    What kind of war is it, that is being done so ineffectually?

  42. "he was handcuffed for his own safety..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a load of nonsense

  43. commentsubjectsaredumb by Falos · · Score: 1

    The thick-skinned, trollfag part of me instantly suggests detecting a subtle jab at the other involved party.

    My actual conscious thought says it's really just damage control about the overall "message" in the air. And while it may be a bit ham-fisted, I can't deny the positive direction it attempts.

    > The Irving Independent School District sent an email ... asking to: "immediately report any suspicious items and / or suspicious behavior."
    Yeah, here's the thing, you've just proven the Powers That Be have shitty judgement and we need to resort to our own. Now people will hesitate to report. I admit that the hesitation is A Bad Thing, but you've encouraged it. And I use that phrasing because I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt. I'm generously assuming you're not a lot of kneejerky fuckwits that leap all over the brown kid with an eastern name.

  44. Nice move Mr. P, but what about the school system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Perhaps there is a nice grant that they have that they shouldn't?

  45. Another swipe at police by Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember that incident in Boston where the professor (and buddy of Obama) went ballistic on police responding to a suspicious person call? Obama called the police "stupid" after that one.

    Same thing here. After several shootings of police officers recently, he finally decides to speak out on this non-event and reiterate that he has no respect for police or the job they're doing. Hope and change.

    1. Re:Another swipe at police by Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember that incident in Boston where the professor (and buddy of Obama) went ballistic on police responding to a suspicious person call? Obama called the police "stupid" after that one.

      Same thing here. After several shootings of police officers recently, he finally decides to speak out on this non-event and reiterate that he has no respect for police or the job they're doing. Hope and change.

      No, it is not. This kid did not do the same thing. He just showed up at school with a science project he did, by himself. He wanted to be recognized for his brilliant work, just like any other kid that feels proud of what they did. Then a school teacher, that is less smart than the kid, calls the police out of fear, and all this happened. The President is right in honor that kid over the police and a school system that treats a kid that way, any day!

    2. Re:Another swipe at police by Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is. Obama is once again saying that police are stupid and don't deserve our respect.

    3. Re: Another swipe at police by Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why only private condolences? Why only privately speak out with dismay over deaths of officers while public decries of some officer behavior?

      He could have easily sent the student a private condolence.

      His outreach is pure publicity and pure bull shit. While I'm outraged at the kids treatment I'm also outraged at the obvious attempt to cash in.

    4. Re: Another swipe at police by Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only private condolences? Another leap of logic there, as I never said anything about them being private, let alone exclusively so.

      Some private condolences may have been offered, I can't say they weren't, since being private, I would hardly expect to know, but there have also been many public statements and outreach. As I said, these are token gestures that are performed.

      Which would nonetheless being publicity and otherwise bullshit as you describe, but it's the kind we expect.

      It's like Batman, they expected him to kiss a baby, even though he knew it was a bad idea.

      Still, good on you, leaping to more wild and unsubstantiated accusations. Double-down on a bad bet! Just because you don't know something happened, it doesn't exist!

      Here’s a selection of events where Obama has appeared, all archived a few quick keystrokes away on the White House website:

      May 7, 2010: Presidential proclamation for Peace Officers Memorial Day and Police Week.

      Excerpt from proclamation:

      "As a nation, we rely on law enforcement officers to keep our neighborhoods safe, enforce our laws, and respond in times of crisis. These men and women sustain peace and order across America, and we look to them as models of courage and integrity. This week, we honor their extraordinary service and sacrifice, and we remember the fallen heroes whose selfless acts have left behind safer streets and stronger communities."

      May 15, 2010: Presidential remarks at the National Peace Officers' Memorial.

      Excerpt from Obama’s remarks:

      "To the survivors of fallen law enforcement officers, our hearts go out to you for your loss. The husbands and wives, mothers and fathers you loved, they protected us all. And all Americans are grateful for the lives that they gave in the line of duty."

      May 12, 2011: Presidential remarks at a White House Rose Garden ceremony honoring National Association of Police Organizations "Top Cops"

      Excerpt from Obama’s remarks:

      "Tomorrow we know that you and your fellow first responders will be back on your diligent duty -- looking out for us, looking out for one another, looking back at times with fallen partners, determined to make sure that their extraordinary sacrifices were not in vain. And we will be standing behind you, as one nation and one people, proud of your actions, awed by your courage, and grateful for your service on our behalf."

      May 15, 2012: Presidential remarks at the National Peace Officers' Memorial Service at the U.S. Capitol.

      Excerpt from Obama’s remarks:

      "Today, with heavy hearts, we honor those who gave their lives. .... Their families are in our thoughts and prayers, as we remember the quiet courage of the men and women we have lost. The rest of us can never fully understand what you go through. But please know that we hold you in our hearts -- not just today, but always. We are forever in your debt. And it is on behalf of all of us, the entire American people, that I offer my thoughts, my prayers, and my thanks. May God shine a light upon the fallen and comfort the mourning. May he protect the peacemakers who protect us every day."

      May 15, 2013: Presidential remarks at the National Peace Officers' Memorial Service at the U.S. Capitol.

      Excerpt from Obama’s remarks:

      "Scripture tells us, ‘None of us lives to himself, and none of us dies to himself.’ The brave officers we gather to remember today devoted themselves so fully to others -- to serve and to protect others -- that in the process they were willing to give their lives. And so, today, let us not remember them just for how they died, but also for how they lived. We can never repay our debt to these officers and their families, but we must do what we can, with all that we have, to live our lives in a way that pays tribute to their memory."

      May 9, 2014: Presidential proclamation for Peace Officers Memorial Day and Police Week.

    5. Re:Another swipe at police by Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The right thing to do would be "Ok sir, we were just checking things out, sorry to upset you" and go on.

      The guy they arrested was stupid. All he had to do was identify himself. Instead he started screaming like a maniac. Do you really think the police, who were investigating a report of a possible burglary and found this guy inside the house, should just say "Fine, you don't need to identify yourself. We'll just leave because we don't want to upset you"?

    6. Re:Another swipe at police by Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He did identify himself. Sorry you missed that detail, but Gates did provide his Harvard University Identification card and driver's license. This is in the police report.

      Maybe he wasn't obsequious enough for you, but not performing the kowtow is not a crime in this country.

      He did identify himself. If that was all he had to do, why didn't the police officer accept that and go on?

      Why did the police officer stick around and exacerbate the situation?

      He did identify himself. It's in the police report. They had to admit that they knew he was there lawfully.

      Why didn't the police officer just leave and let it go?

    7. Re:Another swipe at police by Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you're saying that Obama doesn't respect the police's authority?

    8. Re: Another swipe at police by Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Poor police,Obama doesn't respect their authority.

  46. The internet by raymorris · · Score: 2

    The real, legitimate president who actually won the election invented the internet.

    Also, he invented the strategy of applying different rules in each voting precinct in order to exclude voters in precincts that favored your opponent.

  47. Look hon! There's job openings in Irving! by moorley · · Score: 2

    There's stupidity, there's arrogance, and there's stuff you should really be escorted out of public service for...

    I hope somebody gets fired out of this... No apologies...

    Or on the other hand I look forward to 2-3 days of lame attempts to somehow justify this...

    Shall see...

    --
    "Don't fear death... fear not living..." -me :)
    1. Re:Look hon! There's job openings in Irving! by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

      There's no way they're going to issue an actual apology. Have you read the principal's letter to the parents? He's doubling down on stupid. As are the cops.

  48. Who outed this creative fella, name them ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The media should list the names of the teachers , cops who by their lack of the stuff up there did this ? Are we sending our kids to get educated by these teachers and leaving our community to the mercy of such exemplary public servants. I forgot it happened in texas. : )

  49. Terrorists won this one. by PineHall · · Score: 1

    The terrorists win when we let fear control our decision making like in this case. It is an unfortunate legacy of 9/11.

    1. Re:Terrorists won this one. by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      At this point, I have a feeling the terrorists are just shaking their heads and saying "Come on, guys. At first it was cool how you quaked at everything but now we can't even compete with the idiotic 'terrorist around every corner' attitude you've gotten. When everyone's considered a potential terrorist, where's our job security?"

      Is it irony if officials wind up preventing terrorism because the terrorists think we're too easy of a target (as in too scared of our own shadow, not as in not enough security) and don't even try attacking us?

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  50. The real lesson learned is this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US has a police problem.

    When there is little in the way of actual crime, they need to do *something* to look busy.

    Oh yeah, respect mah authoritay

  51. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I see you saying what he should do.

    What should the adults in a position of authority do differently? Did you pay no attention to their actual statements and comments? If this was "stupid stuff" should we, the rest of society, blow it off, and do nothing, or should we actively consider what happened and why it was such a problem?

    Oh wait, no, we won't pay no attention to the actual parties with responsibilities here, the ones who have a duty. Just the kid. Because kids bringing stuff to school is so wrong we should just strip them all naked before allowing them on the bus, of course, then we'll have to charge them with child porn for being naked.

  52. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You don't handcuff and perp walk kids for a 'misunderstanding'. Everything up to that point was fine (except for the little bit of forgetting to move people out of harm's way should this have been an actual weapon).

    The subsequent arrest and persecution of the kid is flat out paranoid insanity.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  53. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He needs to take his toy home and grow up a bit...

    Maybe so, but nowhere near as much as the faculty and cops need to grow up. They didn't even let him contact his family before questioning, and you're making excuses for them.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  54. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The war is being waged with cell phone cameras and is going very well.

    The police have resorted to putting cameras on themselves to defend. Not realizing that was the desired outcome. Morons that they are.

    They are not primarily being killed, they are being denied their right to kill with impunity.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  55. I spent 5th grade in school in TX by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I remember being in fifth grade in Arlington, Texas, after being born in San Antonio.

    Luckily, given that I loved to make science things and collect meteorites and stuff, I wasn't Being A Kid While Black.

    Seattle stands with Ahmed.

    And this Texan is sad to see the reactions of so-called adults there.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  56. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by dywolf · · Score: 1

    of course they are:

    "the terrorist in chief is already bringing him to the white house. after that he'll introduce him to his terrorist buddies"
    http://www.freerepublic.com/fo...

    "It's a PR conspiracy between the White House and the CAIR"
    also note that while the article admits its a stupid incident on the public officials' parts, but the readers/commenters have already jumped to "CAIR/Obama put the kid up to it, and the town fell for the trap"
    http://www.redstate.com/2015/0...

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  57. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by dywolf · · Score: 1

    they have since fixed that oversight

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  58. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I have a former roommate who still responds to emails that I wrote 15 years as if I sent them yesterday, still hateful from what happened back then and unwilling to let go because that's all he has now. He's trapped in a prison of his own making, unwilling to ask for help because he doesn't want to be free.

  59. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by dywolf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    there is no war on police.

    merely a growing movement that wants them held accountable for when they fuck up (particularly if someone gets hurt/killed as a result), and a growing suspicion that they have been covering up past fuckups by writing false reports, as several have been caught doing in recent news.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  60. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by SecurityGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    t's time for everybody here to grow up and see this for what it was and is, a simple misunderstanding because a kid was doing dangerous looking things.. He needs to take his toy home and grow up a bit...

    Absolutely not.

    He wasn't doing anything dangerous looking. People overreacted. Fine, I can forgive that. Go ahead and determine that the kid didn't have a bomb, apologize for the misunderstanding, and make an end of it. That didn't happen. The kid was interrogated, arrested, fingerprinted, suspended for 3 days, and might be charged with an actual crime, and he did nothing wrong.

    It's time to grow up and accept that punishing people who didn't do anything wrong is never acceptable.

  61. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by david_thornley · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In fact, it wasn't a dangerous-looking thing. If it was, the teacher would not have confiscated it, put it in a desk drawer, and continued teaching the class. If it had actually scared the blank out of the teacher, the teacher would have left it where it was, gotten the school evacuated, and had the bomb squad handle it.

    People like the teachers and police officers need to learn what appropriate behavior is. The behavior was inappropriate no matter what they thought.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  62. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He needs to take his toy home and grow up a bit...

    That would be a nice option if he wasn't detained. And what part of growing up a bit involves threats of arrests after it has become clear to be a misunderstanding.

  63. Who builds a clock that doubles as a briefcase? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 0

    Honestly, what a shitty clock. Zero tolerance policy is what happened not islamophobia.

    Plus who builds a two foot by two foot portable clock that looks like a bomb?

    1. Re:Who builds a clock that doubles as a briefcase? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus who builds a two foot by two foot portable clock that looks like a bomb?

      The same person who wins millions in a lawsuit.

    2. Re:Who builds a clock that doubles as a briefcase? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Zero tolerance policy

      Zero tolerance of what, precisely? I though zero tolerance was meant to be zero tolerance of breaking rules. Not zero tolerance of random shit made up on the spot by mad people.

      Last I checked, clocks weren't against the school rules.

      Plus who builds a two foot by two foot portable clock that looks like a bomb?

      It only looks like a bomb because oooh scary circuit boards!!1111one1!oneONE1!

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    3. Re:Who builds a clock that doubles as a briefcase? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      Zero tolerance of anything that disrupts school. Maybe you haven't noticed but there has been a rash of school arrests of preteens (meaning cops are being called at any disturbance), pre-teen kids threatened with expulsion by making a gun with their fingers, elementary school kids being threatened with expulsion for a "paper gun" (imagine a tic-tac-toe grid with a corner square missing), wearing an NRA shirt, and a whole host of other sad situations if you want to search for such things.

      Let's not forget that schools have been targeted as well so teachers, administrators, and guards are already very sensitive.

      As for the clock, no clocks aren't against school rules, but dude, come on now, that was the shittiest clock I've seen in a long time. That wasn't something analog, or even remotely looked like a clock. It could easily be confused as a bomb by a a school worker who has to be on the look out for such things because once again WHO BUILDS A CLOCK IN A BRIEFCASE? It had giant numbers, a large circuit board, wires EVERYWHERE. Seriously, teach that dude to cut some wire and solder.

      I'm not saying what they did was the right thing. They over-reacted. But again WHO BUILDS A CLOCK IN A BRIEFCASE? It's like someone building a telescope on to a rifle stock for portability and stability.

      Everyone has to be cognizant of the date and times we live in and there are just things we can't do now. I took a bayonet to school to show my friends. No particular reason other that's where and when I could show it to them. Certainly can't do that now.

      So yes, they over reacted. But he acted stupidly as well. Again, time and place.

    4. Re:Who builds a clock that doubles as a briefcase? by germansausage · · Score: 1

      It wasn't A CLOCK IN A BRIEFCASE. It was a small pencil case. See picture here http://www.thisnext.com/item/A.... To be fair, the picture from the cops doesn't give much scale. It is in fact the perfect case for a small electronic project. Also, why does A CLOCK IN A BRIEFCASE frighten you so much?

    5. Re:Who builds a clock that doubles as a briefcase? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      but dude, come on now, that was the shittiest clock I've seen in a long time.

      Christ Alive, man! The kid's 14. Give him a break. I'll bet you weren't making things that looked like they'd been created with the full weight of Chinese mass production when you were 14.

      That wasn't something analog, or even remotely looked like a clock.

      lolwut? It was made from a clock radio. You know, those rather common digital clocks. Which have digits. You know?

      WHO BUILDS A CLOCK IN A BRIEFCASE?

      A 14 year old who's not so hot on the mechanical side of things? It's a decent enough case, though I think it's actually smaller than you think given some of the other pictures.

      It had giant numbers, a large circuit board, wires EVERYWHERE.

      So that looks like just about any 14 yr old's project ever.

      Seriously, teach that dude to cut some wire and solder.

      Yes of course. Neatness becomes important for large projects. But he's 14. The only 14 year olds I've seen who made neat projects (remembering my time in school) were the anally neat ones who made really really simple projects because they were more concerned about neatness than making anything.

      I'm not saying what they did was the right thing. They over-reacted. But again WHO BUILDS A CLOCK IN A BRIEFCASE?

      Go and look at the pictures. There's a US plug for scale. That makes it the world's tiniest briefcase, for micro-briefs. And besides, its a nice good cuboidal box. Perfect for someone who doesn't have a home workshop to make something else.

      So yes, they over reacted. But he acted stupidly as well.

      If by acted stupidly, you mean: he failed to consider ways that insane and power mad adults could go completely mad and over-react to something obviously harmless, then yeah, he was stupid.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re:Who builds a clock that doubles as a briefcase? by onkelonkel · · Score: 1

      It was about 6" by 10". It was built in a pencil case.

      --
      None of them can see the clouds; The polished wings don't care.
    7. Re:Who builds a clock that doubles as a briefcase? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      It doesn't frighten me. I'm not even going to go into a detailed reply because you're not looking for one. Again, time and place and now is not the time to bring something that can be easily confused with something else.

      Is it unreasonable that a kid could bring a bomb to a school? No. Is is reasonable? Well, not really. But the way the culture is now, scared, nosy, and some people generally concerned but generally just wanting to get on TV, all it takes is ONE person to over-react and public service HAS to kick in. Because if they don't, news services, TV commentators, and politicians are going to crucify everyone.

      So what would have happened 15 years ago is completely different from what happened today. Also fourteen year olds while still fourteen, are worlds more sophisticated than they were 15 years ago as well. I'm not placing the blame on him for what happened, but come on, he isn't completely blameless. He should have known better and people asking with are "straight" face and hands up in the air "Whut? He just brought a clock to school?" know better as well.

    8. Re:Who builds a clock that doubles as a briefcase? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      I've replied to the other points and I'll just say again "Everyone acted stupidly, including him. He should have known better."

      Anyone saying "It's just a clock" know they are being ridiculous. Things don't happen in a vacuum. Time and place. This isn't 20 years ago and all of the pundits saying "I was this kids 20, 30, 40 years ago" know this as well.

      Yeah, 30 years ago things were different. I had full run of the school office & computers because I maintained them. Now do you think some kid could just sit down at a schools computer at any time of the day and just type with no one asking questions? I brought a bayonet to my elementary school. Kids carried knives.

      It's a completely different time and place and EVERYONE, including you, knows that. Everyone over-reacted, but again, there is nothing wrong with saying the kid should have been more self-aware.

    9. Re:Who builds a clock that doubles as a briefcase? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      This isn't 20 years ago and all of the pundits saying "I was this kids 20, 30, 40 years ago" know this as well.

      Maybe I'm tilting at windmills but I refuse to ever accept this. The people in power were being idiotic, unreasonable and reactionary. Being a sign of the times or common place does not excuse it. All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing etc etc. So I will keep railing against idiocy where I see it.

      And I wasn't this kid 20 years ago, I was *worse*.

      It's a completely different time and place and EVERYONE, including you, knows that.

      I don't think my old school has been evacuated due to a bomb scare since I left. We had terrorists in the 90s in London, you know.

      Anyway, the kid probably thought it was a clock. Apparently we now require colossally nerdy 14 year olds to figure out how panicky and stupid "adults" might react to a project he brought in to show his engineering teacher.

      Are "times different" now? Yes, in that now it's apparently OK for the teachers, headmaster and police to be utter fucking morons. And no, that's not OK and never will be.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    10. Re:Who builds a clock that doubles as a briefcase? by gzuckier · · Score: 1

      Zero tolerance policy

      Zero tolerance of what, precisely? I though zero tolerance was meant to be zero tolerance of breaking rules. Not zero tolerance of random shit made up on the spot by mad people.

      Last I checked, clocks weren't against the school rules.

      Plus who builds a two foot by two foot portable clock that looks like a bomb?

      It only looks like a bomb because oooh scary circuit boards!!1111one1!oneONE1!

      zero tolerance of intelligent thought, a texas/rightwing principle for a long time now.

      --
      Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
    11. Re:Who builds a clock that doubles as a briefcase? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      Maybe I'm tilting at windmills but I refuse to ever accept this.

      Then you're a fool. I don't mean that as an insult, but as a classical fool. Honestly, we were all worse 20 years ago. But school administrators had leeway and common sense but not the ACLU, 24 hour news, and every lawyer breathing down their neck.

      Things have changed. I remember my dad bringing home a container of mercury and me bringing it to class. Think that could happen now? They would call the local HazMat team to the school and at least suspend if not expel me. I remember riding in the rear window shelf the family car. How fast do think every busybody on the road would call the police upon seeing that? Times have changed and schools have become terrifyingly politically correct and zero tolerance.

      You do know how they found the device, right? It started beeping in class which alerted, startled, and frightened the class & staff. So why did he build a briefcase clock that had an alarm during class? I don't think he meant to but I also think he realized the severity and scope of his actions when he couldn't tell the authorities what it was & why he built it.

      You can also say that it looks nothing like a bomb but you're wrong. It looks exactly like a suitcase bomb because his clock and a suitcase bomb look exactly alike except for the explosives because they use the exact same parts. Sure, you can say "BUT THERE WERE NO EXPLOSIVES" and you're right. There were none. But that's after examining it. On first glance, the school did the right thing.

      Anyway, it looks like everyone falls into two camps. One camp thinks the authorities overreacted and the kid is 100% blameless. The other camp thinks the authorities overreacted and the kid is somewhat as fault as well. I think the kid should have known better in this day and age. This isn't 30 years ago and you know that as well.

    12. Re:Who builds a clock that doubles as a briefcase? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Then you're a fool. I don't mean that as an insult, but as a classical fool.

      Triumph of evil etc...

      It started beeping in class which alerted, startled, and frightened the class & staff.

      I don't see reference to frightening the class in any of the news reports.

      It looks exactly like a suitcase bomb because his clock and a suitcase bomb look exactly alike except for the explosives because they use the exact same parts.

      No it didn't look like a suitcase bomb.Firstly it wasn't suitcase sized, it was small. Look at the pictures (US plug is for scale). Secondly, when the IRA used to leave actual suitcase bombs around the place, the didn't have a big timer on the side letting everyone know it was a bomb. A suitcase bomb looks precisely like a suitcase. Sometimes they just used generic bags. Frankly that means every single kid's school bag actually looks more like a REAL suitcase bomb than the comedy clock.

      The only place a bomb has a fuck-off massive clock face taking up half the side of the entire thing is in cartoons. Cartoons are not real. It did not look like any actual suitcase bomb.

      On first glance, the school did the right thing.

      No they didn't. If they actually thought it was a bomb they should have called bomb disposal, not confiscated it and stuck it in a desk and waited for the keystone kops to show up.

      This isn't 30 years ago and you know that as well.

      The fact that in this regard people act like galloping morons more than 30 years ago does not justify their behaviour.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    13. Re:Who builds a clock that doubles as a briefcase? by SensitiveMale · · Score: 1

      An interesting link I found http://blogs.artvoice.com/techvoice/2015/09/17/reverse-engineering-ahmed-mohameds-clock-and-ourselves/#.VfzJZFgXd5A.twitter

      Turns out the briefcase was smaller than I thought. It also turns out the "invented" clock was just a clock taken out of a plastic clock body and put in a case.

      Anyways, calling the police was the right thing. They didn't call the bomb squad because they knew relatively quickly they were dealing with a hoax bomb. "Something is beeping. It's in a case. It's looks like a bomb. What is that?" "Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh" "It's looking like a hoax bomb."

      Surely, you can forgive them for not having "IRA bomb identification" classes until junior levels, right?

    14. Re:Who builds a clock that doubles as a briefcase? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Anyways, calling the police was the right thing. They didn't call the bomb squad because they knew relatively quickly they were dealing with a hoax bomb.

      Aah you are sure it was a hoax bomb then. No, they were not sure it was a hoax, they chose to act as if it was but they had no proof even though they tried to illegally coerce a confession. All they knew for sure was that they had something which they mistakenly thought looked like a bomb.

      It's looks like a bomb.

      Only bombs in really silly blockbusters and cartoons look like that. Apparently you think it's reasonable that grown-ass adults can't tell the difference between fantasy and reality.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  64. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't handcuff and perp walk kids for a 'misunderstanding'.

    You do in 21st-Century USA.

  65. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People like you need to get your asses beat down.

  66. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    That's insane. The thugs steal from the poor more often than they steal from the rich, mainly because they are close by and usually unarmed. There are thugs out there who will kill you for a few dollars. They don't care who you are or how much money you have.

    And far, far more blacks are killed by other blacks than by law enforcement, despite what the mainstream media would have you believe.

    I know a lot of cops. There are rich ones, poor ones, black ones, white ones, and everything in between. Most are salt of the Earth and a few shouldn't be trusted with any authority at all. They're just like everybody else trying to do a job and make it to retirement.

  67. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He needs to take his toy home and grow up a bit...

    That would be a nice option if he wasn't detained. And what part of growing up a bit involves threats of arrests after it has become clear to be a misunderstanding.

    The part that involves a a lifetime of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Welcome to our Brave New World and sit down next to the kid who sent an inappropriate selfie to his girlfriend.

  68. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, we can take this to mean, "Hi! I'm such an asshole that I do things that people hate me for, even decades later!"

  69. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But, this is his fault. He wrote the executive orders in a way that they couldn't be redone. Be redone. He ordered this. Maybe not directly, but indirectly he ordered all Muslim children to be arrested and beaten. Arrested and beaten. Don't think for a minute if this kid wasn't brown that he wouldn't have been beaten near death and put in the hospital.

  70. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Calydor · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cell phones can be used as bomb triggers.

    Cell phones look like cell phones which can be used as bomb triggers.

    Cell phones sometimes go off in class and make weird sounds, ie. ring tones.

    Do you know what I expect to happen? The teacher asking the owner of the phone to turn it off.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  71. Suspicious behavior - Teachers are idiots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Suspicious behavior - Teachers are idiots!

    I don't remember teachers being so dumb when I was in school. Obviously, they weren't all brilliant, but a few were who could keep the idiots in check.

    For example, the science teacher knew what this was. He would be "the local expert" and should have been consulted.

    This sort of behavior has caused many issues ad we are'nt just talking about schools. TSA, Police, FBI - being stupid has a price. I'd like for the perps to pay it for once.

    Ah - at least the student has a few days of free time to go to 1600 Pennsylvania Ave (that's the address of the white house for those teachers who don't know it).

  72. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Absolutely. George W. and I have moved on. Other people, not so much.

  73. Re:there is no war on police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I guess being "held accountable" means shooting some innocent cop at a gas station?

  74. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they really believed that the device might be a bomb they would have evacuated the school.

  75. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut the fuck up, bubble boy. Get back to your safe little bubble and put your fucking helmet on.

  76. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Oligonicella · · Score: 0

    It may not be war on the scale of Bosnia but a number of assassinations doesn't support your view. Assassination is a fuck of a lot more than "accountable".

  77. Texas stands a good chance of unseating by mark_reh · · Score: 1

    Florida as the most entertaining state.

  78. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 0

    He needs to take his toy home and grow up a bit...

    Maybe so, but nowhere near as much as the faculty and cops need to grow up. They didn't even let him contact his family before questioning, and you're making excuses for them.

    Nope... I'm only explaining why the authorities did what they did.

    This thing he built looks for all the world like a device that could trigger a bomb, and given the kids description of what he was trying to build seems likely it would have WORKED as a bomb trigger. So like it or not, intended or not, this kid's device is indeed dangerous on it's face and kids building bomb triggers need to be detained. This explains why he was arrested, why they took his electronic devices and why they searched these devices. It is called probable cause, and by all appearances they had enough probable cause to consider what they did prudent. Once they determined that they couldn't prove the kid intended to harm anybody and they didn't suspect he was building bombs in his bedroom or something they released him.

    Now it's for the courts to decide if they really had probable cause, and I'm not so ready to think they just where on some power trip because of the kids name or something, and if it had been my kid, I'm not sure I would be screaming bloody murder about how unfair it all was.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  79. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    t's time for everybody here to grow up and see this for what it was and is, a simple misunderstanding because a kid was doing dangerous looking things.. He needs to take his toy home and grow up a bit...

    Absolutely not.

    He wasn't doing anything dangerous looking.

    Oh yes it was, I've seen the pictures. The kid actually built something that COULD have triggered an explosive device out of an alarm clock. He may not have been building it to trigger a bomb, but that's EXACTLY what it could have done had it functioned as the kid said he intended. Now it wasn't connected to a bomb, but it WAS intended to function as a trigger.

    I'm telling you, the authorities didn't run off half cocked here, there was probable cause as soon as somebody got the idea that this thing might be usable as a bomb trigger. How that happened is the real question.. Looking at the pictures of the device it is easy to see how it could be interpreted as a home made trigger worthy of a low budget Hollywood movie, so I'm not surprised the police reacted like they did...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  80. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Sorry if that seems harsh to you, but if you show up with a device that LOOKS like a bomb trigger and could be used as a bomb trigger and then plug it in during English class

    And if police were ever to detain you for hours because you had a Raspberry Pi in your backpack, you'd shit on the floor in fury and start looking for a lawyer.

    The whole thing might not be so bad if it wasn't for the official statements from the Irving, Texas mayor, the principal of the school and the police chief. They're still pretending that there was some danger to the students. There was not.

    And they STILL suspended the kid from school for three days. Fucking Texas is a shithole. When they're not executing innocent people, they're running around thinking that the U.S. Military is invading them and when they're not Jade Helming themselves into a frenzy, they're banning science and history in the classroom if it doesn't conform to Christian teaching. Now, when a kid builds a clock and takes it to school, they arrest him because they "wanted a broader explanation of its purpose". Basically, the kid said, "This is a clock" and they said, "Yeah, but what's it FOR? And what kinda name is "Ahmed" anyway?"

    I'm just surprised they didn't fire a warning shot into the kid's head.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  81. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by rockout · · Score: 0

    The handful of police officers that have been shot and killed in the last year just for being police officers is a tiny drop in the ocean of unjustified police killings that this country has seen.

    And in case you're missing another obvious difference - in the vast majority of murders of officers, the perp is caught and sent to prison for life, at a minimum, as he should be. Most of the cops that kill unarmed people are still on the job, which is outrageous. So fuck you and your blind "defend the cops at all costs" mentality.

    --
    I've learned that they're worthless, so I don't read AC comments anymore.
  82. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 0

    Cell phones used as bomb triggers are partially disassembled and have wires attached to them....

    This kid had a disassembled alarm clock with wires soldered to it..

    Need we say more?

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  83. en/dis/couraging reporting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If parents and students believe (with cause) that the school will totally over-react to a report, and that they won't be able to use common sense and differentiate harmless devices and harmful ones, they will be disinclined to file reports. Filing a report is trusting that it will be handled sensibly; this was a complete fail by the school and police department. (If you are in doubt, have a look at photos of the clock; there is nowhere for the most important element in an explosive device to be. Then, the kid made no attempt to hide it or scare anyone.)

  84. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one forced them to be police.
    They are public servants, and the public should have the option to terminate them.

  85. The president wants him arrested again? by Mishotaki · · Score: 1

    wait.. so the president is asking him to bring his "bomb-like" device to him? that means he's going to bring his "bomb-like" device on a plane... i can't wait to hear about how he got arrested at the TSA checkpoint for trying to bring a bomb on a plane!

  86. Suspicious behavior by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Irving Independent School District in Irving, Texas sent an email to parents about the incident asking students to: "immediately report any suspicious items and / or suspicious behavior."

    I hope a lot of students take the opportunity to show just how stupid school administrators are. "That teacher has a wristwatch, it's an obvious timing device for a bomb, quick call the police!"

  87. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by dywolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Whats the count of killed officers so far this year?
    21?
    Something like that?
    Meanwhile the number of citizens killed by police so far this year is more than 500.

    Again: there is no war on police.
    And if there is, it is a pittance compared to the War being waged by police upon the citizenry.
    (and no i dont actually believe that 'that' war exists either)

    read, and become educated. you could surely use it.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com...

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  88. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by dywolf · · Score: 1

    ^bingo

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  89. i.e he's funny looking by publiclurker · · Score: 0

    and so I'm going to try to find some excuse to blame him no matter how insulting it is to everyone around me.

  90. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by dywolf · · Score: 1

    Instead, police groups and their advocates are claiming that the mere act of criticizing a government entity is akin to declaring war on it, and that therefore, police critics are culpable every time a police officer is murdered. (And given the way they ignore and abuse statistics, those critics are also apparently culpable for a lot of murders that never happened.) They’re essentially saying that exercising constitutional rights and participating in democracy are in and of themselves acts of violence. And in many cases, this is coming from the very people that the government empowers to use actual violence.

    That is something worth worrying about.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  91. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    unless it is an unarmed black, then it's just an accident.

  92. Time out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I need to build one for work. I can use a vacation!

  93. how many years since 9-11 by publiclurker · · Score: 2

    it's been more than seven yet idiots still like to use that as an excuse to screw over people like this kid.

  94. I think you meant to say by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    he was a dangerous looking kid. that's OK, someone that thinks a electronics project automatically looks suspicious can't be expected to get too many things correct.

    1. Re:I think you meant to say by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Well don't put the cart before the horse... The electronic part looks pretty suspicious to me and that's what started this whole thing remember... I'd rather error on the side of caution with the weird looking wired up stuff in the box. What happened from there is the from the suspicions generated from the box and the investigation needed to clear up exactly what it was and why it had been created.

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
    2. Re:I think you meant to say by soccerisgod · · Score: 1

      If you believe it is a bomb, evacuate, call the specialists in and denotate that thing. Did that happen? Curiously, no. What does that tell us?

      --
      If a train station is a place where a train stops, what's a workstation?
    3. Re:I think you meant to say by bobbied · · Score: 1

      Again.... I'm not saying anybody believed it WAS a bomb, but that it looked for all the world like a bomb trigger (and as I understand the kid's explanation) could have been used as one. Sorry if that draws some unwanted attention when it shows up in the hands of a somewhat eccentric and nerdy 14 year old boy but we live in a post Columbine world now. Authorities MUST act in these cases to make sure the kid isn't doing what it kind of looks like.

      Also understand that we are getting only ONE side of this story. School policy forbids authorities from discussing this in the press so they are keeping silent. IMHO there was a bit more than a suspicious looking device involved here and that the kid plugged in his little device and it went off during class tells me that he INTENDED for this to draw attention to the thing. Well, he's done that...

      I know what 14 year old nerdy boys do, I was one once a long time ago and I have a nerdy 15 year old boy now. Not to mention I do volunteer work as an assistant scout master in a troop that has a couple dozen boys around that age. My experience says the kid was acting stupid and looking for attention with his little "device" which is why he hid it in a briefcase and had it mounted like he did.... But hey, on this I'm just making a guess based on experience...

      --
      "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  95. no way could you show us that by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    since you are obviously too clueless to know what one looks like in the first place.

  96. Talk about public relations failure by epyT-R · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's washington's terrorism paranoia (or convenient excuse to clobber liberty) that created this situation in the first place, and now the president is trying to make up for it with some publicity stunt? A solution fixes the problem. It does not brush it under the rug and hopes it goes away.

  97. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Sique · · Score: 2
    For you obviously anything with a display and wires "looks like a device to trigger bombs"?

    With your logic, every science fair in every school in the whole U.S. should end in arrests and threats to prosecute for "making a hoax bomb", right?

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  98. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    right on cue, the disconnected from reality wingnut makes his appearance.

    and not three days ago he was decrying the abuse of government power infringing on american's rights under the constitution.

  99. What does it look like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there a picture anywhere.
    How can anyone know, who is at fault here?
    What did the school and police actualy see.
    who refered the charges, and for what?

      Is this just another the world is picking on me I teling the internet?
    Or is the school really dumb?

  100. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    I agree with you. not only that but he gave the teacher a smart-ass answer "well it doesn't look like a bomb to me" is not a responsible answer. Our president is a total jackass for even talking to him he knew damn well it looked like a bomb. The teacher he originally showed it to even told him not to show it to anyone else. That kids was a jerk. If he had said he already showed it to whatever the teachers names was, it would never gotten out of hand like it did. And this is the age where kids mass murder other kids because they pissed them off. So i dont blame the reaction of the teachers i seen the picture it looked just like a suitcase bomb it didn't look like an alarm clock at all.

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  101. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    Christ you're a boot licking apologist.

    They didn't think it was a bomb and never did. If they actually did think it was a bomb, they'd have called in bomb disposal experts. What they did do was insist it was a hoax bomb. See the word hoax?

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  102. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Calydor · · Score: 1

    Are you seriously advocating that anything that COULD theoretically work as a weapon - IF YOU ADD MORE PARTS TO IT - should be grounds for being slapped in handcuffs, paraded past your friends and interrogated without the presence of a lawyer or, in the case of a minor, your parents?

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  103. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's an interesting example of a straw man. You carefully pick the certain specific elements of the story which ABSOLUTELY NOBODY is upset about, and point out how silly it would be to get upset about them.

    The whole thing was a misunderstanding, and it is what happened after it was established that it was a misunderstanding that is being scrutinised.

  104. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Sique · · Score: 1
    According to your logic, everything that contains an electrical power source, wires and a switch should be reason enough to handcuff people, arrest them and prosecute them. Because that's all you need to trigger the explosion of the bomb.

    And no, all the boy said was that he build a clock. A clock. You know? That thing that tells you the time.

    Honi soit qui mal y pense. If you have any problem with people building clocks, then you have a deeply troubled mind.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  105. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 2

    What should the adults in a position of authority do differently?

    Be brave and don't panic

  106. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Sique · · Score: 1

    I don't want my kids to ever be at a school you are a teacher or a principal. I don't want to live ever in a district you have any saying in police proceedings. You have a deeply twisted mind just looking for trouble.

    --
    .sig: Sique *sigh*
  107. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by thinkwaitfast · · Score: 1
    These kid toys have been around for 50 years. I used to carry one around with me everywhere since the third grade.

    http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb...

  108. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    How many kids have been murdered in school in the last 10 years again?

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
  109. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Sorry if that seems harsh to you, but if you show up with a device that LOOKS like a bomb trigger and could be used as a bomb trigger and then plug it in during English class

    And if police were ever to detain you for hours because you had a Raspberry Pi in your backpack, you'd shit on the floor in fury and start looking for a lawyer.

    Nope. If they truly believe that my little raspberry pi was a danger and choose to detain me until they figure out it isn't, so be it. Last time I went though a TSA checkpoint with one, they didn't even bat an eye, though I expected all the wires and the bread board attached would draw some attention.

    But before you go off half cocked on this, remember that this device really DID look dangerous and like what you'd imagine a bomb trigger would be, that raspberry pi obviously is a commercial device. This kid produced a jumble of clock parts and soldered on wires that he plugged into the wall and it made noises. It looked (and likely was) dangerous.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  110. Irving is currently a Muslim battlezone by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you remember news stories of a town in Texas (Irving, in fact) that had to pass local legislation to prohibit sharia courts that were settling various business and personal disputes of Muslims.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com...

    If you take things in context here, there is a political, religious and PR battle waging in this city between the government and Muslims. The Muslims lost round 1, rightly so, by not be allowed to set up their own government systems in parallel to those of the United States or State of Texas. They won round 2 today, with Obama officially taking the side of the youth.

    I was modded down in a comment to a previous story, but I will say at least this much again. No one has seen the device. I tried finding pictures, but to my knowledge none have been posted. It was in a small metal briefcase like box (for holding pencils) with a steel cable around it. Since no one here actually knows the physical appearance or context of how it was presented and perceived, none of us can make any kind of informed opinion on whether or not teachers were justified in having any concerns of what he brought to school.

    His father has had run ins of various sorts with the local governments regarding Islam. It did not say what those were (if they were related to the Sharia law deal or what).

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Irving is currently a Muslim battlezone by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      The Muslims lost round 1, rightly so, by not be allowed to set up their own government systems in parallel to those of the United States or State of Texas.

      Do you know what "consensual arbitration" means?

  111. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    If he is, then I look forward to the news article proclaiming: "Kid arrested in school for having a possible bomb detonator in class. His cell phone was confiscated and the child has been sent to juvenile detention."

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
  112. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So a 20-year low on cop killings is now a war?

  113. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Marful · · Score: 2

    Been watching a few too many movies... Next you'll say that bombs are identifiable by the blinking red light.

  114. That's lovely by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    That's lovely how it fits the approved narrative.

    I'm sure the occasional beefy guy named Guido in Chicago actually played violin too. That means the Mob was just a myth.

  115. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It *is* acceptable in the United State. We need to change *that*, not settle for punishing the individual idiots in high-profile cases

  116. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    There are actual pictures of the clock floating around the interwebs. You might consider acquiring access to the information superhighway so that you can view these pictures.

    There was no "disassembled alarm clock with wires soldered to it." There was a home-made circuit board, connected by ribbon cables to a small battery and digital display. There was no taken-apart alarm clock with drama-department wires attached to road flares, or any such nonsense. There was no Wile. E. Coyote alarm clock contraption. There was no part of the device that looked like explosives.

    The teacher who claims to have "thought" it looked like a bomb picked it up and walked off with it, and sent the student to the office... without evacuating anybody. If the teacher has an IQ above 65, then I'm gonna call bull-pucky on having thought it actually looked like a bomb. If the teacher is a former special-ed student living the dream, OK, I can believe the story, and maybe it is just a "training issue."

  117. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is true, but a few lunatic individuals does not make an army which one can wage a war with.

    For the most part, it's people like me who are sick and tired of the police constantly trying to intimidate (the local state troopers had a banner up for a while declaring themselves as "your worst nightmare", I don't want a police force that's my worst nightmare, I want one that's working for the good of the community). We want them to be held responsible when they do wrong (a local police officer went buck hunting in the middle of a neighborhood while on duty, he was found guilty of hunting without a license, but not even charged with illegal discharge of a firearm within city limits or reckless endangerment). We want them to top lying, we want to feel that either they are there to help us, or they are replaced with people who are. All we want in short, is to not feel afraid any time a police officer approaches us if we've not been doing anything wrong.

  118. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't know if you noticed, but there's been a war on law enforcement recently.

    Seems I missed it, since the number of police officers being killed is 13% lower than last year. And if you figure that there are around 765,000 sworn police officers at the state and local level and, so far this year, there are about 26 police officers killed (or about 0.003%), it's not much of a war.

  119. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 0

    Well, if you show up with a science fair project, I have a feeling you will also have a pile of supporting evidence that shows you are entering the science fair... As I recall there where graphs, charts, and display boards with my science fair project.. Oh and there was the pesky teacher's approval of my project BEFORE I was allowed to bring it into school....

    Oh, and mine didn't have old alarm clock parts taken out of the case with wires soldered onto it..... Which for all the world looks like a bomb trigger from a Hollywood B movie...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  120. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's total bullshit, a lot of things CAN trigger a bomb. The trigger isn't the dangerous part, the exploding part is the dangerous part. If it can't explode then it's not dangerous.

  121. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Thank you...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  122. Just do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    #nuketheusa

  123. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 0

    I never said they thought it was a bomb.. They though it was a BOMB TRIGGER you ninny... Both building a bomb and building a bomb trigger are illegal you know....

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  124. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Aighearach · · Score: 1

    I strongly advise looking for the lawyer before resorting to defecating on the floor.

    While there are numerous troubling details in this story, Texas is a shithole. It was a digital clock. I have no trouble believing that Officer Billy-Bob and Mayor Christian Crusader have trouble understanding the "broader... purpose" of a digital clock. If it was a world clock with 3 time zones and 24 hour time, he'd still be in the interrogation room.

    "Does this mean you can blow up a bomb in three different places at once? In different parts of the world? Holy Smokes Y'all!"

    Maybe if you phrased the situation more like, "you ever wonder how you can know if the Dunkin Donuts is open, without even driving down there to check?"

    Maybe somebody could bribe the County Medical Examiner to explain clocks to them.

    He'll be back in jail next week when they find his metric laser caliper.

  125. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 1

    No. but if a student shows up with something that looks like it could set off a bomb that he built himself out of old alarm clock parts with wires soldered onto it and somebody gets the idea that it might be intended to be used that way, you have to take the treat seriously until you are sure the device and the kid are not a threat. Sorry, but that's the world we live in.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  126. Re: Obama Invites Texas Teen To White House by mwehle · · Score: 1

    The President tweeted: "Cool clock, Ahmed. Want to bring it to the White House? We should inspire more kids like you to like science. It's what makes America great."

    The President then added, "Just don't go looking for your father or I'll blast your ass with a Hellfire from a drone."

    --
    Wir sind geboren, um frei zu sein - Rio Reiser
  127. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 1

    No, I didn't say that.

    But if a student brings something to school that raises suspicions that it COULD be intended for harm, you have to take the necessary steps to secure the student and the school from the possible threat. The stupid part here is that this device looks like something straight out of a Hollywood B movie used to trigger a bomb. What do you expect the school and police to do? Pat him on the back and say "Good job there Jonny, way to think outside the box"!

    Then AFTER the suspicious device is examined it turns out that it is fully capable of triggering a bomb by all appearances, isn't it prudent to make sure that wasn't the intent? And don't tell me you'd just take the kid's explanation at face value and let him go.... You and I know that's not the world we live in and haven't since Columbine way back in the 70's.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  128. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the largest body count wins? Does that mean that WWII was the only real war or something and everything else was a pretender?

  129. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Have you heard of Columbine?

    I don't know what world you live in, but in schools today you have to take ANY hint of troubled youth seriously. Here you have an eccentric kid, with a possible bomb trigger device he build himself, that looks all the world like what you'd expect from a Hollywood B movie bomb trigger, who shows up in class, plugs the thing in and then lies about stuff when specifically asked and you don't think the administration at the school isn't going to react? They better react to this kind of thing...

    Sorry but it's the world we live in and Irving Texas is in this world.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  130. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 1

    A 150 in 1 electronic kit, while it COULD trigger a bomb with that relay, doesn't look like a bomb trigger. What this kid made LOOKED like what you'd see in a Hollywood B movie as a bomb trigger... Authorities reacted to what they saw, and I'm not so sure I would want them doing anything differently.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  131. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Yea, and never cut the red wire to disarm it...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  132. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by T-ice · · Score: 1

    My problem with the situation, is that the teachers didn't respond appropriately for EITHER. If it's a ...

    bomb - evacuate school, call PD and FD don't touch or in any way fuck with the bomb.
    clock - send kid on his merry way.
    something I don't understand - confiscate the item, harass the child and send him to the police department in handcuffs(if they make them that small)

  133. Re:This story has the same virality as police malp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it isn't. He didn't kiss her on the vagina, he kissed her on the cheek/lips. There is absolutely nothing sexual about it.

  134. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 1

    Never claimed this device looked like a bomb, but it does look like a bomb trigger. It is obviously home made and resembles something you'd see in a Hollywood movie representing a bomb trigger. Further, given the kid's description of the device it easily could be used as a bomb trigger..

    So somebody thought it might BE a bomb trigger and reacted as if it was.... How's that a problem? In today's day and age, it sure seems reasonable to me to assume it's a bomb trigger until you can establish otherwise, which involves investigating the device's builder. Sorry but it's the age we live in..

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  135. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody needs to remember that What the kid built COULD have been (and actually if it worked as I assume he intended would have worked as) a triggering device for a bomb and the authorities where totally justified in treating it as such until they proved the kid's intent was innocent.

    You're a FUD-spewing moron. I imagine they still use pens and/or pencils in that school? Someone COULD jam one through your eye-socket, for example. Discussions on whether society would be better off aside, by your logic, everything that can be misused to injure someone should be banned.

    What a miserable world you're asking for.

  136. Terrorists everywhere by penguinoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There were lots of terrorists involved in this incident. The terrified child vowed never to bring another invention to school.

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    1. Re:Terrorists everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A briefcase that plugs into the wall and starts making noise?

      It's not a briefcase. It's maybe 8 inches on its longest dimension.

    2. Re: Terrorists everywhere by spongman · · Score: 1

      Very brief

    3. Re:Terrorists everywhere by towermac · · Score: 1

      It looks like a briefcase:

      http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnnne...

      Looking more closely, the relative size of the plug gives it away. Fine, a mini briefcase.

      I was wrong. White boys bring shit like that to school every day, obviously. Carry on with the social outrage.

    4. Re:Terrorists everywhere by vilanye · · Score: 1

      Anyone stupid enough to question this kid over this pretty much deserves to be sued into poverty and never again be allowed in a position of power or education.

  137. Force the over reactors to apologize by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    Going the White House would be cool and all, but what would really help the situation is if the President could force the police and administrators to publicly and in person apologize to the boy. That would hopefully reduce over reactions in the future.

    1. Re:Force the over reactors to apologize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The President is treating the over-reactors like the adults they're supposed to be.

    2. Re:Force the over reactors to apologize by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Obama can't do that. I don't know if you're in the US, but here the Federal government has restricted powers. They're not as restricted as I think they should be (I think the interstate commerce clause is overextended, for example), but education and local law enforcement are responsibilities of the individual states, according to the Constitution. The Feds can influence these things by providing money with strings on it (the "tax and spend for the general welfare" clause), but that doesn't actually coerce.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  138. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looked (and likely was) dangerous.

    It "likely was" dangerous. Total bullshit.

  139. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What planet are you from where you look at that and think "bomb"? What a terrifying reality.

    As others have pointed out repeatedly, we know nobody seriously thought it looked like a bomb because they didn't evacuate the school or anything.

    If he had said he already showed it to whatever the teachers names was, it would never gotten out of hand like it did.

    What the fuck. You just made that up.

    i seen the picture it looked just like a suitcase bomb

    Dear god, and kids come with sealed backpacks.

  140. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What do you expect the school and police to do? Pat him on the back and say "Good job there Jonny, way to think outside the box"!

    If they thought it was a bomb trigger, I expect them to evacuate and to call in the bomb squad.

    They did not, ipso facto they didn't think it looked like a bomb trigger.

    Please provide stills from some Hollywood B movies that have bomb triggers that closely resemble this: http://www.wired.com/2015/09/heres-bomb-clock-got-ahmed-mohamed-arrested/.

  141. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > He wasn't doing anything dangerous looking.

    To the relevently educated eye, perhaps. But I seem to recall some criminal case about a decade ago where literally the suspects choice of (nonstandard -- oooh customized --- modded) foreground and background text font colors. And this actually contributed to their prosecution, with a judge signing off on it. I've had trouble netsearching for the specific case, but I swear I remember it. This is basically perhaps a half-step past that level of insanity.

  142. This is really embarrassing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Being an American, I am really embarrassed by this incident. The whole story shows how weak and vulnerable we are.

  143. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > a growing suspicion that they have been covering up past fuckups by writing false reports, as several have been caught doing in recent news

    It goes much deeper than that. It's in our culture. A brief perusal of our most popular movies and tv shows demonstrates a pervasive understanding of a 'code of silence' culture. We socially enshrine it with secret rituals at college fraternities and sororities. The only thing that is new is that the tools of modern communication and recording are being used against the 'code of silence'. And progress in fighting it for real seems by all accounts to be happening. Though who knows where the War On The Code will end up.

  144. Clock mistaken for a bomb .. by nickweller · · Score: 1

    "In a followup to this morning's story about the arrest of 14-year-old Ahmed Mohamed for bringing a homemade clock to school that was mistaken for a bomb"

    It wasn't mistaken for a bomb. The teachers are so afraid of getting fired that they won't make a judgement call but immediately report the incident back up to senior management.

  145. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except phones really can be used to trigger bombs. That's one of the things the movies gets right. You just attach another phone to the bomb, and wire it up/program it right to set off the bomb once it receives the right call/text, and BAM! now you have a remote trigger that can work almost anywhere courtesy of the cell phone network.

  146. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep. Yep. Except for the people who literally declared their war on cops and encouraged others to kill cops, there is no war.

    Nope, not going to do a simple google search and inform yourself. That's too much effort. The better play is to demand that I do it, then if I bother to come back and actually deliver, you can declare all my sources as partisan liars and therefore don't count.

  147. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    A war on bad law enforcement is not a bad thing. But law enforcement has unions, thus an attack on an incompetent is seen like an attack on all of them.

  148. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of them were even shot multiple times by multiple officers while they were running away... you have to watch the actual videos to appreciate this. The news media tries to make it look like the officers were responding to a threat while they stood there in their military gear shooting the guy in the running for his life. The threat? He threw a rock at someone earlier. After their paid vacation, sorry "administrative leave", this city did what most cities do in situations like this. They found "no wrong doings be the officers".

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-0uqFTBclo

  149. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by jader3rd · · Score: 1

    This thing he built looks for all the world like a device that could trigger a bomb,

    It also looks like something could not trigger a bomb. Innocent until proven guilty and all that.

  150. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Agree. The cops should have figured out there was no problem in about a minute. Schools are too caught up in paranoia these days.

  151. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good job owing the title of asshole

    At least you are honest.

  152. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    No, they thought it was a hoax, and were trying to get the kid to admit he was trying to scare people. They knew it was not a bomb and was not ever going to be a bomb, it just happened to look a bit like a bomb if you've watched too many bad movies. If this thing could have been turned into a bomb, then any clock radio could have been also; arrest anyone bringing a clock radio to school. Arrest the science professors too, lots of dangerous stuff in their class rooms.

    They asked the kid what it was, he said it was a clock, it clearly was a clock with even cursory examination. It only looked like a bomb if you were paranoid (it was far too small for one). They had all the information they needed to decide to tell the kid to put it away and go back to class.

    Lesson learned. Stick to the test and don't think outside the box. If we ever need any thinking done in this country then we can always offshore it.

  153. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    But everything looks like a bomb trigger if you're paranoid. If you're smoking and are caught with matches in your pocket then it's time for the perp walk. Carrying around a soldering iron means you're a potential bombmaker. We can't teach engineering or electronics in any schools because all of them will be perp walked out of class for learning about such dangerous magical items (this being Texas after all).

    And the thing is, they DID establish without a doubt that this device was NOT a bomb trigger. And they still gave him the perp walk. This is a problem!

  154. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    I saw the picture. It does not look dangerous at all. It's a tiny box that tells time. The photo was misleading since it looks like a larger briefcase or equipment box but when you look closer it's not very big at all.

    If it actually did look dangerous to the teacher then the class would have been evacuated.

    The real problem was that because this was a smart kid he was automatically treated as a trouble maker.

  155. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    It does not look like a bomb. Nobody panicked over it. No one was evacuated. What we have are all the anti-Islamic blowhards deciding to play catch up and damage control by giving excuses on behalf of the stupid school and police officials.

  156. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    But it did not look like a bomb trigger. Sure, it had a suitcase like box, but a small box the size of a textbook. He said it was a clock, and it could have been easily demonstrated to be just a clock. All it had were electronics, and electronics should not be scary except in medieval states where such things look like magic. If you showed up with this device on the set of some cheap ass Syfy show, they'd turn you away and ask for a more realistic looking bomb. Yes, it COULD have worked as a bomb trigger, but if you searched every student and classroom you'd probably find hundreds of things that could have worked as a bomb trigger. Good thing Radio Shack is out of business otherwise law enforcement in Texas would be raiding them on suspicion of aiding and abetting mad bombers. Cancel the science fair, that paper mache volcano might go off.

    They also determined before arresting him and leaving school that they had no case and they knew he was not a danger; they only did the perp walk to shame and scare him. That's the only reason for taking a kid on a perp walk. The police had to save face, make it look like they were spending the tax dollars wisely, and get a pat on the back from the rabidly paranoid mayor of that town.

    How can you apologize for those bozos?

  157. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    Texas is in its own world.

  158. America F**K Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is America! Fu*k Yeah!

    The only things kids need, are bibles, and guns, preferably both.

    If you see a kid NOT carrying a bible, gun, or both, or a gun with bible verses, they must be up to no good, especially if they are trying to some of that
    "fancy learnin" that doesn't come from the only textbook kids need, the bible.

    Bibles = GOOD.
    Guns = GOOD.

    Bibles AND Guns = SUPER GOOD

    Anything else = BAD

    That's all the learnin we need in our schools.

  159. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Enigma2175 · · Score: 1

    There are actual pictures of the clock floating around the interwebs. You might consider acquiring access to the information superhighway so that you can view these pictures.

    There was no "disassembled alarm clock with wires soldered to it." There was a home-made circuit board, connected by ribbon cables to a small battery and digital display. There was no taken-apart alarm clock with drama-department wires attached to road flares, or any such nonsense. There was no Wile. E. Coyote alarm clock contraption. There was no part of the device that looked like explosives.

    The teacher who claims to have "thought" it looked like a bomb picked it up and walked off with it, and sent the student to the office... without evacuating anybody. If the teacher has an IQ above 65, then I'm gonna call bull-pucky on having thought it actually looked like a bomb. If the teacher is a former special-ed student living the dream, OK, I can believe the story, and maybe it is just a "training issue."

    Here is a picture of the clock, just so we know what we are discussing:
    http://www.24hmontreal.canoe.c...

    You say there is a "home-made circuit board" there, can you point it out to me? The clock he "invented" are just the innards of a production alarm clock mounted in a different case. If you look at the picture, there is a standard alarm clock cord, poorly spliced with electrical tape (presumably he had to cut the cord where it went through the case) connected to a small transformer. The transformer output is connected to a production PCB, which appears to be the logic board and LED display driver for the clock. That board is connected with 2 ribbon cables to another board, which is edge-on to the camera so it is difficult to see what is on it. It looks like this is probably an input board.

    Here is what makes this appear to be just the innards of a mass-produced clock:
    -None of the solder joints appear to be hand-done, they all have the look of a factory solder job. Something that is done in a reflow oven, not on a workbench.
    -Production PCBs: He didn't make these PCBs, they were made in a factory. Yes, I know there are discrete LED display driver boards that you can buy, but that isn't what the main board appears to be, as the board appears to handle several different functions.
    -There doesn't appear to be any home-brew technology in the device, no perf boards, no wire wrap, etc.
    -The battery backup - this is something that is almost all production alarm clocks but would probably be implemented differently in a homebrew device (if implemented at all). If he designed this from scratch AND wanted to put a battery in it, he would have made the whole thing battery powered, there would be no reason to have an AC transformer.
    -Screw marks on the LED. There are four mounting holes for the LED display but only two of them have screws. The other two show marks where larger screws (or plastic pegs) used to be, like this display was taken out of an existing device.
    -The edge-on board appears to have the PCB traces that underlie membrane switches. The four grouped together are probably the clock/hour/minute/alarm switches with a single snooze? switch on the end where the power wires enter from the main board.
    - The way the ribbon cables and power connect the 2 boards together makes it hard to mount them in his case. If this was designed for this case those boards would either have longer cables between them to allow for their position in the case.

    Yes, it's possible that the kid designed a pair of custom PCBs, had them screened and shipped, assembled them and soldered them in the reflow oven in his room (instead of the soldering iron shown in the press pictures) and then stuffed them into his pencil case, but all the evidence points to this being the contents of a simpl

    --

    Enigma

  160. Columbine back in the 70's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Columbine back in the 70's? Nice subtle clue that you are really spouting BS.

    Excellent trolling here and throughout the thread.

    I applaud your old-school trolling, the like of which we haven't seen since, oh, 1999.

  161. How to make a terrorist. by cyn1c77 · · Score: 1

    Smart motivated kids like this become terrorists when you alienate them from your society for doing something they are proud of... like showing off their cool, benign project.

    I love the police chief's refusal to admit any mistake as well:
    '“We live in an age where you can’t take things like that to school,” he said. “Of course we’ve seen across our country horrific things happen, so we have to err on the side of caution.”'

    Well heck, let's just stop going to school.

    Idiots.

  162. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha ha!

    Politicians are all liars because they have to be. Nobody votes for the honest ones, because nobody likes their promises, their realistic expectations, nor their facts. Furthermore, there is such a wide variety of political agendas among the voting base that no politician can afford to take a strong opinion on all the important issues, since that would eliminate too many voters. They must speak vaguely, out of both sides of their mouths, to get enough people of opposing viewpoints to all vote for them.

    The set of candidates is automatically filtered such that all the ones that the honest ones who would really serve the country well are eliminated at the starting line.

    Obama is no exception. He, like many presidents of both parties before him, succeeded by being the most popular liar. His successor will be the just the same too.

    Until the American public learns to regard all politicians as necessary evils that must be kept under perpetual scrutiny, they will continue to get away with terrible abuses against us.

  163. Re: I wonder if they're going to use this as "proo by spongman · · Score: 1

    Fucking morons. Who the fuck builds a real bomb and brings it into class and shows it off to everyone?

    If the kid was a real terrorist then the first anyone would have seen of his bomb would be the shrapnel blasting its way through their eyeballs.

  164. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by multimediavt · · Score: 1

    Except phones really can be used to trigger bombs. That's one of the things the movies gets right. You just attach another phone to the bomb, and wire it up/program it right to set off the bomb once it receives the right call/text, and BAM! now you have a remote trigger that can work almost anywhere courtesy of the cell phone network.

    One problem. Your explanation for what a cell phone bomb trigger looks like in order to attack a criticism that you watch too many movies, sounds just like you got it from a movie or just have absolutely no clue what you're talking about.

  165. Re: I wonder if they're going to use this as "proo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They didnt treat it like it was an explosive. No evac. No disposal. So really bizarrely stupid.

  166. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by germansausage · · Score: 1

    He built a digital clock. It looks just like the one I built in electronics class when I was in high school. Only somebody who has seen way too many cheesy movies thinks that digital clock = bomb. I agree that cops might be stupid enough. It could be a bomb trigger. All that was missing was a detonator. Oh wait, the teacher's cell phone could be a bomb trigger too if you added a detonator. Cell phones are often used as bomb triggers. Why didn't the cops haul the teacher off in cuffs too?

  167. Personal liability would go farther... by msimm · · Score: 1

    Towards preventing this kind of shenanigans and more closely scrutinizing any possible policies. But by all means...

    --
    Quack, quack.
  168. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    And far, far more blacks are killed by other blacks than by law enforcement, despite what the mainstream media would have you believe.

    When a black man kills another black man, everyone expects he will be sent to jail, including other black men. When a cop kills a man, black or white, he's unlikely to even lose his job, much less go to jail. That's what gets people pissed off.

    Get it now?

  169. Wake up, people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    These "professional educators" are the morons to whom you are entrusting your children. They are so dense they cannot tell a geeky kid with a clock from a terrorist ... or from a kid who chews his pop tarts into the "wrong" shape ...

    What makes you think these flunkies are smarter and wiser than you are and are better-qualified than you are to raise and educate your kids?????

    It's a VERY recent perversion of human history that parents hand their kids over to government to be raised and educated; it's a byproduct of the industrial revolution when society (and wealthy industrialists) wanted a huge number of interchangeable worker "cogs" for their industrial manufacturing systems. When Ford or GM needs an unlimited supply of people who are all equally trained who can be plugged-into a spot on an assembly line to "insert tab A into slot B" over and over again as products slide by on a conveyor belt, the brick-and-mortar palaces of mediocrity we have created are PERFECT.

    Unfortunately, our obsolete government-run schools have given in to the inevitable fate of all things tied to government (and therefore tied to politicians); They are now intimately tied to political activists and agendas which they value far more than objective instruction. Most of the teachers in the US are unionized, and therefore part of the most-energetic wing of the Democrat coalition (remember all the teachers going wild in Madison, WI?) with administrators elected using lots of teacher union money, and lawyers (also mostly left-of-center) driving a hyper-sensitive response to every grievance group with a megaphone. This is how we went from schools in the 1950s where no student had a clue about the politics of their teachers to schools today where kids have been taught to sing songs praising Barack Obama.

    Want your kids to be propagandized morons with super-high self esteem? Put them in government schools.

    Want your kids to have functional brains? Get them out!

    1. Re:Wake up, people by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      or from a kid who chews his pop tarts into the "wrong" shape ...

      Just wait until one of those teachers notices a printed capital L...

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  170. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Calydor · · Score: 1

    But they ARE sure that it is not a threat.

    Now they are charging him with making a HOAX bomb.

    He is quite literally being charged with NOT making a bomb and saying that it is NOT a bomb.

    Are exposed wires a felony now? Is that the world you WANT to live in?

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  171. Hey, idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was not some rednecks at some church-run school pushing "God, grits, and Guns"

    This was one of your run-of-the-mill secular government-run schools that thinks the only things kids need to learn are "tolerance" and "non-violence" and the multitude of uses fer dental dams, condoms, and lube. They were freaked out because they were leftists and leftists freak-out at everything they don't understand or that violates their anti-dangerous-tech religion.

    In short, this would NOT have happened in the places you ridicule and did in fact happen in the sort of place you apparently prefer. In short: you are objectively wrong in your thinking.

  172. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You really are part of the problem. And you don't even see it. What is wrong with you?

  173. Because ... by garry_g · · Score: 1

    "immediately report any suspicious items and / or suspicious behavior." - Because the last time, it worked so well - no persons were harmed by the insidious contraption ...

    F'ing paranoid @ssholes ... US people who aren't killed by US companies' health-degrading food are taken down and jailed ... and you wonder why the Chinese (and just about any other country on this earth) are kicking your asses in the workplace ...

  174. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've got things that could be used to trigger a bomb in your house, your car, anywhere you have electronics, electrics, and others. Includes wind-up clocks, digital clocks, thermostats, numerous other things. I once built a simple thermostat to control heating in a greenhouse - that could have been used to control anything. Building a clock is a basic exercise for kids to learn electronics. (I started myself building several radios , but that would probably have got me arrested in North Korea. )

  175. I expect that behavior in texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is texas... texas! Of course they will arrest him. He has to be happy they did not shot him.

  176. somewhat different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...the bomb scare started after his 18-year-old son was arrested for trespassing, entering an abandoned warehouse and salvaging mercury switches, which can be used to detonate explosives."

    I see how this is different from a guy building a clock and showing it to his teacher with the words "look, I built a clock".

    1. Re: somewhat different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's about like charging a person who was stealing copper wire of trying to build a bomb too. Both things are multi-use and rarely used in bombs compared to other things.

  177. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by driblio · · Score: 1

    For God's sake, NO.

    14 year old kids in Texas do not, in general, build bombs with electronic triggers (in fact, can you find any evidence of it ever happening, ever?). Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

    'Circuit board==bomb' is the result of fucking idiotic fear mongering, right wing propaganda and islamaphobia since 9/11.

    There was ABSOLUTELY NO REASON to think this kid had tried to make a bomb. If his teachers were doing their jobs, they would have known him. They would have known he tinkered in electronics. He should have brought it in to show and tell and got a fucking medal.

    Grow up. Be realistic. Stop being scared.

  178. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    I never said they thought it was a bomb.. They though it was a BOMB TRIGGER you ninny...

    No, they thought it was a bomb hoax. No one but you thought it's a real bomb trigger.

    Both building a bomb and building a bomb trigger are illegal you know....

    So, watches and cellphones are illegal? Or, is it just things that go from a current source to a controlled explosion (e.g. low explosives) illegal? Such as these:

    http://www.amazon.com/Generic-...

    When you make shit up, be specific!

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  179. That's the ticket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A populist band-aid makes the pain go away every time.

  180. But it did look like a "movie" bomb by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    He probably just put it in the aluminium case to help carry it but that made it look like the sort of thing bad guys mock up in movies. Of course it didn't look like a real terrorist bomb. They look like vending machines, telephones, etc.

  181. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He needs to take his toy home and grow up a bit...

    Ever heard of technology classes? Or you're a "no need to practice to learn" kind of guy?

  182. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by qeveren · · Score: 1

    Uh...

    A watch is a decent bomb trigger. A cellphone is an *amazing* bomb trigger, since it's literally dial-a-boom. Better arrest all the kids that have any of these; never know what they might be planning.

    --
    Don't just stand there, get that other dog!
  183. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Alioth · · Score: 1

    By that measure my cell phone is a trigger. Actually, cell phones are very popular bomb triggers. But we're not slapping every kid with a cellphone in handcuffs. Or every kid with a Casio watch (the venerable Casio F14 watch that's been sold since the 1980s is a popular trigger for IEDs). Do we cuff any kid who comes into school wearing a Casio F14?

  184. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think you watch too much hollywood shit.

  185. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by james_gnz · · Score: 1

    In fact, it wasn't a dangerous-looking thing. If it was, the teacher would not have confiscated it, put it in a desk drawer, and continued teaching the class.

    Well put. I guess the teacher was afraid that other people might be afraid it was a bomb. That's what the police were afraid of. From what I understand, they didn't call the bomb squad, and they didn't arrest him for possessing a bomb, they arrested him for possessing a "hoax bomb". No-one was actually afraid it was a bomb. It wasn't a dangerous-looking thing. It was, perhaps, a kind of thing that looked like it might look dangerous to someone else, if there is such a kind of thing.

  186. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by james_gnz · · Score: 1

    That's total bullshit, a lot of things CAN trigger a bomb. The trigger isn't the dangerous part, the exploding part is the dangerous part.

    So you admit an alarm clock could be used to trigger a bomb. Worse, it could also be used to wake someone up on time to set that bomb. Frankly, I find your cavalier attitude unfathomable.

  187. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by houghi · · Score: 1

    Shoes! What about shoes? There are people that tried to use shoes to blow up a plane! Ban all shoes.

    And don't look up the fact that mines were made to look like toys, especially to target children.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  188. Wow, that might be the best possible response. by sabbede · · Score: 1

    I'm kinda impressed. On one hand, the kid is getting some intense positive reinforcement. On the other, the officials who screwed him are shamed without anyone having to say a single negative thing about them.

  189. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wth? Almost anything can work as a bomb trigger ffs. If someone wan't to make a bomb trigger that doesn't look like a bomb trigger it can look like anything. You cannot tell a bomb trigger from anything else. Did the teacher suspect the kid is of the type that just might want to blow up the school? 99,999999% of kids aren't blowing up schools, and that might be a damn low estimate.

  190. I bet ya... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...if it was a white, affluent, kid, Obama wouldn't have even blinked his eyes.

  191. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by thegarbz · · Score: 1

    Oh yes it was, I've seen the pictures. The kid actually built something that COULD have triggered an explosive device out of an alarm clock.

    I have 4 devices on my desk right now that could do the same thing. And I am sitting at an average desk in an average office, with stock standard office equipment on my desk. Are you going to arrest me for our contract with Dell, Cisco and Samsung?

  192. Re: I wonder if they're going to use this as "proo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unfortunately people get up in arms over the justifiable shootings more than the questionable ones. It makes me doubt their sincerity.

  193. Re: there is no war on police. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Regular people get attacked at gas stations all the time, and cops are regular people... So I fail to see your point.

  194. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    As Client Eastwood once said, "A man gotta know his limitations."

  195. Blogspam by fulldecent · · Score: 1

    "invited the teen to the White House via Twitter" should link directly to a tweet

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  196. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    I agree with GP. I don't want a hysterical liar like you running anything I'm close to.

    The kid didn't show it off in English class. The kid showed it off to his engineering teacher. It alarmed during English class, and that's when the asshole English teacher saw it. What did the kid lie about? Except when under duress, his statements seem consistent with being a kid who fiddles around with electronics and doesn't see anything wrong with making something that's not anything like a weapon.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  197. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This seems to be a shitty stat - Shouldn't it be shown as a percentage of the police population killed by citizens this year compared to the percentage of the citizen population killed by police this year?

  198. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 1

    You have managed to encapsulate the entire reason I no longer live in the US into a few paragraphs, I only wish you were playing the devil's advocate, instead of being serious.

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
  199. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by backwardsposter · · Score: 1

    Again: there is no war on police.
    And if there is, it is a pittance compared to the War being waged by police upon the citizenry.

    There isn't a war but if there is then who cares? Sure, let them feel the wrath brought upon them!

    First of all, just looking at police deaths is not enough to make a blanket statement that there is no increase in the mentality of targeting police for homicide. This source is assuming that because the statistics agree, then the motives do as well. It's easy and convenient that the numbers agree, therefore it must be true! Never mind what people are actually thinking.

    Well, what else is true is that maybe, just maybe, we can hold both agendas. We need to hold people accountable that believe in targeting cops for blind justice AND ALSO our political agenda of holding cops accountable can be pursued. Let's not ignore the bad eggs that will only give police more cause to be afraid.

  200. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Of course it could be used as a bomb trigger. Do you have a cell phone that other people have seen? Ever been perp-walked out of the building wearing handcuffs because of it?

    Investigating the device's builder involves asking questions in a non-hostile environment, and perhaps asking questions of other people (the kid's engineering teacher would have been a good one to talk to).

    If you're going to believe what movies show about bombs, please try to disarm the next one you encounter. You do know which color wire to cut, don't you?

    And, yes, it's regrettable that the age we live in includes people like you.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  201. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by david_thornley · · Score: 1

    Okay, I'll try to use short words. Bomb triggers are not going to hurt people. Bomb triggers are not weapons. In order for one to be dangerous (sorry, long word), it has to be hooked up to something that goes boom really hard. That something would be called an "explosive", and there was no such thing in the case.

    I certainly hope you never have a kid.

    --
    "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  202. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by kaatochacha · · Score: 1

    It was a prime example of escalation. Teacher calls it in, next person in line thinks "Hey, if I don't DO SOMETHING, and something bad happens, I'm screwed. So for CYA's sake, I'm going to be serious about it." And each person along the chain then escalated the issue trying to cover their own ass, with images of every school tragedy floating in their head.

  203. Re: Pool chlorine and brake fluid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ah nostalgia,

    Here in the arse-end of Africa, the specialty was bombs made from brake fluid and calcium hypo-chloride.

    The latter freely being available from any household with a swimming pool.

    The nice part is that the reaction rate was very sensitive to the surface area of the hypo-chloride. Which was a huge unknown in a sealed glass bottle.

    Many a finger lost in the pursuit of science.

    Happy days, now its all f*&^&ing Excel and Powerpoint. How we have been emasculated.

  204. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And this is where I literally LMAO while at the same time crying... The damn thing BEEEPED!! for God's sake. It beeped!! How many bombs made by guys named "Mohammad" around the world were built with an audio circuit? Bombs aren't made to beep.. They're made to go BOOM. Beeping bombs are hollywood, just like satellites that go beep in outerspace. (Newsflash, they don't beep in space).

    With a clearance and 3 years deployed in a situation where I have read hundreds, if not a few thousand, post-analysis reports on IEDs, not a single one. Not. A. Single. One. included a circuit to make an audible signal.

    Then of course there's the obvious, "You even screwed up the bomb found scenario." Let me get this straight, you're telling me with an honest face that you found something you THOUGHT was a bomb, and you didn't immediately lock down the building, evacuate and send in an EOD robot? Wow, great job failing at even getting the mistaken scenario correct as well (in terms of response). Now a real terrorist knows how dumb you are.

  205. Cell Phones probably not capable of triggering now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently I was traveling and found myself in SEATAC. My S.O. tried several times to call me while I was in the terminal building. None of those calls rang through. However, about 10 minutes after she notified me via chat that she could not get a call to me, I saw the voice mails appear. I had no problem at all calling out. We did several tests after that. In each case the call was sent to voicemail as if my phone were turned off. Once I left the terminal building and the surrounding area inbound calls were again allowed to ring through.

  206. So now Republicans have to be against him by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

    Granted, the odds of one of the R candidates supporting somebody named Ahmed Mohamed were already slim. Now that Obama has come out supporting this kid, I will be shocked if any of them to come to his defense. Just look at the comments on a GOP news site. This isn't even the most vitriolic one out there. Mind you, these are the same people who rant when "Obama's" TSA takes their favorite pocket knife, calling it government overreach and unamerican. And here they are saying things like "the dumb kid deserved it," or "maybe he was just testing our defenses for a real bomb." Really?! WTF!? No wonder everybody thinks we're a bunch of racist fucks.

  207. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously... Some are like "Good move, Obama". Yeah, nice of him to not miss the publicity stunt opportunity. Don't worry, back to ordering to drone kill strikes on potential terrorists tomorrow. Oh, sorry, I meant "potential terrorists and their families".

  208. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

    Determining whether something could be a bomb by whether it looks like a bomb from a movie? Which means that if someone really did build a bomb but did not make it look like a movie bomb would be able to explode it. The authorities would then explain that the device did not look like a bomb because it did not beep and did not have blinking lights...

    I would expect more from teachers and police officers.

  209. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

    I have two cellphones. It is possible (and has been done) to use a cellphone to trigger a bomb. ALERT ALERT!
    I also have a car. It is possible (and has been done) to fill the car with explosives and then explode it when needed. You can even fit a small nuke in something like a lorry. I saw a lorry, it must be the terrorists! ALERT ALERT!
    I have a piece of wire. It is possible to use the wire to strangle someone (if the wire is long enough) or to use it to ignite gasoline to cause a fire. ALERT ALERT!
    I have a big book. A book can be used to bash someone in the head, potentially killing them. ALERT ALERT!
    I have some cigarettes. You can extract nicotine from cigarettes and then use it to poison someone. ALERT ALERT!
    I have clothes on. I can take off my T-shirt and use it to strangle someone. ALERT ALERT!

    So, we need to arrest: all cellphone owners, all car drivers, all smokers and everyone who has a piece of wire or even a string and everyone wearing clothes.

  210. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me guess, you vote Republican?

  211. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    That's the world that people like you have made for us to live in, because you were scared shitless after 9/11, so much so that you were willing to throw everything else - sanity, rights and liberties, the free society itself - under the bus, all for the sake of your precious lives. Because terrorists.

    It doesn't have to be that way.

  212. Re:there is no war on police. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    No, it means being put on trial for manslaughter when they raid a wrong house and shoot and kill someone because some retard in blue thought that a cellphone looked like a gun, because there's no way a black person could hold anything else when interacting with police.

  213. Citizen vs. Taxpayer vs. human by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I under the issue of who pays, but sometimes the assertion blurs distinctions between taxpayers prcitizens and humans. In the sense that a lot of the time when someone cries "I'm a taxpayer' they also seem to be saying that mere citizens or human beings have a lesser status that they do, or that their taxpayer status trumps the other two.

    Yes, you can avoid taxes, but it's fairly hard to avoid all taxes. Although if you live in Washington State they have no income tax, and if you drive over to Oregon they have so sales tax. Works for some of my relatives).

  214. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by RingDev · · Score: 1

    Cell phones used as bomb triggers ... have wires attached to them....

    Yeah, like a USB cable...

    -Rick

    --
    "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
  215. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Never claimed this device looked like a bomb, but it does look like a bomb trigger. It is obviously home made and resembles something you'd see in a Hollywood movie representing a bomb trigger.

    Actually, it looks like the kind of homemade circuit that generations of boys built to learn electronics. Perhaps you are too young to remember that. There were dozens of books on how to build that stuff, and they were avidly read. Radio Shack and other electronics stores used to sell parts and kits to support the hobby. The enormously popular fiction series "The Mad Scientists Club" by Bertrand R. Brinley (familiar to lots of Boy Scouts of that era) was essentially based around a group of kids in the hobby and their adventures. There were a number of other books with similar themes that I read in the school library, but it's been too many years for me to remember the titles ...

    I remember taking an summer electronics class when I was even younger than this kid. The class was taught at the local high school (we were far too young to be high school students: the class was explicitly electronics for kids), and the instructor went over the basics of simple electrical circuits. We made a lot of different circuits in the class, including clock circuits.

    As part of the class fee, every student got to take home an electronics kit (I think it was a 150-in-1 kit). We played with those kits for years, doing all kinds of fun stuff with them, before moving on to more advanced stuff. In 9th grade, several of us did some more advanced stuff as extra credit for our science class, building the circuits at home on breadboards then bringing them in to school to demonstrate.

    Those experiences were probably what sent me into electrical engineering instead of history in college.

    Ironically, the electronics I did as a kid was far more sophisticated than the labs for the physics II class at my Ivy League college, which were supposed to provide an introduction to circuits. They really dumbed down things in that college class, I suppose because most high schools no longer teach electronics (and perhaps because the instructor was more interested in research than teaching).

    This is a clear case of police officers violating their oaths to uphold the Bill of Rights, which among other things protects any form of reasonable conduct under the 9th and 10th Amendment (rights retained by the people, rights reserved to the people) irregardless of federal and state law. Those oaths being preconditions to holding any position of public trust or responsibility, the individuals involved are now former police officers. Similarly, the school officials need to find jobs more suited to their level of competence. Any other outcome will essentially treat the Bill of Rights as toilet paper.

  216. obviously by gzuckier · · Score: 1

    the kid is part of Obama's muslim socialist secret army, and he is going to be interrogated as to how his plot failed.
    probably going to end up gay married, too.

    --
    Star Trek transporters are just 3d printers.
  217. Obama should say: "You didn't build that" by moeinvt · · Score: 1

    I was cheering for the kid when I first heard the story about the 14 year old who "built" his own digital clock. I was curious as to the implementation. My first guess was an Arduino board, which would still be pretty cool.
    Turns out it's nothing but an old alarm clock that he disassembled and put into his pencil box.

    http://makezine.com/2015/09/16...

    What a giant let-down. He's getting attention from the White House and tech companies for stealing someone's work and passing it off as his own?
    Remember back when apple pie and baseball were quintessential "American" things? For some reason, this story seems to represent my impression of the new "America". A country that exudes fear and gives out awards to non-achievers.

  218. Re:Obama should say: "You didn't build that" by moeinvt · · Score: 1

    P.S.
    I forgot the USA's new defining attribute ... looking for the slightest hint of "racism" from anyone, anywhere so that we can feel good about ourselves for condemning it.

  219. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 1

    The kid was arrested for doing a "bomb hoax" and it's easy to see why the folks in charge might get the idea that's what he was doing.

    Hindsight is 20/20 and yes they likely overreacted given what actually took place, but there are policies and procedures that MUST be followed and in the light of the post Columbine world it's easy to see why the procedures are so brain dead.

    So nobody did anything wrong here.... Except perhaps for that 14 year old boy, but it's easy to explain HIS issue as being just naïve..

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  220. It was different in Britain 55 years ago. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I was 6 our teacher introduced "show and tell" and asked us to bring something to school to do with our father's job. Dad was in the RAF and gave me an old 25lb training bomb. The teacher asked if it was "live" and I said no you screw a flare into the back. No fuss no panic and everyone looked it.

  221. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

    The point is that, statistically speaking, there has been no discernible uptick in killings of police. 2014 was double 2013, but 2013 was the lowest EVER on record. In fact, depending on whose statistics you use, 2014 was lower than 2012. There is no war on cops.

    The opposite is also true. There is no war on black people either. At least not in the sense of an increase of killings of unarmed black men. On the other hand, society hasn't systematically disadvantaged police for centuries and written drug laws that specifically target them for disproportionately higher minimum jail sentences. So it's kind of hard to compare.

  222. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 1

    The kid was arrested on suspicion of committing a "bomb hoax" which implies they suspected that the device he built was INTENDED to look like a bomb and that he was trying to act like it was a bomb.

    So, by virtue of the fact the device looked the part of a hoax bomb, the authorities had to act per their process in these cases which is CALL THE POLICE, who acted in accordance to their process as well. None of this seems unreasonable if you do a bit of thinking about what each of the decision makers might have seen and what we all can imagine the process says they have to do in these cases.

    I would like to remind EVERYBODY that we are only getting one side of this story and that comes from the kid and his parents. The school and the police have clearly indicated that there is more to this, but they are unable to discuss it because of their policy. In hindsight it sure looks like these people overreacted, but we don't have all the facts and there are some pretty plausible scenarios that might put this in a whole different light.

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101
  223. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by orgelspieler · · Score: 1

    Ah... so it wasn't a bomb but a trigger. Looking at it from your perspective, I guess we should be glad they didn't call in Jack Bauer to torture the kid to find out where he hid the explosives. So in that case, Irving ISD and police did an outstanding job practicing restraint and common sense. Well done!!

  224. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Again, the only reason why what the kid did was even perceived as a bomb hoax (despite him doing everything to convince people otherwise) is because people like you have created the culture of paranoia and fear around all things Muslim.

  225. "Diverse society will fail" --Putnam; by NewYork · · Score: 1

    "Diverse society will fail" --Putnam;
    Let black Police deal with black Culprits;
    http://www.boston.com/news/glo...

  226. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by dywolf · · Score: 1

    Just to follow up, yet more numbers to further dispel this "war on police" myth:
    www.npr.org/2015/09/17/441196546/is-there-a-war-on-police-the-statistics-say-no

    In short: 2014 only looked bad because the previous year was the all time safest year for police. Ever.
    (much like global warming deniers who try to claim arctic rebounded because 2013 had more ice than 2012....the lowest year ever recorded)

    Quote:

    The notion of growing "warfare" against police stems in part from a statistical jump in the number of law officers murdered — "feloniously killed," in the jargon of the FBI's numbers.

    In 2014, the year of the Ferguson protests and increased media attention on police misconduct, 51 officers were killed nationwide. That was a jump from the 27 killed in 2013 and many took it as a sign of greater danger for police.

    But even 2014 was statistically part of an ever decreasing trend and not really a departure from normal:

    While the number of police officers killed on duty nearly doubled from 2013 to 2014, the increase is deceptive, says Seth Stoughton: 2013 had unusually few deaths. 2014 was comparable to other recent years and to the 10-year average.

    --
    The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
  227. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by Pentium100 · · Score: 1

    Well, maybe because I live in a country where people are not as afraid of bombs or terrorists as people in the US, but I would expect a "bomb hoax" to involve 1) saying it's a bomb and 2) sounding serious about it. But it seems that Ahmed built a clock, said it's a clock and still got arrested for a "bomb hoax". What did he have to do to avoid being arrested? What if, say, I wanted to build a "prop bomb" and show it off? Would I be arrested even if I explicitly said that this was a prop bomb and not a real one?

    In my country, a bomb hoax usually involves somebody calling the cops and saying that there is a bomb in some store or wherever (causing the special forces to evacuate the building and look for the bomb), while there is no such bomb.

    Then again, the elevator in the building where I work started beeping for some reason, we joked that it was a bomb and talked how stupid it would be to build a bomb that beeps (or that maybe it's an alarm that the elevator is about to fall down). While being in said elevator. I guess this thing in the US would cause somebody to crap their pants.

  228. He made it or did he disassemble it? by amoeba1911 · · Score: 1

    I can't find anywhere on this article... did he actually make this stupid clock or did he just disassemble a cots alarm clock and stick it the parts in a briefcase? It sounds like the latter, because why would you make it plug-in if you're making your own alarm clock to go in a brief case?

  229. Re:I wonder if they're going to use this as "proof by bobbied · · Score: 1

    We don't know what this young kid said or did because his parents have so far refused to release the school and the police to disclose this information. The school and police are bound by their policy not to discuss such matters without a release from his guardians, and the boy's parents have yet to allow it.

    So, my point here is that there is possibly a valid reason for what happened to this boy and his "clock" but we are only getting one side of the story so it's really hard to know. I choose not to jump to conclusions either way, but there just MIGHT be a bit of fault to lay at this boy's feet.... It just MIGHT be that the authorities acted totally properly and within their policy...

    --
    "File to fit, pound to insert, paint to match" - Aircraft Maintenance 101