There is no expectation of privacy in a public place. None. That's why paparazzi can photograph celebrities, it's why we can photograph misbehaving police (who have tried to use the privacy excuse, and lost 100% of the time).
Douchey response. I'm not talking about a "handful" of "friends" and "associates". I'm talking about everyone I've ever been introduced to. For most people, that is over 1,000 people. When you start a new job and go to a big meeting full of people from other companies, do you memorize all their first and last names in one introduction? Great job. Not all of us have that ability. Some of us have disabilities that make it hard to recognize people.
Names and addresses and habits? Douchebag. That was never said. Go fuck your strawman somewhere else.
I want the camera to facial-recognize people and put their names over their heads, because I am bad with names. But people like you are too busy whining to even think of the positive applications. (Same thing for translating foreign languages would be nice too, then I could actually order at my local establishments.)
I like how you make a strawman out of declaring the device's sole purpose. It's about as convincing as the people who say twitter is solely for telling people what you ate or that you pooped.
Wow. Your 2nd paragraph is downright evil and anti-democratic. I gotta wonder why you were able to become convinced to believe this asshattery. 12% of Democrats voted for Bush in Florida.
Sorry, 200,000, not millions. So you can blame one group of 500 people for voting 3rd party, or you can blame FOUR HUNDRED groups of 500 Democrats who voted for bush. Yeah, it isn't a 3rd party issue, not mathematically.
Whoosh. Try comprehending what I originally said. You are now blaming 500 people who didn't vote the way you wanted, and not the millions of democrats who didn't vote the way you wanted. When things don't go your way, the largest causal group is who is responsible, not the smallest. The most responsible people (besides those republicans that were obviously going to vote for bush anyway) was the Democrats who voted for Bush, not the 3rd party people. Again, quit with the learned helplessness; you are completely fallacious.
No, it's not likely. You're talking about a few thousand people who voted for Nader, vs 12 million democrats who voted for bush in florida. You can't pin the actions of a few thousand as more influential than the actions of 12 million. Stop promoting learned helplessness.
"Refusal to accept and be considerate of this is harmful", says the man who refuses to accept and be considerate. And who apparently purposely micspells words to see the harm it causes in aggravating them.
1. However much you drink, it's 24X cheaper at home. Why are you buying full bottles of liquor you don't like? Are you stupid? Ever hear of an airplane bottle? (Still 2-4X cheaper than at a bar.) A liquor bottle being finished by one or one's guests is not in intractable problem. You're really grasping for straws.
2. Ah yes, the old "atmosphere" excuse. When I go out, I see 99% of people not speaking to anyone other than their own party. 24X and a DUI is worth having meat around you that you don't interact with? Oh, taxi. Okay now, let's increase the cost from 24X to 50+X. That's worth having some meat around.
3. Huh? 90% of people have cars. This is a slashdot article about DUIs. My comment was in the context of DUIs. This is by definition people that drive.
4. You don't. You nap it off. I hope you don't drink that much when you have to be somewhere the next day.
As someone who watches some 60 cartoon series a year, the animation is top quality. It most certainly would have passed as flash animation 10 years ago, and is better than most flash animation today.
Do not mistake disliking a particular aesthetic as being synonymous with bad quality.
Slashdot Mirror
What I got out of your comment was "it's the exact same thing as a GoPro camera".
great strawman
Yes you do, you lying fucking moron.
There is no expectation of privacy in a public place. None. That's why paparazzi can photograph celebrities, it's why we can photograph misbehaving police (who have tried to use the privacy excuse, and lost 100% of the time).
Names and addresses and habits? Douchebag. That was never said. Go fuck your strawman somewhere else.
You're incredibly naive if you think the government -- and probably some corporations -- don't already have the ability to identify you by your face.
Pretty sure the $1,500 price tag will be the revenue stream for glass.
Wait... Cyborgs aren't cool??
I want the camera to facial-recognize people and put their names over their heads, because I am bad with names. But people like you are too busy whining to even think of the positive applications. (Same thing for translating foreign languages would be nice too, then I could actually order at my local establishments.)
I like how you make a strawman out of declaring the device's sole purpose. It's about as convincing as the people who say twitter is solely for telling people what you ate or that you pooped.
Saying the actions of a greater number of people is of equal responsibility of the actions of a lesser number of people is logical why?
Here's one Starscream's been saving for you: http://my.firedoglake.com/jest/2012/08/27/debunking-pathological-myths-of-the-2000-election-part-2-democrat-defections-to-bush-blue-dogs-bush-democrats-caused-gore-to-lose-fl/
The rape analogy really takes the cake, though. An extremely poor map of the real model.
Sorry, 200,000, not millions. So you can blame one group of 500 people for voting 3rd party, or you can blame FOUR HUNDRED groups of 500 Democrats who voted for bush. Yeah, it isn't a 3rd party issue, not mathematically.
Whoosh. Try comprehending what I originally said. You are now blaming 500 people who didn't vote the way you wanted, and not the millions of democrats who didn't vote the way you wanted. When things don't go your way, the largest causal group is who is responsible, not the smallest. The most responsible people (besides those republicans that were obviously going to vote for bush anyway) was the Democrats who voted for Bush, not the 3rd party people. Again, quit with the learned helplessness; you are completely fallacious.
No, it's not likely. You're talking about a few thousand people who voted for Nader, vs 12 million democrats who voted for bush in florida. You can't pin the actions of a few thousand as more influential than the actions of 12 million. Stop promoting learned helplessness.
You're kind of a judgmental asshole.
"If it didn't change in the past, it won't change in the future" is not that great of an argument.
American needs more people like you. Thank you for your service to this country. You're better than a veteran (excluding WW2 vets only).
Because I don't want to eat human burglar meat?
Pinkie Pie is my spirit animal.
I feel sorry for anyone who makes "other people not thinking I'm weird" any sort of priority whatsoever.
"Refusal to accept and be considerate of this is harmful", says the man who refuses to accept and be considerate. And who apparently purposely micspells words to see the harm it causes in aggravating them.
2. Ah yes, the old "atmosphere" excuse. When I go out, I see 99% of people not speaking to anyone other than their own party. 24X and a DUI is worth having meat around you that you don't interact with? Oh, taxi. Okay now, let's increase the cost from 24X to 50+X. That's worth having some meat around.
3. Huh? 90% of people have cars. This is a slashdot article about DUIs. My comment was in the context of DUIs. This is by definition people that drive.
4. You don't. You nap it off. I hope you don't drink that much when you have to be somewhere the next day.
It seems to me that you have a mental disorder about proving others' mental disorders.
Do not mistake disliking a particular aesthetic as being synonymous with bad quality.