And it is fascists anti-fascists. Because not only they are fascists, but they are also a semantic contradiction.
Don't take me wrong, the ban is perfectly justified, but it's always right-wing fascists who get punished. This guy had no right to punch whoever it was in the face, and this is not an isolated case. Even moderate trump supporters get constantly beaten up with no consequences. A young college girl got pepper sprayed while giving an interview at UC, and several innocent bystanders were beaten up by the anti-fascist crowd, which was destroying everything b/c they didn't like a speaker the Republican student association had invited. These people are dividing the country, and creating a climate of tension and violence way more than the alt-right.
The media coverage is ridiculous, and focus instead on actual fake stories of people who are pretending to be assaulted by Trump supporters, a claim, as far as I know, always unfounded.
End of rant. Good luck America.
This might actually work if it supports standard Windows software. For example, you may have an old machine running few selected programs, or even have an actually light version of Windows for Raspberry.
I don't need a bunch of annoying security messages that either tell me something I already know, or that tell me something I have already decided to ignore. What, I think _everybody_ wants from a browser is:
- decent memory management (I don't care if I page takes 2ms more to load, especially if the price is to have a browser taking 2gb of RAM and making my system unusable)
- minimalist interface
- fast startup time
- fast page load
Extra points if it also has:
- add-on support
- sound and videos on page load disabled by default
- address autocomplete That's it. Really. It's a fucking browser. It's sole purpose is to render web-pages. I don't need another operating system. If I wanted that, I'd install a VM or emacs.
I don't need a bunch of annoying security messages that either tell me something I already know, or that tell me something I have already decided to ignore. What, I think, _everybody_ wants from a browser is:
- decent memory management (I don't care if I page takes 2ms more to load, especially if the price is to have a browser taking 2gb of RAM and making my system unusable)
- minimalist interface
- fast startup time
- fast page load
Extra points if it also has:
- add-on support
- sound and videos on page load disabled by default
- address autocomplete
That's it. Really. It's a fucking browser. It's sole purpose is to render web-pages. I don't need another operating system. If I wanted that, I'd install a VM or emacs.
Another Silicon Valley giant working at self driving cars.
The problem of driving cars is complex, but it is modular (avoid obstacles, visual recognition, ethical decisions) and universal (everybody mostly want the same thing, that is the car not to crash). So, why don't all these companies develop specifics APIs, or modules, and make the core, gluing system open, instead wasting time developing their own distro, *ehm, algorithm. Considering that self-driving cars will likely interact with more and more self-driving cars in the future, this may also improve operability in the future.
PS: I know this is partly what's happening, especially with the visual recognition systems, but I am talking about extending the approach to other functionalities as well.
A stupid article. Almost everything can be automated, the crucial question is whether it is cost-effective to do so. It is not surprising that a lot of the activities that can be automated concerns workers in China and India, because in most cases, it's simply more convenient not to replace an $2/h organic automaton with a robot.
Here is your anecdote. A friend of mine was working on the manufacture industry. They had a branch in India, and his role was to mentor the product manager of the Indian factory. For a long time, he insisted that the factory in India bought this expensive machinery that they had been used in the Arizona for their production. The factory in India refused to do so by showing that paying 10 people to do the same job, for 100 years, would still be cheaper than actually buying the machinery.
Slashdot Mirror
Have you ever taken AI class in college? What do you think they teach you, how to develop conscious robots?
And it is fascists anti-fascists. Because not only they are fascists, but they are also a semantic contradiction.
Don't take me wrong, the ban is perfectly justified, but it's always right-wing fascists who get punished. This guy had no right to punch whoever it was in the face, and this is not an isolated case. Even moderate trump supporters get constantly beaten up with no consequences. A young college girl got pepper sprayed while giving an interview at UC, and several innocent bystanders were beaten up by the anti-fascist crowd, which was destroying everything b/c they didn't like a speaker the Republican student association had invited. These people are dividing the country, and creating a climate of tension and violence way more than the alt-right.
The media coverage is ridiculous, and focus instead on actual fake stories of people who are pretending to be assaulted by Trump supporters, a claim, as far as I know, always unfounded. End of rant. Good luck America.
I have been reading this comment for about 4 years now.
This might actually work if it supports standard Windows software. For example, you may have an old machine running few selected programs, or even have an actually light version of Windows for Raspberry.
I don't need a bunch of annoying security messages that either tell me something I already know, or that tell me something I have already decided to ignore. What, I think _everybody_ wants from a browser is:
- decent memory management (I don't care if I page takes 2ms more to load, especially if the price is to have a browser taking 2gb of RAM and making my system unusable)
- minimalist interface
- fast startup time
- fast page load
Extra points if it also has:
- add-on support
- sound and videos on page load disabled by default
- address autocomplete That's it. Really. It's a fucking browser. It's sole purpose is to render web-pages. I don't need another operating system. If I wanted that, I'd install a VM or emacs.
I don't need a bunch of annoying security messages that either tell me something I already know, or that tell me something I have already decided to ignore. What, I think, _everybody_ wants from a browser is: - decent memory management (I don't care if I page takes 2ms more to load, especially if the price is to have a browser taking 2gb of RAM and making my system unusable) - minimalist interface - fast startup time - fast page load Extra points if it also has: - add-on support - sound and videos on page load disabled by default - address autocomplete That's it. Really. It's a fucking browser. It's sole purpose is to render web-pages. I don't need another operating system. If I wanted that, I'd install a VM or emacs.
It's free, and comes with redundant backups in Russian servers.
Thanks for your suggestions. We will start investigating this possibility as soon as our NSF checks get cleared.
New research from my basement shows for the first time that attackers can force a user to reveal their password by beating them up with a hard stick.
The attack does not depend on the authentication technology or device used. Billions of devices can be cracked within just one or two attempt.
Upvoted for the perfect usage of the phrase "crap du jour". (...and upvote cancelled after this comment)
Another Silicon Valley giant working at self driving cars.
The problem of driving cars is complex, but it is modular (avoid obstacles, visual recognition, ethical decisions) and universal (everybody mostly want the same thing, that is the car not to crash). So, why don't all these companies develop specifics APIs, or modules, and make the core, gluing system open, instead wasting time developing their own distro, *ehm, algorithm. Considering that self-driving cars will likely interact with more and more self-driving cars in the future, this may also improve operability in the future.
PS: I know this is partly what's happening, especially with the visual recognition systems, but I am talking about extending the approach to other functionalities as well.
A stupid article. Almost everything can be automated, the crucial question is whether it is cost-effective to do so. It is not surprising that a lot of the activities that can be automated concerns workers in China and India, because in most cases, it's simply more convenient not to replace an $2/h organic automaton with a robot.
Here is your anecdote. A friend of mine was working on the manufacture industry. They had a branch in India, and his role was to mentor the product manager of the Indian factory. For a long time, he insisted that the factory in India bought this expensive machinery that they had been used in the Arizona for their production. The factory in India refused to do so by showing that paying 10 people to do the same job, for 100 years, would still be cheaper than actually buying the machinery.
Moral of the story: stupid article, move on.