Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Reportedly Working On a 'Lightweight Version of Windows' Known As 'Cloud Shell' (neowin.net)

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Neowin: Last week, details emerged of Microsoft's plans to develop a single, unified, 'adaptive shell' for Windows 10. Known as the 'Composable Shell', or CSHELL, the company's efforts were said to be focused on establishing a universal Windows 10 version with a standardized framework to scale and adapt the OS to any type of device, display size or user experience, including smartphones, PCs, tablets, consoles, large touchscreens, and more. Today, Petri reported that Microsoft is working on a new shell for Windows known as 'Cloud Shell'. According to internal documentation referred to in that report, Cloud Shell is described as a "lightweight version of Windows designed for the modern computing world." It also hints at plans to introduce the Cloud Shell sometime in 2017 -- but little else is known about the new shell besides that. Cloud Shell is said to be connected, in some way, with the Windows Store and Universal Windows Platform app framework, and the report speculates that it may also be related to Microsoft's plans to bring the full version of Windows 10 to mobile devices with ARM-based processors, which it announced in December. However, the cloud nomenclature, and the reference to this being a 'lightweight' version of Windows could hint at a 'thin client'-style approach, in which the Windows 10 shell could be streamed from Microsoft's Azure platform to any device with an internet connection, while its cloud servers remotely handle all of the processing and storage requirements of each users' tasks.

164 comments

  1. Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Another product no one asked for or wanted.

    1. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      People often don't know what they want, until they're given it, there's the (possibly apocryphal) Henry Ford quote:

      If I'd asked customers what they wanted, they would have said "a faster horse".

    2. Re:Yay by postbigbang · · Score: 2

      An unbloated, slimmed down version of Window has been on lists for decades. Think: plausible container shells, ROM-able instances, VDI.

      It remains to be seen what the downside(s) are, but yeah, skinny Window might actually be, dare I say it, competitive?

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    3. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget about how linux programs run in Windows now. You could execute csh on cshell!

    4. Re:Yay by OtisSnerd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Another product no one asked for or wanted.

      You're missing the idea that this is a three letter agency and data harvesting company wet dream. Now, they don't even need back doors into your desktops, only to the cloud back end.

    5. Re:Yay by Foofoobar · · Score: 1

      Yes it has been on that list... and it was found over a decade ago in a product called Linux (please see reference of potato web server: http://totl.net/Spud/ )

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    6. Re:Yay by Foofoobar · · Score: 0

      Lol. Ok if you are harvesting data on grandmas playing solitaire and old people using Excel.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    7. Re: Yay by corychristison · · Score: 2

      I'm a Linux guy. I use Funtoo/Gentoo pretty much everywhere.

      This honestly piqued my interest.

      I maintain a custer of DNS servers based on PowerDNS and MariaDB Galera. The deployment image I use is only a few GB uncompressed.

      If MS can bring Windows Server down to 2-3GB (uncompressed) I'm sure people will find a use for it.

      Undoubtedly the licensing will get in the way, like it always does.

    8. Re: Yay by postbigbang · · Score: 1

      Lots of items are unknown. Licensing, api differences, so much more. I'd like to shoot bullets and see how tough it is.

      --
      ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
    9. Re:Yay by chipschap · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only on the cshore.

    10. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet if Ford had his way, we would still be driving the Model T, and it would still have cable brakes, buggy suspension and only come in black.

    11. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recall during the OS/2 - windows 95 wars, all of the trade magazine praised Microsoft for only having one offering while knocked IBM for offering 2 or 3 variants depending on the industry.

      I always wonder at people's objectivity on matters when their opinions appear to change to arbitrarily, or at least with strained rationalizations, depending on who is in power.

    12. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol. Ok if you are harvesting data on grandmas playing solitaire and old people using Excel.

      Yeah, and while she's playing her ad-infested version of solitare, we'll be sending her a nice malvertisement that activates the webcam and microphone, hacks her Myspace and bank accounts, and makes her power LED blink constantly even when the machine is off.

      Or, maybe we're busy messing with your bank account and pinning you with tax evasion and money laundering because some business software still requires Excel?

      You might wind up with your data on one of these at some point indirectly. Work suddenly onboarded them and fired 45% of IT? You're using it. Bank suddenly replaced it's ATMs? You're using it. Power utility did a mass rollout of new smart meters? You're using it. Granted there are other products, but don't assume that just because you don't own one, you are free from it's influence and problems. Security is only as strong as it's weakest link, even if that link 3000+ miles away.

    13. Re:Yay by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      Yes it has been on that list... and it was found over a decade ago in a product called Linux (please see reference of potato web server: http://totl.net/Spud/ )

      ...d.....did....you just *slashdot* a *potato*?!?

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    14. Re:Yay by Opyros · · Score: 1

      It does sound likely to be apocryphal to me; after all, Ford didn't invent the automobile!

    15. Re: Yay by bernywork · · Score: 1

      If you're already paying for a data centre licenses for your VMware hosts, I doubt it.

      --
      Curiosity was framed; ignorance killed the cat. -- Author unknown
    16. Re:Yay by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Did you miss the wikileaks from Snowden? Or the huge fucking monster data processing center the CIA built in Utah?

      Got news for ya pal they want to know everything about EVERYBODY, in case you might be one of those pesky radicals. We shouldn't be surprised, its just COINTELPRO made faster and cheaper thanks to AI and large data processing facilities. hell they don't even have to follow you around anymore, just process the GPS from your smartphone.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    17. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another product no one asked for or wanted.

      Yep. The same could be said about my wife.

    18. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It remains to be seen what the downside(s) are, but yeah, skinny Window might actually be, dare I say it, competitive?

      One downside would be having CenturyLink for an ISP.

    19. Re: Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2-3GB is still on the heavy side. We need a Windows deployment sans GUI that can run in a handful of megabytes. The smaller the better.

      It's pretty silly to spin up instances when they're many times bigger than any software running on them. Docker was a bit better but it has a raft of problems as well, especially in the networking department. This said Microsoft has no answer to this so Linux can win even with the most atrocious solution.

    20. Re: Yay by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      If MS can bring Windows Server down to 2-3GB (uncompressed)

      Windows 2000 Advanced Server was slightly cramped on a 1GB disk, but fitted fine. 2-3GB is a very low bar for an OS. A full install of the FreeBSD plus web, mail, and DNS servers is well under 1GB.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    21. Re:Yay by gtall · · Score: 1

      Wow, you cannot even be troubled to read your own link, that was the NSA, not the CIA.

    22. Re: Yay by shortscruffydave · · Score: 1

      2-3GB is still on the heavy side. We need a Windows deployment sans GUI that can run in a handful of megabytes. The smaller the better.

      I believe that has existed for years, in the form of Embedded Windows.

    23. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A chromebook for Windows is a very important product for MS to compete with Google especially in the Edu space.

      VDI is way too expensive.

    24. Re:Yay by ahabswhale · · Score: 1

      That was because Ziff Davis had a huge investment in Microsoft stock. They dominated the PC press at the time and they did everything in their power to promote Windows over OS/2.

      --
      Are agnostics skeptical of unicorns too?
    25. Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should have gave them a damn faster horse!
      All he needed to do was strap some bloody rockets to their knees.
      Does he know NOTHING about engineering?!
      The nerve that guy has to just make assumptions about people. Honestly!

    26. Re:Yay by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Was the Model T even really faster than horses though?

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    27. Re:Yay by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      According to the top of that webpage, no.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    28. Re:Yay by WeezulDK · · Score: 1

      You're right, they were serious MS shills. It's sad though, because OS/2 2.11 was the bomb... it was Windows 2000 like 7 years early.

    29. Re: Yay by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      What embedded Windows are you working with? The one I work with needs around 4 GB of RAM and 32GB SSD.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    30. Re:Yay by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      If she is your wife, I am pretty sure at some point you admitted in public that you wanted her.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    31. Re: Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      XPe.

      It's on tons of test equipment with sub GB ram and sub 32GB storage.

    32. Re: Yay by corychristison · · Score: 1

      I agree. My DNS image is tailored specifically to my needs. Which is MariaDB Galera Cluster.. the dependencies that pulls in is quite a bit.

      I'm sure I could trim a fair amount of stuff out, but its not worth my time to test to ensure that everything works perfect out of the box on deployment, when this works. After all, compressed with xz its under 1GB, and transfering data center to data center it's pretty quick.

      I haven't used Windows Server, but my recent experience with Win10 is that it's a storage pig. Base install is like 11GB (for 64bit). After some updates and drivers (say AMD or Nvidia full driver package), you're quickly upto 15GB.

    33. Re:Yay by erapert · · Score: 1

      Does it matter? A spook is a spook.

    34. Re: Yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already exists, it's called Nano Server, probably smaller than 2gb as well.

  2. Known as CSHELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And includes the default command line option of csh. (We wish)

    1. Re:Known as CSHELL by bondsbw · · Score: 2
      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    2. Re:Known as CSHELL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. I would upvote if I had points.

  3. Internal name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Interestingly, the internal name is Universal Data Harvester.

  4. Windows Store/Universal Platform by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cloud Shell is said to be connected, in some way, with the Windows Store and Universal Windows Platform app framework,

    Does anyone even use either of those?

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:Windows Store/Universal Platform by epyT-R · · Score: 1

      The few people playing microsoft exclusive games maybe.. That's about it.

    2. Re:Windows Store/Universal Platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I do. Both.

    3. Re:Windows Store/Universal Platform by vbraga · · Score: 1

      I do use. I still have a Lumia 640. Not a bad phone. I could use a GMail app. There's a few other apps I'd like to have (Lykke wallet, an official Google Play Music client).

      --
      English is not my first language. Corrections and suggestions are welcome.
    4. Re:Windows Store/Universal Platform by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      What do you use them for? Especially the universal platform. That sounds like a platform that is the 'future' that will be gone soon, like VB6 and Silverlight.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Windows Store/Universal Platform by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      We had a hard enough time getting our customers to drop XP, and that was predicated upon the notion that security updates were no longer going to be forthcoming from Microsoft. We've got another 3 years to go before we'll be able to even consider such things--when MS ends Windows 7 extended support.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    6. Re:Windows Store/Universal Platform by cjjjer · · Score: 1

      Not the store per se but UWP. I have developed a few apps for my company already. One is used on both desktop and some cheap windows tablets (inventory / shipping / receiving).

      As for the Cloud Shell I wonder if it's just a version of Windows Server 2016 Nano running in the cloud.

    7. Re:Windows Store/Universal Platform by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Does anyone even use either of those?

      For a few apps on my Windows (non RT) tablet, yes. That's it.

    8. Re:Windows Store/Universal Platform by Desler · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you one of the 3 people with a Windows Phone?

    9. Re:Windows Store/Universal Platform by unixisc · · Score: 1

      By which time, people who are forced out of XP or 7 are unlikely to want to migrate to yet another Microsoft platform, when there would be others from the likes of Google, Apple and maybe even others, like Facebook, waiting in the wings

    10. Re:Windows Store/Universal Platform by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was visiting in a hospital last night and happened to see a boot-screen on the front-desk person's desktop. Yep: windows xp.

  5. rumors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Rumors claiming that a space was misplaced by one character during creation of the marketing materials, and the product was originally to be called "Clouds Hell" cannot be confirmed at this time.

    1. Re:rumors... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dropped from my chair to the ground, unable to stop laughing...

  6. Microsoft sells cshells by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Funny

    Microsoft sells cshells by the sea shore.
    The shells Microsoft sells are surely cshells.
    So if Microsoft sells shells on the seashore,
    I’m sure Microsoft sells seashore shells.

    1. Re: Microsoft sells cshells by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

      That was AWESOME. That is all I have to say.

    2. Re:Microsoft sells cshells by unixisc · · Score: 1

      A sailor went to csh, csh, csh,
      To see what he could cshell, cshell, cshell
      But all that he could cshell, cshell, cshell
      Was the bottom of the deep blue csh, csh, csh

  7. MinWin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What is old is new again

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MinWin

    Or you could just run ReactOS in a VM.

    1. Re:MinWin by epyT-R · · Score: 2

      Real men run ReactOS on bare metal.

    2. Re:MinWin by npslider · · Score: 1

      Real men use DOS on solid iron.

    3. Re:MinWin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Real men use DOS on solid iron.

      Fake men who self-identify as women run Windows on Azure.

    4. Re: MinWin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want my own bathroom damnit, why is none sensitive to my needs :(

  8. Sounds like the last thing I'd want by epyT-R · · Score: 3, Insightful

    At least on the desktop. I am sure 'compromises' will be made that will favor mobile interface layout and aesthetics.

    1. Re:Sounds like the last thing I'd want by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Who cares what it looks like, if they can not deliver privacy and security (those two go hand in hand), then they in reality have nothing to offer, well, not to normal people. To psychopathic dictators of course, windows 10 the dream operating system, (would this indicate the board of M$ is composed of potential psychopathic dictators with delusions of controlling the world via a global extortion scheme, all your secrets belong to us).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    2. Re:Sounds like the last thing I'd want by E-Rock · · Score: 1

      Maybe we'll finally get an RDP thin client that doesn't cost as much as a full PC.

    3. Re:Sounds like the last thing I'd want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just get a RaspberryPi, Raspian and rdesktop - cheap as chips.

      https://raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/questions/32540/a-great-rdp-client

    4. Re: Sounds like the last thing I'd want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The biggest compromise is that it can't do anything useful. UWP looks terrific if all you want to do is show buttons.

      I wanted to port my WPF app over as an experiment and it has no functionality to speak of. It barely supports the mouse and there's no Drawing context. I guess that's what you can expect if you remove HWNDS. We've gone so far backwards I'm considering putting magnetic core memory in my Xeon.

  9. Great..... by ruir · · Score: 2

    CLoud shit, another product from the reverse midas than instead of turning everything it touches into gold, turns into turds. And no, I have not forgot to post as AC.

    1. Re:Great..... by npslider · · Score: 1

      Golden turds sound great in theory till nature calls and the plummer makes off with the source of the clog!

    2. Re:Great..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reverse Midas would turn gold into ordinary things.

    3. Re:Great..... by ruir · · Score: 1

      It is Microshaft after all that we are talking about. Relax, do not forget to take your blue pill.

  10. This is a joke right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is gonna sell CHELLs? presumably by the CSHORE?

    Or are they copying Gnome Shell since that was such a hit?

  11. So in a meeting somewhere in Redmond ... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... hey we have all this billions invested in WindowsPhone OS that we don't know what to do with since we plan to leave the market? Any ideas?

    1. Re:So in a meeting somewhere in Redmond ... by npslider · · Score: 1

      The Internet of Things...

    2. Re:So in a meeting somewhere in Redmond ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Even worse they've fired developers and hired more management and even given raises to existing Windows mobile management like my wife. It's like they're trying intentionally trying to do everything wrong.

    3. Re: So in a meeting somewhere in Redmond ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My roommate just got a raise that put her over $400k. When you reward people for doing a bad job, they'll continue to do a bad job.

    4. Re: So in a meeting somewhere in Redmond ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft is just so disconnected from what customers want. When I worked there, their hatred of customers prevented them from doing anything good.

    5. Re: So in a meeting somewhere in Redmond ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't blame Microsoft for that. Every company does that.

    6. Re:So in a meeting somewhere in Redmond ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On my team at Microsoft, they fired all of the good people and gave managers promotions. I don't give a damn after surviving severals rounds of layoffs, but it's amazing how they always decide to do everything assbackwards.

    7. Re:So in a meeting somewhere in Redmond ... by unixisc · · Score: 1

      Would phones be one of those things?

    8. Re: So in a meeting somewhere in Redmond ... by DivineKnight · · Score: 1

      So, any particular reason for their psychopathy?

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    9. Re: So in a meeting somewhere in Redmond ... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why is someone earning over $400k and still sharing a room? Are you both living on the ISS?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re: So in a meeting somewhere in Redmond ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably San Francisco.

  12. 64 bit x86 by backslashdot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about getting 64 bit x86 to work instead of emulating 32 bit x86 which is 1980s technology?

    1. Re:64 bit x86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, microsoft's spyware runs just fine on 32 bits, so no need to upgrade. They are just removing else as MS does not need anything but the spyware. One can just wonder, if their users might actually need something useful to actually run or how is MS going to get data to harvest for?

    2. Re:64 bit x86 by caseih · · Score: 1

      Okay I'll bite. How does MS emulate 32-bit x86 on 64-bit machines? I've got 64-bit Windows 10 on a couple of machines. I've not seen any evidence that these are 32-bit machines in disguise. Many apps out there are still 32-bit, probably for compatibility (32-bit is still supported as a platform), but many are 64-bit native. Are you telling me the software installed in Program Files--as opposed to Program Files (x86)--are all 32-bit?

    3. Re:64 bit x86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Okay I'll bite. How does MS emulate 32-bit x86 on 64-bit machines?

      He appears to be referring to running on 64bit ARMs and emulating 32bit x86, as recently reported that Microsoft are working on.

    4. Re:64 bit x86 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's Turing complete, any processor should be able to emulate any other processor.

  13. You mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cloud smell? Gaseous and malodorous? Alfie is in the House!

  14. The Cloud by backslashdot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Nowadays everything wants to connect to the cloud. I mean you pull up Apple or Google maps on a phone and it can't even display a generic map showing where you are. It insists on asking the cloud. Yet somehow the OS is like 16 gigabytes in size. How can it take up 16 gigabytes when it doesn't know anything?

    1. Re:The Cloud by npslider · · Score: 2

      Spyware. It needs it's safe spaces. Safe spaces take space.

    2. Re:The Cloud by bob4u2c · · Score: 3

      How can it take up 16 gigabytes when it doesn't know anything?

      Simple, all that space is used for storing tracking and real world data about you for "product development" purposes. You know the kind, where you are the product!

    3. Re:The Cloud by Zaurus · · Score: 1

      Emojis. The first 1 gigabyte is the os, the next 15 gigabytes are emojis.

      They haven't even started including the video emojis yet.

      Once we have video emojis of every possible cute cat action, then we will have finally perfected the operating system.

    4. Re:The Cloud by nasch · · Score: 1

      You're expecting your phone to show a map of your location without downloading it from the internet? How would that work exactly?

    5. Re:The Cloud by Desler · · Score: 1

      Because your phone is supposed to get map data from the aether?

    6. Re:The Cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Download once only. Like it used to be, before "always on" became normal.
      Example http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Downloading_data

    7. Re:The Cloud by backslashdot · · Score: 1

      Umm, have a basic map on the phone. It doesn't have to be super detailed though it could have a cache of your neighborhood. That won't take up that much memory. I mean they could easily do it for a few hundred megs. At least the main roads and nearest highways .. if not an approximate location on the planet. Currently neither Apple nor Google will even show you what town you are in without asking the cloud.

    8. Re:The Cloud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All the roads in the US fit on a 700 Megabyte CD rom, probably with room to spare. Even with Apple's outrageous prices for flash memory, it wouldn't be a big hardship to include offline maps.

    9. Re:The Cloud by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      OSMAnd has a world map that is about 30MB and gives you the country and major cities, but nothing much beyond that. Detailed maps for European countries or US states weigh in at 100-300MB (except France, which seems to have incredibly detailed maps and is a few GBs). Routing works offline and I can easily store a map of my home country and half a dozen countries that I've visited recently or plan to visit soon on my cheap 3-year-old phone.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    10. Re:The Cloud by nasch · · Score: 1

      Umm, have a basic map on the phone. It doesn't have to be super detailed though it could have a cache of your neighborhood.

      I doubt many people would have much use for a nationwide map with nothing more than interstate highways, and preloading the device with a detailed map of the US, let alone the world, would be impossible or at least prohibitive. You can certainly instruct the app to cache an area for offline use, but it's not going to do that without you instructing it to (which is appropriate), and the first time it gets that map it has to come from somewhere.

      There are map apps that work differently if you don't like the ones from Google and Apple. You can choose what maps to download ahead of time (oh no, FROM THE CLOUD!) and then you don't need an internet connection to use them. Google and Apple have designed their apps to match how they think most people want to use them, and I think they're probably right. But no solution will work for everyone.

  15. Is it 3D printed? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In space? Privately? From mining asteroids? No? Then it's for Luddites and I don't want it.

  16. Cloud Shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Your OS runs in the cloud and you shell out money every month to use it

    1. Re: Cloud Shell by TWX · · Score: 1

      So Cisco Meraki then?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  17. Chrome OS? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Doesn't this sound awfully like the Chrome OS? Just Microsoft running the servers instead of Google?

    1. Re:Chrome OS? by npslider · · Score: 2

      2017 will be the year of The Cloud.
      2018 will be the year of Linux
      2019 will be the year of the Doomsday Clock
      2020 will be the year of cockroach computing

    2. Re:Chrome OS? by randomErr · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought. My next thought was that Classic Windows would be bolted on the side the way ChromeOS is starting to run Android in a weird sand box. The final move is to create 'Windows Instant Apps' instead of 'Android Instant Apps' and teh circle will be complete,

      --
      You say things that offend me and I can deal with it. Can you?
    3. Re:Chrome OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds a lot like MS NanoServer (~800MB footprint) with some shell added onto it.

    4. Re: Chrome OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      800MB is not nano.

    5. Re:Chrome OS? by vandamme · · Score: 1

      Microsoft's motto: Monkey see Monkey do.

  18. Sea metaphors by mugurel · · Score: 1

    In a couple of years they will be releasing a browser called Navigator.

    1. Re:Sea metaphors by npslider · · Score: 1

      Microscape Navigator... why does that sound familiar??

    2. Re: Sea metaphors by TWX · · Score: 1

      With the reportware, "Spyglass" would be a better name.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  19. CSHELL? CS HELL? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I know CS degree programs are supposed to be hard, but not THAT hard.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  20. Lightweight indeed. by hey! · · Score: 3, Funny

    It'll bring everything you love about Windows to the Cloud.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:Lightweight indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It'll bring everything you love about Windows to the Cloud.

      That'll make for a pretty empty cloud.

    2. Re:Lightweight indeed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to facebook, my personal data is already in the cloud.

  21. M$ slaps "Cloud shell" label on old dumb client* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    with a shiny expensive price tag for the shit it is.

    *Dumb client as in dumb station, not client as in person.

  22. Jumbo shrimp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Military intelligence
    Boneless ribs
    Lightweight Windows

    1. Re:Jumbo shrimp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

      Common Sense

  23. Yippee Skippee by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    Great! Now they'll have an operating system that only takes 10 minutes to boot up instead of the 20 minutes currently required.

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re: Yippee Skippee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your machine takes twenty minutes to boot the OS, you should look into new storage. They have these things called magnetic disks now. They've only been around forty years, but it is a promising new technology you might want to look into while refilling your kerosene lantern.

    2. Re: Yippee Skippee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your machine takes twenty minutes to boot the OS, you should look into new storage. They have these things called magnetic disks now. They've only been around forty years, but it is a promising new technology you might want to look into while refilling your kerosene lantern.

      How's he supposed to fill out an order form when the lights are out?

  24. Am I the only one... by TheFakeTimCook · · Score: 1

    who read that as "Compostable Shell"?

    Seems fitting for a shitty product...

  25. Microsoft's Next innovation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows Chromebook....

  26. A OS stuck in Microsoft's cloud, great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just what I want, a Microsoft OS stuck in a Microsoft cloud. Sorry, I try to stay as far removed from any Microsoft I can except for being a Windows user. However, Windows is the extent of my use of Microsoft products. No Office, One Drive, Xbox, or Azure.

  27. Lightweight Windows by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

    Surely an oxymoron.

  28. Why Microsoft is going to the cloud by The+Swan+Spirit · · Score: 1

    The cloud is the business of human behavior, leaded by Facebook.

  29. See how the mighty had fallen ... by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Interesting
    20 years ago, someone would have a bright idea. Some venture capitalists might see some potential. They will work feverishly on it. Microsoft might get a wind of it. And it will just release a press release saying it is considering working on the same idea. That's it. The VCs will flee like they had seen ebola. Funding gone, the startup will die.

    Now people just make fun of Microsoft, when it says vaguely plausible things they might have actually invested on. Even stupid idea like warehousing products in the near earth orbit and delivering packages using Multiple Independently Targeted Re-entry Vehicles by Amazon would be discussed seriously. But Microsoft? nah! No one believes it can do what it says it wants to do. Including the VP in charge of the project.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:See how the mighty had fallen ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We might not discuss it seriously, but everyone else who is not a basement dweller does. You are full of biased shit.

  30. CSHELL? by chaosmind · · Score: 1

    The first C-SHELL will suck.

    It will be followed by a new and improved TurboCSHELL...

    1. Re: CSHELL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm waiting on the third release. TurboC++Shell

  31. Back full circle by Dorianny · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And just like that we are back to the days of mainframes/dumb terminals except that know we will call it the cloud/thin client. The reason are simple, vendor lock-in, walled gardens and "services" instead of ownership means you can milk your clients for years instead of selling them something once

    1. Re:Back full circle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are not back at anything. Nothing has ever changed. At least you have Bash on Windows now... Or at least I do. You are short-sighted, and slow.

    2. Re:Back full circle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And lose access to your information when the network goes down, or you forget to pay your cell phone bill, or are too far way from an AP, or you hit your monthly data use cap.

  32. Another tongue twister... by Ann+O'Nymous-Coward · · Score: 0

    See shill CSHELL! Bye, the csh whore.

  33. actualy yes wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and easy to make! Start with windows 10 , remove all aps and metro entirely to start with, remove all unwanted cortana, cloud stuff, browser ,mail and other useless application. remove telemetry and spying process. leave just a rubust network and internet stack with a simple file desktop browser , a control panel and an installer/launcher for win32/win64 applications.
    I will BUY that OS $300 the next day...

  34. Windows for Lightweights? by PPH · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  35. C Shell? Full circle by JeffOwl · · Score: 2

    I used to do a lot of stuff in a lightweight environment called C-Shell and it was really awesome, but that was more than 30 years ago and it really didn't have a lot to do with MS.

  36. Actually by lucaiaco · · Score: 1

    This might actually work if it supports standard Windows software. For example, you may have an old machine running few selected programs, or even have an actually light version of Windows for Raspberry.

  37. Windows NT? by slazzy · · Score: 1

    Sounds like they are bringing back Windows NT.

    --
    Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    1. Re:Windows NT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We could only hope. This is Win NT w/ super-charged harvesting and perpetual tracking baked into "The Clouds".

  38. The need to ... by DougReed · · Score: 1

    If Micro$oft wants to please me, they need to work on a Lightweight version of Windows known as Linux.

    1. Re:The need to ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Omg that was so funny. You sure showed them!! Hurr hurr hurr...

  39. Windows = Total dogshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows is now utter dogshit.

    As soon as some decent applications get written for/ported to Android and/or Linux it's game over for Microsoft.

    They no longer have a fcuking clue.

    1. Re:Windows = Total dogshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know, right? it runs too well on hardware and is dangerously edging towards being useful.

  40. First they stole BASH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now they want the C Shell?

  41. Re:Now Microsoft will claim to have invented csh by unixisc · · Score: 1

    You mean their cshills?

  42. Aw, so close! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    >> Known as the 'Composable Shell'

    Almost what I really needed. I'm looking for a 'Compostable Shell' so I can throw away my Windows instance whenever it gets slow, infected, or I just get tired of being tracked all the time. I would totally go for that.

  43. Compostable shell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like shit.

  44. We've gone back to the fscking mainframe... by AtariEric · · Score: 1

    ...but instead of needing to because of technology and cost constraints, Microsoft is doing it as a method of control. Once Microsoft has the O.S. and your data on their servers, they have you by the curlies. You'll pay what they tell you to pay to access your own data or they pull the trigger.

    --
    Don't trust any concentration of power.
  45. sounds like old tech.. to some degree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does any one remember the term "NCD" Network Computing Device
    or um,,, the first incarnation of the X windowing system..
    or
    um
    SUN IPC
    \it may be old, but isnt funny how everything old is "new" again..
    the only difference is,
    greater access to bandwidth (versus the choices 20+ years ago[modem])
    Moore's law, the computing power is astronomical compared to 20+ years ago,

    the idea is the same, centralized computing device networked slaves (screen, kybd, mouse) but no{or light} [hdd,sdd,cpu, ram, etc] everything including the lightweight OS is booted over the net using various methods like pxe, jump or kick start.

    Crazy right?

  46. VT 100 will be next by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

    So the Azure platform will be in some far away place. People will access it using "thin" clients. The C Shell name also has been co opted. I predict next the display will be called Virtual Teleport 100 or something, and it display 24 lines each 80 characters in beautiful glowing green phosphors.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
  47. Article about continuing use of Windows XP by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Article about continuing use of Windows XP by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      People like you only make the problem worse.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
  48. Opposite of what I want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having a cloud connected OS is THE OPPOSITE OF WHAT I WANT!

    Not that I would trust Microsoft anyway.

  49. Abbreviation is quite apt as well: CS HELL by stiebrs · · Score: 1

    Computer scientists will love this

  50. Could it be free or forced spying and updates? Naw by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would benefit the user and we can't have that!

  51. Win32 is being deprecated so yes by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    ...eventually. UWP is a self contained environment with access to APIs that are outside the scope of Win32, as MS updates its APIs to integrate with these services and also other features of UWP, they will further diverge from Win32, meaning Win32 will stop seeing API updates and be relegated to an "insecure" and deprecated status.

    MS is shifting Windows to a walled garden and will drag everyone there kicking and screaming.

  52. Good, do it. Make UWP the only way! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can already tell you who they won't drag kicking and screaming in to that world: gamers, graphics designers, video producers, [any other intense user here].
    Sure, they might drag some business retards in to it because their sysadmin is an idiot who can't stand up to their shit boss, that's their fault. And the casual computer users that buy laptops and end up getting OEM crap on top. New old job opportunity, "will unfuck laptops for money, or a burger".

    These groups are the ones that actually use most of that hardware their trash OS can barely manage to run on.
    If they are forced in to a walled garden, most of them will just leave.
    There is a large number of people now converting to Linux. More and more, people are researching, asking questions on and setting up:
    1) Windows VM and GPU passthrough
    2) Wine / PlayOnLinux / some other software wrappers and compatibility layer.
    3) native support from program developers because most universally HATE UWP with a passion and a good number of them already know Microsoft were going to phase out Win32 and force UWP on everyone. This just confirms it will come sooner rather than later. Cross-compilation is fairly trivial. Drivers are the biggest issue.

    Go ahead Microsoft. Wall yourself in to business. It's the only area you even make money decent money on.
    Even your spyware OS is barely profitable given everything that has happened since its inception.
    One day, Linux might even hit 5% on the desktop! AWE!
    But seriously, they are pushing people away more and more each announcement.
    I wonder how high a market share it will take for them to undo all the shit they've done and fire that "Become your own CEO in a summer" CEO. Even Ballmer wasn't this thick!

  53. Re:Good, do it. Make UWP the only way! by HalAtWork · · Score: 1

    That's why they are getting Linux utilities running on Windows now natively, so they can easily interact with Windows services and become dependent on them.

    If people put up with Microsoft's shit this far and haven't bolted, there's no hope for humanity. Honestly don't know what it would take at this point to make people move away from Windows en masse. Maybe an Android desktop will help but it's a long shot.

  54. Less is more by CptLoRes · · Score: 1

    I'll take the lightweight version with a 'old school' UI that only does OS tasks without the shop and telemetry thank you very much.

  55. No problems with 17 Windows XP computers. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    We have only 17 XP computers, not a lot. But no problems.

    We use other protection, of course.

  56. No one else saw what this actually is? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They have been pushing to get into the "container business" for years now... they have done this same thing multiple times... XP was going to be using the NT kernel blah blah... then it was CE... so on and so forth... this time, they might actually get it done and even half ass correctly because of Docker getting so popular... they don't want to miss another internet like they did the first time... and like they did with phones... and phones will eventually support docker containers... or something like it...

    I remember when this used to be a fucking tech blog... instead of all conspiracies all the time... not that the NSA / CIA / FBI ain't all over this... but making things smaller is a GOOD thing... hell ... I bet they open source it in the next 10 years anyway.