no, the blame lies with every idiot who voted for an incumbant.
that is a very broad and sweeping statement, but it is mostly true.
there have been very few peacemakers trying to negotiate between the aisles; its been blue yelling at red and red yelling at blue, and nothing getting done for over 3 damn frigging years.
(and this recent election is a better example than most of the general across the board dissatisfaction with everyone, with people even voting for the guy on their side, even though they hate the job he did, simply to keep from having the OTHER SIDE win)
I say we replace every chair in the Congress with a Dr Evil style seat, that dumps into a pool of lava. and if more than 30% of an elected representatives constituents become dissatified with the job he is doing, because of things like this, DOWN HE GOES. and I'm not joking.
I care, but only a little. And at this point it's abotu securing myself and my family from any of the negative effects that will come.
I think the whole sequester thing is dumb as hell. Always did. After playing poltical brinkmanship for years, they finally agree on one thing, and its this idiot piece of legislation.
So I do care. But I have very little sympathy left. Because after passing this absolutely retarded "suicide pact" what did the country do?
THEY RE-ELECTED ALL THE SAME IDIOTS AND SENT THEM RIGHT BACK TO CONGRESS, AGAIN.
So who is more foolish? The fools in Congress? Or the fools who re-elected them?
Since day one, I know it would happen like this. As a political gambit both sides knew EXACTLY what they were doing. They knew from the first that they would absolutely intentionally go right over that cliff. And they knew right from the start that they would blame the other side for anything negative to come of it. And they knew that the fools that elected them would believe them when they did so and compeltely ignore any fault on the part of their own political side.
As far as the politicians are concerned, its a win/win no matter what happens. After all, it's not actually going to affect them inside, only everyone else outside the Capitol building
or just lay out sunbathing nude for a few days. if you're all pasty white and hairy like me, they're almost garunteed to detect it and blur it to spare anyone ever having to see that.:P
that usually is easily overturned/thrown out by the concept that assault by its very definition included a lack of consent, so any sexual activity between two consenting adults is thereby automatically not assualt due to the presence of consent.
its not BS. keyboard/mouse is and always will be superior for any game that can take advantage of them (unless they totally botch the port like Dark Souls...)
Game X on your console will never ever look or play any better than it does right now. Nothing a game that pushes the envelope and has a laggy/stuttery feel to it. Or dumbed down graphics to avoid that.
Yet on a PC it can not only be made to look better, but play better/smoother as well. At the same time.
Verdict: Just another trying-too-hard-to-be-clever-and-failing-miserably troll. Did you get enough attention yet? No? Class, everyone stare at DogDude, he hasn't had enough attention yet to compensate for way his parents ignore him at home.
Crysis 3 is a return to the open world levels of the first game. That, and the change in enemy design and abanding a lot of the characters/vehicles of the first game is why the 2nd was merely an OK corridor type shooter, and paled in comparison to the first one. That they abandoned the scope/scale of the first game int he 2nd, as well as the international conflict part of the story also didnt' help. Replacing the external, real, conflict with north koreans / chinese with a secret shadow group from out of nowhere was rather weak story telling.
And when I say scale....In Crysis, taking 10 minutes to drive to the giant fricking mountain that collapses and reveals an alien ship inside.....that is a gameplay moment I will never forget...it was AWESOME.
Gametrailers has a much more favorable video review, available in HD, that shows it off quite well.
Having also already bought Crysis 3 and played through about 3/4 of it, i'd say the GT review is spot on. I'll even go so far as to say that this guy at hothardware is talking out his ass and had an opinion already formed before he "reviewed" the game, and maybe didnt even play the new one before writing it.
Assange played him exactly the way a CIA or KGB handler would play his assets. it was textbook.
And when the stuff hits the fan over espionage, it tends to get on everyone. Assange definitely committed espionage, and if he was a state actor, no one would hesitate to call it that. Manning gets hit iwth it cause he aided and enabled to occur, even if he wasnt the driving force behind it.
ooo. willfilly disregarding and ignoring the point in order to be pedantic and make almost the same point as the person you're replying to. C'mon dude. The only one playing these games is you.
when it comes to sensitive documents the "enemy" is anyone not authorized to have those documents. and there are additional rules and regulations that further refine and drive home that sentiment.
also: you apparently arent even familiar with the basic facts of the case. Wikileaks, Assange particualrly, played him exactly the way handlers play their assets. Its classic, textbook example. he wasnt some whistleblower out to save the day being ignored at every turn.
funny. in all my years in the military i dont once recall being told that in the event of unlawful or questionable orders/conduct that i was to go tell the NYTimes rather than an inspector general or other designated recipient of such tips.
I must have missed the memo designating the NYtimes as an offical step, let alone an official US Agency, in the process of notifying superiors via the chain of command of such things.
I've said it about about similar topics. Even though he is the CiC and their titular boss, he cannot dictate the findings of a court of law, even a military court of law, it is illegal for him to do so, and it would result in an instant mistrail or automatic appeal which would be garunteed to overturn the previous court's decision. that fact you would state such a thinkg only proves how absoutely blind and ignorant you are.
smart ass'ed ness aside (ill ignore that for now, thankyou), i get that they did "science".
but theres no information about study controls to determine how different the us rat is from any other rat faced with the same choice. to prove that the rat made his choice because of the signals from the other rat.
more importantly, how did the brazil rat know to communicate those signals? or is the us rat able to passively read the brazil rats brain/memories? if so, how? cause what that implies is that the rat's brain learned to control a device to read and control anotehr rats brain, and while we dont think about moving our muscles, we just do it at the subconscious level when we send those impulses of will, it is similar in concept.
so again, my questions revolve how. how do they know, and how can they prove it. cause this sort of thing if true is absolutely huge.
Slashdot Mirror
no, the blame lies with every idiot who voted for an incumbant.
that is a very broad and sweeping statement, but it is mostly true.
there have been very few peacemakers trying to negotiate between the aisles; its been blue yelling at red and red yelling at blue, and nothing getting done for over 3 damn frigging years.
(and this recent election is a better example than most of the general across the board dissatisfaction with everyone, with people even voting for the guy on their side, even though they hate the job he did, simply to keep from having the OTHER SIDE win)
I say we replace every chair in the Congress with a Dr Evil style seat, that dumps into a pool of lava. and if more than 30% of an elected representatives constituents become dissatified with the job he is doing, because of things like this, DOWN HE GOES. and I'm not joking.
or do we jsut arbitrarily slash everyones budgets without regard to merit.
I care, but only a little. And at this point it's abotu securing myself and my family from any of the negative effects that will come.
I think the whole sequester thing is dumb as hell. Always did.
After playing poltical brinkmanship for years, they finally agree on one thing, and its this idiot piece of legislation.
So I do care. But I have very little sympathy left. Because after passing this absolutely retarded "suicide pact" what did the country do?
THEY RE-ELECTED ALL THE SAME IDIOTS AND SENT THEM RIGHT BACK TO CONGRESS, AGAIN.
So who is more foolish?
The fools in Congress?
Or the fools who re-elected them?
Since day one, I know it would happen like this. As a political gambit both sides knew EXACTLY what they were doing.
They knew from the first that they would absolutely intentionally go right over that cliff.
And they knew right from the start that they would blame the other side for anything negative to come of it.
And they knew that the fools that elected them would believe them when they did so and compeltely ignore any fault on the part of their own political side.
As far as the politicians are concerned, its a win/win no matter what happens.
After all, it's not actually going to affect them inside, only everyone else outside the Capitol building
They'll make damn sure of that.
I'm going to laugh my arse off when the Engineers return to check on their livestock breeding program.
or just lay out sunbathing nude for a few days. :P
if you're all pasty white and hairy like me, they're almost garunteed to detect it and blur it to spare anyone ever having to see that.
way to read the parent before replying AC.
that usually is easily overturned/thrown out by the concept that assault by its very definition included a lack of consent, so any sexual activity between two consenting adults is thereby automatically not assualt due to the presence of consent.
those cables are more to support the robot in testing so it doesnt fall over.
the Dog has run on its own power source for years.
naked twister...i've seen some of those women they have in the Chinese Army, even if they are just a drill/show platoon. *drool*
my only complaint is i just wish games werent so damn short these days!
yes, judge an entire family of games based on the very first one rather than each on its own merits.
I'd hate to see how you function in the real world.
"My cup of coffee was rather too strong 18 years ago. So I've never gone to another coffee shop since."
it's a compeltely artificial/superficial challenge.
it's not related to the game difficulty at all but instead dependent upon an inconvenience factor.
its not BS. keyboard/mouse is and always will be superior for any game that can take advantage of them (unless they totally botch the port like Dark Souls ...)
Game X on your console will never ever look or play any better than it does right now. Nothing a game that pushes the envelope and has a laggy/stuttery feel to it. Or dumbed down graphics to avoid that.
Yet on a PC it can not only be made to look better, but play better/smoother as well. At the same time.
Verdict: Just another trying-too-hard-to-be-clever-and-failing-miserably troll. Did you get enough attention yet? No? Class, everyone stare at DogDude, he hasn't had enough attention yet to compensate for way his parents ignore him at home.
what a thouroughly unclever (yet trying very hard to be) troll.
Crysis 3 is a return to the open world levels of the first game. That, and the change in enemy design and abanding a lot of the characters/vehicles of the first game is why the 2nd was merely an OK corridor type shooter, and paled in comparison to the first one. That they abandoned the scope/scale of the first game int he 2nd, as well as the international conflict part of the story also didnt' help. Replacing the external, real, conflict with north koreans / chinese with a secret shadow group from out of nowhere was rather weak story telling.
And when I say scale....In Crysis, taking 10 minutes to drive to the giant fricking mountain that collapses and reveals an alien ship inside.....that is a gameplay moment I will never forget...it was AWESOME.
Gametrailers has a much more favorable video review, available in HD, that shows it off quite well.
Having also already bought Crysis 3 and played through about 3/4 of it, i'd say the GT review is spot on. I'll even go so far as to say that this guy at hothardware is talking out his ass and had an opinion already formed before he "reviewed" the game, and maybe didnt even play the new one before writing it.
hmmm. my mod point stalker decided to label the above as "flamebait". hilarious.
Assange played him exactly the way a CIA or KGB handler would play his assets. it was textbook.
And when the stuff hits the fan over espionage, it tends to get on everyone. Assange definitely committed espionage, and if he was a state actor, no one would hesitate to call it that. Manning gets hit iwth it cause he aided and enabled to occur, even if he wasnt the driving force behind it.
ooo. willfilly disregarding and ignoring the point in order to be pedantic and make almost the same point as the person you're replying to.
C'mon dude. The only one playing these games is you.
when it comes to sensitive documents the "enemy" is anyone not authorized to have those documents. and there are additional rules and regulations that further refine and drive home that sentiment.
also: you apparently arent even familiar with the basic facts of the case. Wikileaks, Assange particualrly, played him exactly the way handlers play their assets. Its classic, textbook example. he wasnt some whistleblower out to save the day being ignored at every turn.
funny. in all my years in the military i dont once recall being told that in the event of unlawful or questionable orders/conduct that i was to go tell the NYTimes rather than an inspector general or other designated recipient of such tips.
I must have missed the memo designating the NYtimes as an offical step, let alone an official US Agency, in the process of notifying superiors via the chain of command of such things.
I've said it about about similar topics. Even though he is the CiC and their titular boss, he cannot dictate the findings of a court of law, even a military court of law, it is illegal for him to do so, and it would result in an instant mistrail or automatic appeal which would be garunteed to overturn the previous court's decision. that fact you would state such a thinkg only proves how absoutely blind and ignorant you are.
i can pull fake numbers out of my ass too.
doesnt make them any less fake than yours.
smart ass'ed ness aside (ill ignore that for now, thankyou), i get that they did "science".
but theres no information about study controls to determine how different the us rat is from any other rat faced with the same choice. to prove that the rat made his choice because of the signals from the other rat.
more importantly, how did the brazil rat know to communicate those signals? or is the us rat able to passively read the brazil rats brain/memories? if so, how?
cause what that implies is that the rat's brain learned to control a device to read and control anotehr rats brain, and while we dont think about moving our muscles, we just do it at the subconscious level when we send those impulses of will, it is similar in concept.
so again, my questions revolve how. how do they know, and how can they prove it. cause this sort of thing if true is absolutely huge.