Slashdot Mirror


Intercontinental Mind-Meld Unites Two Rats

ananyo writes "The brains of two rats on different continents have been made to act in tandem. When the first, in Brazil, uses its whiskers to choose between two stimuli, an implant records its brain activity and signals to a similar device in the brain of a rat in the United States. The U.S. rat then usually makes the same choice on the same task. Miguel Nicolelis, a neuroscientist at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina, says that this system allows one rat to use the senses of another, incorporating information from its far-away partner into its own representation of the world. 'It's not telepathy. It's not the Borg,' he says. 'But we created a new central nervous system made of two brains.' Nicolelis says that the work, published today, is the first step towards constructing an organic computer that uses networks of linked animal brains to solve tasks. But other scientists who work on neural implants are skeptical."

176 comments

  1. What... by kiep · · Score: 0

    ...could go wrong?

    1. Re:What... by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Usually people in power is the one that go wrong. Rats have little brain power, so humans could be the logical choice for mind melding, they are cheaper to maintain and are more abundant than other big brained animals. Want a job giving your brain for the next generation of computing 8 hours a day? And once humans get into the equation, we will effectively be the Borg.

    2. Re:What... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they succeed with animals, humans are next.

    3. Re:What... by ackthpt · · Score: 1

      ...could go wrong?

      This is how the Borg begins.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    4. Re:What... by Earthquake+Retrofit · · Score: 1

      ...could go wrong?

      This is how the Borg begins.

      You say that like it's a bad thing.

      --
      Fifty years of Yippie! 1968-2018
  2. cool. by geekoid · · Score: 2

    ". But other scientists who work on neural implants are skeptical.""
    as they should be,. It's a big deal, as such it will require good data and be repeatable.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:cool. by dywolf · · Score: 1

      there's also the whole of, how did they know where to plant the wires? do they even know if the rats can communicate? how do they know rats even shared information and not just random brain impulses? how do they know they used the shared information?

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    2. Re:cool. by jfengel · · Score: 2

      The impression I get from TFA is not that they're skeptical that it can be repeated. Rather, they're skeptical that there is any important advance here. They've been doing implants to send and receive signals for some time. Since only a single bit is being transferred ("Go"), it's a pretty poor sort of "mind meld". It's not really thoughts being transferred at all, just a mental button-push, which they've been able to do for quite some time on both ends. And the Internet connection in between is pure window-dressing; it comes as no surprise to anybody that you can transfer a bit over the Internet.

      The complexities of behavior are not at all due to the signal being sent. Those were laboriously trained in. All that was needed was the single "go" signal. With all the extraneous factors, it's hard to tell what's actually novel here, and the razzle-dazzle of those extraneous factors suggests that the answer is "nothing".

      I'm sure it's actually more than nothing, since there is a difference between "we knew that we could do that" and "we actually did it". But it's far, far less than the press release makes it sound.

    3. Re:cool. by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      how do they know rats even shared information and not just random brain impulses? how do they know they used the shared information?

      By doing science.

      When the first, in Brazil, uses its whiskers to choose between two stimuli, an implant records its brain activity and signals to a similar device in the brain of a rat in the United States. The U.S. rat then usually makes the same choice on the same task.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:cool. by dywolf · · Score: 1

      smart ass'ed ness aside (ill ignore that for now, thankyou), i get that they did "science".

      but theres no information about study controls to determine how different the us rat is from any other rat faced with the same choice. to prove that the rat made his choice because of the signals from the other rat.

      more importantly, how did the brazil rat know to communicate those signals? or is the us rat able to passively read the brazil rats brain/memories? if so, how?
      cause what that implies is that the rat's brain learned to control a device to read and control anotehr rats brain, and while we dont think about moving our muscles, we just do it at the subconscious level when we send those impulses of will, it is similar in concept.

      so again, my questions revolve how. how do they know, and how can they prove it. cause this sort of thing if true is absolutely huge.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    5. Re:cool. by Ieshan · · Score: 1

      The Brazil rat didn't "know" to communicate signals. The US rat didn't "read" the mind of the Brazil rat.

      Here's how it works.

      There is a recording electrode in Brazil Rat's head. It passively records the activity from a region of the brain involved in the task. There is a stimulating electrode in US Rat's head. It passively replays the activity that was recorded from Brazil Rat's head.

      The control condition in this case is what happens to the US Rat's choice behavior when they shut off the stimulating electrode.

      Make more sense now?

  3. What are we going to do today, Brain? by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Oh c'mon Pinky, you already know, you DMA'd it from me 250nS ago.

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    1. Re:What are we going to do today, Brain? by toebob · · Score: 1

      Pinky, are you thinking what I'm thinking? Of course you are.

  4. Jerri Ryan by Comrade+Ogilvy · · Score: 0

    Oh, yes.

  5. A basket of brains? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or a basket case?

  6. Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what could go wrong?

    1. Re:Sure... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahhh... but what could go right?

      http://www.welookdoyou.com/fufme/index.shtml.html

  7. I think I heard about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I move, You move. Just like that?

  8. Four Mice? by gmclapp · · Score: 1

    If the goal is to use this technology to mend broken connections in diseased or damaged brains, wouldn't it make more sense to test a similarly damaged rat brain rather than attempt to repeat the same results with four mice? Note: The question is related to the original article more so than the submission on /.

    --
    Common Sense (+1)
  9. I for one... by srobert · · Score: 2

    ... refuse to issue the standard obligatory decades old Simpson's joke that typically accompanies a story like this one.

    1. Re:I for one... by camperdave · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I for one refuse to issue the standard obligatory decades old Simpson's joke that typically accompanies a story like this one.

      ... out of respect to our cyber-enhanced rat overlords.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    2. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God schmod, I want my monkey-man!

      What, that's not the one you were thinking of?

  10. Fucking Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now we can use distributed methods to apply the Ludovico technique.

    Don't worry: this will only be used for the Greater Good.

  11. Re:Intercontinental? by gmclapp · · Score: 3, Informative

    North America and South America are different continents...

    --
    Common Sense (+1)
  12. Interconnected brains? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nicolelis says that the work, published today, is the first step towards constructing an organic computer that uses networks of linked animal brains to solve tasks."

    Sounds just like Dead Stop.

    1. Re:Interconnected brains? by Culture20 · · Score: 1
  13. Rat Wireheading by lazarus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I notice they do not include a picture of the wireheaded rats (only an artists impression). Probably wise. While I for one believe that the advancement of science to be the greatest height to which a rat could aspire, I have a feeling that others (and possibly the rats) do not feel the same way.

    --
    I am not interested in articles about life extension advancements.
    1. Re:Rat Wireheading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common practice in the field, actually.

      CAPTCHA: anatomy

    2. Re:Rat Wireheading by slinches · · Score: 2

      There's a picture here.

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
    3. Re:Rat Wireheading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If one feels that way, I'm guessing the other will too.

    4. Re:Rat Wireheading by robi5 · · Score: 1

      It looks really weird. Why didn't they use a thinner cable? They might as well nailed down the little creature. There is no need to conduct tens of Ampers. Monster cable, why?

    5. Re:Rat Wireheading by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      I take it you didn't look at the whole page. There's a video in the link.

    6. Re:Rat Wireheading by slinches · · Score: 1

      It looks really weird. Why didn't they use a thinner cable?

      Because this is a picture of the scientist

      --
      Knowledge Brings Fear
  14. Re:Intercontinental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Hemisphere? Yes. Continent? No.

    Surely you've heard of North America and South America, right? Yes, they're connected by land, but so are Europe, Asia and Africa... they're still separate continents.

  15. Re:Intercontinental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I thought Brazil and the United States belonged to the same continent...

    Then you thought wrong. Brazil belongs to the continent South America, the United States belong to the continent North America.

  16. Not the Borg? by Roogna · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, sounds almost exactly like what I'd think was the beginnings of the Borg.

    1. Re:Not the Borg? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Actually, sounds almost exactly like what I'd think was the beginnings of the Borg.

      No, your grandpa probably is. There are a lot of cyborgs walking around today -- I'm one, thanks to my CrystaLens implant. Those, cochlear implants, pacemakers, artificial joints, etc. Fifty years ago (less, actually) there were no cyborgs. Today, we're common. Tomorrow? Who knows?

    2. Re:Not the Borg? by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      Yep; in fact, the Borg specifically worked with implants, hence the need to physically assimilate victims.

    3. Re:Not the Borg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, sounds almost exactly like what I'd think was the beginnings of the Borg.

      Ssh, the unsuspecting are easier to assimilate.

    4. Re:Not the Borg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mmm. No, I think the thing that sets the Borg apart from others is their networked mind.

      Geordi had a VISOR / eye implants and Picard had an artificial heart. No one ever said these were a slippery slope to being Borg.

      But directly connecting your mind to another, to lose your sense of individuality, THAT is the first step to full on Borg time.

    5. Re:Not the Borg? by arisvega · · Score: 1

      'It's not telepathy.'

      It is, almost by definition.

      'It's not the Borg,'

      It is, almost exactly by definition.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    6. Re:Not the Borg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geordi was boog, not borg.

    7. Re:Not the Borg? by klingers48 · · Score: 1

      It's OK. We can just set the mouse traps on rotating modulations.

    8. Re:Not the Borg? by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

      I don't think it's necessarily an omen of man-/mouse- kind's rise to the seat of overstretched cyber-fascist galactic superpower, but certainly "not the Borg" is questionable. I think the Borg themselves would find fault with such a statement.

      --
      Do you see what I did there?
    9. Re:Not the Borg? by Hentes · · Score: 1

      No, this is a simple learning process masquerading as "mind-melding". The important part is that both rats were trained: the first one to choose the right lever, and the second one was trained to act based on the electric stimuli of its brain. It's not different from having the first rat turn a lamp on for the second one. In fact, you can leave the first rat completely out of the equation, and the second one would act the same way. The second rat didn't know there was a first one and the first one didn't know there was a second one, they didn't communicate, this is just two learning experiments connected serially.

  17. Not telepathy, not Borg... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it's a new interface for rodents, allowing the moving of information from one location to another electronically.

    It's the new Ratmouse.

    1. Re:Not telepathy, not Borg... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Bitmouse!

    2. Re:Not telepathy, not Borg... by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      It's Bitmouse!

      A USB mouse.

  18. Obligatory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one welcome our new intercontinental rat overlords.

    Captcha: transmit

  19. Clustering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Imagine a Wolf cluster of these.

    1. Re:Clustering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that would be called a Beorat cluster.

  20. Sex by omnichad · · Score: 1, Funny

    This idea has some interesting real-world applications

    1. Sex
    ???
    ???
    4. Profit

    1. Re:Sex by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Simstim had to start somewhere.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    2. Re:Sex by nametaken · · Score: 1

      If there's a middle step here, I guess it's "wires". But there's really no need for question marks in that old-as-time equation. ;)

  21. Re:Intercontinental? by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I thought Brazil and the United States belonged to the same continent...

    Yea, that can happen when you sleep through geography.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
  22. Re:Intercontinental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The United States belong to the Northern Hemisphere, Brazil to the Southern Hemisphere. So they are not on the same hemisphere.

  23. Cranium Rats by Keith111 · · Score: 1

    Wow. We're making Cranium Rats? Anyone that has played Planescape Torment knows thats a bad idea.

    1. Re:Cranium Rats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's only a bad idea if you can't ID which one got the caster template in the swarm. Remove those and you've just got ugly rats.

  24. Predicted by science fiction? by CRCulver · · Score: 3, Interesting

    One of the most unusual concepts of an alien life form I've seen are the Tines in Vinge's novel A Fire upon the Deep , dog or giant rat-like animals that are not individually conscious, but when together in packs form a single sentient organism. In the case of Vinge's novel, neural communication between the individual members of the pack was carried out via ultrasound, not electricity like here, but I wouldn't have imagined that scientists would pursue the same idea at some point.

    1. Re:Predicted by science fiction? by deadweight · · Score: 2

      If you recall, the Tines (really dogs/wolves - not rats) ended up making wearable radios to extend their intra-pack comms beyond the range of the ultrasound. The packs thus equipped could spread out for miles. JUST LIKE what we just did with the rats.

    2. Re:Predicted by science fiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Tines are repeatedly described as more like evolved sea mammals of some sort--like long-necked seals. They behave more like packs of dogs, though, and that's the metaphor through which the humans generally interact with them.

    3. Re:Predicted by science fiction? by xevioso · · Score: 1

      This book needs to be made into a movie posthaste.

    4. Re:Predicted by science fiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So like the Geth of Mass Effect.

    5. Re:Predicted by science fiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aren't corporations the same? Meaning mindless humans with iPhones and such form single sentient organisms?

    6. Re:Predicted by science fiction? by dywolf · · Score: 1

      Saturn's Race, by Larry Niven. similar concept, only a scientist melding his own mind with a shark.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    7. Re:Predicted by science fiction? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      ...not individually conscious, but when together in packs form a single sentient organism.

      Isn't that (one of) the current theory(s) about colony insects such as ants and bees?

      As I've heard said, if you want the most alien-looking stuff, look no further than right here on Earth.

    8. Re:Predicted by science fiction? by wibblewibble · · Score: 1

      Individual pack members are sentient self-aware beings, they're just not very smart. For example, when Scar approaches Peregrine and asks "May I be a part of you... please?"

    9. Re:Predicted by science fiction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although I really enjoyed the book, it seems like it would be quite difficult to make a comprehensible movie out of it. Alien intelligences that are actually alien are difficult to communicate in cinema. Also, the book takes place across several years (decades?). I can't see it transferring well.

  25. Imagine a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is the maximum number of mice that can be connected in this way?

    Imagine a Beowulf cluster of them!

  26. Douglas Adams was right! by garyebickford · · Score: 1

    Interesting that the hyperintelligent pan-dimensional beings that we call mice would direct us to use their traditional enemies, rats, as preliminary test subjects for the future wiring of all of humanity into one hyper-super-duper-parallel-mind-games-puper-computer to come up with the question much sooner than we would otherwise.

    --
    It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    1. Re:Douglas Adams was right! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, look at all the diseases that can be cured in mice but not the humans and the genetic enhancements available to mice.

  27. Re:Intercontinental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was referring to the Western Hemisphere.

  28. Been done already.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not sure why this type of experiments is making into the news now. Similar and more advanced experiments where conducted 20 years ago already with far more exciting results. Is science spinning in a mud never going to stop?

  29. The Shining? by Mraggoth · · Score: 1

    Was the artist's impression completely necessary? What I take from that, the rats engaged in some Hollywood, overly cgi vulcan mind meld all the while inside of Tron.

  30. I want to know the protocol. by QilessQi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Clearly we need an RFC for the Brain-To-Brain-Interface Protocol.

    Hopefully it'll be built on top of SSL. I don't want someone hacking into my rats.

    1. Re:I want to know the protocol. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Protocols aren't built on top of SSL, SSL can be used to securely wrap other protocols. The payload inside of an SSL/TLS tunnel has nothing to do with the tunnel itself. HTTPS isn't built on top of SSL, it's HTTP wrapped in SSL.

    2. Re:I want to know the protocol. by idontgno · · Score: 1

      "Always mount a scratch rat!"

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    3. Re:I want to know the protocol. by radtea · · Score: 2

      Clearly we need an RFC for the Brain-To-Brain-Interface Protocol.

      You've been modded funny but this is actually insightful.

      The fantasy of "brains working together" is based on a transparently stupid idea: that adding more manpower to a late project will not make it later. Communication and thinking are hard, and brains are decidedly non-standard components, with different internal representations of pretty much everything.

      As a friend who works in GIS is fond of saying, "If I take a group of geologists out in the field and have them map an area, at the end of the day I can tell who mapped where, but not what they mapped." Our internal representations of the world even for such apparently unambiguous concepts as "granite" are sufficiently different that we have genuine trouble agreeing on boundaries between types of rock. And yet for some reason everyone believe that their own person concept of any given thing is "true" and "real" and everyone else is mistaken.

      Even if we could connect two human brains together with high enough bandwidth to do meaningful "co-thinking" the result would look a hell of a lot more like a three-legged race than anything else.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    4. Re:I want to know the protocol. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There would be a learning curve of course, but the brain is incredibly dynamic.

      Exactly why we need to start them young.

    5. Re:I want to know the protocol. by QilessQi · · Score: 1

      Going in the other direction, I'm reminded of the robot armies in Stanislaw Lem's "Cyberiad" that were tricked into linking their minds up, soldier-to-soldier. In the end, the two opposing armies coalesced into two mega-minds whose personalities (which had tendencies to intellectual distraction) were completely incapable of carrying out the original task of fighting.

  31. Re:Intercontinental? by Sarten-X · · Score: 1

    Ah, but this is not a question of geography, but rather one of politics...

    God bless the United Earth of America!

    --
    You do not have a moral or legal right to do absolutely anything you want.
  32. Is one named, ``Lady El''? by WillAdams · · Score: 2

    See the science fiction novel, _Lady El_ by Jim Starlin and Dana Graziunas.

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    1. Re:Is one named, ``Lady El''? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but Algernon issued a press release stating that he was doing fine after the neurosurgery.

  33. Women.. by singhulariti · · Score: 2

    Maybe NOW we can finally understand what the female brain is Really thinking....

  34. While interesting, unethical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How'd you like a set of electrodes in your brain, in the name of experimental science?

  35. Too early! by Skapare · · Score: 1

    Someone let this out a month and a day too early.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  36. This is how it starts by kruach+aum · · Score: 1

    Next time I'm traversing the Warrens, looking for the Decanter of Endless Water, I'll remember that this is how that bullshit started.

  37. And the rat said... by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    Researcher: press that lever, you rat!
    Rat: I realize that command does have its fascination, even under circumstances such as these, but I neither enjoy it nor am I frightened of it. It simply exists, and I will do whatever logically needs to be done.

  38. I admit the financial possibilities are endless by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Why you should be skeptical:

    1. Slapping implants that record...something, and then slapping implants that...play back something that stimulate neurons in the exact same way as they were firing when recorded is a hell of an accomplisment.

    This alone is sci-fi level stuff.

    2. It's doubtful such activity, on the level of a neuron applies to a blanket region as if projecting on a screen. You wouldn't be "projecting" the correct micro-piece on the correct destination neuron.

    3. Even with sufficiently fine neuronal alignment, it's doubtful neural networks at the individual neuron level are identically positioned in rats any more than skin cells are.

    4. Even if neural network topology on the individual neuron level are identical between rats, again they wouldn't line up any more than eyes do for humans needing glasses.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  39. Rats with One Mind by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hate to break it to the researchers, but getting a pack of rats to operate under the same collective consciousness has been done before

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Rats with One Mind by deadweight · · Score: 1

      RIAA and MPAA sue for prior art too!

  40. Should have tried that with cats. by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

    ...since cats do, in fact, have pointy ears. I would have thought that that would be a major help here.

    Also, as a cat lover, I vehemently object to giving mice any special training or equipment that might topple the fragile balance of power between mice and cats. I'm going to file a protest to the United Species Security Council!

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
  41. Cranium Rats by discord5 · · Score: 1

    Oh great, we've just taken the first step into creating Cranium Rats. Bring enough of those together and there'll be talk about overthrowing the bonds human opression.

  42. Re:Intercontinental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So, whose politics shaped the tectonic plates?

  43. gamer movie by Faisal+Rehman · · Score: 0

    implementation of game movie.

  44. Got into a conversation with my mom about this by wbr1 · · Score: 1

    me: this is scary: http://science.slashdot.org/story/13/02/28/1615207/intercontinental-mind-meld-unites-two-rats Sent at 1:14 PM on Thursday
    Poet: scarey
    i think it is brilliant
    me: its good research, but the implications are scary
    Poet: thinking of healing applications for people with brain injury
    or spinal cord injury
    oh yeah
    me: being able to map/read sections of the brain for brain injury and to control prosthetices is great
    Poet: let the army use it create sleeper assasins all over the workd
    yet the army could
    me: but could you imagine the popup adverts coming through your nural implant telling you to go buy Tide detergent.. you dont know why you bought it, you just
    did Poet: shit
    that is scary
    me: actually you do know why you bought it.. you wanted it.. but why did you want it, and why did it feel so good to buy it.. like a hit of opium?
    jeez I am cynical

    --
    Silence is a state of mime.
  45. Re:Intercontinental? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

    Continents are land-masses, not political divisions.

    Gotta love slashdot and its tradition of snarky, but ignorant, posts.

  46. There's no way this could go wrong... by dawich · · Score: 1

    Tie a bunch of animal brains together around the world? Have it make decisions? Nope, no way...

    1. Re:There's no way this could go wrong... by fonitrus · · Score: 1

      of course not. once the proceed to human trials they can hook up people across the world like a movie called GAMER. you get to play WoW, EvE online, Sims, COD black ops WITH REAL HUMANS :)

      plus you can have human drones alongside mechanical ones fighting your battles.

      grab a wghole bunch of nobody prisoners, link them to some teenage nerds sitting in a room somewhere in the pentagon and let them go invade a country :) :)

      nope. this technology is all positive for the human race. nothing bad can ever come of it. i mean look at how much power we produce from nuclear reactors. we get to light up whole cities :) :) (pun definitely intended)

  47. I was thinking of The Matrix instant learning. by TuringTest · · Score: 1

    I for one welcome our ninja-trained helicopter-piloting rat underlords.

    --
    Singularity: a belief in the "God" idea with the "demiurge" relation inverted.
  48. We are the Borg,squeeek squeeek by Timmy+D+Programmer · · Score: 1

    Give us your cheese of be assimilated!

    --


    (If at first you don't succeed, do it different next time!)
    1. Re:We are the Borg,squeeek squeeek by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      Lower your shields and surrender your chips!

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  49. Re:Intercontinental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Atlanteans...and you see how well that worked out for them.

  50. Re:Intercontinental? by SailorSpork · · Score: 2

    Okay, so how about this for a better headline: "Two-headed mutant killer cyber-rats plotting world domination: they share a mind, but may-or-may-not-be-on-different-continents-but-are-at-least-4000-miles-apart. Nothing to contest in that statement now. All happy?

  51. Imagine a Beowulf cluster.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the first step towards constructing an organic computer that uses networks of linked animal brains to solve tasks

  52. video by schneidafunk · · Score: 1

    Are you looking at the same link I am? There's a video at the bottom of the article showing them in all their wired up glory. http://www.nature.com/news/intercontinental-mind-meld-unites-two-rats-1.12522

    --
    Some people die at 25 and aren't buried until 75. -Benjamin Franklin
  53. Re:Intercontinental? by Eevee · · Score: 2

    North America and South America are different continents...

    Citation needed.

    The boundaries that make up continents are to a degree arbitrary and depend upon the person making the statement. There's no real justification for Europe being a continent; Europe and a large part of Asia are on one tectonic plate, while the easternmost part of Asia is on the same plate as North America. And the Indian subcontinent is on yet another plate.

    So, it's ultimately local custom that determines the number of continents. I've seen Europeans refer to the Americas as one continent. For example, the Olympic rings were at one time intended to represent five continents.

    The Olympic flag ... has a white background, with five interlaced rings in the centre: blue, yellow, black, green and red ... This design is symbolic ; it represents the five inhabited continents of the world, united by Olympism, while the six colors are those that appear on all the national flags of the world at the present time. -- Pierre De Coubertin (1931)

    (The quote's copied from Wikipedia, so in five minutes it's entirely possible that De Coubertin would have said the flag represents the population of elephants tripling within six months.)

  54. Re:Intercontinental? by Graydyn+Young · · Score: 2

    Even as a question of geography, it's still two separate continents. North and South America are each on their own continental plate.

  55. Pinky and the Brain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Are you thinking what I'm thinking, Pinky?"

    "Actually, yes, Brain; for once, I am. *narf* *poit*"

  56. International flame-bait by Master+Moose · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And I thought Brazil and the United States belonged to the same continent...

    Yea, that can happen when you sleep through geography.

    Or take Geography at a U.S. school.

    --
    . . .gone when the morning comes
    1. Re:International flame-bait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I thought Brazil and the United States belonged to the same continent...

      Yea, that can happen when you sleep through geography.

      Or take Geography at a U.S. school.

      Nope US schools teach that North America and South America are different continents. It's gotta be europeans or something that think they're the same. The 7 continents as taught in U.S. schools are:

      North America
      South America
      Europe
      Asia
      Africa
      Australia
      Antartica

    2. Re:International flame-bait by rioki · · Score: 1

      Well, for French and and German schools this is the same...

  57. Re:Intercontinental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was referring to the Western Hemisphere.

    That is not well-defined. North and south is.

  58. Wait... by WillgasM · · Score: 2

    So scientists are wiring together rodent brains to create a supercomputer? Maybe my neighbor isn't schizophrenic after all.

    1. Re:Wait... by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      Well, he is schizophrenic and unfortunately all the new supercomputer does is eat, mate and scratch, which is more or less what its creators do on the weekends, but still, you have to start somewhere.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    2. Re:Wait... by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      I guess the wire coming out of his brain is occluded by the tinfoil hat.

  59. Sensationalist not revolutionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I work in this field, and the work here is not nearly as revolutionary as made out.

    We have known for about a decade that a brain can learn to integrate arbitrary patterns of electrical stimuli. This work was done by many groups including the group that performed the current study, so they are clearly aware of that work. Since the placement of recording electrodes and the stimulating electrodes in these experiments are essentially random at a cellular level, there is no reason to treat the recorded signal differently from any signal derived from task related timing.

    Using two animals and the internet is really just a sensationalist re-hash of what has already been well described. Sure it is an engineering achievement, but the claim that there is a 'single nervous system' is wildly overstated. The fact that this study is making such waves is really frustrating to may of us who are working on similar topics because it seems to be rewarding sensationalism rather than progress.

  60. We are complete. Much power. by Ol+Biscuitbarrel · · Score: 1

    My whiskers with your whiskers...my cheese with your cheese...

    PAIIIIIIIIIIN!!!!!!!

  61. It is the future. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Today, the depth, profundity, expressive power, and content of a human thought has some strict biologically-imposed limits. There are only so many neurons available to participate in it.

    Once humans can link up using tech like this, they will be able to participate in thoughts far greater than any that have ever been thunk before (by any and every measurable criteria). No single human will grasp the thought in its totality, but the higher-order "metamind" that is created by the network of humans will grasp the thought, and be able to act on it.

    It will be a very interesting day indeed.

    1. Re:It is the future. by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, a meta-mind created by a gestalt of many interconncted humans subconciously sharing data with each other would be just as susceptable to mental illnesses as the individual human minds it is comprised of. Humans attached having "seditious" thoughts that they would never dream of acting on themselves, would still influence the behavior of the gestalt mind in much the same way a handful of 'diseased' neurons in a single human can profoundly influence behavior. (Or how things like depression work.)

      Given the conflicted nature the being would have, it would almost certainly suffer a number of neurotic conditions without having very carefully selected humans plugged in.

    2. Re:It is the future. by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      I am talking out of my ass here:

      But I imagine that impaired brain function leading to external manifestation of mental illness probably stems from the core functionality of 1 person's brain being damaged. I imagine that a network of minds would be comprised of independent nodes with separate internal functions. I would imagine mental issued from impaired brain function to remain localized.

      If for example internal functions were also distributed, the solutions to that person's problem could also be distributed. If someone is raging because their brain function to calm down is broken, someone else's mental function could send that signal on their behalf. I don't imagine a few broken computers bringing down the internet. While viruses do propagate through the internet, anti-virus measures are also effectively propagating through the internet(though not autonomously).

    3. Re:It is the future. by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Signal cascade anomalies are a recurring malady in many people, and is an underlying feature of many forms of epilepsy.

      [Obligatory wikipedia reference]

      It is important to stress that a directly interconnected hivemind would suffer timing issues if signals were sanitized by the technological component before being relayed, causing many of the cognitative deficits found in people with mylelination defects to become manifest in the gestalt conciousness. It would also run foul of the halting problem.

      This means that propogating signals originating in a single connected mind could cause havok with the whole hivemind, in much the same way a localized signal in the visual cortex of an epileptic can paralyze the entire cortical function of the afflicted person in just a few seconds.

      Neural networks are among other things, open feedback loops. Sensory information gets relayed around the neural net, and "memories" are just sensory information on endless loop being preserved in a dedicated region. Anything that influences these feedback cycles will have avalanching effects on the function of that network. This is why things like depression become hard to correct, since the network gets stuck in cycles that promote the depressed state. Antidepressants are meant to help mitigate these effects by manually supplying stimuli to the depressed nervous system.

      The issue here, is that the "higher" gestalt mind will be operating on the signal data generated by the connected minds interacting and sharing signal information. It would be susceptible to epilleptic like siezures from hypersynchronous signal sources, and from cascading depression between connected peers, and also just from the idle thoughts and memories of the connected people. (Which by the nature of the shared collective, would also influence all other peers as well, so somebody with a neurological defect could cause lasting neurological harm to the rest of the cluster, just by being connected.)

      What I as getting at, is that a subtle seditious thought that isn't really serious, like "we should launch all the politicians into the sun", would bounce around the neural net and if it gets echoed enough times, it will become a recurring thought to the hive mind, and attract its attention as an idea worth pursuing.

      Doesn't mean the hivemind would act on it, but it would likely contemplate all the possible ways to do that action, and contemplate the consequences. It might actually consider the prospect, if said politicians are also connected, and doing things that the other connected minds don't like.

      Simply having the thought is what exposes the hivemind to the concept, and the nature of a distributed neural network means everyone attached will respond in some fashion to that thought, even if just subconsciously.

      Don't underestimate the influence a single brain in the swarm can have over the collective. Remember, a piece of cortex the size of a grain of rice can cause system wide deadlock in an epilleptic siezure. The same sorts of things would be possible in a distributed neural network.

  62. What, no Beowulf Cluster joke? by gurps_npc · · Score: 1
    Or am I just showing my age when I insist on the old classic meme (not joke):

    Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of these!

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    1. Re:What, no Beowulf Cluster joke? by Zaatxe · · Score: 2

      Imagine a Beowulf Cluster of these!

      A Beowulf Cluster of cheese?

      --
      So say we all
  63. No-one else has said it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    " the work, published today, is the first step towards constructing an organic computer that uses networks of linked animal brains to solve tasks." How is that not a horrificially unethical case of animal cruelty? The sad thing is, no-one else on Slashdot seems to give a crap about anything other than humans (or themselves?).

    1. Re:No-one else has said it... by skade88 · · Score: 1

      People don't seem to care. Rat poison is a terrible way to go. Glue traps are horribly cruel. The rat/mouse will starve to death. I once saw a mouse the was struggling so hard to get free from a glue trap that he broke his legs in the process. Other mouse traps snap a mouse's neck by baiting them with food. Some people get cats to kill mice and rats in their houses. Nothing like being hunted by a larger animal that can't be beat. People are willing to scream "ITS A RAT! KILL IT! KILL IT!" Only because its a rat...

    2. Re:No-one else has said it... by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      That phrase is so completely removed from reality that I'm in fact surprized that anybody (you) cared about it.

      When a boy tells his girlfriend that he'll give her the Moon, people don't stop to think about property rights either.

    3. Re:No-one else has said it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, I get the sarcasm, but that's not a good comparison. The issue raised was animal cruelty. Animal cruelty is arguably already occurring in the current experiment described in the TFA, so even if the end goal is unobtainable, the whole line of research involves cruelty. Even if it could be argued that the end justifies the means, I still find it unfortunate and unpleasant.

    4. Re:No-one else has said it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That response is based on survival instinct, not just "because it's a rat" (the plague, etc).

  64. I felt a little sick after reading this summary. by bipbop · · Score: 1

    [...] the first step towards constructing an organic computer that uses networks of linked animal brains to solve tasks.

    Doesn't this make anyone else a little uneasy? It doesn't sound terribly ethical to me...

  65. Re:Intercontinental? by guantamanera · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Depends where you go to school. In Mexico 6 continents. They ignore Antartica sometimes they will say 5 Then I moved to finland, and they count 6. From there we went to czech republic also 6 continents. Then highschool 10th grade in USA they counted 7 continents. I also noticed that refering to a USAian as american is mostly an anglophone thing. While traveling through Europe I could say I am an Amererican, and they knew I was not referring to USA. And it probably was because I do not have a north american english accent or I could speak the local language. And canadians they're are americans they just hate getting confused with their southern neighbour. Even if you say they're From North America they still end up being americans from the north. I took some english classes, studied 1 year in USA and here is how I interpret the name United States of America with my limited english. the key is in the word "OF" a proposition I believe. It says the These united states belong to america. It does not say They are America. Is like saying "the united union of kentucky", "the sons of Carl", "the many cars of Mike" For the name to actually mean the name of the country is America it would have to say it something like this. United American States. Now this would imply they are american and not just belong to. Funny thing is 99% of USAians don't know where the name come from. When you ask they usually end up saying it means freedom or something like that.

  66. Inter-Continental?? by HSkirts · · Score: 1

    The US and Brazil are in the same Continent: America

  67. My body and mind is ready. by flayzernax · · Score: 1, Funny

    To be permanently wired to a porn-star.

    1. Re:My body and mind is ready. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be permanently wired to a porn-star.

      Ron Jeremy is waiting, for $99.00 he will show you those secrets right in your Brain.

    2. Re:My body and mind is ready. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congrats, you've just been wired to $_RANDOM_FEMALE_PORNSTAR...now relax your anus.

    3. Re:My body and mind is ready. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until the herpes flares up.

    4. Re:My body and mind is ready. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you might want to revise the use of the word *permanent*, unless you are pansexual.

      Good luck

    5. Re:My body and mind is ready. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you're talking about the male porn-star and not the woman getting her anus ripped open?

    6. Re:My body and mind is ready. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That happens for both, don't work for a shitty porn company doing shitty porn.

    7. Re:My body and mind is ready. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pleasure is pleasure =)

    8. Re:My body and mind is ready. by flayzernax · · Score: 1

      How do you think the Borg Queen keeps her drones in line? )

    9. Re:My body and mind is ready. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't knock it till you try it. A good prostate massage goes a long way to enhancing orgasmic pleasure.

  68. Star Trek? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'It's not telepathy. It's not the Borg,' he says

    No, it's Vulcan.

  69. Re:Intercontinental? by dinfinity · · Score: 0

    I've seen Europeans refer to the Americas as one continent

    I've seen Americans claim that the sun rotates around the earth. Come to think of it, I've seen Europeans claim the same.
    So, logically, that means that.. Umm..
    Wait, where am I?

    Anyway, I think you'll find very few reasonable people that see any merit in referring to South and North America as a single continent. Unless they're trying to be dicks.

  70. Go Go power rangers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm the red ranger, but when we come together we form voltron FUCING POWER RANGERS MAN _ A SENTIENT BEING

    unusual sci fi shit there..

  71. Re:Intercontinental? by alphaminus · · Score: 1

    So are their minds more or less connected than their continents?

  72. Re:Intercontinental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "

    Yep!

  73. Re:Olympic Flag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Olympic flag has five rings representing the "five inhabited continents of the world". Of the 7 generally accepted continents, Antarctica can safely be excluded. Did the flag designer combine North and South America into just America, or were Europe and Asia combined into Eurasia?

  74. CRAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please don't be fooled by this nonsense. Nicolelis used to be a good scientist, but about 10 years ago he realized he could stage high impact dramatics instead of advancing the field, awe the media, and continue to rake in grant money. I challenge someone to tell me how this study advanced the field.
    We know rats brains respond to cues. We know know how to record that.
    We know the cortex is plastic enough to learn from novel external stimuli (a shock). To be fair, Nicolelis did do grounbreaking research, once upon a time.
    He DID NOT WIRE TWO BRAINS TOGETHER. He modified a very simplified recording from one brain, and he modified it to the extent that he was basically playing back a simple shock to another brain. The magic is that the cortex is plastic enough to use this simple shock to influence behavior, given enough trials. Which had also been shown many times before (to be fair, Nicolelis did do some of this early work)

    The crux though, as a neuroscientist this statement makes me sick: 'But we created a new central nervous system made of two brains.' Nicolelis says
    Such BS. Inexcusable from a scientist.
    Of course it doesn't help my opinion of him that he treated the faculty so poorly at the institute he founded in Natal that they all left, forming a new institute without him.

    I guess the only ones to really blame are the popsci writers who don't have a clue, or who just don't give a damn.

  75. Legal Ratmifications by Common+Joe · · Score: 1

    Now for the all important questions: If one rat hears Metallica while linked to the other rat, what entities will the RIAA sue? Can a DRM take down notice shut down the experiment? And how does the six-strike policy work in such a situation?

    1. Re:Legal Ratmifications by sponse · · Score: 1

      I'd wish I having modding points right now. (+1)

  76. Re:Intercontinental? by smithmc · · Score: 1

    Plus, they are no longer conjoined; they are divided by the Panama Canal.

    --
    Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
  77. Read those EULAs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Want a job giving your brain for the next generation of computing 8 hours a day?

    That reminds me of a South Park episode.

  78. Related Futurama Quote by L.M.T.+Spoon · · Score: 2

    "Everyone's in favor of saving Hitler's brain. But when you put it in the body of a great white shark--Ooooh! Suddenly you've gone too far!" --Professor Farnsworth

    --
    e-Vel!
  79. Pffft! Had it thirty years ago. by mmell · · Score: 1

    Anything like this? (IBDB).

  80. Vulcans do it without wires. by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a bumper sticker to me.

    --
    Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
  81. shock right brain. by leuk_he · · Score: 1

    When rat one moved his left foot, the right brain of rat two was shocked, and ... moved his left foot.

  82. Re:Intercontinental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    God bless the United Earth of America!

    Shhh... We haven't told those people at the UN building yet.

  83. Two rats, wires, wiskers.... by ingo23 · · Score: 1
    They've been doing it with humans on a mass scale for decades without a need for any brain implants.

    It's called TV commercials.

  84. Re:Intercontinental? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    It's exactly as well defined (by the great circle joining Greenwich to the International Date Line). It's just that nobody wants to use it that way.

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  85. Re:Intercontinental? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    The Northern and Southern Hemisphere are defined by the physical characteristics of the planet (namely its rotation). There's nothing physically special about the Greenwich meridian or the International Date Line, they are just set by convention.

    Or said differently, there's a Northern and a Southern Hemisphere because there's a North Pole and a South Pole. There's no West Pole, nor an East Pole.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  86. Re:Intercontinental? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    North and south are also defined by convention. Because we decided that that one was north, that became the rule for every other object in the universe.

    (Actually we have two norths. Depending on which convention you use.)

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  87. Ah, a "skeptical neuroscientist"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But other scientists who work on neural implants are skeptical^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H beside themselves with envy.

    FTFTheSummary, apparently...

  88. Re:Intercontinental? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

    The convention is which one we call "North" and which one we call "South", but those are mere names anyways. The hemispheres as such are uniquely defined by the rotation of the earth. That is, there are two poles, and two hemispheres which reach from the corresponding pole to the equator. And thanks to the weak interaction (more exactly, its parity violation) you can even distinguish from the rotation which hemisphere is which using nothing but fundamental physical laws.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
  89. Failure to specify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prepared to be gang-banged!

    1. Re:Failure to specify by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes!

  90. Re: Intercontinental? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are plenty enough Poles to the east here. Thoug that may be related to the fact that I live to the west of Poland.

  91. Re:Intercontinental? by reasterling · · Score: 1

    I've seen Americans claim that the sun rotates around the earth.

    Everything is relative, and I am at the center of it all.

    Although, I would have said "The sun 'revolves' around the earth." But that is just me.

    --
    "For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice" -- God
  92. Re:Intercontinental? by reasterling · · Score: 1

    While traveling through Europe I could say I am an Amererican, and they knew I was not referring to USA.

    I bet.

    --
    "For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice" -- God
  93. Rat with two brains? by flyhigher · · Score: 1

    "Into the mud, scum queen!"

  94. cranium rats are now a reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, just this week: grey goo, cranium rats. Take your pick. It looks like scientists really work on an end of the world scenario :D

  95. Re:Intercontinental? by rioki · · Score: 1

    Ok I can only vouch for Germany, France, the UK, Spain and Italy, but if you said "I am American" 95% of the time it is assumed you are US-American. (Not USAian! Nobody uses that term.) This is because a Brazilian will say he is from Brazil and a Canadian will say he is from Canada and a Mexican will say he is from Mexico. Only the US-Americans will say he is from America. The again there are pedants like you that will understand what he means and argue with him about semantics.

    But the thing is that when you are asked from where you are from, they want a country not a continent. It is about as useful to answer it with you are from earth. Ask any European where he comes from and you will get, a country not a continent. (Don't get me started with the EU.)

    Oh and before I get angry replies from Australians; semantics... I con't care what continent you come from, I care about the country you come from, to bad they have the same name.