i think partially the right word, as those things would probably still need to exist.
BUT, in a system that includes a GBI, they truly are once again safety net programs to catch people when they stumble and prevent them from falling down the ladder, which would dramatically reduce their size (at least on an average; in time of economic emergency they would of course inflate). but still, better than their current status quo, which is effectively an ad hoc basic income as it is.
since when have you ever cared about substantiated arguments? especially on the topic of the climate, where you repeatedly make unsubstantiated, and even well disproven, statements, even within this very thread?
the problem is that we stopped there, while the rest of the world has gone on to recognize even greater numbers of rights of man. ironically enough, one of its proponents was FDR, but due to his death, the US never adopted it, even though most of Europe and the UN has. (yet another US invention/backed idea, that the rest of the world loves, but the US now ignores)
The DoI is not a legal document in any way binding on the USA or its government. And no, it is not the basis of the Constitution.
It was a declaration of war between the Colonials and England, having almost nothing to do with the founding of a government by of and for the people, securing their rights, and establishing a government, specifically a government stronger and more powerful than the one that came before it under the Articles of Confederation because the AoC were an abysmal failure.
don't you ever get tired of posting ignorant nonsense?
Slashdot Mirror
Whoa whoa whoa! you trying to give me alcohol poisoning?
Nanny state!
DRINK!
we cant control birds because they are wild, so lets not control drones either, even though we can totally control them.
makes perfect sense.
oh and hey, guess what birds naturally, instinctively, do when a wildfire breaks out?
they stay the F away
" "Tyranny" " !
DRINK!
for your next statistic, how about the number of airplane/satellite collisions compared to airplane/buggy collisions since 1865.
North Korea!
DRINK!
"statist" !
DRINK!
We cant all be believers in the Agenda 21 Camping trip.
carry that thought a bit further, and you'll see that he knows exactly what he was saying.
Louisiana?
yes, well, thank you for proving that you don't truly have any idea what the DOE actually does.
Would you rather have Xena the princess warrior
Yes.
what was the question?
i think partially the right word, as those things would probably still need to exist.
BUT, in a system that includes a GBI, they truly are once again safety net programs to catch people when they stumble and prevent them from falling down the ladder, which would dramatically reduce their size (at least on an average; in time of economic emergency they would of course inflate). but still, better than their current status quo, which is effectively an ad hoc basic income as it is.
since when have you ever cared about substantiated arguments?
especially on the topic of the climate, where you repeatedly make unsubstantiated, and even well disproven, statements, even within this very thread ?
no choice but to throw the BS flag on that play.
So apparently you've never heard of either the Commerce Clause not the Supremacy Clause.
You should correct that deficiency.
Ummm.
No.
Not actually true, and the FAA does in fact have rules for model aircraft.
spoken like a true republicant that ignores reality
the problem is that we stopped there, while the rest of the world has gone on to recognize even greater numbers of rights of man.
ironically enough, one of its proponents was FDR, but due to his death, the US never adopted it, even though most of Europe and the UN has.
(yet another US invention/backed idea, that the rest of the world loves, but the US now ignores)
Your history-fu is weak old man
The DoI is not a legal document in any way binding on the USA or its government.
And no, it is not the basis of the Constitution.
It was a declaration of war between the Colonials and England, having almost nothing to do with the founding of a government by of and for the people, securing their rights, and establishing a government, specifically a government stronger and more powerful than the one that came before it under the Articles of Confederation because the AoC were an abysmal failure.
don't you ever get tired of posting ignorant nonsense?
"Their purpose is irrelevant to their constitutionality."
I see you've never read a supreme court opinion.
Dodgson, Dodgson, we've got Dodgson here!
Nobody cares. Nice hat.
What are you trying to look like, a secret agent?
Nice hat.
Kinda shiny.
Is that foil?
Bwahahah
ahhahh
ahhahha
hhahhah
hahha
all you've done is showcase your own ignorance