How much redundancy?!?!? Even if they're on different ---, they're probably still riding in on a loop from the same ---.. and then, they're most likely delivered on the same physical ---.... Don't be too reliant on this setup for redundancy's sake...
You learn things by context. Obviously, soulseller is saying that having multiple T1 lines isn't going to make things any more redundant because there all going to be part of the same physical connection. If one goes down, they all go down.
you develop under windows, you must buy MSs tools, and you sure can't use those tools without their docs.
All of the docs are up on the web , and you don't need to pay to access it either, MSDN is mostly 'extras' that you don't really need, but that do come in handy (new versions of OSs, new API toolkits, SDKs, etc)
And keep in mind they didn't 'just tell the computer to 'fuzz up' the image' they just gave the computer a copy of Starry night, and a blurry copy of Starry night and said 'figure out how to go from the blurry one to the original'. After that, the computer did all the work
That is what they did, although in the case of the paintings, they had the 'after' shot to start with and simply blured it to get the 'before' shot. In other words, there was no 'orgional' filter.
Take a look at some of the other images. And they didn't just "go into xv and sharpen the image" they got the computer to figure out how to do it on its own, given only two inputs!
I doubt you could program something similar if your life depended on it, looser.
Ok, so you need to sign up and give out a little personal information in order for Microsoft to give you software for free.
Sun and IBM do the exact same thing. What's the big deal? Why shouldn't Microsoft be able to use their service-wide authentication system to like, authenticate people?
Well, video game programming is one of the lowest paid fields in the industry. Unless your daughter is obsessed with games, she probably wouldn't choose that sector.
I'd hope you wouldn't pidgin hole her into something as unbelievably uninteresting as databases
I just blew all my mod points already. If I hadn't you can be sure that I would most definitely vote your stupid comment down for it's idiotic inline Perl expressions.
Would be like a Unix worm turning off FTP or disabling mod_perl. It could potentialy improve security... but the people running the systems might not be so happy...
If a recursive function call comes at the *end* of a function, then it's called 'tail recursion', and it dosn't need any stack space, it just jumps back to the begining of the function
Ok, Java might not have Scheme support, but writing scheme interpreters in java is pretty easy, and lots of people have done it. But what's cool about the way java works is that It's very easy to call objects in java dynamically using the reflection API. So, in theory (and in most cases practice as well), you could write a scheme interpreter that runs on the Java virtual machine, and can use the whole of the Java Runtime environment.
I downloaded the simulator, and the 2d one worked fine. I couldn't figure out the the controls on the 3d one, though. I jammed all the keys on the keyboard, and nothing happened. How do you use it?
Oh, and thanks to Microsoft innovation - you may remember this from the trial - the browser is integrated with the OS, so reading email from an attacker
I fail to see how that makes sense... What does the fact that IE is part of the OS have to do with email?
If this security flaw existed in, say, mozilla, then any program that used it's HTML rendering engine would be just as vulnerable.
Actualy, if your running CE you can get microsoft's Visual Basic (or VisualC++, if you want) to program it, it's a free download off their website. I had some stuff up and running on my PocketPC in just a few minutes (a unicode font viewer, since CE supports unicode:)
Of course, visual basic sucks ass as a programming language, but it is 'easy'.
Anyway I don't see why being able to run Linux on a PDA will create a huge overwhelming amount of 'cool' software. I mean, most people already know C++, and I don't see that much cool client-side stuff written in Perl, or whatever.
Slashdot Mirror
Red hat is doing fine...
Look at it this way:
How much redundancy?!?!? Even if they're on different ---, they're probably still riding in on a loop from the same ---.. and then, they're most likely delivered on the same physical ---.... Don't be too reliant on this setup for redundancy's sake...
You learn things by context. Obviously, soulseller is saying that having multiple T1 lines isn't going to make things any more redundant because there all going to be part of the same physical connection. If one goes down, they all go down.
you develop under windows, you must buy MSs tools, and you sure can't use those tools without their docs.
All of the docs are up on the web , and you don't need to pay to access it either, MSDN is mostly 'extras' that you don't really need, but that do come in handy (new versions of OSs, new API toolkits, SDKs, etc)
. In the case of Van Gogh, you just need to fuzz up the image a little. But there's a lot more to Van Gogh than fuzziness!
Wow, THEY DID Did you even read the site? or just look at the example? Here's one of some guy named Lucian Freud
And keep in mind they didn't 'just tell the computer to 'fuzz up' the image' they just gave the computer a copy of Starry night, and a blurry copy of Starry night and said 'figure out how to go from the blurry one to the original'. After that, the computer did all the work
That is what they did, although in the case of the paintings, they had the 'after' shot to start with and simply blured it to get the 'before' shot. In other words, there was no 'orgional' filter.
Take a look at some of the other images. And they didn't just "go into xv and sharpen the image" they got the computer to figure out how to do it on its own, given only two inputs!
I doubt you could program something similar if your life depended on it, looser.
Ok, so you need to sign up and give out a little personal information in order for Microsoft to give you software for free.
Sun and IBM do the exact same thing. What's the big deal? Why shouldn't Microsoft be able to use their service-wide authentication system to like, authenticate people?
Well, video game programming is one of the lowest paid fields in the industry. Unless your daughter is obsessed with games, she probably wouldn't choose that sector.
I'd hope you wouldn't pidgin hole her into something as unbelievably uninteresting as databases
not my presious karma, anything but that. I'd die without it!!!
I still have like 600 points left on this account before I even come close to the 'cap' of 50....
Here I was renaming dlls...
I just blew all my mod points already. If I hadn't you can be sure that I would most definitely vote your stupid comment down for it's idiotic inline Perl expressions.
I'm assuming its a console command? If so, what is the actual command? I can't seem to find any documentation....
Would be like a Unix worm turning off FTP or disabling mod_perl. It could potentialy improve security... but the people running the systems might not be so happy...
14. Chemical removal of facial hair
Uh, we do have that. May not be widely used, but it's there.
I submitted this over a year around new years 2000
It was rejected.
Is I think what you want, as in "I took Perverse pleasure in seeing him fail."
If a recursive function call comes at the *end* of a function, then it's called 'tail recursion', and it dosn't need any stack space, it just jumps back to the begining of the function
Ok, Java might not have Scheme support, but writing scheme interpreters in java is pretty easy, and lots of people have done it. But what's cool about the way java works is that It's very easy to call objects in java dynamically using the reflection API. So, in theory (and in most cases practice as well), you could write a scheme interpreter that runs on the Java virtual machine, and can use the whole of the Java Runtime environment.
I downloaded the simulator, and the 2d one worked fine. I couldn't figure out the the controls on the 3d one, though. I jammed all the keys on the keyboard, and nothing happened. How do you use it?
That Stevie Case was also fucking John Romero....
Oh, and thanks to Microsoft innovation - you may remember this from the trial - the browser is integrated with the OS, so reading email from an attacker
I fail to see how that makes sense... What does the fact that IE is part of the OS have to do with email?
If this security flaw existed in, say, mozilla, then any program that used it's HTML rendering engine would be just as vulnerable.
OnStar? Never heard of them. SAP?
:P
They run adds on TV all the time, actualy. Onstar and SAP anyway. I'm still not sure what exactly SAP does, though
Thats what I thought, to, untill I found the free download (Visual Basic and Visual C++). I was very, very, happy
You can be happy to, go Here. This is just for pocketPC, though, not the HPCs, or whatever
Actualy, if your running CE you can get microsoft's Visual Basic (or VisualC++, if you want) to program it, it's a free download off their website. I had some stuff up and running on my PocketPC in just a few minutes (a unicode font viewer, since CE supports unicode :)
Of course, visual basic sucks ass as a programming language, but it is 'easy'.
Anyway I don't see why being able to run Linux on a PDA will create a huge overwhelming amount of 'cool' software. I mean, most people already know C++, and I don't see that much cool client-side stuff written in Perl, or whatever.
And I can swear that most of the Mexicans do not wear sombreros anymore
Any hat is a 'sombrero'.