Transaction fees are always paid in cryptocurrency and have nothing to do with the exchanges. It's the fee added to a transaction which is paid to the miner when the transaction is confirmed. This fee would be paid even when someone sends BTC directly to another person's wallet.
You could set the fee amount to a much lower BTC value in your wallet software before sending, but that would almost guarantee a *very* long confirmation time for your transaction
Well, if your Bitcoin is already on deposit at the exchange the limitations of the blockchain are irrelevant. Keeping coins on deposit at an exhange is a stupid idea though, with the various hacks/thefts that have happened. Moving your coins from a local wallet to an exchange to sell is one transaction and any trades you make there are off-chain.
Probably because they are asking for information typcially found on phishing sites, such as name and (partial) SSN. It's also apparently running a stock WordPress installation and their production site throws debug messages and stack traces. Ugh.
I actually own my cable modem and router, as well pay for the power it uses. Sure, the cable company owns everything upstream of that. If they want to provide public WiFi why not stick an AP on the pole on the road outside my place?
Well for an improvement you could move to Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand, Switzerland, Canada, Chile, Mauritius, or Denmark....all ahead of the USA if you trust this source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Economic_Freedom
This is exactly what I have already done. I've already bought a nice place on the shore in Hainan. I found the people and the local government perfectly to my liking.
I am using the grsecurity patches and have always had the "restricted ptrace" option turned on (only root can ptrace). Does this provide some (any?) protection against this vulnerability?
Slashdot Mirror
Transaction fees are always paid in cryptocurrency and have nothing to do with the exchanges. It's the fee added to a transaction which is paid to the miner when the transaction is confirmed. This fee would be paid even when someone sends BTC directly to another person's wallet. You could set the fee amount to a much lower BTC value in your wallet software before sending, but that would almost guarantee a *very* long confirmation time for your transaction
Sounds a hell of a lot like Black Mirror S03E01
Well, if your Bitcoin is already on deposit at the exchange the limitations of the blockchain are irrelevant. Keeping coins on deposit at an exhange is a stupid idea though, with the various hacks/thefts that have happened. Moving your coins from a local wallet to an exchange to sell is one transaction and any trades you make there are off-chain.
Probably because they are asking for information typcially found on phishing sites, such as name and (partial) SSN. It's also apparently running a stock WordPress installation and their production site throws debug messages and stack traces. Ugh.
Me too!
AOL!
You're kidding me. You live 300 meters from the bar, and you drove? I have no sympathy.
Tada! JSLinux: http://bellard.org/jslinux/
I actually own my cable modem and router, as well pay for the power it uses. Sure, the cable company owns everything upstream of that. If they want to provide public WiFi why not stick an AP on the pole on the road outside my place?
Well for an improvement you could move to Hong Kong, Singapore, New Zealand, Switzerland, Canada, Chile, Mauritius, or Denmark....all ahead of the USA if you trust this source http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Index_of_Economic_Freedom
This is exactly what I have already done. I've already bought a nice place on the shore in Hainan. I found the people and the local government perfectly to my liking.
I am using the grsecurity patches and have always had the "restricted ptrace" option turned on (only root can ptrace). Does this provide some (any?) protection against this vulnerability?