Economists are among the few who actually perform proper risk/reward calculations. And in studies, among the very few who behave entirely, though rationally, selfishly. If they can get away with it, and survive the consequences if they don't, they will do it.
I know Comcast would never do anything sneaky, shitty, or otherwise underhanded; so this must be either a huge misunderstanding or what's really the best for us all. Comcast knows best!
But yes. I do think they would break it. They would do it happily, tell us its better that way, and insist that its what users actually want because they know best. Because that's how Apple thinks.
Because what are the odds that someone would need consistent MAC's for something crazy like.. oh, I don't know... DHCP lease assignment/reservations? Did Apple forget how dhcpd works? Do they just not care about us networking people who need their users to be on the right frikking subnets?
I listened to his show on AirAmerica a few times. I was not impressed. His analysis was awful, and he sounded like he was suffering a crushing depression.
Well, we could regulate broadband as a utility. Reasonable, considering that it is already a de facto utility. No taking involved, profits are guaranteed, and the public's interests are secured.
Free trade deals are about more than moving goods. They're about strengthening social and political bonds, harmonizing regulations, and the democratization of international relations.
There is a hard and fast rule in political economy - (trade == democracy) -> peace. Trade and democracy are directly and inextricably related, which has caused serious consternation among those seeking to quantify the interactions as there is no known variable that operates on only one. Anything increasing trade increases democracy and vice-versa. The second half of the rule is based on the fact that modern democracies NEVER go to war against each-other.
Well, they want to collect on both ends of the deal. And they want us to ignore the fact that x264 uses far less bandwidth than MEPG-2 with their nonsensical claim that Netflix/Hulu/Amazon streaming bogs down the network.
Slashdot Mirror
Economists are among the few who actually perform proper risk/reward calculations. And in studies, among the very few who behave entirely, though rationally, selfishly. If they can get away with it, and survive the consequences if they don't, they will do it.
Actually, I guess I know the answer. The third largest provider probably has fewer lawyers than the top two.
I could use some honeybees to pollinate my girlfriend's garden. If the USDA is handing out hives, I'll take one!
Can't we just blame VBA like we usually do?
Anybody remember the Long Run Foundation from "Time for the Stars"? Because it sounds like that's what Elon needs.
for porn. What else?
It's only a disability if it can't be corrected. Being fat is easily corrected.
Never heard of this? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I...
Ford is using destroyed cash from the Treasury in their materials research for this exact reason.
I know Comcast would never do anything sneaky, shitty, or otherwise underhanded; so this must be either a huge misunderstanding or what's really the best for us all. Comcast knows best!
But yes. I do think they would break it. They would do it happily, tell us its better that way, and insist that its what users actually want because they know best. Because that's how Apple thinks.
I can't be forgiven for missing that?
What if you have a wifi client whitelist?
Because what are the odds that someone would need consistent MAC's for something crazy like.. oh, I don't know... DHCP lease assignment/reservations? Did Apple forget how dhcpd works? Do they just not care about us networking people who need their users to be on the right frikking subnets?
I listened to his show on AirAmerica a few times. I was not impressed. His analysis was awful, and he sounded like he was suffering a crushing depression.
But if we can't afford to do it now, then that's that.
Well, we could regulate broadband as a utility. Reasonable, considering that it is already a de facto utility. No taking involved, profits are guaranteed, and the public's interests are secured.
There is a hard and fast rule in political economy - (trade == democracy) -> peace. Trade and democracy are directly and inextricably related, which has caused serious consternation among those seeking to quantify the interactions as there is no known variable that operates on only one. Anything increasing trade increases democracy and vice-versa. The second half of the rule is based on the fact that modern democracies NEVER go to war against each-other.
if it weren't for the fact that the Federal Government assigns SS numbers in the first place.
Execute them in front of the board of directors.
Netflix uses less bandwidth than your MEPG-2 TV streams.
Well, they want to collect on both ends of the deal. And they want us to ignore the fact that x264 uses far less bandwidth than MEPG-2 with their nonsensical claim that Netflix/Hulu/Amazon streaming bogs down the network.
Ah, but the robber is breaking the law, Verizon is using the law. A key distinction.
What about using some brave, stupid, and disposable Kerbals?
Which is not to suggest that I think they are behaving as anything other than jerks; just that they are being rational about it.
I think we need to fix the regulations.