I'm not doubting the integrity of the open source community. I'm saying that the majority uses closed source software and are unaware of the potential risks.
I'm not doubting the integrity of the open source community. I'm saying that the majority uses closed source software and are unaware of the potential risks.
It's getting pretty hard to differentiate between living in North America under corporate controlled government and China under government controlled corporatism.
Only if you can read code. What about people who can't and who rely on the integrity of companies to provide them with proper software. Oh, that's right. Companies and integrity don't mix.
Clean energy is abundant on this planet. That's exactly why the investors and governments don't want to use it. Eventually, there will be no gain for them, because the cost to produce clean energy will amount to almost nothing for the consumers.
70% of this word is covered by oceans, seas, rivers and lakes, which produce massive currents. If government aroud the world chose to use tidal energy plants on a planetary scale, combined with solar plants, geothermal plants (see Iceland, they want to export electricity), windmills and the recovery of gasses produced by natural waste, combine into a worldwide network, there wouldn't even be a debate about it.
Also, electricity would be abundant enough to massively produce hydrogen for cars.
Unfortunately, we do not live in a resource-based economy and the motives of investors, governments and other powers that be are anything but noble. They'd rather sell their sould to the devil and mess up this planet in spite of all the knowlege and the fact that there is no amount of money that could ever replace a ruined planet, not the mention the burden on future generations.
So articles like the ones in this post can be dismissed as sick propaganda.
If we all decide to boycot this nonsense and not visit their website at all. That will be 0 hits, 0 revenue. Catch my drift? Maybe they don't understand the "Inter" word in Internet.
In the real world, there no chance that a single man takes out entire armies. There is also no chance that CSI detectives drive Hummers.
Academic code is better, because the purpose is entirely different. Once you start coding for a company, you basically become a code monkey under strict financial and other constraints. It's slave labor.
Slashdot Mirror
What if the spyware is designed to provide such proof? Using a webcam to transmit pictures of the user for instance.
I'm not doubting the integrity of the open source community. I'm saying that the majority uses closed source software and are unaware of the potential risks.
is aware :)
I'm not doubting the integrity of the open source community. I'm saying that the majority uses closed source software and are unaware of the potential risks.
Honey, so soon?
You hit the nail right on the head. IP addresses can be spoofed. Long live Tor nodes and secure browser profiles.
Brutal, but effective.
It's getting pretty hard to differentiate between living in North America under corporate controlled government and China under government controlled corporatism.
Different control mechanisms, same goal.
Futhermore, you cannot expect all users to be familiar with netstat, iptables, tcpdump and other similar tools.
Only if you can read code. What about people who can't and who rely on the integrity of companies to provide them with proper software. Oh, that's right. Companies and integrity don't mix.
On every machine I find.
Clean energy is abundant on this planet. That's exactly why the investors and governments don't want to use it. Eventually, there will be no gain for them, because the cost to produce clean energy will amount to almost nothing for the consumers.
70% of this word is covered by oceans, seas, rivers and lakes, which produce massive currents. If government aroud the world chose to use tidal energy plants on a planetary scale, combined with solar plants, geothermal plants (see Iceland, they want to export electricity), windmills and the recovery of gasses produced by natural waste, combine into a worldwide network, there wouldn't even be a debate about it.
Also, electricity would be abundant enough to massively produce hydrogen for cars.
Unfortunately, we do not live in a resource-based economy and the motives of investors, governments and other powers that be are anything but noble. They'd rather sell their sould to the devil and mess up this planet in spite of all the knowlege and the fact that there is no amount of money that could ever replace a ruined planet, not the mention the burden on future generations.
So articles like the ones in this post can be dismissed as sick propaganda.
My encryption was a failed investment...
That's obviously the attitude they use at Microsoft HQ.
I decided that everybody can use it against troll patenters.
If we all decide to boycot this nonsense and not visit their website at all. That will be 0 hits, 0 revenue. Catch my drift? Maybe they don't understand the "Inter" word in Internet.
I second that. Corporate owned, corporate operated. No more democracy that in the United States, just more liberals.
You mean the Moron Church?
Alternative employment is also slave labor. Actually, anything that is based on monetary gain is slave labor.
In the real world, there no chance that a single man takes out entire armies. There is also no chance that CSI detectives drive Hummers. Academic code is better, because the purpose is entirely different. Once you start coding for a company, you basically become a code monkey under strict financial and other constraints. It's slave labor.
I think that is extra safe, even when the safety is off.
+1 for courage.
But thanks anyway, Microsoft.
Oops, I lost my F-16 engine. I can't remember where I put it.
I love panda steak with some whale sauce.
http://www.cio.com/article/722182/Stop_the_ITU_Taking_Over_the_Internet_Warns_the_European_Parliament http://www.dtic.mil/biosys/hscb-mp.html