Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Has Been Watching, and It Says You're Getting Used To Windows 8

Dupple writes "Microsoft's user data shows that users are getting used to dealing with the Windows 8 user interface, reports this article at MIT Technology Review. Despite some of the more scathing reviews of Windows 8, ordinary users are getting along with it just fine, according to Julie Larson-Green, the Microsoft executive who leads Windows product development. Data collected automatically from some Windows users, she says, show they are adjusting to some of the new operating system's controversial features without problems 'So far we're seeing very encouraging things,' Larson-Green says of the large volume of data that Microsoft receives every day from people using Windows 8 who have chosen to join the company's 'customer experience improvement program.' All users are invited to enroll in that program when they first log into the new operating system. If they do so, anonymized information about how they are using the operating system is sent to Microsoft. Referring to complaints from some quarters, Larson-Green says: 'Even with the rumblings, we feel confident that it's a moment in time more than an actual problem.'"

675 comments

  1. Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know a single company whose IT will implement Windows 8 on anything. I'm talking everything from tablets, phones, laptops, PC's, or servers. In fact my company said straight out "No" because of all the problems it would entail.

    Did they ever fix the lack of command line for windows 8 servers?

    1. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by WolfgangPG · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We have already deployed several Windows 8 Touch laptops and most of our IT staff is using Windows 8. We don't currently have plans to roll it out to the general population -- but we will be buying more surface Pros, etc...

    2. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I don't know a single company whose IT will implement Windows 8 on anything. I'm talking everything from tablets, phones, laptops, PC's, or servers. In fact my company said straight out "No" because of all the problems it would entail.

      Did they ever fix the lack of command line for windows 8 servers?

      I work desktop IT for a company in fortune's top 10. We are not moving everything there (yet) but we definitely are standardizing it for the enterprise and will probably move large numbers (tens of thousands) of users there. Enterprises aren't as scared of 8 as they were of Vista. Roll-out of a new os in a large enterprise takes time and I'm sure once the projects have been worked at various companies many will be moving.

    3. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's great, we're not. Rolling out Android and iPad tablets....sticking with Windows 7.

    4. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yep, but probably not to Windows 8. I'd sooner deploy Microsoft Bob.

    5. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That'll take a decade, ala Windows XP. By then Windows 10 will be out. So, no thanks.

      Get left behind by the business community, you shills crack me up.

    6. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by JediJorgie · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I work for a University and we manage about 9,000 Windows desktops, mostly Win7 at this point. We are looking to roll out Windows 8 on all new deployments beginning in January or February. All of our early-adopters have been running Win8E for months now and the only issues we have seen have been related to IE10. Most of these issues have been dealt with by using group policy to set compatibility mode for specific sites.

    7. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by gl4ss · · Score: 4, Insightful

      win9, or win8.5 will be out next year. by then they'll maybe have figured out if they really think people want to use 2 apps at the same time. or that people want to use applications instead of cut down appzzzzzzzz.
      besides, wolfgang certainly isn't buying more surface pro's because he hasn't bought the first one.

      anyways, people who haven used windows 8 for 3 months have used windows 8 for 3 months without switching to apple - what kind of fucking stupid poll is that?!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by jythie · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being forced to upgrade by end of lifing support does not make Win7 any less 'good enough for me', it just means taking the option away.

      Not sure what you are going on about with being 'left behind'. I am skeptical many businesses out there refuse to interoperate with other businesses because they are not running the latest and greatest software. I still see, for instance, a great deal of standardization on .DOC rather then .docx, and I do not recall seeing any companies saying 'sorry, your file format is out of date, no business for you'.

    9. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by MitchDev · · Score: 1

      My company is still doing the rollout to Windows 7 on desktops and laptops, and some machines are still getting XP due to software that won't run under Win 7. Win 8 will be like Vista, skipped over and mostly ignored.

    10. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by davidbrit2 · · Score: 2

      Kinda the same here. We're running it on a few machines, and while the tablet-UI side of things is largely ignored, the rest of it works well enough. Yeah, there's some stuff that's missing (the GUI for modifying all stored wireless connections, for example), but I like the spatial nature of the new Start menu. It's kind of like being able to pin programs where you like them on your taskbar, but in two dimensions. Yes, I know you could do that with icons on the desktop, but you can't scroll the desktop, and you have to hide windows to get to it.

      We don't have immediate plans to roll out Win 8 to everybody (as far as I know), but it sounds like there are some improvements to memory footprint. I'll have to test this in our ESX environment, because if we can reduce the memory usage of a hundred VMs vs. Windows XP or 7, then that might make it worth jumping over 7. If we take that route, I should be able to do a few hour-long lunch-and-learn sessions to get everybody up to speed. For most people, I'll just have to teach them about the Start menu. On the IT side, I'm sure we'd have to figure out what kind of new group policy settings would be needed, what with the app store and such.

    11. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well we're Microsoft partners and we sure ain't getting any Windows 8 for now (tech support tested for several months and final word was: no go).
      We have VS2012, TFS2012 and most of the software that launched on par with Windows 8 except the OS itself. Big no no.
      The decision was to postpone until the end of life or when Windows 8 finally meets our needs, until then Windows 7 stays.

    12. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Lawrence61 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Getting used to dealing with it". Wow, that must be some operating system. I'm sure Microsoft is sure proud of that. In time people can get used to all sorts of things, an operating system shouldn't be one of them. It should just work, and get out of the way of the user and be intuitive. In other words, more opposite of what windows 8 is.

    13. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by brianwski · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hello, nice to meet you. Now you do know somebody who uses the start menu. I'm typing this on a Windows 7 64 bit system, and I use the "Start" menu all the time. Personally I keep a list of the top 10 applications I launch (Chrome, Visual Studio, a screen capture utility, etc) right at the very top level of the "Start" menu so I can get to them quickly, but the shortcuts disappear (when I release the mouse button) and don't clutter my view all the time.

      I work at a company that does both Mac and Windows apps deployed to customer's desktops. So we *HAVE* to stay current and support all the new Microsoft and Apple OS releases. Windows 8 is the future, it's just that the future really sucks. The only thing keeping my spirits up for now is the hope that Microsoft comes to its senses and makes Windows 8.5 or Windows 9 suck less. Honestly I don't have much hope left, they are still pushing the tool ribbon and pretending it is a success. Microsoft doesn't like to admit it made a mistake, even when the evidence is overwhelming.

    14. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by danomac · · Score: 1

      Did they ever fix the lack of command line for windows 8 servers?

      I have Server 2012 running on ESXi, and on day one it came with PowerShell. It never had a lack of a command prompt. If anything, it's a more powerful command prompt by default.

    15. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Columcille · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Personally I keep a list of the top 10 applications I launch (Chrome, Visual Studio, a screen capture utility, etc) right at the very top level of the "Start" menu so I can get to them quickly"

      So put them on the metro page. Functions in a similar way: press the windows key and you'll see all your pinned apps for quick and easy access as well as be able to just type the name of any given app you may want.

      Prior to the release of Win8, I was highly, highly critical. Thought it was the dumbest thing MS had ever done. As someone who went through the pain of WinME, that's saying a lot. But I've gotten used to it. Still spend almost all my time in the desktop, but I've grown to like the metro apps for things like easy access for my kids. I still think MS made a mistake by not at least making a full-desktop-mode option, but I can live with Metro and find it beneficial in some ways. I certainly haven'y been hampered by it at all.

      --
      I love my sig.
    16. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by tibit · · Score: 2

      Wait a minute, you actually, as a company policy, encourage people to use IE except for legacy sites that won't work on anything else? Isn't that crazy? Then they go, do the same at home, and they end up owned. Kudos.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    17. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by slashmydots · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or, perhaps, you could not waste your money and get stable, working, long-term Thinkpads with flip screens running Windows 7 Pro (downgrade rights) and dual batteries for cheaper than a pro tablet and it comes with a DVD drive and full keyboard. Or are you one of the IT departments that buys pretty, shiny, trendy gear to impress the boss instead of actually get work done?

    18. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Motard · · Score: 0

      The Start Menu is still there. It's just full screen now. And you can fit more than 10 applications to launch on it (or fewer, if you prefer). I've read one complaint that the Start Menu hides the desktop, but I don't care about looking at the desktop when I'm starting a new app. Why would I? And the Start Menu still appears and disappears quickly.

      It really not much of a change if you stay away from metro apps (those are good for 'leisure mode')..

    19. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of Compaqs and Dells will not boot anything but Windows 8. On the consumer level, it is UEFI lockdown. On the enterprise level, it is the fact that some machines "accidentally" only boot from a NTFS filesystem.

      Since HP and Dell are your only games in town (think a business is going to put iMacs on worker bee desks, think again), it will be Windows 8 coming in on the next PC buy cycle, or nothing.

    20. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by war4peace · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Taskbar. Does it have a taskbar readily available at the bottom or side of the screen at all times? Right now, on Windows 7, I have 9 active applications and one-click access to about 40 others. The System Tray holds some more 15 icons out of which 11 allow double-click access to software (the other ones are informative-only). I like this, it helps me quickly get to this or that software without having to perform a few extra steps which take my focus away from what I need to do.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    21. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you going with a default install, or are you significantly tweaking the settings for your campus-wide roll out?

      Because "switching to Windows 8" means different things if you're talking about Joe Random and his off-the-shelf Dell, and University of We-Have-Our-Own-IT-Department who has customized the snot out of it such that it behaves as much like Windows 7 as is BOFH'ly possible.

    22. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Ravaldy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You're right. Windows XP users have proved that by still holdind a high percentage of the OS market. If you don't change the tools you run on your OS you don't need to upgrade. Eventually time catches up and you have no choice.

      In our line of business we deal with AutoCAD a lot. We have been forced to upgrade our AutoCAD only because our customers use a newer version and if we don't upgrade we simply can't do our work.

    23. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      TL;DR. Instead, let's talk about Julie Larson-Green's beautiful tits.

    24. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Ravaldy · · Score: 1

      If they have intranets coded in ASP.net running on IIS and authenticating through NTLM, then it makes perfect sense. Something you can get done with only IE. I personally hate using domain authentication through IIS for web applications but it has value in some businesses. There's also the intranet configuration that can be handy.

    25. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 2

      "Personally I keep a list of the top 10 applications I launch (Chrome, Visual Studio, a screen capture utility, etc) right at the very top level of the "Start" menu so I can get to them quickly"

      So put them on the metro page. Functions in a similar way: press the windows key and you'll see all your pinned apps for quick and easy access as well as be able to just type the name of any given app you may want.

      Prior to the release of Win8, I was highly, highly critical. Thought it was the dumbest thing MS had ever done. As someone who went through the pain of WinME, that's saying a lot. But I've gotten used to it. Still spend almost all my time in the desktop, but I've grown to like the metro apps for things like easy access for my kids. I still think MS made a mistake by not at least making a full-desktop-mode option, but I can live with Metro and find it beneficial in some ways. I certainly haven'y been hampered by it at all.

      So put them on the Metro page, WTF? That way, I can jump back on forth from the metro page to the pseudo desktop without the start menu everytime I need to open an app. How efficient is that? Why not allow apps that require the pseudo desktop to have a menu entry on the desktop, unless your fear is that nobody will use the metro apps or the metro page?

    26. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Dunbal · · Score: 5, Informative

      And my wife's co (Fortune 500, top 100 even) is sticking with Windows XP.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    27. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The Start Menu is still there. It's just full screen now. And you can fit more than 10 applications to launch on it (or fewer, if you prefer). I've read one complaint that the Start Menu hides the desktop, but I don't care about looking at the desktop when I'm starting a new app. Why would I? And the Start Menu still appears and disappears quickly.

      It really not much of a change if you stay away from metro apps (those are good for 'leisure mode')..

      There is no start menu. There is the metro page, but that is hardly the same thing. A start menu would mean that I could have a word document open on my screen and hit the start menu to open another app, without losing site of the word document that might actually contain the credentials I need to enter into the other program. With the metro page, you are jumping back and forth from entirely different screens and then scrolling looking for the proper square on the metro tab.

      Maybe that is more efficient on the Minority Report, but it in reality it seems much less efficient than click-click.

    28. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are several utilities (here's one) that show the taskbar on the start screen. You can customize windows 8 to your heart's desire.

    29. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 2

      The only people I know who used the search option are IT admins and the helpdesk. I use the start menu in Win7, I use it in Ubuntu Gnome Classic. I have never seen anyone use the search bar from the start menu unless following directions from the helpdesk.

      The only thing that I use more than the start menu is the quick launch bar, but I can't fit ALL my applications down there, just the ones I use all the time (browsers, cygwin terminal, notepad++). Honestly I don't even know how to invoke half the applications on my machine, many of them have separate launchers and application programs, some have built in command line options passed via the start menu shortcut.

       

    30. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Githaron · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So put them on the metro page.

      Why would anyone want to completely change their view so that they can click on a saved app when they don't have to? I installed Windows 8 on my main machine because I heard about some of the non-metro updates/improvements and I knew there were several free/cheap third-party applications that I could install to bring back the start menu.

      For two days, I tried to give the metro start menu a chance. At first, I tried to pin everything I use often to my taskbar and metro start page. Unfortunately, I found the task bar was too cluttered for my tastes and I hated having to go back and forth between the desktop and metro for basic things.

      I hated how many extra steps they made you go through to shutdown the computer. Of course, later I found out you can just hit Alt + F4 from the desktop to bring up a shutdown menu.

      The search in metro was also a huge peeve. In Windows 7, the search was all inclusive. It didn't matter if I was looking for an app, settings, or files. Everything was there. In Windows 8, you have to click a category for anything but applications. Don't get me wrong, I understand having categories. What I don't get is why they don't have an "All" category and why it is not default. When I search for things I go from general to more specific, no the reverse.

      The last thing I found immensely annoying was the metro split screen. I have a 23 inch monitor on my desktop. With that much real estate, you have room for two applications side by side. Unfortunately, Windows 8 does not let you do a 50/50 split between two metro apps. Only one-third/two-thirds or two-thirds/one-third. It doesn't make sense on a large screen.

      In the end, I got fed up and finally purchased a copy of Start 8. It looks and acts almost exactly like Windows 7's start menu and lets me boot directly into the desktop app. If I actually want to get into the metro start, I just hold down the Windows key for a couple of seconds. I have my top four/five application pinned to my taskbar and the next five/six pinned to my Start 8 menu. If Microsoft added a "desktop mode" for those of us that are using it as a desktop OS and polished their metro interface to remove the mentioned usability nightmares, the OS would probably be widely accepted. without the need to purchase third-party interface apps.

    31. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by tripleevenfall · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No kidding. The business community stays with what works, until they have to move for a legitimate business reason. "New shiny touchy colory" is not a legitimate business reason.

    32. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Personally I keep a list of the top 10 applications I launch (Chrome, Visual Studio, a screen capture utility, etc) right at the very top level of the "Start" menu so I can get to them quickly

      Isn't that precisely what the "pin this program" feature on the taskbar is for in Win7?

    33. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Osiris+Ani · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know anyone who used the start menu for anything but search and shut down.

      This statement is significant because, of course, the plural form of "anecdote" is "data."

    34. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait a minute, you actually, as a company policy, encourage people to use IE except for legacy sites that won't work on anything else? Isn't that crazy? Then they go, do the same at home, and they end up owned. Kudos.

      Yes, it's called "the real world".

    35. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 1

      So put them on the Metro page, WTF? That way, I can jump back on forth from the metro page to the pseudo desktop without the start menu everytime I need to open an app. How efficient is that? Why not allow apps that require the pseudo desktop to have a menu entry on the desktop, unless your fear is that nobody will use the metro apps or the metro page?

      Using the metro start for your top programs is no different than for the Windows 7 top programs. Hit the windows key and select your program. One just happens to be a fullscreen start menu. I don't really see how that is less efficient. I'd prefer to have a start menu of course, but really I'm on the desktop 99.99% of the time and all the functionality I used in Windows 7 is just as efficient in Windows 8.

      I think you are correct that Microsoft wants everyone to use metro apps. (I don't use them myself. I just use the desktop and metro is my start menu.) I believe it is so they can get a foot hold on mobile and get a cut of software sales. Part of it could be a vision of taking your OS everywhere, though.

    36. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      A start menu would mean that I could have a word document open on my screen and hit the start menu to open another app, without losing site of the word document that might actually contain the credentials I need to enter into the other program.

      And as soon as you click that app, it brings you back to the desktop with your Word document. Wait, you aren't actually using Metro apps, are you? (I won't even ask why you keep credentials in Word files...)

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    37. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Out of curiosity, what do you expect to gain from replacing Win7 with Win8?

    38. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by gagol · · Score: 1

      Given project blue, it will most likely be Windows 18...

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    39. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Does it have a taskbar readily available at the bottom or side of the screen at all times?

      Technically the answer is no, however, that said, you won't miss it. Once you boot, and click to go to the desktop, you never have to leave the desktop if all you applications are pinned to the task bar like you have in Windows 7. The only time you'll not have one is if you go back to the start screen to launch an application that isn't pinned to the task bar, and in that respect it comes more like a full screen start menu, which IMHO, works better than the start menu in XP-Windows 7 ever did.

    40. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by overmoderated · · Score: 1

      +1 for courage.

    41. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      I put my most-used programs in the quick launch portion of the taskbar. I also auto-hide my taskbar (which has its own shares of annoyances, but I won't go into that here).

      The pinned apps in the start menu are nice, but I reserve that list for programs that I use often but not all the time, and for programs that could be superseded by a different program altogether (e.g. a media viewer or non-Word text editor).

      The difference? One click vs two for programs I bring up all the time (I still have to bring my mouse to the bottom to get to the buttons). Differentiating the important programs from the less-important programs, and hence not cluttering a single space with everything.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    42. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      There is no start menu. There is the metro page, but that is hardly the same thing.

      I guess that is a matter of opinion. They perform the same functions, activated with similar (or the same) methods. Of course the start menu isn't live, has limited area to pin applications, is forced to being in a single list rather than multiple categorized lists/groups, and eats up task bar space that could be used for better things.

      A start menu would mean...

      No it doesn't. A start menu would mean a menu that allows you to start applications. No more than that. Are you trying to say that if the start menu in Windows had a start button, and when you clicked it that it took you automatically to the Windows XP style "All Programs" that covered your entire screen that it would no longer be a start menu? Do you realize how silly that sounds because that is the way it started in XP.

      without losing site of the word document that might actually contain the credentials I need to enter into the other program.

      You do realize that after you click on the program to start, it will start on the desktop, just like it would have if you launched it from Windows 7, right? Are you somehow typing credentials into a program before launching it, like Run As or something odd?

    43. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is one nice thing about tablets: They don't get malware. Yes, it is possible, but it is relatively rare.

      So, if I can push out a GPO that requires users to have a decently long PIN for unlocking, then set the number of times before it erases itself to 10, that will take care of almost anything but the schlub who leaves the tablet unlocked at a table in a coffee shop while they hit the loo.

      With tablets, I don't have to worry about the sales droid from the field bitching about a slow machine (because they downloaded a 0-day), or the company IDS detecting a botnet on a device. Unless it is a freak event like the Samsung issue, generally a Windows RT tablet or non-jailbroken iPad is going to be more secure than any general purpose PC without exception.

      Given a choice, I much rather give employees tablets because they are far less of an IT headache than full fledged PC. No worry about Active Directory issues, no need to worry about disk encryption (the iPad and RT tablets have it built in), easy remote kill capability, no hard disks to fail in the field, and maintaining is easy -- if a tablet breaks, hand the user a new one, RMA the old one.

      From a desktop support perspective, tablets are a Godsend. You push a policy out to enforce corporate items (long password, max times before erase, times between changes), make sure the employee has some way to back up data [1], and call it done.

      [1]: Citrix Receiver is also excellent for this. Using this, zero user data is stored on the tablet so the user can back those up on their own time.

    44. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      A start menu would mean that I could have a word document open on my screen and hit the start menu to open another app, without losing site of the word document that might actually contain the credentials I need to enter into the other program.

      And as soon as you click that app, it brings you back to the desktop with your Word document. Wait, you aren't actually using Metro apps, are you? (I won't even ask why you keep credentials in Word files...)

      I can't help what format people choose to send me things in.

    45. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Powershell works fine in Windows Server 2012.

      Metro is not a big deal on a server as admins use a console with MMC from another machine to service it anyway and do not need 10 windows of word and excel apps open where Metro would be prohibitive.

      Windows Server 2012 is a great server OS and is catching up to Unix in many areas. A desktop however where someone interacts all day is different.

    46. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by KingMotley · · Score: 0

      No fortune 100 company is sticking with XP in any major way. Maybe your wifes department is for some odd reason, but I suspect the rest of the company is not following suit. There is even fortune 100 companies that have Windows 3.1 running somewhere for some reason, but claiming they stuck with it is foolish.

    47. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0

      Being forced to upgrade by end of lifing support does not make Win7 any less 'good enough for me', it just means taking the option away.

      Not sure what you are going on about with being 'left behind'. I am skeptical many businesses out there refuse to interoperate with other businesses because they are not running the latest and greatest software. I still see, for instance, a great deal of standardization on .DOC rather then .docx, and I do not recall seeing any companies saying 'sorry, your file format is out of date, no business for you'.

      Until last year I always downgraded my resumes to .doc for these reasons. Today I use docx. If it can not be read or has formatting issues then you are a company that is not important.

      In the good old days it was businesses that forced us to upgrade and it was the other way around. When the boss shows off he has office XP which can not be read properly under Office 97 he figures anyone else who does not have the latest and greatest is not important. It forced IT to constantly upgrade. Now the opposite is true but is starting to change slowly as my example above back to where it was.

      I am hoping corps stop supporting IE 6 and forcing suppliers and vendors to use it. One company does it for some crappy Oracle ERP app and all 6 other companies that use their login then have to downgrade which forces there customers to downgrade and hold the whole internet back 10 years, until consumer websites wont even load anymore.

      This madness needs to stop.

    48. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by bemymonkey · · Score: 1

      Is your IT staff mostly on touchscreen devices? Or do I detect a faint whiff of masochism? :p

    49. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      Touche!

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    50. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. The only reason most went to XP was because it was wildly better than win9x and its crashfest even at SP0.

      I went to XP when my friend rang me up. "havent had a crash in 3 months" I bought it that day and had it overnighted.

    51. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      I guess that is a matter of opinion. They perform the same functions, activated with similar (or the same) methods. Of course the start menu isn't live, has limited area to pin applications, is forced to being in a single list rather than multiple categorized lists/groups, and eats up task bar space that could be used for better things.

      I don't know about you, but my start menu is pretty well organized into categories and groups instead of one long list. It is also much easier to navigate and find things than scrolling horizontally through numerous screens of tiles. And it takes up exactly the width of one icon on the task bar versus the entire desktop for the metro page.

      The metro page only makes sense for limited sized screens, just like on phones and tablets. The fact that you can move tiles around to different pages of it doesn't change that.

      No it doesn't. A start menu would mean a menu that allows you to start applications. No more than that. Are you trying to say that if the start menu in Windows had a start button, and when you clicked it that it took you automatically to the Windows XP style "All Programs" that covered your entire screen that it would no longer be a start menu? Do you realize how silly that sounds because that is the way it started in XP.

      Yes, I would say that is not a start menu, at least not the traditional style used by Windows, which is what the discussion is about. Even in XP, there were always folders for subgroups. Why? Microsoft, at the time stated it was too difficult to scan through everything to find just what you were looking for. Of course with metro, they have now implemented what they once deemed too difficult.

      You do realize that after you click on the program to start, it will start on the desktop, just like it would have if you launched it from Windows 7, right? Are you somehow typing credentials into a program before launching it, like Run As or something odd?

      Yes, of course I realize that. What Windows 8 doesn't do, however, is respect window positions like Windows 7 and earlier version did, so things are now covered up that once were not. Technically, that is probably not related to the actual start menu, but just the poor implementation of the desktop metaphor.

      But, then maybe Microsoft is right, it makes sense to leave the desktop (or cover it up) to go search through a bunch of large tiles to find an application you want to open next. Of course, by their own admission, the desktop metaphor is just a stop-gap until they get most things converted over to metro.

    52. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Nope.

      You will need to click +40 times in the upper right hand corner over and over and over and over and over until you get to each app if you are in Metro or if one of your apps is in Metro mode.

      Wow does it suck! That was my pet peeve.

      Metro could work with a task bar on a bigger screen with aero peak and the ability to resize tiles. If MS did this I would probably upgrade to Windows 8. I agree with others. It is a cute cell phone OS. But for real work its new terrible start/search and lack of taskbar means it is not ready for real work.

    53. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by WolfgangPG · · Score: 1

      I guess a lot of people like it. None are using touch screen devices. We have a few executives that we have traded out their iPads for Samsung Win 8 Pro tablets, etc... I happen myself to enjoy Windows 8 on my desktop, but to each their own.

    54. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by rk · · Score: 1

      I keep mine in HTML because it renders on anything. If someone then asks for my resume in doc format the only reasons I can think of is they're technologically clueless or they want to edit it for their own purposes (and can't Word edit HTML documents too? See reason 1.) Both of those are red flags and give me a lot of information they probably didn't want to reveal to me.

    55. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 0

      Most just run them through a search program that ranks resumes like search engines. Those with the highest hits get interviewed. That is the game and yes they love .docs because they want to edit them and highlight things and email them to groups of different people.

      Also if they use IE 6 or IE 7 it may not render properly due to bugs and will make you look bad if they see margins all over the place which IE 6 probably inherited from Word.

    56. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Really? I work for a fortune 100 company. We still have a lot of XP machines. Until last year, we had a lot of NT machines.

    57. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      Why is it that every post you make is shilling Wndows 8?

      Seriously your history reads like marketing material.

    58. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by tguyton · · Score: 1

      Yeah, same with us... we're working on the Windows 7 rollout this month and next, but the real big push will be starting in February. I'd imagine someone somewhere is playing around with Windows 8, but given the current state of things I don't think we'd even have an image ready until the later part of this year at the earliest, let alone start rolling it out for anyone. We still have whole business units stuck on XP for old applications.

    59. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Kwyj1b0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Taskbar. Does it have a taskbar readily available at the bottom or side of the screen at all times?

      Actually, it does have a task bar. And if you have a dual monitor setup, the taskbar is open on one monitor at all times (and if you don't open some "app" on the second monitor, it is open on both monitors at all times).

      Not that I'd recommend anyone upgrade to Win8. I like it, but I also got it free from my organization. I don't really see any must-have features (unlike Windows 7, which had all the nice snap-to functionality that I couldn't get with XP). Sure, it might boot faster, but it has been months since I rebooted my computers. The extended task bar (one on each monitor) is also nice, but I generally reserve one screen for "Metro" apps. Once you know the keyboard shortcuts (Win+C, Win+I, Win+H), it is better than Windows 7 for social stuff (quickly sharing websites, tweeting, Skype). But from a work point of view, it is not significantly better than Windows 7.

    60. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by SourceFrog · · Score: 1

      ... I don't know anyone who used the start menu for anything but search and shut down

      Your post might have carried some weight had it not gone off the rails with this ridiculously absurd claim.

      --
      My other UID is three digits.
    61. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by jythie · · Score: 1

      If it can not be read or has formatting issues then you are a company that is not important.

      A company's importance is based off how likely they are to result in more money for your own company, not how up to date their tools are. I am extremely skeptical that any company (working with its own money.. the excess of the dot-com VC time-frame might make an exception) would say 'we need XYZ from you and are about to pay ABC.. but oh no, you saved your Word doc in an older format! We can not do business with you'. In fact the only place I see such idiotic behavior is from large glacially upgrading institutions that still run old versions and require all their customers/contractors/etc to submit paperwork in some older common format.

    62. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by jythie · · Score: 1

      Typically the reason people want .doc files is because they have legacy systems that can read the format and import it into their HR/tracking system, and upgrading such a custom application at great expense requires a larger justification then 'people will not think we are cool'.

      So typically in such situations, it is not that they want to use Word, it is that they are using some library that can parse .docs and dump the output into some other application.

    63. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by JohnFen · · Score: 1

      I, too, use the start button for a lot more than search and shutdown. So, now he knows 2.

    64. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by WolfgangPG · · Score: 0

      I happen to like it. When it comes up I will talk about liking it. You might call it shilling, but I mostly a) talking about my feelings towards a product or b) talking about the truth. I work at a company that has over 20,000 employees and we are already using Windows 8 on a few devices with no real complaints. We have also started to use Windows Server 2012 in a few deployments.

      Is it an amazing ground breaking change your life software package? No. Do I happen to enjoy using it? Yes. I find, as many have mentioned, it performs better than Windows 7, has some cool new features and I enjoy the start menu and think the Live Tiles are ingenious.

    65. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a pristine unopened copy of Microsoft Bob I'll sell!

    66. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clippy, is that you?

    67. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We also deployed several Win8 touch laptops. They were all sent back by the end users as unacceptable. In our dept, we try to please the users and have halted all Windows 8 deployments. They'll accept it if you force it down their throats but not if they have a choice.

    68. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Personally I keep a list of the top 10 applications I launch (Chrome, Visual Studio, a screen capture utility, etc) right at the very top level of the "Start" menu so I can get to them quickly

      So put them on the metro page. Functions in a similar way: press the windows key and you'll see all your pinned apps for quick and easy access as well as be able to just type the name of any given app you may want.

      You're both idiots. Pin them to the Taskbar.

      You use them in the Desktop space so having to go to Metro to launch them is dumb.
      If these apps are used that often you generally have them already on the Taskbar when they have open Windows, so why not keep them there.

      I've been using Windows 8 since DP and rarely ever touch the Metro side, with a 1920 pixel wide Taskbar I can pin more than 20 apps for easy access.

      Prior to the release of Win8, I was highly, highly critical. Thought it was the dumbest thing MS had ever done. As someone who went through the pain of WinME, that's saying a lot. But I've gotten used to it. Still spend almost all my time in the desktop, but I've grown to like the metro apps for things like easy access for my kids. I still think MS made a mistake by not at least making a full-desktop-mode option, but I can live with Metro and find it beneficial in some ways. I certainly haven'y been hampered by it at all.

    69. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but we will be buying more surface Pros, etc...

      I thought those weren't available until January. Hmm, something smells fishy.

    70. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deploy Bob? Can that really be done; can we send him to the front lines where he might confuse and distract the enemy, too?

    71. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by sperm · · Score: 1

      I dont where to vent this, but I need to.

      Bought Windows 8, its been crashing non-stop, yesterday it would not allow me to log in at all!

      My wife, said "enough of this piece of crap. I am not an IT person and I know this OS is unuseable...but do you persist trying?"

      So, I asked for my refund (it was actually fairly simple to do). And Windows 7 is back on in full glory. I wonder how many people have done this? The operator said that there's was quite a few. Would love to hear the stats on that.

      I'll stick to Android for touch screens. W8 is useless and stupid on a desktop. Hard to believe this OS had actually gone through a testing cycles.

      Thanks for listening to my rant, I feel much better now!

    72. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by WheezyJoe · · Score: 1

      "Personally I keep a list of the top 10 applications I launch (Chrome, Visual Studio, a screen capture utility, etc) right at the very top level of the "Start" menu so I can get to them quickly"

      So put them on the metro page. Functions in a similar way: press the windows key and you'll see all your pinned apps for quick and easy access as well as be able to just type the name of any given app you may want.
       

      Better solution! If forced to upgrade to Windows 8, use Classic Shell or one of the other hacks out there that take the hate out of Windows 8 (you get a start menu, and the Metro screen is just a memory). A quick search for "windows 8 start menu" speaks volumes to how much people detest Metro, many of these hacks and how-to's written before 8 was officially released!

      Given how often one is forced to use Windows, it is fortunate that Windows is so tweakable (albeit by third parties) to make up for Redmond's incompetence. Unless you work at a place where Windows is locked down and you can't install anything... but such places aren't likely to upgrade, either.

      --
      Take it easy, Charlie, I've got an Angle...
    73. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More likely the response is what?! This man can't even set a margin RIGHT! What an idiot. .. Next! . . and your resume gets thrown immediately in tge recycling bin by the clueless HR lady.

      Not hmm gee our version of office 2003 cant render. docs the same as Office 2010 maybe we should get with the times? These companies look bad to customers and other companies when this happens and costs business. PDFs are a bandaid solution. That and I forgot the menus in Office 2003. I would have to relearn it.

      Non tech users do not understand so this is why I use docx.

    74. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by davydagger · · Score: 1

      "
      So put them on the metro page. Functions in a similar way: press the windows key and you'll see all your pinned apps for quick and easy access as well as be able to just type the name of any given app you may want."

      thats exactly how gnome 3 works in linux. That came out 2 years ago. mabey microsoft should have asked linux users what they thought about gnome-shell(3) before jumping in.

      It was so bad, that while most major desktop distros shipped gnome 2 as the default, almost all of them jumped ship, and even produced two forks, MATE and cinamon, to retain application compatibility while not having to deal with the UI design.

    75. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Columcille · · Score: 1

      I spend 95% of my Win8 time on the desktop, which does have the taskbar. As in Windows 7, my most frequently used apps are pinned to the taskbar for quick access via shortcuts rather than mouse or start menu. Works like a charm. I didn't mention the taskbar in my original comment because OP said he wanted to place these links somewhere that could be hidden. You can hide the taskbar, but the closest comparison to the start menu is the metro start screen, so I mentioned that rather than the taskbar.

      --
      I love my sig.
    76. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by squiggleslash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Given most corporate entities forced their users to use IE back when IE was a security and standards nightmare, why, exactly, would they change their minds now that recent versions of IE isn't significantly worse, either with security or standards compliance, than Chrome or Firefox?

      It's not exactly 1999-2006 any more. The world has moved on.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    77. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Columcille · · Score: 1

      So either place them on the desktop (ugly and annoying, I know) or pin them to the taskbar (quick and efficient). There are plenty of options for ways to access your frequently-used programs. I mentioned the metro start page as the closest analogy to the start menu.

      --
      I love my sig.
    78. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1

      > I'll have to test this in our ESX environment, because if we can reduce the memory usage of a hundred VMs vs. Windows XP or 7, then that might make it worth jumping over 7

      One option to consider is consider making your own Tiny Windows7 (Tiny7) or Tiny Windows XP (TinyXP)

      These are the stats for Tiny7

      ISO File Size ... 699 Mb
      RAM Usage On First Installation ... 145 Mb (idle for 5 mins)
      Entire Installation Size ... 2.46 Gb
      WINDOWS Folder Size ... 2.40 Gb
      Running Processes, total ... 24
      Running Processes, Windows ... 22
      Install Time In VMware ...10 to 15 minutes*

      http://forums.mydigitallife.info/archive/index.php/t-7846.html

    79. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by operagost · · Score: 1

      You don't know anyone who changes their configuration from the Control Panel? Or uses the Help? Or looks in their Music folder? Or opens a network share? Or configures their printers? You know some dull people indeed.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    80. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Columcille · · Score: 1

      Taskbar is what I use, but the OP specifically mentioned putting apps out of view. Unless you auto-hide the taskbar, things pinned to the taskbar are still visible. The Metro start screen remains the comparable method to adding something to the Start menu.

      And calling people idiots because their UI choices aren't yours? What are you, 12?

      --
      I love my sig.
    81. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. It has a taskbar. As far as I can tell, the taskbar functions exactly the same as the taskbar in Win7 except that it doesn't mix in any metro apps you may have open (not really a big deal if you're work mode tho, imo).

    82. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the alt-F4 tip! I was also baffled by them adding so many steps to such a simple and often-performed process.

      I'll attempt to return the favour; if you press enter when arriving at the metro start screen, the top-left shortcut is activated so you can just put the desktop shortcut there and have 1 button access to it. I've got it set up that way and have been pretty happy with it.

    83. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by war4peace · · Score: 1

      I have counted my apps list in Programs and Features. Leaving obvious crap aside, I have 264 software products installed (including games). Some I use maybe twice a year, some I use twice a month, and some are open pretty much all the time. Sure, maybe if you have 30 applications installed, then you could tile them all up or whatever. But I do open and close applications all the time. Paint, for example. I use it to quickly open, crop and save screenshots as much as 30 times a day. No, I don't have it pinned to my taskbar, instead I press start button on keyboard and click it there. Also, my 25+ games that I play regularly are all piled up in a nice toolbar attached to the taskbar.
      Anyway, if I spend my whole time in a Windows 8 view that's similar to my Windows 7 default interface, why upgrade at all?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    84. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by war4peace · · Score: 1

      So it's not readily available. Of course there are 3rd party applications that do pretty much everything you are looking for, but I find it worrisome that Windows 8 has apps that make it look like WIndows 7. Usually, there was the other way around, as in apps which made your XP look like 7.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    85. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by war4peace · · Score: 1

      My work mode includes the need to have Skype open, for example. If it's not visible at all times, then I have a problem.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    86. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by war4peace · · Score: 1

      No but wait a minute... why upgrade to Windows 8, then?

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    87. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry but the scenario you outlined doesn't make sense.
      "With the metro page, you are jumping back and forth from entirely different screens and then scrolling looking for the proper square on the metro tab." -- How is this any different from opening the start menu on windows 7 and having to scan through the application folders to find the app you want. Did you know that you can simply type the name of the app? (this works in win7 as well). Entirely different screens? They're both basically overlays. It just happens to be that the new one is opaque. I don't think I've ever *needed* to be able to see the desktop while using the start menu.

      "without losing site of the word document that might actually contain the credentials I need to enter into the other program." -- If they are both desktop apps, opening the 2nd app will bring you back into desktop mode where both apps will be visible. Honestly, how many times do you go through this process?
      1) open some app
      2) press windows key
      3) look at app opened in 1) while start menu is visible in order to obtain information needed for step 4)
      4) open some program, search for something, I don't even know...

    88. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't the Surface Pros have to be released before you can buy "more" or them?

    89. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by SeaFox · · Score: 1

      Prior to the release of Win8, I was highly, highly critical. Thought it was the dumbest thing MS had ever done. As someone who went through the pain of WinME, that's saying a lot. But I've gotten used to it. Still spend almost all my time in the desktop, but I've grown to like the metro apps for things like easy access for my kids. I still think MS made a mistake by not at least making a full-desktop-mode option, but I can live with Metro and find it beneficial in some ways. I certainly haven'y been hampered by it at all.

      Oops. Ignore that paragraph. It's not my words, and I didn't mean to quote it.

    90. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

      That basically only proves that you do not know that many companies.

      Most companies are slow to adopt new OS versions, as there is quite a process to verify that all things that must work, will work.
      For the company I work for, we are in a test phase. It is unlikely that we will deploy W8 in a big way in the short term (still getting rid of XP), but there will be a deployment. W8 on tablets will probably also be deployed.

    91. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Not true, otherwise why would http://classicshell.sourceforge.net/ exist. Even windows 7 is pretty crappy, so classic shell turning Windows desperate phone user interface schemes into a usable desktop and notebook computer interface. Classic shell fixing Uncle Festers GUI delusions for nearly a decade.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    92. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by batkiwi · · Score: 1

      Did they ever fix the lack of command line for windows 8 servers?

      You gave yourself away there as a troll, and not a serious poster. Hopefully the moderators will catch on soon.

      Windows Server 2012 (there's no such thing as "windows 8 servers") ships by default with powershell. ALL configuration tasks are doable via the command line and embeddable into scripts, and MANY tasks are doable ONLY via powershell still (especially when it comes to detailed Exchange configuration).

      In addition, the "core" level of windows server, which is Microsoft's recommended configuration for all new servers, doesn't even have a functioning GUI and is command line only. You can add back the GUI if you want, but for a typical datacenter server you wouldn't have a reason to, as you'd be managing it remotely via powershell remoting.

    93. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know anyone who used the start menu for anything but search and shut down.

      Hello, pleased to meet you, you're an idiot. I'll see everyone else's top ten (or fifteen, or twenty) programs, and raise them the top ten (or thirty) files, such as reference tables, time sheets, checklists, and so on. All accessible without lifting your fingers from the keyboard. It's called ergonomics. You should try it sometime. You can actually do it on Windows, in spite of Microsoft's best efforts.

    94. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a great deal of standardization on .DOC rather then .docx

      Bwhahahahahahahhhahh aaahahhahaahaahhhhhaaaaaaaaaaaaha aaaaaaaaahahaahhaharrghe. Thanks for a great laugh!

    95. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by rtfa-troll · · Score: 2
      The thing is it's fucking funny when the shills can say:

      Once Microsoft drops support for Windows 7, you will be upgrading. Trust me. Or get left behind by the business community

      Basically a straight out threat to their own customers. Or in other words;

      Just be clear: you are renting. That's not your IT infrastructure it's ours. Next renewal comes around and everything you saved is coming straight back out.

      If I was a CIO I'd be willing to pay almost any price to get rid of a supplier with an attitude like that. No wonder Google Apps migrations are taking off.

      --
      =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
    96. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Who doesn't use start menu? Seriously. If someone can get away with just stickied applications and desktop icons, then I suspect they either have a limited range of activities, or they're wasting time when they do need to use an application or service that's not on a shortcut. Then again, I do see some people with a hundred icons or more on the desktop...

      The real problem in my view is not whether start menu is strictly needed, but that Microsoft has decided to be patronizing and tell us flat out that we don't need it. The customer is being treated badly. We need more options not fewer.

    97. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      They gain karma from Microsoft, so that when they die they get to go to the great help desk in the sky.

    98. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not rolling it out yet becasue my software vendors are not ready for it except for one. When more of the programs we need work on the OS it will be used. For now I'm good with an all win7 network with a little Linux througn in.

    99. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      So this elderly gentleman goes to a tailor to pick up a new suit from a famous tailor. It doesn't fit very well, the sleeves are too long. The tailor tells him to just hunch is shoulders and lean forward. The gentleman does so and the sleeves fit better, but he complains that the legs are too long. The tailor tells him to crouch down slightly. He does so and the legs pull up and are the right length. So he pays the tailor and leaves the shop. In the way home these two old ladies see this gentleman shuffling down the street in a half crouch with his shoulders hunched over. One lady says "look at that poor old man, he must have a really awful case of arthritis." The other lady says "yes, that's true, but look at the wonderful looking suit he has!"

      That's what microsoft is doing here.

    100. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      Most people are of the opinion that it is an unmitigated disaster. Businesses don't like it, consumers find it confusing, it's ugly, and there are banner ads lurking in the built-in programs.

      I don't know of a single business that actually has any plans to adopt Windows 8, and I am in contact with many. Most have plans to stay with Windows 7 until it is phased out, by which time I imagine that most will be in a BYOD type arrangement.

    101. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by armanox · · Score: 1

      You forgot Lenovo, which is still offering 7 on all the systems that we're looking at buying.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    102. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know I won't be upgrading any of our 2,000+ workstations to Windows 8. I demo'd Windows 8 to the rest of the leadership team at my company, and the basic message that I came away with was, "WTF is this? Where is the start menu? How will we train all of our users?" Windows 8 is a non-starter for us.

    103. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Getting used to dealing with it".

      Wait isn't that the Apple way?

    104. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow that info is outdated.

      IE 10 != IE 6 by a longshot! It is the most caught up version of IE yet that supports HTML 5, CSS 3, and has great hardware acceleration and loads up sites as fast if not faster than Chrome. It is the only browser that is double sandboxed against hep spray attacks, as well as ASLR, and DEP.

      I am not an IE fan nor am I even using it right now (Chrome), but for using shitty ancient web apps optimized for IE 7 and IE 8 is it the only option. Also only IE is enterprise grade with .MSI and group policies and AD integration so you can manage 9,000 easily with different settings for different OUs and groups such as one for faculty, another for students etc.

      If you have a problem with this go harass Mozilla for not making Firefox enterprise friendly. Until that time comes we are staying IE only. With the later releases following standards and behaving like Chrome and Firefox it is not a big of an issue as it once was.

    105. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Eirenarch · · Score: 1

      If you do use the start menu in this way Windows 8 will surely suck for you (you may try one of the replacement software solutions). For me (and everybody I know) there is no reason to complain about Windows 8.

    106. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I'm talking everything from tablets, phones, laptops, PC's, or servers.

      What the crap are you going on about? Why would anyone install a client OS on a server or a phone? HOW would they get it on a phone?

      > Did they ever fix the lack of command line for windows 8 servers?

      I'm going to assume you mean Server 2012 here, I've never heard of it not having a command line. You can even do a core installation, which is ONLY a command line. Also there's PowerShell, which is more command line than anyone could ask for...

    107. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, but probably not to Windows 8. I'd sooner deploy Microsoft Bob.

      The subjects real name just might be Bob. There was some drive corruption and parts of a couple of articles got merged. The main article was actually about a prison inmate that was in a corner cell having both a side and a back window. Guys that never thought they would, did get used to time with him and affectionately gave him the nickname Windows 8.

    108. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can we send him to the front lines where he might confuse and distract the enemy, too?

      You mean the customers? Win 8 is already doing that, no matter what MS pretends.

    109. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      I have never seen anyone use the search bar from the start menu unless following directions from the helpdesk

      Really? I use it all the time. If I want to open an application or control panel applet that isn't in my N most recently used apps, I'll start typing its name. Much quicker than browsing the All Programs menu.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    110. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then they don't count or need nothing more than notepad.

    111. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Open the properties of the Paint shortcut and assign a hotkey so you can use Win+N (random example) to open it without ever clicking.

      Most of my regularly opened programs have keyboard hotkeys associated with them. Favourite Windows feature since Win9x.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    112. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A big fat cheque from Microsoft, no doubt.

    113. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      I bet people get used to prison rape too.

      Doesn't make it good.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    114. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever used Linux or OSX... they are nothing but "getting used to"!

    115. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "New shiny touchy colory" is not a legitimate business reason.

      You have obviously never dealt directly with a CEO.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    116. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by JMJimmy · · Score: 1

      And I wonder how they can determine this from the new Win8 laptop that has sat unused under my coffee table for the past couple weeks. I'd be using it but I've been having trouble with the Win7 setup crashing.

    117. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

      Or a simple right click -> open with would work as well.

      Most of my games are run through Steam, so I don't have to search for them.

      It seems like a lot of people feel they *need* to upgrade. If you're accomplishing everything you want to do under Win7, stay there. Nobody is telling you to upgrade.

      I did one PC from 7 to 8 because I got it cheap and I like to play with new stuff. It's the same reason I jump Linux distros. That being said, I like 8. I haven't felt the need to install a start menu replacement. I purposely skipped reading about or watching any videos of peoples opinions of 8 before I got it. I've gone back and read what people have complained about and very little holds true for me.

      Again, if you're on 7 and it's working fine for you, don't feel like you need to buy 8. If you're on XP and feel like it, 8 is a fine upgrade path when support ends.

    118. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Market research for dozens of well known brands? Yeah because Office 2007 is completely incapable of running on anything other than Windows 8...

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    119. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      I just took a MOS Excel 2010 exam today, and after working extensively with Excel for years and having studied it thoroughly for certification testing, I still cannot remember where everything is on the ribbon. I had gotten to the point where I didn't think about it because I only use certain functionality every day, but if you need to branch out from common tasks you have to hunt around--very frustrating. There simply isn't enough abstract terminology to organize everything that goes on the ribbon. I want the old menus back, in fact, it would be better to just learn keyboard shortcuts and avoid the GUI (which is *mostly* possible--still no keyboard shortcut to get to the name box, WTH).

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    120. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by KernelMuncher · · Score: 1

      I asked our IT Director and he said we won't even consider testing Windows 8 for a least a year (and after the first service pack comes out). Then it will be another year minimum until we start to phase it in across the company (a big financial services firm).

    121. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by RedCard · · Score: 1

      I've dealt with a few, and I will grant that for some 'shiny' is probably enough.... but... I think that in most cases it will depend on whether the CEO is willing to dedicate time to learning Win8 or not. It does take time to learn, and until you learn, you look stupid.

      CEOs don't like to look stupid.

      Unless they have come to Win8 on their own, it is very unlikely that a CEOs underlings will persuade them to change.

    122. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      You can always right click on the start screen and select "All Programs" and you can launch just about anything. Alternatively, just start typing a few characters of it's name and it'll pop up. Works great.

      As for why you would upgrade for something that looks the same, I would say upgrading your OS so it looks pretty/better is a poor reason to upgrade. You can get skins for most of that on any OS. Heck you could probably write a skin for Windows 3.1 to look like Windows 7/8 if you wanted. The reason you upgrade is for better hardware support, better performance, better security, more productivity. All of which Windows 8 has over Windows 7. Not that Windows 7 was bad, because it wasn't. It was great. Windows 8 just builds on top of it and adds some really nice things.

    123. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Great advertisement, but I'm not sure how that is relevant to the conversation.

      I could easily say, but it's totally true, other why would http://www.metro7app.com/ exist?

    124. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they'll quite happily take the .doc file. Anything that they might send back is going to be in .docx. And if the 'anything that they might send back' happens to entail documents generated and emailed by a script, the time and effort involved to have a human being get the output of the process prior to emailing, convert it to a .doc file and send it by hand may very well end up being non-trivial if a significant number of documents/clients are involved.

      Certainly much easier to just say 'get .docx or die trying'.

    125. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      There is a difference between "sticking with windows XP" and still having windows XP machines. Obviously the difference is that the former means that there are no plans to upgrade them, while the later may or may not mean that they will be upgraded at some point.

      The company I work for isn't an American Company, so it isn't a fortune X, however, by revenue, it would be in the top 150ish, and 354 out of the fortune 500 are clients of ours. Not that my position there would allow me to tell you the plans of any of them, or really have any direct interaction with them, I just thought I would toss that out there since we're tossing around useless facts.

    126. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Ack, I just double checked. We'd be around 40th position in the Fortune 100 if we were listed.

    127. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Nyder · · Score: 1

      You are probably not aware that Windows 8 supports the full range of Windows 7 desktop features and allows you to run as many programs as you wish and configure their windows as you see fit. The only thing missing is the start menu and I don't know anyone who used the start menu for anything but search and shut down. The fact that desktop users (or even all users) may not like Metro apps does not matter at all since you don't need to use them.

      Don't care. I do not need to upgrade to Windows 8, just like everyone else out there. Windows 7 works great, Windows 8 is NOT needed.

      And I have a better idea, why doesn't MS work to make sure their OS is the best ever, instead of making new versions to confuse the public with? Mainly so quick after the release of the last OS.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    128. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Nyder · · Score: 0

      "Personally I keep a list of the top 10 applications I launch (Chrome, Visual Studio, a screen capture utility, etc) right at the very top level of the "Start" menu so I can get to them quickly"

      So put them on the metro page. Functions in a similar way: press the windows key and you'll see all your pinned apps for quick and easy access as well as be able to just type the name of any given app you may want.

      Prior to the release of Win8, I was highly, highly critical. Thought it was the dumbest thing MS had ever done. As someone who went through the pain of WinME, that's saying a lot. But I've gotten used to it. Still spend almost all my time in the desktop, but I've grown to like the metro apps for things like easy access for my kids. I still think MS made a mistake by not at least making a full-desktop-mode option, but I can live with Metro and find it beneficial in some ways. I certainly haven'y been hampered by it at all.

      Well, aren't you special? You are happy because the Metro UI makes your computer easier for your kids to use. And you are okay with it because you are used to it now. Seriously? Your post makes me think that the UI is really dumbed down, which is cool, because it fits your IQ better.

      --
      Be seeing you...
    129. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by war4peace · · Score: 1

      The reason you upgrade is for better hardware support, better performance, better security, more productivity.

      Better hardware support makes sense if you buy a new computer which Windows 7 no longer supports. Maybe 5 years from now it will make sense.
      Better performance? Time shall tell. Right now, I am doubtful about that. Oh yes, "it starts faster". With my uptime measuring in months, hardly an advantage. Also, all freshly installed Windows OS start "faster".
      Better security? Microsoft products have historically had worse security right off the box, maybe it will get better after SP1.
      More productivity? Please... that's something most people complain about when they try out Windows 8.

      --
      ...gis sdrawkcab (usually not responding to ACs; don't bother posting as AC)
    130. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I administer a large network with machines running Windows 7 with both IE 9 and Chrome. IE is significantly more complex to properly administer via GPO, much slower than Chrome and also still seems to struggle with some basic CSS layout issues. So much so that we all agreed to make Chrome the default browser. Nobody has complained and those who have provided feedback are very positive.

      Every time we upgraded IE I waited eagerly to see what issues would be fixed and was quickly disappointed. So yes, IE still sucks unfortunately.

    131. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also only IE is enterprise grade with .MSI and group policies and AD integration so you can manage 9,000 easily with different settings for different OUs and groups such as one for faculty, another for students etc.

      I thought the same until I gave Chrome Enterprise a try. In fact it's miles easier to deploy and manage via GPO than IE itself is. I've never looked back.

    132. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by efitton · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure I'll miss it. Left KDE when they dropped Kaskbar. Use Win 7 Taskbar extensively. Find Macs Doc a sad replacement. And I almost never look at the desktop. Plus, I frequently switch windows / tasks.

    133. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Hardware comes in all types, like printers, docking stations, multimedia keyboard, mice, touch mice, touch screens, external storage, scanners, web cams, video/sound cards. Not everyone buys everything with the computer, and many don't know how to go looking for updated drivers for what they do have that makes it work better/more stable.

      Performance wise? Yes, it boots faster, takes less memory, uses the remaining memory more efficiently for caching. It's pretty easy to check yourself if you don't want to you know, read stuff on the web. Clean install both and see.

      Better security? Compared to Windows XP? Are you kidding? They've even added a few more tricks on top of even Windows 7 security as well, like SmartScreen.

      Granted, most of the productivity features are actually hold outs from Windows 7 like snap, etc. But there are other things that make it easier to see what is going on with your system, like the redesigned task manager and resource manager that let you pinpoint problem areas, get rid of useless start up items, etc. For people who have laptops that have them sleep and resume, a faster "boot" is productivity gains. It may not apply to you, but it does for many others.

      Lastly, my comment was about upgrading your OS in general, while you seem to want to nit pick on false or misleading hyperbole regarding Windows 8 specifically. I get it, you hate everything.

    134. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Nothing keeping you from switching windows/tasks. I currently have 8 windows open, and I can switch between them, tile them, arrange them all just like I have been since Windows 3.1.

      The garbage about not being able to have multiple windows on the screen only applies to Metro Applications. I don't use any Metro applications except for a few freebie games, which I suspect is what most people do or will do for a long time. Any application that you can/do run in Windows 7 will act just the same in Windows 8. It's not a replacement. It's not like all of a sudden your Windows 7 apps when you upgrade with Windows 8 you can no longer tile/overlap/switch. You can do absolutely all of it in Windows 8. Some of those you can't do in Metro applications, however, sticking with Windows 7 because you don't like that is silly, because you can't run them AT ALL in Windows 7.

    135. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no start menu. There is the metro page, but that is hardly the same thing. A start menu would mean that I could have a word document open on my screen and hit the start menu to open another app, without losing site of the word document that might actually contain the credentials I need to enter into the other program. With the metro page, you are jumping back and forth from entirely different screens and then scrolling looking for the proper square on the metro tab.

      Maybe that is more efficient on the Minority Report, but it in reality it seems much less efficient than click-click.

      Microsoft had better worry you might defect to Mac where Launchpad ... also hides all the active apps ... no, wait to iOS because it's app launcher also does it ... erm, alright you'll defect to Android then because it dammit, it does that too.

    136. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by efitton · · Score: 1

      What would be silly would be to pay to "upgrade" to an operating system that has a serious learning curve. I have neither the money, the inclination or the time to learn a new OS. That goes for Mac, Gnome, KDE and Windows 8 at this point. At some point I'll be compelled to switch. But the, "after three weeks I really liked it" and "you can actually accomplish many of the same things" are hardly compelling reasons.

      Now put yourself in the shoes of a CTO and CFO. Do you want to pay for a rollout where you know your productivity will significantly drop for two plus weeks? And at the end of a month your employees might be 3 to 5 minutes more effective per day. But this is the optimal scenario of Win 8, KDE and Gnome. Not a personal or business case I find compelling. Actually I feel pretty compelled to stick w/ XP and Win 7 because I can get my work done. Maybe I'll look at Trinity again. Bah, get off my lawn.

    137. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      ROFL. Lowered productivity for 2 weeks? Please, just try it, or at least see it. Watching comments from people who haven't even seen the damn thing is so damn funny.

      If you know Windows 7, and after 5 minutes you aren't fully productive on Windows 8, there is something wrong.

      On the other hand, I'm trying to make a case to my boss about letting me drive my own car to out of state clients, because I can't possibly just jump in a rental car, because who knows what is different. The car might be BLUE, and I've never driven a BLUE car. Especially if the headlight switch on on the left instead of it being a knob.

      I have now made the appropriate automotive analogy. Do you understand? And... get of MY lawn.

    138. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by efitton · · Score: 1

      I have watched multiple people do the transition on mac and 2 weeks is a conservative estimate. There are plenty of anecdotes about Win 8 being a multiple day transition. Three weeks is the often quoted Gnome transition.

      Seriously, awful car analogy aside, why the hell would I try Windows 8?

      Better car analogy: http://www.nytimes.com/2002/05/12/automobiles/menus-behaving-badly.html

    139. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Because, the problems people talk about in Windows 8 are about as important to being able to drive the car as is the color of it, or where the headlight switch/knob is.

      Your desktop is the EXACT same. The applications are the EXACT same. In fact, if you typically pin your applications to the taskbar, or have your links on your desktop, most uneducated computer users probably couldn't tell the difference between Windows 7 and Windows 8 if you showed them one then showed them the other the next day unless you made a point about it being different.

      The differences that people complain about are so trivial, that my ex-wife, who is absolutely terrible at computers picked it up and had no problems after my son taught her everything she needed to know in 30 seconds. Yes, 30 seconds later, she was fully productive doing all her normal stuff on Windows 8. Yes, the internet talk is all about...that. It is beyond silly.

    140. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by efitton · · Score: 1

      So why switch? If there is no difference why not save the money and keep running Win 7 Pro? You are advocating like a paid shill to switch to Win 8 but have yet to give an actual advantage to using it.

      You didn't read the article about the iCrash did you? Where knobs are do matter. The iDrive in 2004 was so bad they had to have a class for new drivers and Consumer Reports refused to recommend BMWs until the problems with the interface were mitigated. Obviously this was an extreme example. However, the interface for computers is much more complicated than the steering wheel. Which you should notice they aren't mucking about with looking for some better paradigm.

    141. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by efitton · · Score: 1

      You say 30 seconds; Microsoft says two weeks. http://www.gottabemobile.com/2012/12/17/microsoft-2-week-learning-curve-for-windows-8/. Why should I believe you over Microsoft? Or maybe I should look at the Times? http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/25/technology/personaltech/microsofts-windows-revamped-and-split-in-2.html?_r=0 Anyhow, I think I'll just stick to Win 7 rather than trusting your personal anecdote and bad analogies.

    142. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by KingMotley · · Score: 0

      Advocating like a paid shill? Really? Have I been making unfounded claims of greatness? No. Have I ever once said everyone should run out and buy it now? No.

      On the other hand, you've been making all kinds of claims and comparisons and yet, you haven't even seen it. I have. I'm writing this from a Windows 8 system right now. I can't speak for everyone. I can only tell you what I have personally done or seen, or tell you when someone says something that is incorrect.

      I've mentioned what is better about Windows 8 in other threads, I'm not going to repeat them here. Plenty of other articles about what Windows 8 does right. If you have questions, I'll answer them.

      As for iDrive, yes, I read it, but I find it off-topic as what you are describing has very little to do with Windows 8. It's completely different because distractions while driving is dangerous, and obviously most of the user interface there was complete and utter garbage that made you do many useless steps that didn't help. First, applications behave the same, so you won't have to go trying to figure out the new way to bold a word in some hidden menu 5 clicks down when the same application was one click in Windows 7. My analogy was better because it refered to things you do once -- before you begin you main task -- not constantly while you are doing it. Secondly, it's not something that is typically life threatening to the user or to others around them, even if it was.

    143. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by KingMotley · · Score: 0

      Because they are referring to switching from a desktop version of Windows 7 using a mouse, and going to a completely touch driven device with no mouse. Yes, if you get a brand new computer/laptop/tablet, and want to switch to a touch screen, it will take much longer as you learn how to point at the screen, and the new gestures and how to close applications, etc with no keyboard. That is a far cry from taking a Windows 7 machine with a keyboard and mouse and upgrading it to Windows 8 and continuing to use the keyboard and mouse.

      As for the new york times article, re-read the section that starts with "Desktop Windows". Seems they say pretty much exactly what I did. It's the same as Windows 7 with a few minor tweaks and enhancements. The rest of the article is about touch interfaces, the metro apps, and they don't like it. You don't have to use it. You don't have to buy a touch screen. I don't use it, and I don't have a touch screen, nor do I see things heading that way. It's an additional feature that you may or may not like. Just as many people have said before, touch screens (and metro apps) can be nice, but they fail when used as the only interface for people CREATING stuff. It's fine for consumers to consume, but it's a PITA for those that create stuff (documents, spreadsheets, programs, etc). Most people on slashdot are the creator types. Most people however are the consumer types. Many are a mix of both.

      You seem to be unwilling and unable to actually even look at Windows 8 at all. I'm certainly not going to change your mind, and honestly, I don't really care to. However, blindly dismissing something out of ignorance is for fools.

    144. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      The metro page is ugly. It has all those irregularly shaped rectangles, with a bunch of shitty unneeded programs we don't want, and some of these rectangles containing animated crap.

      I want my still desktop. With a nice background picture. A few icons for the programs I use on the desktop, a small clock down the bottom right. That's what I need. I don't need "zany".

    145. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      You don't see how displaying a list over a full screen is less efficient that displaying it as a... list?

    146. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by tbird81 · · Score: 1

      They're a university. They have to spend vast amounts of money upgrading computers every year. If they don't, they won't get as much money in next year's budget. Plus the university gets money from the taxpayer, you have to spend it on something.

    147. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by JoshRosenbaum · · Score: 2

      You don't see how displaying a list over a full screen is less efficient that displaying it as a... list?

      Your response would be taken much better if it wasn't in the form of a condescending question that contributes nothing to the discussion. How about some logic or real world examples why you think I'm wrong? (Something that doesn't involve 0.001% of users.)

      As far as user efficiency goes, 99.9% of users take the exact same steps that take all of about 1-3 seconds. They don't lose any efficiency, because the workflow to complete the action is the same for both.

      If your question is about actual software/hardware efficiency of displaying a list on desktop vs fullscreen, then that's an entire different ballgame and I won't argue against that. (Lame argument, though, considering how powerful hardware is these days.) I, also, was not arguing on whether the metro start is better than Win7 start. Win7 start is better to me. Being popped to a fullscreen start is an annoyance, but does not hinder normal user efficiency of accessing top programs.

    148. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      I imagine the people who bought into Windows ME got pretty used to working around its egocentricity, too. Yes, I meant egocentricity.

      Like with WinME, I suspect the statistics are somewhat skewed to show people 'adapting'. It's either that or die, right? And when you're the only three people left in the world who haven't put Windows 7 on the device, you kind of have a reputation to uphold for being the statistical outliers who adapt to what they're given than adapt their world to their existence. (Here's guessing they also own Macs.)

      Joking aside, if this is all truthful and on the level, and isn't just a symptom of people backgrading to W7 or some such thing, this will mark yet another "modern operating system" I've been able to completely avoid. I haven't touched OS X for the better part of 5 years now; I have never touched an iPhone except briefly, and I'm a complete incompetent while using one (they're not all that intuitive, apparently). Maybe I'm doomed to be irrelevant in a couple years, but I somehow doubt it - I've familiarized with three new operating systems (to me) in the past year and demand for my skills is in no short supply.

      When vendors continually marginalize the the talents of the people who work on their products instead of reinforcing them, they alienate themselves first and foremost. IBM knows this, and most of its products, as a result, never lose functionality (only gaining it, despite the frequent need for that functionality to be eliminated). The result is a bit of a mess, but it creates a mess which people can spend an entire career maintaining and fixing - not just the 'best and the brightest' or whatever, but normal people as well.

      You'd think that Microsoft would've learned that, given that they've been the "starter OS" for technical people in recent years. While I understand MS wants to eliminate the need for technical people outright, it's not likely to ever* happen. It's just going to alienate MS.

      * At least soon.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    149. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have been using Win8 exclusively for 6 mos and would be interested to see your results. I have gotten past some of the radical features, but the Jekyll and Hyde continues drive me nuts on the desktop. I had my first chance to play with it in a tablet this weekend, it almost perfect sense on the tablet. While the start screen indeed is more functional and admittedly an improvement of the start menu, I wish my Metro experience stopped there on the desktop. Just give me a way to stay in desktop and then it is a big improvement over Window 7, big time.

      Metro does not make much sense on desktop other than games. The Metro Email / IE experience on a desktop is an example of the suckage. Click a link in an email and you go to Metro IE. Close Metro IE and you are not taken back to email, but rather you end up on the start screen left fumbling to get back to email. Try it for for more than 2 emails and see what a fail this is.

      Some of this operating system is a step backward, but the tablet experience works well, wish I could say the same for the desktop.

    150. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have not tried IE 10, it stacks up against latest releases of other browsers.

    151. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until last year I always downgraded my resumes to .doc for these reasons. Today I use docx. If it can not be read or has formatting issues then you are a company that is not important.

      Perhaps you should reconsider that policy, now that you are entering another year of joblessness.

    152. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Of course the start menu isn't live, has limited area to pin applications, is forced to being in a single list rather than multiple categorized lists/groups, and eats up task bar space that could be used for better things.

      Ok, so the start menu is very bad. Got it. People have paid billions of dollars to its creator. Now they should pay MORE money to get rid of it?

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    153. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only people who use the start menu are casual computer users. I never touch the start menu because I have Rainmeter and Blaze to handle everything. If you knew your way around a PC, you'd be using something similar.

    154. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because anything that takes any amount of learning must suck. Fuck having to pass tests and get a license to drive, you should be able to hop into a car and go without any prior learning. The same for guns and neurosurgery.

    155. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in one of the worlds largest five banks by market cap...

      And I am working right now (initial stages) on rolling out an operating environment based upon Windows 8.

      You wont hear about large corps having migrated for a while yet as rolling out a big change like this is a 6 > 12 month job on this scale.

      Don't let the media coverage fool you, more than half of enterprise customers are still on XP, they have absolutely no option but to upgrade/migrate over the next 12 months. Extremely conservative companies will go to 7, the rest to 8. You may find some edge cases where they do a Linux or Mac deployment, but the statistical significance of this group is insignificant.

    156. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      No, pinned programs clutter the field of vision all the time. First level start menu items clutter the field of vision only when start button is clicked.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    157. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait... That username... I'm sure I've seen it before...

    158. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Exactly this.

      Just because Microsoft wanted to try and be as cool as Apple, they come up with this hunk of junk and then try to use their position in the marketplace to ram it down everyone's throats. "Look at the colours, man! And wow - everything is so big. We're way cooler than Apple."

      Windows 8 - a turd, any way you try to polish it.

    159. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      I was greatly hampered by it.

      I use a multi-monitor setup, using multiple graphics cards, with multiple windows open at a time, as well as a VM or two, or three, or four.

      This is impossible to do under Windows 8. The OS simply refuses this configuration. This was on Win8 "Pro".

      I won't even get into the hot mess that was that stupid "Metro/Modern" UI shoving it's unwanted face in at the most inopportune moments.

      I can even live without the Start button, but it's not worth the trade-off when I have two user interface paradigms fighting each other tooth and nail for attention, when all I want to do is open a new application in a new window and place it on monitor three.

      I WILL grant Win8 this: It is faster and consumes fewer resources for the OS than Win7.

      This being said, I still reverted to Win7, and will take another look at upgrading when Windows 10 or 11 rolls around.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
    160. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Geeky · · Score: 1

      Because, the problems people talk about in Windows 8 are about as important to being able to drive the car as is the color of it, or where the headlight switch/knob is.

      More like the indicators being in a different place - something you use far more often. I keep launching Internet Explorer by mistake because I go to hit the start menu and it isn't there - the first icon on the taskbar is there instead.

      I've actually gone back to shortcuts to applications on the desktop to launch applications rather than drop out to the new start screen or clutter up the taskbar with pinned applications.

      I'm also not keen on the new Metro versions of apps - take Skype for example. I want it in a window, so I can see the person I'm talking to in the top corner of the screen while looking at the document/website we're both talking about in another window. I can do that for now using the old Windows version, but for how much longer?

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    161. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Geeky · · Score: 1

      You're both idiots. Pin them to the Taskbar.

      You use them in the Desktop space so having to go to Metro to launch them is dumb.

      I hate pinning applications to the taskbar. I want the taskbar to show me what programs are running, not what ones are available to run, and if I mix and match it's not obvious what's open and what isn't.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    162. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      Okay, first of all: bulshit, they don't. If they're running Android they do and there have been malicious iOS apps too. Secondly, nobody here who isn't marked as an administrator on their computer catches a virus either. What a coincidence.

    163. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have, they may ask IT to help with the toys (e.g. sync car to iPhone) in their personal life but they don't want to spend for infrastructure unless forced or there is political coin to be made -- iggymanz

    164. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about my post makes you think I haven't tried IE10, or that I wouldn't think it would stack up with other browsers?

    165. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Sepodati · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure I'd have to get used to dealing with OSX if I switched to that for some reason, too. I had to get used to Linux when I switched to that on some of my computers. My wife, kids and I have no problems using Win 8. It's different, yes, so it takes a little learning. Just like anything new.

    166. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pain of Windows ME? I remember not having much trouble with it at all.

    167. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I don't get is why they don't have an "All" category and why it is not default. When I search for things I go from general to more specific, no the reverse.

      Just be glad it's not an Apple product. There would have been no options and you would have been told your search methodology is wrong.

    168. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Since pinned programs on taskbar do not take any extra space (that wouldn't otherwise be taken up by the taskbar), how can they clutter anything?

      (and, of course, you can always make the taskbar itself auto-hide)

    169. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by SJester · · Score: 1

      Second this. I went through the same process, being forced to use a damn finger-painting interface on my big dual screens and suffering Metro telling me how my apps should look. It's like being held hostage by a hostile interior decorator. I grabbed Start8 and can honestly say that it saved my laptop.

    170. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      First, your question "Isn't that precisely what the "pin this program" feature on the taskbar is for in Win7?" has only one answer, and that is NO. Because by any interpretation, it is not precisely that.

      Secondly, the pinned programs take space on the taskbar. If there were no pinned programs, or less pinned programs, the icon representing each application would be larger and hence potentially more helpful. After a certain threshold number of applications, the taskbar representation of applications become so tiny as to be meaningless. I guess such threshold is 25 applications in a single line taskbar of 1080 width screen, which is why I have always used 2 or 3 line taskbars as 35 running programs is not a high number for me. And I hate grouping, as it increases number of clicks to reach a particular window. This unfortunately takes precious vertical space, which I resent given the trend in monitor resolutions.

      So with lots of pinned but not running programs, takes precious taskbar space which eventually translates to more wasted vertical space. Hence even with your this post's clarification, the answer to the original question is still NO, and not even imprecisely that.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    171. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Once Microsoft drops support for Windows 7, you will be upgrading. Trust me. Or get left behind by the business community.

      Yes, just like the business community all adopted Windows Vista so quickly and everyone had to move to that or get left behind.

    172. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      If there were no pinned programs, or less pinned programs, the icon representing each application would be larger and hence potentially more helpful. After a certain threshold number of applications, the taskbar representation of applications become so tiny as to be meaningless.

      At this point I have to ask: did you even see the Win7 taskbar? Because it doesn't make app icons smaller when you overflow it...

    173. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Yes, I've seen it. Though the habit is persisting from windows 2k days, and my windows use is in spurts. Does it download a 50 inch screen for you to fit 50 icons 1 inch long each on your small 25 inch wide screen?

      With windows 7, there is another issue of it randomly reordering the alt-tab window list so that the user cannot concentrate on his work but has to actually think about "window management". In the 21st century.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    174. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      Ok, so I searched for it( http://www.windows7taskforce.com/view/208) . And wow is it stupid! You get to dig for your window in the underground taskbar. And guess what, we helpfully randomized your alt-tab list so your misguided attempts to keep thinking about your actual work do not succeed. You are made to suffer every moment of your windows using time.

      Please tell me my quick Google search fed me false information as Google detected I'm no good.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    175. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Does it download a 50 inch screen for you to fit 50 icons 1 inch long each on your small 25 inch wide screen?

      No, it just creates "pages" of icons if they don't fit the length of the bar. You can make them smaller manually to fit more, of course.

      Regardless of that, pinned apps don't really cause overflow, because you pin those apps which are heavily used - i.e. the kind of stuff that's normally "always open" in any case. Since the icon for the app is reused for its window when it's running, you only waste space on those apps which are pinned but not running.

      With windows 7, there is another issue of it randomly reordering the alt-tab window list so that the user cannot concentrate on his work but has to actually think about "window management". In the 21st century.

      It's not randomly reordering - it's in most recently used order, so that a single Alt+Tab always takes you back to the task that you've just Alt+Tab'bed from - which is perfect for the most common case of rapidly switching between two windows. Also, it's not a Win7 change - it was there since XP, at least.

      In Win7, if you want to switch using keyboard, you are far more likely to use Win+number, anyway.

    176. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      No, it just creates "pages" of icons if they don't fit the length of the bar.

      Yep, dig for your window in the underground taskbar. Keep clicking. What, you need to do work? Why are you using windows then? Got it.

      Regardless of that, pinned apps don't really cause overflow, because you pin those apps which are heavily used - i.e. the kind of stuff that's normally "always open" in any case.

      ok, so you have conveniently forgotten that I explicitly mentioned that only pinned but not running applications cause the clutter? And that the same problem is not there for first level entries in the start menu. So the answer to your question is NO because pinning has this problem of cluttering and first level start menu entries don't. Do I have to repeat myself a million times to make you understand this?

      It's not randomly reordering - it's in most recently used order,

      No, you are wrong again, shill. http://lmgtfy.com/?q=windows+7+alt+tab+order+

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    177. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by vandamme · · Score: 1

      "win9, or win8.5 will be out next year. .."

      Suckers! So will Mint 15.

    178. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting used to windows 8? Hell, I've been getting used to bleeding hemorrhoids for a couple years now. Doesn't mean I like them, just the way things are.
        Now there's a slogan for you. Windows 8, as much fun as hemorrhoids!

    179. Re:Seeing how most companies won't migrate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "New shiny touchy colory" is not a legitimate business reason.

      You have obviously never dealt directly with a CEO.

      very good response. but not all CEOs are fools. only the ones that don't pay the bills. ie. owned by the public.

  2. Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    most techs-savvy users, or people who know what they're doing just click 'no' to any such data collection prompts so the sample is going to be severely skewed towards people who have ended up with this bundled and know no different.

    1. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Motard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, if the population being measured does not include the 'tech-savvy', the results suggest a pretty successful transition.

    2. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First of all, I'm not sure what bundling has to do with it. I mean, as opposed to all the Windows 8 user data they're getting from people who didn't have Windows 8 installed on their PC?

      Secondly, surely if the user data was skewed to less-competent users then a more representative sample would should an even quicker rate of acclimitisation?

      I'm sceptical of the kind of coarse-grain user data they're surely getting, and the conclusions themselves* but I genuinely can't tell what your point is here.

      *That people are able to comfortably use Windows 8 within a few weeks shouldn't be a cause for celebration, that should be the level below which everyone in the project gets fired. The cheering shouldn't start until your design changes are shown to have led to improvements that are worth the cost.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    3. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are arguing that a sample skewed to less sophisticated users makes for a bad argument on Microsoft's part. In reality, it makes their argument stronger. Regular unsophisticated users get along just fine because they aren't emotionally attached to things like user interfaces. It's only the whiny IT crowd who has a problem.

      I upgraded my laptop just to check it out and so far I like it. I don't really ever use the Win8 apps, but the start screen is handy, the search works great, and my laptop is actually more stable than it was with Win7.

      That said, in 4 months I will no longer need to run the one piece of Windows based software I am currently cursed with and some flavour of Linux will be my OS of choice.

    4. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Tech savvy" is always going to be an outlier groupo for stats tho, due to the ways tech savvy people tend to customise their workflows rather than having their workflows customised for them.

    5. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Ordinary users" == people who use nothing but a browser?

    6. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there's some geeks who worked on win8 looking to see if their UI work has added productivity/usability. I'm also pretty sure the only thing Microsoft is using as a measurement for 'worth-the-cost' is revenue. The worth of their data analysis will be whether or not they can turn the tide of bad press to get that revenue.

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    7. Re:Poor Sample Pool by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Please provide reviewed, reliable, scientific evidence of your claim.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    8. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would suspect that the tech savvy will have more trouble with the new interface simply because there is so much for us to relearn about it. I've gotten about 15 minutes of use with it so far, and I'm extremely bewildered by it. I'm actually kind of embarrassed by the new operating system, and it might be a couple of years before I'm willing to recommend it to someone who has used a computer before.

      It would actually be nice if there were some kind of tutorial that ships with the OS, or if they included some visible cue when there was some completely hidden functionality that would be incredibly useful. I went over to a user to help them with something on their new laptop, and they had to show me how to operate their computer before I could get any work done. A good user interface should be something where fumbling around like an idiot reveals 99% of its functionality in a safe manner. Mac OS X does a fantastic job of this.

      The total lack of visual cues about hidden functionality is the absolute worst aspect of the new interface, and I would likely find it less daunting to learn it if there was something that simply indicated that "hey, if you're looking for the Control Panel it's over here!" At least with Mac OS and Unity there isn't anything that's completely hidden from view unless you know about the secret part of the screen that you have to move your mouse over to make it appear. All of the basic functionality is out in plain view right from the start.

      Although Microsoft got the memo about touchability, and they're intelligent enough to gather data about things, they seem to have completely missed the point of a tutorial. Tutorials are useful because they expose functionality that is otherwise non-obvious. Nobody walks away from a tutorial with 100% or even 10% of the actual skill learned, but they probably retain enough information that they know how to ask intelligent questions when the material that they were tutored on comes up later, and that's what's comforting. I'm not surprised at all that Microsoft doesn't care about comforting their users though. I've been yelled at by Microsoft support on the phone before.

      When I started to work with Android, there was nothing about the interface that wasn't easy to intuit about it. You could see what zones of the screen were for touching, and the OS responds very quickly with feedback: it tells you when you are able to do what you think you can do. Windows 8 is very confusing for me and all of the other developers at work. We spent half a month setting up a demo system with a Windows 8 laptop, and our engineers had a lot of trouble locating simple things like the Control Panel. It wasn't nearly that difficult for us to learn Mac OS or Android or iOS.

      I'm not going to deride it as a piece of crap UI because I haven't used it very much, but I certainly find it to be the most frustrating thing I've ever encountered in my entire career. I will say that if the VP in charge of this project decided that their interface shouldn't be comforting, then she's either stupid or deluded.

    9. Re:Poor Sample Pool by theVarangian · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, if the population being measured does not include the 'tech-savvy', the results suggest a pretty successful transition.

      Let's face it, the most conservative grouches who most venomously oppose anything new in UIs and desktop environments are usually the "tech savvy" and them nerdier they are the more potent the venom. Just take one look at the angry tirades over Gnome 3.... Ok, so they changed Gnome, learn to like the new UI or fork the old one, it's not the end of the world. I'm a Mac user but I actually kind of like the new Windows UI, it's different and innovative. Microsoft deserves some credit for not taking the path of least resistance and aping somebody else's UI like Google did.

    10. Re:Poor Sample Pool by slim · · Score: 1

      "Ordinary users" == people who use nothing but a browser?

      Doubtful. I tried to sell my Dad the idea of an iPad/Nexus/whatever or a Chromebook (because I don't know enough about Windows to support him). He came up with a list of Windows apps he wants to use. Nothing that couldn't be done in a browser in theory, but stuff he's been using since Win95.

      I think that's going to be fairly typical.

    11. Re:Poor Sample Pool by somersault · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Regular unsophisticated users get along just fine because they aren't emotionally attached to things like user interfaces. It's only the whiny IT crowd who has a problem.

      Regular unsophisticated users bumble along doing things by rote memory or by really bizarre roundabout routes because they don't know the most efficient way to do things. The "whiny IT crowd" like to be able to get to the features they want without dealing with bullshit like the ribbon bar (which according to TFA the designer of said bar also designed Windows 8).

      --
      which is totally what she said
    12. Re:Poor Sample Pool by JediJorgie · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself. Where I work we have a really good relationship with Microsoft and we turn on the feedback reporting on most workstations specifically because we WANT our issues to be seen. I enable it on all my non-server systems specifically for this reason.

    13. Re:Poor Sample Pool by jythie · · Score: 1

      True, but it also means that the people who have their computers set up for them by 'tech savvy' individuals will also have it shut off... which on the consumer level will still be pretty small, but I suspect on the IT scale it means corporate users are not being tracked. I also wonder, is this option given to people who's OS is pre-installed like on new Dells?

    14. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming they would never capitulate on any design decisions. I know this won't be a popular notion, but I'm guessing people really are figuring out how to use the new ui and are puttering along pretty normally. More like, "Oh... so shit is hidden in these sidebars. Well ok." than "Oh gawd I can't do this I'm returning my computer to the store."

      We just tend to get a little crazy-worked-up over stuff. The world doesn't actually end when you take away the start button. I heard that happens on the 21st.

    15. Re:Poor Sample Pool by jythie · · Score: 1

      Oversimplified and incorrect, but it does point to something.. specifically 'ordinary users' tend to have fewer needs and use cases out of their OS... so what this indicates is that the UI is doing fine for the most common use-cases.. but designing a UI that can do a few things well is pretty simple... designing one that can handle the pre-defined cases and still be flexible enough for the unexpected is harder. That will be the test.. otherwise it is just Bob again.

    16. Re:Poor Sample Pool by WolfgangPG · · Score: 2

      How to use Windows 8 in 4 minutes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wi8NpwiEuzc

      Windows 8 Tutorial in 12 minutes: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_E1UxI5I_jo

      I share those videos with most people who purchased Windows 8. Answers the vast majority of questions for most people.

    17. Re:Poor Sample Pool by realityimpaired · · Score: 2

      learn to like the new UI or fork the old one

      Let me know how well that works for you on a Windows desktop....

    18. Re:Poor Sample Pool by realityimpaired · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Secondly, surely if the user data was skewed to less-competent users then a more representative sample would should an even quicker rate of acclimitisation?

      The headline says people are getting used to it, not that they like it.

      Case in point, my mother's got an old laptop that doesn't have a multitouch touchpad. I am able to use it, but I find myself cursing the lack of features like two-finger scrolling. If I use it for any prolonged period of time, I remember how to use edge scrolling instead... I still miss the convenience of two-finger scrolling, etc., but I adapt to what I'm given. As soon as I'm back on my own laptop again, I breathe a sigh of relief.

      As to Windows 8 users... the non-technical users are the ones who are least likely to have the option to go back to what they prefer, so they adapt to what they have. That doesn't mean they like it, it means that they don't have a choice in the matter.

    19. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ok, so they changed Gnome, learn to like the new UI or fork the old one, it's not the end of the world.

      Yeah, developers should never listen to feedback from their users. What do they know about UI design?

      And you missed option 3: switch to XFCE.

    20. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      the non-technical users are the ones who are least likely to have the option to go back to what they prefer

      Why not? The first google result for "Windows 8 start menu" or even "Windows 8 start" is a simple utility that replaces the start menu in 2 clicks. The rest of the results are instructions, videos, tutorials, and utilities to replace the start menu in the plainest, simplest language. What makes you think this is beyond the reach of most users? I can see maybe the most novice users having problems, but if there's two things most users know how to do (which has more often than not lead them to trouble) its search the web and download and install executables.

    21. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Missing.Matter · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Works out great for me. There are keyboard shortcuts for everything. I can navigate the entire UI from keyboard.

    22. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I just watched the first of those two videos.

      I have had Windows 8 for about two weeks now, and I tell people that I hate it.

      I agree with the GP here, that the problem is that it is not intuitive how to do anything.

      I purchased Windows 8 Pro Upgrade and installed it. Aside from a single post-card sized piece of paper, it comes with no documentation what-so-ever. There are a few cues on the screen the first time, and that's it. I probably learned more from watching just that one video that from playing around with Windows 8.

      My question is, "Why couldn't Microsoft provide a decent tutorial for new users?".

    23. Re:Poor Sample Pool by NatasRevol · · Score: 0

      How can you be a Mac user and like the new Windows?

      Try putting a link to your Applications folder on the Dock - one click access to every app installed there.
      Can't do that on Windows, any version.

      Same for Documents, Desktop, etc.

      The new Start/Metro interface is actually harder to get to & more complicated than the old Start menu. But more customizable. I guess that makes up for it.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    24. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Omestes · · Score: 2

      I would suspect that the tech savvy will have more trouble with the new interface simply because there is so much for us to relearn about it.

      I doubt this. I'm not as savvy as many people here, but in the course of my life I've must have learned around 100 different GUI/UI schemes. Tech savvy people learn about the conventions and metaphors of UI, the universal bits, while non-savvy people learn the specific bits (click this, for this to happen). I don't have a problem with learning new UIs anymore. Sure, there is a learning curve, and my productivity suffers for a week or two, but generally I haven't found a UI I couldn't use after a bit. This isn't saying I enjoy using some of them, but I can learn them easily since I have tons of experience with tons of different UIs.

      To a nerd, the only difference is graphics, placement, and flow, as the underlying systems are generally the same. To someone like my parents a misplaced icon makes their computer unable.

      As for Windows 8, I actually think it is a superior mobile interface to its competitors. I really like it, and I love its aesthetics. I would have picked it up when I got my last phone, but for the lack of apps and development. I also am pretty locked in to Google, and don't want to have to repurchase things to duplicate functionality. I also don't trust MS in the mobile market yet. On the desktop... Ugh. Hidden elements are bad, as you stated, as is the touch/tablet scheme. Even if I had a touch screen desktop, I would hate it, since using it would be less than comfortable. And I'm really not keen on cleaning my monitor once a day, like I do with tablets and phone. The conventions don't translate well. They should note that iOS and OS X are different looking still, even if they are merging into a single OS over time (both in underpinnings and in function). Different forms require different conventions.

      Though if there ever was a Kinect for desktops (supported, not hacked) that worked with Win 8, I'd probably give it a shot. I have an odd feeling that this is what they had in mind, but for some reason couldn't actually bring to market in time, so just steamed ahead in the typical MS style.

      The only place in my house where Win 8 is going, is to my HTPC.

      We spent half a month setting up a demo system with a Windows 8 laptop, and our engineers had a lot of trouble locating simple things like the Control Panel. It wasn't nearly that difficult for us to learn Mac OS or Android or iOS.

      This isn't hard to believe. To MS's credit, they are trying something almost completely new. They are trying to create new conventions, instead of just modifying old ones. Win 95 is pretty much Win 7, at least from a GUI perspective. Win 8 completely breaks that tradition, so it screws with our inner "this is Windows, this is how it works) schema. They would probably have an easier time if Win 8 was a completely new product, not tied to an existing line, or history.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    25. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Captain+Hook · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Those are Youtube tutorials by people unassociated Windows Development, their very existance reinforces the GP's comment about they needing to be an easier learning curve for a completely new way of interacting with a PC.

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    26. Re:Poor Sample Pool by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The fact that this is an article tells how poorly thought out some of their design decisions are.

      http://www.pcworld.com/article/2012202/how-to-shut-down-windows-8.html

      It's not difficult, but it's definitely not obvious or intuitive.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    27. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      The headline says people are getting used to it, not that they like it.

      That'd by why I said "acclimitisation".

      "adaptation to a new climate (a new temperature or altitude or environment)"

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    28. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "whiny IT crowd" like to be able to get to the features they want without dealing with bullshit like the ribbon bar

      The irony is that the "whiny actual user crowd" won out on getting the features they want. The other irony is that the "whiny IT crowd" couldn't adapt to an obviously superior UI paradigm (according to multiple IT sources with independent statistics). I still get a chuckle when I hear crotchety 'get off my lawn' old people whining :D

      I think it takes a certain breed of geek to complain about having to learn something new. I'm not even sure I would call that breed a True Scotsman geek.

    29. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      their very existance reinforces the GP's comment about they needing to be an easier learning curve for a completely new way of interacting with a PC.

      How to use iPad
      How to use Windows 7
      How to use OSX
      How to use Android
      How to use Windows XP

      By the existence of these videos, it seems like there's a lot of devices out there that need an easier learning curve.

    30. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Well, if the population being measured does not include the 'tech-savvy', the results suggest a pretty successful transition.

      Let's face it, the most conservative grouches who most venomously oppose anything new in UIs and desktop environments are usually the "tech savvy" and them nerdier they are the more potent the venom. Just take one look at the angry tirades over Gnome 3.... Ok, so they changed Gnome, learn to like the new UI or fork the old one, it's not the end of the world. I'm a Mac user but I actually kind of like the new Windows UI, it's different and innovative. Microsoft deserves some credit for not taking the path of least resistance and aping somebody else's UI like Google did.

      If you think putting a UI designed for a smart phone on a desktop is innovative and worthy of credit, then that is your opinion. However, unlike Gnome 3, where it is still possible to get work done, just differently, Metro is quite clumsy on a desktop. Picture a legal department in a large corporation or any place where the employees need to multi-task on several different projects, not just consuming data, but actually creating it. How does Windows 8 fit into that environment? It doesn't and neither would iOS.

      What makes an OS successful is that the UI is tailored for the form factor of the device and the expected use. Windows 8 has the expected use of data consumption, not creation. That means it is fine for the xbox, tablets and phones, but it doesn't work well on dekstop/laptops. It is also designed for small screen touch devices, which again implies tablets and phones (and even xbox as they uses such large character sets, they are effectively small screens). Again, this doesn't bode well for desktop/laptops.

      The desktop/laptop market is mature, there isn't going to be a lot of innovation there. All the growth right now is in the tablet and phone market. To compete there, Microsoft needed to do something to get the attention away from iOS and Android and Windows 8 does that. But to write off the desktop market seems foolish. It would seem a much better approach for Windows 8 would have been something like KDE did by having a common infrastructure but a replaceable UI on top of it (desktop, netbook and the new active). That way, Microsoft would have had Windows 8 desktop edition Windows 8 tablet edition and Windows 8 phone edition, but they would all have the same basic code base.

      All they've done now is assumed that their corporate users will continue to buy Windows, but assumptions are dangerous and if Windows falters, so do sales of Office, which is their real cash cow. It is not beyond the realm of possibility that a major IT company could offer a thin client solution not based on Windows but accessing a Windows Terminal Server. That is, of course, unless Microsoft plans on giving up on the server business and implementing their server products all on windows 8, too.

    31. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      "Obvious" and "intuitive" are not ways shutting down the start menu has ever been. First there was the whole nonsense of going to a menu labeled "Start" to shut down the computer. Not obvious or intuitive, but people got used to it. Then they changed the restart/sleep/switch user/hibernate options to fit inside a little arrow next to the very large shut down button. What a wonderful UI design: making the function you do maybe once a day large and easily accessible, and making the more frequent functions like sleep and log-off hidden and hard to click. I can't tell you how many times I've accidentally shut down my computer due to careless clicking. Thank god Windows 7 asks you if you want to save work before shutting down.

      Now, functions like power, sleep, and hibernate are supposed to be handled by automatic power options. Shutting down the computer is supposed to be something that rarely occurs; your computer is either supposed to sleep when you're not using it for instant-on access, and hibernate after extended away time.

      Much more common functions like log off and lock have been moved far far away from the shutdown option into your account picture. In my opinion, this is a much more sensible and easily accessible place than where they were in the start menu.

    32. Re:Poor Sample Pool by somersault · · Score: 2, Informative

      There's a difference between "learning something new" and "making an ungodly mess of a previously clean interface". In our UI design classes we were told that when users have more than 7-9 options in one section of a menu, it starts to become less efficient. The ribbon is a mess that you really have to "learn" where everything is. With good menus you don't have to learn shit, you can just find what you want by looking at the headings. The few times I've had to use the ribbon bar, things have been in weird places. I've had to Google or ask someone. Whereas with all other new interfaces I'm presented with (Android or even iOS for example) things make sense. MS don't have a fucking clue when it comes to good interface design. The only worse offenders are RIM.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    33. Re:Poor Sample Pool by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Agreed, but the fact that most interaction was from a simple pop up menu bar was obvious and intuitive.

      If they called it something besides the Start menu, ie Windows menu, it would have been clear - this is where you start using Windows.

      Also, I'm a bit frustrated using w2k12 in ESXi as the mouse goes off the console screen. Thus I have to precisely move my pointer to a corner, which makes using the corner popups much harder.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    34. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      most techs-savvy users, or people who know what they're doing just click 'no' to any such data collection prompts so the sample is going to be severely skewed towards people who have ended up with this bundled and know no different.

      So basically, the most computer-illiterate people are having an easy time with Windows 8?

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    35. Re:Poor Sample Pool by TangoMargarine · · Score: 1

      old laptop that doesn't have a multitouch touchpad. I am able to use it, but I find myself cursing

      First-World Problems.

      --
      Unity? Screw that: XFCE. Slashdot Beta? Screw that: SoylentNews. Australis? Screw that: Pale Moon. UX developers DIAF
    36. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      How can you be a Mac user and like the new Windows?

      Try putting a link to your Applications folder on the Dock - one click access to every app installed there.

      I have my Applications directory on the dock, and I never use it. It's much slower than Alfred, or even Spotlight. It's nice for the Downloads directory, though, as I usually keep that pretty small. Any directory large enough to require scrolling, or any that has multiple subdirectories, is better suited for the Finder in column view.

      The new Start/Metro interface is actually harder to get to & more complicated than the old Start menu.

      It is because of comments like this that I am convinced most Windows 8 complainers on Slashdot have never actually touched Windows 8. You can access the start screen in exactly the same way as the old start menu. Either move your mouse to the lower left corner or press the Win key on your keyboard.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    37. Re:Poor Sample Pool by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      I have my Applications directory on the dock, and I never use it. It's much slower than Alfred, or even Spotlight. It's nice for the Downloads directory, though, as I usually keep that pretty small. Any directory large enough to require scrolling, or any that has multiple subdirectories, is better suited for the Finder in column view.

      I don't go to the finder, just use the dock icon so I don't have to hid the app(s) I'm using. Doesn't seem any slower than trying to remember, or type correctly, the name of the app I want.

      It is because of comments like this that I am convinced most Windows 8 complainers on Slashdot have never actually touched Windows 8. You can access the start screen in exactly the same way as the old start menu. Either move your mouse to the lower left corner or press the Win key on your keyboard.

      Been setting up template VMs for win8/w2k12 so I'm somewhat familiar with them.

      Exactly the same way? No, you can't. The landing area for your mouse pointer is MUCH smaller in Win8 than Win7.
      Also, the start menu in Win8 is much less useful than Win7. Can you shut down or get to a specific control panel in Win8? No. Or at least not without adding each control panel to the start menu, making it much more cluttered.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    38. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Cinder6 · · Score: 1

      I specifically mentioned the Finder for document browsing, not apps. I wouldn't use it for apps, either (but neither do I use the dock).

      The landing area for the start screen might be smaller, but I'd be surprised if most people didn't move the cursor to the old button the same way you move it to the hot corner--namely, by hurling the cursor into the corner. It's faster than trying to pinpoint a button (even a relatively large one), and you don't have to look at the screen to do it.

      You can shut down from any screen in Windows 8, not just the start screen--but I will concede this is an area where the UI is obtuse. You can also shut down by hitting Alt+F4 on the desktop.

      As for control panels: While I don't need to use them much, when I do, I just hit Win+W, then type in what I'm looking to do.

      Maybe the reason I'm as pleased with Windows 8 as I am is that it's so keyboard-friendly. I hardly ever need to use the mouse when navigating the UI.

      --
      If you can't convince them, convict them.
    39. Re:Poor Sample Pool by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      In other words, if you know a lot of keyboard shortcuts, Win8 is great. Otherwise, it's a PITA.

      Also, so is Unix.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    40. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What makes you think this is beyond the reach of most users?

      Clearly, you've never supported lots of end users. Spoiler alert.

      They're idiots.

    41. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4-digit UID's father is typical user? I'd say you must be new here, but instead I'll say "you must have only woken up recently."

    42. Re:Poor Sample Pool by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      Ways of shutting down a PC:
      Hitting ALT-F4 on the desktop -- Still works.
      Hit Control-ALT-Delete then choosing shutdown -- Still works.
      Hit the power button on the front of the PC (Not hold, just hit) -- Still works (If it was configured that way).

      And of course the way that pcworld describes as well is a new way.

    43. Re:Poor Sample Pool by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Yep, still work. And still not obvious, unlike it was on the Start menu (despite its name).

      At least now you can't shut down from the new Start menu.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    44. Re:Poor Sample Pool by ras · · Score: 1

      Ok, so they changed Gnome, learn to like the new UI or fork the old one, it's not the end of the world.

      Of course it isn't the end of the world. Linux has many Window managers, so you just choose another one. On the other hand if could be the end of Gnome, as Gnome 2 was the default desktop on most distributions but almost to the man they have dropped Gnome 3 in favour of something else.

      With Microsoft and Windows 8 the situation is a little different. There are no choices, nowhere for users to run to. I don't know how bad Windows 8 is because I've never used it, but if they have truly fucked it up it could be the end of the world for Microsoft.

    45. Re:Poor Sample Pool by somersault · · Score: 1

      BTW I've been thinking about it and I guess the thing is that your average Office user only uses a couple of functions, therefore obviously a UI which brings commonly used functions to the fore will be good for those people. They only have to go searching a couple of times and then they're set.

      You can have commonly used functions showing up without having to use a retarded ribbon design though. The way the XP and Windows 7 Start menus work is pretty good design. The combined run/search function in Windows 7 is even better, bordering on genius for just getting shit done when you want to get it done. The ribbon sucks.

      Actually that just made me realise that if they simply had a search function for commands in the ribbon that would solve the problems with the interface. After Googling I see that MS have indeed made a plugin to do that, which is basically an admission of how much it sucks trying to find stuff in that ugly mess. Funny how moving more towards a CLI style interface makes things much easier to use (and no, I'm definitely not one of these people that thinks everything should be CLI only, but I do find it very convenient for some things).

      --
      which is totally what she said
    46. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used to think the ribbon bar sucked. Now I like it, it's nice for finding things (if you knew where it was in the old menu, it sucked), but for new users, its more intuitive than endlessly searching menus. Also, I feel like its made for the current century. The IT crowd will bitch about anything Microsoft! And bitch about anything else that's changed since their "A+" certification.

    47. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny how you pretend that "change" and "improve" are synonyms.

      When Win 95 came out, people stood in line at midnight to buy it. It was widely adopted. Was that a new UI? Yes it was, and it was an improvement.

      Win8 is a devolution, and you can't admit it, claiming falsely that "people just don't like change".

    48. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Microsoft Windows are not supposed to have to browse the web and download third party tools the first day just to make the desktop be halfway usable.

      Really the only thing that has changed is the application launcher, which is now the start screen as opposed to the start menu, if you don't find it 'halfway usable' as it is then frankly you aren't ready for computers, in fact you probably shouldn't be doing anything without supervision.
      Are you able to articulate what specifically is causing you to have this inability to use it?

    49. Re:Poor Sample Pool by CAIMLAS · · Score: 1

      The impression I get is that most of the people getting W8 at this point are actually just IT departments at companies. Most people are avoiding W8 still if they're using computers at all - most people are seemingly switching to Android and even Apple tablets for 'primary computing', because they meet their needs.

      --
      ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
    50. Re:Poor Sample Pool by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      i think its a matter of opinion: I hate 2 finger scrolling. I prefer the old-school edge scrolling. I also don't like the pinch to zoom thing on laptops. ctrl+scroll is way better.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    51. Re:Poor Sample Pool by somersault · · Score: 1

      Also, I feel like its made for the current century

      Wow, way to show yourself up as a marketing tool.

      for new users, its more intuitive than endlessly searching menus

      What the fuck are you talking about? So searching a big panel across the top of the entire screen is easier than some relatively well named menus? I don't think so. I don't want to play Where's Wally every time I need something new.

      The best solution would just be a box to type in what you want, like the one in the Windows 7 Start menu. No stupid searching through icon soup.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    52. Re:Poor Sample Pool by bingoUV · · Score: 1

      "Obvious" and "intuitive" are not ways shutting down the start menu has ever been. First there was the whole nonsense of going to a menu labeled "Start" to shut down the computer. Not obvious or intuitive, but people got used to it. Then they changed the restart/sleep/switch user/hibernate options to fit inside a little arrow next to the very large shut down button. What a wonderful UI design: making the function you do maybe once a day large and easily accessible, and making the more frequent functions like sleep and log-off hidden and hard to click. I can't tell you how many times I've accidentally shut down my computer due to careless clicking.

      Exactly. People have paid billions of dollars to the creator of such a horrible UI. People want the refund of the wasted billions of dollars before they pay MORE to a company known for very bad UI. Creating such bad UI in the past gives no confidence to people that the new one is any better, or even that it is not worse in various aspects.

      --
      Bingo Dictionary - Pragmatist, n. A myopic idealist.
    53. Re:Poor Sample Pool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has nothing to do with an "inability", cretin. It's called "refusal", because I don't use garbage.

      Windows 8 is garbage. Your inability to see that marks you either as a troll, a paid shill, or a moron. Windows 7 works perfectly fine for me. In the mean time, my quest to create a better, more reliable computer, and a better choice than any of the existing options, has taken me from programming language design to OS design to file system design to where I'm at now, which is designing a new type of microprocessor. Needless to say, my ability to articulate how and exactly why Windows 8 is a piece of shit is not in question. What's in question is how long a company which continues to make such incredibly idiotic mistakes (Vista and Windows 8 only being the most notable examples) can continue to remain in business.

      Best of luck with your life.

    54. Re:Poor Sample Pool by readnotpost · · Score: 1

      There are no choices, nowhere for users to run to

      Don't be so dramatic. A Windows user has two choices:

      (1) Downgrade to Windows 7 or just don't move to Windows 8 in the first place. I have 32 and 64-bit ISOs of Windows 7 Ultimate with a Windows Loader activation tool which guarantees I'll be able to stick with Win 7 for as long as I like. I guarantee there's no chance you'll find yourself unable to use a program because it's Windows 8-only any time soon. Metro apps pale in comparison to full-blown Win32/.NET applications.

      (2) http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-33642_7-57496506-292/how-to-get-the-start-menu-back-in-windows-8/
      The above link lists several Start menu applications that, depending on the options you select, either complement the Start screen or replace it entirely with a Start menu (either classic or Vista/7 style). They can even be set to boot straight to the desktop, bypassing the Start screen entirely.

  3. Except people who join that program..... by Stickiler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are already probably lenient towards Microsoft, so they will of course make themselves learn the new UI. About 80% of the people I know just automatically click no and go past it, and the other 20% make an active effort to click no and go past it. It's like polling the people at a major sporting event about how enjoyable they find that sporting event.

    1. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While your anecdotal evidence is like polling the people in a high school class on which is the best school in the area.

    2. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the people and organizations out there who is and will continue to flat out refuse windows 8. I'm pretty sure their numbers are *anything* but insignificant, but they sure as hell won't show up in the data set microsoft will draw their conclusions. This is just ridiculous; they are currently getting users who either are enthusiastically going along with the book-burning "Microsoft uber Alles" crowd, those who have no choice, and those who just plain doesn't know any bettter.

      This piece of news reminds me of something.. oh, right "Forwards Comrade, we have to retreat." Wonder where that came from... /irony

    3. Re:Except people who join that program..... by nogginthenog · · Score: 2

      It's opt-in, not opt-out.

    4. Re:Except people who join that program..... by RivenAleem · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, then why do people complain about the quality of the product when they don't participate in such a program? That's like non-voters complaining about the state of the nation. If, instead, all these people opted in and the first thing they did was buy and install Start8, then Microsoft might have more realistic results, we might even get an option on first boot to choose between MetroUI and Desktop as our default option.

      Unfortunately the people who I want most of all taking part in the improvement program are too anti-MS to want to do anything that might improve it.

      I'm holding off on upgrading my PC to Windows 8 until near the end of the promotional period, because I'm holding out hope that MS will listen to reviews, or user stats and announce a patch or service pack that gives start8 functionality natively. But if the only people providing feedback are those 'happy' to learn to use metroUI, then that's not going to happen.

    5. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Threni · · Score: 0

      If they're genuine users, they've already provided Microsoft with their phone number and post code when they did the install/setup. Presumably with real data. Quite why anyone would do that is beyond me - you just *know* you'll be reading about that data getting used in phishing exploits over the coming months/years. "Why does an OS need your phone number" people will ask. "What will the front end to a file manager do with your postcode"? It's like they want to train people to be more malleable phishing victims, like waiters in restaurants who say "I'm just taking your credit card over here, where you can't see what I'm doing with it".

    6. Re:Except people who join that program..... by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because a lot of people have an issue with..

      "This application is going to send off 'some stuff you don't understand.. bla bla tech bla' to servers somewhere you don't know." They automatically mistrust a program that sends off unknown information when presented with the choice.

      What Microsoft says. "Send anonymous usage details to Microsoft servers"

      What the user reads. "Send your porn viewing habits to god knows where and who"

    7. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Rogerborg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because this "program" isn't about making the product better, it's just about collecting some numbers - any numbers - that can be used in the sentence "Windows 8 is an astonishing success because X of our users figured out how to do Y within Z seconds."

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    8. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ok, then you go and try to sell that to tech support on why they explicitly block that feature on new installs. Not that I would enable it, mind you. But if they want feedback then they should go take a look at their own forums, you know the ones they've been ignoring since the developers preview release? So don't say they weren't warned and that there wasn't feedback, there was just not the one they wanted.

    9. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I came around to your house and punched you in the face, then asked you how you liked being punched in the face. If you didn't answer my question and just yelled "Get out of my house - I'm calling the cops", that's to be taken as you not only liking being punched in the face, but next time I can punch you harder?

    10. Re:Except people who join that program..... by danomac · · Score: 1

      Even so, for those that actually joined the program, will it report users searching for how to shutdown the computer, and then after a few minutes of useless results yank the power cord?

    11. Re:Except people who join that program..... by ibwolf · · Score: 1

      Well, then why do people complain about the quality of the product when they don't participate in such a program? That's like non-voters complaining about the state of the nation. If, instead, all these people opted in and the first thing they did was buy and install Start8, then Microsoft might have more realistic results, we might even get an option on first boot to choose between MetroUI and Desktop as our default option.

      This is a very flawed comparison. Anonymous voting is the bedrock of democracy and you are only providing one bit of crucial data to a (reasonably) respected authority. None of that holds true for allowing Microsoft to monitor your usage of Windows 8.

    12. Re:Except people who join that program..... by nine-times · · Score: 2

      I'd also doubt it factors in the people who have upgraded to Windows 8, used it for a couple weeks, and downgraded back to Windows 7, or those who refused to upgrade int the first place.

    13. Re:Except people who join that program..... by RivenAleem · · Score: 2

      No, If I asked to be punched in the face, but opted out on giving feedback, then the next time I asked to be punched in the face I'd expect the exact same punch. If, however, I asked as part of a trial to be punched in the face and then gave feedback saying, I'd like a better interface between face and fist, say a glove and mask, then the next time I asked to be punched, I'd expect my feedback to be implemented, otherwise I'd look elsewhere for punches to the face.

      If I just passively accept whatever punches are given to me w/o giving actionable feedback, then I really can't complain about the bad end-user experience I receive.

    14. Re:Except people who join that program..... by RivenAleem · · Score: 0

      Well that's understandable. If you don't believe you can trust MS then it's a good thing you believe them when they say that by ticking the opt out box, they don't just go share your details anyway, right?

      If you can't trust them, why use the OS at all? Do you use their OS while going online to do internet banking? How can you do that w/o being afraid that they aren't monitoring what websites you go to and what keystrokes you input, sending all that information back to Redmond?

      I know they are not Open Source, please educate me on this (I honestly would like to be shown the truth here) are there recent examples of personally identifiable information being sent in these improvement programs? If so, why haven't I, as a regular /. reader not seen something about this? Have they managed to hide it from the entire computer community? I just now did a Google search for "windows 8 leaking private information" but found nothing relevant.

      Is this just paranoia, or a really real threat to users?

      Again, I'd like to point out I don't have Win8 yet, and am looking for information that helps me decide whether to upgrade or not, and not interested in the common MS bashing that goes on here.

    15. Re:Except people who join that program..... by LordLimecat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      To be fair, I was pretty rabidly anti-metro about 2 weeks ago, and my dislike is waning a bit. I still miss the old start menu, and every time metro comes up i hit "escape", but the new search is OK and it seems like the use of RAM as cache is better this time around.

      "Getting used to" doesnt mean that Im happy that things changed, however. One "gets used to" a chronic health ailment; that doesnt mean youre happy that you got it to begin with, it just means youre learning to deal with it.

    16. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      I'm not pro of con Win8 because I haven't actually used it. But from what I have seen and read, I can't imagine that business will want to adopt this new (excuse me, I'm so sorry) touch-screen / tablet UI "paradigm". I certainly don't see it being even remotely workable in my work area (military C3 applications) where we moved from XP to Win7.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    17. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since it's opt-in, not opt-out as you described, I call bullshit. You know nothing about the program or the people who enrolled in it.

      "80% of the people you know..." - sure, you know a significant number of people who use Windows 8? Bullshit.

      Total, MS-hater bullshit troll.

      Be ashamed.

    18. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Gaygirlie · · Score: 1

      Well that's understandable. If you don't believe you can trust MS then it's a good thing you believe them when they say that by ticking the opt out box, they don't just go share your details anyway, right?

      Atleast in the EU they'd likely be liable for quite a lot of damages if they did that.

      If you can't trust them, why use the OS at all? Do you use their OS while going online to do internet banking? How can you do that w/o being afraid that they aren't monitoring what websites you go to and what keystrokes you input, sending all that information back to Redmond?

      If Microsoft did that it'd be likely that one or another security researcher would have already found that out and you can just imagine how much bad PR that would've been for Microsoft at a time when they're still working hard to get people to use the OS.

      Is this just paranoia, or a really real threat to users?

      The thing is, we just do not know. Ask Microsoft for actual details on what they really collect and maybe then we can answer that question. Until then it's still likely the best choice not to participate in that.

    19. Re:Except people who join that program..... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'd say "That's not Microsoft, that's the government." except the government doesn't ask your opinion. They assume that because the country is ostensibly a democracy, you asked for it.

      Frankly, I don't understand Microsoft's strategy with Windows 8 unless they are laying the groundwork for Metro to become the only choice, instead of the clumsily-tacked on new default. Let's face it, the OS/Office money fountain is drying up, and MS is having a hard time breaking into new markets because they still think it's the 1990s and they can do what they want and everyone will accept it ("Yeah, it sucks now, but in a few more versions it will be good." doesn't cut it any more).

      That 30% cut Apple gets from every app sold probably looks like the only way to move forward. I'm sure MS wants everyone to get used to Metro and the apps it provides so they can start phasing out everything else over the next few years. Then they will have more of a monopoly than ever.... assuming anyone still uses Windows by then.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    20. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      The Windows 8 privacy policy is pretty extensive. You can find it here: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-US/windows-8/windows-8-privacy-statement

      For each Windows 8 feature that collects data they include: what data they collect (including what, if any, personally identifiable information), how they use the data, and how you can opt in/out. You'll find that, at least as far as I have read (haven't read the whole thing... again it's extensive), the data they collect isn't sold or used for advertising, even within Bing.

      Here is an FAQ about the CEIP.

    21. Re:Except people who join that program..... by sjames · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Several potentially good reasons:

      Perhaps they don't actually care if MS produces a quality product or not. If it does, great, if not they'll just buy something else. Why do MS's homework for them?

      Perhaps they feel it would be casting pearls before swine? No matter how many times they participate, they'll get the same old crap in return.

      Perhaps they fear the data might be too invasive and they'd just rather not.

      The second option there is, BTW, a commonly cited reason for not voting. If you abstain from an election because you see no candidates you actually support, you remain perfectly entitled to complain about the state of the nation.

    22. Re:Except people who join that program..... by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      You don't see it as being workable only because there is a lot of hype about nothing. For the vast majority of people who actually use it, there is very little difference other than it being faster, using less resources, and using better the resources it does use. Oh, AND you can run metro applications if you want to. I don't have any metro applications really installed at home other than a few freebie games and I do all my work on the desktop that looks EXACTLY the same, except without Aero (see through glass effects), and I have slightly more room on the taskbar because the circle at the bottom left has been removed.

    23. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you assume that? A major focus in User Research is how people are using the product. You really don't think that Microsoft employs a large number of User Researchers who would love to have this type of information in order to make their product better? I'm not saying their User Researchers are running down the right path but saying that this program is purely for marketing lies is extremely pessimistic.

    24. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just built a new Win 7 PC and activated the OS. It never asked for my phone number or any other information other than my product key. Just pointing that out.

    25. Re:Except people who join that program..... by marcello_dl · · Score: 1

      The problem from my POV is that ok, people will get used to win8, and then? Then they are cripples whenever they have to work on past desktops. Or alternative desktops.

      And when it will be over? next year microsoft execs decide that some other UI changes will help differentiating their system from the competition, preventing os switching, and implement those.
      And people will bitch and submit again.

      BTW I think Canonical wanted to do something similar with their own DE, but you see it's quite a different matter when you have free software. And God bless the gazillion distros. If we had only a couple all the energy would be spent discussing instead of implementing stuff.

      --
      ---- MISSING MISCELLANEOUS DATA SEGMENT --- [sigdash] trolololol
    26. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      So basically the pool of people in their data are those who don't worry about about privacy and those who aren't paranoid about Microsoft.

    27. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's also like people complaining about Linux without submitting kernel patches. Who do they think they are? And to anyone who might disagree, don't even bother posting unless you're going to help make a better argument for me.

    28. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I moved a relatively computer illiterate design office into 8 for the need of a 64 bit system and windows only applications. The 7 would have been equally difficult for them, and much more expensive as an upgrade bought from the local store. I still prefer the physical disks for these small environments with no servers of any kind.

    29. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is about windows 8, not 7. They are different operating systems.

    30. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Sepodati · · Score: 1

      I found out how to shutdown the computer within the first couple of minutes of "playing around" with the new interface. Stupid people are going to be lost on any OS.

    31. Re:Except people who join that program..... by Sepodati · · Score: 1

      Once you start your "mlitary C3 application" the OS is out of the way and you're using the application just like you would on Win 7. I'm pretty sure I can teach people in the military to "click there.. now click there"...

  4. "Good, Good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ... let the M$ hate flow through you."

    1. Re:"Good, Good... by erroneus · · Score: 2

      "...something something something Dark Side! Something something something complete!"

    2. Re:"Good, Good... by nozzo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      love to hate them but as long as they're putting out OS's it's keeping a large slice of us employed! You could say it is our destiny.

    3. Re:"Good, Good... by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      "Using Windows leads to fear, fear leads to anger, etc".

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    4. Re:"Good, Good... by geminidomino · · Score: 2

      No no...

      "Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to using Windows for mission-critical applications."

      If that's not "suffering," I don't know what is.

    5. Re:"Good, Good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      that's just the parable of the broken window

  5. that what they call it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    wanting to pound keyboard in frustration or fist through monitor is 'getting used to it'?

    1. Re:that what they call it? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      No, "getting used to it" means this only happens once a day instead of the original once a minute.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:that what they call it? by nozzo · · Score: 1

      funny thing is their data gathering can probably see multiple keys pressed at once (as fist repeatedly contacts keyboards) - I wonder if they can detect loss of monitor (as it flies through the window).

      [12/12/12 14:12:35][log_event][42][multiple keyboard events]pressed keys 4,5,6,e,r,t,y,d,f,g,h,x,c,v,b,SPACE]
      [12/12/12 14:12:87][log_event][42][multiple keyboard events]pressed keys 5,6,7e,r,t,y,d,f,g,h,x,c,v,b,n]
      [12/12/12 14:13:22][log_event][42][multiple keyboard events]pressed keys 4,5,6,e,r,t,y,d,f,g,h,x,c,v,b,n]
      [12/12/12 14:13:58][log_event][42][multiple keyboard events]pressed keys 3,4,5,6,e,r,t,y,d,f,g,c,v,b,SPACE]

      uh-oh we got a keyboard pounder

    3. Re:that what they call it? by Peristaltic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Getting used to it".... Right. After about 6 months my dad told me that he was getting used to his chemotherapy, too- somehow this wasn't a very good selling point for the experience.

    4. Re:that what they call it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Getting used to it".... Right.

      Exactly. While I'm sure I could get used to not having my right arm, that doesn't mean I want to lose it.

      Windows 8 reviews are just full of stuff that Windows 8 WON'T do that all previous versions of Windows did just fine. I don't understand how companies can remove functionality from a "new and improved" version of a well established product and expect people to ooh and ahh about how much less useful the new product is.

  6. Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by erroneus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I am not saying that Windows 8 is even remotely similar to prison rape (though some might suggest there may be some similarities, I am not saying that) but the very notion that a party or group is getting used to something does not mean they like it or want it.

    I supposed I could have said "taxes" or any other thing people generally don't like, but I wanted to be a little edgy... a little dramatic.

    So yes. We acknowledge Microsoft is shoving their things [Windows 8 in this case] through our [choose an orifice] and we acknowledge that we presently don't have much choice in the matter.

    1. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That sums it up. Nothing in the article about people liking or preferring the New Windows Order. Just the limp pronouncement that people who must use Windows are finding ways of grinding through the experience.

    2. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      the very notion that a party or group is getting used to something does not mean they like it or want it.

      No, but the fact that they went out to the shops and bought it, when they could just as easily have bought something else, does tend to suggest that some of them might have wanted it.

    3. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I prefer prison rape.
      Windows 8 just annoys me so much that I end up attacking my laptop. That's getting pretty expensive over time.

    4. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2

      Uh, pretty quickly you won't be *able* to choose not to buy it. The only way currently is stock left in the pipeline isn't it?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    5. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not saying that Windows 8 is even remotely similar to prison rape (though some might suggest there may be some similarities, I am not saying that) but...

      I'm not saying you're saying that Windows 8 is even remotely similar to prison rape (though some might suggest there may be some similarities, I am not saying that) but...

    6. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by bobstreo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think it's more like stockholm syndrome
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome

    7. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by ElmoGonzo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes. There is a Russian proverb from the Tsarist period that translates into something like: "You can get used to anything. Except dying."

    8. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but the fact that they went out to the shops and bought it, when they could just as easily have bought something else, does tend to suggest that some of them might have wanted it.

      Or that they wanted windows xp but were told that they can't buy windows xp but windows 8 is the latest greatest.

    9. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Supposedly some prisons provide condoms to stop the spread of STDs among prison rape. But I say go one step further and provide lubricant to prisoners. Although, that's still ignoring the problem of prison rape.

      When a new computer is cheaper WITH Windows 8, you know you have a problem. I assume that's the case, but I haven't gone out looking to see if that's true. (We might be able to compare Windows machines vs similar machines with a Linux distro installed.)

      I don't need the legal definition of monopoly to know that Microsoft has one, or perhaps is part of a duopoly or oligopoly. By that, I mean it feels like they have one even if they legally don't. There's little choice in the matter and I for would favor our (American) government to step in and regulate oligopolies. Not that capitalism is necessarily wrong, but we should have a choice to opt out and purchase said computers for a lower price if we do not want software that's part of an oligopoly. This also goes for cable and satellite companies. I do not favor cable companies buying media companies.

      And while I'm ranting, don't you think the "light bulb" ban that kicks in for "inefficient" 75 watt bulbs this coming new year is a bit wrong? I mean, whom does it benefit? CFL bulbs makers of course! Notice how the incandescent bulbs burn out so much easier when located in heat and humidity (bathrooms) or perhaps outside in the elements.

      In the Windows situation, our government is ignoring a problem in favor of a business. In the light bulb situation, the government is stepping in to benefit a business (in my opinion, and it is just an opinion).

    10. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      All new consumer PC's come with windows 8. It is pretty much unavoidable unless you have a legacy windows 7 license.

      I still have windows 7, and in the 4 to 8 years it will take my top of the line PC to become hopelessly outdated, I am hoping that something other than windows 8 becomes a viable option.

    11. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by MatrixCubed · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't confuse "ignorance about alternatives" with "desire to purchase".

      Many users only "see" Windows. They don't know about Linux, and consider Mac OS as "those things that aren't Windows that other people have".

    12. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, consider: You can either get Windows 7 and be forced to upgrade, and at full price, to Windows 8 in a year or two when most game developers stopped supporting it, or you could get Windows 8.

      But please, customer, you have the free choice (*snicker*)!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    13. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by dissy · · Score: 2

      No, but the fact that they went out to the shops and bought it, when they could just as easily have bought something else, does tend to suggest that some of them might have wanted it.

      That's pretty funny, since I did exactly that by purchasing Windows 7, and yet I was never asked to join this program to tell them I purchased Windows 7 over 8.

      So yes, you are right, as long as you totally and completely ignore everyone who purchased something else, then of the subset of people that purchased Windows 8, all of that subset purchased windows 8.

      Why is that at all insightful or useful information again?

    14. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by rudy_wayne · · Score: 1

      the very notion that a party or group is getting used to something does not mean they like it or want it.

      No, but the fact that they went out to the shops and bought it>

      Wrong. They went out to buy a new computer and were given exactly one choice -- Windows 8.

      when they could just as easily have bought something else

      And what would that "something else" be? A substantially more expensive Apple product?

    15. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Linux is already a viable option.

      It won't be a painless transition and there will be things you'll miss. Wine might be able to help with that, or it might not. Expect a bunch of swearing and cursing as you work through the internet looking for drivers for that one last elusive bit of hardware, or to get that damn network running. Expect two weeks downtime as you relearn everything you thought you knew about computers.

      In the end though, you'll have a system that runs the way *you* want it to, not the way Apple, Microsoft, HP, Canonical, Red hat, Novell or Google wants it to.

    16. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

      +1

      In my office if you ask most people what version of Windows/Word/Outlook they have, they usually say "I don't know". To them Win XP and 7 look the same and I would guess that Win 7 and 8 also look the same.

    17. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Actually, that is exactly what you are doing. So, why are you stating one thing in your subject and denying it in the first sentence of your post?

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    18. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Stop lying, you KNOW you want to say Windows 8 is prison rape.

      You KNOW Windows 8 is prison rape.

      This denial will not help you get over the fact that WINDOWS 8 IS PRISON RAPE.

    19. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      God bless and keep Steve Ballmer...far away from us!

    20. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by mark-t · · Score: 1

      App devevelopers won't stop supporting it until the market segment for it finally falls below a viable threshold.

      For crying out loud, it was only quite recently that many devs stop supporting XP.

    21. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Pollardito · · Score: 1

      the very notion that a party or group is getting used to something does not mean they like it or want it

      Exactly. It just means they're past the Bargaining and Depression stages and are into Acceptance...

    22. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      What world do you live in? Virtually all game developers for Windows still support XP.

    23. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by armanox · · Score: 3, Funny

      Expect a bunch of swearing and cursing as you work through the internet looking for drivers for that one last elusive bit of hardware, or to get that damn network running.

      Funny, that's what I do with Windows...

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    24. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      No. No, it won't. XP and 7 are basically the same user interface painted different colors. Windows 8 makes fundamental changes to the interface. They won't have any idea what they're supposed to do with it. They'll have a breakdown.

    25. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux is already a viable option.

      It won't be a painless transition

      And the next windows will be a viable option, that'll won't provide a painless transition either.

      Painful transition to another os is just a painful transition

      In the end though, you'll have a system that runs the way *you* want it to

      May be, or a system that is compromised to the point that it's an acceptable trade off between pros and cons. If there's something Linux can't do that another OS can then it's not running the way you want if you can't do the thing you want.

    26. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      I bought Win 8 because I needed a legit license for a new PC. I could buy windows 8 for only $15 since I already had win7 on the wife's laptop.

      It's been almost 3 weeks, after the initial gripe period with the UI and adjusting settings/layout on some stuff, I'm ok with it now. Probably because it's largely the same as Windows 7. I miss having gadgets on the second monitor for time and performance monitoring though. I never really used the start menu, so I don't care that it's been replaced. There's been a handful of tiny conveniences:
      1) I like the picture log-in, saves typing time
      2) SSD settings automatically adjusted for.
      3) Built-in ISO mount
      4) Task Manager is much more useful now.
      5) The new menu that pops up when you right-click the start menu is a nice quick link to the control panel items I'd use the most.

      Individually or in the aggregate, these conveniences don't form a good argument for upgrading to Windows 8. But if you don't have a windows license and you need one, it might as well be Windows 8, unless you used the start menu often.

    27. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      But MS doesn't. And the latest and greatest effects your graphics card can muster won't be shown on your XP because they "need" the awesomeness that is Windows 7 (at least according to MS).

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    28. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting a system that runs the way I want it to gets harder also on Linux. Not impossible, but it used to be just a few tweaks here and there, but nowadays it isn't. Currently I'm using Cinnamon, but considering switching again because I simply cannot find out how to get rid of certain annoying things, like dialog windows being glued to the title bar of their parents, or windows being raised when clicking them anywhere (clicks which are intended to interact with the program, and decidedly not to raise the window). Oh, and getting a properly working Scroll Lock key is a challenge in itself (just because most people don't use it doesn't mean nobody uses it).

    29. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Linux is already a viable option.

      That really depends on what you use your computer for.

      It won't be a painless transition and there will be things you'll miss.

      And that right there is what makes it a non-viable option for many people.... especially those whose livelihood depends on a continued sustained level of productivity.

    30. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Some time ago, some lights turned on with regards to the issue that a machine with Linux installed is more expensive than a machine with Windows installed when provided by an OEM.

      To make sense of it, you have to recognize that bloatware/crapware is a revenue source for the OEMs. Linux machines will have less crapware. (Note that I didn't say "no crapware" because thanks to Ubuntu's apparent affiliation with Amazon, there's just a touch of commercial interest there as well.) By removing the opportunity to install crapware on a machine sold, they are losing an opportunity. The words "opportunity cost" emerge as the reason for the difference in cost between a Windows OEM PC and a Linux OEM PC.

      This has little to nothing to do with the cost of the license for the OS.

    31. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by erroneus · · Score: 1

      Yes... I too have noted the weakness of CFLs around certain environmental conditions.

      1. I used silicone sealer for the CFLs in my fish tank... seemed to work very nicely.
      2. I have taken to LED bulbs over CFLs. More expensive but more workable and flexible too.

    32. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Brulath · · Score: 1

      Perhaps those who are getting used to it are simply ignoring the changed components and continuing to use their PC as they did under previous versions of Windows, much as I am.

      It's actually pretty easy to ignore metro entirely if you install something like Start8 to replace the start menu. It's a bit daft that we have to - particularly with a third-party program - but once you've done it the general experience is more or less like using Windows 7 with a couple of minor feature upgrades (file history, multi-monitor taskbar).

      Attempting to explain how to shut down the PC to older computer users has been a challenge though, particularly for my folks with dual monitors; it's quite hard to summon the charm bar properly in the gap between the two screens, and going to "Settings" to shut down is just...weird. I've just told them to press the power button once and let the PC shut itself down that way, or installed Start8.

    33. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by erroneus · · Score: 1

      The next few lines explain that too. Sorry I wrote more than two sentences. Must be a challenge for you.

    34. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Are we talking legitimate prison rape here?

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    35. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not saying it (of course you are) but implying it... one thing: JUST SHUT UP. Seriously. This comparison is disrespectful of rape victims in so many ways... and you clearly have NO clue what you are blabbering about.

    36. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Rogerborg · · Score: 2

      I've yet to see anything released on Steam that doesn't support XP. I've only just switched to 7 due to a hardware failure, and XP wasn't a barrier at all, except for missing out on DX10/11 support. And that issue itself is really just an argument in favour of devs using OpenGL.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    37. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is why I am hoping that the wine project catches upto win7's API's fast enough so we can have a singularity in the computing world were no one wants the previous version of windows and things slowly migrate off wine to KDE or gnome, or xfce native.

      Or some other similarly interesting multipurpose API that supports wildly configurable interfaces =)

      How would you like to draw your own office UI? or Desktop UI? Set your own paramaters for lists and what attributes get shown and what keys do what. I think this is what the original idea of the PC was for =)

    38. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 1

      Well, consider: You can either get Windows 7 and be forced to upgrade, and at full price, to Windows 8 in a year or two when most game developers stopped supporting it, or you could get Windows 8.

      But please, customer, you have the free choice (*snicker*)!

      Yeah, that'd definitely be a concern if it had ever happened before. Thankfully, game developers like to make money, and the ones that don't still haven't quite mastered writing a game engine that depends on features in a version of Windows that won't be out for two years or more.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    39. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My livelihood definitely depends on that factor. That is why I am unable to use windows for work. The fact that everything takes much longer and the workflow just isn't efficient as with using linux keeps my shop an all Linux shop.

    40. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Marillion · · Score: 2

      This is Microsoft's equivalent of Steve Jobs saying “You're holding it wrong” when the iPhone 4 case was the antenna.

      --
      This is a boring sig
    41. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's more like stockholm syndrome
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stockholm_syndrome

      Yeah it's just like Stockholm Syndrome...

      In what way, exactly, is becoming accustomed to using a new tool even remotely like this?

      I'll reserve the words I wanted to call you so this post isn't down-modded to oblivion. Because it's a worthy question to help understand how both you can think something like that, and how others can mod you +5 Insightful. Your comment belittles Stockholm Syndrome. Period.

    42. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is why most games are still DX9, or at least have a DX9 mode. Microsoft are crippling their own OS by using DirectX as a club to try to force people to 'upgrade'.

      At this rate, DX11.1 games won't be out much before 2025.

    43. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      I really think Im starting to see things through Metro's point of view. Really, Im sure I deserve this somehow, and its not all THAT bad. Honestly, Microsoft is doing me a favor here.

    44. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by FatRichie · · Score: 1

      Considering many of the people I work with don't even understand the difference between Windows and Office, I'm guessing they won't realize Win8 is a new OS. Yes, they'll realize something is different, but they won't recognize it as a new operating system (not that they know what an OS is).

    45. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Uh, pretty quickly you won't be *able* to choose not to buy it.

      Well, yeah. If you're buying your first computer and you don't already have a copy of Windows 7, getting one legally could become difficult, but that hasn't happened yet. You want a Windows 7 PC? I can get you a Windows 7 PC by four o'clock this afternoon.

      And, you know, they could have bought Apple Macs (well, some of the wealthier ones could). I've also read once or twice on Slashdot about some other operating system that is neither Windows nor Mac OS. The name of it escapes me just now.

    46. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by guttentag · · Score: 0

      So, effectively...

      Prison Warden Says Prisoners Getting Used to Sodomy
      "We've installed microphones throughout the prison that listen for screams but filter out conversations to protect them and help us identify problem areas while respecting their privacy. We're finding that new inmates scream less after the first month, which suggests they're getting used to the sodomy. In fact, we suspect they are beginning to enjoy it. Bear in mind, the screaming program is totally voluntary. No one is forcing them to scream, but we encourage them to for the good of the community. When an individual voice is not heard to have screamed for a certain interval of time, it indicates that the inmate has died and we know who to look for, which has turned out to be an unexpected benefit of the system. Being able to locate and remove corpses faster has improved the smell of the prison in general."

    47. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's little choice in the matter and I for would favor our (American) government to step in and regulate oligopolies. Not that capitalism is necessarily wrong, but we should have a choice to opt out and purchase said computers for a lower price if we do not want software that's part of an oligopoly.

      They did, and you do.

      This also goes for cable and satellite companies. I do not favor cable companies buying media companies.

      Those are two different problems, the one is a limitation of physical reality, the other is a leveraging of the first.

      And while I'm ranting, don't you think the "light bulb" ban that kicks in for "inefficient" 75 watt bulbs this coming new year is a bit wrong? I mean, whom does it benefit? CFL bulbs makers of course! Notice how the incandescent bulbs burn out so much easier when located in heat and humidity (bathrooms) or perhaps outside in the elements.

      Really? Usually the complaint is the opposite. But there's ways to deal with that problem, and given that most lights aren't in those locations, it's not necessarily a problem.

      Besides, outside? A lot of people have had Sodium-Vapor lights for years, for other reasons.

      In the light bulb situation, the government is stepping in to benefit a business (in my opinion, and it is just an opinion).

      Sometimes that happens. Any decision the government makes is bound to have somebody who can profit from it. Yet the benefits to society may be considerable, and the profits? Well, so what? Is the government supposed to stop the free market?

      Then again, given that it's GE making the light bulbs, do you really care who is the oligarchy?

    48. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly you have not been raped or used Windows 8.

    49. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by guttentag · · Score: 1

      I need to put that on a T-shirt and sell it:

      Windows Customer Experience Improvement Program
      The screaming program is totally voluntary. No one is forcing them to scream.

    50. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Or he tried to get netflix to work in Windows Media Center on windows 7 64bit.

    51. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by mark-t · · Score: 1
      Yeah... that's kind of my point. It's even more noticeable with games.

      Devs aren't going to stop supporting an operating system that everyone prefers... even if it's not the current one.

    52. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      aka marriage

    53. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am not saying that Windows 8 is even remotely similar to prison rape [...]

      Then why the fuck did you lead with that subject header?

      No, seriously, that's like 80's sitcom level bullshit right there. "Well, as we all know, 'Fred' was the most common first name of serial murderers when Fred here was born. Now, I'm not SAYING that Fred is a serial murderer (though some might suggest there may be some similarities), but there is this amazingly strong correlation between first names and criminal activity..."

    54. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      All new consumer PC's come with windows 8. It is pretty much unavoidable unless you have a legacy windows 7 license.

      Maybe in brick and mortar retail... haven't been to a Best Buy in a while. But you can still buy Windows 7 machines from Dell, HP, Lenovo, et al.. You can even buy Windows 7 machines from Best Buy's online store. There are still plenty of machines that were built before Oct 26 with Windows 7 installed that need to be sold, and it will be that way for some time now.

    55. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And considering many of the people I work with don't even understand the difference between the monitor and the computer...

    56. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you honestly think Microsoft doesn't have any avenues to tell which users are buying and using their own OS? They can get this information through OEMs, retail vendors, even their activation servers.

    57. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      Wrong. They went out to buy a new computer and were given exactly one choice -- Windows 8.

      How is this the case, considering there is more choice now than ever? Hell you can still buy Windows 7 computers from all major retailers (at least online).

      And what would that "something else" be?

      Windows 7 laptop/desktop, Chromebook, Android tablet, iPad.... and yes even a Mac. Just because it's more expensive doesn't mean it's not a choice.

    58. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by BenoitRen · · Score: 1

      If you buy a laptop with Windows 7, the upgrade to Windows 8 is only 15 euros. Brands like HP and Samsung even refund it.

    59. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see they got to you already.

    60. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I am not saying that Windows 8 is even remotely similar to prison rape (though some might suggest there may be some similarities, I am not saying that)"

      Glenn Beck? Is that you?

    61. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by hfranz · · Score: 1

      The Cylons managed even that... SCNR.

    62. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but the fact that they went out to the shops and bought it, when they could just as easily have bought something else, does tend to suggest that some of them might have wanted it.

      The hardware I wanted only came with Windows 8. Two weeks after 8 came out, Windows 7 wasn't available. I wiped one without ever running Windows 8. I tried it on the other one, but ended up wiping it a week later. It wasn't that hard to get used to, but being force to use Metro just so Microsoft can sell tablets is pretty nasty. Being force to sign up for Windows Live, just to setup the computer was equally disgusting.

    63. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Well of course Microsoft will tell you that things will be awful if you don't upgrade to 8. Doesn't mean it's true.

    64. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      In other words you actually ment to say that using Windows 8 is similar to prision rape to get attention. You meant to say it, you just said it because you are an attention whore who was afraid his comment wouldn't get noticed unless he said something "a little dramatic".

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    65. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by erroneus · · Score: 1

      I doubt I could have put it more plainly than I already did. Getting attention is the first step to being understood. After you have their attention, you can put out what you want understood. If they disagree after that? So what? Shocking that anyone would have to explain this to anyone really. It's why commercials are as they are, why political campaigns are as they are and why, fo example, picketers hold big colorful signs and why PETA chicks pose nude!!!

      I have a white paper on the topic but no one ready white papers, so I printed it on hot-pink.

    66. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by armanox · · Score: 1

      Normally I wouldn't dignify you with a response to that, but here goes:

      Network drivers with a fresh install of Windows - just isn't there. Windows 7 does about as well as XP did on that ground. Specific example - I switched out the wifi card in my laptop (Realtek 802.11g card for a Atheros 802.11n card). Linux worked with the new card without issue. Windows never did fully work with the card - Bluetooth still doesn't work in Windows, and hunting down the right Ath9K driver to get the wifi working took quite a while.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    67. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

      Control-Alt-Delete and click the power icon. Much easier.

    68. Re:Prisoners are getting used to being sodomized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen a couple of games that are DX10-only.
      If I remember rightly, Shattered Horizon was one of them.

  7. 3 month rule by weszz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone really surprised?

    Give any big change 3 months and it will get accepted if you don't give in as the change forcer.

    I've seen it at work too many times to count. Manglement makes a decision that upsets everyone and lots of people talk about how they are going to start looking elsewhere for employment and the sky will fall and this is terrible, but after the 3 month gripe period, everyone accepts the changes and life moves on.

    It's how things work.

    1. Re:3 month rule by Lisias · · Score: 1

      Manglement makes a decision that upsets everyone and lots of people talk about how they are going to start looking elsewhere for employment and the sky will fall and this is terrible, but after the 3 month gripe period, everyone accepts the changes and life moves on.

      It's how things work.

      Yep. Same thing here.

      However, after de 3rd upsetting decision, the company where I used to work lost the fidelity of the higher valued professionals - a lot of them give this job the finger on the first acceptable offer they received from the competition. Hell, some of them accepted an offer with the same incoming - a 0% net incoming grow job exchange.

      So, your mileage may vary. You can screw your staff now and then, but don't make it a business practice.

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    2. Re:3 month rule by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That doesn't mean that they like the new situation more than the old one. And while at work there may be some good reason why you have to adapt to a management change because the primary concern is the well being of the company and not yours, pardon please if I put MY comfort ahead of that of MS.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:3 month rule by Lisias · · Score: 1

      where I wrote "give this job", please read "gave this job".

      (Yes, I know - I need to practice English a bit more...)

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
    4. Re:3 month rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, after de 3rd upsetting decision, the company where I used to work lost the fidelity of the higher valued professionals - a lot of them give this job the finger on the first acceptable offer they received from the competition. Hell, some of them accepted an offer with the same incoming - a 0% net incoming grow job exchange.

      Different company, same situation. Founders running company into the ground, fucking over the people who built it in favor of a bunch of agilistas. They spend more time fucking around with cue cards than coding. People have quit without even getting job offers.

    5. Re:3 month rule by assertation · · Score: 1

      True, very true.

      However, that is when people do not have a choice.

      At home, I ditched Ubuntu despite having used since it came out because I had enough of Unity and now their links with Amazon. I had a choice. Here have a MINT or maybe you prefer to have an Apple instead.

    6. Re:3 month rule by weszz · · Score: 1

      you always have a choice. You can stick with XP and not get any updates, hang onto 7 forever, or learn the new way things work and probably will continue to work.

      You can accept management's changes, create a disruptive workplace by rebelling, or look elsewhere for work.

      May not be good choices from your view, but there are always choices. Pay mortgage or get foreclosed on...

    7. Re:3 month rule by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Give any big change 3 months and it will get accepted if you don't give in as the change forcer.

      Ah, the Facebook Rage Phenomenon, but with a different tempo.

      Change-3 days: This is a horrible idea, if this goes live I'm going to Google+
      Changed day: This is a horrible change, if they don't revert this I'm going to Google+.
      Change+3 days: Here's a photo of my dog being funny.

    8. Re:3 month rule by hAckz0r · · Score: 2

      Manglement makes a decision that upsets everyone and lots of people talk about how they are going to start looking elsewhere for employment and the sky will fall and this is terrible, but after the 3 month gripe period, everyone accepts the changes and life moves on.

      True, but why exactly is that?

      Because it takes about three months on average for the vocal and confident employees to find other employment, get fired, or can be otherwise forced to leave (that option usually takes longer). One place I was at had a 43% turnover in the first two months, but I can't speak for what happened after that, because nobody I really knew was still there.

      What the management is then left with is a staff of indecisive and often inferior employees that are easily intimidated by management. They are either not feeling financially secure enough to move on or are just thinking that they are incapable of finding other employment. They are not your 'movers and shakers' and they just feel trapped in their employment situation. Bad Management likes things that way, because those that are left will more likely just bend over and ask for more. Some managers just thrive on that dominance-high.

      My take is that If you don't/can't enjoy what you are doing then you are working for the wrong people. Been there, done that, never again!

    9. Re:3 month rule by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, most people just can't stick with XP. Not after they get new computers.

      If they could, lots of them would. (But I'm certain an amount of them would prefer 7.)

    10. Re:3 month rule by Strudelkugel · · Score: 1

      Give any big change 3 months and it will get accepted if you don't give in as the change forcer.

      I've seen it at work too many times to count. Manglement makes a decision that upsets everyone and lots of people talk about how they are going to start looking elsewhere for employment and the sky will fall and this is terrible, but after the 3 month gripe period, everyone accepts the changes and life moves on.

      I agree with you in general, but not in the case of Windows 8. At first I was skeptical about it, but then I tried using it on a laptop with a good trackpad. I was rather amazed at how fast I could navigate the OS. I think the most complaint about Win 8 is the Metro/desktop context switch. In other words, people are more comfortable with having everything jammed under the familiar "Start" button, since that is where everything has been for almost 20 years. After using Win 8 for a few minutes on proper hardware, I became very used to the context switch. In a way, it serves as a way of convenient way categorizing apps. Multi-function, multi-window work = desktop. Singular task, single window touch centric apps = metro.

      Mac OS, OTOH, is old and creaking. It has the same paradigm it was designed with in the 80s. iOS was clearly a step in the right direction for touch, but it is antiquated now, too. The rich gesture environment of Win 8 on a tablet makes it much nicer to use than iOS in my experience. YMMV. But in my view, it is Apple that is forcing users to adapt to their way of doing things, not Microsoft. I think it is safe to say that Microsoft did incorporate user feedback into Win 8 design. Apple seems to think they figured it all out with the original Macintosh. I am now beginning to believe that Win 8 will become quite popular, much to everyone's surprise - including me.

      --
      Imagine how much harder physics would be if electrons had feelings! -Feynman, maybe
    11. Re:3 month rule by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      I think the most complaint about Win 8 is the Metro/desktop context switch. In other words, people are more comfortable with having everything jammed under the familiar "Start" button, since that is where everything has been for almost 20 years. After using Win 8 for a few minutes on proper hardware, I became very used to the context switch. In a way, it serves as a way of convenient way categorizing apps. Multi-function, multi-window work = desktop. Singular task, single window touch centric apps = metro.

      Which would be all well and good if I could stay on the fucking desktop and pick which program to run next. The start menu was seamless in this respect. Bringing up the metro menu is a non-option (far too jarring). So my options are a). 3rd party software to hack back in the same functionality I used to have for free b). clutter the hell out of my desktop/quick launch/taskbar or c). shut up and eat the shit Microsoft is shoveling at us.

      Also, it's a complete non-starter in enterprise environments for the very simple fact that new apps only appear on the Metro screen of the person who installed them. So if a tech installs, say, Microsoft Office, then only the tech gets the Office app tiles in Metro. Everybody else has to know that Office was installed, go to all apps, pin it *one by one* onto their Metro screen and fix up their UI before they can use the app. That's not as big a deal for dedicated computers, I guess (though training 1000+ users on how to do that would be a clusterfuck of epic proportions), but on shared computers especially it would be hell. Unless a service pack or update fixes this colossal screwup by Microsoft, I won't be able to recommend Win8 to our company...ever.

    12. Re:3 month rule by Lisias · · Score: 1

      Some guys give the Agile a bad name.

      I had a bad time on a company where a Agile methodology were the rule. I didn't bought that "Planning Poker" at first, but hell, somehow they managed to make that thing work.

      Things gone havoc, however, when the unavoidable errors started to popup on the launching event, and no one had the slightest clue about what was happening. Since there was no code reviews, and even worst, the GIT repository was "rebased" constantly after deleting the last sprint's development branches (just the delivery branch were keep, so we could not know easily in what task one change was made), the sad true is that nobody was responsible for anything and the bad apples started to rot the chest.

      The funny part is that they insisted on this "pair programming" thing even when what was needed was fast response to the many little mistakes. It was silly to put two valuable developers to fix stupid things as a typo or misspelled variable names (that happened on the previous sql-injection hunt that, somehow, the pair programmin didn't prevent to happen =P)

      Accountability sucks, but unfortunately it's it what keeps everybody on line.

      (I got the boot, by the way)

      --
      Lisias@Earth.SolarSystem.OrionArm.MilkyWay.Local.Virgo.Universe.org
  8. Ahah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm a Toydarian. Mind tricks don't work on me, only sensible user interfaces!

  9. Mold-breaking by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've found that I use the mouse less for launching apps when using Windows 8 which I didn't in Windows 7, despite the functionality being the same. Press the Windows key, start typing an app / file name, and hit Return to launch. While the Start Menu existed, I was using the mouse, because we navigate WIMP UIs with a mouse. The Start Screen took that away; It was a full-screen interface all of its own, without menus, and that broke the psychological boundary between me pointing-and-clicking and moving over fully to the keyboard for launching apps.

    So, now I've learned that behaviour instead, I've swapped back to Windows 7 with its sensible desktop UI :) Thanks again, Microsoft!

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Mold-breaking by linebackn · · Score: 1

      >start typing an app / file name, and hit Return to launch

      Congratulation, this is how we did it back in the DOS days, and even up to Windows 3.1 because the Program Manager was so poor.

      We started using GUIs because, among other things, they gave us an easier way to launch programs.

      You just showed that Windows 8 fails in this regard.

    2. Re:Mold-breaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you weren't missing the start menu because well, it's easier not to use it(truth be told hitting windows key and then typing what you want always was better, known this for a long time), but you ditched the improvements of windows 8 under the hood while still using windows 7 exactly like you would windows 8... how did you get a score 5 interesting?

    3. Re:Mold-breaking by snemarch · · Score: 1

      In DOS, you had to navigate to the directory your application was installed in, or type the full path - and if you hadn't actively installed something like 4DOS, you had to type out everything in full. With the Start Screen (and the new-style Start Menu of Vista and Win7 too), you type a few words (heck, often only a few characters) from the application name. Sure, it takes a bit getting used to the she start-screen of Win8, but it's IMHO more useful than the start menu since it's full-screen and thus can show more information.

      But I guess I'm biased - I've always thought the old start menu and it's nested folders was sucky, and have used a combination of quicklaunch bars (DonationCoder's LaunchBarCommander) and keystroke launchers (Find And Run Robot, Launchy) ever since the XP days. I like my keyboard goodness.

      --
      Coffee-driven development.
    4. Re:Mold-breaking by sootman · · Score: 1

      Back when I used Windows (95/98/2k) I used this great trick with the start menu: I put programs in there right at the top level, so when you clicked 'start', you could see them. The trick was, if you pressed the windows key and then pressed THE FIRST LETTER of the app's name, it would launch. (If it was the only app with that first letter. If you had two 'A' apps, it would select the first. But I had a very short list and they were all unique.) So Windows key, P, BAM! Photoshop launched. Windows, N, Netscape. Windows, E, Eudora. (Showing my age here. :-) )

      > Press the Windows key, start typing an app / file name,
      > and hit Return to launch.

      So it's like that now, except you have to press a lot more keys? Awesome. :-) You should check and see if my method works in 7. Might have to turn on the 'classic' start menu, if that's there anymore.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    5. Re:Mold-breaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's funny, I've actually grown attached to the Start Screen because I don't need the mouse to use it.

      This affection could be related to my switch to a tiling window manager on my *nix machines.

    6. Re:Mold-breaking by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      DOS had a path variable. Not sure what version it was introduced in but I'm pretty sure it was at least since 4.something. It didn't have command completion though unfortunately.

      Windows 7 completion is kinda OK. Until a program installs with the name which matches the command you're trying to use. Case in point, cmd brings up the command console. Until a program called "cmdProc" got installed. Then problems.

    7. Re:Mold-breaking by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

      Vista/7/8 do not do command completion. It is a search. This also means you do not need to type the program name from the start. It will also find documents and control panel applets or whatever.
      I use 7. and I pretty much never use the menu to find a program.

      If you have several programs matching, you may need to use the arrows to chose. Not a problem, just an extra key to push.

    8. Re:Mold-breaking by FaxeTheCat · · Score: 1

      So it's like that now, except you have to press a lot more keys? Awesome. :-) You should check and see if my method works in 7. Might have to turn on the 'classic' start menu, if that's there anymore.

      No need to put them on the start menu, pin them to the task bar. So then you can start the most frequently used programs with one click.
      For the rest, use the start menu to search.
      By the way: the most recently used programs show up at the first level of the start menu, so we now have kinda automated W95 start menu... :-)

    9. Re:Mold-breaking by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Heh, your memory is a little faulty. In DOS, what you actually did was browse the directory structure before launching an application, unless the application was located in the default path. You might remember having to type "cd [child directory]" several times, or typing out the whole path before launching any application.

      Tell me how this is any faster than pressing the Windows Key and entering "wri[Return]" to bring up Libre Office Writer. Before you try, it's not. You're wrong, and Windows 8 does this better.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    10. Re:Mold-breaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the exact opposite of my experience. With windows 8 the search is segmented between categories, and becomes largely useless for me when it won't launch standalone apps that didn't have an installer or window's utility programs. With 7 I could just press windows and start typing the name of the program or document I wanted to load and then press enter, with windows 8 this isn't true more than half the time on my setup. I felt that windows vista was quite effective in breaking the pointing and clicking philosophy when they nix'd the classic menu in favor of a search bar, and then they tried to back-peddle with shiny animated tiles and a gimpy search service.

    11. Re:Mold-breaking by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is that it performs the auto-complete even if that's not what you want. If I type cmd, what I want is to run cmd. This is the way every other auto-complete I have ever used works. With Windows, it assumes that it knows better than you what you want which seems to be standard Microsoft behavior (and one that is increasingly being adopted by "good guys" like Firefox)

  10. Warm feeling by morcego · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Data collected automatically from some Windows users

    Oh, that gives me such a warm feeling inside...

    --
    morcego
    1. Re:Warm feeling by farlukar · · Score: 0, Troll

      Data collected automatically from some Windows users

      Oh, that gives me such a warm feeling inside...

      If people just used Ubuntu, that wouldn't happen.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une .sig
    2. Re:Warm feeling by morcego · · Score: 1

      Data collected automatically from some Windows users

      Oh, that gives me such a warm feeling inside...

      If people just used Ubuntu, that wouldn't happen.

      Humm, I know this is a personal prejudice of mine, but I never trusted Ubuntu either.

      --
      morcego
    3. Re:Warm feeling by assertation · · Score: 1, Insightful

      +1

      I'm glad someone mentioned having a problem with Microsoft collecting data off of people PERSONAL Computers (PC)

    4. Re:Warm feeling by morcego · · Score: 1

      +1

      I'm glad someone mentioned having a problem with Microsoft collecting data off of people PERSONAL Computers (PC)

      I would have no problem with them collecting it if they did so in a honest and upfront manner. Meaning letting people know they would do it beforehand, and before collecting it for the first time, giving the use a clear and direct option to disable it.

      Yes, I know some will say "opt-out" is evil, but I believe it is possible to do it the right way. Evil is doing it in some hidden way that takes hours to find out. "Opt-out" is ok when you throw the option directly into the user's face. Then again, maybe that is not "opt-out", but simply a direct choice with a default option.

      --
      morcego
    5. Re:Warm feeling by Siberwulf · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you've not used Visual Studio, SQL Server Management Studio, MS Office, Windows 8 or any other MS product. When you install an app that has ties to the "Customer Experience Improvement" stuff, there is a handy balloon at the bottom of your taskbar which invites you to click to opt out. If you dismiss the balloon, the icon in your systray stays there showing that you're collecting data.

      I'm not sure how much more upfront you can get. Honestly. (And I opt out immediately for anything I use.)

    6. Re:Warm feeling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you RTFS the part where it says that it's opt-in?

    7. Re:Warm feeling by PNutts · · Score: 1

      Data collected automatically from some Windows users

      Oh, that gives me such a warm feeling inside...

      If people just used Ubuntu, that wouldn't happen.

      Or if people don't choose to opt in.

    8. Re:Warm feeling by PNutts · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm guessing you've not used Visual Studio, SQL Server Management Studio, MS Office, Windows 8 or any other MS product. When you install an app that has ties to the "Customer Experience Improvement" stuff, there is a handy balloon at the bottom of your taskbar which invites you to click to opt out. If you dismiss the balloon, the icon in your systray stays there showing that you're collecting data.

      I'm not sure how much more upfront you can get. Honestly. (And I opt out immediately for anything I use.)

      Actually, it's off by default. It's an optional opt-in program.

    9. Re:Warm feeling by morcego · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you've not used Visual Studio, SQL Server Management Studio, MS Office, Windows 8 or any other MS product. When you install an app that has ties to the "Customer Experience Improvement" stuff, there is a handy balloon at the bottom of your taskbar which invites you to click to opt out. If you dismiss the balloon, the icon in your systray stays there showing that you're collecting data.

      I'm not sure how much more upfront you can get. Honestly. (And I opt out immediately for anything I use.)

      Windows will still send data even if you opt-out, although it is less data.

      --
      morcego
    10. Re:Warm feeling by ojak · · Score: 1

      Data collected automatically from some Windows users

      Oh, that gives me such a warm feeling inside...

      Eeen Sovyet Rusha... I meen eeen Amereekan Redmond, kompuuter yoozes you!

    11. Re:Warm feeling by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      Data collected automatically from some Windows users

      Oh, that gives me such a warm feeling inside...

      Feel this.

      If it works like on Windows 7, the data is collected automatically, every day/week, regardless of whether you participate in the "customer experience improvement program". It's just not uploaded if you decline. Check the Scheduled Tasks and you'll find several scheduled to run every day/week to collected data and some to upload the data (if you opt-in) - look for "Customer Experience". I've manually disabled all those tasks on my Windows 7 systems - just to be sure, and save some CPU cycles and disk space.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  11. It's not terrible by cuppett · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've noticed a couple different things:

    1) It makes me a lot more selective about putting things on the taskbar and desktop.
        a) I put things I really do use out there, so things are highly geared to my workflow
        b) Things I find I'm not using get punted
    2) The windows button finally has purpose. You can hit that button, start typing an app name and then space/enter to launch. I find I'm mousing less actually.

    In addition, Windows 8 hasn't come with the alternating-release-something-new instability problems we've gotten used to. It's every bit as solid as 7 and has better integrated security features. Win, win in my book.

    1. Re:It's not terrible by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The windows button finally has purpose. You can hit that button, start typing an app name and then space/enter to launch. I find I'm mousing less actually.

      This is Windows 7 functionality isn't it?

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    2. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find I'm mousing less actually.

      That's not because typing an app name is better -- if it was, we'd have stuck with command lines -- it's because mousing sucks ass in Windows 8.

    3. Re:It's not terrible by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      2) The windows button finally has purpose. You can hit that button, start typing an app name and then space/enter to launch. I find I'm mousing less actually.

      The problem I have with that is that for most apps, if I use the app often enough that I might remember the name of the app, it is going to have a shortcut on the taskbar or the desktop. Worse than that, I am pretty computer knowledgeable. I know people who refer to Adobe Acrobat as "Adobe". If they are on a computer with more than one Adobe app, they are going to have a hard time finding Acrobat (actually, they are likely to have trouble finding one of the other Adobe apps that they, also, call Adobe).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    4. Re:It's not terrible by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      windows 7 has a text search in the start button, you don't need windows 8 for that.

    5. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was introduced in Vista, actually.

    6. Re:It's not terrible by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Well, Spain in Summer ain't terrible either, but frankly, I will only go there again if I get paid, and certainly not on my own time, I have better alternatives.

      Get the idea?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      since you don't think it's terrible, perhaps you can help me clear up a few things as I don't use W8. A female acquaintance recently bought a hp ultrabook with w8 and in less than 5 minutes I had to listen to complaints of how:
      1) applications randomly switch, or at least switching from application to the desktop (I suspect it's some fancy hot-corner thingy but it would be nice if she was able to disable it).
      2) There's no way to attach files when writing emails using the default email client?
      3) Where did the explorer go? it was painful to see someone copy a powerpoint presentation by using the 'save as' functionality in powerpoint and using the explorer integration there.

      and no "just press win-" doesn't cut it with this level of technical inemptitude.

    8. Re:It's not terrible by pscottdv · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The windows button finally has purpose. You can hit that button, start typing an app name and then space/enter to launch

      So... It's just like DOS except you have to hit the windows key before you type the name of the program you want to launch.

      The more things change, the more they stay the same...

      --

      this signature has been removed due to a DMCA takedown notice

    9. Re:It's not terrible by rudy_wayne · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've noticed a couple different things:

      1) It makes me a lot more selective about putting things on the taskbar and desktop.

          a) I put things I really do use out there, so things are highly geared to my workflow

          b) Things I find I'm not using get punted
      2) The windows button finally has purpose. You can hit that button, start typing an app name and then space/enter to launch. I find I'm mousing less actually.

      In addition, Windows 8 hasn't come with the alternating-release-something-new instability problems we've gotten used to. It's every bit as solid as 7 and has better integrated security features. Win, win in my book.

      LOL!!

      Type the name of an app and then hit enter. Welcome to DOS. Are we suddenly back in 1992?

    10. Re:It's not terrible by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 1

      That would be why I missed it then ;-)

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    11. Re:It's not terrible by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      I've made a folder of all the shortcuts I want on the start bar, and sub folders containing different groups of programs. You can then add it as a toolbar to the task bar and it behaves kind of like the XP start menu. Keeps me out of that clusterfuck of the metro start page thing.

    12. Re:It's not terrible by hobarrera · · Score: 1

      [...]security features[...]

      You haven't been reading slashdot the past few weeks, have you?

    13. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but most people don't use it in Win 7 because it's integrated into the POS Start menu. Which is designed to be navigated using mouseover actions.

    14. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you type the list of things that match the search query changes, so you only need to start typing and then click on the thing you want as soon as you've narrowed the list enough you can spot it.

      This is 1 faster, 2 more forgiving if you can't spell, and 3 able to handle cases like 'I think it was Adobe Actor or something' (meaning Adobe Acrobat)

      Moving this interface full screen is the logical extension of the Win 7 capability, and active tiles are a neat idea (it'll be interesting to see if they work in practice of if software companies are too retarded to use them responsibly)

    15. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah i don't really get this either. os x has had this for like 8 years (spotlight), and windows 7 did it too. fast app launching by typing an app's name is nothing new.

    16. Re:It's not terrible by guttentag · · Score: 1

      So... It's just like DOS except you have to hit the windows key before you type the name of the program you want to launch.

      Obligatory:
      "Their operating system is a mess. Thank goodness I remember DOS... Trust me, that was hilarious."
      Rodney McKay, trying to grok a computer system on an alien organic spaceship. Stargate Atlantis episode "No Man's Land"

    17. Re:It's not terrible by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      So... It's just like DOS except you have to hit the windows key before you type the name of the program you want to launch.

      It's completely unlike DOS, since DOS didn't do a full-text search on all app names. It just let you type specific command names. If you didn't know that creating a directory is "mkdir" or "md", good luck guessing.

      In Start menu/screen (not just Win8 - the feature has been there since Vista), you can type things like "resolution", and it will automatically find the control panel item that lets you adjust that.

    18. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except not as comprehensive or convenient. In Windows 7, I can hit start and type "network connections" and hit enter. In Windows 8, I press the start key, type "network connections," click the "settings" tab beneath the default "apps" tab and find which one of the fifteen results is the one I'm looking for.

    19. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As opposed to the POS start page in Windows 8 that's designed to be navigated using a touch screen.

    20. Re:It's not terrible by PNutts · · Score: 1

      Also, there are plenty of utilities to restore the Start Orb functionality.

    21. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ahead and try exactly what you just said on any windows 7 or 8 machine. You type adobe, it brings up a list of all the adobe products installed and after a few seconds, it'll also give you files named adobe that you've opened recently.

      Also I don't know why people think this is a new great feature of windows 8. You've been able to do this for years, it's just that the new version made people stop being stuck in their ways and learn new and more efficient ways of doing things.

    22. Re:It's not terrible by steelfood · · Score: 1

      That's because UI people suddenly realized some 10, 15 years ago, that the keyboard and keyboard interfaces are faster than graphical interfaces. Graphical interfaces are better for certain things, e.g. finding options and settings. This is meta-work; it is work that the user needs to do to figure out how to do actual work. But the keyboard is better for getting actual work done.

      To provide an example, seeking and launching a very specific program is actual work. Looking through a list of all installed programs, perhaps to find what to launch, is meta-work.

      Windows used to be centered around the GUI. POSIX OSs are centered around the keyboard. Apple sought and found a middle ground. Have a GUI for meta-work, use the keyboard for actual work. With 7 and 8 (mostly 7 it'd seem), Windows seems to be moving towards the latter paradigm as well.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    23. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!!

      Type the name of an app and then hit enter. Welcome to DOS. Are we suddenly back in 1992?

      OMG so true!! When I use that spotlight icon in OSX it reads my mind. No typing in that text box that pops up for me! LOL!

    24. Re:It's not terrible by Aqualung812 · · Score: 1

      This is Windows 7 functionality isn't it?

      No, it is "improved". Now, when I type "Windows Update", I get no results until I go the "Settings" sub-section.

      In Windows 7, it was Start button, "Windows Up" then Enter.

      Somehow, this is better?

      --
      Grammer Nazis - I mod you "troll" unless you actually add something on-topic. Yes, I know I have mispellings in my sig.
    25. Re:It's not terrible by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      It's completely unlike DOS, since DOS didn't do a full-text search on all app names.

      You are right. It's like UNIX, but not as good as it.

      In Start menu/screen (not just Win8 - the feature has been there since Vista), you can type things like "resolution", and it will automatically find the control panel item that lets you adjust that.

      So, just like apropos, but not as good as it.

    26. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is, but most of slashdot can't figure out how to use Windows effectively. It's a very complex system for the kinds of homo-nerds you have on this site.

    27. Re:It's not terrible by quacking+duck · · Score: 3, Informative

      More like Vista in 2007.

      Or Mac OSX's Spotlight from 2005 or '06.

      (Excluding 3rd party utilities/launchers since they're not part of the out-of-the-box UI).

    28. Re:It's not terrible by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      Alternatively you can just add the Start Menu folder (%USERPROFILE%\Start Menu) as a toolbar. It's essentially the most basic start menu replacement you can have.

    29. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you didn't know that creating a directory is "mkdir" or "md", good luck guessing.

      Isn't it both? Same with chdir/cd and rmdir/rd.

    30. Re:It's not terrible by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Not quite. In DOS you had to either typed out the whole name, or typed part of it and tabbed to auto-complete (think of it as hitting the Windows key *after* typing the name of the program). And that's only if you knew the exact letters it started with, too.

      Type "Word" into the search-launchers of Vista/7 and it'll correctly offer up "Microsoft Office Word 20xx" as the first choice instead of "Wordpad"

      And sure, 8.3-format names aren't a big deal for the 5 programs you use normally, but a small problem for the dozens or hundreds of others you don't use often.

    31. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you don't remember the name of an app that gets run very rarely but you need it now?

    32. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vista too.

    33. Re:It's not terrible by snemarch · · Score: 1

      Who actually starts their PDF reader in any other way than through clicking on a .pdf, or selecting "open" as the action in their web browser? (Heck, "normal" people would most likely have the crappy and insecure in-browser AdobePDF, or would be using Chrome).

      --
      Coffee-driven development.
    34. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is meta-work; it is work that the user needs to do to figure out how to do actual work.

      Very similar to modern education. In many classrooms, where worksheets are the formative assessment, teachers often have to teach the kids HOW to fill in the required information, even though they have successfully demonstrated knowledge in other mediums.

    35. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The strange thing about my desktop and taskbar is that I've always put things I really do use on them. I do this all on my own without the operating system putting arbitrary limits on how many and how often I need to use something to keep it there. This type of cleaning up is so minor and rarely needed it's of negligible benefit as a feature, but it's potential for annoyance and disrupting workflow when you can't find something where you left it is quite high.

      What windows button? I've ripped these off every keyboard I've had since they came out. They only time I ever hit it is by mistake trying to hit Ctrl or Alt in the first week of owning the computer, then I remember to remove it.

      My DOS-style keyboards are incompatible with the DOS-style method of starting programs on Win8, which is neither an improvement nor a new feature.

    36. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The windows button finally has purpose. You can hit that button, start typing an app name and then space/enter to launch. I find I'm mousing less actually.

      This is Windows 7 functionality isn't it?

      No, it's Windows Vista functionality.

    37. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vista also had that funcionality.

    38. Re:It's not terrible by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      It is both. My point was that it's not "make directory" or "create directory", and if you type either of the latter, you don't get a search result pointing you at mkdir - it'll just throw a generic error message at you.

    39. Re:It's not terrible by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      How useful is apropos for GUI apps?

    40. Re:It's not terrible by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      Who actually starts their PDF reader in any other way than through clicking on a .pdf, or selecting "open" as the action in their web browser?

      In all fairness, he did say Adobe Acrobat (the expensive PDF maker), not Adobe Acrobat Reader (which is free and only reads them). If you're actually generating content then you may very well start with a blank file and run Acrobat from the icon.

    41. Re:It's not terrible by ignavus · · Score: 1

      The windows button finally has purpose. You can hit that button, start typing an app name and then space/enter to launch

      So... It's just like DOS except you have to hit the windows key before you type the name of the program you want to launch.

      We need a minimalist Windows. A plain black desktop and you just type the name of the program - and to make it easy, no need to press any "Windows" key first ... and the program just starts.

      We could call it: Desktop Only System, because there is no taskbar or start menu or icons... just the DOS.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    42. Re:It's not terrible by snemarch · · Score: 1

      In all fairness, he did say Adobe Acrobat (the expensive PDF maker), not Adobe Acrobat Reader (which is free and only reads them). If you're actually generating content then you may very well start with a blank file and run Acrobat from the icon.

      True - I just assumed he meant "reader", most "normal people" I've heard refer to the program either calls it "Adobe PDF" or perhaps "Adobe Acrobat" :)

      I'd kinda assume somebody using the (indeed pretty darn expensive!) Acrobat to know what the program is called... or at least not having an issue typing "Adobe" and then picking acrobat from the result list. Then again, marketing drones... :)

      --
      Coffee-driven development.
    43. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has using the mouse ever been a problem? If so why not work on voice recognition then both hands can be on the keyboard at all times.
      There are times when I simply cannot remember the name of an application (example "gpedit.msc") and end up staring at the screen for
      several minutes racking my brain for the name. I would rather dig into the start menu/file system until I find it. This issue is compounded
      when you only boot into Windows for Visual Studio or games or only run Windows in a VM. And yes I have installed and used Windows
      8 since it started leaking, I really did try to adjust to the new UI it interrupted and interfered with my workflow to much so in my case
      Windows is becoming irrelevant I have 1 computer that still has Windows installed on it and as soon as XBMC's PVR functionality is
      more mature Windows will be gone from my life.

    44. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More like Vista in 2007.

      Or Mac OSX's Spotlight from 2005 or '06.

      (Excluding 3rd party utilities/launchers since they're not part of the out-of-the-box UI).

      More like MS-DOS and every other command-line based OS.

      Microsoft has really brought users to the point of preferring to type the applications' names instead of using their GUI, and they still think this is a success.

    45. Re:It's not terrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2) The windows button finally has purpose.

      I use the windows key quite a lot. Usually for Win+E for an explorer window and Win+R for Run.
      Unsure what you mean by 'finally has a purpose'. Perhaps you don't know the useful shortcuts associated with the windows key?

      http://www.google.com.au/search?q=windows+key+shortcuts

    46. Re:It's not terrible by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      If they have a man page, it's quite usefull.

      Anyway, the GUI launcher is better. That's why everybody switched to it... Except that now MS came with a GUI launcher that is nearly as good as apropos, just a bit cruder.

  12. So far, it seems to pass the Mom test by LordSkippy · · Score: 2

    My mother had to get a new machine this past weekend, all they had in stock came with Win8. I was dreading it the entire way back from the store, and while I was removing her old box and connecting up the new box, due to my experiences with the Win8 preview. Looked and acted pretty much like the preview did to me, but surprisingly, my mother liked it. I heard a lot more "oh wow"s than I did "oh no"s.

    --
    My karma is in a nose dive
    1. Re:So far, it seems to pass the Mom test by Andy+Prough · · Score: 1

      I agree - my wife is doing fine with her new Win 8 laptop. I think she's asked me 2 questions about it since I set it up for her 2 weeks ago.

    2. Re:So far, it seems to pass the Mom test by TuxWithoutPants · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should delicately ask her if she found the start button yet, it could just be a face saving exercise like what MS is trying to pull.

  13. Much Like ... by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Microsoft Has Been Watching, and It Says You're Getting Used To Windows 8

    Much like a kid who has broken his arm "gets used to" a cast or sling. Much like a cow who has been electrocuted many times by a fence "gets used to" staying away from it. Much like someone convicted of a DUI "gets used to" riding a bicycle.

    'Even with the rumblings, we feel confident that it's a moment in time more than an actual problem.'

    Under what circumstances, exactly, would someone who works for Microsoft ever say anything contrary to that? Anything could be going on, good or bad, and that is exactly what they would say to dismiss criticism.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Much Like ... by pixelpusher220 · · Score: 2

      Under what circumstances, exactly, would someone who works for Microsoft ever say anything contrary to that?

      Depends, what's Ballmer drinking these days? ;-) Though I suppose it's an open question on whether he works 'for' MS or against them...

      --
      People in cars cause accidents....accidents in cars cause people :-D
    2. Re:Much Like ... by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

      Much like someone convicted of a DUI "gets used to" riding a bicycle.

      Actually, my impression is that people with DUI's just get used to being convicted of DUI's.

  14. UI design by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should not require the user to "become used to it" in order to use it.

    1. Re:UI design by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 1

      Should not require the user to "become used to it" in order to use it.

      Pretty limiting flaw in your logic. If they never change anything, they'd never get better.

      Disclaimer: Not a fanboy. I only use MS for gaming and have no plans to move to 8.

    2. Re:UI design by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Should not require the user to "become used to it" in order to use it.

      Pretty limiting flaw in your logic. If they never change anything, they'd never get better.

      If it's improved, then it will work faster, use less memory/disk space, have extra features. "Getting used to" an "upgrade" should never NEVER be "ok, so how do I go about performing that task I've done every day for fifteen years?" It should be "Hey! I didn't have to do this, this, or that, I got it done quicker."

      Microsoft has a sorry history of an "upgrade" being no more capable than the previous version, just UI juggling which gives the user a learning curve wothout increased functionality.

  15. 10% day 1 fail rate nothing to boast about by Jerry+Atrick · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's mind boggling, only 90% managed to use the start screen and charms on day1.

    So in that 10% are folk that failed to work out how to get the login prompt from the completely control free boot page. And people who failed to shutdown their PC making up the bulk of it - since that needs the charmless bar.

    Just to install ClassicShell or fire up the desktop to use it with needs use of both the start screen and charms. So even if you never use them again you still count as a MS success in these stats.

    Any other company would be panicking over a 10% fail rate just starting up their software, not claiming it as a success.

    1. Re:10% day 1 fail rate nothing to boast about by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      It's mind boggling, only 90% managed to use the start screen and charms on day1.

      So in that 10% are folk that failed to work out how to get the login prompt from the completely control free boot page. And people who failed to shutdown their PC making up the bulk of it - since that needs the charmless bar.

      Just to install ClassicShell or fire up the desktop to use it with needs use of both the start screen and charms. So even if you never use them again you still count as a MS success in these stats.

      Any other company would be panicking over a 10% fail rate just starting up their software, not claiming it as a success.

      I sort of agree. When you login to windows 8 you have to use the metro UI unless you install third party software to give you a start button. If you've got win8 and you're not savvy, you're going to be using metro. It's more interesting to me that 10% actually figured out how to work around it.

    2. Re:10% day 1 fail rate nothing to boast about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only Microsoft would call it a success when people work around their crappy UI solutions by installing 3rd. party software that restores previous functionality. IE: ClassicShell. It (or other similar tools) are basically a must to make Windows 8 and 2012 usable by anyone who wants to do things aside from browse the web.

    3. Re:10% day 1 fail rate nothing to boast about by Jmc23 · · Score: 1
      A company does not panic in public, it spins.

      Keep your eye on all the shiny as she spins... take no note that she's falling slowly into oblivion

      --
      Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    4. Re:10% day 1 fail rate nothing to boast about by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      So in that 10% are folk that failed to work out how to get the login prompt from the completely control free boot page. And people who failed to shutdown their PC making up the bulk of it - since that needs the charmless bar.

      Please show where the article states what you have claimed.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    5. Re:10% day 1 fail rate nothing to boast about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I used the Start Screen on day 1. Then I installed Start8, and so days 2 through present have been Start Screen free.

      Irritatingly, a number of default apps use the full-screen Metro view, including the app that displays PDFs. (I guess the movie player is forgivable, you generally want to watch movies full-screen).

    6. Re:10% day 1 fail rate nothing to boast about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. So I spent $5 for Stardock's Start8 and the first day I received my Win8 machine installed it and set it so that my laptop always boots right to the desktop.

      After that, Win8 runs pretty much like a slightly different flavor of Win7. No charms, no tiles, etc. The only real hassle is occasionally having to change the default app for things from the crappy Win8 native apps to regular Windows apps (for example, my laptop was set to open PDFs with one of the new Win8 app handlers...very annoying).

      My anonymized reports back to MS probably say I'm doing just fine with Win8, which I am because I routed around all of their new UI cruft.

    7. Re:10% day 1 fail rate nothing to boast about by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      Classic Shell and similar tools have been around long before Windows 8. You'll find with every version of Windows, there is a group of people longing for "classic" start menu. Happened with XP, Vista, and again with Windows 7 (for those who skipped Vista).

    8. Re:10% day 1 fail rate nothing to boast about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just to install ClassicShell or fire up the desktop to use it with needs use of both the start screen and charms. So even if you never use them again you still count as a MS success in these stats.

      The first time you boot Windows 8 you boot to the start menu, so if they were counting stats this way, you'd see 100% of users using the start screen. Obviously MS has much more detailed, granular statistics on this, including how many times you use the start screen, how often, how long you spend there, etc. They also have this data for Windows 7 and the start menu, and are internally comparing the two.

      Fact is, you don't even need to use the start screen or charms to install Start8 or classic shell or any other Metro replacement. Just Win+D, launch IE, install, never use them again.

      Further, after all the news articles and comments on Slashdot about how terrible and unintuitive the Metro UI, you'd expect about 10% to find it and use it on the first day. Turns out it isn't working that way, so I guess we have to keep spinning this, huh guys?

    9. Re:10% day 1 fail rate nothing to boast about by Kpt+Kill · · Score: 1

      I took the win8 plunge to upgrade my PC from Vista. 40 bucks was about the price I paid when I was a student. With Classic Shell, Classic Start, and Win7 taskbar tweaker, I have absolutely no issues with win8.

    10. Re:10% day 1 fail rate nothing to boast about by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      My biggest fear is that I'm being counted as one of the successes and I've looked at metro maybe 8 times since I installed startisback.

      I tried to use it but the UI is like a fucking hamster on crack. It can't figure out if it wants to be Windows or some random tablet UI of which there are already a billion that both do their own jobs better and ALSO don't belong on a desktop. It switches back and forth so often you could have an epileptic seizure just from trying to use it.

    11. Re:10% day 1 fail rate nothing to boast about by kelemvor4 · · Score: 1

      My biggest fear is that I'm being counted as one of the successes and I've looked at metro maybe 8 times since I installed startisback.

      I tried to use it but the UI is like a fucking hamster on crack. It can't figure out if it wants to be Windows or some random tablet UI of which there are already a billion that both do their own jobs better and ALSO don't belong on a desktop. It switches back and forth so often you could have an epileptic seizure just from trying to use it.

      Try start8. I hardly ever see the metro screen unless I intend to with that one.

    12. Re:10% day 1 fail rate nothing to boast about by Ironhandx · · Score: 1

      startisback actually works better. I had start8 first, its better at eliminating ALL of metro, but Startisback is better at restoring full win7 start menu.

      Plus the bits of metro that seep through startisback are actually better IMHO.

      The one thing I REALLY hate is every now and then an update will "mysteriously" lose all of my default program settings, causing them to default back to metro crap.

      The PDF viewer is the absolute WORST.

    13. Re:10% day 1 fail rate nothing to boast about by Jerry+Atrick · · Score: 1

      You have to use Metro at least once to get to the desktop to install the software that stops you having to use Metro to get to the desktop.... ;)

    14. Re:10% day 1 fail rate nothing to boast about by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And people who failed to shutdown their PC making up the bulk of it

      And you think the bulk of people ever shut down their PCs? How cutely 1990s would that be.

  16. I pirated windows 7, bought windows 8 for £1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Success in my book.

  17. Users will put up with just about anything by Rgb465 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Many moons ago we got a new intern in the office. He was young, naive and hopelessly clueless about the corporate world. We took a liking to him immediately.
    Of course, this meant that we had to play pranks on him. Because that's what you do to people you like, right?

    Our best prank was what we did to his computer. We wrote a small program that ran in the background and drew a dot in the center of the screen on top of whatever was running. This dot grew bigger over time; at first it was just one pixel wide, but after a week it was over twenty.

    One morning, just over a week after we'd secretly installed it onto the intern's computer, he called me into his cubicle and asked me if I had ever heard of "dead pixels on a CRT". I said no, holding back the laughter, and politely suggested that he try reinstalling his graphics card drivers. He declined, and said that was too much effort and he would just live with it.

    The intern was fully prepared to live with this large, expanding, black dot in the center of his monitor. It was nothing but sheer annoyance, but he was willing to ignore it.
    At this point we caved and uninstalled the software.

    That experience taught me that users will put up with just about anything. As long as it doesn't outright prevent them from doing their job (eg, the network card has died), they will find some way to soldier on.

    1. Re:Users will put up with just about anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should definitively submit that story to The Daily WTF ( http://thedailywtf.com/ )

    2. Re:Users will put up with just about anything by deodiaus2 · · Score: 1

      I suppose your office mates put tripwires outside of handicap access ramps?
      With friends like you, who needs enemies?

    3. Re:Users will put up with just about anything by gl4ss · · Score: 5, Funny

      I suppose your office mates put tripwires outside of handicap access ramps?

      With friends like you, who needs enemies?

      of course not. they made the ramp 1 degree steeper every week.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Users will put up with just about anything by gtirloni · · Score: 1

      I suppose the WTF part will be about jerks thinking the prank was funny, right?

      You know when a prank is bad when the people doing it won't bother telling the guy he was pranked ("At this point we caved and uninstalled the software"). It affords a "oh! ok" at most.

      --
      none
    5. Re:Users will put up with just about anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And then after 6 weeks you put the ramp back to the way it was at the start. You don't notice the increase but you do notice the increase back.

    6. Re:Users will put up with just about anything by lee+n.+field · · Score: 1

      Our best prank was what we did to his computer. We wrote a small program that ran in the background and drew a dot in the center of the screen on top of whatever was running. This dot grew bigger over time; at first it was just one pixel wide, but after a week it was over twenty.

      That's evil. Can I have a copy?

    7. Re:Users will put up with just about anything by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 2

      Your story was very good. It reminded me of something I did to a co-worker about 20 years ago. I was working for the federal government at a military base in the US. I was in an IT department but we had a small number of senior level paper pushers who didn't do any programming. One of them was a lady who was barely computer literate. I wrote a DOS batch script that called a C program I wrote and installed both on her PC. When the PC got powered up, the batch script called my C program. The program grabbed any keyboard input, shifted it into the ASCII range for Greek letters and echoed it back in Greek with a message that the command was not understood. After doing that 3 times, the program would say that it was doing a "DOS memory dump - do not abort!" and printed lines of dots below ii, opened a new file and deleted it to make the disk active (these old PCs were noisy when you did that) after printing each dot and waited until a counter was reached (about1 minute on average), whereupon the program terminated and normal control returned to the PC. It had been some time since I installed it and myself and another guy (he knew about it) were the guys who got notified about PC problems and she never said anything. So one day I just went into her office and asked her about it. I told her it was a joke. She told me that when she saw it, she just turned the PC off and never used it again! I didn't expect that. It really spoke volumes about the quality of "work" that Uncle Sam was getting out of her.

    8. Re:Users will put up with just about anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you suggesting that Windows 8 is like a dead and growing imediment to accessing or processing information on your computer?

    9. Re:Users will put up with just about anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so you are training your cripple not to be crippled by training them for the paralimpics, how nice !

    10. Re:Users will put up with just about anything by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Considering you were an IT department supposed to assist users, not hinder, this sounds like a very good way of getting fired. I can think of a hundred ways that could have back-fired badly and ended in your ass hitting the pavement.

      I wrote a DOS batch script that called a C program I wrote and installed both on her PC. When the PC got powered up, the batch script called my C program.

      So you wrote a batch file that called the C program? What called the batch script at power up? The AUTOEXEC? A batch file to call a batch file to call a C program? Who was the barely computer literate one again?

  18. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Numerous people also get used to living with terrible diseases.

  19. Doesn't help me do what I want to do by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    I don't have a problem using Windows 8, my problem is it is not helping me do what I want to do. Simple things like cutting and pasting between applications is a pain. Copying text from the Metro email app to a word document is far to difficult. I have been using it since the first preview, so it is not the learning curve. Too many times the item you are working on leaves the screen so you can do some Windows function full screen.

    1. Re:Doesn't help me do what I want to do by Missing.Matter · · Score: 1

      Copying text from the Metro email app to a word document is far to difficult

      What exactly is your problem? Just highlight text in mail app > right click > click copy > Right click in word document > click paste. If you like keyboard shortcuts, standard ctrl+c and ctrl+v work as well.

  20. Where Have I Heard This Before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh yea! Vista.

    1. Re:Where Have I Heard This Before? by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

      Vista was a pain, but not like Windows 8. Vista had software and driver incompatabilities. It asked for permission to do things way to often. But, if you knew how to use XP, you could use Vista. Not so with Windows 8. Now, 8 has software and driver imcompatabilities also, but the dual GUI thing is its major problem.

    2. Re:Where Have I Heard This Before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything that works on Windows 7 works on Windows 8.

    3. Re:Where Have I Heard This Before? by xhrit · · Score: 1

      So you are saying that Windows 8 is actually worse then Vista?

  21. my sample pool is different by iggymanz · · Score: 2

    Most the people in my IT group at work are windows users. most of my friends and relative are windows users. No one likes windows 8, several have downgraded new gear because they hated the 8 so much. At work they say its the new Vista, useless rubbish that should be shunned, and that hopefully "9" will be a release Redmond gets a clue again and puts out something useful.

    That's pretty funny when the die-hard windoze fangals/fanbois I know can only bad-mouth the windows 8. Microsoft has failed its own customers, driven dissatisfaction upward, regressed the state of the UI art.

    1. Re:my sample pool is different by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 1

      Was the new gear touch screen? I used the Win8PR on a regular laptop and didn't like it. I thought is was a pain to use with a mouse. But, I went to a local store after release and used a touch screen model and found I liked it much more with the touch screen.

      --
      There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    2. Re:my sample pool is different by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      only two guys at work had it on tablets, but that's not how most people would want to use their desktop as they do email, word processing, spreadsheets. Touch is good for buying online from established account, for entertainment and news.

  22. Really? by oh_my_080980980 · · Score: 1

    So give people a choice, Windows 8 versus Windows 7 - see which one people prefer.....

  23. Start8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, Windows 8 is fine, as long as you install a third party app like Start8 in order to giver yourself power user abilities from the Desktop.

    Seriously Micro$oft, how boneheaded are you?

    1. Re:Start8 by znanue · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Windows 8 is fine, as long as you install a third party app like Start8 in order to giver yourself power user abilities from the Desktop.

      Seriously Micro$oft, how boneheaded are you?

      windows key->type what you want->launch desktop app == much faster than a start button. Always works for me quickly.

      How boneheaded are you? (ooo invective is fun)

      In all seriousness, I think windows 8 has some pretty neat features, although I spend most of my time outside of metro.

      Z

    2. Re:Start8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If we wanted to type application names to run them, we'd have stuck with bash.

      Your argument seems to be 'yeah, this GUI fscking sucks as a GUI, but you can still use the command line'. That's monkey talk.

    3. Re:Start8 by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      If you remember exactly what you want to look for (or what ever the programmer decided to name that shit) it works quite well, except when it doesn't.

      I just make a folder named 'Start'
      Fill it full of the shortcuts don't use quite enough to want them pinned to my task bar.
      ->subfolders work fine too, keep all the networking stuff in one, adobe stuff in another.
      Click add toolbar from the task bar and add the Start folder.

      Ta da. I now have a start menu. It's far more information dense then the metro interface. Contains everything that I feel I need and it doesn't make me run the mouse all round the screen to click what I want.

    4. Re:Start8 by Jerry+Atrick · · Score: 1

      "windows key->type what you want->launch desktop app == much faster than a start button. Always works for me quickly. "

      Tried that, after typing MediaPortalFS2 (the entire name of the Windows shortcut except the .lnk) it still hadn't found it. A feature that only works some of the time on some of the stuff is not worth wasting any of my time on.

      To add insult, it takes longer waiting for search to pop up a result window then select from it than to mouse a zigzag in the old Start Menu. Even when it finds the correct damn app it usually takes longer.

      The only time I find search faster is when trying to remember where the hell they hid the settings I want in this iteration of Windows. That fails quite a lot when I don't think of the magic phrase they renamed things to. This is a feature that only looks good because it's papering over UI design faults. Lucky I can restore sanity with ClassicShell and layout everything in an optimal and discoverable way for me.

  24. OS... get out of the way of my apps by vlm · · Score: 1

    how they are using the operating system

    If the great unwashed are "using" the OS then they're doing it wrong.

    From the end user perspective the OS is supposed to be an app launcher, not much else.

    --
    "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    1. Re:OS... get out of the way of my apps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From end user point of view and from developer point of view, operating system is the software what operates the hardware and software aka monolithic kernel like Linux and FreeBSD or micokernel+ servers if OS is Server-Client by archtechture like NT, XNU and many other.

      Graphical User Interface aka GUI is a separated software from operating system and operated by it. Modern UI or Desktop in windows 8 isnt part of operating system but are separated software top of dozens of other software what all are top of operating system and operated by it.

      User only see and use GUI and apps but never the operating system itself.

  25. Windows 7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently overheard a staples employee state that they were no longer allowed to sell any Windows 7 machines. This is why Windows 8 is picking up market share. The couple he was talking to walked out when he said that. Microsoft is screwing itself over with moves like these. Our company has no plans to deploy Windows 8 any time soon, nor do we plan to roll out Windows Server 2012. Sorry Microsoft.

  26. What about VISUAL STUDIO 2012? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone getting used to VISUAL STUDIO 2012, where the UI is so flat you often can't tell where dialog box borders are, and the MENUS shout at you? This has got to be a usability disaster of historical proportions.

    1. Re:What about VISUAL STUDIO 2012? by znanue · · Score: 1

      Anyone getting used to VISUAL STUDIO 2012, where the UI is so flat you often can't tell where dialog box borders are, and the MENUS shout at you? This has got to be a usability disaster of historical proportions.

      I couldn't hear you over the slashdot icon shouting at me. Z

    2. Re:What about VISUAL STUDIO 2012? by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      Do you have VS 2008 installed? If so check out Visual Studio Icon Patcher

      No if only we can revert the new brain-dead Team Foundation back to VS 2008.

    3. Re:What about VISUAL STUDIO 2012? by nschubach · · Score: 1

      The fun part is using VS 2012 with TFS 2008. Every time I check out code, I have to go in and remove the read-only flag on every file.

      Also, why the hell doesn't Visual Studio include the option to remove trailing white space like every other sane editor in the world? We have one person in our team that decided they like the option that allows them to insert text anywhere and they consistently check in code that has massive white space issues.

      (Yes, I've seen the plugins, but at this point I'd have figured that "developer, developers, developers" would have included features to help developers out.)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    4. Re:What about VISUAL STUDIO 2012? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? For driver development, I now have SDV and code analysis built into the UI ... I'm in heaven with VS2012. Flip to the dark theme and voila, it's perfect.

    5. Re:What about VISUAL STUDIO 2012? by Jerry+Atrick · · Score: 1

      I had problems with tiled windows on the desktop, with identical low contrast borders on all sides, spotting where one window ended and the next started was visually confusing. Same with working out where scroll bars were, thanks to no internal visual clues. Installing UxStyle and the XP style pack made an instant difference. Just having a distinct title bar and scroll bars that stand out makes an enormous improvement navigating complex windows and window collections.

      Win7 Aero was undeniably a step too far, too visually distracting. Ripping it all out was an idiotic overreaction.

    6. Re:What about VISUAL STUDIO 2012? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Visual Studio 2012's UI changes are godawful. There is nothing else I can say except that it is a clear sign (as if Metro weren't enough of one) that Microsoft is so sold on their new "style" that they're willing to alienate people who do real work on a PC.

  27. If you're using Windows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you're already pretty used to substandard things.

  28. "getting used to it"??? by mark-t · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You can probably "get used to" almost anything when you aren't given a choice. Heck, you can "get used to" chronic back pain too...

    But that's a far cry from meaning that a person actually prefers it

    1. Re:"getting used to it"??? by codemachine · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      [Larson-Green] previously led a redesign of the Microsoft Office interface that, in 2007, replaced text-based menus with a more visual “ribbon interface,” an initially controversial change that is now widely accepted as an example of good design.

      The awfulness of Windows 8 makes more sense, knowing it was designed by the same people that consider the ribbon an example of "good design". So many features are not easily discoverable in both cases. Though funny enough, Office for Windows RT basically has a menu on top which then brings you to the ribbon, rather than having the ribbon always be there (probably because it was an inefficient use of screen real estate, especially since Windows RT defaults to landscape, and has a virtual keyboard on the bottom, leaving very little vertical space).

      I'm really curious what part of their user experience feedback determined that their menus should be all in CAPS on their new applications. I have to wonder why Visual Studio and Office are shouting at me. It seems every one of Microsoft's recent UI innovations has made their products uglier and more cumbersome. It almost makes you wonder how the same programmers managed to get so much right in Windows 7.

  29. Just like ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... a frog in a pot of water on the stove.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  30. Ordinary! by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "...ordinary users are getting along with it just fine..."

    Ah, them! You do mean the ones that cannot distinguish between Microsoft Word and Microsoft Windows?

    1. Re:Ordinary! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "..the ones that cannot distinguish between Microsoft Word and Microsoft Windows?"

      I always tell them they have to get used to it, the Director of the Internets unfortunately decided it that way, the bastard.

  31. Steve Ballmer AKA Colonel Kurtz by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm amused how he looks a little more and more like Colonel Kurtz from Apocalypse Now every year. I'm pretty sure that there's eventually going to be an investor meeting in a temple surrounded by spikes with iMacs and Apple computers skewered on them somewhere in Redmond. Ballmer will be sweating out and squeezing cool water over his bald forehead while rambling slowly in spurts to SEC reporters who are trying to make heads or tails of what he is saying. Minions will be slaughtering a cow with chairs in the background while he sputters on about Windows 8's success and how they said his methods were madness.

    --
    My work here is dung.
  32. Upgrading from W8 to W7 by Serk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The sheer number of friends and relatives bringing their shiny new computers to me (The resident geek) begging me to upgrade them from Windows 8 to Windows 7 says otherwise...

    I suspect most of these people did not voluntary opt into Microsoft's "Track Me" program either.

    --
    Never ask a geek why, just nod your head and slowly back away. -Rob Malda
    1. Re:Upgrading from W8 to W7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Honestly, why?

      If you install StartIsBack onto win8 then you get an OS that *looks* exactly like Win7, but has all the under-the-hood improvements (better print-drivers, better copy dialog, faster loadtimes, lower memory-footprint, better task-manager. I think you're doing your "friends" a disservice.

    2. Re:Upgrading from W8 to W7 by Clockwurk · · Score: 1

      The plural of anecdote is not data.

    3. Re:Upgrading from W8 to W7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe 95% of the people in the "Track Me" program are MS employees? Who can know for sure?

    4. Re:Upgrading from W8 to W7 by headcase88-2 · · Score: 1

      Go to Ninite and throw on Classic Shell (along with the other apps they will need; Ninite is great for this). Hopefully that will give most people what they're looking for. Classic Shell also lets you bypass Metro on startup. Then it's just a matter of configuring the auto-login and it's mostly like Win7 by that point, with the major difference being that Win8 has flat colours and Win7 has shiny glass.

  33. Bashing it back into shape, rather by obarthelemy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I wanted to try it out, so I put it on my (non-touch) laptop. The Metro UI is an abomination. I wouldn't even want it on a touch tablet ("live tiles" compare very badly to Android's widget, notifications are a joke...), on a PC, it should be taken out and shot.

    Which, luckily, you can do easily with http://classicshell.sourceforge.net/, and get back the Desktop shell that the IT gods intended.

    Apart form that, the new features are:
    1- Remote Desktop server...
    2- and that's it. Not even ReadyBoost for SSD, nor some tiered storage like Apple has started doing.
    3- and after Jan 31st, you won't even get Media Server.

    MS is trying to force-feed Metro UI to their Desktop users, hoping to use that familiarity to get some traction on phones and tablets. The problem are that Metro UI 1) makes no sense on non-touch machines, and 2) lacks severely even on tablets and phones.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re:Bashing it back into shape, rather by nogginthenog · · Score: 1

      As far as I can see there is no difference between Windows 8's Remote Desktop and the one that came with XP.
      One nice new feature of Win8 is the inclusion of Hyper-V.

    2. Re:Bashing it back into shape, rather by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      One nice new feature of Win8 is the inclusion of Hyper-V.

      A selling point is that it helps you run other operating systems?

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    3. Re:Bashing it back into shape, rather by Sedated2000 · · Score: 1

      It made me remember the old mobile Windows operating systems. Microsoft thought everyone would want a normal start bar, etc on their mobile device. It didn't work out well as history has proven. Now they're trying the other way around... force the mobile UI on the desktop. They don't fathom that people want desktop (and at the very least non-touch laptops) to have one UI, and mobile devices to have another.

    4. Re:Bashing it back into shape, rather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      MS is trying to force-feed Metro UI to their Desktop users, hoping to use that familiarity to get some traction on phones and tablets. The problem are that Metro UI 1) makes no sense on non-touch machines, and 2) lacks severely even on tablets and phones.

      Approximately 60 million Xbox360s have been sold. Let's make a conservative assumption that 25% of those work and receive online updates as per usual. That means ~15 million people have "Metro UI" on (I'll make another assumption that only 25% of that 25% has Kinect) mostly non-touch machines.

      You'd think we'd constantly hear the tears of ~15 million people if "Metro UI" was as terrible as you full grown adults cry that it is.

      I think middle-aged old people whine more as technology changes accelerate, and saying things like this make it all the more obvious you are losing your ability to cope with the changes. There is nothing wrong with the UI; your other points might be valid (I don't know, and I only use ReadyBoost with a SmartCard on my laptop), but your failure to adapt to new paradigms is not Microsoft's failure.

      I remember when I was a child, I didn't like bedtime, and I cried a lot when I was forced to change to unconscious mode.

    5. Re:Bashing it back into shape, rather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RDP is Windows 8 is light years ahead of the RDP in 7, let alone XP..

      Try using Win8 RDP Server with a Win8 RDP client and it's much smoother and responsive over a low speed / high latency connection.. Win7 is barely usable over a HSPDA connection (Tmobile), where as Win8 is very usable..

      Hyper-V is great, unfortunately it is not hackintosh comparable...

    6. Re:Bashing it back into shape, rather by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      You're right, RDP is RDP is RDP (there's a guy further down who thinks RDP on Win8 is better over sucky links though, and he might even be right, I'm usign mostly over LAN or wired Internet so I wouldn't know).

      Thing is, they took away RDP server in Win7 Home Premium. They put it back in whatever version they're giving us when we upgrade from 7HP to 8.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    7. Re:Bashing it back into shape, rather by obarthelemy · · Score: 1

      Good analogy, it's indeed the same mistake, only the other way around. I remember, back when I was spending much time trying to click my WinMob 6 HD2 little "close" buttons, thinking MS really wanted us to tack a keyboard and mouse onto that thing.

      I think MS don't realize that aesthetics is as important as functionality. We don't need the same damn tiles and mysterious hotspots on a desktop screen: there's plenty of room to be more discoverable and information-intensive. They could have come up with unified visual design, without actually making the high-res/KBMS and the low-res/touch version identical.

      --
      The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    8. Re:Bashing it back into shape, rather by thejynxed · · Score: 1

      The "Metro" UI pushed out on XBoxLive is not even quite the same as the one in WinRT or Win8. It's been stripped down considerably, and seeing as how the previous recent versions of the software already used tiles (movie browsing, etc), it was not much of a change other than "new shiny".

      For instance: There's no hidden ridiculous "charms" or other such nonsense in the XBoxLive version.

      And yes, the paradigm change was horrendously wrong. They took two completely separate paradigms, and crunched them together into a mushy slop of a mess, that doesn't work right for either one.

      --
      @Mindless Drivel: 100% of Twitter posts ever Tweeted.
  34. Beta Testers by phrostie · · Score: 1

    so they all were paying to be beta testers?

  35. "It's a moment in time, not an actual problem" by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1

    Other famous Microsoft Moments In Time (MMITs) that were not Actual Problems:

    = 8.3 filenames
    = Microsoft Bob
    = Windows XP security
    = Microsoft Windows Vista, *.*
    = Microsoft advertisement in which Seinfeld asks Bill Gates to "adjust his shorts"
    = Microsoft Zune, whether brown or not
    = Chief Executive Orificer, Squirts Ballmer, *.*
    = Microsoft advertisement for the Surface tablet in which ungraceful, robotic people coordinate senseless movements that no one would ever do in reality... if anyone bought a Surface tablet in reality

    --
    Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
  36. Failure by The+Grim+Reefer · · Score: 1

    This statement alone should say it all:

    "users are getting used to dealing with Windows 8"

    If it was such a "success" wouldn't you expect users to do more than deal with it.

  37. Wow, no kidding MS? Gosh! by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Call me a skeptic but somehow the very fact that MS feels the need to say this, shows people are NOT picking up Windows 8. Yeah, so early adapters of the new MS vision who are so in love with the company they allow it to see everything they do, are sticking with it... and? Fans of a dog food company eat their favorite companies dog food. Doesn't mean it doesn't tastes like... well like nothing actually, animal food lacks spicing.

    If Windows 8 adoption was really good, MS would be crowing about actual sales figures. They are not. For the truth NEVER listen to what a spokesman says, listen for what he doesn't say.

    Basically, people that haven't given up on Windows 8 or refused to even start using it or didn't mind MS watching over their shoulder, haven't given up in large volumes. Damned by faint praise? If this is the best press release they could come up with, the truth is far more dire.

    Want proof? Go back in history and read MS press release on Bob, ME and Vista.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  38. Simple question: by 3seas · · Score: 1

    If people backcharged Microsoft for the time and frustration the Windows OS cost them, would microsoft still be in business?

  39. W8 isn't bad once you learn to ignore Metro. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 8 is a lot more palatable once you realize that Metro can be ignored completely.
    Faster startup/shutdown, a much improved task-manager, and large-file-copy that actually works makes this a big improvement over Win 7.

  40. Udoubtedly true. by drankr · · Score: 1

    People can adapt to a range of misfortunes, from bad weather to living without limbs. The question is, would they, unless they had to? And if they would, what does that make those people?

  41. They know when you are sleeping by jfdavis668 · · Score: 1

    They know when you're awake

    1. Re:They know when you are sleeping by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      They know if you watch porn or cats*, so downgrade+ for privacy's sake, oh...

      (*I don't really know. Do they?)
      (+"install Linux" didn't really scan)

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  42. Happy data by freeze128 · · Score: 1

    What kind of data is being collected? Is it detecting the frustration level of the user? Maybe it could detect HOW HARD the user taps on the touch screen.... Maybe it's a PUNCH!

  43. Getting used to it? Wow, high praise by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    I'd get used to having a prostate exam every day, if I had to.

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    1. Re:Getting used to it? Wow, high praise by Jintsui · · Score: 1

      You might start to enjoy it too much...

    2. Re:Getting used to it? Wow, high praise by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      "I just realised the doctor had BOTH hands on my shoulders when he did it!"

      (rest of joke omitted as redundant)

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  44. Sure, I'm using Windows 8...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I'm not using the "metro" crap on it. I am using start8 which makes windows 8 usable again.. At least for me. I did try the new start screen for a day or two, and figured out how to uninstall or un-pin all of the metro type applications as I refuse to run 8 on anything other than a local account so couldn't use em anyways. After doing this and then pinning all of the programs I normally use, it was usable but I still missed using the desktop and start menu. and I agree with the other posters who complain about having to jump thru hoops to shut down or restart windows 8. Yeah I know you can press the power button and turn the computer off or have it go to sleep depending on how you have it configured, but for those of us who keep their computers up under their desk having to do this is a pain in the ass compared to just being able to click shutdown and have the computer do so as opposed to how you do it on windows 8. using start8 kept me from having to reformat my computer and go back to windows 7.

  45. hidden message by Papa+Legba · · Score: 1

    according to Julie Larson-Green, the Microsoft executive who leads Windows product development also showed she enjoys getting a paycheck and is willing to skew any set of numbers as she is told to. Early adoption of her pay check as an executive has led to a quick adaption of weasling positions and stats to make the higher ups, and HR, happy. She expects, as an early adopter of her pay, that future trends will encourage more of this same behavior leading to hoped for increase in pay adoption.

    --
    Papa Legba come and open the gate
  46. Behold! by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    This is how propaganda works -- make everyone believe that everyone else agrees with something, and you have a herd of sheep ready to be controlled.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  47. Used to bugs/missing features by Horshu · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I'm really getting used to being forced to check my POP3 inboxes using my supposedly less-powerful WinPhone. And the IE10 renderer's tendency to render all-white/all-black when I have more than 8 tabs open tells me I've been using the browser wrong all these years.

  48. Expectation bias by WaffleMonster · · Score: 1

    In the early days of using computers to optimize logistics folks would peer into their inventories and make decisions with a narrow view of what made them the most money. It was only later they discovered secondary effects of this was actually costing them money.

    The lack of low value item x in stock meant a customer wanting item x and may also purchase item y decides they would rather shop somewhere both x and y items are in stock translating into lost sales.

    I think as TFA points out this data shows only that humans can adapt to changes in their environment. It does not address TFAs productivity question or validate a design decision.

    If we did a "project mojave" style test replacing metro shell with program manager I suspect we would find the same signals in the data.

  49. Canonical Has Been Watching... by the_other_one · · Score: 5, Funny

    Canonical Has Been Watching, and It Says You're Getting Used To Unity

    --
    134340: I am not a number. I am a free planet!
  50. this reads like a backhanded complement by Dan667 · · Score: 2

    win8, you don't sweat much for a fat guy. Overall, those are pretty terrible results and microsoft appears to be panicking even with their PR.

    1. Re:this reads like a backhanded complement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Referring to the title you put on your post, I must say you spell very well... for a moron.

    2. Re:this reads like a backhanded complement by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      and yet, you took felt the need to respond.

  51. Wow.... by Jintsui · · Score: 1

    MS is really throwing the bull**** around when it comes to Win8. They will do almost anything other than admit they screwed up.

  52. But *who* is getting used to Windows 8? by JDG1980 · · Score: 2

    What Larson-Green fails to take into account is that technically experienced users (1) are still running Windows 7, and (2) turn off Customer Experience Improvement Program anyway for privacy reasons.

    In addition, most corporations will turn off Customer Experience Improvement Program via group policy, for the same reasons power users do. (Even if it's not supposed to be personally identifiable, why risk sending more personal/corporate information to Microsoft than you have to?) So CEIP turns out to measure little more than the responses of technically inexperienced users who buy cheap OEM systems – a shrinking demographic.

    Microsoft needs to remember that business users and power users, not the dumbasses who buy $299 eMachines, are its real customer base.

  53. Catch-22 compromise. by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

    Well, being into computers for at least 20 years my wife likes it over win 7. Took a while to rip the gui apart but it seems to work well for her.

    As far as me... well the MS compatibility tester prog says there's about a dozen or more legacy progs I depend on that aren't compatible. So it'll probably cost me at least $500 to upgrade them. And there are some that'll just die.
    Seems like it's getting more and more like the mac. Upgrade the OS you have to upgrade some programs. Want to upgrade some programs, you have to update the OS.
    So I'm at a catch-22 with it.

    --
    Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
  54. the post says it all by JoeTierney · · Score: 1

    I can't imagine Apple or Google putting out something similar ... "despite all the negative reviews, people really like it" Right. No one was asking for a more complicated OS but that's exactly what MSFT delivered.

  55. This is what I love about geeks by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    You complain that Microsoft doesn't innovate. Microsoft has no ideas. Microsoft just copies.

    Then, when they realise they might need to update the 3 decade old UI to handle innovations such as trackpads, touchscreens, multitouch, and multiple screens everyone is horrorstruck that they're actually trying to do something different.

    And while the UI experts analyse how people use computers, they maximise real estate, maximise flexibility, and design a UI that tries to fit these usage patterns, people who have barely even used it declare it the worst idea ever.

    1. Re:This is what I love about geeks by Tridus · · Score: 1

      About 20 minutes ago, we got a certificate error on a windows 8 machine in IE 10 (the metro version). We tried to figure out how to view the certificate to see what the error might be (since of course it gives you no details in the error message), and there was no apparent way to do that.

      If that is what the "UI experts" think I want, I`d love to know who decided they`re experts.

      --
      -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  56. If M$ has to prove that the adoption is going well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...then it's definitely not.

  57. Why is microsoft press release a slashdot article? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Seriously.. this sounds directly like a microsoft propaganda puff piece.

    I would want the actual data to be made available for independent analysis before wasting slashdot's bandwidth on an article saying "a microsoft executive says users are liking our product".

    I mean-- seriously. Come on.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  58. for the sake of argument... by gadget+junkie · · Score: 2
    ... I'd like to know what percentage of users ticked "yes" to : 'do you want to enroll in the customer experience improvement program?' My hunch is that such a group suffers from two defects:

    1. It's self selecting, and selection is based practically on a positive view of Microsoft products;
    2.it might be too small to be representative of the whole, and no data on enrollment is available in the article.

    moreover, the article says:

    "[...]The data collected by Microsoft also show that people are becoming more familiar with the new features over time, says Larson-Green. She previously led a redesign of the Microsoft Office interface that, in 2007, replaced text-based menus with a more visual “ribbon interface,” an initially controversial change that is now widely accepted as an example of good design. “Two days to two weeks is what we used to say in Office, and it’s similar in Windows 8,” she says.

    So my quick summary: Microsoft wants me to believe that a group, selected according to criteria and methods that would have my statistics professor at the University screaming that I am a confounded moron, is right in believing that windows 8 does not have a usability problem, and therefore I am also a confounded moron because I use windows 7 with the XP menus. Ah, I did not mention that there's no word on how would I use touch on my installed screen base, which does not have a touch interface.

    --
    "If a boss demands loyalty, give him integrity. But if he demands integrity, give him loyalty." (John Boyd, 1927-1997)
    1. Re:for the sake of argument... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      or 3) people who just do what the computer tells them will nearly always pick "Yes" when confronted with such a question.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  59. Rewrite history much by portwojc · · Score: 1

    "an initially controversial change that is now widely accepted as an example of good design"

    Yes, since they fixed it in Office 2010. The Office 2007 interface was just like Vista's. They got it fixed on the next version of both.

  60. No, I'm not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I'm not using it.

    End of story.

  61. When I sit on a toilet I get used to the smell of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I sit on a toilet I get used to the smell of shit. But that does not mean I will want to start playing with it.

  62. Not Spying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "the large volume of data that Microsoft receives every day from people using Windows 8 who have chosen to join the company's 'customer experience improvement program.'"

    They're not spying - just stuffing the ballot box (in this case).

  63. First impressions suggest a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Walked in big-box store, had to browse the web to check some prices and asked if I could use one of their machines. They said "Sure, use one of the laptops." I do that, discover they're all Windows 8. This was my first time using it. "How bad can it be? I only have to browse the web." I spent 2 minutes trying to figure out how to get to the "real" desktop before finally giving up and asking one of the sales people, who let me in on the secret. Of *course* -- the Windows key. It does make sense. I'll grant them that. But when a person who has been using computers of many different operating systems since the 1980s can't figure it out how to get started, then there's a problem.

    I suppose, like anything, I could get used to it, but it's not exactly a good first impression. Maybe I'm just too stupid or set in my ways, but I don't think the neophytes in my family would find it any easier. I mean, hell, I got used to VMS at one stage, so anything is possible.

    On top of that, the local computer shop that does build-to-order/pick-your-own-components machines hasn't sold a *single* Windows 8 machine when users have been given the choice between Win 8 and 7. The only reason people are buying Windows 8 is due to pushing it through the retail system as almost the only option offered. What you've got here is people showing up at the big-box retail stores, seeing all the brand-new machines saying "What are my choices?" "Well, there's Windows 8, Windows 8, and Mac", "Windows 8, Windows 8, Windows 8, Windows 8, Mac, Windows 8, and Mac", "Windows 8, Window 8, Windows 8, Windows 8, Windows 8, Windows 8, Mac, Windows 8, Windows 8, and Mac", "Win8, Win8, ..." [Vikings]"WINDOWS 8, LOVELY WINDOWS 8! WINDOWS 8, WONDERFUL WINDOWS 8!"[/Vikings]

    "But I don't like Windows 8!"

    And so on. Adding Lobster Thermidor doesn't make it any more palatable for most people.

  64. staples is dumb to not offer to install 7 on syste by Joe_Dragon · · Score: 1

    staples is dumb to not offer to install 7 on systems but then again there techs are ranked on sales and don't have the time to install a os + do a driver hunt.

  65. used to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've spent my life on different flavours of Windows for the past 18 years (and DOS before that).
    Took me two months to get totally used to OSX.

    1. Re:used to by efitton · · Score: 1

      Which is why, even w/ a hand me down mac I use an older, smaller windows machine to actually get work done. Also why KDE4 and Gnome seem like such a bad idea to me. I liked my customized KDE 3.5. I don't have three or four weeks to get use to a different workflow or a new "paradigm" or whatever crap Sergio is pushing today.

  66. Wrong Sample Pool by http · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have some formal training in HCI and a love of accurate terminology, so I have the ability to articulate problems with a user interface - I can voice my opinion and experience with weak design. A regular user doesn't have those skills, so they appear silent. The end result is that you call us IT types whiny.
    "Less sophisticated users" aren't getting along fine. They struggle to use it and/or call for help because bad user interfaces (and arbitrary vendor changes) interfere with the creation of an accurate mental model of how the software is supposed to be used or what it's capable of. The confusion created in their mind is real.

    --
    If opportunity came disguised as temptation, one knock would be enough.
    3^2 * 67^1 * 977^1
  67. I don't have a windows key... by raehl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seriously, I don't... I still have my keyboard from 1993 because these new ones stink.

    More seriously - I use my computer for work. Not kids, not watching videos, not games, WORK. Windows XP/7 is better at getting work done than Windows 8.

    Hopefully microsoft pulls their heads out of their butts on this and allows a quick setting change to "I have no use for metro, thanks."

    1. Re:I don't have a windows key... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windows XP/7 is better at getting work done than Windows 8.

      How so exactly? I use Windows 8 at work and haven't noticed any productivity hits personally. In fact quite the contrary; with the improvements like better multi-monitor support, enhanced task manager, enhanced file copy dialogue, etc. I find myself more productive on Windows 8. Even the start screen keeps me more productive with live tiles, so I can see information I want at a glance.

      Hopefully microsoft pulls their heads out of their butts on this and allows a quick setting change to "I have no use for metro, thanks."

      It's already a quick change. Just download and install any of the 100 free utilities already available that do this, then promptly stop your bitching.

    2. Re:I don't have a windows key... by howardd21 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Seriously, I don't... I still have my keyboard from 1993 because these new ones stink.

      More seriously - I use my computer for work. Not kids, not watching videos, not games, WORK. Windows XP/7 is better at getting work done than Windows 8.

      Hopefully microsoft pulls their heads out of their butts on this and allows a quick setting change to "I have no use for metro, thanks."

      So do I - real work. I do not play games on a PC; prefer a 4:3 aspect if I can get it because no movies, etc. I do not even listen to music. But real work is generally done in applications like Word, Excel, AutoCAD, ERP, etc. Not the Windows operating system, but the apps loaded from it. Beyond loading an app, or managing files, what other real work is done in the Operating system? Very little. And I find Windows 8 about as good for that Windows 7. Plus it loads faster and finds printers nearby.

      --
      no comment
    3. Re:I don't have a windows key... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The ironic thing about this, for a "work" setting for applications like QuickBooks (which should be isolated from everything anyway), I use an XP VM with the same Classic interface as in Windows 2000. No the antediluvian UI isn't fancy (no Aero Peek), but it is effective at getting what needs done , and it is easy to isolate data (namely unmount the TrueCrypt partition with the accounting stuff), so no info is accessible when updating the OS or the applications.

      XP is lightweight and functional (although security is something that isn't so hot), so stuffing it in a VM with 512MB to 1GB of RAM is easily doable. Its security isn't that hot, but for places where network connectivity can be unplugged (I really don't need Web access with Quickbooks), it does a decent job, especially with a VM program that allows for seamless windows.

    4. Re:I don't have a windows key... by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Seriously, I don't... I still have my keyboard from 1993 because these new ones stink.

      More seriously - I use my computer for work. Not kids, not watching videos, not games, WORK. Windows XP/7 is better at getting work done than Windows 8.

      Hopefully microsoft pulls their heads out of their butts on this and allows a quick setting change to "I have no use for metro, thanks."

      So do I - real work. I do not play games on a PC; prefer a 4:3 aspect if I can get it because no movies, etc. I do not even listen to music. But real work is generally done in applications like Word, Excel, AutoCAD, ERP, etc. Not the Windows operating system, but the apps loaded from it. Beyond loading an app, or managing files, what other real work is done in the Operating system? Very little. And I find Windows 8 about as good for that Windows 7. Plus it loads faster and finds printers nearby.

      You mean you never read a spreadsheet and want to research something you see like ACME sales 2009 while typing a report in Word? Or be working on autocad and think, shoot what did the customer request again and need to open word or IE/Chrome to take a peak without losing your screen of your drawing when referencing tiny details?

      Auto peak, snap, and side by side, are key Windows 7 features mixed with the instant search. What many ignorant slashdotters fail to realize is when you are presented with a start screen is it ruins your multitasking in your brain and destroys your attention span and train of thought. What if your drawing had 10 things you wanted to check briefly? You would forget them as the start screen would reset your attention span and would lose your drawing.

      By having your work still open and using search with translucent Windows and instant search you can be referencing something or having 2 things together and not lose your train of thought.

      The Windows 7 desktop is the best Redmond has ever made. You can access quick information FAST and still have your views protected with jimp lists and stacking. Stacking and jumplists for Windows 8? Silly that is what Metro is for!

      No I do not want to smudge my finger across my tiny 9 inch screen over and over like an autistic person in a cycle for each app opened! You can keep your Windows 8 desktop. Me? I am sticking with Windows 7. The best version ever made.

      FYI in Windows 8 when I type in "resume" I have to then cancel using the fast keyboard and go back to the mouse as it is too stupid to know the difference between power-settings and Resume-Chron-10-14-12! In Windows 7 I just hit the arrow key up or down in 1/3 of a second to differentiate. So much better and superior to Windows 8.

    5. Re:I don't have a windows key... by JosephTX · · Score: 0

      What is there to even complain about productivity-wise with Windows 8? It's EXACTLY the same after you press the Start button. And it boots up significantly faster than 7. Most importantly, only Windows 8 supports development of Metro programs, which should be reason enough for you to upgrade if you're only using a computer for work.

    6. Re:I don't have a windows key... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Seriously, I still have my car from 1993 because these new ones stink.

      More seriously - I use my car for work. Not kids, not Sunday drives, not a stint on the race track, WORK. 1993 Toyota Camry is better at getting work done than a 2010 Lexus.

      Hopefully Toyota pulls their heads out of their butts on this and allows a quick setting change to "I have no use for ABS and stability control, thanks."

    7. Re:I don't have a windows key... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey, I thought of something: go get a new fucking keyboard. Fucking nerds.

    8. Re:I don't have a windows key... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You and your new fangled toys.
      I'm still using a Lexmark keyboard from 1984, seriously.

    9. Re:I don't have a windows key... by davydagger · · Score: 1

      the "file manager", is probably on the biggest key components.

      Find your documents quickly, and preview them painlessly. How many people work straight from the apps instead of the file manager?

      Oh, and the tech guys need a command line for doing tech guys things. Also need a schedular and a scripting lang to automate tasks to make our lives easier.

    10. Re:I don't have a windows key... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ctrl+Esc still works for the start screen. I have yet to see a problem with "getting work done" on Windows 8. Been running it since the developer preview over a year ago. I pin all the applications I commonly use to the task bar, and switch into metro mode occasionally for the calendar and mail apps. A number of less used applications get pinned to the start screen too.

    11. Re:I don't have a windows key... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ctrl-Esc should bring up the Metro "Start" page. And you can always install Start8 if you want the start menu back.

      After about an hour of using it, I'm comfortable with it - and I thought it was utterly awful at first (posting from Mountain Lion however).

    12. Re:I don't have a windows key... by howardd21 · · Score: 1

      Yep, and that is all in Windows 8. The only thing I see in Windows 8 that slows me down is the fact that Outlook emails do not show up in search results like they did in Windows 7. FOr some reason, even with Outlook 2013 Microsoft is not providing a contract between Outlook and data and general Windows search (Hit the Windows key and type a string that would be in an email and a file, it only shows the file). Otherwise it is about as good as Windows 7 for real work; though I cannot say it is markedly better. And I have a Windows laptop (Fujitsu tablet) but I use it more like a laptop, s Surface RT, and a Acer tablet (W500) with Windows 8 pro).

      --
      no comment
    13. Re:I don't have a windows key... by howardd21 · · Score: 1

      Thanks Bill Gates - you seem a little salty since you left Microsoft, is that Wife driving you crazy? You make a semi-decent point about the potential distraction, and like I told somebody else on this thread a moment ago, I do not like that Outlook mail data is not in the search results. I may have better focus that you, as I do not get distracted by the metro home screen when searching, but I can see where a person could.

      --
      no comment
    14. Re:I don't have a windows key... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been using this cool $5 program called start8, it pretty much takes the suck out of windows 8. I read about it in an anandtech article, I think its ridiculous that I even need to buy a program like that to basically turn windows 8 into windows 7.

    15. Re:I don't have a windows key... by definate · · Score: 1

      More seriously - I use my computer for work. Not kids, not watching videos, not games, WORK.

      You're posting this on Slashdot, your point is invalid.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    16. Re:I don't have a windows key... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still using a Lexmark keyboard from 1984, seriously.

      That is quite a feat considering Lexmark wasn't founded until 1991.

    17. Re:I don't have a windows key... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It does not load faster. Takes three times longer here than 7 did.

  68. Ordinary users by peppepz · · Score: 1

    Despite some of the more scathing reviews of Windows 8, ordinary users are getting along with it just fine, according to Julie Larson-Green

    "Ordinary users"? I guess they're those who don't use a computer to get work done, and therefore would be better off with a tablet anyway.

  69. Do NOT Want! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't get 'used' to something you've never tried..................

  70. correct, I guesss...? by slashmydots · · Score: 1

    They're right, I have learned how to quickly change the JPG and multimedia extensions back to opening with normal Windows programs in desktop mode, learned how to create shortcuts to useful, common things on the desktop in desktop mode, how to uninstall apps, and generally learned other nifty ways to stay off of that terrible not-metro-anymore interface. So they're right but it does sort of imply that we still hate their terrible design.

  71. Except you'll already be doing that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except you'll already be doing that going to Win8. It won't be painless and there will be things you miss.

    Oddly enough, this doesn't appear to you to be a reason why Win8 is a non-viable option for people, especially those whose livelihood depends on a continued sustained level of productivity.

  72. I'm having no problems by rk · · Score: 1

    With the Windows 8 UI... because I'm still running 7. Fercryin' out loud, I just went to 7 from XP in June. They're smoking crack if they think I'm shelling out money to upgrade anytime soon.

  73. I customized the way I use it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And I like it ... I don't use any metro apps, i uninstalled all of them that I could. I use the desktop 99% of the time and the 1% i hit the win button, i'm using the metro interface to find the app i want to open on the desktop. Its actually much faster than using start->programs->{folder}->{application}. I have all of my most frequently used apps at the front of the tiles.

    NOTE: I'm a windows driver developer and until now have never been able to use Windows as a full time workstation, i've always used Linux or OSX and RDP'd to my dev box. Now, I use Win8 full time for everything and only ssh to a linux box when I need to.

  74. Filling in the gaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm getting used to Windows 8.

    Of course, I've had to buy third party apps to replace the start menu. Use Firefox since IE10 doesn't work on certain sites. Download the "soon to be not free" Windows Media Player, which was included with Windows 7. Oh and spend wads of cash on upgrading all my apps and utilities.

    Now, I'm almost as productive as before I upgraded!

    1. Re:Filling in the gaps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had to buy third party apps to replace the start menu.

      There are free start menu apps for Win 8. Classic Shell/Explorer works: http://classicshell.sourceforge.net/

      Use Firefox since IE10 doesn't work on certain sites.

      Install Firefox.

      Download the "soon to be not free" Windows Media Player, which was included with Windows 7.

      Intall VLC, Media Player Classic or any number of free programs that are better than WMP.
      Oh and spend wads of cash on upgrading all my apps and utilities.

      Now, I'm almost as productive as before I upgraded!

      Is LibreOffice (free) available for Win 8? Seems to run on it anyway. Don't spend money on after-market software for Windows unless you really have to. Win 8 is just a fallback system for me. OSX and Linux are my primary OSs.

  75. Frogs Get Used to Temperature of Boiling Water by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In the end?

    Still tastes like chicken.

    Seriously. If this is the best language of encouragement that Ballmer can choke out of his throat, then you know there is a Vista-sized hole in Microsoft's delivery.

    I know! Why don't we all get used to Ubuntu Unity and Libre Office? "Even with the rumblings, we feel confident that it's a moment in time more than an actual problem."

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  76. Microsoft disagrees. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just two days ago, I saw a Windows 8 ad running on a laptop in a store display. It said "the desktop you are used to".

    So, apparently the old Metro interface is so bad that Microsoft has decided to offer Windows 8 with XFCE. Well, either that, or they would just love to get fined for false advertising.

  77. Microsoft's Brave Face by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In short, Windows 8 is a train that went off the rails. I'm a techie, so I don't put too much credence in my own experiences with a new interface. However, when I hear from a number of (non techie) people around me that they *hate* Windows 8, I have to take note.

    I really think that Microsoft has put a brave face on the fact that Windows 8 is a bad product.

    The Emperor has no clothes? Don't say that!

    Personally, I think they're scrambling internally to bring on Windows 9 to keep the people that are really unhappy with 8 'in the fold'.

  78. I hate it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I have been using it for a couple of months now.

    I hate it.

    Maybe it is a Microsoft business plan:

    1. Sell Windows 8 on a pre-loaded machine.

    2. User tries windows 8 and hates it.

    3. User purchases Windows 7 and reloads machine.

    4. Double license fee profit.

  79. No choice by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    Most people buy a PC and are stuck with the OS on it. So of course they need to suck it up and use it.

    1. Re:No choice by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Using a feature does not imply liking the feature, especially when there is no alternative available. I could lock someone in a room and feed them bread coated with horse dung every day. After a while they would eat it, but that doesn't mean they would like it.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  80. Not just MicroSoft. by mevets · · Score: 1

    IE has a feature to let websites monitor all the mouse activity on your computer. Iâ(TM)m not sure why they left this open to everyone, I would think they would charge for this level of access.
    Maybe afraid of another criminal charge? Does WA have a three-strikes rule?

  81. But I've only just seen it today by amigabill · · Score: 1

    I bought the preorder back in October, but only today have had time to deal with the big problems installing it. Tried to install it over a Windows 7 Pro system, and every time just as it was very nearly done, it bluescreened on some IRQ error and removed itself, going back to Windwos 7. Though at some point Windows 7 developed a Counterfeit copy error and became a problem itself. I then tried to install Windows 8 to a clean hard drive, which it did successfully, but then failed to activate/authenticate due to the previous failed installs. And it took an hour or two and 4 MS phone reps to get that cleared out and working as it should have the first time.

    So my experience so far is not a happy one. Though I really haven't got to actually use Windows yet, or install applications or games or anything to run on it.

    And luckily I made a backup of Windows 7 before I started any of this, so I have it in good condition as well, and can wipe the mangled copy hard drive to use for something else.

  82. Bias by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course they can't collect data from people who get fed up and install something else, or who know enough to turn off data collection.

  83. Do you really think... by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    Do you really think that Microsoft would say anything else besides, ~the users are getting used to Windows 8's interface~. Let's be real here. You are not going to see anything from Redmond along the lines of, ~the users are still fumbling around trying to get Windows 8 to work for them~

  84. Stockholm syndrome by daboochmeister · · Score: 2

    Nothing more.

    --
    "Ahh! I see you're in that indeterminate Schrodinger state where - oh, uh ... never mind." Dave Bucci
  85. Or step off the hamster wheel completely by daboochmeister · · Score: 1

    There ARE alternatives, ya know. You might not have ever heard any mentioned here on /. ;-)

    --
    "Ahh! I see you're in that indeterminate Schrodinger state where - oh, uh ... never mind." Dave Bucci
    1. Re:Or step off the hamster wheel completely by garyoa1 · · Score: 1

      Sometimes that archaic wheel works better! ;)

      --
      Wuddooeyeno? IITYWYBMAD? Like nuts? eclecticallyincorrect.com
  86. Seems OK. by Andy+Prough · · Score: 1

    I've set up laptops for a couple of family members. I tell them to avoid the full-screen apps. Seems fast, and they don't have any complaints at all.

  87. ok good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok good, many thank - http://cado24.net

  88. Propaganda? I THINK SO! by Chas · · Score: 1

    Since not one of my co-workers or clients are on Windows 8 at the moment.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  89. I hurt my foot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I walk with a limp. But I can get around just fine.

  90. Microsoft: We can F*&K Over Our Customers Too! by BrendaEM · · Score: 1

    With UEFI, The set things up so Linux can be locked out, but UEFI is too big and complex to be bug free, as a BIOS should be. Now, the customer pays the price.

    MS is walling in their garden, but it's not their garden, but one they took from IBM, and gave and sold to the people in the form of an open hardware market, but now that Apple pulls things from that open market and makes money, they figure that they should just close up the rest of it.

    With all the software money going through MS, the retailers that supported MS, are screwed. Big program such as games, such as Guild Wars 2 at over 20 GB will have to be downloaded byte for byte.

    Microsoft learned nothing with their 2 prior bad releases: Windows ME and Windows Vista. They are spending too much time working to take marketshare through force and not enough time trying to please customers.

    With a graphic suite and a CAD program, I have thousands of dollars of software--and not confidence in MS.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/c/BrendaEM
  91. I'm used to Linux by overmoderated · · Score: 1

    But thanks anyway, Microsoft.

  92. BSOD's, no biggy now by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    After all, we all more or less got used to BSOD's. Pressing Ctrl+S become a reflex so that we stopped losing much content. I still have the Ctrl+S reflex. Whenever the building starts shaking, my hands form Ctrl+S without even thinking about it. People think I'm a "Horizontal Catholic" or something.

    1. Re:BSOD's, no biggy now by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      To be fair, I learned to do Ctrl+S (or equivalent) before I ever used Windows. If you heard a loud scream from the Midwestern US in 1986 or early 87, that was me, when I'd been working for hours without saving, and my network connection went pear-shaped, losing nearly a full day of intense coding.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  93. The Nazis have been watching... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and they say that you're getting used to sleep deprivation, exhaustive labor, and daily gassings.

  94. Something is wrong here: by Tablizer · · Score: 2

    Apple's slogan:

    "We make things easier"

    Microsoft's slogan:

    "You'll get used to it."

    1. Re:Something is wrong here: by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      "Where do you want to go today shut up"

  95. Windows 8? Nah. by axl917 · · Score: 1

    We have at present 973 devices in our organization, 589 of which are on WIndows XP.

    Runs like a champ.

  96. My experience so far... by theycallmeB · · Score: 1

    is that Win8 is an utter pile of crap. Windows 8 Pro might possibly be less crappy, and is apparently the version all of the pre-release 'you can get used to this' reviews were based on. But from the pointless non-locking lock screen that you can't disable, to the tiles thing to its ridiculous insistence on making documents full screen on a widescreen laptop, regular Windows 8 does nothing but get in the way of user. And I will be darned before I pay Microsoft another penny to remove some of the suckage they went to extra effort to ram in there. And so, my shiny new core i3 laptop is less useful than my 10 year old pentium-m/WinXP system, at least until I get some flavor of linux installed.

    And once that happens, Microsoft, know full well that I will not be going back.

  97. They know if.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you've been bad or good, so update for goodness' sake!

  98. Whatever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If by getting used to they really mean avoiding then yes. There is a big difference to "getting used to" and still hating the re-design. People may lose a limb and get used to it but it does not mean they like it. Personally, I won't be recommending it to anyone.

  99. I'll tell you my Windows 8 experience by future+assassin · · Score: 2

    Ordered a HP laptop for my son as a present. It arrives at work and my plan is to load up MInt 14 MATE but first I might as well make a recovery disk for Windows just in case I have to send the laptop for repairs.. Anyways I go through the normal first time install.

    Well so I install it and I'm greeted with some weird screen that has boxes all over the place and I have to scroll sideways to see the rest. WTF? There's a reason no website scrolls sideways and just up and down. Ok ok maybe there's a reason for this madness. So I'm moving the mouse around trying to get some kind of a panel/menu. I get one but can't figure out where to get the programs menu. Also noticed something weird when I moved the mouse over to the corner, a small screen shots appears. I'm like WTF, OK?

    Anyways I look online and find the menu to create the backups disk or in this case "5" DVD disk or a USB drive that requires min 20 gigs of space. WTF again? Christ most Linux distros are one DVD. Ok what ever, I go ahead and it says I can't use DVD-RW ony DVD-R, well fuck me.

    Ok I give up and decide I will just get a 32gig USB drive later. I go do some work and I guess as I was turning around to my desktop the mouse must have moved to one of the corners and somehow the desktop appeared. Now I didn't notice this till about an hour later when I turn around and see the desktop there and the start screen is gone. So now I'm scratching my head as to what happened. Eventually I figure out that moving the mouse to the corner and clicking the small screen shot would flip me between desktop and start screen. BUT WHY?

    So today I start the laptop and figure ok get the little screen shot in the corner to flip to the desktop. Well its not showing, mother fucker I think I'm gonna need beer for this. Eventually clicking on Norton AV brings me back and now I can flip back and forth.

    Now I'm usually not too ani MS and I'm for using the tight too for the right job but where we have a swiss army knife where you have to pull out the scissors to be able to pull out the blade and you have to pull out the tooth pick to be able to close the scissors and blade.

    WTF is the point of the start screen?

    --
    by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    1. Re:I'll tell you my Windows 8 experience by future+assassin · · Score: 1

      >Now I'm usually not too ani MS and I'm for using the tight too for the right job but where we have a swiss army knife where you have to pull out the scissors to be able to pull out the blade and you have to pull out the tooth pick to be able to close the scissors and blade.

      Should read

      Now I'm usually not too ani MS and I'm for using the right tool for the right job but here we have a swiss army knife where you have to pull out the scissors to be able to pull out the blade and you have to pull out the tooth pick to be able to close the scissors and blade.

      --
      by TheSpoom (715771) Uncaring Linux user here. I have nothing to add to this but please continue. *munches popcorn*
    2. Re:I'll tell you my Windows 8 experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The point is to look at it first !! Does it look familiar?... Windows8 is intended for the Touch generation (The Computer Illiterate), like the large majority of iPad, iPhone, and Android users that are stealing Microsofts thunder these days. If thats what the larger majority wants than Microsoft is going to try and give it to them, and it's working. "Apart from RT" what the hell is the point of putting that out in the first place. It doesn't do anything. Ok some moron may save a few bucks getting RT, but it deosn't do anything. Nothing..!! I have students coming to me asking how to do this and how to do that... I have used Windows8 Developer and Beta editions, and do know some things about how to do certain things, but RT won't let you do SHIT!! Rant on RT that is deserving...

  100. THANK YOU! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was hoping to come in here and see that someone had already brought up something along these lines.

    I mean seriously, "getting used to dealing with"? If you have to use terms like that, you've horribly failed. One should not have to "deal with" your product. Saying that (hell, advertising the fact) is basically another way of saying "Users manage to suffer through the misery"

  101. In other news by Richy_T · · Score: 1

    It's possible for many stroke sufferers to make nearly a complete recovery.

  102. Customer Experience Program by loufoque · · Score: 1

    What power user would agree to such a thing?
    It's just using my connectivity needlessly, and the anonymity in it is probably dubious.

  103. "all is fine, nothing to see here" wow..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't care what microsoft says, metro is horrible on the PC.

    I love how they use the "all is fine, nothing to see here" mentality. Actually there is Microsoft. your Metro interface on the PC..blows...trying to force folks to use it doesn't mean they will. Just means for me, that I'm now running linux. I have everything I need, the Office suites (which are basically free) are excellent, the OS runs great, less problems. excellent, thanks for giving me the nudge I needed to switch.
    Only drawback, is some mainstream gaming..and I believe folks are working to solve that as well and NO I don't want to use wine.

  104. My personal anecdote by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

    ...is that I'm still using Windows XP (within an OSX/VMWARE VM) and that's what I expect to be using forever, because (a) I have all the Windows software I need, and (b) XP is sandboxed from the Intertubes so it can't fall and hurt itself. As well as keeping it in a fully backed up state, and only home to software and configurations, rather than my most important data, which lives under OSX, an OS which has yet to truly jump the shark.

    I imagine there might in fact be a lot of people out there that want an OS that is essentially a surface clone of an XBox. But I don't. I want a computer that starts out right at the top with tools I can use to manipulate and examine the system -- not just a hotlink to twitter. Here on slashdot, I'm thinking I probably have a fair bit of company in that outlook, although I have no doubt many of you use something later than XP, but still not Windows 8.

    It looks like this is a sea change, and that it might be inevitable. But I'm digging in my heels and will resist the dumbification of the desktop by MIcrosoft (and Ubuntu, for that matter) as long as I can.

    I sure am glad I really went for broke last time I bought a computer. I think I'm safe from them trapping me with a new machine that an older OS can't boot on.

    Ah, change. It isn't always pleasant!

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    1. Re:My personal anecdote by Balthisar · · Score: 1

      Windows 8 isn't so bad. I run it in Parallels on my Mac. Windows 8 was a no-cost license, so I replaced Windows 7 (which I paid for), which replaced Windows XP (for which I also had a lot of no-cost licenses). Mostly I need it for OneNote and Access (no Mac versions of those), and EveMon (simply because I like it better than the Mac alternatives). My assessment: for the type of use that I have, Windows 8 doesn't suck. Oh, it has annoyances like everything post-XP does, but it's not a show-stopper. At work, though, I have a Vista machine, and I miss XP. I tend to think that if I had Windows 8 at work, I'd probably say it sucks.

      Oh, I forgot about the two little Atom nettops I used as HTPC front-end. I put Win8 onto those, too. Definitely an improvement, except for the mouse cursor not being present when no mouse is plugged in (makes using phone-based remote controls a bit tricky).

      --
      --Jim (me)
  105. Ubuntu Unity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should have ported Ubuntus Unity. Best NG UI imho.

  106. Re:Canonical Has Been Watching... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

    Actually, I prefer Unity to Metro. Not even close either. I'm not sure what that really means though ;)

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  107. "Microsoft Has Been Watching... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    ...and It Says You're Getting Used To Windows 8"

    They're wrong. I've never even seen it.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  108. emacs is faster to get used to than windows 8? by Mirar · · Score: 1

    "Getting used to"?

    "There's a cutover point, around six weeks in, where you start using the new things more than the things you're familiar with."

    That's a lot longer than it takes for people to get used to *emacs*.

    I never heard anyone "getting used to" iOS or even "getting used to" Android.

    Although I have heard people taking time "getting used to" windows 3.0, unix shell, emacs, and gnome 3.

    I believe when something takes any noticeable time getting used to, and it's post 1995, there's a very serious user interface design problem.

    (That said, I could probably get used to Windows 8, if it decided it wanted to be windows 8 all the time and not pretend to be windows 7 when someone didn't want to redesign something.)

  109. Install start menu app. Done. by wdef · · Score: 1

    The first thing I did on Win 8 to make it useable was install one of the 3rd party start menus (Classic Explorer) and then move the desktop card to the top left hand corner of the sodomizing (q.v. above) and irrelevant (for non-touchscreen devices) Metro. Then you get something like the Windows 7 desktop back on boot and will never have to look at Metro again, unless it's on a tablet.

    What an idiotic business decision it was to try to fuse these two very different use cases, shove it down the consumer's throat with a rolled up newspaper, and then totally omit the option to have a traditional start menu. Seniors will not cope but who cares about them, eh? MS are banking on kids just taking to Metro and then never learning what a start menu is.

    Also strange that MS are duplicating the mistakes of numerous smaller companies who have worked hard to build something rather like Metro and then dismally failed in the marketplace. Stop force-feeding consumers what you think they have to have! I am dumbfounded at the stupidity of that decision.

    I think the desktop metaphor is as optimum as it gets for usability on traditional boxes/laptops. Apple know that; they have had the brains to keep the desktop on OS X. MS doesn't know it or chooses not to. There is simply nothing better around for a non-touchscreen device with a keyboard. If there is, where is it? 'Coz it ain't Metro. It's all just about trying to move to the iOS walled garden model and shut down our choices and freedom as usual.

    1. Re:Install start menu app. Done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean Classic Shell, which includes an optional Explorer clone. http://classicshell.sourceforge.net/

  110. Godwin's law: In other news... by DontScotty · · Score: 1

    It appears the captured Jewish people are getting used to traveling by train...

  111. Win8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not.

  112. Sure, Microsoft. by UltraZelda64 · · Score: 1

    I have two operating systems currently installed on my machine; the Windows 8 Enterprise Evaluation and something else entirely. The W8 eval was installed shortly after it was released. For a week I played around with it and then got bored, seeing no reason to continue on with it. Two things I have decided during my evaluation:

    1. I don't like it. Used to it or not, I just don't like it. All I care about are a few programs, and they're not important enough to subject myself to Windows 8 to use.
    2. I will be ordering my next computer from a company that doesn't preload Windows 8... probably System76, and wipe the default Ubuntu crap they install by default.

    There's no way I'm going to support that monstrosity if I can help it, and I certainly won't be recommending it to friends either.

  113. statistics and marketing by hoolaparara · · Score: 1

    I've said it before and I'll say it again, I'm sure marketing has already done a report and they will plug in some so called statistics of this type to say that with Windows 8, Home users never installed anything outside of the app store and then the next windows will allow only Professionals to install non-store software.

    And here we see they are already softening people up.

  114. How can I... by rbprbp · · Score: 1

    ... get used to something I haven't used at all, due to a complete lack of interest, and that I will not use any time soon?

    --
    They're there in their room. You're on your own.
  115. vista whiners all over again by Nolas · · Score: 1

    every single time a new version of windows comes out there will always be a small, yet vocal crowd stirring up the pot. "i have never used windows 8, but I KNOW it sucks". This is 100% a 1:1 mirror of the vista release. oh noo this UAC crap is everywhere oh no my life is ruined. never mind that a lot of the problem had to do with 3rd party developers not using the new UAC guidelines. a few months after vista, and people educated themselves, actually used vista, 99% of the UAC hate was gone. Now here we are doing the same dance all over again. While all you anal retentive's scream, whine, and throw a tantrum, everyone else is happily using windows 8 and enjoying it. I actually pity most of you who are turning 3 shades of red over your exclamations of how terrible some OS is that you have never used, or even given a real chance. anyways, i'l see you guys in windows 9, with the SAME metro UI still, or windows 10, or however long it takes you guys to get over your OS tantrum this time.

    1. Re:vista whiners all over again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      High UID, total of 5 comments, all pro-Win8. So how's the pay for a MS shill?

  116. Selection Bias for People Commenting... by Glasswire · · Score: 1

    So opinions Microsoft is forming comes from "people using Windows 8 who have chosen to join the company's 'customer experience improvement program.' ". Isn't that automatically pre-sorting for the sycophants that love Win 8 or Microsoft in general? I hate these kind of programs and I think most users do too, so those who have signed up are already ready to selflessly help the folks in Redmond. I expect that means their tolerance for bad behavior is higher, their inclination to like the Win 8 UI starts strong and their willingness to be patient with fixes will be extraordinarily deep. If Microsoft thinks that's representative sample of the user population, they need to revisit their methodology. (Or move to the assumption that Win 8 is a niche OS with a small, cult following).
    If Microsoft sincerely wanted to find out what's wrong and what's right with Win 8, they would PAY random users to spend the time to give them honest impressions about the user experience. Anyone willing to do that work for nothing has drunk way to much Win 8 Kool-Aid already.

    1. Re:Selection Bias for People Commenting... by Nolas · · Score: 0

      Or maybe there are people on this planet who are not giant man-children who actually want their preferred OS to be improved upon. This does not make them a "fanboi" nor does this necessarily mean they are a Microsoft shill either. Some people on this planet have the ability to be subjective, and are able to separate the pro's from the con's. and not lump everything together as in "this all sucks" or "this is all great" some people have the ability to recognize both, and are not necessarily super forgiving, or super willing to put up with problems, or bad designs.

  117. Well it's "Fast and Fluid" by NHSdev · · Score: 1

    ... Just like Diarrhea!

  118. I never send any company my usage data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So MS has no way of knowing that I've tried Win 8 and replaced it with Win7 on one machine, switched one user to a Mac Mini w/Office, and returned one laptop that had win 8 preloaded and no win 7 drivers from the vendor.

  119. a laptop is a laptop.. *yawn* by nanospook · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's not Windows 8 that is the issue. Maybe it's the technology. Mouse/keyboard/screen/windows.. nothing new.. When it comes to laptops... I'm bored. Nothing has changed in forever. I go to Best Buy and look around for something really new and interesting.. Oh look.. more laptops.. Touch screens? We were doing that on Macs back in the 90's with a cheap kit. I have Window's 8 on my 3 year old laptop and mostly I just hit escape to get back to Windows 7 look and feel, and do what I've been doing all along. But it's all boring.. really.. now my new Galaxy Note II phone, that's a little more interesting.. I can talk to it, touch it, shake it, you can smell the innovation in it!

    --
    Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
  120. Windows 8 is not bad by Vince6791 · · Score: 1

    Windows 8 is basically a tweaked windows 7 with a new start menu. I don't understand why people think windows 7 is for work and windows 8 is not professional enough to be used in a work environment. If you can get your work done in 7 than 8 should be no problem. For xp, vista, and 7 I never used the start menu I always found myself using a docking system to access my programs as quickly as possibly. In kubuntu or mint kde on my dual monitor I always created a third taskbar and just pin whatever program I want on to their and afterwards hide it. I actually prefer metro, gnome 3, and unity(basically a dock) over any of the old start menu taskbars.

    When windows 95 came out people were reluctant to make the huge leap to a new interface and it was the same with xp, vista, 7, and now 8. It's same thing with people and software companies scared of moving from windows to a linux distro, mint is more stable and faster than ubuntu.

           

  121. "Get used to it" only works for a monopoly by quixote9 · · Score: 1

    Does MSFT still think they're a monopoly? Really? They want users to get used to a phone/tablet interface, where they have a 2% share (? less?), so they put it on their desktop where people keep buying Macs these days every time they pull these boneheaded stunts.

    The other huge thing waiting to be noticed is that there are Linux distros out there (e.g. LinuxMint) that take less "getting used to" for a WinXp user than Win8. The only thing saving MSFT is that Linux has no advertising budget. And we'd never agree on which distro to recommend.

    1. Re:"Get used to it" only works for a monopoly by Nolas · · Score: 1

      The other huge thing waiting to be noticed is that there are Linux distros out there (e.g. LinuxMint) that take less "getting used to" for a WinXp user than Win8. The only thing saving MSFT is that Linux has no advertising budget. And we'd never agree on which distro to recommend.

      The other huge thing waiting to be noticed is that there is not very much "to get used to" going from winxp to windows 8 that all these people that have never used windows 8 seem to think exist, other then a different Start Menu interface. the other parts of the OS are about 99% the same as 98/xp/vista/7 just a few things reworded and some graphic updates. windows explorer is still there, control panel, device manager, blah blah everything is there, and it's even in the SAME place. it's just that now it works better, and faster than winxp. Though you would have to actually use it to know this, and not on 12 year old hardware.

    2. Re:"Get used to it" only works for a monopoly by efitton · · Score: 1

      They control 95%+ of the desktop / laptop market. You know, machines for getting work done. Business machines. So yeah, I'd say they have a monopoly.

  122. Thank You M$ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For giving me the final push required to go completely Linux.

  123. This is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is nothing but M$ FUD from the masters of FUD!

  124. None of my users want it. by MonkeyPaw · · Score: 1

    When I first had access to Windows 8 through the MS Partner site I installed it on a workstation at work and placed it at a free desk. I asked my users to test it and let me know if they're interested in having it on their workstation. Not one reported back they want this OS. The only reason we'll keep it is for testing.

    I'm not pushing this upgrade because I don't think the adaption downtime is worth it. I have some users that have a hard time with change and Windows 8 would kill them.

    I just gave my girlfriend a new laptop which came with Win 8 pre-installed. It only took her 30 minutes before she asked me to "fix her laptop" and put Win 7 on it.

    --
    My studio - www.graylands.ca
  125. Dear Microsoft: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a severe dental issues in my early 20s.

    I spent almost 3 years living with the issue (which caused a wonderful gamut of pain, every second of every minute of every hour of every day). I "got used to it", as you say, and simply learned to keep on trucking and ignore it as best I could. That didn't mean that there were moments of idleness where that pain overrode my ability to block it out, because there were times when I felt like I should go jump off a building just to make it stop.

    My family and friends tell me that I wasn't a very pleasant person to be around during this time. The pain made me very cynical and bitter towards a lot of things. I didn't go out much and I didn't sleep very well at night. But I learned to live with it, I "got used to it" in the hopes that one day someone would be able to help me. This didn't mean that I was better off for it. In fact, those three years were some of the darkest days of my entire life.

    Eventually I found a dental surgeon crazy enough to go in there and fix things. The procedure took the better part of a day. When I woke up in an aesthetic induced daze all cross-eyed and barely able to make sense of myself, soon everything started coming back to me. Except the pain. The pain was gone, left beside the operating chair in a stainless steel bowl as bits of a dead wisdom tooth cut out from my head.

    I never took a single pain killer after the operation. The pain I felt afterwards from the stitching and void in my head was nearly imperceptible compared to what I'd been living with and what I'd "gotten used to". Soon that too faded, and I was borderline euphoric for a few weeks afterwards. I'd totally forgotten what it had felt like to simply sit somewhere- in a chair or on the couch- and breathe. Stare into nothingness, and feel nothing back. No pain, no alarms inside my body, no pressure in my head making me feel like I should rip out my jaw and take a jackhammer to my upper left rear teeth.

    So, frankly, in regards to your "you're gonna get used to it" mentality- fuck you. Just because you get used to something doesn't mean you're going to be a better person for it. A long time ago, people used to say that "computers let you do anything". Today, they're saying "computers do everything for you". I don't need my computer doing shit for me, I don't need you to make decisions on my behalf without offering me the option to revert. I operate the tool, the tool does not operate me.

    So fuck your Metro and Windows 8 in general. I'll make up my own damned mind, and you can be sure I won't get used to something simply because you think I should. I tried that 10 years ago when 7 different dentists told me I was hosed and I should deal with it. I don't feel like repeating that mistake again. Using computers is a joy with Windows 7. Why should I put myself through the same damned thing with Windows 8 and "get used to it"?

  126. Gaaaah! "Charms Bar"?! by Radical+Moderate · · Score: 1

    From the linked article: "In the slide-out menu (known as the Charms Bar) "
    Just shoot me.

    --
    Never let a lack of data get in the way of a good rant.
  127. adjusting just fine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If they hadn't *broken* it, no one would *have* to adjust.

  128. Education by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As long as people have to call tech support the scripts would ask first did you update to Windows 8? As both hoping having to go through an upgrade would be a cover-all approach to solving legacy support and the latest Windows OS is the only education offered.

  129. win 8 is cumbersome ridiculous PC op system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there is no excuse for this operating system on a PC
    on the plus side, newer computers with multiple cores and gpus do see a speed increase.
    but the gui interface is nice on a cell phone, great on a surface tablet, marginal ok on a tablet and ABSURD on a PC

    What i want is just my old desktop back with those ridiculous icons gone, gone , gone.
    Microsoft really dumped on this user AND EVERYONE THAT I KNOW. getting used to it is not an approval, at all

  130. This brings to mind by reboot246 · · Score: 1

    the old saying, "You can polish a turd, but it's still a turd."

    Microsoft is in denial. It's a turd.

    1. Re:This brings to mind by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Which explains this utility..

      http://www.sfxmachine.com/tppro/

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  131. I got used to it in about 2 hours by elabs · · Score: 1

    It's been great ever since. I use it all day for work with ease. All the FUD people were throwing about how terrible it was for desktops has not materialized. Turns out they were just fear mongering. I would recommend Windows 8 to anyone as long as they are willing to put in a few hours up front getting used to it.

  132. Windows 8 is a step backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The whole 2 color giant tile thing is ugly, a step backwards, and a giant waste of my screen's real estate.

    No minimize, no maximize, no start menu... that's what's called "losing functionality". It's really more of a downgrade.

  133. Re:Canonical Has Been Watching... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canonical Has Been Watching, and They See I've Switched to Mint 13 Xfce.

  134. Windows 8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I work in the industry. I usually lag behind the Microsoft propaganda push for why their new features are so Needed and Wanted by users. This time out, I decided to be proactive and jump in early and try the newest OS.
    Here is my take so far. First and foremost, Windows 8 is Ugly. The "Metro" (or whatever the interface is now called) is one step above CGA graphics (I'm dating myself here). The Desktop and Explorer screens are not much better. I guess it is easier for an OS to appear quicker when you take away any eye appeal, no rich colors, no 3-D shadows, or button textures. The end result is no visual snap and grab, it is simply ugly. Live tiles make the metro experience seem more vivid, but quickly becomes very distracting. I have searched minutes for features that should be much more accessible. All I have shown it too have commented on the look of it, which they all call UGLY.
    The Metro interface is more about Microsoft having it's own App Store that delivering what people expect from an OS, and frankly if there is one thing computer users and developers do not need is another App Store.
    Next is the branding and Ads. I do not need ads popping up in the content tiles (as they do in games mode or Music mode). For a business deployment the last thing anyone, including a CEO, wants to see on someones computer is ax XBOX logo on the screen of their employees. Go to Video, or Music, or Games and the XBOX logo is all over.
    The Windows Desktop looks barren and washed out, the Explorer windows and dialogs are ugly, and extremely boring.
    The switching back and forth between the Metro Start screen and the Desktop for apps is very counterproductive and is confusing and distracting.
    One thing I have noticed, a touch screen does make the interface a little better, but on an ultrabook, doing anything needing a soft keyboard reduces the screen to the real estate of a smart phone.
    I agree with one of the comments here about giving a Traditional Desktop (Win7) desktop mode to let seasoned users keep a productive interface.
    Microsoft has carried the Ugly to it's new release of Office, Office 2013. Pure ugly. Interface and start screens that make you feel like you are back in Kindergarten again. There are three color schemes for Office, White (or Extremely Ugly), Light Grey (did the color actually just change?), and Dark Grey (is gray a color now?). All kidding aside, this stuff really is extremely non pleasing to the eyes.

    So once again Microsoft offers downgrade rights so that from this point on, even if you buy a pc loaded with Windows 7 it is registered as a sale of Windows 8. Vista was the OS that sold more copies of an OS that was never run, than ever before. Every time I see a PC with Vista on it (Which thank goodness is rare) I think, oh so you are the one running this!
    So all in all, the only benefits I have seen in Windows 8 are the speed with which it operates (Boots, shutdown, video smoothness) and the fact that so far backward compatibility seems good. All in all, the touch and the feature sets are a good addition in some ways, but the Interface and the visual aspects are very very below par for today's colorful and vivid devices. When your Android Phone has a richer Screen experience than your desktop, things are headed in the wrong direction, Let's hope Windows 8.5 or 9 will have a new "Expert Mode" that gives you back a more productive Desktop screen or a maintenance mode that allows IT people a Desktop that lets us get done what we need to without the Ugly Wow screens.

  135. Impressions after a couple of days by Geeky · · Score: 1

    I've been using it for a couple of days and most of my reponses to the changes have been "I can live without that" - I keep finding things that were handy but don't seem to exist any more (I say seem to, I might be wrong, I'm still exploring)

    I keep hitting the left most icon on my taskbar by mistake when I want to launch an application. I'm trying the new launcher, but one feature I miss from the start menu is the ability for each application to have it's own submenu - of recently opened items, recently visited websites, or whatever. I don't see the equivalent functionality anywhere in the new interface.

    I want to give it a fair shot before I go for a third party launcher, but so far my impression is that it'll do, but it's lacking features I took for granted.

    --
    Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  136. Get Over it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Win8 isn't that bad at all. I think once you get used to the UI its much more agile than Win7.

    Just in IT we have a bunch of hillbillies who think that because a giant start button is missing the world is over.

    The metro apps were a pretty good excuse to to revamp a few programs to. Have you used the new RDP metro? Its slick!

  137. Sounds like... by jennatalia · · Score: 0

    a self-licking ice cream cone.

  138. Start page instead of Start button by Andy+Prough · · Score: 1

    Perhaps you should delicately ask her if she found the start button yet, it could just be a face saving exercise like what MS is trying to pull.

    No - first thing we did was sit down and work out whether she was going to use the Start page, or if I was going to go with a 3rd party Start button add-on. She decided to stick with the Start page. Seems to be working alright.

  139. Re:I pirated windows 7, bought windows 8 for &poun by nukenerd · · Score: 1

    So you thought that Win8 was infinitely better?

  140. Used to what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows what? There's an update to XP? ;-)

  141. Is that so? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft Has Been Watching, and It Says You're Getting Used To Windows 8

    In related news, the guy sodomizing you has been watching, and he says your anus is getting used to his cock. Also, Al Qaeda has been watching, and they say you're getting used to having no freedoms as a result of their actions anymore. The businesscriminals have been watching, and they say you're getting used to them stealing everyone's money, pissing in your face, and laughing about it as you tremble with impotent rage. Your neighbor has been watching, and he says you're getting used to him fucking your wife while you're at work earning money that she then spends on presents for him. The waiter at your favorite restaurant has been watching, and he says you're getting used to him spitting in your food. The sun has been watching, and it says you're getting used to its UV rays causing you to develop skin cancer. Your colon has been watching, and it says that since you're okay with skin cancer, you're getting used to the idea of dying from colo-rectal cancer. Opportunistic bacteria have been watching, and they say you're getting used to having no immune system with which to fight them off. The nurse has been watching, and she says you're getting used to the idea of a dozen different things fighting for the honor of being what kills you. The angel of death has been watching, and he says you're getting used to the idea of being a corpse.

    I've been watching, and I say you're getting used to the idea that Microsoft is run by a bunch of greedy fucking shitheads.

  142. Meaning what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meaning that consumers don't have the option to switch back to Windows 7, or that Dell and HP no longer sell Windows 7 computers? I upgraded one laptop to Windows 8 (because it has a touch screen) and everybody in my household hates it so I installed and run by default Classic Desktop on Windows 8, thank you very much.

  143. I'm so happy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... That I dumped windows for Linux a decade ago.

  144. phone ok, pc no way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    windows phone -- like the xbox -- is great. very good ui. and also entirely useful.

    windows pc. complete cr*p. cant even get at the file system.

  145. XP? still rules by rhalstead · · Score: 1

    I recently had a chance to check out the system in a large regional medical center. Sho nuff...even the custom programs were based on XP Pro. Medical records and all!

  146. What else will you use? Honestly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On one hand you have Mac that has a limited range of software available for it, on the other hand there is Linux that has both limited range of available "WORKING" software that doesn't require one to Hack & / it in order to get any usability out of it and an unfriendly UI. Believe it or not the majority of computer users that make a difference, (Thats the little punks and elderly, kids, and other computer illiterate people out there) and they want a GUI. Windows is the ONLY operating system that whether you want to hate it or not has a wide range of working software available for it, is a Stable platform, and not to forget is the only OS that will run Visual Studio. Windows also runs Eclipse, Netbeans, the Python IDLE and any other IDE you want to think of with ease. The GUI in Windows7 was devine, and I have played around with Windows8, but I currently have no interest in it since I am quite comfortable with my Start button... As it is there really aren't alternatives for people like me... Linux is the most unfriendly OS I have ever encounterd, and Mac, well it speaks for itself... Android sort of had the right idea, but it is way too fragmented compared to the iPad which developing software for is a piece of cake compared to Android. I know my App will run on every single iPad, but thats not the case with Android unfortunately and that has scared alot of developers away. A.D.D It's a bitch...