Built-in storage is going to be an IC or two that are soldered to a PCB. If the device won't boot, the only really safe way to delete the data is to dismantle the unit and totally destroy the board and make sure all ICs are broken.
People assume that the Internet is a strict connection from server to client. But actually from a non-linear, non-connected viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, streamey-wimey... bits.
I would even say, it's quite a Quantum Leap, unfortunately it's unavailable to stream on Netflix Canada. Which is funny because it's probably available on Netflix USA which I could access via VPN too.
“We now live in a nation where doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the press destroys information, religion destroys morals, and our banks destroy the economy.” - Chris Hedges
Brain scans and actions aside, did they question the people who didn't save the NPC, or were they asked to act as if everything in the simulation was real?
Without the last instruction, my thought would have been "screw the NPC, I'm not going to fail the test for a virtual
I'd be interested to know, with a total from all those password surveys, how many are "luggage12345". A search on Google gives "About 10,600 results", so that's already a possible hint about how popular it could be as a password.
Does anyone think there's any chance that the next IE version will simply switch to Blink or WebKit, with a fallback to Trident if the X-UA-Compatible meta is present?
If that happens, Firefox will be the odd one out as far as rendering is concerned.
Slashdot Mirror
Built-in storage is going to be an IC or two that are soldered to a PCB. If the device won't boot, the only really safe way to delete the data is to dismantle the unit and totally destroy the board and make sure all ICs are broken.
So what you're saying is, they're screwed.
It's pointless to send robots into space. All they do is waste processing cycles looking at the stars and mess around with fire extinguishers.
I would have modded him, but my last mod points expired in march 2017. He should have posted his comment a few years earlier.
Sounds like something NSA spyware would do.
You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
People assume that the Internet is a strict connection from server to client. But actually from a non-linear, non-connected viewpoint it's more like a big ball of wibbly-wobbly, streamey-wimey... bits.
I would even say, it's quite a Quantum Leap, unfortunately it's unavailable to stream on Netflix Canada. Which is funny because it's probably available on Netflix USA which I could access via VPN too.
The editors don't even see the errors anymore. All they see now is blonde, brunette, redhead...
Ni!
I guess you've never watched The Flintstones.
“We now live in a nation where doctors destroy health, lawyers destroy justice, universities destroy knowledge, governments destroy freedom, the press destroys information, religion destroys morals, and our banks destroy the economy.” - Chris Hedges
A simple not-yes would not not suffice?
Glad I'm not the only one who thought about that after reading the summary.
I guess he doesn't want to get laser eye surgery because he's afraid of sharks.
I fourth this post.
Reading about this test kind of reminded me of the test given to Wesley Crusher in Star Trek: The Next Generation.
Their degree is in Double Quarter Pounder with Cheese.
Do you want fries with that?
Brain scans and actions aside, did they question the people who didn't save the NPC, or were they asked to act as if everything in the simulation was real?
Without the last instruction, my thought would have been "screw the NPC, I'm not going to fail the test for a virtual
And no, I didn't RTFA.
Mynd you, møøse bites Kan be pretti nasti...
I'd be interested to know, with a total from all those password surveys, how many are "luggage12345". A search on Google gives "About 10,600 results", so that's already a possible hint about how popular it could be as a password.
Life is pain, Highness. Anyone who says differently is selling something.
Does anyone think there's any chance that the next IE version will simply switch to Blink or WebKit, with a fallback to Trident if the X-UA-Compatible meta is present?
If that happens, Firefox will be the odd one out as far as rendering is concerned.
Yeah, but no other browser can claim a 100% increase in vulnerabilities!
Take THAT, Apple, Mozilla, Google and Opera!
Then again, how many Slashdot readers are left-handed?