Somebody made one of the coolest audio appz, it's non free and made for a non free OS. If you like to get robbed and feel stupid for supporting a non free company I recommend you to do so. The only difference in our attitudes is you want to rule other peoples lifes while I care about myself instead of trying to fuck with others
What attitude should linux have, shoud it maybe just go kill itself and leve you to BE ?, is it so dangerous to wish we get cool apps cloned to linux?, its the way it works GNU ain't commercial and GNU is lots more than LINUX. the only thing thats damaging to the community is looser who can't accept GNU but run it for some other strange reason.
as linux said -- World domination --;) lets hope we wont have to run crappy oses within 10 years.
It sounds fair, still no facts though but if all you are saying are true, none are needed.
I just hope the next BSD article won't feature the same bad-attitude-against-linux--bsd-people and instead has a more open mind(like your post) so we won't need another one of these discussions;-)
Everybody sais I think this and My Personal Experiense is that but haven't relly anyone got any facts at all?. No benchmarks no Statistics no nothing???. I can't say I agree with any thing you are saying. For example in many post one can read thet Linux people flame BSD because they are inexperienced. What I tend to notice is that its actully the opposite, every BSD article I've read got lost of bad opinions about linux but Never every do I read an article by a linux user that sais so much bad stuff without showing any facts at all.
But hey, maybe linux people are silly fools who just follow the stream because all these post are lame and BSD biased (almoast) and generally looks about the same. So maybe we linux users just follow the BSD streem and continue to say, BSD is better but i use linux cuz its more of a workstation and got a cute penguine instead of that daemon;)
Is relly BSD so good that everyone that uses it falls in love or are just the average linux user not intressted in BSD because every "fact" about linux and BSD tend to be written by a BSD fan who relly thinks BSD emulates linux faster than linux ever run by itself and goes on like that, maybe saing some other non-existant-fact until he has bored you insane.
But come on, what is wrong ?, if you don't correct it how are the truth suppose to get heard of?
I agree with the "Down the toilet" thing because nobody shows any statistics or any benchmarks and yet BSD is said to be better, but I don't beleve it just because someone (especielly the maintainsers of some BSD version) sais so.
Okey okey, it was cool but consider the fact that it is commersial and its for BeOS. I relly can't imagine mysealf running that OS, its OK but its not free nor any software that runs on it.
I hope that someone will make a clone for linux, and since we already have terminatorX we already have a ground to build on...
When I was a newbe I installed MkLinux without knowing anything exept "ls" , almost. I ran it a while and messed averything up so I had to reinstall it. After totally ruining my system severaltimes I got to a point there I began to understan how things worked etc.
Whats my point?- Its only the will that is the limit. I wanted to do things so I had to figure out how to do it. I wannted to install applications, and since I had a Mac with a terrible outdated port of redhat I had to compile everything myself.
A way to make the whole thing more democratic would be to only let moderators lower one half or less at a time... But I guess we need at least the double amount of moderators to make that work.
>Will Apple kill off MkLinx? (notice the word APPLE in the question?)
I still really doesn't think apple care a bit about MkLinux, just leaving one developer to the project.
please note that I have only said MKLINUX is as good as dead, NOT mach or mac linux or anything.
Ive said that MkLinux (as an apple project) is as good as killed off. Of cource the sources are free and will be free but apple doesn't care about it any more.
The main purpose of MkLinux was as I see it to start the linux development for mac, and it did, now we have LinuxPPC and don't need mklinux anymore. It is slower and it is older so why care. Apple doesn't
Of cource a lot of people have downloaded and bought it, it was the only linux for mac when it was released, but as soon as you've tried the real kernel instead of mach you see how much faster it is and will never go back to mach.
Probably apple will use some parts of the mach kernel in OS X but thats something totally different than MK LINUX
Please tell my a good reason why MkLinux is better than the "real thing"?
Exactly, No DR4 and just the kernel is being developed, Anybody can use the real linux kernel as of 2.2.x, so why should anybody need mach to host it (maybe some 6200 people but nobody else). MkLinux is as good as dead. The mach version used ain't even GPL...
Slashdot Mirror
Somebody made one of the coolest audio appz, it's non free and made for a non free OS. If you like to get robbed and feel stupid for supporting a non free company I recommend you to do so. The only difference in our attitudes is you want to rule other peoples lifes while I care about myself instead of trying to fuck with others
;)
What attitude should linux have, shoud it maybe just go kill itself and leve you to BE ?, is it so dangerous to wish we get cool apps cloned to linux?, its the way it works
GNU ain't commercial and GNU is lots more than LINUX. the only thing thats damaging to the community is looser who can't accept GNU but run it for some other strange reason.
as linux said -- World domination --
lets hope we wont have to run crappy oses within 10 years.
It sounds fair, still no facts though but if all you are saying are true, none are needed.
;-)
I just hope the next BSD article won't feature the same bad-attitude-against-linux--bsd-people and instead has a more open mind(like your post) so we won't need another one of these discussions
Everybody sais I think this and My Personal Experiense is that but haven't relly anyone got any facts at all?. No benchmarks no Statistics no nothing???. I can't say I agree with any thing you are saying. For example in many post one can read thet Linux people flame BSD because they are inexperienced. What I tend to notice is that its actully the opposite, every BSD article I've read got lost of bad opinions about linux but Never every do I read an article by a linux user that sais so much bad stuff without showing any facts at all.
;)
But hey, maybe linux people are silly fools who just follow the stream because all these post are lame and BSD biased (almoast) and generally looks about the same. So maybe we linux users just follow the BSD streem and continue to say, BSD is better but i use linux cuz its more of a workstation and got a cute penguine instead of that daemon
Is relly BSD so good that everyone that uses it falls in love or are just the average linux user not intressted in BSD because every "fact" about linux and BSD tend to be written by a BSD fan who relly thinks BSD emulates linux faster than linux ever run by itself and goes on like that, maybe saing some other non-existant-fact until he has bored you insane.
/prove me wrong - with facts please!!!
But come on, what is wrong ?, if you don't correct it how are the truth suppose to get heard of?
I agree with the "Down the toilet" thing because nobody shows any statistics or any benchmarks and yet BSD is said to be better, but I don't beleve it just because someone (especielly the maintainsers of some BSD version) sais so.
Prove me wrong if you can, please do!
Okey okey, it was cool but consider the fact that it is commersial and its for BeOS. I relly can't imagine mysealf running that OS, its OK but its not free nor any software that runs on it.
I hope that someone will make a clone for linux, and since we already have terminatorX we already have a ground to build on...
When I was a newbe I installed MkLinux without knowing anything exept "ls" , almost. I ran it a while and messed averything up so I had to reinstall it. After totally ruining my system severaltimes I got to a point there I began to understan how things worked etc.
Whats my point?- Its only the will that is the limit. I wanted to do things so I had to figure out how to do it. I wannted to install applications, and since I had a Mac with a terrible outdated port of redhat I had to compile everything myself.
I totally agree with the author of the article.
/The users are all the problems...
Yes,
It could be done by showning the score in each comments link.
I would prefer it that way...
A way to make the whole thing more democratic would be to only let moderators lower one half or less at a time... But I guess we need at least the double amount of moderators to make that work.
>Will Apple kill off MkLinx?
(notice the word APPLE in the question?)
I still really doesn't think apple care a bit about MkLinux, just leaving one developer to the project.
please note that I have only said MKLINUX is as good as dead, NOT mach or mac linux or anything.
Ive said that MkLinux (as an apple project) is as good as killed off. Of cource the sources are free and will be free but apple doesn't care about it any more.
The main purpose of MkLinux was as I see it to start the linux development for mac, and it did, now we have LinuxPPC and don't need mklinux anymore. It is slower and it is older so why care. Apple doesn't
Of cource a lot of people have downloaded and bought it, it was the only linux for mac when it was released, but as soon as you've tried the real kernel instead of mach you see how much faster it is and will never go back to mach.
Probably apple will use some parts of the mach kernel in OS X but thats something totally different than MK LINUX
Please tell my a good reason why MkLinux is better than the "real thing"?
/my opinion
Exactly, No DR4 and just the kernel is being developed, Anybody can use the real linux kernel as of 2.2.x, so why should anybody need mach to host it (maybe some 6200 people but nobody else). MkLinux is as good as dead. The mach version used ain't even GPL...
Apple has already killed off Mklinux, its only one active developer at apple who is working on it now.
:)
LinuxPPC is the only working linux for macs until Debian realeases its version. MKlinux is outdated and slow, its been practicly dead a loong time
/don't falme my spelling