VB is actually alive and well as a first-class.NET language. It's not click and drag, of course, but it's a usable language with a solid API behind it.
How's this for context: this article is about the Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, not mass surveillance, unjustified wars, or previous administrations. Hillary's server is especially relevant.
If Trump's campaign fuels attacks, then why haven't they been owned as thoroughly as the DNC? Guccifer 2.0, whoever that might be, has leaked numerous DNCs docs at this point, and I believe more are in the pipeline. At the time of this writing, nothing comparable has happened to the RNC.
The right sentiment, but not entirely true, actually. Some SQL injection bugs are only exploitable when a specific dialect of SQL is used under the hood. Some support query stacking (MSSQL), while others don't by default. Some allow for easy creation of files on the server's filesystem (MySQL), some don't. It's not exactly the norm, but also not uncommon for the behavior of a SQL dialect to mitigate a vulnerability. Not that one should rely on such behaviors for security, but it can assist.
That's not to say this is a case where a different version of SQL would have helped, of course. I haven't looked at the details.
Your misuse of the word "exploit" ("vulnerability" was what you were looking for) shows how much you know about the topic. If companies output low quality code, they should be punished for putting their users at risk. It doesn't matter if they are "just trying to get stuff done".
He automated his entire workload and ignored development to such an extent that, over a period of 6 years, he forgot how to program? Sounds like bullshit. Things come up. People ask questions. Problems change. This is probably fake.
This isn't really news, Wordpress plugins are notoriously insecure. It would be more surprising if someone found one that wasn't rife with vulnerabilities. Fortunately, 10,000 sites is a tiny user base compared to a lot of plugins.
The first two points are valid. That last, not so much. A vulnerability can be patched at any moment, intentionally or not. This is especially true if live 'spoits are in play.
On what grounds? Are you encountering problems that you believe a woman or minority would be better equipped to solve? Further, why do people like you see it fit to drive women and minorities? By the way, you say you're "in tech." What do you do?
So many questions, AC. So many questions.
I'm talking about Chrome OS as a whole. It is most certainly a powergrab in the form of driving users to Google's services using cheap hardware and a locked down OS that they know will only be replaced by a small minority of users. Introducing the Android ecosystem is just more shit stirred into the same soup.
Slashdot Mirror
VB is actually alive and well as a first-class .NET language. It's not click and drag, of course, but it's a usable language with a solid API behind it.
I don't disagree with you. My original comment was a joke about the perception that these tools are product of something other than unseen developers.
Excellent point. As more tools like this appear from the aether, the value of developers will decline.
More expensive? Sure. Almost impossible? No.
Something to say? Of course! Go away.
How's this for context: this article is about the Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign, not mass surveillance, unjustified wars, or previous administrations. Hillary's server is especially relevant.
Pointless semantic games. That aside, bigotry is a natural property of mankind and will exist as long as people do. Get over it.
It's not a hate crime, idiot. That's what you're missing here.
Let's ignore the emails about rigging the election and instead focus on how these hackers are trying to rig the election.
Yeah, who cares if one of the most powerful people in the world violated federal law and put national security at risk. Stop obsessing about it.
If Trump's campaign fuels attacks, then why haven't they been owned as thoroughly as the DNC? Guccifer 2.0, whoever that might be, has leaked numerous DNCs docs at this point, and I believe more are in the pipeline. At the time of this writing, nothing comparable has happened to the RNC.
The right sentiment, but not entirely true, actually. Some SQL injection bugs are only exploitable when a specific dialect of SQL is used under the hood. Some support query stacking (MSSQL), while others don't by default. Some allow for easy creation of files on the server's filesystem (MySQL), some don't. It's not exactly the norm, but also not uncommon for the behavior of a SQL dialect to mitigate a vulnerability. Not that one should rely on such behaviors for security, but it can assist. That's not to say this is a case where a different version of SQL would have helped, of course. I haven't looked at the details.
Oops, wrong post. Regardless, GP went on to describe defense in depth, touching on many proven technologies.
If that sounds like gibberish, you don't actually work in security. Seriously, ASLR is a buzz word? Fuck off before someone accidentally believes you.
Your misuse of the word "exploit" ("vulnerability" was what you were looking for) shows how much you know about the topic. If companies output low quality code, they should be punished for putting their users at risk. It doesn't matter if they are "just trying to get stuff done".
This has been a long time coming. Companies should be held accountable for their negligence.
If you want hands-free, that can easily be had without a bot. What value does "Alexa" add?
Keyboard and mouse work just fine.
Wait a second, you're suggesting people use an unpatched and out of date browser to protect themselves? Good luck with that.
How is this an Oscars for black hats? It's almost exclusively white hat stuff.
He automated his entire workload and ignored development to such an extent that, over a period of 6 years, he forgot how to program? Sounds like bullshit. Things come up. People ask questions. Problems change. This is probably fake.
This isn't really news, Wordpress plugins are notoriously insecure. It would be more surprising if someone found one that wasn't rife with vulnerabilities. Fortunately, 10,000 sites is a tiny user base compared to a lot of plugins.
The first two points are valid. That last, not so much. A vulnerability can be patched at any moment, intentionally or not. This is especially true if live 'spoits are in play.
On what grounds? Are you encountering problems that you believe a woman or minority would be better equipped to solve? Further, why do people like you see it fit to drive women and minorities? By the way, you say you're "in tech." What do you do? So many questions, AC. So many questions.
I'm talking about Chrome OS as a whole. It is most certainly a powergrab in the form of driving users to Google's services using cheap hardware and a locked down OS that they know will only be replaced by a small minority of users. Introducing the Android ecosystem is just more shit stirred into the same soup.