More than 50 posts and nobody ever mentioned there is like dozens of Gigabytes of data for our fellow privacy defenders at NSA to harvest. Just how easily something like that gets overlooked, I wonder.
Have you considered the very real posibility that brain may not have proper mandatory authorization and intput verification and anyone with local access can say stop your heart?
Am I the only one who finds it weird? For gods sake.can't they come up with a normal name? Some future names when other countries begin making robotic organs: FranCervix TavuLung ChAdrenal ChiLeg MaLiver
I'm afraid tor is safe against that.because it's traffic crosses borders that NSA cannot.
And you can manually adjust hop count if you're too paranoid(developers advise not to; because it only degrades performance).
Nope,
It's just because they can build a very huge receiver on the ground that can receive signal with much less error and that allows them to have less FEC and bla bla bla that makes this huge difference.
That is not always possible, there are cpu intensive applications that transcode video or maipulate images and have lots of assembly code here and there.
It's not as easy as clicking on the recompile button.
Security researchers do a lot of testing on a device to make sure if it sends the same data with a legit certificate and a forged one, they test packet length, timing, cpu and memory usage, data enteropy, disk/sd activity, etc.
I'm not a security researcher nor had any cryptography related jobs, but have read lots of papers on the topic and I'm sure it can be verified if the device changes its behaviour if it detects unussual behaviour.
It may be hard, but not too hard to be considered impossible.
I don't let anyone with an apple device in my room or touch my network because they are usually too unintelectual to even know what privacy is and don't have a clue why i call them iSheeps or whatever.
But you're damn wrong about this one because it can be verified with minimal security knowledge and there are always good security researchers out there that use insecure devices including apple iDevices.They already found this, even if it's too late.
Slashdot Mirror
More than 50 posts and nobody ever mentioned there is like dozens of Gigabytes of data for our fellow privacy defenders at NSA to harvest.
Just how easily something like that gets overlooked, I wonder.
They actually killed people to test an app.
Couldn't they just call out for beta testers?
Have you considered the very real posibility that brain may not have proper mandatory authorization and intput verification and anyone with local access can say stop your heart?
Am I the only one who finds it weird?
For gods sake.can't they come up with a normal name?
Some future names when other countries begin making robotic organs:
FranCervix
TavuLung
ChAdrenal
ChiLeg
MaLiver
I'm afraid tor is safe against that.because it's traffic crosses borders that NSA cannot. And you can manually adjust hop count if you're too paranoid(developers advise not to; because it only degrades performance).
Maybe because a random anyone doesn't even compare to US in power, surveillance technology and a whole lot of other things that matter.
I wish I could reply after 9 month, but anyways I'm marking it on my calendar.
Nope, It's just because they can build a very huge receiver on the ground that can receive signal with much less error and that allows them to have less FEC and bla bla bla that makes this huge difference.
That is not always possible, there are cpu intensive applications that transcode video or maipulate images and have lots of assembly code here and there. It's not as easy as clicking on the recompile button.
Security researchers do a lot of testing on a device to make sure if it sends the same data with a legit certificate and a forged one, they test packet length, timing, cpu and memory usage, data enteropy, disk/sd activity, etc. I'm not a security researcher nor had any cryptography related jobs, but have read lots of papers on the topic and I'm sure it can be verified if the device changes its behaviour if it detects unussual behaviour. It may be hard, but not too hard to be considered impossible.
I don't let anyone with an apple device in my room or touch my network because they are usually too unintelectual to even know what privacy is and don't have a clue why i call them iSheeps or whatever. But you're damn wrong about this one because it can be verified with minimal security knowledge and there are always good security researchers out there that use insecure devices including apple iDevices.They already found this, even if it's too late.
GOOGLE
FTFY
We already have enough congestion on 2.412~2.482.Why on earth did they choose Wi-dear lord-Fi?
You just made the only analogy that could make me think this chip is made by J.J. Abrams.
I have no idea what i was thinking.
I'd go with BTS crash.AFAIK it takes way longer to diagnose.
Yes, I believe we have java, Qt, gtk, python, Tk, and a few quadrillion more cross-platform languages and frameworks for that purpose.
There has been transcoding and repacking software out there for decades. Bloody(pronounce brittish, BlOOdy) not brilliant.
Just burn one and you will see how long it takes. 11 days 13 hours 46 minutes 40 seconds
...but people and light and everything else as well.
Maybe it's just me, but I don't think thats a wall anymore.
Java uses less memory for initialization and less cpu when accessing elements. I prefer that over a few more keystrokes.
Only if its UF6 Cheese cake:)
I'm sure I'm not the only one here that knows what a root/admin password is. And who in any company has direct access to THE database.
I'm guessing he can get a lawyer for that matter.Right?
So we live in different caves, because I've never seen mercurial.