Slashdot Mirror


UW Researchers Demonstrate First Direct Communication Between Human Brains

An anonymous reader writes "Opening a fascinating set of ethical and legal issues, researchers at UW Seattle have demonstrated the first device to allow direct communication between two humans' brains. Effectively, they allowed a subject to play a video game with another subject's fingers. For now, the communication is uni-directional, though they intend to extend it to bi-directional. EEG sensors are attached to a subject's motor cortex to detect 'motor imagery' — imagined hand movement, in this case. That activity is translated and sent over a computer network where it triggers a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator (TMS) located over Subject 2's motor cortex. Effectively, Subject 1 imagines moving their hand, and Subject 2's hand moved."

154 comments

  1. Let's just cover the basics here real quick... by He+Who+Has+No+Name · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...bring on the Kaiju, ultimate dutch rudder, we need a young priest and an old priest... ...did I miss any obvious ones?

    1. Re:Let's just cover the basics here real quick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You forgot the most obvious one: Vulcan mind meld!

    2. Re:Let's just cover the basics here real quick... by jonyen · · Score: 1

      "What do you want?"
      "Inception. Is it possible?"

    3. Re:Let's just cover the basics here real quick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you use the left hand it feels like a stranger is doing it.

    4. Re:Let's just cover the basics here real quick... by BreakBad · · Score: 0

      Yes but this article clearly intends that you use a strangers left hand.

    5. Re:Let's just cover the basics here real quick... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mein Furher! I can walk!

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    6. Re:Let's just cover the basics here real quick... by skids · · Score: 1

      ...did I miss any obvious ones

      Giant Smurf Ponytails?

    7. Re:Let's just cover the basics here real quick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first device to allow communication between 2 human brains was grandma's hand as she slapped the side of our head when us kids were doing something dangerous and beyond stupid. The next communication device was a broom when the hand didn't work.

    8. Re:Let's just cover the basics here real quick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GitS-style 'cyberbrain' hacks?

    9. Re:Let's just cover the basics here real quick... by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 0
      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
    10. Re:Let's just cover the basics here real quick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you missed all of the obvious ones. i don't know what the hell you're talking about. perhaps if we link brains sometime i will understand.

    11. Re:Let's just cover the basics here real quick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Demolition Man style imaginary sex! Because actual copulation is gross duh!

    12. Re:Let's just cover the basics here real quick... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      This brings an entirely new meaning to the term.

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    13. Re: Let's just cover the basics here real quick... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use my lucky hobo's hand.

  2. Fuck ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think the tinfoil is going to stop that ... I've been saying it for years, government freakin' mind control experiments. ;-)

  3. Brings a whole new meaning... by bosef1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    to the "Stop Hitting Yourself" game.

    1. Re:Brings a whole new meaning... by aralin · · Score: 1

      I'm so disappointed, this was not first used on the researcher's girlfriend to give himself a better handjob :)

      --
      If programs would be read like poetry, most programmers would be Vogons.
  4. I saw that movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    there was a rat under a chef's hat, right?

  5. Re:Misleading... by i+kan+reed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And using a telephone isn't contacting someone directly? Even as far as pedantry goes, that's pretty pedantic.

  6. Imagine the future by cp5i6 · · Score: 4, Funny

    of inet pr0n!

    1. Re:Imagine the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We can fuck ourselves! Oh wait..

  7. move that hand, move it! by themushroom · · Score: 2

    Subject 1 imagines moving their hand, and Subject 2's hand moved.

    I think I saw this premise in an adult movie once

    1. Re:move that hand, move it! by N0Man74 · · Score: 1

      You forgot Step 1, sit on your hand long enough that it falls asleep and feels like someone else's...

      Then when it's controlled by someone else, it's even more convincing.

  8. Next Time... by Eleint · · Score: 2

    Next time I murder a dude I am total using this as my defense. "But your honor its science, you can't argue with science otherwise you would have to toss all the blood evidence" Yeah, they don't let me talk in court anymore...

    --
    If someone tries to kill you, you try and kill them right back
    1. Re:Next Time... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I'm using it as my offences, as in getting the judge to strangle themselves and the bailiff to shoot the jurors.
      .

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  9. Just Thinking About Science Triggers Moral Behavio by space_jake · · Score: 1

    Phew good thing that article a few hours back has us covered.

  10. This is so great by oodaloop · · Score: 0

    This isn't creepy at all, and I see no way this will be abused. I can't wait!

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    1. Re:This is so great by X-Ray+Artist · · Score: 1

      Resistance is futile...........

      --
      I would have a sig but I am too busy updating programs and restarting my computer
  11. Re:Misleading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed, I was led to believe that they had discovered a whole new level of telepathy, I guess not :/

  12. Just wait... by Jmc23 · · Score: 1

    until people discover they can send those signals without the computer inbetween! Just a matter of sending the proper signal to the proper antenna.

    --
    Don't complain about syntax, grammar, or spelling. There is no.hell like input on android.
    1. Re:Just wait... by Areyoukiddingme · · Score: 1

      So you're saying buy stock in tin foil manufacturers?

  13. verbal instructions to his own brain. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like "Raise my left arm"? - Or "Throw the harpoon".

    People are gonna come from all over. This boy's an Eskimo.

  14. Transitional by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    Transcranial Magnetic Stimulator -- Hmmmmm, I will wait a few more days.

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    1. Re:Transitional by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Those things are rather abuseable. Zap a person in the right place, and they'll come out quite convicted they just had a personal experience with God.

    2. Re:Transitional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those things are rather abuseable. Zap a person in the right place, and they'll come out quite convicted they just had a personal experience with God.

      How many years did they get from that pulse?

    3. Re:Transitional by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A six pack, a bottle of Tequila and some mescaline works just as well. No wires.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:Transitional by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      I just attempted to take the adjective form of 'conviction.' I'm not sure if that is a legitimate gramatical move or not.

    5. Re:Transitional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Convinced.

      You're welcome.

  15. Zombies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems the end of the world (as we know it) will be by AI controlled human zombies. They're going to be the fast, intelligent types. Yikes!

  16. Won't use it until my brain discloses it's source by behrooz0az · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Have you considered the very real posibility that brain may not have proper mandatory authorization and intput verification and anyone with local access can say stop your heart?

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion. -- Spazmania (174582)
  17. Oujia board by suso · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sally: Mom, Bobby is moving my hand, tell him to stop.
    Bobby: I'm not moving it.

    1. Re:Oujia board by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Mom: don't make me make you slap yourselves!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  18. combine this... by roc97007 · · Score: 2

    ...with quantum entanglement as a transmission method, and you'd really have something...

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:combine this... by Jesrad · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be the communication stones from Stargate lore ?

      --
      Maybe we deserve this world ?
    2. Re:combine this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quantum entanglement does not allow transmission of information by itself. It requires a regular ("classical") communication channel before any interesting phenomena can be observed.

  19. Time to reboot Star Wars Episodes 2-6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The clones don't need to be submissive... they just need to be jacked in.

  20. Re:The Internal Revenue Service has a similar tool by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Threat of gun. Actual use of the gun as a communication tool only leaves you with goose feathers and meat, no more golden eggs.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  21. Re:Not that impressive by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Person ignorant of the science and engineering uses his ignorance to declare it isn't impressive.

    Learn to think.

    Hint: It's as impressive as hell.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  22. Re:Just Thinking About Science Triggers Moral Beha by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    The first thing I thought, "what could possibly go wrong?"

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  23. Honestly Dear by NEDHead · · Score: 2

    I thought it was you, just trying out a new body!

  24. Paging Dr. Hfuhruhurr by maroberts · · Score: 0

    I couldn't fuck a gorilla!

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  25. Prerecorded impulses? by Antipater · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can they record and save the impulse patterns? I can see it now - just pop on my brain-stimulating hat, hit play, and I can finally Dougie!

    --
    Everything is better with chainsaws.
    1. Re:Prerecorded impulses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just like the movie "strange days" where the lead role works like memory dealer.... pre-packaged moments in the live of anyone you like to be

    2. Re:Prerecorded impulses? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTL chips FTW!

    3. Re:Prerecorded impulses? by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 1

      - I know Kung Fu!
      - Show me!

    4. Re:Prerecorded impulses? by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      I know you're being funny, but I wonder... sure, you're telling the motor cortex to do something... but it's still doing it. I wonder if this "trains" it the same way as doing it voluntarily would.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  26. Re:Misleading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    just like technology called "speaking" and "writing"

  27. It's only creepy if you speculate. by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Okay, let's just speculate about all the ways this could be misused:

    *-- Vending machines that make you reach into your pocket and pull out money whenever you pass by them.

    *-- Rich handicapped people buying time on poor people's bodies.

    *-- Rich people buying time on poor people's bodies, in order to do criminal things.

    *-- Police officers with a 'lay down with your hands behind your back' raygun.

    I'm sure I missed a few, any suggestions?

    --
    Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
    1. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Yes: Drive your car at 100mph into a palm tree in the middle of the night for no reason... oh wait...

    2. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sure I missed a few, any suggestions?

      My wife could use this to make me wash the dishes.

    3. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by EmperorArthur · · Score: 3, Insightful

      *-- Rich handicapped people buying time on poor people's bodies.

      *-- Rich people buying time on poor people's bodies, in order to do criminal things.

      They made a movie about that, except that it was "Rich people buying time on peoples bodies to do whatever the hell they wanted," and "Rich people buying time on death row inmate's bodies to make them kill each other."

      Gamer

      It still has some major plot holes that need to be overlooked, but I thought it was a decent sci-fi action flic.

      --
      So lets pretend that we've just completed writing this code, as opposed to having just completed sabotaging it -Altera
    4. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Intelligence Service Delux feature, if you will.

    5. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by DRMShill · · Score: 1

      Star Trek level technology pops up and this is where your mind goes first?

      I'm thinking you're a sippy cup is half empty kind of guy.

    6. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by psithurism · · Score: 1

      *-- Vending machines that make you reach into your pocket and pull out money whenever you pass by them.
      Vending machine would need a huge magnetic field, to hit passersby a few feet away from it in that particular spot. Assuming it was able to target the magnetic field well enough not to simply illuminate everything in the targets brain at once (doubtful), then it will still destroy all of the targets credit cards, cell phones and anything else that might be invented to let you pay vending machines in the near future (all of the targets coins have just been ripped from pockets or are too hot to touch depending on the metals that make them up).

      *-- Rich handicapped people buying time on poor people's bodies.
      First, I don't see the problem here. Second, a human body is a really poor platform to take over and at the moment, this is a really tricky way to do it.

      *-- Rich people buying time on poor people's bodies, in order to do criminal things.
      This has always been a problem, at least in the future you can say: Whitey Bulgar shoved this mind control cap on my head, so it's not my fault. Instead of trying to convince the police that the gangsters made some non-specific threats that may have been about your dog if you didn't take their money. Once again, as long as the poor guy has a dog, I think an expensive helmet full of precisely located coils will be the least efficient way to control him.

      *-- Police officers with a 'lay down with your hands behind your back' raygun.
      I misread this at first. See the vending machine problem, they have to get you on the ground first before they could slip the mind control helmet on you.
      and that is the one I'm worried about. The researchers say the receiver can't force you to do something against your will, but the article describes the receiver directly stimulating the motor cortex, causing the finger to move involuntarily. And other articles here have shown researchers who think they can stimulate the "moral part of the brain" or "the religious part of the brain." So, your will can become a very subjective measurement once you have some coils pressed against your skull. Given how we seem to treat criminals, prisoners, and people who are trying to get on an airplane these days, this could get scary really fast.

    7. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Well, she has to stand there staring at you, imagining herself doing all dishes, so I don't think she's going to save much effort here.

    8. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is some really deep-seated fear and denial you're displaying, not to mention projection -- using the phrase "sippy cup" to imply he's immature, when in fact your blatant denial of the realities of the world we live in indicate you're probably vastly less mature than someone who speculated about potential abuses of new technology, which is a reality we must all face head-on if we are to mitigate it.

    9. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The possibilities that require manipulation at a distance will start to happen when we all have permanent implants that are all networked -- then the NSA and other bad actors will just hack their way in and sell the ability to override safety controls when ever they want; with flimsy justifications. That's the most likely way for the police raygun thing to work.

    10. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Truth. However, I wouldn't fault anybody for not seeing this movie.

    11. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think for her it's more the principle of the matter. Kind of a 'If I have to stand here doing this, so do you' type scenario.

    12. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      I think for her it's more the principle of the matter.

      You have a good understanding of the feminine mind. Years ago I built a toilet seat lowering mechanism out of an old hydraulic hinge. I would raise it to pee, and then just walk away. The toilet seat would lower on it's own over the next five minutes. I expected my wife to be happy about it, but instead she was upset. To her, the point was not that the toilet seat was lowered, but that *I* lowered it, as a conscious and deliberate act of love and commitment.

    13. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're seriously gonna say anything to someone named "DRMShill?"
      What the fuck is wrong with you? Bad coward! You know better!

    14. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by Svenia · · Score: 1

      I was the AC that posted this (was at work / too lazy to login), and as a female I'd hope I had a good understanding of the female mind. =)

      That being said I feel that kind of logic is absolute crap and a bit whiny, but I've seen it enough in others of my gender that I easily recognize it. If 'us' (read: females) leaving the toilet seat down isn't inconvenient for 'you' (read: men) when you have to piss, then 'you' leaving it up isn't inconvenient to 'us'. {I.e. if that's the worst thing I have to deal with today, I should probably STFU and stop complaining.}

    15. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think for her it's more the principle of the matter.

      You have a good understanding of the feminine mind. Years ago I built a toilet seat lowering mechanism out of an old hydraulic hinge. I would raise it to pee, and then just walk away. The toilet seat would lower on it's own over the next five minutes. I expected my wife to be happy about it, but instead she was upset. To her, the point was not that the toilet seat was lowered, but that *I* lowered it, as a conscious and deliberate act of love and commitment.

      Yes, because it is not a commitment to build a toilet-seat-lowering mechanism. Why don't you bring that up and see how the discussion goes...

    16. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NSA

    17. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      Why does anyone need to put it up anyways? Is it really so damn hard to aim into the bowl and avoid the seat? If you hit the seat is it any worse than hitting the rim? Isn't it easier to clean off the seat than the rim?

      As a man I've never once lifted the seat.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    18. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by Svenia · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't know if it's harder to aim into a toilet bowl with the seat up or down, but from my turns cleaning the bathroom I can tell you most men seem to be terrible aim-ers or don't particularly care one way or the other. The only boyfriend I've ever lived with who didn't require the toilet being cleaned more often so to say, was one that sat down to pee.

    19. Re:It's only creepy if you speculate. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the last bit. The flow starts strong, but winds down, and the last few drops are ... drops. I believe the saying goes, "You can wriggle, and you can dance, but the last drop always lands in your pants." Anyway, the drop before that ends up on the rim, more often than not. I also think there tends to be more aerosolized backsplash than one might immediately notice, settling on the rim over time, which might explain why after a few weeks the rim of a male-frequented toilet looks like it's been dipped in concentrated urine (along with a few other gross things, depending on grooming), like the world's worst martini glass.

      So it's not necessarily a matter of aim. I lift the lid before I go, not to increase the area of the target, but because there's bound to be some collateral damage, and while I'm enough of a slob to not really care that the rim of the toilet isn't clean enough to eat off of anymore, even I don't want to sit in my own piss later.

      Well, I hope that was either informative or entertaining. Yeah, think I'll post anonymously...

  28. Assuming Direct Control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That is all.

  29. Re:Misleading... by lxs · · Score: 1

    Nope. We're still stuck with the regular level of telepathy. Still, it comes in useful when playing poker.

  30. Re:The Internal Revenue Service has a similar tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Threat of gun. Actual use of the gun as a communication tool only leaves you with goose feathers and meat, no more golden eggs.

    Except that the remaining geese are more compliant to having their golden eggs taken.

  31. It's real. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is old news. Like over a decade old.

    They've been using TMR tech for all kinds of experimental purposes. I remember coughing up my coffee upon first reading about it more than ten years ago; they were temporarily blinding people with the tech for some kind of banal attention study. The tech wasn't the focus, only mentioned in passing. It was taken for granted. And that's part of the problem; they don't know how safe it is, as this paper points out:

    http://www.tmslab.org/includes/article3.pdf

    But the tool works. Yay. Only the main stream believers insist that the electromagnetic spectrum can't do anything to the brain.

    "Science is good and great, but only when it doesn't make me uncomfortable. I mean, criticize my iPhone? I disbelieve on principle!"

    I've met smarter cats. But then, they don't use cell phones.

    1. Re:It's real. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Yes, because the magnetic fields emitted by a cell phone are in any way comparable to those used by TMS...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:It's real. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because the magnetic fields emitted by a cell phone are in any way comparable to those used by TMS...

      How are they not comparable? It's the same spectrum. That makes them comparable. TMS technology grew from the many observations of effects upon the nervous system via low power EM. It's the same science.

      People claiming that low power EM can't *possibly* have any effect is due to the primitive instinct to deny the possibility of things people don't want to consider because they make them feel unhappy.

      The problem is that while you can reflexively resist under the guise of "rational debate" the countless studies available, when some forward-thinking company ignores the bullshit and goes ahead and starts selling a device which deliberately and unquestionably uses the effect, it makes denial a lot harder to maintain. Or is it a placebo effect, hmm?

      So what will happen instead is that people will simply reboot and forget it ever happened. I've seen it before, and I'll see it again.

      Cognitive dissonance is for chumps and cowards.

  32. Conspiracies by jjp9999 · · Score: 0

    Good. After it turned out the government really was watching all of us, the conspiracists can have something new to play with :)

  33. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That means, at some point we will understand .... women???

  34. With further development ... by hendrikboom · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Would this help people with locked-in syndrome? Would they be able to use someone else's hand to act? to communicate?
    Which one of the two people would have to have Parkinson's to make the resulting hand movements irregular?
    Etc., Etc.

    -- hendrik

    1. Re:With further development ... by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      I think this requires you to pick up signals from the originator's motor cortex. I don't know anything about the syndrome, so unless there is something to pick up you're not going to get anywhere.

      That said there could be signals, and they just don't go anywhere or are not strong enough... in which case I bet you could get it to work.

      The reverse might help too! By making the cortex do things, it does them, and consider brain plasticity...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:With further development ... by tpjunkie · · Score: 2

      Excellent idea, from my understanding of the process demonstrated above, yes, this could work, as this would be above the neurological level of the lesion in most patients suffering from locked in syndrome. - I am a physician.

    3. Re:With further development ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Further development according to Michio Kaku from 2012

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KXin82A6maM

  35. Re:Just Thinking About Science Triggers Moral Beha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first thing I thought, "what could possibly go wrong?"

    Better that you know it's possible then just waking up inside the Matrix tomorrow and being none the wiser.

  36. Re:Not that impressive by PPH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You know those magnets that can shut down a portion of your brain if you put the plate right against your skull?

    This explains those people walking down the street wearing headphones.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  37. Next step by Sla$hPot · · Score: 1

    What about emotions or perhaps even thoughts?
    Will it be possible?

    1. Re:Next step by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will it be possible?

      Yes. Though perhaps not in our lifetimes. Once we know how the brain works and we can insert gadgets into it, you could make whatever change you want.

    2. Re:Next step by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Or how about physical sensation? There's money in that.

  38. Re:Misleading... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not to mention that the eye is part of the brain, by many accounts

  39. This story has mutual masturbatory overtones by GodfatherofSoul · · Score: 1

    Couples in long distance relationships eagerly await the results.

    --
    I swear to God...I swear to God! That is NOT how you treat your human!
    1. Re:This story has mutual masturbatory overtones by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Without translating sight or touch, that could be really painful. If they can transfer touch sensations, well then - this is even more useful.

  40. Re:The Internal Revenue Service has a similar tool by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    Threat of gun. Actual use of the gun as a communication tool only leaves you with goose feathers and meat, no more golden eggs.

    Except that the remaining geese are more compliant to having their golden eggs taken.

    You'd think so. I wonder what would happen were that tested en masse.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  41. Re:Not that impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, yes, compared to your body of work, it's not impressive.

    Keep handing in your class assignments on time--something truly worthy of praise and accolades!

  42. If the NSA does not already have this ... by Skapare · · Score: 1

    ... well, they sure do now.

    --
    now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  43. Stupid scenario by joemck · · Score: 1

    FTFA: "Stocco said years from now the technology could be used, for example, by someone on the ground to help a flight attendant or passenger land an airplane if the pilot becomes incapacitated."

    Or, you know, use fly-by-wire. A normal computer-to-computer interface is sufficient here, and already exists and is in widespread use.

    1. Re:Stupid scenario by Spottywot · · Score: 2

      An example that is flawed for sure, what about a situation where someone needs emergency surgery and this could be performed by proxy by a willing bystander? There are definitely potential uses for a mature version of this technology, most of them are quite scary though. I do not like the idea of this being done to me. In reality though I think for all the 'save the day' scenarios in which this could be useful it would have to be a ubiquitous technology, now that's pretty damn unlikely even if it does mature so that would leave specialised applications. Any takers?

      --
      In a cybernetic fit of rage she pissed off to another age...
    2. Re:Stupid scenario by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it made me think of the movie gamer.

    3. Re:Stupid scenario by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

      We might have a medical bag in the future that has a helmet with the magnetic transceiver in it. An immediate application would be field surgery, with a physician in a safe place performing life-saving operations in the troop transport via the vehicles encrypted sat signal. pop it on, do the work, and your good. Perhaps combine it with an immersive 3D computer technologies and remote cameras (and maybe even a bit of a finger/hand level feedback loop) this could go a long way. I can see a whole industry centered around "rent-a-professional" where you just use the helmet to connect to someone who can fix whatever that you normally lack the skill to do. Far more efficient than traveling all over the place, and so far it seems easier to control a human than make a decent robot, or at least probably cheaper. And the expert repetitive-motion training could be useful too.

  44. Pacific Rim by SengirV · · Score: 1

    One step closer...

    Mwahahahahahaha

    --

    Prof. Farnsworth - "Oh a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!"

  45. cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    now someone can think about me jacking off and I jack off?

    1. Re:cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      now someone can think about me jacking off and I jack off?

      Is it working?

  46. What's next? by bulletman · · Score: 1

    What's next, line dancing?

  47. Re:The Internal Revenue Service has a similar tool by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    Do it enough times and you'll start finding out just how many of those goose also have guns.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  48. Re:Misleading... by vlad30 · · Score: 2

    Yes but once the computer can record the signals and replay them without the controlling human this could get interesting

    --
    Your'e all thinking it, I just said it for you
  49. Re:Not that impressive by perceptual.cyclotron · · Score: 1
    His description wasn't exactly... eloquent – but he is basically correct. I'd say it's still impressive – in the same way that any successful application of bleeding-edge technology is impressive – but there's no real theoretical advancement here at all. They combined two well-established techniques: EEG-decoding (the stuff that's so well established you can buy your own crappy sets and play boring games 'with your mind'), and TMS (invented circa 1910 by this badass - Silvanus Thompson) which now-a-days can be applied to replicate the 1950s era work of Wilder Penfield in electrical stimulation.

    In other words: we were already able to trigger motor impulses externally, and we were already able to record and decode the neural signatures of sufficiently different thoughts. What they did here has huge media value, but it isn't particularly ground breaking. Even TFA states this:

    The technologies used by the researchers for recording and stimulating the brain are both well-known.

  50. As with everything else on the internet... by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    ...clearly, this has MAJOR applications for the porn industry.

    Holy smokes.

    --
    -Styopa
  51. Borg? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did nobody make a comment about the Borg yet? Are you guys real geeks? ;)

  52. Frederick Pohl's 1959 story was much better by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *-- Rich handicapped people buying time on poor people's bodies.

    *-- Rich people buying time on poor people's bodies, in order to do criminal things.

    Frederick Pohl used the plot device to much better effect in his 1959 short story "The Day the Icicle Works Closed" http://aboutsf.podomatic.com/entry/2011-12-30T08_40_13-08_00

  53. In Soviet Russia... by Sentrion · · Score: 1

    ...Computers hack into YOU!

  54. Re:Misleading... by Scarletdown · · Score: 4, Funny

    All those who believe in telekinesis, raise my hand.

    --
    This space unintentionally left blank.
  55. FAP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fap fap fap

  56. Muscle memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Could this be used by an expert to teach somebody something physical and reinforce their muscle memory? IE some physical skill like playing guitar could be taught - at least the physical practice part - by using this?

    what about general physical therapy?

    This sounds totally wicked.

  57. So what are the ethical uses of this again? by jd.schmidt · · Score: 1

    For real, so much of this brain research stuff it scary as heck to me. Even the so called ethical uses seem pretty creepy.

    There was another research piece where they could associate negative or positive emotions with memories artificially. Some genius though it might be a way to fight PTSD, except I think he kind of overlooked the possible side effect associating positive emotions with death and carnage.

    1. Re:So what are the ethical uses of this again? by elucido · · Score: 1

      For real, so much of this brain research stuff it scary as heck to me. Even the so called ethical uses seem pretty creepy.

      There was another research piece where they could associate negative or positive emotions with memories artificially. Some genius though it might be a way to fight PTSD, except I think he kind of overlooked the possible side effect associating positive emotions with death and carnage.

      It depends on how it is developed but if its a top down government technology there are none.

  58. Re:Won't use it until my brain discloses it's sour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good question. Can you stop your own heart? If possible, it is hard enough for owner of heart. So how hard is it to stop another persons heart?

  59. Re:Not that impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's bringing all these technologies together that makes it both practical and amazing, and subject to gradual improvements in any of the technologies.

  60. Anyone who thinks this would be fun... by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    .... raise my right hand.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  61. Aehm, "direct"??? by gweihir · · Score: 0

    These medical types must be blind to all the technical equipment in their "direct" communication path...

    --
    Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
  62. This is new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, maybe but once again science fiction has inspired science.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brainstorm_(1983_film)

  63. science copying art ? by jerryjnormandin · · Score: 1

    Now it could be possible to control an Avatar ? I really don't like the way this is going. We are losing our privacy. Now in a few generations even our thoughts won't be private ? I am all for learning how to build bionic limbs and controlling them... but mind an actual link from one brain to another individuals brain or cortex ? NO THANKS.

  64. Re:Not that impressive by Kielistic · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Okay... what they did was put a big fire under a balloon with some guys in in. Then they aimed the balloon up at something. Then they just had to time the lighting of the fire... and bam "moon landing".

  65. Happy Happy Joy Joy Joy by blahblahwoofwoof · · Score: 1

    Why did the Ren 'n Stimpy Happy Helmet just jump into my thoughts?

    Oh no...

    1. Re:Happy Happy Joy Joy Joy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stimpy, for the hundredth time, stop making me drag my butt across the carpet :)

  66. Re:Won't use it until my brain discloses it's sour by Kielistic · · Score: 1

    Definitely. Brute force attempts can often result in the person's brain being bricked. And that will definitely stop their heart.

  67. Re:Won't use it until my brain discloses it's sour by Smallpond · · Score: 1

    If you want to stop someone's heart there are much cheaper ways. However, this may be the first one that works over the internet.

  68. Quick "muscle memory" ? by dbreeze · · Score: 1

    Could this be an effective path to "teaching" muscle memory quickly with an experienced subject sharing to an inexperienced one? Wanna play guitar? Let's hook up and I'll get you through the awkwardness of some basic chord changes quickly........
    If the impulses for an action came from external source instead of a persons own brain would there be a "memory" effect? How far up or down the neural pathway would it have to trigger the action for "memory" of any sort? If the subject is experiencing the action wouldn't that add some "memory" reinforcement?

    --
    When the king heard the words of the Book of the Law he tore his robes.2Kings22:11
  69. Re:Won't use it until my brain discloses it's sour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's pretty easy to stop a heart, actually.

  70. Cyber Dutch Rudder is Coming Soon by utkonos · · Score: 1

    I predict that this will advance the science of cyberdildonics to the max. I can see all sorts of uses for this type of thing.

  71. We are... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...the Borg.

  72. I almost clicked.... by MyHair · · Score: 1

    I thought "wow, cool, I need to see that video," then realized it would be a video of someone watching someone else play a video game. How could I tell who's controlling the hands?

    Whew, time waste avoided.

    (Still, cool.)

  73. Re:Won't use it until my brain discloses it's sour by l0n3s0m3phr34k · · Score: 1

    What if you "recorded" someone having a heart attack and then dying, them played that back over the interface? I don't think this device works on that level though, or else the receiver's heart and other automatic functions might have an issue...they might even sync up, or just freak out and beat twice as fast with a weird rhythm. It probably depends on where and what they are recording, and how close they are to the particular nerve bundle carrying those signals.

  74. Re:Won't use it until my brain discloses it's sour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Have you considered the very real posibility that brain may not have proper mandatory authorization and intput verification and anyone with local access can say stop your heart?

    Now I have. I'm pretty sure that anyone with local access can't stop the heart. I've never heard of anyone being consciously able to stop their own heart or even temporarily stall it like one can hold ones breath.
    If I were to guess I would say that the heart signal works on a hard-coded enough level to make it mentally impossible to stop.

    Now, holding the breath for someone else could be a fun experiment.

  75. Use on chimps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know, the poor animals.. but kan we use it on chimps so we can remove fukushima nuclear waste?

  76. Re:Not that impressive by Karmashock · · Score: 1

    Dude.

    1. I have seen demonstrations of these brain disrupting magnets before. A guy puts it against specific parts of a person's skull and he gets a response. Typically disrupting or even enhancing certain brain function.

    2. I have seen the sensors before. I think I saw someone control a wheel chair with nothing but one of those devices. Vastly more impressive then the above demonstration.

    All they did was connect point 1 to point 2. The magnet was fixed in the portion of the skull that would get the desired result and then all they had to do was get the computer to trigger the subroutine to activate it.

    The most impressive bit is the sensor reading that signal from the guy triggering the command. The effect translating into motor function in the second man is not that impressive. You could have as easily wired the guy up to a generic electrical shock and gotten a very similar reaction.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  77. Re:Won't use it until my brain discloses it's sour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your brain doesn't, but nobody can remotely "hack" your brain like that, they just hack the equipment that is already connected to your brain (*), and the equipment is a computer that can enforce mandatory authorization.

    (*) if equipment is NOT already connected to your brain, then this is probably the most complicated way to kill you.

  78. Re:Won't use it until my brain discloses it's sour by msk · · Score: 1

    You've been watching (or thinking of) Brainstorm .

  79. Finally by Another,+completely · · Score: 1

    They used to say that you can pick your friends, and you can pick your nose, but you can't pick your friend's nose.

    Now you can. With your friend's own hand.

  80. Christians have been doing this for 2000 years now by Kodack · · Score: 1

    So we now have laboratory mind control? /golfclap
    Christians have been doing this for 2000 years now. It may be lowtech but it's definitely mind control.

  81. I'm not worried by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    About your headache, dear. . .

  82. Ihara-Grubb by AbominousSalad · · Score: 1

    So NOW is anybody working on a software framework for a 5-senses UI to go with the coming datajacks?

    --
    Every trollism an AC posts is prefixed, in my mind, with "A. Coward whined, in a weak and cowardly voice:"
  83. What's scary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's scary is where the money is coming from:

    Their research was funded in part by the National Science Foundation’s Engineering Research Center for Sensorimotor Neural Engineering at the UW, the U.S. Army Research Office and the National Institutes of Health.

    The Obama regime only funds technology that can be used for weapons or surveillance. [[science.slashdot.org/story/13/04/30/0115216/sopa-creator-now-in-charge-of-nsf-grants]]

    The U.S. House Committee on Science, Space and Technology chose Smith to Chair as an overseer for the National Science Foundation's funding process. Smith is preparing a bill (PDF) which will require that every grant must benefit 'national defense,' be of 'utmost importance to society,' and not be 'duplicative of other research.'

  84. Re:Won't use it until my brain discloses it's sour by cornjones · · Score: 1

    The assumption there is that these methods don't bypass whatever control we have against stopping our own heart. there is no reason that we would have evolved properly gated defense in depth type systems. think how open the early internet was, i would be the brain will be much more like that when we first start connecting them. And evolution isn't quick. we will have to build the security into the interface and hope your interface vendor is legit.