"It one of the least efficient form for transporting ethanol. " But still more efficient that carrying the potable form which multiplies the mass by another 2.5x.
"You're better off transporting a small flask vial of pure ethanol." In which case you now have to account for the mass of a container for liquid and the potential for damage to it and the cost of that container, vs. a paper/foil packet for the powder.
The Executive Order cites the laws that are claimed to authorize the order in the first paragraph, to wit "including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code".
No one is restricted to a single course of action.
When labor complains about working conditions, they are told that they are free to seek a different job. In this case, when capital complains about working conditions they are also free to open a different business.
The table at your link shows Public Debt Outstanding, not Debt Held by the Public. The former includes intragovernmental holdings. For example, the surplus gathers by Social Security counts as against the Public Debt Outstanding. If the Social Security surplus is greater than the Federal Budget surplus, the Public Debt Outstanding will increase.
"Neither of your sources actually found dark matter."
Your original claim wasn't about whether it has been conclusively found or not, therefore the fact that my responses do not address such a claim is as irrelevant as it is unsurprising.
Your actual claim was "The justification for dark matter is unexplained gravity" to which I responded with a non-gravitational justification.
Particle physics predicts certain weakly-interacting particles (http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/9802007) which just so happen to have properties that coincide with the WIMPs which are one of the possible predicted particles from cosmology. There is data coming in from non-gravitational experiments (http://www.sciencemag.org/content/327/5973/1619) though not a lot so far. However, conformation of the particles' existence is not necessary to refute your claim there that there are only gravity-based predictions.
"Most warehouse workers are 'judgement proof', in that they don't have the assets to pay anything."
This also mean that most warehouse workers cannot afford individual legal counsel to advise them that they are judgement-proof, thus are vulnerable to intimidation.
"The justification for dark matter is unexplained gravity"
You imply that this is the *only* justification. Is this because you are unaware of the rest pf physics or because you are trying to mislead others about the rest of physics?
Why is using the built in features of one runtime program but using the built in features of another runtime not programming? You can write things like the game arkanoid or the calculator dc for sed. Do they suddenly become non-programs?
Or how about your "Hello, World" with input:
#!/usr/bin/sed -f 1 i \ Input Name: 1 d 2 s/\(.*\)/Hello, \1/ q
(It requires an initial carriage return to get the prompt, because I'm not that good with sed.)
'Don't forget that there is a concept called, "jury nullification."'
Don't forget that meta-monkey explicitly mentioned nullification and explained why it would be hard to prompt it, so saying "don't forget" makes you look like kind of a jackass.
Slashdot Mirror
A slate that no one knows about be definition cannot affect voting.
"It one of the least efficient form for transporting ethanol. "
But still more efficient that carrying the potable form which multiplies the mass by another 2.5x.
"You're better off transporting a small flask vial of pure ethanol."
In which case you now have to account for the mass of a container for liquid and the potential for damage to it and the cost of that container, vs. a paper/foil packet for the powder.
The Executive Order cites the laws that are claimed to authorize the order in the first paragraph, to wit "including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code".
The alluded-to impact is not transportation but rather usage.
"Artificial scarcity is the best way to increase demand. "
Even if that's true, not selling things is a terrible way to increase revenue.
No one is restricted to a single course of action.
When labor complains about working conditions, they are told that they are free to seek a different job. In this case, when capital complains about working conditions they are also free to open a different business.
The table at your link shows Public Debt Outstanding, not Debt Held by the Public. The former includes intragovernmental holdings. For example, the surplus gathers by Social Security counts as against the Public Debt Outstanding. If the Social Security surplus is greater than the Federal Budget surplus, the Public Debt Outstanding will increase.
Where do you think they built from all of the other times?
"Neither of your sources actually found dark matter."
Your original claim wasn't about whether it has been conclusively found or not, therefore the fact that my responses do not address such a claim is as irrelevant as it is unsurprising.
Your actual claim was "The justification for dark matter is unexplained gravity" to which I responded with a non-gravitational justification.
Particle physics predicts certain weakly-interacting particles (http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ex/9802007) which just so happen to have properties that coincide with the WIMPs which are one of the possible predicted particles from cosmology. There is data coming in from non-gravitational experiments (http://www.sciencemag.org/content/327/5973/1619) though not a lot so far. However, conformation of the particles' existence is not necessary to refute your claim there that there are only gravity-based predictions.
Capital is free to do whatever it likes. Labor is free to go fuck itself.
"Most warehouse workers are 'judgement proof', in that they don't have the assets to pay anything."
This also mean that most warehouse workers cannot afford individual legal counsel to advise them that they are judgement-proof, thus are vulnerable to intimidation.
But at least they aren't unionized!
"The justification for dark matter is unexplained gravity"
You imply that this is the *only* justification. Is this because you are unaware of the rest pf physics or because you are trying to mislead others about the rest of physics?
" because they lack talent"
And your evidence for this is...?
But you can chose to take up another line of business, therefore you are not being forced to participate in anything.
That's line that gets fed to labor when they have a problem with working conditions, why shouldn't it be fed back to capital and management?
'they didn't "hack" the machine using heat!'
That's not the claim, so put your strawman away.
Why is using the built in features of one runtime program but using the built in features of another runtime not programming? You can write things like the game arkanoid or the calculator dc for sed. Do they suddenly become non-programs?
Or how about your "Hello, World" with input:
#!/usr/bin/sed -f
1 i \
Input Name:
1 d
2 s/\(.*\)/Hello, \1/
q
(It requires an initial carriage return to get the prompt, because I'm not that good with sed.)
Some people need to get over the ridiculous notion that they have the right to force other people deal with their dicks jokes.
Most programmers don't need computer science: when was the last time you really cared about the difference between a 2-3 tree and a red-black tree?
"The ability to write computer programs is mostly useless, outside actually writing computer programs."
For most people writing programs, the program is a tool used to make thing they are actually trying to sell; the program itself is not the product.
So you're trying to prove that most people don't need to know who to write a program *by writing a program*?
I do not predict success for this endeavor.
"Remove the third party"
You ran point-to-point network links to everyone who want to get to your website? Impressive!
'Don't forget that there is a concept called, "jury nullification."'
Don't forget that meta-monkey explicitly mentioned nullification and explained why it would be hard to prompt it, so saying "don't forget" makes you look like kind of a jackass.
A free market would care, because the players in the market need information to make efficient decisions between suppliers and their products.
"make sure it is used for space exploration as intended"
Why do you want NASA to go against its objectives spelled out in The National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958?