Most cops carry Glocks, which feature no "complex safeties". They have no "safeties" at all.
One in the chamber is the best way to carry. You never see cops racking the slide, and it's for a damn good reason.
He was off by 2 deaths. When the difference is that small, it's safe to say it's a non-issue. Describing it as the "deadliest" even seems over the top. Why not "bloodiest" while you're at it? That way, you can add those horrific injuries and boost the total.
Mod up.
If gun control is a viable option, then let the facts speak for themselves. Constantly fudging numbers for shock value makes me doubt seriously the motives of the pro-gun-contol side.
You might want to bone up on your American history there, my friend. Black Americans returning home to the South after the Civil War would likely have something to say about the pointlessness of the 2nd amendment, for instance.
The balance of power between the state and the people is a fluid, delicate thing, dependent on a certain calculus. The disarmament of the people changes this balance, this calculus, weakening the people against the state. It's not about parity of force. It's about maintaining some measure of power, however limited, against the state.
If you're truly okay with the police in this country (I'm assuming you're in the U.S., if not, kindy disregard) having a monopoly of armed force, good luck with all that.
Hopefully, OP's idea gains enough traction that it frees him from ever having to pointlessly troll/. every day, typing boastful but otherwise incoherent manifesto-style posts and utterly failing to grasp what constant -1s should have told him years prior.
The U.S. and Australia are two vastly different countries. When the U.S. fought a war and won independence from the king, the 2nd Amendment, among pther things, was the result. Australia took a decidedly different path, and the irony of bringing them up is not lost here.
Slashdot Mirror
I read it as referring to Snowden.
Silicone Valley is San Fernando Valley. You mean Silicon Valley.
Many magazine-fed firearms will in fact function without their magazine, if only briefly.
This is absolutely ridiculous.
Most cops carry Glocks, which feature no "complex safeties". They have no "safeties" at all.
One in the chamber is the best way to carry. You never see cops racking the slide, and it's for a damn good reason.
Whoosh.
It's a torrent - there is no central server.
I read this as "barker's chocolate". Thanks for the hearty laugh.
A magnetic field.
The stellarator is 20th century technology.
It's called "gaslighting".
He was off by 2 deaths. When the difference is that small, it's safe to say it's a non-issue. Describing it as the "deadliest" even seems over the top. Why not "bloodiest" while you're at it? That way, you can add those horrific injuries and boost the total.
The state militias include every able-bodied male (white males originally).
I didn't post that.
What did I assert, again?
So, the Shah wasn't exiled? That's what you're asserting?
Mod up.
If gun control is a viable option, then let the facts speak for themselves. Constantly fudging numbers for shock value makes me doubt seriously the motives of the pro-gun-contol side.
You're a bit late; this particular distro will be a decade old next year.
First of all I am not in the US
I had a feeling. Nevermind, then.
You might want to bone up on your American history there, my friend. Black Americans returning home to the South after the Civil War would likely have something to say about the pointlessness of the 2nd amendment, for instance.
The balance of power between the state and the people is a fluid, delicate thing, dependent on a certain calculus. The disarmament of the people changes this balance, this calculus, weakening the people against the state. It's not about parity of force. It's about maintaining some measure of power, however limited, against the state.
If you're truly okay with the police in this country (I'm assuming you're in the U.S., if not, kindy disregard) having a monopoly of armed force, good luck with all that.
One swears allegiance to the Queen, the other does not.
Hopefully, OP's idea gains enough traction that it frees him from ever having to pointlessly troll /. every day, typing boastful but otherwise incoherent manifesto-style posts and utterly failing to grasp what constant -1s should have told him years prior.
The moon lacks an atmosphere, for starters.
The U.S. and Australia are two vastly different countries.
When the U.S. fought a war and won independence from the king, the 2nd Amendment, among pther things, was the result. Australia took a decidedly different path, and the irony of bringing them up is not lost here.
SCOTUS disagrees; self-defense is also now included.