The summary says that increasing diversity will be good for innovation and technology, with no stated reason as to why. So I'll ask: why will increasing diversity be good for technology and innovation?
Oh that's easy: if you do not increase diveristy then you are literally hitler.
They should just ban everyone who is not diverse enough, pass a law that you must have coitus at least 50% with the fat chicks,
and 50% with Negro chicks, plus 30% hispanic. They seriously passed do this things about how many people should share company with you (CEOs), so we can also do this with sharing-your-bed-with topic.
</how I fell about some omg-I-hate-freedom-to-choose-own-peers leftist articles>
please give me citation of a country where Democracy brought freedom to the masses.
Very good question.
Democracy destroys freedoms everywhere, does not bring it.
NSA, war on drugs, war on alcohol, war on sharing files - are all brought on by democratic government bodies, funded by democratically assigned taxes, and then other countries copy this laws also by democratic governmnets.
USA sadly has democracy - so it does not matter what "he" thinks - the gov will do as it pleases, after making the most campaign sponsored one of two war criminals as the president, and passing some other representatives they will rule as they want, putting as much value on honor or morality as they did in past DECADES, acta, sopa, DMCA, patents, war on drugs, war on children drawing guns on paper, war on "sexuall predators" meaning 2 teenagers sexting eachother and so on.
Why you focus on a tool, while the problem is that we let this bad people create laws and take tax to sponsor the abovementioned evil projects and laws?
Even if it would be direct democracy, still it is simply a matter of calling "think of the childreeeen" "national emergency!" "external enemy!" "weapons of mass destruction" and other bullshit as usuall, and the scared with media masses of idiots will vote on what the hidden leaders want - the wonder of modern democracy.
Yeah they would be very concerned about "being strict with copyritgs" while heaving no problem killing you;)
Well that is in fact what they do, but to enemies. It is ok to murder some rebels in one country, while you must over protect people in another one, such hypocrisy - but either way if you are the "target" they will not give any shit about any silly laws.
Weapons are important to defend oneself from governments, like democracy of Nazist's Germany or in more recent times the democracy that given usa NSA.
Bespides freedom versus big government problems, the guns are giving people chance to defend from common criminals.
Your girlfriends vs rapist - very little chance in unarmer combat.
Your girlfriends vs robber with illegal gun (strangely criminals tend to ignore law) - no chance.
Your girlfriend with gun vs rapist - is the better situation, I say she has right to defend herself, you say she does not?
Gunophobes have a serious lapse of logic in this matter usually.
Yes, this is in general why democracy is a stupid system (or any form of gov where gov decides about live of people to anything other then absolute minimum like making it illegal to murder, steal physical actuall property, rape, assault etc).
And I fully agree that we should have such a free world or at least a country somewhere in modern times too.
Sometimes I wonder if Linux should have functionality similar to AIX's trustchk.
Tripwire, SELinux, AppArmor...
grsecurity is more advanced then AppArmor,
and even then SELinux.
AppArmor does some simple RBAC
SELinux does good RBAC
GrSecurity does good RBAC, and provides wonderfull set uf kernel self-protection, memory protecion, randomization, logging, chroot jailing stuff (from PAX project). http://grsecurity.net/features.php
With friends we now develop a Hardened Debian offspin that includes grsecurity, for now just a tiny addon to Debian, but it does provide grsecurity kernel for debian pre-built and checksummed realibly for well over half year now.
mempo.org project.
What?
Chine is one of most capitalistic country in the world, they "communism" applies to worldview/personal freedoms (but also USA is fascist, so both suck), and to state-sponsored projects (but, USA does it too of course).
China is much more free market then USA (but not a perfectly free market, because it as all existing powerful city-states does run state central sponsored grand projects).
Didn't the democracy of USA written a law that you can imprison who ever for what ever reason, and without trial, for indefined time?
Noble Prize Winner, War Criminal, Obama signed this law into existance as NDAA.
Did something changed? That sounds like a quite compeling argument.
Local organization that you volountarly join.
For all things except crime this is even more obvious that you don't need central government, all you need is to "kick" people out.
Slashdot has some rights, e.g. if guy X posts viagra he will be removed - no need to have state wide court hearings for this, you only need lack of state wide law so the spammer can not complain that he is "discriminated" or whatever.
Once this is understood, I could explain criminal cases options, if anyone wants.
No, this is a democracy - you get often what OTHER people voted for.
As apposed to not-violent freedom where people can organize in cities or clubs and have local laws without need to convince millions of citizens even from other side of country.
Paging doctor "but if we would be free, who will build the roads, private companies and organizations like Linux, Mozilla do grand things but I think we're too stupid to hire some construction workers without government holding gun to taxpayer's head"
No, "just" memory of the program that runs with libssl and to which attacker connected via ssl.
There would need to be other exploits to cross program-program and user-user isolation.
(well and the data/mem mapped/read/accessed by the compromised program)
What the hell are you talking about, with "supporting legacy stuff" and not being able to move on?!
Kernel was using "debug" kernel-cmdline option for years.
Systemd shows up and messes up this option and tells others to go fuck themselves
There is no problem to solve, there is no huge innovation by systemd that kernel somehow blocks, it's just systemd going apeshit when seeing debug options.
Systemd should just use systemd.debug and that is all - instead of Kay being a dick for no good reason
Slashdot Mirror
The summary says that increasing diversity will be good for innovation and technology, with no stated reason as to why. So I'll ask: why will increasing diversity be good for technology and innovation?
Oh that's easy: if you do not increase diveristy then you are literally hitler. They should just ban everyone who is not diverse enough, pass a law that you must have coitus at least 50% with the fat chicks, and 50% with Negro chicks, plus 30% hispanic.
They seriously passed do this things about how many people should share company with you (CEOs), so we can also do this with sharing-your-bed-with topic.
</how I fell about some omg-I-hate-freedom-to-choose-own-peers leftist articles>
Host it in Freenet (at least a mirror), that way it can never be taken down by ANYONE :)
democracy, you tool, is a product of and protector of freedom.
No, democracy is the tool that took away all our freedoms. Who do you think create NSA or DMCA - a king? A dictator? An anarchy? Or a democracy?
America
LOL. What freedom, in America? The freedom to be arrested for filiming police, or for using on own body substances some assholes deemed illegal?
please give me citation of a country where Democracy brought freedom to the masses.
Very good question. Democracy destroys freedoms everywhere, does not bring it. NSA, war on drugs, war on alcohol, war on sharing files - are all brought on by democratic government bodies, funded by democratically assigned taxes, and then other countries copy this laws also by democratic governmnets.
Yeap I was replying to OP; Either way I agree weapons are no more "evil" they say a hammer is.
USA sadly has democracy - so it does not matter what "he" thinks - the gov will do as it pleases, after making the most campaign sponsored one of two war criminals as the president, and passing some other representatives they will rule as they want, putting as much value on honor or morality as they did in past DECADES, acta, sopa, DMCA, patents, war on drugs, war on children drawing guns on paper, war on "sexuall predators" meaning 2 teenagers sexting eachother and so on.
Why you focus on a tool, while the problem is that we let this bad people create laws and take tax to sponsor the abovementioned evil projects and laws?
Even if it would be direct democracy, still it is simply a matter of calling "think of the childreeeen" "national emergency!" "external enemy!" "weapons of mass destruction" and other bullshit as usuall, and the scared with media masses of idiots will vote on what the hidden leaders want - the wonder of modern democracy.
Oh but USA gov and usa miliarty complex are quite in the bed with eachother... didn't you know this?
Yeah they would be very concerned about "being strict with copyritgs" while heaving no problem killing you ;)
Well that is in fact what they do, but to enemies. It is ok to murder some rebels in one country, while you must over protect people in another one, such hypocrisy - but either way if you are the "target" they will not give any shit about any silly laws.
Why blame software, while you do sponsor NSA?
Your tax and democratic laws are the foundation of NSA-state, not the tools, software, guns or hammers used.
Weapons are important to defend oneself from governments, like democracy of Nazist's Germany or in more recent times the democracy that given usa NSA.
Bespides freedom versus big government problems, the guns are giving people chance to defend from common criminals.
Your girlfriends vs rapist - very little chance in unarmer combat.
Your girlfriends vs robber with illegal gun (strangely criminals tend to ignore law) - no chance.
Your girlfriend with gun vs rapist - is the better situation, I say she has right to defend herself, you say she does not?
Gunophobes have a serious lapse of logic in this matter usually.
Yes, this is in general why democracy is a stupid system (or any form of gov where gov decides about live of people to anything other then absolute minimum like making it illegal to murder, steal physical actuall property, rape, assault etc).
And I fully agree that we should have such a free world or at least a country somewhere in modern times too.
Tripwire, SELinux, AppArmor...
grsecurity is more advanced then AppArmor, and even then SELinux. AppArmor does some simple RBAC SELinux does good RBAC GrSecurity does good RBAC, and provides wonderfull set uf kernel self-protection, memory protecion, randomization, logging, chroot jailing stuff (from PAX project). http://grsecurity.net/features.php
With friends we now develop a Hardened Debian offspin that includes grsecurity, for now just a tiny addon to Debian, but it does provide grsecurity kernel for debian pre-built and checksummed realibly for well over half year now. mempo.org project.
What?
Chine is one of most capitalistic country in the world, they "communism" applies to worldview/personal freedoms (but also USA is fascist, so both suck), and to state-sponsored projects (but, USA does it too of course).
China is much more free market then USA (but not a perfectly free market, because it as all existing powerful city-states does run state central sponsored grand projects).
Not everyone has broadband, jackass.
relax gramps
lacking zero, they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs.
return I - I ;
}
This article makes little sense, it doesn't deliver any explanation for such thesis.
Yeah we merricans prefer now our beloved police-state, big brother of NSA and all. Down with libre, liberty and all such terrorists.
Slavary is Freedom. NSA is Security War is Peace.
Better now?
Yeap, that is an option. Dunno which idiot mod downvoted your insightfull question and why...
Didn't the democracy of USA written a law that you can imprison who ever for what ever reason, and without trial, for indefined time?
Noble Prize Winner, War Criminal, Obama signed this law into existance as NDAA.
Did something changed? That sounds like a quite compeling argument.
what the fuck did I just read?
Local organization that you volountarly join.
For all things except crime this is even more obvious that you don't need central government, all you need is to "kick" people out. Slashdot has some rights, e.g. if guy X posts viagra he will be removed - no need to have state wide court hearings for this, you only need lack of state wide law so the spammer can not complain that he is "discriminated" or whatever.
Once this is understood, I could explain criminal cases options, if anyone wants.
No, this is a democracy - you get often what OTHER people voted for.
As apposed to not-violent freedom where people can organize in cities or clubs and have local laws without need to convince millions of citizens even from other side of country.
Paging doctor "but if we would be free, who will build the roads, private companies and organizations like Linux, Mozilla do grand things but I think we're too stupid to hire some construction workers without government holding gun to taxpayer's head"
No, "just" memory of the program that runs with libssl and to which attacker connected via ssl.
There would need to be other exploits to cross program-program and user-user isolation.
(well and the data/mem mapped/read/accessed by the compromised program)
What the hell are you talking about, with "supporting legacy stuff" and not being able to move on?!
Kernel was using "debug" kernel-cmdline option for years.
Systemd shows up and messes up this option and tells others to go fuck themselves
There is no problem to solve, there is no huge innovation by systemd that kernel somehow blocks, it's just systemd going apeshit when seeing debug options.
Systemd should just use systemd.debug and that is all - instead of Kay being a dick for no good reason