You don't call women dicks. I've never heard of it, and it's always been genderized with usually more gender slurs thrown in. How about snarking about the "male ego" or using the phrase "testosterone poisoning"? Women do that all the time when talking down to/about males. A guy calling that sexist will just get more of the same and likely be called misogynous then creepshamed, ostensibly, if not explicitly, for talking back to a female.
Dicks, among other gender terms, would also be acceptable. Hell, males gender slurs are way more publicly acceptable with no sense of sexism, ironically particularly when coming from a woman.
Taxes taxes taxed by taxes?! Yeah... Fuck you, You greedy little idiot. The government's stealing enough to piss it away elsewhere. It's dumb enough two people could lose money just by rebuying stuff from each other. Wealth isn't being created by mere changing of hands, and the goverment's already in the way of wealth being created. We don't need to pay them for engaging in business they've nothing to do with other than robbing us of both money and freedom during.
Some of us don't like sharing our pens. The disadvantages are sufficient for us paying not to. Seen enough proud communalists complain about resulting problem but pretend to shift blame to everyone else. Commune girls bitching about "capitalism" (whatever they actual intend that to mean at the time) then explicitly seeking guys that "want" to feed them and entertain them away their grand commune is particularly amusing.
The level of corruption we've reached makes it absolutely impossible to run a non-parasitic government. We need this country remade or destroyed already.
Irrelevant. You're conflating the law with what actually happens in court rooms and the like. They're two different things. The fact (de facto) of how those in power act isn't the law (de jure). Corruption doesn't rewrite law it finds inconvenient by merely existing. They just ignore it and lie.
Uh, that's quasi-religious dogma... There's nothing rational about being superego ridden by a reified, deified "Man". I don't defer to the herd like a good little tool.
Man, your head is haunted; you have wheels in your head! You imagine great things, and depict to yourself a whole world of gods that has an existence for you, a spirit-realm to which you suppose yourself to be called, an ideal that beckons to you. You have a fixed idea! Do not think that I am jesting or speaking figuratively when I regard those persons who cling to the Higher, and (because the vast majority belongs under this head) almost the whole world of men, as veritable fools, fools in a madhouse. What is it, then, that is called a "fixed idea"? An idea that has subjected the man to itself. When you recognize, with regard to such a fixed idea, that it is a folly, you shut its slave up in an asylum. And is the truth of the faith, say, which we are not to doubt; the majesty of (e. g.) the people, which we are not to strike at (he who does is guilty of — lese-majesty); virtue, against which the censor is not to let a word pass, that morality may be kept pure; — are these not "fixed ideas"? Is not all the stupid chatter of (e. g.) most of our newspapers the babble of fools who suffer from the fixed idea of morality, legality, Christianity, etc., and only seem to go about free because the madhouse in which they walk takes in so broad a space?
While: "All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others.”, "The map is not the territory; the word is not the thing."
Your tastes and preferences define your notion of importance. This is empirically verifiable. The empirical map is labeled by and drawn for utility. It's cybernetically abstract. Analysis has transfinite potential thus all rationality is necessarily bounded rationality, thus heuristics are required. Also, all solutions are tradeoffs that do create more problems, just different ones. Reality isn't a maze with intrinsic goals and ends, and there is no objective requiring attention, if emotion and instinct don't prompt action. You won't consciously act because you won't care.
Humans, no. Feudal lords and khans that evolved their propaganda to pretend to be more than mere warlords. Nations run by politicians only recognize nations run by politicians. It's like monotheists with other monotheists vs polytheists, much less atheists. They're assumed out of the power question thus fair game. Society as you're defining it is merely a power game, and taxes are robbery to maintain that power, just like the old tribute days. Most taxes go to propping up malfunctional "social" programs meant to farm sheeple and sheepledogs for the shepherds. Sheepledogs regularly openly violate the pretense of functional "order" to run extralegal enforcement as per TFA. It's not even a coherent system, never was, never will be, barring social engineering and technology eventually giving us the bastard child of Idiocracy and the Borg.
Logical payments would require opting out without penalty, not being force to pay someone else's bills, and not being arbitrarily charged for the collector just wanting more.
According to the feminazis, yes. "Men" should just be "taught not to rape". Judging by primary aggressor laws and dominant aggressor policies, we should be taught not to disobey violent female too. Cleary there's no connection between these though...
The majority don't know anything about them thus the rhetoric. You're either a loser or a criminal. They don't care. They just care that you're not a generic idiot like them.
They lie about constitutional law as their primary job. They even want carte blanche to "reinterpret" it as if it were written in relation to contemporary law elsewhere, so they can rewrite it with current newspeak. That's either blatantly expanding their options for deceit or outright psychosis.
Actually you were speculating without any rational basis, just a circularly derived myth. Pregnancy doesn't magically make women better parents, which my reference proves quite disturbingly. Children are programmed with your myth by self-serving mothers all the time. The presumption of righteousness involved is precisely why mothers justify their abuse including whitewashed manipulation such as maternal superiority and sanctity.
I've seen those presentations and similar debriefings. They use a lot of doublespeak, and dissenting politics (or just honest questioning clearly false information) is explicitly supposed to be kept to oneself. It's consider both unprofessional and antisocial.
Of course, not. Sheeple and sheeple dogs are well respected here, the latter by the former, the former by the former. Never heard of judicial immunity? How about how anyone targetted by cops or soldiers obviously deserved it?
A PC version of the sociopath. It's rarely documented since it's what the State actually wants. The failure of empathy is ironically a badge of righteousness in this context. Smear the queer's perfectly fine for acceptable targets. Criminalization generally works as a programmed trigger to dehumanize, though most are already dehumanized to prevent backlash (white women >> black women >>>> white men > black men). Remember how executions used to be grand entertainment?
Man down, Little bitch, and stop beating your bitch tits, like we didn't notice. The Innocence Project greatly disagrees, and even just femnazis alone are making it easier all the time. The Blue Line of Just-Us is also in high form, nowadays.
Slashdot Mirror
Your mindless apologist for sleaze does render you sheeple though.
You don't call women dicks. I've never heard of it, and it's always been genderized with usually more gender slurs thrown in. How about snarking about the "male ego" or using the phrase "testosterone poisoning"? Women do that all the time when talking down to/about males. A guy calling that sexist will just get more of the same and likely be called misogynous then creepshamed, ostensibly, if not explicitly, for talking back to a female.
Dicks, among other gender terms, would also be acceptable. Hell, males gender slurs are way more publicly acceptable with no sense of sexism, ironically particularly when coming from a woman.
Taxes taxes taxed by taxes?! Yeah... Fuck you, You greedy little idiot. The government's stealing enough to piss it away elsewhere. It's dumb enough two people could lose money just by rebuying stuff from each other. Wealth isn't being created by mere changing of hands, and the goverment's already in the way of wealth being created. We don't need to pay them for engaging in business they've nothing to do with other than robbing us of both money and freedom during.
Some of us don't like sharing our pens. The disadvantages are sufficient for us paying not to. Seen enough proud communalists complain about resulting problem but pretend to shift blame to everyone else. Commune girls bitching about "capitalism" (whatever they actual intend that to mean at the time) then explicitly seeking guys that "want" to feed them and entertain them away their grand commune is particularly amusing.
The level of corruption we've reached makes it absolutely impossible to run a non-parasitic government. We need this country remade or destroyed already.
Irrelevant. You're conflating the law with what actually happens in court rooms and the like. They're two different things. The fact (de facto) of how those in power act isn't the law (de jure). Corruption doesn't rewrite law it finds inconvenient by merely existing. They just ignore it and lie.
Yeah, but by "the law" here, you just mean whatever the sleaze currently in power care to pretend it is at the moment.
But he doesn't swim. That's why he's trapped.
Man, your head is haunted; you have wheels in your head! You imagine great things, and depict to yourself a whole world of gods that has an existence for you, a spirit-realm to which you suppose yourself to be called, an ideal that beckons to you. You have a fixed idea! Do not think that I am jesting or speaking figuratively when I regard those persons who cling to the Higher, and (because the vast majority belongs under this head) almost the whole world of men, as veritable fools, fools in a madhouse. What is it, then, that is called a "fixed idea"? An idea that has subjected the man to itself. When you recognize, with regard to such a fixed idea, that it is a folly, you shut its slave up in an asylum. And is the truth of the faith, say, which we are not to doubt; the majesty of (e. g.) the people, which we are not to strike at (he who does is guilty of — lese-majesty); virtue, against which the censor is not to let a word pass, that morality may be kept pure; — are these not "fixed ideas"? Is not all the stupid chatter of (e. g.) most of our newspapers the babble of fools who suffer from the fixed idea of morality, legality, Christianity, etc., and only seem to go about free because the madhouse in which they walk takes in so broad a space?
While: "All opinions are not equal. Some are a very great deal more robust, sophisticated and well supported in logic and argument than others.”,
"The map is not the territory; the word is not the thing."
Your tastes and preferences define your notion of importance. This is empirically verifiable. The empirical map is labeled by and drawn for utility. It's cybernetically abstract. Analysis has transfinite potential thus all rationality is necessarily bounded rationality, thus heuristics are required. Also, all solutions are tradeoffs that do create more problems, just different ones. Reality isn't a maze with intrinsic goals and ends, and there is no objective requiring attention, if emotion and instinct don't prompt action. You won't consciously act because you won't care.
Humans, no. Feudal lords and khans that evolved their propaganda to pretend to be more than mere warlords. Nations run by politicians only recognize nations run by politicians. It's like monotheists with other monotheists vs polytheists, much less atheists. They're assumed out of the power question thus fair game. Society as you're defining it is merely a power game, and taxes are robbery to maintain that power, just like the old tribute days. Most taxes go to propping up malfunctional "social" programs meant to farm sheeple and sheepledogs for the shepherds. Sheepledogs regularly openly violate the pretense of functional "order" to run extralegal enforcement as per TFA. It's not even a coherent system, never was, never will be, barring social engineering and technology eventually giving us the bastard child of Idiocracy and the Borg.
Logical payments would require opting out without penalty, not being force to pay someone else's bills, and not being arbitrarily charged for the collector just wanting more.
According to the feminazis, yes. "Men" should just be "taught not to rape". Judging by primary aggressor laws and dominant aggressor policies, we should be taught not to disobey violent female too. Cleary there's no connection between these though...
The majority don't know anything about them thus the rhetoric. You're either a loser or a criminal. They don't care. They just care that you're not a generic idiot like them.
They lie about constitutional law as their primary job. They even want carte blanche to "reinterpret" it as if it were written in relation to contemporary law elsewhere, so they can rewrite it with current newspeak. That's either blatantly expanding their options for deceit or outright psychosis.
You're on the wrong planet then. This is a kill-the-icky sheepledom all 'round.
Actually you were speculating without any rational basis, just a circularly derived myth. Pregnancy doesn't magically make women better parents, which my reference proves quite disturbingly. Children are programmed with your myth by self-serving mothers all the time. The presumption of righteousness involved is precisely why mothers justify their abuse including whitewashed manipulation such as maternal superiority and sanctity.
Then why is the most likely child abuser the child's own mother?
I've seen those presentations and similar debriefings. They use a lot of doublespeak, and dissenting politics (or just honest questioning clearly false information) is explicitly supposed to be kept to oneself. It's consider both unprofessional and antisocial.
Some clearly don't read fine print or the news.
You call that debt free?!
Of course, not. Sheeple and sheeple dogs are well respected here, the latter by the former, the former by the former. Never heard of judicial immunity? How about how anyone targetted by cops or soldiers obviously deserved it?
A PC version of the sociopath. It's rarely documented since it's what the State actually wants. The failure of empathy is ironically a badge of righteousness in this context. Smear the queer's perfectly fine for acceptable targets. Criminalization generally works as a programmed trigger to dehumanize, though most are already dehumanized to prevent backlash (white women >> black women >>>> white men > black men). Remember how executions used to be grand entertainment?
Man down, Little bitch, and stop beating your bitch tits, like we didn't notice. The Innocence Project greatly disagrees, and even just femnazis alone are making it easier all the time. The Blue Line of Just-Us is also in high form, nowadays.