You want to get an idea of how much better to know the Net-Set is, why not go to Linux world and mention that you think maybe there's a few good Microsoft products.
See how pleasant it is to be around the new elite then.
Using the word social in the same sentence as the net population doesn't really make sense.
Wouldn't dynamic web server performance be governed by other system standard benchmarks? It seems tome that generting dynamic content is a function of processor+disk+bus performance and so we already have good measures for these things.
Regardless of what may or may not be going on in the codebase, there is an impending public relations disaster for Netscape and I think AOL is trying to avoid this before it happens.
When the browser went open source, I think the world was expecting a quick upgrade to the 4.0 level product to bring it inline with IE, instead we're getting a rewrite.
Everyone's looking for a big open-source failure to point to because companies don't want to believe it works, this is a perfect scapegoat. AOL doesn't want any of the mudslinging to hurt its share price, so...
Slashdot Mirror
You want to get an idea of how much better to know the Net-Set is, why not go to Linux world and mention that you think maybe there's a few good Microsoft products.
See how pleasant it is to be around the new elite then.
Using the word social in the same sentence as the net population doesn't really make sense.
Ya, its the other people that need their money, he just needs enough to get by on, say 2 Billion or so.
Oh, maybe he made that on THX 1138.
Wouldn't dynamic web server performance be governed by other system standard benchmarks? It seems tome that generting dynamic content is a function of processor+disk+bus performance and so we already have good measures for these things.
Regardless of what may or may not be going on in the codebase, there is an impending public relations disaster for Netscape and I think AOL is trying to avoid this before it happens.
When the browser went open source, I think the world was expecting a quick upgrade to the 4.0 level product to bring it inline with IE, instead we're getting a rewrite.
Everyone's looking for a big open-source failure to point to because companies don't want to believe it works, this is a perfect scapegoat. AOL doesn't want any of the mudslinging to hurt its share price, so...
Why is it that every computer acronym has to stand for something? That retarded phrase that SGI is supposed to stand for really is a prime example.
Why can't people just simply say "our company is called SGI"?
And, the old logo was better.