And rabidly so, in spite of being mostly Catholic.
Why? Because the religious nuts had always been against the aspirations of the populace and ther was a need to get them out of politics. It was a matter of national survival.
That is a lesson the US may do well to learn from their Southern neighbours.
... to judge if a homosexual way of life is better or worst thant a Christian way of life?
In a free country, children would be presented both wolrd views and let them make up their minds (under the wise guidance of their family and community).
In the US gay bashing is a national sport and the "Christians" don't have the moral stature to live and let live.
The fact that you put The Telegraph as left wing propaganda (amongst others in your list) shows just how completely to the right is politics in the US and how uninformed and parochial many of you are, in spite of managing to quote some foreign publications.
I would laugh if it was not so tragic for the US and the rest of the world the de facto baning of any social polieies in the US.
The XXth century brought rights for the working classes, the XXIst will bring the dismantling of those rights by means of relnetless propaganda an indoctrination.
Humble people in the US (and if we are not careful, in many other places) will be exploited and may even be thankful for the oportunity these gives them...
Well, if youngsters can't be bothered to vote, not even for self preservation (since they will be the next line of cannon fodder when your Orwellian reelected overlords launch their next conquest) I frankly can't see a group of people whose political apathy could be more ritghly punished.
Please go and try to find some evidence that Al Quaeda is this highly organized network that your Orwelain reelected masters say it is.
Try to find a single shred of evidence.
LEts stop giving credence to this myth, AL Quaeda is just a political puppet brandished with outstanding success by people that lacking any idease about how to better society are pandering to the fear of the masses.
-Killing 100000 Iraquis (and counting) based on lies.
-A horrendous deficit
will not come back to bite you in the ass, then Bush supporters are more delussional than I thought.
You may not have to pay anybody else's healthcare bill, but you will be financing the oulandish adventurism of the scaremongers you have chosen to govern you.
Every single civilian death in Iraq has been financied with your tax money. I hope you are happy with your money to be wasted that way (in the mean time real terrorists keep sending videograms like if they were you old looney uncle).
Given the margin of difference Gore was confronting (~500 votes) and the enormous irregularities in the Florida process only somebody politically irresponsible would have not looked into making completely sure, by any means necessary, what was the real result of the election.
Neither the Islamists or Reagan stopped the USSR in AFghanistan.
The corruption, cynisism and croniism prevalent in the USSR made the country implode. They simply were not organized enough and lacked the morale to confront a widespread guerrilla war with some support from the US.
Had the USSR been a cohesive society there would have been no way they would have been kicked out of Afghanistan. They hung to half of Europe for 45 years, but they stablished their stronghold when the people and leadership in the USSR believed all the propaganda that was been generated by the system.
By th early eighties no sane Soviet believed in the Soviet state, and young soldiers in Afghanistan knew the enterprise was doomed to failure and made the best to get some scraps from the table.
The Neocon propaganda that somehom Reagn dismembered the USSR is fantasy: the USSR's contradictions would have killed it without any helping hadn from Reagan and Co.
The point that is made is that it makes no sense to use a stupid word with no base in any sane linguistics every time a nation goes into space.
The term astronaut perfectly describes anybody that goes into space in the Englis language, what reason is there to use stupid terms like the one sprouted in the initial posting?
If there was no term to describe a person going into space then the use of a neologism from a different language will be appropriate and to be encouraged.
I was in Spain one week after the terrorist attacks in Madrid, the reasons why Spaniards kicked out the liars in goverment is that the right wing former goverment used all the power of the state to try to blame ETA (the Basque terrorists) for the attacks without haveing any shred of evidence, because they feared the backslash from the electorate after the attacks.
The effort was so cynical and clumsy that the people got completely fed up with them and kicked them, rightly, out of office.
To suggest that the Spanish people, who have lived with terrorism for more than 30 years, and with state sponsored terrorism for even longer, would be scared by a single terrorist attack is a vulgar lie.
... if you don't know how to use the gadgets modern technology has to offer.
But no wonder, somebody so patronizing surely could not do any better.
I am a gaget freak, I admit it, but your supositions about people like myslef are ludicrous.
I make plenty of nice suppers for family and friends (heck, my redsnapper Veracruz style is the stuff of which legends are made), I travel, I play a musical instrument (at the same level as a pro) and I do sports (my first triathlon is next year).
And as myself I am pretty sure many "gadget freaks" have very interesting and fulfilling lifes, so your assumptions frankly look pathetic from this side of the gadget divide.
-Most Palms (I don't know about others except the Zaurus, that sucks on this department) can go on a week with one charge only. If you can't remember to once in a while charge your PDA then you are unable to use modern mobile devices, it would ot suprise me if you whistle your own tunes in preference to have a MP# player or usic payphones because your apparently inabiility to plug a device to a cable.
-I have taken my Palm and Zaurus to the beach. Many times. Not only there, but on Safari, skiing, etc. They are so convinient that have been used in the filed to identify tracks of animals in Southafrica by people touching the screen with their fingers (and having myself being on "safari" several times, your hands can be quite dusty, the Palm enver seemed to care).
-Regarding backups, what nonsense. Put the PDA in a craddle, press a button, one minute later your backup is finished. Oh sorry, I forgot you are divorced with complex technology requiring you to ocassionaly plug a device to the power supply. My bad.
-Is there a version of Google to find information in your archive of notebooks? or are you a very sparse writer?
The advantage is simplicity, portability and searchability. You have 4 years of notes which you can't consult unless you are phisically there. Translate that to bytes, check the capacity of modern PDAs and if you don't get it you are beyond redemption.
Software that demands an insecure environment should not be installed. Period.
I am pretty sure that Palm (or PalmOne or whatever their name is this week) wul be more than willing to change how their apps work if security conscious WIndows SAs would demand this fixed.
But there you have an oxymoron, no wonder companies can get away with nonsense like this (not in the UNIX world, sometimes we get applications with lax security and it is sent back to the manufacuter. Normally things get fixed very quickly).
Slashdot Mirror
And rabidly so, in spite of being mostly Catholic.
Why? Because the religious nuts had always been against the aspirations of the populace and ther was a need to get them out of politics. It was a matter of national survival.
That is a lesson the US may do well to learn from their Southern neighbours.
... to judge if a homosexual way of life is better or worst thant a Christian way of life?
In a free country, children would be presented both wolrd views and let them make up their minds (under the wise guidance of their family and community).
In the US gay bashing is a national sport and the "Christians" don't have the moral stature to live and let live.
The fact that you put The Telegraph as left wing propaganda (amongst others in your list) shows just how completely to the right is politics in the US and how uninformed and parochial many of you are, in spite of managing to quote some foreign publications.
I would laugh if it was not so tragic for the US and the rest of the world the de facto baning of any social polieies in the US.
The XXth century brought rights for the working classes, the XXIst will bring the dismantling of those rights by means of relnetless propaganda an indoctrination.
Humble people in the US (and if we are not careful, in many other places) will be exploited and may even be thankful for the oportunity these gives them...
Well, if youngsters can't be bothered to vote, not even for self preservation (since they will be the next line of cannon fodder when your Orwellian reelected overlords launch their next conquest) I frankly can't see a group of people whose political apathy could be more ritghly punished.
Impossing your way of life and values into others.
That is why you and your lot are so dangerous, I hope more people, including decent religious ones, come to realize this on time.
Please go and try to find some evidence that Al Quaeda is this highly organized network that your Orwelain reelected masters say it is.
Try to find a single shred of evidence.
LEts stop giving credence to this myth, AL Quaeda is just a political puppet brandished with outstanding success by people that lacking any idease about how to better society are pandering to the fear of the masses.
Whe wolf is comming! The wolf is comming!
... that
-Killing 100000 Iraquis (and counting) based on lies.
-A horrendous deficit
will not come back to bite you in the ass, then Bush supporters are more delussional than I thought.
You may not have to pay anybody else's healthcare bill, but you will be financing the oulandish adventurism of the scaremongers you have chosen to govern you.
Every single civilian death in Iraq has been financied with your tax money. I hope you are happy with your money to be wasted that way (in the mean time real terrorists keep sending videograms like if they were you old looney uncle).
Given the margin of difference Gore was confronting (~500 votes) and the enormous irregularities in the Florida process only somebody politically irresponsible would have not looked into making completely sure, by any means necessary, what was the real result of the election.
Germany and Mexico just for starters are Federal Republics that are democracies.
One thing does not exclude the other by any means.
Neither the Islamists or Reagan stopped the USSR in AFghanistan.
The corruption, cynisism and croniism prevalent in the USSR made the country implode. They simply were not organized enough and lacked the morale to confront a widespread guerrilla war with some support from the US.
Had the USSR been a cohesive society there would have been no way they would have been kicked out of Afghanistan. They hung to half of Europe for 45 years, but they stablished their stronghold when the people and leadership in the USSR believed all the propaganda that was been generated by the system.
By th early eighties no sane Soviet believed in the Soviet state, and young soldiers in Afghanistan knew the enterprise was doomed to failure and made the best to get some scraps from the table.
The Neocon propaganda that somehom Reagn dismembered the USSR is fantasy: the USSR's contradictions would have killed it without any helping hadn from Reagan and Co.
In 2000 the difference in Florida were ~500 votes.
In Ohio the difference was almost 200000.
Gore had all the right to ensure the counting was accurate. Kerry clearly lost this time.
Completely different circumstances demand completely different actions, in both cases the Democrats follow the path that needed to be followed.
So I really don't understand what you are aiming at.
Because your priceless pearl of wisdom is descontextualized.
If you delve deeper into Stalin's context and life circumstances, you know why he said that.
Circumstances in modern democracies are completely alien to what Stalin surely had in mind when he said this.
The point that is made is that it makes no sense to use a stupid word with no base in any sane linguistics every time a nation goes into space.
The term astronaut perfectly describes anybody that goes into space in the Englis language, what reason is there to use stupid terms like the one sprouted in the initial posting?
If there was no term to describe a person going into space then the use of a neologism from a different language will be appropriate and to be encouraged.
Google for Lancet Journal, a prestigious scientific UK magazine that did some scientific calculations.
I was in Spain one week after the terrorist attacks in Madrid, the reasons why Spaniards kicked out the liars in goverment is that the right wing former goverment used all the power of the state to try to blame ETA (the Basque terrorists) for the attacks without haveing any shred of evidence, because they feared the backslash from the electorate after the attacks.
The effort was so cynical and clumsy that the people got completely fed up with them and kicked them, rightly, out of office.
To suggest that the Spanish people, who have lived with terrorism for more than 30 years, and with state sponsored terrorism for even longer, would be scared by a single terrorist attack is a vulgar lie.
You should apologize frankly.
Master,
Can you kindly loosen a bit the leash, it is hurting my neck.
Many thanks.
... if you don't know how to use the gadgets modern technology has to offer.
But no wonder, somebody so patronizing surely could not do any better.
I am a gaget freak, I admit it, but your supositions about people like myslef are ludicrous.
I make plenty of nice suppers for family and friends (heck, my redsnapper Veracruz style is the stuff of which legends are made), I travel, I play a musical instrument (at the same level as a pro) and I do sports (my first triathlon is next year).
And as myself I am pretty sure many "gadget freaks" have very interesting and fulfilling lifes, so your assumptions frankly look pathetic from this side of the gadget divide.
But I call bullshit:
-Most Palms (I don't know about others except the Zaurus, that sucks on this department) can go on a week with one charge only. If you can't remember to once in a while charge your PDA then you are unable to use modern mobile devices, it would ot suprise me if you whistle your own tunes in preference to have a MP# player or usic payphones because your apparently inabiility to plug a device to a cable.
-I have taken my Palm and Zaurus to the beach. Many times. Not only there, but on Safari, skiing, etc. They are so convinient that have been used in the filed to identify tracks of animals in Southafrica by people touching the screen with their fingers (and having myself being on "safari" several times, your hands can be quite dusty, the Palm enver seemed to care).
-Regarding backups, what nonsense. Put the PDA in a craddle, press a button, one minute later your backup is finished. Oh sorry, I forgot you are divorced with complex technology requiring you to ocassionaly plug a device to the power supply. My bad.
-Is there a version of Google to find information in your archive of notebooks? or are you a very sparse writer?
The advantage is simplicity, portability and searchability. You have 4 years of notes which you can't consult unless you are phisically there. Translate that to bytes, check the capacity of modern PDAs and if you don't get it you are beyond redemption.
.... ACs start at -1, so that means people have taken notice and are actually modding it up.
:-P
Did you read the FAQ
That is the bulshitiest excuse in the history of mankind.
.
You explain to the suit that you can't install the software because that would make your network a virus/spyware testbed.
If the suit inisist have him put it in writting exhonerating you from any responsibility and financial damage the company may suffer
It always amazes me the deference that some people have for somebody wearing a suit and with an important sounding job description.
Your job is to make that network safe, in spite of the owners of the company themselves if necessary.
Software that demands an insecure environment should not be installed. Period.
I am pretty sure that Palm (or PalmOne or whatever their name is this week) wul be more than willing to change how their apps work if security conscious WIndows SAs would demand this fixed.
But there you have an oxymoron, no wonder companies can get away with nonsense like this (not in the UNIX world, sometimes we get applications with lax security and it is sent back to the manufacuter. Normally things get fixed very quickly).
And I *am* a Linux geek (RHCE).
And I have lived in Europe enough years to have noticed.
http://www.weymouth.gov.uk/