Internal Server Error The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.
Please contact the server administrator, mail@marcosweskamp.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.
More information about this error may be available in the server error log.
-There is not such thing as "social evolution". People that mix evolution and social sciences understand neither.
-More efficent this, more efficent that. Define efficent in terms of a society.
-"Strong flourish, weak fail" : same pseudo evolutionism applied in a field in which it does not apply.
-"About corporate power? We can do nothing." Oh yes, as people did not do anything about kingdosm (French Revolution), Nation States (I will not elaborate, it would be ludicrous not to assume enybody moderately educated can come with his own examples).
Regarding corporations there are many things we can do if we don't like the status quo, the most important is become active in matters one is passionate about.
Stop delegating, start assuming responsibilities. The immense political apathy is the greatest indictment about how much we could do but how little we are prepared to do it.
"Lust is bad not because it's abusive to the body. The body is something that can be healed with modern technology. Lust is bed because it wears away the ability for people do decide not to be lustful."
I will not point the obvious (why the US would comply with WTO rulings, as it has done in the past), but just congratulate you for an sterling work of missing all the points at once.
What is stopping the OSS world for creating a new protocol to share disks and or directories, or using an open one, create a client and a server for Windows as well as for any OS required (i.e LINUX, Solaris, MacOS or whatever it is called)?
It baffles me the well intentioned stubborness of the Samba team. Why to dance at the tune of MS if we could make our own music?
I signed with Yahoo in 1996, from no spam at all I am now receiving 100+ messages a day.
The irritating thing is that at least 5 or 6 make it to my Inbox that could have been clearly filtered.
Also false positives are common, so I am forced to check the last page of spam for legit messages before removing the full lot.
Very dissapointing, specially since early adopters like me, that got a yahoo.com address have to pay for POP3 access (the people sying you don't have to are clearly uninformed). WIth POP3 I would take care of spam myself.
In which way, language, pictoral expresion, monogram, do we need to explain to people like you, obvisouly with weak powers of logical reasoning, that once a company achieves monopolic position in a market the rules that apply to it are different?
It does not matter if the people are willing (as many obviosuly are) to give anything to this company in order to be infected by the latest worm or virus, and pay heftly for the benefit (junkies). No, what matter are this company practices, which are not only immoral but have been found to be illegal.
What to they need to do in order for people like you stop defending them?
So is it better to be hostage to a single company that dictates prices and terms and conditions of service as they see fit?
Somehow you asked the correct question:
"But is anti-trust law really good for most people in the long run?"
And then you got the wrong answer, in spite of reasoning close to the real issues.
If millions of costumers are benefitted by lower prices and the price to pay is the livelihood of a few thousends of people in the IT industry, then the cost-benefit balance is on favour of curbing the monopoly without the shadow of a doubt.
In industries and services where a monopoly is allowed to dominate, it is a well known fact that innovation is replaced by bureaucracy, prices spiral upwards and customer service suffer.
The coziness of a few geeks is not worth preserving if the price to pay is to keep the industralized world hostage of a few unescrupulous companies.
Slashdot Mirror
Internal Server Error
The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.
Please contact the server administrator, mail@marcosweskamp.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.
More information about this error may be available in the server error log.
Apache/1.3.27 Server at www.marumushi.com Port 80
Pity in most parts of the civilized world that is not allowed.
Hernan Cortez, the conqueror of the Aztec Empire, burned all his ships to ensure nobody could be tempted to abandon the enterprise and return to Cuba.
As they say , the rest is history.
Sometimes it is indispensable to burn bridges, the world is small, but it is not that small.
-There is not such thing as "social evolution". People that mix evolution and social sciences understand neither.
-More efficent this, more efficent that. Define efficent in terms of a society.
-"Strong flourish, weak fail" : same pseudo evolutionism applied in a field in which it does not apply.
-"About corporate power? We can do nothing." Oh yes, as people did not do anything about kingdosm (French Revolution), Nation States (I will not elaborate, it would be ludicrous not to assume enybody moderately educated can come with his own examples).
Regarding corporations there are many things we can do if we don't like the status quo, the most important is become active in matters one is passionate about.
Stop delegating, start assuming responsibilities. The immense political apathy is the greatest indictment about how much we could do but how little we are prepared to do it.
Patriotic fluff...
If you are consuming a product or service you are a consumer, this is completely independent of your status in regards to the country you mention.
I have gambled, many times.
Guess what, I spent 20 or 30 bucks a night and had a great deal of fun. Like going to the theatre, the movies or any other kind of entertainment.
Just because you think you could not handle it does not mean all the rest of the world is so completely hopeless to handle adulthood responsibly.
Your medieval views in gambling are frankly laughable.
"Lust is bad not because it's abusive to the body. The body is something that can be healed with modern technology. Lust is bed because it wears away the ability for people do decide not to be lustful."
I am spechless....
Honestly, the logic sense of some people is non existent.
Of course it can happen, but ut is less likely to happen, which is the frigging point of having a code in the first frigging place.
Frigging. What a nice word.
Good rant!.
I will not point the obvious (why the US would comply with WTO rulings, as it has done in the past), but just congratulate you for an sterling work of missing all the points at once.
What is stopping the OSS world for creating a new protocol to share disks and or directories, or using an open one, create a client and a server for Windows as well as for any OS required (i.e LINUX, Solaris, MacOS or whatever it is called)?
It baffles me the well intentioned stubborness of the Samba team. Why to dance at the tune of MS if we could make our own music?
I signed with Yahoo in 1996, from no spam at all I am now receiving 100+ messages a day.
The irritating thing is that at least 5 or 6 make it to my Inbox that could have been clearly filtered.
Also false positives are common, so I am forced to check the last page of spam for legit messages before removing the full lot.
Very dissapointing, specially since early adopters like me, that got a yahoo.com address have to pay for POP3 access (the people sying you don't have to are clearly uninformed). WIth POP3 I would take care of spam myself.
Since obviosuly you have half a clue about what you are doing.
For the people that have got not a clue, the recommendation of the poster preceding your post is timely and accurate.
I will give you only one more chance before denouncing your wrong arithmetic ways.
Terrorist.
Hate is a legitimate feeling.
Thankfully we have politics to channel those emotions.
It is not interesting to read about case mods.
Sorry, read first line of article and had to make the point....
... you normaly needs a surface where to spin it, or at least a credible frame of reference.
Otherwise you just look silly.
In which way, language, pictoral expresion, monogram, do we need to explain to people like you, obvisouly with weak powers of logical reasoning, that once a company achieves monopolic position in a market the rules that apply to it are different?
It does not matter if the people are willing (as many obviosuly are) to give anything to this company in order to be infected by the latest worm or virus, and pay heftly for the benefit (junkies). No, what matter are this company practices, which are not only immoral but have been found to be illegal.
What to they need to do in order for people like you stop defending them?
Despair, frankly, despair....
Wait that they get the bill for overtime support of the MCSEs that have to work unholly hours everytime a new vulnerability is exploited.
Try Knopix or any other of the several live CD distributions.
Stop the excuses, you can try Linux today.
John can decline if he is busy.
Do not confuse and organizational problem with a technical one.
That silly argument has been debunked innumerable times.
Apache vs. MS ISS for example.
To write such rubish just to be proven wrong by several other posts almost immediately.
Unadulterated anty OSS zealotry at its worst.
It is obvious even to the most blithering idiot that the rules that apply in a normal competitive market do not apply in a monopolized one.
The actions that are kosher for Apple or Linux distributors are not necessarily so for MS.
The car analogy is so idiotic that I don't understand why blithering idiots keep using it.
So is it better to be hostage to a single company that dictates prices and terms and conditions of service as they see fit?
Somehow you asked the correct question:
"But is anti-trust law really good for most people in the long run?"
And then you got the wrong answer, in spite of reasoning close to the real issues.
If millions of costumers are benefitted by lower prices and the price to pay is the livelihood of a few thousends of people in the IT industry, then the cost-benefit balance is on favour of curbing the monopoly without the shadow of a doubt.
In industries and services where a monopoly is allowed to dominate, it is a well known fact that innovation is replaced by bureaucracy, prices spiral upwards and customer service suffer.
The coziness of a few geeks is not worth preserving if the price to pay is to keep the industralized world hostage of a few unescrupulous companies.
IBM?
HP?
SUN?
Novell?
And of course
Red Hat.
Madrake.
and maybe
Walmart.
No marketing muscle.
Goodnes gracious me. What is the fscking name of this planet? I want out, some of the natives are mentally challenged.