Thank you for assuming that I haven't ever suffered from paranoid schizophrenia. If anything, you've just insulted the very group you were trying to "defend".
When you believe that every person in a crowded room is watching you and can read your thoughts, then you can talk to me about the suffering. When you're afraid to turn on the radio because the advertisements are specially crafted secret codes trying to tell you the secrets behind reality, then maybe you'll understand what I've suffered from. When I went to DefCon and could hear people whispering my name as I wandered through the crowd, being scared to the point where I needed to retreat to my room, is a pretty recent reminder of how constant a presence this mental illness has in my life.
So please, don't belittle me.
So every person with a cameraphone has it recording at all times? What person goes through life assuming that every camera in existence is recording their every move?
Hint: It's called paranoid schizophrenia, and it's no fun.
First you allow a submission with a summary that completely contradicts the article; then you put the wrong specs in the headline when it's clear from both the summary and the article itself what the correct specs should be?
Get yourself a cup of coffee, come back and try again.
I certainly hope that the news orgs will include a warning that they should be using this only as one part of an attempt at anonymity. With the NSA's beam splitters hard at work in every major ISP backbone, it would be quite trivial for them to trace this back.
I think you misunderstood what I meant. 99% of the interaction with the therapist can be reproduced digitally. Of course it still comes down to it being a matter of somebody wanting to change, but that doesn't have anything to do with what means they use to interact with their therapist.
Seriously, why the hell hasn't this already been a thing? I regularly engage in therapy, 99% of it is just discussion. Very little, if any, would be unable to be reproduced digitally.
Slashdot Mirror
The above is a link to "Let Me Google That For You" with a query of "Co3 Systems".
I don't trust URL shorteners and figured I would save everyone the time that I wasted in expanding it.
Stoplights?
Thank you for assuming that I haven't ever suffered from paranoid schizophrenia. If anything, you've just insulted the very group you were trying to "defend". When you believe that every person in a crowded room is watching you and can read your thoughts, then you can talk to me about the suffering. When you're afraid to turn on the radio because the advertisements are specially crafted secret codes trying to tell you the secrets behind reality, then maybe you'll understand what I've suffered from. When I went to DefCon and could hear people whispering my name as I wandered through the crowd, being scared to the point where I needed to retreat to my room, is a pretty recent reminder of how constant a presence this mental illness has in my life. So please, don't belittle me.
So every person with a cameraphone has it recording at all times? What person goes through life assuming that every camera in existence is recording their every move?
Hint: It's called paranoid schizophrenia, and it's no fun.
If they can catch a tax break for it, then yeah. It would be in their financial interests to do so.
This slashvertisement proudly brought to you by Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.
You had the same thought I did, but apparently two minutes sooner. :-P
...that someone who had been working on it "accidentally" leaks the source.
Perhaps this would have been a better link: http://gs.statcounter.com/#browser-ww-monthly-201309-201309-bar
Or you could use Chromium.
Please, tell me more about how your anecdotal evidence trumps statistics. http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp
First you allow a submission with a summary that completely contradicts the article; then you put the wrong specs in the headline when it's clear from both the summary and the article itself what the correct specs should be? Get yourself a cup of coffee, come back and try again.
Considering the original version is priced at $280, that would put it closer to being 1.4x the cost of the original.
So is it "gee-eye-eff", "giff" or "jiff"?
I certainly hope that the news orgs will include a warning that they should be using this only as one part of an attempt at anonymity. With the NSA's beam splitters hard at work in every major ISP backbone, it would be quite trivial for them to trace this back.
Anything they suck up in their endless surveillance will only ever be used AGAINST you, never for your defense.
I thought it was common knowledge that life is a terminal, sexually transmitted disease.
If manipulating people into doing things they wouldn't normally do is what you consider a "normal relationship", then you just might be a sociopath.
I think you misunderstood what I meant. 99% of the interaction with the therapist can be reproduced digitally. Of course it still comes down to it being a matter of somebody wanting to change, but that doesn't have anything to do with what means they use to interact with their therapist.
several recent studies have found that therapy via the Internet is just as effective as face-to-face treatment.
In other words, not generally effective at all?
[citation needed]
Not everyone has problems with social skills. My therapy experience is to help me overcome substance abuse.
More like Dr. Sbaitso.
xD
Seriously, why the hell hasn't this already been a thing? I regularly engage in therapy, 99% of it is just discussion. Very little, if any, would be unable to be reproduced digitally.
Except in the finance world, you can screw people out of everything they have, get caught and STILL get your bonus.
Congrats on the milestone!
Our business uses them as Linux Terminal Server Project thin clients. We were able to cut our new hardware costs to 1/5th of what they were before.