Could someone recommend me a good slot-1 pentium-ii motherboard to go with those "slockets" adapters? I want something with the best performance/price ratio.
Is it me or they're faster already? I visited the site last night and I was bitching about how slow it was. Now it seems more responsive. Either that, or it's because I've been Linux brainwashed;-).
I wonder what kind of hardware they're running?
Anyway, now we get an explanation of why they ran so many OpenSource articles...
It's been a few months already and they have nothing to show for it. Just a long list of members. How can LSB provide a standard that adapts fast enough to the changing world of Linux if it can't even provide ONE quickly for starter?
I love Linux with passion, it's my only OS at home and I try to get people to use it at work, but I'm so angry right now with it!
I had the most frustrating time lately trying to compile even the simplest program on my S.u.S.E. 5.3. And forget about using pre-compiled packages: I just can't believe how many different kind of RPM are sprouting up! Just check out http://rufus.w3.org/linux/RPM/ for proof...
I'm sure general software quality and ease of install would increase if software could be build on a standard base.
I'll admit I haven't tried Gnome on a daily basis yet, but my KDE is very useable on my P133/48Megs RAM. I'm running multiple terminal, Netscape, wordprocessor, 3d software and always with some elaborate backgrounds. Never noticed a slowdown in any of these preceding combination; the system always responds quickly. Even my younger sisters (10-14) find it very nice...
I guess I just haven't tasted the speed of a P2 yet...
Slashdot Mirror
Could someone recommend me a good slot-1 pentium-ii motherboard to go with those "slockets" adapters? I want something with the best performance/price ratio.
Thanks!
I'd have to recommend kppp. It works great!
Is it me or they're faster already? I visited the site last night and I was bitching about how slow it was. Now it seems more responsive. Either that, or it's because I've been Linux brainwashed ;-).
I wonder what kind of hardware they're running?
Anyway, now we get an explanation of why they ran so many OpenSource articles...
It's been a few months already and they have nothing to show for it. Just a long list of members. How can LSB provide a standard that adapts fast enough to the changing world of Linux if it can't even provide ONE quickly for starter?
I love Linux with passion, it's my only OS at home and I try to get people to use it at work, but I'm so angry right now with it!
I had the most frustrating time lately trying to compile even the simplest program on my S.u.S.E. 5.3. And forget about using pre-compiled packages: I just can't believe how many different kind of RPM are sprouting up! Just check out http://rufus.w3.org/linux/RPM/ for proof...
I'm sure general software quality and ease of install would increase if software could be build on a standard base.
LSB NOW!
Hello anonymous coward,
/. right?
I hope you're joking. For your information, queso gives me this on your c2.org site:
209.249.31.128:80 * FreeBSD, NetBSD, OpenBSD
Hmmm, guess they don't trust NT that much.
And could you provide and more specific link on that web site? I can't seem to find anything about NT + C2?
I get it! You actually work for C2NET and you want to get
I'll admit I haven't tried Gnome on a daily basis yet, but my KDE is very useable on my P133/48Megs RAM. I'm running multiple terminal, Netscape, wordprocessor, 3d software and always with some elaborate backgrounds. Never noticed a slowdown in any of these preceding combination; the system always responds quickly. Even my younger sisters (10-14) find it very nice...
I guess I just haven't tasted the speed of a P2 yet...