Read Godel, Escher Bach by Douglas Hoftstader. Mind blowing, and shows how science is not the same as deterministic. The humanities are all about non-deterministic
I've given out a homework problem to candidates for several years now and I really like the insight it gives me. the problem is based on this: http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2008/10/universal-design-pattern.html - just design a class that implements the prototype/property pattern. Amazing the stuff people come up with
The way I like to think of it is that the dollar is based on the value of the citizens of the United States, and what could be more valuable than that?
Also, asteroid mining
Yes! Which is why when you hear stuff like "Social security is just pieces of paper", remember those pieces of paper represent money *we* lent to the government, much of which was then given to rich people for tax cuts who don't want to pay it back.
Right now 10 year treasury bonds are selling at rates that mean investors *lose* money, accounting for inflation. Tell me again how our debt makes us in trouble?
I live next door in Bolton, so this is particularly interesting.
One thing I know about the area is that at Town meeting much of the most interesting and cogent points are made by older folks that are the least likely to have an internet connection. How are you going to represent people that do not have an internet connection?
It may be finite, but if it's as much as currently exists it's going to have an impact, to put it mildly. Ask the Spanish what happens when a ton of gold is brought in.
However, this brings up another point. Before the establishment of the Fed, there were bank runs on a pretty regular basis. The Fed acts as sort of a shock absorber - what serves this function otherwise?
And remember, these panics happened while we were on the gold standard.
And another question: what would the value of gold have to be if it needed to cover all the money that currently exists?
It seems to me that if scientific papers were published with a series of standard meta data they could be submitted to software based peer review that could go through the published literature and look for inconsistencies, missing references, misleading statistics and other things that need addressing.
I've done a bunch of these and can testify that it is the ultimate grandparent present. Nothing else compares to a high quality bound book of pictures of the grandkids that they can show to their friends.
Now of course they bug me to do them all the time...
I did a quick skim, and it seems to conflate the idea of Lovins saying what 'could be' with what 'actually happened', which of course is comparing apples to oranges.
For example, from TFA:
"The piece predicted that if the U.S. were to embrace Lovins’s vision, by around 2005 more than a third of the country’s energy would be coming from “soft technologies,”"
Then,
"So how did Lovins’s prediction turn out?"
Huh? the US most definitely did not embrace his vision, so of course the prediction is void.
There's a bunch of that kind of stuff in there. Try again.
You might be interested in reading some actual analysis - the Rocky Mountain Institute has done great research for years on this.
Reinventing Fire
What you have above is a good case study of a set of logical fallacies. How many can you find?
Yes! Get all three. Code Complete by Steve McConnell, Refactoring, by (I'm pretty sure) Martin Fowler, and Design Patterns, by Erich Gamma et al.
Understand these three books and you'll be well on your way.
Slashdot Mirror
I think it should be 'rise into the public domain'.
I need some more bong hits to fully consider this
Read Godel, Escher Bach by Douglas Hoftstader. Mind blowing, and shows how science is not the same as deterministic. The humanities are all about non-deterministic
I've given out a homework problem to candidates for several years now and I really like the insight it gives me. the problem is based on this: http://steve-yegge.blogspot.com/2008/10/universal-design-pattern.html - just design a class that implements the prototype/property pattern. Amazing the stuff people come up with
The way I like to think of it is that the dollar is based on the value of the citizens of the United States, and what could be more valuable than that? Also, asteroid mining
This is exactly why not to base your currency on gold. If someone finds a huge new deposit, your currency goes in the toilet.
Lock your laptop in a hard case while you're out.
But Hostess' CEO got a 300% raise, so it's all good, right?
Yes! Which is why when you hear stuff like "Social security is just pieces of paper", remember those pieces of paper represent money *we* lent to the government, much of which was then given to rich people for tax cuts who don't want to pay it back.
Um, no. China isn't the largest holder of U.S. debt.
Right now 10 year treasury bonds are selling at rates that mean investors *lose* money, accounting for inflation. Tell me again how our debt makes us in trouble?
Yeah and their morning host was a Republican member of Congress! Oh wait...
" They'll definitely give domestic political groups a whole new world of dirty tricks to play."
As if they didn't have them before?
I live next door in Bolton, so this is particularly interesting. One thing I know about the area is that at Town meeting much of the most interesting and cogent points are made by older folks that are the least likely to have an internet connection. How are you going to represent people that do not have an internet connection?
Just for the record, inflation isn't about the price of anything, it's about the value of money, which is not the same thing.
I like having an anti-social network
It may be finite, but if it's as much as currently exists it's going to have an impact, to put it mildly. Ask the Spanish what happens when a ton of gold is brought in.
However, this brings up another point. Before the establishment of the Fed, there were bank runs on a pretty regular basis. The Fed acts as sort of a shock absorber - what serves this function otherwise?
And remember, these panics happened while we were on the gold standard.
And another question: what would the value of gold have to be if it needed to cover all the money that currently exists?
What happens if you're on the gold standard and someone brings down 100 years worth of production all of a sudden?
With my five seconds of thought,
It seems to me that if scientific papers were published with a series of standard meta data they could be submitted to software based peer review that could go through the published literature and look for inconsistencies, missing references, misleading statistics and other things that need addressing.
Sort of a semantic web for scientific publishing.
I've done a bunch of these and can testify that it is the ultimate grandparent present. Nothing else compares to a high quality bound book of pictures of the grandkids that they can show to their friends. Now of course they bug me to do them all the time...
And what fun would that be?
I did a quick skim, and it seems to conflate the idea of Lovins saying what 'could be' with what 'actually happened', which of course is comparing apples to oranges.
For example, from TFA:
"The piece predicted that if the U.S. were to embrace Lovins’s vision, by around 2005 more than a third of the country’s energy would be coming from “soft technologies,”"
Then,
"So how did Lovins’s prediction turn out?"
Huh? the US most definitely did not embrace his vision, so of course the prediction is void.
There's a bunch of that kind of stuff in there. Try again.
You might be interested in reading some actual analysis - the Rocky Mountain Institute has done great research for years on this. Reinventing Fire What you have above is a good case study of a set of logical fallacies. How many can you find?
Yes! Get all three. Code Complete by Steve McConnell, Refactoring, by (I'm pretty sure) Martin Fowler, and Design Patterns, by Erich Gamma et al. Understand these three books and you'll be well on your way.
This is timely - I'm just starting an effort to get a makerbot in our local middle school. Get out there and support engineering in your school!