Slashdot Mirror


Ask Slashdot: What's the Best Place To Relocate?

New submitter tsakas writes: "I am an IT researcher from southern Europe looking for a good place to relocate. Markets are pulling the teeth out of the strong European countries by destroying the south. The U.S. is in debt and there is no way of telling how long this can go on. China and India are on the rise. Brazil and Australia are looking good. The question: Which city would you choose to go and start a family if you were to stay there for a) 5, b) 10 and c) 20 years?"

999 comments

  1. Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Earth is screwed

    1. Re:Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dude, I'm not saying Earth is all that, but post-industrial Mars is a wasteland. Until they get the manufacturing sector working again, you're better off at home.

    2. Re:Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Which city would you choose to go and start a family...?

      Mars. Earth is screwed

      Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kids.

    3. Re:Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mars, where global warming is welcome!

      Soil temperatures on Mars can reach 81F.

    4. Re:Mars by crazyjj · · Score: 1

      No room in my suitcase for the oxygen tanks.

      --
      What political party do you join when you don't like Bible-thumpers *or* hippies?
    5. Re:Mars by fredrated · · Score: 0

      Do you really think that the god Mars still has a following?

    6. Re:Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      In fact, it's cold as hell.

    7. Re:Mars by PRMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      No way. I heard there's only one computer on the whole planet and it's like a 386. Plus the latency will be murder on your games...

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    8. Re:Mars by gagol · · Score: 1

      Mars have crappy latency and bandwidth, and that is IF you can find a working rover and hack your signal in... Have you taught about Canada? Montreal is big in IT stuff and life is great there.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    9. Re:Mars by dgatwood · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can you imagine the seven-month journey with your kids, and the whole time they're screaming, "Are we there yet?"

      No, and if you don't quit your whining, I'm going to turn this spaceship around.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    10. Re:Mars by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      No, and if you don't quit your whining, I'm going to turn this spaceship around.

      Empty threats. It's a an one way trip and turning around requires more fuel than what's on board.

    11. Re:Mars by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kids.

      Unless you have a "bubble boy" for a child, then not so bad.

    12. Re:Mars by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mars have crappy latency and bandwidth, and that is IF you can find a working rover and hack your signal in... Have you taught about Canada? Montreal is big in IT stuff and life is great there.

      You taught you taw a putty cat?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    13. Re:Mars by gagol · · Score: 2

      Thank for pointing out, non native engrish speaker here ;-)

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    14. Re:Mars by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kids.

      Actually, raising your kids on Mars is 2.66 times easier than on Earth.

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    15. Re:Mars by nschubach · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, you have room, but the TSA won't let you take more than a few ounces.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    16. Re:Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've seen photos from the recent lander. Mars is absolutely indistinguishable from Australia. The difference is that, on Mars, your pregnant wife gets healthcare and the internet is capable of handling the occasional youtube video without bringing down the neighbourhood's shared "broadband" 56k connection.

    17. Re:Mars by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 1

      Speak for yourself, squishy Terran.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    18. Re:Mars by OhSoLaMeow · · Score: 1

      Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kids.

      In fact, it's cold as hell.

      --
      They can take my LifeAlert pendant when they pry it from my cold dead fingers.
    19. Re:Mars by phaggood · · Score: 1

      >Montreal is big in IT stuff and life is great there.

      ... for the 2 wks per year that the ice melts.

    20. Re:Mars by treeves · · Score: 1

      But rearing them is much harder.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    21. Re:Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And there's no one there to raise them if you did.

    22. Re:Mars by Master+Moose · · Score: 2

      Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kids.

      In fact, it's cold as hell.

      And there's no one there to raise them if you did

      --
      . . .gone when the morning comes
    23. Re:Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard there's only one computer on the whole planet and it's like a 386

      I believe that it's a PowerPC G3? Much faster than a 386...

    24. Re:Mars by Tarlus · · Score: 2

      If you can be high as a kite till then, it shouldn't be too bad.

      --
      /* No Comment */
    25. Re:Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And all this science I don't understand.

    26. Re:Mars by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      Either way, going to Mars would be a trip, but... I think it's gonna be a long, long time.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    27. Re:Mars by KhabaLox · · Score: 1

      No way. I heard there's only one computer on the whole planet and it's like a 386. Plus the latency will be murder on your games...

      There are a couple of older machines up there with enough power to get a Doom II LAN party going.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un sig.
    28. Re:Mars by grantspassalan · · Score: 1

      I always thought that hell is HOT!

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    29. Re:Mars by 14erCleaner · · Score: 1

      Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kids.

      In fact, it's cold as Hell.

      --
      Have you read my blog lately?
    30. Re:Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Montreal is big in IT stuff and life is great there. ... for the 2 wks per year that the ice melts.

      The way I heard it, they always hope summer falls on a weekend, so they can enjoy it!

    31. Re:Mars by ignavus · · Score: 1

      Which city would you choose to go and start a family...?

      Mars. Earth is screwed

      Mars ain't the kind of place to raise your kids.

      Just be careful if you come across any wrecked spaceships with a dead pilot who has a big hole in his chest.

      Or at the very least, make sure you have Sigourney Weaver with you.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    32. Re:Mars by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Just be careful if you come across any wrecked spaceships with a dead pilot who has a big hole in his chest.

      Or at the very least, make sure you have Sigourney Weaver with you.

      From what I've seen, leaving the earth with her is basically a death sentence.

    33. Re:Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mars, where global warming is welcome!

      Soil temperatures on Mars can reach 81F.

      WTF is F?! How much is that in C's?

    34. Re:Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So much for the concept of "in space, no one can hear you scream."

    35. Re:Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, if the computer you're referring to is the 'Curiosity' rover, the computer it not a 386 PC, it's not even a PC at all, it's a Mac. Curiosity uses a PowerPC processor running at 200MHz, same type used in Apple PowerMacs from the 1990's. ;) The OS is VxWorks.

    36. Re:Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have to agree. It doesn't matter where you live, the whole planet is going down.

      As far as the US debt... thats not the problem. The big problem state-side is plutocracy & stupidity.

      Unfortunately, due to the stupidity factor, 1/2 of the people who live here are upset because we're not consuming the planet fast enough, and we're not creating enough green house gasses. (they don't say it that way.. but thats what it amounts to)

      So, in a way, the US is the best place to live if you're trying to save earth (provided you're in a position to do something about it) but it's not the best place if you just want a nice life.

    37. Re:Mars by Just+Another+Perl+Ha · · Score: 1

      Not according to Dante. The ninth level of hell is the coldest of them all.. because it is the furthest you can get from God's grace (or so thy say).

      IANAT

    38. Re:Mars by HArchH · · Score: 1

      Cold as hell? If hell has frozen over, then Jim is going to get to have sex with Mary. (If you remember the classic old joke.)

    39. Re:Mars by garaged · · Score: 1

      Damn hell, it will burn us no matter what!

      --
      I'm positive, don't belive me look at my karma
    40. Re:Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Cohaagen. All those cheap domes, and the mutant unrest. He's got a stranglehold on turbinium, and it's probably not going to change in our lifetime...

  2. Kansas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Google Fiber

    1. Re:Kansas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Google Fiber

      Kansas CITY.

      Three quarters of which are in Missouri.

    2. Re:Kansas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And 99.9% of which won't see hair nor hide of Google Fiber in the foreseeable future.

    3. Re:Kansas by OhHellWithIt · · Score: 0

      Google Fiber

      Not to mention their great education system:
      Kansas State Board Votes to Teach Intelligent Design in Schools

      --
      "Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls the past." -- George Orwell
    4. Re:Kansas by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 2

      Three quarters of which are in Missouri.

      I used to live in a state where westborough was east of eastboro, southboro was also to the east of westboro. There was no northborough or borough or central borough to be found anywhere.

    5. Re:Kansas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kansas - the state where you can ride dinosaur to church !

    6. Re:Kansas by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      I lived in a city where the road Western was east of East, and North was miles south of the road named South.

    7. Re:Kansas by mooingyak · · Score: 1

      This one is still my favorite though:

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  3. US by keltor · · Score: 2, Informative

    The US - still the best place to live and the whole "debt" issue is really not a huge deal.

    1. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yes, they are simply going to print more money. no problem involved...they are doing it from a long time now...

    2. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Umm.. no. If you are going to North America, go to Canada. Specifically Western Canada. Crime is very very low compared to the US, the economy is very strong compared to everywhere else in the world, and we don't expect you to shed your culture.

    3. Re:US by jhoegl · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Politically motivated "Ask Slashdot" is politically motivated.
      FYI, signs of China's economy slowing down since last year.
      Also FYI, be good at what you do and no financial crisis can hurt you.

    4. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "whole "debt" issue is really not a huge deal."

      $16 Trillion in Federal Debt going to $21-21 Trillion by 2016? It is a huge Deal!
      The US is just as insolvent as southern europe if not more. The US is headed for a breakup. The question is, where is the best state to live in the US when the break up occurs.

    5. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US - still the best place to live and the whole "debt" issue is really not a huge deal.

      In a debt-based society and economy, one must borrow and remain indebted to survive.

    6. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All nations are headed for a breakup.

      The question is whether the US is going to break up in the foreseeable future. And the answer to that question is "no".

    7. Re:US by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sounds like someone who has never set foot inside the U.S. Our civil War settled this issue long ago, there is no getting out of the Union. If anything you will see solidarity and calls for war if our creditors decide to get uppity.

      --
      Good-bye
    8. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      naive is good at being naive.

      being good at what you do is never enough when you have to deal with the politics of the day in pretty much any circumstance. Just because I am the best and cheapest and fastest at what i do is only an insignificant part of the equation.

    9. Re:US by JackieBrown · · Score: 2

      Come to San Antonio and see which culture is being shedded

    10. Re:US by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      only if you have/make good money. If you don't, there are whole bunch of places better to live than US.

      Debt *is* an issue. If something can't go on forever -- for instance spending more money than you earn every month -- it won't. Reality will catch up eventually and the most probable outcome (judging by the current political climate and all the talk about "fairness" and "1%") is that US will adopt high tax rates like Europe. And then US will not be such a good place to live for people making lots of money.... it'll just become another Europe but with worse food and more crime.

      I recommend New Zealand, if they'll take you... I've heard nice things about that place and they have hobbit villages there too.

    11. Re:US by metrometro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The US's major creditor is also its biggest trading partner. China can't wreck the US economy without destroying their own. And if you think the US needs Chinese stuff, China needs US markets more. The debt is not a big deal other than as a political flamebait; if it was, institutional money wouldn't still be using dollars as a reserve currency and running up US equity markets.

    12. Re:US by Jeng · · Score: 4, Informative

      Also FYI, be good at what you do and no financial crisis can hurt you.

      History tells a different story.

      Being good at what you do alone will not insulate you from financial crisis's, you also have to make good business decisions.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    13. Re:US by clarkkent09 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Choose US if you are ambitious and good at what you do. There is no country on Earth that will offer you the same opportunity to succeed and the same liberty to pursue your goals without excessive interference from the government, while at the same time offering strong rule of law and minimum corruption. Ignore the impression you might have from Hollywood movies. Apart from some inner city ghettos, the quality of life in the US is amazing. Chose Canada or Scandinavia if you are insecure about your ability to maintain employment, have no ambition to start a business and need the reassurance of a strong safety net. China and India are still third world countries with extreme poverty and an enormous amount of corruption. Australia may be a good middle ground between the collectivist nanny states of Europe or Canada, with zero energy and innovation, and the US. Also, as far as I know, the immigration policy is relatively welcoming (like in Canada) compared to the US and Europe.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    14. Re:US by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      yes, they are simply going to print more money. no problem involved...they are doing it from a long time now...

      But still...so far, we're still doing better than much of the EU which is going down the tubes...

      And I can't imagine wanting to live in India or China...from the images I've seen of the general living conditions in each of those countries, I don't think I'd care to live there!! If nothing else, recent articles about India's problems with energy infrastructure.

      I kinda go back to an old saying I hears..."...sure the US sucks, but it sucks a whole lot less than it sucks everywhere else in the world.

      I'm quite pessimistic these days about the US economy...the printing of money and all as you've alluded to, but hell...I can't imagine it will be a lot better anywhere else in the world at the point in time.

      I'm worried about the current administrations spending like a drunken sailor on shore leave....I hope it gets better next year, but I'm not sure of that. It would likely take a bunch of the politicians that cared about the US...to get in there, and not worry about re-election, and vote and do what has to be done.

      Those steps would be unpopular with many, but to save the US economy in the long run, we're gonna have to cut a LOT of spending, and a lot of that is social programs, there's just no two ways about it. Medicare will likely go bankrupt in the near future if nothing is done.

      And likely any thing seriously done to fix it...will not get you re-elected, but man...someone....actually a large group of folks need to get into office by whatever means....and sacrifice their political careers and fix things.

      But, even with that diatribe....I can't see it being any better outside the US. Quality of life and all is still great here, better than what I've seen when I've been outside the country.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    15. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Sir, are a fucking retard.

      Just keep using that plastic fucknut.

    16. Re:US by jackjumper · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right now 10 year treasury bonds are selling at rates that mean investors *lose* money, accounting for inflation. Tell me again how our debt makes us in trouble?

    17. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The US's major creditor is itself. Foreign investment accounts for only 32% of US debt. China just happens to be the largest single foreign owner, but their ownership of total US debt is only about $1.2 Trillion or about 11% of total debt.

      You are correct though, China's economy is very dependent upon the US and they do not have enough control, power, influence, etc, to crash the US economy.

    18. Re:US by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      [quote]best and cheapest and fastest[/quote]
      Best does not go with cheapest and fastest.

    19. Re:US by jackjumper · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um, no. China isn't the largest holder of U.S. debt.

    20. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the funny part, there are stats that state the US debt is in the $100 Trillion area... The problem is how the debt is calculated, can you really subtract a future value for an asset against todays "real" debt to calculate a "debt" value for today? And Americans think the US housing bubble (and financial debacle) were unavoidable... just like the US debt is not a problem.... very sad.

       

    21. Re:US by mooingyak · · Score: 4, Insightful

      1. Eliminate the mortgage interest deduction

      That sounds like a cure that's worse than the disease. Unless there's a very careful plan to phase that in gradually, that'll produce a fat pile of foreclosures.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    22. Re:US by m.ducharme · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Er, there's a rather large country with lots of open spaces right next door, that someone might consider as a viable option to the US or Europe. You know, Canada, that place where we've weathered the downturn better, are on track (in 2-3 years or so, unless Europe implodes) to eliminate the temporary deficits we ran up to keep our heads above water during the financial crisis and go back to running surpluses, have universal, single payor health care (at half the price per capita of US health care), similar standard of living, stable democracy, and politicians who are saner than the US ones, even if I don't like anything our current government is doing.

      Just sayin'.

      (We've got our own problems here, no question, but we're in better shape than the US, for the foreseeable future)

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    23. Re:US by cpu6502 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Canada? In the west? No. The U.S. is still being used as the world's currency for trading the world's fuel: Oil. It has a massive debt but that debt is being propped-up by everyone else, so we still have many good years left.

      I would locate to the Northeast along the I-95 corridor since there are tons & tons of jobs there. Also lots of cities so you'll never get bored. (And you can get Free TV because those same cities broadcast free entertainment on almost every channel (6 to 51).) The northeast also has cheap internet. I pay $15 a month for DSL, or have the option to pay $50 a month for highspeed FiOS or cable.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    24. Re:US by jellomizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      US Bond Rates (US Debt) is currently under inflation. Really that means countries are buying US dollars at a loss to them. In a global recession like this, the whole world is screwed. The US is strong enough to endure this. The idea of China is going to cash in all at once is ludicrous because if the US economy is killed so is China's.

      What people don't seem to realize, we are in a global recession, during these recessions most of the normal rules of economics are messed up.

      Recession isn't a lack of money but the lack of moving it around. So...
      1. The Rich will hoard all their money they make. They will not start investing it out (trickle down) until the economy improves, right now many investments are too risky so they will hold on to their profits, vs using it towards growth.

      2. Putting money in Low Yield but Safe investments. (High US debt,) US Bonds are the safest place to put your money... Yes at the rates you will loose money, but you will loose it at a slower rate then other investments.

      3. Increased Crime, People who do not have an income will get what they want at any costs, also the rich who do have what they want will try every trick in the book to prevent too much loss. So more crime happens and the victims (sometimes poor, sometime rich) loose what is theirs, thus making life harder for them.

      4. Radical Political Stance. Things have gone wrong. the guys in charge seem to be moderates and doing too little too slowly. Lets try to get someone who will make the trains run on time, and punish the opposition who possibly caused the problem in the first time.

      5. Less funding on infrastructure. Things go in disrepair and we cannot benefit as much from it.

      What happened with this recession (A very basic explanation/my opinion) is that it was building up for a long time (I would say from the mid 90's) Because between the mid-late 90's-mid 2000's we had a decade of bubbles (false economic success) First we had the y2k fix/internet tech bubble, we had a need to upgrade or redo our infrastructure to handle Y2K, being that a lot of it is just get new stuff, we started to take advantage of the new stuff (Aka Internet) so we had a bubble there, with young kids with Economy 2.0 and sell at a loss and make it up by selling a lot of it. After 2001/2 the infrastructure had been upgraded, and the stupid business models couldn't hold on for that long. So the Tech bubble popped. But at the same time, of the tech bubble popped we got the housing bubble. Like the tech bubble, we got a lot of bad (illegal) business ideas accepted by well known companies. Democrats and Republicans didn't do much to stop it, because citizens are getting the American dream of their own home, and the growth seemed endless. We saw signs of trouble but were ignorant of it because the bubble was keeping us going. After the housing bubble popped, we didn't have a strong bubble to go onto the next step. Thus a Huge recession.

      It is a perfect storm that causes a downward spiral, that feeds itself. Unfortunately the only thing that will really fix it, is time. At some point there will some new invention or idea that will spur more innovation. The rich will want to expand again, and things will improve. Having this recovery be slow, although it is very painful for a lot of people, is probably a good thing over all. We are building strong fundamentals (which Bush was incorrect when he said that) again, our core values are returning, get rich quick isn't the mantra anymore. So things will slowly get better.

      The United States has actually weathered the recession over all a lot better then most other countries.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    25. Re:US by m.ducharme · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And not start from the bottom of the pile in the first place.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    26. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah yes higher taxes. You mean during the 50'd when the tax rate for people making more than $200,000 ($1.6 million in 2012 dollars) was 91%. Yeah that was a really bad time for people with a lot of money

    27. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I seem to remember something about being a colony of the United Kingdom. Seems like that one got revisited....
      I'd be willing to bet the whole "inviolate union" thing will get revisited again at some point as well.

    28. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At some point China will be forced to cut its loses. It will happen when inflation in the US goes out of control. China is already aware of this and has been very active in getting rid of its US Gov't Bonds. Go look up China's US gov't debt holdings for the past few years. China has all been very active in bilateral currency exchanges to avoid using the US dollar. It has agrreements with may nations, including Brazil, Japan, Vietnam, several Middle east nations.

      "institutional money wouldn't still be using dollars as a reserve currency and running up US equity markets."
      'Fraid to tell you this, with the exception of this year, The Fed has been indirectly buying US equities. The Fed has been giving banks and major US companies with virtually Zero interest, which have fueled US stock buybacks. Without Fed support (printing money) the US equity market would be in the trash. This year is been about getting out of the Euro, as European investors are fleeing Europe for US investments fearing for the pending Euro collapse.

    29. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Out of interest, why do you say Western Canada specifically? I've found Ontario, particularly both Toronto and Ottawa quite attractive places to live (I don't live their myself, I'm from the UK, but my girlfriend is Canadian so we go back often to see her family).

      I understand more Eastern Canadian areas such as Nova Scotia, and Northern Canada might not be ideal due to their lack of, well, anything much. But doesn't even, Ontario, and even Quebec if you're happy with the French influence culture have quite a lot of redeeming value too?

      For what it's worth we did actually consider living in Canada instead, but since Harper got a majority we're waiting to see what happens next election. Politically, to us, he makes even David Cameron look like a saint, and that's saying something.

    30. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best place? Hardly.

      I've lived in several European and Asian countries, most of which were far better places than anything in the US.

    31. Re:US by cpu6502 · · Score: 2

      >>>we're gonna have to cut a LOT of spending, and a lot of that is social programs

      You just have to sell it properly. I don't think anyone would complain if you changed them to needs-based programs like welfare and food stamps. And advertised it as: "No more medicare or social security for the rich!" I think there's near-universal agreement that the rich & well-off should not be receiving government assistance. They can live off their own personal savings.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    32. Re:US by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Much of the West is still booming and likely to continue to do so for as long as the Chinese and Indians keep buying our stuff (which, admittedly, may not be long). The East... isn't.

    33. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US is heap of shit. One of the few countries where evolution is still being debated - and where the majority want to get very rich so badly that they are ready to believe anything idiots say. ( LOL some pastors here say Jesus wants you to get rich.. and have a congregation in the tens of thousands). 30% taxes - and you get very little in return as most of it goes to pay bills for senior care and defense. Plus - having a US passport is like having the distinct ability to be targeted by most of the undesirables. This is the country where except for maybe the supreme court, everyone else is corrupt and can be paid to do your bidding.

      US is much better than most of Europe - but that's it.

      Australia is the place to go. Low population, lots of mineral wealth, far removed from most other centers of population.

      The other place I would think of are the scandinavia. Your children will grow up relatively all right and you will make decent money.. of course if money is your primary choice, I would suggest Australia.

    34. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "without excessive interference from the government, while at the same time offering strong rule of law and minimum corruption"

      Which Multi-universe are you from?
      The gov't is interfering in just about everything these days. The US now has capital controls. Just try to open a banking of investment account overseas. Not one foriegn bank will open an account for Americans. How about the TSA? You think getting groped, prodded and X-rayed is freedom? Have you tried opening a business lately? Corruption? You can't be serious! Does Jon Corzine sound familiar? Exactly which bankers went to Jail over the Financial Crisis? How about all of the legalized Insider trading by Congress? The list goes on and on. The US has been come one of the most corrupt developed nations!

    35. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately they also have lots of orcs which go on raids on a regular basis. Not so safe unless you are good with a sword.

    36. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Executive branch doesn't spend a penny - congress does. and that spending started a loooonnng time back. Just keepin' it real.

    37. Re:US by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2

      It is a huge deal but combine that with the corruption, lack of public healthcare, complete lack of privacy, and growing religious extremism, I'd say the US needs to get itself back on track before considering it.

    38. Re:US by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 0

      politicians who are saner than the US ones

      Nope, sorry, you lost me there. Between the last federal election and the last Alberta one, I saw about three sane people and they all lost.

    39. Re:US by transcender · · Score: 1

      Yes, come to the US. But if you do, you'll soon realize that the debt "problem" doesn't fit into our narrative of how great we are.

    40. Re:US by midifarm · · Score: 1

      Yeah but beer is $42CA!!! Yikes!

    41. Re:US by PhamNguyen · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Gross public debt is approx. 100% of GDP. That means the US govt owes about the same amount as the US economy produces in 1 year. While this level of debt is generally considered harmful by economists, it's also not something to panic over.

    42. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, born and raised in the US. You sound like someone who doesn't understand US history!

        When the US dollar becomes worthless the federal gov't has no power. Without money they cannot pay for goods and services, nor can they pay the army. Read about early American history, regarding Alex. Hamilton and the continental notes.Every major nation has always broken apart when its currency fails or is unable to pay its bills, the US won't be any different.

      Well, not quite true. If the currency fails, a strong man could TAKE POWER.

      See Weimar Germany.

    43. Re:US by YttriumOxide · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Of course if money is your primary choice, I would suggest Australia.

      As someone who thought the same a few years back, I'd highly discourage this as a course of action. In Australia, I made far more money than in my native New Zealand, but it was all eaten up with the ridiculous cost of living. Sure, some places might be cheaper than Sydney, but good luck finding a well paying job outside of Sydney (if you do, grab it - it probably WILL be worth it).

      Since moving to Hannover, Germany, my pay stayed around the same or increased slightly and my cost of living went down by more than 50%. I feel significantly better off here than I ever did in Sydney.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    44. Re:US by EvilBudMan · · Score: 2

      Yeah and it's getting warmer there. So you don't have to worry about that.

    45. Re:US by rock_climbing_guy · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've lived in San Antonio for about two years now. I enjoy a good IT job with the military (big military presence here). The only fly in the ointment is the long, brutally hot summers we've had the last few years. (Much hotter than average)

      --
      Wh47 d1d j00 541, 31337 15n't t3h r0xor5 ne m0r3???
    46. Re:US by PhamNguyen · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You don't understand the definition of "insolvent". US GDP is approx $15 Trillion. The total output of the US economy in 1 year would be sufficient to pay back all Federal debt. This is like having in income of $80,000 a year and owing $85,000 dollars. Insolvency would be more like if federal debt was 10x GDP.

    47. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What, the snake consuming its own tail? Whodathunk?

    48. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was making a point. You can be the best possible candidate for a specific line of work in every area of measurable performance and unless you have the politics of the situation perfect then you'ill still fail. Meaning that in a financial crisis being the best is still not enough.

    49. Re:US by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      We all know who that is don't we? Us!

    50. Re:US by PhamNguyen · · Score: 1

      Everything you have said is true, except that I think you are grossly exaggerating the differences in government regulation between US and Europe. The main difference between the US and Europe are (A) cultural - the US culture encourages innovation more, and people are more inclined to become entrepreneurs because they place more value on being very wealthy, or the lifestyle associated with it. (B) network/scale effects. The US has the largest GDP of any nation, this means a good idea has more chance of making a profit, and people will choose to start promising businesses in the US, or move their business to the US when it starts to see success. This is especially true in IT - there is no equivalent to Silicon Valley in the world (or in the US for that matter).

    51. Re:US by Sir_Sri · · Score: 5, Informative

      The US - still the best place to live

      That's simply not true. The best places to live are canada, australia or northern europe.

      e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World's_most_livable_cities or http://money.msn.com/family-money/the-worlds-15-best-places-to-live/ etc.

      For a southern european the best (and by far easiest) bet is simply northern europe, including germany, but preferably somewhere not in the euro zone. Even somewhere that is indexed to the euro, but not on the euro.

      The US can be lucrative if you're in IT. But it has unnecessarily long work hours, bad health care, and a persistent civil rights and racism problem that aren't worth dealing with if you can avoid it. Not that europe doesn't have racism problems too, but they're different than in the US, so why deal with the US problem at all? If you go to the US and have kids you have to worry about the education they'll get, how you'll pay for post secondary etc. In a civilized country those are problems, but at 1/10th the magnitude, so why would you deal with it? Healthcare is the same sort of problem. If you're going to the US you may as well talk about brazil, russia, china, there are all very lucrative opportunities but you can also end up really screwed if the police or government or just some random local asshole decides they want rid of you.

      If you're seriously worried about politics then the US and UK in particular are bad places to be. Both have political parties (the conservatives in the UK and the Republicans in the US) pushing thoroughly discredited economic policies on their own country, and that again, is just not worth dealing with. It's not that their problems aren't solvable, it's that the people in charge are deliberately not solving them. Germany is in the same boat, but their discredited policies are fucking over the rest of europe, rather than themselves.

      Failing a european solution, which from an immigration perspective is by far the easiest, your second choice is probably canada. Australia is probably more lucrative, and you don't have to worry about being dragged down by the americans the way we do in canada, or buried in our own internal political stupidity (the french separatists in quebec, the Alberta-ontario split on oil vs manufacturing etc.) but canada is much closer to europe physically, which makes going home a lot less painful.

      Then it's a matter of immigration. I'm not 100% sure on australia, but I would think they have the same thing as everywhere else, if you have paper IT skills it's easier to get immigration, at which point any of canada, australia, new zealand all work reasonably well.

      The problem is the questioner is an "IT Researcher". It's hard to know what exactly that means. Is that a PhD in some IT field looking for a faculty position? Then basically anywhere you can find a job is the right answer, because faculty positions are decent everywhere. If you're looking for private sector research that's much harder, because it depends what you can do exactly.

      It's not that there aren't great opportunities in second and 3rd world countries, there are, but if you don't know your way around the local system it's very hard to capitalize on those without a lot of money to start with. If you're just looking for a job to settle your life down with, then go somewhere with a high per capita income, decent vacation time, decent education and decent healthcare (on which the US gets 1/4, canada australia 3/4 and northern europe 4/4).

    52. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unemployment is much lower in Alberta and BC than Oregon and Washington. (Roughly 6% vs roughly 8%)

      The Canadian dollar is stronger than the US dollar. (Roughly $1.02 right now)

      British Columbia household debt is lower, Canadian federal debt is lower (even as a share of GDP), Canadian economic forecasts are stronger for the 5-year time horizon. Canadians pay LOWER taxes than someone living in a higher-tax state (like California), yet this pays for health care and more generous unemployment benefits if you are not employed.

      Other than the money being green and the patriotitism being frothy, what is better exactly? Specifics, please.

      Disclaimer: I've lived extensively in both countries, in Ontario, BC and Alberta as well as California, Washington, Missouri and Texas. I strongly prefer Canadian culture and it's great now that the economy is ALSO better. :-)

    53. Re:US by Jerry · · Score: 2

      The question is, where is the best state to live in the US when the break up occurs.

      It's obvious. The state with the greatest amount of natural resources: oil, metals, wood, rich soil, wildlife, and a low population.
      Southern Alaska, close to the Pacific Ocean.
      That it has a large supply of military weapons, including nukes, is a side benefit. It's big enough to be a nation on its own, and enough power to ward off potential invaders.

      --

      Running with Linux for over 20 years!

    54. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Canada, that place where we've weathered the downturn better, are on track (in 2-3 years or so, unless Europe implodes) to eliminate the temporary deficits we ran up to keep our heads above water during the financial crisis and go back to running surpluses

      I like our country as much as the next guy, but it's blatantly obvious that somebody has been watching too many Conservative/Harper commercials. In reality, Canada's economy isn't too far off from the United States' when you consider that Canada has a mere 10% of the U.S' population... So if Canada has 10% or more of the U.S' debt and our debt has been steadily rising by an exponential factor of around 5% - 10% how can you honestly claim anything such as you have? I'll say it again... Canada's debt has been exponentially rising by around 5% - 10% per year until this financial "downturn" as you call it hit and Canada's debt skyrocketed by 55.9 billion in a single year!

      Citing WikiPedia and Statistics Canada:

      Canada’s federal debt grew steadily between 5% and 10% per year until 1975. For the next 12 years it grew on average over 20% per year. It surpassed $100 billion in 1981, $200 billion in 1985, $300 billion in 1988, $400 billion in 1992, and $500 billion in 1994. It peaked at $563 billion in 1997.

      With the recession, the federal debt grew by $5.8 billion in 2008-09 and is expected to grow by $55.9 billion in 2009-10. - WikiPedia.org

    55. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US - still the best place to live

      Really? Seriously? I think you need to get outside more often. No offense, but there are plenty of better places in the World than USA.

    56. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hmmm. I disagree, as someone who left the US and moved to Canada to start a business.

      The process is actually exactly as easy here, overall, my taxes are comparable- maybe slightly lower (Washington vs Alberta), and the crime rate in this city is substantially lower, despite it being a very close approximation of the same place in the US (Seattle vs Calgary).

      Canada's economy has a stronger growth outlook for the 5 year horizon than the US, the dollar is stronger than the greenback (though that's bad if you're exporting) and the housing market has been much more stable. Plus, I don't have to shell out $900 per month per employee for health coverage. I'm not sure I could afford to do that, I'd probably just go without... And that sucks, but it's the price of being an entrepreneur in the US, and that's pretty fuckin' lame if you ask me.

      If you look at studies, the US has a lower economic mobility and a higher prevalance of "social class" being an indicator of future success than almost any country in the world (it rivals Russia in this way).

      Having seriously lived in both places and having moved to Canada to start a business, I'm going to tell you that you have been fed a line of patriotic froth and while you're free to blather on with your opinion, it's pretty funny to watch from here.

    57. Re:US by readin · · Score: 1

      Also lots of cities so you'll never get bored.

      Unless, of course, you find waiting in traffic boring. Or if you find overcrowding and pollution to be boring..

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    58. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The correct way to think about printing money is that it's a tax on people who already have money in cash!

      People with no savings are essentially unaffected by inflation (everything costs more, but they get cost of living increases).

      People with investments or real property are unaffected; the price of property rises with inflation.

      Only assets held in cash decrease in actual value.

      See? Inflation is really a tax on cash and cash-equivalent assets.

    59. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you can get Free TV because those same cities broadcast free entertainment on almost every channel (6 to 51)

      Yes! Availability of OTA TV channels should be among everybody's top criteria when choosing where to live.

    60. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol... wow... might as well off yourself.

      Or you could, you know, blow that shit off, work hard, and excel the same as everyone who is successful does. Statistically, very, very few people have things handed to them on a golden platter, regardless of what you say above. I have never waited around looking for a handout in my life. I've been unemployed a few times in my life and unemployment is a nice safety net but its not a living. I always did my best to become re-employed again and never sat around boo-hoo-ing or pointing fingers at this person or that person for being at fault for my job loss. Its always always always my fault, no matter the circumstances, when I lose a job. No sense blaming anyone else.

    61. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We may have less crime, but the economy isn't THAT much better. Plus, western Canada (Read: BC) is probably one of the most expensive areas of North America to live in for the least amount of pay. The average income in vancouver can't cover the average cost of a 2 bedroom apartment ($1250/mo)

      Also, you'd have to contend with Canucks fans.

    62. Re:US by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      How?

      You are already paying the interest, the only difference is you will get a smaller refund or owe a little more tax.

      If you need that to make your mortgage you bought more house than you can really afford.

    63. Re:US by SirGarlon · · Score: 2

      The northeast also has cheap internet.

      Yes, but along that I-95 corridor, property values are exorbitantly high, and the cheap internet does not really offset the rent / mortgage+taxes. Not to say living here is all bad -- just that, in the grand scheme of things, "cheap internet" is not really a major consideration.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    64. Re:US by Sir_Sri · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is a huge Deal!

      No, really, it's not. Saying it's a huge deal doesn't make it a huge deal.

      http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/pages/textview.aspx?data=yield

      Your debt is at negative interest rates for anything past 10 year notes. 16 trillion dollars is spread across 330 million people.

      What matters isn't how much debt you have. That sounds strange, but hear me out. If you owed me 1 million dollars but I was charging you 1% interest a year (10k/year) you could probably manage. If you owed me 100k at 10% interest a year the net cost is the same. So then the issue with the US is whether or not your interest rates are going to magically spike (which despite all the predictions they haven't), and if they do whether or not you can still pay the debt off. Which you can.

      The US debt problem is *entirely* an artificial political construction. Right now you should be borrowing several hundred billion dollars a year more to fund job creation (in this case in particular probably infrastructure rebuilding) so you can get the economy back to growing. Paying people unemployment when you could pay them to do work is simply stupid. Leaving people unemployed when there is work that needs to be done and you can borrow money at negative interest rates to pay them to do it is willful damage to the economy.

      The way out of any debt problem for a government once the economy picks back up (which is different from a person) is to manage the money supply to keep interest rates low relative to nominal GDP growth (nominal GDP grows with inflation, productivity and population), and then make sure you have sensible tax revenue, especially when the economy is doing well. The US has a nominal GDP growth rate of 5% a year over the last 60 or so years (and remember the government can tweak that number itself with inflation and immigration), so even running a 4% of GDP deficit (which right now would be about 640 billion dollars) is still shrinking the relative size of the debt, which is all that matters.

    65. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      .. unless you believe in honour killings, no rights for women and children, continuing feuds and wars with other ethnic groups and/or imposing your religion on other Canadians. Those aspects of your old culture we definitely, positively, DO expect you to shed.

      (Not directed at the story poster of course.. but I felt it had to be said)

    66. Re:US by jackjumper · · Score: 2

      Yes! Which is why when you hear stuff like "Social security is just pieces of paper", remember those pieces of paper represent money *we* lent to the government, much of which was then given to rich people for tax cuts who don't want to pay it back.

    67. Re:US by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I'm fine with getting rid of Social Security, just don't make me pay the 6% of my income then. (Even if you "force" me to open a 401(k) instead, which I obviously already have, because anybody that's not a moron won't give up free employer match.)

    68. Re:US by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      I would locate to the Northeast along the I-95 corridor since there are tons & tons of jobs there.

      Hmm, the same exact place I left years ago for reasons which have only grown exponentially since then; needless to say I haven't looked back...

      Anyway, if you don't mind an insanely high cost of living for everything other than broadcast television and internet access, a high percentage of unhappy and often angry people (albeit generally honest ones, unlike a lot of these Bible Belt dimwits who've been indoctrinated since birth to say what they think people want to hear) and you're not adverse to horrible traffic jams and the concrete jungle in general, then that shithole might just be up your alley. ;)

    69. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been living in Pasadena, California, for 10 months now. It took 3 weeks to clean the street after a big storm in december. Most buildings are so badly insulated they run heating constantly in winter when the outer temperature is in the mid-50s. Your streets and highways are in awfully bad shape. Your street lighting is woefully insufficent AND inefficient (kudos). The least expensive food products in the US are more expensive than their equivalent in my home country, and are horribly unhealthy. Except if I go to a farmer's market, the vegetables are disgusting. I had never heard a gun fired outside a) a forest with hunters b) a shooting range, now from my home I hear at least one shot every couple of weeks. Oh, and police chasing people on the highway at the same frequency too. The amount of taxes I pay to the federal government is higher than what I paid for all taxes in my home country (France), relative to my salary (and yes I have a good enough salary that I paid taxes in my home country).

    70. Re:US by hierofalcon · · Score: 1

      While that is technically true, I'm pretty sure that several recent presidents have declared and fought wars that were never formally declared by Congress. Oh Congress approved the spending after the wars started and some committees may have given tacit approval before hand, but the constitutional process was never carried out before we joined the fights. The executive branch caused a huge pile of money to be spent. It is the one major item that has broken the budget.

    71. Re:US by scharkalvin · · Score: 0

      Eliminating the mortgage interest deduction would only work if the tax code were restructured so as to be tax netural to most families. What can be done is to limit the mortgage interest deduction so that the average middle class family is 100% covered and people like Bill Gates with their insanely expensive castles can deduct only a percentage of their mortgage interest. Also second homes would not be covered at all.

      The tax breaks on the very rich need to be gotten rid of, however you should get a tax deduction on any money that you give away to charity.

      The current administration may be spending like crazy, but it's mostly been to prop up the ecconomy. The recent stimuls pacakges didn't work well enough only because they DIDN'T spend ENOUGH and you can blame the GOP for that. You can also blame the last 8 years of GOP leadership for the current ecconomic problems. THEY fucked things up and want a second chance to fix it. Yeah RIGHT!

    72. Re:US by DrLang21 · · Score: 2

      The interesting thing about this is that the largest chunk of our debt comes from the Fed inventing more money and causing inflation. The amusing/sad thing about that is that to pay it off would cause mass deflation, which is almost as bad. Really we should just write off the debt to the Fed since it's all bogus anyways and leave it as a permanent increase in the money supply.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    73. Re:US by aristotle-dude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nah, the Canuks are shitting the bed as fast as the other western nations. They just have further to fall, so they look better right now.

      They've let a bunch of ultra-conservative wingnuts get hold that are trying their damn hardest to turn the place in to the 52nd state. If you want to see Canada in 10 years, see Australia.

      Let me guess, you are either a teenaged Canadian who never lived under an NDP government and you get your news from American liberal media or you are an American Obama supporter who is completely clueless about Canadian politics.

      The Canadian conservative party is "fiscally" conservative. Our prime minister is a boring economist with a masters degree and that is the way we like it. Americans have no clue what the conservative party stands for. Our economy is still doing better than the American and European countries and our Canadian dollar is currently on cent above the US dollar.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    74. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would stay away from the areas around Washington DC and Baltimore though as the cost of living is astronomical compared to other parts of the country. As far as where the jobs are it all depends on the profession. If you are a software engineer (like myself) there are plenty of government contracting jobs around DC/Baltimore or you can find plenty of sf eng jobs in the Raleigh/Durham area of NC (which has a cost of living approximately 50% of the cost of living in the DC metro area).

      Ideally you wan't to relocate where the cost of living is low yet your profession still earns a good bit and there are plenty of places along the east coast where you can do that.

    75. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should rename it Saint Tony and see if that has any effect.

    76. Re:US by notjustchalk · · Score: 0

      ...So if Canada has 10% or more of the U.S' debt and our debt has been steadily rising by an exponential factor of around 5% - 10%...

      Canada's debt has been exponentially rising by around 5% - 10% per year

      Exponential.

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

    77. Re:US by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Disregard parent post, Canada is well known to be too cold, full of euro-trash and a socialist hellhole ;)

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    78. Re:US by notjustchalk · · Score: 1

      [Insert mythic deity here] save you if you get chronically sick or have/develop a medical condition.

    79. Re:US by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      I'm fine with getting rid of Social Security, just don't make me pay the 6% of my income then. (Even if you "force" me to open a 401(k) instead, which I obviously already have, because anybody that's not a moron won't give up free employer match.)

      I've worked at places without matches. Its not a guarantee. That being said, its worth the tax savings.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    80. Re:US by mcmonkey · · Score: 2

      How?

      You are already paying the interest, the only difference is you will get a smaller refund or owe a little more tax.

      If you need that to make your mortgage you bought more house than you can really afford.

      That doesn't make any sense. Most people don't have an unlimited budget. What you've said is, "If you pay X, but can't afford X+Y, then you shouldn't have committed to paying X."

    81. Re:US by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      The northeast also has cheap internet. I pay $15 a month for DSL, or have the option to pay $50 a month for highspeed FiOS or cable.

      I live in Jersey city (literally right across the river from manhattan). After taxes I pay just under $100 for the FIOS double play (phone and internet). It might get cheaper if I drop the land line, but I don't think I can do fios or cable for under $50.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    82. Re:US by h4rr4r · · Score: 0

      No, what I am saying is if you can afford X(mortgage)-Y(tax credit for interest paid) then you should be able to afford X.

      If you cannot afford a reduction in your income of less than 10%, you cannot afford the home you are in.

    83. Re:US by FirephoxRising · · Score: 1

      You can say the same about Australia if you're thinking of moving.

    84. Re:US by flaming+error · · Score: 5, Insightful

      He knows exactly what exponential means.

    85. Re:US by j-pimp · · Score: 1

      Well, not quite true. If the currency fails, a strong man could TAKE POWER.

      See Weimar Germany.

      I can't see a Hitler taking over the entire US by persuasion. The union would split up first, and a large chunk of the contiguous 48 states might be lead by a dictator. Said dictator might reunite the country via military conquest though.

      --
      --- Justin Dearing http://www.justaprogrammer.net/ We're just programmers.
    86. Re:US by sdssds · · Score: 1

      we don't expect you to shed your culture.

      This is precisely the reason not to go there. When the hosts refuse to assert their culture, the "guests" start to assert theirs. This has been happening everywhere and some people, e.g., aussies, are starting to wake up.

    87. Re:US by RoccamOccam · · Score: 1

      ...So if Canada has 10% or more of the U.S' debt and our debt has been steadily rising by an exponential factor of around 5% - 10%...

      Canada's debt has been exponentially rising by around 5% - 10% per year

      Exponential.

      You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

      Why not? Wouldn't you model his statement as Debt[t] = Debt[0] * (1 + 0.05) ** t ?

    88. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lose.

    89. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50 Kong Bucks says you're wrong, and don't be paying me in no Meeses...

    90. Re:US by cayenne8 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Er, there's a rather large country with lots of open spaces right next door, that someone might consider as a viable option to the US or Europe. You know, Canada...

      Nice country, and generally friendly people too...but just too fucking cold up there.....

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    91. Re:US by Cute+Fuzzy+Bunny · · Score: 1

      Disregard parent post, Canada is well known to be too cold, full of euro-trash and a socialist hellhole ;)

      Yes, but they have poutine with slices of foie gras on top.

      Bonus in the winter you can't tell if the women you're hitting on are thin or fat under the 14 layers they're wearing.

    92. Re:US by ahodgson · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh so the feds only have to take 100% of the economy and apply it to the debt. So easy. Good luck with that.

      You know Greece has less debt per capita than the US, right? How happy are they?

    93. Re:US by Whorhay · · Score: 1

      On top of all that some parts of BC are super temperate so far as the climate goes. I had a friend from there that claimed to regularly scuba dive in the winter.

    94. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada? In the west? No. The U.S. is still being used as the world's currency for trading the world's fuel: Oil. It has a massive debt but that debt is being propped-up by everyone else, so we still have many good years left.

      I would locate to the Northeast along the I-95 corridor since there are tons & tons of jobs there. Also lots of cities so you'll never get bored. (And you can get Free TV because those same cities broadcast free entertainment on almost every channel (6 to 51).) The northeast also has cheap internet. I pay $15 a month for DSL, or have the option to pay $50 a month for highspeed FiOS or cable.

      You are using internet pricing as an argument against entering the hottest labor market in the western world? Significantly cheaper health care, significantly lower crime, good weather (and awesome skiing and hiking), and no religious fanaticism is what awaits in you in Canada.

    95. Re:US by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      Agreed with you until I saw you compare US Republicans and the Conservatives in UK. Sorry - there is no comparison. The Democrats in US is more right-wing than the Conservatives in UK.

      --
      This is blinging
    96. Re:US by Creepy · · Score: 0

      I really hope that is in jest... really. hope.

      OPEC has been moving off the dollar, Russia is already off, China has been moving off the dollar, most of Europe has been moving off the dollar, investors are moving off the dollar... twice this year there have been meetings held to move the central bank to a different reserve currency... nothing to fear, right?

      If you don't fear that and are American, you don't understand how the central bank works... if they switch to the renminbi (Chinese money - yuan), for instance the US will need to buy yuan to pay foreign debt. US currency will have a value based on the number of notes printed and printing more money will devalue the currency, so the US will have to print a lot more money to pay interest if they pay in money, and that will in turn deflate the dollar's buying power (causing massive inflation - probably double digit). If you don't see the freight train of a recession that will cause, you are blind. When it happened to the pound sterling it took England 10 years to dig themselves out. Why have gold and silver prices spiked so much in the US? Because commodities survive when currencies fail.

      Ben Bernanke has said as much, though the fed's job is to delude the sheep into thinking all is well despite being at the precipice of a massive recession.

    97. Re:US by deadweight · · Score: 1

      Wow - remind me never to move there! OTOH I live on an island on the Other Side of the USA - The Good Side ;) We have readily available excellent locally raised vegetables. We have crap food too if you want it. Since some houses date back to the 1600s, insulation is variable. You will hear a lot of gunfire at certain times of the year and if you make friends with the people firing you may get a duck, goose, or deer for your table. Move on over to our side.

    98. Re:US by jkflying · · Score: 1

      It's big enough to be a nation on its own, and enough power to ward off potential invaders.

      You mean like Russia? They're right next door...

      --
      Help I am stuck in a signature factory!
    99. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL the only thing indians and Chinese are buying is stuff being manufactured in China. Soon the employees will also be indian and chinese...you guys can go work on nicer ipods

    100. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mid-late 90s as the start of all this is late. The real start is ~7/31/1982 or late 1987, depending on how you look at it - that's the start and end of the last "normal" boom/bust cycle, where the end would classically have been the start of a small recession, but was instead propped up by increasing the money supply. Money supply manipulation has been done every time the US approached a down since then.

      You can see this fairly clearly in the Market cap/GDP ratio - up, up, up until 2000, and then wide swings but *way* over the traditional levels.

    101. Re:US by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      It might as well be dust for all of the good it will do us. Wait until everybody looses faith in the dollar. We are done then. Right then.

    102. Re:US by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      Houston.

      Lots of software people there, not all traveling (I ran into a lot from CA there too). It's mostly oil and gas type stuff. The big companies pay as much as NYC without a cost of living differential, and you can get a decent apartment on the public transit (light rail) rout to downtown for less than half of manhatten, and for a 2 bedroom, significantly less than Brooklyn too (1200-1500).

      The people I ran into in downtown were almost entirely there temporarily for work (like myself), or from somewhere else, there was essentially no stereotypical southern or texan culture, and it was less douche-ridden than DC, trendy than NYC, or yucky than Philly (my area). The family issue may be problematic as Texas has been dramatically reducing investment in education, but the pay/cost of living ratio should make that not too big of a problem.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    103. Re:US by GeodesicGnome · · Score: 1

      All good points. The USA would be a big gamble at this point. There is a big anti-science, anti-intellectual, anti-reason political faction in the USA today that is taking it on a downward path. Perhaps it will self-correct -- perhaps not.

    104. Re:US by formfeed · · Score: 1

      The US - still the best place to live and the whole "debt" issue is really not a huge deal.

      No. First, it's not the "best place to live". Not the worst either, but the "best" depends on your values and how much weight you assign to each of them. Second, "the US" is also bogus. Differences in life style, political climate, and culture can be just largee within the US as when moving from a "nice" place (=place you like) in Europe to a "nice" place in the US.

    105. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How?

      You are already paying the interest, the only difference is you will get a smaller refund or owe a little more tax.

      If you need that to make your mortgage you bought more house than you can really afford.

      Indeed. To reinforce the parent: mortgage payments are typically gauged at between 20% - 30% of your monthly income. (This is historical and has been a rule of thumb for significantly longer than the housing downturn.)

      To use hypothetical, concrete numbers: say your salary is $100,000/yr. Post-tax, right now, you're probably bringing in $75,000/yr (between federal, state, property taxes, etc., you're probably paying 25% of your total income at $100k/year with the following mortgage.) $17,000/yr is what is historically a reasonably yearly price for a mortgage payment (translates to roughly $1400/month.) At the beginning of the mortgage, most of this is interest, so that $17,000/yr is mortgage interest.

      Elimination of the mortgage interest deduction would mean paying an additional 25% of that $17k to the government - a little more than $4000. That mortgage interest deduction elimination just bumped the taxes of the hypothetical homeowner above by over 4%.

      Most people don't budget with a gap of 4% between income and outflow. (In fact, it's arguably economically WORSE for a country for its population to hoard money. Read "The Wealth of Nations" to understand why.) From my own personal perspective, I could make 4% work - that would just be a matter of adjusting my retirement contributions - but I would seriously consider walking away from the mortgage and the house rather than adjusting my retirement contributions downward by 4%.

      I suspect there are many people that feel similarly, and the parent poster would be correct if that were the case: there would be a significant wave of foreclosures if the mortgage interest deduction was eliminated.

    106. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may not be spectacular, but Winnipeg, Manitoba? During that whole economic crash, we're so diversified and covered by a hundred different things, that it didn't affect us even slightly really. We're too small to be a threat to anything, big enough to be getting big name stores like Ikea, central enough to make it fairly easy to travel wherever you may want to go in. As well, the fact that we're central (literally, the longitudinal center of Canada is about a 10 minute drive from where I'm currently sitting at work) is coming into play lately... we're starting to build ourselves up as a central shipping hub

      Also, if you like a diversified culture that's celebrated, just google up 'Folklorama'

      So yeah, we may not be Vegas or New York, but we've got our festivals, and a little bit of everything kicking around here.

    107. Re:US by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 2

      No, what I am saying is if you can afford X(mortgage)-Y(tax credit for interest paid) then you should be able to afford X.

      If you cannot afford a reduction in your income of less than 10%, you cannot afford the home you are in.

      The prices of the houses increased because sellers KNEW that buyers had more to spend because of the tax refund. That's part of the air in the housing bubble.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    108. Re:US by Sentrion · · Score: 5, Informative

      You've never been to Australia, mate. Better quality of life. EU style healthcare so you don't lose your life savings when some doctor surprises you with his out-of-network facility or lab fees. If you get cancer and are too weak to work you don't lose your health coverage, so there's at least some chance of continuing medical treatment undisrupted to possibly beat your disease or at least leave your kids an inheritance. Better work-life balance, longer vacations, less expensive to fly from Oz to hundreds of tropical destinations. A road trip could take you to any type of landscape you prefer (though mostly desert in the interior, but no worse than the American West).

      Australia doesn't have as many "enemies" as America, so traveling with an Aussie passport is generally safer, and it isn't as likely to get nuked off the planet in WW3. Only problem is so many people want to move to Australia that immigration is tight. But if you're under 40 and have technical or trade skills you'll probably get in. It helps to speak English like a native speaker, as well as if you come from a Commonwealth country. The Aussies, due to geography, have an advantage trading with China, India, and other nations in the Pacific Rim. Very little national debt, so economy is great, but trying hard to get more immigrants with high-tech skills. Lots of land in the interior, though water is in short supply, so sustainable agriculture for a growing population could be an issue in the future. If China ever seeks military expansion like Japan in WW2 then Australia could be a target for invasion, but what are the odds, right? China on the warpath wouldn't be good for anybody in the way, and the USA is more of a threat to China than Australia. All said, thousands of miles of ocean separating Australia from the rest of the world means that military threats can only come from heavily industrialized nations with substantial military forces. There is illegal immigration, but limited to boat people, so no porous border issues to worry about. Little to no terrorist threat to Aussie soil, though occaissionally Aussies can be targeted in hot zones if the terrorists can't find any Americans. Australia tends to be more "out of sight - out of mind" and generally not considered a threat to any other nations. Aussies also benefit from being a Commonwealth country, making future travel or immigration easier. Better social safety net for people down on their luck (though some abusers too lazy to work, so taxes are higher than the US). Relationship with indigenous people can be touchy at times due to abuses in the past, and some present-day conflicts over sacred sites, but Australian aborigines tend to be easy to get along with. Much less racism compared to KKK and Black Panthers in America. Murder rate is lower as well (4.2 in US vs. 1.0 in Australia, per UNODC). All in all its hard to imagine a much better place.

    109. Re:US by Burning1 · · Score: 2

      Those steps would be unpopular with many, but to save the US economy in the long run, we're gonna have to cut a LOT of spending, and a lot of that is social programs, there's just no two ways about it. Medicare will likely go bankrupt in the near future if nothing is done.

      I cringe every time I hear something like this. If you want to reduce debt, you cut spending and raise revenues, and you do it in such a way that doesn't kill your future (E.g. don't cut educational spending) or create additional drains on the economy (cutting medical programs.)

      Everyone wants to talk about running the government like a business. Look at HP and Apple. Which focused on cutting spending, and which focused on raising revenues? Name a single company that grew and thrived through cost cutting alone.

    110. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true at all.
      I lived there for 2 years, there are much better places to live. Europe is far better IMHO.

    111. Re:US by buybuydandavis · · Score: 1

      The US is strong enough to endure this. The idea of China is going to cash in all at once is ludicrous because if the US economy is killed so is China's.

      They'd suffer economic dislocations, but I don't think they have a material need for the pieces of paper we send them. I wouldn't be surprised if the Party leaders one day decide that sinking the Superpower is worth a little economic dislocation.

    112. Re:US by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Having to pay interest on a loan is absurd, while free money is normal. Balancing your budget is stupid, while spending money you'll never have is smart. Are you Greek?

    113. Re:US by znrt · · Score: 0

      yes, they are simply going to print more money. no problem involved...they are doing it from a long time now...

      yeah, they've done it too much.

      the problem with that is it devluates the currency, which is the primary struggle now. that's precisely the reason for the constant fud against europe or asia, plain currency wars.

      US debt hole doesn't affect only economy (local and abroad), but it shifts international balance too and what is at stake now is world predominance. money has no homeland. realize that the elite doesn't give a fuck on your job or your living standard, but is very concerned about their assets not turning to dust and their privileged international position not being compromised. they could be perfectly happy being awfully rich elsewhere in the world, where they may get better support.

      you just can't print money forever. US is having it increasingly hard to influence international finances and markets (where they have been the absolute boss for decades) and it is becoming obvious that it's predominance has now more to do with a privileged position and perceived value than with real underlying value of it's present economy. a fair chunk of banks will eventually fail, and wall street will stall, then rise again but will have lost most of its international "mojo". midterm US will depend entirely on it's own real economy, which is pretty fucked up but huge and indeed capable of recovery, but this marks the burst of the bubble of US world "domination" and US willl have to compete on equal conditions, which is though.

      my guess is that they will try to address both problems at the same time, and not by printing money, but by waging war. after all the military is the only real and effective power that US currently maintains in full, and selective destruction is a very effective way to shift economic balance, or in general mess everything up so as to get a fresh restart.

      the question is ... do they have enough drones, or are you ready to die for your homeland, buddies? :-)

    114. Re:US by Creepy · · Score: 1

      hmm... China deregulates renminbi. Central bank moves to renminbi as its currency. US has to buy renminbi in order to pay its INTEREST on its debts, and printing money deflates the value of the dollar and causes massive inflation and possibly a currency collapse. The only good I see is most of the country's debt is to itself, thus giving citizens and companies that own the debt more money.

      Fairy tale? maybe you weren't paying attention...

      Still think China can't crash the US economy? Well they may not have to... in May, a secret meeting was held in Europe to create a new reserve currency as well, based on several countries' currencies (google it and you can find some details).

      IMO, the dagger is already in our gut, we just don't know we're dead yet.

    115. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish all these people moving to Australia to live would realise they're unlikely to ever be financially better off for it unless they save up money and take it back home with them. Australia's pay rates may be higher but what is given by one hand is taken by the other.

    116. Re:US by buddyglass · · Score: 1

      That's simply not true. The best places to live are canada, australia or northern europe.

      I like how you say this with such authority. As if the choice of how to measure "best place to live" weren't to some degree arbitrary. Different people like different things. Even among things all people generally like (low crime, low cost of living, etc.) they may prioritize them differently. So, I'm not sure it's possible to state definitively that "the best places to live are Canada, Australia or Northern Europe" without knowing how the OP defines "best".

    117. Re:US by dell623 · · Score: 1

      Your post reads like a parody, although based on your signature I assume you are deadly serious. A parody because it lives up to so many stereotypes of Americans, a big one being utterly clueless about the rest of the world.

    118. Re:US by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Well if you pay me $10 to hold onto $100 for you, and when you come back it I ask for another investment of $100 + $10 fee so I can pay you the $100 you're likely to hit me with your shoe instead

    119. Re:US by Creepy · · Score: 1

      You don't understand how the fed works - they are a Ponzi and all they need to do is print more money to create inflation. They could, in fact, just print 16 trillion and pay off the national debt and even have a little bit of surplus (well at the moment I'm typing this at least), but that would cause a massive decrease in the value of the dollar (increase in supply) and decrease in buying power of that dollar, thus creating inflation. As the fed is a private company owned by banks and wealthy individuals that have purchased this debt (or so I presume - as a private company, they don't need to disclose their owners or their business), it is not in their best interest to do this. Their job is to create wealth for their owners by paying interest on their debt.

      By the way, if you don't see something inherently wrong with allowing a private company to print money with the government's snookered approval, you should.

    120. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Keep telling yourself that.

    121. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm.. no. If you are going to North America, go to Canada. Specifically Western Canada. Crime is very very low compared to the US, the economy is very strong compared to everywhere else in the world, and we don't expect you to shed your culture.

      Why western canada?
      Eastern Canada is a lot more "European"....and the girls are Hottttt :)

    122. Re:US by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      The current administration may be spending like crazy, but it's mostly been to prop up the ecconomy. The recent stimuls pacakges didn't work well enough only because they DIDN'T spend ENOUGH and you can blame the GOP for that. !

      So you're just about liberal talking points. If you actually believe the last four years has been propping up the economy I have swamp land for you.

      Most of the spending has been to the administrations cronies. Stimulus didn't work because most didn't make it to the places that could have used it, most went to the cronies again Government selecting the winners at it's finest. I admit Bush was a spender, but Obama is no better!

    123. Re:US by Sir_Sri · · Score: 2

      Ok, by objective measures, low crime, highest average disposable income (which, without specifics of his qualifications we can't pin down more), the 4 I listed at the end, on health, education, vacation time the US is still behind canada australia and northern europe. On immigration ease the US is behind northern europe (for a southern european anyway).

      You would actually be hard pressed to find, on any average measure, a reason why the US is a better place to live than a number of choices elsewhere. If you're a staunch religious nutter then sure, but if you're a staunch religious nutter you're not going to ask on /. the best place to be.

      If all you value is highest disposable income then I guess you want to move to norway Luxembourg or Qatar or something, but still not the US. If you're looking for what is, on average, the best place to live, it's not going to be in the US. That's why none of the links I had put any US cities on it.

      If you're coming from India or the middle east it's a different calculation entirely. Because there you are much much much more concerned about where you can get into, and in what time frame. It doesn't do you any good if it's going to take 10 years to move to norway or 3 to move to the US even if the US is 10% worse by every objective measure. It's not that the US is really bad, but compared to europe it's not all that appealing, and if you just want riches there are smaller novelty states that will always outperform the US because they aren't burdened by being big which has a natural averaging effect.

      I grant you, I'm assuming he's looking for an average measure of where is a good place to live, because he asked /. If you want to live somewhere with the highest average salary you can look it up yourself in 10 seconds.

    124. Re:US by gallondr00nk · · Score: 1

      The US debt problem is *entirely* an artificial political construction.

      Exactly this. The "debt crisis" is an ideological argument used to further conservative aims. Pick an issue, austerity measures, public spending cutbacks, welfare "reform" (read: destruction), loss of working rights (in the name of a 'competitive workforce'), anti union legislation. You name it, they all, at some point or another, invoke the spectre of this enormous debt crisis. They throw figures around, a trillion dollars here, ten trillion there, and it doesn't really mean anything.

      It doesn't mean anything except for as a tool to further their ends by way of warping debate and fuelling the apocalyptic visions that spew out over the airwaves day after day after fucking day. Here in the UK we have a government that buys hook line and sinker into the whole rotten edifice. They seem to have no conscience at all, happy to slash and burn at every slither of public spending they can possibly at all, regardless of human cost. They argue that their scorched earth austerity measures are a road to recovery, even though our economy has tanked into a double dip recession with no recovery in sight.

      They don't understand, or more likely, it doesn't fit their fuck-the-poor ideological mindset, that for an economy to recover people need to have some fucking money to spend.

    125. Re:US by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      The OP's premise was quite flawed-- the strong economies of Europe are strong because of what they did to southern Europe economies. It was a zero-sum game, and the debt is due now. Likewise, the "resource economies" of Canada and Australia (arguably middle east as well, but I can't make a well-informed conclusion there) are starting to sputter based on the need for their commodities being held hostage to growth elsewhere. The US debt situation is generally more manageable than Europe, although the politicians are equally likely to cause major problems.

      The best place to move for a 5-year horizon is a growing or transitioning economy (in terms of making the most money anyway). Hong Kong was golden shortly after the handover; Thailand was around 2000; Malaysia was around 2005; Singapore around 2010. Each of these places (well, we'll see on Singapore) "expired" as a great location five years later. If you were well established by that point, you might still come out ahead staying, but if you were chasing a bubble you would have lost.

      If you are looking at quality of life... think more in terms of what makes you happy. I love the water... and pick places to live based on that.

    126. Re:US by mcvos · · Score: 1

      But hat if you don't want to live in a police state? The stories of police brutality and the cops getting away with it are a bit too common for my taste. The TSA, Patriot Act, indefinite detention etc also don't inspire a lot of trust.

      Canada could be a good place, or otherwise northern Europe. Debt isn't so bad there (but if you're really worried, go to Norway; no debt there), the standard of living is really high, plenty of jobs for all kinds of programmers, and they're free, egalitarian, happy and well-organized for the most part.

    127. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American debt is denominated in dollars, why would we have to buy yuan to pay that debt? Its not like we would suddenly start issuing government bonds payable in yuan.

      Plus where have they been moving to? EUR? That's currency with an even shakier future than the USD. The yuan is heavily manipulated so that chinese exports are competitive and isn't freely convertible.

      Also there is no single central bank.

    128. Re:US by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily, although declining home prices, stagnant wages and loss of the deduction could have a pretty big impact on even the most financially prudent homeowners.

      Phasing it out now (while rates are low) is the best possible approach if that is a priority. In reality though, it only benefits people like me who hate accountants to have a low flat tax with no exemptions.

    129. Re:US by DrLang21 · · Score: 1

      I never said anything about not having an issue with the Fed, but seeing as how the money is already in the system, the Fed simply "forgiving" the debt would have no impact on inflation at all. It would simply prevent a decrease in the current money supply. Since all money is debt anyways, you would have to be crazy to advocate paying off all of the debt. There would be no more money.

      --
      I see the glass as full with a FoS of 2.
    130. Re:US by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Agreed. I'm in Seattle but if/when I move my list would be:

      1) Wellington or Dunedin in NZ
      2) Sydney
      3) Vancouver, BC
      4) Singapore

    131. Re:US by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      The greeks are in the mess they are because they don't control their currency, and there's no transfer or averaging effect from the european union the way there is for poor states in the US, and because now that they're in this mess trying to balance their budget is going to make things worse not better.

      If Europe had a single heathcare, retirement and maybe a few other things funds (like the US with medicare, medicaid and social security) greece would not be in nearly as a bad a situation as it is. They can't get out of it because they can't depreciate their currency.

      I'm guessing you've been buying into the rhetoric that the greeks were somehow fiscally irresponsible and now need to be punished. That's completely batshit crazy economic policy, and going with that plan is why greece is in the mess it is. Their interest rates are absurd because everyone figures they can't stay in the euro (true without major changes), when they exit the euro, or the euro collapses it's not clear what debts they will be able to pay, if any.

      The US situation is completely different. Which is pretty much as I described.

      Greece needs euro area inflation, (the US can set it's own inflation targets), they need to refinance the debt they do have (which was flat at about 100% of GDP from 1993 to 2008) at interest rates they can afford (The US is paying negative real interest rates, and from the chart I linked the US 10 year rate is 1.73% whereas for greece it was over 8% before all sorts of policies kicked in to make tracking it today meaningless), and they need to spur job growth, while stopping existing economic contraction. The economic contraction is because the government is cutting spending, which is cutting government worker spending which is cutting consumer spending, which is cutting demand, which is cutting government revenue, which is cutting government spending. The US is going through the same thing with states and cities slashing employment rolls (teachers, firemen, police etc.), but it's buffeted by private sector growth. The US would be in good economic shape right now if you weren't cutting government spending, and you'd have significant growth. So the last point is how to attract investment. Greece can't attract investment because of a lot of factors, first is 'nominal wage rigidity', to be competitive everyone needs to take a pay cut, but they can't, and the euro area doesn't have strong enough inflation targets so employment will continue to lag, the second is that persistent unrest makes investing (and travel) risky. I have two weeks vacation left for this year, and as much as I could get a deal going to greece I'm not going to risk getting trapped at an airport for 2 days, or in athens in the middle of a strike. I could go to the US, where there's much lower risk for major protests etc.

      So to summarize

      Having to pay interest on a loan is absurd

      That has no basis in what I said. If your interest rate is lower than your income growth the net effect is you are reducing the relative problem of the debt.

      while free money is normal

      Doesn't matter if it's normal. Right now people who have money are clamouring to give it to germany and the US. Either tax it away, borrow it, or both.

      Balancing your budget is stupid

      Right now it certainly is. If you don't understand that go run a business but don't try and do economics for a living.

      while spending money you'll never have is smart

      That would be the difference between a euro area country and the US. As I pointed out, the US can have the money if it wants it. Euro area countries cannot.

    132. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If some guy don't blow your brains out. Discard that.

    133. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah you just wait till the housing market collapses!

      The entire economy is propped up on conservative lies and selling our resources off to the cheapest (foreign) bidder. We may be the last to fall, but fall we will.

    134. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I moved from Sydney to Hannover I gotta say I was a bit dismayed with the new salary but too, then again I don't actually feel worse off either. I love Sydney but Hannover is way more livable with good public transport, bike ways and nice parks and no urban sprawl. I would say thumbs upfor Germany especially at the moment they seem to be hiring.

    135. Re:US by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      We could fix #1 by taxing unused wealth above a certain level. Use it or lose it.

    136. Re:US by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Well of fuck course we cant do that, don't be a dumbshit.

    137. Re:US by corychristison · · Score: 1

      Depends on which part of the country you are in.

      However the two provinces in the best economic climate has the coldest winters. Alberta and Saskatchewan. -40C in the winter is normal around here. This is not including "the wind chill factor". I personally think that is a load of BS. If it measures at -45 on a thermometer that is the temp.

    138. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think you know how government debts work for nations that have a stable currency. They are contracts that specify that they are to be repaid in dollars. There's no option to change that to whatever currency people feel like. So there's no reason the US would buy renminbi to pay interest.

      If the US entered into a period of hyperinflation like say Germany or Argentina, then the debt issued during that period might be denominated in another currency but that's pretty unlikely.

    139. Re:US by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      You'll pull a lot of people upside down when the value of their home falls 20% overnight because family budgets just went down by a couple hundred a month.

    140. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Hampshire.

      It's a tax donor state (gives more to the government than it receives) has access to land, air, and sea. It's a border state, and largely self sufficient.

      I wouldn't be surprised if all of New England weathered the storm quite well.

    141. Re:US by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Wrong. The civil war didn't "settle" anything. The civil war was successful for the Unionists because they had a strong manufacturing economy and were able to finance the war effort, plus they were able to conscript lots of people to send into battle against the rebels.

      When the economy collapses in the US, there won't be any money to finance a war effort to hold the union together, and there probably won't be any political will to do so either. And where do you think you're going to find soldiers to fight that war? This breakup isn't going to be a whole bloc of states banding together and seceding at once, it's going to be a bunch of different places breaking off and doing their own thing, probably just ignoring the powerless federal government for a while before making any formal declarations of secession.

    142. Re:US by cayenne8 · · Score: 2
      Frankly, I'd like to take things further than you mentioned.

      I'd like to see a more flat/fair tax implemented....and NO deductions whatsoever....!

      The govt figures what they need to function, divvy it up and we all pay. And I don't think anyone working should be 100% exempt..everyone can afford to throw in at least $1-$5. That way, everyone has some skin in the game.

      This way, everyone pays a more reasonable tax...no more 'loopholes', and finally, the federal govt will STOP using taxation as a means to try to mold citizen behavior via the deduction, etc.

      With the tax savings many of us would realize in the middle class with such a system, home ownership would be easier.

      But I'm all for no deductions at all....and then figure the realistic tax needed.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    143. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (1) The vast majority of US debt is held within the US (by the US Government, American corporations and individuals, etc.). china holds about 8% of the total. (2) China cannot "cash in" all of a sudden - bonds have a set payback period. ... I could go on, but I don't have the time ATM. The amount of ignorance and misinformation about the US debt staggers me and I just had to correct these two blatant errors in your +5 post.

    144. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, if you're solution to the problem of politicians spending too much is to collect more tax ... you're in for a surprise. If you give someone who overspends more money, guess what's going to happen.

      This is not an argument for 0 tax btw, so don't pull that red herring. Spending will have to be cut, and there is only one really big and rising expenditure.

      People are going to find out that having the government be your insurance is stupid, as the government has the right to go back on signed contracts. Before you say it's impossible, this is exactly what Europe has been doing. Hell, in UK and Holland the yearly spending on disease per patient by the government insurance is below $70k (for people > 60), a figure even cheap insurance will beat in the US. Someone in my family died, a life that could have been prolonged by dialysis (which he had been receiving for >8 years) but it cost a few thousand bucks too much. And no, they don't even give you the choice even to pay the difference. Hell, docters refused to tell him what was happening until he threatened to pull a gun on them (most ww2 veterans in Europe will know where to find a gun, no matter how illegal it is. I've got 4 grandparents, 3 had hidden a gun somewhere at the end of the war that I know of. One of them I'd be amazed if he only hid one gun)

      They did this, after telling (and making a law that said so) him since he was 32 that they would pay all his medical costs for life, then went back on it when he was 70.

    145. Re:US by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Eliminating the mortgage interest deduction would only work if the tax code were restructured so as to be tax netural to most families. What can be done is to limit the mortgage interest deduction so that the average middle class family is 100% covered and people like Bill Gates with their insanely expensive castles can deduct only a percentage of their mortgage interest. Also second homes would not be covered at all. The tax breaks on the very rich need to be gotten rid of, however you should get a tax deduction on any money that you give away to charity.

      As I posted before...lets get rid of ALL deductions...reduce the tax on everyone to what's really owed by eliminating all loopholes. More of the flat/fair tax type thing...

      We could stop the govt from trying to manipulate behavior through taxes too....just let us pay taxes for the funding of basic constitutionally prescribed services and let that be it.

      Taxation shouldn't be a vehicle for the govt to try to tell you how to behave.

      No mortgage deductions, no child tax credits, nothing...but lower the tax on everyone since the govt would be catching more money from everyone since it would be more of a level playing field, and everyone would have a stake in the payment of the country.

      No reason that about 49% of the population is not paying any net federal tax at all....I mean, if you're working, get real...pay SOMETHING.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    146. Re:US by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      Depends on which part of the country you are in.

      Dude...I don't like it to hardly reach FREEZING (32F).....and it rarely does here in New Orleans.

      :)

      I'm guessing -40C is really fucking cold....and I wouldn't want to live anywhere near that temperature.

      I kinda like wearing shorts and tshirts when cooking my Thanksgiving meal near end of November....deep frying a turkey out doors on a nice warm, winter day.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    147. Re:US by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      Heh I just checked my thermometer. It only goes down to +5 degrees. Never seen it anywhere near that either.

    148. Re:US by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      I cringe every time I hear something like this. If you want to reduce debt, you cut spending and raise revenues,

      I wouldn't mind a modest raise in revenues...IF it could be guaranteed that that raise would not in any shape, form or fashion, be used for new spending. I want it only to go towards paying the debt down.

      If they do that, and cut waste and spending (like any household or business has to do when they have less income that outgo)...I'd be cool with it.

      Then again, while I'm wishing for things, I think I might as well ask for a pony too...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    149. Re:US by chispito · · Score: 1

      I've lived in San Antonio for about two years now. I enjoy a good IT job with the military (big military presence here). The only fly in the ointment is the long, brutally hot summers we've had the last few years. (Much hotter than average)

      Is it possible that your estimation of "much" is colored by them being your first two summers in the area?

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    150. Re:US by chispito · · Score: 1

      "Crises."

      --
      The Daddy casts sleep on the Baby. The Baby resists!
    151. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Low crime and strong economy ? Western Canada, why not, but he could also consider Luxemburg.

    152. Re:US by bigmadwolf · · Score: 0

      That's simply not true. The best places to live are canada, australia or northern europe.

      e.g. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World's_most_livable_cities or http://money.msn.com/family-money/the-worlds-15-best-places-to-live/ etc.

      Strange, they missed Melbourne off that list. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-14/melbourne-remains-worlds-most-liveable-city/4198294

    153. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is so ridiculous it's not even funny. The US is utterly rigged against anybody non-wealthy when it comes to starting a business. Where I come from (Scandinavia) literally anybody can start a business if they have a marketable idea and some willpower. Here in the US (I have lived here for ~15 years), you need a marketable idea plus twenty million dollars, unless your idea of a "business" is selling trinkets on Etsy while living with your parents. Having a social safety net is an incredible boon to any middle-class person starting a small business - in the US it's literally suicidal because the average person is dependent on an employer for things like health insurance. If you look up the data, you will find that Scandinavian countries in particular have many more small-to-medium businesses per capita than the US. People there have more personal freedom in their lives, as they are not de facto indentured servants to a corporation.

    154. Re:US by cultjam · · Score: 1

      Er, there's a rather large country with lots of open spaces right next door, that someone might consider as a viable option to the US or Europe. You know,....

      Mexico.

      Just sayin'.

    155. Re:US by ace37 · · Score: 1

      The US can be lucrative if you're in IT. But it has unnecessarily long work hours, bad health care, and a persistent civil rights and racism problem ... education ... so why would you deal with it?

      Not trying to argue, but at least for the OP's case I don't think all of your conclusions apply. Education is a weakness, but:
      *High work hours are easy to fix - don't work there; find a project with good funding and do 40/week. You can easily feel this out in an interview.
      *Health care is not an issue with health insurance (salaried IT worker). US physician skill level, medical equipment, drugs, and access/availability of care are top notch. US health care system is ridiculously expensive without insurance, but with insurance it will work well for the OP.
      *I saw significantly more racism/hate of specific foreign cultures/immigrants when living in areas of Finland (2 years, spoke the language) than most of the US; my parents had the same experience comparing their time in Germany to the US ( ~3 years, did not speak the language).
      *On education prior to college, I agree completely - the US public education system on the main is lousy right now unless you are very careful in selecting where you live so your children attend a specific 'good' school (or pay for a private school). Universities are generally good and can make up for lost time, but they're often expensive.

    156. Re:US by mirix · · Score: 1

      Canada? In the west? No. The U.S. is still being used as the world's currency for trading the world's fuel: Oil.

      Western Canada is where a bunch of that oil is coming from. Seems more important than what IOU-slips-of-paper are used, to me.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    157. Re:US by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

      We spent 430 billion on interest on the debt last year, and that number will grow with the debt, until all revenue is consumed by interest on the debt.

      What happens then?

    158. Re:US by mirix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, Our 'fiscal conservative' govn't that blew through the liberal's surplus, and is creating the largest deficit in the history of the nation. Some fucking fiscal conservatism that is.

      I'm old enough to have lived through provincial NDP governments, and they've been the most fiscally sound we've ever had, while at the same time increasing social programs.

      tory times are tough times.

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
    159. Re:US by Courageous · · Score: 1

      > By the way, if you don't see something inherently wrong with allowing a private company to print money with the government's snookered approval, you should.

      Oh, there's plenty wrong with it, however what's worse is allowing a government to print its own money based on the political whimsy of the current issue de jure. Politicians absolutely don't have any restraint. The Fed does.

    160. Re:US by irenaeous · · Score: 3, Informative
      A couple points regarding Canada:
      1. The Average Canadian is now richer than the average American.

      2. Regarding Canada's federal debt. As of a year ago Canada's total Public Debt hit $1.1 Trillion, but that was only 57.9 % debt to GDP ratio. That is regarded as low and is perfectly fine. Canada can handle that just fine and still sustain robust economic growth. The US recently exceeded a ratio of 100% debt to GDP ratio. That is bad because when the debt ratio exceeds 85-90 % then economic growth is inhibited significantly.

      Canada did the right thing running up the deficit during the recession so as to maintain economic growth. The U.S also had to do the same to keep the recession from expanding into a full blown depression. But Canada had good fundamentals -- a relatively low debt -- so it could run large deficits for a while without undue long term effects. It can lower spending later and bring the deficit down using expanded revenues from future GDP growth. The U.S was not in as good a shape having already run large deficits through out the Bush years. Now we are saddled with a huge debt burden that is sapping our growth dooming us to many years of low growth and high unemployment.

      This is a list of the ten countries most in debt based on this percentage.

    161. Re:US by PieceOfShitAndroid · · Score: 1

      All the money is in the mines in Western Australia, not in Sydney. It's possible to save a good chunk of money in a short period of time, especially because you don't have to pay for accommodation and food while you are working. Sydney is not where the money is at. But where Australia has a huge advantage over all the other countries is that the retirement system (superannuation) is completely funded, it is not a ponzi scheme like Social Security is in the US. The US is completely fucked at this point, what you are going to see in the next 10 years or so is the government is going to become more and more aggressive trying to collect as much taxes and fees as possible until there is nothing left in order to feed it's addiction to debt. (I am originally from the US but moved to Australia 5 years ago. My only regret is that I should have moved from the US much much earlier.)

    162. Re:US by guises · · Score: 1

      Canada? In the west? No. The U.S. is still being used as the world's currency for trading the world's fuel: Oil. It has a massive debt but that debt is being propped-up by everyone else, so we still have many good years left.

      The US isn't in any danger of collapsing, but that wasn't the statement he made. The original poster is looking to start a family: Canada has a lower crime rate, much better health care, and one of the best school systems in the world (they're number three, after South Korea and Finland - the US is fourteenth). I'm sure he would do fine in the US as well, the point is that he would do better in Canada.

    163. Re:US by defaria · · Score: 1

      If you "lose your life savings when some doctor surprises you with his out-of-network facility or lab fees" - it's clear you didn't have much of a savings plan - you loser!

      And it makes me wonder why Australian immigration is always boning for "high tech skills" - can't you guys think on your own?

    164. Re:US by defaria · · Score: 1

      Perhaps but being a slacker is a recipe for pain.

    165. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      right sure it isn't.. if you want to debilitate the economy to trigger a 'socialist revolution, then I agree. don't worry about it.

    166. Re:US by defaria · · Score: 1

      It's clear you haven't a clue. Interest rates are already at all time lows and have been for quite some time. That didn't really help. You seem to think the way out of debt is more debt and to print more money because after all it's an "artificial political construction" anyway. Just print money or declare it suddenly has more value.

      But that's pure folly. This is all a result of going off the gold standard. Why does a dollar have value? Well because we say it does. And we can say whatever we want to adjust its value to whatever we want! Anybody with half a brain knows that's a recipe for disaster. This is not an artificial political construction - it's the real world and real world values will come into play soon.

    167. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm moving from AUS to USA for this reason.

    168. Re:US by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "See? Inflation is really a tax on cash and cash-equivalent assets."

      Which is exactly what we want it to be.

      Who would want money just piling somewhere instead of serving a purpose?

    169. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Sydney cost of living vs salary ratio is quite livable compared to mining towns in Australia (for non-miners). My quality of life here is just a bit less than it was in Redmond, Washington, USA, where it was Darn Good. My quality of life in a mining town, where the primary entertainment was bars, "working girls" and betting on horse races, and my salary was at a 50% discount from what I earned in America while housing was at least twice as expensive, not so much. If you have a blue collar skill, or mechanical engineering or geology background, by all means, head to an Australian mining town and take their money for a few years. Having lived in 7 American states and 2 Australian states, the Pacific Northwest US and larger cities on the east coast of Australia (Sydney, Brisbane, Melbourne) are my pick for their mix of good income, activities for all ages and interests, ease of travel to other places via cheap airfares, and interesting places to explore. I think Australia has better economic opportunities than America at this point, which is why I'm here. Sydney housing is expensive, though, so you might do better in Brisbane if you're not living and working out in the suburbs (which many people do).

    170. Re:US by grantspassalan · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Debt is measured in dollars. Germany and other countries all over the planet have canceled all debt and all bank accounts by simply changing this thing that people call money. There is no country on earth that uses real money i.e. gold or some other item of value. Fiat money wears out, whether that is negative (debt) or assets in bank accounts, which in either case these days are only numbers in computer registers somewhere. In ancient Israel in biblical times, their economy was essentially reset every 49 years. All debt had to be forgiven and any properties mortgaged, went back to their original owners. This was a planned, foreseeable reset, after which everyone started over. In our modern economies there are also resets, such as experienced by many countries, such as Germany and others. The problem is that these resets are not planned, but happen haphazardly. That makes the results much more traumatic for the average person. Fiat money, such as is used in all world economies is based on faith. When people lose their faith that particular kind of money is no longer accepted by most of them for trading, people resort to exchanging items of value, using them as money. In Germany after World War II, coffee beans and cigarettes were used as money, because people no longer trusted the old Hitler money. The US dollar is only as strong as the faith that people have in it. When that faith evaporates, other media of exchange will be used until a new form of government regulated money is issued. Most likely, very soon, there will be a world currency replacing the various forms of national money used today.

      --
      A sufficiently advanced simulation is indistinguishable from reality.
    171. Re:US by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      It's boom times in Western Canada but housing prices are extremely high and winters are very cold and very long. Unless you're in Vancouver. Lovely city but very expensive as well and in the winter it rains all the time. Very good for outdoor activities though since you have the ocean and mountains. Northeast US? I lived there for a few years. Lots of history, beaches, fall colors but very expensive cost of living and very high taxes. It's also very provincial, meaning that if you weren't born there you will always be an outsider. Horrible traffic, especially in the bigger cities. Personally I loved the Carolinas. Great weather, good job market, reasonable housing, nice people. I ended up settling in Arizona. I tell people that it's California at 1/4 the price. Housing and taxes are very affordable. The weather is outstanding, outside of 3 months of blistering hot summers. Lots of outdoor activities. The problem is that for the most part the schools are lousy so if you have kids you'll probably want to look at private schools. Crime is very low here, outside of the inner city corridor. Job market is reasonably good.

    172. Re:US by Sir_Sri · · Score: 4, Insightful

      *High work hours are easy to fix -

      http://squirrelers.com/2010/10/20/vacation-days-by-country-how-do-we-rate/

      By moving to europe. US 25 days off a year. Just about everywhere else on the list, more than 30, with some over 40. Even working a shitty call centre job in ireland will get you 5 weeks vacation. Finding that in the US or canada if you're not a professor is basically impossible.

      *Health care is not an issue with health insurance (salaried IT worker). US physician skill level, medical equipment, drugs, and access/availability of care are top notch.

      False. Lose your job, lose your insurance. You also pay a lot for inferior care. Even those insured in the US get bad care. The problem in the US is that you actually get a lot of treatments (even covered ones) that aren't very good, and insurance providers are interested in reducing costs or attracting customers with flashy treatments, not trying to provide the best care for the minimum cost. This is why, for example, the poorest in the UK get better healthcare on average than the richest in the US. e.g. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/03/world/europe/03health.html?_r=1 and the UK system provides better outcomes for everyone.

      Lets not get into things like lifetime caps on insurance, or not getting preventative care covered, because Obamacare will theoretically help but it's still an enormously wasteful system.

      I saw significantly more racism/hate of specific foreign cultures/immigrants when living in areas of Finland

      Without a doubt. Europe has a racism problem. It's just a different racism problem than the one in the US. If you're used to the one in europe why bother getting used to the one in the US? The racism problem in europe is going to get worse before it gets better as it becomes 'blame the turk' 'blame the arab' 'blame the indian' 'blame the roma' etc. for all that ails them, and their lack of jobs.

      but they're often expensive

      Unnecessarily expensive. As an american you are in many cases likely to get a better education for less money by being a foreign student in Canada or europe (paying 20k a year in tuition) than by staying in the US. Some of the state schools in the US aren't bad and aren't soul crushingly expensive, but every school in canada australia or europe is 'not bad and not soul crushingly expensive'.

    173. Re:US by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      My general feeling is that there are probably about 30 or 40 cities across europe canada and australia that are all within a margin of error of each other, and you could sort of randomly pick one and be about as well off as the others.

    174. Re:US by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      OK, sorry, I know it's not guaranteed. I thought it was typical, however. (But yeah, the tax savings along, presuming you will be in a lower tax rate when you retire, are worth it.)

    175. Re:US by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      Great fallacy. You have just shy of 3 trillion dollars in revenue. You've got a long way to go before interest on the debt comes anywhere near revenue, (and you're spending close to 4 trillion dollars a year total, so having 10 cents on every dollar in taxes paying interest is not, in and of itself a problem).

      The US (and the UK especially) have had far far far worse debt situations than they have now and managed quite successfully. The UK peaked at over 300% of GDP in debt and fluttered around 150% for the better part of the 19th century. The US has peaked up around 200% of GDP in debt, and right now is fluttering around 100%.

      Again, you can also gradually ease your way out of debt with inflation.

    176. Re:US by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      It's clear you haven't a clue. Interest rates are already at all time lows and have been for quite some time. That didn't really help. You seem to think the way out of debt is more debt and to print more money because after all it's an "artificial political construction" anyway. Just print money or declare it suddenly has more value.

      No, that's not what I said. Borrow more money to get demand going again so the economy can keep functioning. Then *decrease* the value of money gradually over time (which even with 2% inflation is what happens) and then grow the economy on a nominal basis (again, what happens in the US with a growing population and growing productivity).

      This is all a result of going off the gold standard

      No. Greece is what happens when you're trapped in a currency you don't control, like gold. For Greece being trapped on the gold standard are exactly the same, and their problems reflect what would happen if you were still on gold. Not to mention all the bizarre effects of china and russia manipulating the price of gold to fuck with you.

    177. Re:US by geekpowa · · Score: 1

      So you defend USAs 'outlier' health care system by leveling withering criticism of a persons assumed financial situation, when you don't even know the persons real name, let alone their actual financial position or life situation. Stay classy proud citizen of glorious nation of USA.

    178. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spoken like a true keynsian.

      The alternative, and simpler explanation is that a recession is the natural outcome of a credit bubble / money printing.
      Head over to http://mises.org/ to learn about, instead of repeating such ridiculous concepts such as velocity of money.

    179. Re:US by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      And choose to be good at this weard autmobile stuff, not at carriages.

    180. Re:US by flaming+error · · Score: 2

      There is no such thing as "robust growth," or at least not "perpetual growth."

      Growth is not permanently sustainable in a finite universe. Any economy based on perpetual growth is a pyramid scheme on a collision course with the laws of physics.

    181. Re:US by PhamNguyen · · Score: 1
      You know debt/GDP ratio is more important than debt per capita, right?

      Greece in 2011 had debt/gdp ratio of 165%, US had 103% in 2012.

      Obviously the govt couldn't tax 100% of GDP, in fact people would starve since GDP includes all food consumed. Did I actually claim otherwise?

    182. Re:US by quintus_horatius · · Score: 1

      Choosing a starting point is the most crucial business decision you'll ever make. Be sure to check the financial history of every parental candidate BEFORE you are born.

    183. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Property values are extremely low. Where else do you get a 1700 square foot house with 3 bedrooms and 2 baths for less than $100k? The $3-5k/year in taxes can be a bit daunting though.

    184. Re:US by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      The universe could as well be infinite as far as we are concerned. There is plenty of room to grow.

    185. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Canada is a great option, but too cold.
      If quality of life is important to you, and you value the outdoors, choose Brazi.
      Brazil has great unis where you can get a research job, and you have cities of any size you want, Also, with the olympics and the world cup, large cities are getting better infrastructure and standards of living. The greatest quality of life should be at a medium size city, probably in Santa Catarina, great weather.
      Brazil is also large enough to endure a global crisis, less in debt and a lot more peaceful than NATO countries.
      Plus, you can always come to visit to neighbour Uruguay, the greatest place in the world to live, only not big enough to offer attractive jobs.

    186. Re:US by AmazingRuss · · Score: 1

      That implies you cut spending or increase revenue.... Otherwise borrowing a trillion a year will get you in trouble real quick... As will interest rates climbing from historical lows.

    187. Re:US by Immerman · · Score: 1

      Remember Hitler was voted in to office, the dictator bit came later after careful machinations. You think modern Americans are far less vulnerable to a charismatic leader promising to to fix its problems? Sure, the flavor of charisma would almost certainly be different, but in both cases you've got a faltering nation yearning for better days and willing to believe almost anything if it's backed by a promise of a return to glory. Imagine what would have happened if Obama had been crafty sociopath with aspirations of global conquest instead of just a spineless moderate who talks a good line (and I say that planning to vote for him again, given the alternative).

      As for revolting - how exactly? One of the first actions of an aspiring dictator would be to cement his control on the military and disarm any possible competition, and probably strengthen the economic dependency on a central authority as well - and keep in mind he would be doing this with the support of a consortium of powerful like-minded allies throughout the political system. Sure, you could get an insurgency going - but a smart despot would make sure that things were in fact getting better for the common folk so that any insurgency would have popular opinion strongly against it. *Eventually* things would likely take a turn for the worse, but an aspiring dictator could have almost a decade as the legally sitting president, conspiring with his (or her, let's be fair) allies to cement their control behind the scenes before revealing the iron fist within the velvet glove - and played well the final seizure of power might be welcomed by most - a strong, charismatic leader with a decade of success behind him and bi-partisan backing (shouldn't be that had to get - the difference is largely a matter of theatrics these days, and everyone has gotten accustomed to selling out to lobbyists on a regular basis. I imagine being a member of the Party would pay at least as well )

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    188. Re:US by OneAhead · · Score: 2

      yes, they are simply going to print more money. no problem involved...they are doing it from a long time now...

      But still...so far, we're still doing better than much of the EU which is going down the tubes...

      Funny, that's exactly what my European friends say: (paraphrasing) "Yeah, the Eurozone is having a bit of a rough time, but politicians haven't even brought out the big guns yet. So far, we're still doing better than the US which is going down the tubes..."

    189. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to ask: are you fluent in German? Are there any sort of assimilation requirements in terms of language/cultural knowledge? How did you go about finding your job there? I know a bit of German from my 2 years in college, and I know Germany has a huge tech sector, but I haven't seriously looked into it yet, and the language thing would be a pretty big barrier I think. That aside, germany seems like one of the best places in the world to live at the moment from an outsider's perspective.

    190. Re:US by flaming+error · · Score: 1

      The same has been said for the midwestern plains. And the pacific ocean. And the planet.

      Meet the exponential function:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F-QA2rkpBSY

    191. Re:US by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      You've never been to Australia, mate. Australia doesn't have as many "enemies" as America... and it isn't as likely to get nuked off the planet in WW3. All said, thousands of miles of ocean separating Australia from the rest of the world means that military threats can only come from heavily industrialized nations with substantial military forces. Australia tends to be more "out of sight - out of mind" and generally not considered a threat to any other nations.

      Don't forget that if you are holding Australia in a game of Risk, you will receive two extra armies per turn.

    192. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do think loose is not what you think it means.

    193. Re:US by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      I've not found apartment/home prices to be significantly higher in the northeast than anywhere else. Unless of course I moved to someplace that has no engineering jobs (but that would be silly) or in the middle of the city (claustrophobic). My apartment rent has always hovered around $800 per month, regardless if I'm in OK City, Iowa City, Salt Lake City, Hartford, Baltimore, Washington DC, and so on. The only places that ever charged more was northern Jersey (because of closeness to New York City) and southern California (~$1000 per month).

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    194. Re:US by cayenne8 · · Score: 2

      Planet Money went over the should-be-easy choices that are the start to fixing our problems:

      1. Eliminate the mortgage interest deduction

      2. Tax employer-provided health insurance

      3. Eliminate corporate income tax

      4. Eliminate income and payroll taxes

      5. Significantly tax bad things that we want to reduce (i.e. pollution, gasoline, energy use)

      6. Legalize drugs (especially marijuana)

      Now all you need to do is get a successful Economist Party up and running. Good luck with that.

      http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2012/07/18/156928675/episode-387-the-no-brainer-economic-platform [npr.org]

      Not sure why this got modded into oblivion....this is pretty interesting for ideas....I don't agree with ALL of it..but most of it, IMHO, is very much on track and should be considered.

      Ok...goodbye points....

      :)

      Oh well...sometimes you have to take one for the 'team'.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    195. Re:US by deek · · Score: 1

      The US has almost double the GDP per capita of Greece. They're probably happy enough.

      Although, if you want officially measured happiness, there's only one country that does that: Bhutan.

    196. Re:US by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>I'm fine with getting rid of Social Security, just don't make me pay the 6% of my income then.

      You pay for Welfare and Food Stamps and Housing Assistance even though you are not eligible for any of them. A Social security or medicare programs that excludes the rich/well off would be the same. (Of course you wouldn't need 6% tax if only, say 50%, of the population was eligible. You could lower it by half.)

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    197. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A problem with Australia is that housing, cars, and other goods are very, very expensive. IIRC, the typical cost of a home in Melb and Sydney metro areas is over 10x the average worker's income. That is simply unsustainable, so expect a housing bubble burst in the future. The murder rate is lower, but other violent crime is higher than the US and surveys have recorded that Australians feel much less safe walking around at night than US, Canada, and some European nations. Doctors can still surprise you with fees that can rapidly deplete your savings if you do not want to wait on the public system. China doesn't really need to go on the warpath....they're buying the place out from under you.

    198. Re:US by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Then don't make me pay for welfare, food stamps, or housing assistance too. I never said I was for those.

    199. Re:US by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Our 'fiscal conservative' govn't that blew through the liberal's surplus, and is creating the largest deficit in the history of the nation. Some fucking fiscal conservatism that is.

      I'm old enough to have lived through provincial NDP governments, and they've been the most fiscally sound we've ever had, while at the same time increasing social programs.

      tory times are tough times.

      Right, because the Liberal surplus had nothing to do with the booming world economy at the time and the deficit has nothing to do with the world-wide economic downturn. Did you notice that it took this long for us to start feeling the effects?

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    200. Re:US by SurfaceMount · · Score: 1

      And it makes me wonder why Australian immigration is always boning for "high tech skills" - can't you guys think on your own?

      Of course intelligent and talented people are wanted, those sort of people improve the economy, its essentially headhunting talent from other countries.
      There is no need for more unskilled workers, there are enough low skilled workers already looking for jobs.
      The high minimum wage (A$15.51 for fulltime adults, even more for casual employees), plus further retirement benefits and compulsory insurances on top means there are less low skilled jobs available.
      Bringing in "cheap immigrant labour" does not help the manufacturing industry etc. Because they still have to be employed on a high wage by law, which makes the job impossibly uneconomical compared with outsourcing to China.

    201. Re:US by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      That you D?

      Or is there someone else that moved from Sydney to Hannover? If so, drop me a private message - be good to get to know you.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    202. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh so the feds only have to take 100% of the economy and apply it to the debt.

      Why would you want to pay the whole debt in a year? Raise taxes overall by about 5%, and pay it off over roughly 25 years. Given that income taxes are at historic lows, this should not be an issue over the long term.

      You know Greece has less debt per capita than the US, right? How happy are they?

      Greece doesn't have its own currency. The US does. If Greece had its own currency, changes in exchange rates would make Greek exports cheaper for the rest of the world. Look at the recent history of Argentina.

      If Greek currency lost value, people holding greek currency and greek debt would suffer losses. That is more or less fair: Those holding Greek currency are (mostly) Greeks who elected leaders who made bad decisions. Those holding Greek debt made a bet that Greek currency would hold value, and deserve to loose. Such an outcome is bad, but not catastrophic. The current situation, where Greece must default sooner or later, is far worse for everyone.

    203. Re:US by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      I have to ask: are you fluent in German? Are there any sort of assimilation requirements in terms of language/cultural knowledge?

      I'd say I'm pretty fluent now, after 5 years here. But when I got here, I didn't speak a word of it. When you get a residence permit (basically think of it an as extended visa for living and working longer term), you are required to take an "integration" course, that the government will pay for (beyond a token 1 euro per day from you). This course is primarily a language course, but also covers some basics of the German political system, history and culture.

      How did you go about finding your job there?

      I was kind of lucky - I work for a large international firm with head offices located in each region. The European head office is here in Germany; and our company language is English.

      I know a bit of German from my 2 years in college, and I know Germany has a huge tech sector, but I haven't seriously looked into it yet, and the language thing would be a pretty big barrier I think.

      There are quite a few companies where you can get by in your working life with only English, so trying to find one of those would make the most sense. That way, you can learn German at your leisure (and with the course) so that your social life isn't so terrible (basically, work was fine for me with no German; but I lived like a hermit until I could speak enough German to go out and meet people... now I have a German wife and a gorgeous little bi-lingual daughter)

      If you want to seriously look in to it, try looking around on the job portal websites like stepstone.de, monster.de and so on and just search for jobs that require English but don't require German... they do exist.
      Another possibility might be to sign up on some "ex-pat community" type websites and post a bit in forums to gauge what opportunities there are. Off the top of my head, there's toytowngermany.com and internations.org.

      That aside, germany seems like one of the best places in the world to live at the moment from an outsider's perspective.

      I've lived in 5 different countries now. Germany has its fair share of things I don't like (excessive and often silly bureaucracy is one of them; annoying social customs where I accidentally offend people from time to time is another); but every country has good points and bad points. Overall I do love it here and would highly recommend it to others.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    204. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please, the north east oozes yankees. They are everywhere and the traffic and taxes suck as well.
                        Canada is a good idea but in many ways I would like India and China better but I'm just too dumb to learn the local languages.

    205. Re:US by raster · · Score: 1

      you need to get out more.

      try australia - better quality of live and less debt, lower unemployment.
      new zealand - similar story, but a bit more limited in options
      singapore - rising and good standard of living and tropical
      hong kong - solid, good standard of living and always having money and trade flowing through
      brazil - sure - general standard of living lower, but it's like the usa with a huge class split and if you come from europe or the us or other "first world" countries you have an advantage in that the money you bring is worth more there and frankly with that you have as good a life as"back home", with much more growth and opportunity.
      korea - standard of living on the rise and getting close to on-par with the west.
      japan - stable, always has jobs, not growing, not doing much exciting, but high quality of life.

      those are places i have lived in or visited often enough. never been to chile - but i hear, due to resources, it has a high standard of living.

      --
      --------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
    206. Re:US by raster · · Score: 1

      actually it benefits the economy at large as people and companies can't get out of paying tax as easily by playing games or just finding great accountants. it cuts overhead and simplifies things.

      --
      --------------- Codito, ergo sum - "I code, therefore I am" --------------------
    207. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow. Very ignorant and very American. Awesome.

    208. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come to Australia if you don't want to be surrounded by homeless people or shot at and want more than two weeks holidays every year.

    209. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything you say about Oz can be said about NZ, but more so. Kiwis are hard-working, still have a good health, social welfare and education system, and the summers aren't so brutally hot. The scenery is just as good in NZ, and you don't have to drive for hours to see it. The people are friendlier, taxes are lower (kinda - it's complicated) race relations are better and tradies actually show up when they say they will and do the work they say they will. Only downsides are that salaries are lower, and it costs more to travel to other countries.

      After five years living in Oz, I'm moving my family back to NZ.

    210. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good post, but under NO circumstances should you ever spend Christmas in Pennsylvania. The documentary "it's always sunny in .." spends an entire episode on the dangers.

    211. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't choose Scandinavia if you think you can't maintain employment, we haven't paid our taxes to look after foreign bums, we have plenty of our own to take care of. Also, people are racist (well, actually nothing to do with race, but culture, and the fact that the ones the "racists" hate are leeches). Also, the climate sucks.

    212. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed.
      Just moved to Melbourne last year, and now I am looking for other place (which is not in Australia). Cost of living is killing me here and IT industry is not that 'big'.
      Singapore is better to save money if you don't mind the crowd.

    213. Re:US by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      That is bad because when the debt ratio exceeds 85-90 % then economic growth is inhibited significantly.

      Citation Needed

      When you can borrow at 1% interest, you do not have a debt problem.

    214. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it has unnecessarily long work hours, bad health care, and a persistent civil rights and racism problem that aren't worth dealing with if you can avoid it. Not that europe doesn't have racism problems too, but they're different than in the US, so why deal with the US problem at all?

      The only thing that adds to my working hours is surfing the net 4-6 hours per day (at work). How are your comments re 'racism' not pure nonsense? Sounds like it is an issue everywhere. Thus, it is a a wash. Health care is fine here, it can be ten times better but someone who thinks the rest of world is doing it right, is not likely to improve matters the way *I* would like to see it done (e.g., eradication of import restriction, competitive licensing boards, end tax-favored status of employer-versus-employee purchased health care, end the DEA, et cetera, et cetera). Every country is going in the wrong direction - seemingly - some just faster than others.

      Regarding civil rights, as a US citizen, the biggest threat to my life regarding civil rights might be greater if I leave the country (DRONE ATTACK!!!!!). Renouncing citizenship isn't easy and would not be done so I can spend more time web surfing at work.

    215. Re:US by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      You completely misunderstand the situation.

      You give me $100, and I agree to pay you back $90 in 10 years.

      There is no surprise at the end. You knew you were losing $10 when you bought it.

    216. Re:US by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Hello Mate,

      Speaking as an Aussie, Australia is a very nice place but it is a small pond. There are opportunities but few and far between at times. You only realize that when you leave it for some bigger place.

    217. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bellingham Costco shoppers take to Facebook to ask for 'American Only' hours Business Bellingham News
      Canada milk Bellingham dollars - Google Search

      And one time, while in Bellingham, I do believe I saw someone putting gas cans into the back of a car with Canadian plates at a gas station. (The "smuggling" aspect aside, isn't that really dangerious to do?)

    218. Re:US by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      If you don't fear that and are American, you don't understand how the central bank works.

      No, you're just one of the people who likes to think you know how it works, but have fundamental misunderstandings.

      the US will need to buy yuan to pay foreign debt.

      No, we won't. We issue the debt. When we do so, we pick what currency we issue the debt in. We will not have to suddenly pay in Yuan because people are happy to buy our debt in dollars. In fact, they are so happy to buy our debt that they're giving us $100 and getting back $98 when the bond matures.

      If you were correct, Japan would be having to buy tons foreign currency because nobody is or has ever been "on" the Yen. They don't actually do this, because they issue their debt in Yen.

      The other massive flaw is the vast majority of US debt is owed to US persons and companies. So "foreign debit" is great for spooking people, but not a big real-world problem.

      OPEC has been moving off the dollar, Russia is already off, China has been moving off the dollar, most of Europe has been moving off the dollar

      Iraq tried to get OPEC to abandon the dollar for obvious political reasons and was completely shut down. Russia was never "on" the dollar.

      China abandoning their currency peg to the dollar is good for the US, because it helps our trade deficit - Chinese goods should have gone up in price a lot over the last decade, and have not due to the currency peg. Cheap crap from China no longer being cheap is good for US manufacturing.

      And as mentioned above, "investors" are running so fast towards dollars they are buying debt that announces on it's face that it will lose money.

      US currency will have a value based on the number of notes printed and printing more money will devalue the currency

      It already does have a value based on the number of notes printed. In fact, that has been the case since the Great Depression and our de-facto abandonment of the gold standard. We officially abandoned the gold standard in the 70s, but before that we just changed the gold-to-dollar ratio every year.

      Why have gold and silver prices spiked so much in the US?

      Because people believe commodity traders when they deliberately misinform.

    219. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Wikipedia article does not leave Melbourne off. It's on two out of the three cited "most livable" lists.

    220. Re:US by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Really that means countries are buying US dollars at a loss to them.

      Um...no.

      The vast majority of US debt is bought by, and owed to, US persons and companies.

      Just because the US is a country doesn't mean it has to sell debt to other countries. Our own citizens will buy it just fine.

      The idea of China is going to cash in all at once is ludicrous because if the US economy is killed so is China's.

      Actually, it's ludicrous because there is no mechanism by which they could "cash in". We issue debt with a specific maturity date. You aren't going to get any money until that date is reached.

      Theoretically you could try to find someone else to buy the bonds from you, but in your scenario, who would do that if China was dumping their bonds?

    221. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Scandinavia has a higher rate of startups than the US, precisely because of the safety net. It's much more tempting to try your luck starting a business if you're still covered by universal health care and unemployment insurance if it goes wrong.

    222. Re:US by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      US has to buy renminbi in order to pay its INTEREST on its debts

      Wrong.

      US issues debt in whatever currency it feels like. We like dollars. So we pay dollars. We will not have to buy renminbi.

      Still think China can't crash the US economy?

      No, we don't think China is suicidal. Just ask Germany what happens to your economy when you tank the economies of your major trading partners.

    223. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if Canada can become Australia in 10 years then good on them !

      Booming economy, full employment, no real debt, safe and clean cities, highest incomes in the world, best healthcare etc etc the list goes on and on.

      Let the USAians wallow in their festering shithole.
       

    224. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Collectivist nanny states? You need to get out more. As an American
      who's been living in Germany for more than a decade, I can assure you:
      everything (well, except Mexican food and blues bands) is better here.
      Lower crime rates (partly because near-zero poverty, and of course sane
      restrictions on gun ownership), universal and affordable health care, free
      public education from preschool through PhD, double the vacation time I
      ever got in the States, modern and well-maintained public infrastructure.
      and the list goes on and on. There is such a thing as good government,
      despite what Willard Mittington Romneyfeller III and his new rich-kids-
      sticking-together best friend tell you. Nothing would ever persuade me
      to move back.

      You want to see what a bright future for humanity looks like? Look at
      northern Europe. You want to see what the United States' future looks
      like? Look at Tsarist Russia or feudal England. A handful of them will
      be living very decadently, and a boatload of us in desperate poverty.

      Any yet millions of Americans who aren't obscenely rich will vote
      Republican, in the childlike belief that the people that own 99.9%
      of everything are going to cut them in. Helpful hint: are you one of
      their kids, or married to one of their kids? If not, they're not going
      to be cutting you in.

    225. Re:US by mcvos · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a myth that the US still has the highest social mobility. It used to, but it stalled. Europe is now the better place to make your ambitions come true, unless you are already rich and you want to become a millionaire. The US is still the millionaire's paradise.

      The minimum of corruption is also false. Corruption is inherent in the US political system, which relies on corporate money. Corruption is much lower in northern Europe (but less so in the south).

      The US is a great place to be for the haves. They control the money, the media, the politics, the government, the patents, etc. It can still be okay if you can get support from the haves: VCs, get bought by a major company, etc. But if you want to be your own man, do your own thing, and benefit from your own growth, Europe is the better place now.

    226. Re:US by mcvos · · Score: 1

      True. Most of the damage in the UK has actually been done by that other conservative party: Labour.

    227. Re:US by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Greece also has less income per capita.

      But the real problem with Greece is that young Greeks just cannot find jobs that pay enough to cover even the most basic living expenses. They're all leaving the country, because there's just nothing there for them.

    228. Re:US by Carewolf · · Score: 1

      It's a myth that the US still has the highest social mobility. It used to, but it stalled. Europe is now the better place to make your ambitions come true, unless you are already rich and you want to become a millionaire. The US is still the millionaire's paradise.

      I am not sure if it was ever true. The highest social mobility in world is btw in the Scandinavian countries by a wide margin. The US is only good if your already is rich and want to stay rich, places like Scandinavia are places you can make a career for yourself, and end up better than where you started.

    229. Re:US by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I suspect it was true in the 19th century. The wide open frontier and the immigration-driven, egalitarian (if you're white) society helps quite a lot. Most of Europe was still pretty conservative back then, and just getting out of autocratic monarchies and embracing democracy.

    230. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US debt problem is *entirely* an artificial political construction. Right now you should be borrowing several hundred billion dollars a year more to fund job creation (in this case in particular probably infrastructure rebuilding) so you can get the economy back to growing.

      Actually, it's this exact type of thinking (which, tragically and comically, was rated +5 Informative) which is destroying our economy.

      Keynesian economics is doomed to failure.

      captcha: usually

    231. Re:US by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2

      China won't sell its US debt because it is the mechanism by which it can exert control over the US economy. After what happened in Indonesia with the US funded property boom China decided to make sure it could prevent the US doing it again through debt.

      You are absolutely right, China and the US are now so reliant on each other and so inextricably linked financially neither side can screw the other and the whole world is more stable. We have China to thank for that.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    232. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US - still the best place to live and the whole "debt" issue is really not a huge deal.

      "Debt issue is really not a huge deal"????? Are you snorting something or are you off your meds? When China stops buying US debt (and it is already happening), what do you think will happen to the standard of living of your miserable life? Forget about that. You will end up on the street as your money will be worth nothing. Get a grip and get your head out of your arse before you starting saying stupid things like that.

    233. Re:US by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      No one forced you to buy a house. If you cannot afford your home on 50% of your current income you cannot afford your home. What would you do if you lost your job for an extended amount of time? What would you do if you were injured and could no longer work that job?

    234. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia is a shit-hole dont come here. Tell the rest of the world while you're at it ;-)

    235. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha. Let me guess.., you hail from the country where the black olympic female hurdlers and white olympic female hurdlers appear to be on different teams??

    236. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm from northern europe and I can't really agree with your post. If you want safety and have little ambitions apart from living a normal boring life and raising a family, yes, northern europe is a very good choice. However, if you want to work with cool stuff, world class people, are thinking of starting a business, want to work with radical innovation etc, northern europe is not your place.

      " If you go to the US and have kids you have to worry about the education they'll get, how you'll pay for post secondary etc"
      Yes, but the quality of education can potentially be much better, though primarily at university level. In northern europe you have way less chances of networking with people who can help you do cool stuff in the future for example, but of course, this depends on your ambitions and what you want in life.

      I would say the outlooks for an "IT Researcher" in northern europe are very bad. Yes, you can have an okay safe job with an okay pay to live an okay life, but it is extremely difficult to get resources to achieve anything significant. Depending on your level of ambition, this can be okay, or it can get extremely frustrating.

    237. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to admit, I agree with the wingnut theory. I lived in Canada till the end of the 90s. No development in infrastructure for decades; not enough hospital beds but grand parking lots and shopping malls. The destruction of Studio D (in favour of the American content Mafia) and the relentless attacks on culture and the poor through a decade of prosperity, the 90s finally did me in. I had grown up country that gradually, but surely disappeared.

      Last summer, I visited my brothers in BC (Victoria). American SUV parking lot. Practically impossible to cycle (safely) on the Island. And it's evident that people live in fear! They're afraid to have opinions. They're afraid to drink a beer in the park.

      There isn't much difference between Canada and the US any more.

      I've been in Berlin, Germany for a decade now. I'm not going back. The cost of living here is less and I have MORE space in a smaller country. Absurd, but to my advantage as it is.

    238. Re:US by taiwanjohn · · Score: 1

      Similar to Prof. Albert Bartlett's lecture on exponential growth (above), Chris Martenson's Crash Course is an expansion on the same theme which ties it all together with the debt-money system, peak oil, etc.. Well worth the time.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    239. Re:US by Alioth · · Score: 1

      The problem with the US is immigration is a tortured, slow process whereby you have to be an H1 worker for a time then work on a tortured, slow process to get a green card.

      Canada has a simple points system, and is so close to being as good as the US (and in many respects better), going with the simpler immigration system is probably going to be the best choice.

      Other than that, the original poster can go to Britain. It's not in the eurozone, there's lots of IT opportunities, and you can just move there on a whim because it's part of the EU - no visa required.

    240. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been in San Antonio for a little more than 20 years. It is a bit hotter.

      It is a lot drier; the number of cattle that my dad's farm can support is way down.

    241. Re:US by Alioth · · Score: 1

      That's irrelevant. It's the ability to service debt, not the absolute debt that matters most. Greece may have less debt per capita but they can't service that debt. The US has no problem in servicing its debt (political will issues aside).

    242. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, ha, ha. Seattle vs Calgary. Not even close.

    243. Re:US by fearofcarpet · · Score: 1

      Choose US if you are ambitious and good at what you do. There is no country on Earth that will offer you the same opportunity to succeed and the same liberty to pursue your goals without excessive interference from the government, while at the same time offering strong rule of law and minimum corruption. Ignore the impression you might have from Hollywood movies. Apart from some inner city ghettos, the quality of life in the US is amazing. Chose Canada or Scandinavia if you are insecure about your ability to maintain employment, have no ambition to start a business and need the reassurance of a strong safety net. China and India are still third world countries with extreme poverty and an enormous amount of corruption. Australia may be a good middle ground between the collectivist nanny states of Europe or Canada, with zero energy and innovation, and the US. Also, as far as I know, the immigration policy is relatively welcoming (like in Canada) compared to the US and Europe.

      Apparently you haven't been following current events... since about 1964. Let me bring you up to speed: basically nothing you said is true anymore. The reason you perceive the US as offering more opportunity and liberty is because in Canada, Europe, and Australia, you can live a fantastic, enjoyable life and even raise a family on middle-class wages. Scandinavians aren't all striving to be the next Mark Zuckerberg because they're allowed to be happy and aren't shamed and punished for being poor or middle class. And "safety net" is not a good way to describe what social democracies provide because it is a loaded term that implies that only people that are lazy or down on their luck need or use. It's more like a substrate on which you can build whatever type of life you would like to live.

      --
      Actually, I wrote my thesis on life experience.
    244. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess, you are either a teenaged Canadian who never lived under an NDP government and you get your news from American liberal media or you are an American Obama supporter who is completely clueless about Canadian politics.

      The Canadian conservative party is "fiscally" conservative. Our prime minister is a boring economist with a masters degree and that is the way we like it. Americans have no clue what the conservative party stands for. Our economy is still doing better than the American and European countries and our Canadian dollar is currently on cent above the US dollar.

      They are a bunch of ultra-conservative wing nuts that are are surfing on dirty tar sand oil money and the surplus created under the liberal government, very dirty oil, they destroyed the environmental laws in the name of easy profits, liars and opportunist that govern the country like its a business pleasing just enough voters to get re elected with no long term vision about what is good for the country as a whole, as a society...

      I m neither a leftist or the right, i believe this fallacy of division is created by lazy journalism, a misinformed population and manipulative political parties, its a shame and a failure of our society, politics is more complicated than a freakin hockey game...

      No, being fiscally responsible does not mean you are automatically against having a decent social net, believing that a social net is a good thing does not mean you are against capitalism, being against abusively strict laws against meaningless "crime" does not mean you are pro child molesters, all this is obvious but it is exactly what the conservatives have been doing in Canada since they have a majority, you re either for them of for the terrorist...they are living in a Tea Part wet dream.

      Our economy might be doing ok for now in the west, but take a look at what is going on in the rest of the country, and pray the oil price does not go under 75$...

    245. Re:US by fearofcarpet · · Score: 1

      Without a doubt. Europe has a racism problem. It's just a different racism problem than the one in the US. If you're used to the one in europe why bother getting used to the one in the US? The racism problem in europe is going to get worse before it gets better as it becomes 'blame the turk' 'blame the arab' 'blame the indian' 'blame the roma' etc. for all that ails them, and their lack of jobs.

      The difference between the US and (Northern) Europe is that racism is overt in Europe. There are simply less social taboos against expressing or even legislating racism. The US has more of a broad culture of hate; everything is us versus them. In certain parts of the country that hate manifests as racism. In other parts of the country it is based on political views, sexual orientation, religious belief, etc. Blame the liberal, blame the tea-party, blame the gays, blame the Muslims, blame the atheists, blame the socialists, blame the immigrants, blame the South, etc.; the country is going to hell in a hand basket and it is everyone's fault by my ethnic/religious/political group. The thing that the US has going for it is that it is enormous so you can generally find a place to live that aligns well with your beliefs and talk to people that you agree with about how terrible it is in some other part of the country.

      --
      Actually, I wrote my thesis on life experience.
    246. Re:US by ace37 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that makes your perspective a lot clearer to me, and understand each of your points now. I also think your experiences and conclusions match mine pretty closely.

      FWIW, some random person on the internet agrees with you.

    247. Re:US by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      The day it is means tested is the day it stops being the third rail of politics. Then it will be funded just like other welfare programs.

      That said I'm all for means testing it (and indirectly killing it).

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    248. Re:US by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      That was exactly the deal Reagan got out of congress to get him to agree to a tax increase.

      Of course we know how that worked out. Congress lied. Decades later they paint Reagan as a taxer.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    249. Re:US by randyleepublic · · Score: 1

      Lord, it makes my teeth grind to read what you wrote here. I understand where you are coming from - it's that place that distresses me so much. The place where booms and busts are like part of the weather - facts of life that you deal with one way or another. NO! Booms and busts are caused by permitting banks to engage in fractional reserve lending. Ban FRL, and booms and busts are no more.

      --
      Social Credit would solve everything...
    250. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bad health care, really? We have the lowest cancer rates and the highest recovery rates from heart issues. Canadian come HERE for their health care because they can't wait for their own state-run doctors to see them. Once we repeal ObamaCare and make the right kind of reforms, you won't be able to find a better health care system on earth. Bar none.

    251. Re:US by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Being homeless is not much of an option.

    252. Re:US by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Translation,
      "I got mine!"

    253. Re:US by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Worry less about the world, and more about your world (spouse, children, friends). You'll be happier and things will sort themselves out.

    254. Re:US by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      If I promise you dollars, you cannot demand euros when the time comes to pay up.

      If I owe a million dollars and I can't pay, I'm in trouble. If I owe you a trillion dollars and I can't pay, your in trouble. Guess which one is the US.

    255. Re:US by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      That implies you cut spending or increase revenue

      Depends on whether the economy grows faster than the interest a year or slower, and for how long. If you spend a trillion dollars this year, 800 billion next year, 600 billion after that and so on but have growth of 200 billion, then 400 billion then 600 billion in 5 years the net effect would be 3 trillion dollars in debt for an economy that is 3 trillion dollars bigger a year sort of thing.

      And yes, interest rates will climb from historical lows. But that's the point, you're at the very bottom of how low interest rates can get, there's a long way from where they are to where they become a problem.

    256. Re:US by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      Except when it's worked in similar circumstances.

      Claiming a theory that has a working track record is wrong is dishonest at best.

      Now sure, Keynesian economics as written initially would be a bit like thinking evolution is exactly as laid out the origin of species, that's silly, the model evolves over time quite a lot as you figure out more and more detail on more and more pieces of the puzzles.

      which is destroying our economy.

      The fact that people aren't doing it is what has caused your economy be stuck in the doldrums for a 4 years with no great prospects for the future. Things would be about equally bad under obama for another 4 years without a change in direction, and significantly worse under romney assuming you can believe anything he is saying now.

    257. Re:US by jerryjnormandin · · Score: 1

      I second the North East. I have headhunters calling me every day. IT R&D is ramping up big time. I'm content with my 24 mile commute. I get to drive my Wrangler Sport to work. No need for a fuel sipping commuter vehicle. I live @65 miles south of Boston in a rural community.

    258. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. Canada is a great country, we have lots of jobs (especially in Alberta), low crime, free healthcare, and we are very culturally diverse.

    259. Re:US by jerryjnormandin · · Score: 1

      I live in a Massachusetts suburb near a town beach yet far enough away from the water that it doesn't force me to buy flood insurance. This has helped my home keep it's value.

    260. Re:US by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      Alberta's unemployment rate is 4.6%.

    261. Re:US by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      Being homeless is not much of an option.

      And sometimes that means one has to go with the flow, paying through the nose for an overpriced house. Especially in one of the most dense populated countries of the world.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    262. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Choose US... There is no country on Earth that will offer you the same opportunity to succeed and the same liberty to pursue your goals...bla bla
      Chose Canada or Scandinavia if you are insecure about your ability to maintain employment... bla bla
      ... the collectivist nanny states of Europe or Canada, with zero energy and innovation.... bla bla
       

      Ignore the impression you might have from Hollywood movies...

      A question to you as someone who actually urges others to ignore the impression you get from the media: Where did you yourself acquire this view of the world?
      Was it by extensively researching facts and figures to back this up or have you perhaps personally lived and worked in each of these countries for years to
      form a strong factual base for this belief. Or have you, I'm just providing this as a utterly far fetched hypothetical possibility, pulled this crap right out of your posterior?

      There are these things called 'facts' you should check them out some times.
      A few of these 'facts' regarding the "zero energy and innovation" of the horrible socialistic Scandinavian countries:
      Swedes are, by capita, the third highest recipients of patents in the world , easily beating the average* US citizen by more than a factor of 2.
      You are also beaten by a significant margin by both Finland and Denmark.
      You do manage to outinvent the Norwegians so hurray for you I guess. You may now continue waving your flag.

      I realize that in the US the celebration of the "American way of life" is nearly a form of state religion and that you are currently not doing so well but if the
      only way you can still feel pleased about yourselves is to make up shit about how the rest of the world is an awful place then frankly you are just sad and
      pathetic.

      *by average I mean arithmetic mean

    263. Re:US by no+bloody+nickname · · Score: 1

      Choose US... There is no country on Earth that will offer you the same opportunity to succeed and the same liberty to pursue your goals...bla bla
      Chose Canada or Scandinavia if you are insecure about your ability to maintain employment... bla bla
      ... the collectivist nanny states of Europe or Canada, with zero energy and innovation.... bla bla

      Ignore the impression you might have from Hollywood movies...

      A question to you as someone who actually urges others to ignore the impression you get from the media: Where did you yourself acquire this view of the world?
      Was it by extensively researching facts and figures to back this up or have you perhaps personally lived and worked in each of these countries for years to
      form a strong factual base for this belief. Or have you, I'm just providing this as a utterly far fetched hypothetical possibility, pulled this crap right out of your posterior?

      There are these things called 'facts' you should check them out some times.
      A few of these 'facts' regarding the "zero energy and innovation" of the horrible socialistic Scandinavian countries:
      Swedes are, by capita, the third highest recipients of patents in the world , easily beating the average* US citizen by more than a factor of 2.
      You are also beaten by a significant margin by both Finland and Denmark.
      You do manage to outinvent the Norwegians so hurray for you I guess. You may now continue waving your flag.

      I realize that in the US the celebration of the "American way of life" is nearly a form of state religion and that you are currently not doing so well but if the
      only way you can still feel pleased about yourselves is to make up shit about how the rest of the world is an awful place then frankly you are just sad and
      pathetic.

      *by average I mean arithmetic mean

    264. Re:US by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Renting is not possible in the universe you live in?

      Buying a smaller home not an option either?

      If you cannot afford your home on 50% of your income get a smaller one or rent.

    265. Re:US by metrometro · · Score: 1

      You do realize that inflation benefits people with debt, right? And that inflation is currently near historic lows, right? And that if the Congress were seriously worried about our debt, they'd be telling the fed to run up inflation? But then, that would hurt banks (who are the among those collecting on that national debt), so that ain't gonna happen.

    266. Re:US by TaxDoktor · · Score: 1

      I also agree with this list, however I can't qualify Singapore. But please do not come to Canada unless you are going to pull your weight. We have too many people sucking off of our system already, which is making it tough on everyone who does pay.

    267. Re:US by TaxDoktor · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Our 'fiscal conservative' govn't that blew through the liberal's surplus, and is creating the largest deficit in the history of the nation. Some fucking fiscal conservatism that is.

      I'm old enough to have lived through provincial NDP governments, and they've been the most fiscally sound we've ever had, while at the same time increasing social programs.

      tory times are tough times.

      Tory times are tough times, because they need to tighten the belt after the NDP governments have had a spending spree on fiscally irresponsible dreams. People forget what it is like to have the NDP in after numerous terms then screw up and vote them in, after a couple years they realize the mistake and get the Tories back to try and get the finances back in order.

    268. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was born in Perth, Western Australia and lived in the city for 60 years.

      The grass over the horizon is always greener in the glossy travel brochures and snapshots. When people arrive at the marketed destination and observe the local turf, it is just as brown as the original home turf. In simple English; don’t expect utopia.

      Instead of asking the hard questions on a nerd’s site and receiving adolescent answers, consult the Australian Consulate Office in the country of your residence. They can provide you with a skills package and direct contact with employers seeking those skills.

      Worldwide; the IT industry is a saturated industry. All the important IT work is being sent to India. Therefore; if you are seeking a job in IT, don’t waste your time migrating to Australia.

      The Western Australian mining industry is seeking technically qualified, highly skilled workers. If you can program in a low level language, Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC) have a good future.

      If you arrive in Perth with only your suitcases and rent a home, life will become very difficult and your relationship will fail due to the day to day stress.

      Don’t seek financial advice from financial advisors; they are in business to maintain their income, not look after your financial affairs. Therefore; consider your current financial situation and work out the true cost relocating and day to day living.

      If you are seeking a lavish house and lifestyle and prepared to work long hours, the lifestyle is available on time payments.

      An average home in a good working class area of Perth will cost $500,000 at an average interest rate of 7%. Depending on your liquid assets and home deposit can be negotiated lower.

      All houses built in Perth over the past 40 years are built of double brick; not brick veneer.

      The lifestyle is Mediterranean weather.

      The Australian public healthcare system is paid for from your taxable income. If you are made redundant, you don’t loose your healthcare entitlements, and the social security system is adequate to feed you.

      Most people pay private healthcare to a private healthcare provider of their choice. Averaged cost around $2000 per annum.

      If you commit to the lavish lifestyle and loose your job, be prepared to loose the lot and live on the streets. Therefore; be frugal and don’t listen to any Australian lifestyle propaganda.

    269. Re:US by Burning1 · · Score: 1

      Huh? Regan is rightfully painted as a barrow and spend republican - the first of a generation of em. But I've never heard anyone complain that he raised taxes. Bush Sr. got that complaint, but honestly I kind of respect him for trying to balance the budget after Regan's irresponsible spending.

      If you want an example of a fiscally responsible administration, Clinton is your guy. Of course, there was a policy at that time that spending could not increase without a reduction elsewhere or an increase in revenue.

    270. Re:US by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      The US is very much a have/have not society. If you are on the right side of that equation it's a fantastic place to live. Crime here tends to be very, very concentrated. If you live in a big city the crime areas are well known and easily avoided for the most part. Still, there is a lot of racism here. Much more than my native Canada. It's kind of sneaky and below the surface but not far below. Far too many guns here but, again, most of the violent crime is inner city. The social safety net leaves something to be desired but in the US it's sort of a pull-yourself-up-by-your-own-bootstraps kind of mentality. If you have some ambition and drive you can do very well here indeed.

    271. Re:US by erp_consultant · · Score: 1

      I worked in Minneapolis one winter. Never been so fucking cold in all my life. At least they have heated bridges connecting the buildings downtown. But still...those kinds of temps are inhuman to me. Nice city and nice people but no way would I ever live in a place that cold.

    272. Re:US by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      I have to admit, I agree with the wingnut theory. I lived in Canada till the end of the 90s. No development in infrastructure for decades; not enough hospital beds but grand parking lots and shopping malls. The destruction of Studio D (in favour of the American content Mafia) and the relentless attacks on culture and the poor through a decade of prosperity, the 90s finally did me in. I had grown up country that gradually, but surely disappeared.

      Last summer, I visited my brothers in BC (Victoria). American SUV parking lot. Practically impossible to cycle (safely) on the Island. And it's evident that people live in fear! They're afraid to have opinions. They're afraid to drink a beer in the park.

      There isn't much difference between Canada and the US any more.

      I've been in Berlin, Germany for a decade now. I'm not going back. The cost of living here is less and I have MORE space in a smaller country. Absurd, but to my advantage as it is.

      You "visited" Victoria and I lived there most of my life. Big difference. No infrastructure for decades? Really? So the HD television, phone and high speed internet that I get through my phone line is my imagination? The Dual HSDPA and LTE that I enjoy is my imagination? The fully automated (driverless) skytrain system in Vancouver did not launch in 1986 and continue to expand over the decades? The Coquihalla highway did not see upgrades over the years? The Sea to Sky project never happened? I suppose the bypass in Nanaimo Bypass was never built and that Duke Point Ferry Terminal does not exist either?

      So you never heard of the Galloping Goose Trail? It is famous for cycling in Victoria and the the Western Communities. Try googling "cycling vancouver island". The majority of buses in the Greater Victoria region have bike racks on the front of the bus.

      Yeah, drinking in a park is considered taboo in a lot of countries. Parks are generally meant for everyone to enjoy but especially families. If you want to drink beer, go to your friends house in their backyard or go to a pub. There is on on every block practically in downtown Victoria.

      I was born in Europe and I have visited several European cities in the last decade including London, Paris, Barcelona, Rome, Frankfurt and Helsinki. Perhaps you should visit some other countries including other European ones before you start judging Canada. I hate to break it to you but Berlin is not representative of the whole of Europe.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    273. Re:US by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      Renting is not possible in the universe you live in?

      Buying a smaller home not an option either?

      If you cannot afford your home on 50% of your income get a smaller one or rent.

      There is lack of affordable housing. Prices are pretty much over the top. That includes renting, that includes smaller houses. There is considerable lack of affordable housing. Yes of course I could move back with my family paying $800 a month for a 2-bedroom council house. I could afford that. I can afford the house I live in as well, thank you very much. But the prices are inflated, because there is a tremendous lack of affordable housing. I keep repeating that because somehow the message doesn't seem to get abroad. Never heard of the housing bubble? Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?

      Suppose the petrol in your country gets higher taxation. Up until it costs 8 dollars the gallon. Can't afford it? Get a bicycle or get a job closer to home. You can afford it? Then it's not a problem in your opinion? Does "affordable" mean, "realistically priced" to you? I'll wash your car for $200, you probably can afford that. But are you willing to pay it?

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    274. Re:US by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      We use gasoline, so petrol taxes do not impact us. If gasoline becomes that expensive I would laugh at the SUV drivers while I fill up my compact. I paid $10/gallon in Germany so I can afford $8/gallon here.

      The housing bubble was caused by people buying houses they could not afford, and banks making liars loans. If people cannot afford the homes, the prices will go back down. Supply and demand sets the price of houses. The market for homes does not care how affordable you think they should be. The costs will be what people pay. Buying a home so expensive that you can barely afford it only serves to drive prices up and make you poor.

    275. Re:US by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      We use gasoline, so petrol taxes do not impact us. If gasoline becomes that expensive I would laugh at the SUV drivers while I fill up my compact. I paid $10/gallon in Germany so I can afford $8/gallon here.

      The housing bubble was caused by people buying houses they could not afford, and banks making liars loans. If people cannot afford the homes, the prices will go back down. Supply and demand sets the price of houses. The market for homes does not care how affordable you think they should be. The costs will be what people pay. Buying a home so expensive that you can barely afford it only serves to drive prices up and make you poor.

      So scarcity doesn't affect the prices? People don't have to afford houses? "We'll camp in the streets until the prices go down"? A house is a necessity. There is a demand. There is not enough supply. That drives up the prices.
      There is lack of affordable housing, that's the 4th time, you might read it.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    276. Re:US by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      Ya, I know. Once you have found paradise you don't want to share it with the masses.

    277. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a US Citizen living in British Columbia. I love it here, but I would move back to the US in a heartbeat if I could. My wife grew up here and prefers it though. The reason is cost of living is just horrendous. It might be a little more comparable if your coming from a larger city with higher cost of living. Everything just costs more, a lot more even before taxes. Just assume *everything* costs 1.5-2X more even before the 12% sales tax.

      Income tax is also horrible. I have a US job and paid about $1000 in taxes to the US. Canada I owed close to $10,000.

      The medical system is morally great since everyone gets coverage. I don't think it's any cheaper than the US for your average worker though. It is an awesome system for the poor and retired! I would highly recommend Canada as a place to retire if you can!

    278. Re:US by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      If high demand and limited supply drives up housing prices you might have to move back in with family or rent a small apartment. You could also move to a location with more available housing.

      I am not sure why you think just because it is a little rough for you housing should be cheap.

    279. Re:US by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

      If high demand and limited supply drives up housing prices you might have to move back in with family or rent a small apartment. You could also move to a location with more available housing.

      I am not sure why you think just because it is a little rough for you housing should be cheap.

      I'm an adult, living with my wife and kids. I have a full time job, capable of paying rent and mortgage. Moving to a location with more available housing: like telling someone from Cali advising to move to Detroit, plenty of affordable housing, isn't it?
      Your insinuation that I think my housing should be cheap is pretty silly, I just keep saying that it should be less dependent on scarcity, the market is fixed by developers and builders. More houses are being demolished because of thei age than are being built to replace them. And yes: the Netherlands have a growing population. People just should live longer in their parents' basement, because that's your solution to this situation?? Do you even TRY to understand what I'm writing?? Tell me about YOUR universe, where every day is Bratwurstfestival and your parents love you ever so much.

      --
      All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    280. Re:US by corychristison · · Score: 1

      I have lived in Saskatchewan my entire life.

      The one thing that makes up for the -45C winters is the +45C summers (if you're into that).

    281. Re:US by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      No, I never "got mine" for Social Security (or any of the others), that's why I'm wanting to opt out of it (them) entirely.

    282. Re:US by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      How would housing prices not be dependent on scarcity?

      How do you think the housing market should work?

      I have a house, I could afford even if I lost my job as my spouse makes enough to also pay for it. My solution is to make enough money to buy a home, or to buy something you can afford. My solution is to realize that this is reality not some dream were developers build extra houses just to make you happy.

    283. Re:US by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Got mine, as in I'm up the social/financial ladder, who cares if I break every rung on the way up and wherever my shit goes when I dump over the edge is not my concern.

    284. Re:US by hairyfish · · Score: 1

      less expensive to fly from Oz to hundreds of tropical destinations.

      What if you want to fly somewhere interesting? 10 hours minimum. Australia might have a lot going for it, but ease of travelling is not one of them

      The Aussies, due to geography, have an advantage trading with China, India, and other nations in the Pacific Rim.

      China is roughly equi-distant from Australia, the US and Europe. Tokyo is closer to the US, India is closer to Europe. And Europe or the US have economies 10x the size of Australia. Australia is on the opposite side of the world from New York and London which are the centres of western commerce. Australia might be a nice place to live, but geographically it is probably the most disadvantaged major economy in the world.

      All in all its hard to imagine a much better place.

      Unless you like travelling without a mandatory long haul flight, or you want to go shopping after 5pm, or want to do something other drink beer and watch football. Australia is nice but let's not get carried away.

    285. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have, I was born there and lived there for 45 years. Love the Country, the people on the whole are mostly arseholes so I left 'em to teir own devices and moved to SE Asia. Awesome place full of opportunity.

      Depends what your looking for ? If you're a soft cock, Australia is for you, if your more the Adventurer type, no way, give it a miss

    286. Re:US by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      Er, there's a rather large country with lots of open spaces right next door, that someone might consider as a viable option to the US or Europe. You know, Canada, that place where we've weathered the downturn better, are on track (in 2-3 years or so, unless Europe implodes) to eliminate the temporary deficits we ran up to keep our heads above water during the financial crisis and go back to running surpluses, have universal, single payor health care (at half the price per capita of US health care), similar standard of living, stable democracy, and politicians who are saner than the US ones, even if I don't like anything our current government is doing.

      Just sayin'.

      (We've got our own problems here, no question, but we're in better shape than the US, for the foreseeable future)

      You forgot to include -- no automatic weapons, no small arms, just game hunters with rifles.
      Multi-culturism -- Bilingual English / French, with respect for Spanish-- all European Languages,
      Great universities comparable to the best in the world for science, medicine, music, arts,

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    287. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you must be a canuck, you missed the insightful reference to Australia, gun crime, wacko neo confederate politix any one?

    288. Re:US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has all happened before in Rome. Athens, Babylon, London, Gotham. What could possibly be new about debt? Or the conspiracies of debtors to evade their debts, or of creditors to jack up prices?

  4. Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Canada is the place to be IMHO. With the stable economy, the speedy rise of the IT sector and easy Permanent Residence options, it should be your best bet, both in the short and the long run.

    1. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Canada is the place to be IMHO. With the stable economy, the speedy rise of the IT sector and easy Permanent Residence options, it should be your best bet, both in the short and the long run.

      You like the cold, right ?

    2. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't live in Canada, but I'm loving life when it never gets above 60F.

    3. Re:Oh Canada! by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 1

      Look at the climate in Vancouver.
      If I emigrated to N America that would be on my shortlist, hell - it would probably be my shortlist.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    4. Re:Oh Canada! by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      easy Permanent Residence options

      I believe you must be confusing Canada with somewhere else. The permanent resident visa program has been massively oversubscribed for years, so they're making the points system increasingly restrictive while throwing out large numbers of old applications from the queue.

    5. Re:Oh Canada! by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      Look at the climate in Vancouver.

      Look at the wages and house prices in Vancouver.

    6. Re:Oh Canada! by zill · · Score: 5, Funny

      Seattle: 69 degrees
      Vancouver: 19 degrees

      Jesus! Didn't expect 100 miles to make that much of a difference. We sure drew that border at the right place.

    7. Re:Oh Canada! by Mashiki · · Score: 2

      Canada is the place to be IMHO. With the stable economy, the speedy rise of the IT sector and easy Permanent Residence options, it should be your best bet, both in the short and the long run.

      Canada is teetering right now, and banks are being warned to prepare for a housing collapse much like what happened in the US. A few other things, housing prices are sliding across the country, generally down 5-30% depending on where you are. Vancouver is down around 15%, Toronto is down around 10% on prices from last year. Houses that are on the market, stay on the market for a long time. I live in the SWON(South-western Ontario), and places here are sticking around for 6-9 months before selling. I'm also seeing a lot of places being repo'd by the banks, and I mean a lot. 8 places in my neighborhood in the last 3 months, and more before that, lot of places going up for sale too, even in the new subdivisions. Some places have crashed like Windsor, which are down 40%. It's starting to look a lot like very late 2005 Florida here, and I was in Florida at the time.

      Unemployment is *sticky* at the best depending on where you are. IT can be seriously hit or miss, and you can find good jobs, but some of them require experience way outside of what is required, even by US standards of stupidity.

      Permanent Residence? Waiting list from hell. You'll be waiting a long time. And the numbers are being cut back as well.

      The original poster asked about other places too? India I can't comment too much about, but China is having some serious liquidity issues right now too, and some serious food shortage issues too. Bad enough that they're opening their food banks to stop shortages.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    8. Re:Oh Canada! by dthx1138 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Is this a unit conversion joke?

      --
      I just found the box to change my sig. Um.... [timeless witticism].
    9. Re:Oh Canada! by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Look at the climate in Vancouver.

      Look at the wages and house prices in Vancouver.

      Look at the gang violence in Vancouver. I like the city, but let's not pretend it's all peaches and cream.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    10. Re:Oh Canada! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      GP has probably meant the Greater Vancouver area, which has plenty of low-crime places. How about Richmond?

    11. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My PR application has been in limbo for a year and a half, and I'm married to a Canadian, and we have a son who's a citizen. If it takes me years to get in with a legitimate app, good luck ever getting in just because you took a poll on the internet and decided it sounded nice.

      They recently announced that all applications over 5 years old were being deleted, because the backlog is too long. Not denied, or even notified, just... deleted. If you've been waiting more than 5 years and you still want in, then you reapply.

    12. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Neither point is going be an issue for a new application of an IT researcher. And bonus points if they get a work visa first.

    13. Re:Oh Canada! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Informative

      It depends on which way you go about it. The usual one, where you apply for permanent residency from outside the country... yeah, good luck with waiting for the backlog there. On the other hand, the provincial nominee program (PNP), where you get in the country on a regular work visa, work for a year, and then apply for PR, is still a reasonably fast and simple way to get PR and then citizenship. Less problem with "oversubscribing" there because there are far fewer people who can get a work visa to begin with, and once you're in, you go on a priority track. And you don't have to worry about visa terms, since, once you've applied for PNP, if your work visa expires you can extend it essentially indefinitely and make it open (i.e. not tied to a particular employer) until you get a final judgment on your PR.

      Case in point: it took me ~2 years to get PR, starting from early 2010. This is for BC, so I don't know how other provinces fare in comparison - I'd expect the backlog to be somewhat bigger in Ontario and Quebec, and about the same in Alberta.

    14. Re:Oh Canada! by m.ducharme · · Score: 0

      I'm sure it won't be a problem if the submitter is white.

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    15. Re:Oh Canada! by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Neither point is going be an issue for a new application of an IT researcher.

      It is will be when they look at the points system and realise they don't qualify. As mentioned below, the only viable route is likely to be finding a job first on a work permit and then applying for residency.

    16. Re:Oh Canada! by EmperorOfCanada · · Score: 2

      Canada even has at least one financial company looks exactly like Canada's version of Countrywide. The main thing missing with this company is that the head guy doesn't quite have the tan of the Countrywide guy; close though.

      One difference between Canada's property bubble and the US one is that the ratings people have already started to lower the ratings on Canada's banks. I guess the ratings people have two advantages, one is that they might have learned something from the US disaster and two is that they are far away from the wrath of the Canadian banks and regulators who otherwise might be able to get them to alter reality.

      To respond to the OP's question. Canada has huge regional disparities. Centered in Southern Alberta there is a mountain of cash; but that cash is totally dependent on the price of oil remaining high. If oil were to drop below the extraction costs, say $60, a huge amount of the money in Alberta just drys up. BC has quite a healthy economy and is not too bad. Ontario is trying to rediscover itself after decades of manufacturing that depended on a low Canadian dollar which was bumped way up by Alberta oil. Quebec is just weird. Eastern Canada, called the Maritimes has zero money outside of Newfoundland. The key to understanding Canada is that we specialize in hacking things out of the ground and sea. So if the world commodities market is strong then so are we. Other than Quebec being petulant Canada is a very stable place where the two biggest riots in a while were about student fees and hockey. Canada is self sufficient in food and oil so in theory could weather a world swamping storm. So if your research is in something that comes out of the sea or ground then someone will have work for you to do.

      The main downside to Canada is that we are next to the US and can't move away if trouble starts brewing there.

    17. Re:Oh Canada! by codemachine · · Score: 1

      Ontario is hurting right now, but most of Western Canada is not. There is a shortage of workers in the West, and in some locations a shortage of suitable housing too. So for an unemployed person in Ontario to move to Alberta or Saskatchewan for a job, this can be a problem, especially if they own their home in Ontario. The house in Ontario will be difficult to sell, and finding a place to buy out West could be equally difficult.

      Vancouver real estate has insane pricing, so a reduction there may not be a bad thing. Housing will have to come down eventually, especially if interest rates go up. This could lead to some issues, especially for any overextended home owners and the banks, just like what happened in the US.

      I'm not sure if that'll be enough to derail the booming economy in the West or not (depends on prices of resources more than anything), but it'll certainly hurt any areas that are already in a downturn.

       

    18. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Windsor has had permanently high unemployment for the last 15 years. If you think the low housing prices and slow real estate market are reasons not to move there, think again. A young guy like me is looking at great purchasing opportunities for rental properties. When the economy tanks and more people are losing their homes, they need a place to stay, and they usually start renting.

    19. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The statistic that I've heard is that 80% of Canadians live within 10 miles of the USA border. Imagine if we moved it up just 10 miles...

    20. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/article/1241595--for-vancouver-teens-it-takes-less-time-to-find-drugs-than-alcohol
      >VANCOUVER—A new study has concluded Vancouver’s young users can find the illicit drug they’re looking for in about 10 minutes on the street.

    21. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Atlantic Canada is the place to be if you are in IT right now. Very low cost of living with wages on par with places like Boston (if you are in tech). In the last 4 years there have been several very high profile acquisitions by large tech players and they are expanding their operations here. Now we are starting to see large multi-nationals coming here to open "start up labs". There is a genuine lack of skilled tech professionals so we usually need to import folks from outside.

    22. Re:Oh Canada! by kevmitch · · Score: 1

      The greater vancouver area is where most of the gang violence takes place, not in the inner city. In any case, the homicide rate is still about half that of Seattle Vancouver's murder rate low by North American standards. Property crime on the other hand is a bit of a problem Vancouver crime among worst in North America.

    23. Re:Oh Canada! by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Bravo.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    24. Re:Oh Canada! by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Well with global warming and all it's probably what you say and really who could live in Seattle. The sun never shines there.

    25. Re:Oh Canada! by turkeyfeathers · · Score: 1

      You're fluent in Chinese?

    26. Re:Oh Canada! by turkeyfeathers · · Score: 1

      And you can eat lobster rolls all day long!

    27. Re:Oh Canada! by turkeyfeathers · · Score: 1

      Unless they move somewhere else, leaving you with an empty rental unit.

    28. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the difference between degrees in Fahrenheit and Celsius... 69 F = 21 C.

    29. Re:Oh Canada! by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      You missed Saskatchewan, which has an economy nearly as strong as Alberta's and stronger than all the remaining provinces, and has a diverse economy compared to Alberta. We need oil, gas, potash, uranium, wheat, barley, canola, and pulse crops to die simultaneously to be in complete trouble.

    30. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another reason to move to Canada...We Americans are that stupid.

    31. Re:Oh Canada! by zill · · Score: 1

      A cold front just passed over your head. Woosh!

    32. Re:Oh Canada! by hesiod · · Score: 2

      Well, there's another mark in the "pro" side of Vancouver!

    33. Re:Oh Canada! by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      I remember old American-made cartoons sometimes had an incredible blizzard that started right at the Canadian border, as if Canada was the edge of the Earth.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    34. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And let's be honest about this ... it's crawling with Canadians.

    35. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the US sneezes Canada gets sick. Its entire economy is based around trade with the US. So why not live in the country with the higher GDP/capita, better weather, larger economy, the place where things are actually happening?

    36. Re:Oh Canada! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      I lived there for a while, and you don't have to be fluent in Chinese. The only trick you'd have to learn is dodging cars on the roads. ~

    37. Re:Oh Canada! by ahodgson · · Score: 1

      It's easy. Only drive in the slow lane. No one else uses it.

    38. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy crap, the people in Seattle almost boil. It must hurt a lot.

    39. Re:Oh Canada! by bobschneider8 · · Score: 1

      69 degrees is the right temperature for a medium done steak, not for the weather!

    40. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work in the financial industry (IT) and deal with basically every American and Canadian vendor. The worst American vendor is an order of magnitude better/smarter/faster/responsive than the best Canadian vendor. That combined with my personal visits to Canada where I observed some of the civil infrastructure (highways, houses, etc) have led me to believe Canada is a master of mediocrity (a true nation of equals). This may be good for some people, but not for me.

    41. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations. You passed the test.

    42. Re:Oh Canada! by dthx1138 · · Score: 1

      I wish to rephrase my original comment:

      "Where's my +5, Unit Conversion Joke????"

      /thankyou.

      --
      I just found the box to change my sig. Um.... [timeless witticism].
    43. Re:Oh Canada! by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      but China is having some serious liquidity issues right now

      Contrary to USA, China controls money creation through the central bank (which is controlled directly by the central party). The state also controls directly all banks that are giving out loans. It also has a lot of USD in reserve. So what liquidity issues are you talking about?

    44. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fahrenheit vs Celsius...Vancouver is actually 1.5 degrees cooler by your calculations, bloody Americans...

    45. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fahrenheit vs. Celsius duh...

    46. Re:Oh Canada! by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Contrary to USA, China controls money creation through the central bank (which is controlled directly by the central party). The state also controls directly all banks that are giving out loans. It also has a lot of USD in reserve. So what liquidity issues are you talking about?

      China, unless you haven't been paying attention to the financial markets for the last year or so. China can control all the money creation that they want. That doesn't stop out of control inflation which is happening. It also doesn't stop out of control inflation on core goods, also happening. In turn it doesn't stop food shortages, also happening.

      For the liquidity issues, you might have noticed in the last 3 weeks a large number of chinese firms suddenly dumping stocks.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    47. Re:Oh Canada! by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      For the liquidity issues, you might have noticed in the last 3 weeks a large number of chinese firms suddenly dumping stocks.

       
      That happened for a couple of reasons:

      1. Insider information

      2. Tightening of credits

      3. Flight of money out of China

      4. Political instability - hard liners from the communist (consist of the "tai zhi dang", princes and princesses of old high ranking comrades) are trying to grab power from the moderates

      Of course, there are other reasons as well, but I only list the 4 major ones

      I do follow China closely, for many of my businesses is in there
       

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    48. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't use BC in this argument. The Winter Olympics distorted their market so bad 2 bedroom condos were selling for several million dollars. BC will show a decline for another decade before the prices are back in line with that annoying thing we like to call reality.

    49. Re:Oh Canada! by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      That doesn't stop out of control inflation which is happening.

      I can't deny it's there, everything nearly doubled in about 5 years. But this is unrelated to a lack of liquidity. That's quite the opposite in fact. There's only inflation when there's too much cash out...

      In turn it doesn't stop food shortages, also happening.

      What is this food shortage that everyone is talking about? Last time I checked, my local supermarket was full of food. Did you read some news about that in the "western" press? I heard nobody talking about it over here.

      For the liquidity issues, you might have noticed in the last 3 weeks a large number of chinese firms suddenly dumping stocks.

      I'd be happy to read about it! Please provide URLs if you have some.

    50. Re:Oh Canada! by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      I'm from Canada as well but one of the thing that is always a hurdle for us is the channel to market, that many SMEs are very localized/regionalized. If you're looking for stable job and good quality of life, yes. If you're looking for big business opportunity, then probably not.

    51. Re:Oh Canada! by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      That's the downside (for China) of pegging their currency. The USA can cause inflation in China by printing dollars.

      The solution (for everyone) is to allow the currencies to exchange at market rates.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    52. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on which way you go about it. The usual one, where you apply for permanent residency from outside the country... yeah, good luck with waiting for the backlog there. On the other hand, the provincial nominee program (PNP), where you get in the country on a regular work visa, work for a year, and then apply for PR, is still a reasonably fast and simple way to get PR and then citizenship....

      How about retirees?

    53. Re:Oh Canada! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      As a retiree you can pretty much forget about immigrating to any first world country, unless you have enough money saved to qualify for an investor (e.g. Canada wants $800k).

    54. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Seattle: 69 degrees **FAHRENHEIT**
      > Vancouver: 19 degrees

      Lol ..

      Seattle, using a system of measurement that was discarded in favour of a metric system that made more sense,by the civilized world, 50years ago.
      Vancouver, part of the civilized world :p

    55. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seattle: 69 degrees

      Vancouver: 19 degrees
       

      Hum... your numbers are wrong. Pick a scale Celsius or Fahrenheit and a month.

    56. Re:Oh Canada! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Noh Canada! Canada would be a terrible choice... don't come here! Er... I mean don't go there!

  5. Stay where you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Stay where you are. "I believe I have the nondisprovable ability to predict worldwide economic trends" is a terrible reason to move.

    1. Re:Stay where you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I actually agree right now. A few years back I'd have said move to somewhere like Australia, or Canada, or similar. But frankly, both these countries have taken political turns for the worse. Honestly, if the problems in southern Europe are really problematic for you, just move further North in Europe for now - Germany, France, the UK, or one of the Scandinavian nations.

      Canada needs to kick the Conservatives back into the long grass with a massive electoral defeat that means they'll be un-electable for at least another 15 years before it becomes a reasonable option again, and Australia just needs to ditch Murdoch's complete ownership of nearly the entirety of it's media and simultaneously ditch all the current mainstream parties for some that are slightly more rational.

      There is a lot of wisdom in what you say, it's easy to listen to the miserable press bitching about their own country/politicians, but you get that everywhere, and right now I'm not convinced the grass is greener anywhere much really and hence IMO it's the wrong time to move. Things need to settle first before anyone can give advice as to what the best 5, 10, 20 year bets are. It wasn't much more than 20 years ago that the Berlin wall was still standing and the USSR was dominant across Eastern Europe, so judging what anywhere will be like in 20 years will be tough anyway.

    2. Re:Stay where you are by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well said, cannot up-vote this enough

  6. Check Out this place: by networkconsultant · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.openmint.net/masdar-city-green-living-experiment Masdar is the worlds first attempt at a completely energy neutral city.

    1. Re:Check Out this place: by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What benefits would that provide to the submitter?

    2. Re:Check Out this place: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't the country of Tuvalu an entire country that's committed to that?

    3. Re:Check Out this place: by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      No, that's the country that will be underwater in 25 years.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    4. Re:Check Out this place: by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2

      Oil, coal and gas prices won't wreck havoc on the local economy.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    5. Re:Check Out this place: by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I would expect that such an "energy neutral" local economy would be heavily reliant on imports from other countries for many important goods. Which would in turn be affected by oil/coal/gas prises.

    6. Re:Check Out this place: by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      The same way that a local municipality investing in infrastructure helps provide services to the locals.
      If/when peak oil hits, this city will be ahead of the curve. While others are without power, or paying through the nose (and taxing the locals for it), and/or suffering from rapid change, this city will be self sustaining and simply cheaper to live in.

      It's also a vote of confidence in renewable energy and sustainable living, which, if more people got on board with, will help save the planet as we know it. Saving the planet being a good thing for the submitter (and the rest of us). And since we live in a global society, and it matters to the submitter how the rest of the world does, he helps himself when he tries to help the whole.

    7. Re:Check Out this place: by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Like all solutions designed to isolate yourself from the world, it's imperfect and suffers from bad things sneaking in through unexpected holes. In this case, that would be imports manufactured and transported via energy derived from oil, coal and gas. However, it is an improvement over direct exposure.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    8. Re:Check Out this place: by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      Oil, coal and gas prices won't wreck havoc on the local economy.

      You can't really wreck havoc. Havoc is chaos; it's about as wrecked as wrecked can be. You could *cause* havoc. Or, in other words "wreak havoc". That's a different matter...

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    9. Re:Check Out this place: by guises · · Score: 1

      There are quite a few reasons to live there involving hedging against the future, but the immediate reason is simply that it's new and is being heavily invested in. Areas of rapid growth are excellent for your career, and large amounts of money being poured into infrastructure means that the roads don't have potholes, the buildings aren't crumbling, and no part of the city has descended into slums or otherwise become economically blighted. The fact that it's a show city, Abu Dhabi trying to show off how progressive it is, means that it will probably be very attractive as well - statues, fountains, etc.

      All that said, it looks like it isn't going to be completed until 2025 so it may not be relevant to this discussion.

    10. Re:Check Out this place: by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      There are quite a few reasons to live there involving hedging against the future, but the immediate reason is simply that it's new and is being heavily invested in. Areas of rapid growth are excellent for your career, and large amounts of money being poured into infrastructure means that the roads don't have potholes, the buildings aren't crumbling, and no part of the city has descended into slums or otherwise become economically blighted. The fact that it's a show city, Abu Dhabi trying to show off how progressive it is, means that it will probably be very attractive as well - statues, fountains, etc.

      Yeah, but it's still UAE. Meaning an Islamic absolute monarchy. I can get working there for a few years if the pay is good, but settling for the rest of your life, to raise a family, in a place like that? Not to mention the recent instability in the region, from which UAE is not exempt, and which has a fairly high likelihood of turning the affected states into extreme democratic theocracies (i.e. rule of the religious mob) - again, not a good place to be for someone with a Western background, much less with a family.

    11. Re:Check Out this place: by Darkling-MHCN · · Score: 1

      I guess you've never been to the UAE or Abu Dhabi.

      Well... firstly, they live in a waste land. You can't grow crops there, the soil is no good. Currently all their food is imported from overseas. If there's ever an energy crisis due to peak oil, big populations in these countries will quickly become unsustainable.

      Secondly, these projects are all 4 years out of date property boom hype, like this...

      http://gizmodo.com/5065406/the-plans-for-the-155+mile+high-skyscraper-in-you-guessed-it-dubai ...the eco city is just yet another pie in the sky property development, all of which after some research you'll find are probably already canned. The only one of these super projects ever to see the light of day is a massive flop...

      http://www.arabianbusiness.com/occupancy-levels-rise-as-burj-khalifa-celebrates-first-birthday-371164.html

  7. Dont belong anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a person who was born in one country, brought up in a second, did college in a third, married a woman in a fourth, and when back to live in the country I did college in, I do not belong anywhere. I would move to any country that provided me with an opportunity I was interested in. There are stupid immigration hurdles and such you have to deal with, and those are artificial constructs that we have created to slow the movement of people like me.

    There is a saying in my parent's tongue. I am a pigeon, I fly wherever the seeds are. You should do that too.

     

    1. Re:Dont belong anywhere by spire3661 · · Score: 0, Troll

      God forbid a sovereign nation get to decide who they do and dont let into their nation....... You are a child to be so dismissive of others' right to tell you that you are not welcome.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:Dont belong anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why does your "right" to deny me trump my "right" to travel anywhere I like on this planet? I was born here, same as you. As the GP said - artificial constructs. While I'm in another place the deal is reciprocal: you get my taxes from working, and the benefit of my helping the local economy, etc. And I get the "generous" use of that countries resources. If you're American or Canadian (or most "Countries" I suppose), your ancestors simply went and took this land for themselves, and then wish to deny others the same opportunity.

    3. Re:Dont belong anywhere by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Your right to travel is limited only by your share of Monopoly on Violence, nothing more, nothing less. Most nations' Monopoly on violence decrees that they get final say on who can and cant enter or leave, not the traveler.

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:Dont belong anywhere by oracleofbargth · · Score: 4, Funny

      My fellow Earthicans,

      We need to take a stand against all the illegal aliens coming to our fair planet to probe for jobs. To this end, we will build a Dyson fence around the southern border of the solar system...

    5. Re:Dont belong anywhere by Aguazul2 · · Score: 1

      Having freedom to work and live in several continents seems a plus. If you're pre-marriage and are looking for both a country and a woman, then that gives you more choices. I'm in Peru, married to a Peruvian, working remotely for a UK firm. You have to get to know the culture, but the Peruvian highlands work for us right now. Rent is reasonable, living is cheap enough, but internet and power are more expensive than UK. There is a bit of a bubble inflating right now with the house prices due to loose money from Europe/US (I guess). At one point I was seriously looking at Brazil -- lots of plus points culturally and booming apparently -- but that never happened. Peru is also doing well, but you won't find the density of IT work here like in Europe. Wages are really low for IT (and in general). Seems like there is a boom in training here as well, everyone wants something better for their children, so there are loads of colleges full of IT students, nurses, whatever. Peru will be exporting them in a few years. I suggest you take a holiday to a few locations and do some on the ground research. I could never live in Lima, for example -- being there a couple of days soon convinced me of that. Get some contacts in universities if you want to do research.

    6. Re:Dont belong anywhere by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      So long as GP pays his taxes and performs his civic duties while residing in any particular country, how is it "crapping all over them"?

    7. Re:Dont belong anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      It's not a right to travel anywhere. Immigration isn't an artificial construct. As bent as the planet's resources are right now, mass immigration is a death sentence for many countries who are close to the edge. We have a finite amount of resources, and limiting who can use our resources is the only way that we know of to lessen the impact right now. These 'artificial constructs' exist to keep countries thriving. Is it right? Probably not. Is it effective? Perhaps. Is it based in basic biology that tells me that if my neighbor takes my kill, I don't eat? Absolutely. Please don't forget that above all else, we are monkeys.

      And if you remember American and Canadian History, there were people here when we landed. Ever wonder where they went? Now, why would we want that to happen again, and why would i WILLINGLY let that happen to my family? Times have changed since the new world was discovered. Update your world-view. It's called self-preservation, jackass.

    8. Re:Dont belong anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Because we have guns. Guns trump your silly flighty desires. Try the next house down the road, maybe they'll let you take their jobs.

    9. Re:Dont belong anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as we do it with cheap, cheap illegal alien labor, you can put a Dyson fence anywhere you want.

    10. Re:Dont belong anywhere by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      we will build a Dyson fence

      oh man, that really sucks...

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    11. Re:Dont belong anywhere by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Read in Zapp Brannigans voice.

    12. Re:Dont belong anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're American or Canadian (or most "Countries" I suppose), your ancestors simply went and took this land for themselves, and then wish to deny others the same opportunity.

      And if you are not, then your ancestors were either too lazy or not sufficiently advanced to manage that feat... so please explain why you get the right to the same benefits as those who did it? I am always fascinated by the claims of some to the fruits of the labors of others based on some strange inversion of the meaning of the words "fair" and "rights". What makes it evil/oppressive for one group to move somewhere and develop the resources of the place and setup a society there, but fair/good for somebody else to come along later and shove his way in to take advantage of all the work that was done?

    13. Re:Dont belong anywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There were plenty of responses to my post filled with hate, fear, or both. You are the only one who attempted to reason against me with logic, and then you pissed all over yourself by calling me a jackass at the end. Tsk. Tsk.

      First. I have never lived anywhere illegally.. a lot of people have just assumed that it was the case. Not for a moment. I am welcome anywhere I go, if I am not welcome in a place, I am not interested in living there. Too bad for that country. I have the resources, education and work ethic to provide for myself anywhere I go. I live where it suits me to live. If a place has individuals mature enough to get over their fear and hatred of everything different, they will see me to be the asset that I am, and I will be welcome. If not, I will be some place else creating value elsewhere.

      As far as your example about the native americans. That is an interesting example... they DID try to stop the immigration of these new people. How successful were they? Good luck with the whole holding back the tide of immigrants thing... Who knows, you might get lucky.
           

    14. Re:Dont belong anywhere by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Why does your "right" to deny me trump my "right" to travel anywhere I like on this planet?

      How about their RIGHT to keep you out of their country?

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    15. Re:Dont belong anywhere by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Typically most countries in this world require some kind of procedure for entering, working, living, and eventually just staying. This is artificial like any law system, but this is how it works. Of course if you are a mercenary in some army in Africa or elsewhere, this does not matter at all.

  8. Too little info by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China and India are on the rise. Brazil and Australia are looking good.

    Can you speak the language? What are the immigration policies of these countries?

    1. Re:Too little info by Zontar_Thing_From_Ve · · Score: 1

      China and India are on the rise. Brazil and Australia are looking good.

      Can you speak the language? What are the immigration policies of these countries?

      Given how Australian "Strine" is completely incomprehensible to those of us who don't live there, I think you have inadvertently made a good point about all 4 places with the language question. Note that Australia is pretty hostile to immigration and it can be tough even for white people to get in. India will let you in if you get sponsored and they are willing to work through the bureaucracy but in general foreigners just don't move to India. You would also need to understand that in general Indians are not known for being very open to the idea of cross-cultural marriages.

      There are downsides to it for sure - small size and one party politics come to mind - but Singapore seems to have its act together in a lot of ways and if I was a younger person looking to move off somewhere, it might be my choice. English skills in Singapore are extremely high and it's actually a little difficult to find people who can't speak it reasonably well.

    2. Re:Too little info by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 5, Informative
      China does not permit immigration. You can get a residence permit if you have a real job, but it is only 1 year and is renewed at the pleasure of your local government. I have seen respected businessmen denied for no reason. They have to leave the country and their business predictably fails soon thereafter. There is a China green card program that is granted to a very small number of people every year. You won't get one, don't bother. You can marry a Chinese and get a 1-year "visiting relative" visa that can be renewed as long as you stay married, but this visa class is the same as a tourist visa and you cannot work on this visa, at least not in China. You'd have to have a WWW business or something.

      It's funny how people from Western countries with ridiculously lax immigration procedures go abroad, expecting every country to be just like their own. They are shocked, shocked to find out that a visa is a sovereign act of a nation and it is that country's choice to set the rules.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    3. Re:Too little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia is hostile? Hah, you have never applied for a turist visa to go to USA as a Latin American.

    4. Re:Too little info by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 0

      Australia is not hostile to immigration - in fact, it's one of the few Western countries that are relatively easy to immigrate to.

    5. Re:Too little info by schlachter · · Score: 3, Informative

      India and Australia speak English.

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    6. Re:Too little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with Singapore, however, is that it is hot and humid every day of the year. Oh, did I say humid?

    7. Re:Too little info by c0lo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Note that Australia is pretty hostile to immigration and it can be tough even for white people to get in.

      Confirmed - if you don't find an employer to sponsor you, the wait period is forever-and-a-day.

      Some other things: most livable cities + Melbourne still on top

      However, don't forget most expensive cities for expats

      If you have kids, no matter where you immigrate, good chances to be a nightmare for a period of 1-4 years - a no-no if your kids are past the primary school age.

      Southern Europe may mean: Italy, Spain, Greece - Italian and Greek expats communities are pretty common, Spaniards not that much in English speaking countries.
      Anyway, European countries have rather high population densities and good public transport coverage. US, Australia (and Canada??) are countries with huge suburban sprawls, owning a car is almost survival level (don't expect a shopping centre just as you exist your place and don't expect frequent buses in suburbs). Of course, if you are lucky (and find a good paid job) you may be able to afford to rent in central areas, but don't bet on it.

      India - hmmmm... if you can think of a very busy market day (or a festival day) but forget about the fun, you'd have a pretty good idea on how the everyday streets in India look like (at least the case in major IT centres).
      The car traffic is insane, a continuous rush hours except 4-5 hours during the night. Nobody seems to follow any other rule but "I want to go where I need" and nobody seems to care about incessant honking - I was under continuous stress my week in India, my brain interpreted the honking as "you are in immediate danger" (until I get adjusted to the idea they are using it just to signal their presence). Frequently, cars and motorcycles will even use footpaths to overtake. Malaria is a risk; one may (or may not) get adjusted with the food.
      Power outages (of smaller scale than the recent major ones) are frequent - my experience: almost daily, of 3-15 minutes duration. If you have kids, I would strongly advice you against... otherwise, if you have a big adventurous spirit, why not?

      China? Do you speak mandarin (for the mainland China)? What about Cantonese (for Honk Kong)? If neither, maybe it's not such a good idea

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    8. Re:Too little info by oldmac31310 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't live in Australia and I have never had any problem understanding Australian English. I'm guessing that you are from the US. I have found that people from the US tend to not have a very good ear for understanding English spoken by non US speakers. I genuinely wonder what is up with that. I live in the US but am not from here and personally have little difficulty understanding English speakers from other parts of the world. I think it is just a matter of exposure to different accents over time. Same as learning other languages. As they become more familiar they become more accessible. Though I must admit to being a very poor and lazy linguist.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    9. Re:Too little info by FirephoxRising · · Score: 1

      You are joking about Australians being hard to understand aren't you? Most people find it easier to understand Australian accents than many english/irish/scottish/singaporean ones.

    10. Re:Too little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note that Australia is pretty hostile to immigration and it can be tough even for white people to get in.

      Can't be that bad, given that a quarter of the country's residents were born outside of Australia.

      http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Products/52F24D6A97BC0A67CA2578B0001197B8?opendocument

      And I call BS on the notion that "Strine" being incomprehensible is somehow an obstacle. Unless you're hard of hearing, picking up on an accent isn't that difficult, and if they throw words are you that you aren't used to, chances are pretty high that you'll figure them out in context on your own anyway. "I can't go to Australia because they talk funny" is a silly reason.

    11. Re:Too little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, no. Indians do NOT speak English. They're supposed to, but good luck with that.

    12. Re:Too little info by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      But there are still barriers to people over 40 and people who do not have the skills on their "in demand" list. You can always visit for up to 6 months each year, get a student visa for your next degree, or start a business with an entrepreneurship visa, but otherwise immigration is tighter than, say, Canada that only expects you to be a law abiding citizen with at least a net worth of $10k that you deposit in a Canadian financial institution.

    13. Re:Too little info by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      but otherwise immigration is tighter than, say, Canada that only expects you to be a law abiding citizen with at least a net worth of $10k that you deposit in a Canadian financial institution.

      Uh, I don't know when you've lasted looked into Canadian immigration system, but this is seriously not at all how it works. If you could just deposit $10k and get PR in Canada, they'd be swimming in immigrants right now.

      For the most part, it's actually the same thing in Canada - you need to be a skilled worker in a "demand" area. And, yes, age matters, and applying at 40 would be hard indeed. If I remember correctly, the peak is somewhere around 28 years - it's where you'll get the best balance (i.e. most points) of age and work experience.

    14. Re:Too little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Define 'English'.

    15. Re:Too little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      American here. My wife and I both used to have a very hard time understanding Australian English. Then we watched all 5 seasons of "Sea Patrol" (from BitTorrent), and now we understand it just fine.

    16. Re:Too little info by SilverJets · · Score: 2

      China does not permit immigration. You can get a residence permit if you have a real job, but it is only 1 year and is renewed at the pleasure of your local government. I have seen respected businessmen denied for no reason. They have to leave the country and their business predictably fails soon thereafter. There is a China green card program that is granted to a very small number of people every year. You won't get one, don't bother. You can marry a Chinese and get a 1-year "visiting relative" visa that can be renewed as long as you stay married, but this visa class is the same as a tourist visa and you cannot work on this visa, at least not in China. You'd have to have a WWW business or something.

      It's funny how people from Western countries with ridiculously lax immigration procedures go abroad, expecting every country to be just like their own. They are shocked, shocked to find out that a visa is a sovereign act of a nation and it is that country's choice to set the rules.

      It is the policies of countries like that, that make me wish my country was just as difficult to get into. While I do love my country I would jump at the chance to live somewhere else for a while but most other countries immigration policies make it practically impossible and yet they expect to be able to just walk into my country be given a place to live, health care, and a job or a welfare cheque.

    17. Re:Too little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the humor that falls on tin ears. USians being humorless, do not have this problem.

    18. Re:Too little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China does not permit immigration. You can get a residence permit if you have a real job, but it is only 1 year and is renewed at the pleasure of your local government. I have seen respected businessmen denied for no reason.

      With over 1 Billion people. Any reason is a good reason.

    19. Re:Too little info by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

      I have found that people from the US tend to not have a very good ear for understanding English spoken by non US speakers. I genuinely wonder what is up with that.

      I've wondered that too. I grew up in England where accents abound and vary very considerably, even over relatively small distances. In one place I lived the accent was one particular strong 'west country' where I lived (West Gloucestershire) and completely different and equally strong Welsh lilt 3 miles away (Monmouthshire). It was even possible to detect a blend of the two for people living half way between - a difference of 1.5 miles either side!

      In England you are exposed to a wide variety of accents and so understanding the various forms of English spoken globally from all the American varieties to Australian to all the versions spoken by non-native speakers with all sorts of overlaid foreign accents is not much of a problem. I'm often surprised that TV show makers (e.g. US made reality shows) feel the need to subtitle speech that is perfectly understandable.

      It seems odd that Americans would find it difficult, because they have a very wide variety of accents as well, albeit not as localised. It doesn't make sense because Aussies also seem able to understand most accents, and yet overall there is far less accent variation in Australia.

      I bet most English people could do a fair spread of American accents fairly well, but most amateur American attempts at English accents are awful, and that's without going into regional variants. I guess Usasians just don't have the ear for it.

    20. Re:Too little info by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 2

      FYI, even if you are married, the visa is for 6 months, not one year anymore. After 5 years of being married AND owning a real estate property you live in AND having 200 000 yuan blocked into a bank account AND living for more than 9 months in China during this 5 years period, you may get a green card. The application currently takes more than a year. Once you get it, it's a permanent living permit that has to be renewed every 10 years. With it, you can even create a local Chinese company under your own name.

    21. Re:Too little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The car traffic is insane, a continuous rush hours except 4-5 hours during the night. Nobody seems to follow any other rule but "I want to go where I need" and nobody seems to care about incessant honking - I was under continuous stress my week in India, my brain interpreted the honking as "you are in immediate danger" (until I get adjusted to the idea they are using it just to signal their presence).

      Actually, all those motorists (cars, taxis, rickshaws, motorcycles) are following a single, golden rule:

      Honk if you are about to pass

      As a result, there is no need to look back / turn your head before switching lanes, making a turn, etc. If there were someone coming up next to you, they'd have honked. Simple enough, and it seems to work quite well. Fun to watch, scary to experience (at first).

    22. Re:Too little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indians speak English, Australians speak a unique language consisting mostly of the words "mate", "cobber", "strewth" and "oi oi oi!"

    23. Re:Too little info by ignavus · · Score: 1

      Define 'English'.

      If you can read the definition, then you already know English.

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
    24. Re:Too little info by TranquilVoid · · Score: 1

      My theory is that most Americans are exposed almost exclusively to American entertainment, given the dominance of Hollywood in English-speaking entertainment. Other English-speaking countries have a combination of this and entertainment in their own language. Also, Americans tend to be culturally insular (in a non-perjorative sense), and why not, since it's a huge country capable of providing almost everything internally. Finally, unlike Europe, the geography provides little pressure to be bilingual (changing of late with Mexican interaction).

    25. Re:Too little info by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      In the western world we are definitely lax comparing to China (or Japan), but then it's not just for the sake of being sovereign, it's more likely about supply and demand. China got enough people, where as in Western world (flat birth rate?) there's a certain degree to rely on immigrants to increase labour capacity and tax base, and do the 'dirty work', where as in China there's no need for that.

    26. Re:Too little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India and Australia speak english ... but not American english :p

    27. Re:Too little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Australia .. I can understand nearly all english speakers except for most of the:
      Indians, Americans, Scottish, Irish and any other races which butcher/mangle the english language into incomprehensible gibberish.

      And on that, with some considerable brain power, I can unravel nearly everything, except Americans which fire poorly pronounced English words like a Gatling Gun fires bullets :p

    28. Re:Too little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      fair dinkum mate

    29. Re:Too little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Southern Europe," if spoken by a resident thereof, almost always means Greece. People from Italy, Spain and Portugal refer to themselves as Western, never as Southern. Some Balkanic people might have switched from "Eastern" to "Southern," but there haven't been enough around here for me to find out. Turkey also has strong European aspirations, so if they "leave" the Middle East they'll probably head straight to Southern Europe.

      In the US, the "Southern Europe" designation has gained steam in recent years. But it's mostly been pushed by Wall Street speculators who are long on Euro-zone Credit Default Swaps, hoping to turn bets of millions into billions by triggering defaults by the countries in question. Any notional differences that can induce Euros to cross borders work in their favor.

    30. Re:Too little info by hand_of_lixue · · Score: 1

      "Given how Australian "Strine" is completely incomprehensible to those of us who don't live there

      There's some slang to get used to, but you're probably going to deal with that anywhere, and it mostly comes up in casual conversation. I visited Sydney for two weeks and didn't have any trouble handling restaurants, hotels, travel directions, etc.. Occasionally ran in to a phrase in casual conversation that gave me trouble, and one lady who had a particularly thick accent, but I was told that even fellow Aussies have trouble with her accent.

    31. Re:Too little info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Portland is on that list! Eeek! I was considering Portland. Maybe not so much now.

  9. That's going to vary tremendously by mooingyak · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It depends on what you value. You're from "Southern Europe". That's semi-specific. What sort of place are you looking for? Good schools? What kind of community do you want? What kind of language skills do you have and/or are willing to acquire? What sort of culture are you looking for?

    Plus, your economic analysis is overly simplistic:

    The U.S. is in debt and there is no way of telling how long this can go on.

    If the US experiences a major economic collapse, there is no place in the world where you won't feel the effects of that. Or at least, no place in the world where you can hold a job as an "IT researcher".

    --
    William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
    1. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      If the US experiences a major economic collapse, there is no place in the world where you won't feel the effects of that. Or at least, no place in the world where you can hold a job as an "IT researcher".

      Yep. Pretty much this. If we get into a hole we can't get out of, we'll simply not pay back all that money we borrowed from the rest of you. That sounds really ugly until you look at the interest rates we're paying you. Really low, aren't they? That implies all of you think the likelihood of a US default is very, very low.

      That's not to say we don't need to get our financial ship in order. We do. Not doing so is the path to being the next Greece or Spain. You can only borrow your way to temporary prosperity, and the cost is your children's poverty.

    2. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

      It depends on what you value. You're from "Southern Europe". That's semi-specific.

      Judging by his name, he's from Greece.

    3. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      That sounds really ugly until you look at the interest rates we're paying you. Really low, aren't they? That implies all of you think the likelihood of a US default is very, very low.

      No, it means that governments are buying up US bonds because they know that if they let the US economy collapse they'll be next.

    4. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      His nic is "Tsakas". Now think, which semi-bankrupt Southern European country could he be from. Given that he is looking to exit one country which was living beyond its means and was called on it, the US looks too familiar. One day China is going to call in the debts. From here it looks as though the US is trying to reduce immigration anyway, not the best option.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    5. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by proslack · · Score: 1

      Pretty much every government is in debt to one degree or another. Who controls the money supply? The governments.

      --


      Floating in the black seas of infinity without a paddle.
    6. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by scorp1us · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well then as an American, I would say he should go to Greece.

      (Because I don't want him coming here and bankrupting my country. We don't need any more help!)
      (But even if he came here, he's not like it, you actually have to work 50 weeks out of the year)

      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    7. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by Sique · · Score: 1

      The main problem with "nothing like Spain" and similar comparitions is that Spain paid abouth 10% interest when it hat only a tenth of today's debt. Today, Spain pays 7%. And the U.S. during the Reaganomics had to pay up to 11.75% (Oct 1984) interest on their debts, while the total debt was only a fraction of today.
      Maybe we have a serious case of Yogi Berra here: In theory, practice and theory are the same. In practice, they aren't.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    8. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not to say we don't need to get our financial ship in order. We do. Not doing so is the path to being the next Greece or Spain.

      Nonsense. The US is a sovereign nation, unlike Greece and Spain which are beholden to the European Troika.

      The US cannot run out of money--with a fiat currency it can always issue more, as it did recently via quantitative easing to restore bank reserves. The main risk of too much money in circulation is inflation--but with high unemployment, there is no imminent risk of inflation.

    9. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by swb · · Score: 1

      You're being made an offer you can't refuse. Buy the latest tender of a trillion dollars in bonds at face value, or we'll sell you the same amount for $500 billion and just cut the other $500 billion off the top of what we owe you.

      We'll be back in six months with a new load of bonds, this time two trillion, only this time the offer is buy them all or we cut 4 trillion off what we owe you.

      Thanks for shopping with the Treasury.

    10. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Russia or the Ukraine. There are plenty of IT researchers there, something to do with Virii I think.

    11. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by kiwimate · · Score: 1

      It depends on what you value. You're from "Southern Europe". That's semi-specific. What sort of place are you looking for? Good schools? What kind of community do you want? What kind of language skills do you have and/or are willing to acquire? What sort of culture are you looking for?

      These are extremely pertinent considerations. What are your values? What's important to you?

      Do you want to live in a big city, suburbs, or out in the country? Could you not imagine living far away from the open sea, for instance? (That would knock out many countries and many states of the U.S.)

      Do you value proximity to world class museums and art galleries and opera houses?

      Do you love to go hiking in the bush/rain forest?

      Do you love to go sailing/canoeing/kayaking?

      What languages do you speak?

      Will you be allowed to move to random country? Very often, the more desirable a country is, the harder it will be to get in there (because lots of other people want to move there too). If you don't have family ties there, OR some other compelling reason (i.e. you can prove you have a million dollars to invest, have an advanced degree, and will guarantee to employ 50 locals), then you may be simply out of luck.

      How far are you willing to move? Do you have family where you are now? (It is really, really hard when you get a call that your mother's/father's/sister's/brother's health has unexpectedly deteriorated and you are in a location that is a day's travel away and you get a phone call while between flights that you're too late and your family member has just died.)

      What pace of life do you like? In a large country, different areas have very different cultures. East Coast U.S. is way different from West Coast. Some New Yorkers fall in love with the relaxed pace of Australia or New Zealand or Arkansas. Some New Yorkers can't take it - "nothing ever gets done, everything is so SLOW".

      There are just too many unknowns. You'll get a lot of comments but nothing really to base a decision on here. Only you know what's important to you.

    12. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      Huh? Are you suggesting he is work shy? What do you base this on? Would you send back the generations of Greeks already living in the US to Greece based on your bigoted preconception?

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    13. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by vipw · · Score: 1

      Not in Greece (and the rest of the Eurozone). Greece's economic problem is precisely that they do not control the money supply and can't use inflation to lower real costs.

    14. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm curious, can you point to any nation that has successfully printed it's way out of debt?

      Printing money to pay debts isn't really different from partially defaulting on them. We can certainly do either, but there are consequences to both. If you're willing to swear off borrowing from the nations you just stiffed, by all means do it. Unfortunately, I don't think the US has any credible way to stop borrowing from outside its borders in the near future.

    15. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well then as an American, I would say he should go to Greece.

      (Because I don't want him coming here and bankrupting my country. We don't need any more help!)
      (But even if he came here, he's not like it, you actually have to work 50 weeks out of the year)

      ONE person would bankrupt your continent? (American? from Argentina? Brasil?)

    16. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, your nick is Vlad so you're probably from a Slavic former communist nation, and you secretly envy the free-spirited, relaxed Greek lifestyle. See, two can play that game.

    17. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you send back the generations of Greeks already living in the US to Greece based on your bigoted preconception?

      I would send them back.

      Far too many of them are dishonest and will do anything if they believe they can get away with it.

      You're damned right I'd send them back. But I'd give them a choice : they could stay here and live in
      labor camps.

    18. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by scorp1us · · Score: 1
      --
      Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    19. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by oldmac31310 · · Score: 1

      You linked to an article debunking Merkel's statements about Greece. Yes, you are bigoted. Now get off my internet.

      --
      http://www.acetonestudio.com
    20. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      One day China is going to call in the debts.

      Could you explain to the readers how it is possible that a country controlling its money creation and loans directly by the central government can go into debts?

    21. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 for Melbourne especially if you are from Greece.. largest Greek community outside two cities in Greece (according to wikipedia), low unemployment and recently voted most liveable city in the world.

      I am Australian but not from Melbourne and would certainly recommend it over Sydney, I'm sure northern Europe or Canada would also be good choices however.

    22. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by Darby · · Score: 0

      You can only borrow your way to temporary prosperity, and the cost is your children's poverty.

      This is why I wish there was a hell for Reagan to burn in. That's what he sold everybody on, what we did and the result we're starting to live through.
      Economic cycles last longer than presidents.

    23. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, you got it backwards: the US OWNS China. It's the same difference between owing a bank $100,000 and $100,000,000: with the latter they HAVE to take care of you because you can crater their financials.

      If China held a firesale of US debt, they'd lose hundreds of billions of dollars that they can't afford. Plus they'd piss off a major trading partner. Neither thing is going to happen.

      Take a macroeconomics course. You'll learn a lot. That for one, the US isn't living beyond its means. Savvy investors are willing to loan us money for free. If we're going to go bankrupt, how could that be?

    24. Re:That's going to vary tremendously by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Europe is going down, their politicians made too many entitlement promises they couldn't keep and they won't be able to stave off the looters. The US is next. I'm seriously considering getting out of here in the next few years, though family obligations may keep me here. I hear Chile has a solid economy.

  10. Only 20 years? by davidwr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But you said raising a family.

    This means "where would you go so your kids will have the best opportunities in their lifetimes."

    Unless money to travel and attend college abroad is no object, this requires a much longer time horizon than 20 years.

    Unfortunately, any reasonably precise prediction of where the world - or any part of it - will be politically and socially 20+ years from now has a high margin of uncertainty.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  11. The US. by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think you actual understand the economic issue.
    I suspect you don't understand the EU's issue on a big scale either.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  12. What does this mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Markets are pulling the teeth out of the strong European countries by destroying the south."

    Guess they aren't that strong are they?

    Jeez, go wherever you want. Move to Cuba, they have 100% free health insurance there.

    1. Re:What does this mean? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Jeez, go wherever you want. Move to Cuba, they have 100% free health insurance there.

      Actually... an interesting idea. Not that "IT researcher" would be in high demand there, but otherwise... why not?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    2. Re:What does this mean? by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

      "Jeez, go wherever you want. Move to Cuba, they have 100% free health insurance there."
      Yeah but do you trust their "witch doctors"?

  13. Copenhagen... because of its aerospace sector ;P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go to Copenhagen. You get enterprising neigbours like Copenhagen Suborbitals and the anarchist hippies of Christiania. :P

  14. A true American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Spoken like a true American: one who hasn't ever been outside the country, yet speaks as if he has.

    1. Re:A true American by clarkkent09 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Speaking as a naturalized American who spent 20 years living abroad, mostly in western Europe, there is nothing better than traveling abroad to convince even the most anti-American American (yes there are many, mostly of the 'grass is always greener on the other side' type) just how great the USA really is.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    2. Re:A true American by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well I'm from Canada, been to the UK and Italy as well as Switzerland and Holland, also been on missions to Kenya and Haiti, i can safely say that the U.S by far is the best place to be (even if they are printing money). Will that do for non-biased or will only the answer you want to hear be sufficient for you?

    3. Re:A true American by zlives · · Score: 0

      ditto

    4. Re:A true American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can't say anything that makes sense on this cult like site. Everyone here hates American and freedom, they want to be under the boot of mommy.

    5. Re:A true American by readin · · Score: 0

      yep.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    6. Re:A true American by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 1

      I live in the middle of the drought area. Trust me, the grass really IS greener on the other side.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    7. Re:A true American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've worked both in San Francisco (CA) and in Munich (DE). And I would never ever go back to San Francisco.

      Salaries are nearly the same, taxes are about 10% higher in Germany, but you have free comprehensive healthcare and a generous pension system. And workers' rights are far higher in Germany: in all large companies unions control 50% of the Supervisory Council (nearly equivalent to the "Board" in US companies), shareholders have a limited power, they're not the "owners" of the company. Workers' dismissal is also far more difficult.

      I'm afraid that people in the US are really convinced that they live in "the richest nation in the world" because they've been told that since they were kids. Sorry, it's only the most militarized country in the world, not "the richest": 10% of wealthy people, 90% of quasi-beggars.

    8. Re:A true American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was forgetting about hours and holidays: in Germany 35 hrs a week, 31 days of paid holidays. I'm not joking, it's true.

    9. Re:A true American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as a naturalized American who spent 20 years living abroad, mostly in western Europe, there is nothing better than traveling abroad to convince even the most anti-American American (yes there are many, mostly of the 'grass is always greener on the other side' type) just how great the USA really is.

      Well, I didn't spend 20 years but seriously, except for how hard it is to lay my hands on root beer and nut butters I can't say I'm of the same opinion. It most definitely is far more awesome in so many other places, and the real kicker is in many of those places you have the time to enjoy it. Even as a successful professional in the US it's damned hard to avoid working yourself to death. I just watched far too much of another summer pass me by from the wrong side of the window.

      So yeah, not everywhere is awesome by any means, but the US is far from it. And frankly, I live in one of our more colorful cities, I'd probably drink myself senseless every night if I had to live in the midwest or bible belt.

    10. Re:A true American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh cool, anecdotal evidence without any depth.

      What a totally useless piece of "non-biased", cough, information.

      *ploink*

    11. Re:A true American by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My partner and I made the decision a long time ago to live anywhere but America. I have friends in the USA, and I visit fairly often, but I refuse to be in a country with the kind of politics that the US does. The fact that the abortion debate is alive and well is an absolute killer for us. Philosophically, we have trouble with a political system that thinks so little of its women and seems to be working hard to think even less of them. The split opinion on health care also baffles us; the fact that we don't have to consider our household budget or insurance plan when we need to see the doctor is pretty essential to us.

      But, if you don't mind the politics and the guns (whether or not you get shot; you just need to not mind being around guns), there's a lot of nice folks there and a lot of opportunity.

      So I can recommend Canada. Montreal, Halifax, Toronto and Vancouver are all amazing cities. They all have issues, but they're all wonderful in their own way. Vancouver will have the lowest taxes in that list, Montreal the highest. But the cost of living in Montreal isn't bad, so it kind of works out.

      But ultimately, trying to predict the world economy and then trying to plan on where you want to live is a mug's game. Figure out where you want to live and see if you can make a living there.

    12. Re:A true American by supercrisp · · Score: 2

      I have to disagree. Austria and Bavaria seem to me far nicer than Alabama and Tennessee. When it comes to taxation, you _can_ get what you pay for. My income tax in the US is 27.5% (state and federal income tax with medicare/social security), and in two years I'll likely be in the next bracket up, which puts me at about what my similarly-employed relatives are paying who live in Austria and Bavaria. But they get operas, healthcare, museums, beautiful cities. I get a town that's socially and culturally in a coma, ABC stores, almost daily gunfights, and downtowns built for cars and not people. I mean, Alabama is great if your idea of culture is geriatric hair bands, and it'd be fine for me if I were single again and could invest time in hunting and fishing as I once did. But for urban culture, it's hard to beat some places in Western Europe. But then again, I'm not all "socialism is slavery," and I'll never earn in those brackets where a German is paying 60% of his income in taxes.

    13. Re:A true American by mydn · · Score: 1

      Your mother wears combat boots!

    14. Re:A true American by SecurityTheatre · · Score: 2

      That's funny, I've spent some time in Canada and Germany and I find both the personal, and business culture to be much more approachable and not substantially more expensive (sometimes cheaper).

      Where were you? Spain? Belgium?

      Places with a culture of "work to live" are really different than places with a "live to work" culture like is prevalent in the US. It certainly does take some adjustment, but as someone who left the US a number of years ago, I'm really glad I did.

      http://www.vancouversun.com/business/Labour+shortages+Canada+lure+workers/6992936/story.html

    15. Re:A true American by Creepy · · Score: 1

      Interesting sig... not exactly sure how an economic system where the workers jointly own the business could possibly be slavery, in fact it seems the exact opposite... OH, you mean the idiots that try to apply socialist ideas to politics and get welfare states like Obama has been doing (100 million people/ ~1/3 of the population on welfare?! wtf). But that isn't socialism.

      Incidentally, I have friends and a relative living in various parts of Germany and relatives in Paris and they absolutely love it and would never move back to America (most have lived there 10+ years), so I guess each to their own.

    16. Re:A true American by Applekid · · Score: 1

      But, if you don't mind the politics and the guns (whether or not you get shot; you just need to not mind being around guns), there's a lot of nice folks there and a lot of opportunity.

      Funny you should mention that. I really wish there was a country with a truly progressive political ideology in place that still lets me play with my guns. It's one of my few hobbies that I truly love but I wince when I hear politicians barking about "defending marriage" and such things that should be behind the civilized world by now.

      --
      More Twoson than Cupertino
    17. Re:A true American by TechHSV · · Score: 1

      You could say that others think so little of human life that they believe any reason is good enough for ending it.

    18. Re:A true American by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 2

      Just so you know you hit 42% + 5.5% of taxes at ~50k USD in Germany. And VAT is 19%. So really tax rate for 2* the minimum wage is ~60% in terms of what you can actually spend on goods versus what ends up in the government hands.

      And that's only if you don't own a house or a car or ..., because then you'll be paying more.

      And it's not like higher paying jobs are easier in Germany. In fact, they're far easier to get in the US.

    19. Re:A true American by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 2

      And I forgot about a pet peeve of mine. Keep in mind that for anything remotely interesting, the cost in stores should be using the exchange rate 1 EUR = 1 USD, for example for an iPad or a tablet or a computer. So everything remote computer or telco related is another 30% more expensive than in the US.

      It's getting close to the point that if you want to buy a decent laptop, you may as well travel into the US to buy it, as the price difference will pay for the flight, and you get to go sightseeing in the process.

    20. Re:A true American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quote: But, if you don't mind the politics and the guns (whether or not you get shot; you just need to not mind being around guns), there's a lot of nice folks there and a lot of opportunity.

      You're stereotyping the nation unfairly. I'm from the coast of NH, (in the region known as "New England" - the north eastern most part of the nation)in case you're not aware) - I've never actually seen a gun outside of police issue, museum pieces, and one antique hunting rifle I inherited and would never fire. If there are more than 5 guns privately owned amongst everyone I've ever met, I'd be extremely surprised.

    21. Re:A true American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fact that the abortion debate is alive and well is an absolute killer for us. Philosophically, we have trouble with a political system that thinks so little of its women and seems to be working hard to think even less of them

      Actually, abortion is only an "absolute killer" of unborn children, over half of whom are girls

      The pro-abortion view is terribly corrosive re humanity and society's view of the value of the life of the individual... I'd prefer NOT to live in any place where abortion was a generally accepted idea; such places have a reduced view of the value of the individual human being and tend to try to paper it over with rhetoric about the value of people or groups of people or society (see Europe, where such rhetoric has so infiltrated the minds that many there cannot even comprehend the American focus on the individual).

    22. Re:A true American by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but health insurance is included in the tax. When I moved to the US, I was like "cool, so much less taxes", but now that I discovered just how much money my employer pays for my health insurance (instead of giving it to me), it's more like "lame, more of my wage ends up being withheld than in my home country". And don't give me that "you're still free to not get Health Insurance" shit because it's purely hypothetical - I do want health insurance and I pity you if you don't, thank you very much. It's about as helpful as saying: "instead of complaining about the risk of being mugged at gunpoint, just stay in your house all day, you're free to do so" (but not to have a beer outside).
      And then we haven't factored in the other things yet, such as cheap and ubiquitous public transport, clean and relatively safe cities, yummy and healthy food that in the grocery stores that is actually affordable (unlike Whole Foods) + all the thing GP mentioned.

    23. Re:A true American by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      I call bullshit. The price differences are getting less and less. Except for the simlocked sponsored phones for which you have to sign a 2-year plan at rates that would give Europeans a heartattack.

    24. Re:A true American by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      Funny you should say that; I've always been saying the same thing but with "Europe" and "USA" swapped. Guess it's a cultural thing.

    25. Re:A true American by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      And I forgot about a pet peeve of mine: vacation. I'd just love to see your face when you discover you get 10 days of vacation a year. Yes it's really that little for a lot of jobs in the US. Unless you're a full employee of a university, you'll rarely come close to the 20-30 days you can reasonably expect in your home country.

    26. Re:A true American by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Most of the money you will spend is not in gadgets but in food, clothing, etc. Also the prices for computer hardware in Germany are low compared to the EU average.

    27. Re:A true American by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why if you live in the South, stay out of the cities. They are generally have large run down urban cores with a few nice areas around the edges. If we could nuke the inner cities, they would be ok.

    28. Re:A true American by genik76 · · Score: 1

      Exaggeration. Many companies provide 30 days of paid holidays but AFAIK only 25 is legally required. Of course there are several public holidays on top of the normal holiday (relating to Christianity) which do not exist in USA or many other, especially non-European, countries. 35 hours a week is also not a standard, I think 38-40 hours is more common in white-collar professions.

    29. Re:A true American by Fished · · Score: 1

      Philosophically, I have a problem with any country that thinks so little of children as to allow them to be killed before they're even born.

      --
      "He who would learn astronomy, and other recondite arts, let him go elsewhere. " -- John Calvin, commenting on Genesis 1
    30. Re:A true American by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1
    31. Re:A true American by BertieBaggio · · Score: 1

      Sales tax is not included on the Apple US site as it varies state-by-state :) The actual cost of the iPad 2 in Germany from the Apple store is EUR 335,29 (ie EUR 399 after tax).

      Zwischensumme 335,29 €
      Kostenfreie Lieferung 0,00 €
      Mehrwertsteuer 63,71 €
      Gesamtbetrag 399,00 €

      versus

      Cart subtotal $499
      Free Shipping $0
      Estimated Tax $30
      Order Total $529

      For delivery to a Detroit-metropolitan area ZIP code. Oddly, though the iPad 2 is listed for USD 399, I couldn't actually find out how to buy one of those, the basic price being 499 USD instead. Hope this clears up the confusion!

      --
      If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
    32. Re:A true American by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      37.5 hour days (non-exempt), about 35 days off counting PTO and holidays. Live in the US, midwest.

    33. Re:A true American by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Universities and Gov. jobs are supposed to set the standards of more vacation and balanced worklife. The Fox news crowd has convinced people that they are not free loaders instead of fore-runners.
      It saddens me when I hear people talk about Gov employees salary and benefits. Federal workers and contractors were the first to benefit from an 8 hour workday, it has since spread to the rest of the economy. Unfortunately there are many forces at work to smother this accomplishment.

    34. Re:A true American by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And even in the hypothetical case you'd manage to find it for $399 with no strings attached ("truth in advertising" has a different meaning in the US than in Europe), I dare "oelewapperke" to find a plane ticket to the US and back for EUR 75. The cheapest return flight I ever got was more than EUR 500; I'd love to know what kind of "decent laptop" he's planning to buy. Of course, he might be scheming to bring stuff for his family and friends too. Then he'd have to be very careful; the customs officers in Europe are keeping an eye out for people coming from the US loaded with apple products (which, in all fairness, have been cheaper in the US at times). Bottom line is that I can imagine more profitable businesses than running electronics from the US to the EU. And as I said, the price differences are getting less and less.

  15. Any place except Europe and Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any inhabited continent has a future except Europe and Africa, and I'm not sure about Africa.

    1. Re:Any place except Europe and Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Any inhabited continent has a future except Europe and Africa, and I'm not sure about Africa.

      You must be new here, you forgot to diss America in your post.

    2. Re:Any place except Europe and Africa by dkleinsc · · Score: 2

      Please explain exactly why Europe has a worse future than, say, South America. It has serious problems, but it also has a highly educated population, an industrialized economy, relatively stable political systems (prime ministers come and go, but governments aren't getting overthrown by force like they would in many other places), long life expectancy, and quite a lot of wealth.

      Also, I highly suspect you've never been there. If you had, you'd be pretty much crazy to prefer living in, say, the Congo.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    3. Re:Any place except Europe and Africa by Skewray · · Score: 1

      [...snip...] Also, I highly suspect you've never been there. If you had, you'd be pretty much crazy to prefer living in, say, the Congo.

      Many African countries allow one to have as many wives as one wants. Now that's a draw!

    4. Re:Any place except Europe and Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's simple, discounting the current economic dip, the entire world has been ascending economically, socially and politically, except for Europe, which has been declining for almost a century now and will continue to decline. It may have a highly educated population but it's largely living off entitlements, the result of which is now a global recession, and thank you very much for that.

      Africa too is ascending, but it had to come from so far back. Africa is more than just Congo. Are you Belgian by any chance?

    5. Re:Any place except Europe and Africa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "it also has a highly educated population, an industrialized economy, relatively stable political systems (prime ministers come and go, but governments aren't getting overthrown by force like they would in many other places), long life expectancy, and quite a lot of wealth."

      Obviously a fan of Sir Ralph Norman Angell. He wrote The Great Illusion prior to World War I. He pointed out all the things you've listed and said, ipso facto, that Europe would never see war again. Shortly thereafter war as bad as any ever seen in the Congo was raging among the super-civilized Europeans.

      If you don't think it could ever happen again, you've not been paying attention to what the Greeks are now saying about Germans.

  16. Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously. Texas. And don't believe the haters. It is a great place to raise a family and if you move to the major Urban centers you will find a good mix of conservative government and libertarian social values. Austin is my home and will remain my home for a long time to come.

    1. Re:Texas by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Second for Austin, stay away from Houston unless you want to die young (cancer).

      Economically, Texas has good employment, high pay, low cost of living, decent climate, etc.

      Advice for anywhere you relocate: rent, for at least 3 years - it's much easier and cheaper to relocate again if you don't own real-estate.

    2. Re:Texas by Sponge+Bath · · Score: 1

      Texas has... decent climate

      East Texas is hot and humid, central is hot and arid, West is hot and desert. A central Texas summer weather forecast is typically "very hot with chance of scattered wild fires". I personally like Austin, but know many who have moved here and are disappointed. Know before you go.

    3. Re:Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you will find a good mix of conservative government and libertarian social values.

      Yep, it's a great mix as long as you aren't gay, a minority or poor.

    4. Re:Texas by Jeng · · Score: 1

      No, don't go to Austin, our traffic sucks enough already.

      The public transportation is pitiful if you work anywhere besides downtown or a college community. It is often just as fast to walk somewhere as it is to ride the bus, and riding a bike is a lot faster than the buses. Lived without a car in Austin for a year, so this is personal experience, not hyperbole.

      We also have very expensive rents and apartment occupancy rate is 95%. It is currently cheaper to buy a house in Austin than it is to rent an apartment in Austin.

      I'm sure I can come up with more reasons not to move to Austin.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    5. Re:Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Economically, Texas has good employment, high pay, low cost of living, decent climate, etc.

      Actually it's unemployment rate falls on pretty much both the average and median of the whole country (ranked 19th overall). So nothing spectacular there. For median income it ranks 41st based on 2010 census data. Ranks 24th in per capita income. And is ranked 8th in highest cost of living. So basically all your points are false.

    6. Re:Texas by Desler · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I can come up with more reasons not to move to Austin.

      The obnoxious, poser hipsters would be another one.

    7. Re:Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Austin? I'd really not put that on the list unless one had at a least a USD 200,000 salary.

      The infrastructure is woefully inadequate, and with the powers that be (mainly land developers who want to encourage sprawl as well as the eco-luddites who just don't want to see new roads), it will remain so. The last significant traffic improvement in the town was made in 1995. Even the state of Texas (of course, with the own politics there) ended up cutting a tollway around the east side of the city, although none of the NAFTA truck drivers take that road (too cheap to pay the $20 or so, even though it costs them more in diesel to sit in the I-35 parking lot.) The only changes have been roads closed to make them into bikeways, as well as roads narrowed with lanes taken away.

      Because the city has zero interest in infrastructure, expect to wind up in one of the outer towns like Round Rock or Taylor.

      Home prices: Through the roof. A piece of crap house on the "right" side of town will run a quarter of a mil, and that is before one has to gut and rebuild it from scratch. Renting is a PITA -- renters have to bid on apartments and whomever offers the most amount of money gets to stay there. Buying is also a PITA, as your credit record has to be *perfect* or else you will not qualify, period.

      Public transportation: Also woefully inadequate. There used to be the 'Dillo for going downtown, but that got sacked. Now, most buses are bedrooms, living rooms, and bathrooms for the local homeless population.

      Things to do: There is a push by the council to turn Sixth Street into Main Street USA, so good venues are closing left and right. Austin has less than 1/3 of the places for a band to play than it did a decade ago. Of course, you can try to find a parking spot and try a coffee shop like the Spider House, but good luck to you. If you find one, might as well head to the nearby 7-11 and buy yourself a lotto ticket.

      Hate to say it, but because of all the refugees from California turning the place into another LA wannabee city, Austin's best days are in the past.

      If you want to move to Texas, you might look at Dallas or Fort Worth. Not as "hip" as Austin, but plenty to do there.

    8. Re:Texas by Jeng · · Score: 1

      For the most part as long as you don't go to hipsterish places you don't run into too many hipsters.

      Oh wait, I don't want people to move here.

      Um, yea, hipsters are all over the damn place, they are like lice or something, you can't get rid of them, stay away.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    9. Re:Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, its true, the cost of living in Texas is good. Except that Texas is full of bible thumping retards and its public schools are a disaster (if you have kids). People in Texas use to say "Thank god for Mississippi as it historically had worse schools, now people in Mississippi say "Thank god for Texas" as it leads the pack (for the race to the bottom).

    10. Re:Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I moved away from Austin after giving it 5 years or so. Too many outsiders diluting the local culture.

    11. Re:Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. The remaining space in Austin is reserved for fellow former Los Angeles residents.

    12. Re:Texas by Jeng · · Score: 1

      If you are referring to me as a former Los Angeles resident, you are mistaken, but yes there are many Californians in Austin. I would not be surprised if Austin is 2/3's or more non-native Texan.

      --
      Don't know something? Look it up. Still don't know? Then ask.
    13. Re:Texas by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      My city (Regina, Saskatchewan, Canada) has an apartment vacancy rate of 0.8% (i.e. 99.2% occupancy rate). A 95% occupancy rate (i.e. 5% vacancy rate) is considered to be very, very favourable to tenants. 2-3% vacancy is neutral from what I understand.

    14. Re:Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget zombies. Austin tends to be a hot-spot for those as well.

      All and all, Austin isn't too bad. Just remember, drive out 20 miles east, and you hit banjo country. This is why most Austinites end up with a pickup truck (so they can drive the byways without tearing off an axle or oil pan), and a Prius (which is great for dealing with the idle times on I-35 and Loop 1, while being able to keep up with the traffic going 85-90 on 130.)

    15. Re:Texas by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Based on the stats, sure, Texas is average.

      Based on my colleagues (in Houston) with M.S. Engineering degrees and 10 years work experience, there was basically instant employment in the $60-$110K salary range. People who were laid off from the company with zero warning were finding better paying jobs closer to their homes within less than 3 weeks.

      Cost of living: I'm going based on home ownership - $160K bought us 2800sf on a 1 acre lot in very close-in suburban Clear Lake... taxes are high ($5K on that house), but manageable. We were leaving Miami where we sold 1800sf on 1/4 acre in a similar neighborhood (with similar $5K/yr taxes) for $350K (2003). I'm sure there are cheaper places, but not so many with the good job market.

      So, if you're an average American, read the average stats and ignore /.

      If you're a highly educated tech worker, maybe what we pull out of various body orifices around here is actually of more value than the standard government statistics that any idiot with too much time on their hands can Google up on demand.

    16. Re:Texas by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I lived in Miami from age 15-35, by comparison, pretty much everywhere East of Vegas and South of the Mason Dixon line is filled with bible thumping retards who refuse to fund public education - Miami schools weren't great, though the neighborhood we lived in did pass a special taxing district to help fund the neighborhood schools.

      Clear Lake Texas, and other isolated pockets, are the exception - taxes are higher in those locales, but it is actually possible to run a decent public school system when you're willing to spend 5-10% more than you are absolutely required to by Federal Law.

    17. Re:Texas by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Texas has... decent climate

      East Texas is hot and humid, central is hot and arid, West is hot and desert. A central Texas summer weather forecast is typically "very hot with chance of scattered wild fires". I personally like Austin, but know many who have moved here and are disappointed. Know before you go.

      Depends on your definition of decent... I consider shoveling snow and Phoenix's multi year droughts to be indecent. West Texas doesn't really count, if you go per-capita it's a very small part of the state.

  17. go OR start a family by tokul · · Score: 0

    You can choose to relocate or to start a family and accept jobs in local area. Long distance relocation does not work well with families, if you are not from nomad culture.

  18. Brazil by ventolinmono · · Score: 1

    I live in Mexico doing interactive systems. I like Brazil. Agree there is opportunity there for IT. If moving to another country Brazil will be my first choice.

    1. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like Brazil to move faster, but I have to disagree with your overall opinion.
      Brazil is going to a good direction, by reducing the levels of poverty and so. Many things left to do, I agree, like fighting corruption and putting more money in education and police/safety.

      It's a good place to live if you like "taking it easy". Everything is slower than in many other countries, but people is usually happy, very informal, the weather is amazing, and if you can make enough money, you can live like a king down here.

    2. Re:Brazil by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      a government which is making the same mistakes which resulted in the European crisis

      Isn't it great how we've been conditioned to assume that these are mistakes, when all the evidence (including history) clearly demonstrates otherwise? (Sorry-ass bunch of fucking Teckla, aren't we...)

    3. Re:Brazil by leandrod · · Score: 1

      we've been conditioned to assume that these are mistakes, when all the evidence (including history) clearly demonstrates otherwise?

      Given I never said which are the mistakes, I wonder what you are talking about.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    4. Re:Brazil by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Given I never said which are the mistakes

      That was a real tough one to figure out. :p

    5. Re:Brazil by billcarson · · Score: 1

      But assuming you are confident Brazil is making the same, you know which mistakes Europe has made. Please elaborate.

    6. Re:Brazil by leandrod · · Score: 1

      But assuming you are confident Brazil is making the same, you know which mistakes Europe has made. Please elaborate.

      We are spending against the future, but not getting much out of it. Government spent a lot on salaries by hiring and raising public sector salaries but managed to invest only a little bit — in (specially Southern) Europe, they invested a lot but much of it was malinvestment, that is, investments in building for a market that would never realise, as demographics did not generate demand.

      To expand a bit, government here leaves little room for private investment by a ridiculously high tax level. The resulting dearth of capital makes interest rates relatively high. People have little in return because government simply spends a lot but public services provided are of very low quality. Government development agencies and programs were build and are funded, but these agencies only paid salaries and never managed to build the infrastructure for development they should.

      Another similarity to Europe is that we are under demographic transition. We are below population reposition natality levels, but we have no immigration policy to speak of, and compared to Europe we have much lower savings and education to see us through the transition to an hypothetical new economic model which would not rely on growth. And we haven’t even started to think about this supposed new economic model; we do not even know if it is possible to build such a thing.

      Now, for where we are quite different from Europe: we are relatively comfortable because we have been exporting lots of commodities for high prices, because of the Chinese industrial growth and living standards improvement. Specially iron ore and soy. We have been lucky. For instance, now that Chinese growth is decelarating, crops have taken a hit in the United States and thus commodity prices are likely to stay high for a while longer, perhaps enough for China to recover and keep our balance of payments healthy. But we are not using the opportunity to build a manufacturing or a services factor: we have bad transportation insfrastructure for manufacturing (Chinese model), and a incredibly low quality education for services (Indian model).

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    7. Re:Brazil by billcarson · · Score: 1

      Defecit spending is no stranger to Southern Europe indeed, but things are not always as they seem. In fact, when you look at countries like Germany, France, the US and Japan, you'll notice the same problem. The fact that southern europe is the first to fail has, in my humble opinion, probably more to do with the fact that these countries have not enough industry (and financial lobbying power) to back their spending.
      Actually, the problems you mention apply to all emerging economies: they are spending like there is no tomorrow, but not on the right things. Whether it is Russia who invests in huge prestige projects, while neglecting its infrastructure, or China who invests in military projects that don't go anywhere; I think Brazil is still one of the better ones when it comes to fiscal responsibility.
      I assume you have a better view on the situation than I have, but here where I live (one of the larger cities in Europe), a lot of administration has moved to Brazil because of the lower tax cap (at least that is what they told us).
      The reason why I, as a foreign investor, would prefer Brazil over, lets say India, is that Brazil is now pretty much in the same position as the US was a long time ago: you have their own natural resources, your own industry and your own sales market. A major drop in foreign demand would not influence Brazil as much as it would influence China or India, who are very dependent on the western demand.

    8. Re:Brazil by leandrod · · Score: 1

      Brazil is still one of the better ones when it comes to fiscal responsibility.

      I hope so. Actually, for the last decade or so the current government has been lowering the standards on the public sector accounting and manipulating the numbers both on public finance and on mixed capital companies, so we just do not trust the rosy picture the government paints. It is like we are living for the last decade on the trust built on the decade and a half before that.

      where I live (one of the larger cities in Europe), a lot of administration has moved to Brazil because of the lower tax cap (at least that is what they told us).

      Yes, that is true. But the common citizen, who earns a lot less than his First World counterpart, pays double: he pays taxes to keep roads, but has to change his mini SUV often because asphalt is so bad cars last less; he pays taxes to keep the police force, but has to pay for private security because of violence and criminality; he pays taxes to build schools and hire teachers, to the cost of up to US$5K per pupil (in the Federal District) and then pays another U$5K per children in a private school because public schools are garbage; and he has to live in a closed condominium because public streets are too noisy, since government is not competent enough to police noise levels and mediate between neighbours. Also, plan on the additional risk from a practically nonfuncional judicial system. Many people resort to bribery to get justice done or to navigate state bureaucracy.

      Also, taxes on payroll, on manufacturing and imports are ridiculously high. Manufactured or imported goods usually cost triple as they would cost in the US, or double the European prices.

      If you earn enough to pay double for all these services government is supposed to provide, and to pay around double for everything imported (which is nearly all electronics and automobiles plus quite some stuff), life is pretty good.

      The reason why I, as a foreign investor, would prefer Brazil over, lets say India, is that Brazil is now pretty much in the same position as the US was a long time ago: you have their own natural resources, your own industry and your own sales market. A major drop in foreign demand would not influence Brazil as much as it would influence China or India, who are very dependent on the western demand.

      Actually, we are totally dependent on selling commodities, specially to China.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    9. Re:Brazil by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Me too. But I also wonder what you are talking about.

      I just can't find the mistakes our current government is making that the EU also made. We aren't getting deeper into debt, we aren't taking any power away from our central bank, and we aren't turning into foreign commerce (that being a mistake or not).

      If anything, the current brazilian government just shows that the set of available mistakes is huge, and that they can still get completely original ones.

    10. Re:Brazil by leandrod · · Score: 1

      I also wonder what you are talking about.

      Check my oðer post, elsewhere in ðis thread.

      I just can't find the mistakes our current government is making that the EU also made. We aren't getting deeper into debt, we aren't taking any power away from our central bank, and we aren't turning into foreign commerce (that being a mistake or not).

      Yes, we are. We are spending like ðere was no tomorrow, and in current expenses, not investments; we are bending public accounting to allow ðe Central Bank to print more money; we are living on exporting commodities, pricing manufacturing out of ðe market (Dutch malady).

      If anything, the current brazilian government just shows that the set of available mistakes is huge, and that they can still get completely original ones.

      Granted.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    11. Re:Brazil by joshio · · Score: 2

      If I were going to relocate internationally, Brazil would be high on my list (although I don't know what their immigration policy is, and whether it's even possible). I was sent to Sao Paulo and Campinas recently for work, and although I didn't particularly care for Sao Paulo, I found Campinas to be quite beautiful - it would certainly be on my list of possibilities for relocation.

      I can say from experience that working with various telcos (Algar, Embratel, GVT) and even the colo we put equipment in (Terremark Sao Paulo) is a serious challenge if you don't speak Portuguese. As more and more foreign companies start to look at Brazil for various reasons, more and more of these Brazilian companies are going to be looking to hire people who can speak both Portuguese and English. From our IT staff we have down there (who speak both Portuguese and English), the differences in salary compared to the US aren't that large, and there are other variances in compensation that make up even some of that difference (for example, they appear to have a lot more holidays and PTO than we do).

      As AC mentioned, I did enjoy the slower pace, and everyone seemed fairly happy. Heck, even in the worst traffic in Sao Paulo, I didn't hear that many people blaring their car horns. Unlike places like New York City where almost everyone uses them constantly.

      Yes, Brazil still has issues (corruption, poverty, etc) - but every country has issues of some sort. Pick your poison.

    12. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually,

      Brazil is quite a great place to live if you make the right choices. We have a severe skill shortage in the IT/IB/Consulting sectors. I know several firms in the services industry that are bringing people from abroad to work here, because they just can't find enough local people to hire. And we expect the market to continue to boom for at least 20 or so years.

      Taxes are heavy, and you should expect to pay for most services that are state provided in other countries (like schools and health care) on top of taxes. The only thing you ever get out of the state is free, quality university education.

      About the language and culture issues, Brazil has a fairly similar culture to most European countries (it`s somewhere in between USA and Portugal). The people are very friendly towards foreigners and very understanding about your language short-comings. The language is not easy (at least for most anglophones), but is very similar to Spanish or Italian. You need at least a basic understanding of the language to work here (or you can come straight away if you speak Spanish or Italian).

      Having lived in Australia and in the US as well (but being native from Brazil), I find the country is a good choice, if you plan to stay here on the long run and want to make money. Just don't expect to have the same life you would in Sweden! Brazil is, after all, a developing country.

      Hope I have helped.

    13. Re:Brazil by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      Government spent a lot on salaries by hiring and raising public sector salaries but managed to invest only a little bit

      Public sector salaries have been around 15% of GDP for a decade. Inflation reduce it, then raises increse it again, so it doesn't change much. The HUGE flow spending the government talks about is composed mainly of salaries, interest and money redistribution. And interest is getting lower, because the debt/GDP is falling (also, the governemnt is getting cheaper credit, but that never lasts). Now, money redistribution the way it is currently done is a huge problem.

      We are in a serious situation, we may get into a long term crisis. But we are not following the steps of Europe.

    14. Re:Brazil by leandrod · · Score: 1

      Public sector salaries have been around 15% of GDP for a decade. Inflation reduce it, then raises increse it again, so it doesn't change much.

      Yes — but ðat was while investment stagnated, commodities buoyed the economy and manufacturing stagnated, and education continues to widen the capability gap to oðer societies. Now public servants feel ðey deserve more, and society will not give ðem anything because it feels illserved; and, ðis being a government of syndicalists, it has to say no but does not know how to.

      We are in a serious situation, we may get into a long term crisis. But we are not following the steps of Europe.

      Mutatus mutandis, we are. Check my oðer post. To sum it up here, Southern Europe malinvested based on credit in Euros, in real state instead of manufacturing and services capabilities; we not even invested, but spent all we gained from commodities. And both of us are into a demographic transition changing ðe rules of ðe game, yet we are not capable even of acknowledging ðe fact.

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    15. Re:Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only thing you ever get out of the state is free, quality university education.

      As a Brazilian who moved to the US to study computer science, I believe you missed the word "bad" right before "quality".

  19. My picks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1: Most Canadian cities. Canada does not have the economic ups and downs that other countries have, crime is low (you don't need multiple firearms on you just to go get six-pack of beer), and the cities are safe to have families in, unlike US cities where people are always in a flight mode.

    2: Scandinavian countries. They also don't have the boom cycles, but they are stable and very safe places to settle down in.

    3: Some areas in the US. Unlike TV, the US isn't a place where you have to have eight machine guns on your SUV as you plod along into a Mad Max-like sunrise on your way to work. Vermont is an example of a place you can settle in, and not worry about safety, for example.

    If I were forced to choose a country, I'd probably go Sweden or Canada. Germany is also good.

    1. Re:My picks... by Vlad_the_Inhaler · · Score: 2

      Estonia?
      Climate is obviously a disadvantage (in winter) but it is very IT orientated and on its way up. No problems with immigration authorities. The cost of living is not *that* high but wages are not that high either - unless you work for Skype.

      --
      Mielipiteet omiani - Opinions personal, facts suspect.
    2. Re:My picks... by c0lo · · Score: 1

      1: Most Canadian cities. Canada does not have the economic ups and downs that other countries have, crime is low (you don't need multiple firearms on you just to go get six-pack of beer),

      Ummm... you mean you still need one? Isn't the prohibition over yet?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    3. Re:My picks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup I would say Estonia too. Also Helsinki is nearby if you want to have better wages.

  20. Emigration Sucks by bobbutts · · Score: 1

    It's expensive and time consuming with unpredictable returns.

    1. Re:Emigration Sucks by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 2

      It's expensive and time consuming with unpredictable returns.

      "Time consuming"? This isn't the ocean liner era, this is the jet age! Leave Heathrow and 13 hours later you're in San Francisco.

      When I left England I was excited as all hell about moving to California. The excitement has never 100% worn off, and I've been here 12 years now.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    2. Re:Emigration Sucks by 0123456 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Time consuming"? This isn't the ocean liner era, this is the jet age! Leave Heathrow and 13 hours later you're in San Francisco.

      You seem to have skipped the part where you wait years for a residency visa/green card and then years more for citizenship so you can't be kicked out at any time. Some of my friends went to California on work permits in the late 90s and were back a few weeks later when their new employer laid them off.

    3. Re:Emigration Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Confused. fiannaFailMan is from England? I didn't think they had much use for your brand of political allegiance in England.

  21. I'm also looking for somewhere new by bigjarom · · Score: 1

    I relocated from Calgary, Canada to Phoenix, Arizona about 5 years ago almost entirely for the AZ weather, which I love. I absolutely can't stand the backward politics and social attitudes here though. I too am looking for possible alternatives in the future. I would like to find somewhere with consistently warm weather, progressive social and political attitudes, and reasonable immigration policies for a Data Analyst with a Master's degree. Does such a place exist?

    1. Re:I'm also looking for somewhere new by KPexEA · · Score: 1

      Australia?

    2. Re:I'm also looking for somewhere new by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Australia. See my post below.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    3. Re:I'm also looking for somewhere new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try Austin, TX. Similar weather, but not as dry. It is a progressive college town with lots of tech companies and also startups.

    4. Re:I'm also looking for somewhere new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Come back to Calgary dude. You can make enough here to just travel wherever and whenever you want.

    5. Re:I'm also looking for somewhere new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Southern Europe is the place for you.

    6. Re:I'm also looking for somewhere new by Dan667 · · Score: 1

      Austin is an island of progressive in a sea of conservatives though.

    7. Re:I'm also looking for somewhere new by bigjarom · · Score: 1

      I lived in Calgary for 15 years. I know it's not the coldest place in the world, but it's too cold for me.

    8. Re:I'm also looking for somewhere new by bigjarom · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that's very similar to Tempe, AZ which is actually where I live. The ASU folks are fine, it's everyone else in in the greater Phoenix metro area that are the problem.

    9. Re:I'm also looking for somewhere new by kwerle · · Score: 1

      There are a few degrees difference between Phoenix and Calgary. Most of the planet comes to mind.

      The SF bay area is super expensive, but is about as progressive as you could want. If you find the right place to live, then the weather can be great, too. I loved Redwood City. Mountain View was nice. San Bruno sucked.

      The LA area is plenty warm and has lots of jobs. San Diego - inland - can stay plenty hot. There are a whole lot of options.

    10. Re:I'm also looking for somewhere new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backwards? Is it backwards to ask that the government assure freedom, but not to be our babysitter, or play robin hood? Government is not the solution to all of our problems.

    11. Re:I'm also looking for somewhere new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      San Diego is horrible! do not go there! I repeat, do not go there!

    12. Re:I'm also looking for somewhere new by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      He won't like it in Southern Europe, it's much too cold there. If he loves the weather in Arizona, then he's only going to be happy in someplace like Saudi Arabia, northern Africa, or maybe the desert of Australia.

      BTW, I live in AZ too; it sucks here, and that includes the weather. 115 degrees (F) every day is not fun, and 2 months of nice weather in January/February doesn't make up for it. I'm ready to move north and put up with the cold.

    13. Re:I'm also looking for somewhere new by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I'm posting this from Tempe AZ. The people here suck. Maybe the ASU folks are OK, but there's a big culture change as soon as you get away from campus. This town is mostly a big, ugly ghetto.

      I noticed this years ago when I graduated from college (in a small college town on the east coast), and got a job in that same town. Suddenly, living in a college town wasn't much fun. It was loads of fun when you don't have a job and you spend most of your time on campus or in one of the eateries right next to campus. But when you're working a normal job and not involved with anything or anyone on campus, it's really not a fun place at all.

  22. The grass is not always greener.... by bleh-of-the-huns · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No matter where you look, each location will have its own fair share of problems. Rather then picking a location based on economics and political issues, pick a location where you will be happy.

    Now obviously, being happy is contingent on being employed and being able to live where you choose, but I guarantee you one thing, following the money does not always work.

    --
    I came, I conquered, I coredumped
  23. Minnesota, USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Twin Cities (Minneapolis & Saint Paul) Minnesota. Hands down. Big IT market that is growing, middle of the continent, near the Canadian border, more fresh water lakes than any other place on the planet. Very progressive populace with excellent education and employment opportunities. Only real problem is a terrible fucking transportation system but we are trying to fix that.

    Please tell NO ONE. ;)

    1. Re:Minnesota, USA by sensei+moreh · · Score: 1

      Dude, you forgot to mention our weather. It's very nice today (25C), but it can get a bit on the cool side (-32C) come winter.

      --
      Geology - it's not rocket science; it's rock science
    2. Re:Minnesota, USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transportation system isn't the only problem here - yes, IT market is good - but the taxes are killer on the upper end.

    3. Re:Minnesota, USA by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Isn't that where Michelle Bachmann comes from? Any place where the people are backwards enough to elect that freak is not going to be a place where anyone from Europe would want to live.

  24. Proximity to Slashdot by ewg · · Score: 1

    Ann Arbor, 'cause that's where Slashdot be.

    --
    org.slashdot.post.SignatureNotFoundException: ewg
    1. Re:Proximity to Slashdot by 21mhz · · Score: 2

      Aye. Imagine, being able to shave microseconds off your fr0st p1sst response times...

      --
      My exception safety is -fno-exceptions.
  25. where, oh where by macbeth66 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Regardless of what order you list the cities and/or countries today, you would have a completely different list in 5, again in 10 and yet another in 20. I'd say your pick should be based on the culture you're most comfortable with.

    Personally, I'd stay the heck away from India and China. I would leave if I were in either place. Both countries have serious infrastructure issues. And I would not want to live in a slave state ( China ), regardless if they seem to be opening up. That is only for the well connected. The working slobs have it worse than anywhere else in the wolrd. Hong Kong is an exception, but that is slowly fading.

    1. Re:where, oh where by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry, but that is a gross calumny of what the economic climate is in China. I am not sure what you mean by 'working slob' but a white guy from Europe who knows English well enough to write this 'Ask Slashdot' question and is an 'IT researcher' would do very well in China. For that matter, most Chinese that have family in a major city and successfully graduate from a decent high school and university will find employment that gives them comparable buying power to other first-world nations as long as they buy primarily domestic goods.

      Now if you criticized their political climate for being oppressive and caustic to liberty I would have agreed with you whole heartedly. But as far as economics go, the reality is that the Chinese analogue to your average urban middle-class American actually does quite well and lives comfortably in China.

    2. Re:where, oh where by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But his white children would most likely suffer interminably in a culture where the greatest good is to "be alike", as evidenced by the Beijing Opening Ceremonies. Having worked for a Japanese company, I've experienced this in the US and have talked to many people who have similarly suffered at their jobs for not being "the same" as everyone else.

    3. Re:where, oh where by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Given the crap they ship to America to fill our Wal*Marts, buying primarily domestic goods in China is a step down from the rest of the world in terms of quality of life.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  26. Yes, We are #1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are just concerned about the economy, then go to China. They only care about money, not about anything else.

    If you just care about happiness, go to Northern Europe. Denmark has one of the happiest populations.

    In general, Canada has 90% of the benefits of US, with the minor penalties of a worse current economy (but less problems on the horizon), colder weather, and less potential upside.

    If you have the courage to take risks, then got o US. Pick the right state - the western ones (Alaska -> California) and Colorado all have major things going for them. Frankly while the downside is higher here in the USA, so is the upside, as it has always been.

    1. Re:Yes, We are #1 by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      What's worse about the Canadian economy?

      Debt is lower, unemployment is lower. Some of the country (particularly Alberta and Saskatchewan) are still booming. Saskatchewan saw a 15% increase in real estate prices year-over-year 2011 to 2012, despite significant increases since 2008.

      There are rumblings of real estate price adjustments in BC, Alberta, Ontario and Quebec but they will not be close to the degree of adjustments that California, Arizona and Florida experienced.

      Currently Canadian average wealth per capita and GDP per capita exceed the US's. That is likely to revert to its normal (slightly below the US's figures) but not today. Hardly evidence of a weaker economy in Canada.

    2. Re:Yes, We are #1 by DickBreath · · Score: 1

      > They [China] only care about money, not about anything else.

      That sounds like one giant corporation.

      --

      I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  27. Stay there. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stay in Southern Europe!

  28. Stay in Europe by hernol · · Score: 1

    I would say stay in a "first world" country to raise your children. Then travel the world from there. The other way around is impossible.

    --
    http://twitter.com/bash_history
  29. Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It always works when playing Risk. They speak English. I'm set.

    Seriously, unless you're prepared for a radical culture shift, you need to stay close to home or move to a country that speaks the same language. I do not want to be stuck in Hong Kong trying to make sense out of some Asian-British hybrid laws with a PRC cherry on top. Singapore? I'd probably look at somebody the wrong way, get tossed in jail, and caned to death. No thanks. Rich bastards who move to places like that will probably get what they deserve.

    1. Re:Australia by Skapare · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The way I'd like to do it is alternate between the summer in Norway and the summer in Chile. I love mountains and seaside.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Chile is awesome. Super stable economy, not just during the crisis. Very family friendly. Real estate is cheap compared to, e.g., Argentina. Not sure if an IT researcher could do exceptionally well there. There's no one industry that is killer (except maybe mining), it's just a really well rounded economy. It's also kind of boring, the way Colorado would be boring in the 1950s. That's either a good thing or bad thing, depending on what you're looking for. But that's also why it's not on anybody's radar. (Note, conservatives love to talk about their free market pension plan, but everybody hates it there. The newspapers regularly complain about the 20-30% vig the banks take, so don't move there because Paul Ryan likes it. You'll just be disappointed.)

      If you want to move to Brazil, I'd suggest Curitiba. Built predominantly by emigres from Europe and Japan, it doesn't have a lot of the crime and crazy politics of the larger, older cities further north which struggle with more inequality. It's also a global poster child for sustainable urban development practices, not just because of any single media-hyped development, but because of 30 years of sane planning.

    3. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear what others say about Scandinavia, and those countries truly have their shit together, but I'd find the long dark winters to be very depressing.

      It's depressing if you decide it's depressing. Many people here (Finland) do complain about long winters (it's not really THAT long, 3 months or so, our seasons are pretty equal in length), but mostly it's only about your own attitude. Getting near my 30's and past my teenage angst, I've kinda started to look life differently. The winter I used to hate, I love nowadays just as much as summer.

      Good sides of winter:
      - Lots of aurora borealis and incredibly clear night skies
      - Sunny winter days in -1 to -10C are just absolutely the most beautiful thing there is
      - Skiing
      - Ice hockey
      - Good excuse to stay inside and sit on the computer when you feel like it :-)

    4. Re:Australia by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Economy booming because of natural resources being mined out of the ground and sent to China.

      Doesn't help too much, unless you are prepared to move earth rather than bytes. You see, resource boom != economy boom... a high AUD (double in comparison with 3-4 years ago) means the prices for the other products a high... not that competitive an economy (the "two speed economy" rings any bell to you?).
      Maybe, come this December, the wheat growers will finally be able to get their head above the water with the draught in US and good parts of EU - but is not a certitude.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    5. Re:Australia by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      I'd say Norway if you can swing it or Australia ... the former has oil, the latter just about everything else natural resource wise and a low population density to spread the wealth around. Something which both Norway and Australia are willing to do, without being afraid of taxing the hell out of natural resource profits to do it ... the Australian implementation of the supertax on mining shows a willingness to not let the country devolve into neo-feudalism.

      I personally expect solar power and offline power storage breakthroughs in the near future, in which case Australia would become one of the most self sufficient first world nations in the world (the US has all the natural resources for this as well, but the class divide is going to get ugly there ... debt funding won't last forever, but raising taxation to sustainable levels is essentially impossible ... their population is too well indoctrinated, they're fucked, neo-feudalism ahoy).

      New Zealand might seem to be in a similar position as Australia but IMO any country which manages a current account deficit with a trade surplus is run by traitors or idiots ...

    6. Re:Australia by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Melbourne is a beautiful, fun, vibrant, diverse, relaxed, cosmopolitan, cultured, exciting and friendly city. It is a truly wonderful place.

    7. Re:Australia by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      All you really need to adapt to is driving on the left.

      if your beer is any good, it will naturally cause us to drive on the opposite side of the road.

      which, in this case, would be a good thing. no?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    8. Re:Australia by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      There are drawbacks...

      http://i.imgur.com/ITcYcl.jpg

    9. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... Economy booming because of natural resources being mined out of the ground and sent to China ...

      China is reaching a massive slow down, even now their numbers are all made up - not real. most sane economists predict low demand for resources from China and a slow down Austrialian markets. OK, now if you want to time it, wait for Australian bubble to bust and get in.

    10. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then come be in neighbour in Cape Town, South Africa.

    11. Re:Australia by Spacejock · · Score: 1

      My parents chose Australia just on 30 years ago, and my kids are grateful for that choice every day. Like me, they have dual UK/Aussie citizenship, which is a big plus.

    12. Re:Australia by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      But if you don't want kangaroo pick you for a boxing fight on broad day light, you should choose Canada.

    13. Re:Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Australian and I have been to Copenhagen a couple of times and have always thought that if I had no ties, I would like to live there. You can easily ride your bike around the city (it's pretty flat), the beer is cheaper than in Sweden, great architecture, the people speak English perfectly (better than Aussies)

    14. Re:Australia by Skapare · · Score: 1

      I was ruling out Brazil because "too hot", but Curitiba looks to be a welcoming exception. Thanks for the reference.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
  30. Australia by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Good weather. Anglophone. Fun people. Healthy culture. Melbourne was just voted the most livable city in the world again. Economy booming because of natural resources being mined out of the ground and sent to China. All you really need to adapt to is driving on the left.

    I hear what others say about Scandinavia, and those countries truly have their shit together, but I'd find the long dark winters to be very depressing.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  31. "On the rise" by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

    One thing you have to keep in mind that China and India "on the rise" are still far worse off than US and Europe. There's no guarantee they'll be better in 20 years even if they sustain that rise, which they won't necessarily do - China in particular has a pretty nasty bubble ready to burst.

    I'd stick to developed countries for the simple reason that you get some basic guarantees there that you don't in the third world should things go very wrong. For the same reasons I'd avoid US long-term - it's a good place to earn money during the productive period of your career, but not so good to retire in. If you're already in Europe, it's probably easier to go for one of the better developed countries there as they're more likely to weather the storms - Germany or France are two obvious destinations. Then there's Scandinavia - Finland looks surprisingly decent on many counts if you're willing to live with the weather.

    If you are really bent on seeking something outside of Europe, consider Canada - a saner version of US on so many counts, especially economy wise. And you still have US nearby, which is convenient for shopping and some other things. Very easy to immigrate to, as well. Australia is also a very decent option, and if you're a believer in China long-term, you should consider them for the simple reason that it's in the same region and China is their major trade partner.

    1. Re:"On the rise" by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      I would also add that given Chinese history(both recent and ancient) when that bubble bursts it is going to get particularly nasty for foreigners living in the country.... It already is starting to with China stepping up checking the ID of foreigners in the country, and if you dont have the proper ID on you...well expect to get a first hand tour of Chinas prisons...

    2. Re:"On the rise" by stefancaunter · · Score: 1

      Finland, and Scandinavia, are quite expensive, but they do have things which Canada and the US would love. Pretty much everyone works. Everyone who works can afford a decent place. Also, everyone seems to take pride in what they do. You don't get "this isn't me" from people in the service industry, which is the norm in the US for example. Scandinavian education systems are excellent, and produce knowledgeable, skilled graduates who are curious and empathetic. The majority of the populations speak good English and transact business in English. Winter is beautiful and you have to dress for it, so "cold" becomes "I didn't dress properly", not "it's cold" (which it is, it was -30C there last January). Driving is atrociously expensive, but transport is good and is a priority. With the exception of the health care system, Canada is only saner than the US in the cities, but access to health care is only good in Canadian cities. The US is saner than the US in its cities too. Canadian public educational standards have become quite lax over the last 30 years to the detriment of the workforce, which is an opportunity for the rest of the world, although college technical training is excellent, and most of the universities are good.

  32. Buffalo, NY, USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Relocate to the first ring suburbs around Buffalo, NY, USA. Many of the schools outside of the city are top-notch. communities have deep rooted residents that care about the town/village they live in.

    1. Re:Buffalo, NY, USA by MITguy21 · · Score: 1

      Seconded. Also, with the water from the Great Lakes flowing past in Lake Erie & Lake Ontario, Western New Yorkers will be the last to have to worry about drought and lack of fresh water. When the grid runs out of fossil fuel, we still have Niagara Falls hydro.

  33. The MOON by Tony+Isaac · · Score: 1

    You listed very real problems with the economy in Europe and the US. China, India, and Brazil have real growing pains. It seems that wherever PEOPLE live, there are problems! So the thing to do is go live on the moon! No crime, no national debt, no housing crisis, no politics, no protests. Sounds ideal to me!

    1. Re:The MOON by bobbutts · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot the best part... 0 Air Quality problems

    2. Re:The MOON by PRMan · · Score: 1

      Actually, wouldn't it be 100% air quality problems. You know, there's not enough air? I'd say that's a problem.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:The MOON by Duhavid · · Score: 1

      Brings a whole new meaning to "vacuously true".

      --
      emt 377 emt 4
    4. Re:The MOON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the best part...
      0 Air problems

      FTFY.

    5. Re:The MOON by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quality, not quantity.

  34. Not sure what an IT "researcher" is and if it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...has actual real-world value but if you have bona fide IT infrastructure and/or development skills, the San Francisco Bay Area is probably the hottest IT job market in the US right and possibly the world. The economy is in the tank in the rest of the country but the Bay Area is doing pretty well and the VC investment market here is still hot with a lot of "sugar water" investments still going on robustly.

    That said, the Bay Area is generally really, really expensive, especially in San Francisco so there will be considerable sticker-shock for rents. If you're single and can live with 2-3+ more people, you could save quite a bit though and you could ride mass transit which is quite good in the Bay (not as good as NYC and Chicago but compared to the rest of California it's very good). Lower Peninsula and South Bay/Silicon Valley is also expensive but not quite as bad as SF.

    Other than that Seattle, NYC (more expensive - WAY more expensive than anywhere in the world, save perhaps London, Paris metro areas), Chicago, Dallas, Austin, Washington DC... all are decent job markets for IT.

    Also not sure how hard it is to get visa sponsorship. Probably not so easy. Glad I'm a citizen and already live in the Bay Area.

  35. US will never go broke by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    It'll just go through a period of inflation, which will devalue the dollar and those who bought bonds in the US will be screwed.

    It's knowing how the game is played.

    Move to California, it's still a cool place and a lot is still being done here.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:US will never go broke by Joey+Vegetables · · Score: 1

      Heavy inflation and/or a falling dollar will make oil, food, electronics, and other things crucial to the U.S. economy largely unaffordable to the average person. It won't be a particularly great thing for holders of U.S. bonds either, of course, but, since they are the ones calling the shots, NOT the people, you can be very sure they will be protected from the worst of what's coming, somehow, while the rest of us are about to get screwed good and hard.

  36. Kudos from Portugal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a strong feeling the submitter tsakas is from Greece ;)

    I feel his pain, I am from Portugal and am thinking exactly the same - and raise the same question.

    I can say that Brazil, although has a huge potential, has two major problems that don't seem to have a short/mid term solution:
    - The major cities (São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, ...), where most IT jobs are, are dangerous to live in due to the social-economic differences.
    - There is still a lot of corruption.

    On a personal note, from those choices i would not like to live in China or India generally due to the low standards they still have and government type (China).

    1. Re:Kudos from Portugal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Spanish. I see most of the people from Spain moving to Germany or to Chile.

    2. Re:Kudos from Portugal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, if you just move within the EU you will have the advantage of not having to bother with VIsas, employers have an easier time hiring you and it's not that far from home if things ever change.
      Of course it all depends a bit on how willing you are to learn a new language (or just refresh your knowledge).
      I can't imagine living somewhere without learning the language fluently (even though with a terrible accent, that is hard to fix once grown up), but in Scandinavia and especially Sweden you get along fine with just English. Expect trouble trying that in France (Paris possibly excluded) and to a degree Germany for example.

  37. What's ... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 4, Funny

    What's the Best Place To Relocate?

    That's a tough question. Most areas are heavily acclimated to their current location. Anything non-trivial would have to swapped with something else, rather than simply relocated. Swapping even geographic close regions like North and South Dakota could have drastic unforeseen consequences; certainly swapping larger areas like France and Spain are right out. Perhaps a building or ballpark would be a good candidate for relocation, but I'm not sure it's worth the effort.

    Any ideas /. ?

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    1. Re:What's ... by rwv · · Score: 1

      I'd say a tool shed might be a viable place to relocate. Leave the original foundation in the old place... build a new one and just bring the walls/shelves to the new place. A savvy vacationer might also have the option of relocation their mobile home. I suppose technically those count as "places".

    2. Re:What's ... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I think Japan would like to be relocated off of nature's shooting range.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  38. good question is by nimbius · · Score: 4, Informative

    why are you relocating? if you fear for the wellbeing of your family you should know the health insurance for american workers is generally inferior to that of many european nations especially when considering their family coverage. The public education is routinely inferior as well, and 40 hours per week for tech workers is conservative in many cases. You arent going to see much more than 1-2 weeks of vacation in the first year in the states, and several of the southern states are sadly virulently xenophobic.
    can you clarify on what you mean by markets pulling the teeth out of strong european countries? You make it seem like you've simply become jaded by a spate of recent financial reforms. Strong Europeans are the backbone of strong European countries, so if you and others leave it simply leaves more room to turn the EU into a libertarian dystopia.

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
    1. Re:good question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, this is complete rubbish. How did you come up with this? The education system varies from region to region, and even from school to school just like in Europe. The health insurance is fine. Either you pay through the teeth with taxes, as in Europe, or you pay for health insurance as in the US. The US system is pretty excellent compared to most of Europe.

    2. Re:good question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Health care is better in the US because it is private.
      Education is inferior in the US because it is public.
      I think I see a trend here...

    3. Re:good question is by benjfowler · · Score: 2

      Top notch healthcare does fuck all for me if I can't afford decent cover.

    4. Re:good question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The xenophobia comment is accurate for areas outside of major cities. It's patently untrue in most of the major cities I've been in.

    5. Re:good question is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think he's seeking some genuine economic opportunity.

  39. Finland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Finland

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pN2ZJBh92SM

  40. Prosperity + social democracy by pr0nbot · · Score: 1

    I would choose somewhere with some combination of relative prosperity, underpopulation, and social democratic values: Scandinavia, Canada, New Zealand.

    Developing countries, and to some extent the US, are like the Wild West - they're fantastic as long as you're wealthy to buy your way out of the inherent instability.

    1. Re:Prosperity + social democracy by Trepidity · · Score: 1

      With regards to Scandinavia on that list, a plus is that tech jobs are increasingly English, not caring if you can speak Danish/Swedish/Norwegian at all. Different from, say, Germany, where most companies will want you to speak at least passable German.

    2. Re:Prosperity + social democracy by PRMan · · Score: 2

      I hear New Zealand allows almost zero immigration.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:Prosperity + social democracy by pr0nbot · · Score: 1

      The last time I investigated, they have a points based system where certain jobs gave a lot of points; IT was one of them.

    4. Re:Prosperity + social democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Zealand (Especially Auckland) is a stereotypical melting pot. Possibly they're all tourists/foreign students, but there are a whole lot that look like they're working and must have come from somewhere....

      IT seems growing and stable, only real problem is crap internet infrastructure. ADSL2+ with bandwidth caps FML.

    5. Re:Prosperity + social democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hear wrong.

    6. Re:Prosperity + social democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NZ allows plenty. Start here: http://www.immigration.govt.nz/migrant/general/generalinformation/statistics/

    7. Re:Prosperity + social democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear New Zealand allows almost zero immigration.

      I am from the U.S. but lived in NZ from 2001 through 2005. Like many countries, they have a point system - e.g., being under 30 scores you more points, as does having a Ph.D. or a specific skill (could be aircraft maintenance) that they are looking for at the time. As it turned out, I had enough points for citizenship (I had a letter from my NZ employer who sponsored my work visa to go there), but I decided to return to the U.S. as NZ is just so far from anywhere. Had I already been married I can imagine it could've been a great place to settle down and raise kids (as long as you don't plan to travel a lot, as the NZ salaries, paid in NZ dollars, do not compare well with the rest of the industrialized world).

    8. Re:Prosperity + social democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You heard wrong, just insanely wrong.

      NZ has a lot of outward emigration, especially to Australia which is doing so well, so it would
      not shock me to learn that _net_ immigration to NZ is smallish But you are are taking
      about immigration, not net inflow. If you have family here, or
      more importantly if you can make a good argument that you are a net economic benefit,
      we will likely take you! Compare NZ today to NZ 10 years ago ... can you present
      some (and yes, there are indeed several but my challenge is to you personally) possible
      argument that NZ hasn't become promiscuous - almost sluttily so - in whom we will accept?
      Which, IMHO, is a great thing but before we get to deep controversy wherefore does
      thoust "allow almost zero immigration" come from. If you stand but it (you probably should not!)
      what do you actually mean by this? Numbers? Specific statistics? It seems just craxy without such bakckup

    9. Re:Prosperity + social democracy by pinkstuff · · Score: 1
      I don't think it's all that hard so long as you are a 'Skilled Migrant': From the New Zealand immigration website:

      To be eligible for residence under SMC you must: be 55 or under be healthy be of good character speak English.

      I think most slashdotters would qualify, but there is a calculator you can use to check if you would you could get a visa under this category.

      Disclaimer: I am a proud Kiwi/New Zealander who would welcome more geeks.

    10. Re:Prosperity + social democracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Zealand does carefully control it migration flow. I can speak from experience having been awarded my permanent residence a few months ago. It did take a fair amount of research, planning, and expense but once we were prepared it was fairly straight forward. I was able to qualify under their Skill Migrant Category. http://www.immigration.govt.nz/migrant/stream/work/skilledmigrant/overview

      Been here for a little over a year, and I think we made a good choice.

      BTW: Vancouver was our 2nd choice.

  41. Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A good balance of the lifestyles of US/Europe and the economy/growth of Australia/Brazil. And depending on which European country you are coming from immigration may be fairly easy (relatively speaking).

    Our PM/Government is pretty fucked up at the moment, and when that happens we tend to kiss the USA's ass a lot, but Harper only has a few years left and then things should go back to normal again :)

    If you can do it, try to live in one of the cities that is 30 to 60 minutes outside a major city (for Canada, that is pretty much the capitals of the ten provinces) and you'll have cheap living costs (buy a three bedroom house for under $100K US easy) but still have all the services/work of the nearby city. For most big cities in Europe and US the 30-60 minute rural (not packed like rats on the highway) commute is less than the in-city commute even! If you have time, check city/province/country statistics for things like quality of life, disposable income(more important than actual income), and quality of the environment. One trick however, becarful of the "best city in..." type stats, as they tend to not consider families important (so stats like "Number of off lease dog parks" is rated higher than "number of kid parks".

    In any case, have fun, do your research and then enjoy the experience, I know my family and I did when we did it :)

  42. One word.... by Howard+Beale · · Score: 3, Informative

    Singapore. I worked there for two weeks at the Marina Bay Sands project. English is the primary language, the area is beautiful and clean. Hated coming home. I'd still move my wife and kids there in a second.

    1. Re:One word.... by isorox · · Score: 3, Informative

      Singapore. I worked there for two weeks at the Marina Bay Sands project. English is the primary language, the area is beautiful and clean. Hated coming home. I'd still move my wife and kids there in a second.

      Singapore is nice, just be ware of the various laws and lack of freedoms. They still have caning in Singapore, and the death penalty. No idea what the safety net's like if you get laid off either -- Healthcare, schooling etc.

    2. Re:One word.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Singapore: Disneyland with a Death Penalty

    3. Re:One word.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Singapore is nice, just be ware of the various laws and lack of freedoms. They still have caning in Singapore, and the death penalty. No idea what the safety net's like if you get laid off either -- Healthcare, schooling etc.

      Don't know ppl get carried away so much by all these talks about death penalty, caning, law and lack of freedoms. Are you going to do something bad ? Otherwise why should that bother you so much ? Just so confounding.

    4. Re:One word.... by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      Two weeks is not the same as two years or two decades.

    5. Re:One word.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Singapore. I worked there for two weeks at the Marina Bay Sands project. English is the primary language, the area is beautiful and clean. Hated coming home. I'd still move my wife and kids there in a second.

      Singapore is nice, just be ware of the various laws and lack of freedoms. They still have caning in Singapore, and the death penalty. No idea what the safety net's like if you get laid off either -- Healthcare, schooling etc.

      Singapore is excellent. Ignore the naysayers who've never been here and claim it isn't "free."

      You feel (and subjectively are) freer here in Singapore than you are in the US.

      It is true there is the death penalty here, but they do so in the US also, which the OP seemed willing to consider (even if only to exclude...)

      There is caning here, but frankly, they cane you for stuff you shouldn't be doing anyway, like graffiti and such. (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/7853690/Singapore-to-cane-Swiss-man-for-graffiti-terrorism.html)

      Also, unlike most places in the world, this is not corrupt, the justice system works and is seen as one of the most transparent places in the world. (http://www.transparency.org/cpi2010/results Singapore, New Zealand and and Denmark tie for first place...)

      Combined with the transparent/honest system, is the fact that it is safe here. Lived in Geneva, Switzerland before and there is no comparison, this is safer/nicer.

      You might not like the weather, it's hot and humit every day, easy choice of clothing though! :)

      Health care here is excellent, although personally, the public school system isn't suitable, as it is very heavily 'stream' oriented. This is a personal thing for me and may not bother someone else. You can work around this by sending your kids to international schools, of which there are plenty, but they cost a bit of money.

      Further, Singapore has very friendly immigration laws (although they do not allow dual/multiple citizenships...) and if you are skilled/qualified, you can get residency here relatively easily and work permits if you have a job at a 'senior' enough level, will be easy.

      Nothing bad to say, to be honest. We've lived here three years and love it. Moved here from Switzerland and wouldn't go back. We struggle to think where we'd go from here...

    6. Re:One word.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a matter of balance, can you compare death row in the US to death row in Singapore? There is no comparison either in absolute terms or, more importantly, how someone ends up there. In Singapore you are a murderer or drug courier. Is that the same in the US?

      In terms of. Social safety nets, as a foreigner you are pretty much on your own. If you lose your job on an employment pass you have 2 weeks to leave basically. While it used to be easy to become PR Its much harder now and there is somewhat of a backlash against the influx of foreigners to which the government is overreacting.

      Finally, there is this myth of "lack of freedom". When I originally came here I was a little concerned about that, but as a foreigner you are not subject to the incessant government campaigns designed to get the citizenry to do one thing then another - speak better English, singapore's ok (clean toilets believe it or not) , gracious Singapore etc and if you talk to the locals they are pretty peeved at them as well. The government can be somewhat arbitrary but in general the place is very safe, very well run and seductively easy to live in, though increasingly expensive.

    7. Re:One word.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Singapore is nice, just make sure you're not doing drugs or think you have any kind of free speech and you'll be fine.

    8. Re:One word.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Singapore. I worked there for two weeks at the Marina Bay Sands project. English is the primary language, the area is beautiful and clean. Hated coming home. I'd still move my wife and kids there in a second.

      Singapore is nice, just be ware of the various laws and lack of freedoms. They still have caning in Singapore, and the death penalty. No idea what the safety net's like if you get laid off either -- Healthcare, schooling etc.

      There is no freedom in Singapore. It is a state controlled by one family. Worse than any Communist state.

  43. Which City I would Choose by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

    The question: Which city would you choose to go and start a family

    Not a damn one of them; Green Acres is the place for me.

    IMO, living in close proximity to thousands (even hundreds, really) of other humans is not a desirable situation to be in, and a disaster waiting to happen.

    Then again, I'm a born-and-bred 'country boy,' so of course YMMV.

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:Which City I would Choose by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      Not a damn one of them; Green Acres is the place for me.

      But I'm not sure if farm livin' is the life for me. Also, always being fleeced by Mr. Haney sucks.

    2. Re:Which City I would Choose by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

      Not to mention you'd have to dig up Eva Gabor, which would be an unpleasant experience.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    3. Re:Which City I would Choose by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      For that matter, I'd have to dig up Mr. Haney, too.

    4. Re:Which City I would Choose by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      In fact, just about everybody who starred in Green Acres is dead. Damn, that's depressing. Eb Dawson (Oliver Douglas's dim farmhand) is still around, though. And so is Ralph Monroe, the decidedly unfeminine female carpenter. But that's all.

  44. that's quite ambitious by bitt3n · · Score: 5, Funny

    here's how I would do it: first 5 years in US, which probably won't collapse before then, and if it gets close, we'll just hornswoggle the Chinese into buying a bunch of movie studios like we did with the Japanese. Next 10 years in China. Make sure you pick up Mandarin. Parlay your ability to quote verbatim the scripts of popular 80's action movies into a career as executive of a floundering movie studio. Walk out of the office one day saying "I'll be back." Never go back. Next 20 years in Brazil, where you'll leverage your Chinese connections to become a major wheeler dealer in a revival of the opium trade. The most important thing is to leave no trace as you proceed. You don't want families 1.0 or 2.0 paying you and Conchita an unexpected visit in your Sau Paulo hacienda.

    1. Re:that's quite ambitious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      paying you and Conchita an unexpected visit in your Sau Paulo hacienda.

      How about:

      paying you and Conceição an unexpected visit in your São Paulo fazenda.

      Brazil is not a Spanish-speaking country.

    2. Re:that's quite ambitious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, thanks for spoiling the entire plot of GTA V for me.

  45. The U.S. is in debt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Want a country that's not in debt? Your choices are Macau, Taiwan, and Liechtenstein. Even the Vatican is in debt:

    http://articles.latimes.com/2012/jul/05/business/la-fi-mo-vatican-deficit-20120705

  46. Sweden by Orphis · · Score: 3, Informative

    The economy here isn't bad at all and it's quite peaceful, even in the capital Stockholm.
    Sweden's definitely a great place to start a family as the society do a lot for the parents (compared to many countries).
    I moved there a year ago and I have no regret at all :)

    Oh, and Swedish isn't that difficult to learn at all, you'll be just fine speaking English until you learn it!

    Bonus: if you haven't found a spouse yet, I can say that there are some really beautiful girls here too ;)

    1. Re:Sweden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. We have nearly a majority of foreign researchers in our department and English is the default language. The only problems are the darkness in the winter, the grayness in the summer, and the enforced full year of (paid) parental leave before you can start your kid in daycare. (That last one is a real problem for an international academic as you can't just disappear from advising students and publishing for that long.)

    2. Re:Sweden by DELNI-AA · · Score: 1

      Didn't know it was enforced but it is certainly paid!

  47. Telecommute? by adlib24 · · Score: 1

    As an IT researcher, one would think living where ever you want, working from home, and telecommuting would be the ideal for family life. Let me put it another way. There is a telecommuting homomorphism between the set of the best places to live and the set of best place to live for an IT researcher.

    1. Re:Telecommute? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a telecommuting homomorphism between the set of the best places to live and the set of best place to live

      fantastic!

  48. Reading too much into the cover of The Economist by jeffmeden · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sounds like you are basing your decisions on a glance at the financial section of a magazine rack...

    "Trouble in Europe"? Oh no! Better get out of here!
    "Trouble in The US"! Oh no! Better not move there!
    "Indonesia at a crossroads" Hmm, sounds promising!

    Try opening the thing up next time and actually read what's going on. Then take the "am I ready to live in am emerging market?" quiz:

    Do you like to have to bribe your way around the local bureaucracy?
    Do you like to live within a mile of crushing poverty?
    Do you like to endure social, natural, and economic crises?

    If you answered yes to all of these, then yes an emerging market is for you (i.e. Brazil, China, India, etc). If you answered no to any of them, stay in a Western country. Keep your skills current and if the place goes downhill, just relocate again. Hell, you did it once, right?

  49. London by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Depending on how successful you've been and what kind of house you can afford, lifestyle, food, climate, industry rocks.

  50. Simple plan by metrometro · · Score: 1

    I just move to wherever Slashdot puts inside of the string "Is"..."the next Silicon Valley?" I have a script set up to buy airline tickets and everything. Don't miss out!

  51. Norway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Norway; no debt, high salaries, increasing oil production.

    If you can land a job in the offshore sector (oil), you have basically made it. Make sure that you done your paperwork beforehand though. And be prepared for the living expenses, but with a good income that won't be a problem.

  52. One alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I say stay here and loot when the U.S. Economy crashes.

  53. Brazil by leandrod · · Score: 3, Informative

    Brazil and Australia are looking good

    We are not. No education to speak of, a government which is making the same mistakes which resulted in the European crisis, lots of crime and violence. Also we are more and more becoming an exporter of commodities, because our tax system is totally regressive and cumulative, working against manufacturing and services by making everything very, very expensive — and we have lower salaries than those of the First World.

    I lived in Europe. Only reason I did not stay was that I was not allowed to.

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  54. 20 year outlook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're looking 20 years ahead you might want to factor in the likely climate changes. Most models indicate that many regions will be hit with extreme weather either in the form of droughts, extreme storm events or adversely affected by sea level changes. According to a climate change vulnerability study done by Maplecroft (http://maplecroft.com/), Australia and Bangladesh are two places that may feel the effects of climate change very strongly. Canada may be a good place to adapt to these changes.

  55. I've seen some of the world, it's OK, I guess. by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Living in a foreign place can be pretty lonely. It's no surprise that people are of the opinion that their own country is one of the best places to live. It's not a uniquely American phenomena. The handful of Frenchmen I know hold the same view of their homeland (save one, who actually like the US better than France).

    I think it takes a certain personality to enjoy travel and new places. Some of us are homebodies, and I think it is unreasonable to view us as backwards or ignorant of the world.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:I've seen some of the world, it's OK, I guess. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      (save one, who actually like the US better than France)

      Maybe he ate at a McDonald's in Paris and decided the McD's in the US are better, since you don't have to worry so much about being physically attacked by the employees there.

    2. Re:I've seen some of the world, it's OK, I guess. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This,
      having lived some years in three European countries and spent months in 10 more, the only non-racist place i've experienced is the US. It's not a bad kind of racism, but you will always know that you are a foreigner. Making local friends will range from a bit difficult to really difficult (France) depending on the country and your knowledge of the local language.
      (disclaimer, i'm not from the US, was born in Finland)

    3. Re:I've seen some of the world, it's OK, I guess. by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "Some of us are homebodies, and I think it is unreasonable to view us as backwards or ignorant of the world."

      You can't cope, so don't expect respect for not being able to mingle and use social skills to get on. Just say "I can't handle this" and be done with it.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  56. Purely subjective view by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd consider Germany (Luxemburg), England, New Zealand and Australia. And here in the Czech Republic it's not that bad either :-) .
    Germany is close, not only geographically, but also culturally. It's generally relatively easy to get a well paid (compared to CZ) technical job there and the proximity to "home" - i.e. broader family and friends is good too. England ditto.

    New Zealand is generally considered "paradise" here, so it's obvious choice :-) . NZ and Australia are beautifully "far" from the problems here, although I bet they have their share of problems. At least they are well developed and not that culturally distant. Moreover it should be relativelly easy to actually move there, due to immigration politics.

    All of these countries are English speaking except Germany, where everyone speaks English well, which is important.

  57. Singapore by nedlohs · · Score: 1

    for a), b), and c).

    The only mark against it is the lack of individual freedoms, but if southern europe is fine then you won't mind them (and they in the scheme of things the US actively removing the alternative option anyway).

    1. Re:Singapore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Singapore is crazy expensive. Only move there if you're bringing a suitcase of money, otherwise you'll never be able to afford an apartment or condo. 80% of housing is built by the government, and only citizens get in on the bottom floor, so to speak. The resale value is through the roof.

      If you move to Singpore, as a foreigner you're competing with Saudi princes and executives from international corporations.

    2. Re:Singapore by Whuffo · · Score: 1

      The cost of living in Singapore is very high. Incredibly high, in fact. And while the laws are reasonable, they're quite different from what the European / US people live under and seemingly minor infractions can have significant penalties

  58. Attitude Adjustment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Based on the name and the comments; our southern European friend must be from Greece.

    Based on professional experience equivalent and education, it matters greatly where you come from, if you speak the language, your aspirations and YOUR ATTITUDE.

    In a few short sentences you have displayed some significant bias and a clear lack of understanding, simplifying a LOT of global economic issues. As a prospective employer, I would move on to another candidate who is a bit more open-minded and rational. Yes, the BRIC countries are in the rise. What skills do you have to offer that they do not have internally? Research and Development jobs can be had, yet the standard of living can vary greatly.

    I could suggest some other places and i don't think that you would be a good fit for those.

  59. Norway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Norway is the place to go. We are doped on oil and the party isnt over for a few more decades.

    Besides of the oil the women are beatuiful and everything else is pretty much perfect. Our biggest complaints are if we have to be in a queue on the road for more than three minutes.

    Look it up.

    Cheers

  60. Best place to relocate? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the best place to relocate is one that is small and uninhabited. small because it can fit in the trunk of your car. uninhabited so there aren't any protests.

  61. Re:Not sure what an IT "researcher" is and if it.. by inglorion_on_the_net · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I moved to the San Francisco bay area last year and I'm loving it. Things to add to what AC said:

    * Good weather.
    * There is something here for everyone. If you like quiet, you can live in the suburbs. If you like more lively, you can live in one of the cities. You can go surfing and skiing on the same day.
    * Yes, house and groceries are expensive. On the bright side, if you work for any of the tech companies, you will easily be able to afford things.
    * Regarding visas: If you get a job with one of the larger tech companies, they will sponsor your visa. It may take a while before visas become available, though, as there is a quota.
    * Companies here are definitely looking for more good people to hire, so if you have the skills they need, your chances of getting here are pretty good.

    I don't know about the other places that have been mentioned, so I'll save the commenting on those to people who actually live there.

    --
    Please correct me if I got my facts wrong.
  62. England by benjfowler · · Score: 4, Informative

    I hail from Australia, and always felt that I was in a very small country with limited opportunities, despite everything going for it. Probably a fantastic country to raise kids or retire, but the economy isn't as big, and there aren't as many opportunities as, say, the US or UK.

    I wanted out, because I wanted to swim in a bigger pond. It was a tossup between the US and the UK, and because I had an easy visa (something you might like to consider), I just went to London. The UK has big social problems (even more than the US, it has a huge, feral, festering underclass, and I get the impression that the UK is a *BAD* place to be down on your luck), but if you're good at what you do, you can probably afford to live in a good areas and send your kids to decent schools and generally stay away from all the shit. London is a huge, bustling, dynamic place that's fairly close by, and there's something here for just about everyone (unless you're poor, of course).

    You're southern European, as you say, so don't forget that you have EU treaty rights. There are plenty of options for relocation within Europe.

    That said, you wouldn't want to retire here. I certainly don't plan on sticking around past retirement.

    1. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In my experience, your criticism of the UK applies mostly to London and various towns around it. The major cities in the UK are dismal shitholes if you're not making sufficient money. The smaller cities and larger towns can be fantastic places.

      Unfortunately, most of the jobs are in the major cities, so you're stuck with them.

    2. Re:England by FirephoxRising · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing you moved to england years ago, Australia has grown enormously in the last twenty years in terms of culture and sophistication, while retaining the positives of the "fair go". I've been in US/Canada (liked it, too cold), Scotland, France, Turkey and China, they all have major problems unless you're very well off. I'm quietly optimistic about Australia if we can not blindly follow the US+free trade path, take advantage of our proximity to Asia and build a balanced economy not one too reliant on commodity exports.

    3. Re:England by iserlohn · · Score: 1

      The social issues in the UK are overblown by the mostly cynical British press. Similarly, the social problems in the US are under reported by the American media. Statistics indicate there is less violent crime in the UK, less income inequality, higher social mobility, etc. in the UK and most western European countries than the US.

    4. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The UK has big social problems (even more than the US, it has a huge, feral, festering underclass, and I get the impression that the UK is a *BAD* place to be down on your luck), but if you're good at what you do, you can probably afford to live in a good areas and send your kids to decent schools and generally stay away from all the shit. London is a huge, bustling, dynamic place that's fairly close by, and there's something here for just about everyone (unless you're poor, of course).

      Without wanting to sound like an apologist for the UK, this sounds like you never spent any time outside of London. You see a lot of homeless people in London, mostly because they've relocated there as the begging is better. I'll catch a lot of flak for this, but being homeless in the UK is a choice.

      The UK is one of the best places in the EU for unemployment benefits/social housing, which is causing us a few problems with immigration from eastern Europe at the moment. If you're legal to live and work in the UK, you have a guaranteed income (that's actually higher than US minimum wage) and rent is provided. It's not comfortable, but certainly liveable.

      I really don't know what causes you to think we've got a "huge, feral, festering underclass". We do have an unfortunate number of households without work, and they tend to have an over-inflated sense of entitlement. Other than that, our most pressing social problems are rising anti-immigration sentiment (mostly towards the Polish, but also the other recent east-European entrants to the EU which has fueled a wave of economic migrancy) and politivally moving away from Europe, towards the US.

      We've definitely got our fair share of problems and I personally think that London is an absolute shithole, but your post focuses on things that aren't actually true...

    5. Re:England by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, the UK has big social problems and that's why their violent crime rate for the entire nation is almost as bad as Detroit.

  63. Look at Economics by fadethepolice · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Calgary, Alberta - Just located the world's greatest source of hydrocarbons near here on top of the second largest heavy oil deposits in the world. Coupled with great opportunity for growth in both tourism and agriculture. This city is one of the safest bets. Not too far from Vancouver and the sea as well. Perth Australia - Australia hasn't had a recession in 50 years. Perth is isolated both geographically and politically from most of the destructive currents on our planet, has significant energy deposits in the are, so it's probably a pretty safe bet. Good climate too. If global civilization collapses this is a possible re-seed point of civilization. North Dakota. - Low unemployment, booming economy. Pittsburgh PA - Low unemployment, booming (relatively to res of US) economy, massive sources of clean water, cheap place to live. Russian border regions around china - Probably a good area to locate economically. May have to worry about wars caused by demographics. Halifax Nova Scotia - Stable climate, place is isolated, local stocks of food.

    1. Re:Look at Economics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      North Dakota huh?

      Spoken like someone who has never lived in north dakota.

  64. Oxymoron Question by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1st of all: If I would want to start a family I wouldn't plan to go anywhere for less than 20 years. Times are unruly enough as it is. With children you want a good school, a good community and - most important of all - a good wife and her our yours or both families near by. Everything else comes second!

    If you want to start a family you should even consider a career change if that is required to provide for the other things mentioned above. The family will be your primary fullfillment, not the job, so you might as well work as a bricklayer, provided the income is enough. Also factor in: Free housing or easy real estate from your family or in-laws, quality of life, happiness of wife (where does she want to live and raise children) etc. All of these are *way* more important than monetary income. Especially in times like these.

    If I'd start a family again, I'd move together with my girlfriend in the town she lives, simply because her career is way more solid than mine right now. And I wouldn't care if I were the main caregiver to children and would be driving a dump-truck on the side. Be prepared to do that aswell if your future wife turns out to be the vice-exec of some uprising company or having and wanting to keep a more stable career than you aparently have right now.

    2.) If you want to earn money in IT and are prepared to leave everything behind, you do the full monty and should get prepared to move anywhere within a few weeks notice, at any time and occasion. Singapur, Silicon Valley, Moskow, Dubai perhaps and maybe some high-polpulation areas in china are where the partys at right now. Live out of the suitcase or in microapparments for the next 15 years, rake in some stable cash or real estate and buy/build a home for your old age.

    3.) If you aren't prepared to go full-on cyberpunk and move around the globe for the rest of your working career you should stay put right where you are and adapt. If the Euro goes belly-up and the world finally notices that the US dollar isn't worth the paper its printed on then you'll be glad if you've got some contacts to a local farmer and some real-estate and a small shed on it somewhere in southern europe. And maybe some solar panels to power your computers. I'd be happy if I had that. I'm living in a single room sharing flat with 6 people in Germany and right now things aren't looking up, even for an expert like me. Living expenses are through the roof, the IT staff shortage is nothing but a legend to keep wages at the 2002 minimum and inflation is ramping up allready.

    Bottom line: Move for the family you want to start, and *only* for that, go fully international and prepare to relocate to Timbuktu if the money and/or the benefits package is right or stay put, get by somehow and prepare for some elongated worldwide economic downtime.

    My 2 cents.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Oxymoron Question by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      Excellent advice, mod parent up.

      Another thing to consider, is going where the work is. My priorities are similar, but I am compelled to go where the work and money is. For me, that's the south east of England at the moment.

    2. Re:Oxymoron Question by benjfowler · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Some excellent points here.

      If you plan to start a family, everything else is subordinate to supporting a happy, healthy family. A big part of that is being somewhere where there's a lot of work.

    3. Re:Oxymoron Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to call you out on your assessment of the IT worker shortage in Germany. As a manager looking to hire I can tell you that the shortage is very real, trying to get GOOD people is very hard and it is difficult to stomach the very high salaries being asked for from MEDIOCRE candidates. I don't know what your expertise are, but may I suggest that maybe you are going about it the wrong way.

      Your assessment seem to be a very black vs. white, only extremes being acceptable. It is not a challenge to make good money in IT without having to constantly be on the move, or be relocating regularly, of course, such positions do provide a premium, but often only because of the undesirability and hence to difficulty to fill them. In any economy there are high and low paid positions, with the economy as a while having an influence on the spread, and in the modern connected world, relocating will only have a minimal impact, especially when one considers the cost of relocating. Usually the best course of action is to maximize the current environment, and only if one is in an extreme position (as the OP coming from Greece is) is it worth investing the effort in a relocation.

      PS: Also why on earth would a worker shortage keep wages DOWN, which pretty much surmises your grasp on the matter.

    4. Re:Oxymoron Question by Qbertino · · Score: 1

      I have to call you out on your assessment of the IT worker shortage in Germany. As a manager looking to hire I can tell you that the shortage is very real, trying to get GOOD people is very hard and it is difficult to stomach the very high salaries being asked for from MEDIOCRE candidates. I don't know what your expertise are, but may I suggest that maybe you are going about it the wrong way.

      There is maybe a slight bit of little truth in what you say, but not much.

      I just recently decided not only to consider learning another prorpietary product besides you favorite x-plattform rich client technology, which I thought would be my first, last and only for my entire carreer, but instead decided to bite the bullet and get ready to learn and get familiar with some new prorpietary closed source product line like .Net, SAP or Oracle. Right now I'm systematically moving full-force away from FOSS-based and/or agency oriented web development. Salaries and working conditions there are a joke, but with boring, unspectacular business programming joints I have the feeling I might stand a chance for some advancement im my career. Just yesterday I had a talk with such a crew that made me actually feel I wasn't wasting my time - and the talk took 150 minutes!

      But again: The way people, companies, teams, investors and founders go about hiring, building and maintaing teams and product pipelines here in Germany is silly beyond bizar. 80% of companies I encounter are pure shit in terms of software production. Volatile employment terms, crappy right up to flat-out non-existant product pipelines, absolutely zero HR strategies, ... the list ist endless.

      Two months ago I worked for a test day in a junk-storage/office with the teamlead playing heavy metal on his loudspeakers all day. I finished my task way ahead of time and the Director didn't even have the decency to get back to me in person. Its US-style hire-and-fire all around, but the want German style relyabilty from the workers. Well, f*ck you I can only say. Won't fly. If you want me to build your rich client player/reader on a weeks notice and deliver by the end of the year on January 1.1.2013 it's going to cost you 50 000€. If not, go screw yourself.

      If you want good people for short-term projects fast (and today they all are short-term) you are going to have to pay. Its that way in every industry. And if you aren't even willing to train your next team, then you're up shit-creek.

      In fact: I call *you* on *your* statements! Get in contact with me if you think you've got problems finding and/or integrating people for your projects. I also do work-management, contract and HR consulting for Softwareproduction, and I have yet to find a company moaning about staff shortage that isn't in deep trouble right at the heart of their production facilities with even the most basic prerequesites for professional software production not in place. ... No seriously, call me! A weeks worth of consulting and I'll show you where you're companies lacking. And by the overall state of things thoughout the industry I bet it is.

      You'll find everything here: Team Active Content.

      Ball's in your court.

      --
      We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  65. Only *Cities*? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well,

    There isn't a city I'd care to live in these days.. anywhere.. for any amount of time..

    I'd say find a nice piece of acreage, with decent internet connectivity, and live as far from the crowds as possible while still making a living.

    Hell, find a marina w/ decent net access and live a a good sized blue-water capable boat, and cast off when things get crazy...

    If neither of the above appeal to you, a small town or suburb, can be nice.. There are small towns in Italy I wouldn't mind moving to, even now..

    Good luck.

  66. let the level of equality be your guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    valuable country comparison info http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk

    Physical Health
    People in more equal societies live longer, a smaller proportion of children die in infancy and self-rated health is better. Find out more.

    Mental Health
    People in more equal societies are far less likely to experience mental illness. Find out more.

    Drug Abuse
    People in more equal societies are less likely to use illegal drugs. Find out more.

    Education
    Children do better at school in more equal societies. Find out more.

    Imprisonment
    Unequal societies are harsher, they imprison a higher proportion of people. Find out more.

    Obesity
    Obesity is less common in more equal societies. Find out more.

    Social Mobility
    There is more social mobility in more equal societies. Find out more.

    Trust and Community Life
    Communities are more cohesive and people trust each other more in more equal societies. Find out more.

    Violence
    Homicide rates are lower and children experience less violence in more equal societies. Find out more.

    Teenage Births
    Teenage motherhood is less common in more equal societies. Find out more.

    Child Well-being
    Unicef measures of child well-being are better in more equal societies. Find out more.

    Equality not Growth
    Further economic growth will not improve our health or well-being. For a better quality of life we need greater income equality. Find out more.

    Rich and Poor Countries
    More equal societies spend a higher proportion their income on overseas aid and perform better on the Global Peace Index. Find out more.

    Equality and Global Warming
    Inequality fuels status competition, individualism and consumerism. It makes it harder to gain public support for policies to reduce global warming. Find out more.

    Evidence: Social Mobility http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk/why/evidence/social-mobility
    Why More Equality? http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk/why

    The evidence in detail: http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk/why/evidence

  67. Think simplicity by Havenwar · · Score: 1

    Well, there isn't a perfect answer, because as others have mentioned the list would be another one in five years, or in ten, and so on. Basically if you live in southern europe, you have a lot of "up" to go to, thinking about places that are better choices financially, politically, to raise families in or just to have a tech career in. You should consider the next thing: how hard is it going to be to emigrate?

    If you are within the EU, you can pack your bags and drive to another EU country, get a place to live, and you basically only have to sign some papers within three months and get a job. That's it. The simplicity of this process compared to having to get a job in advance, apply for residency and work permits with the help of your employer, and all that shite that you'd have to do in most other places makes it a huge advantage. So the question then becomes, what's the most stable economy in EU? Well, none of them, because they're all in the EU.

    I'm from Sweden myself, and I'm considering moving elsewhere in the EU later, for other reasons, so I have other concerns... however for you, I'd recommend scandinavia. Specifically because if you move to Sweden for instance, and then live here for a while, getting a swedish citizenship... then you can move to Norway afterwards through the agreements that the scandinavian countries has with each other. Norway has their own oil money, good stable finances, beautiful nature, and all that, and are not in the EU. If your worst worry is financial collapse, then that's probably a decent place to be. You might be able to move there directly of course, but not as easily.

    I suppose you could also move to the border of Sweden and work in Norway - a lot of people around here do that. Better pay, lower living costs.

    But there's no magic bullet... you're going to have to weigh the pros and cons here. For all you know in 20 years the place you live might be the financial hub of europe.

  68. Melbourne, Vienna, or Vancouver by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:Melbourne, Vienna, or Vancouver by Ryanrule · · Score: 1

      Lol vienna

    2. Re:Melbourne, Vienna, or Vancouver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm currently living in Northern Europe again and just moved back from Vancouver. While I would recommend the city to anyone who can get in I would add that Vancouver is not that great for families: it's simply not feasible to find affordable housing for a family of four, unless you're willing to move to the dreadful suburbs (Burnaby) or put up with a hefty commute (White Rock, Mission). Furthermore the city is going through a bit of a downturn at the moment and I believe the immigration laws were getting a little tougher. General cost of living is also a tad higher, around 20% on average make sure you have / get a job that covers that.

    3. Re:Melbourne, Vienna, or Vancouver by chrb · · Score: 1

      While I would recommend the city to anyone who can get in I would add that Vancouver is not that great for families

      People want to live in great places: the price of living in great places is therefore higher than the lesser places. There is an old saying, "It's better to have the cheapest house in the most expensive part of the city than the most expensive house in the cheapest part of the city."

  69. Montreal, qc, Oh Canada by denisbergeron · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Speaking for my church.
    We don't have the recession, we don't have the climate problem, we don't have gun, neither any strong social/cultural problem.
    We do have a strong IT/software development infrastructure from aerospace to game field or financial institution.
    We are a multilingual and multicultural city, you can find food and language from anywhere around the globe here.
    We do have apartment or house that doesn't ask you a arm.
    We do have nice commuting infrastructure, the metro (subway) are underground, some apartment building and office building have direct access to the metro... so you don't have to but your nose outside during the cold day of the winter or the hot day of the summer.
    We have a unique family policy that put the children as a societal value (6-8 month of parental care for a new birth, cheap children gardening, real restaurant with children place...)
    In the city of Montreal, you will find a lot of natural park and children park.
    Park are big enough to do mountain bike, skying, and so on....
    Lot of Europeans people work in the IT field in Montreal, you will not look that strange...
    It's easy to have the canadien residence for a european
    If you have a diploma from a know european university, you will have a job faster than the canadian residence.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
    1. Re:Montreal, qc, Oh Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they have Poutine

    2. Re:Montreal, qc, Oh Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Montreal is definitely NOT the place to be in IT.

      1. The province has lost 50,000 jobs in just the last two months, and IT has been bleeding 1,000 jobs a WEEK for 2 years running (they hide it by combining it with other non-related stats, so you have to really drill down into the data to elicit the facts)

      2. Political instability - the separatist Parti Quebecois is leading in the polls and the election is less than a month away. And there's the nightly anti-gov't demonstations.

      3. Debt, debt and MORE debt - if Quebec were to separate, it would be as indebted as Italy, Ireland, Greece or Spain;

      4. It used to have the 2nd-highest taxes in the western world, but with the last 2 tax increases now ranks #1;

      5. regressive taxation caused by failure to index taxes for a generation. Someone earning the minimum wage pays more in provincial taxes (base rate starts at 16.5% to the province) than someone making $40,000 per year in Ontario 100 miles to the west (base rate 5.05%, larger base exemption, fewer mandatory levies). Even Alberta's flat 10% tax rate is much better;

      6. Language laws - your kids won't be allowed to attend english schools unless YOU attended an English school in either Quebec or somewhere else in Canada. English schools outside the country don't count.

      7. More taxes coming up next year, even though taxation has now passed the theoretical tipping point, and the last increase resulted in a dollar-for-dollar loss of economic activity in the first 3 months of 2012;

      8. Crime and corruption - street shootings are becoming a daily occurrence, despite guns being banned.

      9. Most corrupt western government in the world since at least 1991 - corruption is now estimated to cost every taxpayer $500 per year. In other words, Quebec would not be running a deficit if it weren't for corruption (and with the highest taxes anywhere, it SHOULDN'T be running a deficit - especially since it also receives over 8 BILLION a year in equalization payments, mostly from Alberta - that's $100 per person per month in govt welfare, not counting the $850 million in excess DEI payments, and the billions in indirect subsides).

      10. The "multi-cultural" is not really - official gov't policy is that "les autres" ("the others", immigrants) should be assimilated into the "French Fact" (and this despite the fact that the "French Fact" is unsustainable - what are you going to do, ban the Internet, satellite TV, English music and movies, etc? You could force every kid into french-only schooling, and french will still be a dead language within 2 generations);

      11. Decades of under-funded health care (diverting federal grants, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, to other programs) and education;

      12. A demographic time bomb that over the next decade will explode, as the number of seniors grows faster than pretty much anywhere else; already, the system is dependent on illegal workers making less than the minimum wage (I know people who are working for $4/hour) to contain costs.

      Nobody I've spoken to outside of Quebec gives a sh*t any more - if Quebec wants to separate, good riddance. The rest of the country (7 provinces with 50% of the population minimum) has the right to hold a constitutional meeting and reset Quebec's borders to what they were at confederation (costing Quebec most of its' territory).

      And the "Plan Nord? What a joke - "Up to 20,000 jobs!!!" Hey, Quebec lost more than that in just one MONTH.

    3. Re:Montreal, qc, Oh Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Outside of Cuba, there isn't anywhere in the Western hemisphere I'd prefer less than Montreal.

    4. Re:Montreal, qc, Oh Canada by turkeyfeathers · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the crumbling infrastructure. Literally, pieces of concrete fall off bridges and overpasses regularly (even killing drivers every few years). With all the potholes, count on replacing the ball joints of your vehicle every couple of years.

    5. Re:Montreal, qc, Oh Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      50% taxes on your income, -25C in the winter, no customer service mentality (or is that, "the customer is always wrong?"), difficult to get the natives to interact with you in French when you genuinely want to practice and learn, hours to weeks waiting for the most routine of medical services, only to be told that nothing is wrong (or, "maybe you're pregnant...no? Let's take blood and check anyway. Oh, you're right, you're not. Well, nothing is wrong. Go rest.") And not everything is right next to the metro/underground so you could end up somewhere with a 10 minute walk to the metro in winter (or worse, who knows how long standing outside waiting for a bus.) No GPS on the buses, so no service to let you know where they actually are...and they're typically not on time. There is some good multicultural food, but it's hit and miss.

      Okay, on the whole it's a decent place and many of the parent points are valid...but perhaps I compare to west coast US too much. ;-)

    6. Re:Montreal, qc, Oh Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "children gardening"....

      The term you were looking for is "day care".

      Unless, of course, you were literally talking about growing children in the ground.

    7. Re:Montreal, qc, Oh Canada by leandrod · · Score: 1

      Speaking for my church.

      Which church, and what does it have to do with the issue at hand?

      --
      Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
      DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
      GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
    8. Re:Montreal, qc, Oh Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TLDR: I lived in Montreal for one year, and coming from southern Europe too I can just give you one tip: don't go to Canada, stay in Europe, maybe move outside the Eurozone if you wish (Norwegen, Switzerland).

      Canada's healthcare is infinitely better than US's health care, and that is why most americans here will recommend you to go there. However, let me tell you something, the European and the American definitions of healthcare are not the same. The best definition I can come up with about European healthcare is: living your whole life without ever having to worry about healthcare, without ever having to worry about getting sick, and being unable to work. Ever.

      Canada's healthcare is "third-wordllish" at least, if compared to that of Spain's, Portugal's, or Italy's, as well as the rest of other southern European countries. The difference is huge, so, although for some US residents Canada's healthcare will be something amazing, for you it will suck, really hard.

      When I was 23, I went to work in the US. It was a really nice experience (so was Canada), but it was also the first time in my life I was afraid of getting ill. I had never felt that before. Later on in Canada, things were way better. Healthcare was only cheaper, but still as bad as in the US. I am now living in Germany, so I am going to tell you a situation that happened last weeks wednesday, with one that happened living in Canada (all other situations in Canada were similar, see below).

      Germany: a coworker faints for 10-20s after an hour of swimming. We pick her up, she feels dizzy, and we decide to carry her to the hospital. When we arrive and tell them what happened, they dont even ask for her Id. Immediately they put her on a wheelchair, take her to do an electrocardiogram, then xray her chest, and then take an MRT of her head. Everything takes about 30min. They think it might be some muscle on her back pressing some nerve, so she is sent to orthopedics, where a doctor sees here in 10min, agrees with the other doctors, sends her to physio in the same hospital, they put the muscle in the right position but it is still inflamated so give her muscular relaxants, and send her home. She is back home in about one hour and thirty minutes. She hasn't been involved in any economical transaction, and obviously gets her full salary those three days that she cannot work. The forth day she is back at work at 100%.

      Canada: a friend slides on ice and falls on the stret, hits the floor with his head, and bleeds like hell from a wound. He feels dizzy too. We take him to the hospital. We have to wait there, for 11h, until the first doctor sees him (before some nurses came every hour or two hours to check if he was still alive). The doctor stiches him and sends him home. If his head hurts he should buy some drugs in a pharmacy, if he gets really worse he should come back.

      This might have been an exception (bad day at the hospital?). Sadly it was not. Once I had fever in canada, 40C (in F: when you start boiling eggs in your forehead). Took a taxi to the hospital. Had to wait there, for 9 h... the corridors were overcroweded, had to lie on the floor. A nurse came to check in every one or two hours or so, at least till I fainted... fever was then by 41.... Now how do you think it would take to get an MRT in Canada? I dont know, but yeah, in Canada I was also afraid of getting ill because healthcare sucked. In my company, the HR girls that gave us the introduction to the firm and to working there, Canada, services, and so, had two rules. The first one was: don't get ill. The second one: Do NOT get ill.

    9. Re:Montreal, qc, Oh Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and you get a share of the 8 billion dollars a year in transfer payments from Alberta you don't have to work for! ;)

    10. Re:Montreal, qc, Oh Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All paid for by Alberta. And you forget to mention that in many companies, not being truly Francophone means you hit a glass ceiling very quickly.
      I would recommend the Rocky Mountains and the weather and career freedom of Calgary over Montreal.

    11. Re:Montreal, qc, Oh Canada by AnonyMouseCowWard · · Score: 1

      Wow. That's.. a lot of hate right there, most of the time misplaced.

      There's a good, I wouldn't say amazing, but a good IT industry here, because the Quebec government subsidizes IT jobs. The nightly anti-government protests have mostly stopped, and haven't been in the news for a bit (also, if you think 50 people marching with their babies protesting a law that forbids protesting is political instability, erm, reconsider wanting to live in a democracy). You do pay a lot of taxes, which is annoying, but you get services, and yes, a non-zero amount is wasted due to corruption and just plain incompetence, like everywhere. True, your kids are expected to learn French, as the province is in majority francophone, tough luck. However you can easily function as a pure anglophone in Montreal itself, as most of my colleagues can prove to you (I'd say English is making a resurgence in the city). Street shootings are not daily occurrences; I've been here for over almost 20 years now, and have never seen one, except on the news, like, again, most other places. Some neighbourhoods are bad-ish, and poor; don't live there if you don't want to. If there's an official policy of assimilation, it's not working, precisely because no one is banning English TV or the Internet.

      No, it's not a perfect place. In terms of employment and taxes? Alberta is way, way better, did you see that boom in Calgary? But then it's colder, the distances are greater, and it's just plain more boring than Montreal in summer. Win some and lose some.

      Also, Canada: Newfoundland, PEI, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Quebec, Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Alberta, British Columbia. That's 10 provinces, minus Quebec, 9. We also have 3 territories, did you know?... Man, I hope you weren't educated in Canada, because if you can't tell the number of provinces in your own country, your education system must suck more than Quebec's. :)

    12. Re:Montreal, qc, Oh Canada by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except... you're french.

  70. I'm about to relocate inside Brazil by asr_br · · Score: 2

    I'm Brazilian and I started working from home recently. Since my wife and I don't like they city we're currently living in, we decided to do some research and find a city where we would like to move to (still inside Brazil). If you can read portuguese, you might find our announcement and the criteria we've used useful: https://plus.google.com/112051803418632798341/posts/BTDpsC9Enta

    I have plenty of friends who moved from Europe to Brazil. If you're single, you'll probably enjoy it for quite some time, and you'll probably have fun no matter which part of the country you move to. If you have wife and/or kids, you should be extra extra careful when selecting a city or region to move to. Brazil is huge and the difference in quality of living vary a lot between the different regions. And pay attention: the poorest areas usually have the best offers in the tech field (mostly due to tax incentivies for the tech companies).

    Good luck.

  71. i want to relocate to greenland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even before the recent news of dramatic thaw, i wanted to move to greenland. i knew it would eventually thaw due to global warming, i just didn't know it would be this quick.

  72. It's worth mentioning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Markets are pulling the teeth out of the strong European countries by destroying the south.

    Markets would have no power over the southern countries if they didn't keep going into debt. If Spain didn't need to keep borrowing, then a 7% interest rate wouldn't matter to them.

    1. Re:It's worth mentioning by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      It's hard to convince people not to borrow when the ECB keeps interest rates artificially low for years.

      The real problem is the Euro, and once that collapses inflation and devaluation of the new currencies will wipe out the debts.

  73. San Diego by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US economy may be faltering, but as others have said a full economic collapse in the US would be felt everywhere. So move to San Diego, where the weather is perfect nearly year round (http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/sgx/climate/san-san-month.htm) and the job market for techies is good (a bit out of date but still fairly true: http://www.utsandiego.com/news/2011/feb/12/why-san-diego-tech-companies-cant-fill-thousands-j/). It's a beautiful place, close to Mexico, two hours from LA and five hours from Vegas.

    1. Re:San Diego by grc · · Score: 1

      The weather is nearly perfect after 12 noon. Until then you have a haze/fog. Anyone that doesn't know San Diego's weather would wake up every morning and says "Not another crappy day!".
      All said though, San Diego is a very nice place to live.

  74. Start a family? by houghi · · Score: 1

    The most important part to start a family is the one you start it with. The values of a family are the family, not the size of the house.

    See that you have a job that allows you to be with them instead of working all the time.

    Wherever you go, there will be upsides and downsides. When you just arrive, all will be great, until you start to miss small things, like food. Also: have an open mind and try not to compare how things are done differently then what you are used to.

    And once you have a family, don't move again after they are 12. That is when they will start their own youth and memories. It is not nice moving away at hat age from the comfort of their world.

    I know people from all over the world. My family lived all over the world and only after a lifetime can you say if you lived a good life.

    If you need a change for yourself, moving inside your country might be refreshing enough to give yourself the boost you need.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  75. Wars are expensive, and if you're in debt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Be careful... being in debt is not good for anybody. Mexico lost good bunch of his territory partly because it was in debt with the US and other countries; that sparked a war, and waging any war is costly: if you're in debt and willing to default and to fight is like shooting yourself in the foot.

    It's just better not to owe anything. You end up paying one way or the other.

  76. Better question by onyxruby · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The better question is where can I relocate and survive outsourcing? Outsourcing is the number one threat to job stability no matter what country you are in. When I was younger I thought it was a problem with job being outsourced from more expensive northern states to cheaper southern states - it was. As I grew older I learned that was just the tip of the iceberg and that outsourcing meant you were competing against people all over the world. Outsourcing means that your job can be sent all over the world.

    It doesn't matter where you go, you will face the same problems. Not only that you will also face all of the challenges of being an immigrant. Over the years I have talked with IT people from places like India and even there they outsource their jobs to other firms.

    The bottom line is that you have to find a job that is difficult to outsource. There are ways to do this, for example find a job that can't be outsourced out of the country for national security reasons. Find a job that involves working directly with people and requires face to face interaction as a consultant. Find a job that requires your presence and not your skills.

    You can be replaced, and companies will spend a fortune to do do it because in the long run they /perceive/ that they will save an even larger fortune by doing so.

    1. Re:Better question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh shucks...
      And all this time I was trying to build a superior skill set.

    2. Re:Better question by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      Sad to say, but your superior skill set is worthless. There was a time when it had value, but that time has come and gone by at least a decade now. At this point it is all about skills that can't be outsourced. Any skill that you think you have can be replicated in (at least on paper) by someone in another country at a cheaper price. The managers at the outsource firms will only look on paper and will most likely never bother to interview you in person.

      I have worked with the likes of IBM, DELL and HP as they swoop in and took over IT of one enterprise after another. I've seen experienced people who thought they had superior skill sets lose their job time and time again. I was a consultant out in the field for years and believe me your superior skills aren't worth the paper their written on. I saw everyone from architects to programmers to dba's to level 3's with 25 years experience get the axe. They all had high levels of technical skills that on paper could be replaced elsewhere.

      The dba's got replaced by people in Argentina. The programmers got replaced by people in India, the level 3's with 25 years experience got replaced by help-desk monkeys with 2 years experience in the Philippines.

      You know who didn't get outsourced? People with security clearances that worked in positions where the government required a US citizen. People who had consultancy skills that could become direct hire consultants and the rare person who was really, really good at what they did.

      I'll give you a hint, I was brought in as a replacement for a team of six people. If you can't replace six people you aren't of the caliber that they will keep and you will be outsourced. That is their standard.

  77. Great State of New Jersey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good luck!

  78. A first world country, duh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you are leaving Europe, I guess your best bet is US, Canada, Australia, Japan, Israel, etc.. Whichever you can get a job in before you leave. The high pay and first world conditions make any other place look like a retirement location. Lots of star Israeli programmers manage to get jobs here in the US before moving over, for example. US debt problems are pretty meaningless. Even if it meant a bad economy in a decade, the tech economy is hot now, so come collect your money and leave later.

  79. Other places by KingMotley · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The US is still a great place to live, but assuming you are part of the new trend of US haters, I would recommend you look at the following places:
    1) Vancouver, Canada
    2) Japan (one of the non-irradiated sections)
    3) Norway
    4) New Zealand
    5) Switzerland

    But those would be my preferences, yours may differ.

    1. Re:Other places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Japan

      In case you forgot, the Japanese (and Asians in general) don't like foreigners. The treatment you will receive as a immigrant residing in Japan is nothing like the treatment you may have received as a tourist.

    2. Re:Other places by sandysnowbeard · · Score: 1

      Ah, I'm a white American, but also fluent in Japanese, and I love Japan (though I live in the U.S. now).

      While we're presumably mostly familiar with American problems, here are some I find with Japan:
      - inability to question authority (found in Korea, too, I'm told)
      - misogyny. Not explicit, but more implicit, just in that women get stuck with shit jobs and get sexualized in all sorts of bizarre ways. (I *hate* snack bars and hostess clubs, not to mention massage parlors.(
      - lack of creative thinking. If it's not by the literal book, it can't be done. Countless examples exist. (There's a good one in "Black Passenger, Yellow Cabs," a book you can hate, but which has a great example of this involving ordering milk at Mr. Doughnuts.)
      - concrete EVERYWHERE. Where is the fucking grass?
      - absolutely no rights as a non-citizen, which is compounded by:
      - racial profiling. Yes, even us white males.
      - cigarette smoking EVERYWHERE. (Though last I saw Shibuya had prohibited it -- - in its main thoroughfares.)
      - service fees for "nothing" abound at restaurants and izakayas and bars, and key money for apartments.
      - etc.


      BUT, Japan is super clean, I think the Japanese are by-and-large good folk (as are people everywhere, duh), and it is a BEAUTIFUL country when you aren't looking at concrete.

      Also, to the original poster, if you think the U.S. sucks, well, I mean, really dude? Read some economics books, a lot of the huge political issues for the U.S. aren't really world-ending and terrible (e.g. debt... we do have to pay it down, and it will be paid down at some point, hopefully sooner than later, but it's not going to destroy the U.S. or anything). Also, I think the driving culture of the U.S. is unfortunate, BUT it is its own means of freedom of a sort. Anyways, it's a place, it's not so bad, be grateful that you can be here for now.

    3. Re:Other places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      new trend of US haters?

      What's to hate? So we do torture, start wars of aggression, indefinite detention without trial, murder by presidential decree (NDAA), impose our laws (written by *AA etc) on the rest of the world, support al Qaeda in Syria, etc, etc, but we mean well.

    4. Re:Other places by Supercooldude · · Score: 1

      It's worth noting that the average price of a detached house in Vancouver is $961,000 while the average family income is $67k/yr. I would recommend against Vancouver if you expect to retire before 80. Toronto isn't much better but at least it has a real economy.

    5. Re:Other places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Vancouverite, I do recommend Vancouver, but recommend that you look in the surrounding cities instead. Cost of living is very high here, and a house in which to raise a family is very difficult to arrange, and you'd better believe you'll be renting, not owning. Unless you're fabulously wealthy.

      It's a terrifically livable city, despite cost of living, and I love it. Just be aware, when reading about Vancouver, that YMMV if you're not actually *in Vancouver* but rather in Richmond, Burnaby, Surrey, New West, Coquitlam, ... etc.

    6. Re:Other places by ChunderDownunder · · Score: 1

      Real estate is a huge factor.

      Australia in that regard isn't the lucky country either. These liveability surveys putting my home city (Melbourne) at the top neglect to mention that houses in nice neighbourhoods regularly cost $1m plus. An Indian couple with a child I know moved from NZ to Melbourne for higher wages. They're back in Wellington after evaluating the bang for buck was better in NZ.

    7. Re:Other places by KingMotley · · Score: 1

      In case you forgot, the Japanese (and Asians in general) don't like foreigners.

      Nah, just because everywhere you go people don't like YOU, doesn't mean they don't like foreigners. It really is just you.

    8. Re:Other places by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Zealand?

      I'd suggest you look at the income power indexes for that one, as sad as it may be, the cost of living has dramatically increased over the last half decade without a matching increase in pay. And the Ozone hole makes the great out doors significantly less appealing for those of a fair complexion :(.

    9. Re:Other places by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      You forgot the shitty hours and pay

    10. Re:Other places by Whuffo · · Score: 1

      That may well be true in Japan, but there's other countries in Asia that treat foreigners very, very well

  80. There's nowhere left to hide... by AtlanticCarbon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think I've read stories about people from just about anywhere feeling the need to move in order to escape bad economic conditions. You hear a lot about people bringing up Australia or Germany. I don't see any long-term scenario in which other countries of the world are flailing but Germany and Australia are thriving. Economies are too interdependent these days.

    One should choose a city where they have the strongest base of support from family and friends. If thinks get worse, you will need to rely on those people.

    1. Re:There's nowhere left to hide... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people ARE relying on those people and it's hiding the true extent of the problems. When an entire generation lives with their parents rebellion can't be too far off.

    2. Re:There's nowhere left to hide... by 0123456 · · Score: 2

      When an entire generation lives with their parents rebellion can't be too far off.

      You mean, like people used to do fifty years ago?

    3. Re:There's nowhere left to hide... by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I would chose countries with lots of natural resources and a good track record of stable government. That's mostly Canada and Australia.

    4. Re:There's nowhere left to hide... by HuguesT · · Score: 1

      At the moment Australia is doing very well in part because they export a lot of their resources to China. This can last some time but eventually this will stop. They have a service-based economy and by and large they are not investing enough in R&D.

      At the moment Germany is doing great because they export tooling machines (and luxury cars, etc) to developing countries building a manufacturing infrastructure. This has beeng going on decades, and as long as there is some manufacturing somewhere Germany will do OK but eventually the Chinese or other will have the skills to develop their own infrastructure. Then what ?

  81. Yes, and a massive one by jeko · · Score: 0

    I can promise you that the God of War has a huge following of mostly adolescent males...

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
    1. Re:Yes, and a massive one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Obama who escalated the war in Afghanistan, had involvement in mid-east uprisings, has dramatically increased the use of drones to murder. Take your partisan bullshit elsewhere, they're all pretty scummy.

    2. Re:Yes, and a massive one by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Does the Drone War mean anything to you at all? The current administration is at least as warlike as the last one, the only difference is that they've figured out that automated flying robots are cheaper than soldiers.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    3. Re:Yes, and a massive one by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 2, Interesting

      some in the current administration

      But as far as that goes, there are some days I wish it were possible to drop an atom bomb on the Pakistan frontiers where the Taliban take up shop. I suppose you think the Taliban are hard done by. Nice people who destroy national (and important to the world) antiquities, force women to wear tents, and shoot them if they see fit, poison school wells because they don't think students, especially girls, should learn anything that isn't in the Koran, etc. etc. etc.

      If you can live with yourself implicitly supporting the Taliban, I can live with the drone war on them. It isn't a matter of you're either with me or against me, more you're either part of the problem or you're not. Not providing Afghanistan a look at what the alternative to the Taliban can be by providing schools and support for their fledgling police and government infrastructure just invites the Taliban back. Not preventing the Taliban from killing, poisoning, intimidating, is inviting them back just as much as anything. But of course you have already implied you think theocracies are just fine with you.

      Sure you'll spout, let the people decide. How well can you decide anything if someone points a gun at your head? If someone were going to kill you or kill your children if you didn't suck a cock, you'd do it and ask for more. Unless you give the people a break from these thugs, they won't have chance. The Taliban preach their theocracy with a gun barrel. And these Taliban thugs won't stop. Hell just yesterday they attacked a base where the Pakistanis store nuclear weapons. So you'd rather we did nothing a would be OK if religious radicals were in control of nuclear weapons. Are you looking forward to Iran arming Hezbollah with nuclear bombs?

      You think trying to do something against these scumbags is warlike? When the Pakistani government not only won't do anything about them often even where forced, but actively if covertly support them (Bin Laden couldn't have set up shop like that without government help). You really think combating these people is warlike? I don't fucking think so.

      Chamberlain showed what happens if you choose to avoid a distasteful but needed call to arms. Don't give me any crap about some principle when I say his name, but Hitler could have been stopped early if the leaders hadn't been so afraid to do what needed to be done. Do you know who had the most heavy tanks in Europe in the late 1930s (including 1939/1940 during the phony war)? France; that's who. Not Germany. It had nothing to do with manpower or equipment. Thinking forcible disarmament of Germany was warlike and war mongering caused WWII and the deaths of 11.5 million people in death camps (the Jews weren't the only group thrown in the ovens). It lead to the deaths of hundreds of thousand of soldiers and civilians. It lead to Japan making the Nazi atrocities look like a kids sandbox game when they went into China and the Philippines.

      Being forced down the path to war because diplomacy doesn't work, doesn't mean you're warlike. It just just means you do what you have to do. Being warlike means doing something like that when there is no need. Before the invasion in 2001/2002 the Taliban were asked to give up Osama Bin Laden and they said no, they didn't think he did anything wrong. In fact the Taliban government showed themselves complicit by providing training bases for things they knew Bin Laden was up to (terrorism). They were a rogue state in every sense of the word. Never mind a few years before they had fired artillery into 1000 year old massive carvings of Buddha on mountain walls, at least 100 feet tall when many in the world begged them not to... all because of religious principles (that is a good indication of how they think).

      You want warlike? Genghis Khan was warlike. Napoleon was warlike. Wehrmacht Germany was warlike.The Khmer Rouge were warlike. Most dictators are warlike. The Taliban are warlike. Stopping those who would kill to forc

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    4. Re:Yes, and a massive one by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      The Drone war I'm talking about has nothing to do with the Afghanistan Taliban. It has to do with American terrorists such as the pro-life movement and the Catholics.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    5. Re:Yes, and a massive one by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      So by your drone war, if you're talking about surveilance and treating U.S. citizens and close friends (like Canadians) like they're the Taliban, then I agree with you completely.

      There used to be a thing proudly said that Canada and the United States were such good friends, unparralled in the world, that we had the longest undefended territorial boundary in the world. Now the U.S. is flying drones over it like Canadians are the bloody Taliban all because of bullshit rumours that the hijackers of 9/11 came through Canada (a baldfaced lie reiterated for years by morons like Janet Napolitano who even try to tell Canadians that one on a trip here a couple years ago... she got slapped back hard on that one). Now because of paranoia we have the longest defended border in the world.

      If you want a good example of how friendly countries work, go to Europe and drive a car across the border. The border guards don't give a shit as long as your passport is from one of the right countries (and even though not a part of Europe, Canada and America for the most part qualify) they don't even want to usually see more than the picture then, "get outta here we were talking" kind of attitude. If you're a friend we don't need to ask any more than that. You're a friend.

      And now the FBI is calling anyone who identifies as a Juggalo and listens to the Insane Clown Posse a criminal, and lists followers as part of an informal criminal enterprise. A gang. J. Edgar Hoover would be proud of the modern FBI and the president for that one. He'd probably buy the new director and the pres a fine frock for their actions there. Personally I think those two guys, the other two guys, the Insane Clown Posse are idiots and really don't like most of their music (I'm sure there is something in there that might be decent to listen to). But those guys don't have enough unburnt brain cells between them to be a criminal enterprise. Especially not an organized one. I mean holy fuck, what's next, separate water fountains?

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  82. Switzerland of course! by ecbpro · · Score: 1

    It is in Europe but not in the EU.
    2.8% unemployment rate! Highest salaries in the world. Health insurance, pension it is all there! US people would call it a communistic country though ;-)
    And it is a nice and very safe place to live (except if your name is Polanski...).

    1. Re:Switzerland of course! by billcarson · · Score: 1

      Because of course, a country that is enclosed by EU countries and is heavily dependent on them (60% of its exports go to the EU) is a safe haven.

    2. Re:Switzerland of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hehe, Switzerland is presently suffering the highest prices in history. Many people need to do their weekly grocery shopping in Germany just to make ends meet.

      Unless you're invited for a specific job companies are quite reluctant at accepting foreign workers, including their German or French cousins, when from further away it gets worse.

    3. Re:Switzerland of course! by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      Switzerland's famous (infamous? notorious?) neutrality, and diplomatic roles to connect enemies of the world into peaceful dialogue makes Switzerland one of the last places to be targeted for terrorism or invasion, especially since they have a strong military and enough bunkers in the Alps for the whole population to take up defensive positions. Dispite Polanski, Switzerland is still least likely than just about any other Western democracy to expedite its residents to potentially abusive regimes (such as USA). Ironically Switzerland is a major supplier of some of the finest weapons to the armies of the world. So with a long tradition of being a safe place to store one's cash and gold, as well as their reputation for fine mechanical work (clocks, locks, and guns), their economy will remain strong during just about any crisis no matter how global in nature. But with such desirable characteristics there are many who would prefer to immigrate to Swtizerland, so immigration standards are very high to limit a flood of would-be Swiss citizens.

  83. US is great for IT by musicalmicah · · Score: 1

    The US might have a decently high unemployment rate right now, but in IT it's quite low. IT jobs are expanding very rapidly here, and I don't think that outsourcing has put a dent in it. In particular, Seattle and San Francisco are great places to be, with oodles of jobs, high quality of life, lots of diversity, and a very educated populace.

  84. Have you considered Iran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you considered Iran? Beautiful country, rich in natural resources. When you get there, you want to talk to a guy named Ahmadinejad. When you find him, tell him Benjamin Netanyahu sent you. I am sure he will hook you up with some free room and board for a while.

  85. Not Canada! by kiwisteve · · Score: 5, Funny

    All the houses are crap and Mike Holmes is going a round fixing them ONE AT A TIME!!!

  86. The U.S. Deficit by fm6 · · Score: 1

    The deficit, as bad as it is, is not even close to reaching Armageddon proportions. Viewed as a percentage of GDP, our debt isn't even that high. The deficit itself is less of a problem than the inability of anybody to confront the problem honestly. And yes, I include Paul Ryan, who refuses to look at our biggest black hole for fiscal waste, the military. Jeez, even if you're a hawk, doesn't it bother you that we spend more on defense than the rest of the planet combined?

    But even if I'm wrong, and the U.S. is on the verge of economic collapse, consider this: if we go down, we're certainly taking everybody with us. We're still the center of the world economy, and everybody trades with us. If the U.S. market disappeared, there'd be a global crash that would make 1929 look like a hiccup

    So if you're worried about the imminent collapse of the U.S. economy, I'd suggest going to a remote location and learning to survive as a subsistence farmer. And if you're not willing to go that drastic, you might as well not worry about it.

  87. Canada's pretty good by dskoll · · Score: 1

    I live in Canada and like it a lot. My family emigrated here from South Africa when I was 11, and Canada has been very good to me. It's sort of like the USA, only with slightly less polarized politics and slightly more sane social policies.

    I live in Ottawa and it does get rather cold in the winter. But hey, global warming's fixing that... the last few winters have been mild. :)

  88. Re:Reading too much into the cover of The Economis by dkleinsc · · Score: 0

    An additional question on the "Am I ready to live in an emerging market?" quiz:

    Do you mind dodging gunfire?

    (That's not an everyday problem in all emerging markets, but it's enough of one in many of them that's it's worth mentioning, and being a relatively wealthy person is likely to make you a target.)

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  89. Re:typical by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't hold back, kid. Give that strawman everything you've got.

  90. Germany ! - Welcome to Germany by burni2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    1.) very reasonable priced health care ! (contributions will be transfered by your employer to the insurance company from your salary)
    - the health care insurance company is not allowed to pick, they have to take anybody

    2.) good job market

    3.) reasonable priced rent

    4.) you can mostly get along with speaking english,
    but learning german is not that hard,

    Example: that iranian young women whose face pic was taken from facebook by western media due to a name glitch, she was prosecuted by the mullahs,
    got asylum here and after only one and a half year she is fluent and speaks execelent, she was on radio last week.

    If you want to learn german the national public radio (not npr) has a livestream,
    http://www.dradio.de/

    you can also find places on the internet where you can watch our exported tv series ("Der Tatort" which translates as "The Crime Scene" or "Derrek" these got even dubbed with japanese language for Japan of course!!)

    5.) state forced sponsored pension (will be transfered by your employer as part of your salary) after your 67 birth day these insurance benefits will be paid

    6.) disabled persons & families are last to be fired (workers rights)

    7.) strong unions

    8.) from north to south, funny speaking people

    9.) reasonable wages
    When you negotiate your salary keep taxes and other things in mind (~%43 will be subtracted from your salary) so just add it beforehand !

    10.) IT, Tech & Engineering Jobs

    I love my country so I'd like to present my country to people in this world, european, african, asian, indian.

    Think of finding a job ?
    -> Try Germany!

    1. Re:Germany ! - Welcome to Germany by Sentrion · · Score: 1

      I've been to Germany several times and love it. Health insurance system makes more sense than in the US. I work for an American subsidiary of a German company, but from what I have looked into immigration is very difficult unless you are a refugee. Any tips to get past the immigration barriers?

    2. Re:Germany ! - Welcome to Germany by burni2 · · Score: 1

      Hi,

      when I remember correct for people from US, Canada and Israel there are special "lessend" restrictions.

      I think the best(easiest) way to find a job here, is to study. Because you have time to get to know german "beurocratic" specialties, also company internships are mostly part of a universitty education, so this is a good way to getting to know the companies. There are many students from vietnam & china, and sometimes they decide to stay here for a while after they received their b.sc. /b.eng./m.sc./m.eng.
      (a good amount of courses are only taught in english)

      Nearly every university has special internal consultants for foreigners to guide them through the beurocratic jungle.

      Just a Job:
      1st applying for a "good" (sometimes starting at or even less don't know right now exact 36000â/year) paying job, this will differ as for certain jobs.

      European/German job sites like monster, xing, and so on, are good for looking into job offers, just try "google.de" and enter some german words like "Ingenieur Stelle Angebot"

      Linked.in is also good!

      Then there is a priorization, german & EU workers first, if there are no applicants (equally quallified) than the foreign applicant is good to go.

      Then there are "Engpassberufe"
      - Medical doctors
      - mechanical, electrical, automobile engineers

      where getting a job for a foreigner is much easier

      But an at least 2 year education is mostly needed.

      Even company leading jobs might be excluded from the german & EU first rule! ("FührungskrÃfte")

      Members from these countries do not need a visa:
      Australia, Israel, Japan, Canada, South Korea, Newzeland, USA

      others need one even for a job interview

      Some sites with information

      http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/ -> set to english
      -> entry & residence

      http://www.bmas.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/faq-beschaeftigung-auslaendischer.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

      sorry for the messed up posting,
      I just woke up.

    3. Re:Germany ! - Welcome to Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am living in germany for 13 years now. I agree, it is a very nice country with very high living standards.
      however, the it/software industry is NOT on a par with the one from the united states. to put it gently, despite
      all the efforts put into it by several german governments, germany is not famous for its software industry.
      here is a report with it salaries in germany:
      http://www.heise.de/jobs/artikel/Wer-verdient-wie-viel-981845.html

    4. Re:Germany ! - Welcome to Germany by BlkRb0t · · Score: 1

      How easy is it to find a job in Germany? I'm an Indian and have completed my engineering under-graduation(B.E. Mechanical) just recently. I am thinking of doing my Masters in Germany considering the opportunities in fields relating to anything mechanical are quite high in Germany. Which university would be best suitable for my needs? My interests lie in the fields of Automobile and Robotics. P.S. - I have completed three levels of German Language from Goethe Institut. Though I'm not very fluent while speaking, I can understand most of what the other person is saying.

    5. Re:Germany ! - Welcome to Germany by burni2 · · Score: 1

      Finding a job in germany, it's difficulty level: "medium" ;)
      - German employers demand a high level of self-reliance (look at a problem and find a solution by yourself without additional help)
      - The other thing is know your stuff and like what you are doing.
      - Having real working experience is also good.
      - But you should improve language skills first, because that might be a showstoppers. (please read further to see my hint)

      An engineer is like a swiss army knife - has every tool, perhaps not the sharpest or best but gets the job done.

      Masters degree automotive & robotics:
      I would suggest looking down to the south of germany, like munich for example, they have an automotive focus,
      or RWTH Aachen (very hard, very elite) mostly looking Aachen and south of it. The automotive areas are
      Stuttgart(Mercedes Benz, Porsche), Ingolstadt(Audi), München(BMW).

      btw. Thinking aside from automotive:
      University of Stuttgart has Wind Power Engineering courses and Suzlon group is also active in Germany (Hamburg & Rostock)

      But even though I would suggest first re-doing your B.eng or B.sc.in germany (I think there is so much difference in academic titles you will be able to do that ), only for first 2 semesters or even more, just to assess the requirements better, because this is the most difficult part for foreigners from china and india to cope with the requirements. Please keep in mind, Bachelor degrees just sound equal, but are not in terms of requirements & their contents.

      This approach has also a benefit, you would have gained a degree perhaps quicker because of your previous knowledge, you could devellop your language skill
      and you could have earned a german engineering degree, even called the same, but I would say this has a good "ring" in every employers ear.
      (this was also confirmed by a guy from india with a german masters degree I recently met)

      But also as german employers like self-reliance, you will need that too in a german university, sustianability, creativity and not being shy.

      And language skills are important, even you can do your Masters degree 100% in english, but you need a real social network with fellow students to achieve your goal. But a word of caution, you will probably encounter people who don't like indians or *enter country here*, racism is quite international, but those are not the majority. The better you speak the language the less those people will get a grip! Most professors speak a very simple english, but this changes as the medium age of them changes.

    6. Re:Germany ! - Welcome to Germany by burni2 · · Score: 1

      You won't get rich, but you will make a good living ;) where is the problem ?

      And there is SAP ;)

      But you are right not on par, but not bad either.

  91. Scandanavia by Prien715 · · Score: 4, Informative

    If by "Europe" is doing badly you must surely mean the Eurozone. Unemployment in Norway/Sweden/even formerly bankrupt Iceland is very good. If you're having kids, the 2 months mandatory paternity leave in Sweden would be nice. You'd get to spend time with your kids and not have to work all the time and it allows your spouse to keep a career too. The governments themselves are very stable with the lowest levels of corruption in the world (if only Greece could say the same!), allowing the high tax rate to give you a decent rate of return on services you receive.

    In short, it's the southern European welfare state on steroids but done responsibly.

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    1. Re:Scandanavia by gestalt_n_pepper · · Score: 2

      Which is the elephant in the room. Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Iceland all have nicely functioning societies, quite popular with their own citizenry for the most part. They also act as if their citizenry mattered. They're also taxed up the wazoo BUT they get decent services out of it and a functioning safety net. Every time I hear about the dire consequences of taxes, socialized health care, and a reduced military, I can only look at these countries, and despair. Apparently, people here in the USA are now unable to see real world examples that demonstrate how nutty their ideas are.

      --
      Please do not read this sig. Thank you.
    2. Re:Scandanavia by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      Probably because there's no comparison between tiny, traditionally homogenous countries with substantial amounts of oil wealth and a vast hodge-podge like the USA. And, uh, didn't Iceland have a little economic problem or two recently?

    3. Re:Scandanavia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sweden has 16 months of parental leave.

    4. Re:Scandanavia by The+Wannabe+King · · Score: 1
      You could possibly make a case for Norway due to the oil, but there is absolutely no oil in Sweden or Iceland and the latter has handled the economic problems without imploding.

      I wish more Americans could realize that a social security net is actually beneficial in a capitalist society, since it enables entrepreneurs to try to start their own business without jeopardizing their children's education or the family's health. Start a small company and you don't have to worry about health insurance for your workers. They have the same good coverage as anyone else. And insurance against unemployment, illness, permanent disability...

      Since you play the size card: Organize at the state level. 28 states have a smaller population than Norway, and only 10 states have a larger population than Sweden. All of them are significantly smaller than fairly well-functioning Germany.

      One last thing: Why on Earth do you allow such socialist interference in private business as government-mandated minimum wages? That would be unheard of, at least in Norway.

    5. Re:Scandanavia by ace37 · · Score: 1

      The Scandinavian cultures are able to pull it off because of their citizens and culture. The US and many other nations are not able to duplicate the model because of their citizens. The economic and social models can work extremely well, but they fall apart if enough of its citizens choose to abuse and exploit it for personal gain at societal expense.

      One Finnish woman I knew told me she wanted to take a vacation to Spain for two months but didn't feel like waiting for the vacation, so she said she planned to quit her job and started collecting the very generous year-long Finnish unemployment package (~75% of her wage). She'd hang out at home for the duration of the year while she collected checks, then she would probably go back to working again. I didn't hear from her after her trip, but she did at least head out for Spain according to that plan. The economic model can be sustained because most of the population doesn't do what she did.

    6. Re:Scandanavia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yepp, Sweden might be worth considering.

      There are actually open positions for "IT-researchers" (which, given the lack of details in the question, might be a match or not) at one of northern Europes largest computer science departments: http://www.liu.se/en/job/show.html?4662

      It's also quite good to look for work at universities - being foreign is quite normal since there are a lot of international staff and researchers already, so it's easier to fit in than in a more uniform company,

    7. Re:Scandanavia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USA are now unable to see real world examples that demonstrate how nutty their ideas are.

      It's really starting to look that way to the rest of the world unfortunately. Some policy in the US seems about as logical as that in North Korea compared to ultra sensible places such as Norway etc. It's because policy in the US is driven by dumb populist agendas and media hysteria about *everything*. Unfortunately Australia (and I suspect Canada?) are falling down the same pathway to government by lowest common denominator.

  92. WHAATT??! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you've lived in how man other countries to know this??

    let me guess, none.

  93. Zombie plan... by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

    I'd work on the presumption that the worldwide economy is going to fail and there are going to be some very unpleasant times ahead. It's actually fairly unlikely in my (guesswork) opinion, but given the stakes a variation on Pascal's Wager is a reasonable approach.

    Forget cities. You've got a job you can do remotely to a large extent, so use the opportunity to get out of cities, the most dangerous place in a collapse is places with lots of people who are 99% reliant on "the system".

    Find a farm somewhere growing a staple crop, wheat, rice, corn or whatever. You don't need to live on the farm, just nearby, because what you're looking for is land that will provide you with plenty of calories for a minimum of effort if you need it. You don't have to start being self-sufficient, just have a garden and grow some fresh veg to get the hang of it (it's fun too).

    The real bonus is bringing the kids up. They'll get plenty of fresh air and exercise in an area that's very safe. Schools in rural areas are generally very good too, and commuting isn't a big deal if you need to, just find somewhere close to a rail station.

    --
    Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
  94. Singapore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Singapore is a good match. Safe, clean, efficient, business and family-friendly. It is an English-speaking country right in the middle of Asia.
    The so-called lack of freedom is overrated.

  95. Watch Portlandia by danpbrowning · · Score: 1

    Before you decide, be sure to watch "Portlandia", a recent TV Series (on a torrent near you). It's a documentary about how much fun it is to live in Portland. (Heh heh). Where else can you see stuff like this on a daily basis? :D

    --
    Daniel
  96. Tyranny has a Grip on Humanity by hackus · · Score: 1

    and there is no where to run.

    Historically you could run off to far undiscovered lands and start over.

    Now, there isn't a place you can go where a crooked banker or politician has their teeth sunk deep in.

    A new dark age is setting in, and with it will come massive wars of opression, and billions will die.

    -Hack

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
  97. Don't come to the US! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't come to the US. As a person that use to live in the nations capitol, D.C., and now lives in poverty in southern VA. Stay out of the US! This country is going down the toilet slowly, and it sucks! There is no employment here, the 9-10% unemployment the government claims is total BS! It's more like 25-35% as they don't go door-to-door, but count people on unemployment benefits. The problem with that is those benefits only last about 3-6 months and then you're on your own. There is no tech jobs here, and I make a measly $30,000 a year, in DC I made closer to $60,000! Try supporting a family of 5 on $30,000 a year, it is fing killing me!

    When I was in Germany (2011), it was beautiful and I could make 50-60,000 EURO a year in the tech industry! Europe is no where near as bad off as CNN claims, in fact I'm pretty sure it's BS propaganda to make us poor US civies feel better about our poverty. It's just too bad it's nearly impossible to become an EU citizen, especially a German EU citizen. Here in the USA, you can just walk on it, pathetic. And don't even get me started on the BS laws here.... It's out of control, just about everything is illegal and I feel like I live in a cage!

    Sorry for being long winded, I'm just trying to save you from a life in hell.. I mean the USA.

    1. Re:Don't come to the US! by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Believe me, that area hardly reflects the United States.
      I'm so damned glad I moved away from there back in 2000.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  98. Family by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Live near where you have extended kin as they likely will be a help and solace in bad times, and you know the local ecomy, speak the language, have a support network, etc.
    Just live far enough away to provide insulation.
    Keep in mind a much bigger collapse will likely be coming in tweny or thirty years.
    as food gets scarcer and pricier and world energy supplies dwindle (so everything becomes much more expensive and forces a series of unpleasant tradeoffs such as food or warmth or transport) Things like wood supply, fresh water sources, and the ability to grow crops and sustain yourself
    localy will become more important.
    The US west will burn up completely by midcentury and that population moves east so pick areas, if you are a US citizen, that are far from major population centers.
    Oh, and for slash dot users, forget coding and IT and learn how to grow food and hunt. ; )

  99. Chile by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government will pay you if you want to start up a business. You can get citizenship without giving up your previous citizenship. Crime rate is very low, completely free market economy (check the economic freedom index), very good standard of living and plenty of people speaking southern european languages (french and italian are very popular and many kids learn them as a second language, portuguese is close enough to spanish so after a couple of months you'll be speaking fluently).
    Santiago is a huge metropolis, although I would recommend you to move either to the south or to the north since that's where most of the big business are (North is mining, south is fishing).

  100. God forbid you stay put.. by faedle · · Score: 1

    ... and try to improve life where you are.

  101. new??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what is new about not liking the US? The US military and corporations have ben shitting all over the world since before you or i were born.
    There is nothing "new" about it.

    1. Re:new??? by evil_aaronm · · Score: 0

      Seconded. Given that America has been involved in conflict more often than not, it's not hard to see why many foreign countries don't care much for us.

      See: http://americanhistory.about.com/library/timelines/bltimelineuswars.htm

      Personally, I don't hate America, but I see it like Carl Schurz: "My country, right or wrong. If right, to be kept right, if wrong, to be set right." Setting things right means accepting the truth: that America does not always act as a well-behaved world citizen. Like a petulant child, it needs to be held accountable.

    2. Re:new??? by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      Many of the conflicts we have been stuck with are the long term outcomes of old colonial empires or desires for modern empires by intransigents.

      For example the damn Middle East and ex-Ottoman Empire was partitioned by the British and French in such a way as to guarantee continuous war for the foreseeable future.

      Throw in world oil dependence and what happened and is happening is mostly inevitable.

      Yes mistakes were made, and will continue I am sure but blaming the US for it is just showing a lack of knowledge of history and economics.

      It would be heaven for the US to be energy independent and be able to walk away from this mess.

  102. I've been thinking about this for some time by cynop · · Score: 0

    We're on the same boat here. I'm a Greek mixed-signal designer, and for the past 3 years i've been contemplating this question. Here's what i've come up with:

    1st choice: Canada. Quality of life, wages and workplaces seems to be among the best worldwide. The climate can be a bit harsh, especially for south Europeans but you get used to it. From what i understand Canada was the first 1stWorld country to get pass the financial crisis. So it seems as shielded as can be from future problems. Also, having only one neighbor, with whom you have excellent relationships, can only help. Last but not least, the Canadian dollar seems strong enough, and other countries in the region [like Iceland] consider adopting it. Biggest problem: It's very difficult to migrate to Canada. They have very strict conditions to be met. I have working experience, a m.sc in microelectronic design and a large sum of money in the bank, and the "migration wizard" at the Canadian embassy’s site keeps rejecting me. I'd live there for 20 years easily.
    2nd choice: Finland. Basically all the goods of the E.E. without the bad. Bad climate here too, but excellent social policies, and workplaces. If you can handle the climate and the language you can’t lose. Seems well shielded to any economic crisis that are coming.
    3rd choice: Australia. Having a thriving economy, and being close to the Asian market can only help. The language and weather is a big plus. I’m not sure about the IT market there, but it’s probably not bad. You should check it out.

    Basically, for a long term solution you can’t bet on the US, or the centre/south EE countries. If you speak the language, Brazil seems to be a good choice, since for the next 5 years it will ride the wave of the Olympics and there will be lots of work possibilities.

  103. From southern Europe? by excelsior_gr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Giorgo, is that you?

    On a more serious tone, and as others pointed out above, you should have provided us with more clues. Relocating is an issue with lots of variables that vary strongly in each case. Having said that, all tips that one can give you can only be vague/anecdotal at best. Here are mine:
    1. I am Greek working in Germany for 7 years now. Whether you can feel safe economically here strongly depends on who you work for. I work for a large chemical company (>15.000 employes worldwide) and can't complain. However, we now hire only if we explicitly need to fill a vacant place.
    2. My Greek family and friends from my school/university years are all over the globe: Germany, Canada, Australia, the Netherlands, Switzerland, Brazil, UK. Those that are still in Greece plan to go away. However, this should come as no surprise. Greeks always had the tendency to migrate (also for no apparent reason) and this can only be enhanced by an economic crisis.
    3. Strangely, some friends that were in USA came back (before the crisis broke out). Personal reasons also came into play, but it seemed that the conditions in the USA were not overwhelmingly good so as to encourage their stay.
    4. In Australia you first need to get a well paying job in order to qualify for a visa. You can't go there looking for a job as many would imagine. This is likely to be valid for other countries as well.

    My 2 cents.

  104. Grass is greaner over here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One thing is for sure. Grass is definitely greener in Vancouver area compared to southern Europe. Having up to 2400mm of rain / year in helps a lot.

    But now more seriously. I moved from Netherlands almost a decade ago and I love it here. Biggest assets of living in Western Canada is the people and the natural beauty over here. Job secrity is pretty ok too.

  105. China and India bad options by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    China is screwed. Horribly screwed. You do NOT want to be there when the hammer falls. Perhaps Hong Kong would be OK, it might escape the worst of the problems... if they let you live there...

    India is probably better off, but coming from Europe are you seriously ready for the massive culture and lifestyle shock? It just strikes me as one of those societies that it's really hard to get along in if you have not grown up there. This is based on friends from india that go back from time to time, telling me what it is like to live there.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  106. KCK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kansas City, KS. Google Gig.

  107. Stay in europe by billcarson · · Score: 1

    I'd consider staying in Europe for the moment. Yes, the eurocrisis will worsen, but economies will recover eventually. Besides, most countries you mention (Australia, Brazil, etc.) have problems of their own: Brazil is still struggling with its poverty, Australia is more dependent on foreign investment than you would expect, and the US isn't really better of than Europe when it comes to job opportunities.

  108. About Brazil by morcego · · Score: 1

    It will depend on your priorities.
    The best paying positions are in São Paulo, followed by Rio de Janeiro.
    However, since you have a family, you might want to consider other cities with higher quality of life, like Curitiba or Florianópolis.
    Brazil is a very big country, and things can change radically depending on the city you are talking about.

    --
    morcego
  109. waterfront property by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

    A van, down by the river.

  110. Few places ticks the boxes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Forget the economic issues where you are moving TO. The economy may be an issue where you are moving FROM of course (if you are unemployed and unable to find work, which is of course the case for may people in Spain and Greece at the moment). Anywhere you can find a suitable job has a good enough economy. In fact, if the economy isn't booming it could actually help you since housing will be cheaper there.

    As for WHERE you want to go, that is of course a personal preference. I'd be looking for anywhere with good public healthcare, is safe, has progressive political attitudes, decent climate and good food. France comes to mind, but if you can stand a colder/wetter climate, I hear Vancouver is good. Stockholm is also nice (but then you have completely given up the weather part). I'd stay away from any developing nation and the BRIC countries, for their poor security.

    The US is bearable in some parts (SF, NY, Pacific northwest) but remember to not get ill and unemployed at the same time...

  111. US Northeast by FranTaylor · · Score: 1

    If you like Europe, the northeastern US is as close as you can get on this continent.

    Decent public transportation, decent schools, friendly people, varied climate, mountains, ocean, forests, lakes, what's not to like?

  112. Consider Iran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you considered Iran? When you get there, you want to talk to a guy named Ahmadinejad. When you find him, tell him Benjamin Netanyahu sent you. I am sure he will hook you up with some free room and board for a while.

  113. Re:Reading too much into the cover of The Economis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brazil, China, and India are huge countries. There are large cities in all of those countries where the standard of living is on par with, or exceeds, that of the West.

    In Brazil you'd want to move to Curitiba. China, Shanghai or Beijing. Not sure about India. Maybe Madras?

    The problem is that the cost of living in those cities might be higher than back home, especially in China. I'm an American, and if I had to move somewhere it'd probably be Chile or southern Brazil. I'm thinking about buying a condominium down there, actually.

    There are also tiny towns all over the world with long histories of very stable economies and politics. Those are obviously harder to find, but they exist. Not every city in emerging or undeveloped countries is teeming with knife wielding, unemployed, illiterate natives.

    And not every emerging economy is corrupt. Some have very stable political systems with a long history of the rule of law. Argentina and especially Chile have always enjoyed a strong rule of law, even during their military dictatorships.

  114. Hubris by jeko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Also FYI, be good at what you do and no financial crisis can hurt you.

    Deep, classical hubris.

    FInancial crises promote societal upheavals. They crash stock markets. They wipe out real estate values. They destroy savings accounts. They turn cities into war zones. If you're rich enough, you get to learn all about the wonderful world of K&R insurance, and the wonder of placing full-time bodyguards with your children. You get to live behind more walls than most Supermax inmates. Your spouse begins to take their frustration out on you, as do your kids.

    You become acutely aware of how far away the panic room is, and you push down any thoughts that someone might not come when you call for help from inside. You hire people to carry guns for you, and you have to worry as much about them as you do any bad guys. You become a family under seige. Even your kid's puppy love has to be fiercely vetted and worried about as a potential gold-digger.

    Your whole world becomes as much about fear and survival as any plane crash victim lost in the wilderness. Your doctor recommends anti-anxiety drugs, and THAT becomes something to worry about.

    So there you are, as grim as any soldier in a losing battle. Your food is exquisite and tasteless. Your insomnia is at least wrapped in silk sheets. Spend as much money on hookers as you want. You'll never get close to what a woman who loves you can do for you.

    And remember, this is what happens when you have enough money to try to insulate yourself from the upheaval. "Being good at what you do," means you're just another working stiff, and the functional difference between $100K and homeless isn't nearly as much as you might like to think...

     

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  115. Grand Rapids Michigan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could go for the suburbs of Detroit, but there is so much dependency on the auto industry. Grand Rapids is a very nice "small" city with decent numbers of tech jobs and some cultural stuff. Being in Michigan gives you easy access to thousands of miles of coastline with flesh water and no hurricanes. If you like the outdoors, there are many national and state parks. There are 4 seasons (not a plus if you can't stand winter). Wages are good, cost of living is low - for me to relocate to California for example, my pay may go up 20 percent, but my cost of living would go up at least 50 percent while the size of my home goes down 50 percent. Michigan also leads the nation in number of second homes - go buy something on an inland lake an hour away so you can leave town on the weekends if that's your thing. I'll stick to the Detroit area because I've got family there, but Grand Rapids would be near the top of my list in the US.

  116. Start with country evaluations. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a good country freedom reference.

  117. VIRUS IN LINK? by rwv · · Score: 2

    My corporate firewall warns me that the link to openmint.net contains a Trojan Virus. Buyer Beware.

  118. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  119. Interesting Question by 32771 · · Score: 1

    5 years: some civilized country not in monetary problems
    10 years: any country with oil/gas reserves and other resources that so far was relaxed about developing an empire in the recent past
    20 years: any country with a proven track record of a reasonably stable culture (I mean stable over relevant time scales like multiples of 1000 years) that still has >50% farmers in its population and didn't experience any significant overshoot during the last 200 years of party time.

    Even under the assumption that mankind finds a newer better energy source, it might take a while until full scale implementation, so even the optimists have something to worry about.

    Also I assumed that when you stay in a country for 20 years you will stay there.

    So far my decision is to stay where I am and take what comes my way. If I wasn't so fatalistic I would try to prepare for the 20year option which at my age ~35 would be doable but hard.

    Cities aren't my thing, fringes of cities might be OK though.

    --
    Je me souviens.
  120. EU citizenship by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

    In the US, people have to fund their own retirement and medical expenses. The social safety net is weak. That is no problem if you are rich or young (with lots of time to amortize the costs), but if you are over 30, the cost of moving here may be very high. Since you are an EU citizen, I would suggest you take a look at other EU countries like Sweden and Denmark.

    --
    [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  121. Salary or safety? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want a high salary (and you're good at what you do), the US is still the best place to go and will probably be for the foreseeable future. China, India and other similar countries may be on the way up, but they still have a long, long way to go before they catch up with the "west" economically.

    If you on the other hand prioritise family things like health care, education, child care etc. you would probably be better off moving to Canada or northern Europe. Even if there will be a new recession in the eurozone, Germany will not crash. The Netherlands will not crash. Scandinavia will not crash. Unemployment may rise a bit but there won't be any major systemic changes in the near future.

  122. It's up to you by Crypto+Cavedweller · · Score: 0
    Maybe the first question to ask yourself is how the place you're from is ever going to get better if everyone willing to work hard leaves to capitalize on the infrastructure work already done in other countries.

    But of course there's no reason to be chained to the place of your birth. I was born in the northwestern U.S., have lived and worked on the east coast, England, Australia, and most recently 2 years of work based in Holland and traveling the E.U. You'll certainly have easier immigration issues staying within the E.U. and the north is as strong economically as anyone else in the world.

    Australia & NZ ... very nice, and they want to keep it that way by not allowing the whole world to move there, so good luck.

    China and India "on the way up"? Check out the massive political and environmental issues they face in the years ahead.

    I'm back in Washington State now after seeing a LOT of the world, and love it more than ever. 'America' is not one place any more than 'Europe' is, there is a huge variety of environment, culture and employment opportunity.

    Bottom line is that it will be your commitment and flexibility that determines whether a new place is a good fit for you ... if it doesn't work out, don't blame the place.

  123. Culture and weather by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would check a place where I like the way people is, behavies and relates; and that I can acclimate to the weather. Scandinavia is very rich, but they are very close to foreigners and it can take years to simple go have a beer with a work colleague you see everyday. Also, the Scandinavian winter can be very hard to your mood. I lived there for a year and couldn't stay even with the very good job offers I was getting. That is true, to a less degree, to Germany, UK, France, etc.

    If you are from southern Europe, you are probably, as me, mediterranenan. Also, if you work in research you have probably been in contact with a lot of people around Europe and the world. You know, conferences, projects and all that stuff. Use that as a sample.

    If you plan on continue doing IT research skip emerging countries. They are not emerging by doing research, but big industry muscle and natural resources. Not research as done at Europe at least.

  124. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  125. The problem is, by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    ...if I answer the question, it's likely to get more crowded.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  126. Austin, TX if you can take the heat by Diss+Champ · · Score: 1

    Austin has a great local economy, plenty of tech, a decent state university, and plenty of things to do.

  127. Think Neal Sampat, not Will McAvoy... :-) by jeko · · Score: 1

    the God of War

    Sorry, Dude, it's Slashdot. :-) I meant Playstation, not politics.

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  128. I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by Chirs · · Score: 3, Informative

    Have been to the UK, and most of Europe, have lived in the US and in the Congo.

    While there are parts of the USA that are nice, on the whole I'll stick with Canada, thanks. Of course our current government really would like to turn Canada into the USA, while I think we'd be better off with a bit less of a gap between haves and have-nots.

    1. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well the difference between the 'have's' and 'have-nots' in the US is really how many houses,cars,TV's, one has. The poor here are pretty wealthy compared to most of the world.

    2. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by iserlohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You must have led a pretty sheltered life to say that.

    3. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 0

      Really?? I grew up with a lot less than what some of these 'poor' people have, A/C was considered a luxury not owning a car. Since then I've traveled a lot as I mentioned, I'm guessing though you just know liberal talking points and yourself have had a considerable sheltered life.

    4. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other words, yes, he says, he has led a pretty sheltered life.

    5. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by iserlohn · · Score: 1

      You mean that people aren't poor unless they were poorer than you?

      I'm afraid you've made up your mind already and no matter what the facts are (for example, the US has a much higher level of relative poverty than Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom and most western European countries), it wouldn't change your view one single bit.

    6. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no fucking clue. I know poor people, and even roughly-median-income people, and in no way is their lifestyle comparable to the civilized world. I have a friend with a debilitating back injury that he can't afford to have treated, because his job doesn't provide health insurance, or allow sick leave, or pay him enough. Nobody else will hire him, because it's perfectly legal to discriminate against someone because they might need time off for health reasons, and no insurance company would cover a pre-existing condition anyway (if he could afford to pay for one). In spite of his constant pain he needs to work in order to clothe and feed his two children. They live in a bedbug-infested hovel because that's all he can afford. No, he doesn't have a car or a house or a TV. He's going to be broke and in pain for the rest of his life, with no possibility of a resolution. This is the kind of shit that goes on in the US, but simply doesn't happen anywhere else in the (first) world because other countries are more civilized than this.

    7. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      Thanks for putting words in my mouth, where is this source for these claims? I'm not one who believes that forced redistribution of wealth is the way to go. Other people think it's OK.

    8. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Well the difference between the 'have's' and 'have-nots' in the US is really how many houses,cars,TV's, one has.

      If "difference between" includes 0 to 1, maybe. Sure, even the very poor often have cheap old TVs, but there's a huge number of people for whom ownership of one single hope is just a distant dream, and a good number for whom a car would be luxury too. I've spent most of my life barely on the car-having side of things, and am just now starting to think that I might be able to own a home by the time I'm too old to work, and not spend my retirement on the street thanks to not having the income to rent anymore.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    9. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      I understand, I've been there, times I wondered if I would have food for the week.It isn't good, I wasn't saying everyone who was poor wasn't hard off, just that ones who some (like the government) consider poor have a lot more than the real ones I managed to get out of it and made something of my life, it wasn't easy, but I did it on my own. I have a somewhat of a unique view, I've been to Hatti, sadly I've seen real poverty, even they had cell phones an a bikes, not many cars there guess those were the rich ones, but many had no homes and barely any electricity. Government is a big part of their problem though, both theirs and ours unfortunately. That's a different story though. I do understand about owning a home though I was over 40 when I was able to get one finally. Never thought I would have one myself, odd how things change over time.

    10. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      I'm not one who believes that forced redistribution of wealth is the way to go.

      Taxation by definition is "forced redistribution of wealth", so are you saying we should not have tax and therefore not have government, or do you think taxes should be voulentary and therefore ineffective?

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    11. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Yeah, totally agreed that the U.S. poor have it much better than the poor in many other parts of the world. It just struck me that "how many houses and cars one has" doesn't really belong in a discussion of "have-nots", even when talking about the U.S., because as well-off as we may be in terms of at least having some kind of food and shelter (vs maybe none at all in places like Haiti), the have-nots here are still hoping to have a house or a car, never mind "how many". If "how many" is even on the table, you're already far on the "have" side no matter where you are.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    12. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      Well, it's hard to make objective comparisons, but when attempts are made to do so, the US usually is nowhere to be found in the top 10
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_Poverty_Index#For_selected_high-income_OECD_countries_.28HPI-2.29
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_inequality-adjusted_HDI#List

    13. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      Mitt, is that you?

    14. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      The first time I saw beggars crowding the streets in the middle of the night burning garbage to heat themselves was when I was in the US. Heck I have been to Southern Europe and Eastern Europe and I never saw anything like it.

    15. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by vistic · · Score: 1

      I'm from the USA and lived in Canada for a while, now back in the USA again. I've visited UK, Australia, India, China, and Brazil. I think long term however many years down the line I'd like to go back to Canada eventually.

    16. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      Odd I have. They try to hide it more, even Toronto had several, definitely have seen it though. Here's a youtube special; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dW8ZBbhbnWc

    17. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1
      A Reuters article on homelessness in Europe, http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/12/us-europe-homelessness-idUSTRE78B6KE20110912

      It's never nice to see anywhere, but seriously U.S is not by any means the only ones to have them.

    18. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by savuporo · · Score: 1

      I'd move to Vancouver from SF in a heartbeat if they sold beer in the grocery stores. As it is, thats a dealbreaker.

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    19. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      Taxation by definition is "forced redistribution of wealth"

      Not by a long shot,

      1. a sum of money demanded by a government for its support or for specific facilities or services, levied upon incomes, property, sales, etc. 2. a burdensome charge, obligation, duty, or demand.

      Taxes have only become a serious form of redistribution in the past few years.

    20. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      No Barrack it isn't.

    21. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1
      Here is where the information from the study was done, before anyone attacks it because it was done by the Heritage Foundation, I would have provided studies from more liberal studies but could not find any.

      http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/277040/strange-facts-about-america-s-poor-robert-rector

      some high-lights;

      Eighty percent of poor households have air conditioning. By contrast, in 1970, only 36 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.

      Fully 92 percent of poor households have a microwave; two-thirds have at least one DVD player and 70 percent have a VCR.

      Nearly 75 percent have a car or truck; 31 percent have two or more cars or trucks.

      Four out of five poor adults assert they were never hungry at any time in the prior year due to lack of money for food.

      Nearly two-thirds have cable or satellite television.

      Half have a personal computer; one in seven have two or more computers.

      More than half of poor families with children have a video game system such as Xbox or PlayStation.

      Just under half — 43 percent — have Internet access.

      A third have a widescreen plasma or LCD TV.

      One in every four has a digital video recorder such as TiVo.

      Does this mean there are no truly poor? no, of course not, it does show that we have different ideas of what is classified as poor.

    22. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      You can't find any liberal studies because only the social conservatives are concerned with these straw man arguments. Unless we want to fight decades of war we will never impose our own values on the rest of the world. They will slowly seep out if we show people how good things can be.

      Crapping on someone because the have some dumpster / RTO electronics and live in an air conditioned rental does not help anyone. In my city it is almost impossible to find a rental without AC.

    23. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      You can't find any liberal studies because only the social conservatives are concerned with these straw man arguments

      Why start your sentence with an obvious lie? For the first time I actually thought we were opening the lines of communication between right and left ideologies and then you go ahead with this crap.

    24. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      Unless we want to fight decades of war we will never impose our own values on the rest of the world."

      Personally I like Germany to be like Germany, France to be like France, the Great Britain to be like Great Britain, and the U.S to be like the U.S. I like the differences, it makes things much more interesting than everything having to be the same. I have no desire for them to have our values, if the don't them.

    25. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I was referencing this particular straw man argument. There are plenty on the left also.

    26. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I agree, however some differences necessitate change. Bribery is rampant in Mexico and not something I would like to see imported to the US. Apparently tax evasion is a national sport in Greece, again, something I would not like to see spread.
      Many of our societies virtues cause a noticeable positive effect, things like gender equality and freedom of religion or speech. These are the tings that need to spread.

    27. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      I was referencing this particular straw man argument

      My point being this isn't a straw man argument.

    28. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      I see you've been lucky enough to never experience economic hardship. Good for you, don't crap on everyone who has not been so lucky,

    29. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by cheesybagel · · Score: 1

      Yeah sure one or two in isolation I have seen them around. However not like I saw in the US where the main streets were packed with them. They weren't violent or disturbing the peace but still it was a degrading spectacle. One would expect society to support those people better. It wasn't even in one of the main US cities.

    30. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      Now that is different, I've been across the US from New York to San Fransisco and all and up down the costs and never saw that. I'm in Atlanta and I still never saw that.

    31. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      So you obviously don't read well, I said I grew up in poverty but was able to get out of it. Whats pathetic is for people like you who don't even take the time to bother to read what your posting about.

    32. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by hraponssi · · Score: 1

      I come from Europe, have lived in a couple of European countries and in Canada with my family. I have also been to many other places but I have no idea how it would be to actually live in those places since I haven't lived in them. From having lived in Canada and visited many places in the US, I think Canada is nice and definitely for me nicer than the US (still, haven't lived there so it is just a guess), although I guess there are big differences in which part of the country you choose.

      But with my European roots I still feel I belong more in Europe. I like how it has more history (less megacities far apart with everyone sitting in their cars), everything is close, and especially my extended family and the rest of the people I know are close by. That is maybe because that is what I grew up to. Perhaps the same with Canada/US.

      For me it has been nice how easy it is to move inside Europe, just the languages are an issue. Which partly seems to be the same in the more European sections of Canada (the French speaking). The culture I can more easily manage as it is also up to who you end up interacting most with, which is commonly the other more "international" folks.

      As for the OP, seeing the world by living in another country and culture can be a great experience. With a family the move is a huge change with plenty of big variables, so you don't want to keep repeating that too often.. So a tough choice, unless you are only planning to start the family someday and have not done so yet. In which case you have the freedom to explore for yourself.

    33. Re:I'm from Canada too, but I disagree with you. by pnutjam · · Score: 1

      Poverty as a child is different then poverty as an adult or as an adult with children. Your experiences 20+ ago may not qualify you to judge others.

  129. As a resident of New York by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    who almost yearly takes the 6 hour drive up i87 to Montreal for R&R, Montreal is a pretty awesome place. I totally dug your pick-up-bike-drive-someplace-drop-it-off thingy, that now NYC is copying. You should make it friendlier for tourists to use though, although I guess there's good reasons against that (liability, transience, getting lost, etc.).

    And sorry for not knowing any French or having any desire to learn. But I think you guys are used to us ethnocentric Americans, as I've never encountered brusqueness or hostility about being an outsider, I've always encountered warmth. But this is is in Francophone Quebec. I HAVE encountered less friendly snooty attitudes, only in Anglophone Canada. Which is telling. We got your back Quebecois if you ever try to go independent again. As a descendant of a New England American Revolutionary War soldier who killed redcoats and was shot at by tories, all I have to say is fuck the Queen.

    Granted, I've never been there in the winter, and don't really want to go. But I hear you've built lots of interconnected underground malls and live like moles in the 6 month long winter.

    I love Vancouver too. Canada is awesome in general, your attitudes towards healthcare, education, social welfare, guns, and financial responsibility is obviously way better than the USA.

    Except for the weather, which is a pretty huge ding. That is why I have always maintained that global warming is a Canadian conspiracy.

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  130. Sorry can't tell you by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    We try to keep it quiet.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  131. Research with Data! by X86Daddy · · Score: 1

    My consort and I went through the "where do we ultimately want to live" question a couple years ago, mostly focused on the US (being from the US meant no paperwork problems). We found a few websites to be awesomely useful:

    • City Data does a lot of statistics on the demographics of major US metro regions. Income, religious mix, crime, education, cost of living, etc... Unfortunately, I think it just covers US and Canada.
    • Google Trends helps you see which cities have people interested in the same topics as you. The best way I found to use this was to search on technical or scene terms from various interests to see which cities show up as top 10 contenders.
    • Most weather sites will show you annual averages on sunshine, rainfall, snow, humidity, hours of light, and temperatures... Also note that some metro regions have emerging structures/behaviors to deal with weather... Some Canadian cities have huge indoor networks and good public transit to help offset snow issues. Pacific Northwest cities are espresso nirvana as a way to cope with dark, cloudy days 3/4 of the year.

    Searching this way will probably yield a few candidates who have the mix of demographics you care about, zeitgeist hits, weather you're happy with, etc... Subscribe to RSS feeds of their newspapers, local music scene forums, etc... to get a better feel for each, and ultimately, visit your top candidate(s) for a vacation. We visited our top candidate after all of the above, and we were astounded that it felt perfect on top of being a specification match.

  132. Wuss by Chirs · · Score: 1

    I live in Saskatoon. :)

    1. Re:Wuss by mirix · · Score: 2

      Me too. And it's too bloody cold here, even being a native. If I immigrated from somewhere warmer I'd want to kill myself (more than I already want to) all winter long (all 8 months of it).

      --
      Sent from my PDP-11
  133. Confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How do you do #2 without doing #4; is a benefit not a form of income?

  134. Get a job before you move by ion++ · · Score: 1

    Get a job before you move regardless of where you are moving to.

  135. Brazil or BC Canada by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I'd recommend either Canada (in BC) where they have cheap power and plentiful water and will not be impacted by global warming rising heat for the next 40 years, other than most of the glaciers melting.

    Or Brazil. They have a diverse energy economy and should do well long term.

    Australia is going to get even hotter and have even more destructive wildfires in the coming decades, sadly.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  136. Switzerland by markus_baertschi · · Score: 1
    The Swiss economy is still doing fine, finding work is not a problem. Salaries are good too, compared to Europe. The downside is that prices (especially housing near the economic centers) are high too. Quality of life is good too.

    For an European, getting a work and residency permit is a formality so you'll have no problems there. You can get by in English initially and pick the local language up later (French / German / Italian, depending where you go).

  137. Ill tell you..... by who_stole_my_kidneys · · Score: 1

    after i have relocated there and landed a sweet job, I don't want you taking my prospects.

  138. Avoid Canada by NicBenjamin · · Score: 1

    Yes it's great right now, but there's a housing bubble:
    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-07-19/congratulations-canada-on-your-ongoing-housing-bubble.html

    That's not the only problem. Basically the reason Canada is great right now is that a) it never de-regulated it's banks, so no financial crisis, and b) they have loads of oil to sell from Alberta. a) will probably continue, but b) is associated with loads of prosperity for a few years, and then a major crash. It's called the Dutch Disease, and it's a major reason why South Korea is richer then Nigeria in 2012, despite the fact Nigeria was economically better off in the 50s and then discovered billion$ worth of oil.

    I'd actually say the US is the best bet. The debt situation isn't ideal, but since the US uses the US Dollar the problems this can cause are pretty limited. Inflation is the main one. We're basically printing money, which means there's more dollars but the same amount of stuff, which means that (in theory) every dollar should be worth less, in turn it should take more dollars to buy the same amount of stuff, and that is the definition of inflation; but so far the reality is we haven't experienced any. We would probably be better off with some, if only because that would make all the debts holding us back easier to pay off.

    Southern Europe is in a much different situation. They don't control their currencies, and inflation is anethema to their Euro-zone partners, so they have to balance their budgets. But they can't do that without economic growth, and their economies are designed to grow only under conditions of extreme global prosperity or high inflation. Since neither is likely to be the case anytime in the foreseeable future they are totally, 100% screwed.

  139. New Zealand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The pay isnt as great as Australia but still better than the parts of Europe. They also seem quite keen to get techincal people here as most of the local talent has jumped ship to Australia. Quality of life is good although the holiday allowance is lower.

  140. Here is what I wuuld say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First thing, before we talk further, switch your career. "IT researcher" sounds like a bogus job which no one will pay one they find out where you are from since they will think that you were responsible for gutting down those Southern European economies.
    Second is that take as much load as possible, if anyone is still giving it, then buy gold and bury it. Then declare bankruptcy. And please do it by forming a corporation not as an person. Remember, corporations are people when it comes to rights and they are zombies when in comes to responsibilities.
    Third is chill out and relax. The grass is always greener on other side. American life is fucked up. Unless you work 70 hour weeks (yes YOU not the whole family put together) you can not maintain average quality of life.
    Fourth is don't bother relocating. Do something to become rich wherever you are. Steal, rob, fraud, deceive, I mean learn something from bankers and politicians. Do some exercise and mediate for few minutes as well. Once you are rich, life is easier in all parts of the world.
    Fifth is, take my advice seriously although it sounds funny.
    But unfortunately you will never get to read this, since this post will buried somewhere.

  141. Re:Reading too much into the cover of The Economis by cynop · · Score: 0

    Actually the question is valid and from his whereabouts I’m pretty sure not based on a glance. He (and I for that matter) probably sees and feels the full effect of the economic crisis all around him.

    And he didn’t imply that he wanted to move to an emerging finance power. Rather he is looking for a stable economic environment (as is the vast majority of south Europeans right now). Stable is the key here. And unfortunately there are very few western countries that seem to be shielded from the coming economic crash.

  142. Indianapolis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - The IT market is strong - my organization can't hire people fast enough.
    - The cost of living is low, compared to the coasts.
    - It has one of the better downtown areas in the country.
    - If you're into sports, there are several draws (though a pro hockey team is sorely missed).
    - If you're into motorsports, it's heaven on earth.
    - If you're into games, there's GenCon.
    - The museums are nice.
    - The weather has its extremes, but it's at least varied.
    - Other major metro areas (Chicago, Detroit, Cincinnati, Louisville) are within easy reach.
    - For ESL speakers, the midwestern accent is a mainstream one.
    - There is a good mix of post-secondary schools in and around the area.

    The main downside - to me, at least - is the northside, which is sprawl at its worst (Carmel, Fishers, Westfield). I'm fortunate to have a tech job downtown, so I don't have to go there very often anymore. But many tech jobs are there, so you may not have a choice in that. Then again, some people obviously like that style of living, or it wouldn't be so crowded.

  143. Easy by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Equestria. Immigration is easy (the ruler just hands out land parcels is you show up looking sufficiently plumb tuckered out), the land is packed with resources (especially precious gems), public transportation is everywhere from trains to taxis (although you might have to take your turn pulling the taxi now and then), they're the only nation to possess weather control technology, they have the best pastries and apple products in the world, and the folks are really, really, *really* friendly.

  144. Interesting question by Roogna · · Score: 1

    My own family and I ponder this question regularly. I'm self employed and able to work and support my family and household from anywhere in the world, so we frequently discuss just up and moving someplace. Not so much to get away from the US, but just to take advantage of the fact that there's an entire world out there. I'd be curious what peoples opinions of the best places to go if self employed are. On an up point for myself is I technically meet the requirements to gain Czech citizenship through my Father. So that may open up more regions in the world.

    Anyone have any good places to go and live for various lengthy periods of time just to absorb cultures?

    I've found it's difficult to get information on, as most people who are looking are specifically looking at countries that may also have work for them and most conversions, like this one here on /. seem to tend toward political/economic discussion of the living.

  145. Move to trade oil in non-USD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iran is working on supporting oil being traded in currencies other than the USD.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iranian_oil_bourse

    Iraq also tried to do that ... then it got invaded.

    Dominique Strauss-Kahn as the head of the IMF called for considering using other currencies besides the USD as the world's reserve currency ...
    http://money.cnn.com/2011/02/10/markets/dollar/index.htm .. then had problems with a maid in a hotel.

  146. BEST PLACE? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    Ask Julian:

    ECUADOR!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
    1. Re:BEST PLACE? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For asylum from out of control governments, perhaps.

      But for IT, I'd be looking at Singapore.

    2. Re:BEST PLACE? by Taco+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      But for IT, I'd be looking at Singapore.

       
      You must be kidding !!
       
      Singapore's IT business is shit
       
      Their best shining star is Creative Labs, the maker of sound cards, and it's going nowhere - with its share prices tanked, and tanked further
       
      If you are really serious about IT (and I mean, serious IT, not the "facebook" kind of kid-script IT), look to Eastern Europe
       

      --
      Muchas Gracias, Señor Edward Snowden !
    3. Re:BEST PLACE? by Dun+Kick+The+Noob · · Score: 1

      Im from singapore.
      Forget IT.
      And if you want to continue as an IT researcher forget it, the large majority of IT jobs are tech support or borderline stupidity developers.
      And you need a lot of certifications and they are very specific about it.
      You are the lowest rung in the organization
      Unfortunately in the financial industry there are serious racial issues with regards to hiring of IT Staff.
      If you are white, chances are better
      If you are Indian, chances are good
      If you are Fillipino, chances are good also

      Anything else you dont stand a chance and you need politics not capability
      Its not good, but it is what it is.

  147. NZ or Aussie by AAKiwi · · Score: 1

    No doubt that Auckland, Wellington, Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane and Perth would all be better cittes for work, safety and overall quality of life.....I love it out here. No stress, good job, and good pay.

  148. Sweden by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    Very cheap, I moved here myself, got an amazing house for 57000$, which is considered INSANELY cheap by my friends in Denmark, Norway, Canada, Usa and Australia. I got a BRICK house, yes a BRICK house for that price, I live in the most amazing nature you can imagine, and we have the train station 10 minutes away from where I live, and that takes me to anywhere in the world...I just traveled to USA about 3 weeks ago, easy peasy. Wonderful country USA, I love you guys, so friendly people, such a nice country.

    But if you want a cheap retreat, not too bad weather, come to South of Sweden, you'll have any luxury you want, super shopping malls, 1-2 hours by train to any BIG city, 1-2 hours to any BIG airport to anywhere in the world...and less than 100.000$ for your house here...and clean drinking water right out of the tap...I can guarantee you...you WILL be in heaven. Super fast Internet pretty much anywhere.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  149. For future reference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "IT Researcher" means "unemployed".

    1. Re:For future reference by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      obviously, if he's in southern europe especially. The issue isn't so much what *are* you doing, it's what job specifically are you capable of doing. A PhD in computer science is very different than a community college diploma in setting up a LAMP server.

  150. When it all goes to shit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America has the most guns

  151. Bias by chrb · · Score: 1

    Will that do for non-biased or will only the answer you want to hear be sufficient for you?

    No offence meant, but your answer is biased - even though you didn't intend it - by being based around a single data point: yourself.

    If I were choosing a place to relocate for the next 20 years, then I would want something more statistically grounded than the opinion of one person. Like, say, the world's most livable cities, based on Mercer's quality of living index. My list of places to permanently relocate would certainly include Sydney, Vienna, Zurich, and Vancouver. On the other hand, for a temporary relocation I would be tempted by somewhere more exotic like Brazil. If I were doing it short term and for the money and parties then Dubai - no taxes, and crazy expat salaries.

    1. Re:Bias by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1
      Truth is I can only give you my opinion, I can't talk for others, I respect that other people may think differently. I was being unbiased as much as humanly possible, and since I'm an outsider to the typical American, I added my point of view. Personally I don't follow what others say, I find out for myself, I try different places without someone telling me what was good or bad, (ie. indexes).

      When I moved to the US I was worried because of all the stories I heard, how American's love their guns, violence was rampant, pollution, etc. What I found was far from what the media or any anti-American ever said. All I can do is stress, find out for yourself, don't let others tell you.

  152. Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are the Übermensch and will stay there even if the whole world collapses. Although as a Southern European you might find their culture fa too precise.

  153. Move to London by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    London! It is the strongest economy in the UK (ignore the bad press about the UK recession, the north and midlands are doing really bad and that is driving the overall data down), the economic data here is on par with Germany. It is one of the, if not the, most multicultural cities in the world. No matter where you are from, you will find your countrymen and women as well as friends from all over the world. And you seem to speak English well, so you won't have to learn a new language just to deal with everything and the government.

    For tech jobs, have you heard of Silicon Roundabout?
    http://www.wired.co.uk/topics/silicon-roundabout
    It is the biggest cluster of technology firms (established and startup) outside of California. Google opened a huge office where tech firms can just network over lunch and startups can share ideas or raise funding (unlike Silicon Valley, you don't have to drive 40 miles to network) Did you know that Silicon Valley Bank opened its first branch outside of California right in London?

    The biggest paying industry here is finance, but the good news is that you don't need a MBA in finance to work in the industry, just as long as your technology skills are good. I recommend working for a financial services consultancy first, then moving to a big bank or fund manager.

    There are jobs here in media, advertising, biomedical, health care, tourism... It just depends on what you are interested in.

    I moved here from the US, and I am glad to work somewhere where I always have at least 4 weeks paid vacation per year. I still work hard, but I don't feel my job is threatened if I call in sick. The UK is a good midpoint between the US's "live to work" culture and continental Europe "work to live" culture. There is a big degree of entrepreneurship here (shows like Dragon's Den and The Apprentice are really popular here), and you seem to be from a EU country, so you do not need to worry about any visas. Plus, the political climate and degree of cultural conservatism are way more open and welcoming than the US (the poster who said that the US Republicans and UK Conservatives are the same has no idea about the politics of either country). Plus, take the US high per capita GDP with a grain of salt - inequiality is higher in the US than anywhere else in the western world.

    Yes, the weather isn't the greatest but the weather changes so much that since the Olympics have started, it has been sunny here most of the time. Plus, being on an island means the weather here is more moderate (cooler in summer, warmer in winter) than continental Europe. If you are a super-outdoorsy person who likes to do beach hiking and mountain biking every day after work, then I can't recommend London but the cultural activties here are second to none. Check the culture ratings of the global cities, and London always comes out on top, beating Paris and New York. I won't lie to you - the cost of living here is high, but the salaries usually make up for it. If all you want to do is to work for a charity or teach - more power to you, but you probably won't cover the cost of living here. However, IT jobs in the private sector pay well enough for you to live a comfortable lifestyle

    You don't have to have a permanent job, a lot of my friends do freelance contract assignments. You lose the paid vacation and benefits, but make it up with twice the money - and unlike the US, you don't worry about having to get health insurance.

    So in short, give London a try. You may find yourself here for years and years.

  154. Omaha, NE by freshmeathead · · Score: 1

    Great, diverse economy. In the worst times, unemployment hit 6%. In good times, almost down to 2%. Lots of good jobs, in private, public and in non-profit. Good schools, low real estate prices, Nebraska tends to be conservative (but fiscally, not a bunch of rednecks, too much), but Omaha is more liberal, so it is kind of Nebraska's Austin, TX. There is a reason Warren Buffett still lives here. And it has become much more diverse in the last 20 years, bringing with that better selection of food and cultures. I run the local BMX track in a city park, across from the cricket fields, next to the dog park, just down the street from the one of the mountain bike parks. And of course we have all the baseball, softball and soccer (football) you could want. Tons of music venues, and Omaha has it own sound and bands (http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/06/06/136896920/the-indie-rock-club-behind-omahas-100-million-creative-boom). We have minor league baseball, two pro football (American of course - UFL and arena), two semi-pro hockey teams a few good college teams in various sports. We hold the NCAA College World Series (baseball) every year and have held the US Olympic Swim trials the last two times. Traffic is good. On the downside, it mostly flat (hilly) and the nearest skiing is 8+ hours away, if you are into that. Hot and humid in the summer, and cold (but not much snow, usually) during the winters. Autumn here is great, however. Not New England great, but still pretty good. There is casinos across the river in Iowa (plus or minus depending on your tastes). I could go on. Good luck in your search.

  155. USA: Seattle, Silicon Valley, or LA by cowtamer · · Score: 1

    I've lived/worked in a LOT of cities in the USA (as well as another country). If you're an IT researcher, USA is probably the place to be for the greatest earning potential/mobility -- this is where the brainpower of the world aggregates. It will continue to be this way for a while despite reports to the contrary.

    Food, gas, and electronics are cheap and plentiful. People (depending on where you are) have a high tolerance for eccentricity, 'different-ness', and new ideas. The Internet (for the time being) remains uncensored.

    Seattle is EXCELLENT for jobs (even if you don't want to work for Microsoft), and has both a hacker and a foreigner friendly culture. This is the only place I've ever been where I can put a resume online and get around 8 phone calls the same day (YMMV). Besides Microsoft, it has Amazon, Boeing, and a couple of other places you've heard of nearby. That being said, it can be very isolating, and very cold and dark if you're from Southern Europe. The cost of living is high, but not insanely high. The city is beautiful and eclectic (live in the city -- do not move to Redmond -- neither beautiful nor eclectic!). It's the perfect place to be in the summer, and wonderful in the winter if you like having ski resorts within 30 minutes of driving distance. Avoid anyplace in this latitude if you have a problem with 4:30 pm sunsets during the winter.

    Silicon Valley is another place where you will probably find a good critical mass of companies who need your skills.

    Los Angeles is a place that I'd personally like to move to, and I imagine would have critical mass. The weather and beaches are beautiful.

    The Washington, DC area (East Coast in the USA) including Northern Virginia and Southern Maryland is also a good area for IT, but has a lot of defense contracting work (which means that you will be at a disadvantage as an immigrant).

    Florida also has some decent opportunities, and the wonderful bonus of being able to drive to the beach whenever you want (you will miss this pretty much anywhere else in the USA, even if it looks close to the water on the map).

    Texas is also rich and foreigner-friendly in a way that you would not expect -- but it's not Silicon Valley!

    I would stay away from the Midwest (as wonderful as it is) and any metropolitan area whose name you've never heard of, even if the particular opportunity is good. You will want the ability to change companies without necessarily moving.

    Another piece of advice: If you care at all about your home country, do three things: 1) try to find a position that will let you go to there for the summers -- e.g., an appointment at an institution for only 9 months, etc. This is very difficult to come by, but otherwise you may be slowly driven insane with homesickness and the one to three (if you're super-lucky) weeks of vacation that a typical US company will give you. 2) Get plugged into your local expat community. Make sure it exists where you're going. 3) Pick a place with the most direct airline routes back to your home city -- otherwise you'll waste 2-3 days traveling each way (I'm not kidding!).

    1. Re:USA: Seattle, Silicon Valley, or LA by Sentrion · · Score: 2

      America is a great country for a second citizenship and second passport. Go there when you are young to make a lot of money quick. Then get out, fast, with your money before you get a chance to get sick or old, as the US system is based mostly on a vulture economy of compelling you to spend down your wealth to every single provider of health or care services. Insurance is a farce to give you piece of mind, but it is a POS that will not come through to meet enough of your expenses to survive anything but the most mild and short term illness.

  156. Re:Reading too much into the cover of The Economis by hanwen · · Score: 1

    There is a lot of corruption in Brazil, but it happens in the private/public atmosphere (cooperations paying politicians, politicians awarding contract to cooperations, much like the US). I have lived in Brazil for 5 years and never had to bribe anyone.

    --

    Han-Wen Nienhuys -- LilyPond

  157. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania by talldean · · Score: 1

    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. I moved here three years ago looking at staying 10-20 years. So far, so good. We have a thriving tech community, a low cost of living, and low crime. Due to this being the steel making capital of the world 100 years ago, we have a lot of old and awesome cultural institutions much larger than would be expected of a city of this size, but houses cost next to nothing compared to larger cities. We're in the middle of a natural resources boom; we export quite a bit of energy. We sit at the junction of three rivers, and west of a mountain range; we rarely have droughts. Winters are reasonably mild. Summers are reasonably mild. There's an enormous education center here. Healthcare is great. And we certainly have jobs, as well. Take a look at Carnegie Mellon University, the University of Pittsburgh, the Software Engineering Institute, and the National Robotics Engineering Consortium; pghtech.org lists quite a bit more. Education, medicine, finance and software tend to be the dominant industries here, which are (not coincidentally) more recession-proof than most. Best small city I know.

  158. Australia, Canada, New Zealand by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 1

    Australia is consistently near the top of all Quality of Life and other measurements, along with Canada and New Zealand.

    Here is the latest:

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-08-14/melbourne-remains-worlds-most-liveable-city/4198294

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quality-of-life_Index

    http://www.oecdbetterlifeindex.org/

    Do a bit of research and make sure you find the best place to live, not just for yourself but your family, your kids futures and their kids.

    Disclaimer: I was born in Australia and moved to New Zealand.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
  159. Wrong Question by pubwvj · · Score: 1

    "Which city"

    Well there's your problem.

  160. Mombasa, Kenya? by Bob9113 · · Score: 1

    Anyone have any thoughts on Mombasa, Kenya? I don't want to color this with my own perceptions, so I'm just going to leave the question wide open.

  161. Stay the $%@! away from Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Texas is hotter'n hell. It's full of right-wing tea party gun nuts, Castle Doctrine and death penalty and rednecks who drive dually pickup trucks everywhere even in city traffic where they take up two lanes at the same time. Texans don't know how to drive in general either. Traffic sucks in the big cities and everything is spread so far apart you must drive long distances to get anywhere. There is no public transportation much to speak of either. We also have rabid skunks, rattlesnakes, and venomous brown recluse spiders everywhere. Tornadoes happen every spring, and wildfires every summer and winter. In winter it never snows... we have ice storms instead, and nobody in Texas knows how to drive on ice either. We also don't like foreigners moving here, especially Californians, so stay away because we'd like to keep Texas just the way it is.

    1. Re:Stay the $%@! away from Texas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "and nobody in Texas knows how to drive on ice either."

      It's not just Texans who can't drive on Texas ice. I used to work for Kodak, and we had some folks come down from Rochester NY one winter and we had an ice storm - a couple of them laughed that we would not drive in the stuff. After five minutes out on the road, both of them came back scared shitless and asked "How the hell do you drive on that shit?". Our answer? "We don't - Everything shuts down for a few days."

    2. Re:Stay the $%@! away from Texas by jerpyro · · Score: 1

      Yeah I'm from Rochester NY. I'll drive on your ice with proper equipment. The fact is, there's no proper equipment down there. We have cambered roads, a shitload of salt, and (for the most part) roll with studded snow tires. Those guys were morons to think they could just hop in a van with half-bald tires and take on an ice storm.

  162. Portland OR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because the dream of the 90's is alive in Portland.

  163. Re:Reading too much into the cover of The Economis by VikingOfNorth · · Score: 1

    Do you like to have to bribe your way around the local bureaucracy?
    Do you like to live within a mile of crushing poverty?
    Do you like to endure social, natural, and economic crises?

    If you answered yes to all of these, then yes an emerging market is for you (i.e. Brazil, China, India, etc). If you answered no to any of them, stay in a Western country.

    A nice, cozy, Western country like the United States?

    If you want to avoid all these, you pretty much don't have other choice than one of those OMIGOD SOCIALIST! wellfare states, and even then these are not guaranteed. Nitpicking aside, all these three problems seem to be a part of everyday life in the US, just in a (slightly) different scale.

    --
    "I'm just here for the achievements"
  164. Go Panama young one! by Pepebuho · · Score: 1

    Go to Panama.
    Strongest growing country in the middle of America with easy connections around the world and an American standard of living with a third world country cost of living. Your money will go very far there without the paranoia you will find in other countries.
    Our only curse is the politicians.... :)

  165. Along the same lines by ace37 · · Score: 1

    Rather than discussing social and other items statically, I would focus more on how well the culture's priorities match or fit those of the OP.

    *The US prioritizes economic productivity, efficiency, and convenience at the expense of other virtues.
    *People in the US benefit from decent wages, low total taxes and cost of living --> very large new homes and nicer cars, good entertainment/music, and 24 hour stores are everywhere.
    *The US suffers low quality or high costs for education and is straddled with a need to maintain health insurance or bear that as a financial risk.
    *Usually public transport is weak because of the urban sprawl, but cars are so cheap and convenient that hardly anyone cares.

    Compare that package to others that might meet your wants and needs.

  166. Re:Greenland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you were looking for the response that you wouldn't want to wind up unemployed in Greenland, I won't give you the satisfaction!

  167. Re:Greenland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    satisfaction? You keep on using that word, but I do not think it means what you think it means...

  168. Lights and water by michael_cain · · Score: 1

    If I were looking 20 years out (emphasis on at least that far in the future), my first questions would be whether the country/region has a high tech level broadly distributed today and is likely to have reliable local sources of water and electricity then. Yes, I know that puts me out on the lunatic fringe, but the arguments in Limits to Growth are still relevant and we're just now entering the period of interesting times in their forecasts. IMO, that rules out Africa, India, China, and most of the rest of Eastern Asia including Japan (in that order). I'd stay clear of isolated urban city-states (eg, Singapore). New Zealand seems a reasonable bet, also parts of Canada, Northern Europe, and select parts of the US. Brazil and Argentina if they can finish getting their acts together soon. Water may be in issue in Australia, but my main concern would be that they've got an awful lot of resources that China would like to more directly control. Canada may have that same problem with the US.

    I gave my own kids the advice that within the US, they ought to stay in the contiguous states, roughly west of 105 W longitude, north of 40 N latitude.

  169. I hate questions like this... there is no "best". by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

    I hate questions like this. It always reminds me of people that used to act like the world is trying to obfuscate things and they ask things like what the best beer is, or what the best operating system is, or what the best car is.

    There is no "best"! What you like is not what I like.

    --
    -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  170. Re:Not sure what an IT "researcher" is and if it.. by godel_56 · · Score: 1

    I moved to the San Francisco bay area last year and I'm loving it. Things to add to what AC said:

    Don't forget about "The Big One". The entire US west coast is due for some serious, industrial-strength natural disasters in the first half of this century.

    Normally "the end is nigh" pronouncements are just scare mongering, but in this case they have a real basis of fact.

  171. Equador by Skewray · · Score: 1

    The way I'd like to do it is alternate between the summer in Norway and the summer in Chile. I love mountains and seaside.

    Naw, Equador. If it's good enough for Julius Assange, it should be good enough for anyone.

  172. Nowhere near that easy by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2

    So I realize that this is chapter ad verse from the Book of Bernanke, effectively, but it's insane. Yes, you are correct in the short-term that the amount of the debt doesn't matter, but how much it costs to service it. But that's only true if you can manipulate the interest rates to ever-lower levels to account for the deficit spending that we've all been experiencing. After all, even given your math, if the principal keeps increasing, the interest rate has to keep going down, right? So my question to you is, how long do you think the US can keep pushing interest rates lower? Certainly not forever. Probably not much longer at all. These historically low interest rates will have to increase at some point.

    I make analogies to household finance because it's easier for people to see certain ideas as completely insane when framed in a conventional frame of reference. Essentially what the US - and much of the rest of the world - has done is take out national debt on what amount to variable interest rate loans, and we've taken them out at historically low rates. Indeed, we've set our national budget based on what we can barely afford even given those historically low rates, and even then our total debt continues to grow.

    Sound familiar? Pretty much exactly what happened around 2004 when every homeowner maxed out on interest-only loans they could barely afford, then paid bills on credit cards. And we saw how smart that was. As soon as rates went up a bit, we saw a feedback loop that resulted in a cascade of debt failure. Now every country in the world is doing the same thing with their national finance that those homeowners did with household finance. Great plan.

    The problem with your strategy is the same problem that happened then: everything gets screwed up when the interest rate merry-go-round stops and the cost to service the debt balloons. Even more fun is that, if we don't solve the problem, lowered debt ratings will also result in higher interest rates on that debt as it goes out of control.

    So what do we do? Claiming that the debt is an artificial political construct is fantasyland. If your neighbor told you his debt - that amounted to as much as he makes in a year and is growing rapidly - is just something his wife says to piss him off, you'd say he was delusional. It's no different here. Ballooning debt is a huge long-term issue. The only question is how much we trade off short-term vs. long term to solve our immediate problems. Put another way, how much do we live off our credit cards to pay the bills?

    First, you've highlighted one thing very accurately - continuing to pay unemployment benefits to some people who have been on them for up to four years straight is completely insane. Providing incentives to employers to hire full-time employees with health benefits would be a much better idea. But that is too obvious for US leadership.

    The next thing is how you get off this merry-go-round. Your solution, as you state, is to simply manage interest rates at a low level. If only it were that easy - sorry, but you can't keep them this low forever. Or even likely very long. So the question is, how do you let them rise without leading to crippling inflation or an equities crash? Your plan requires a solution to that problem. It also requires a plan to return our debt-to-GDP level to where it needs to be, which will probably require keeping debt constant (ie, balance the budget) while increasing GDP and letting interest rates rise to normal levels. And it's going to be very hard to do all those at the same time.

    Otherwise, we "solve" this stagnation/unemployment problem only to cause new, potentially worse problems. And this is the problem I have with Greenspan's legacy - we've spent the last 30 years solving the short-term problem while ignoring the long term. That's how we got where we are. We need to actually start looking at the long-term consequences of our policies for once. And that's why our debt problem isn't an artificial political issue. Anybody who thinks that hasn't thought this issue through past the next year or so.

    1. Re:Nowhere near that easy by Sir_Sri · · Score: 1

      So I realize that this is chapter ad verse from the Book of Bernanke

      No actually, he's part of the problem. His refusal to use monetary policy to try and bolster employment means he should be removed from his position.

      After all, even given your math, if the principal keeps increasing, the interest rate has to keep going down, right?

      uh... no it doesn't. That's simply not mathematically correct.

      So my question to you is, how long do you think the US can keep pushing interest rates lower? Certainly not forever. Probably not much longer at all. These historically low interest rates will have to increase at some point.

      yes, interest rates will start to pick back up as there are things worth investing in, at which point you can start to cut spending and raise taxes. That's the whole point. You're in this mess because you refuse to get out of it because you're waiting for the end of it to start doing things that would end it. Circular stupidity is circular.

      I make analogies to household finance because it's easier for people to see certain ideas as completely insane when framed in a conventional frame of reference

      And this is a fundamentally flawed analogy, because your spending is my income and my spending is your income, but thanks for trying.

      The problem with your strategy is the same problem that happened then: everything gets screwed up when the interest rate merry-go-round stops and the cost to service the debt balloons.

      People have been claiming that's on the verge of happening for about 4 years. It hasn't. Eventually interest rates will rise yes, but right now they're in real (PPP) terms negative, so you have a long way to go before they become a problem.

      Claiming that the debt is an artificial political construct is fantasyland.

      True. The debt crisis is entirely a political construct. The debt itself is very real.

      that amounted to as much as he makes in a year

      Uh... this is why you don't compare personal finance to government. If your neighbour makes 75K a year and has a 300k loan on his house he's perfectly fine, but his debt is 400% of his income.

      If only it were that easy - sorry, but you can't keep them this low forever.

      uh.. you didn't really understand what I wrote did you? You don't need to keep interest rates low, in fact you only have some influence over interest rates. As long as your GDP is growing faster than debt (when you have decent employment and so on) then you're fine, and it's not an issue, and you have quite a lot of knobs to turn to keep nominal GDP growing faster than interest on your debt, especially when most of your debt is at a fixed rate for years.

      . And that's why our debt problem isn't an artificial political issue. Anybody who thinks that hasn't thought this issue through past the next year or so.

      other way around. Anyone who thinks now is the time to be worrying about debt is why you've been stuck in a liquidity trap for 4 years when you could have been out of it 3 years ago. Right now *is* the time to borrow more money to get employment going and get jobs created to spur demand to get the economy going. When demand picks back up then you cut those jobs and raise taxes and so on so that you can ride things along while the debt shrinks away. Anyone who can do math that has thought about this problem realizes that now is the time for more spending, and at negative real interest rates, that can easily include more debt, because in the long term gutting education, social security, healthcare etc. will just trap the US for a more protracted period of no growth, bad education with less competitive workers etc. until someone else picks up the slack and drives demand. That's a stupid long term plan, because your w

    2. Re:Nowhere near that easy by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2

      uh.. you didn't really understand what I wrote did you? You don't need to keep interest rates low, in fact you only have some influence over interest rates. As long as your GDP is growing faster than debt (when you have decent employment and so on) then you're fine, and it's not an issue, and you have quite a lot of knobs to turn to keep nominal GDP growing faster than interest on your debt, especially when most of your debt is at a fixed rate for years.

      The problem is it never happens that way. You actually have to consider historical context and pretend this isn't the first time we've been through an economic hiccup. Every problem in the last 30 years has been "solved" with spending - the problem is, when the economic ship rights itself, no one wants to do the hard thing and reduce spending or increase taxes. That's why we have a debt that is now 100% of GDP, an increase from about 20% in the pre-Greenspan era. That is a level that has been associated with economic destabilization, and no one seems to care. Our debt ratio is higher than any time except the time immediately surrounding WWII. This is a real problem. Not for the next couple of years, this could be a problem for decades, and probably will if it's not solved.

      If you think you have magical knobs to turn to keep GDP growing faster than interest on your debt, you're deludedl. The problem with all your solutions are things like "As long as....". When you build up such an unstable situation, you rely on those things continuing to be true, and when they fail, they fail hard.

      other way around. Anyone who thinks now is the time to be worrying about debt is why you've been stuck in a liquidity trap for 4 years when you could have been out of it 3 years ago. Right now *is* the time to borrow more money to get employment going and get jobs created to spur demand to get the economy going. When demand picks back up then you cut those jobs and raise taxes and so on so that you can ride things along while the debt shrinks away.

      Sounds lovely. The problem is when it doesn't work, and you end up having jacked up the debt, and your payments on the debt, only to face interest rates that you can't control any more and an unemployment problem that wasn't solved by your spending. In other words, exactly what happened during the "stimulus". Now what do you do?

      Here's the thing: the idiots on the fringe on either side are both wrong. Yes, we need to spend money - wisely - in targeted ways to get unemployment down and the tax base up. We also need to do it in a way that isn't going to build a house of cards that will completely destroy the economy with runaway inflation within a decade of the recession ending. Which is why your mindset is dangerous, and that mindset is pervasive in the global economic leadership right now: namely, the notion that we have a lot more control over the global economy than we really do, that we can fix all problems, and that the cure is never worse than the disease. If they were that good at controlling things, we'd never end up with these problems in the first place.

      So when you say things that insinuate that our mounting debt poses no long term risk, I have a problem with that. We can't ignore it. No one ever said it's the only problem that should be addressed - a lovely false dichotomy, to be sure - but we certainly can't go back to the Obama stimulus plan (and touted by such luminaries as Krugman) that we just need to spend a lot of money, and it doesn't matter how.

      One thing I've found is that, in the long run, economics is simple. And I've also found that people who think they can outwit the basic principles always end up crashing in the end. What I want is to not be in the same boat when it happens.

    3. Re:Nowhere near that easy by Sir_Sri · · Score: 2

      That is a level that has been associated with economic destabilization, and no one seems to care. Our debt ratio is higher than any time except the time immediately surrounding WWII. This is a real problem. Not for the next couple of years, this could be a problem for decades, and probably will if it's not solved.

      claiming something is a problem (wrongly) doesn't make it a problem. The UK ran the world with about 100% of GDP in debt for a century. http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/uk_debt is tremendously illustrative, and I suggest you look at it. First, 250% of GDP in debt is manageable. Secondly, if you get yourself out of an economic crisis you can manage the debt.

      As you (correctly) point out, the US has had much higher debt and managed quite successfully, which is the historical context, in fact that same historical context showed that massive spending and borrowing (ww2) was the way out of a long protracted recession and liquidity trap. Claiming you have some serious problem now despite the problem being half what it was when you manged quite well is making an intellectual pretzel.

      The problem is when it doesn't work,

      Well your plan demonstrably doesn't work, my plan demonstrably has worked in the past, so odds are it's the plan you should be going with. Clinging to a failed plan isn't helping anyone.

      exactly what happened during the "stimulus"

      Your assertion, unfortunately, is factually untrue. The stimulus worked about as well as one expected. One short term burst of 700 billion dollars in a crashing economy when it should have been 2 trillion will a very limited effect. It barely stopped the proverbial bleeding, and that's about all you can say for it. When the math says you should spend 2 trillion dollars and you spend a third of that don't turn around and claim the math calling for 2 trillion dollars was bad.

      destroy the economy with runaway inflation within a decade of the recession ending.

      I realize you're wrongly obsessed with inflation, without any real evidence that inflation will be a problem beyond your gut feeling, but that's not helping your case. Obviously stimulus like the olympics is worse than useless, a mountain of spending that immediately crashes does have an effect but not much of one, and in the end you're left with a bunch of junk you need to get rid of. Building bridges, roads, a space programme or the like can at least leave you with something to show at the end of it.

      Obama stimulus plan (and touted by such luminaries as Krugman) that we just need to spend a lot of money, and it doesn't matter how.

      Krugman was correct, the stimulus plan was about a third of the size needed at the time, and now that the situation has gotten worse because the stimulus was 1.4 trillion too small in 2009 another 3 trillion or so has been wasted on waffling around, and more will be needed to fix it.

      One thing I've found is that, in the long run, economics is simple.

      Simple is relative. Economics is inherently hard to test in a vacuum, but you have a series of natural experiments when governments make policies, and assuming you can do differential equations and stats, no, it's not that hard to figure out. And the people who have working predictive models are calling for more spending, and the people with models that predicted 4 years of inflation which didn't materialize are clearly not worth listening to.

      insinuate that our mounting debt poses no long term risk, I have a problem with that. We can't ignore it.

      Ignore is a strong word. It's not really a problem unless your politicians make it a problem, and it's certainly a manageable one if you bother to deal with it, as it has been dealt with by economies in much worse shape than yours.

      Unfortunately you claim economics is simple, but then you base all o

  173. Overambitious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the best place to relocate?
    That just could be difficult.

  174. Re:Reading too much into the cover of The Economis by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    There are also tiny towns all over the world with long histories of very stable economies and politics. Those are obviously harder to find, but they exist. Not every city in emerging or undeveloped countries is teeming with knife wielding, unemployed, illiterate natives.

    The problem is that the submitters big plan is to have a career in technology. Try moving to some backwater town where you a) dont look like anyone there, b) don't talk like anyone there, and c) don't know anyone there... And then try competing for, if you're lucky, the ONE job around in technology. If you aren't lucky, you will not find out that there are no technology careers for 100 miles, only after you put a down payment on a bribe to a land owner so you can get a place to live.

  175. Re:Reading too much into the cover of The Economis by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    Do you like to have to bribe your way around the local bureaucracy?
    Do you like to live within a mile of crushing poverty?
    Do you like to endure social, natural, and economic crises?

    If you answered yes to all of these, then yes an emerging market is for you (i.e. Brazil, China, India, etc). If you answered no to any of them, stay in a Western country.

    A nice, cozy, Western country like the United States?

    If you want to avoid all these, you pretty much don't have other choice than one of those OMIGOD SOCIALIST! wellfare states, and even then these are not guaranteed. Nitpicking aside, all these three problems seem to be a part of everyday life in the US, just in a (slightly) different scale.

    Holy moly, if you think the "Scale" of these issues (especially poverty) is even recognizably similar to the US, you must have the world's best pair of fisheye glasses. What happens when several MILLION people live on only 1-2 dollars a day, right next to a metropolis of several million with a western style of life of 100 to 200 dollars a day, or more? Hint, the answer has to do with private helicopters. And if you can't afford one... well...

  176. Edmonton/Calgary/Alberta by hguorbray · · Score: 1

    I live in the SF Bay Area, so I am used to a pretty high level of culture, etc

    But I spent 6 months contracting for Alberta's power utility Epcor about 10 years ago and really liked Edmonton -it is very multicultural, there is a big college -a lot of downtown is interconnected so you don't have to go outside when it is cold/wet and they have the Fringe Festival and a fair amount of live music and good restaurants.

    There were enough french speakers and ethnic enclaves that it felt more European than Calgary or any American city I have been in although I realize that Quebec and probably Vancouver are more cosmopolitan.

    If my gf could stand the cold I would definitely consider living there, but she can barely handle Bay Area winters....too bad, but it is below freezing for days at a time -in fact EPCOR was not allowed to completely shut off anyone's electricity -they had to give them enough so that they could run a heating coil so as not to freeze to death...

    It was really cool taking BART to Edmonton for my commute I must say...2 weeks up there, one long weekend back home...

    -I'm just sayin'

  177. Yes you CAN go to Australia looking for a job by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I did it successfully. It's called the short stay business visa. Or even a tourist visa, because no one's going to follow you around, and they're not going to ask when they grant you the work visa "What kind of visa were you in the country on, when you interviewed for this job?". Sure, you have to leave the country every 90 days, but New Zealand is just a couple hours away and it's not too expensive to fly there. Businesses hire people on long stay business visas all the time. (Those are the ones with the minimum salary level).

    If you're under 30, it's even easier. You can get a working holiday visa that lets you work for 1 year (renewable for a second), without proving qualifications or without having to have a certain level of income. That can easily turn into sponsored employment and/or sponsored permanent residency.

  178. Re:US murder rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The percentage of murder victims that are criminals is extremely high in the US. Depending the year and location of the sample, it can be as high as 80 or 90%: http://articles.baltimoresun.com/2012-01-02/news/bs-md-ci-homicide-analysis-20120102_1_killings-baltimore-murder-victims-violent-crime

    Most of these killings are drug related. If you don't hang with violent criminals and you aren't a criminal, the actual odds of being murdered in the US aren't greatly different than in most first world nations.

  179. Columbus OH by the-matt-mobile · · Score: 2

    We've weathered 3 tech downturns since I've been in the IT biz without a dent, our housing market didn't have a huge bubble so there wasn't much value lost, and unemploment in IT is near 1% here right now. Everyone's hiring developers. Lived here all my life - weather's decent if you like real snow in winter and heat in the summer, the city is growing and modern, and there's a fair amount to do if you prefer more family-oriented over a single's night life. If you write code, come. We'd love to have you.

  180. Singapore by aminorex · · Score: 1

    If you can take the heat, and don't mind the orderly government.

    --
    -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  181. Bozeman by azadrozny · · Score: 1

    Bozeman, Montana, is a great place to live. It has a low crime rate, and will likely be the place where we make first contact with extraterrestrials.

  182. Ecuador by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cuenca, Ecuador. Google it.

  183. There is only one serious choice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is only one choice that makes sense.

    The 21st century is shaping up to be the Russian century. When China collapses in a combination ecological and economic crisis due to too many people, too little space and too much corruption, Russia will be sailing ahead. They have lots of territory rich in all kinds of natural resources. They have too few people but are willing to pay families for every child born in order to solve that problem. And there has been a steady battle against corruption over the past 10 years that has made a lot of headway and made life easier in most of the large cities. Russia is a major beneficiary of global warming as it opens up many millions of square kilometers of new territory to agriculture. The forests will also grow faster, and there will be less need to import foods from southern countries. And Russia has enough oil and gas to supply all of Europe, not only its own needs.

    Added to that, the Russian language is easier for foreigners to learn than English or many other languages. It has a simple and regular grammar, a simple straightforward verb structure that will be a pleasant surprise to anyone who has struggled with the verbs of French, Spanish or Italian. It is written phonetically and the Russian people love foreigners who take the trouble to learn their language.

    The cuisine is varied and includes influences from Turkey, Georgia, Kazakhstan and others which most Europeans have never experienced. Such a variety of salads that you will find European salads rather plain and uninteresting after experiencing Russian variety. And it is a vast country ranging from the southern beaches of the Black Sea to the Arctic volcano ski mountains of eastern Siberia. It is a huge and vast country.

  184. ExPat Brit living n US here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Different situation - I'm retired (at 45 thanks) so don't have to worry about opportunities for myself.
    I do worry about opps for my kids, but it's too late - we've raised them to be American.
    Our (wife+self) game plan has always been to move offshore when the last kid goes to college.
    If Ryan (eff Mittens) gets elected we may rethink that.
    The political and economic risk in the US has been growing ever since Clinton got elected, Ryan *may* turn the tide.

    Without rule of law and respect for property rights, why on earth would you subject yourself to worldwide taxation.

    FUIRS, FUBO.

    P.S. "Rule of law" and "respect for property rights" rules out *all* the BRICS.

  185. Re:US Soylent Greenland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The US economy....its a moot point for many Americans. The only economics that matters to people is their own. This fact seems to reflect in most opinion on the subject. If you're sufficiently well fed then economics can be debated with much less consequence.

    If not for food stamps, we'd have to eat the rich.

  186. Australia by couchslug · · Score: 1

    The economy is booming, and the energy export sector will boom for decades as Asia grows.

    You might consider a change in professions to suit their needs, but Oz is rich and getting richer.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  187. Warning! Don't click that link! by OneAhead · · Score: 1

    It's a massive rambling wall of text with horrible cultural stereotyping and unwarranted historical extrapolation. If you follow the author's logic, Europe would never have become technologically advanced because it was feudal, backward and stuck with a debilitating belief system during large parts of the middle ages. Pretty much the only thing good about the text is that it contains a crash course in (certain parts of) Chinese history, although if that's what you're in for, Wikipedia is a much more enjoyable read.

    Go ahead, don't say I didn't warn you.

    1. Re:Warning! Don't click that link! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      It's overly long, I agree. But it's not wrong at all. Have you BEEN to China? Have you talked to people that have lived in China for more than a decade, preferably westerners? Do you have chinese friends that lived there for a long time? I have all of the above.

      It's not really racist to observe deep-seated behavioral mechanisms in a culture.

      Read just the end, if the whole truth is so unpalatable for you.

      In any case, it's not really like moving there is much of an option for most westerners.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    2. Re:Warning! Don't click that link! by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      You have a funny definition of "truth". One could put the historical facts together a bit differently, apply different but equally valid logic to them, and come to exactly the opposite conclusion. People change, cultures evolve, backwards regions become forerunners, forerunners become backwards, and then the pendulum swings back again. Japan went from a ridiculously outdated society to an undeniable modern superpower in the time span of about 50 years (I'm thinking 1853-1905). In 1895, you probably would have been among the people saying "no big deal, they can't possibly keep this up". The Islamic world had its cultural, scientific and technological heyday in early medieval times, and now appears to be somewhere at the opposite end of the oscillation. China and India had their cultural, scientific and technological heydays in ancient times, and seem to be poised for a comeback. It may or may not happen; I don't claim to know for sure. Neither should you; the truth value your link (or any speculation about the future of nations, for that matter) is very soft at best.

      Oh by the way, I never even thought about dropping the term "racist". I just profoundly disagree with the kind of fallacious logic being applied, that's all. And I'm sure the same goes for a lot of my Chinese friends.

    3. Re:Warning! Don't click that link! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

      That's because Japan has changed over the years. 50 years ago I would have said I thought they could improve quite a lot, because they seemed willing to. Just the fact they were able to become a major military power shows that.

      China just DOESN'T change though. That is the point. They do not welcome outside ideas, they do not like fundamental cultural change. You may quibble with some of the points of what happened through history, fine, but in the end the important thing is what will happen now. And all signs from people living there is - there are huge problems, bubbles we cannot even fathom.

      China had the comeback, we saw it. Now the force of the culture they are unwilling to change will drag them back again, as it has with so many other cultures that are unable to fundamentally change.

      --
      "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    4. Re:Warning! Don't click that link! by OneAhead · · Score: 1

      China just DOESN'T change though.

      And you are the one claiming that the truth is unpalatable to me?

      Yeah I know you mean culture, society and power structures, but I'm not buying it. One could just as well say that the US hasn't changed since 1842. All it takes is the right color of glasses.

  188. Australia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not sure if this will get read, but i'll comment on Australia first hand. It's a good country but has some quirks; for example we are quite pre-occupied with what every one else is doing, we are very easy going provided you fit within a fairly broad range of a type of person (so an IT researcher starting a family probably wont have any problems if you don't have any weird habits) but that differs a little from Europe where people generally don't care what any one else is doing unless it's directly affecting them. Also its a very safe country (probably due to my first example), which means there aren't any semi-automatic rifles, but you also can't take up base jumping or get a nice paint-ball gun (your allowed some paint-ball guns if you get a licence and never show it to any one, but all the good ones are still banned). IT is doing ok, dollar is going well, stuff is more expensive, beaches are good, and climate is nice (but don't expect amazing skiing),

  189. Re:US murder rate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's called "Shit on shit" crime and it happens a lot in Australia. A difference though is that if someone in Australia owes a loan shark or drug dealer money, they'll get shot, collect a payout from the Victims Compensation fund, and then hand that over to the crook. A Melb cop was telling me that's one of the reasons why many of the various shootings are non-fatal hits to the extremities: the crooks want you alive to collect your payout.

  190. Re:I hate questions like this... there is no "best by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's similar to when some one asks what's do you think the best phone is so i tell them my dream phone and why but then what would probably suit there needs (i can't stand using an iphone, but for some people it's perfect). So with this question i'm guessing the answer is Australia because it's generally going to be better suited for an educated guy looking to settle down, personally I'm a bit more adventurous and think Brazil could be a huge amount of fun.

  191. Canada. by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 1
    It's nearby. They have a housing bubble, but they also have all the oil and fresh water, so as long as people need energy and are thirsty, Canada's on top of it. Toronto, Vancouver, and Montreal are expensive, but only as expensive as Chicago or LA area. Thanks to all the oil being pulled out of Alberta, Canada will get warmer over time. Eventually we'll all be up around the Arctic Circle, and most of that is in Russia. Greenland is still under ice for our lifetimes, so Canada's really the easy choice.

    Now, if you have some means to move, Australia is pretty cool, but I'd focus on Melbourne and points south. Much nicer, cooler, weather. The economy is rockin' but the soil is weak and it has very little fresh water.

    If you don't mind isolation and are more family oriented and neighbourly, New Zealand could work for you.

    Good luck. I left San Francisco for Toronto in 2006 because I saw what was coming down the pike. Sold my place that I bought for $375k for $890k. Was able to put a REALLY nice down payment on a place here in Toronto, and bought a small cottage in Prince Edward County for cash. So, if housing prices go down 20, 30% I don't really care. The poor fuckers who bought my place in SF are now underwater on their mortgage. Be smart. Look ahead. Look at basic strengths. But do get out of the USA. That place is fucking doomed.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  192. Mt Airy, Philadelphia by russellh · · Score: 1

    Mt Airy, Philadelphia. I am not kidding. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mount_Airy,_Philadelphia

    - diversity: one of the most racially integrated communities anywhere
    - excellent schools: Philadelphia and the surrounding suburbs have some of the biggest variety of excellent schools anywhere including private and charter schools.
    - tight knit startup community
    - cheap: low cost of living for a big city on the US east coast
    - transportation: fast train to center city or to New York
    - food: Philly is a fantastic city for foodies
    - beer: philly is an unbelievable beer city. tons of local crafts and world class bars
    - Not Boston
    - Not New York, but it is highly accessible

    --
    must... stay... awake...
  193. contigious blocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is why some operating systems "defrag"

  194. do you surf? by bigtreeman · · Score: 1

    I met a guy from Germany settled on the mid north coast of NSW in Australia to do IT consulting work for global clients. Surf all morning, work all afternoon.

    --
    Go well
  195. Re:US - Offshoring or Automation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a problem with this recession: it's technology.

    Companies have been outsourcing work to cheaper countries because they can: call centers and programmers in India are possible because of the internet, manufacturing in China is possible because of the internet.

    Now that technology is good enough for self-driving cars (Yay Google), and champion game-show contestants (Yay Watson and IBM), we're finally going to see people replaced by machines. Since most of a company's operating budget is taken up by salaries, any company would jump at a chance to replace a person (yearly recurring cost) with a robot (a one-time cost). The more robots you have, the more successful your company and your competition goes out of business or buys their own robots. The cost of production drops, and everything is great... for those of you who are still working!

    And what about the products? In the beginning, cars (for example) were hand-made, and expensive. Then came the assembly line; prices dropped, quality dropped. Then the robots came to the assembly line; prices dropped again. At that point, all that can be done to lower prices is to build faster with cheaper parts. I can't see that the quality will be going up, which brings me to my next point:

    "There's nothing made by man that can't be made a little bit cheaper and a little bit worse." -- Mark Twain

    What should you do? The answer is obvious: get a job making or servicing robots, or own a company that uses robots. And get a robot for yourself, by which I mean a 3d printer.

    Cheers!

  196. Phillipines? Malaysia? ...? by rover42 · · Score: 1
    As someone said earlier, forget China (unless you can get a Western company to send you there at a Westen salary). Visa policies are fairly tight; there is no simple way to get a visa longer than one year. Ten-year vias are possible, but you need five years married to a Chinese, four years in a senior job in China, or starting your own successful company in China before you can even apply.

    It is not a perfect fit for what you want, but check the Wikitravel article on "retiring abroad" for info on various places that are cheap to live and that do encourage immigration: http://wikitravel.org/en/Retiring_abroad

  197. One with many pretty chicks... by kubusja · · Score: 1

    So brunettes: Latin America , blondes: Eastern Europe.

  198. Two to think about by multicoregeneral · · Score: 1

    South America, I think, has it's best days ahead of it. I'm seriously considering Buenos Aires in Argentina, or Guayaquil in Ecuador. The advantage to most countries in South America is that the dollar usually stands up pretty well against local currency, and they often have generous immigration programs for the "investor" (anyone who's willing to drop $25k in a CD) class. I'm not sure about Argentina, but I know Ecuador has such a program.

    When looking at countries for stability, I like to look at how well capitalized the banking systems are. The theory being that the more capitol the banks have on hand, the less likely they are to totally screw up the local economy. The banks all over south America have ridiculously good capitalization, some even holding as much as 30% of deposits in liquid. Contrast that with American banks that hold less than 6% in liquid, and the places you want to be become obvious. There are a couple spots in Europe where it's good to be a foreigner right now, but I would avoid anywhere on the continent until things start looking up.

    Lots of good places in Asia too. For example, Hong Kong looks promising. Very business friendly, if that's what turns you on.

    --
    This signature intentionally left blank.
  199. Don't worry too much by HuguesT · · Score: 1

    As a multinational having lived and worked in several countries in Europe, as well as Australia and the US, and working everyday with people from all over the planet, my opinion is that differences are largely cosmetic. If you have any talent at all you can do well in almost any country that isn't obviously at war and that isn't an insufferable dictatorship.

    In spite of what people say, the actual differences in the West are often exaggerated. If you want long-term employment in a stable company Germany is probably one of the safer bets right now. If you want to start your own company soon, the US is probably still the best place to get initial funding if you have a good idea. Some countries are more welcoming to foreigners than others, these include the UK, Canada, Australia, and France (contrary to what people might think). This is less the case now in the US in fact. Some countries are not doing well economically right now like Italy, Spain, Portugal and Greece, but most likely they will rebound in a year or two.

    Be prepared for a culture shock now matter where you go. Spend time to really learn the language. Plan to stay at least 2-5 years to make it worth the investment. Be prepared to go through a lot of red tape (visas, work permits, etc). Make sure you can acquire the nationality of where you want to live, eventually, without losing the one you have now. You will eventually want to participate in the political system of where you live. Since you plan to have kids, look up the school system. Research before going, get help, etc. Once there invest time and effort into your community, and you will be right.

    Don't sweat it.

  200. Berlin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Berlin is a growing metropolis in the financially strongest country in Europe, and is attracting a large number of IT professionals due to the numerous High Tech companies moving there. I'm not sure why you want to leave Europe, as not all of Europe is suffering.

  201. Czech Republic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently (two years ago) relocated to Prague from a Scandinavian country and I have to tell you I'm loving it. Part of the EU, own national currency, small enough not to be interesting to anyone.
    Very culturally satisfying, girls are pretty and the general culture is very relaxed.

  202. re: Argentina by jago25_98 · · Score: 1

    You mentioned Argentina, I'll comment on that.
    The place has a lot going for it in many respects but it also has many factors against it.

    If earning from abroad I'd say it's a proposition. They say in Argentina you'll never starve as such, you'll just be really uncomfortable.

    However, the peso has been devaluing at >20% for decades now. Graph it against the dollar and you can see this is intentional printing press work. Strikes and chaos have been going on and off for decades. There's regular economy crashes. Currency exchange restrictions and protectionism bite.

    It all depends on what your income is. If you have safe income outside the country then you should be fine apart from getting caught up in the economy crash every 10 years, subway strikes and bureaucratic madness.

    The bureaucracy is insane. It's much like Business is systematically pursued and attacked from all angles. Perhaps this is a result of having peace for so long instead of having everything flattened in WWII and rebuilt. It has a cooling effect on buying houses, exporting is a nightmare, things go missing, people rip you off, goods get stuck at the port etc etc. Anything involving red tape is bedlam.

    There's still a large element of blackmarket. Everybody is just trying to survive. Every now and then the gov comes after an element and changes it.

    People are hardened against all this stuff. It's an interesting study in the things that could be coming the way of Europe and the USA. People survive in their own ways, whether it's doing cash in hand in a profession, keeping funds outside of the country or blackmarket trading. The question would be how you would be able to do that? You might be able to do this for years but I wouldn't feel completely secure... just more secure than Greece.

     

  203. London by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an American expat living in London for the past 5 years. It is the greatest place I've ever lived. If you work in IT, you can get a good job here, earning well above the average salary. It makes the city appear cheap, even though most people find it quite expensive. If you can land a contract job in the finance sector, even better. London has not been hit hard by the recent economic swings, despite what you may have heard. People here are generally happy, and the weather is not nearly as bad as rumoured, although this summer has been a bit crap.

    I moved here from San Francisco, a beautiful-yet-unforgiving city. I made $130k there, and could not afford to by a flat. It is an excruciatingly-expensive city. Since a huge majority of people living there either work in finance or IT, you wouldn't stand out, salary-wise. Hence, everything from milk to break to transport takes its toll on your wallet. If, God-forbid, you should lose your job, you will feel like the world caved in on you. It's very difficult to survive there unless you make really good money. You won't be able to afford to put your kids through private school on a single salary, and the public schools are crap. The only families I knew still living in the city were quite well-off. I also left SF because the job market was very competitive. London, as I've mentioned, seems cheap when you're making 3x the average salary or more.

    The bottom line is, where can you find good work? Don't forget the visa issue. The U.S. has tightened up immigration heavily, and it's very difficult to get an H1-B visa anymore. Anywhere in Europe would work for you, and London is, arguably, the tech hub of the continent.

    I could go on, but everyone has their own opinion. If you have the freedom to go anywhere, it's really going to come down to getting a job (and visa). I've had the opportunity to go to Asia, Australia, etc. I don't see myself leaving this great city anytime soon.

  204. Relocate to Finland by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Helsinki is on the list of the most livable cities.
    Finland has a high standard of living, very safe place to live in (in comparison) especially for children, good healthcare.
    For a trained and experienced IT worker there will be a job, and in IT depending on the position, working in English might be realistically possible.
    In Finland you will NOT get rich or find success, but you'll get a comfortable life and adequate income even as an immigrant (if you're an able IT professional).

  205. There are only 6 AAA-rated countries in the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These are the only currently AAA-rated countries by Moody's, S&P, and Fitch:

    Sweden, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Luxembourg, and Canada.

  206. I moved from UK to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Canada.
    They are looking for skilled people, it's a free country (unlike certain places that call themselves "free" but aren't really), the people are great and it comes out towards the top of surveys for things like standard of living, education, "happiness" etc.

  207. the secret ... by Bobtree · · Score: 1

    Those who live in a paradise don't want more people to move there.

  208. Winnipeg by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    I here Winnipeg is lovely.

  209. adv by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like Judy implied I'm blown away that a single mom able to make $5530 in 1 month on the internet. have you read this site makecash16.com

  210. Consider a multicultural society by PhosphoricX3 · · Score: 1

    The biggest factor in my opinion is whether you are truly accepted in the new country. Countries such as the US, Canada, Brazil, Australia, Mexico and many others especially in the Western Hemisphere are full of European immigrants like yourself so you feel quite welcome. I personally would be skeptical of moving to a country which is dominated by a few local cultures such as China, India, Russia, most of Europe, and most of the world for that matter. It makes a big difference whether you feel that you have to assimilate or if your native culture and adopted culture both become your identity.

  211. My two cents as an expat by arikol · · Score: 2

    I moved countries a few years ago, and even moving within one's own culture area can be hard work. There will be many little legal things and things to do with the system you move to that you need to learn.

    As to the question "what is the best country to move to", the answer is based on your expectations of the future, or your goals.

    I am a family man and moved with young children. I believe I will stay here in Sweden for the foreseeable future. There are a few reasons for this, many of which have to do not only with my own chances for the future but also for my children:

    Good, cheap healthcare
    Good efficient social care (not perfect, but pretty good)
    Excellent quality schools at all levels
    Schools have no tuition fees (paid for with tax money. This applies to universities as well)
    Good human rights situation
    Good safety (low crime, low accident rates, high survivability) ...and a few more reasons

    As you may see many of these reasons include contingency planning. If I should become unable to work I won't lose a chance of a decent life, and the rest of my family continues to have good future prospects. The US scares me mostly because of health care costs and job loss issues, otherwise the US can be seen as a land of opportunity. But lose your health and job in the US and it's not just your problem but also your kids' problem. That's not something I really want to aim for (unless I were to get the kind of wages/income that makes those issues moot).
    Scandinavia is excellent for this, but much of Europe is also quite good. The public healthcare systems in most of Europe range between decent and excellent, and the public school systems do likewise. The UK has quite expensive tuition for most higher level schools, and most countries have some private schools that may cost a bit.

    So I don't see it as only being about the visible costs of housing and food vs the size of the paycheck as I see many other issues that easily outweigh that. In Sweden I can survive on a very small paycheck, live comfortably on a small paycheck, and live extremely nicely on anything larger all the while knowing that if something gets messed up there is a safety net for myself and my family. I would trade away half my paycheck for this (in the form of taxes and/or a lower total paycheck)

  212. Depends on what you are after... by servant · · Score: 1

    IMHO, to determine what you are after, analyze each country and location the same way you would analyze any other system for a customer. Do a cost / benefit lifecycle analysis for each timeframe and assign a probability to each outcome for the reliability of the data. Multiply the probability times the probable outcome weight and compare it to the sum or average of the probability adjusted weights. Now maximize/minimize for desired probabilities, and take pick your winners in each category. Now adjust the answers due to the weight you give to each category, and choose the max/min of each. Sum the answers and get your 'winner' overall.

    Take that answer, and adjust it by your gut feel 'reasonable answer' fear factor quotient to see if you believe the imperical results to see if you want that answer or not.

    Now if you were a client, you would make a recommendation to a customer (where to build a new datacenter, or distribution center, etc). But for personal use it still comes down to personal bias. ... Since my wife won't read this, I will admit I did a cost/benefits analysis of getting married vs not, and a 'requirements' list for desired traits in a spouse. She meets or exceeds requirements in all areas I had noted as important, of which I am very pleased. And 30+ years later, it seems like it stuck, but I still try to NOT take her for granted.

    We do the same thing when we make any life decision. Normally the analytical solution wins, but sometimes the 'gut feel' wins. The 'gut feel' wins when there is 'just that something that doesn't seem right' about the analysis. ... Doing a post mortum analysis of our analytical analysis to see 'why' normally finds there are areas we didn't consider or our analysis in that area was made on bad assumptions for whatever reason. ... All that being said, what is your 'best guess'? Where are you getting your data from? Is that source normally accurate? Do you believe their perspective?

    As a US citizen, I am bias in favor of the USA doing the right thing in the long run. But long run might be longer than I live. The USA does make stupid decisions mainly because the US voting public is gullible and overly optimistic when given dreams of a brighter future rather than information and facts about the way to a more prosperous for all future, IMHO.

    For my money, If you see a country like Greece starting to believe in doing the right thing, and going down the belt tightening route, it might be the best long term bet, and if you can move in with some capital, it is the time to 'buy low' and 'sell dear' in 20+ years. But the time in-between can and probably will be hard. If they don't, just don't go there, the risk is to high both in safety and economically.

    Canada and Austrailia are good, but IMHO their level of socialism is unsustainable in the long run, like the UK. But it will work for a while longer because they have the peoples mandate, and their governments can live on debt for a long time.

    Depending on your religious tolerance, some Islamic countries are quite good for 20+ years, and some are not. Religion and religious tolerance by you and the country might be a reason to choose or disqualify a country. Even in the USA, some states are more liberal than others and some of them are more 'tolerant of different views' than others, even though our laws supposedly don't allow it. (i.e. Utah is still basically Mormon (the Church of Latter Day Saints) as a de-facto religous requirement to succeed. Some southern states are considered 'bible belt' and are pro-conservative Christian interpretation. Some states are effectively 'atheistic' if you look at polls taken by various groups (many states in the NE and West coasts, and north), Folks in the midwest 'flyover states' tend to be more 'independant' both economically and religously, but tend to be 'more religous' than the coasts.

    Reviewing the CIA Worldbook web site might help in overall country selection based on lots o

    --
    ... "When you pry the source from my cold dead hands."
  213. US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We're all doomed anyway...

  214. Tsakas markets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'markets are pulling the teeth out of strong European countries by destroying the South' !!!? Oh Dear Tsakas, markets are neutral, there is no planning in free markets, that's the beauty of them; you seem to be anthropomorphizing them. Take responsibility for the state of your own economy. It's not always everybody else's fault. Loz

  215. Best Place To Relocate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, since --42-- is the answer for everything, I suspect it could be...

    1. The 42nd country of the world.
    2. The 42nd State in America.
    3. The 42nd Glacier in Antarctica.
    4. The 42nd county in Ireland
    5. The birth state of America's 42nd president.
    7. The 42nd island in Micronesia.
    8. The 42nd suburb of London.

    OK, well, that's enough hilarity for now. Remember, keep your friends close but keep your 42nd enemy even closer!

  216. Re:Not sure what an IT "researcher" is and if it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm moving AWAY from the San Francisco area next week, back to Australia after being here decades.
    This place is too expensive in bad ways.. bringing up kids is hard enough without the government being actively against you.
    Luckily I have an AUS passport to fall back on..
    The US has great attractions unfortunately it's systemically screwed. Joe Average has no way to avoid getting screwed by Joe 1%.

  217. Australia by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1

    Australia has great amount of resources, has a fiscally conservative government and they are poised to make big bucks in the next 20-30 years. Other than that, China is looking good. Know Manderin? Down side is they aren't nearly as well armed. Easily the best place would be Australia or New Zealand. Don't go there if you think Obama is great. The shock of reality may kill you.

  218. Today on "Expanding Your Word Power" -- "Crises" by jeko · · Score: 1

    "crisis [krahy-sis] noun, plural crises [-seez]

    Example Sentences:

    1. Well, let's go back to history and think about the leading indicators of financial crises and what they are.

    2. However, computers are still amateurs when it comes to thinking their way through unforeseen crises such as component failures.

    3. Feedbacks in the economic network can turn local crises into global ones. "

    --
    He put his boots up on the table and made a face. "The sig," he smirked. "You can waste your life in search of the sig."
  219. Or just print your own money by NewYork · · Score: 1
  220. Singapore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Singapore is a city-state almost completely devoid of left-wingers... In other words - paradise!

    The most economically free, lowest-taxed, most competitive, most high-tech, safest, and cleanest place on Earth.

  221. away from me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    somewhere other than where I live!

  222. Canada Points System favors young educated by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I've non-seriously looked at moving to Canada a couple of times. The first time was during the Vietnam draft; I would have probably done Conscientious Objector instead, but also I'd only seen the Frozen North parts of Canada and hadn't yet been to Vancouver. Fortunately, the draft was winding down and I had a high lottery number.

    But more seriously, during the Bush years somebody posted the Canadian immigration points system to Slashdot. If you're under 20 or over 50, they really don't want you unless you've already got a job that will sponsor you, and otherwise it would take me a lot more work now than it would have then. You get points for advanced degrees and speaking the languages - it would have made sense to have my wife finish her master's degree and me to relearn my elementary-school French. (I don't remember if First Nations languages counted or only French and English. And French isn't really all that useful in Vancouver, except for immigration, and I don't speak Chinese even though probably more of the locals speak it than French.)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  223. Singapore? by ananthap · · Score: 1

    Close enough to three of the four countries that you mention. But not part of draconian China or chaotic India. City state with a good standard of living. Welcomes people in the service industry. OK

  224. Move Somewhere Cool When You're Young! by billstewart · · Score: 1

    It's a lot easier to move to random places when you're young and single than when you're older, more responsible, and potentially have a spouse or especially kids. And if you don't like it, you can move back home. (In my case, the cool place that I moved was California, and I wasn't young or single when I came here, but it is a big world out there with a lot of places you might like moving.)

    The original poster didn't say what part of Southern Europe he's coming from - if it's Italy, France, or Spain, learning Spanish or Portuguese won't be that hard, and Brazil and Argentina are interesting places to go. (Friends of mine moved to Buenos Aires and like it.) Costa Rica's friendly and doesn't have a military, though there's enough political corruption that the economy's not as good as it should be. Canada's nice, though for weather reasons I'm too much of a wimp to consider anywhere but Vancouver, even though I have lived in climates more like Toronto's. Australia and New Zealand seem to be accessible (not sure how the immigration bureaucracy is if you're not from the US or a Commonwealth country.) Singapore's supposedly a very interesting place, but any country that executes people for possessing politically incorrect drugs strikes me as really inhospitable to freedom of thought. (Cousins of mine lived there for a few years, moved to back to the US when their kids were starting school.)

    I'll let the Europeans tell you about Europe :-)

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  225. Re:Not sure what an IT "researcher" is and if it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    San Francisco is sitting in the middle of a state about o go broke. He's trying to get away from economic disasters, not trying to move into an incipient one.Same with India--did you notice the small power outage recently? China, serioiusly? I suppose you know something of the political history of the Middle Kingdom, but even moving to Hong Kong might not be long-term secure. Singapore might be a better choice if you want an Asian tiger, can remember not to chew gum while you walk, and are Asian yourself. I only note the last point to remind that racism was not invented in the West, however much work has been done here. Japan is a no-go for that reason, not to mention economic ones.

    You might want to take South America, perhaps with the exception of Chile, off the list. Long term prospects of Argentina favor either war or currency collapse--again. Brazil? Possibly, but this will be a harshly two-tier society for a long time to come. The remainder of South and Central America have political and drug cartel problems or are too small to completely insulate themselves against busy neighbors.

    Some parts of Europe are still a pretty good bet, Germany, the Scandinavians, the Dutch. Personally, so long as Putin or someone like him is in charge, I'd avoid any part of or any small nation near the former USSR. In the European spots mentioned, you will pay for a significant bureaucratic overhead, but you'll probably be okay. On second thought, I would avoid Malmo, Sweden, unless you're Islamic or don't mind dhimmitude. On third though, that's a problem in the UK, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Norway. Germany, depends.

    Africa? Probably not much demand at competitive wages, so aside from tribal, religious, and race concerns (Christian in Nigeria, white in Zimbabwe, etc) there's probably nothing there.

    Which leaves North America. Canada, eh? Sure, Probably good on nearly all counts, and very European in an American sort of way. They even speak French of sorts in Kay-beck. The US, despite my opening comment, also has a few good places left. Once you sort things out, you might decide, like millions of other Americans that Texas is where you want to be. I recommend Austin--university town, liberal, but still in a state that values personal drive and won't tax away your income (no VAT, no state income tax), and you get to wear a cowboy hat and boots. Your family will be safe and valued. And people like to mind their own business.

    The only problem is getting in. The US welcomes all sort of needy, unskilled people with open arms, so you might have to tell la Migra that you know nothing, nothing! It can take years otherwise if you insist on doing it the right way, i.e. lawfully. Still, who knows? Try this--get accepted at UT, and apply for a student visa. Then just stay. Frankly, if you work hard and pay your bills, nobody's going to care. Most of our ancestors got here by just staying, why should you be different. And if you do get caught make sure you can verify a long Democrat voting record.

  226. What's the Best Place To Relocate? by unitron · · Score: 1

    Probably Israel.

    Not sure where you'd put it, but the current location just isn't working out.

    Don't know why anyone ever thought it would.

    Oh, you meant what's the best place to which to relocate one's self?

    Never mind.

    --

    I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  227. Not Brazil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Having lived in Brazil for nearly two decades, I certainly wouldn't recommend it as a good place to live or work.

    It is one of the more difficult country to do business (126th place), high in the Perceived Corruption Index (75th place), and the cities of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro are the twelfth and thirteenth most expensive cities in the world for ex-pats to live (and the two most expensive cities in north and south america).

    If you plan on using the internet at all, don't forget that Brazil is the world champion in content removal requests for Google and YouTube content. Just last week, a judge to order the blocking of Facebook in all of Brazil for 24 hours (although that order has been rescinded at the moment).

    I love living in Brazil - I really do - but I would not consider it anything like the developed world, such as Australia or New Zealand if you want to start a business or do some serious work.

  228. Whatever you do, don't come here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Choose Australia. As our former PM once declared:"New Zealanders who emigrate to Australia raise the IQ of both countries"

  229. Brisbane, the Gold Coast by Stolzy · · Score: 1

    In Australia, there's quite a lot of gaming related business happening on the Gold Coast and Brisbane, both cities in Queensland. If you wanted to take a look at the job market in I.T., Australia wide, the best website to use it Seek.com.au. Hope this helps! -Stolzy