Assuming that the employee will give substandard work is an insult. Both sides should expect that other will maintain professional behavior at all times. Doing the opposite would be worse for morale.
They could try it and IANAL but IMO they would easily win as long as the client software is not closely coupled with MySQL by using queries that do not rely on:
Communication of internal MySQL data (but only standard SQL compliant data formats).
Based on the GPL FAQ you could also use a socket interface and the software would still be considered "aggregate programs" and not linked modules unless "the semantics of the communication are intimate enough, exchanging complex internal data structures, that too could be a basis to consider the two parts as combined into a larger program." MySQL is probably claiming that making various queries constitutes exchange of complex internal structures. I would disagree with this and label it as communication between separate programs if the data exchange is that of formated data as expected from any other standard SQL RDBMS implementation.
You notice the difference because Metal is not very big on using melody. The listener therefore concentrates on other elements of the Metal song which IMO doesn't have much to do with music by themselves.
I'm skeptical. The perceived lack of problems could be just the lack of an extensive media to report the problems. Electronic voting without safeguards is inherently insecure.
What kind of computer scientist doesn't understand that with any random access storage there is a risk of accidental or intentional destruction or alteration, at any time, in a random fasion. That's why it's called uhh random access. Hello? This is like a CS 101 second week quiz question. They even still call it RAM!
That is NOT why they call it random access. They call it random access because memory can be accessed just as easily (with smallish time variation) no matter the order of memory locations requested.
Thats why the voting machines should not keep track of any results. The voting machines should just print out a ballot with your choices you selected from the touchscreen. The tally should be done at the optical scanner that scans in the printed ballots. The optical scanner/tabulator software of course should be bulletproof and not easily modifiable. The physical security issue would be easier in this case and the real records are always the paper ballots with the tabulator output as the intermediate records.
First of all the paper document in the HBO documentary that was fixed to show incorrect results was produced by a central tabulator computer that reads aggregate results from memory cards. If the individual voting machines print out a paper trail of each voter then the the individual voters can catch the erroneous paper trails. This is not true if only the central tabulator machines have paper trails. So this recommended solution is totally different than the situation in the HBO documentry.
Secondly each electronic voting machine can be equipped to output paper records that can be scanned optically. The paper record outputted is checked by the voter and then it is summited to optical scanner where then and only then it is counted. Therefore you can have the benefits of electronic selection of votes and paper records that are transparent to the voter and can be recounted.
The password manager should only fill in the password on the actual page you have entered it on before. This is just common sense.
Even if the password manager saved passwords specific to pages (rather than domain specific) the exploit can still work if the page that allows a login also allows user created content.
Most people back then were iliterate. This is one of the reasons why we have a republic and not a democracy. Although all people did not have voting rights, electorate back then was White males only, but at least property ownership was not required. The Founding Fathers were not putocrats.
Windows does not overwrite any partition that you do not tell it to. It just overwrites the MBR and the partition you choose to put Windows on. Install Windows and then your old boot loader.
You don't seem to understand software or operating systems. Oracle is a self-contained database management system. Why would it have to link to any GPLed software on the Linux Platform? An application program doesn't link to the Linux kernel: it would only use kernel's services through system calls which is not considered linking.
The paper records are the master copy which are counted when necessary. The voter can look at the paper before casting. As someone else said you cannot just lump all "paper methods" together say they have the same error. The new electronic Diebold machines also have fundemental flaws in designed that allow a virus to spread.
Slashdot Mirror
Assuming that the employee will give substandard work is an insult. Both sides should expect that other will maintain professional behavior at all times. Doing the opposite would be worse for morale.
Based on the GPL FAQ you could also use a socket interface and the software would still be considered "aggregate programs" and not linked modules unless "the semantics of the communication are intimate enough, exchanging complex internal data structures, that too could be a basis to consider the two parts as combined into a larger program." MySQL is probably claiming that making various queries constitutes exchange of complex internal structures. I would disagree with this and label it as communication between separate programs if the data exchange is that of formated data as expected from any other standard SQL RDBMS implementation.
Where does the Lord Jesus fit into this?
There is hardly any "hatred" at Slashdot. This is one of the most tame discussion sites I have ever seen. Get off your high-horse.
You notice the difference because Metal is not very big on using melody. The listener therefore concentrates on other elements of the Metal song which IMO doesn't have much to do with music by themselves.
I guess if you lived when only wax recordings were available you'd be one angry prick.
I wouldn't worry so much. We all make gaffes once in a while.
I'm skeptical. The perceived lack of problems could be just the lack of an extensive media to report the problems. Electronic voting without safeguards is inherently insecure.
The machines could be used to help the blind vote and detect over-voting and other selection mistakes.
Thanks for pointing out that potential hurdle. I hadn't thought of that myself.
Or you could use a pen and an optical scanner like the entire state of New Mexico did.
Thats why the voting machines should not keep track of any results. The voting machines should just print out a ballot with your choices you selected from the touchscreen. The tally should be done at the optical scanner that scans in the printed ballots. The optical scanner/tabulator software of course should be bulletproof and not easily modifiable. The physical security issue would be easier in this case and the real records are always the paper ballots with the tabulator output as the intermediate records.
First of all the paper document in the HBO documentary that was fixed to show incorrect results was produced by a central tabulator computer that reads aggregate results from memory cards. If the individual voting machines print out a paper trail of each voter then the the individual voters can catch the erroneous paper trails. This is not true if only the central tabulator machines have paper trails. So this recommended solution is totally different than the situation in the HBO documentry.
Secondly each electronic voting machine can be equipped to output paper records that can be scanned optically. The paper record outputted is checked by the voter and then it is summited to optical scanner where then and only then it is counted. Therefore you can have the benefits of electronic selection of votes and paper records that are transparent to the voter and can be recounted.
Even if the password manager saved passwords specific to pages (rather than domain specific) the exploit can still work if the page that allows a login also allows user created content.
5. Nobody gives a fuck because people are skeptical about anonymous postings to the internet.
OMG, we fucking won.
Most people back then were iliterate. This is one of the reasons why we have a republic and not a democracy. Although all people did not have voting rights, electorate back then was White males only, but at least property ownership was not required. The Founding Fathers were not putocrats.
Yeah I do have each OS on a different HD. The nice thing is you can get a high quality 250GB HD for $90.
Windows does not overwrite any partition that you do not tell it to. It just overwrites the MBR and the partition you choose to put Windows on. Install Windows and then your old boot loader.
What law of economics says that the transition to an alterative fuel will be smooth, there will be no turmoil, and no one will die?
You don't seem to understand software or operating systems. Oracle is a self-contained database management system. Why would it have to link to any GPLed software on the Linux Platform? An application program doesn't link to the Linux kernel: it would only use kernel's services through system calls which is not considered linking.
The paper records are the master copy which are counted when necessary. The voter can look at the paper before casting. As someone else said you cannot just lump all "paper methods" together say they have the same error. The new electronic Diebold machines also have fundemental flaws in designed that allow a virus to spread.
Maybe OCD.