Sure you can. You can design hot rod parts for custom mods for people. You can design race car parts that you can sell to racers. There are all sorts of things you can do.
Just as with software. Just because you are a "software developer" does not mean that all software you develop should therefore be owned by the company if you do it on your own time. It's like being a chef for a restraunt. You can still do catering for parties in your free time and the company doesn't get x% of your profits (unless you use the company's food).
You're in no position to argue as long as you violate the existing laws.
That is entirely stupid. Someone caught speeding in a speed trap has every right to argue that the speed limit should be increased. Someone having gay sex has every right to argue against anti-gay sex laws. Just because you are violating a law does not automatically void your opinion on the law.
Remember the story of how the US spent $5 million to develop a space pen, which would work in vacuum, under water, in massive heat, etc?... the Russians brought a pencil.
In which case I would assume it is always best to say, "yes." You're not under oath at that point, so they cannot go after you for perjury. If you were read your rights, then you weren't lying. If not, then they just started interviewing you without you knowing your rights.
I don't know how well it would hold up in court if the officer said, "Well ummm... He wasn't actually read his rights. But he said he was!!!"
Re:The names may change, but
on
Diamonds & the RIAA
·
· Score: 3, Insightful
Odd, I told my fiance that very thing. She completely agreed. I let her pick out her ring and she immediately went for a beautiful amethyst one. It is prettier and a heck of a lot cheaper than a diamond. The fact that it doesn't come with the baggage of a diamond was only a plus.
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that PostgreSQL complains very loudly when run as root, and instead prefers to be run in a separate account named "postgres". Likewise, my Apache was by default set to run in an account named "httpd". As for sshd, I dunno, you may well be right about that one.
I got married, and briefly used IE again until I installed Moz1.4 on the wife's PC.
I must be lucky. My fiance saw me using Mozilla (Firebird, actually) with the tabs. She immediately wanted it for her computer too. Now she refuses to use IE. She even went and got her sister hooked on Mozilla because of the tabs.
I'm pretty sure static electricity, as in what happens when you rub your feet on carpet, is usually less than 5,000 volts. I seem to remember it being between 2,000 and 4,000. Could be wrong though.
I have been zapped by a 7,500 volt cap once though. That hurt like you wouldn't believe. Much more painful than a simple static shock. That's one reason I'm keen to believing static shocks are well less than 5,000 volts. The part about AMPs being the deadly thing is correct though.
Agreed. Same reason that hellish bill was named the CBDTPA (Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act). What, my senator voted against broadband and digital television????
Ejection seats are worthless. If you ejected from the Challanger (assuming you even knew it would blow before it did), you would be burned alive by the exhaust flames from the rocket. If you ejected from the Columbia, again assuming you even knew anything was wrong before you were dead, you would have been torn to tiny pieces by wind drag across your body.
I also think "spectacularly unsafe" is extremely unfair. NASA has lost two shuttles in 20 years. I would argue that statistic hardly says they are unsafe.
Hate to break it to you, but Mozilla does do automated installs from web pages. Just head on over to MozDev and see for yourself. Many projects, such as OptiMoz and Spellchecker, have automated install links right on the page.
You go to OSU? Then you should be glad that they aren't making you code in Resolve. The last contest I participated in there we had to do all of the code in Resolve. The fun part is we found a bug in the GUI toolkit that prevented anyone from completing the third and final task of the contest.
For those who don't know, if Java and C++ had an illegitimate mutant child that was locked in a dark room and was never seen in outside its home, it would be Resolve. It's worse than C# because at least C# is known outside the university.
Far, far too many people rely solely on simple, ineffective door and window locks, and the false promise of law enforcement.
So what you're saying is that you do sit in front of your door with a loaded shotgun 24/7? Or at least, you always carry a loaded gun with you 24/7? If not, then you are at some point in time the "chewy center". If you are, then you're much more likely to shoot and kill a perfectly innocent person and have a few volts of electricity dance across your skull..
That arguement only works until all the car makers get together, much like the printer makers have, and decide to all require that you buy only their parts.
Unless the moon orbits on a different axis. The moon can orbit "top-to-bottom" so that it is never in the shadow of the planet. Not sure how likely it is, but it is at least theoretically possible.
Technically, it's called "attack against the person" and it is a scientifically valid arguement if used correctly. For example, would you ask Jerry Farwell if gay couples can make good parents? The same arguement applies here. If the founder of a "debunking" website is linked to tobacco companies then he does lose some credibility when he says things like "secondhand smoke is harmless."
I can remember a few things from around when I was 2. I had been enrolled in some swimming program to get me used to water before I grew old enough to be scared of it. I can remember what the pool area looked like, but that's about it.
I know it had to be from when I was between 2-3 because my parents switched places they took me to sometime after I turned 3 and the pool area was entirely different.
Do you have to sign an agreement that you
won't resell the stuff you got at a discount?
When I worked at Best Buy, a few years ago, the answer was yes. You did have to sign an agreement that you would only buy items at discount for personal use or for your immediate family. I don't remember the exact words it used, but it definately implied that you were not allowed to resell the stuff you got at a discount.
Slashdot Mirror
Sure you can. You can design hot rod parts for custom mods for people. You can design race car parts that you can sell to racers. There are all sorts of things you can do.
Just as with software. Just because you are a "software developer" does not mean that all software you develop should therefore be owned by the company if you do it on your own time. It's like being a chef for a restraunt. You can still do catering for parties in your free time and the company doesn't get x% of your profits (unless you use the company's food).
Show me someone whining about fair use and I can show you someone violating copyright law.
Here's some Librarians "whining" about fair use.
You're in no position to argue as long as you violate the existing laws.
That is entirely stupid. Someone caught speeding in a speed trap has every right to argue that the speed limit should be increased. Someone having gay sex has every right to argue against anti-gay sex laws. Just because you are violating a law does not automatically void your opinion on the law.
Silly person, the answer was 1. It just had to make lots of trips.
Remember the story of how the US spent $5 million to develop a space pen, which would work in vacuum, under water, in massive heat, etc? ... the Russians brought a pencil.
Not entirely true.
In which case I would assume it is always best to say, "yes." You're not under oath at that point, so they cannot go after you for perjury. If you were read your rights, then you weren't lying. If not, then they just started interviewing you without you knowing your rights.
I don't know how well it would hold up in court if the officer said, "Well ummm... He wasn't actually read his rights. But he said he was!!!"
Odd, I told my fiance that very thing. She completely agreed. I let her pick out her ring and she immediately went for a beautiful amethyst one. It is prettier and a heck of a lot cheaper than a diamond. The fact that it doesn't come with the baggage of a diamond was only a plus.
I could be wrong, but I'm pretty sure that PostgreSQL complains very loudly when run as root, and instead prefers to be run in a separate account named "postgres". Likewise, my Apache was by default set to run in an account named "httpd". As for sshd, I dunno, you may well be right about that one.
This is on RH 7.1, so it may have changed.
I got married, and briefly used IE again until I installed Moz1.4 on the wife's PC.
I must be lucky. My fiance saw me using Mozilla (Firebird, actually) with the tabs. She immediately wanted it for her computer too. Now she refuses to use IE. She even went and got her sister hooked on Mozilla because of the tabs.
... or c) Al Queda training camp.
I'm pretty sure static electricity, as in what happens when you rub your feet on carpet, is usually less than 5,000 volts. I seem to remember it being between 2,000 and 4,000. Could be wrong though.
I have been zapped by a 7,500 volt cap once though. That hurt like you wouldn't believe. Much more painful than a simple static shock. That's one reason I'm keen to believing static shocks are well less than 5,000 volts. The part about AMPs being the deadly thing is correct though.
Agreed. Same reason that hellish bill was named the CBDTPA (Consumer Broadband and Digital Television Promotion Act). What, my senator voted against broadband and digital television????
Ejection seats are worthless. If you ejected from the Challanger (assuming you even knew it would blow before it did), you would be burned alive by the exhaust flames from the rocket. If you ejected from the Columbia, again assuming you even knew anything was wrong before you were dead, you would have been torn to tiny pieces by wind drag across your body.
I also think "spectacularly unsafe" is extremely unfair. NASA has lost two shuttles in 20 years. I would argue that statistic hardly says they are unsafe.
Hate to break it to you, but Mozilla does do automated installs from web pages. Just head on over to MozDev and see for yourself. Many projects, such as OptiMoz and Spellchecker, have automated install links right on the page.
Saying the Resolve people are lucky because you got stuck with Modula 2 is kind of like saying that lepers are lucky because you have the plague.
You go to OSU? Then you should be glad that they aren't making you code in Resolve. The last contest I participated in there we had to do all of the code in Resolve. The fun part is we found a bug in the GUI toolkit that prevented anyone from completing the third and final task of the contest.
For those who don't know, if Java and C++ had an illegitimate mutant child that was locked in a dark room and was never seen in outside its home, it would be Resolve. It's worse than C# because at least C# is known outside the university.
Far, far too many people rely solely on simple, ineffective door and window locks, and the false promise of law enforcement.
So what you're saying is that you do sit in front of your door with a loaded shotgun 24/7? Or at least, you always carry a loaded gun with you 24/7? If not, then you are at some point in time the "chewy center". If you are, then you're much more likely to shoot and kill a perfectly innocent person and have a few volts of electricity dance across your skull..
That arguement only works until all the car makers get together, much like the printer makers have, and decide to all require that you buy only their parts.
I've heard that before, but cannot remember where. You have the name of the song?
The vents on Earth that contain life also contain lots of water. To my knowledge, no water has been found on Venus yet.
Unless the moon orbits on a different axis. The moon can orbit "top-to-bottom" so that it is never in the shadow of the planet. Not sure how likely it is, but it is at least theoretically possible.
Can you provide proof of that, or are you just making it up? Many smokers have long lived health problems, and many of those are on Medicare/Medicaid.
Technically, it's called "attack against the person" and it is a scientifically valid arguement if used correctly. For example, would you ask Jerry Farwell if gay couples can make good parents? The same arguement applies here. If the founder of a "debunking" website is linked to tobacco companies then he does lose some credibility when he says things like "secondhand smoke is harmless."
I can remember a few things from around when I was 2. I had been enrolled in some swimming program to get me used to water before I grew old enough to be scared of it. I can remember what the pool area looked like, but that's about it.
I know it had to be from when I was between 2-3 because my parents switched places they took me to sometime after I turned 3 and the pool area was entirely different.
How about Master of Orion 3?
Do you have to sign an agreement that you won't resell the stuff you got at a discount?
When I worked at Best Buy, a few years ago, the answer was yes. You did have to sign an agreement that you would only buy items at discount for personal use or for your immediate family. I don't remember the exact words it used, but it definately implied that you were not allowed to resell the stuff you got at a discount.