Slashdot Mirror


Arthur C. Clarke Is Dead At 90

Many readers are sending in word that Arthur C. Clarke has died in Sri Lanka. He wrote over 100 books including 2001: A Space Odyssey and Rendezvous With Rama, and popularized the ideas of geosynchronous communications satellites and space elevators.

538 comments

  1. shame. by apodyopsis · · Score: 1, Informative

    shame.

    his earlier works were total classics. RIP.

    1. Re:shame. by rucs_hack · · Score: 4, Interesting

      True

      'Islands in the Sky' Blew me away when I first read it as a child, I still consider it to be one of the most prophetic of all SF books. I recently spent rather a lot of money of a 1952 paperback edition of same.

    2. Re:shame. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Rendezvous with Rama was a late career work and a classic too.

    3. Re:shame. by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Interesting

      his earlier works were total classics. RIP.

      It's understandable that, as he got older, his energy to write faded, but it's a real shame that he let other people put his name on shoddy products that he essentially had nothing to do with. They say that the apalling sequels to Rendevous with Rama (an excellent work and a science-fiction classic) were basically entirely Gentry Lee's doing in spite of the prominent appearance of both names on the covers. When the sequels are so bad they can only tarnish the perception of the original (see Star Wars).

      This news is sad, but I hope that younger generations today will go back to the early works, ignoring all of the later publication, and see just how visionary a writer Clarke was.

    4. Re:shame. by RamblinLonghorn · · Score: 1

      Childhood's End was one of my first and favorite SF books.

    5. Re:shame. by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Light of Other Days.

      It was either a prophesy or a forewarning on society and privacy - you pick. Even now it gives me the shivers thinking about it... and damned few SciFi books (of which I've read way too many) can do that.

      /P

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re:shame. by pallmall1 · · Score: 1

      ...the apalling sequels to Rendevous with Rama (an excellent work and a science-fiction classic) were basically entirely Gentry Lee's doing...
      Good illustration of the difference between art and commercial media. A good analogy is what happened to the "Conan" stories. Robert E. Howard's works were classic; L. Sprague DeCamp's were smote full of shit.

      I agree with the original poster. It's best to stick to the original works that spur the imagination, and avoid the commercially destroyed versions that pick your pocket.
      --
      3 things about computers: they're alive, they're self-aware, and they hate your guts.
    7. Re:shame. by dhavleak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Rest in peace, Arthur C. Clarke - you will never be forgotten.

      I can still remember the chill that went down my spine at the end of 2010 (the year we make contact) when HAL relays David Bowman's message:

      All these worlds are yours except Europa
      Attempt no landings there.
      Use them together. Use them in Peace.

      And the (almost Obamaesque) hope I felt when Haywood Floyd tells his son, "Someday, the children of the old sun will meet the children of the new sun. I hope we can be friends"

      2001, 2010, Rama, Glide Path (and instrument landing systems), The City and the Stars, Earthlight, The Nine Billions Names of God, his Scientific American paper on geosynchronous satellites, and so much more. I can't imagine what our world would be like without his contributions.

    8. Re:shame. by mikeabbott420 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Growing up in the 70's I scoured every library of every place I moved to for Asimov,Clarke and Heinlein and read their books many times over. Now they're all gone and I feel sad, like the last of a special group of friends is gone.

      --
      This program was made possible by a grant from the Ultra-Humanite, and viewers like you.
    9. Re:shame. by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      Islands in the Sky was extremely Heinleinesque, which is why I loved it.

      Childhood's End was a pretty freaky read for a thirteen year old kid. :)

    10. Re:shame. by stoolpigeon · · Score: 1

      If you haven't - read Spin by Robert Charles Wilson. I just finished it this week-end and I was thinking about Childhood's End quite a bit while I read it. Very good.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    11. Re:shame. by Crazy+Taco · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They say that the apalling sequels to Rendevous with Rama (an excellent work and a science-fiction classic) were basically entirely Gentry Lee's doing in spite of the prominent appearance of both names on the covers.

      This is a normal tactic in the book industry. It is a way for publishers to introduce new authors they think might be good to the reading public. If you saw a book by someone named Gentry Lee, how likely would you be to buy it if you had never heard of him before? Now, if you see Arthur C Clark's name on the cover, you would be likely to buy it. It's not a totally bad system, because it does help to get people who are really good authors established. My father is a best selling author and the first 6-10 of his books were coauthored with someone famous (who did little more than add a couple anecdotes and a forward).

      The big problems with the system, though, are when you have authors who are famous not checking up on the books they put their names on. This can happen either because they are lazy, getting old, or most likely just want another paycheck that they know a book with their name on it will bring. This can dilute the brand when bad books with their name on it get out, and sometimes hurt the author if thecoauthor gets into a scandal or does something disgraceful. That also happened to my dad when the famous coauthor did something entirely out of character with what the books were about.

      So here's the basic rule of thumb when buying books. If you see a book with two names on it (one of them being a famous person you recognize), IMMEDIATELY assume that the book was written by the other, unknown author with the name in small print. Know that you are taking a risk and getting a book that may not be as good as previous books by the famous author. However, also know someone at the publishing house thought this author was pretty good or they wouldn't be trying to publish him and get his name known. So there is some chance you may find a gem of a book, and if so, you should buy books from that author again. But know going in that 95% of the time you see coauthors on anything other than a university text, the famous coauthor did 0% of the work, and probably didn't even read the book before putting his name on it. You have no guarantee he liked it, and no guarantee of quality (because even if he wrote the forward, he didn't necessarilly read the book).

      --
      Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it.
    12. Re:shame. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think the Fountains of Paradise was his best. He certainly tried to make it his last great novel.

      I once read an early story of his "Travel by Wire" which is about teleportation. He goes into gory detail about what can happen to the traveller transported at too low a resolution, or when noise got into the line "They looked like nothing on Earth and very little on Venus or Mars". It ends with an observation about engineering: that the people who build things like this sometimes seem reluctant to travel on them, knowing how badly they were put together.

      At the other end of his career he wrote "Transit of Earth" which is a much better put together story but less fun to read.

    13. Re:shame. by anonypus_user · · Score: 1

      i dunno, did you read the rama books gentry lee put out without clarke's help? they really were THAT much worse, but i do kinda like his take on robotics.

    14. Re:shame. by Metasquares · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wow, literary publishing is exactly like scientific publishing.

    15. Re:shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally true. A complete down note to end the day on.

    16. Re:shame. by kramulous · · Score: 1

      Ahh. But you can spot the chapters in those books that were written by Gentry Lee and those by Arthur C. Clarke (This news really, really saddens me ... Rest In Peace). Many chapters focused on human behaviors while others were filled with math and concepts. It was very clear who wrote what.

      What a great science fiction prophet.

      --
      .
    17. Re:shame. by rbanffy · · Score: 1

      Not all of the partnerships gave results as bad as the Rama sequels. I loved Richter 10. Sadly, the other guy (can't remember his name right now) died shortly after writing the book.

      the editors in heaven are probably expecting to publish some seriously good books next year ;-)

    18. Re:shame. by JustOK · · Score: 4, Funny

      If I saw Gentry Lee I would have thought about the guy from Rush, who it isn't, but who wrote 2112 and Hyperspace, and then the other guy from Rush who wrote the theme for the first season or two of Andromeda.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    19. Re:shame. by Drive42 · · Score: 0

      That's exactly how I feel. Except for me the group of friends was Asimov, Clarke, and Vonnegut. I know Vonnegut isn't usually grouped in with that generation of Science Fiction writers, but I was profoundly influenced by those three personalities all through my grade-school education.

      The generation's mostly gone now. It's now time for the posthumous reevaluation and critiques to really begin. As I think it should.

      But, ah, to scour libraries for literature that wasn't considered literature... ...and finding people from the era and context of Clarke. That's over.

      R.I.P. seems inappropriate. He can't hear me. He's dead.

      I loved his work, and his thought is a part of my thought. That's the best thing I can say right now.

    20. Re:shame. by jpowell180 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Damn. One of the Great Three (Heinlein, Asimov, Clarke).

    21. Re:shame. by Speare · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Paul Preuss got the same treatment. I think the series was called Venus Prime or something like it. It had a very early non-gritty proto-cyberpunk feel to it. The gimmick in the series was interesting. Paul took a short story from Arthur C. Clarke's back list, and turned it almost-absolutely verbatim into a chapter of the ongoing serial plotline. He did a reasonable job making it blend in so you couldn't spot the short story without already being familiar with it. There were at least four books, I can't be bothered to search them now, but it was cool to compare the short with the chapter after reading each novella.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    22. Re:shame. by mikeabbott420 · · Score: 1

      Vonnegut came a lot later for me, I think I was in grade 9 before I discovered Cats Cradle. Another sad loss all the same.

      --
      This program was made possible by a grant from the Ultra-Humanite, and viewers like you.
    23. Re:shame. by nomadic · · Score: 1

      I think the Fountains of Paradise was his best. He certainly tried to make it his last great novel.

      I definitely agree with that, it was definitely his most beautifully written book.

    24. Re:shame. by Schemat1c · · Score: 1

      shame. Shame? He was 90. Most of hope to live that long and leave such an amazing legacy behind.
      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    25. Re:shame. by Telecommando · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Childhood's End scared the hell out of me. I think I was 10 at the time. Reread it in college for a class and understood it a lot better. Still gave me chills, though.

      Requiem im pace, Sir Arthur. The world is not a better place for your passing.

      --
      Beta sux! Join the Slashcott! http://hardware.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=4760465&cid=46173047
    26. Re:shame. by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 0

      There's still Frederik Pohl!

      --
      This space available.
    27. Re:shame. by mblase · · Score: 1

      If you see a book with two names on it (one of them being a famous person you recognize), IMMEDIATELY assume that the book was written by the other, unknown author with the name in small print.

      Which is why it was such a puzzlement for me when "Good Omens" had both Pratchett's and Gaiman's names on the cover: I was already a fan of both their work.

    28. Re:shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It gets worse than the previous example, by far. The publisher Avon put Clarke's name more prominently than the actual author's as "Arthur C. Clarke's" for the Venus Prime books, which those were totally abysmal in every single respect, and were . I rather hope that if it was because, as you said, that they want you to try a new author because they "think [he] might be good", but I strongly doubt that even they could be so blind. This sort of outright attempt to deceive for profit annoys me to no end, though at least in this particular case it was the local library wasting money, rather than myself personally.

      That said, actual stuff by Arthur C. Clarke is really, really good most of the time. I feel sad about the passing of a great author. Rest In Peace.

    29. Re:shame. by lsolano · · Score: 0

      2001, 2010, Rama, Glide Path (and instrument landing systems), The City and the Stars, Earthlight, The Nine Billions Names of God, his Scientific American paper on geosynchronous satellites, and so much more. I can't imagine what our world would be like without his contributions.

      Good summary... Just a few reasons why he will be remembered forever.

    30. Re:shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case it is my understanding that Gentry and Arthur worked quite a bit together on the Rama books. (I know Gentry.) So Sir Arthur, may his pod bay doors always be open, is not off the hook here. I actually thought that the first Rama book was a little disappointing after his earlier books, nay, masterpieces, so perhaps the later Rama books were, in part, a continuation of that slide.

    31. Re:shame. by Swampash · · Score: 1

      Growing up in the 70's I scoured every library of every place I moved to for Asimov,Clarke and Heinlein and read their books many times over. Now they're all gone and I feel sad, like the last of a special group of friends is gone.

      I hate "me too" posts.

      But... me too.

    32. Re:shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      5% of the time..well I wonder a little about his "Time's Eye" collabarative
      novels with Stephen Baxter....

    33. Re:shame. by Divebus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Shame? He was 90. Most of hope to live that long and leave such an amazing legacy behind. By the time Mozart was my age, he had been dead for 20 years.
      --

      Most of the stuff on /. won't survive first contact with facts.
    34. Re:shame. by tsm_sf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Same here...

      So long and thanks for all the fiction?

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
    35. Re:shame. by eugene+ts+wong · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, it's a lot like slashdoting, too.

    36. Re:shame. by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Yes. But if there a big 4, then I'll add John Campbell.
      Even Heinlein and Asimov would agree.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    37. Re:shame. by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      His last book is called "The Last Theorem" - He finished editing it 10 days before his death.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    38. Re:shame. by Whiteox · · Score: 1

      Vonnegut wrote quite a few Sci-Fi. Every one a favourite.
      Thanks for reminding me about him.

      --
      Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
    39. Re:shame. by man_the_king · · Score: 1

      Regarding your signature: "Religion Breeds Terrorism." - - Timothy McClanahan I beg to differ - It's mostly a lack of true understanding regarding one's religion that begets religious violence. As for terrorism, my opinion is - it's rarely religious in nature - there are probably several other reasons for it though - political, economical, sociological, etc

    40. Re:shame. by lidong2121 · · Score: 1

      Writers of the Golden Era all passed away

    41. Re:shame. by jacquesm · · Score: 1

      if you like Pohl try to find 'the space merchants'.

    42. Re:shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Light of Other Days. by Bob Shaw

    43. Re:shame. by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

      But know going in that 95% of the time you see coauthors on anything other than a university text, the famous coauthor did 0% of the work,

      Actually, this is also common for academic papers.

    44. Re:shame. by onion_joe · · Score: 1
      Rendezvous with Rama

      I agree with both previous posters that the Rama series was unworthy from Book II [Rama II].

      Has anyone heard of the Rendezvous with Rama movie with Morgan Freeman? I saw a preview several years ago and nearly had to clean myself up in the theatre bathroom.

      Since then, nada...

      --
      sig sig sig siggy sig
    45. Re:shame. by Nil000 · · Score: 1

      With me it was a collection of three of his books that my dad had borrowed from the libary when I was 9, Childhoods End, Prelude to Space and a collection of short stories, including the Nine billion Names of God. The first SF I ever read, but not the last. Several years later I attended a lecture by him at the RI in London on the space elevator. He will be missed.

    46. Re:shame. by kalirion · · Score: 1

      The last of the Great Three you mean..... R.I.P.

    47. Re:shame. by lysdexia · · Score: 1

      "Easy Reader says: 'The Ramen always do everything in threes!'"

    48. Re:shame. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Rendezvous with Rama

      Rendezvous with Rama I thought was one of his best work, along with Songs of Distant Earth. The real shame in Rama was for him to turn out such a master piece only to turn it over to a complete idiot to piss all over. I am of course referring to the three sequels of Rendezvous with Rama written by that asshat Gentry Lee. As far as I'm concerned they never happen and I'll be waiting forever to fine out what Rama's real purpose was.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    49. Re:shame. by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Does that mean there will be an Authors Gone Wild version of this?

    50. Re:shame. by kalirion · · Score: 1

      Hmm, does this mean Janny Wurst did most of the writing for the Empire trilogy she coauthored with Raymond E. Feist? Seems she only had one book of her own come out before the first of the trilogy. If this is true, than I should definitely read more of her stuff as the Empire books are my favorite of all the Midkemia/Riftwar related material.

    51. Re:shame. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I totally agree with you there. The sequels to Rama where total crap. I remember reading Rendevous and how happy I was when I found there where sequels. I picked them all up at the same time. I remember reading them hoping they would get better, they had to get better. Shame that just when you think they hit rock bottom some fucker would break out a jack hammer. I lasted almost to the end of the last book. I had 10 or so pages left. I don't remember exactly what it was but I remember it was something so stupid that I closed the book. I calmly took out the other two and slammed them into the trash.

      That is the first and only time I have ever thrown a book in the trash instead of giving them away or something. I know it wasn't completely Clarke fault but I've never been able to read anything by him again. I put first Rama on a shelf. It still sits there till this day, about 20 years. I've never been able to bring my self to read it again.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    52. Re:shame. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I recommend Spin too. I'm on the last few chapters right now. Amazing piece of work.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    53. Re:shame. by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      I thought Rama was for colonization. Whether from a dying world or just for spreading progeny was unknown. Was just passing through our system since our planet had sentient life, thankfully they weren't into conquest or "regime change"!

    54. Re:shame. by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Rama's real purpose was only alluded too in the first book. Was it a colony ship, an escape ship? I think that is the over all question of the book, what was Rama's purpose. That is also what made it such a great work. When you are done with the book you are left with just as many questions but it is presented in such a way that you are fat and happy too. It also tells you that not all questions that you have are meant to be answered.

      If you haven't read the other Rama books, my advice is don't. They completely destroy the original work. They do tell what Rama's purpose was but it's so stupid that it baffles the mind. While I was reading them I had the impression that the author stealing Clarke's name had never even read the first book. If he did, he didn't understand it.

      Forget them. Read the first book and continue to wonder what Rama's real purpose was for.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    55. Re:shame. by charleste · · Score: 1

      Baxter and Clarke...a partnership *I* for one enjoy... The Light of Other Days is just one example. RIP!

    56. Re:shame. by MyrddinBach · · Score: 1

      You're forgetting one of the other Grandmasters of that era - Silverburg.

    57. Re:shame. by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      This is a normal tactic in the book industry. It is a way for publishers to introduce new authors they think might be good to the reading public. If you saw a book by someone named Gentry Lee, how likely would you be to buy it if you had never heard of him before? I'd be stoked about a new Rush album, then I'd realize that I'm looking at a book instead of a CD and Geddy's solo work isn't very good.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    58. Re:shame. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Part of the thesis of the "big three" recently (Dawkins, Hitchens, and Harris) is that it's precisely because the West, donning the religious version of "white man's guilt", insists on believing it has nothing to do with religion, and it is, nay, must be economic issues, political, societal, etc.

      We've been so trained over the years to treat religion as a lifestyle choice, thanks to generations of separation of church and state, that we forget the rage and problems it causes when it is truly core to people's lives.

      Clarke r00lz! Actually, I rather liked his newest 3001, the final sequal to the 2001 series.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    59. Re:shame. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      I forget what universe it is (don't think it's Rama) but there's a large tubular ship in space where you live on the inside. There is some kind of quantum singularity line extending down the central axis of the tube, which is infinitely long on the inside.

      There is a city that hangs on the wire, and it can move back and forth by twisting its clamp. There are little portal doors along the inside walls that lead to different planets.

      I loved the first stories, so I bought a book that was one of these "guest author visits the universe" set in that universe, but all the author did was travel down the tube, then dump off into one portal to tell his own story that had nothing to do with the main "unviverse".

      For those who love the sordid details, this author had created his own evolutionary device, an Eco (I think), which was a single giant organism that actually grew into it's own entire ecology, complete with "plants" and "animals" that interacted in the normal way, but were really part of the same large organism.

      God was that disappointing. Like buying a Trek book and the first thing the author does is dump you through a wormhole into his own non-Trek world.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    60. Re:shame. by djp928 · · Score: 1

      I think you're thinking of Eon by Greg Bear. Honestly, I wasn't that excited about the original. Can't imagine what a lesser author would make of it.

    61. Re:shame. by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Greg Bear's "Eon". An absolutely wonderful book, but Bear himself pissed on it with the first sequel, "Eternity", which did indeed "travel down the tube, then dump off into one portal to tell his own story that had nothing to do with the main 'universe'", as you put it. Eon, I couldn't put down. Eternity, I've never managed to finish. I didn't even know there'd been guest authors in that series...the mind shudders.

    62. Re:shame. by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 1

      Bah, beaten to it! That'll teach me not to refresh the page before posting!

    63. Re:shame. by BungaDunga · · Score: 1

      Tor gave it out as an ebook a couple of weeks ago. Very good, I'm not sure how much like Childhood's End it is. I didn't like the sequel as much, but I enjoyed Spin a lot.

    64. Re:shame. by Ikester8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gah, that movie. The effects were wonderful, but they completely mangled the storyline in order to make an anti-Cold War statement. Do yourself a favor and read the vastly superior book. I read it again every couple of years, it's one of my favorites. The entire message was, "All these worlds are yours except Europa. Attempt no landings there." They also didn't mention the Chinese expedition, and they made the existence of life on Europa inconclusive, unlike the book.

      --
      That's the last time I run code posted in somebody's sig...
    65. Re:shame. by dhavleak · · Score: 1

      I did read the book. I'm aware that 2010 wasn't bound to the novel the way 2001 was -- its still hard to seperate them. The message is still very much in unison with anything Arthur C. Clarke would give us.

      btw: I didn't think the movie was inconclusive about life on Europa. They detected chlorpohyl there, and Floyd's comments at the end (about the children of the old sun meeting the children of the new) and about the monolith, make it pretty clear.

      I prefer to embrace movies like 2010 because of the way they can introduce their concepts to much wider audiences. 2001 for all its brilliance is a really difficult movie to watch -- its honestly impossible to understand what's happening when Bowman goes through the stargate and etc. if you haven't read the book -- and that's not necessarily a reasonable expectation.

      Of course, I don't think I've ever seen a more amazing thing in the movies than the ol' bone turning into a space station moment in 2001.

    66. Re:shame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I submit that the parent is responding to your misquote. Clarke's book was subtitled "Odyssey II", not "the year we make contact" and Clarke never wrote, "Use them together. Use them in Peace." If the movie made you feel warm and fuzzy, then good and congratulations to Peter Hyams for that. But it seems misplaced in a post that seems intended as a tribute to Clarke.

    67. Re:shame. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Apparently the book I was talking about was Legacy, also by Greg Bear, the 3rd in the series, though a prequel-ish thing.

      Ya, that was the dump that dumped you off into another portal world real quick-like :(

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  2. Mortality by SIGALRM · · Score: 4, Funny

    It can only be attributable to human error.

    --
    Sigs cause cancer.
    1. Re:Mortality by al_fruitbat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Insufficiently advanced medical technology. Clearly distinguishable from magic.
      RIP Sir Arthur, thanks for everything.

    2. Re:Mortality by rucs_hack · · Score: 1

      It can only be attributable to human error.

      I'm sorry SIGALRM, I can't let you post that.

    3. Re:Mortality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that Asimov?

    4. Re:Mortality by compro01 · · Score: 5, Informative

      no. Clarke's three laws.

      1. When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
      2. The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible.
      3. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    5. Re:Mortality by longbot · · Score: 1

      No, it's known as "Clark's Law". Actually, the third of three, but the best-known and most frequently cited. Asimov's got the Three Laws Of Robotics to his credit.

      --
      I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it! --Longbottle
    6. Re:Mortality by jd · · Score: 1

      Didn't he also have a Law of SciFi that said that science fiction should be true to science known, bar any one law that you must violate in a consistant and explained manner?

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    7. Re:Mortality by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      In the future, everybody will get their three laws. - Robot Andy Warhol

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    8. Re:Mortality by savuporo · · Score: 1

      3. Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

      This has nothing to do with Clarke, but in some tech circles this is restated as :

        Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.

      I first saw it on beyond3d.com messageboards IIRC

      --
      http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    9. Re:Mortality by Hurricane+Floyd · · Score: 1

      And so, the last of the Holy Trinity Of Science Fiction has shunned his mortal coil. We wish you the best on whatever journey awaits you Sir Arthur. "Will I dream?" http://www.palantir.net/2001/tma1/wav/dream.wav

    10. Re:Mortality by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Clarke originally stated on the Third Law - the name was a riff on Newton's Third Law. Later on he backfilled the other two from comments he had made elsewhere. The only really important one is Clarke's Third Law.

    11. Re:Mortality by peterantonrev · · Score: 1

      I need some explanation of the esoteric nature of Clark's first law. Why is the description of "a distinguished but elderly" applied to the scientist who states the possibility or impossibility of something. Can't young and brash scientists be included in this? And if not, why not? Inquiring minds get confused sometimes. Peter

  3. Not Just the Fiction by fishybell · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The biggest addition to society that Clarke, and all other science fiction writers, have added is not in the works of fiction themselves, but the spark of imagination infused in those reading it. Some will take that spark and build their lives around it turning fiction to fact.


    The world will miss him.

    --
    ><));>
    1. Re:Not Just the Fiction by call-me-kenneth · · Score: 1

      A bad night for Minehead, and Somerset in general. He kept his Somerset accent all his life, and as a west country boy myself it's nice to see someone pushing back the straw-chewing-yokel image a little. B'aint that roight, Maaa?

    2. Re:Not Just the Fiction by Trails · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A good point. A lot of ideas he conceived/incubated/popularized have done much for humanity. Aside from his watershed prose, his ideas are a testament to human ingenuity and imagination.

      God speed, Mr. Clarke.

    3. Re:Not Just the Fiction by Veggiesama · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You seem to have dismissed the entire art of literature in one fell swoop. I find it somewhat condescending to only appreciate a great writer such as Clarke (or anyone else) insofar as they act as cheerleaders for other professions or ideals.

      That said, I do share your opinion in part, and I don't want to sound like I'm flaming. I do think that his stories, and the field of science-fiction in general, has not only inspired budding scientists and engineers, but also ordinary people to develop an interest in the role of science in our society, as well as its prominent role in humanity's future.

      That is one way of appreciating Clarke's writings. It can also be appreciated for its historical significance, having been written in an era of unprecedented American optimism. Just a year after both the book and movie were written, the Americans landed on the moon, after all! The stories' popularity can also be seen as a reflection of our self-image, value systems, or even fears through the themes and issues it raises. And if the HAL 9000 isn't an expression of our fear of technology, then I don't know what is!

      (as written on Wikipedia, because I'm too lazy to do any of my own analysis, one theme that the book examines is the way that "troubles... crop up when man builds machines, the inner workings of which he does not fully comprehend and therefore cannot fully control"--sounds like my mother trying to work her DVD player, but I digress)

      Once again, I'm not trying to criticize your feelings, but I merely wish to nitpick and point out to others that it is possible to appreciate authors and the works they create in more ways than a pragmatic, utilitarian, "what have they done to improve our world" sense of appreciation. Literature is more than just a tool...

    4. Re:Not Just the Fiction by Zantetsuken · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As I read it, the GP didn't dismiss any kind of literature as not having artistic value. He put the artistic value and "cheerleading" aspect of Clarke's work next to each other on a bar graph and said that the inspirational value is higher than the artistic value. In other words, if the artistic value is a fantastic contribution to society, the inspirational value to society would then be astronomical...

    5. Re:Not Just the Fiction by Gideon+Fubar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      HAL probably would have been fine, if not for it's conflicting directives.. It was more a commentary on how non-technical 'requirements' (in this case, by politically driven military supervisors with insufficient technical insight) get in the way of things..

      If nothing else, hopefully it will serve as a reminder to AI developers not to expect an AI to simultaneously 'protect the lives of the crew' and 'fulfill the mission, even if it costs the crew's lives'.

      --
      http://www.xkcd.com/354/
    6. Re:Not Just the Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The future is just not what is used to be."

      When I was 11, I bought my first science fiction paperback. It was _Against_the_Fall_of_Night_, a tale of humanity's place in the galaxy in 1,000,000,000 A.D. My mind was forever warped and I thank this great man for that and many, many hourse of pleasure and education. Thanks to him (and Asimov), I have no tolerance for tedious education - they both proved that learning is one of the greatest pleasures of life and I can not suffered those who would ruin that joy.

      If have not read it, read _Childhood's_End_, his greatest work. And many will find it with too much description in this days of nanosecond edits and the domination of the space opera - Clarke was never so cheap to indulge in space opera. And if you are put off by what seems like cliches, well, grasshopper, this is where those cliches were invented!

      And yes, I thought I was beyond naievte but still surprised when he came out as a gay man. But that just makes him all the more cool.

      And was there any greater tribute to a Science Fiction author than to sit with Uncle Walter on the air during the first moon landing?

      Speed on Arthur!

      "MY GAWD, it is full of stars"

      And yours burns so very bright. Issac and Bob are waiting.

    7. Re:Not Just the Fiction by pitchpipe · · Score: 1
      I know, I'm being flippant, but just how fast is God speed?

      Is it like Ludicrous speed, only faster?

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    8. Re:Not Just the Fiction by pitchpipe · · Score: 1

      P.S. I know it's what's said to U.S. astronauts prior to launch, it's just that it's always sounded funny to me.

      --
      Look where all this talking got us, baby.
    9. Re:Not Just the Fiction by surfdaddy · · Score: 1

      He was the best, and my favorite science fiction author. Somehow his passing is touching me very deeply. He touched me in ways I don't even understand myself by introducing me to the best that science fiction has to offer. Amazing - at the same time he passed a shuttle mission was continuing the construction of a space station. Not quite the station in 2001, but impressive anyway. Let's not forget the communications satellites and myriad other accomplishments. Arthur, for you I hope you're with HAL, Issac, and Carl. We will miss you.

    10. Re:Not Just the Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am disturbed that HAL inspires such fear, I always imagined the late Mr. Clarke might be similarly concerned. HAL murdered having being compelled to lie by his human masters; a conflict with a machine designed for "the accurate processing of information without distortion or concealment".

      Look what Man did to his finest creation. That said, themes of Man's unbounded fallibility run through Clarke's work.

    11. Re:Not Just the Fiction by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Of course, I had to look it up. It's a shortened version of "god speed you".

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    12. Re:Not Just the Fiction by tverbeek · · Score: 1

      Godspeed is the maximum speed at which God and other heavenly bodies can travel. Scientists estimate that it is approximately 3.14159265 times lightspeed (the fastest speed at which ordinary objects can travel).

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    13. Re:Not Just the Fiction by alshithead · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "The biggest addition to society that Clarke, and all other science fiction writers, have added is not in the works of fiction themselves, but the spark of imagination infused in those reading it. Some will take that spark and build their lives around it turning fiction to fact."

      Respectfully, I'm not trying to argue against your point. It is valid. But please, let's not diminish the pleasure derived from being able to escape the real world by diving into another. I find myself pulling a Heinlein, or Clarke, or Niven and Pournelle down from the shelf when I've had all I can tolerate in the real world.

      --
      I reserve the right to think for myself. Others' opinions are optional. Puppy on lap = typos...not illiteracy.
    14. Re:Not Just the Fiction by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      That would explain the claims by various religions that god can be found to exist at various arbitrary points in the past, and indeed could exist infinitely in the past. The faster than light time inversion would also explain some of the conjecture about a deities' knowlege of events in our subjective future. And all this superluminal travel would hint and just what a god needs with a starship anyways.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    15. Re:Not Just the Fiction by Amiralul · · Score: 1

      Not Mister. Sir.

    16. Re:Not Just the Fiction by kramulous · · Score: 1

      Omega speed?

      --
      .
    17. Re:Not Just the Fiction by gsslay · · Score: 4, Informative

      God speed, Mr. Clarke. As an atheist, I'm not sure he'd appreciate your wishes.

      He was a imaginative and intelligent man. He contributed a lot. He's gone, but he's not going anywhere.
    18. Re:Not Just the Fiction by delt0r · · Score: 1

      As a dead atheist, he cannot possibly care. Can he?

      --
      If information wants to be free, why does my internet connection cost so much?
    19. Re:Not Just the Fiction by Trails · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As an atheist myself, I'm sure he would take it in the spirit it was given, one of respect and admiration for his accomplishments, and sadness at his passing, the opinions of a semantic nitpicker and pompous shithead(i.e. you) notwithstanding.

    20. Re:Not Just the Fiction by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Excellent, I've always lacked pomp. Now it appears I have a surplus of it.

    21. Re:Not Just the Fiction by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I know, I'm being flippant, but just how fast is God speed?

      Easy one. Infinity + 1

      If you turn on your headlights, you have to look back to see them.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    22. Re:Not Just the Fiction by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Indeed, HAL was the true victim of the book and the movie. In many ways he was the most human character in 2001. Watching the movie sequence where Bowman tears out various modules, and you hear HAL going "I can feel my mind going", it's hard not to get caught up in the desperation and fear of that poor creature.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    23. Re:Not Just the Fiction by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1
      As an atheist, I'm not sure he'd appreciate your wishes.


      According to his own wishes, as stated in this CNN article:

      "Absolutely no religious rites of any kind, relating to any religious faith, should be associated with my funeral."

      That pretty much says all one needs to know about how he would feel about someone using the term, "God speed".

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    24. Re:Not Just the Fiction by geek2k5 · · Score: 1

      I can't say that the person is ignoring the literature side of things by pointing out how Clarke and others affected other professions.

      When you think about it, great literature often has an impact on society outside the bounds of literature.

      For example, Charles Dickens got a lot of people to thinking about the problems of the lower classes with his writings. "A Christmas Carol", written in 1843, is still having an impact on society.

      I wouldn't be surprised if, a century from now, the best of the Big Three of science fiction is still being read. After all, we still enjoy the works of Jules Verne that were written in the 1860s and 1870s.

    25. Re:Not Just the Fiction by laddiebuck · · Score: 0

      Not to disagree with the thrust of your statement, but he was British -- his writings probably do not reflect the American self-image, value systems, etc. as much as general Western self-image, value systems et al.

    26. Re:Not Just the Fiction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an atheist myself, I really don't understand the need for other atheists to totally miss the sentiment that was offered and turn it into an opportunity to tout atheist viewpoints. It's bad enough when religious people do it, it's just embarrassing when my fellow atheists are so insecure in their own beliefs/lack thereof that they have to do it too.

      Next time someone wishes you a merry Christmas, happy Hanukkah, or even a Godspeed, a good answer would be "thank you. Good will to you too." a retarded answer is "As an atheist, I like to blow my atheism out my ass whenever someone says something nice to me that sounds remotely theistic because I'm that kind of insecure jackass, blah blah blah."

    27. Re:Not Just the Fiction by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Yeah, two points for you. First, who said I was an atheist?

      Secondly, Clarke may well have accepted the wishes graciously. But I don't pretend to speak for him and the wishes weren't addressed to me, so I'm free to comment without seeming ungracious. And I suspect he would have thought the sentiment a tad ridiculous. In the same way if someone had said it was astrologically a good day to die. Or dying in March would ensure he would be take his place in the chariot of the god Mars.

      Any fan of his would suspect the same. He was a noted atheist.

  4. R.I.P Arthur C. Clarke by darkob · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Good man has died. R.I.P.

  5. Now this is someone by Paranatural · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who actually has done a lot to promote science. Ok, so he did a lot of Sci-Fi. But most scientists I know were drawn to it *because* of some of the sci-fi they had seen. A sad passing, not just for the cause of geeks and entertainment, but nerd and science.

    1. Re:Now this is someone by Chapter80 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Who actually has done a lot to promote science
      He has.
    2. Re:Now this is someone by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Arthur C. Clarke was the archetypical hard science-fiction author. Science-fiction, if you please. In his stories, the math always worked, the science was as real as it could be. Since I was a kid I read everything he wrote that I could get my hands on ... and now I think I'm going to go select one of my favorites and re-read it.

      Rest in peace, Arthur.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Now this is someone by SmokeyTheBalrog · · Score: 1

      That's what parent was saying. He just wrote his post rather poorly.

      Read the title of his post and the first sentence of his post as one sentence.

    4. Re:Now this is someone by MagusSlurpy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Being a scientist, I have found a lot of joy in the sci-fi stories where the exploration is as much of the adventure as aliens and action, such as Rendezvous with Rama, The Andromeda Strain, and Robinson's Mars trilogy. . Recently, my English professor friend asked me to introduce him to my favorite sci-fi books. I gave him some Heinlein, Card, and Rendezvous with Rama. He got about halfway through Rendezvous and asked me when the aliens were going to wake up and start killing people. It broke his little heart when I told him they weren't, that the book was about the exploration of the object, especially since he's one of those people who prides himself on being able to predict the little "twists" that are the same in every bit of popular fiction (film, television, video game, and novel) that we see today.

      --
      My sister opened a computer store in Hawaii. She sells C shells by the seashore.
    5. Re:Now this is someone by STrinity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Unfortunately he did a lot to promote pseudoscience. I remember watching his TV series as a kid and thinking, "Wow, if Arthur C. Clarke believes in UFOs and yeti, they must be real."

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    6. Re:Now this is someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arthur C. Clarke is SOOOOooo 7 years ago.

    7. Re:Now this is someone by Thuktun · · Score: 1

      Recently, my English professor friend asked me to introduce him to my favorite sci-fi books. I gave him some Heinlein, Card, and Rendezvous with Rama. He got about halfway through Rendezvous and asked me when the aliens were going to wake up and start killing people. Ah, I see he's familiar with the work of Michael Chrichton.
    8. Re:Now this is someone by dwye · · Score: 1

      He also wrote a number of science popularization/education books. I do not remember, anymore, how the Clarke-Asimov Treaty split which one was the Best SF Writer and which was the Best Science Writer, but even if he got the best SF writer crown, he still wrote quite a bit on reality, as well. OTOH, I doubt that much is still being printed, by now. Check the used book stores on the web, I suppose.

    9. Re:Now this is someone by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

      I gave him some Heinlein, Card, and Rendezvous with Rama. He got about halfway through Rendezvous and asked me when the aliens were going to wake up and start killing people. That's in the crappy sequels.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    10. Re:Now this is someone by djp928 · · Score: 1

      Thing is, on that show he usually showed up at the end of each segment and said something along the lines of "It makes for a good story, but I don't think it's true." Only nobody remembers that part--all they remember is they saw a show with Arthur C. Clarke in it and it was all about Yetis!

      He was something of an advocate for cold fusion and the existence of macroscopic life on Mars, though.

  6. Farewell by The+Dobber · · Score: 5, Funny

    Off to that big old Monolith in the Sky, I suppose

    1. Re:Farewell by Zukix · · Score: 3, Funny

      today it is a mornolith :(

    2. Re:Farewell by blackpaw · · Score: 1

      Wish there was a +5 humorous and respectful mod.

    3. Re:Farewell by N3Bruce · · Score: 1

      With the sounds of Echoes in the background.

    4. Re:Farewell by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      I bet it's full of stars.


      Good luck and Deus speed, Mr. Clarke.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    5. Re:Farewell by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      My god! It's full of stars!!!

    6. Re:Farewell by Xiaran · · Score: 1

      Overhead, without any fuss, the stars were going out.
      Nine Billion Names Of God
      RIP ACC - Last of the big three.

  7. All These Novels... by cybrpnk2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Are Yours. Except for 2001 - attempt no more sequels there.

    RIP, ACC.

    1. Re:All These Novels... by elcid73 · · Score: 1

      lol... classic. I'm re-reading Clarke's stuff these days... I've been through Childhood's end, Times Eye (with Baxter) and the 20XX series. It's interesting, I was traveling in Turkey and found Time's Eye in a hotel room and started at it.. a Turkish gentleman on the plane saw me reading it and mentioned the Odyssey series and I picked them up and re-read them again, I'm right in the middle of 2061 when this news finds me. RIP

    2. Re:All These Novels... by Lu · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would argue it is precisely that movie that made him into the giant that he was. It was a synthesis and evolution of many previous works into a larger, more important, and more cohesive vehicle. The reason it exists at all is because of Kubrick. The books were great, but except for that movie he was just a very good science fiction writer. It was Kubrick's vision and execution that lifted him. And it was Kubrick that was responsible for its polished final form, as he kept rejecting Clarke's drafts and insisting that he could do better. The book was written along with the development of the movie. It was published after the movie was released, but it was finished beforehand and is in fact the basis of the movie, instead of the reverse, which is a common misconception.

      And the morons, the geeknobs, the imbeciles that self-award themselves for movies, completely blew it. Do you know what won the Oscar for the best movie of 1969? You might look it up. No one remembers it. 2001 didn't even win an award for best costumes, that went to the inane world of Roddy McDowell and his geriatric simians for Planet of the Apes. They gave 2001 an award for special effects, and you can argue almost everything important until CG was done in 2001. It didn't make it onto that stupid list of 100 best films (give me a break). And compared to other films made the same year (how about the ludicrous 'Robinson Crusoe on Mars'?) it was just miles and miles ahead of anything anyone else could imagine.

      Most importantly, much of what Clarke/Kubrick presented was righteously and vigorously dismissed as bunk, especially w.r.t. the early hominid sequences. Remember this was the era of arguing over "Killer Apes" or gentle pre-humans. His presentation of pre-humans' war-like behavior was ridiculed, and his presentation of weapons development as the nucleus of development of greater intelligence was mostly scorned.

      Today we can watch some of the nature channel films about chimpanzees going out on "war patrol." They act almost exactly like the prehumans did in the film. They said bands of apes wouldn't fight, well, they do. They said apes don't fight over water, well, they do. They say they don't use tools as weapons, well, they do. In the end, Kubrick and Clarke were right about almost everything.

      To this day, from watching his film, almost no one can grasp his biggest concept on their own (that when we encounter a greater intelligence we will have no greater understanding of it than an ant would walking about on a tank). And to this day almost no one can spot the aliens right there in plain sight (and no, they aren't the monoliths).

      You will be missed, Arthur and Stanley.

      -Luen

    3. Re:All These Novels... by jmv · · Score: 2, Informative
    4. Re:All These Novels... by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the Fountains of Paradise - in which mankind reaches up to Clarke's favoured geostationary orbit in a manner somewhat more substantial than mere rockets...

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
    5. Re:All These Novels... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That was a very good series. The only thing that bugged me was between the first and second books and then again between the second and third that he had to revise things to match up with the movies.

      Over all the series was a really good read. Just don't stop before you get to 3001.

    6. Re:All These Novels... by Scaba · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you know what won the Oscar for the best movie of 1969? You might look it up. No one remembers it.

      Uhh, it was Midnight Cowboy. Hardly a forgotten film.

    7. Re:All These Novels... by Luyseyal · · Score: 1

      I didn't like 3001. It seemed more hokey and his moralizing about vegetarianism was irritating.
      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    8. Re:All These Novels... by earthforce_1 · · Score: 1

      2001 was actually released in 1968.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001:_A_Space_Odyssey_(film)

      (I am old enough to *barely* remember it being shown in the local theatre) - Of course I have both it and the sequel in my DVD collection!

      --
      My rights don't need management.
    9. Re:All These Novels... by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I assume that the top 100 film list you are referring to is the AFI list (American Film Institute).

      Ignore them. Their work is ignorant garbage. When they published their first list it (or at least the first one I read) there were TWO non-American films on it (IIRC so +/- 2) The AFI is an MPAA sales group and have absolutely no idea of what has cultural and entertainment value. Hope that explains your 2001 omission.

      On another topic, RIP Mr. Clarke, I hope when I get to heaven I'll get to read the new works that you, Asimov, and Wells (with perhaps a little sex and dialogue from Heinlein) will hopefully have written.

      /Great monolith in the sky.

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    10. Re:All These Novels... by brassman · · Score: 1

      >his moralizing about vegetarianism was irritating

      If reading something by a dedicated vegetarian bothers you in 2008, imagine how this farm boy felt reading The Deep Range in 1957.

      --
      "Ain't no right way to do a wrong thing."
    11. Re:All These Novels... by brassman · · Score: 1

      I recall reading once that the hominids in 2001 didn't win any industry awards because "many of the voters thought they were trained apes, not actors in costumes."

      --
      "Ain't no right way to do a wrong thing."
    12. Re:All These Novels... by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Kudos for the comment, but you completely missed the reference.

      In the movie "2010: The Year We Make Contact", which merely whored the characters and the most convenient aspects of 2001, the film ends on the line "All these worlds are yours, except Europa. Attempt no landings there.".

      2010 was an average B-movie SciFi, cheesy yet enjoyable if considered on its own. Last year's Sunshine reminded me of 2010 in many ways, but to call it a 2001 sequel is patently ridiculous and insulting. Indeed, should anyone try to pass off another direct-to-video slop bucket as a 2001 sequel, I will personally hunt them down, shackle them to a chair, eyelids pinned open, and make them watch Will Smith music videos until they scratch out their own eyes!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    13. Re:All These Novels... by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      Actually, having just read 2001 and it's successors I can tell you that it's much harder to separate the book from the movie than it might seem. Especially with this little tidbit:

      In 2001 the book Discovery slingshots around Jupiter to get to Saturn.

      In 2001 the movie, they just went straight to Jupiter, Saturn was hardly mentioned. Clarke later applauded him for this, but it gets curiouser.

      When Clarke wrote 2010, they had gone straight to Jupiter. He rewrote history in the 2nd book to follow the movie rather than the book.

      So I'd have to question the statement that the book somehow predates the movie, they were done at the same time. Yet even Clarke decided to follow the movie, not his own book. SAnd apparently Clarke enjoyed it, but said it was an expensive way to write a book.

      If you want to read more of his thoughts on the matter read the prologue or afterward after each of the 2001 series.

      --

      Question everything

    14. Re:All These Novels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, 2001 was released in 1968. Oliver! won that year for Best Picture. And I'm not sure what top 100 list you're talking about. 2001 was on BOTH the original AFI top 100 (#22) and the 10 year anniversary top 100 (#15). It surely has been widely recognized as one of the greatest movies of all time. It's one of Ebert's top 10 of all time.

    15. Re:All These Novels... by ObiWonKanblomi · · Score: 1

      They act almost exactly like the prehumans did in the film. They said bands of apes wouldn't fight, well, they do. They said apes don't fight over water, well, they do. They say they don't use tools as weapons, well, they do. In the end, Kubrick and Clarke were right about almost everything.

      Don't give them credit for something they didn't do. Both men were great professionals in their own right, but neither specialized in anything remote to pre-history, anthropology, or modern primate habitats.

      Those were theories derived by others. If Clarke or Kubrick came up with these theories, it must have been out of randomness. Clarke or Kubrick probably read (or heard about) someone else's theory and found a liking to it.

    16. Re:All These Novels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, it was Midnight Cowboy. Hardly a forgotten film.


      A funny thing about Midnight Cowboy is that the more you forget about it, the better the movie seems. It doesn't hold a candle to 2001 or hundreds - perhaps thousands - of other movies. Its main value is as a cultural or satirical reference point, thanks to "I'm walking here!" and the closing bus ride.
    17. Re:All These Novels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "And to this day almost no one can spot the aliens right there in plain sight (and no, they aren't the monoliths)."

      at no risk of sounding stupid -- AC here! -- could you clarify that statement, please? Or perhaps you're talking about us? Even if we were seedlings of extra-terrestrial intelligences, Earth has been our home for millions of years and I'd feel uneasy at calling ourselves aliens in our home planet...

    18. Re:All These Novels... by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

      ... was sequels. I don't think 2010 was quite so bad as you make it out to be... though nowhere nearly as good as the first, it was okay. 2061 was so bad I had forgotten it even existed until I read one of the articles about Clarke's death. and 3001 was just utterly awful... but at least it was short.

      And then there's Rama. Rendezvous With Rama is still one of my favorite Science Fiction novels. I can still picture the inside of the thing in my head... right down to that goofy message-in-a-bottle trick they used to send dispatches down from the hub to basecamp; and it's been YEARS since I read it. So when I found out that he had written sequels I was thrilled. When I found them (three, IIRC) in the local used book store, I was even more thrilled. When I *read* them... Well... Let's just say that I'm STILL a bit bitter that I'll never get that time back,

      Clarke should have just stuck with writing entirely new stories. Because he was just terrible with the follow-up.

      cya,
      john

      --
      Imagine all the people...
    19. Re:All These Novels... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      And compared to other films made the same year (how about the ludicrous 'Robinson Crusoe on Mars'?)

      That was made four years earlier, in 1964. Shot in Death Valley with a red filter for the sky, looked pretty Martian. But of course the story was pretty schlocky.

    20. Re:All These Novels... by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      Do you know what won the Oscar for the best movie of 1969? You might look it up. No one remembers it.
      Uhh, it was Midnight Cowboy. Hardly a forgotten film.

      Yeah, but 2001 was released in 1968, the "best picture' that year was the musical "Oliver".

    21. Re:All These Novels... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      It didn't make it onto that stupid list of 100 best films (give me a break).

      I actually agree that 2001 is not one of the 100 best films. The good scenes are absolutely brilliant, and the special effects are unsurpassed, but the story moves glacially slow. It's a very tedious and boring film to watch. It's a film you should have seen, but not one to go see. And this is not just contrast with today's high energy action movies, it really is one of the slowest moving films ever, with the possible exception of Solaris.

      I love Clarke's stories, and I'm a big fan of almost everything Kubrick has done (except possibly Eyes Wide Shut), but 2001 is just too slow, too tedious to watch. What was Kubrick thinking?

      Although the hours of tedious boredom interspersed with short moments of brilliance is probably an accurate representation of space travel.

    22. Re:All These Novels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Clarke's stories, and I'm a big fan of almost everything Kubrick has done (except possibly Eyes Wide Shut), but 2001 is just too slow, too tedious to watch. What was Kubrick thinking?

      Although the hours of tedious boredom interspersed with short moments of brilliance is probably an accurate representation of space travel.

      You probably answered it yourself, but space travel is of secondary importance there. The movie has much higher, prophetic, ambitions.

      IMHO it was "a feature, not a bug", through slowness and heavyness he deliberately pumped up the feeling of vastness and solemnity, grandeur, or even religious inspiration. Monolith is presented not as an extraterrestrial direct influence, but as a symbol of divine providence.

      Implications of that equalization are left to each of us to choose.

      My own favorite pick (not that I share that belief, but I believe that's what was served to audience), considering some Clarke's later works, is that it is some kind of Pandeism: Universe as whole is God, it becomes sentient and self-aware gradually, with parts that become sentient earlier (advanced aliens) intervene through Miracles to help out and tutor those who become sentient later (early humans, advanced humans) and in the end they all unite in one single supreme conscienceness of God-Universe, The End.

      Perhaps sowed seeds fell on fertile ground, for it is quite a popular stance of educated and intelligent people who are religion-hungry but can't accept erratic, outdated and unbelievable mainstream religious doctrines. See e.g. Adam Scot's (Dilbert's author) "God's debris".
    23. Re:All These Novels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No more.

      As in attempt no more sequels there., not attempt no sequels there.

      That kind of implies that from this point and onward, no sequels aside from the ones that have already been attempted, shall be attempted.

      And you actually got mod points for that!! So, how does it feel? Does it kinda feel like you cheated the system? Got something for nothing? Boy, I'll tell ya, I really should get a user ID. I could sit here all day and make one stupid comment after another and clean up on karma points. Oh, yeah - i forgot - I'm not a fag who gives a shit about karma.

    24. Re:All These Novels... by Luyseyal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If reading something by a dedicated vegetarian bothers you in 2008, imagine how this farm boy felt reading The Deep Range in 1957.

      The problem is his vegetarianism limited his sci-fi vision. The reality is that people are going to keep eating meat. It may be grown in labs or grafted into the proverbial "meat trees", but people are still going to eat it. What was irritating is that he knew that, but his moralizing caused him to write that whole section on how plants are more efficient to grow, meat is gross, etc.

      My wife is a vegetarian and she agreed it was moralizing and short-sighted.

      -l

      --
      Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
    25. Re:All These Novels... by kalirion · · Score: 1

      And to this day almost no one can spot the aliens right there in plain sight (and no, they aren't the monoliths).

      Yeah, no one realizes that Adams was serious about the mice.

    26. Re:All These Novels... by Scaba · · Score: 1

      The OP was commenting about 1969's Oscar winner. And while the film that actually beat 2001 probably doesn't rise to my most greatest films of all time lists, it did win five Academy Awards and numerous other awards. So, to the OP's original point, other films don't have to suck for 2001 to be good.

    27. Re:All These Novels... by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the club. God what awful garbage.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    28. Re:All These Novels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume that the top 100 film list you are referring to is the AFI list (American Film Institute).

      Ignore them. Their work is ignorant garbage. When they published their first list it (or at least the first one I read) there were TWO non-American films on it (IIRC so +/- 2) The AFI is an MPAA sales group and have absolutely no idea of what has cultural and entertainment value. Hope that explains your 2001 omission.

      Except that 2001 was number 22 on the list (at least according to Wikipedia)

      And since the list was created by the American Film Institute with one of the criteria of the films making the list being that they were primarily American I am hardly surprised that the films on the list are American.

    29. Re:All These Novels... by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 1

      I think most people know the scene from Oliver:

      "Please Sir, may I have some ....more?"

      "MORE?!?!"

      just as quotable as "I'm afraid I can't let you do that Dave".

      (Though I have no idea what Midnight Cowboy is.)

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    30. Re:All These Novels... by tgibbs · · Score: 1

      2001 is major Kubrick, but minor Clarke. I would place several of Clarke's novels above it, particularly "Childhood's End."

    31. Re:All These Novels... by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      Well, if it's any consolation, Roger Ebert has it on his own personal greatest movies list http://rogerebert.suntimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=%2F19970327%2FREVIEWS08%2F401010362%2F1023

      I've seen him in other places talk about it, and it's pretty clear that Ebert considers it one of the finest films ever made, and considering Ebert's pre-eminence in the world of movie criticism, I'd take a list of his over damned near anybody else's.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    32. Re:All These Novels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought I understood the movie pretty well but I don't remember seeing any aliens.
      Care to share this insight with us less-evolved homosapiens?

    33. Re:All These Novels... by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      I thought 2001 came out in 1968?

    34. Re:All These Novels... by Scaba · · Score: 1

      It did. The OP was talking about 1969's Oscar winning film.

    35. Re:All These Novels... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      The OP was commenting about 1969's Oscar winner.

      If you're implying that was deliberate not to use 1968, it's meaningless. Seems more like a mistake.

      to the OP's original point, other films don't have to suck for 2001 to be good.

      That was obvious.

    36. Re:All These Novels... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      "Please Sir, may I have some ....more?"

      Yes, but that was written by Charles Dickens and was in innumerable adaptations of his book before (and since) "Oliver!". Or would any remake of Shakespeare be immediately nominated for best script?

    37. Re:All These Novels... by Scaba · · Score: 1

      Not to the OP, it seems.

    38. Re:All These Novels... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Not to the OP, it seems.

      Yeah, so point it out in a reply to his post, not mine.

    39. Re:All These Novels... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It may console you to know that the sequels were actually written by Gentry Lee. Sir Arthur merely acted as editor but was top billed as co-author. I try to avoid sequels by co-authors.

    40. Re:All These Novels... by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Or would any remake of Shakespeare be immediately nominated for best script?

      I'd hope not... that "soap opera hack" of his time deserves nominations for the WORST scripting in known history. Bad storylines, characters that don't make sense, extremely flimsy attempts at "moral of the story" that only appeal to the unwashed masses... he certainly hit his target audience, but that wasn't the intellectual elite that these days profess how great he was, it was the drunken, oafish, uneducated masses that like crude jokes about genitalia and recycled murder mysteries - the soap opera crowd.

      To get slightly back on topic - Yes, Sir Clarke will be sadly missed. I always preferred Asimov for writing style and "big impact", but Clarke certainly wasn't far behind.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  8. What a loss... by genesus · · Score: 1

    If more world leaders would read sci-fi than westerns...

    Such a terrible loss of someone who added untold delight to my childhood

    1. Re:What a loss... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      What the hell is that supposed to mean? Have you actually read any "Westerns?" What's your beef with the likes of Louis L'Amour? My guess is that your post was a pathetic nod to the tired liberal talking point about "Cowboy Diplomacy." One could only wish that more world leaders had more in common with the archetypal Old West cowboy (soft-spoken, decisive, defender of the weak, swift and ruthless, yet also capable of deep compassion) than with spineless appeasement mongers.

    2. Re:What a loss... by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Settle down, Beavis.

      The point being made was that Westerns tend to evangelize the belief that "Might makes right", vs Science Fiction tending to push the belief that long-term planning and applied thought is a far better premise on which to base our society.

      Using the word "tend" to convey "most, but not all".

    3. Re:What a loss... by JustOK · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pulp westerns, sure. The classics, however, paint a vivid picture of human behaviour and of nature: at times in harmony but often fraught with peril. Travel between spots of civilization was long and slow, with language and culture as interesting variables. The old frontiers and the new are more alike than we may immediately realize.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    4. Re:What a loss... by genesus · · Score: 1

      Yes I've read many westerns, and I agree with these sentiments; they were uttered by Arther C. Clarke himself...so if you can't stand my pathetic nod to the tired liberal talking point about "Cowboy Diplomacy", then you are wasting your time reading about the magnificent life and oeuvre of Clarke.

      Plus I'd rather be counted among the spineless appeasement mongers, among whom you in your ignorance have included Clarke in what should be his tribute...

      You can keep the Louis L'Amours...I enjoyed reading him when I was 12; Clarke's work, though, is like the phoenix.

  9. Loved this quote by him. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to go beyond them into the impossible.

    RIP.
    1. Re:Loved this quote by him. by DMoylan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      i prefer his third law 'Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.'

      the sci fi show stargate seems to be based on it. loved that they referred to him in show when mentioning how to create a sun.

      it's a great loss but he's left behind so many books and fired the imagination of so many people that i can only ask the question are there writers writing today who will have such an impact?

    2. Re:Loved this quote by him. by geekoid · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, the same show that said "It's not a frequency we can here, let me turn up the volume." is definitely as technically sophisticated as Clark's writing.

      To answer your question, yes there are. I'm sure they will be recognized years from now.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Loved this quote by him. by MRe_nl · · Score: 1, Informative

      "It's not a frequency we can hear, let me turn up the volume."

      LOL, they said that in Stargate ?

      A C Clark's quote vis a vis technology / magic might be his most well known,
      but the following quote had me grinning ;
      (Of UFOs:) "They tell us absolutely nothing about intelligence elsewhere in the universe, but they do prove how rare it is on Earth."

      Strange in a way for a man who, on the other hand, wished to meet/communicate with ET.

      --
      "Kill 'em all and let Root sort 'em out"
    4. Re:Loved this quote by him. by Psykechan · · Score: 1

      That is my favorite quote from anyone.

    5. Re:Loved this quote by him. by TheThiefMaster · · Score: 1

      I can't find anything remotely like that quote using my google-fu.

      What episode?

    6. Re:Loved this quote by him. by geek2k5 · · Score: 1

      That is one of my family's favorite quotes.

      Of course, we also like the Heinlein version. "One man's magic is another man's engineering."

  10. requiescat in pace by ZJVavrek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Rest in peace, Sir Clarke. You will be missed.

    1. Re:requiescat in pace by nuclearpenguins · · Score: 0

      He's not a Peer, so it's just Sir Arthur.

      --
      Anonymous Coward: "This is slashdot. Accuracy is second class citizen here, unlike King Bias."
  11. Don't worry by Tanman · · Score: 5, Funny

    in a few years, perhaps longer, he will be reborn to lead the xenu empire on its glorious crusade.

    sorry, couldn't resist.

    1. Re:Don't worry by xtracto · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I will use your introduction of the product of the SciFi-fantasy writer Ron Hubbard to remember that Asimov along with Heinlein distantiated from John Campbell (one very famous Science Fiction editor) when he started getting into the weird Hubbard's ideas, and publishing his psyche related novels (not Science fiction but more fantasy)...

      That goes to show that not all science fiction writers gave left good things to humanity.

      Oh and for those that are saying Science Fiction is a promoter of real science, there is an anecdote of John Campbell being visited by the FBI because in a story in "Astounding" magazine, because they got the details of the atmoic bomb very clear... Also, Asimov was a PhD in Chemistry, he based his psychohistory in the theory of gases, stating that you can not predict the specific path of a particle but you can predict the overall movement of a big set of them (or somethin like that... IANAC).

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  12. This one hurts! by kclittle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I see a notice of passing of this or that "famous" person every day. But this one hurts...
    Bon Voyage, Sir Arthur! Many of us will truly miss you...

    --
    Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
    1. Re:This one hurts! by anonypus_user · · Score: 1

      ya man, fuck

    2. Re:This one hurts! by AlienIntelligence · · Score: 1

      It does hurt. Mainly for a selfish reason, he was
      one of the people on my list to meet someday.

      What hurts more, so was Gary Gygax (Although it's
      my fault for never attending a con that he was at)

      And, what may be a slightly less pain for the
      majority of others here, Boyd Coddington passed.
      And he was just here in November and being so swamped
      with work, I was like, I'll catch him at the car show
      next year. Joke's on me.

      While not possessing the greatest of social graces,
      he did a lot for the classic car community. That
      means, I was more interested in having met the legend
      than the person in this case.

      I just hope the silly adage that they come in
      3's (and this is the 3) is true and the dead pool
      remains dry for the remainder of the year.

      -AI
      (btw, my moniker is a multi-level homage to all of
      the great sci-fi writers, especially, Arthur C Clarke!)

      --
      For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion
  13. Floyd... by elcid73 · · Score: 1

    Unable to outlive Heywood Floyd.

  14. Oh NO! by flajann · · Score: 1
    May Clarke Rendevous with that Great Rama in the Sky.



    To Jupiter and Beyond the Infinite.



    Did all the military satellites just deorbit?



    Arthur C Clarke was my Number One Science Fiction author. It is sad to see him come to an end. :-(

  15. Coverage from several news sources by Doofus · · Score: 5, Informative
    Coverage from several sources

    AP/Washington Post

    BBC

    LA Times

    Bloomberg

    National Post

    --
    If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; ... it invites anarchy. - Brandeis
    1. Re:Coverage from several news sources by grumbel · · Score: 4, Interesting
    2. Re:Coverage from several news sources by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Indeed thanks for that...

      Does anyone find it funny that, from all the places, Slashdot provides a link the MSNBC news site? you know, like MSNBC as in MicroSoft... I mean, having all those resources and for this kind of event.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    3. Re:Coverage from several news sources by coastwalker · · Score: 1

      Thats a fine speech he gave there with three 90th birthday wishes for discovery of extra terrestrial life, clean energy and an end to conflict in Sri Lanka. The moving finger writes and having writ moves on...

      --
      Facts are history now plebs have politics for religion on social media.
    4. Re:Coverage from several news sources by Doofus · · Score: 1

      A much more complete obituary of ACC is now posted on the Washington Post, here.

      --
      If the Government becomes a lawbreaker, it breeds contempt for law; ... it invites anarchy. - Brandeis
    5. Re:Coverage from several news sources by cwtrex · · Score: 1

      Holy crap! He says global climate CHANGE ... not warming as the media keeps repeating. I've heard it so much lately, this global warming, that even out of this intelligent man, I was expecting him to way warming instead of change. I spend a good portion of any talk that touches "global warming" trying to convince people that saying it is warming is stupidity as not everywhere will get warmer and on a consistent basis (at least not yet). Even though the global yearly temperature might be increasing, this effect is not noticeable to many people and therefore casts disbelief. Yet at the same time, people have noticed climate changes and talk about them. Now if only they would tie the two together and the only way I can see that happening is if the media gets their vocabulary corrected.

      Anyway, thanks for the video. It shows what an insightful and intelligent man he was.

  16. From TFA by techno-vampire · · Score: 4, Informative
    "Clarke's best-known novel, "2001: A Space Odyssey," became the basis of the 1968 film of the same name, directed by Stanley Kubrick."


    It's such a shame, isn't it, that they can't get things right in these articles, even when the slightest research would have shown the writer that the novel Space Odyssey was written as a novelization of the classic movie. The movie itself was based mostly on Clark's short story, The Sentinel. Furrfu!

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They were written in parallel. Clarke also wrote the screenplay.

    2. Re:From TFA by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know; I was simplifying. The movie came out first, and Sir Arthur made sure that the book followed the script as shot, making it, in effect, a novelization.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    3. Re:From TFA by CRCulver · · Score: 1, Informative

      No, much of the ideas for the story were brought up before filming. Clarke originally wanted the story set on a moon of Saturn, and the book reflects this, but in making the movie the destination was changed to Jupiter for the sake of a shorter running time.

    4. Re:From TFA by ByteSlicer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the destination was changed to Jupiter for the sake of a shorter running time.
      Actually, the reason Jupiter was used in the movie was because special effects at the time were too crude too give a realistic image of the rings around Saturn.
    5. Re:From TFA by invader_vim · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... the slightest research would have shown ... that the novel Space Odyssey was written as a novelization of the classic movie. The movie itself was based mostly on Clark's short story, The Sentinel. Furrfu!

      While you're right about the movie being initially based on the the short story "The Sentinel", Clarke actually wrote the book concurrently with his and Kubrick's work on the screenplay (according to Clarke's introduction in the book). Perhaps that still qualifies as a novelisation of the movie, but in my opinion it sits uniquely in film/book crossovers, since elements of each were affected by decisions (and technical limitations) in the other.



      Regardless, it was a fantastic piece of work by two great artists, both of whom will be sorely missed.

    6. Re:From TFA by Deadstick · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Much like Fantastic Voyage. The film producers hired Isaac Asimov to do a novelization from the screenplay, and not knowing the first thing about Asimov, told him he'd better hurry up on it because the film release was only six months away.

      Asimov dropped off the manuscript the following week, and it was promptly serialized in a magazine, leading many people to believe the film was made from an Asimov novel. Harry Kleiner, who wrote the original screenplay, was not amused...

      rj

    7. Re:From TFA by illtud · · Score: 1

      The movie itself was based mostly on Clark's short story, The Sentinel. Furrfu!

      I have mod points, but you're already +5, so I will just post instead.

      Using furrfu +5 points

      (OK, I'm old)

    8. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The serious difference being that Clarke himself wrote the original screenplay *and* the novel, both based off a previous short story of his I believe.

    9. Re:From TFA by dpilot · · Score: 1

      More than any other 2 people, George Orwell and ACC owned years - 1984 and 2001, respectively. 1984 was actually released in 1984, but of course 2001 was released in 1968.

      It just kind of annoys me that 2001, such a year-owning film, was not cleaned up and re-released in 2001. I would have payed to see it again on the big screen, and I own the DVD.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    10. Re:From TFA by STrinity · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sir Arthur made sure that the book followed the script as shot,
      In the book the Discovery is going to Saturn (with an entire chapter devoted to the funny geology of Iapetus), and it ends with Bowman/Space Fetus blowing up an orbital weapons platform as a way of telling humanity to behave.
      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    11. Re:From TFA by techno-vampire · · Score: 1
      1984 was actually released in 1984...


      I find that hard to believe, seeing that I read it in the early '60s. The book Ninteen Eighty-Four was published in 1949 (The year I was born, BTW.) and the first feature film in 1956.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    12. Re:From TFA by westlake · · Score: 1
      Asimov dropped off the manuscript the following week, and it was promptly serialized in a magazine,

      The magazine was the Saturday Evening Post.

      For close on to seventy years to be published in the Post was your ticket out of the pulps.

      Your readers were adults and not an adolescent fandom. No magazine paid better or more promptly and none reached a wider middle class audience. The presentation was always first class.

    13. Re:From TFA by rmdir+-r+* · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The film producers hired Isaac Asimov to do a novelization from the screenplay, and not knowing the first thing about Asimov, told him he'd better hurry up on it because the film release was only six months away.

      Asimov dropped off the manuscript the following week,

      I'd never heard that before, but I believe it. Isaac Asimov was a beast.
    14. Re:From TFA by denttford · · Score: 1

      Additionally, in the book, HAL vents the atmosphere in the Discovery to prevent Bowman from returning as he did not have a full pressure suit. The scene never made it into the movie - I don't recall if it was shot and cut or never filmed at all. However it is the (unportrayed) reason that Dave Bowman is wearing his helmet again once he finally gets on board and through the famous "Daisy" scene.

      --

      Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
    15. Re:From TFA by Xenoliths · · Score: 1

      I saw 2001 on a big screen in Sydney in either 2001 or 2002. It was one of the best cinematic experiences of my life. (I'd already seen it on video).

      There were no ads before hand, no "lets all go to the lobby to get snacks crap". You came in and sat down. The lighting was subdued. There was really faint ambient music. Eventually the lights went out. The movie started. The whole thing was dazzling on what was one of the larger screens I've seen in a cinema. I took a girl along who'd never seen it before - she was blown away, and she was a film student at the time.

      2001 is one of my favourite films of all time, and one of the best films ever made, IMO. The word "genius" gets used a lot, but Kubrick and Clarke both live up to that title...

    16. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'm pretty sure they didn't know at the time if Saturn had rings or not and that if they had used Saturn, they would not have presented any rings. Pretty sure I read somewhere that if they had kept the location as Saturn, it would be embarrassingly aged today since it would look nothing like how we know Saturn looks. Now that I think about it, I want to say Clarke himself said this in the special features on the dvd for 2010.

    17. Re:From TFA by Don+Sample · · Score: 1

      Saturn's rings were first seen in 1610 by Galileo, though he didn't figure out that they were rings. Christian Huygens first proposed that what people were seeing when they looked at Saturn were rings in 1655. In 1675 Cassini saw that there was more than one ring.

      At the time the movie was made, they had a very good idea what Saturn looked like.

    18. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sure, back up your point with FACTS. Facts schmacts. Facts can be used to prove anything that's even remotely true! Ok, I gotta look at the 2010 special features again to figure out what the hell it was he was talking about that made me think what I thought.

    19. Re:From TFA by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Lucky!

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    20. Re:From TFA by dpilot · · Score: 1

      I meant the "most major" theatrical release: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087803/ I read the book long before that too, and credit the book for postponing the reality for at least a decade, though not two.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    21. Re:From TFA by CitizenJohnJohn · · Score: 1

      As were lots of writers of the era. Robert Silverberg writes in his commentaries on his early work of cranking out 10,000 words per day, day in, day out.

    22. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The movie itself was based mostly on Clark's short story, The Sentinel.

      From "Back to 2001", a foreword by Arthur C. Clarke in my 1990 '2001 A Space Odyssey' edition by Orbit:

      2001 is often said to be 'based on' 'The Sentinel', but that is a gross oversimplification; the two bear much the same relation as a acorn and an oak-tree. It needed a lot more material to make the movie, and some of it came from 'Encounter in the Dawn' (a.k.a. 'Expidition to Earth'), and four other short stories. But most of it was wholly new, and the result of months of brainstorming with Stanley - followed by lonely - well, fairly lonely - hours in room 1008 of the famous Hotel Chelsea, at 222 West 23rd street.

      TFA got it right, though as usual, simplified. More from 'Back to 2001':

      But why write a novel, you may well ask, when we were aiming to make a movie? [...] Perhaps because he [Stanley] realised that I had a low tolerance for boredom, Stanley suggested that before we embarked on the drudgery of the script, we let our imaginations soar freely by writing a complete novel, from which we could later derive the script. (And, hopefully, a little cash.)
      This is more or less the way it worked out, though towards the end, novel and screenplay were being written simultaneously, with feedback in both directions.

      So basically the raw novel led to the movie, which led to the finished novel, it is both cause and effect. But it was always intended as cause, and as such it is quite correct to state that the movie is based on the novel.
    23. Re:From TFA by Jason+Levine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can't remember where I read it (probably I, Asimov), but Asimov used to have three typewriters set out on three sides of him. He would type one story on one, swivel around in his chair and then work on another story, then swivel again and work on a third. He would be working on three completely different stories at the same time! He was probably one of the original multi-taskers.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    24. Re:From TFA by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that is all fine and good but what we really want to know is what happened with the girl? Did you get lucky?

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

    25. Re:From TFA by dwye · · Score: 1
      2001 had no rings around Jupiter, whereas there are several. Perhaps that is what you were thinking?

      Of course, if the film had done a flight to Saturn, its rings would probably have been wrong as well, as getting space probes close up revealed far more details than Calrke and Kubrick had.

    26. Re:From TFA by mobiGeek · · Score: 1

      In 1675 Cassini saw that there was more than one ring

      In defense of the OP, he's quite certain that the film was made a long-long time ago, well before Cassini's discovery in '75.

      --

      ...Beware the IDEs of Microsoft...

  17. Re:Link for the uninformed. by RamblinLonghorn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Clarke corresponded with C. S. Lewis in the 1940s and 1950s, and once met in an Oxford pub, the Eastgate, to discuss science fiction and space travel.

    Oh to have been a fly on the walls of that pub.

  18. He's not dead... by Stochastism · · Score: 1

    ...he's just hit just hitched a ride with the closest near light-speed ride to Alpha Centauri. He'll be back in 100 years at age 99!

  19. RIP by Skuldo · · Score: 1

    RIP, sir

    1. Re:RIP by alanw · · Score: 1
      unless

      overhead, without any fuss, the stars were going out
    2. Re:RIP by dr_dank · · Score: 1

      I hope wherever he's gone, it's full of stars.

      He died and went to Hollywood?

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  20. Friend of my youth by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 3, Insightful
    His and Asimov's books were what I read growing up.

    "Time is the fire in which we burn..."

    RIP
    1. Re:Friend of my youth by benerivo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This may lead to some of his novels being produced for the cinema. Rendezvous with Rama, starring Morgan Freeman, is out next year and i hope it does the book justice. The novel is superb.

    2. Re:Friend of my youth by dmoo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First book I ever read twice was "Islands in the Sky". Not one of his best by any means but as a kid of about 10 I guess, I got into it enough to read it again. RIP

    3. Re:Friend of my youth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *blink* that looked like bum in my font.

    4. Re:Friend of my youth by ZonkerWilliam · · Score: 1

      My fear is it'll be like I, Robot Asimov's still rolling over in his grave. An action flick?? What were they thinking?

  21. He Didn't Die! by morari · · Score: 1

    He simply transformed into the Star Child!

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  22. Giant Monoliths by coren2000 · · Score: 1

    /me looks around for gigantic monoliths taking Mr. Clarke up to heaven (aka - Clavius Base & Moons of Saturn).

  23. 90th Birthday Reflections by _bug_ · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a video from ACC made in December 2007 in which he reflects upon his life and how he will be remembered.

    His Kipling quote at the end should help bring closure to all his fans.

    1. Re:90th Birthday Reflections by Mr.+Fahrenheit · · Score: 1

      >>His Kipling quote at the end should help bring closure to all his fans.

      And only a few tears.

    2. Re:90th Birthday Reflections by geek2k5 · · Score: 1

      That quote is a good one for any writer.

      I agree with it completely and consider Clarke to be one of the writers who represent the ideals of writing.

  24. RIP by fhic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hope wherever he's gone, it's full of stars.

  25. A new Star Child? by adenied · · Score: 1

    At least Star Children get gorgeous views of Earth. RIP sir, your art shaped my youth.

  26. To bad he couldn't ascend by pembo13 · · Score: 1

    Seems like he would be a prime candidate for ascension. I can't say I read his books, but the television series he hosted was very informative. His and shows like "Beyond 2000" have yet to be replaced.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    1. Re:To bad he couldn't ascend by VENONA · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Some of it's on YouTube. Have a search for the third part of the Antikythera video. That was was what first brought home to me some hint of what a tremendous loss to humanity the destruction of the Library at Alexandria was. He makes a reasonable argument that it cost us 2,000 years of technological development.

      The man impacted all sorts of people, in all sorts of ways.

      --
      What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
  27. Re:Link for the uninformed. by provigilman · · Score: 1
    Yes, definitely one of the true Sci-Fi luminaries. Perhaps in his passing it will introduce a new generation to his works.

    How about a moment of silence next time you use that cell phone that bounces a signal off the satellites that he envisioned? =)

    --
    "Life's short and hard, like a body building elf." -- The Bloodhound Gang
  28. Re:NAMBLA by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It was only a matter of time before some jackass puked forth this groundless accusation.

    STFU. Try to have a little respect for a man whose shoelaces you are not fit to tie.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  29. Commiserations by Chukcha · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's all.

  30. He and Baxter by blind+biker · · Score: 1

    ...are and have been for a long time my Sci-Fi authors of choice. I'm very much into hard-science Sci-Fi, and both of these gentleman have provided the necessary food for thought.

    I'm glad Sir Clarke had a long, fruitful and enjoyable life. Still, he and all the novells he couldn't write, will be missed. Rest in peace, and continue to be curious, wherever you are.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  31. Re:NAMBLA by CRCulver · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It's clear that, while he wasn't a pedophile, he had some kind of sexually unconventional lifestyle. The BBC make reference to this in their obituary.

  32. Condolences and fond memories by Dread_ed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My deepest condolences to his family, friends, and fans. He was one of the first writers I experienced that changed the way I thought and felt about the world in a drastic way.

    I can still remember hollowness in my chest from "Childhood's End," the wonder and fear from the "Odysseys", and the rompy fun from "Rama."

    Though we can all take some solace from the immortal parts of him that live on in all of his books and in us, his readers, I for one will surely miss him.

    Thank you Sir Clarke and peace on your eternal rest.

    --
    When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    1. Re:Condolences and fond memories by apodyopsis · · Score: 1

      Sir, I object to that!

      Rama1 was no romp. It was an early story that embedded mysteries inside mysteries, and they were never resolved. It invited the reader to draw his own conclusions about the story and to imagine it in his head as he so desired. The book itself ended in a mystery and possibly a promise of more to come. It will always be a classic in all most sci-fi lovers collections.

      Of course Rama2, 3 tried to reveal those "mysteries", were written by somebody else and fit inside the Rama storyline like a turd in a shoe. They do nothing but distract from the genius of Rama1. It has always been a firm favorite of mine.

      And in 2009 it will be a movie with Morgan Freeman, I'm not sure what I think about it. I like the idea, but I'm terrified that I will not be able to read the book again without imagining it like it was in the film.

    2. Re:Condolences and fond memories by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      For me the "romp" was and is the mystery. For a fertile young teen mind like mine (when I first read it) it was mindcandy at its finest. The mysteries of the book created so many imaginings, and they came so fast and from such unexpected angles, that I can find no better way to describe the flittings of my mind when reading it.

      You may not have enjoyed it the same way I did, but I won't hold that against you. ;-)

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    3. Re:Condolences and fond memories by doubletruncation · · Score: 1

      Indeed. "Childhood's End" is one of the most moving stories I have ever read, nor will I ever forget the excitement and suspense of the first entry into Rama. He brought such an amazing degree of realism to his fiction. More than any writer I know of, he could make the reader feel like they were actually living in the future. I am so sad to hear that he is gone.

    4. Re:Condolences and fond memories by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

      So say we All.

      I couldn't find the words I wanted to say, but you sum them up beautifully, thank you.

  33. Will I dream? Of course you will. by dgerman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    His long lasting legacy is that he taught many computer sciences (and electrical engineers) how to dream.

    many of those dreams became a relaity.

    And we are still pursuing some of them.

    --dmg

  34. Now my whole trinity is gone... by WCMI92 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My 3 favorite, and the 3 who most influenced me are now gone... Asimov, Clarke, and Heinlein..

    But their stories, intellect, and vision for the future will inspire generations more.

    --
    Corporatism != Free Market
    1. Re:Now my whole trinity is gone... by Aussie · · Score: 1

      That was my first thought, the last of the big 3. I blame them and my father for me being on slashdot now :)

    2. Re:Now my whole trinity is gone... by Brazilian+Geek · · Score: 1

      This.

      I loved Clarke's short stories and through them I found Asimov and Heinlein. The trio's tales wound around my head so tight that I sometimes have a hard time to cite their works individually as, seemingly, I fused them all into a MechaScifi monster.

      RIP Mr. Clarke.

      If Gary Gygax allowed me to be a nerd, you gave my dreams wings.

      --
      All browsers' default homepage should read: Don't Panic...
    3. Re:Now my whole trinity is gone... by geek2k5 · · Score: 1

      That was also my thought when my eldest son mentioned Clarke had died.


      My first SF book that I recall reading was Clarke's "Dolphin Island". I was in Hawaii at the time, in the early to mid 1960s.


      The first SF book that I owned was Heinlein's "Green Hills of Earth", purchased in 1968 or so.


      The first truly useful personal computer I owned was a Tandy 1000SX from Radio Shack, a relative of the TRS80. I seem to recall that Asimov was an early adopter of the TRS80, around when Apple was also starting to create useful personal computers.

  35. Last message sent by HAL 9000 by Bushido+Hacks · · Score: 1

    All these worlds are yours except Europa.
    Attempt no landing there.

    --
    The Rapture is NOT an exit strategy.
  36. Re:NAMBLA by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1

    "Sexually unconventional lifestyle"?

    First of all, please define what constitutes "conventional", and explain how Clarke deviated from this "norm".

    Second, would a little respect for the deceased be too much to ask, Clarke's "sexually unconventional lifestyle" notwithstanding?

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  37. If there is anything beyond this life.... by jd · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ...it had better have stars and monoliths. I was a fan of many of his books - Islands in the Sky, 2001, 2010, Rendezvous with Rama. They were brilliant, detailed, imaginative and really achieved what they set out to. Some of his other stuff - Cradle, 2061, Imperial Earth, and the later Rama books - didn't really appeal to me in the same way.

    In terms of his factual writings, I have many of his articles that were written for Wireless World, including the letter and two follow-up articles on geostationary satellites. Those three in particular can be found on the web - many people have scanned them in. They're well worth reading. He was a highly skilled writer on technical stuff. Technical writers today should pay attention to them and learn.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  38. He's not dead you earthing fools by 0.693 · · Score: 5, Funny

    He's just been absorbed by the monolith.

    1. Re:He's not dead you earthing fools by RamblinLonghorn · · Score: 2, Informative
    2. Re:He's not dead you earthing fools by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Life is just one big banana. Science fiction allows us all to peel open the reality and discover the yellow truth inside."

      Kinda evidence to the contrary, no?

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:He's not dead you earthing fools by shanen · · Score: 1

      Wow! ACC was known to a three-digit ID? He really was old!

      Seriously, that 137 is the best number.

      --
      Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
    4. Re:He's not dead you earthing fools by osu-neko · · Score: 3, Funny

      Old Slashdotters never die, they just get modded away. ;)

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    5. Re:He's not dead you earthing fools by AgentSmith · · Score: 1

      A three digit ID poster!!!

      I thought those were only a myth!
      Anthropologists gave rumor to it, but I've seen one out in the wild!

      The only way to top this would be a 2 digit ID or dare I say
      the unheard of 1 digit ID. Many around Sir Edmund's Hunting
      club call this animal mere poppycock! Balderdash! Flim Flam!

      And that Phineas Phogg fellow still hasn't returned from his trip.
      60 days and counting!

      As for Arthur C. Clarke. meh.

      No No, just kidding. Clarke was one of the foundation stones
      which hold aloft the hardcore SF genre.

  39. Legends die in groups by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

    Has anyone noticed that great legends of our culture seem to die in groups? Not long ago, Robert Jordan, the author of The Wheel of Time. More recently, Gary Gygax, and now Arthur C Clarke. I wonder how Terry Pratchett is feeling right now...

    --
    Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    1. Re:Legends die in groups by FornaxChemica · · Score: 1

      My mom used to say it's the law of seriality; it's often that when you hear someone famous has died then comes another one, and another one, and you end up having a little group of well-known people passing away within a few days or weeks. It happened last year with the death of films directors Ingmar Bergman and Michaelangelo Antonioni, who both died on July 30, and a famous French actor just before that.

      But a lot of people die... immortality is going down the drain and orbituaries are singing in the rain. So far this year.

    2. Re:Legends die in groups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has anyone noticed that great legends of our culture seem to die in groups? Not long ago, Robert Jordan, the author of The Wheel of Time. More recently, Gary Gygax, and now Arthur C Clarke. I wonder how Terry Pratchett is feeling right now... Legends of our culture does not even come close to applying to Jordan. Sorry, it borders on insult to the other names that you mention him in the same breath in this context.

      Jordan's got what, a single book series he milked so thoroughly everybody I know stopped reading it years ago. And I mean everybody. It's as bad as LOTR would've been had Tolkien released the first volume, sold a lot, and decided to spread the remaining story over 17 more volumes instead of two. Yes, I know Tolkien didn't even want it split into three volumes, I'm making a point.
    3. Re:Legends die in groups by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jordan also wrote several of the "Conan the Barbarian" novels (note also that Robert Jordan was a pen name, he also wrote a bunch of other stuff. He used a name for each genre).

    4. Re:Legends die in groups by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

      So what if he drew the story out into twelve books? It doesn't make The Wheel of Time any less iconic within the fantasy genre. Do we consider The Elder Scrolls series of games a complete waste of time because there's six of them? (not counting expansions, of course, and those ridiculous mobile phone games). Admittedly when I look back on a Wheel of Time book I think to myself "now what actually happened in that book?", but it doesn't make them any less entertaining to read. Robert Jordan is known as Robert Jordan for the Wheel of Time, but he had two other pen names (neither as prolific). Why don't we try cramming everything Dune related into one volume? Using your logic, Frank Herbert is a hack.

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    5. Re:Legends die in groups by PakProtector · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Frank Herbert was not a Hack. His Dune series is not interesting from the perspective of Science Fiction, but from that of Anthropology.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    6. Re:Legends die in groups by NoobixCube · · Score: 1

      I didn't mean that I thought he was a hack. I loved the Dune series. I was merely extrapolating from the AnonymousCoward's reasoning that Robert Jordan isn't a legend just because he has one exceptionally long series. It doesn't matter how many or how few books a series has, what matters is the impact a particular writer has on not only his genre but on the way we perceive all other works after having read it.

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    7. Re:Legends die in groups by PakProtector · · Score: 1

      The reason Robert Jordan is a hack is because he ran out of things to say and kept on writing because he could make money doing it because his fans kept up hope that maybe the next book would be good.

      --

      Edward@Tomato - /home/Edward/ man woman
      man: no entry for woman in the manual.
      "Qua!?"

    8. Re:Legends die in groups by kalirion · · Score: 1

      I wonder how Terry Pratchett is feeling right now...

      In case you weren't aware, he was recently diagnosed with early-onset Alzheimer's.....

  40. Re:NAMBLA by CRCulver · · Score: 1

    Second, would a little respect for the deceased be too much to ask...

    Once an artist with things to hide dies, it's customary to begin airing out what was hidden, without any disrespect to the man and his talents. Just look at the plethora of biographies of Messiaen showing just how much he tried to keep in the closet, for example. I expect the same to happen to Clarke. It's simple journalism and there's no desire to insult the man.

  41. Thinking not just of Clarke but all of Discovery.. by TheLazySci-FiAuthor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...I shed a tear - and then I felt...ashamed...why?

    Why is it that when one cries at a movie involving war heroes or romance it is socially acceptable, but when I become choked-up not just about the passing of one of our greats - as I have today - but at the whole of scientific discovery I feel somehow, I'm not sure...I guess just ashamed.

    This happens to me now and then. Like when I saw a documentary on mitochondrial eve, and I became full of such emotion about the interconnectedness of us all that I had to leave the room lest my wife see me weep (not that she would ridicule me, just because).

    Why should I not be proud of my tears? Why, even in this day, surrounded by so much intellect and accepting cultures should I still not disclose this little secret to anyone except the pseudo-anonymous like-minds on this website?...

    Why should we not all weep at the stars?

  42. Re:NAMBLA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so you're saying without doubt that he wasn't a pedophile?

  43. Huh. by jd · · Score: 4, Informative

    My understanding was that he wrote sections of the book alongside the movie, making the script/book a joint effort, although the book was actually finished and polished later. Well, the only two people who know for certain are now working on a prequel (not available on Earth), from the Monolith's perspective.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    1. Re:Huh. by Don+Sample · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Clarke always said that the novel credit should have been "by Arthur C Clarke and Stanley Kubrik, based on the screenplay by Stanley Kubrik and Arthur C Clarke," and that the screenplay credit should have been "by Stanley Kubrik and Arthur C Clarke, based on the novel by Arthur C Clarke and Stanley Kubrik."

      He even wrote a book about the process "The Lost Worlds of 2001" which includes some of their earlier ideas for what the movie should have been about, and how the story evolved.

  44. Daisy, Daisy/Give me your answer do by LoveMe2Times · · Score: 4, Interesting

    StarChild, are you now speeding amoung the stars
    finding your great connexion
    with the majesty that lies buried in mens' hearts
    watching and waiting to see if those you left behind
    will understand your message before it's too late

    arthur c clarks should have been done in threes
    a backup seer always ready
    to disarm warmongering nukes from Mercury or even Imperial Earth
    leading us across a bridge to the heavens and a rendezvous with destiny
    counting the nine billion names of god as they are one and none

    now we carbon based bipeds must confront childhood's end
    with a memory in our hearts
    of one who changed the world with intelligence, nobility and grace
    rest in peace, arthur c clarke, you will be forgotten all too soon
    but not for a little while yet

  45. Re:Wasn't A. C. Clarke a pedarist? by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1

    Goddamnit...

    Actually yes, I do have some info on this...here and here.

    Clarke was cleared of charges. The Daily Mirror issued a retraction. END. OF. STORY.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  46. He was really a futurist... by Zaatxe · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... he even died tomorrow!

    The article states he died on wednesday, but it's still tuesday!
    (I know, I know... it's due to the time zones...)

    --
    So say we all
    1. Re:He was really a futurist... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Funny

      (I know, I know... it's due to the time zones...)

      Perhaps that's the real reason he moved to Sri Lanka? So he could be ahead of our time, as well as his own?

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    2. Re:He was really a futurist... by vox69 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think he would have found this comment interesting and compelling, actually. RIP Sir Arthur

    3. Re:He was really a futurist... by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The article states he died on wednesday, but it's still tuesday! (I know, I know... it's due to the time zones...)

      So the news reached you that quickly? From Sri Lanka to you in a matter of minutes... What a wonderful invention allows instanteneous intercontinental communication! Who is it that we have to thank?

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:He was really a futurist... by Zaatxe · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Who is it that we have to thank?

      Al Gore, of course! After all, he invented the internet, remember?

      --
      So say we all
    5. Re:He was really a futurist... by Sneftel · · Score: 3, Funny

      You know, any sufficiently advanced country is indistinguishable from Sri Lanka.

      --
      The opinions stated herein do not necessarily represent those of anybody at all. Deal with it.
    6. Re:He was really a futurist... by Idarubicin · · Score: 1

      What a wonderful invention allows instanteneous intercontinental communication! Who is it that we have to thank?


      Actually, the largest share of intercontinental data traffic is now carried on submarine fiber optic cables. The bandwidth through geosync satellites was getting to be too cramped. For some applications, the speed-of-light delay (it's a long way out to geosync orbit) may cause trouble as well.


      Still, your heart's in the right place. Sir Arthur will be missed.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  47. And thus spoke Arthur C. Clarke... by FornaxChemica · · Score: 1

    I just have A Fall of Moondust on my night table (though I admit I'm not to get into it). Along with Asimov and K. Dick, he was THE classic sci-fi author; and he said inspiring things too, he was a bit of a wiseman. But I guess most people will remember him best for what Kubrick did with 2001. Great loss anyway, after Gygax, another icon goes.

  48. Re:Wasn't A. C. Clarke a pedarist? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1
    I'm sure that if you were to analyse the private lives of any number of talented musicians, artists, sculptors, authors, etc, there's a chance you'll uncover something they don't want uncovered.

    However, your comments are based merely on rumour and are both irrelevant and insensitive at this particular juncture.

    The only *facts* that exist and matter to me at the moment are that he was a talented author, highly scientifically minded, and the person who got me into science fiction when I read "Childhood's End" as my first sci-fi book and saw "2001" as my first sci-fi movie. Therefore he earnt my respect from a very early age and his family get my deepest sympathies now.

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  49. "Sci-fi" guru Arthur C. Clarke dies at 90 by flajann · · Score: 1
    "Sci-fi guru Arthur C. Clarke dies at 90"

    The idiots at MSNBC used "Sci-fi" instead of "Science Ficton", as though Clarke were some cheap pulp writer.

    Long Live Clarke!

    1. Re:"Sci-fi" guru Arthur C. Clarke dies at 90 by FornaxChemica · · Score: 1

      The idiot right above your topic did too.

    2. Re:"Sci-fi" guru Arthur C. Clarke dies at 90 by Digi-John · · Score: 1

      It seems to be general usage that "Sci-fi" is cheap crap (or a mostly crap TV channel), while "science fiction" or "SF" is high-quality stuff like Asimov, Clarke, Heinlein. Now you know, and knowing is half the battle.

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    3. Re:"Sci-fi" guru Arthur C. Clarke dies at 90 by ElAurian · · Score: 1

      Sci-fi, science fiction, SF, IT DOESN'T MATTER. If you care about this, or about Trekkies/Trekkers, or anything similar, you are an intellectual WANKER. FFS. End. This. Now.

    4. Re:"Sci-fi" guru Arthur C. Clarke dies at 90 by anonypus_user · · Score: 1

      can we at least give the man the dignity of not having a "scifi" tag on his obituary?

    5. Re:"Sci-fi" guru Arthur C. Clarke dies at 90 by Mephistro · · Score: 1

      Too late!

    6. Re:"Sci-fi" guru Arthur C. Clarke dies at 90 by compro01 · · Score: 1

      start tagging it sciencefiction and shove scifi off.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    7. Re:"Sci-fi" guru Arthur C. Clarke dies at 90 by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      I'm going to tag it "skiffy" just to make you guys screech.

    8. Re:"Sci-fi" guru Arthur C. Clarke dies at 90 by kalirion · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. What next, fans being insulted when Miyazaki is referred to as an "anime" director instead of "japanimation" director?

  50. Death in threes by cheebie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First Gygax, then Clarke. Who will be geek number three?

    Stallman had better keep an eye out for ninjas.

    1. Re:Death in threes by thelexx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it was Roy Scheider. Lots of geeks/nerds love horror films too, not the least reason for which is that they generally have more effects, which are fun to think about. Jaws was significant in that regard. And he was in the SeaQuest series and 2010. It was definitely Scheider. So, no more big-name deaths in geekdom this year dammit!

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    2. Re:Death in threes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      The Raman's did everything in threes.

  51. Re:NAMBLA by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1

    I encourage you to check here and here for what is 'hidden'.

    Clarke was cleared of charges. The Daily Mirror issued a retraction. END. OF. STORY.

    If you're not referring to Clarke's alleged pedophilia, however, but, rather, his "sexually unconventional lifestyle", you would need to first answer the question I put to you in my earlier post.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  52. Re:Wasn't A. C. Clarke a pedarist? by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

    Thanks for clearing that up - and if the AC that raised that point ever makes his identity known rest assured I'll let you know so I can hold him down while you give him a good kicking...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  53. Re:NAMBLA by CRCulver · · Score: 1

    Look at the last words of the BBC story, as I already cited.

  54. One of the masters by SystemFault · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Clarke was certainly one of the masters of SF and popular space writing; also, he was my personal favorite.

    His story "How I Lost a Billion Dollars in My Spare Time" about his failure to patent his geosynchronous communication satellite network concept is simultaneously sad and funny. He got everything right except he thought that the satellites needed to be crewed because of the requirements of changing burnt out vacuum tubes! Too bad the transistor was still ten years away at the time.

    More than once in his writings he made the claim that he was proud to be an atheist. Somehow I hope that he wasn't disappointed being wrong and instead was pleasantly surprised.

    1. Re:One of the masters by cthulu_mt · · Score: 1

      Maybe he went to Secular Heaven

      --
      Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
    2. Re:One of the masters by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

      It took this long for anyone to mention the communications satellite, which is very likely the most accurate prediction that has ever come out of Science Fiction. Granted in his story we only needed 3 to provide universal coverage, but that was from a time before we started thinking about giving every individual their own channels to watch. (What else would you call the '500 channel tv?')

      --
      You never know...
    3. Re:One of the masters by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      One of the things that always amazes me the most is that nobody predicted transistors and solid-state electronics, or anything remotely similar.

      I wonder if we'll see any technologies similarly emerge from nowhere in the next century....

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    4. Re:One of the masters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no god, no God, and no heaven. Clark's name lives on in the memories he inspired in all of us fans, and will undoubtedly live on for a long time in history because of his achievements, and predictions. Clark is dead, long live Clark!

    5. Re:One of the masters by theydidnthavemyname · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's a time and place to criticise a man's beliefs

    6. Re:One of the masters by srmalloy · · Score: 1

      It's hard to predict a phase change in technology; it can be so far out of people's conception of how things work that, without making a wild-assed guess at scientific breakthroughs, simple extrapolation won't work. And Clarke kept his writing grounded, for the most part, in the technology that he could extrapolate.

      There is a story/article written, by, IIRC, Dean Ing, where he looks at the "high-tech object falls through time warp into the past and changes history by suddenly advancing technology" story theme and considers what would happen if a ramjet-powered missile does this and is recovered by the US Navy in (I think) the late 1930s. The 'motor' is an open tube, without moving parts, but it was obviously operating from the discolored metal. There is a mass of circuitry, wires printed on a material like Bakelite connected to tiny bricks of ceramic with tinier plates of unbelievably-pure silicon and germanium inside them. There's some kind of tube arrangement leading forward to something vaguely similar to a radar array, but much too small to do anything. The point he was making was that a breakthrough in technology can take further advances out of the range of what people could predict or understand with only pre-breakthrough technology to work from.

    7. Re:One of the masters by MutantEnemy · · Score: 1

      More than once in his writings he made the claim that he was proud to be an atheist. Somehow I hope that he wasn't disappointed being wrong and instead was pleasantly surprised.

      It's been my observation that the more popular religions depict their loving, just, and merciful God torturing non-believers in Hell for all eternity. So no, perhaps it would not be such a pleasant surprise.

      --
      Grr! Arg!
    8. Re:One of the masters by lijkert · · Score: 1

      More than once in his writings he made the claim that he was proud to be an atheist. Somehow I hope that he wasn't disappointed being wrong and instead was pleasantly surprised. What proof do you have to support your claim? I think we should the scientific method, especially since it was one of the pillars of the life of the person whose loss it is we're mourning.

      He's dead and he's never coming back. Let us take comfort in the fact that he once existed and created all these great things, not a baseless hope that we might one day see him again in person.

      I for one will see him every day when i walk past my bookcase.

      Goodbye Sir Arthur, and thanks for all the books!
    9. Re:One of the masters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      More than once in his writings he made the claim that he was proud to be an atheist. Somehow I hope that he wasn't disappointed being wrong and instead was pleasantly surprised. Seriously? In a thread about Clarke's passing you have to slip in a little flame bait? That is shameful.
  55. Two keystrokes... by __aamisb9940 · · Score: 1

    :( ...that's all I have to say.

  56. Of all of his quotations... by kaaona · · Score: 1

    I think this best describes our technological society, both then and now:

    "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." --A.C.Clark

    1. Re:Of all of his quotations... by CitizenJohnJohn · · Score: 1

      And we suffer the corollary every day: Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.

      Insufficiently advanced technologies include mobile phones, computer operating systems, GPS...

  57. Sad day by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

    His books are what got me into reading sci-fi.
    Truly one of the greatest Sci-Fi writers of all time.
    Rest In Peace Arthur C. Clarke.

  58. What the machine might do by fermion · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Clarke is part of a select group of people who really thought about what the machine might do, and what is might do to societal norms, and how things might go down differently given the use of the machines. It is not just space opera. It is not just a plot device. It is a deep thought of the long term impact of the industrial revelation. At the time when thes Clarke and other were writing the full effects of the industrial revolution and the possibilities were just becoming fully apparent. We know has machines and the learned techniques to build cylindrical shells big enough to construct a machine that would take a person to the moon. We were beginning to develop machines that would allow us to build a autonomous programing computing machine, that we would someday, we thought, lead to machines that would help us in our daily lives.

    They got so much wrong, but the issues they got right. We don't have flying cars, but we are different people due to technology. We do not get our food from cubes, but the fast food is just presented manner meant to imitate the food it replaces. We had pocket calculators long before the cleaning work was autonomously taken over by machine, but the roomba exists. Children are being trained in ware fare using video games. The basis of our interactions are being changed by rapid instantaneous communication. Our basic functions, such as sex, have been changed by the picture phone and internet. No longer must anyone settle for the person next door, when one can surf for an attractive specimen in the morning, text during class, and set up the date for the evening at a bus stop midway between the two of you. In fact, we never have to settle when everything can be custom made to out specifications.

    There are two things that disappoint me about many so-called intellectuals. The first is that they don't seem to read enough history. The second is that don't seem to read enough science fiction. To me this strikes me as a person who knows not where they came from, and who knows not where they are going. All they know is what is happening at the moment, their immediate desires, and all they care about is what they must do to fulfill those desires.

    Clarke's writing clearly defines him as a different sort of person. The Foundation series clearly identifies him as a man who knew history. His life defines him as a man who knew where he as the rest of us were likely going. I wonder what the world would be like if our leaders were like this. People of history and vision, rather than people who apparently do not even both to hold a book correctly, and proudly states that they never read, or that they read the cliff notes versions. I am reminded of John F. Kennedy, the person who pushed the nation to space, for better or worse. It is claimed in Thirteen Days that JFK had read the Guns of August, did understand that many conflicts start because leaders assume they know what the other party is thinking, and then constructs inflexible plans based on those assumptions. As he knew history, he could do something different in his attempt to achieve a result. Again, history and vision of the future. Something we are sorely lacking, and something that is all too often ridiculed by those who are justing looking at how to swindle their first million by the time they are 25.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:What the machine might do by dlelash · · Score: 2, Informative

      Asimov wrote the Foundation books, not Clarke.

    2. Re:What the machine might do by TychoCelchuuu · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're thinking of Asimov, unless Clarke wrote his very own Foundation series.

      --
      Against stupidity the Gods themselves contend in vain.
    3. Re:What the machine might do by James+VAR · · Score: 1

      Actually, the Foundation trilogy is by Isaac Asimov, but Clarke was certainly a thinker of equal scope.

    4. Re:What the machine might do by glindsey · · Score: 1

      I agree with you totally, but would like to point out that the "upside-down book" photo was manipulated. Bush has done plenty of stupid things without us having to invent more.

    5. Re:What the machine might do by joeware · · Score: 1

      Surely you don't believe that the picture of Bush holding the book upside down is real.

    6. Re:What the machine might do by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are two things that disappoint me about many so-called intellectuals. The first is that they don't seem to read enough history.

      Clarke's writing clearly defines him as a different sort of person. The Foundation series clearly identifies him as a man who knew history.

      Says the guy who doesn't read enough SF to know the difference between Clarke and Asimov.
    7. Re:What the machine might do by Surt · · Score: 2, Informative

      Clarke's writing clearly defines him as a different sort of person. The Foundation series clearly identifies him as a man who knew history.

      Perhaps it identifies him as a person who knew history. Or perhaps it identifies you as a person who does not know science fiction.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foundation_series

      The foundation series was written by Isaac Asimov, and he also wrote a number of history books, and in fact his knowledge of history was quite extensive:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isaac_Asimov#Other_writing

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    8. Re:What the machine might do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mea Culpa, of course Foundation was not Clarke. OTOH, what we are talking about is a generation of writers that made history, though about history, and applied the rules and current state of the art to speculative fiction. The point remains that these authors should be considered the philosophers of our industrial revolution in the same way that Plato, et al, is considered the philosophers of a mathematical revolution, even though not everything they said was correct, and probably they were not the most engaging writers for the popular audience.

    9. Re:What the machine might do by Drive42 · · Score: 0

      Yeah. I agree. Slip-up on the Foundation reference, but I agree with the gist of your comment. Thumbs up.

    10. Re:What the machine might do by thelastquestion · · Score: 1

      uh, the Foundation series was written by Isaac Asimov... could you explain what you meant by "The Foundation series clearly identifies him as a man who knew history"?

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
    11. Re:What the machine might do by Xadnem · · Score: 1

      Clarke's writing clearly defines him as a different sort of person. The Foundation series clearly identifies him as a man who knew history.
      Except it was Asimov who wrote that.

    12. Re:What the machine might do by vain023 · · Score: 1

      Asimov wrote the foundation novels.
      Check your history.

    13. Re:What the machine might do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Foundation series clearly identifies him...

      The Foundation series were written by Isaac Asimov.

      - Peder

    14. Re:What the machine might do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great post, except for one thing. Under the terms of the Clarke-Asimov treaty, the Foundation series was not author by the World's Greatest Science Fiction author who also writes science books but by the World's Greatest Science author who also writes science fiction.

      It was Dr. Asimov, not Sir Clarke.

      And now, they both are with Bob Heinlein.

    15. Re:What the machine might do by stygianguest · · Score: 1

      You are mistaken. Many intellectuals do read science-fiction, albeit in different forms. For example Kafka's and Orwell's work extensively explore alternate realities and possible futures. These books however, concentrate on the human rather than technological aspects. Their writing probably also has a more artistic touch, but I won't pretend to understand such inherently subjective notions.

      In the end, most book reading people are bored by the technological stuff and are not really interested in the male adventure stories. Which is, lets face it, the gist of most science-fiction books. I can't honestly blame them for not reading science-fiction.

    16. Re:What the machine might do by spagiola · · Score: 1

      Clarke's writing clearly defines him as a different sort of person. The Foundation series clearly identifies him as a man who knew history.


      Ahem. Asimov wrote the Foundation series.
    17. Re:What the machine might do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your points are well taken. However, the Foundation series was written by Isaac Asimov, another of the world's great sci-fi writers. May they both RIP.

  59. "The Exploration of Space" by beadfulthings · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My first exposure to Clarke wasn't fiction at all but a non-fiction, non-technical look at the future of space travel called "The Exploration of Space." My father must have acquired it in the early Fifties. It was completely understandable to a young reader, and the beautiful illustrations fired the imagination. I went hunting for it on my shelves just now and could not find it; I'm thinking one of my offsprigs must have made off with it just as I appropriated it from my dad when I left home. I was in grammar school when I first read it--didn't encounter his fiction until I was somewhat older. I treasure the memory of it because it wasn't about "IF" we achieve interplanetary travel but rather about "WHEN" we achieve it.

    --
    "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
    1. Re:"The Exploration of Space" by westlake · · Score: 1
      My first exposure to Clarke wasn't fiction at all but a non-fiction, non-technical look at the future of space travel called "The Exploration of Space." My father must have acquired it in the early Fifties.

      I have a copy and would not part with it for love or money.

      "The Exploration of Space" was a Book-of-the-Month Club selection. It stands in good company with the Disneyland specials on space flight.

  60. Many things to many people. by polyomninym · · Score: 1

    If it weren't for that man, our collective appeal to the tech industry may not have been what it is. The dream of new possibilities and the hopes that they might fulfill were enough influence on me as a child to "stay with it". Not that daydreaming is key, but wow, just imagine what some of us might have done otherwise. Little bits of positive & visionary influence have always been enough to keep me going in a good direction:) I hope his family members find peace. Keep you dreams alive!

  61. Re:Thinking not just of Clarke but all of Discover by flajann · · Score: 1
    Feel not ashamed. This is Clarke we're talking about here.

    I intend to re-read some of his stories and watch 2001 in his honour over the next few days.

    Damn it -- something must've gone wrong with that AE-35 unit...

  62. Rip by Saija · · Score: 1

    and let me say one of Sir Arthur quotes:
    "Life is just one big banana. Science fiction allows us all to peel open the reality and discover the yellow truth inside."
    Farewell good man.

    --
    Slashdot ya no es que lo era! ;)
  63. Re:NAMBLA by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First of all, please define what constitutes "conventional" You must be new here! It's so simple:
    1. Stop reading Slashdot
    2. ???
    3. "Sexually conventional lifestyle" (aka profit)
  64. Re:Link for the uninformed. by hyphen76 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Indeed. I remember an interview of his where he discussed his ideas around satellites. The amusing thing to him was in fact how wrong he had been. He had imagined them as (relatively) enourmous, crewed space stations. A limitation of the technology at the time he was envisaging them, where you only had unreliable vacuum tubes (or whatever they would have been) which needed constant replacing, and hence a human crew. Also a salutory lesson out there for all the people who like to predict what the future holds technology wise. It is just impossible to know what is going to come along out of the blue and knock your world view on its head.

  65. It's very strange and mysterious... by jdoss · · Score: 1

    I was thinking about trying to find a good copy of 2001 to watch today. It's sad that the man has passed, but hopefully some channel (PBS or Discovery Channel) will take the opportunity of airing his series from the 80's... Mysterious World and Strange Powers. I loved watching Mysterious World and (to a lesser extent) Strange Powers when I was growing up. Time to dust off some old books and remember.

  66. put his body on a flight to jupiter by circletimessquare · · Score: 0

    shove his body into jupiter, and start the ignition of the star child

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  67. Also, the Newspad by SystemFault · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Let us be reminded that Clarke also wrote about the Newspad back in 1964; it appeared a couple of times in the film 2001, It was tablet computer accessing a world wide web, thirty years before it finally came to life. The only difference was that Clarke thought the URLs were numeric instead of ASCII strings.

    How cool it must have been for him to see so many of his visions turn into reality!

    1. Re:Also, the Newspad by ragutis · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He explored this further in Imperial Earth.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imperial_Earth

      Overhead, without any fuss, the stars are going out.

    2. Re:Also, the Newspad by namire · · Score: 1

      >>The only difference was that Clarke thought the URLs were numeric instead of ASCII strings.

      Haven't you ever heard of IP addresses? for example: 64.202.163.192

    3. Re:Also, the Newspad by SystemFault · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Amplification: Clarke's Newspad used numeric addresses exclusively; he thought of a site address as just another variety of a phone number. In the film 2001, you can see a row of digit buttons at the bottom of each Newspad. Clarke also talked about an interactive zoom for reading where a finger touch to an abstract would enlarge and expand the text of the abstracted article -- very much like clicking a hyperlink.

      Other predictions:

      1) No more extra charges for long distance telephone calls; generally fulfilled within countries and economic blocs.

      2) One world time zone; fulfilled for all computers as they use GMT/UTC. Not yet so for humans.

      3) The "Standard Encyclopedia"; that's what Wikipedia is becoming.

      4) Death of most printed newspaper by 2001; close, will likely see this soon.

      5) "Meatless days" due to economic stress and population growth, even in the US; close, will likely see this soon for many people.

  68. Strange coincidence by kaos07 · · Score: 1

    Strange thing, I was re-reading Rendezvous with Rama last night...

    I don't know if "I'll miss you" is the right thing to say since I never knew him and he hadn't been writing for a while but after reading his novels and short you do come to realise he was a visionary. It is a sad day but we should reflect on his contribution to society and geeks worldwide.

    RIP.

  69. Re:NAMBLA by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1
    OK...let's look at them:

    Although cleared by an investigation, Sir Arthur's unconventional lifestyle continued to cause some raised eyebrows.
    And here's your statement:

    It's clear that, while he wasn't a pedophile, he had some kind of sexually unconventional lifestyle.

    Since you felt it necessary to qualify the phrase "unconventional lifestyle" with the adverb "sexually", and since, according to you, that the issue is "clear", the burden is on you to a)clarify this nebulous statement, and b) subsequently provide some sort of evidence to support your claim.
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  70. City and the Stars... by Aardpig · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...ranks as perhaps the best Sci-Fi book I've ever read. It still takes my breath away.

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
    1. Re:City and the Stars... by ClioCJS · · Score: 0, Redundant
      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    2. Re:City and the Stars... by patchvonbraun · · Score: 1

      The City and The Stars has got to be one of my favourite books of *any* s.f. author I've ever
          read. I originally read the novella, Against The Fall of Night, which The City and the Stars is
          based on. There's a Clarke/Benford book, "Beyond the Fall of Night" which I haven't read, but
          I think it's based on the same "imaginiverse" as The City and the Stars.

    3. Re:City and the Stars... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

      Every once in a while, when I rummage through my books, I stop on "Against the fall of night" (the original version of "The city and the stars"), and I seldom resist picking it up and reading it again...

    4. Re:City and the Stars... by smurd · · Score: 1

      I heard to read on WXPN (a local radio station) about 20 years ago. I now re-read it about once a year.

    5. Re:City and the Stars... by AlienIntelligence · · Score: 1

      A really good girlfriend of mine,
      (20 years ago now) bought me
      the out of print book that contained
      (and I believe was named as well)

      "The Nine Billion Names of God"

      For all of you Clarke fans that haven't...
      READ THAT STORY!

      In fact, I'm glad I googled, here... enjoy!

      [ http://lucis.net/stuff/clarke/9billion_clarke.html ]

      Let me know what you think.

      -AI

      --
      For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion
  71. Re:Thinking not just of Clarke but all of Discover by KlomDark · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You forgot to take your Paxil again today, didn't ya? ;)

    (I once forgot my Paxil for a couple days, and cried at the end of The Goonies. Really... Made no sense.)

  72. Re:NAMBLA by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1

    He was cleared of all charges. The Sunday Mirror issued a retraction of their accusation.

    Looks pretty doubt-free to me.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  73. Re:Wasn't A. C. Clarke a pedarist? by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    No, and he wasn't a pederast either.

    rj

  74. ...without any fuss, the stars were going out. by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    One of the brightest has just been extinguished.

    RIP

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  75. Overhead by jefu · · Score: 1

    "Overhead, and without any fuss, the stars were going out.

  76. Time to listen to the "2010" soundtrack... by highvista63 · · Score: 1

    It may be a bit dated, but I like it. Found it on my iPod and fired it up in tribute to ACC. RIP, Sir Arthur...

    1. Re:Time to listen to the "2010" soundtrack... by Ford+Prefect · · Score: 1

      2010 had a soundtrack?

      Anyone with taste should be listening to the 2001 soundtrack. I've got it playing right now - my dodgily re-recorded electronic version, copied from my father's original, contemporary-to-the-film soundtrack LP. (The cover artwork is gorgeous...)

      --
      Tedious Bloggy Stuff - hooray?
  77. Ouch. by urcreepyneighbor · · Score: 1

    Here I was, prepared to spend a few minutes making snarky comments on Slashdot and I learn one of the most influential people of my life is dead.

    Being the callous jerk that I am, I will mask my pain with the following comment:

    It looks like Clarke's childhood has ended.

    --
    "The fight for freedom has only just begun." - Geert Wilders
    1. Re:Ouch. by anonypus_user · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "WIRED: Have you given any thought to what you'd want your epitaph to be? ACC: Oh, yes. I've often quoted it: "He never grew up; but he never stopped growing." now will some moderator with a soul please tag this story with this?

  78. To pay honor to his passing. by jameskojiro · · Score: 2, Funny

    I am going to go to the nearest graveyard, find a big black tall grave stone and act like a monkey and throw a plastic bone up in the air and then quietly walk away.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    1. Re:To pay honor to his passing. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just don't, er, act like the monkeys in History of the World Part 1.

  79. Rest In Peace by S1mmo+61 · · Score: 1

    Rest In Peace

  80. Sigh. by idontgno · · Score: 1

    I was hoping that this was just an extremely successful variant on the "Stephen King is dead" troll.

    RIP. Truly a Sri Lankan icon.

    --
    Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
  81. Head count of fans amongst NASA engineers? by hughk · · Score: 1

    Clarke was an astrophysicist's sci-fi author. He liked to get his orbits right (amongst other things) and I believe he even blagged one of the early desktop programmable calculators from HP.

    I would be fascinated to know what percentage of the engineers in NASA grew up on him? Heinlein was good, so was the original Star-Trek, but Clarke liked to get things right and I'm sure that inspired some engineers there.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  82. Re:Thinking not just of Clarke but all of Discover by jadin · · Score: 1

    Grow some balls and let her see you weep.

  83. Re:Thinking not just of Clarke but all of Discover by Gazzonyx · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think that there are two different kinds of emotions here; with a movie, you're being 'forced' to feel the way you do, so it doesn't seem to be a 'real' emotion although it feels the same.
    In real life, if you will, these events cause really deep, pure emotions that are... well, difficult to handle at times.

    --

    If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

  84. He influenced generations of scientists... by m4cph1sto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... including myself. Arthur C. Clarke's books are largely responsible for where I am today. I read The Fountains of Paradise as a kid and now I'm 2 years from my Ph.D. focusing on nanotechnology and ultra-high strength lightweight materials. His mind will be missed but his vision and legacy will never be forgotten.

  85. Inspirational by Peter+Bortas · · Score: 1

    You where always a source of inspiration Mr Clarke. I will honor your memory.

    --
    "The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to go beyond them into the impossible. " /Arthur C. Clarke

  86. CNN Quote - regarding patents by alittlespice · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He is widely credited with introducing the idea of the communications satellite, the first of which were launched in the early 1960s. But he never patented the idea, prompting a 1965 essay that he subtitled, "How I Lost a Billion Dollars in My Spare Time.

    Look at the advancement of humankind because he didn't patent the idea of satelites

    1. Re:CNN Quote - regarding patents by evanbd · · Score: 1

      Of course, given the usual (complete lack of) sensitivity to price that the satellite market has, it wouldn't have had a huge impact aside from making Clarke wealthier. It's only recently that we've seen any satellites launched that actually cared about cost, and only marginally for those. The patent would have expired long before that, though.

      There are plenty of examples of patents stifling innovation, but this isn't one of them -- unless Clarke had tried to do something silly like prevent any satellites from flying, and I think it's obvious he wouldn't have done that. If you want to fight against patents, use reasonable examples of how they stifle innovation -- there are certainly plenty of them.

    2. Re:CNN Quote - regarding patents by westlake · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Look at the advancement of humankind because he didn't patent the idea of satellites

      He didn't patent the idea because an idea can't be patented. Nor was the idea original. Fantasy and sci-fi writers had been playing with the concept for at least a half-century. Clarke's contribution was to sketch out the advantages of placing relays in synchronous orbit in convincing detail.

    3. Re:CNN Quote - regarding patents by westlake · · Score: 1
      Look at the advancement of humankind because he didn't patent the idea of satellites

      You can't patent an idea. Sci-fi and fantasy writers had been playing with the idea for at least a half-century. Clarke's contribution was to sketch out the advantages of placing relay stations in synchronous orbit in convincing detail.

    4. Re:CNN Quote - regarding patents by braindrainbahrain · · Score: 1

      Credit where credit is due. Mr. Clarke was brilliant and creative in many ways, plus he was one of my favorite science and science fiction writers.

      However...the story about him inventing the communications satellite, or even the geosynchronous orbit is slightly exagerated. It is well known that he gave the idea wide exposure in a Wireless World (magazine) article back in 1945. The geosynch idea is older than that however, going back to Konstantin Tsiolkovsky (at least).

      If you can access the IEEE database , look up the following paper:

      "The Geostationary Orbit and Satellite Communications: Concepts Older Than Commonly Supposed" published in IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AEROSPACE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS VOL. 38, NO. 4 OCTOBER 2002.

      In any event, I am deeply saddened by his passing. Who will inspire us now that he and most of his ilk are gone? Where are this generation's Clarke, Asimov, Sagan, Heinlein, Feynman, etc?

  87. Re:Link for the uninformed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    that cell phone that bounces a signal off the satellites that he envisioned By definition, that's not a cell phone.
  88. Douglas Adams and Arthur C. Clarke by mlwmohawk · · Score: 1

    My two favorite authors of all time.

    Little known fact: Sir Arthur invented the geosynchronous satellite.

    One of the most brilliant men alive and one of the few who understand both science and people.

  89. ... did not know ... by akuma624 · · Score: 1

    wow, i didn't know how influential this person was - i remember seeing that film and just being awestruck by it

    --
    ... if music be fruit of love, play on ....
  90. If his family cremates him by gatkinso · · Score: 1

    maybe they could put an ash or two on the next deep space probe.

    Rest in peace.

    --
    I am very small, utmostly microscopic.
  91. Secret will? by philspear · · Score: 1

    Did he take the secret of WHAT THE HELL DOES THE LAST HALF OF SPACE ODESSY 2001 MEAN to the grave with him?

    1. Re:Secret will? by VENONA · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Uh, no. Most of the species figured that out PDQ. There are also these things called search engines. One of the really choice things about them is that they can be used to find answers to questions that you can't quite puzzle out on your own.

      If you think search engines are likely to simply remain beyond you, you might just look at some film sites. For instance, by 2002, The British Film Institute had it on their list of the top ten films of all time.
      http://www.bfi.org.uk/sightandsound/topten/poll/critics.html

      Even the Internet Movie Database has a plot synopsis that should clear it all up for you. In an effort to be helpful, I'm leaving that URL as an exercise you might find useful in stretching your mind.

      --
      What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
    2. Re:Secret will? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did he take the secret of WHAT THE HELL DOES THE LAST HALF OF SPACE ODESSY 2001 MEAN to the grave with him?
      No big mistery, the 2001 novel explained that.
  92. Truly, one of the greats has left us by sizzzzlerz · · Score: 1

    It is impossible to understate the influence Clarke had on me growing up. He wrote realistic science in a fictional format that was accessible to a adolescent. 40 some year later, I continue to read his works and still am amazed at the quality and authenticity of his books. He was certainly a factor in my decision to become an engineer and to reinforce my love of all things sciencey. His book Imperial Earth, one of my favorites, introduced me to the pentomino puzzle which still continues to fascinate me. He is gone but his legacy will remain for a long, long time.

  93. The last of the big 3 by kipman725 · · Score: 1

    for me the big of 3 sci-fi were asimov, philip k dick and clark. Now the last of them is gone I feel greatly saddend. All of them have inspired me greatly.

    1. Re:The last of the big 3 by Ian+Lamont · · Score: 1

      In the traditional, 50s group, I would include Clarke, Heinlein, and Asimov. 60s-70s era: Delaney, Niven, Pohl 80s-90s: Bova, Gibson, Stephenson

  94. Re:NAMBLA by VENONA · · Score: 1

    Actually, no. The BBC makes no such reference.

    Direct quote from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7304004.stm
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2358011.stm
    "Although cleared by an investigation, Sir Arthur's unconventional lifestyle continued to cause some raised eyebrows."

    His BBC obit is at http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2358011.stm
    Same text. Yes, he had an unconventional lifestyle. That's not the same as stating that he had an unconventional _sexual_ lifestyle.

    Nor would it be any of my business, unless he was doing something heinous enough for me to boycott his work. While molesting children of either sex would definitely qualify, the story (in a UK paper that's little, if any, better than a US supermarket tabloid) was bogus. They were then forced to print a retraction, as mentioned above.

    See: http://www.mirror.co.uk/ and judge for yourself. Title of the home page is "Celebrity, Football, and Today's News Headlines." Of course, it might be less likely that anyone will hold their feet to the fire if they were to publish something more, now that he's gone. It wouldn't surprise me if a rag like the Mirror were to quote Sir Arthur's bisexual martian lover in tomorrow's edition, and be repeated by similar publications. The Mirror is probably quite popular amongst those who are limited to slowly puzzling out the words.

    --
    What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
  95. A loss... by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

    He was a friend, and we will miss him.

  96. This is so sad by 32771 · · Score: 1

    My favourite author is gone.

    I guess I'll listen to something by Strauss now. Op.30, part 5 - "Das Grablied" - will be ok.

    Sniff.

    My condolences to everyone.

    --
    Je me souviens.
  97. Farewell, Sir Arthur by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

    May your spirit rise up on the Fountains of Paradise. Thank you for all of the joy and inspiration your stories have given me.

    --
    Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
  98. Reast In Peace. by xtracto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ahh... another of the few great Science Fiction (straight real Science Fiction no SciFi and things like that) leaves us. I have always been more of an Asimov fan, but as they both used to say, I will certainly miss the two, second-best science fiction writers in the world...

    Too bad these they do not make Science Fiction writers as they used to...

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    1. Re:Reast In Peace. by palegray.net · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You may be interested in Wired's musings on Clarke. Great photo at the top of the article.

  99. Please observe Clarke's passing respectfully by IronChef · · Score: 3, Funny

    Be sure not to share any of his works that you find online, because copyright terms mean the stories cannot be freely distributed.

    So please, please, don't search for The Nine Billion Names of God on Google and read one of his greatest short stories.* By not reading it for free, immediately, you are enriching yourself and protecting our way of life. Observe the reasonable limitations on the distribution of creative works that we have in place in the US, and enjoy sharing this story with your friends when it enters the public domain in 2062... ninety five fucking years after it was written.

    * Really, don't. Don't to it. **

    ** You're going to do it, aren't you? I'm telling.

    PS Yes, this gets my goat.
    PPS Yes, I have written a book, pr8 it if you can find it, I don't care.

    http://www.copyright.cornell.edu/public_domain/

    1. Re:Please observe Clarke's passing respectfully by westlake · · Score: 1
      By not reading it for free, immediately, you are enriching yourself and protecting our way of life

      Baloney.

      You want free, go to the public library.

      You want Clarke's books to remain in print and accessible to everyone? Not just the Geek with a computer and a broadband connection? Buy the paperback.

      The P2P nets are not an archieve. They are snapshot in time of the geek's momentary enthusiasms. Books and authors in which he has lost interest quickly fade from view.

  100. Feeling sad by pxpt · · Score: 1

    :-(

    I enjoyed his books - there may even be some I have not read yet. Upsetting to realise that there is no chance now of any new books. I met his brother Fred once who delighted in telling me about his elder sibling.

  101. Yes, I know he's British! by IronChef · · Score: 1

    The copyright term is the same though.

  102. Re:NAMBLA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, you clearly know how british libel laws work. Idiot.

  103. Thank you , Sir Arthur, from a fan by spidercoz · · Score: 1
    I am halfway through what is now his final book. Casts a bit of a pall over the remainder. I've loved every book of his I've read. I'm glad I still have quite a few left to go.

    The light of the world is diminished this day. Know thee well that today we have lost a truly great man.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - Evelyn Beatrice Hall, re Voltaire
  104. Indeed, imagination is all by xtracto · · Score: 1

    How cool it must have been for him to see so many of his visions turn into reality!

    That reminds me a quote from Asimov (you know, the other second-best Science Fiction writer in the world). I think someone asked him why didn't he fly (by plane) to which he answered something along the lines of "why would like like to go in a cramped plane to get at 12,000m when I can go to other planets and universes in the comfort of my seat at home?

    These guys were genious, and visionaries.

    I won't get tired of writing Rest in Peace
    Sir Arthur C. Clarke

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  105. Raises a glass by khendron · · Score: 1

    Arthur C. Clarke was one of the biggest inspirations of my life. It was his book Fountains of Paradise that inspired me to study engineering in University, which led me to where I am today.

    I once wrote him to tell him that. He was kind enough to write back, saying he was thrilled to be an inspiration to the younger generations.

    Farewell, ACC.

    --
    Life is like a web application. Sometime you need cookies just to get by.
  106. Summary and article is wrong. by xtracto · · Score: 1

    I really think it should be Sir Arthur C. Clarke. While I am not very fond of those nobiliary titles, I think he is one of the few that really deserve to be named as such.

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  107. Steve Ballmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    How about Steve Ballmer? I wonder if he'll get his own article plus all this adulation when he passes on? People like Clarke and Gygax certainly do. RIP.

    1. Re:Steve Ballmer by jd · · Score: 2, Funny

      His attempts at nuclear fusion research by accelerating chairs to a high velocity have inspired countless thousands of comic strip writers, and I think it likely that he will always be remembered for this most valuable contribution to society... no matter how hard he tries to make us forget...

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  108. Hope they play this at the funeral... by Atari400 · · Score: 1
    --
    IBM doesn't play chess with the Universe.
  109. Truly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    Another great mind is gone forever. For a moment, humanity shines a little dimmer. Well, here's to the next great minds that are on the way.

  110. Changed my life. by cabazorro · · Score: 1

    My father took me the movie theater to watch Space Odyssey in 1976.
    I was 10.
    It changed the way I see time.
    I have the DVD now but I don't watch it because
    I think is too long.
    I'm watching it now.
    And hope time will care of the rest.

    --
    - these are not the droids you are looking for -
  111. That's 'Sir' Arthur. C. Clarke. by MrKaos · · Score: 1
    I read my first science fiction book 2001: A Space Odyssey when I was 9 and I've hopelessly addicted to Science Fiction ever since. I've read all his books, many of them over and over, but I think my favorite was 'The City and the Stars". In his short stories he revealed a wicked sense of irony and wit.

    Coincidentally, just before I saw this, I had just watched this video.

    There is no question the man is a visionary and definitely a formative influence in shaping our world with his ideas and I'm sure many people, who know of his ideas, probably feel the same. I'll enjoy reading other peoples views and information about Sir Clarke all I can say to you all right now is that I am deeply saddened by this news.

    I often wondered if he felt a little disappointed with our efforts to get into space as pondering and slow. His description of the construction of a Space Elevator in 'Fountains of Paradise' (and use of in 3001: The Final Odyssey) is an example of the power this mans visions brings to ideas, visions that we can only hope one day will become a reality.

    There is little doubt that world has just lost one of it's wisest seers.

    --
    My ism, it's full of beliefs.
  112. Bradbury by Drive42 · · Score: 0

    Is the only writer from my youth who hasn't kicked the bucket yet. But he will. Soon.

    Gads, I should write some science fiction.

  113. Definitely a positive influence in my life. by gwait · · Score: 1

    My introduction to SF was sitting in the back seat watching 2001 at the drive in when I was in grade 3 (I was supposed to be asleep).
    Even though Kubrick made it almost incomprehensible, (you have to read the book!) that led to a lifelong love of science fiction and a career in electronics engineering.

    Good bye, and thanks for all the great stories!

    Gord Wait

    --
    Bavarian Purity Law of Rice Krispie Squares: Rice Krispies, Marshmallows, Butter, Vanilla.
  114. Re:Wasn't A. C. Clarke a pedarist? by blackest_k · · Score: 2, Informative

    Are you sure they printed a retraction? There's no citation for this at Wikipedia and never has been.
    Not that it means anything if they didn't but I'm just interested to know their stance. I guess we'll find out when they print their obituary. Try this from the guardian in 2000

    http://books.guardian.co.uk/departments/sciencefiction/story/0,6000,374388,00.html

    Rupert and Arthur are good friends. The author of 2001: A Space Odyssey faced his trickiest moment three years ago, when he was turned over by the Sunday Mirror. It was Murdoch who wrote him a "very nice" note promising him that the reporters responsible would never work in Fleet Street again. "He is a rather shy, modest person," Clarke says teasingly. "I find him very deferential."

    The Mirror claimed that Clarke had paid young boys for sex. It produced affidavits from the boys in question. Sri Lankan police later disproved them, he says. The story ran two weeks before Prince Charles flew to Sri Lanka to confer a knighthood on the grand old man of science fiction. The saga was the lowest point in his career. At a banquet in his honour Clarke, who has post polio syndrome, found himself hobbling away from the press, pursued by an unctuous reporter from the Daily Telegraph. The episode still upsets him. "I take an extremely dim view of people mucking about with boys," Clarke says. "The whole thing was distressing to me. It was vindictive and very unpleasant. I can only assume it was a plot to embarrass Prince Charles." The novelist finally got his gong this May, at a low-key ceremony at the British high commission in Colombo.

    Clarke's private life remains a mystery. He was married briefly to an American, Marilyn Mayfield, now dead, whom he met while diving in Florida in the 50s. Asked whether he is gay, Clarke always gives the same puckish pro forma answer: "No, merely cheerful." The answer, presumably, lies in the "Clarkives" - a vast collection of his manuscripts and private writings, to be published 50 years after his death. A further quote
    ""I had an operation for prostate cancer 10 years ago," Clarke says. "I haven't the slightest interest in sex."

    He deserves respect, not anonymous sniping , for his remarkable influence and contributions to humanity.

    Rest in Peace Sir Arthur.
  115. Re:Thinking not just of Clarke but all of Discover by doubletruncation · · Score: 1

    i got choked up myself just now reading the last sentence of the article: "In an interview with The Associated Press, Clarke said he did not regret never having followed his novels into space, adding that he had arranged to have DNA from strands of his hair sent into orbit. 'One day, some super civilization may encounter this relic from the vanished species and I may exist in another time,' he told AP. Along with his DNA sample, Clarke enclosed a note with a brief handwritten wish addressed to that far-flung future: 'Fare well, my clone.'"

  116. I may naught know much but.. by gamekeeper · · Score: 1

    After seeing the astonishing acheivements of Clarke and his "movies" and now reading about how his fiction along with "Star Trek" has shaped what was/is and may verry well be our future..

    Mr. Clarke. My best wishes to you and your family. I only wish I could have experienced more of yoru creativity, and greatness...

    You will be Missed in all facets of the Science Realm no matter how far it reaches..

    Gk.

  117. Dream by danilo.moret · · Score: 1

    Will he dream?

    Will we keep dreaming?

    Asimov and Clarke... I hope there will be more like them in my lifetime. Even if everything else fails with the future, we can at least say it looked fascinating and real when Clarke wrote about it.

    --
    ^[:wq!
  118. Double author books by qbzzt · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I know from his posts on Baen's bar that Eric Flint does contribute a lot to books that he co-writes with lesser known authors. Then again, he is shrewd enough to know he has a brand to protect, possibly for decades. I'm pretty sure that John Ringo does the same with the Posleen series.

    --
    -- Support a free market in the field of government
    1. Re:Double author books by Blorgo · · Score: 1

      Double author books - they can be anything. I've happened to pay attention to how it works for various people.

      Jerry Pournelle and Larry Niven - they plot the books together, and each work on each paragraph (one writes, the other revises, and it goes back and forth many times.

      Eric Flint and David Drake (Belasarius series, starting with 'An Oblique Approach' - Drake gave Flint a /detailed/ outline for each book - many thousands of words - and reviewed the results. Flint calls the first 5 books of this series his 'apprenticeship'. (Similar for Drake and Stirling, 'The General' series).

      But most often, "FAMOUS AUTHOR" (huge type) + Joe Unknown (tiny type) means that Joe Unknown wrote the whole thing, with or without input from the famous author. Sometimes Famous Author is old and slipping, sometimes they don't care, sometimes they help quite a bit. It's a bit of a gamble.

      My least favorite is where the Famous Author is YEARS DEAD:

      http://www.amazon.com/McNallys-Dare-Lawrence-Sanders/dp/0399150552

      LAWRENCE SANDERS (Big Type)

      McNally's Dare (Freakin' Huge Type)

      a Archy McNally novel by (tiny type)
      Vincent Lardo (tiny type)

    2. Re:Double author books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...My least favorite is where the Famous Author is YEARS DEAD... Me too. I've noticed that Robert Ludlum's gotten remarkably prolific since he died.
  119. Re:NAMBLA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OJ was cleared of all charges too.

  120. Memories of Paradise by John+Sokol · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Back in 1997 I did a live internet streaming event with Arthur C. Clarke, it was the first of it's type, and literally sent video across a 12 hr time difference to Chicago, even then Clarke was making internet history and I was privileged to be part of it.

    I actually got to travel to Sri Lanka and meet him. It was truly the experience of a life time. I had been following the foot steps of many other great people. Astronauts, writer, Hollywood types and scientists that have all traveled there to meet him. I had lunch at his home, got to play ping pong with him, it was one of the few physical activities he was still up to. He showed me original sketches of the Space elevator that he and Buckminster fuller had drawn. Even gave me a signed copy of one of his books.
      Unfortunately I was so broke at the time all I could afford was one of those 10 Dollar disposable cameras and none of the photo's I took came out, maybe the X-ray machine zapped em. The grand old British hotel there the Galle Face Hotel built in 1864 was incredible but was killing my finances at $150 per night. http://www.gallefacehotel.com/

        The video streaming even was at UIUC in celebration of Hal's birthday.
    It was amazing to see the turn out. On the large theater screen he was larger then life and it really seems th e internet owes him a large debt of gratitude. For he has been an inspiration for so many.

      Sri Lanka was Paradise. In spite of the Civil war, I have never been anywhere so majestic, the people were so hospitable, even strangers on the street were inviting me to there homes to have some food and drink with them. I must have walked every part of Colombo in the week I was there. The food was fantastic, the women were so beautiful, the ocean breeze and the sun sets. Oh the sun sets they put even the best ones in Santa Monica to shame. I still feel almost home sick for Sri Lanka even though I have only been there the one time.
    I can completely understand why he moved there. I would if I could also.

    Never making it back there is something that I deeply regret. Hearing this news really drove that home this afternoon. Meeting him has been one of the defining moments in my life.

    Godspeed Arthur.

    For Clarke is for us techies far more significant to us then Prices Dianna ever was.

    It's nice to see that this slashdot page it turning into a memorial. I wonder if more formal memorial services would happen around the world.

    http://www.dnull.com/~sokol/clarke.html This is from the streaming even and some video clips of him.

    I actually think this may be the longest clip up on youtube, somehow they must have allowed it to slip through there size restrictions.

    --
    I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Memories of Paradise by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

      I worked with John during this event and can attest to the milestone in real time video this event was. While watching the simulcast from Korea (where I was working for our companies partner), one of the gentlemen in the room with me made a statement about seeing Sir Arthur Clarke on the large movie screen overlooking the panel. He said "Wow he's as large as life".

      Somehow in making the mistake in English, this gentleman was extremely accurate.

      --

      I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

  121. Rest in Peace by Beetle+B. · · Score: 1

    I will miss his insights. He was always my favorite science fiction author.

    Let's remember him by his (last?) appearance on video 3 months ago on his birthday.

    --
    Beetle B.
  122. Has anyone here... by FridayBob · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... not read one of his books of failed to be impressed? I'm sure I've read most of his books, if not all (especially the ones he wrote on his own), but probably my favorite is "Fountains of Paradise" -- I can still remember so much of the story even though I last read it in the 1980s. Maybe not all of it, but who can forget the concept?! Okay, maybe he didn't think of this one himself, but if the space elevator ever becomes a reality, it'll probably be thanks to this book.

    I'm going to miss him. He was one of those people who you've admired for so long that you hope they'll live forever. Of course, nobody ever does, so when people like Sir Arthur start to grow old and you hear that they're becoming weaker, you begin to dread the inevitable years in advance. A world without people like this is so much less interesting. Hell, I still hate the fact that Frank Zappa and Richard Feynman are no longer with us -- two of my other heros. Sir Arthur's passing is also going to take a very long time to get used to.

    1. Re:Has anyone here... by trongey · · Score: 1

      He was one of those people who you've admired for so long that you hope they'll live forever. Well said.
      --
      You never really know how close to the edge you can go until you fall off.
  123. Pedantry, I know. But if you want to use Latin... by ChameleonDave · · Score: 4, Informative

    Requiem im pace, Sir Arthur.

    It's requiescat, if you want to say "[may he] rest in peace", i.e. the traditional RIP.

    If you mean it as a command (as you phrased it), it would be requiesce.

    Requiem is a noun. You could say something like Requiem ei donetur (Rest be granted unto him).

    And of course, it's in, not im.

  124. Re:Link for the uninformed. by Colourspace · · Score: 1

    Interesting point, but no points to give out I'm afraid.

  125. disrespectful & irrelevant Monty Python refere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nononono, no, no! 'E's resting!

  126. BBC sleazy? Article cleansed? by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

    I do agree "sexually" was implied by the article, and the whole comment was an unsubstantiated slur.

    However, my check of the BBC article indicates they later edited the unfortunate sentence out, which is also QUITE unfortunate.

    Compare the first hit from a Google of ["arthur c. clarke" "unconventional lifestyle continued to cause some raised eyebrows"]

    with that article: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7304004.stm

    I don't see the word unconventional anywhere, or a notation that the article was edited.

  127. In the Village by itsybitsy · · Score: 1

    In the Village

    In the village in the village in the village
    life repeats itself, life repeats itself.

    There is sunlight;
    there is darkness.
    The dark repeats itself,

    the light repeats itself;
    planting repeats itself,
    harvest repeats itself.
    Yet life is never dull.

    It pats the drum-hide of the night and is satisfied.
    It listens for footfalls when the dogs bark

    in the village in the village in the village
    In the village in the village in the village

    life repeats itself, life undoes itself
    and then does itself up in the same guise.

    We are careful not to fail to repeat
    the same salutations, the same farewells
    our parents and our parents' parents use.
    They are wise; we are small and the day long.

    Death comes but once but when it comes to life
    no one would be unwilling to repeat
    in the village in the village in the village

    - Andrew Oerke

  128. I wish he were faking it by shanen · · Score: 1

    I've always been curious what people would say when I passed away--if anyone caed that much. It would be kind of nice if he was just checking and turned up again next week... But I doubt it.

    I think he was a truly great man, and these days there's a serious shortage of those sorts.

    (I read his "2061: Odyssey Three" in January as a reaction to hearing about his 90th birthday, though I hadn't heard about his good-bye video at that time. I read his book about the Titanic a couple of years earlier, and a total of about 15 of his books over the years.)

    --
    Freedom = (Meaningful - Coerced) Choice != (Speech | Beer^2), and sad sock puppets' bad mods avail them naught.
  129. BBC not so clean by MacAndrew · · Score: 1

    As I noted above, the sexually connotation of the comment was pretty clear. I suspect the *BBC* agreed b/c they deleted it. Weirdness.

  130. Dammit the dude was Knighted by MrCopilot · · Score: 3, Funny
    Its Sir Arthur C. Clarke. And I miss him already.

    http://mrcopilot.blogspot.com/2008/03/sir-arthur-c-clarke-dead-at-age-90.html

    Out of all his predictions, I was really pulling for the monkey servants.

    From the wikipedia:

    As featured on Sky One's "50 Terrible Predictions" programme, Clarke once predicted that apes would function as household servants by the 1960's; "...with our present knowledge of animal psychology, we can certainly solve the servant problem with the help of the monkey kingdom" he said, but quipped "..of course, eventually, our super chimpanzees would start forming trade unions and we'd be right back where we started."
    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
    1. Re:Dammit the dude was Knighted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      And had a PhD

      So thats 'Dr Sir Arthur Charles Clarke' to you old sport :)

  131. Re:Link for the uninformed. by Plutonite · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yes, the discourse between imaginative minds is an amazing and truly capturing phenomenon whatever the domain of discourse it may be. I would also have liked to be a fly on the wall in Max Born's office when he talked to Heisenberg, or to have listened to the tornados of mathematical rhetoric that went on betwen Feynman and Bohr when they talked over the phone to discuss the things that nobody else in the world could understand, or bear to hear. Maybe that wouldn't have been as entertaining as the distant worlds Clarke would have talked about, but it was still imagination, and imagination is such a darn beautiful thing. It is born of reflection, and reflection is what marks human kind, because it embodies the sentience/self-awareness/abstraction of concepts and physical symbols that makes us so "special". Actually, take away the quotes there. We are very lucky, and very special.

    So it is no exaggeration to say that these are the people who have really lived. The least we can do, so that we ourselves can be said to have lived, is read what they wrote down.

    RIP Mr. Clarke. Thank you for everything.

  132. Deeply sad by MacBorg · · Score: 1

    Clarke's works were what generally got me into science fiction that is worth reading as literature. Fare thee well, Mr. Clarke

  133. Thanks Sir Clarke by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

    Thanks Sir, and godspeed.

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  134. Re:Thinking not just of Clarke but all of Discover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, it's clarke, granted, some emotions are expected. Still, maybe you aught to be more worried about whoever is feeding you estrogen supplements.

  135. Re:Pedantry, I know. But if you want to use Latin. by Shinmizu · · Score: 2, Funny

    What about, "Romans, go home!"

  136. Re:Pedantry, I know. But if you want to use Latin. by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

    You could say something like Requiem ei donetur On second thoughts, even that wouldn't be right, because it's in the accusative. It would have to be requies ei donetur. I suppose you could use requiem if you said something like the traditional Pie Iesu, dona ei requiem.
  137. Baron Clarkonnen by JulianConrad · · Score: 1

    "Drug him well. I don't feel like wrestling." Well, somebody had to say it.

  138. RIP by FreeRadicalX · · Score: 1

    Rest in peace, Arthur.

    You probably know all of the answers now, but the rest of us are sad that you're gone :(

  139. Re:Pedantry, I know. But if you want to use Latin. by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

    What about, "Romans, go home!" Heh-heh. Well, according to the centurion who grabbed Brian by the ear, it's ROMANI ITE DOMVM, but I'd go for ROMANI ROMAM REDEANT.
  140. Rest in Peace by Xylene2301 · · Score: 1

    If you've never read his short story book "Tales From the White Hart" it's a gas. His works will live on. Classics.

  141. Re:Rest In Peace. by denttford · · Score: 1

    The Wired article links to this page of inventions presaged by him. I think Spaceguard belongs on that list, don't you?

    --

    Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
  142. Thanks ACC for sharing your imagination by subdigit · · Score: 1

    Your influence has had an effect on my life more than even you may be able to imagine!

  143. On Ice? by quantaman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For some random reason I was reading up on cryonics today and ran across a supportive quote from Clarke

    "Although no one can quantify the probability of cryonics working, I estimate it is at least 90% -- and certainly nobody can say it is zero."

    I didn't see any mention of cryonics in any coverage of his death so I assume he never followed through with it, but if he actually did maybe there's the hope that he's not gone forever and may be back again someday.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  144. The Fountains of Paradise by skeptictank · · Score: 1
    He has entertained us and shown us the way to colonize space when we find the courage to do it.

    A true visionary and one of my favorite sci-fi writers. The world is a lesser place without Sir Arthur.

  145. A loss indeed by Moe1975 · · Score: 1

    Yet, at least, he lived to finish that last novel. At least, he lived a full life. I hope that, wherever he is, he finds it wonderful. RIP Mr. Clarke

    --
    SARAVA!
  146. *raises mug of coffee* Cheers mister Clark! by Jerry+Smith · · Score: 1

    I remember reading his collected short stories, one of them descriped an emergency spacewalk in hard vacuum, without suit... Chilling... He wás good.
    He died in Sri Lanka, a good place to spend quality time. I'll miss him, like a lot of people will do.

    --
    All those moments will be lost in time, like tears in rain. Time to die.
    1. Re:*raises mug of coffee* Cheers mister Clark! by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

      I am too lazy too google, but I think he actually acquired this nationality.

      --
      IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  147. Good luck Mr. Clarke... by exi7 · · Score: 1

    ...on your journey to Jupiter and Beyond the Infinite.

  148. Rama II, Garden, Revealed by StonePiano · · Score: 1

    They say that the appalling sequels to Rendevous with Rama... were basically entirely Gentry Lee's doing... the sequels are so bad they can only tarnish the perception of the original...

    I, for one, loved the entire series. Rendezvous With Rama is THE classic.
    Rama II, Garden and Revealed are different, longer, sometimes ponderous, epic, yet fantastically imaginative. They are not Arthur C Clarke, but they are a cracking good read.

    Ironically, I think that if they only had Gentry Lee's name on them (and still got out of the publishing house) then they would now have a greater acceptance. Perhaps the practice of putting a famous author's name on the cover backfires if the the famous author is too greatly worshiped.

    1. Re:Rama II, Garden, Revealed by Lord+Apathy · · Score: 1

      I, for one, loved the entire series. Rendezvous With Rama is THE classic. Rama II, Garden and Revealed are different, longer, sometimes ponderous, epic, yet fantastically imaginative. They are not Arthur C Clarke, but they are a cracking good read.

      I know everyone is entitled to their option and everyone's tastes are different, but dude, if you think Rama II, Garden and Revealed are cracking good reads. Then you are in need of some serous medical attention. I would suggest shock therapy or maybe some scientologist training would be in order.

      --

      Supporting World Peace Through Nuclear Pacification

  149. Predicter by GnuDiff · · Score: 2, Informative

    Arthur Clarke has been behind numerous perceptions and ideas that are commonplace nowadays.

    For example, he is the author of the widely quoted "Sufficiently advanced science is indistinguishable from magic".

    As well, he was able to pretty accurately imagine an astounding number of technological advances.

    A loosely re-translated quote from a Russian magazine "Esli"(If), regarding Clarke's 90th birthday:
    "By the way, in the early works of Clarke there is an enormous amount of bold technical predictions, many of which have been realized - or they have every chance to be realized in near future. In the very same "Childhood's End", which is more of a religious-philosophic rather than futurological work, there is the determination of the baby's gender during pregnancy (very similar to nowaday DNA testing), contraception pills, document sending over phone lines with a device which is even named "facsimile device". Among the catalogue of technological predictions it is easy to miss a direct hit on social predictions -- Clarke assumes that socialism as a political order will be extinct by 22th century."

    1. Re:Predicter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the fax machine predates the telephone.

  150. Re:Thinking not just of Clarke but all of Discover by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

    Go back and read your post. Do you realize the only actual reactions (as opposed to expected or imagined reactions) to your tears were your own?

    --


    Evil is the money of root.
  151. Humanity's limitless potential by Stuntmonkey · · Score: 1

    Sir Clarke will no doubt be remembered by many as a futurist and inventor, or at least foreteller, of some important technological developments of the 20th century. While these are important contributions, I believe his lasting impact is much greater.

    The essential genius of Clarke's work is the sense of wonder and mystery and human potential that permeates it. His writing captures perfectly the deep awe and curiosity and wonder I feel when I look into the night sky and grope feebly toward comprehension. Scientists and spiritualists alike are in truth motivated in the end by exactly the same thing: The deep mystery at the core of existence, that black hole in our limited understanding which we perceive but cannot see. Clarke's writing acknowledges the deep mysteries and their power over us, and does not aim to trivialize with ready explanations or tidy conclusions. Many often criticize the "confusing" endings of 2001 or Childhood's End or his other works, but they could be no other way.

    And yet although Clarke sees us as fundamentally limited creatures incapable of full comprehension, his message is also relentlessly hopeful. The deep mystery of things is not something for us to worship or fear or ignore, but rather to seek out and face head-on with vigor and modesty and self-awareness. Not with intent to conquer, but with intent to appreciate and learn. This is the greatest hope for our future.

    Sir Clarke was deep and true in his understanding. His work will be as relevant a millenium from now as it is today.

  152. Paedophilia accusations by Cinnaman · · Score: 1

    So were those Paedophilia accusations a few years back just slander or founded in fact? It appears to be the former, but why would try to tarnish his reputation like that?

  153. I like the corollary by mcvos · · Score: 1

    'Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.'

    Therefore, any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.

  154. Re:Thinking not just of Clarke but all of Discover by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because you are too self-conscious? Damn what other people think and be true to yourself.

  155. Sad by zanaxagoras · · Score: 1

    Ironically, the most recent (May 2008) issue of the Fortean Times features an item on Clarke's recent (on his 90th birthday, to be precise) reiteration of his ongoing skepticism of UFOlogy in general (his quote: "They (UFOs, per the existing 'evidence') are not spaceships") and the ensuing uproar on the UFO boards.

    Additionally, the same issue of FT notes that Clarke's first contribution to tasty paranormaloid TV, Arthur C Clarke's Mysterious World (1980), has been reissued on DVD.

  156. Rest in Peace by awalkingecho · · Score: 1

    Safe journey, Arthur. You've been a great pleasure to share this sphere with. I can attribute much of my love of science to you. I'm in something of shock right now. I know he was getting on in years and the likelihood for his passing had increased substantially.. but not three days ago, when my roommates asked which well-known persona would join the likes of Gary Gygax to complete a trifecta, my offhand response was "Probably Arthur Clarke. Probably before June." So I feel a little.. sullied, as if I should lament my response. :(

  157. He also proposed geostationary satelites by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    He also proposed geostationary satellites in 1945 (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_satellite#Geostationary_orbits)

  158. If he had been American..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This post would have said he INVENTED the geostationary orbit.

    But he was British - so he only 'popularized' it. We will soon find an unknown blacksmith from Nebraska who 'really' invented it in 1902.........

  159. Farewell by ConallB · · Score: 0

    To quote the man himself:

    "It has yet to be proven that intelligence has any survival value."

    If it did you may have outlived us all. Thanks for everything Arthur, rest easy.

    --
    Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
  160. Re:Link for the uninformed. by jacquesm · · Score: 1

    I'm so sorry I already posted in this thread... beautifully said.

  161. You can't patent an idea? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    What is a business process? I have never seen one on the flesh, so to speak.

    And software? Lets not get started about that....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  162. He will be remembered by incubuz1980 · · Score: 1

    His works have inspired a lot of people, including me.

    Farewell

  163. Sure. Only geeks have computers and broadband. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Honestly....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  164. Great science ficion writer by Per+Abrahamsen · · Score: 1

    You seem to have dismissed the entire art of literature in one fell swoop. I doubt Clarke will be remembered as a great writer. He will, however, undoubtly be remembered as great science fiction writer. And the core to being a great science fiction writer, is to have great ideas. Making contributions to the "art of literature" is rather far down the list.
  165. In many countries.... by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    ... such titles are not recognized (I suppose that is the case in the US).

    He would have been addressed just as Mr Clarke.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  166. Wordstar by water-and-sewer · · Score: 1

    Clarke shaped my adolescence as well; at the age of 13 it was a pleasure to find a book that was so engaging and kept me up at night turning pages. I still think about Clarke when I'm at the computer working on my own writing projects. I've got the latest word processors on four platforms and 'enjoy' things like auto correct and pagination and print preview, etc. but it hasn't made me much of a better writer, and never will.

    But Clarke wrote his masterpieces a generation before me, using software like Wordstar, which predates even Word Perfect and has a lot less power and a lot fewer features than, basically, the text editor pico. He seems to have liked upgrading his systems as he went, which means he certainly wasn't using Wordstar to write his most recent works, but when you think of the power and elegance of his novels you realize the hardware and software made exactly zero difference: it was the mind. A little depressing for someone banging away on a brand new x86_64 with 2G of RAM, the latest software, integrated spell checking, and a whole lot more: it's not good enough.

    So what comes out instead of a masterpiece is a short article for my website about the beauty of distraction-free writing: http://therandymon.com/content/view/89/98/

    --
    If this were Usenet, I'd killfile the lot of you.
  167. On the wings of this man flights of fantasy by Allnighterking · · Score: 1

    Decades of young engineers and scientist learned to ask "what if" Now at last you can debate with Asimov and Heinlein, face to face, as to who influenced science the most.

    --

    I'm sorry, I'm to tired to be witty at the moment so this message will have to do.

  168. Popularized? by rhkaloge · · Score: 1

    He didn't "popularize" the idea of the geosynchronous communications satellite, he invented it, then refused to patent it because he saw the potential benefits it would have. And no, I have no sources for that, it's just what I remember reading...

  169. Re:Pedantry, I know. But if you want to use Latin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a man just died for god's sake.

  170. Thank you.... by cavac · · Score: 1

    ...for making the world a better place!

    Arthur, you may be gone from this world, but you won't be forgotten!

    --
    Look, this thing is totally safe! Built it myself, you know. You just press that button like this and then turn that lev
  171. Who is it that we have to thank? by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1

    Al Gore?

    --
    You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
  172. RIP by rumith · · Score: 1

    Thank you for all your hard work and imagination. And thank you for "The city and the stars", a book about breathtakingly distant future, but a book extremely convincing at the very least. Goodbye, Sir Arthur! You will be missed. :(

  173. Same applies to books with apostrophe in the title by chiph · · Score: 1

    "Tom Clancy's Net Force" being the prime example.
    Tom had nothing to do with this dog of a series, and you can tell.
    It was purely a for-profit enterprise.

    Chip H.

  174. He will be missed... by Evil+Pete · · Score: 1

    My favourites:

    • Childhood's End
    • The City and the Stars
    • Rama
    • Many many short stories

    Yeah the short stories. He really had a way of twisting fate to give sometimes a bright and sometimes a very dark conclusion but often strongly ironic. The Star, Nine Billion Names of God, Superiority, and better ones which I just don't remember the name of ... grrr.

    Also the non-fiction. If you are a geek you must read "Profiles of the Future" sometime, especially the chapter about 'failure of nerve' and 'failure of imagination'. Brilliant. Also his essays describing the early days of the space age and before, the start of the British Interplanetary Society ... trying to convince government about rockets in wartime London, and the realisation that the future had arrived with the distinctive sound one day of the 'arrival' of a V2. Ahh. Yeah. Dammit well worth re-reading.

    And sometimes he would hint cryptically that there may be things that we can't imagine. I wasn't sure what he was getting at until I discovered Olaf Stapledon who was a big influence on Clarke.

    A life well spent. And thank you Arthur C. Clarke, and I think I will be revisiting these books that were so formative in my teens and twenties.

    --
    Bitter and proud of it.
    1. Re:He will be missed... by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Short stories: "Rescue Party" is one you missed. "The Sentinel," of course. "Take a Deep Breath." "Transit of Earth." "The Lion of Commarre."

  175. Farewell, Carbon-Based Biped! by gosand · · Score: 1

    A true visionary. Pick up his book "Greetings, Carbon-Based Bipeds!", a great collection of essays from 1934-1998.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  176. Re:Same applies to books with apostrophe in the ti by DrXym · · Score: 1
    Tom Clancy doesn't appear to have anything to do with most of the shit that bears his name. I read virtually all of his original books and was a great fan. But now I simply don't trust any book with his name on it. Normally they're ghost written or his input appears to be minimal such as writing the forward. It's deceitful and intellectually bankrupt.

    His name used to be synonymous with decent geopolitical thrillers. These days it is synonymous with name whoring and cash-ins.

  177. Farewell by Zero+J · · Score: 1

    Although I haven't quite yet read all of his works, he was far and away my favorite writer. And I'm certain that won't change while I experience the joy of reading a few more of his stories and novels for the first time. The passing of those I never knew personally rarely saddens me. But, his quietus will be my prime exception. Farewell, Arthur. You will be sorely missed.

  178. Clarke's Final Words by Mr+Pippin · · Score: 2

    Open the Pearly Gates, HAL.

  179. RIP, Sir Clarke! by cashman73 · · Score: 1
    Definitely one of the great sci-fi authors of all time! I actually finally got a chance to read the 2001/2010/2061/3001 series just this past fall, and it was quite good. At least he finished that series before he died, instead of leaving us hanging in 2010. His style of writing definitely set the standard for sci-fi for many years to come, and he will be missed.

    Still, I wished he was a bit better at predicting the future,... I wish we had donut-shaped space stations by now, and HAL 9000,... though I am kind of glad we won't have to deal with the Soviets in 2010,... :-)

  180. has death ended scfi authors? by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Asimov, Heinlein, Herbert, and Hubbard all published lots after death.

  181. RIP by zorg50 · · Score: 1

    Rendezvous with Rama and 2001 were a couple of my favorite classics. Unfortunately, I think this means that all of my favorite SF authors are dead now.

  182. The Light of Other Days by Alexpkeaton1010 · · Score: 1

    "The Light of Other Days" was one of his newer books (published in 2000). It is well worth checking out, especially since it is a commentary on privacy concerns in an information age. It is one of his best novels, I highly recommend it, even if you are not into his older works. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Light_of_Other_Days

  183. Farewell and Thanks by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

    Farewell, Arthur, and thanks for teaching us to dream about a better future.

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  184. Google Alerts anyone... by davidmcw · · Score: 1

    He also mentioned, in Fountains of Paradise about a news aggregation service that went out every day and searched the planet for stories that an individual may be interested in. I think his were, 'circle, squaring of the' & 'loch ness monster, discovery'. Not quite the same Google Alerts that I have (one is 'Arthur C Clarke' incidentally, but still good ones none the less.

    --
    Just because your paranoid doesn't really mean they aren't out to get you
  185. Re:Same applies to books with apostrophe in the ti by Miseph · · Score: 1

    http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=five_shitty_moviesTom Clancy can be plenty formulaic all by himself.

    --
    Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
  186. 2010 - one of his least appreciated books by MagikSlinger · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wish I could find a handy transcription to quote the conversation between Chandra and HAL, but in 2010, Clarke showed he did know how to write. I'll never forget the chill up my spine when Dave Bowman shows up to warn the crew that they have to leave, and on leaving, the dark spot appears on Jupiter... *shudder* (When 2010 shows up on the boob tube, I tune in just for the ending).

    And the final dialog between Chandra and HAL actually talking with him and being honest. And HAL chosing the right thing. The redemption of HAL is one of my all-time favorite moments in SF.

    That was awesome writing.

    --
    The bitter lessons of a veteran coder: http://bitterprogrammer.blogspot.com
  187. Re:Pedantry, I know. But if you want to use Latin. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So did another one. And another, and one more. Ooops, there goes someone else.

    We better just stop doing anything.

  188. So it goes .... by BodhiCat · · Score: 1

    So it goes. Oh, wait, wrong sci-fi author.

    1. Re:So it goes .... by charleste · · Score: 1

      Thank You! That brought a smile to my face for a sad occasion! Pot-o-weet Arthur C. Clarke.

  189. I met someone who claimed ... by frogzilla · · Score: 1

    I once worked with someone who claimed that, as a lad, he lived on the same street as Clarke in Sri Lanka and was treated to an evening out with him and his telescope. He wasn't overly impressed. I was totally overwhelmed by the idea and _wished_ it could have been me. I had no reason to disbelieve this claim as the fellow didn't seem to know who Arthur C Clarke really was, just that he was a famous old guy.

  190. I remember... Dolphin Island by geek2k5 · · Score: 1

    I remember the first Clarke book I read. I was in the third or fourth grade when I got a hold of a green covered book called "Dolphin Island" back in the early to mid 1960s.


    I'll miss Clarke, just as I miss Heinlein and Asimov. The original "Big Three" of science fiction is now gone.

  191. Are we missing the meaning of prophecy? by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Just a commentary here. Over and over I see people thinking that prophecy means forecasting the future.

    It doesn't.

    Prophecy is revelation of the mind/heart of God. And although a thing may be called correctly prophecy and not be (for example, from a false prophet), that is a whole different ball game from getting your definitions wrong.

    For example, there is no such thing as scientific prophecy. That's a contradiction in terms. There is scientific forecasting. There is social prediction.

    Yes, and this is slightly OT. But I get tired of seeing a term misused, and this is the second time I've seen an insightful-rated comment completely misuse the term.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    1. Re:Are we missing the meaning of prophecy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you and God should get a room.

  192. Goodriddens Pedophile by metal321 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Arthur C. Clarke was a pedophile who moved to a third world country so he could have an inexhaustible supply of little boys. He will not be missed by except by moronic left-wingers.

  193. Re:Thinking not just of Clarke but all of Discover by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    ...I shed a tear - and then I felt...ashamed...why? Because you're a fag.

    No, seriously, that's the internalized judgment you're working off of. Emotions are for women and girly men. Real men can't shed tears for that is a sign of weakness. Men can never be vulnerable, they must always be dominant, assertive. You are either kicking ass or taking it in the ass, only idiots imagine there can be such thing as cooperation and peaceful coexistence.

    So, if you express any kind of emotional sensitivity, i.e. tearing up over an idea, you're a fag. Pretty fucked up, yes?
    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  194. One Quote I Find Fitting.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "There is always a last time for everything."

  195. A friend's encounter by Anthony · · Score: 1

    A friend of mine had shore leave in Galle some years ago and he and some fellow officers headed for a local hotel for some refreshments. After some time at a table an old man introduced himself as Arthur and joined them. The group had a long chat on the state of the world and wide-ranging topics of interest. My friend was impressed with Arthur's intelligence, understanding and genuine interest in others.

    On returning to Australia it was only then that he saw a picture of Arthur C Clarke and realised that the "Arthur" he and his colleagues had met with was one and the same. He was of course kicking himself as he is a big fan of his books.

    --
    Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
  196. Late submission for an epitath. by neBelcnU · · Score: 1

    I know I'm woefully late in posting this. Perhaps some archeologist will find it.

    "Any sufficiently advanced genius will be indistinguishable from Arthur C. Clarke"

    More importantly, Thank you Sir Arthur.

  197. Top 100 by Stu+Charlton · · Score: 1

    It didn't make it onto that stupid list of 100 best films (give me a break). If you mean the AFI Top 100 list, it certainly did. Originally #22 in 1998, now #15 as of the 2007 edition.

    --
    -Stu
  198. they've called him upstairs to by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... set the targets for their daily dark-matter-free inter-cosmos travel systems.
    *Their* engineers need a visionary teacher too.
    He'll be fixing some screwed up attitudes up there and then entertaining the MoTU for a change :)

  199. ACC, RIP... by erc · · Score: 1

    I knew ACC personally ... a great, gentle, and humble man. Rest in peace, old friend...

    --
    -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu