Yep... doing a great job. Keep them coming. You'll have everyone voting against Bush soon... especially when you come acrossed as so intelligent and well spoken.:)
Yes... lets see papers from the courts when they have been 'expunged'. You do understand what expunged means right? Maybe not... maybe like George Bush himself you need to ask yourself 'Is our children learning?' (direct quote from Georgie himself)
And if it's untrue, how come they never sued for slander? How come Karl Rove never denied saying it? He named his sources and Karl Rove was conveniently 'unavailable for comment'.
I always wondered how brain washed nazis could be in full denial even when staring something in the face. Care to explain why you think Georgie is above coke sniffing? Care to explain WHY he was doing community service and Project P.U.L.L.? Community service for WHAT? Must be for jaywalking huh? As we all know that powerful politicians NEVER try to get their sons out of trouble. Considering that Bush Sr. was also the head of the CIA, I doubt he would EVER try to hide information. As we all know, the CIA loves to keep people informed. Isn't that their motto?
Keep goose stepping their boy. You're looking REAL good. Bushland, Bushland uber alles!
If you need proof of George Ws cocaine bust, it is mentioned here . The story was confirmed by 3 sources close to the Bush family and has YET TO BE REFUTED. Naturally, such an allegation would be considered slander... but no one has yet to be sued for it. Instead, in one instance, they discredited the author by pointing out he had previously been convicted, not that the story was UNTRUE, but just that he had been convicted. And severe pressure from the Whitehouse was placed on the publisher to pull the book.
Hatfield said it was 3 sources close to Dubya and when pressed, he named Karl Rove.
Commonly known that George Bush jr was busted for coke but the charges were dropped; he refuses to answer any questions regarding the matter. If it were untrue, he could always say so but he has refused to say anything.
And you doubt my oil comment? What other purpose was there to invade Iraq? Bin Laden connection? None was found or substantiated. Imminent threat? Those around him should be more threatened by Iraq than we are but the refused to join the war on Iraq. Aside from that, several people including Daddy Bush have denied that they had weapons of mass destruction and even though over years of searching, the only weapons we could ever PROVE existed were the ones we gave them.
It's nice to see you don;t refute the AWOL charges against him.
I may look like a sheep but at least I'm not a boot stepping nazi who can't face facts. Wake up and smel the coke trail.
Well believe it or not, even though we still let trolls like yourself in, we still consider this an intellectual forum. We just keep monkeys like yourself around to give us a few laughs every now and then:)
Great journalism? Hello Mr Kettle, how black are you? If there is a conspiracy, supply evidence of said conspiracy? No evidence, then at least supply converging proofs which point in the direction. You don't have any? Welll I'm sorry pal. This is an intellectual forum where we expect reason with our proofs.
Um... what's your point? You don't actually refute it, you just make a lame attempt at FUD. In an intellectual forum, we expect a logical debate; please supply reason for objection otherwise your objection is without reason.
It's not Slashdot vs Bush... it's common decency and civil liberties vs Bush. Have you ever read George Orwell's 1984?
I remember a time when Reagan preached against the 'commies' because they spied on their neighbors and because the people had no freedoms. Now the same thing is happening in our backyard and you expect us not to say anything about it? Some cokehead who went AWOL is running our government and getting our young men and women killed so that we can have more oil to power our SUV's and you think this is a good thing?
Hell, even daddy Bush disagrees with you it seems.
Hmmm...well let's see. If they want insecurity, instability and platform-centric programming that can NEVER be ported to any other platform (still liking C#?), they more than likely will choose IIS.
I think C# is pretty cool too but will never use it outside of just having to support tools built by other companies in it. It's merely a Java wannabe that loses one of the best features of java... operating system independence.
I hate to break the news to you but Netcraft counts these as well. The only ones it DOESN'T count are those behind a firewall such as a company intranet.
If it's port is open to the outside world, netcraft counts it. And again, Windows does not automatically install IIS and run it as a service. Last I knew, you have to choose IIS as an option (depending on the version/package you run) and then you have to start it as a service.
In other words, Windows machines at home do not automatically become a web server after install...
Welll yes, this is fairly correct. But the ORIGINAL SCO changed their named to Tarantella. Caldera bought Xenix and all other operating systems from the ORIGINAL SCO and then later CHANGED their name to SCO... so in other words:
Tarantella = old SCO Caldera = new SCO
and the old SCO sold Xenix and all that crap to what is now the NEW SCO.
Monoculture? How so? I happen to work for a company with VERY close ties to MS and they won't let me run Linux... so I run Apache, MySQL and PHP on a windows machine. Works great and I never have any down time.
The key phrase here is cross platform compatibility. That is something that Microsoft has yet to learn.
Heh... don't make me hit you with my purse. I'm only bitter because I work for a company with very close ties to MS and I'm not allowed to use anything but Windows as a server; I'm lucky I was able to convince them to go with an AMP architecture though.
A little more research on the Tarantella website (formerly SCO) shows that Caldera purchased their entire operating system divisions in 2001... meaning that Caldera IS Xenix.
Now Xenix as you know was Microsofts attempt at Unix. The work on the OS eventually was farmed out to SCO rather than done in house and eventually SCO owned the license to the OS... thus ending Microsofts attempt at a Unix version. Now mind you Caldera (the newly renamed SCO) is NOT the same company, and that Microsoft lost a lawsuit with Caldera forcing a huge settlement out of court.
Now Microsoft threw tons of money at SCO the second the lawsuit against Linux started... which leads many to believe this is a combined effort by both companies.
So which disease would this be? The tech version of syphilis? Going insane and blind as time goes by?
Lucky they have Microsoft funding their insanity. Can someone put this poor stupid beast out of its misery before it starts fucking our livestock and peeing in our drinking water?
What's there to steal?:) It's given away for free. The only thing they can do which is a violation is to add to the codebase but not contribute the code added (or claim ownership of the code and then sue IBM).
I don't think having a whole country supporting an OS can be that bad of a thing.:)
Slashdot Mirror
Yep... doing a great job. Keep them coming. You'll have everyone voting against Bush soon... especially when you come acrossed as so intelligent and well spoken. :)
LOL! You know the funny thing about zealots like yourself? The louder they scream, the more people want to convert to the other side. :)
Keep up the great work.
Yes... lets see papers from the courts when they have been 'expunged'. You do understand what expunged means right? Maybe not... maybe like George Bush himself you need to ask yourself 'Is our children learning?' (direct quote from Georgie himself)
And if it's untrue, how come they never sued for slander? How come Karl Rove never denied saying it? He named his sources and Karl Rove was conveniently 'unavailable for comment'.
I always wondered how brain washed nazis could be in full denial even when staring something in the face. Care to explain why you think Georgie is above coke sniffing? Care to explain WHY he was doing community service and Project P.U.L.L.? Community service for WHAT? Must be for jaywalking huh? As we all know that powerful politicians NEVER try to get their sons out of trouble. Considering that Bush Sr. was also the head of the CIA, I doubt he would EVER try to hide information. As we all know, the CIA loves to keep people informed. Isn't that their motto?
Keep goose stepping their boy. You're looking REAL good. Bushland, Bushland uber alles!
If you need proof of George Ws cocaine bust, it is mentioned here . The story was confirmed by 3 sources close to the Bush family and has YET TO BE REFUTED. Naturally, such an allegation would be considered slander... but no one has yet to be sued for it. Instead, in one instance, they discredited the author by pointing out he had previously been convicted, not that the story was UNTRUE, but just that he had been convicted. And severe pressure from the Whitehouse was placed on the publisher to pull the book.
Hatfield said it was 3 sources close to Dubya and when pressed, he named Karl Rove.
Commonly known that George Bush jr was busted for coke but the charges were dropped; he refuses to answer any questions regarding the matter. If it were untrue, he could always say so but he has refused to say anything.
And you doubt my oil comment? What other purpose was there to invade Iraq? Bin Laden connection? None was found or substantiated. Imminent threat? Those around him should be more threatened by Iraq than we are but the refused to join the war on Iraq. Aside from that, several people including Daddy Bush have denied that they had weapons of mass destruction and even though over years of searching, the only weapons we could ever PROVE existed were the ones we gave them.
It's nice to see you don;t refute the AWOL charges against him.
I may look like a sheep but at least I'm not a boot stepping nazi who can't face facts. Wake up and smel the coke trail.
Well believe it or not, even though we still let trolls like yourself in, we still consider this an intellectual forum. We just keep monkeys like yourself around to give us a few laughs every now and then :)
Great journalism? Hello Mr Kettle, how black are you? If there is a conspiracy, supply evidence of said conspiracy? No evidence, then at least supply converging proofs which point in the direction. You don't have any? Welll I'm sorry pal. This is an intellectual forum where we expect reason with our proofs.
Come back when you find your brain.
Um... what's your point? You don't actually refute it, you just make a lame attempt at FUD. In an intellectual forum, we expect a logical debate; please supply reason for objection otherwise your objection is without reason.
It's not Slashdot vs Bush... it's common decency and civil liberties vs Bush. Have you ever read George Orwell's 1984?
I remember a time when Reagan preached against the 'commies' because they spied on their neighbors and because the people had no freedoms. Now the same thing is happening in our backyard and you expect us not to say anything about it? Some cokehead who went AWOL is running our government and getting our young men and women killed so that we can have more oil to power our SUV's and you think this is a good thing?
Hell, even daddy Bush disagrees with you it seems.
Heh. Your logic is correct but you neglect two key points:
1. People would choose Windows as they already know it and change frightens them.
2. All the software they know is made for windows (their favorite game, their favorite app, etc).
Get software support and a desktop that is similar to Windows and nobody would care.
Hmmm ...well let's see. If they want insecurity, instability and platform-centric programming that can NEVER be ported to any other platform (still liking C#?), they more than likely will choose IIS.
I think C# is pretty cool too but will never use it outside of just having to support tools built by other companies in it. It's merely a Java wannabe that loses one of the best features of java... operating system independence.
I hate to break the news to you but Netcraft counts these as well. The only ones it DOESN'T count are those behind a firewall such as a company intranet.
If it's port is open to the outside world, netcraft counts it. And again, Windows does not automatically install IIS and run it as a service. Last I knew, you have to choose IIS as an option (depending on the version/package you run) and then you have to start it as a service.
In other words, Windows machines at home do not automatically become a web server after install...
Welll yes, this is fairly correct. But the ORIGINAL SCO changed their named to Tarantella. Caldera bought Xenix and all other operating systems from the ORIGINAL SCO and then later CHANGED their name to SCO... so in other words:
Tarantella = old SCO
Caldera = new SCO
and the old SCO sold Xenix and all that crap to what is now the NEW SCO.
Monoculture? How so? I happen to work for a company with VERY close ties to MS and they won't let me run Linux... so I run Apache, MySQL and PHP on a windows machine. Works great and I never have any down time.
The key phrase here is cross platform compatibility. That is something that Microsoft has yet to learn.
Heh... don't make me hit you with my purse. I'm only bitter because I work for a company with very close ties to MS and I'm not allowed to use anything but Windows as a server; I'm lucky I was able to convince them to go with an AMP architecture though.
No no... I don't hack. Stay out of trouble that way. Besides, already noticed it was someone else posting.
A little more research on the Tarantella website (formerly SCO) shows that Caldera purchased their entire operating system divisions in 2001... meaning that Caldera IS Xenix.
Now Xenix as you know was Microsofts attempt at Unix. The work on the OS eventually was farmed out to SCO rather than done in house and eventually SCO owned the license to the OS... thus ending Microsofts attempt at a Unix version. Now mind you Caldera (the newly renamed SCO) is NOT the same company, and that Microsoft lost a lawsuit with Caldera forcing a huge settlement out of court.
Now Microsoft threw tons of money at SCO the second the lawsuit against Linux started... which leads many to believe this is a combined effort by both companies.
Nope... not confusing it at all. Read the history of SCO and know thine enemy.
True true... one makes a great server while the other is great for playing games.
Nah... it's that they are in bed with Microsoft and getting PAID to do this.
Who owns the Xenix code? SCO.
Who paid to develop it? Microsoft.
Who is helping in the development of Longhorn?
Xenix developers.
Who bought a couple millions dollars worth of licenses from SCO? Microsoft
Put 2+2 together and you see the REAL motivation behind this.
Heh... Yeah I did some further research and the guy who is 'supposedly' credited with writing it is actually, pro-linux.
So which disease would this be? The tech version of syphilis? Going insane and blind as time goes by?
Lucky they have Microsoft funding their insanity. Can someone put this poor stupid beast out of its misery before it starts fucking our livestock and peeing in our drinking water?
Um... you post anonymously here, the exact same post you put in the writeup? What's the point? Everyone is still going to know who to hack.
Yes I know, That's implied by the statement. Hence the +5 Insightful.
What's there to steal? :)
:)
It's given away for free. The only thing they can do which is a violation is to add to the codebase but not contribute the code added (or claim ownership of the code and then sue IBM).
I don't think having a whole country supporting an OS can be that bad of a thing.