The more cable channels we get, the more graphic the channels seem to get (anyone see last week's Sopranos, where about half the episode took place in the strip club?). I think it's due to the increased competition. What's the best way to get someone to watch your channel instead of a "Friends" repeat? Hmmm... howzabout sex!
CNN did an piece on Mr. Kutaragi last September. It's interesting enough to read the interview, I'm not sure I'd care enough to read an entire book on the subject though.
in point of fact its going to be a bit before cards have the oompf so that
pixel shaders replace vertex shaders for all lighting work; so its not going
to be unnatural to perform lighting in vertex shaders for some time.
eventually vertex shaders may evolve to be completely geometry oriented; but
I doubt that goal will be reached since some lighting operations per vertex
are acceptable. why pay the cost to perform those at the pixel level if you
dont have to?
Slashdot Mirror
I have no idea why you keep posting this (is it supposed to me ASCII art?) but it's definitely amusing.
Is your boss an astronomer or something? Or are you just finding yourself strangely attracted to men with big telescopes?
mackga is the cockgobbler - Leave this pathetic loser alone. It's not his fault his mom smoked crack while she was pregnant.
Dipshit.
I'm the decoy - Also known as a negative-mod-sponge.
Will you please shut the fuck up you cockgobbler?
Who wants cock?
I see his spelling hasn't improved.
The thing is more powerful than the computer I'm using right now! 733MHz PIII CPU, 64 MB RAM, not too shabby.
This is a pretty good book on the subject. No CD's, but a good book in it's own right.
I was checking out this page and noticed it said something like "26 comments". I hit refresh about 10 minutes later and it was suddenly at 82!
I hope this doesn't mean that many people want to see Katz having sex.
The more cable channels we get, the more graphic the channels seem to get (anyone see last week's Sopranos, where about half the episode took place in the strip club?). I think it's due to the increased competition. What's the best way to get someone to watch your channel instead of a "Friends" repeat? Hmmm... howzabout sex!
Here's an old Wired! story about how phony degrees are a big scam. This may be related to the fact that you see so many PhD's at Microsoft.
Agreed, but unfortunately this is what disabled people have had to deal with... $1,000 for a product just because, well, you have no choice!
Just bang your head on the desk twice in rapid succession. Most computer users do this a few times a day anyway.
There are other systems out there that can do similar things with eye movement, so you can save your neck.
Some good research from Stanford.
A practical demonstration.
Some people have no choice but to use such devices unfortunately.
Check out Headmaster Plus. I work in adaptive technology and this kind of stuff has been going on for a few years now.
You said the same thing two years ago!
CNN did an piece on Mr. Kutaragi last September. It's interesting enough to read the interview, I'm not sure I'd care enough to read an entire book on the subject though.
- Filter them out, or
- Enforce the "1 x 1 pixel" banner standard, or
- Pay me $1 for each banner viewed, or
- Fill them with pornographic images
I think those are the only real options here.
Can be found here.
Can be found here. Written by a professor at California PolyTech.
...can be found here.
What about this? OK, it's the Sun store, but it's there.
in point of fact its going to be a bit before cards have the oompf so that
pixel shaders replace vertex shaders for all lighting work; so its not going
to be unnatural to perform lighting in vertex shaders for some time.
eventually vertex shaders may evolve to be completely geometry oriented; but
I doubt that goal will be reached since some lighting operations per vertex
are acceptable. why pay the cost to perform those at the pixel level if you
dont have to?