If somebody goes to a political rally for black people dressed in a klan robe and yelling "N*GGER N*GGER N*GGER" and he gets punched, whose fault is it, and what does it say about everyone involved?
The modern left are fascists. The Podesta emails prove they own the media and the whole show is staged, the undercover videos prove they're using threats and violence to intimidate their political opposition (and in an organized, directed fashion), and now they've got their own Kristallnacht firebombing the opposition's political organizations. This is the part where you're supposed to say "Are we the baddies?"
While they do have some legitimate points about those things, the problem is that the way they framed their arguments created massive division. Not just political disagreement, it goes far beyond that. One side is outraged at what they see as overt xenophobia and closed-mindedness, the other is upset that they think their legitimate complaints are being ignored or branded racist.
But that's the media's fault. They intentionally misrepresent the Leave/Trump arguments to be racist in order to stir up that hate and division against them.
The media is just propaganda. They propagandize for the preferred positions of the media organization's owners.
You're just splitting hairs. "Democratic Republic." Kind of implies the people have a say in their governance. However, Podesta's emails prove that we don't. It's all kabuki theater. We don't have a state-run media, we have a media-run state. The elite own the media and the politicians, they pick the policies they want, the politicians implement them and the media colludes with the politicians to persuade the public to go along with their pre-drawn conclusions, and if the public disagrees they're evil and stupid because all the Smart People in the media say so and now we know the DNC hires goons and the mentally ill to attack and intimidate the peasants when they wrongthink. The campaigns write news articles the "unbiased" news publishes for them, they time stories to coincide with campaign messaging, the networks give the debate questions to the preferred candidate ahead of time. It's a show. Top down not bottom up. There is no democracy, there is no republic.
I feel the same way about people voting for Clinton. We have her emails. She armed the moderate beheaders in Syria to overthrow Assad to disrupt Hezbollah operations so Israel would feel okay about a nuclear Iran. Now we've got 400k war dead, the rise of ISIS (and the memos saying they knew we'd get something like ISIS by opposing Assad), all their atrocities, Paris, San Bernardino, Pulse nightclub, Nice, and the migrant crisis that threatens to destabilize Europe. And this is the person some people honestly think should be in charge of foreign policy. Completely baffling, but here we are.
Yes, and her black husband sued the building where they live for racial discrimination because the board refuse to let him buy a FOURTH condo in the building.
How does that even work? "Well, we'll let the darkies buy three condos, but four?! Not in my 'murica!"
I also read a story recently about muslims who helped rebuild a Christian church in Egypt that was destroyed by extremists. There's rare good in this world.
Of course I wouldn't shocked if those muslims were later killed by other muslims as apostates.
Goebbels and his family committed suicide, but he certainly would have been hung had he been captured, though, right? What's the difference between what he did and "unethical journalism?"
Insane to you. But the elite have different objectives and morality than you do.
How many wars have already been fought, and how many millions of people have been killed or maimed based on complete lies? Those weren't accidents. That was deliberate malice, with zero concern for the people killed on either side.
Anyway, we'll find out. Just keep watching the news. Particularly if Hillary wins. Just keep watching for more and more saber rattling. The pattern goes:
1. Media question of Russian nefarious behavior.
2. Government "sources" who confirm Russian nefarious behavior.
3. Media "forgets" the nefarious behavior was ever in question and treats it as fact.
All of this plays out over a few weeks, and via different media outlets. Paper A reports allegations which Channel B cites as fact which then Paper A cites as fact and now "everybody knows."
rather than "investigative journalism" she was building a sensation piece and willfully-misrepresenting the situation.
CNN does that shit now with their BLM race baiting. Their pattern is to present the most sensational version of uncorroborated witness testimony as confirmed fact, while ignoring there even exists an alternative interpretation of the events. This is what led to the murder of 5 cops in Dallas. When they reported on the Philando Castille shooting over and over and over again they would state the girlfriend's story (pulled over for a broken taillight) without question while never mentioning reality (the police radio recording of the officer saying he was pulling him over for matching the description of an armed robber). Obviously any shooting of a suspect who wasn't trying to shoot at the cops is a tragedy, but "man matching the description of an armed robbery suspect shot during investigation" is far less inflammatory than "racist cop shoots kindly black man over broken taillight." A few days later the Dallas shooter cited this case as one of the motivations for his attack. I wonder if he knew about the armed robbery?
It's unlikely Wolf Blitzer will ever be held responsible for his crimes, though.
I mean, I can't say I would be shocked if Putin were behind it. It's obvious the elites want war with Russia. The US anti-war movement is ONLY interested in stopping wars led by Republicans. So if a democrat, especially Hillary gets in, they're going full steam ahead. We'll have an illegitimate no-fly zone and some plane will crash or get shot down or something and blah blah blah Putin is the devil and he killed journalists (but not leakers via drone strike so it's okay) and I'm sure they'll figure out some way he "gassed his own people" (that one always works) and then consent will be manufactured and we'll be off to the races.
If I'm Putin, or any sane individual, I do not want war between the US and Russia. So yes, of course I'd attempt to sabotage the democratic candidate via h4xx0ring. There really is no downside, since they're going to try to kill you anyway.
That doesn't mean he did it, though. I'd give it 50-50 odds.
I don't even know what would happen if Hillary wins and she starts a war with Russia. I would not be shocked at a US military coup. Those Red State boys are the ones who get sent to die, and they are woke as fuck about this election. They might love killin' hajis, but I don't think a one of them is itching to kill Russians (or get killed by Russians) for Hillary.
Slashdot Mirror
If somebody goes to a political rally for black people dressed in a klan robe and yelling "N*GGER N*GGER N*GGER" and he gets punched, whose fault is it, and what does it say about everyone involved?
But what if they let you grab them by the pussy? I hear there are lots of women who let musicians, TV & movie stars, etc, grab them by the pussies.
Can you describe "technically legal but shady as fuck" "rigging"?
How about CNN giving Hillary the debate questions ahead of time?
But they're inciting riots and blocking freeways.
The modern left are fascists. The Podesta emails prove they own the media and the whole show is staged, the undercover videos prove they're using threats and violence to intimidate their political opposition (and in an organized, directed fashion), and now they've got their own Kristallnacht firebombing the opposition's political organizations. This is the part where you're supposed to say "Are we the baddies?"
While they do have some legitimate points about those things, the problem is that the way they framed their arguments created massive division. Not just political disagreement, it goes far beyond that. One side is outraged at what they see as overt xenophobia and closed-mindedness, the other is upset that they think their legitimate complaints are being ignored or branded racist.
But that's the media's fault. They intentionally misrepresent the Leave/Trump arguments to be racist in order to stir up that hate and division against them.
The media is just propaganda. They propagandize for the preferred positions of the media organization's owners.
You're just splitting hairs. "Democratic Republic." Kind of implies the people have a say in their governance. However, Podesta's emails prove that we don't. It's all kabuki theater. We don't have a state-run media, we have a media-run state. The elite own the media and the politicians, they pick the policies they want, the politicians implement them and the media colludes with the politicians to persuade the public to go along with their pre-drawn conclusions, and if the public disagrees they're evil and stupid because all the Smart People in the media say so and now we know the DNC hires goons and the mentally ill to attack and intimidate the peasants when they wrongthink. The campaigns write news articles the "unbiased" news publishes for them, they time stories to coincide with campaign messaging, the networks give the debate questions to the preferred candidate ahead of time. It's a show. Top down not bottom up. There is no democracy, there is no republic.
I feel the same way about people voting for Clinton. We have her emails. She armed the moderate beheaders in Syria to overthrow Assad to disrupt Hezbollah operations so Israel would feel okay about a nuclear Iran. Now we've got 400k war dead, the rise of ISIS (and the memos saying they knew we'd get something like ISIS by opposing Assad), all their atrocities, Paris, San Bernardino, Pulse nightclub, Nice, and the migrant crisis that threatens to destabilize Europe. And this is the person some people honestly think should be in charge of foreign policy. Completely baffling, but here we are.
Yes, and her black husband sued the building where they live for racial discrimination because the board refuse to let him buy a FOURTH condo in the building.
How does that even work? "Well, we'll let the darkies buy three condos, but four?! Not in my 'murica!"
Trump doesn't have any.
But I'm voting for Trump because of his policies: BUILD WALL DEPORT ILLEGALS BAN MUSLIMS BOMB ISIS BEAT CHINA STOP TPP.
Did he match the description, though?
How about Hildawg getting the debate questions ahead of time? Is that just "politics?"
It's been explained a million fucking times. You don't believe it because you don't want to believe it.
You can't tell anyone anything. They have to learn it for themselves.
How dare he expose your team's corruption.
What sexual assault? Are you suggesting women don't let billionaire TV stars grab their pussies?
I also read a story recently about muslims who helped rebuild a Christian church in Egypt that was destroyed by extremists. There's rare good in this world.
Of course I wouldn't shocked if those muslims were later killed by other muslims as apostates.
Did Trump cover anyone's legal expenses? The Democratic operatives on the tape admit to doing so, routinely.
And did he actually confiscate anyone's coats? Or was that a joke, that everyone got, except liberals playing dumb?
Goebbels and his family committed suicide, but he certainly would have been hung had he been captured, though, right? What's the difference between what he did and "unethical journalism?"
Understanding that women like getting their pussies grabbed by high status men is not misogyny. It's just reality.
I agree, I would not want to date Trump. Thankfully he's not running to be my boyfriend.
The Republican establishment was never with him. The Republican base always was, and they're the ones who vote.
Insane to you. But the elite have different objectives and morality than you do.
How many wars have already been fought, and how many millions of people have been killed or maimed based on complete lies? Those weren't accidents. That was deliberate malice, with zero concern for the people killed on either side.
Anyway, we'll find out. Just keep watching the news. Particularly if Hillary wins. Just keep watching for more and more saber rattling. The pattern goes:
1. Media question of Russian nefarious behavior.
2. Government "sources" who confirm Russian nefarious behavior.
3. Media "forgets" the nefarious behavior was ever in question and treats it as fact.
All of this plays out over a few weeks, and via different media outlets. Paper A reports allegations which Channel B cites as fact which then Paper A cites as fact and now "everybody knows."
Correction. Hillary Clinton is fully aware she's paying thugs to start violence with Republicans. We don't know about this bombing specifically, but all through the campaign, yes. Literally fascism, from the top down.
I don't think any voters, Republican, Democrat or other want war with Russia. I think the people who fund both parties want war with Russia.
rather than "investigative journalism" she was building a sensation piece and willfully-misrepresenting the situation.
CNN does that shit now with their BLM race baiting. Their pattern is to present the most sensational version of uncorroborated witness testimony as confirmed fact, while ignoring there even exists an alternative interpretation of the events. This is what led to the murder of 5 cops in Dallas. When they reported on the Philando Castille shooting over and over and over again they would state the girlfriend's story (pulled over for a broken taillight) without question while never mentioning reality (the police radio recording of the officer saying he was pulling him over for matching the description of an armed robber). Obviously any shooting of a suspect who wasn't trying to shoot at the cops is a tragedy, but "man matching the description of an armed robbery suspect shot during investigation" is far less inflammatory than "racist cop shoots kindly black man over broken taillight." A few days later the Dallas shooter cited this case as one of the motivations for his attack. I wonder if he knew about the armed robbery?
It's unlikely Wolf Blitzer will ever be held responsible for his crimes, though.
Other than piss of people with a shit ton of money and expose their illegal activities.
That's the only crime that matters in America.
I mean, I can't say I would be shocked if Putin were behind it. It's obvious the elites want war with Russia. The US anti-war movement is ONLY interested in stopping wars led by Republicans. So if a democrat, especially Hillary gets in, they're going full steam ahead. We'll have an illegitimate no-fly zone and some plane will crash or get shot down or something and blah blah blah Putin is the devil and he killed journalists (but not leakers via drone strike so it's okay) and I'm sure they'll figure out some way he "gassed his own people" (that one always works) and then consent will be manufactured and we'll be off to the races.
If I'm Putin, or any sane individual, I do not want war between the US and Russia. So yes, of course I'd attempt to sabotage the democratic candidate via h4xx0ring. There really is no downside, since they're going to try to kill you anyway.
That doesn't mean he did it, though. I'd give it 50-50 odds.
I don't even know what would happen if Hillary wins and she starts a war with Russia. I would not be shocked at a US military coup. Those Red State boys are the ones who get sent to die, and they are woke as fuck about this election. They might love killin' hajis, but I don't think a one of them is itching to kill Russians (or get killed by Russians) for Hillary.